[dataset] Structure of MLQA seems unecessary nested
{'login': 'thomwolf', 'id': 7353373, 'node_id': 'MDQ6VXNlcjczNTMzNzM=', 'avatar_url': 'https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7353373?v=4', 'gravatar_id': '', 'url': 'https://api.github.com/users/thomwolf', 'html_url': 'https://github.com/thomwolf', 'followers_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/thomwolf/followers', 'following_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/thomwolf/following{/other_user}', 'gists_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/thomwolf/gists{/gist_id}', 'starred_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/thomwolf/starred{/owner}{/repo}', 'subscriptions_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/thomwolf/subscriptions', 'organizations_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/thomwolf/orgs', 'repos_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/thomwolf/repos', 'events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/thomwolf/events{/privacy}', 'received_events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/thomwolf/received_events', 'type': 'User', 'site_admin': False}
[]
[]
Same for the RACE dataset: https://github.com/huggingface/nlp/blob/master/datasets/race/race.py

Should we scan all the datasets to remove this pattern of un-necessary nesting? You're right, I think we don't need to use the nested dictionary. 

The features of the MLQA dataset comprise several nested dictionaries with a single element inside (for `questions` and `ids`): https://github.com/huggingface/nlp/blob/master/datasets/mlqa/mlqa.py#L90-L97

Should we keep this @mariamabarham @patrickvonplaten? Was this added for compatibility with tfds?

```python
            features=nlp.Features(
                {
                    "context": nlp.Value("string"),
                    "questions": nlp.features.Sequence({"question": nlp.Value("string")}),
                    "answers": nlp.features.Sequence(
                        {"text": nlp.Value("string"), "answer_start": nlp.Value("int32"),}
                    ),
                    "ids": nlp.features.Sequence({"idx": nlp.Value("string")})
```
{'url': 'https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/378/reactions', 'total_count': 0, '+1': 0, '-1': 0, 'laugh': 0, 'hooray': 0, 'confused': 0, 'heart': 0, 'rocket': 0, 'eyes': 0}