Align question answering tasks with sub-domains
{'login': 'lewtun', 'id': 26859204, 'node_id': 'MDQ6VXNlcjI2ODU5MjA0', 'avatar_url': 'https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/26859204?v=4', 'gravatar_id': '', 'url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun', 'html_url': 'https://github.com/lewtun', 'followers_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/followers', 'following_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/following{/other_user}', 'gists_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/gists{/gist_id}', 'starred_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/starred{/owner}{/repo}', 'subscriptions_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/subscriptions', 'organizations_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/orgs', 'repos_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/repos', 'events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/events{/privacy}', 'received_events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/received_events', 'type': 'User', 'site_admin': False}
[{'id': 1935892871, 'node_id': 'MDU6TGFiZWwxOTM1ODkyODcx', 'url': 'https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/enhancement', 'name': 'enhancement', 'color': 'a2eeef', 'default': True, 'description': 'New feature or request'}]
{'login': 'lewtun', 'id': 26859204, 'node_id': 'MDQ6VXNlcjI2ODU5MjA0', 'avatar_url': 'https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/26859204?v=4', 'gravatar_id': '', 'url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun', 'html_url': 'https://github.com/lewtun', 'followers_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/followers', 'following_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/following{/other_user}', 'gists_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/gists{/gist_id}', 'starred_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/starred{/owner}{/repo}', 'subscriptions_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/subscriptions', 'organizations_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/orgs', 'repos_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/repos', 'events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/events{/privacy}', 'received_events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/received_events', 'type': 'User', 'site_admin': False}
[{'login': 'lewtun', 'id': 26859204, 'node_id': 'MDQ6VXNlcjI2ODU5MjA0', 'avatar_url': 'https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/26859204?v=4', 'gravatar_id': '', 'url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun', 'html_url': 'https://github.com/lewtun', 'followers_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/followers', 'following_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/following{/other_user}', 'gists_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/gists{/gist_id}', 'starred_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/starred{/owner}{/repo}', 'subscriptions_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/subscriptions', 'organizations_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/orgs', 'repos_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/repos', 'events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/events{/privacy}', 'received_events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/lewtun/received_events', 'type': 'User', 'site_admin': False}]
As pointed out by @thomwolf in #2255 we should consider breaking with the pipeline taxonomy of `transformers` to account for the various types of question-answering domains:

> `question-answering` exists in two forms: abstractive and extractive question answering.
> 
> we can keep a generic `question-answering` but then it will probably mean diferrent schema of input/output for both (abstractive will have text for both while extractive can use spans indication as well as text).
> 
> Or we can also propose to use `abstractive-question-answering` and `extractive-question-answering` for instance.
> Maybe we could have `question-answering-abstractive` and `question-answering-extractive` if somehow we can use a for a completion or search in the future (detail).
> Actually I see that people are more organizing in terms of general and sub-tasks, for instance on paperwithcode: https://paperswithcode.com/area/natural-language-processing and on nlpprogress: https://github.com/sebastianruder/NLP-progress/blob/master/english/question_answering.md#squad
> 
> Probably the best is to align with one of these in terms of denomination, PaperWithCode is probably the most active and maintained and we work with them as well.
> Maybe you want to check with a few QA datasets that this schema make sense. Typically NaturalQuestions, TriviaQA and can be good second datasets to compare to and be sure of the generality of the schema.
> 
> A good recent list of QA datasets to compare the schemas among, is for instance in the UnitedQA paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00178

Investigate which grouping of QA is best suited for `datasets` and adapt / extend the QA task template accordingly.
{'url': 'https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/2371/reactions', 'total_count': 0, '+1': 0, '-1': 0, 'laugh': 0, 'hooray': 0, 'confused': 0, 'heart': 0, 'rocket': 0, 'eyes': 0}