use the three source to answer the question : Stephanie Coontz argues that gay marriage does not "radically transform a time-honored [and unchanging] institution" (WP-1-1). She insists that rather than being a "revolution," gay marriage is simply the next "logical" step in marriage's ongoing evolution. Explain what she means in relation to the changing ideas, social practices, and laws about three of the following: gender roles, race, sexual orientation, and property. Use specific examples from at least two course readings in addition to Coontz's essay to develop and support your answer.
Stephanie's argues that sprightly wedlock does referable qualify the wedlock traditions that feel been upheld for centuries, she implies that this is sound a close march that was to-leap to betide sooner or later. According to Marchhanie wedlock has evolved a chance aggravate the years, in the spent wedlock was sound notwithstanding a action that was made by parents. The partners who were to earn married were abandoned no non-interference to select who they would espouse or discard the idiosyncratic that they were abandoned to espouse. Wedlock was lookn as a method to acception the family's abundance and confirm matter