US9087155B2 - Automated data collection, computation and reporting of content space coverage metrics for software products - Google Patents
Automated data collection, computation and reporting of content space coverage metrics for software products Download PDF
US9087155B2 US13/741,791 US201313741791A US9087155B2 US 9087155 B2 US9087155 B2 US 9087155B2 US 201313741791 A US201313741791 A US 201313741791A US 9087155 B2 US9087155 B2 US 9087155B2
content space
Expired - Fee Related, expires 2033-05-23
US20140201713A1 (en
Edward B. Boden
Robert C. Hansen
Anthony F. Pioli
International Business Machines Corp
2013-01-15 Application filed by International Business Machines Corp filed Critical International Business Machines Corp
2013-01-15 Priority to US13/741,791 priority Critical patent/US9087155B2/en
2013-01-15 Assigned to INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION reassignment INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BODEN, EDWARD, HANSEN, ROBERT C., PIOLI, ANTHONY F.
2013-01-29 Assigned to INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION reassignment INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ATTORNEY DOCKET NUMBER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 029633 FRAME 0275. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ATTORNEY DOCKET NUMBER LISTED AS YOR920110138US1 IS INCORRECT.. Assignors: BODEN, EDWARD, HANSEN, ROBERT C., PIOLI, ANTHONY F.
2015-07-21 Publication of US9087155B2 publication Critical patent/US9087155B2/en
Status Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
2033-05-23 Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 18
238000000034 methods Methods 0.000 description 12
230000002596 correlated Effects 0.000 description 3
238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
280000156839 Program Products companies 0.000 description 2
239000003365 glass fibers Substances 0.000 description 2
230000000644 propagated Effects 0.000 description 2
210000003666 Nerve Fibers, Myelinated Anatomy 0.000 description 1
280000667465 Run Time companies 0.000 description 1
230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
238000009429 electrical wiring Methods 0.000 description 1
230000002708 enhancing Effects 0.000 description 1
239000000835 fibers Substances 0.000 description 1
230000000717 retained Effects 0.000 description 1
239000004065 semiconductors Substances 0.000 description 1
G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
G06F11/3668—Software testing
G06F11/3672—Test management
G06F11/3676—Test management for coverage analysis
G06F11/3692—Test management for test results analysis
One or more test results and one or more user stories are received. For each test result in the one or more test results a set of content space coordinates of the one or more test results is compared to a set of content space coordinates of the one or more user stories. Based on the comparison it is determined if one or more user stories have been tested. One or more results of the comparison are then stored.
This invention relates generally to processing within a computing environment, and more particularly to automated data collection, computation and reporting of content space coverage metrics for software products.
A new metric is being adopted to help measure the completeness and effectiveness of software product testing, test automation, Functional Verification Testing (FVT) and System Verification Testing (SVT). This metric is called "content coverage" in short-hand form. A full name would be "content space coverage." It is based on the idea and processes concerning (software product) content spaces. The term "content coverage" is meant to convey parallels and analogs with the "code coverage" metrics. These two coverage metrics express what percentage of an underlying measurement basis has been tested, or tested successfully, or failed, etc. The basis for code coverage is the code itself, at varying levels of detail (e.g., class, entry point, block, line of code). The basis for content coverage is the content space for the software product (or component), at varying levels of detail (noun group, noun, verb, interface, platform, requirement, etc.)
BRIEF SUMMARY
Another embodiment includes a system, the system including a content coverage module circuit configured to receive one or more test results and one or more user stories. For each test result in the one or more test results the content coverage module circuit is further configured to compare a set of content space coordinates of the one or more test results to a set of content space coordinates of the one or more user stories. The system determines if one or more user stories have been tested based on the comparison, and the results are stored.
Additional features and advantages are realized through the techniques of the present invention. Other embodiments and aspects of the invention are described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimed invention. For a better understanding of the invention with advantages and features, refer to the description and to the drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several FIGURES:
FIG. 1 depicts a schematic diagram of a system for automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics that may be implemented by an embodiment;
FIG. 2 depicts a schematic diagram of a content coverage module in an embodiment; and
FIG. 3 depicts a process flow for automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics.
An embodiment of the present invention provides for automated data collection, computation and reporting of content space coverage metrics for software products.
A test automation framework includes the capability to associate a test case with a set of content space coordinate values that represent a content space. The content space is a way of representing software content from an outside-in perspective via a set of dimensions. Each of the content space dimensions has values defined in terms of the software itself that concern a particular aspect, such as information abstraction, function, external interface and run-time environment. The dimension values can represent existing content and also new content for the software based on requirements (via content space analysis). The content space can be programmatically traversed, and as this traversal occurs, end-to-end testable units (termed user stories) are output, each corresponding to a particular and identified region of the content space. The set of all output user stories partitions the software content. The set of all user stories and various subsets (e.g. all Power user stories) are used to compute the content coverage metric of various scopes.
The content space coordinate values correlate with a set of business requirements for software under measurement (also referred to herein as an "application") and for various platforms that the application is developed to execute on. In an embodiment, an application is a defined scope of software, such as a software product, an operating system, a software component of a larger software suite, an end-user application, a web server, a database application, etc. In other embodiments, an application is any software component, the boundary of which is determined by the provider of the software development requirements. The content space coordinates for the tests are output by each test as it executes and collected and reported along with test case execution results. The test results are automatically combined with the full set, or a subset, of user stories. The user stories are generated from the content space for the product release or application that is being tested, and each user story has the content space coordinates for the region it represents. These coordinates are retained in the information comprising the user story. The user stories are testable units of functionality derived from the business requirements. The user stories may include only a single function of the application, or may include multiple interrelated functions, hence sizes of user stories may vary. The resulting content coverage metric is calculated as a ratio of the number user stories tested (from the test results) over the total number of user stories in application, and reported (i.e., via web pages, data files, database, etc.).
