Singapore deal needs national approval, EU lawyer says
Recent trade deals have sparked a public outcry. (Photo: Jakob Huber/ECI Stop TTIP!)
By Eszter Zalan
Brussels, 21. Dec 2016, 14:16
The EU-Singapore trade deal must be concluded by member states and ratified by EU countries' parliaments, an advocate general at the EU's top court said in an opinion published on Wednesday (21 December).
The advisory opinion, if followed by a subsequent European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling next year, could mean complex trade deals will not only have to be approved by EU institutions, but also by parliaments across the union, slowing down the process.
This could affect the EU's trade policy, and a possible trade deal with the UK after Brexit.
The commission, which concluded a trade deal with Singapore in October 2014, asked the ECJ if the EU has exclusive competence to conclude the agreement.
The deal is still waiting for approval from EU governments and the European Parliament.
EU governments argued that the ratification could not be fast-tracked, as the accord includes issues where powers are shared between the EU and member states.
Advocate general Eleanor Sharpston, in her opinion, outlined specific measures in the Singapore deal that involved shared competences, including trade in transport services, public procurement for transport services, intellectual property rights, and labour and environmental standards.
Dispute settlement, mediation and transparency mechanisms should also be considered as shared competences, she wrote.
"While the Advocate General notes that difficulties may arise from a ratification process involving all of the member states alongside the EU, she considers that that cannot affect the question of who has competence to conclude the agreement," the court said in a statement.
Impacts on trade policy
Last October, the government of the Belgian region of Wallonia almost torpedoed an EU-Canada trade deal (Ceta) when it presented last minute demands for changes.
In certain international agreements the EU has exclusive competence, after the EU states task the commission with negotiating the agreement, and ratification is only needed by the EU institutions - the EU Council representing member states and the European Parliament.
In so-called "mixed agreements", where the EU and member states share competencies, all must give their consent.
The commission initially said that Ceta was an "EU-only" agreement but decided to make it a "mixed" agreement after a public outcry.
The advocate general's opinion could also affect a possible trade deal between the EU and the UK after it leaves the bloc.
It could mean that Britain faces the task of getting agreements from 27 national parliaments, and in some cases regional lawmakers, to secure wide-ranging trade agreement with the EU.
An EU commission spokesman said the EU executive saw the lawyer's opinion as an "important element contributing to the court's reflection".
But he added that "it must be clear that no definitive conclusions can be drawn until the court itself issues its final opinion".
Shira Stanton, of lobby group Greenpeace, said in a statement they were "fairly confident" that the ECJ would reach the same conclusion.
"The European Parliament and the commission should not ignore this opinion, and should wait for the court's final decision in 2017 before taking any further decision on Ceta," she said.
Ceta failure deepens EU trade crisis
EU countries agree to reinforce trade defence
EU signs Canada trade pact, rejects 'post-truth' critics
EU seals Singapore trade pact
Trade deal ratification needs member states, EU court says
Canada said on Friday that the free-trade agreement with the EU had failed and that the bloc was "not capable" of concluding agreements.
After two years of stalled talks, member states decided to keep the current rules on tariffs but to suspend them in case of "state-induced" distortions in raw material and energy.
The signing ceremony of Ceta highlighted tensions between EU officials and its critics, who can still derail the deal at a later stage.
EU trade officials moved a step closer to sealing an trade pact with Singapore after negotiators for both sides presented the entire text of the agreement on Friday.
The EU Court of Justice has ruled that the Singapore trade deal needs member states' ratification in its current form. It said that only investments do not belong under the EU's sole competence, potentially removing Brexit complications.
Covid variants put Schengen under pressure
The EU Commission also raised concerns about the proportionality of Belgium's ban on non-essential travel, for people wishing to leave the country.
Europe must plot its own course on China
Given China's size and interconnectedness with Europe, a strategic policy of non-engagement hardly deserves the label "strategic".
Vietnam jails journalist critical of EU trade deal
A journalist who had demanded the EU postpone its trade deal with Vietnam until human rights improved has been sentenced to 15 years in jail. The EU Commission says it first needs to conduct a detailed analysis before responding.
Nordic Council of MinistersNineteen demands by Nordic young people to save biodiversity
Nordic Council of MinistersSustainable public procurement is an effective way to achieve global goals
Nordic Council of MinistersNordic Council enters into formal relations with European Parliament
Nordic Council of MinistersWomen more active in violent extremist circles than first assumed