Michigan's ex-gov. charged in Flint water crisis
Hammoud: "At this very moment, the people of Flint continue to suffer from the categorical failure of public officials, at all levels of government."
Michigan's former governor, former health director and seven others were charged on Thursday with crimes stemming from lead contamination of the city of Flint's water supply as prosecutors detailed the findings of a yearslong investigation.
Michigan Solicitor General Fadwa Hammoud:
"Nicolas Lyon, former director of MDHHS is charged with 9 counts of involuntary manslaughter for each a 15 year felony, and one count of willful neglect of duty, a one year misdemeanor." "Richard Snyder, former governor for the state of Michigan, is charged with two counts of willful neglect of duty. Each a one year misdemeanor."
Lyon and Snyder were among the nine defendants arraigned on Thursday on a total of 42 criminal counts in Genesee County courts for their roles in a debacle that afflicted the predominantly African-American city of Flint, and became emblematic of racial inequality in the United States.
The criminal investigation that ran parallel to civil litigation which last year yielded a settlement worth more than $600 million for victims of the water crisis… that is awaiting court approval.
Flint's troubles began in 2014 after the city switched its water supply to the Flint River from Lake Huron to cut costs.
Corrosive river water caused lead to leach from pipes, tainting the drinking water and causing a Legionnaires' outbreak, resulting in 9 deaths.
The contamination also prompted several lawsuits from parents who said their children were showing dangerously high blood levels of lead, which can cause development disorders.
Snyder, a Republican who has been out of office for two years, has repeatedly apologized for the state's poor handling of the crisis.
His lawyer, Brian Lennon, alleged that the prosecution of his former client was politically motivated.
Hammoud, one of the lead prosecutors on the case, said their ongoing grand jury investigation could yield additional charges.
FADWA HAMMOUD: At this very moment, the people of Flint continue to suffer from the categol-- from the categorical failure of public officials at all levels of government.
- Michigan's former governor, former health director, and seven others were charged on Thursday with crimes stemming from lead contamination of the city of Flint's water supply, as prosecutors detailed the findings of a year-long investigation. Michigan Solicitor General Fadwa Hammoud:
FADWA HAMMOUD: Nicolas Lyon, former director of MDHHS, is charged with nine counts of involuntary manslaughter, for each a 15 year felony, and one count of willful neglect of duty, a one-year misdemeanor.
Richard Snyder, former governor of the state of Michigan, is charged with two counts of willful neglect of duty, each a one-year misdemeanor.
- Lyon and Snyder were among the nine defendants arraigned on Thursday on a total of 42 criminal counts in Genesee County courts for their roles in a debacle that afflicted the predominantly African-American city of Flint, and became emblematic of racial inequality in the United States. The criminal investigation ran parallel to civil litigation, which last year yielded a settlement worth more than $600 million for victims of the water crisis that is awaiting court approval.
Flint's troubles began in 2014 after the city switched its water supply to the Flint River from Lake Huron to cut costs. Corrosive river water caused lead to leach from pipes tainting the drinking water and causing a Legionnaires' outbreak, resulting in nine deaths. The contamination also prompted several lawsuits from parents, who said their children were showing dangerously high blood levels of lead, which can cause development disorders.
Snyder, a Republican who has been out of office for two years, has repeatedly apologized for the state's poor handling of the crisis. His lawyer, Brian Lennon, alleged that the prosecution of his former client was politically motivated. Hammoud, one of the lead prosecutors on the case, said their ongoing grand jury investigation could yield additional charges.
A person's 2020 presidential vote is proving the biggest indicator of whether or not they want a coronavirus vaccine.People who supported President-elect Joe Biden in November are overwhelmingly in favor of getting the COVID-19 vaccine, with 79 percent saying they want it and 4 percent saying they've already gotten it, an NPR/PBS Newshour/Marist poll out Tuesday shows. Meanwhile just 39 percent of voters who backed President Trump say they want the vaccine and a similar 4 percent have already gotten it.Marist asked adults whether they'd get a COVID-19 vaccine if it was made available to them. Support for getting the vaccine was clearly divided along party lines, with 75 percent of Democrats saying they wanted the vaccine but just 43 percent of Republicans saying the same. Democratic men were the most likely of any demographic — race, region, income, education, age, or generation — to want the vaccine, at 85 percent. Meanwhile the smallest percentage of adults who said they wanted the vaccine were Trump voters.Also among groups who had a low percentage of vaccine support were Gen Xers — just 49 percent of Americans age 40-55 want the vaccine, the poll found. Republican women and people who live in small towns were not very likely to want the vaccine, with just 41 and 51 percent saying they would like it, respectively. Trump has so far not publicly said if he has gotten the vaccine, but has underplayed the seriousness of the virus for the past year.Marist surveyed 1,173 American adults from Jan. 11–13 via landline and mobile phone, with a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.More stories from theweek.com 5 more scathing cartoons about Trump's 2nd impeachment The most alarming thing about the Trump presidency Trump tried to act like a mob boss. Instead he's just a thug.
