If This Person Can Pass the CPA Exam, So Can You EY Germany Gives 40 Partners and 380 Staff the Boot to Boost Profitability After That Whole Wirecard Thing Do Ex-Big 4 Accountants Make Good NFL Team CEOs? KPMG Vice Chair Hopes All the Tech Layoffs Will Scare College Kids Into Accounting Overcoming the Five Stages of Lease Accounting Grief
CPA Exam September 13, 2022
Hear Me Out, Extend the CPA Exam Window to 24 Months
It has now been more than a decade since the AICPA observed — and worried about — a growing gap in the number of accounting graduates and the number of those graduates who pursue the CPA exam. In the time since, that gap has only widened and much effort has been expended to figure out why.
In 2014, AICPA President, CEO, and Steely Dan fan club treasurer Barry Melancon gave his state of the profession address and in it he mentioned the gap and how they planned to put some brain power into figuring out how to fix it:
We have had about six consecutive years of record numbers of people majoring in accounting. That's a great thing. For the last three years, however, we've basically had a level number of people taking the CPA exam. So there is a gap that's building.
A major research project under way will help us to better understand that development. We want to find out what's causing people to sit or not sit for the exam and then design tactics to deal with it strategically. The results will help us design and implement tactics to reverse the trend. That will involve the AICPA as well as state societies, firms themselves and management accounting functions or finance functions in business.
It seems that effort did not bear much fruit and now here we are all these years later facing not just a slight disinterest in the CPA exam but rather a critical disinterest in the profession as a whole referred to as the accounting pipeline problem.
Because we know the AICPA is tied up with all manner of initiatives to attract people to the profession and thus very busy, I'm going to propose a suggestion that might attract at least a couple accounting students to the CPA who might have otherwise given it the snub. Old-timers, y'all might want to hit the "back" button on your browser now because you aren't going to like this. Extend the CPA exam window to 24 months.
That's it. Just six little months. Give people just a little bit more cushion to sit for and pass all four parts. I mean, if you really want to be generous you could add another six months to that but let's be reasonable in our demands here and say two years would be great.
"The 18-month period is set in board rules, regulations and statue. There are no plans to change this period," reads a NASBA FAQ published in 2021. We get it, rules are rules. So change them. They've done it before. They've done it recently even.
In the not-so-distant past, you couldn't take the CPA exam in March, June, September, and December. Like at all. Over time, these "blackout months" turned into shorter blackout dates and then they threw the idea out altogether and launched continuous testing in 2020, eliminating regular blackout dates completely. So change is not only possible, it's necessary. If it wasn't, you'd still be taking the exam on paper.
When the Illinois CPA Society did a little research into why accounting graduates are less interested in the CPA than they used to be, the feedback ICPAS received shed light on the mystery of lower candidate numbers. Why aren't people choosing to pursue the CPA exam?
They feel they can take off in their anticipated or chosen careers without it.
They believe that any value the CPA credential holds is outweighed by its lack of relevance to their personal endeavors and the time commitment necessary to obtain it.
They don't see the personal or financial return on investment.
Their employers or prospective employers aren't supporting or requiring it.
They see other experiences as being more valuable.
TL;DR: "It's hard, it's costly, and I don't need it to succeed in my career path." You can't make the actual exam any easier but perhaps making the process a bit easier — as has already been done with computerization and continuous testing — would have a positive impact on candidate numbers. Busy seasons are getting longer, staff shortages are causing associates to work harder, and let's be real, firms aren't aggressively pushing the CPA like they used to. These factors can't really be changed, the time allowed to complete the exam could be. Can it not?
Look, at this point it's either that or drop the requirement to sit down to a GED and a pulse, you want candidates then you gotta start thinking about what's standing in the way.
Anyone who wants to argue why the CPA exam window absolutely must be 18 months and not a day more is welcome to do so in the comments. We also welcome any comments that start with "back in my day."