Code coverage is a measure of the amount of source code (i.e., lines of code, modules, etc.) that was tested by a set of test cases. Content coverage similarly measures the part of an application (and/or a body of code) that has been tested by a set of test cases; however, content coverage is directed to the amount of a set of business requirements and prior release functionality that has been tested by the test, as measured by user stories generated from the application content space. Testing based on content, i.e., business requirement testing, provides a link between the tested application and the set of requirements that were used as the "blue print" for the application itself. Once the content coverage can be determined, the thoroughness of the set of test cases may be determined.
While code coverage is expressed in lines of code, classes, method, etc., content coverage is expressed in terms of a verb (i.e., a function), a noun (i.e., the thing the function is operating on), one or more interfaces (i.e., a graphical user interface (GUI), the command line, a web service, etc.), and the platform the application is executing on (i.e., the operating system, the hardware, etc.).
Content coverage is useful; however, without automation of the content coverage data, it is of little practical use. Raw data is collected during testing. The resulting data is automatically related to the underlying content space for which the tests have been executed against to allow computation of the metric itself. Then the results are automatically reported with various splits (overall, per platform, per requirement, per license, per noun and verb combination, etc.).
Turning now to FIG. 1, a system 100 for implementing automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics will now be described. In an embodiment, the system 100 includes a host system computer 102 executing computer instructions for implementing automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics. Host system computer 102 may operate in any type of environment that is capable of executing a software application. Host system computer 102 may comprise a high-speed computer processing device, such as a mainframe computer, to manage the volume of operations governed by an entity for which the automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics system is executing. In an embodiment, the host system computer 102 is part of an enterprise (e.g., a commercial business) that implements the automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics.
In an embodiment, the system 100 depicted in FIG. 1 includes one or more client systems 104 through which users at one or more geographic locations may contact the host system computer 102. The client systems 104 are coupled to the host system computer 102 via one or more networks 106. Each client system 104 may be implemented using a general-purpose computer executing a computer program for carrying out the processes described herein. The client systems 104 may be personal computers (e.g., a lap top, a personal digital assistant, a mobile device) or host attached terminals. If the client systems 104 are personal computers, the processing described herein may be shared by a client system 104 and the host system computer 102 (e.g., by providing an applet to the client system 104). Client systems 104 may be operated by authorized users (e.g., programmers) of the automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics system described herein.
The networks 106 may be any type of known network including, but not limited to, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a global network (e.g., Internet), a virtual private network (VPN), and an intranet. The networks 106 may be implemented using a wireless network or any kind of physical network implementation known in the art. A client system 104 may be coupled to the host system computer 102 through multiple networks (e.g., intranet and Internet) so that not all client systems 104 are coupled to the host system computer 102 through the same network. One or more of the client systems 104 and the host system computer 102 may be connected to the networks 106 in a wireless fashion. In one embodiment, the networks 106 include an intranet and one or more client systems 104 executing a user interface application (e.g., a web browser) to contact the host system computer 102 through the networks 106. In another embodiment, the client system 104 is connected directly (i.e., not through the networks 106) to the host system computer 102 and the host system computer 102 contains memory for storing data in support of automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics. Alternatively, a separate storage device (e.g., storage device 112) may be implemented for this purpose.
In an embodiment, the storage device 112 includes a data repository with data relating to the automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics by the system 100, as well as other data/information desired by the entity representing the host system computer 102 of FIG. 1. The storage device 112 is logically addressable as a consolidated data source across a distributed environment that includes networks 106. Information stored in the storage device 112 may be retrieved and manipulated via the host system computer 102 and/or the client systems 104. In an embodiment, the storage device 112 includes one or more databases containing, e.g., automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics system data and corresponding configuration parameters, values, methods, and properties, as well as other related information as will be discussed more fully below. It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the storage device 112 may also comprise other structures, such as an XML file on the file system or distributed over a network (e.g., one of networks 106), or from a data stream from another server located on a network 106. In addition, all or a portion of the storage device 112 may alternatively be located on a client system 104.
The host system computer 102 depicted in the system of FIG. 1 may be implemented using one or more servers operating in response to a computer program stored in a storage medium accessible by the server. The host system computer 102 may operate as a network server (e.g., a web server) to communicate with the client systems 104. The host system computer 102 handles sending and receiving information to and from the client systems 104 and can perform associated tasks. The host system computer 102 may also include a firewall to prevent unauthorized access to the host system computer 102 and enforce any limitations on authorized access. For instance, an administrator may have access to the entire system and have authority to modify portions of the system. A firewall may be implemented using conventional hardware and/or software as is known in the art.
The host system computer 102 may also operate as an application server. The host system computer 102 executes one or more computer programs to provide the automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics. The host system computer 102 includes a content coverage module 108. As indicated above, processing may be shared by the client systems 104 and the host system computer 102 by providing an application (e.g., java applet) to the client systems 104. Alternatively, the client system 104 can include a stand-alone software application for performing a portion or all of the processing described herein. As previously described, it is understood that separate servers may be utilized to implement the network server functions and the application server functions. Alternatively, the network server, the firewall, and the application server may be implemented by a single server executing computer programs to perform the requisite functions. In an embodiment, the automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics system executes on the same host computer system that executes the application that is being tested. In other embodiments, the automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics system is executed on a separate computer system from the application that is being tested.