Joe Biden's Pandemic-Relief Bill Is a Mess
At the outset of the pandemic, the government undertook a deliberate effort to reduce economic activity in what was widely thought to be a necessary measure to slow the spread of COVID-19. Whereas most recessions call for policy that stimulates the economy, the COVID-19 recession called for the opposite — measures that would enable workers and businesses to hit pause until a vaccine or therapeutic became widely available. Now that vaccines are being administered, policy-makers face a different challenge — not keeping Americans inside, but getting them back to work as quickly as possible. In this context, President-elect Biden's $1.9 trillion stimulus package misses the mark. The proposal gives a nod to public health — with $20 billion allocated to vaccine distribution, $50 billion to testing, and $40 billion to medical supplies and emergency-response teams — but fails to address the most pressing hurdles to COVID-19 immunity. Vaccines sit unused not for lack of funding but thanks to burdensome rules determining which patients can receive shots and which doctors can administer them. Additional spending to speed up vaccine distribution is welcome, but its effects will be muted if bureaucratic hurdles remain in place. Even if the public-health provisions were to succeed in reopening the economy, much of the rest of Biden's plan guarantees that it will reopen weaker. For one, an expanded unemployment-insurance top-up of $400 a week would mean more than 40 percent of those receiving unemployment benefits would make more off-the-job than on-the-job at least until September, and possibly for longer. The food-service and retail industries hit hardest by the pandemic would see the largest shortfalls in labor, exacerbating the challenges they've faced over the past year. Enhanced unemployment may have been reasonable when we wanted workers to stay home, but it's catastrophic when we want them to go back to work. Meanwhile, Biden's proposed minimum-wage increase to $15 nationally would eliminate an estimated 1.3 million jobs, hitting low-income states hardest. In Mississippi, where the median wage is $15, as many as half the state's workers would be at risk. A minimum-wage hike may be high on the Democratic wish list, but it does not belong in an emergency-relief bill. The Biden plan isn't all Democratic priorities, though. He took a page from Trump's book and proposed $1,400 checks to households, bringing the second-round total to $2,000. With household income now 8 percent above the pre-pandemic trend, additional checks would do little more than pad savings accounts. Indeed, 80 percent of the recipients of last year's checks put the money into savings or debt payments, not consumption. The flagship item in Biden's plan would do little to spur economic growth even on Keynesian assumptions. The same goes for state and local aid, for which Biden is seeking $370 billion on top of $170 billion in public-education grants. The total of $540 billion far surpasses the roughly $50 billion hit to state and local tax revenues last year. As we wrote in December, states and cities are slow to spend federal grants, so the lion's share of this stimulus would not show up until 2023. Rather than attempting to stimulate the economy, Biden is hoping to launder bailouts of profligate Democratic states through COVID-19 relief. Other parts of the bill — expansions of the earned-income and child-tax credits — are defensible long-term structural reforms, but as year-long emergency measures, they will have the same muted effect as direct checks. By including a slew of proposals unrelated to the pandemic, Biden has weakened his hand in negotiations and made it less likely that urgent measures pass quickly. In the depths of the COVID-19 pandemic, economic policy-makers rose to the occasion. Following an unprecedented external shock, the U.S. economy has emerged in relatively good shape, with less unemployment and bankruptcy than most feared. But the policies implemented to curb COVID-19 are not suited for what will begin to become, over the course of this year, a post-pandemic economy. Biden may have campaigned during a recession, but he is taking office during a recovery. He should govern accordingly.
Attorneys: Ex-governor charged in wrong county over Flint
Flint water charges against ex-Michigan Gov. Snyder should be dismissed, his lawyer says
Mackensie Alexander's misdemeanor battery charge dismissed
Bengals Wire
Florida COVID-19 whistleblower turns herself in on felony computer charge
Michigan football RB Zach Charbonnet plans to transfer
One Year, 400,000 Coronavirus Deaths: How the U.S. Guaranteed Its Own Failure
Fired Manager of COVID-19 Data and Surveillance for Florida Arrested, Charged
Trump leaves a destructive presidential legacy