Tags: pipeline problem, taking the CPA exam, the 18 month window
OldRetiredAcctant says:
Back in my day….which was a long time ago and maybe I don't remember it so well, you could only take the exam twice a year. And it was on paper, with no calculators. However, I think once you passed two parts (which was called a "condition" for some reason) I think you got much longer than a year and a half to pass the rest. You were known as a "conditioned candidate" and your "condition" did have an expiration date but I don't think it was that short.
So I'm actually supporting your position that the rules have been changed before, and they could be changed again. Sorry if I didn't make that clear.
Spenser maldrum says:
"… That's it. Just six little months. Give people just a little bit more cushion to sit for and pass all four parts."
Either that or change the exam to 3 sections and ditch the three "disciplines" for 2024
Big4Veteran says:
If someone is too lazy, stupid or unfocused to pass all four parts of the exam in 18 months, what makes you think they'll be any more likely to do it in 24 months?
Gregg says:
OK Boomer. There's nothing lazy or stupid about needing more time to balance studying with the rest of one's life.
The smart ass non-accountants in the business world don't even think about accounting until everything goes to shit. So I say let it go to shit. We shouldn't water down the standards to be a part of our profession. The shortage of accounting talent means more opportunities and more money for the people who aren't too fucking lazy and stupid (or think too highly of themselves) to study for and pass the CPA exam.
When companies can't close their books, or produce accurate financial information, or pay vendors correct amounts, or charge customers correct amounts, or properly forecast the cash balance, or pass an audit, then the smart asses will start to value accountants more. We shouldn't be helping them to devalue our worth.
CommentChecker says:
Wow, bitter much?
My career as a CPA was extensive and varied and what I have witnessed is a growing sense that accountants are viewed as overhead and not really appreciated and to that you can add overworked and underpaid. There is always an effort to keep costs down at the expense of overworking the accounting staff. I heard on many occasions from my staff that management does not appreciate what we do and the effort that it takes, it's an arrogance on their part…"they think all we do is push a button at the end of the month".
By all means, let's just keep making getting a CPA license EASIER. Why should the next generation actually have to work at something that takes everyone else YEARS of hard work to gain. Wow!
I speak from experience. I passed 2 sections and was on my 3rd when life happened. I was a care giver for my father and he took a turn for worse. I had to make a choice, spend time with my dying parent or study for a test. I choose my father. Then tax season was approaching, so find time for family, study and work 60+ hours a week. I choose to live my life and stopped studying. If I would have taken up testing after tax season, till I passed 1 section a previously passed section would have expired and I would have had to re-take it. Had the window been 24 months, I would now be a CPA. I feel it is an elitist test and if you don't get into a firm that allows you study time and helps pay for the study courses for the exam, it is a steep up hill climb for most.
Jerome says:
Get rid of the window entirely. My firm has mandatory internal CPE requirements, and i've seen plenty of dumb people get a CPAs that used ADHD/ADD drugs or something to pass while not working a job. There's a lot of hard working adults that are strapped in time and way more qualified. There's no prestige or anything special about a stupid person with a lot of time and drugs on their hands getting the CPA license.
CPA Exam 25 mins ago
I was cleaning out pics on my phone and was reminded of something I saw on Reddit a few weeks back: a screenshot of someone's many, many, MANY CPA exam attempts over twelve years. Most people would have given up around the tenth attempt but this person persisted. And persisted. And persisted. So if you […]
EY January 26, 2023
EY has been tightening the purse strings over the past several months ahead of the big Project Everest split, the vote on which remains delayed and should happen before the end of this quarter. The firm did not hand out mid-year bonuses in December and sources say that travel, training, and even hiring are on […]
Sr Advisor Controller Remote
Remote Tax Manager
Remote Senior Accountant- Blockchain
Audit & Accounting Manager- Remote
Senior Accountant (CPA or EA)
KPMG Vice Chair Hopes All the Tech Layoffs Will Scare College Kids Into Accounting
Overcoming the Five Stages of Lease Accounting Grief