"What About the Apocrypha?"
Home "What About the Apocrypha?"
, May 27, 2003 March 29, 2019
The Catholic institution claims the apocrypha is inspired. Protestants don't. Therefore, within the Body, there are two different lists of supposedly God-inspired authoritative Scripture.
So… How can we claim the Bible is authoritative when there are two differing lists of supposed Scriptures within Christianity…Two different Bibles? My next question is akin to the first: How do we know with certainty which list is THE list?" Both of these questions center on authority. Who do we trust as our God approved authority able to testify for us on behalf of Scriptures?
It is no wonder that the other religions of the world do not take true Christianity seriously when such fundamental divisions exist within the Body.
The Apocrypha is not included as part of the inspired text because it does not meet the criteria of the inspired canon. Here are just a few examples.
The Apocrypha contains historical errors. In Judith 1:1 Nebuchadnezzar is reigning in Ninevah instead of Babylon.
The Apocrypha contains unbiblical teaching. 2 Maccabees 12 teaches to pray for the dead. Tobit 12:9 teaches faith by works, a clear contradiction to the Bible (Ephesians 2:8-9).
Jesus and the Apostles do not quote the Apocrypha. We do not see it directly quoted in the New Testament.
Finally Jesus tells us where the inspired canon ends in Luke 11:51. He says the prophets extend from Abel (Genesis 4) to Zechariah (2 Chronicles 24:20-21). So the line of prophets ends with the Jewish Old Testament, the Masoretic text that Jesus used as authoritative.
The history of the Apocrypha is interesting. It was not part of the Catholic Church's inspired canon until 1545 AD. No council recognized it in the first four centuries. The historical evidence goes against the Apocrypha. It was incorporated by the Catholic Church in response to the Protestant challenge to several unbiblical teachings such as praying for the dead and penance. Hope this helps.
The Old Testament Apocrypha Controversy - The Canon of Scripture
Don Closson analyzes the controversial issue of the Apocrypha, weighing the evidence on the canonicity of these books, affirming their value, but agreeing with the Protestant tradition which does not regard them as…
"Did the Early Church Fathers Accept the Apocrypha?"
I have been searching for some time to find quotes from the earliest church fathers (first through fourth centuries) that will demonstrate that they did not accept the books of…
"Did the Church Create the Bible?"
What would you say to a Catholic person who said "the church created the Bible"? In a very real sense, the person who says this is basically correct. But some…
"Are the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha Writings Part of the Apocrypha? Why Aren't They Scripture?"
I can't find any solid information on the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha [Ed. note: (Greek, "falsely attributed") Jewish writings of the period between the Old and New Testament, which were attributed…
"Jesus Contributed to Drunkenness!""What Does the Bible Say About Tithing?"