Ronald Thomas West
Intelligence agency snafus, corruption exposés, satire & general irreverence
Archives for posts with tag: Ukraine for Dummies
The Washington Post & Double Think
"One thing you can't hide, is when you're crippled inside" -John Lennon
The Washington Post and Double Think
When, in the span of six weeks, the Washington Post both; gives a soap box to Zbigniew Brzezinski and receives a Pulitzer Prize for reporting on the Snowden leaks, a thoughtful person might be inclined to 'think twice.'
Brzezinski's 'service' to the USA has included advising figures from Jimmy Carter to Barack Obama, including the first USA [CIA] involvement in Afghanistan in 1979, and he is one of the architects of policy that has resulted in the rise of militant Islam. It is interesting to me a media outlet that provides platform for world class criminals, is lauded as a giant of journalism. The prize might have better been awarded solely to the Guardian journalists who met with Snowden and passed on the material to secondary outlets in media. Instead, we have an oxymoron; purveyors [The Washington Post] of criminal wonks [Brzezinski, among others] and their vicious ideation responsible for incalculable social damage world-wide, lauded as heroes of journalism.
George Orwell's original term was not 'double speak' or 'double talk' but actually is 'double think'
"Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them" -George Orwell
'Simultaneous' & 'accepting' points to a complete lack of normal brain function. The normal reaction [in a healthy mind] should be 'cognitive dissonance', perhaps best explained as 'grotesque reflex' of mental state or distress caused by mental apprehension of irreconcilable phenomena.
A comprehensive lack of cognitive dissonance, in face of irreconcilable ideation, points to a clear mental disorder. This mental disorder patently manifests in narcissist sociopath personalities, lacking any sense of taking responsibility for consequence.
For instance, Brzezinski's replies to the questions…
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic [integrisme], having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
Brzezinski: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
…altogether ignores the fact of Brzezinski, as Carter's National Security Advisor, dispatched USA support to rebels in Afghanistan in 1979, an endeavor put into hyperdrive by [Obama's first Secretary of Defense] Robert Gates during the Reagan administration, resulted in the rise not only of the Taliban and al-Qaida but turned Afghanistan into the world's leading supplier of heroin.
"Political language — and with variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists — is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind" -George Orwell
In any 'healthy' mentality, there would be some sense of contrition in having initiated the policy that had, over the ensuing years, resulted in the 21st century global jihad. Brzezinski experiences no indication of contrition [taking responsibility] and he experiences no sense of cognitive dissonance either. Now, let's look at the Washington Post providing Brzezinski a soap box on Ukraine:
"Regarding the Russian aggression against Ukraine, much depends on what Vladi­mir Putin does next. But what Putin does depends on not only his calculation of the likely NATO (and especially the U.S.) response but also his estimate of how fiercely the Ukrainian people would respond to any further escalation by Russia. And, to complete the circle, the Ukrainian response would be influenced by citizens' reaction to any repetition of Putin's Crimean aggression and by whether the nation believes that the United States and NATO are truly supportive.
To begin with, career Russia hater and author of 'The Grand Chessboard' demanding Russia be cornered and isolated to the benefit of USA world domination, casts Russia as the instigator in Ukraine, following a USA supported putsch placing neo-nazis in power in a nation Putin had been telling the western democracies for six years to stay out and not meddle.
"Putin's thuggish tactics in seizing Crimea offer some hints regarding his planning. He knew in advance that his thinly camouflaged invasion would meet with popular support from the Russian majority in Crimea. He was not sure how the thin and light Ukrainian military units stationed there would react, so he went in masked like a Mafia gangster. In the event of serious Ukrainian resistance, he could disown the initiative and pull back.
Anyone who'd acquired a C+ in the history of the former USSR would know the Russian ethnic majority of Crimeans would welcome a return to Russia with open arms. Putin knew this. Where Brzezinski lies with a clear conscience is in regards to this is, Crimea was the territory of Russia for two hundred years, to 1954, when Khruschev made a technical transfer of Crimea to Ukraine to put work on a canal under a single administrative body. The Crimeans not only celebrated their return to Russia, two thirds of the Ukrainian military stationed in Crimea defected to Russia or changed sides. Crimea had been historically, linguistically, culturally and factually Russia/Russian in everything but name. There was ZERO chance of 'serious Ukrainian resistance' but Brzezinski cannot pass up a chance to pose Putin as a thug and coward. The man knows no sense of shame.
"His initial success may tempt him to repeat that performance more directly in the far eastern provinces of Ukraine. If successful, the conclusive third phase could then be directed, through a combination of political unrest and increasingly overt use of Russian forces, to overthrow the government in Kiev. The result would thus be similar to the two phases of Hitler's seizure of the Sudetenland after Munich in 1938 and the final occupation of Prague and Czechoslovakia in early 1939.
Here, Brzezinski projects a nonsensical historical comparison; the government in Prague was not toppled by forces threatening to Hitler, nor were the ethnic Germans being persecuted by a non-existent power hostile to Germany on its borders … and Putin is not the leader of a NAZI state, rather the reverse is true. The neo-nazi regime installed by the USA in Ukraine, on the other hand, has demonstrated extreme hostility to the large ethic Russian population, and the new leadership in Kiev has demonstrable NAZI roots represented in the five ministries held by the neo-nazi Svoboda party. Notice Brzezinski demonstrates no sense of cognitive dissonance, nor does he blink an eye over this next shameless lie:
"Much depends on how clearly the West conveys to the dictator in the Kremlin — a partially comical imitation of Mussolini and a more menacing reminder of Hitler — that NATO cannot be passive if war erupts in Europe. If Ukraine is crushed while the West is simply watching, the new freedom and security in bordering Romania, Poland and the three Baltic republics would also be threatened.
