Tag Archives: Torstar
How low can the Tribune stoop to deny full access to its online news?
In all the years of working in the news business, I have never witnessed a newspaper reject access of its online content that has already been published.
Is it possible they are building a list of future subscribers?
Here is what the organization that owns the weekly newspaper demands before you can access content online. This is reproduced from the Mercury Tribune online website under the heading "Local News."
Unless you aren't registered to receive the complete story online, the following is posted on the Mercury Tribune's website:
HEADING -Guelph could phase out vacant property tax discount by 2021Currently, vacant and excess commercial and industrial lands see 30% discount on property taxes
News Jun 26, 2019 Guelph Mercury
In a report to council, city staff is proposing to phase out the 30-per-cent property tax discount for vacant and excess commercial and industrial properties by 2021. – Dreamtime
Owners of vacant commercial and vacant properties may soon have to start paying the same tax rates as others in the city.
According to a report to be presented to councillors at their July 2 meeting of committee of the whole, city staff are recommending that the property tax discount for vacant and excess commercial and industrial lands be phased out over the next two years. (Balance of the article is blanked out)
You've reached your article limit (Directed at guelphspeaks)
Already have a Torstar account? Sign In
Please register to support the local, relevant news you need from a source you trust.
Register now and enjoy:
Breaking news that affects your community
The latest neighbourhood news, opinions and insight
Access to our events calendar, including the ability to submit your own listings.
Torstar is the corporation that owns the Toronto Star and Metroland Publishing that owns the Mercury Tribune. Now, you may ask, why is there an arbitrary limit to access the full article online, as published free every Thursday?
Am I the only reader who has reached his article limit? Perhaps the Tribune management should explain why the restriction online access is only to those who register.
This is a form of public information censorship that only one major advertiser would request.
The only advertiser who resen any criticism of its operations by gielphspeaks.ca is the City of Guelph administration.
The Tribune refuses to label the city administration's weekly ads labeled "City News" when, in fact, it is advertising and not labeled as such. The kicker is that these "City News" ads are paid with public funds.
Now some of the "City News" content, as published weekly in the Tribun includes legal notices that are required to be published. It remains advertising and not news. Missing is the city logo. Wonder why?
But that does not excuse the city spending thousands of public funds to pretend the content is legitimate news. Perhaps the following Tribune statement urging readers to register to get their news online explains it:
Two words stick out from this statement, 'support' and 'trust.'
Believe me, I know from personal experience that both those words can mean the opposite.
I can only comment about the Tribune statement using the expression, 'support local, relevant news you need.' It's not only an untrue premise but a deceptive way to disguise the Tribune's real intent to support the administration's point of view.
This comes down to trust.
How can the thousands of citizens who receive the free ad-heavy Mercury Tribune each week trust the content? More important why is the city paying to print only one side of the story produced by the city's communications department?
I know what it has cost me to defend my right to speak freely as outlined in the Canadian Charter of Rights.
It comes down to public participation in government affairs without the threat of litigation to prevent it.
This concerns every citizen to be able to access information and comment on it wuthout the threat of costly retaliation.
Opinions matter.
One final question to ask yourself: Would you have voted to merge Guelph Hydro with Alectra Utilities in December 2017?
Well, ten elected members of council did and that sealed the deal.
That was the most lurid misuse of the public trust that this city has endured in the past 13 years.
Trust is not just a five-letter word.
Tagged as city of guelph, Guelph, Mercury Tribune, Torstar
Is the Tribune a newspaper or a paid lackey of the city administration?
Opinion, based on Facts and News, written by a taxpayer and is Non-Profit
In a recent column written by Doug Coxson in the weekly Tribune, he used the word transparency in running his editorial department. There was no mention of Open Government or Accountability, aka TOGA, the other points of public responsibility of which the paper should base its coverage.
Journalism is not about labeling content so the reader can tell the difference between news, opinion and advertising.
I am reminded of an interview with Mr. Coxson two or three years ago in the Globe and Mail, in which he said that the Tribune would be conducting more "investigative reporting."
