Datasets:

dirtycomputer

/

Wikipedia_Talk_Labels

like 0

You overtly undertake bold indignantly grotesque coldness over candid kindheartedness. Furthermore, unless considerably knowledgeable, you ought undertake avoidance, stay silent. However objectionable, leave everything.

article

blocked

train

:I agree. I think his name is Heinrich. Not Henry.

article

blocked

dev

{dilwale 368.96 crores by bollywoodhungama.com}

article

random

train

You overtly undertake bold indignantly grotesque coldness over candid kindheartedness. CountyOfKent (talk) Furthermore, unless considerably knowledgeable, you ought undertake avoidance, stay silent. However objectionable, leave everything

article

blocked

test

` == Internet Article 23 == Is it another case? Besides the effect of restricting freedom of speech, it also makes copyright trolls. Copyright holders can sue netizens for copyright infringement, one by one, with any reason they want. － , `

article

random

train

I'm sorry but I have to go now as I am constipated and must use the bathroom.

user

blocked

train

== This entry is self-authored by the subject == This page is not impartial and is almost certainly written by Sean Gabb or someone close enough to him to have a conflict of interest. In any case, the entry is full of biased, promotional content. It is also far longer than is necessary. Can it be cut down to something smaller and impartial, and could User:Kentishresident be prevented from making further edits?

article

random

train

I HAVE A VANDAL BOT AND I AM WILLING TO USE IT IF I HAVE TO! I WILL BAN EVERYONE!

user

blocked

train

I LOVE VIENNESE OYSTERS!!!!

user

blocked

train

== What? == What did I add to Wolfgang that you removed? Also, most of wikipedia is lacking citations, but the pages are still there...

user

blocked

test

::I never linked anything to Transformers! And why would the page about Germanic Mythology have the name Wolfgang in it?

user

blocked

test

` == Dogs == One question, how many dogs do you need to make a ``pack`` ... three, four, five ... a dozen? Do they not live in three and fours too? So, should it be, ``They may live in packs, fives, fours, threes, pairs, or singly``? The point I am making is this, you made a canonical statement in your summary, ``no evidence ... etc`` but you did not provide any evidence or reference to sustain it in your edit. Can you do so? The reason I am writing this is because I spent some time cleaning up and developing the Indian pariah dog topic, which I am sure you know. It's obviously a topic which you have some interest and passion in, perhaps even want to promote, which is a good thing. But isn't content on the Wikipedia supposed to be supported by references? You may well be right, but you know that's not enough. I am actually interested in these kinds of dogs and would like to know more but there does not seem to be many academic or other reliable reference to support them. At least in the English language. A lack of dogs overseas means that there seems to be a lack of knowledge and acceptance of their heritage. I know a little more about Spitz types, Shibas etc, which are a little better studied. A lot of dog and cat topics on the Wikipedia seem to be in bad shape. I'm thinking because they are written by their fans modelled on breeder pages, e.g. every breed appears to ``very intelligent``. I've yet to read one topic that says the breeds are ``stupid and neurotic``, and I've met a lot of stupid and neurotic dogs ... even if that's just the owners'/breeders' fault! Too much work for me to consider taking on right now but at least the Indian pariah dog article is, I think, a little cleaner and in better shape now. BTW, what are the Hindi/Indian language names for it? Pariah appears to be a Post-British thing. Is it just ``dog``? Thank you. `

user

blocked

train

Kosovo Zoupan, dont delete my texts just because you can't handle arguments. Kosovar-Albanians are pretty anti-slavic. So whats the problem?

