Roland Boer's Blog: Marxism, Philosophy and Socialism in Power
STALIN'S MOUSTACHE
Selected Publications (2009-2019)
Socialism in Power
Soviet Affirmative Action: The Harvard Interview Project of 1950-51
15 May, 2015 21 November, 2018 by stalinsmoustache, posted in another world is possible
The Soviet Union during Stalin's era saw the world's first and far-reaching affirmative action program. I have now read carefully Terry Martin's The Affirmative Action Empire. This is a 500 page book, peerless in its use of archival material and chock full of insights. It has its shortcomings, especially in the theoretical area, thereby missing some of the complexities and dialectical tensions at work. All the same, he argues persuasively that the Soviet Union was not a nation-state, not a federation, nor indeed an empire (despite the title). Instead, its 'imagined community' was the friendship of the peoples, or 'international nationalism'. (As someone suggested to me recently, China too is a new form of the state, developing further the experience of the Soviet Union.) What Martin does not do is use this to develop a Marxist theory of the state based on actual practice, but then he is not so interested in Marxist theory.
Let me return to the question of affirmative action, for not a few will be a little sceptical: sure, the Soviet government may have made many statements concerning affirmative action, and Stalin may have made many speeches to that effect and even shaped the 1936 constitution, but what about actual experiences? What happened on the ground? An extraordinary amount, as Martin shows. One small example comes from the Harvard Interview Project of 1950-51, which interviewed displaced persons – 250 Ukrainians, Belorussians and Russians – after the Second World War, from Smolensk and Leningrad.
The interviewers did not ask direct questions concerning ethnic conflict. Instead, they asked respondents to list the 'distinguishing characteristics' of Russians, Ukrainians, Jews, Georgians, Armenians, Kalmyks and Tatars. To the astonishment of the interviewers, many of the respondents replied that there were no ethnic differences whatsoever. The interviewers pressed their case, but the respondents (as Martin points out) determined that there were two very different issues at stake. First, did the Soviet government treat nationalities differently, even persecuting them as the Nazis did? The responses: 'Politically and in living standards, no. In national customs, yes'; 'Yes, the Jews have the first place in the Soviet Union'. Second, the respondents inferred an interest by the interviewers in popular prejudice in the Soviet Union. In response: 'Yes, of course there are [national differences]. But the nationalities are not enemies because of that'; 'But that does not mean there are necessarily antagonistic feelings between us'.
Even more, many of the respondents connected the absence of popular prejudice and conflict to state policy. In response to the question concerning 'distinguishing characteristics', a dozen respondents asserted that the absence of open national prejudice was due to the very severe punishments for racial-hate speech. The responses are worth noting:
No, that is impossible. Everyone must love everyone in the Soviet Union … It is against the law to have national animosities.
There is no chauvinism. You can get ten years for it.
In the army, a soldier got seven years for calling a Jew 'Zhid.'
All are alike. You cannot tell somebody that he is a Ukrainian and brag that you are a Russian or you would be arrested.
It is strictly forbidden by law to offend any member of any nationality, regardless of whether he is a Russian, Ukrainian, White Russian, or anything else.
If you cussed out a member of a minority group, there was serious trouble.
If you call a Jew a 'zhid', he can go to the police and you will get a prison sentence.
A primary school teacher told a personal story of how she had used a Russian proverb, 'An untimely guest is worse than a Tatar', and almost lost her job.
Martin observes, 'When one considers that the interviewers neither asked about national prejudice nor about state policy, these spontaneous responses are impressive testimony to the success of the Soviet campaigns against great power chauvinism and in favor of internationalism and friendship among the Soviet peoples' (p. 390).
What about the 1936 'Stalin' constitution's guarantee of national equality for all peoples? How did respondents see it? They initially opined that it was a complete fraud and not worth the paper on which it was written, but then pointed out, 'correct', this guarantee is observed; 'in this case there is no conflict between the text of the constitution and reality'; 'all nations have the same rights'. What a contrast with Russia now.
Bear in mind that these positions were also voiced in the context of immediate memories of Nazi racial theory and practice. And that they arose from the same period as the extensive purges of the 1930s – part of my investigation of the practical contributions to a materialist doctrine of evil, if not a thorough revision of Marxist theories of human nature.
Tagged affirmative action, reading Stalin
Previous postCan a religious person join the communist party?
Next postThe Soviet Union as a Multinational State
2 thoughts on "Soviet Affirmative Action: The Harvard Interview Project of 1950-51"
Prole Center says:
Reblogged this on Proletarian Center for Research, Education and Culture.
stalinsmoustache says:
Red Theology: On the Christian Communist Tradition
A book that identifies the fascinating tradition of Christian Communism, from Europe through China to North Korea. Click on the image to find a copy.
Stalin: From Theology to the Philosophy of Socialism in Power
Click on the picture for your copy. This work marks a final phase of the long 'Marxism and Theology' project and the first steps in my 'Socialism in Power' project.
Criticism of Heaven and Earth (paperback)
The complete five-volume set, available from Haymarket Books at a very reasonable price (click on the image).
Lenin, Religion, and Theology
Published by Palgrave Macmillan, the sixth instalment in my study of Marxism and religion.
Time of Troubles: A New Economic Framework for Early Christianity
Out now with Fortress Press, the final part of three studies that includes Idols of Nations and The Sacred Economy of Ancient Israel
The Sacred Economy of Ancient Israel
Now published, you can purchase the book by clicking on the image.
Idols of Nations
The first book in the series on Marxist economics and the Bible, written by Christina Petterson and me. Click on the link to find the book
Critical Theory of Religion
KCNA (Korean Central News Agency)
Marxist Internet Archive
Materializmi Dialektik
Prole Center
Pyongyang Times
Red Flag Flying
The Spectre Still Haunts
Voyages on the Left
Xinhua News
İştirakî
Increasing international support for China's human rights achievements in Xinjiang
Neo-colonialism and Hong Kong: Ambassador Liu Xiaoming responds to a couple of ignorant UK politicians
Why Is Chinese Governance Better?
China and the DPRK (North Korea) take another step closer
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation supports China's anti-terrorism actions in Xinjiang
Marxism is China's Basic Guiding Ideology
Colonial Policy by Other Means: Losurdo on Hong Kong's Supposed 'Self-Determination'
Chinese economic indicators stable, indicating further growth in 2019
A thief always thinks everyone else is a thief
China and Russia agree to work together more closely for global stability
Lenin the Nudist
Stalin's reply to Churchill's 'Iron Curtain' speech
Increasing international support for China's human rights achievements in Xinjiang
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation supports China's anti-terrorism actions in Xinjiang
Stalin's tobacco preferences
An Effort to Understand the DPRK (North Korea) in Light of the Marxist Tradition
Losurdo on Stalin: A Review
Was the Russian Revolution a success? Part 1
19th congress affirmative action Africa anti-colonialism anti-communism art Belt and Road Initiative betrayal book review Bulgaria capitalism Christianity civil war collectivisation constitution CPC Cultural Revolution Dalai Lama democracy Deng Xiaoping dictatorship of the proletariat Domenico Losurdo DPRK East Germany ecological civilisation economics education Europe Germany Hong Kong Huawei Interview Jesus Kim Jong Un lice miracle Moon Jae-in North Korea peasants poverty alleviation racism reading Deng Xiaoping reading Lenin reading Mao reading Stalin reform reform and opening up religion reunification revolution Roman Catholic Church rule of law Russia Russian Revolution Second World War socialism with Chinese characteristics socialist market economy Soviet Union stability Stalin terrorism two sessions United States USA USSR Uyghur Western Marxism West Germany white paper workers World War II writing xiaokang society Xi Jinping Xinjiang
another world is possible
socialist democracy
socialist human rights
socialist market economy
socialist state
Stalin Prize