After reading the Coxson column, the evidence shows that he doesn't understand what or why the City of Guelph is a golden pond of opportunity to dig under the press releases and get the truth.
Here are the paper's policies of don't rock the boat that feeds you:
* The $34 million Organic Waste Processing Facility that turns wet waste into compost in which citizens cannot even buy. It was built to handle six times the needs of the city for 20 years and is dependent on wet waste from other municipalities.
* The wrongful dismissal trial of Urbacon Buildings Group, general contractors of the new city hall complex that ended four years later by a ruling of a Superior Court Justice that cost citizens an additional $23 million over the contracted price.
* The deal with a Detroit trucker to receive motor city recyclables. That secret agreement ended up costing Guelph more than $2 million in wages and handling poor quality Detroit feedstock.
* The more recent giveaway of Guelph Hydro to Alectra Utilities was another creation of closed-session transparency, Open Government and Accountability. But it did get Hydro Chair Jane Armstrong a job as Guelph's representative on the Alectra board of directors. Our share? That's only 436 per cent of the diluted Alectra Utility's profits.
* The unexplained circumstances surrounding the trio of senior managers who received $98,202 in salary increase for 2015. Yes that decision by city council in closed-session was made in Dec. 10, 2015. It became public knowledge when the provincial Sunshine Lists of 2014 and 2015 were compared following release in late March 2016.
The Tribune pretends to be a newspaper. The editorial content is biased big time and could favour the city administration. There are 13 employees on the city staff whose job is communications. The Tribune is a major receiver of the news releases spewing out of city hall. Much of it reflects what the administration wants readers to hear. Any editorial challenge of the city handout material is rarely questioned or investigated.
Why is that? According to Coxson's lecture on the newspaper's management principle stating: "We must draw a clear line between journalism and advertising."
I doubt the paper really follows that line. The city of Guelph buys space to publish pages of City News" over the year. It is the worse example of manipulation of the reader to believe the City News content is news and not labeled "advertising."
It is advertising, controlled and paid by the citizens
As a reader, would it be fair to assume City News was news or, another way to control the editorial content of the Tribune? It appears that's the case, judging from the majority of municipal news stories most of which are generated by the city administration. Most of these pieces dominate the news pages without fact checking or critical editing.
Having been commenting on the city administration for 14 years, it is egregious to believe that the newspaper has conducted any investigative reporting. Journalism is about questioning, researching, being curious and truthful, and getting both sides of the story, investigating and fact checking.
Two years ago, Guelph resident Pat Fung, CA, and CPA completed a detailed analysis of city operations. Using published city financial data and a report by a city consultant reviewing city operations. Mr. Fung wrote a 2,700-word analysis that, among other things, showed Guelph's operating costs were 50 per cent higher than Cambridge or Kitchener.
That's a news story, right? It certainly is in the public interest.
When Mr. Fung asked the Tribune to do a news story, the editor said he didn't have the resources to fact check the material. Her added he might consider it if Mr. Fung would reduce the report to 400 words. Later Mr. Fung presented his report to city council and had only five minutes to present it.
Not one councillor asked a question. When ms. Fung left the chamber, he was mocked behind his back.
I became involved when I attempted to pay $1,400 for a half-page ad in the Tribune. Just hours before the copy deadline, the advertising manager told me the ad would not run because it was, "inflmmatory."
Briefly, the report stated that Guelph's operating overhead was too high compared to other comparable sized cities. He explained that by reducing the overhead, the city could save some $20 million annually that could be used to fix the city's infrastructure over time.
Now you know what happened. In 2016, Council approved a 1 per cent property tax levy to be spent overhauling the aging infrastructure. Note, just last week there were two raw sewage spills that allowed waste to go into the Eramosa River.
The Tribune reported that sewage spill but refused a factual report by a Chartered Accountant on how to meet the infrastructure deficit.
The disappearance of responsible print journalism
Our print media picture changed in January 2016 when MetroLand Publishing closed the Daily Guelph Mercury. That left the Tribune that, at the time, had three reporters. When the Mercury shut down it had an editorial staff of seven plus some freelance writers.
