HomeAboutServicesContactSubscribe
Toxic Tort Monitor
Subscribe to Toxic Torts
Toxic Tort Monitor: Louisiana Upholds Reduction of a Large Toxic Tort Verdict
By Kathryn Modeer on July 22, 2020
Posted in Legislative & Judicial Updates, Toxic Torts
In April, the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Louisiana upheld the reduction of a large toxic tort verdict in James Gaddy, et al. v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., et al., No. CV 19-12926. Plaintiff sought reconsideration of the remitted verdict which reduced the jury's initial award of general damages from $7.5 million to $3 million.…
Continue Reading Toxic Tort Monitor: Louisiana Upholds Reduction of a Large Toxic Tort Verdict
Toxic Tort Monitor: Iowa Enacts Over-Naming Law
By Molly Dugan on July 15, 2020
Posted in Toxic Torts
Iowa became the first state to enact a law addressing the over-naming of defendants in asbestos litigation this month. Signed June 1, the new law requires a plaintiff to file a sworn affidavit, in addition to the initial pleading, with specified evidence as a basis for his or her claim against each named defendant. Failure to provide this information against a defendant results in dismissal of that defendant. More details on the bill (SF2337) in our previous post. …
Continue Reading Toxic Tort Monitor: Iowa Enacts Over-Naming Law
Pitfalls of Remote Depositions
By Dominique Savinelli, Tim Larkin & Daniel Fanning on June 17, 2020
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, courts and litigants are reinventing civil litigation – holding hearings on Zoom or Skype, using emails and conference calls to communicate status, and taking remote depositions. That said, "virtual discovery" is not new. Since 1993, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure expressly authorized taking depositions by remote electronic means. States including Ohio, Massachusetts and Texas have followed suit. See, e.g., Ohio R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6); Mass. R. Civ. P. 29; Tex. R. Civ. P. 199.1
Continue Reading Pitfalls of Remote Depositions
Toxic Tort Monitor: Venue Statute's Savings Clause Clarified by St. Louis City Order
By Dominique Savinelli & Tim Larkin on June 15, 2020
St. Louis City Judge Michael K. Mullen recently entered an important order interpreting Missouri's 2019 legislation governing joinder and venue law. See Order, Johnson v. Bayer Corporation, et al., 1622-CC01049-01 (Mo. Cir. Ct. St. Louis Cty. May 5, 2020) (Johnson). Put simply, St. Louis City's automatically-generated trial docket dates (the "rolling docket") do not satisfy the eligibility requirement of a having a "trial date" on or before August 28, 2019 within the savings clause.…
Continue Reading Toxic Tort Monitor: Venue Statute's Savings Clause Clarified by St. Louis City Order
Illinois Reins in Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction over Out-of-State Defendants for Nonresidents' Claims
By Corey Schaecher & Blake Thompson on June 9, 2020
On June 4, the Illinois Supreme Court issued an opinion that further limits the exercise of personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants in Christy Rios et al., v. Bayer Corporation et al., and Nichole Hamby et al., v. Bayer Corporation et al., 2020 IL 125020. At issue was whether "Illinois may exercise specific personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant as to the claims of out-of-state plaintiffs for personal injuries suffered outside of Illinois from a device manufactured outside of Illinois." Following rulings from the United States Supreme Court and those from other states, the court answered with a resounding: "no."
Continue Reading Illinois Reins in Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction over Out-of-State Defendants for Nonresidents' Claims
Toxic Tort Monitor: Over-Naming of Asbestos Defendants Bill Awaits Iowa's Governor
By Molly Dugan on May 21, 2020
On March 10, 2020, in a 54 to 46 vote, the Iowa House of Representatives passed Senate File 2337 (SF2337) in an effort to reduce the over-naming of asbestos defendants in related lawsuits filed in Iowa. The legislation focuses on reducing, or eliminating, the over-naming of asbestos defendants by requiring plaintiffs to provide detailed evidence of exposure for each named defendant. While Iowa is not known as a hot-spot for asbestos-related lawsuits, Iowa has reportedly seen its fair share of alleged asbestos related deaths.¹ Iowa's lack of asbestos filings likely comes as a result of the state's significant tort reform efforts, with SF2337 being the latest addition.
Continue Reading Toxic Tort Monitor: Over-Naming of Asbestos Defendants Bill Awaits Iowa's Governor
Toxic Tort Monitor: Missouri Senate Bill 591 Provides Clarity and Safeguards for Defendants
By Tim Larkin & Corey Schaecher on May 15, 2020
On May 12, 2020, the Missouri legislature passed Senate Bill 591 (SB 591), which provides major changes related to how punitive damages are assessed in civil and medical malpractice actions and brings significant reform to the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA), Missouri's consumer protection law. Missouri Governor Mike Parsons is expected to sign the bill shortly.