If Ukraine is 'crushed', it will consist of Putin doing exactly what he has stated will be his intention to do, were the nazis in Kiev to follow through with a large scale persecution of Ukraine's ethnic Russians … put a stop to the nonsense unleashed on Russia's very doorstep. Russian will go no further than push the Ukrainian military out of the majority Russian areas of a nation [Ukraine] with unnatural borders, deeply dividing a populace with a historical split, western Ukraine's sympathies are with western Europe and eastern Ukraine's sympathies are with Russia. The parties behaving like Hitler are the western democracies who've been fanning the fires in Ukraine and tossing a civil war in Russia's face. These are problems Putin does not need or want but also problems he cannot ignore.
"This does not mean that the West, or the United States, should threaten war. But Russia's unilateral and menacing acts mean the West should promptly recognize the current government of Ukraine as legitimate. Uncertainty regarding its legal status could tempt Putin to repeat his Crimean charade. The West also should convey — privately at this stage, so as not to humiliate Russia — that the Ukrainian army can count on immediate and direct Western aid so as to enhance its defensive capabilities. There should be no doubt left in Putin's mind that an attack on Ukraine would precipitate a prolonged and costly engagement, and Ukrainians should not fear that they would be left in the lurch.
Brzezinski, who is proud he was able to draw the USSR into Afghanistan, bragging he'd handed the Russians their own Vietnam, is promoting a repeat, and the Washington Post has provided the soap box. There can be no doubt in Brzezinski's mind that Putin will be forced to act in the circumstance of chaos delivered by the USA's geo-political sleight-of-hand and then the finger pointed at Putin as the aggressor. Brzezinski is a shameless liar and no matter war breaking out could lead at some point to escalation including tactical nuclear weapons, were NATO to become involved, this is good in the mind of Brzezinski, if it serves his 'Grand Chessboard.'
"Meanwhile, NATO forces, consistent with the organization's contingency planning, should be put on alert. High readiness for some immediate airlift to Europe of U.S. airborne units would be politically and militarily meaningful. If the West wants to avoid a conflict, there should be no ambiguity in the Kremlin as to what might be precipitated by further adventurist use of force in the middle of Europe.
Brzezinski is saying here, throughout, goad, lie, provoke, lie, call names, lie, arm up, lie, escalate, lie, and call for peaceful accommodation:
"In addition, such efforts to avert miscalculations that could lead to a war should be matched by a reaffirmation of the West's desire for a peaceful accommodation with Russia regarding a joint effort to help Ukraine recover economically and stabilize politically. The West should reassure Russia that it is not seeking to draw Ukraine into NATO or to turn it against Russia. Ukrainians themselves can define the depth of their closeness to Europe and the scope of their economic cooperation with Russia, to the benefit of peace and stability in Europe. And after their May elections, they can revise some of the arrangements for a special status for Crimea, but they should not do so under duress or attack from a neighbor driven by imperial or personal ambitions"
And so, our soap box protagonist, Zbigniew Brzezinski, author of his personal imperial ambition named the Grand Chessboard, closes with pointing to Putin as the imperial ambition, when Putin has actually been placed in impossible circumstance demanding action on behalf of the ethnic Russians of east Ukraine, by the geopolitical engineering of the USA, with Putin cast as the boogeyman. This is really very much like the schoolyard bully, USA, smashing the smaller kids [Ukraine's Russian minority] face and then crying to the neighborhood 'look what little Billy [lying on the ground bleeding] did to my fists!' And expect Putin would stand back and do nothing? This is messing with the wrong man. Europe should rethink its relationship of political fellatio to USA and NATO because 'war is peace' & 'newspeak' freaks like Brzezinski and his numerous fans at USA Department of State, CIA and NATO have no sense of reality. They are neither 'normal' nor 'healthy.'
"For America, the chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia… Now a non-Eurasian power is preeminent in Eurasia – and America's global primacy is directly dependent on how long and how effectively its preponderance on the Eurasian continent is sustained" -Zbigniew Brzezinski writes in 'The Grand Chessboard'
This immediate preceding Brzezinski position on projecting USA empire is at odds a full 180 degrees with what he professes (blames/projects) onto Russia in his Washington Post editorial on Ukraine. Here he admits the USA is the region's imperial aggressor. If Orwell were here to ask, I would ask him if what he had noticed in people is the phenomena I have noticed; some people seem to have 'cellularized' sets of mutually exclusive 'facts' they (consciously or unconsciously) shift between, with no noticeable level of psychological discomfort. Brezezinski strikes me as one of these people.
In the end, a media outlet, in this case the Washington Post, giving platform to such depraved criminal mentality, should be disqualified from any journalistic recognition other than propagandist for the criminally insane-
"In the case of a word like DEMOCRACY, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides. It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of régime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using the word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way" -George Orwell
Meanwhile, think about it … in regards to media, do the western democracies geopolitical propaganda and depraved acts, promoted by the Washington Post and other outlets, meet Orwell's description of 'words used in a consciously dishonest way?' Methinks: yes.
At the end of the day, it would appear that in any democracy, ethics, self restraint, tolerance and honesty will always play second fiddle to narcissism, avarice, bigotry & persecution, if only because people who play by the rules in any democracy, are at a disadvantage to those who easily subvert the rules to their own advantage.