It will be understood that the automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics system described in FIG. 1 may be implemented in hardware, software executing on a general purpose computer, or a combination thereof.
FIG. 2 depicts a schematic diagram of a content coverage module in an embodiment. In an embodiment, the content coverage module 206 executes on the host system computer 102 of FIG. 1. The content coverage module 206 receives data and generates output In an embodiment the content coverage module 206 receives a set of test results 202, and data representing a set or subset of business requirements for an application. In an embodiment, the data representing the application is a set of user stories 204. The user stories 204 are based on a set of user requirements and prior release content that are implemented in the software or application under test.
In an embodiment, the set of requirements is partitioned into one or more user stories. In an embodiment, the full set of user stories represents the entirety of the business requirements with no gaps. In addition, no two user stories will overlap (i.e. represent the same business requirement) and some user stories are impacted by multiple requirements. The user stories 204 are generated from the business requirements. In an embodiment, the user stories 204 are automatically generated from the business requirements, using an automated system, and are stored in, for example, a file or a database. The user stories 204 that are planned for a given release are then passed to the content coverage module 206. In an embodiment, a subset of the total user stories may be used to compute content coverage. The user stories 204 may be supplied in a single file or in multiple files.
In an embodiment, the test results 202 are generated as a result of executing one or more test cases. Test cases are user defined as automated or manual tests. The test cases are executed to test a particular aspect of the application to ensure that the application is functioning as specified in the business requirements. When the tests are executed, either manually or using an automated testing system, the results of the tests (i.e., passed, failed, etc.) are collected and recorded. The results include content space coordinate values which indicate which regions of the content space the test has tested. The test results 202 are correlated back to the test cases so that the reports will indicate which tests succeeded and which failed. The test results 202 may be supplied in a single file or in multiple files. In an embodiment, the test results 202 include an indicator to identify if the test was executed manually or if the test was executed automatically.
The test cases are also correlated to the user stories 204. In an embodiment, the test cases are correlated to the user stories 204 using a test case meta file. The test case meta file includes the name of the test case as well as a set of content space coordinates. The set of content space coordinates matches coordinates associated with one or more of the user stories 204. In an embodiment, the content space coordinates include a verb. The verb indicates the function that is being described in the user story, and/or the function that is being tested by the test case. For example, in an application such as a web browser, one function that may be tested is the download of a file. In this case the verb is "download." The content space coordinates also include a noun. The noun is the object of the verb. Therefore, for a download verb, the noun may be "file." The content space coordinates also include an interface. The interface is the method of accessing the verb. For a browser the interface may be a GUI. Other interfaces, such as command line, web service, etc. may be used both in the user stories, and in the test cases. In addition, the content space coordinates include a platform. The platform is the operating system and/or the hardware that the application is executing on. Both the user story and the test case may specify one or more platforms. In other embodiment, other properties may be included in the content space coordinates in order to add more granularity to the test cases and/or user stories as would be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art.
The test case meta file is created as a bridge between the test cases and the user stories 204. In an embodiment the test case meta file is a json file including a content-space segment such as:
{... "cs": ["noun":"file", "verb":"copy", "interface":"CLI", "platform": "UNIX"] ...}
It will be understood that the json representation of the content space coordinates is only one example provided for purposes of clarity and that, in other embodiments, any method for representing the content space coordinates may be used. Although the example described above uses a single value to represent each of the content space coordinates, it will be understood that in embodiments multiple nouns, verbs, interfaces, and platforms may be specified for a single test case and/or user story. Furthermore, any of the values may be represented by a wildcard character indicating that it is applicable to all values.
When the test case is executed, the results of the test are stored along with the content space coordinates associated to the test case. These results are fed to the content coverage module 206 as test results 202. The content coverage module 206 matches the content space coordinates in the test results 202 with the content space coordinates in the user stories 204, and then generates the results of the match. In an embodiment, the generated data is fed to a dashboard 208, and/or a data file 210. The dashboard 208 includes a hyper-text markup language (HTML) page viewable in a web browser, or a set of data that is viewable in a GUI application. In an embodiment, the data file 210 is a comma separate value (CSV) file, a text file, or a database. In an embodiment, a dashboard 208 is generated from the data file 210 instead of, or along with, being generated as a direct output of the content coverage module 206. In an embodiment, an error, such as an error matching the content space coordinates of a test case to a user story, is saved in an error data file 212. In an embodiment, the dashboard 208 includes a link or URL that allows a user to download the error data file 212.
FIG. 3 depicts a process flow for automated data collection, computation, and reporting of content space coverage metrics. In an embodiment, the process flow of FIG. 3 is executed by the content coverage module 108 of FIG. 1. At block 302, a set of test results is received. The test results include content space coordinates corresponding to the test cases that were executed. At block 304, all of the user stories are retrieved. The user stories may be retrieved from a file on a file system, a database, a web service, or other storage locations and methods as is known in the art. At block 306 the test result is compared to the user story using the content space coordinates of each. In an embodiment, the coordinates may represent multiple sets of coordinates as stated above. At block 308, the user stories that were tested are determined based on the comparison. At block 312, it is determined if any errors were detected. In an embodiment, an error may occur if only some of the coordinates were matched (i.e., fewer than 4 coordinates were matched), if there was no match for a valid test coordinate, it there was no match at all, or if there are multiple conflicting matches to the coordinates. If there was at least one good match, then processing continues at block 310, where the output data is updated to reflect the user stories that were tested, as well as the results of the test. At block 314, it is determined if there are more tests results to process. If there are more test results to process, then processing continues at block 306, and blocks 306-316 are processed for each of the remaining test results. Otherwise, if there are no more test results, then at block 318, a content coverage value is computed. In an embodiment, the content coverage is computed as a percentage by dividing the tested user stories, as determined by the content coverage module, by the total number of user stories, as determined by the retrieved user stories. The results of the computing as well as the results of the comparison of the test results to the user stories are output at block 320.
