label
stringclasses 2
values | text
stringlengths 165
803
|
|---|---|
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that William does not know whether John is thirsty. Hypothesis: Brian can now know that William can know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Susan knows whether Curtis's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that David's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Curtis can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Sara's card is shown to Sara. Dianna's card is shown to Dianna. Sulema's card is shown to Bonnie. Bonnie's card is shown to Bonnie. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Dianna can now know that someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Abraham's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Shirley can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Christina does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Christina knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Mary can now know that Nellie's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Billy does not know whether Billy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Mary can now know that Jose can know that Mary's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Ethel does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Ethel knows whether someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Melba can now know that Ethel can know whether someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that John does not know whether Carl is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Carl does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Carl does not know whether Marcus is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Carl does not know whether Marcus is thirsty. Hypothesis: Carl can now know whether Marcus can know that Marcus is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kirk does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Frances's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Kirk can now know whether Frances's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Grace does not know whether Karl is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Grace does not know whether Karl is thirsty. Hypothesis: Grace can now know whether Karl is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gary does not know whether Gary's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Norman's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Kathleen can now know whether Gary's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Dorothy does not know whether Davis is thirsty. Hypothesis: Frank can now know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Nathaniel can now know that Robert's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Karen knows whether Dacia's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: David can now know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Patrick's card is shown to Patrick. Michael's card is shown to Patrick. Patrick's card is shown to Suzanne. Suzanne's card is shown to Suzanne. Patrick's card is shown to Michael. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Michael can now know whether or not nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Victoria does not know whether Victoria's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Donn does not know whether Donn's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Donn can now know that Victoria can know whether Victoria's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Roy is thirsty. Hypothesis: Dan can now know whether Marina can know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Jeffrey's card is shown to Jeffrey. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Jeffrey knows whether Jeffrey picked a red card. Hypothesis: Jeffrey can now know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gail does not know whether Gail's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gail does not know whether Gail's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Ronald can now know that Gail can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Frank's card is shown to Frank. Patricia's card is shown to Patricia. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Patricia can now know whether someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Tiffany knows whether Terry's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Max can now know that Max's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Derrick does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Derrick does not know whether Angela is thirsty. Hypothesis: Angela can now know that Roberta can know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Charles's card is shown to Charles. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Charles can now know whether Charles picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Alan's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Patricia can now know that Carolyn can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Cheryl does not know whether Cheryl's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Cheryl does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Cheryl can now know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Pearl knows whether Joshua's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Joshua can now know that Daisy can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Catherine knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Catherine does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Catherine can now know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Maria does not know whether Kimberly is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Kimberly does not know whether Burton is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Maria does not know whether Kimberly is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Maria does not know whether Patricia is thirsty. Hypothesis: Kimberly can now know whether Maria can know that Maria is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Veronica knows whether Scott's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Ernestina can now know that Scott's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Barry does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Barry can now know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Joan's card is shown to Joan. Margaret's card is shown to Joan. Jason's card is shown to Jason. Jason's card is shown to Margaret. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Jason does not know whether Joan picked a red card. Hypothesis: Margaret can now know that Joan can know whether Margaret picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Mary does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Mary does not know whether Mary's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Ada can now know that Mary can know whether Mary's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Dixie's card is shown to Mark. Randall's card is shown to Mark. Randall's card is shown to Randall. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Dixie can now know whether Mark can know that Randall picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Harry knows whether Harry's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Larry can now know that Jane's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Maria knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Connie can now know that Maria can know that Maria's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Renata's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Derek can now know that Renata can know that Derek's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Ruth's card is shown to Diane. Joseph's card is shown to Ruth. Richard's card is shown to Ruth. Diane's card is shown to Joseph. Ruth's card is shown to Joseph. Ruth's card is shown to Richard. Joseph's card is shown to Richard. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Diane can now know whether Ruth can know that Ruth picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Jewel's card is shown to Beverly. Don's card is shown to Don. Beverly's card is shown to Mary. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Don picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Jewel knows whether someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Jewel can now know whether Beverly picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Susan's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that James knows whether Dorothea's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jacqueline knows whether James's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Susan can now know whether Jacqueline can know that James's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Brian does not know whether Erin is thirsty. Hypothesis: Dionne can now know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Angela's card is shown to Angela. Dorris's card is shown to Angela. Darryl's card is shown to Dorris. Darryl's card is shown to Darryl. Darryl's card is shown to Violet. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Darryl picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Angela picked a black card. Hypothesis: Angela can now know that Angela picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Darren can now know that Patricia's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Della knows whether Della's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Charles can now know that Charles's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Justin knows whether Rosalie's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Ronnie can now know that Justin's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Leola knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Nancy can now know whether Nancy's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Terrie can now know that Sherry's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Frances's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Frances's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Frances's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Laila can now know whether Paola can know whether Frances's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether Kim's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Christopher can now know whether Kim's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Aaron's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Dudley can now know whether Aaron can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Mary's card is shown to Tonya. Tonya's card is shown to Glen. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Mary can now know whether Tonya can know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Joseph knows whether Robert's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Madelyn's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Joseph can now know whether Thomas can know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Donald does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Margaret can now know that Nadine can know whether Margaret's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that James's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Brandon can now know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Gregorio can now know that Jarrett's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Pearl knows whether Ed's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Ralph can now know that Ralph's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Roy knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: John can now know whether Roy can know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Alma knows whether William's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Alma knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: William can now know whether William's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that William does not know whether Karen is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Tyson is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Karen is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Tyson is thirsty. Hypothesis: Karen can now know that Tyson can know whether or not nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Rick's card is shown to Tyrone. Lydia's card is shown to Tyrone. Tyrone's card is shown to Leon. Lydia's card is shown to Leon. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Tyrone can now know that Rick picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Mary does not know whether Mary's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Mary does not know whether Mary's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Tom can now know whether Mary can know whether Tom's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that James's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Dennis can now know that James can know that Terry's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Dorinda can now know whether Clara can know whether someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Bernardo does not know whether Timothy is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Timothy can now know whether Clarice can know that Bernardo is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Diana does not know whether Alyssa is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Alyssa does not know whether Alice is thirsty. Hypothesis: Geoffrey can now know that Diana can know whether someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jasmine does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jeremy does not know whether Virginia is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jeremy does not know whether Virginia is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jeremy does not know whether Peter is thirsty. Hypothesis: Virginia can now know that Jasmine can know whether someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Elizabeth's card is shown to Regina. Janice's card is shown to Janice. Harvey's card is shown to Janice. Elizabeth's card is shown to Harvey. Janice's card is shown to Elizabeth. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Elizabeth can now know that someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Donna does not know whether Jeannine is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Donna does not know whether Robert is thirsty. Hypothesis: Robert can now know that Michael can know that Robert is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Sandy's card is shown to Sandy. Curtis's card is shown to Lauren. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Sandy picked a red card. Hypothesis: Curtis can now know that Sandy picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Michael's card is shown to Michael. Michael's card is shown to Paul. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Paul does not know whether Paul picked a red card. Hypothesis: Michael can now know that someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Larry does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Vicki can now know whether Richard's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Sharon does not know whether Sharon's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Joey's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Leonard knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Billy can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Erika's card is shown to Erika. Bessie's card is shown to Erika. Erika's card is shown to Michael. Michael's card is shown to Michael. Thomas's card is shown to Thomas. Bessie's card is shown to Thomas. Erika's card is shown to Bessie. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Erika can now know that Michael can know whether or not nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Timothy's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Gertrude can now know that Timothy can know whether Timothy's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Arthur knows whether Judy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Judy can now know that Dewayne can know that Mildred's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Regina knows whether Kim's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Regina can now know that Kim can know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Stella can now know that Donna can know that Donna's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Glenn can now know that Lessie can know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Jimmie's card is shown to Jimmie. Larry's card is shown to Larry. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Larry does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Larry can now know whether Jimmie can know that someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Joan's card is shown to Joan. Barbara's card is shown to Barbara. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Barbara does not know whether Joan picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Joan picked a red card. Hypothesis: Joan can now know whether Barbara picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Audrey's card is shown to Audrey. Charlotte's card is shown to Howard. Earl's card is shown to Earl. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Charlotte does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Earl picked a red card. Hypothesis: Audrey can now know that Charlotte picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Charles can now know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Judith's card is shown to Ronald. Anthony's card is shown to Ronald. Ronald's card is shown to Judith. Anthony's card is shown to Judith. Ronald's card is shown to Anthony. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Anthony knows whether or not everyone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Judith can now know that Anthony can know whether Judith picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Mary does not know whether Courtney is thirsty. Hypothesis: Mary can now know that Courtney can know whether or not everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Robert's card is shown to Robert. Robert's card is shown to Elaine. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Elaine does not know whether Elaine picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Elaine knows whether or not nobody picked a red card. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Elaine can now know that Robert can know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Linda does not know whether Jessie is thirsty. Hypothesis: Linda can now know that Charles can know whether Linda is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Steven can now know whether Daniel can know whether Glenn's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Helen does not know whether Jerry is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Helen does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Thomas can now know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Daniel's card is shown to Daniel. Cecil's card is shown to Therese. Daniel's card is shown to Cecil. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Daniel does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Therese can now know that Elizabeth picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Kenny's card is shown to Anna. Kenny's card is shown to Kenny. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Anna does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Kenny can now know whether Anna can know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Joan's card is shown to Joan. Steven's card is shown to Steven. Joan's card is shown to Neal. Steven's card is shown to Neal. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Steven can now know that Joan picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Susan does not know whether Anna is thirsty. Hypothesis: Claudia can now know whether Paul can know whether Anna is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Linda knows whether someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Nicole is thirsty. Hypothesis: Marc can now know that Linda can know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kathleen's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Tina can now know whether Michael's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jason knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Larry can now know whether Larry's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: William can now know that Betty can know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Janice knows whether someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Hipolito can now know that Estelle can know whether Claire is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Richard's card is shown to Richard. Abigail's card is shown to Abigail. Julie's card is shown to Julie. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Julie picked a red card. Hypothesis: Abigail can now know whether Julie can know whether someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Leonard is not thirsty. It is publicly announced that Leonard does not know whether Haywood is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Dennis does not know whether Cody is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Dennis does not know whether Cody is thirsty. Hypothesis: Haywood can now know whether Cody can know whether Leonard is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that James's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: James can now know whether Helen can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Blanca can now know whether Michael can know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |