Uniting industry, academia and government to advance computing research and change the world.
Society Liaisons
Joint Activities
Policy Blog
CS in DC
CERP
CRA-E
CRA-W
All Committees
Summit on Technology and Jobs
Career Mentoring Workshop
URMD Grad Cohort
Conference at Snowbird
Conferences We Support
Computing Research News
CRA Taulbee Survey
Creating Institutional Homes for Computing
Reports on Research Issues
Workforce Reports
Best Practice Memos
BPCnet Resource Portal
Center for Evaluating the Research Pipeline
Report on CS Enrollment Surge
Additional Reports
Statements/Positions
Search Applicant Database
CRA Government Affairs
Computing Research Policy Blog
The Computing Research Association (or CRA) has been involved in shaping public policy of relevance to computing research for more than two decades. More recently the CRA Government Affairs program has enhanced its efforts to help the members of the computing research community contribute to the public debate knowledgeably and effectively.
Appropriations Update: Department of Energy does well in FY2019 Bills
June 14, 2018 /In: Funding, FY19 Appropriations /by Brian Mosley
[Editor's Note: This post was written by CRA's new Tisdale Policy Fellow for Summer 2018, Amita Shukla.]
Continuing CRA's tracking of the Fiscal Year 2019 (FY19) appropriations process, we pick up with coverage of the Energy and Water Appropriations bills. This is the annual appropriations bill that funds the Department of Energy (DOE) and all the research the department conducts.
The accounts at the department of most importance to the computing community are the Office of Science and the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E). Fortunately, these agencies have avoided the drastic cuts proposed by the President in his February budget request; regular readers will remember the Administration had recommended the complete defunding of ARPA-E and a 34% cut to the Office of Science. While the Department of Energy overall sees cuts in both chambers' version of the appropriation bills, computing research fares relatively well. The House approved its bill as part of a minibus on June 8th. The Senate has not yet considered it on the floor, but has passed it out of the full Appropriations Committee.
On the Senate side, DOE would see healthy increases over FY18 budget numbers. The Office of Science would see a 6 percent increase, going from $6.26 billion in FY18 to $6.65 billion in FY19. Drilling down into the account, the Advanced Scientific Computing Research program, where the majority of the computing research resides at DOE, would see a very good increase of 21 percent, going from $810 million in FY18 to $980 million in FY19. There are still some concerns within the research community that this increase is geared less towards research and more towards the deployment of the two exascale systems called for in Administration plans. However, such a large increase should still be a plus for the research community. In its report, the committee voiced support for the direction of the program, saying, "the Committee is supportive of recent research thrusts to develop scientific machine learning tools to enhance scientific discovery from user facility data and fundamental research in quantum information science that will lay the groundwork for deployable quantum computing systems." Finally, the Senate set aside $13 million "to support work on artificial intelligence and big data focused on the development of algorithms and methods to identify new ways of extracting information from data," generated at DOE facilities, "or validating use of machine learning in the Office of Science's program's scientific simulations." Given the Administration's recent interest in AI, it's good to see both the House and the Senate funding additional efforts in this area.
The other DOE program of note for the computing community is the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy, or ARPA-E. It would receive a 6 percent increase under the Senate bills, going from $353 million in FY18 to $375 million in FY19. Our regular readers will recall that ARPA-E was slated to be eliminated in the President's request and is marked for an 8% reduction in House Appropriations bills.
FY19 PBR
$ Change
DOE SC Total $5.39B $6.26B $5.39B $6.65B $390M 6.0%
ASCR $647M $810M $899M $980M $170M 21%
ARPA-E $306M $353M $0 $375M $22M 6.0%
Meanwhile, on the House side, the numbers are good, but not as good as the Senate. The Office of Science would see a 5 percent increase over FY18, going from $6.26 billion to $6.6 billion. ASCR would also see a less generous increase of 13 percent, going from $810 million in FY18 to $915 million in FY19. The House appropriators expressed concerns about the department's exascale initiatives saying they are, "concerned that the increased costs of the Exascale Computing Initiative compared to previous high performance computing (HPC) efforts are not transparently presented." As well, much like their Senate counterparts, the House appropriators commented that, "a focus on only early-stage activities will forego the nation's scientific capabilities in medium- and later-stage research and development and may not fully realize the technological advancements possible under the Department's applied energy activities." Finally, as noted, the House also set aside money for AI activities, recommending $26 million for these efforts.