Ukraine for Dummies
Ronald Thomas West is a former U.S. intelligence professional
Tags CIA, double think, doublethink, George Orwell, Kiev, NAZI, neo nazi, Putin, Russia, Svoboda, The Grand Chessboard, Ukraine, Ukraine for Dummies, Washington Post, zbigniew brzezinski
Categories assassinations, CIA, corruption, counter intelligence, crime, culture, Espionage, false flag, information operations, intelligence, international law, male hierarchy, narcotics trafficking, politics, propaganda, social responsibility, transcendent warfare, treason, Uncategorized, war crimes
Dominionism's Fingers in Kiev
The beauty of open source intelligence analysis in the present day is two-fold; the age of internet has brought what used to be a laborious process of time consuming weeks, even months or years of research, to the analysts fingertips, and the sheer amount of information available from multiple sources, insures information never intended to be assembled into a picture nevertheless is assessable. In a flip sense, the 'metadata' so valued by the NSA in its spying on the citizen, is also available to the citizen or freelance investigator in relation to the behavior of institutions. One only need develop a compendium of metadata subject threads, to follow theme and bring focus to a target. That institutions must provide some cover for certain behaviors only enhances the process, in that any competent analyst is simply aware one must take a modicum of care not to become a 'believer' in any official line, to avoid being misled.
There is a very interesting blurb at the official White House website:
"our office launched the first-ever Interagency Working Group on Religion and Global Affairs (RGA), co-chaired by the [White House] Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships and the White House National Security Staff. This groundbreaking working developed a comprehensive map of how our government currently engages religious actors in foreign affairs through USAID Missions, Embassies, and Departments across government from the Department of Defense to the Department of Health and Human Services"
This is a pretty blanket admission religion plays a role throughout the USA government, despite the American foundational law erecting 'a wall of separation between church and state.' It is no news to me the White House (and American government generally) trashes this principle of law, and that is not the particular focus of today's 'revelation.' Let's narrow the preceding quote:
"co-chaired by the [White House] Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships and the White House National Security Staff"
Ok, so now we've reduced this to a White House endeavor or effort on behalf of 'religion' and 'national security.' Never mind just how creepy that sounds, when contrasted to history from ancient to modern time, the role of empires, and the countless dead in too many wars to count. Rather lets look at another aspect of the quote in relation to modern USA foreign policy:
"a comprehensive map of how our government currently engages religious actors in foreign affairs through USAID Missions, Embassies, and Departments across government"
Particularly noting 'engages religious actors' & 'USAID' & 'Embassies', and noting the 'embassies' recalls the fact of Department of State is a CIA Siamese twin, and USAID is a CIA cover program, one need not wonder for long how it came to be Voice of America (CIA radio) notes Ukrainian Major Archbishop Sviatoslav Shevchuk of the Greek Catholic Church was in attendance at the most recent so-called 'National Prayer Breakfast.'
As previously noted in my article 'Victoria Nuland's Wedding with Christian al-Qaida', the Voice of America (CIA) states the so-called 'National Prayer Breakfast' attended by the Arch Bishop Major of Kiev is sponsored by 'The Family' or that is the 'Christian Dominion' element which has penetrated every aspect of American government. The three pillars of the Christian Dominion movement in the USA are:
Dominionists celebrate Christian nationalism, in that they believe the United States once was, and should again be, a Christian nation. In this way, they deny the Enlightenment roots of American democracy.
Dominionists promote religious supremacy, insofar as they generally do not respect the equality of other religions, or even other versions of Christianity.
Dominionists endorse theocratic visions, believing that the Ten Commandments, or "biblical law," should be the foundation of American law, and that the U.S. Constitution should be seen as a vehicle for implementing Biblical principles.
An example of the literally tens of thousands of dominionists in USA government include, but are not limited to, these notable 'Family' members:
"Men under the Family's religio-political counsel include … Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Jim DeMint and Lindsey Graham, both R-S.C.; James Inhofe, R-Okla., John Thune, R-S.D., and recent senators and high officials such as John Ashcroft, Ed Meese, Pete Domenici and Don Nickles. Over in the House there's Joe Pitts, R-Penn., Frank Wolf, R-Va., Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., Robert Aderholt, R-Ala., Ander Crenshaw, R-Fla., Todd Tiahrt, R-Kan., Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., Jo Ann Emerson, R-Mo., and John R. Carter, R-Texas. Historically, the Family has been strongly Republican, but it includes Democrats, too. There's Mike McIntyre of North Carolina, for instance, a vocal defender of putting the Ten Commandments in public places, and Sen. Mark Pryor, the pro-war Arkansas Democrat responsible for scuttling Obama's labor agenda. Sen. Pryor explained to me the meaning of bipartisanship he'd learned through the Family: "Jesus didn't come to take sides. He came to take over." And by Jesus, the Family means the Family"
And the 'family' interest in spreading what amounts to Biblical-corporate-capitalism is quite international as the preceding research by Harper's investigative reporter, Jeff Sharlet, goes on to note:
"One needn't be a Marxist to find fault with the Family's mash-up of New Testament and unfettered capitalism — Adam Smith himself would have recognized that theology as a disingenuous form of self-interest by proxy. Such interests have led the Family into some strange alliances over the years. Seduced by the Indonesian dictator Suharto's militant anti-communism, they described the murder of hundreds of thousands that brought him to power as a "spiritual revolution," and sent delegations of congressmen and oil executives to pray to Jesus with the Muslim leader. In Africa, they anointed the Somali killer Siad Barre as God's man and sent Sen. Grassley and a defense contractor as emissaries. Barre described himself as a "Koranic Marxist," but he agreed to pray to Grassley's American Christ in return for American military aid, which he then used to wreak a biblical terror on his nation. It has not yet recovered. More recently, the Family has paid for congressional Christian junkets to bastions of democracy such as Serbia, Sudan, Belarus, Albania, Macedonia and Musharraf's Pakistan"
And now to Ukraine and Ukrainian Major Archbishop Sviatoslav Shevchuk of the GREEK CATHOLIC CHURCH at Kiev:
Answers to Rome
The Pope at Rome considers all Christians, regardless of denomination, to be in communion with the Catholic church, no matter how 'imperfect.' The Orthodox church does not, however, recognize the Pope's authority. Roman Catholicism is dominionist by deed and history to present time, example of present day dominionism in Spain, similar to 'The Family' is given:
"As an organization of Catholics – half-monks, half-soldiers – they seek to sanctify themselves through political struggle and their goal is to gain power. It's a hierarchical structure governed by the motto "He who obeys does not go astray." They overlap with the Church, invoking the bishops and the pope with an ethical, Christian discourse and with right-wing political and media organizations"
"the Anvil is made up of airtight cells, to make effective the following rule: "Know no more than what is strictly necessary." He claims to have no clue how many members there are, but says there are national and international leaders. "Our enemies were masonry, the gay movement, feminism, de facto unions, abortion, Marxism, and of course, Zionism""
What does the Roman church authority have to say about this?