In an embodiment, the results of the computing as well as the results of the comparison of the test results to the user stories are output directly to a dashboard, such as the dashboard 208 of FIG. 2. The dashboard may include various automated visualizations of overall test results, for example in the form of a tree map. In an additional embodiment, the output is sent to an output file or database, such as the data file 210 of FIG. 2. In yet another embodiment the results are output to both a dashboard, and an output file. The output may also include an error file, such as the error data file 212 of FIG. 2.
Returning to block 312, if at least one error is detected, the error is logged in an error file. In an embodiment the error is logged to a database. It will be understood that the content space coordinates may reference multiple nouns, verbs, interfaces, and platforms, and therefore, in an embodiment, multiple user stories may match a single test result. Furthermore, it is possible that multiple combinations of the content space coordinates may not match any user stories and therefore may result in multiple errors. In addition, an error may be found while at the same time a valid match is also found resulting in both one or more entries in the error log, as well as one or more entries in the output record.
Technical effects and benefits include providing a consistent, simple, cross-product and cross-release metric of the completeness and other quality aspects of a broad range of testing. This new metric has the additional advantage of directly relating user requirements, use cases and similar software product elements of stakeholder to business value. The computational basis for the metric is meaningful, realistic and inherently tied to business value. A further benefit is that consistent content coverage metrics are automatically computed and compared for new function and prior release functionality. An additional benefit is that consistent content coverage metrics are automatically computed and compared across supported platform environments. Further benefits include that content coverage is tracked across sprint (iterations) and releases for reasonable and realistic improvements. Yet another benefit is that test completeness is automatically measured and reported with various break downs (e.g. by requirement, by platform, by noun, etc.). A further benefit is that end-to-end automation allows very low overhead and frequent update of content coverage metrics.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a "circuit," "module" or "system." Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the "C" programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
Aspects of the present invention are described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or schematic diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
As described above, embodiments can be embodied in the form of computer-implemented processes and apparatuses for practicing those processes. In embodiments, the invention is embodied in computer program code executed by one or more network elements. Embodiments include a computer program product on a computer usable medium with computer program code logic containing instructions embodied in tangible media as an article of manufacture. Exemplary articles of manufacture for computer usable medium may include floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, universal serial bus (USB) flash drives, or any other computer-readable storage medium, wherein, when the computer program code logic is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. Embodiments include computer program code logic, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein, when the computer program code logic is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. When implemented on a general-purpose microprocessor, the computer program code logic segments configure the microprocessor to create specific logic circuits.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
1. A system, comprising:
a content coverage module circuit, the content coverage module circuit configured to, perform a method comprising:
receiving one or more test results;
receiving one or more user stories;
for each test result in the one or more test results:
comparing a set of content space coordinates of the one or more test results to a set of content space coordinates of the one or more user stories; and
determining if one or more user stories have been tested responsive to the comparing;
storing one or more results of the determining; and
calculating content coverage of the one or more test results by dividing the tested user stories by a count of the one or more user stories.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the set of content space coordinates comprises a verb and a noun.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the set of content space coordinates further comprises an interface and a platform.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein one or more of the interface and the platform comprise a value that includes a table having one or more values.
5. The system of claim 3, wherein one or more of the noun, the verb, the interface, and the platform comprise a table having one or more values.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more results of the determining are displayed in a dashboard.
US13/741,791 2013-01-15 2013-01-15 Automated data collection, computation and reporting of content space coverage metrics for software products Expired - Fee Related US9087155B2 (en)
US13/741,791 US9087155B2 (en) 2013-01-15 2013-01-15 Automated data collection, computation and reporting of content space coverage metrics for software products
Related Child Applications (1)
US14/501,103 Continuation US9256518B2 (en) 2013-01-15 2014-09-30 Automated data collection, computation and reporting of content space coverage metrics for software products
US20140201713A1 US20140201713A1 (en) 2014-07-17
US9087155B2 true US9087155B2 (en) 2015-07-21
US13/741,791 Expired - Fee Related US9087155B2 (en) 2013-01-15 2013-01-15 Automated data collection, computation and reporting of content space coverage metrics for software products
Family Applications After (1)
US (2) US9087155B2 (en)
US20150261526A1 (en) * 2012-08-17 2015-09-17 Hartford Fire Insurance Company System and method for monitoring software development and program flow