Continue Reading Toxic Tort Monitor: Missouri Senate Bill 591 Provides Clarity and Safeguards for Defendants
Toxic Tort Monitor: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rejects Fair Apportionment of Liability Among Strictly Liable Defendants Under the Fair Share Act
By Andrew German on April 22, 2020
Litigators have closely followed a recent decision that has provided needed guidance and has reshaped how asbestos liabilities are apportioned in strict liability cases. On February 19, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Roverano, et al., v. John Crane, Inc., et al., 6 EAP 2018 (Pa. Feb. 19, 2020), which held that in strict liability asbestos cases, damages are to be split per capita among remaining defendants, and that the Fair Share Act under 42 Pa.C.S. § 7102 does not require percentage apportionment of liability in strict liability cases. The decision further held that bankruptcy trusts may be included on the verdict sheet to bring more parties to the table for the purpose of apportioning liability only.
Continue Reading Toxic Tort Monitor: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rejects Fair Apportionment of Liability Among Strictly Liable Defendants Under the Fair Share Act
Toxic Tort Monitor: Illinois Appellate Court Overturns Asbestos Jury Verdict Based on Insufficient Evidence of Causation
By Michael Hopkins & James O'Shea, II on April 16, 2020
On January 21, 2020, the Fourth District Appellate Court reversed a $3.2 million asbestos jury verdict, holding Tremco, Incorporated (Tremco) was entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict where Plaintiff presented insufficient evidence of causation. Krumwiede v. Tremco, Inc., 2020 IL App (4th) 180434.
Continue Reading Toxic Tort Monitor: Illinois Appellate Court Overturns Asbestos Jury Verdict Based on Insufficient Evidence of Causation
Toxic Tort Monitor: Madison County Court Denies Intrastate Motion to Transfer Based on Forum Non Conveniens
By Jessica Prosperi & Blake Thompson on April 10, 2020
On January 3, 2020, in Mary Ellerbrock, Individually, and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Alex Kaszynski, Deceased, v. A.O. Smith Corp., et. al. (case No. 18-L-1434), the Third Judicial Circuit Court in Madison County, IL, denied defendant PW Power Systems' ("PW") motion to transfer based on forum non conveniens. In this asbestos case, premises Defendant PW sought to have the case moved from Madison County, IL to LaSalle County, IL. In denying PW's motion, the Court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Fennell v. Illinois Central R.R. Co., emphasizing "[t]he defendant must show that the plaintiff's chosen forum is inconvenient to the defendant and that another forum is more convenient to all parties." 2012 IL 113812, ¶ 6. The Court's reliance on Fennell for support that all defendants must join the motion is misplaced given that Fennell involved only one defendant.
Continue Reading Toxic Tort Monitor: Madison County Court Denies Intrastate Motion to Transfer Based on Forum Non Conveniens
Newer PostsOlder Posts
RSS Instagram Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
Topics Select Category Energy & Environment Husch Blackwell News Labor & Employment Legislative & Judicial Updates Manufacturing Product Safety Toxic Torts
Archives Select Month January 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013
Latent Injury Exception to Illinois Workers' Compensation Legislation Challenged
Remote Asbestos Jury Trials Face Challenges
Statute of Limitations on Asbestos Claims: MN Supreme Court Reinforces
Manufacturers Liable for Third Party Replacement Parts Says NJ Supreme Court
Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporation Asserted By Minnesota Court of Appeals
American Chemistry Council
American Tort Reform Association
International Technology Law Association
National Air Transport Association
National Aircraft Finance Association
National Highway Transportation Safety Administration
Product Liability Advisory Council
U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission
Husch Blackwell Blogs
Association Alert
Byte Back
Cannabis Law Now
Emerging Energy Insights
Food & Ag Law Inights
Healthcare Law Insights
International Trade Insights
K-12 Legal Insights
Labor Relations Law Insider
Safety Law Matters
The Contractor's Perspective
Our industry teams collaborate across practice areas to deliver in-depth solutions to the most complex business challenges. We bring together the best legal minds and reach beyond law to include experienced industry professionals. This approach gives our clients a greater perspective and ensures forward-thinking results. Read More
About Our Practice Group
The Technology, Manufacturing & Transportation Industry Insider blog features original insight and discussion on cutting edge legal topics affecting professionals within the technology, manufacturing and transportation industries.
Copyright © 2021, Husch Blackwell LLP. All Rights Reserved.