"Cardinal Antonio Cañizares, the former archbishop of Toledo and current prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, based in the Vatican [stated] "They're not called the Anvil any more; now they go by the Association for the Common Good and I think they are offering great services to society""
The major differences between the Catholic and Orthodox are more than cosmetic, the church at Rome is a strict hierarchy with a dominionist theology founded in neo-Platonic thought. The Orthodox church theology is, by contrast, rooted in mystic asceticism. Catholicism is aggressive in comparison to the Orthodox, and particularly aggressive towards the Russian Orthodox Church:
"After the breakdown of the Soviet Union" [a spokesman for the Russian Patriarch said] "a great number of people in the Roman Catholic Church decided that was the moment when it was possible to conquer these big territories and huge populations of the countries of the former Soviet Union"
Ukrainian Major Archbishop Sviatoslav Shevchuk of the Greek Catholic Church, it must be noted, is a stealth Roman Catholic, having trained at Rome in the Roman doctrine of Thomas Aquinas' neo-Platonic theology, anathema to the Orthodox Rite he purportedly represents as an Eastern Rite or so-called 'Greek Catholic' (with allegiance to the Pope.) The Greek Catholic minority (6%) he represents in mostly Western Ukraine, makes his elevation into American foreign policy circles (under the guise of a 'religious' event) all out of proportion to the Ukrainian mainstream Orthodox, but this begins to make sense when one looks at the larger picture coming into focus with the USA dominionist agenda in concert with recent USA policy promoted in Ukraine. In fact the USA putsch installed 'interim' prime minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, is a right wing Greek Catholic, in league with the neo-nazi Svoboda party which holds five ministries in his new regime.
So, who is using who here? Is the Roman Catholic church using the dominionists in the USA or are the USA dominionists using the Roman Catholic church? The plain answer is both. It is a joint effort in Ukraine.
This analysis points to church-state intrigue of a sort you'd expect in medieval Europe. It would appear some habits never die…
Note one: The Vatican has a long history of supporting right-wing fascism to present time, recent past examples include strong support for Franco's Spain as well as fascist Italy and to a certain extent Hitler's Germany, in South America the military junta in Argentina, and Chile's murderous dictator Pinochet, example given. In the cases of Franco and the Argentine junta, the church was involved in 'pro-life' programs such as the placement of very young children of executed dissidents with 'proper' Catholic families, unknown to the executed dissidents relatives. This included keeping dissident pregnant women, who were tortured (and sometimes impregnated via associated rapes) alive long enough to deliver their babies prior to the women being 'disappeared.'
Note two: USAID, Voice of America, The National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House and too many more NGOs to name here, are no longer funded direct from the CIA budget but have been over the past few decades, shifted to direct congressional funding, a cover or 'denial' mechanism. These NGOs continue to serve as CIA fronts, per the revelations of rogue CIA officer Phillip Agee. These are without doubt the channels utilized when Victoria Nuland reports to Chevron & Exxon-Mobil, five billion dollars had been spent in Ukraine enroute to the present geo-political circumstance in that nation. For Chevron's 'hands on' strategy & relationship to these type of NGOs and related events, read HERE
Note three: The Vatican's intelligence relationship with the CIA, for purpose of coordinating policy, goes back decades. A very useful investigative report on this history is a 1983 (still highly relevant today) Mother Jones investigative report which may be read HERE
Note four: The present director of the White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships, Melissa Rogers, has belonged to the State Department's 'Religion and Foreign Policy' Working Group since 2011, and has been a 'senior fellow' or policy wonk at Brooking Institution. The Brookings Institution is a think tank whose millions in funding is provided by who's who of multinational corporations and associates who benefit [profit] from conflict opening opportunities [markets] around the world, including but not limited to:
Department for International Development, United Kingdom
The John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Claude R. Lambe Charitable Foundation
Charles Stewart Mott Foundation
Embassy of Qatar
Cheryl and Haim Saban
Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office
Richard C. Blum and Senator Dianne Feinstein
State Farm Insurance Companies
Tokyo Club Foundation for Global Studies
Visa USA, Inc.
Government of Denmark
Johnson & Johnson Family of Companies
J.P. Morgan Chase Foundation
Alcoa Foundation
Altria Group, Inc.
American Express Foundation
BP America Inc.
Eli Lilly and Company Foundation
Ford Motor Company Fund
GE Foundation
General Dynamics Corporation
W.K. Kellogg Foundation
MassMutual
BellSouth Corporation
Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation
Citigroup Foundation
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Honda North America, Inc.
Marathon Oil Company Foundation
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Mitsubishi International Corporation
Deep State IV (related)
Tags Arch Bishop Major, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Dominionism, Greek Catholic Church, Keiv, Rome, Ukraine for Dummies, USAID, Vatican, White House
Categories Author, CIA, corruption, counter intelligence, crime, culture, Espionage, false flag, information operations, intelligence, male hierarchy, philosophy, politics, propaganda, psychology, religion, social responsibility, transcendent warfare, treason
Germany's Martyrs of the Maidan
3rd Reich monument at Lindau (Bodensee)
denazification |dēˌnätsəfiˈkāSHən|
the process of bringing the leaders of the National Socialist regime in Germany to justice and of purging all elements of Nazism from public life.