PH12018000218A1 (en) * 2017-08-14 2019-03-04 Accenture Global Solutions Ltd Artificial intelligence and machine learning based product development
CN103034583B (en) * 2011-09-30 2016-03-30 国际商业机器公司 A kind of method and system for the treatment of software automatic test script
US9606906B1 (en) * 2014-04-24 2017-03-28 Google Inc. Method for generating test data from expected product output
US9678856B2 (en) * 2015-04-30 2017-06-13 Emc Corporation Annotated test interfaces
US9697105B2 (en) * 2015-04-30 2017-07-04 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Composable test automation framework
US9858177B2 (en) * 2015-10-30 2018-01-02 International Business Machines Corporation Automated test generation for multi-interface enterprise virtualization management environment
CN107992362A (en) * 2016-10-27 2018-05-04 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 The method, apparatus and system of automated performance testing
Citations (126)
US5617568A (en) 1994-12-14 1997-04-01 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for supporting file attributes on a distributed file system without native support therefor
US20010013024A1 (en) 2000-02-08 2001-08-09 Yoshinori Takahashi Apparatus and method for managing software licenses and storage medium storing a program for managing software licenses
US6342907B1 (en) 1998-10-19 2002-01-29 International Business Machines Corporation Specification language for defining user interface panels that are platform-independent
US20020016953A1 (en) 1997-10-02 2002-02-07 Borland International, Inc. Development system with methods for assisting a user with inputting source code
US6367077B1 (en) 1997-02-27 2002-04-02 Siebel Systems, Inc. Method of upgrading a software application in the presence of user modifications
US20020111808A1 (en) 2000-06-09 2002-08-15 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for personalizing hardware
US20020149614A1 (en) 2001-02-07 2002-10-17 International Business Machines Corporation Customer self service iconic interface for portal entry and search specification
US20020165912A1 (en) * 2001-02-25 2002-11-07 Storymail, Inc. Secure certificate and system and method for issuing and using same
US20020178360A1 (en) * 2001-02-25 2002-11-28 Storymail, Inc. System and method for communicating a secure unidirectional response message
US20020194483A1 (en) * 2001-02-25 2002-12-19 Storymail, Inc. System and method for authorization of access to a resource
US20020194501A1 (en) * 2001-02-25 2002-12-19 Storymail, Inc. System and method for conducting a secure interactive communication session
US20020199001A1 (en) * 2001-02-25 2002-12-26 Storymail, Inc. System and method for conducting a secure response communication session
US20020199096A1 (en) * 2001-02-25 2002-12-26 Storymail, Inc. System and method for secure unidirectional messaging
US20030009694A1 (en) * 2001-02-25 2003-01-09 Storymail, Inc. Hardware architecture, operating system and network transport neutral system, method and computer program product for secure communications and messaging
US20030041110A1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2003-02-27 Storymail, Inc. System, Method and Structure for generating and using a compressed digital certificate
US6536036B1 (en) 1998-08-20 2003-03-18 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for managing code test coverage data
US20030056173A1 (en) 2001-01-22 2003-03-20 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for dynamically generating input for a test automation facility for verifying web site operation
US20030093716A1 (en) 2001-11-13 2003-05-15 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for collecting persistent coverage data across software versions
US20030121011A1 (en) 1999-06-30 2003-06-26 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Functional coverage analysis systems and methods for verification test suites
US20040025166A1 (en) 2002-02-02 2004-02-05 International Business Machines Corporation Server computer and a method for accessing resources from virtual machines of a server computer via a fibre channel
US20040143811A1 (en) 2002-08-30 2004-07-22 Elke Kaelicke Development processes representation and management
US6799718B2 (en) 2001-07-10 2004-10-05 Borland Software Corp. Development assistance for mixed-language sources
US20040204970A1 (en) 1998-03-20 2004-10-14 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for business process space definition
US20050039045A1 (en) 2003-07-21 2005-02-17 Microsoft Corporation Secure hierarchical namespaces in peer-to-peer networks
US20050044197A1 (en) 2003-08-18 2005-02-24 Sun Microsystems.Inc. Structured methodology and design patterns for web services
US20050055399A1 (en) 2003-09-10 2005-03-10 Gene Savchuk High-performance network content analysis platform
US20050114830A1 (en) 2003-11-24 2005-05-26 Qwest Communications International Inc. System development planning tool
US20050114771A1 (en) 2003-02-26 2005-05-26 Bea Systems, Inc. Methods for type-independent source code editing
US20050114331A1 (en) 2003-11-26 2005-05-26 International Business Machines Corporation Near-neighbor search in pattern distance spaces
US6910041B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2005-06-21 International Business Machines Corporation Authorization model for administration
US20050144529A1 (en) 2003-10-01 2005-06-30 Helmut Gotz Method for defined derivation of software tests from use cases
US20050160405A1 (en) 2004-01-20 2005-07-21 Microsoft Corporation System and method for generating code coverage information
US7000184B2 (en) 2003-01-24 2006-02-14 The Cobalt Group, Inc. Remote web site editing in a standard web browser without external software
US20060036935A1 (en) 2004-06-23 2006-02-16 Warner James W Techniques for serialization of instances of the XQuery data model
US20060150200A1 (en) * 2004-12-03 2006-07-06 Microsoft Corporation Interface infrastructure for creating and interacting with web services
JP2006195529A (en) 2005-01-11 2006-07-27 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Use case diagram creation support device and method, and program for carrying out the method
US20060230410A1 (en) 2005-03-22 2006-10-12 Alex Kurganov Methods and systems for developing and testing speech applications
US7127707B1 (en) 2002-10-10 2006-10-24 Microsoft Corporation Intellisense in project upgrade
US7149699B2 (en) 1999-11-22 2006-12-12 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for project designing and developing a procurement and accounts payable system
