label
stringclasses 2
values | text
stringlengths 165
803
|
|---|---|
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Timothy does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Timothy does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Timothy can now know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Gregory is thirsty. Hypothesis: Kevin can now know that Kevin is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Erica does not know whether Stacy is thirsty. Hypothesis: Erica can now know whether Nicki can know that Brian is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Mollie does not know whether Mollie's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Mollie can now know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Henry can now know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Laura's card is shown to Jason. Nancy's card is shown to Jason. Laura's card is shown to Laura. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Laura can now know whether Jason can know whether Laura picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jennifer knows whether Jennifer is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Wade knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. Hypothesis: Jennifer can now know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). James's card is shown to Christopher. Christopher's card is shown to Cheryl. Cheryl's card is shown to James. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that James does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: James can now know that everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Mitchell knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Mitchell can now know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Lisa's card is shown to Grace. Thomas's card is shown to Grace. Grace's card is shown to Lisa. Thomas's card is shown to Thomas. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Lisa can now know that Thomas can know whether Thomas picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Janet knows whether Janet's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Stephen knows whether Timothy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Janet can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that George knows whether George's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: George can now know that Brittany can know whether Simone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Charles knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Charles can now know that Kevin's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Nancy does not know whether Stanley is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Robbie is not thirsty. Hypothesis: Robbie can now know whether John can know that John is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Daniel knows whether Scott's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Todd can now know that Jill can know that Daniel's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ann does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: George can now know whether Sarah can know whether Ann's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Lynn's card is shown to Lynn. Ruby's card is shown to Ruby. Lynn's card is shown to Robert. Ruby's card is shown to Robert. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Robert can now know whether Lynn can know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jesse does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Shirley can now know whether Jesse is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Julie knows whether Kathleen's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Julie can now know that Kathleen can know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Louis's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Louis can now know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Matthew knows whether someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that James does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Matthew can now know that James can know whether or not nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Shelby knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Sharon can now know that Sharon's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Kelly knows whether someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jay does not know whether Gerald is thirsty. Hypothesis: Jay can now know whether Jay is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Sara's card is shown to Sara. Joanne's card is shown to Tim. Latanya's card is shown to Tim. Tim's card is shown to Joanne. Tim's card is shown to Latanya. Joanne's card is shown to Latanya. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Latanya can now know that Joanne picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Margaret does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Margaret can now know that William can know whether Claudio's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Daphne can now know that Christopher can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Ed can now know whether Zoe can know whether or not nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Michael knows whether Michael is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Michael knows whether someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Sherman can now know whether or not everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Frank knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Kayla can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Betty's card is shown to Betty. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Betty can now know that nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Stanley can now know whether Franklin is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Sidney can now know that Sidney's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Dolores is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Marilyn does not know whether Mark is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Nellie knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Nellie is not thirsty. Hypothesis: Marilyn can now know that Nellie can know that Nellie is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Joann's card is shown to Rick. Howard's card is shown to Rick. Howard's card is shown to Joann. Rick's card is shown to Howard. Howard's card is shown to Howard. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Howard can now know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Hazel does not know whether Adam is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Adam is thirsty. Hypothesis: Hazel can now know whether someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: James can now know that Irving can know whether William's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Magda's card is shown to Magda. James's card is shown to Magda. Patrick's card is shown to Magda. Patrick's card is shown to Sharon. Magda's card is shown to Patrick. James's card is shown to Patrick. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Magda can now know whether James can know that everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Melissa does not know whether Melissa's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ronald knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ronald knows whether Carol's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Melissa can now know that Carol can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Vanessa can now know that Vanessa is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Young's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jennie can now know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Melissa's card is shown to Melissa. Melissa's card is shown to Alberto. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Alberto does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Alberto can now know whether Melissa can know that everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jill does not know whether Timothy is thirsty. Hypothesis: William can now know whether Jill can know whether Timothy is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Annette knows whether Richard's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Richard can now know whether Janice can know whether Janice's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gabrielle's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Christian knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Mary can now know whether Gabrielle can know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Donald can now know whether Lawrence can know whether Donald's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jesse is not thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Edward can now know that Thomas can know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Dorene's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that Richard knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Donna can now know that Donna's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Chrissy's card is shown to Chrissy. Sophie's card is shown to Chrissy. Sophie's card is shown to Sophie. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Sophie can now know that Chrissy can know whether someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Eric does not know whether Eric's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Betty's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Leo can now know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Roberto knows whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Roberto can now know that Ronald can know that Ronald is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Ivan does not know whether Carole is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Kathryn does not know whether Joseph is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Ivan does not know whether Kathryn is thirsty. Hypothesis: Kathryn can now know that Carole can know that Carole is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Anna knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. Hypothesis: Lawrence can now know whether Justin can know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Julienne does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Julienne can now know whether Jimmy can know that Wilbert's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). William's card is shown to William. Harlan's card is shown to William. Joyce's card is shown to Harlan. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: William can now know whether or not nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Karin's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Anthony can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that James knows whether someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Pamela does not know whether James is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Pamela knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. Hypothesis: William can now know whether someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Richard's card is shown to Wayne. Richard's card is shown to Richard. Tom's card is shown to Richard. David's card is shown to Richard. Richard's card is shown to David. David's card is shown to David. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Wayne does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Tom can now know that Wayne picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Amy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Amy can now know that Pete's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that David knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: David can now know that Eli's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Janelle's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Linda can now know that Linda's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Walter can now know whether or not everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Janet knows whether someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Paula does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Paula does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Monica can now know whether Janet can know that Paula is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Guadalupe's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Guadalupe's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that William's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: William can now know that Tara's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jacob knows whether Tracey's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Seth does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jacob can now know whether Tracey can know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Teresa can now know that Nikki can know that Jamie's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Phillip is not thirsty. It is publicly announced that John is thirsty. Hypothesis: Catherine can now know whether Phillip can know that Catherine is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lois knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Aida knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Michael knows whether Aida's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Michael can now know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that David knows whether David's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that David's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: David can now know that Scott can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that David knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: David can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Rocky knows whether Rocky's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Eddie can now know that Rocky can know whether Eddie's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Doris does not know whether Merry is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Doris knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. Hypothesis: Doris can now know whether Merry is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Joanna can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lena does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lena does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jose can now know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ellen does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ellen's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Matthew can now know that Ellen can know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Eric does not know whether Frances is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Gloria does not know whether Eric is thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Eric can now know whether Gloria can know that Eric is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Kimberly's card is shown to Karen. Karen's card is shown to Kimberly. Kimberly's card is shown to Kimberly. Karen's card is shown to Richard. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Karen does not know whether Karen picked a red card. It is publicly announced that everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Karen can now know whether Richard picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Kelvin's card is shown to Melissa. Melissa's card is shown to Melissa. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Kelvin knows whether someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Kelvin can now know whether someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Roberto does not know whether Beverly is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Mauricio does not know whether Ira is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Ira does not know whether Roberto is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Roberto knows whether someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Beverly can now know that Ira is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Manuel does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Manuel does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Manuel does not know whether Colleen is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Manuel knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. Hypothesis: Colleen can now know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Paul's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Stanley can now know that Paul can know whether Roger's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Brent's card is shown to Janie. Janie's card is shown to Barbara. Barbara's card is shown to Barbara. Barbara's card is shown to Brent. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Janie can now know that Barbara picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Monica does not know whether Monica's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Candace can now know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Adrienne knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Robert can now know whether Robert's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Brandon is thirsty. Hypothesis: Renato can now know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Darryl's card is shown to Darryl. Darryl's card is shown to Mary. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Mary can now know whether Darryl can know that Mary picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Gail can now know that Robert's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Bernice knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Bernice can now know whether Adrienne can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Hilda's card is shown to Hilda. Ernestine's card is shown to Hilda. Margaret's card is shown to Ernestine. Marilyn's card is shown to Ernestine. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Hilda can now know whether someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Luis does not know whether Luis's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Dean can now know that Luis's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Miranda does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jake can now know whether Jonathan can know whether Steve's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Jayne's card is shown to Jayne. Ruby's card is shown to Jayne. Jayne's card is shown to Christopher. Christopher's card is shown to Christopher. Ruby's card is shown to Christopher. Christopher's card is shown to Ruby. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Ruby knows whether someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Christopher picked a black card. Hypothesis: Christopher can now know whether Ruby can know that nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Caroline's card is shown to Caroline. Charles's card is shown to Caroline. Jay's card is shown to Caroline. Caroline's card is shown to Charles. Charles's card is shown to Charles. Caroline's card is shown to Jay. Charles's card is shown to Jay. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Jay can now know whether Caroline can know whether Caroline picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Melissa knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Brent can now know whether Melissa can know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Virginia's card is shown to Hildegard. John's card is shown to John. Virginia's card is shown to John. Virginia's card is shown to Richard. Richard's card is shown to Virginia. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Richard can now know that Hildegard can know that someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Theresa does not know whether Robert is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Kurt does not know whether Robert is thirsty. Hypothesis: Thomas can now know whether or not everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Yvonne does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Joseph can now know whether Yvonne can know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Michelle does not know whether Mary is thirsty. Hypothesis: James can now know that Carol can know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Thomas knows whether Miriam's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Miriam can now know that Thomas can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Claude does not know whether Claude's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Dean does not know whether Dean's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Kay can now know whether Claude can know whether Dean's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Mario knows whether Alan's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: James can now know that Michael can know whether Michael's forehead is muddy. |