Denazification didn't actually happen in Germany folks, I took the photo of the Third Reich eagle (NAZI monument) at Lindau myself, in 2008. Germany still harbors deep NAZI sentiment widely, particularly in the south. Many Nazi criminals were quietly reintegrated to German society and lived out life unpunished with rationale such as:
"the West German Supreme Court overturned the judgment .. saying Rehse and other judges of the [NAZI] People's Court had only been abiding by the laws of the time"
Because:
"The Americans and the British turned over the denazification program to the Germans, who made a mockery of it by electing or appointing some Nazis back into power"
It is only recently, with the most serious offenders dead of old age, a few lowly camp guards have been prosecuted in what amounts to a token expression of social responsibility. Insofar as Angela Merkel's present government in coalition with Social Democrats, together with her Christian Democrats and their ideologically aligned Christian Social Union, this points to a wider tolerance of the German past than could even be imagined only a short time ago. But first:
On 24 March, in Ukraine, Oleksandr Muzychko, neo-nazi leader of the 'Right Sector', was assassinated by interior ministry elite special operations police of the new regime in Kiev. He was without doubt a nasty man, a killer, criminal and terrorist. And because he was incredibly stupid, he also died a 'patsy' or that is a used and discarded stooge.
Oleksandr Muzychko
This man led the skinheads who provided the 'muscle' behind the violence that brought the new regime to power in Kiev. Now, his CIA supported putsch having been accomplished, he became an embarrassment. Can't have people running around openly proclaiming a NAZI agenda. Muzychko, having been used to provide a service, was then shot dead in a demonstration of the new regime asserting 'law and order.' The Western media spin will be all about tamping down on the criminal NAZI element in the Kiev uprising and all the USA's sheep will sleep better at night, knowing Obama, Cameron, Hollande, Merkel and 'friends' aren't doing business with NAZIs (and couldn't be more misled.)
It is beyond question the USA's intelligence (CIA, primarily), having utilized Muzychko to optimal putsch effect prior to demanded he be eliminated (the more likely story) for appearance sake. In today's game, you cannot be openly NAZI, you have to conceal the fact in order to qualify for support from the western democracies leaders. But in fact a neo-nazi party, Svoboda, holds five ministries in the new regime at Kiev, putting down the 'Right Sector' is a smokescreen. Check this out:
"One of the "Big Three" political parties behind the protests is the ultra-nationalist Svoboda, whose leader, Oleh Tyahnybok, has called for the liberation of his country from the "Muscovite-Jewish mafia." After the 2010 conviction of the Nazi death camp guard John Demjanjuk for his supporting role in the death of nearly 30,000 people at the Sobibor camp, Tyahnybok rushed to Germany to declare him a hero who was "fighting for truth." In the Ukrainian parliament, where Svoboda holds an unprecedented 37 seats, Tyahnybok's [Svoboda's] deputy [member of parliament] Yuriy Mykhalchyshyn is fond of quoting Joseph Goebbels – he has even founded a think tank originally called "the Joseph Goebbels Political Research Center""
Kind of puts this next photo in perspective:
Far-fetched? Perhaps not
Can anyone explain how Merkel would not know this following?
"The European Parliament in 2012 condemned Svoboda's racism, anti-Semitism and xenophobia as "against the EU's fundamental values and principles"
Especially considering
"In [the 2011] commemoration of the 1918 Battle of Kruty, Svoboda, accompanied by a substantial number of so-called autonomous nationalists, organized a huge torchlight parade, rife with Nazi symbolism.
"On April 28, 2011, Svoboda celebrated the 68th anniversary of the establishment of the Waffen-SS Galizien. Octogenarian Waffen-SS veterans were treated as heroes in a mass rally, organized by Svoboda and the "autonomous nationalists"" -quoting 'The Return of the Ukrainian Far Right' by Swedish academic Per Anders Rudling (2013)
I hold Germany responsible for the NAZIs put in power in Kiev, not the USA. Why? Historic responsibility, plain and simple. Merkel has a historic responsibility to call out the the facts of a NAZI regime and refuse on principle to do business with killers laundered into power by the CIA. If a German leader had the personal courage to do this, it would have stopped the nonsense in its tracks and we'd have a whole new geo-political game. But in fact German politicians are cowards (or worse.)
Think Merkel doesn't know this next?
"Der Spiegel is a mainstream German news source with a generally centrist orientation. It has the most prominent English language presence on the internet of any German source. It is most definitely not a radical left wing publication. It is reporting an interesting story about ties between the German National Democratic Party and the right wing Svoboda Party that holds ministerial posts in the present Ukrainian interim government. The NDP has long been described as Germany's leading neo-Nazi party"
Svoboda party leader Oleh Tyahnybok
Without a doubt, despite CIA media laundering, German intelligence certainly knows the facts about Svoboda, and nothing is done. I wonder what that has to with the preceding noted article going on to mention…
" [Svoboda] Party members appeared at events hosted by the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, the German political foundation affiliated with Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives"
… considering who have been the German interior ministers of the past several years, responsible for domestic intelligence. All are Merkel appointments from the German right. You think these Merkel Christian Democrat, and their affiliated Christian Social Union political appointments, don't know the Merkel aligned Adenauer foundation is associating with and sponsoring NAZIs?
"Adenauer's determination to integrate the right-wing nationalists who supported the Nazis into the CDU and thus into an acceptance of democracy explains much of the apparent paradox between his dislike of National Socialism and his willingess to accept men who had been very active in supporting the National Socialist dictatorship"
What's more is, Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) or Federal Intelligence Service (Germany) reports directly to Angela Merkel. This German counterpart to the CIA had been born out of the USA's rescue of Nazi intelligence at the end of World War Two. Initially organized by the OSS and subsequently CIA as the 'Gehlen Organization' under Hitler's veteran Soviet spymaster (Nazi war criminal) Reinhard Gehlen, the BND came into existence when the Gehlen Organization, staffed with Nazi Party & SS veterans, as well as more than 100 former Gestapo officers, was transferred by the USA to the Federal Republic of Germany (then so-called 'West Germany') to be under the authority of Chancellor Konrad Adenauer. And so it was Hitler's top intelligence people became Germany's post-war CIA. One can only imagine Reinhard Gehlen's smirk when he'd stated his organization employed a lower percentage of former SS & Gestapo than most ministries in Adenauer's Federal Republic of Germany government
Following on this historical political fantasy of a leopard shedding its spots in post-war Germany, of these three recent interior ministers, Hans-Peter Friedrich is from the Christian Social Union's 'unreconstructed south' of Germany, de Maizière and Schäuble are from Adenauer's Nazi integrated Christian Democrats (Merkel's CDU.)
Wolfgang Schäuble, 22 November 2005 to 28 October 2009
Thomas de Maizière, 28 October 2009 to 3 March 2011
Hans-Peter Friedrich, 3 March 2011 to 17 December 2013 (boss when files likely incriminating police relationship to neo-nazis were shredded)
Thomas de Maizière, 17 December 2013 to present (2nd term)
These interior ministers, ostensibly responsible for denazification, are more likely example, actually, of why a monument to Hitler, in the form of a Reich eagle, still stands at Lindau, Bodensee:
The frosting on the Adenauer empowered Nazi cake would be this next:
"Arrested by the Canadian Army in 1945 Alfried Krupp was tried as a war criminal at Nuremberg. He was accused of plundering occupied territories and being responsible for the barbaric treatment of prisoners of war and concentration camp inmates. Documents showed that Krupp initiated the request for slave labour and signed detailed contracts with the SS, giving them responsibility for inflicting punishment on the workers.
"Krupp was eventually found guilty of being a major war criminal and sentenced to twelve years in prison and had all his wealth and property confiscated.
"On 5th December, 1950, Adenauer wrote .. a letter urging clemency for Krupp.
"In January, 1951, [it was] announced that Alfried Krupp and eight members of his board of directors who had been convicted with him, were to be released. His property, valued at around 45 million, and his numerous companies were also restored to him" (45 million in 1951 is 410 million 2014, adjusted for inflation)
Denial aside, Adenauer's Nazis integrated to the party in charge of present day Germany, could explain a lot about Germany's strongly supportive relationship with the new NAZI regime in Kiev, you think?
Closely related story: Sociopaths & Democracy
Tags Angela Merkel, CDU, Christian Social Union, CSU, Germany, Kiev, NAZI, neo nazi, Oleh Tyahnybok, Oleksandr Muzychko, Right Sector, Social Democrats, Svoboda, Thomas de Maizière, Ukraine, Ukraine for Dummies
Categories assassinations, CIA, counter intelligence, false flag, information operations, politics, propaganda, social responsibility
The New Great Game
A short history leading to events in Ukraine
The war between Russia and Georgia in 2008 was long term result of South Ossetia broken off from what became North Ossetia by Stalin (a Georgian) and given to Georgia as a sort of gift. When the USSR broke up, the South Ossetians wanted nothing to do with Georgia, they are historically a part of and strongly identify with Russia. The Ossetians rebelled from the beginning at being a part of post-Soviet Georgia. The Bush selected (& New York lawyer) Mikheil Saakashvili was installed by a CIA supported 'color revolution' in Georgia and that is when the real trouble began. It was (then) President Medvedev ordered the Russian military to 'invasive' counter-attack while (then) Prime Minister Putin was sitting with Bush at the Olympics in Beijing, after the USA trained Georgian military crossed the border (following skirmish with militia) en mass and unleashed rocket barrage on the South Ossetian city of Tskhinvali. Message to the West & NATO from Russia? Leave the border regions alone.
Similarly, Crimea had been integrated to Russia for 200 years, to 1954, when Khrushchev (married to a Ukrainian) presented Crimea to Ukraine as a birthday gift of sorts (the practical reason underlying this was to put the construction of a canal under a single administration, a logistics issue.) More recently, Putin had been telling the western leaders for at least six years to stay out of Ukraine but wasn't listened to. Meanwhile Russia had been promised at the breakup of the USSR that NATO would not expand to the east, a promise repeatedly broken. The reaction of Russia (with the neo-nazi Svoboda party having five ministries in the new regime at Kiev) in Ukraine is the result. If Russia takes the east of Ukraine to the Dnieper River (with its majority ethnic Russian population), the West only has itself to blame. Putin, with the backing of a very large majority of Russians, is not going to put up with NATO on Russia's doorstep. Relevant to this, following internationally monitored elections deemed free and fair, Ukraine had dropped its association with NATO in 2010 and Russia will not be allowing NATO to return to its' border, end of story.
This is the second time around for the West pushing its way into Russia's face in Ukraine. The Russians put up with it with the color revolution bringing Viktor Yushchenko to power, but the neo-nazi Svoboda regime installed this second time around, was too much (the new regime is also populated with a liberal handful of corrupt oligarch Yulia Tymoshenko cronies.)