US20060287959A1 (en) 2005-06-17 2006-12-21 Macrovision Corporation Software license manager employing license proofs for remote execution of software functions
US20070005300A1 (en) 2005-05-31 2007-01-04 David Haggerty Systems and methods for graphically defining automated test procedures
US20070006160A1 (en) 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Sue Kunz Software digital fingerprint
US7210066B2 (en) 2002-12-31 2007-04-24 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and system for determining computer software test coverage
US20070156693A1 (en) 2005-11-04 2007-07-05 Microsoft Corporation Operating system roles
US20070168918A1 (en) 2005-11-10 2007-07-19 Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation Software Development Planning and Management System
US7272752B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2007-09-18 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for integrating test coverage measurements with model based test generation
US20070250815A1 (en) 2006-04-21 2007-10-25 Microsoft Corporation Measuring code coverage
US20080027742A1 (en) 2006-07-27 2008-01-31 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information processing method, information processing apparatus, computer program and storage medium
US20080066071A1 (en) 2006-09-12 2008-03-13 Sandeep Jain Capturing effort level by task upon check-in to source control management system
US20080102422A1 (en) 2006-10-20 2008-05-01 Hayes Marcus P Method of and systems for business and narrative development
US20080120602A1 (en) 2006-11-21 2008-05-22 Microsoft Corporation Test Automation for Business Applications
US20080148253A1 (en) 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Microsoft Corporation Automatic software license reconciliation
US20080229278A1 (en) 2007-02-13 2008-09-18 The Court Of Napier University Component-based development
US20080244557A1 (en) 2007-04-02 2008-10-02 Inventec Corporation Knowledge management system and method for implementing management software using the same
US20080263505A1 (en) 2007-04-03 2008-10-23 Ldra Technology, Inc. Automated management of software requirements verification
US20080270981A1 (en) 2007-04-30 2008-10-30 Gordon Douglas Hutchison Determinatioin of a set of candidate code insertions for insertion in program code
US7467198B2 (en) 1999-10-01 2008-12-16 Accenture Llp Architectures for netcentric computing systems
US20090031286A1 (en) 2007-07-25 2009-01-29 Oracle International Corporation Device-based software authorizations for software asset management
US20090037912A1 (en) 2007-07-31 2009-02-05 Todor Stoitsev Distributed task handling
US7503037B2 (en) 2004-04-02 2009-03-10 Bea Systems, Inc. System and method for identifying bugs in software source code, using information from code coverage tools and source control tools to determine bugs introduced within a time or edit interval
US7509626B1 (en) 2004-03-31 2009-03-24 Sprint Communications Company Demonstrating proof of concept of a project with requirements component providing weights on importance and tracking with use cases
US7530057B2 (en) 2004-10-21 2009-05-05 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Program code coverage
US20090119779A1 (en) 2007-11-06 2009-05-07 The Mathworks, Inc. License activation and management
US7555742B2 (en) 2000-04-04 2009-06-30 Sosy Inc. Automatic software production system
US7581205B1 (en) 2003-09-30 2009-08-25 Nextaxiom Technology, Inc. System and method of implementing a customizable software platform
US7587636B2 (en) 2005-08-04 2009-09-08 Microsoft Corporation Unit test generalization
US20090271319A1 (en) 2008-04-29 2009-10-29 Microsoft Corporation Embedded Licenses for Content
US20090271760A1 (en) 2008-04-24 2009-10-29 Robert Stephen Ellinger Method for application development
CA2680978A1 (en) 2008-10-08 2010-04-08 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Integrated design application
US20100169862A1 (en) 2008-12-29 2010-07-01 Microsoft Corporation Interface infrastructure for a continuation based runtime
US7752606B2 (en) 2005-08-10 2010-07-06 Capital One Financial Corporation Software development tool using a structured format to generate software code
US20100180258A1 (en) 2009-01-15 2010-07-15 International Business Machines Corporation Weighted Code Coverage Tool
US7761591B2 (en) 2005-12-16 2010-07-20 Jean A. Graham Central work-product management system for coordinated collaboration with remote users
US7778899B2 (en) 2003-05-19 2010-08-17 Serena Software, Inc. Method and system for object-oriented workflow management of multi-dimensional data
US20100228683A1 (en) 2009-03-06 2010-09-09 TxVia, Inc. Issuing systems, acquiring systems, and payment networks/systems development
US20100251379A1 (en) 2009-03-31 2010-09-30 Bmc Software, Inc. Method and System for Configuration Management Database Software License Compliance
US20100269095A1 (en) 2009-04-21 2010-10-21 Microsoft Corporation Analysis of dynamic elements in bounded time
US20100313179A1 (en) 2009-06-05 2010-12-09 Microsoft Corporation Integrated work lists for engineering project change management
US7861178B2 (en) 1999-05-07 2010-12-28 Knoa Software, Inc. System and method for dynamic assistance in software applications using behavior and host application models
US7904890B1 (en) 2006-09-19 2011-03-08 Oracle America, Inc. Software test coverage metrics
US20110066420A1 (en) 2009-09-11 2011-03-17 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for system integration test (sit) planning
WO2011031328A2 (en) 2009-09-14 2011-03-17 Ldra Technology, Inc. Systems and methods for management of projects for development of embedded systems
US20110088014A1 (en) 2009-10-08 2011-04-14 International Business Machines Corporation Automated test execution plan generation
US20110131315A1 (en) 2009-11-30 2011-06-02 James Michael Ferris Methods and systems for verifying software license compliance in cloud computing environments
US20110131134A1 (en) 2009-11-30 2011-06-02 James Michael Ferris Methods and systems for generating a software license knowledge base for verifying software license compliance in cloud computing environments
US20110138358A1 (en) 2009-12-09 2011-06-09 Stefan Rau Systems and methods for analyzing test coverage at an organizational level
US20110154378A1 (en) 2009-12-18 2011-06-23 Microsoft Corporation Api namespace virtualization
US7979796B2 (en) 2004-11-10 2011-07-12 Apple Inc. Searching for commands and other elements of a user interface
US8006222B2 (en) 2004-03-24 2011-08-23 Guenther H. Ruhe Release planning