In a nutshell, the politics of administrating the city have barely changed.
The number of closed-session council meetings hit 84 in the first two years of the Guthrie administration. It did not include those closed-session meetings conducted by the Strategic Option Committee assigned by council to negotiate the disposal of Guelph Hydro.
Also for four years, the Guelph Municipal Holdings Inc operations were conducted in closed-sessions. Now we know the story, well much of it, of the money wasted trying to establish electric self-sufficiency and District Energy systems.
That abortive enterprise according to the consolidated audit of GMHI including Guelph Hydro by the accounting firm KPMG, cost citizens some $63 million as shareholders. Today the project is still losing money. The last figure was for 2017 and the loss was reported to be $17 million.
This entire GMHI experience was concealed from the public until May 16, 2016 when a report signed by CAO Ann Pappert and CEO of Guelph Hydro Pankaj Sardana revealed the beginning of a financial disaster and gross mismanagement. Ten days later, Ms. Pappert left the city. In July 2016, the staff produced even more details of the collapse.
Newspapers, the media including bloggers are an integral part of media and the responsible dissemination of the news. Unfortunately, more and more newspapers are closing due to dwindling ad revenue to pay the bills.
Journalism still thrives Online but when used to suppress the news then it is no longer journalism.
The Guelph Mercury Tribune is a partner of the city that spends thousands to ensure its message is being controlled, using paid advertising.
Of course MetroLand and Mr. Coxson will deny this is the case. But it's comfy when you have a secure source of income from a client who will never go broke or leave town.
Tagged as Canadian Association of Journalistss, Guelph, Metroland, Torstar
Here are some thoughts: Monopoly is just not a board game
Weekend edition July 8, 2017
I am a curious kind of guy. It goes with a lifetime of being a reporter.
As many viewers know, I am not a fan of the Guelph Mercury Tribune. The owner of the twice a week publication is TorStar Corporation through a subsidiary called Metroland Publishing.
This organization owns and manages some 52-community newspapers, big and small, across southern Ontario. Metroland's goal is to deliver profits to the mother ship, the Toronto Star. The Star remains a great newspaper despite degradation of its ad base, major staff reductions and farming out its production facilities to Transcontinental, a major print production group.
There exists an editorial firewall between the Star and Metroland Publishing. Metroland's chief goal is to sell advertising to create profits. There is nothing wrong with that provided that the editorial content is usually a ratio of 60 per cent compared to 40 per cent advertising.
But editors and reporters cost money. The larger papers in the Metroland group provide greater funding for editorial personnel than say, the Guelph Tribune. When you have your Tribune delivered on Tuesday and Thursday, the 60/40 ratio is in general terms, reversed. The Thursday edition containing usually 42 pages plus a boatload of flyers is a classic Metroland strategy.
Think about this. The Tribune is the only print newspaper in our city of 131,000. Metroland folded the Mercury daily 18 months ago. The Mercury building on Macdonnell Street has been sold leaving the city with only a memory. It left an enormous editorial vacuum that has not been filled by its sister paper.
The connection between the Tribune and the city allows the administration to have a virtual monopoly controlling the news. One of the reasons the Tribune is soft in its news coverage is the paid adverting it receives twice a week from the city called "City News." The city communications department controls the content. It's a department that has 13 staffers, more than twice the number of Tribune editorial employees.
Can you imagine the Toronto Star allowing this to occur? Allowing the city administration to control the editorial content of the paper? In Guelph, this has been going on for ten years. For much of that time the Mercury provided a counter balance in terms of news coverage.
I speak from personal experience. A year ago I supported Guelph resident Pat Fung's financial analysis comparing the city's operating and capital spending to peer Cities Including Kitchener and Cambridge. Mr. Fung is an experienced financial expert with Chartered Accountant and Certified Public Accountant credentials.
When he asked the Tribune to report on the results, he was told it would take too long to check the facts. He took that as a no. I suggested we take out an ad in the Tribune explaining the report and its impact on city finances. After accepting the copy for the ad, the day before publication I was informed that the paper would not run the ad as they considered it inflammatory. Funds donated by citizens are held in a trust account to be used to promote and ensure distribution of an updated Fung Report next year prior to the election.
