Posts Tagged 'drought'
A closer look at Kim Jong-un's forestry speech
Vice-premier Choe Yong-gon was reportedly executed because he criticized Kim Jong-un's reforestation policy initiative. It is interesting to look in more depth at what these policies actually are.
The forestry issue is tightly connected and reinforced both to the lack of food and energy, and to flooding damage. (I have laid out some of these connections in an earlier post.) There can be little doubt that Kim Jong-un is justified in focusing attention to the forestry issue.
The best (and only?) official guide I have seen so far to the policies underlying the reforestation drive of the past few months – which, again, Choe was reportedly executing for criticizing – is a speech delivered by Kim Jong-un to "senior officials of the party, the army and the state economic organs on February 26, Juche 104 (2015)." To understand the reforestation policies and their pitfalls, this speech is an interesting piece of information. Here are a few interesting things to note from the speech:
First, Kim is quite frank about describing the core problem. In the beginning of the speech, he talks openly about how the "arduous march" (the famine of the 1990s) has led people to cut down trees on a large scale across the country. He also mentions the reasons: to "obtain cereals and firewood", and talks about how this causes landslides and flooding. Perhaps this is part of an overall pattern in recent years where North Korean authorities are less prone to deny the extent of problems and sometimes even exaggerate them, as may have been the case with the drought impact warnings of the early summer.
But it is also interesting to speculate about whether this says something about the way that information is treated in the uppermost echelons of North Korea. Some have claimed that Kim Il-sung might not have been informed of the extent of the country's economic problems in the late 1980s and early 1990s, and that this might have been the case for Kim Jong-il as well. In this context, the frank way in which Kim Jong-un describes the results of the lack of food and fuel is striking.
Earlier official narratives of the impacts of natural disasters, like those in the mid-1990s, have often blamed the impacts on nature rather than on politics. Kim Jong-un seems to see it the other way around (which of course makes all the sense in the world).
Second, Kim seems to criticize politicized forestry management. In one sentence, he says that trees shouldn't just be planted on official days and ceremonial "tree-planting days" (my emphasis):
Forest planting should not be done in such a way as planting some trees ceremoniously on tree­-planting days or transplanting fully­ grown trees, as was done in the past. It should be done in the way of raising young trees in large numbers and enlisting all the people in transplanting and cultivating them.
Maybe I am reading too much into this, but this can be read as a criticism of the North Korean practice of honoring various occasions by economic measures, like doling out extra rations on the leader's birthdays et cetera. At least in forestry, Kim seems to be advocating pragmatism at the expense of ideological rigour. He also gives an anti-formalism shoutout later on, saying that
The plan for forest restoration should not remain in figures or charts on a piece of paper.
Third, Kim indicates that tree-felling will become more severely punished. He calls unauthorized felling of trees an act of "treachery" (my emphasis):
Random felling of trees in mountains must be prohibited. Now some people climb mountains and cut down trees to obtain firewood or timber without permission as they do not care a bit about the country's forests. Unauthorized felling of trees is tantamount to treachery. All the people on this land should treasure and protect even a blade of grass and a tree of their country.
Later on, he says that
Random felling should be made a serious issue of whatever the unit concerned is and whoever the person concerned is.
This might speak against the sense of pragmatism mentioned above. Of course, people aren't cutting down trees for fun or to ruin things for the state. It's part of the coping-behavior that has been developed since the famine, where people do what they can to get by.
The state has expanded the scope for what is allowed in other areas, such as private market trade, in order to better align with the reality on the ground. Here, in contrast, Kim seems to suggest that cutting down trees must be punished more harshly, even though the core reasons why people cut down trees to begin with – lack of fuel and food – remain. Implementing harsher punishments would probably be a difficult task for local authorities.
Kim does mention that the fuel problem needs to be solved that that trees should be planted specifically for firewood. But almost in passing: he basically says that the fuel problem should be solved and moves on (I don't imagine that most North Korean localities have the resources necessary to replace firewood with biogas at the moment):
In order to conserve forest resources, we should solve the people's problem of fuel. Positive measures should be taken to solve this problem, including creating forests for firewood in every place and increasing the production and supply of coal for the people's living. There are several units which have solved the fuel problem with biogas, fly ash or ultraanthracite. By actively popularizing their experience, we should ensure that all regions solve the fuel problem on any account by their own effort.
The strategy outlined isn't all that impressive, and the forestry issue highlights politics as a battle for scarce resources: on the one hand, the state needs to prevent the floods and landslides that keep coming back every summer. On the other hand, people on the ground need a way to access firewood and space to grow food as the state isn't providing these things. The problem won't be solved by just saying that everyone should have access to fuel and all will be well. Nevertheless, it'll be interesting to follow how this all plays out, and how the policies that Kim has outlined will be implemented (or not implemented) on the ground.
Tags:drought, Flooding
Posted in Agriculture, Forestry, Kim Jong Un, Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
The paradoxes of North Korea's food situation
A lot of things are going on in North Korean agriculture and food production these days. First, there was the drought. I haven't seen any unequivocal assessments showing with certainty that the damage wasn't as bad as feared, but both outside and regime sources certainly seem to be indicating this. Then, a few weeks ago, a regime source said that food production had even increased this year, thanks to management reforms in agriculture. And now, international relief agencies are reporting that the nearly yearly flooding has hit the country once again, damaging food production.
How can one reconcile all these events?
It may of course be that the earlier assessment published in Tongil Sinbo, with an optimistic forecast of food production, took the coming flooding into account and assumed that food production, overall, would still be up. Crop damage so far seems far smaller than it has been in previous years. 4,000 hectares have been reported as damaged this year, while the equivalent figure in 2013 was 13,300.
It may also be that the Tongil Sinbo claims were premature, but it is difficult to see why a North Korean regime source would claim production increases without taking potential damage from torrential rains into account. After all, they keep on coming year after year. Still, it seems risky to claim success for agricultural production before the August rains. North Korean publication routines are too murky to tell exactly how it is decided what information should be released and when.
It could also be that regions were agricultural reforms have been implemented have seen harvests increase, while others have been hit worse by both the drought and the floods. Reforms have so far been implemented on a local experimental basis and it could be that the success has been so great in localities where they have been tried that production has increased overall, despite both the flooding and the drought.
Hopefully, some of the confusion will clear as more information becomes available about the flooding damage. Natural disasters, after all, tend to increase the information flow from North Korea somewhat through the extended work of relief agencies.
Tags:agricultural reform, drought, Flooding
Posted in 2015 Food Shortage, Agriculture, Economic reform, Food | Comments Closed
The drought that didn't matter, North Korea says – thanks to agricultural reform?
During the past few months, the World Food Program (WFP) has made reoccurring pleas for increased food assistance to North Korea to alleviate the food shortages expected from a severe summer drought. The North Korean government made similar statements and claimed that the drought was the worst one to occur in 100 years. Aid to the country was subsequently increased from the originally planned level, due to the drought. But now, one North Korean official is saying that food production ended up increasing, after all, thanks to agricultural reforms.
A recent brief by the Institute for Far Eastern Studies at Kyungnam University (IFES) cites a July issue of Tongil Sinbo, a North Korean state-run weekly newspaper. There, Chi Myong Su, director of the Agricultural Research Institute of the Academy of Agricultural Sciences in the country, says that
"the effectiveness of field management system (pojon) from cooperative farm production unit system (bunjo) is noticeable and succeeded in increasing grain production despite the adverse weather conditions."
The article cited by IFES highlights the smaller work-team structure as key to the success of the reforms. Also, it almost outright states that greater economic incentives were the main factor (although they call it "enthusiasm" and "patriotism"):
"Despite the adverse weather conditions last year, the high grain yield was possible due to implementation of scientific farming methods and field management system to increase enthusiasm of farmers," and "based on this experience, many cooperative farms across the country will expand subworkteam management system to field management system."
This is interesting for several reasons.
First, the agricultural reforms seem increasingly pronounced. Though other reforms were reportedly backtracked earlier this year, the government seems eager to claim success for the road travelled in agriculture.
I have written elsewhere that the data doesn't necessarily support a claim that reforms are working. There is still reason to be skeptical – after all, a North Korean government official claiming that his government's policies are working is not surprising – but even the claim itself is interesting.
Second, the statement raises questions about monitoring and data gathering capacities, both of the regime and relief organizations in Pyongyang. Again, just a few months ago, alarm bells were ringing about a potential food shortage, and now, a regime official claims that food production has increased. What was the basis of the WFP and regime claims that a food shortage was imminent a few months ago, and what has changed since those claims were made?
Another recent IFES brief also deals with North Korean press reports about the agricultural reforms. It quotes a Rodong Sinmun article from earlier in the summer that brings up some adjustment problems that farmers have had, such as learning how to properly use fertilizers. The most interesting part in my opinion is the following:
The newspaper stressed that "when all farmers claim ownership of their field and subworkteam, one can create innovation in the farming operations."
Thus, it seems like Pyongyang wants to encourage experimentation and diversity in production methods. This would be a potentially important step towards more efficient agriculture. Perhaps it is part of a pattern. Provinces have reportedly gotten significant leeway in setting up their respective special economic development zones, which could also be a way to encourage experimentation in policies and management methods.
According to the Tongil Sinbo article, reforms are set to expand further in the country given the alleged success. Perhaps it won't be too long before we can learn more about them through assessments by multilateral organizations like WFP.
Tags:agricultural reform, agriculture, drought, Economics, foreign aid
Posted in 2015 aid from South Korea, 2015 Food Shortage, 6.28 Policy on Agriculture (June 28), Agriculture, Agriculture statistics, Economic Development Zones (2013), Economic reform, Food, Foreign aid statistics, International Aid, North Korea Agricultural Research Institute, Special Economic Zones, Statistics, UN, UN Food and Agriculture Organization, UN World Food Program | 1 Comment »
Aid to North Korea up by 110 percent in July
According to UPI citing World Food Program sources, aid to North Korea increased by more than 100 percent from June to July of this year:
Food aid to North Korea more than doubled from June to July and over 3,000 tons were distributed to pregnant women and children, according to the World Food Program.
Damian Kean said Monday the July delivery of 3,231 tons of highly nutritional food items for infants and expectant and nursing mothers is this year's largest, Voice of America reported.
In June, the World Food Program said 1,528 tons of food was sent to North Korea, and aid reached a low in February when only 1,187 tons of food reached the reclusive country.
South Korean news agency Yonhap reported the July food aid package was the biggest in 19 months, but the number of aid recipients decreased from 632,000 to 620,000 between June and July.
The World Food Program's fundraising goal of $168 million – needed to provide highly nutritional food packages to 1.8 million hungry North Koreans – has only reached half, or $82.9 million, of its target number.
The U.N. organization has postponed the termination of its North Korea food aid program, due to an ongoing drought in the country that is posing risks to the food supply.
Tags:drought, Economics, foreign aid, World Food Program
Posted in 2015 Food Shortage, Agriculture, International Aid, UN World Food Program | 1 Comment »