Narrative QA Manual
{'login': 'rsanjaykamath', 'id': 18527321, 'node_id': 'MDQ6VXNlcjE4NTI3MzIx', 'avatar_url': 'https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/18527321?v=4', 'gravatar_id': '', 'url': 'https://api.github.com/users/rsanjaykamath', 'html_url': 'https://github.com/rsanjaykamath', 'followers_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/rsanjaykamath/followers', 'following_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/rsanjaykamath/following{/other_user}', 'gists_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/rsanjaykamath/gists{/gist_id}', 'starred_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/rsanjaykamath/starred{/owner}{/repo}', 'subscriptions_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/rsanjaykamath/subscriptions', 'organizations_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/rsanjaykamath/orgs', 'repos_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/rsanjaykamath/repos', 'events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/rsanjaykamath/events{/privacy}', 'received_events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/rsanjaykamath/received_events', 'type': 'User', 'site_admin': False}
[]
[]
@lhoestq sorry I opened a new pull request because of some issues with the previous code base. This pull request is originally from #1364 Excellent comments. Thanks for those valuable suggestions. I changed everything as you have pointed out :)  I've copied the same template as NarrativeQA now. Please let me know if this is fine.  > Awesome thank you !!
> This looks all good :)
> 
> Just before we merge, I was wondering if you knew why the number of examples in the train set went from 1102 to 32747 in your last commit ? I can't see why the changes in the code would cause such a big difference

Ok the change was the way I presented the data. 
In my previous code, I presented a story with a list of questions-answers related to the story per sample. So the total 1102 was the number of stories (not questions) in the train set. 

In the case of `NarrativeQA`, the code presented each sample data with one single question. So the story gets replicated as many times based on number of questions per story. I felt this was not really memory efficient so I had coded the way I did earlier. 

But since this would be inconsistent as you pointed out, I modified my code to suit the `NarrativeQA` approach. Hope it's clear now :)  Ok I see ! that makes sense Thanks for your time and helping me with all this :) Really appreciate the hardwork you guys do. 
Submitting the manual version of Narrative QA script which requires a manual download from the original repository
{'url': 'https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/1778/reactions', 'total_count': 0, '+1': 0, '-1': 0, 'laugh': 0, 'hooray': 0, 'confused': 0, 'heart': 0, 'rocket': 0, 'eyes': 0}
{'url': 'https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/pulls/1778', 'html_url': 'https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/1778', 'diff_url': 'https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/1778.diff', 'patch_url': 'https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/1778.patch', 'merged_at': '2021-01-29T09:34:51Z'}