article

blocked

train

` Motherfucka the whole ``Blanqueamento in Puerto Rico`` (Whitening of Puerto Rico) section was allll me, or as you renamed it ``Present Day Puerto Rico``. They all are facts and they all got sources to back them up. So you saying you removed all unsourced content is bullsh*t. Its a fact, that most ``white Puerto Ricans`` have significant amounts of African and Native ancestry. But your racist ass delete my facts n statistics, as if you dont wan it to be lnown that alot of ``white````Puerto Ricans have African and Native ancestry. Instead of reverting back to your vandalistic bullsh*t, look at ALL the statistics and their sources, all of which i supplied, in the ``blanquemento in Puerto Rico`` section.`

user

blocked

train

:: Oh, I thought you were an Indian Pariah Dog fan. :: I've seen this with other breeds abroad, unless some people pick them up and promote them, the kennel clubs just don't know they exist. Likewise, with academic studies. I have no idea what family/pack groups they create, or who or what they pack with. I've read a bit about feral dogs in general, and the material is against the idea of their packs. More often just pairs or small groups. This is why I asked. I don't know what IPD do naturally. Joing wolf packs does not sound right. Wolves are known to kill and eat domestic dogs. They are just too different now. But I know it's not enough to guess on the Wikipedia. :: I suspect in cities due to crowding and lots of waste, natural patterns for IPDs are corrupted. Thanks.

user

blocked

train

:: Not until we resolve this issue, you apologise and remove or preferably erase the bad mark you erroneously made. :: Why should I live it? You were clearly in the wrong. You need to take responsibility for your actions and consider the effect of them upon others. :: It's remarkable that you will go to all this effort to refuse obstinately, when to simply remove or delete it would take less. Thank you

user

blocked

dev

== The Rams are now gone from Skank Louis. == What's the point of reverting back to the name of Skank Louis when the team has officially relocated to L.A. and have gotten the votes to move. Please, try to put it back to L.A., since it's our team now, not yours kid. 😂😂😂😂

user

blocked

train

` No, you utter RETARD! HISPANIC MEANS FROM SPAIN! Mexicans are not hispanic, only idiot, uneducated yanks call them that since they are retards who can't tell the difference between the White people from Spain and the Red people of Mexico! Mexicans and Indians (whoo-hoo feather natives) like Apache, Sioux and other former scalping savages from the Lone Ranger era are the same race!!!! They got CONQUERED BY WHITE SPANIARDS aka TRUE HISPANICS and that is the reason non-White, RED Mexicans are HISPANOPHONES, they're not Hispanics (FROM SPAIN IS THE TRUE DEFINITION OF HISPANIC!!), they are Mayans or Aztecs or whatever tribe. The native people of Spain, are White! Maybe, since retarded yanks can't grasp these FACTS, them Mexicans ought to be shamed for their defeated, loser past so they can quit speaking the EUROPEAN SPANISH language and go back to speaking Aztec, that way you imbeciles will quit calling these NON-SPANIARDS, NON-WHITES ``Hispanics`` or ``Latino`` and call them what they are, Red indigenous native Americans. That way you will learn the DIFFERENCE. Pendejos gringos! It's about time! Blacks are no longer called Negroes, it's now an insult to call Asians Orientals (even though Taj Mahal Indians are also Asians, duh!!!) so quit calling Mexicans ``Hispanic`` or we will start calling you yanks English or British! `

article

blocked

dev

== Question == How do you add references?

user

blocked

train

== Position paper and points necessary for article? == Hello allI'm really having trouble figuring out why there is so much content on this page that is this group's policy positions, if that is the right word, copied verbatim from various sources. Should the *two* sections dedicated to them not be replaced by a simple summary? It's hard to find any other political party/pressure group/campaign with *that* much content of that nature. Barring blowback on this page, I'm of a mind to do the summary myself shortly.

article

random

dev

::@ we have been over the prophethood bit long ago, please see the archives of talkpages here, at the Ahmadiyyah article and at the Prophethood (Ahmadiyya) article. There is a long standing consensus on that matter which cannot be changed by your views. so I will not even start to discuss it with you unless you have something new to add which has not been covered by previous discussions. As for your view that muslims do not consider him to be the founder of their faith just do a quick google search. Amina Adil calls him founder, so do these guys [v 1], 2, 3. Just look through this google search, there are a lot of muslim writers. So I am not sure where this started from. now as I have given you sources as per WP:BURDEN it is your duty to provide reliable sources which say that he is not considered the founder by muslims, then we can compare them. ty for the opinion. Regards

