Create README.md for WER metric
{'login': 'sashavor', 'id': 14205986, 'node_id': 'MDQ6VXNlcjE0MjA1OTg2', 'avatar_url': 'https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/14205986?v=4', 'gravatar_id': '', 'url': 'https://api.github.com/users/sashavor', 'html_url': 'https://github.com/sashavor', 'followers_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/sashavor/followers', 'following_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/sashavor/following{/other_user}', 'gists_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/sashavor/gists{/gist_id}', 'starred_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/sashavor/starred{/owner}{/repo}', 'subscriptions_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/sashavor/subscriptions', 'organizations_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/sashavor/orgs', 'repos_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/sashavor/repos', 'events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/sashavor/events{/privacy}', 'received_events_url': 'https://api.github.com/users/sashavor/received_events', 'type': 'User', 'site_admin': False}
[]
[]
The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/datasets/pr_3898). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. For ASR you can probably ping @patrickvonplaten  Ah only noticed now that ` # Values from popular papers` is from a template. @lhoestq @sashavor - not really sure if this section is useful in general really. 

IMO, it's more confusing/misleading than it helps. E.g. a value of 0.03 WER on a fake read-out audio dataset is not better than a WER of 0.3 on a real-world noisy, conversational audio dataset. I think the same holds true for other metrics no? I can think of very little metrics where a metric value is not dataset dependent. E.g. perplexity is super dataset dependent, summarization metrics like ROUGE as well, ...

Also, I don't really see what this section tries to achieve - is the idea here to give the reader some papers that use this metric to better understand in which context it is used? Should we maybe rename the section to `Popular papers making use of this metric` or something? 

 I put "Values from popular papers" as a subsection of "Output values" -- I hope that's a compromise that works for everyone :hugs: 
Proposing a draft WER metric card, @lhoestq I'm not very certain about "Values from popular papers" -- I don't know ASR very well, what do you think of the examples I found?
{'url': 'https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/3898/reactions', 'total_count': 0, '+1': 0, '-1': 0, 'laugh': 0, 'hooray': 0, 'confused': 0, 'heart': 0, 'rocket': 0, 'eyes': 0}
{'url': 'https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/pulls/3898', 'html_url': 'https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/3898', 'diff_url': 'https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/3898.diff', 'patch_url': 'https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/3898.patch', 'merged_at': '2022-03-15T17:04:59Z'}