US20110239227A1 (en) 2004-08-03 2011-09-29 Microsoft Corporation System and Method for Controlling Inter-Application Association Through Contextual Policy Control
US20110246540A1 (en) 2010-03-31 2011-10-06 Saleforce.com, inc. Method and system for automatically updating a software QA Test repository
US8037453B1 (en) 2006-09-13 2011-10-11 Urbancode, Inc. System and method for continuous software configuration, test and build management
US20110264649A1 (en) 2008-04-28 2011-10-27 Ruey-Lung Hsiao Adaptive Knowledge Platform
US8069435B1 (en) 2003-08-18 2011-11-29 Oracle America, Inc. System and method for integration of web services
US20110295701A1 (en) 2010-05-25 2011-12-01 Justin Phan Web-based system and method to implement digital out-of-home advertisements
CN101833507B (en) 2010-05-04 2011-12-07 王轶辰 Method for testing software based on testing framework
US20120005209A1 (en) * 2010-05-24 2012-01-05 Intersect Ptp, Inc. Systems and methods for identifying intersections using content metadata
US20120005692A1 (en) 2010-06-30 2012-01-05 International Business Machines Corporation Workspace creation and management for a computing desktop
US20120011455A1 (en) 2010-07-06 2012-01-12 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Requirement statement manipulation system
US8104018B2 (en) 2006-10-26 2012-01-24 International Business Machines Corporation Configuring a software product
US8112814B2 (en) 2006-05-10 2012-02-07 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Information processing apparatus, access control method, access control program product, recording medium, and image forming apparatus
US20120054250A1 (en) 2010-08-31 2012-03-01 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Changing records associated with a software application
US20120158527A1 (en) * 2010-12-21 2012-06-21 Class6Ix, Llc Systems, Methods and/or Computer Readable Storage Media Facilitating Aggregation and/or Personalized Sequencing of News Video Content
US20120158669A1 (en) 2010-12-17 2012-06-21 Microsoft Corporation Data retention component and framework
US20120159441A1 (en) 2010-12-17 2012-06-21 Tata Consultancy Services Limited Recommendation system for agile software development
US20120174194A1 (en) 2009-09-10 2012-07-05 Nec Corporation Role setting apparatus, and role setting method
US20120210243A1 (en) 2011-02-11 2012-08-16 Gavin Andrew Ross Uhma Web co-navigation
US20120246611A1 (en) * 2011-03-26 2012-09-27 Accenture Global Services Limited Transformation framework
US20120246609A1 (en) 2011-03-24 2012-09-27 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic generation of user stories for software products via a product content space
US20120304248A1 (en) 2009-10-13 2012-11-29 Provance Technologies, Inc. Method and system for information technology asset management
US20120311003A1 (en) 2011-06-04 2012-12-06 Microsoft Corporation Clustered File Service
US8347263B1 (en) 2007-05-09 2013-01-01 Vmware, Inc. Repository including installation metadata for executable applications
US20130024847A1 (en) 2011-07-21 2013-01-24 International Business Machines Corporation Software test automation systems and methods
US20130061200A1 (en) 2011-09-07 2013-03-07 Mckesson Financial Holdings Converting existing artifacts to new artifacts
US8429708B1 (en) 2006-06-23 2013-04-23 Sanjay Tandon Method and system for assessing cumulative access entitlements of an entity in a system
US20130216205A1 (en) 2010-04-09 2013-08-22 Microsoft Corporation Automated story generation
US8566779B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2013-10-22 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Visually prioritizing information in an agile system
US8577937B1 (en) 2007-05-09 2013-11-05 Vmware, Inc. Repository including exclusion list
US20130326637A1 (en) 2012-06-05 2013-12-05 Quanta Computer Inc. Platform and method for dynamic software license
US20140013440A1 (en) 2012-07-05 2014-01-09 Sap Ag User license calculation in a subscription based licensing system
US20140053127A1 (en) 2012-08-17 2014-02-20 Hartford Fire Insurance Company System and method for monitoring software development and program flow
US8701078B1 (en) 2007-10-11 2014-04-15 Versionone, Inc. Customized settings for viewing and editing assets in agile software development
US20140123107A1 (en) * 2012-10-30 2014-05-01 Ebay Inc. Systems and methods to maintain consistency between software specification and code
US20140201704A1 (en) 2013-01-15 2014-07-17 International Business Machines Corporation Integration and user story generation and requirements management
US8875088B1 (en) 2009-01-21 2014-10-28 Versionone, Inc. Methods and systems for performing project schedule forecasting
US20150020053A1 (en) 2013-01-15 2015-01-15 International Business Machines Corporation Integration of a software content space with test planning and test case generation
2013-01-15 US US13/741,791 patent/US9087155B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (138)
US7139737B2 (en) 2000-02-08 2006-11-21 Fujitsu Limited Apparatus and method for managing software licenses and storage medium storing a program for managing software licenses
US8032860B2 (en) 2003-02-26 2011-10-04 Oracle International Corporation Methods for type-independent source code editing
US7467202B2 (en) 2003-09-10 2008-12-16 Fidelis Security Systems High-performance network content analysis platform
US8458646B2 (en) 2003-11-24 2013-06-04 Qwest Communications International Inc. System development planning tool
US7512957B2 (en) 2004-12-03 2009-03-31 Microsoft Corporation Interface infrastructure for creating and interacting with web services
US8645907B2 (en) 2006-09-12 2014-02-04 Sandeep Jain Capturing effort level by task upon check-in to source control management system
US20120291010A1 (en) 2007-04-30 2012-11-15 International Business Machines Corporation Determination of a set of candidate code insertions for insertion in program code
US8407669B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2013-03-26 Oracle International Corporation Device based software authorizations for software asset management
US8645341B2 (en) 2010-03-31 2014-02-04 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Method and system for automatically updating a software QA test repository
US8707248B2 (en) 2011-03-26 2014-04-22 Accenture Global Services Limited Transformation framework
Non-Patent Citations (13)
Achim D. Brucker et al., "HOL-TestGen An Interactive Test-case Generation Framework,"; M. Chechik and M. Wirsing (Eds.): FASE 2009, LNCS 5503, pp. 417-420, 2009.