article

blocked

train

` ::::@ so you have no sources that state that ``muslims do not consider him to be the founder of their faith``. Your inference from the sources you quoted is WP:OR and in the presence of WP:RS supporting the fact that many muslims call him founder, such OR amounts to nothing. Perhaps you can try to find actual sources, otherwise, this isn't looking good for your case. `

article

blocked

train

` == Inadequacy of the page == At best, creating an article with a specific linguistic name can appear as a manner to essentialise it. At worst, it is a bad attempt to politicise Wikipedia. I suggest the article to be removed and the information to be relocated in appropriate and existing pages, such as ``Sexual harassment`` and ``Violence against women``. The sources and the date of creation of the page, as well as its use on the Internet, indicate rather clearly that the aim of this page is not to enlighten but to manipulate. `

article

random

train

::::::@ 16 sources say he was not, while THIRTY FIVE HUNDRED SAY HE WAS clearly the fringe view has been brought to light. Ty man. Ty very much for this search you linked.

article

blocked

train

Plus many of your 16 are non reliable self published books. NOT all, but many.

article

blocked

dev

` ==``The Returds Need to GET A LIFE!!!``== Instead of cruising Sheen's Wiki talk page night and day. If you can't handle the truth, eat shit! Retarded much? Just sayin! 1:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC) ==``The Amazing Spiderman 2``== Hi, I apologize in advance for not knowing the Wikipedia procedures for this type of thing, but I wanted to point out that ``The Amazing Spider-Man 2`` is listed in his filmography. First, this film did not come out in 2013 as indicated by the table and will not come out until this year, and second, Martin Sheen will not be in ``The Amazing Spider-Man 2`` as ((SPOILER)) his character, Uncle Ben, was killed in the first movie in the series revamp, ``The Amazing Spider-Man,`` which was a 2013 film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by `

article

blocked

train

`GET A LIFE DHASS HOLE!== Finding articles 10min after submission you no life retuhrd! Try stepping away from the computer and cracking a history book open! Then I won't have to correct your stupidity. ==`

user

blocked

train

| date2 = 21 December 2015 | result2 = no consensus | page2 = Kreuz Chemnitz

article

random

train

: Conjecture. Reading through that, the author simply thinks that the so-called 'son' looks like Bowie and the only credible context is that he has worked at Hansa. Nice story though.

article

random

test

` == Name == The article states: ``Because of having ``yellow cab`` in its name, many thought of the company as a taxi business. But the name is actually a reference to the way it frequently uses the colors black and yellow, a pattern seen on taxi cars.`` Taxis are generally white. I was under the assumption that it called ``Yellow Cab``, as many dishes on their menu are ``New York`` style, where they are famous for their ubiquitous yellow taxis. This is not the case? Seems odd... `

article

blocked

dev

:True, put them in as well. I just torrented the full cut but I know their commentary might not count as RS.

article

blocked

train

I can't even believe these accusations of harassment. Why? Did I ever leave a message of their talk pages? The fact that there's none only shows their desperation, and don't bother using this argument against me.''

user

blocked

test

, you people want me to debase myself at the hands of people who have their own personal agendas against me. As much as I want this block revoked, but their claims should not be dignified and everything must be kept the way they were before those people came along and RUINED EVERYTHING

user

blocked

train

Brandon Semenuk has won the event four times you idiot. Look it up. I'm trying To make a good page about him. Stop changing it

user

blocked

train

Don't keep changing my page I made please. You're obviously retarted. If you know the slightest thing about Brandon Semenuk, you would know he's won Red Bull Joyride four times. Leave the page alone.