For related information on this aspect of geo-politic of isolating and cornering Russia, one need only do a short online research of the topics 'The Grand Chessboard' by Zbigniew Brzezinski:
"Regarding the landmass of Eurasia as the center of global power, Brzezinski sets out to formulate a Eurasian geostrategy for the United States. In particular, he writes, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger should emerge capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America's global pre-eminence"
And the 'New Great Game:
"The New Great Game is a conceptualization of modern geopolitics in Middle East as a competition between the United States, the United Kingdom and other NATO countries against Russia for "influence, power, hegemony and profits in Central Asia and the Transcaucasus""
For a good read on the related 'color revolutions' one need only study: 'Terror and Civil Society' by rogue CIA officer Phillip Agee, exposing method-
Reporting from undisclosed location
Tags CIA, color revolutions, Crimea, Obama, The New Great Game, Ukraine, Ukraine for Dummies
Categories assassinations, CIA, corruption, counter intelligence, crime, culture, Espionage, false flag, information operations, intelligence, international law, philosophy, politics, propaganda, social responsibility, transcendent warfare, treason
Obama's Ukraine
March 2, 2014 //
Ukraine for Dummies, article one in the thirteen part series (links to the followup articles at the bottom of this page)
Recent events point to the idea the USA intends the new regime in Kiev is deliberately to be so outrageous to the Kremlin, Russia will feel compelled to intervene so far as to remove the literal nazis in Ukraine empowered by the western democracies. Immediately following DCI (Director of Central Intelligence) John Brennan's visit to Kiev, the new Ukrainian authorities had initiated a military action in the ethnic Russian east of the country. Following the 17 April Geneva accord, the action was briefly put on hold, until Joe Biden visited and military action was renewed. With the USA's influence and promises of aid to the new regime, this cannot be construed to be an accident. Geneva had been nothing more than a propaganda ploy by the USA and Biden's visit was to inform the Geneva meeting for purpose of defusing the crisis was geopolitical theater to be ignored. What the Kiev regime doesn't understand is, they're nothing more than a pawn to be sacrificed on the so-called 'Grand Chessboard' in the 21st Century edition of 'The Great Game' –Update 2 May 2014
Neo-NAZI Svoboda party members in the new Ukraine administration supported by Obama:
Oleksandr Sych – Vice Prime Minister
Andriy Mokhnyk- Minister of Ecology
Ihor Shvayka – Minister of Agriculture
Ihor Tenyukh – Minister of Defence
Oleh Maknitsky – Prosecutor General
In the lead-up to these fascists installed with the USA (and Western Europe's) support, the neo-NAZI Svoboda party head Oleh Tyahnybok:
"has met with U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and EU foreign affairs representative Catherine Ashton"
This preceding is the tip of the iceberg:
"The leader of the"Fatherland" coalition in the absence of jailed leader Yulia Tymoshenko, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, "as a Christian and a Greek Catholic," rants against gay marriage.
"A major contributor to the demonstrations is the far right "Freedom" [Svoboda] party, which this year the World Jewish Congress –and many others– described as neo-Nazi.
"Another smaller component is the the Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists, established by the former Nazi collaborator émigré group, the war time Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUM ) which assisted in the extermination of Ukrainian and other Jews. Still another is the Ukrainian National Assembly/Self Defense, which maintains a close relationship with the neo-Nazi National Democratic Party of Germany"
It doesn't end there. Oligarch & new interior minister Arsen Avakov, was head of corrupt oligarch Yulia Tymoshenko's "Batkivshchyna" political party (Bloc Yulia Tymoshenko.) He escaped an Interpol arrest warrant for real estate fraud by acquiring immunity from prosecution with election to legislature as a 'People's Deputy.' Now as Interior Minister (Ukraine's top policeman), Avakov is positioned to remove or weaken any evidence that could lead to his or other Tymoshenko related players and other corrupt officials conviction in possible future trial.
And Oleksandr Turchynov, the USA engineered, putsch-proclaimed President of Ukraine? Just another corrupt Yulia Tymoshenko stooge who'd, when head of Ukraine's security service, destroyed documents connecting Yulia Tymoshenko to the world's most dirty organized crime boss, Semion Mogilevich.
As well, the new Russia hating Kiev administration has appointed 'governors' for the Russia leaning, industrialized east of Ukraine; oligarch billionaires Igor Kolomoysky and Sergey Taruta, now well positioned to snap up and loot Ukraine's industrial base which cannot be competitive in the European Union, as well buy up agricultural land the IMF will insist be 'privatized' along with 'austerity' demanding cuts to benefits for children and halving the pensions of the elderly. Factories will shut down and unemployment skyrocket, all to the advantage of western European exports at the expense of Ukraine's domestic infrastructure, similar to the model imposed on and devastating Greece. This is an attempted highway robbery of entire regions of Russia sympathetic people in the East of Ukraine the new 'authorities' in Kiev actually despise. The cynical geo-political calculation in NATO is a destabilized Ukraine on Russia's doorstep will require Russian intervention and all fingers can be pointed at Russia for interfering, self-justifying the alliance in Brussels strengthening and expanding an aggressive NATO.
Here is NATO fanatic John McCain, meeting with Ukrainian NAZI Oleh Tyahnybok [center] in the presence of the now USA installed Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, the very same man Under-Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, in a leaked conversation, had instructed the American ambassador to Ukraine the USA wanted put in charge:
And here is Victoria Nuland meeting with NAZI Tyhanybok together with the same:
And now John Kerry in the company of known NAZI Tyhanybok:
Now, less anyone misunderstand the importance of the NAZI Tyhanybok to propping up the USA installed prime minister of Ukraine, one only need see this image:
And finally, here is Obama together with the NAZI supported prime minister the USA has installed in Ukraine:
Now, all of this geo-political maneuvering, employing NAZIs to push NATO in Russia's face, on Russia's very doorstep, is on track to backfire in a really big way, recalling NATO inducting 'partner' nation Ukraine is one more example of a multiple broken promise, a promise to Russia NATO would not expand into the former Soviet sphere of influence, when Gorbachev allowed the former Warsaw Pact nations to pursue their own destiny with the break-up of the Soviet Union.