That order preventing publication had to be a Metroland executive decision. Of course the information, thoroughly researched and confirmed, was highly critical of the city administration. But Metroland didn't want it published because it reflected negatively on the cozy relationship between the Tribune and the administration.
That friends, is called a monopoly that includes censorship. The administration controls the message, not the newspaper management. Most news is rewrites of city press releases. There is no attempt to check the details or investigate the background of decisions made by council.
The latest example was the Tribune's failure to investigate the Guelph Municipal Holdings Inc. scandal that has cost the city millions. This is a tough and complex story because of the manipulation of city-owned agencies, including Guelph Hydro to pursue an abortive attempt to create self-sufficiency of electric power.
How many millions are involved? It's difficult to pin down but it appears to be more than $100 million pending disposition of assets and a large pair of senior unsecured debentures owed by GMHI. That debt amounts is $94.283 million.
The Tribune has not covered this major story for more than a year except for press releases provided by the city or statements made in open council.
Why do I bother telling viewers about this corporate management of information?
I believe it is vital for citizens to be informed, have access to public information and be free to criticize and comment without fear of retribution.
We are the real shareholders of the Corporation of the City of Guelph, and not the employees including the members of council who are elected to represent our interests.
Tagged as Guelph Mercury Tribune, Metroland Publishing, Torstar
The Guelph Mercury: An old friend passes and we are the less for it
I guessed last year when the Mercury presses were moved to Hamilton that the newspaper may close. Love it or ignore it, the Merc has been a key news source in our city since Confederation in 1867.
While the bulk of local advertising went to the Guelph Tribune, it spelled trouble for the six-day a week daily to sustain its existence. My condolences go to the staff of 23 fulltime employees, eight of whom were editorial writers and editors. A fine pool of talent managed by Phil Andrews.
I expect Metroland to find homes for these talented people who have performed their job under trying conditions. The bean counters decided that Metroland would be financially better off.
Other's affected are the members of the Community Editorial Board whose variety of opinions were a cheap way to fill the space. Most of that group was writing self -serving pieces but not all, there were some levl-headed members who wrote balanced points of view and did it well.
Missed, will be the locally paid columnists such as veteran newsman, Geoffry Stevens, Owen Roberts and Michael Strickland.
Remember that the Letters to the Editor feature will pass on and no longer provide space for individual opinions. Instead, the only letters content will be in the twice weekly Tribune, with space to print no more than three of or four each issue. That's a far cry from the Merc's letters, space that published sometimes 24 letters a week.
But here's the real fallout of this corporate decision to close a daily newspaper: In the business, the space provided for news and opinion is referred to as "the newshole." That means the rest of the page space is for advertising.
This is what happened to our Mercury.
The editorial staff filled its space allotment every day. But the advertising space kept shrinking putting more pressure on editorial to fill the remaining space, thereby reducing the nember of pages each day.
Our Mercury has been on a page diet ever since Metroland bought the paper.
The corporate strategy of Metroland, a subsidiary of Torstar, owners of the Toronto Star, has driven the newspaper to oblivion, through patronizing the former Farbridge administration for some eight years. The result is the paper was way behind the wave of pubic rejection of that administration. The civic election results of 2014 were obviously the harbinger of the death of the Mercury.
The reason was the Metroland decision to support the former administration was to protect the estimated $500,000 a year advertising contract with the Guelph Tribune to buy city-paid space in the name of "City News."
The Mercury editorial was instructed to support the Farbridge administration up to the election, despite the the loss of some $23 million, buidling the new city hall following a lawsuit for wrongful dismissal brought by the general contractor of the project.
In those days running up to the civic election last October, the Mercury, in its editorials, questioned the management of the city hall project's cost overruns.
So what's the fallout of this decisions to shut down our daily newspaper?
A friend and space is gone. A platform for personal expression is gone. An essential part of community is gone.
Oh well, only an estimated 9,000 subscribers really care if you believe the Metroland corporate decision.
It all occurred right under our very noses.
The rush is at city hall to force citizens to rely on city propaganda. It is being pumped out daily on the Internet by a large staff in the public-financed city communications department. It is presumed that it is sufficient to meet the balanced news of a multi-dimensional, community,
No, it isn't
We know the power of the Internet. But not everyone is connected. It doesn't provide sufficient public critique of action taken by the city on its website.
Our democratic right is to ask, challenge, demand answers and influence our elected members of various legislative bodies.
Today, we lost that ability with the death of the Mercury.
Finally, our Mercury delivery lady, Marla, presented our Mercury every day. We oten chatted with her at the front door and she was a credit to her employer. She was like a daughter to us but a corporate decision comes home and we won't see her at our doorstep now. Just another victim of corporate action.
This decision was nother but a naked corporate exploition of a small community that cannot fight back.
Tagged as Guelph Mercury, Torstar
November 9, 2015 · 11:09 pm
Newspaper readers deserve better says Torstar Chairman
In an op-ed piece in the Toronto Star, the chairman of the Torstar Corporation. John Honderich takes umbrage over Postmedia CEO, Paul Godfrey, ordering his chain of 16 papers to endorse Stephen Harper.
Honderich decries the Postmedia action in the recent federal election pointing out that "owning a newspaper is a privilege, not a right."
The Torstar Chairman goes further stating " Newspapers are an essential informing part of the democratic process and their first responsibility must be to the local readers they serve."
Right on, John.
He goes on to state: "In the interest of transparency, it must be declared that editorial independence has always been the official policy of the Torstar newspaper group."
For clarity reasons, it is important to know that Metroland Publishing, a division of Torstar, is owner of the KW Record, Guelph Mercury, Guelph Tribune and Hamilton Spectator.
Two people manage the Guelph Mercury editorial department. The managing editor and, who reports to Lynne Haddrall, editor in chief at the Record and Mercury. Donna Luelo is publisher of both papers. The Mercury is now printed in Hamilton resulting in closing down its in-house printing operation.
So, perhaps Mr. Honderich can explain how the Guelph Mercury is independent and transparent? As he pointed out, the first responsibility is to the local readers they serve. So with the publisher of the Mercury and his editor in chief working and living in Kitchener, where is the editorial independence of the Mercury/Tribune readers and citizens of Guelph?
Mr. Chairman, I can help you with this as I have been covering Guelph municipal affairs for nine years. For five years I wrote a regular column in the Mercury that was often critical of the administration.
I was let go about three months after announcing that I started an online blog guelphspeaks.ca to fill the void of three weeks in which my Mercury columns were not scheduled. I have no regrets about that decision. It gave me more freedom to question the administration's policies and how our city was being managed.
The bottom line is, in eight years, the Mercury suffered staff cuts in the editorial department, thereby reducing its ability to check slanted news releases from the city communication department and investigate the facts and operation of the municipality.
As time went by, it became increasingly apparent that the two-term regime of Mayor Karen Farbridge was in serious trouble. The situation exploded in June 2014, when a superior court judge found the city wrongfully dismissed the general contractor constructing the new city hall and the renovation of the old city hall into a provincial offences court.
It became known as the Urbacon affair and the current overrun cost to the municipality is $23 million.
Mr. Chairman, the result in the October civic election was the defeat of the mayor and four councillors who either quit or were defeated. This happened because the people were galvanized to bring about change in the operation of the city.
I regret that the two newspapers that Torstar owns in Guelph played so little role in this major political upheaval. Their phlegmatic approach reporting the news over those eight years, and their loyalty to the administration, did not go unnoticed. Record numbers of electors flooded the polls. Shortly after the election the editor of the Tribune retired.
So John, perhaps you ought to inform your Metroland group to grant real editorial independence and transparency to the Guelph Mercury and Tribune.
Otherwise your declaration of the newspaper's first responsibility is to the local readers they serve, doesn't wash in this part of the province.
Guelph is not Kitchener-Waterloo nor is K/W, Guelph.
I think you get the point.
Tagged as Guelph Mercury, Guelph Tribune, John Honderich, Postmedia, Torstar