As for ARPA-E, the House was uncharacteristically easy on the agency's budget this year, recommending only an 8 percent reduction. The agency's budget would shrink from $353 million in FY18 to $325 million in FY19. Regular readers will remember that the House has historically been more skeptical of ARPA-E's mission, and has recommended in years past (and as early as last year) to eliminate the agency. This proposed cut is likely a part of a negotiating strategy when both chambers come together to hammer out a final bill.
ARPA-E $306M $353M $0 $325M -$28M -8.0%
What are the next steps for these bills? As we've mentioned before, it is still unlikely for these appropriations bills to move much before the midterm elections this November. This is because members of Congress typically don't like to take contentious votes just before going before the electorate. However, there is a push from Congressional Republican leadership to get something tangible done before November. Only time will tell; please check back for more updates.
Tags: ARPA-E, Department of Energy, DOE, DOE SC, office of science
Subscribe via E-Mail:
Type e-mail and hit enter.
Categories Select Category Action Alerts (3) American Competitiveness Initiative (101) Artificial Intelligence (2) COMPETES (8) Computing Community Consortium (CCC) (44) Computing Education (46) CRA (98) CS Education & IT Workforce Highlights (4) Cybersecurity R&D Highlights (3) Defense R&D Highlights (2) Diversity in Computing (42) Economic Stimulus and Recovery (16) Events (75) Funding (275) FY06 Appropriations (13) FY07 Appropriations (32) FY08 Appropriations (37) FY09 Appropriations (28) FY10 Appropriations (3) FY11 Appropriations (11) FY12 Appropriations (10) FY13 Appropriations (7) FY14 Appropriations (3) FY15 Appropriations (9) FY16 Appropriations (13) FY17 Appropriations (8) FY18 Appropriations (11) FY19 Appropriations (12) FY20 Appropriations (5) General (29) Impediments to Research Highlights (3) Information Technology R&D Highlights (3) Intelligent Infrastructure (1) Internet of Things Highlights (3) Misc. (56) People (176) Policy (350) R&D in the Press (111) Research (142) Security (39) STEM (21)
Archives Select Month July 2019 (2) June 2019 (1) May 2019 (4) March 2019 (4) December 2018 (2) November 2018 (1) September 2018 (1) August 2018 (1) July 2018 (1) June 2018 (2) May 2018 (2) April 2018 (3) March 2018 (2) February 2018 (2) January 2018 (2) November 2017 (4) September 2017 (1) August 2017 (2) July 2017 (2) June 2017 (1) May 2017 (6) April 2017 (1) March 2017 (3) February 2017 (1) January 2017 (3) December 2016 (2) November 2016 (3) October 2016 (1) September 2016 (4) August 2016 (1) July 2016 (1) June 2016 (5) May 2016 (3) April 2016 (2) March 2016 (1) February 2016 (3) January 2016 (2) December 2015 (3) November 2015 (1) October 2015 (6) September 2015 (1) August 2015 (2) July 2015 (3) June 2015 (4) May 2015 (2) April 2015 (2) March 2015 (1) February 2015 (2) January 2015 (6) December 2014 (1) November 2014 (3) October 2014 (2) September 2014 (3) July 2014 (4) June 2014 (1) May 2014 (3) April 2014 (1) March 2014 (4) February 2014 (1) January 2014 (4) December 2013 (2) October 2013 (2) September 2013 (2) July 2013 (5) June 2013 (2) May 2013 (2) April 2013 (1) March 2013 (4) February 2013 (4) January 2013 (1) December 2012 (3) November 2012 (3) October 2012 (2) September 2012 (1) August 2012 (1) July 2012 (4) June 2012 (4) May 2012 (1) April 2012 (3) March 2012 (1) February 2012 (5) January 2012 (1) November 2011 (3) October 2011 (1) September 2011 (5) August 2011 (1) July 2011 (3) June 2011 (3) May 2011 (4) April 2011 (4) February 2011 (4) January 2011 (2) December 2010 (4) November 2010 (4) October 2010 (2) September 2010 (4) August 2010 (2) July 2010 (5) June 2010 (3) May 2010 (4) April 2010 (4) March 2010 (3) February 2010 (7) December 2009 (2) November 2009 (2) October 2009 (1) September 2009 (3) August 2009 (1) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (3) May 2009 (3) April 2009 (2) March 2009 (6) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (4) December 2008 (3) November 2008 (5) October 2008 (3) September 2008 (5) August 2008 (4) July 2008 (6) June 2008 (9) May 2008 (5) April 2008 (7) March 2008 (8) February 2008 (7) January 2008 (5) December 2007 (5) November 2007 (8) October 2007 (7) September 2007 (8) August 2007 (3) July 2007 (6) June 2007 (8) May 2007 (13) April 2007 (8) March 2007 (12) February 2007 (7) January 2007 (12) December 2006 (3) November 2006 (10) October 2006 (2) September 2006 (11) August 2006 (3) July 2006 (7) June 2006 (8) May 2006 (7) April 2006 (3) March 2006 (4) February 2006 (9) January 2006 (5) December 2005 (7) November 2005 (9) October 2005 (10) September 2005 (8) August 2005 (13) July 2005 (10) June 2005 (15) May 2005 (14) April 2005 (15) March 2005 (14) February 2005 (16) January 2005 (14) December 2004 (11) November 2004 (11) October 2004 (14) September 2004 (19) August 2004 (12) July 2004 (20) June 2004 (14) May 2004 (15) April 2004 (13) March 2004 (16) February 2004 (21) January 2004 (20)
Appropriations Update: House FY20 Energy & Water Bill is out and there are Reasons for Optimism
House Science Committee Explores the Ethical and Social Implications of AI
"This Is a Moral Issue": Hearing Calls Attention to Sexual Harassment in Science
Appropriations Update: House Numbers for NSF, NIST, and NASA are out and they are quite good!
Have an Impact on U.S. Science Policy, Attend CRA's CCC Leadership in Science Policy Institute!
@CRATWEETS
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Call for Proposals in A.I. https://t.co/Sy0s92XjcR9 hours ago
RT @compcomcon: New episode of the #CatalyzingComputing podcast is out now featuring @dplopresti of @LehighCSE. Dr. Lopresti discusses his…10 hours ago
Connect with BPCnet Collaborators, like @IAAMCS, on your @NSF #HBCUUP proposal. Let's work together to strengthen… https://t.co/g2WjjEFizC10 hours ago
2019 CRA Grad Cohort URMD Videos Released on Updated CRA YouTube Channel https://t.co/Jk9wIImPIi3 days ago
RT @Tapia_con: #Tapia2019 is pleased to welcome Gold Sponsor CRA. Be sure to join us in San Diego Sept 18-21. https://t.co/0YRlKhQ7Tv3 days ago
Annual Reports Now Available https://t.co/EwIekx3Nwi https://t.co/RS5FKgtvUZ4 days ago
Appropriations Update: House FY20 Energy & Water Bill is out and there are Reasons for Optimism https://t.co/7xicOjB0w04 days ago
CRA Home | Contact Us | Unsubscribe/Removal of Information | Terms of Use © Copyright 2019 - CRA
CRA Statement Concerning New Restrictions on Chinese Graduate Students in the... Appropriations Update: NSF, NIST, and NASA do well in FY19 Senate Bill