if constant contact er "dyrt", hvad er et mere rimeligt prisklasse?
dette varierer. husk, at jeg allerede tænker constant contact has earned its price tag, and this is subjective.<br/><br/>plus, other services will usually offer fewer features or some sort of drawback for lower prices. it varies a lot.<br/><br/>but here are some other examples: <br/><br/><a href="https://www.activecampaign.com/pricing/">active campaign</a> starts at $9 a month for up to 500 contacts, but it has four tiers and the second one is a much higher $49 a month. the first tier is naturally more basic, but still pretty decent considering the price.<br/><br/>remember that 500 contacts on constant contact are more than twice that, at least.<br/><br/><a href="https://www.mailerlite.com/pricing">mailerlite</a> has a free plan, limited to 12,000 emails a month, but still solid. you can use the free plan for up to 1,000 contacts, or pay $10 a month for a more featured version. <br/><br/>you can pay up to $50 a month for max features with 1,000 contacts, or raise prices across the board for more contacts. but it’s considerably cheaper than constant contact.<br/><br/><a href="https://mailchimp.com/pricing/">mailchimp</a> may be the most famous of these companies, and it has both a free option and premium options starting at just under $10 a month for up to 500 contacts.<br/><br/>but then <a href="https://www.hubspot.com/pricing/marketing?edition=starter&amp;term=monthly">there’s hubspot</a>—it starts at $50 a month for up to 1,000 contacts, and it’s got tons of features but maybe overkill for smaller organizations.<br/><br/>so as you can see, the contact threshold does make constant contact dyrere end andre konkurrenter - hvis priserne var de samme, men tilladte op til 1,000 kontakter, ville det være mere "normalt."