Anonymous, "Standardization for the Configuration of Heterogeneous Platforms Through Schema-Based Platform Tag Definitions", IP.com IPCOM000020720D, Dec. 10, 2003, pp. 1-5.
European Examination Report for Application No. EP10776347.6-1957, dated Oct. 3, 2014, 6 pgs.
Huaikou Miao et al., "An Approach to Generating Test Cases for Testing Component-based Web Applications,"; Workshop on Intelligent Information Technology Application, Dec. 2-3, 2007, p. 264-269.
IBM, "Method and System for Dynamically Unloading and Loading Software Applications from a Peer-to-Peer Platform", IP.com IPCOM000193302D, Feb. 18, 2010, pp. 1-3.
International Search Report and Written Opinion: International Application No. PCT/IB2014/058076, International filing date: Jan. 6, 2014; Date of mailing Apr. 21, 2014.
L. Chung et al., "On Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering," Lecture Notes in Computer Science, v.5600, pp. 363-379, 2009.
Leffingwell, "A Rally Software Development Corporation Whitepaper-Agile Software Development with Verification and Validation in . . . ", 2011, [retrieved Feb. 3, 2015]; retrieved fm internet <URL:http://www.ultertechnologies.com/docs/agile.pdf> 33 pgs.
Leffingwell, "A Rally Software Development Corporation Whitepaper-Agile Software Development with Verification and Validation in . . . ", 2011, [retrieved Feb. 3, 2015]; retrieved fm internet 33 pgs.
Leffingwell, "A Rally Software Development Corporation Whitepaper-Agile Software Development with Verification and Validation in . . . "; 2011, [retrieved Feb. 3, 2015]; retrieved fm internet <URL:http://www.ultertechnologies.com/docs/agile.pdf> 33 pgs.
Leffingwell, "A Rally Software Development Corporation Whitepaper-Agile Software Development with Verification and Validation in . . . "; 2011, [retrieved Feb. 3, 2015]; retrieved fm internet 33 pgs.
Wei Yu, "Refactoring Use Case Models on Episodes," Thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Concordia Univ., Montreal, Quebec, Mar. 2004.
Yara, P, et al. "Global Software Development with Cloud Platforms", Gotel, O. et al. (eds): SEAFOOD 2009, LNBIP 35, pp. 81-95, 2009.
US9367308B2 (en) * 2012-08-17 2016-06-14 Hartford Fire Insurance Company System and method for monitoring software development and program flow
US9965272B2 (en) 2012-08-17 2018-05-08 Hartford Fire Insurance Company System and method for monitoring software development and program flow
US10255066B2 (en) * 2012-08-17 2019-04-09 Hartford Fire Insurance Company System and method for monitoring software development and program flow
US9465725B2 (en) 2016-10-11 Software defect reporting
US9720795B2 (en) 2017-08-01 Performance regression manager for large scale systems
Ocariza et al. 2013 An empirical study of client-side JavaScript bugs
US10795673B2 (en) 2020-10-06 Diagnosing production applications
US20160162322A1 (en) 2016-06-09 Remote Debugging As a Service
Chirigati et al. 2013 Reprozip: Using provenance to support computational reproducibility
Yuan et al. 2012 Improving software diagnosability via log enhancement
Qi et al. 2012 Darwin: An approach to debugging evolving programs
US9015006B2 (en) 2015-04-21 Automated enablement of performance data collection
Beschastnikh et al. 2011 Leveraging existing instrumentation to automatically infer invariant-constrained models
Artzi et al. 2010 Practical fault localization for dynamic web applications
US7406685B2 (en) 2008-07-29 System and method for whole-system program analysis
US9063766B2 (en) 2015-06-23 System and method of manipulating virtual machine recordings for high-level execution and replay
Yuan et al. 2010 SherLog: error diagnosis by connecting clues from run-time logs
US9064041B1 (en) 2015-06-23 Simple method optimization
US8613080B2 (en) 2013-12-17 Assessment and analysis of software security flaws in virtual machines
US9064055B2 (en) 2015-06-23 Software development assistant method and system
US10795977B2 (en) 2020-10-06 Digital asset traceability and assurance using a distributed ledger
US20150052402A1 (en) 2015-02-19 Cloud Deployment Infrastructure Validation Engine
US8225281B1 (en) 2012-07-17 Automated baseline deployment system
Kasikci et al. 2015 Failure sketching: A technique for automated root cause diagnosis of in-production failures
US8166348B1 (en) 2012-04-24 Method of debugging a software system
US9239773B1 (en) 2016-01-19 Method and system for debugging a program that includes declarative code and procedural code
US9405662B2 (en) 2016-08-02 Process for displaying test coverage data during code reviews
US8943478B2 (en) 2015-01-27 Fault detection and localization in dynamic software applications
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BODEN, EDWARD;HANSEN, ROBERT C.;PIOLI, ANTHONY F.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20121017 TO 20121018;REEL/FRAME:029633/0275
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ATTORNEY DOCKET NUMBER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 029633 FRAME 0275. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ATTORNEY DOCKET NUMBER LISTED AS YOR920110138US1 IS INCORRECT.;ASSIGNORS:BODEN, EDWARD;HANSEN, ROBERT C.;PIOLI, ANTHONY F.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20121017 TO 20121018;REEL/FRAME:029717/0619
2015-06-30 STCF Information on status: patent grant
Free format text: PATENTED CASE
2019-03-11 FEPP Fee payment procedure
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY
2019-08-26 LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY
2019-08-26 STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362
2019-09-17 FP Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee