Or to Tuesday 13 Tammuz 5779
The Three Weeks on the site
Now it's the final week of the lottery. We need you in order to reach our goal!
Hot Subjects Q&A Self Guided Learning Weekly Torah Portion
Beit Midrash Categories Rabbis Filter filter_list0
Beit Midrash פרשת שבוע ותנ"ך יתרו
Justice or Peace?
Rabbi Jonathan SacksShvat 16 5777
יתרושיג ושיח
69visibility
Click to dedicate this lesson
The sedra of Yitro, which contains the account of the greatest Divine revelation in history, at Mount Sinai, begins on a note that is human, all too human. Yitro, priest of Midian, has come to see how his son-in-law Moses and the people he leads are faring. It begins by telling us what Yitro heard (the details of the exodus and its attendant miracles). It goes on to describe what Yitro saw, and this gave him cause for concern.
He saw Moses leading the people alone. The result was bad for Moses and bad for the people. This is what Yitro said:
Moses' father-in-law said, "What you are doing is not good. You and these people who come to you will wear yourselves out. The work is too heavy for you; you cannot handle it alone. Listen now to me and I will give you advice, and may God be with you. You must be the people's representative before God and bring their disputes to Him. Teach them the decrees and laws, and show them the way to live and the duties they are to perform. But select capable men from all the people-men who fear God, trustworthy men who hate dishonest gain-and appoint them as officials over thousands, hundreds, fifties and tens. Have them serve as judges for the people at all times, but have them bring every difficult case to you; the simple cases they can decide themselves. That will make your load lighter, because they will share it with you. If you do this and God so commands, you will be able to stand the strain, and so too all these people will reach their place in peace." (Exodus 18:17-23)
Moses must learn to delegate and share the burden of leadership. Interestingly, the sentence "What you are doing is not good (lo tov)" is one of only two places in the Torah where the phrase "not good" occurs. The other (Genesis 2:18) is "It is not good for man to be alone." We cannot lead alone; we cannot live alone. That is one of the axioms of biblical anthropology. The Hebrew word for life, chayyim, is in the plural as if to signify that life is essentially shared. Dean Inge once defined religion as "what an individual does with his own solitude". That is not a Jewish thought. However, it was the great nineteenth century scholar the Netziv (R. Naftali Zvi Yehudah Berlin) who made an unexpected, even counter-intuitive observation on this passage. He begins by raising the following question. It is easy to understand how Yitro's advice helped Moses. The work was too much. He was becoming exhausted. He needed help. What is less easy to understand is his final comment: if, with God's permission, you delegate, "so too all these people will reach their place in peace". The people were not exhausted; Moses was. How then would they gain by a system of delegation? Their case would still be heard – but not by Moses. How was this to their advantage? (Harchev Davar to Exodus 18:23).
The Netziv begins by quoting the Talmud, Sanhedrin 6a. The passage is about what the sages called bitzua, or what later become known as pesharah, compromise. This is a decision on the part of a judge in a civil case to seek a solution based on equity rather than strict application of the law. It is not wholly unlike mediation, in which the parties agree to a resolution that they both consider fair, regardless of whether or not it is based on statute or precedent. From a different perspective, it is a mode of conflict resolution in which both sides gain, rather than the pure administration of justice, in which one side wins, the other loses. The Talmud wants to know: is this good or bad? To be adopted or avoided? This is part of the debate:
Rabbi Eliezer, son of R. Jose the Galilean, said: it is forbidden to mediate . . . Instead, let the law pierce the mountain [a saying similar to: "Let the chips fall where they may"]. And so Moses' motto was: Let the law pierce the mountain. Aaron, however, loved peace and pursued peace and made peace between people . . . R. Judah ben Korcha said: it is good to mediate, for it is written (Zechariah 8:16), "Execute the judgment of truth and peace in your gates." Surely where there is strict justice, there is no peace, and where there is peace, there is no strict justice! What then is the justice that coexists with peace? We must say: mediation.
The law follows R. Judah ben Korcha. It is permissible, even preferable, to mediate – with one proviso, that the judge does not yet know who is right and who is wrong. It is precisely this uncertainty at the early stages of a hearing that allows an equitable resolution to be favoured over a strictly legal one. If the judge has already reached a clear verdict, it would be a suppression of justice on his part to favour a compromise solution.
Ingeniously applying this principle to the Israelites in Moses' day, the Netziv points out that – as the Talmud says – Moses preferred strict justice to peace. He was not a man to compromise or mediate. In addition, as the greatest of the prophets, he knew almost instantly which of the parties before him was innocent and which guilty; who had right on his side and who did not. It was therefore impossible for him to mediate, since this is only permitted before the judge has reached a verdict, which in Moses' case was almost immediately.
Hence the Netziv's astonishing conclusion. By delegating the judicial function downward, Moses would bring ordinary people – with no special prophetic or legal gifts – into the seats of judgment. Precisely because they lacked Moses' intuitive knowledge of law and justice, they were able to propose equitable solutions, and an equitable solution is one in which both sides feel they have been heard; both gain; both believe the result is fair. That, as the Talmud says above, is the only kind of justice that at the same time creates peace. That is why the delegation of judgment would not only help Moses avoid total exhaustion; it would also help "all these people" to "reach their place in peace."
What a profound idea this is. Moses was the Ish ha-Elokim (Psalm 90:1), the supreme man of God. Yet there was, the Netziv implies, one thing he could not do, which others – less great in every other respect – could achieve. They could bring peace between contending parties. They could create non-violent, non-coercive forms of conflict resolution. Not knowing the law with the depth that Moses did, not having his intuitive sense of truth, they had instead to exercise patience. They had to listen to both sides. They had to arrive at an equitable verdict that both parties could see as fair. A mediator has different gifts from a prophet, a liberator, a law-giver – more modest perhaps, but sometimes no less necessary.
It is not that one character type is to be preferred to another. No one – certainly not the Netziv – regarded Moses as anything less than the greatest leader and prophet Israel has ever had. It is, rather, that no one individual can embody all the virtues necessary to sustain a people. A priest is not a prophet (though a few, like Samuel and Ezekiel were both). A king needs different virtues than a saint. A military leader is not (though in later life he can become) a man of peace.
What emerges at the end of the train of thought the Netziv sets in motion is the deep significance of the idea that we can neither live nor lead alone. Judaism is not so much a faith transacted in the privacy of the believer's soul. It is a social faith. It is about networks of relationship. It is about families, communities, and ultimately a nation, in which each of us, great or small, has a role to play. "Despise no one and disdain nothing", said Ben Azzai (Avot 4:3), "for there is no one who does not have his hour, and nothing that does not have its place." There was something ordinary individuals (heads of thousands, hundreds, tens) could achieve that even Moses in all his glory could not achieve. That is why a nation is greater than any individual, and why each of has something to give.
To engage further with Rabbi Sacks's teachings, or to sign up to his mailing list, please go to www.rabbisacks.org
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
Former Chief Rabbi of the UK, Currently Professor of Judaic Thought at New York University and the Kressel and Ephrat Family University Professor of Jewish Thought at Yeshiva University.
The Crown All Can Wear Tamuz 11 5779
שיג ושיחפנחס
Not Reckoned Among the Nations Tamuz 4 5779
שיג ושיחבלק
Losing Miriam Sivan 27 5779
שיג ושיחחקת
149 Lessons>
More on this Topic Yitro
GOT MY "I" ON YOU!
Rabbi Stewart Weiss, Shvat 18 5777
Matan Torah – Why Fire?
Rabbi Yosef Tzvi Rimon, 5777
The Bond of Loyalty and Love
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, Shvat 3 5778
"His Congregation He Founded on the Land"
Rabbi Shaul Yisraeli zt"l, Shvat 16 5778
THE 11th COMMANDMENT
No Leg to Stand On
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff, Shavt 17 5778
"Many Waters Cannot Extinguish Love"
Carrying in Public and the Use of an Eruv
Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff, Shvat 16 5779
More Things to Say about "Devarim"
Rabbi Yossef Carmel, Shvat 18 5779
Mount Sinai and the Birth of Freedom
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, Shvat 18 5779
38 Additional lessons on this Topic Yitro
The English Beit Midrash of the Yeshiva Website is dedicated in memory ofAmi Handlerאמנון יוסף בן גבריאל יהודה ז"לת.נ.צ.ב.הנלב"ע כ"א אדר ב תשע"ו
Desktop site - Switch to mobile site
Find us there too
Bet El Yeshiva Center, Bet El
D.N. Mizrah Binyamin 90628
Email: beitel@yeshiva.org.il
Beit Midrash
My yeshiva
אתר ישיבה
Family purity (Hebrew)
Shabat times
Parashat hashavua
Meavnei Hamakom
Pninei Halacha
Talmudic Micropedia
Times on your site
Be part in the world's largest yeshiva
את המידע הדפסתי באמצעות אתר yeshiva.org.il
Connecting To The Torah
Connecting to notifications from the Yeshiva Website in the browser, to always stay connected.
What will we send?
New lessons
Interesting answers
ההגרלה הגדולה של אתר ישיבה
ופרסים רבים נוספים