Now, we all (in the intelligence world) know none of this 'regime change' agenda is going to be brought off without CIA involvement. Going to that fact (of life in real-politic), it does to note here the CIA has longstanding ties to the Ukrainian neo-NAZI movement. No better evidence of this is a former CIA collaborator (Canadian academic) in the Ukrainian nationalist movement, acknowledging the facts but (one must presume disingenuously, academics dare not be associated with NAZIs) claiming he 'did not know' about the NAZI elements in the CIA Ukraine program:
"I cooperated with Prolog … I did understand in the 1970s and 1980s that Prolog was CIA funded … In the 1970s and 1980s I did not comprehend to what extent Prolog had hidden the dark past of OUN and UPA and propagated a legendary version of nationalist history…"
He might more honestly state today 'to what extent Prolog (the CIA operation codename) had laundered the neo-NAZI movement' behind the new USA installed regime in Kiev.
Insofar as CIA associated 'regime change' in Ukraine, this is the second time around. The first time around was the 'Orange Revolution' which had brought Yulia Tymoshenko & Viktor Yushchenko to power. For an expanded understanding of both operations, one only need study rogue CIA officer Phillip Agee's expose: 'Terrorism and Civil Society.'
So, when Obama behaves as though he were sincere in addressing the world as if Russia were the instigator of Ukraine coming apart at the seams, actually Russia has every reason to feel it cannot allow these manipulations to follow through to the Western democracies desired conclusion. To this point, it cannot hurt to recall erstwhile Obama foreign policy consultant, career Russia hater Zbigniew Brzezinski, neo-liberal guru to Obama administration officials such as Victoria Nuland, considers Ukraine central to his 'Grand Chessboard' strategy of pushing Russia into a corner in the 21st Century edition of the 'Great Game', a step towards freeing up the USA for world domination.
Meanwhile, the major difference between Obama and Bush is quite straightforward; Obama is a by far more natural & dangerous liar, and not only when promoting the neo-NAZI administration installed by USA instigated violence in Kiev with this disingenuous quote:
"I commend the Ukrainian government's restraint" -Obama
But guess what? A Polish MEP [Member of European Parliament] states in an interview the Maidan snipers were trained in Poland in a joint operation with USA intelligence services.
Question: "[you are] a supporter of the thesis it was a CIA operation?"
Answer: "Maidan was also our operation. The snipers were trained in Poland"
The original interview transcript in Polish language HERE
A reasonable English language summary of the interview by PRAVDA:
As well, a leaked phone call between the European Union's Cathrine Ashton and the Estonian foreign minister, indicates it was people aligned with the new USA supported Ukrainian administration were behind the snipers who killed both protestors and police during confrontation in Kiev. According to the Estonian foreign minister, in a leaked conversation, evidence points to the new Ukrainian regime behind the snipers that killed both police and protesters, blamed on the ousted administration by the USA. Have a listen to the Estonian:
Obama is a world class geo-political liar in the final estimation, backing a neo-nazi killer regime for the sake of isolating Russia in the 21st Century (nuclear armed) world domination endeavor on behalf of the Council on Foreign Relations, CHEVRON, Monsanto and 'friends', variously known as the 'ultra-wealthy', 'one percent' and the 'oligarchs'
Why don't you see any of this CIA fostered and implemented NAZI relationship to the USA in the western press? Because:
"You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month." -CIA operative cited in "Katherine The Great" by Deborah Davis
"There is quite an incredible spread of relationships. You don't need to manipulate Time magazine, for example, because there are [Central Intelligence] Agency people at the management level." -William B. Bader, former CIA intelligence officer, briefing members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, From 'CIA and the Media', by Carl Bernstein
"The Agency's relationship with [The New York] Times was by far its most valuable among newspapers, according to CIA officials. [It was] general Times policy … to provide assistance to the CIA whenever possible." -CIA and the Media by Carl Bernstein
How does one sort fact from fiction in the Western media world? Go to the skills found in professional intelligence, where it's a matter of training and knowing what to look for. Wikipedia claims the nazi elements had been pushed out of Tyhanybok's Svoboda party but this does not square with the World Jewish Congress describing Svoboda as neo-nazi. Or the research turned up by the Swedish academic Per Anders Rudling documenting Svoboda organized the celebration of octogenarian 3rd Reich Waffen SS veterans as heroes as recently as 2011 (cited at the beginning of this article.) And then you have the former CIA collaborator (Canadian academic) stating CIA laundered Svoboda party pre-cursor elements in the 1980s (associated with the mentioned Prolog program) and the fact CIA edits Wikipedia, not only has controlling influence in more traditional mainstream media as demonstrated by a former CIA director's quote:
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." -William Colby, former CIA Director, cited by Dave McGowan in "Derailing Democracy"
In the applied geo-politic of Obama's USA, CIA requires straight-forward aggression to achieve a means to an end. Neo-nazis will accomplish a goal (violent coup) law abiding citizens will not. And then CIA launders the facts with its controlling influences in mainstream media. Present CIA director Brennan is a nasty man and is by far too close to Obama.
If the facts of the 'Maidan Coup' line up behind Russian President Putin's position and you don't like Putin, that sucks for you. Truth is often not a comfortable thing and why CIA would prefer you did not know truth.
Tags CIA, color revolutions, NATO, NAZI, neo nazi, Obama, oligarch, regime change, Russia, tymoshenko, Ukraine, Ukraine for Dummies, victoria nuland, zbigniew brzezinski
Categories CIA, corruption, counter intelligence, crime, false flag, information operations, intelligence, international law, Law, politics, propaganda, social responsibility, treason, Uncategorized