UCL Energy Institute Blog
Blogs by staff & students of the UCL Energy Institute
UCL Energy Institute Blog »
UCL-Energy Director's thoughts on UCL-Energy/French Embassy/UKERC Event
By Robert Lowe, on 27 October 2015
On Tuesday 2 0 October 2015, UCL Energy Institute, UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources, UKERC and the French Embassy hosted 'Global Energy, Global Climate'. This was the first in a series of three events organised jointly by UCL Energy Institute and the French Embassy (under the auspices of the long-established relationship between the French Embassy's Science and Technology Department and UCL's Grand Challenges programme), to be held termly through the 2015-16 academic year.
For an evening event on Energy and Climate Change, in the middle of Global Climate Change Week and in the run-up to COP21, it would have been hard to think of a better line-up of speakers – Jean-Charles Hourcade (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CNRS), Jim Watson (UKERC Research Director, Paul Ekins (Director of UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources), Jim Skea (ex-UKERC Research Director and IPCC WGIII co-chair) and our discussant, Jill Duggan (Doosan Babcock).
Jean-Charles gave a fascinating summary, peppered with memorable epithets, of the attempts that have been made since 1988 to craft an international agreement that would limit global CO2 emissions (and yes, there are other GHGs, but CO2 accounts for roughly 2/3 of man-made climate forcing). Those who rail against the glacial rate of progress over almost 30 years, would do well to reflect on the real complexities of the negotiations.
Paul Ekins, Jim Skea, and Jim Watson then set out some of the key findings and arguments from the latest UKERC book, Global Energy: Issues, Potentials, Policy Implications. Paul reflected on choices and policy challenges, Jim Skea on on-going developments in global energy markets, among them the very high rate of growth of renewables, and Jim Watson on the complexities of the innovation process – the importance of learning-by-doing, the long time scales to deploy new technologies at scale, and the low probability of university-based researchers finding a silver bullet that will solve the problems of energy and climate change.
Jill Duggan gave a masterful summing up, reflecting on how, despite disappointments, there are signs of progress – among other things, she stated that it would now be inconceivable to propose the construction of a new, unabated coal-fired power station in the UK. It is less than ten years since E.ON proposed the construction of two new coal-fired units, at Kingsnorth. Perhaps her most memorable point was that credibility is one of the most important resources that governments have to drive through what may prove to be the most difficult infrastructural, social and political transition of the last two centuries.
The panel discussion was memorable both for the level of agreement, and one notable disagreement – on the feasibility of carbon taxation. All participants agreed on the desirability of carbon pricing, but Jim Skea, Jim Watson and Jill Duggan thought that carbon taxation was very unlikely to be the best way to achieve it. Jean-Charles described how, in the 1990s, key EU governments worked to frustrate attempts to introduce EU-wide carbon taxation. No UK government would have the credibility to make it stick, and in the absence of long-term certainty, it would be largely ignored by industry. There are spectacular outliers – Denmark and Sweden – which have maintained very high levels of energy and carbon taxation, in the case of Denmark since the late 1970s. But those of us, like Paul Ekins and myself, who have argued for twenty years for carbon taxation, would do well to understand the political problems elsewhere.
My own conclusions after having chaired this event? The fossil fuel age will prove much harder to get out of than to get into – those who are yet to be persuaded of this would do well to read the reports of the Deep Decarbonisation Pathways Project undertaken by UCL-Energy and IDDRI (another Anglo-French collaboration), and perhaps McGlade & Ekins paper, The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C.
Thomas Kuhn's description of the nature of the scientific crises that precede scientific revolutions (paradigm shifts) seems to me to be a useful metaphor for the challenge of climate change and our attempts to solve it – and here I paraphrase: the accumulation of widely disparate problems that initially attract a series of incremental responses; the generation of a host of new ideas, many of which ultimately fail to be taken up, but some of which point the way to a new paradigm; a growing sense of disorientation and crisis as it becomes clear that ways of tackling the underlying problems that have been successful historically, no longer appear to work; and finally, resolution, as the new paradigm with all of its technical, social, economic, and political dimensions is articulated and entrenched.
Presentation slides from this event
Filed under UCL Energy Institute staff
One Response to "UCL-Energy Director's thoughts on UCL-Energy/French Embassy/UKERC Event"
GCCW 2016 Activities – Global Climate Change Week wrote on 13 August 2016:
[…] one or another aspect of climate change (like this one at the University of California Berkeley, or this one at University College […]
Tweets by UCL_Energy
All views expressed in the posts on the UCL Energy Institute blog are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of the UCL Energy Institute or University College London. Views expressed in the comments of this blog do not necessarily reflect those of the original post's author.
Delivering on Paris: how the UK responds to its climate obligations April 19, 2018
Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals: how, why, and what's next November 20, 2017
Stakeholder Engagement Study: What are the social issues affecting wind energy deployment? July 6, 2017
The making of a globally sustainable energy system November 14, 2016
The highs and lows at the United Nations International Maritime Organisation's 70th Marine Environment Protection Committee November 11, 2016
Emit now, pay later: The case of shipping and its GHG emissions October 18, 2016
A low carbon industrial strategy? July 19, 2016
RIP DECC – but will we miss you? July 15, 2016
What would a better London transport system look like? How do we get there from here? And what could the next Mayor do about it? May 3, 2016
Oil Producers Meeting in Doha, Qatar: Technical opinion April 14, 2016
What would be the impact of the April 17 OPEC meeting on the UK electricity market? April 13, 2016
Gender equality in the workplace – Energy Demand in Practice seminar series March 8, 2016
Athena SWAN in the Bartlett – Bringing Us Together March 8, 2016
International women's day, inspiration from the past, present and hope for the future March 8, 2016
The changing face of architecture: Value difference March 8, 2016
Two months since COP21, where are we now? January 21, 2016
'Is there life after PhD?' First event from the Energy Demand in Practice seminar series January 20, 2016
In the aftermath of the Paris COP Agreement – grounds for optimism or pessimism? December 16, 2015
The ground-breaking Paris Agreement leaves no room for delay in cutting emissions December 15, 2015
The Paris Agreement – second time lucky? December 14, 2015
Shipping under scrutiny in Paris at COP 21 December 9, 2015
How a global solar alliance can help developing countries December 7, 2015
Ratcheting up the ambition level: Implementing deep decarbonisation pathways December 4, 2015
Paris – outside looking in November 30, 2015
UCL-Energy Director's thoughts on UCL-Energy/French Embassy/UKERC Event October 27, 2015