Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time
Ira H. Bernstein, Mark H. Clark, Barry A. Edelstein
The stimulus events in a visual RT task consisted either of a visual (V), visual-auditory (VA), or auditory (A) signal, the latter serving as a catch signal not to be responded to. On VA trials, V and A were separated by interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 0-90 msec. in 10-msec units. RT to VA events was generally faster than RT to a V event alone and was directly related to ISI. The obtained intersensory facilitation supported previous findings by M. Hershenson and L. K. Morrell (see 41:8 and 42:9). Also, an index of facilitation previously employed by Hershenson was obtained and, as with Hershenson's study, was an inverted U-shaped function of ISI. However, an artifact was noted in Hershenson's measure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
Journal of Experimental Psychology
3 PART 1
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027444
visual reaction time, effects of auditory signal
10.1037/h0027444
Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Artifacts Medicine & Life Sciences 100%
Bernstein, I. H., Clark, M. H., & Edelstein, B. A. (1969). Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(3 PART 1), 567-569. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027444
Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time. / Bernstein, Ira H.; Clark, Mark H.; Edelstein, Barry A.
In: Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 80, No. 3 PART 1, 01.06.1969, p. 567-569.
Bernstein, IH, Clark, MH & Edelstein, BA 1969, 'Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time', Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 80, no. 3 PART 1, pp. 567-569. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027444
Bernstein IH, Clark MH, Edelstein BA. Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1969 Jun 1;80(3 PART 1):567-569. doi: 10.1037/h0027444
Bernstein, Ira H. ; Clark, Mark H. ; Edelstein, Barry A. / Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1969 ; Vol. 80, No. 3 PART 1. pp. 567-569.
@article{cc97589595ee41a594189d7360b4bf53,
title = "Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time",
abstract = "The stimulus events in a visual RT task consisted either of a visual (V), visual-auditory (VA), or auditory (A) signal, the latter serving as a catch signal not to be responded to. On VA trials, V and A were separated by interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 0-90 msec. in 10-msec units. RT to VA events was generally faster than RT to a V event alone and was directly related to ISI. The obtained intersensory facilitation supported previous findings by M. Hershenson and L. K. Morrell (see 41:8 and 42:9). Also, an index of facilitation previously employed by Hershenson was obtained and, as with Hershenson's study, was an inverted U-shaped function of ISI. However, an artifact was noted in Hershenson's measure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "visual reaction time, effects of auditory signal",
author = "Bernstein, {Ira H.} and Clark, {Mark H.} and Edelstein, {Barry A.}",
doi = "10.1037/h0027444",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3 PART 1",
T1 - Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time
AU - Bernstein, Ira H.
AU - Clark, Mark H.
AU - Edelstein, Barry A.
N2 - The stimulus events in a visual RT task consisted either of a visual (V), visual-auditory (VA), or auditory (A) signal, the latter serving as a catch signal not to be responded to. On VA trials, V and A were separated by interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 0-90 msec. in 10-msec units. RT to VA events was generally faster than RT to a V event alone and was directly related to ISI. The obtained intersensory facilitation supported previous findings by M. Hershenson and L. K. Morrell (see 41:8 and 42:9). Also, an index of facilitation previously employed by Hershenson was obtained and, as with Hershenson's study, was an inverted U-shaped function of ISI. However, an artifact was noted in Hershenson's measure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
AB - The stimulus events in a visual RT task consisted either of a visual (V), visual-auditory (VA), or auditory (A) signal, the latter serving as a catch signal not to be responded to. On VA trials, V and A were separated by interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 0-90 msec. in 10-msec units. RT to VA events was generally faster than RT to a V event alone and was directly related to ISI. The obtained intersensory facilitation supported previous findings by M. Hershenson and L. K. Morrell (see 41:8 and 42:9). Also, an index of facilitation previously employed by Hershenson was obtained and, as with Hershenson's study, was an inverted U-shaped function of ISI. However, an artifact was noted in Hershenson's measure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
KW - visual reaction time, effects of auditory signal
U2 - 10.1037/h0027444
DO - 10.1037/h0027444
JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology
IS - 3 PART 1