Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
United States: Ohio District Court Rejects FERC Enforcement Of Disgorgement And Joint And Several Liability
by J. Daniel Skees , Levi McAllister and Pamela Tsang Wu
Morgan Lewis
The US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio held on November 29, 2021, that in actions commenced under 16 USC Section 823b, district courts have the power to decide whether FERC can enforce civil penalties but do not have the ability to consider challenges to FERC orders that pursue joint and several liability and disgorgement. The court held that those challenges generally fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of federal appeals courts.
FERC sought to enforce an order in which it imposed civil penalties and disgorgement, on a joint and several basis, against a Pennsylvania power trading firm, its co-owners, and three of its traders. FERC argued that Section 309 of the Federal Power Act grants it broad authority to craft remedies and impose orders as it sees fit, including joint and several liability and disgorgement. However, the court held that it lacks jurisdiction to review orders imposed under Section 309 because that section specifically provides that a party aggrieved by a FERC order can seek review and raise its objections to the FERC order in a US court of appeals.
The court held that Section 823b, which addresses the assessment of civil penalties and under which FERC initiated the action, provides a different process, but only for penalties. That statute allows a defendant to affirmatively elect a penalty assessment by FERC. If the defendant does not pay the civil penalty within 60 days, Section 823b requires the Commission to file an action in district court for an order affirming the assessment of the civil penalty at which point the court provides a de novo review of the allegations.
Finding that disgorgement is not a civil penalty, the court held that FERC cannot enforce a disgorgement award through the district court enforcement process under Section 823b. The court explained that FERC can enforce a disgorgement award or impose joint and several liability by applying to a district court for a writ of mandamus commanding compliance with FERC's order under 16 USC Section 825m. However, because FERC in this case commenced its action under Section 823b, the district court held that it will not enforce those remedies through this action because Section 823b does not provide for the enforcement of joint and several liability or disgorgement.
This article is provided as a general informational service and it should not be construed as imparting legal advice on any specific matter.
J. Daniel Skees
Levi McAllister
Pamela Tsang Wu
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration Trials & Appeals & Compensation
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from United States
Is Arbitration The Answer: Vaccination Arbitration?
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
We have written a lot about the pluses and minuses of requiring arbitration of employment disputes. The arithmetic is complicated and employers come to different sums.
Class Action & MDL Roundup – Fall 2021
Alston & Bird
Welcome back to the Class Action & MDL Roundup! Our fall edition covers notable class actions from the third quarter of 2021.
The OSHA Mandate — Supreme Court Oral Argument Preview
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
Tomorrow morning (Friday, January 7), the Supreme Court hears oral argument in the OSHA (10 a.m. EST) and CMS (11 a.m. EST) mandate cases. (You can listen to the arguments live here.)
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds That Requiring Consent To Personal Jurisdiction In Order To Do Business In Pennsylvania Violates Due Process
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
In a December 22, 2021 decision that will have far-reaching effects, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held in Robert Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company...
The Sixth Circuit Deals Another Blow To The Contractor Mandate
As readers of this Blog know, the OSHA vaccine-or-test mandate has occupied much of the Sixth Circuit's time the past few weeks.
Avoiding A Toxic Situation: Lessons From Bard V. Monsanto
Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP
Schools have long needed to address issues arising from the presence of hazardous substances, including asbestos, dust and chemicals, in their facilities.
U.S. Court Of Appeals Rules That Student "Snapchat Bullying" Is Not A First Amendment Protected Activity Freeman Mathis & Gary
Can You Waive Liability For Reckless Conduct? Iowa Supreme Court Finally Says No. Husch Blackwell LLP
Statements In Demand Letters Could Result In Defamation Liability In Pennsylvania If The Sender Does Not Intend To Sue Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
Arbitrability Of PAGA Cases Before US Supreme Court Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standard Of Care For Attorneys Advising On Unsettled Areas Of The Law Freeman Mathis & Gary
How Alternative Dispute Resolution Can Help Hospital Administrators Handle Conflicts
Latest Update On Section 301 Litigation
Braumiller Law Group, PLLC