user

blocked

train

im soory since when is google images not allowed (ppl take stuff from it all the time fuggin fagit Italic textyou asshole

user

blocked

dev

what ever you fuggin fag Question how did you know they were not mine

user

blocked

test

== Nice try but no cigar........idiot == Then explain Odocoileus virginianus idahoensis

user

blocked

train

` == kys == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | Master Fag |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Mind your own damn biz those pages had no quarrel with you |}`

user

blocked

test

== hi Drmies == My name's Little Cletus, I'm just here to teach you about Internet manners. For starters, don't go around threatening people if they change an article multiple times back to the way it should be. It's extremely rude and inconsiderate. Especially when it was originally their page. Just a friendly reminder that's all! Little Cletus signing out

user

blocked

train

shut up mind your own business and go fuck some one else over

user

blocked

dev

This talk page is actually a better place to determine if there is consensus for inclusion of contested material. It doesn't appear like there is consensus for this .

article

blocked

train

== defunct?== The article sources a claim that WOJAC ceased to function in 1999 to an article by Shenhav, but his is contradicted by the following, which states it was still active in 2001: - page 222

article

blocked

train

Yeah, I realized I created a duplicate ID. Sorry about that. I guess I'm just not into the politics of what Wikipedia has become recently. It used to be more friendly and forgiving around here. I don't see how referring to the manufacturer site from an article about what they manufacture is spammy, but ok. I was trying hard to avoid promotional language. I agree with you on the Verifiability issue.

user

blocked

test

:There's some weaseling and pov pushing in the next to last sentence, but other than that I don't think it's too bad.

article

blocked

train

` :::Yeah and in the earlier sentence I'd reword ``fever pitch``. `

article

blocked

test

` :::::::::::::Again, WP:NOTAFORUM (and there's usually a good reason why a website is blocked on Wikipedia. And no, that's not ``censorship``) `

article

blocked

dev

` [``Those Were the Days``]`

article

random

train

== Japanese Scene == The largely neoclassical Japanese power metal scene should be mentioned somewhere.

article

blocked

dev

I am sorry I was only apologizing for if my intentions were misconstrued. And was only trying to clarify my intentions by pointing out just some really basic facts. Thats it

user

random

train

` == Jim1138 == Hi. How did you get involved in this business with ? Jim1138 left an erroneous and damaging Edit Warring warning on my page. You can see what he did here. In the 'History' section, he replaced an entirely duplicated section, duplicating the content immediately above it. He called it an ``Unexplained removal of content``. No content had been removed, it had only been paragraphed ... which he then duplication. He was obviously in the wrong. He obviously paid no attention to the content. Then he left the erroneous and damaging bad mark which I have asked him politely to apologise, and remove and erase it. It strikes me it would take a lot less effort just to do so than all this running around. It is not a ``content issue``, it was bullying. Can you remove and erase it? I don't want it to be left to be used against me, as already happened. Thank you. `

user

blocked

dev

== Why oh why... == You removed the trolls ANI section about Drmies.....WHILE I WAS EDITING IT, and I had collected almost 10 pictures from commons to use there. It was going to be such hilarious drama, you owe me my morning laughs.....

user

blocked

test

== Daily Beast Article == I'm removing the source that is a hit-piece on RT by The Daily Beast, because frankly, it has nothing to present to the article but a biased, negative perspective from a political editorial meant to slander a rival media station. That, and the Daily Beast generally isn't considered a reliable source.

article

blocked

dev

`The lead also lacks proper citation and sources. Saying that Gamergate is a ``Campaign of Harassment`` without sources that aren't just editorials from web blogs one way or another will be difficult, but I definitely think the lead should be changed to something less vitriolic, and something more explanatory of what Gamergate actually is, because to say that Gamergate is a 'Harassment Campaign' doesn't even seem encyclopedic to begin with. `

article

blocked

dev

` The lead itself is original research. Where is the (proper) citation for Gamergame being a ``harassment campaign``? `

article

blocked

train

:::::: Well done, thanks!

user

blocked

dev

` ::I'm talking about you making unjustified major changes. In this edit. Did you just restore ``caused criticism`` in the lede? No. No, you didn't. You reverted to your own preferred wording (removing sources etc in the process) the entire ``Election of Constitutional Court Judges`` section. Does that diff look like you're just restoring two words to the lede? I don't know, maybe somebody slipped something in my coffee this morning, but that sure as hell does not look like just restoring two words to the lede, so please, cut it out. ::And speaking of WP:BATTLEGROUND and WP:GAME here is the context: ::I edit the ``Election of Constitutional Court Judges`` section to clarify, provide info and fix some blatant mistakes. ::You blindly revert within minutes claiming it's ``unsourced`` even though most of the text you added to the article was unsourced as well. ::I add sources . You complain about the refs being just bare urls. Which is a valid criticism... if you hadn't blindly reverted within minutes, not even giving me the chance to fill out the refs. ::I, others, fill out the refs. ::You revert anyway with an edit summary ``ce, restore`` , effectively pretending your edit is just some minor grammar corrections, rather than blatant edit warring. ::So. I add text, you complain about lack of sources and revert, I add sources, you complain about formatting and revert, the refs are formatted to your specifications, you revert anyway under the disguise of a ``copy edit``. Now. Who's playing WP:GAMEs and who's got the WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality here? `

article

blocked

train

` Yes, from the word ``Guci`` or ``Puci`` meaning ``flash`` or ``flashlight`` referring to a strategic position. The source is reliable. If you cannot provide counter-sources, then this discussion is over. Edits are made with sources and proper arguments, not nationalist editing with nothing to back it up with. `

user

blocked

dev

` :``Comment````. Gentlemen, this article provides an insight of the Albanian version of said historical period. Serb or Montenegrin sources are welcome although the sources i've provided have gained a lot of information from Montenegro (specifically regarding the part with King Nicholas of Montenegro) there is nothing irredentist or non-reliable about this. Mr Zoupan has been actively persecuting my posts as he is a fascist, irredentist nationalist himself who constantly removes my edits despite the fact that i provide PROPER sources as it does not fit his nationalistic preferences. I would appreciate if Zoupan would provide some counter-sources for his claim instead of just bashing on Albanian history of which he is not competent nor reliable enough to handle. Thanks for me. For source regarding this period there is plenty. This article is important and provides a different perspective, aside from the very Pro-slav, fascist versions. Thank you. `

article

blocked

dev

` These sources don't exactly exude a sense of impartiality. Newsweek is a *better* start, but it still is an article written by someone with an ax to grind (Would an article from Breitbart be as easily accepted? I hope not) but that page from that Massanari woman seems a bit lacking, especially considering it uses such an inflammatory, biased word as ``toxic`` in its own abstract. I doubt my words will have much effect since the consensus by wiki admins (the only ones who really matter around here) seems to be stuck-in-place, but for anyone else reading this, consider the damn sources. Single studies, politicos writting polemics, etc. etc. `

article

blocked

train

The Institute for Historical Review is a peer-reviewed journal as well, and that doesn't stop it from attracting massive criticism for Holocaust Revisionism. Just because its peer-reviewed, doesn't mean it is infallible. That is an argument that appeals to authority. Is there any organisation that takes an impartial view in things, that did a mass study on gamergate and come to any solid conclusions about the nature of GamerGate? I'd love to see it.

article

blocked

test

:The way you're trying to describe it in this article is as if it was some serious step whereas most sources see it as EU Commission backing down from brinkmanship (no sanctions etc).

article

blocked

train

== Warning == There is clearly a protectionist regime going on here and a witch hunt to boot. The duck rule has been abused to effect this. The article Jonathan Mitchell isn't promotional as that IP that is NOT me claims. It's not notable. As I have been blocked for false reasons, I give notice that I am consulting my lawyers for slander by the blocking admin and reviewing admins. Delete the Jonathan Mitchell article. He's not notable. I maintain that I have not socked but you lot refuse to believe the truth. Well it will likely be sorted out in a court room now. You can re-block this account for legal threats if you want. I will not be slandered and if making the warning is blockable conduct then so be it.

user

blocked

dev

Alternate option=== Is there perhaps enough newsworthy information to make an article about the Bundy family as a whole, that the various family members can be redirected to? Or does that violate a guideline I'm not aware of? =

article

blocked

train