Death Penalty Articles Presented by Homicide Survivors
"Too much mercy often results in further crimes which are fatal to victims who need not have been victims if justice had been put first and mercy second" ~ Agatha Christie
Activist Dudley Sharp Responds to Catholic Publications Call To End Capital Punishment
By Frank Walker
Pewsitter.com
Original Article http://pewsitter.com/view_news_id_197844.php
Advocate Dudley Sharp has written the four Catholic and pseudo-Catholic publications who this week made joint declaration against the death penalty in the name of the Church.
TO: the Editorial Boards of America magazine, National Catholic Register, National Catholic Reporter, and Our Sunday Visitor
One of the major problems with the Church's newest teachings on the death penalty is that neither the Bishops, nor any other Catholics, opposed to the death penalty, appears to fact checksanything the anti death penalty movement produces, resulting in error after error presented to the flock, undermining the truth. You must fact check and consider opposing facts (1) to find the truth. As a rule, on this topic, the Church will not do that.
The Bishops have accepted anti death penalty claims, as gospel (small "g"), even when they conflict with Church teachings, as described.
"NCR" is for quotes from the referenced op/ed, with my reply as "Sharp reply".
NCR: "Next month, the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will hear arguments inGlossip v. Gross, a case out of Oklahoma that challenges the most widely used lethal injection protocol as being cruel and unusual punishment."
Sharp reply: That is untrue. as found within Glossip, Oklahoma has adopted many new additional protocols, which are unique to Ok – not the most "widely used" and are those which will be the areas of contention at SCOTUS.
NCR: "Our hope is that (the Glossip v. Gross case) will hasten the end of the death penalty in the United States.
Sharp reply: SCOTUS will only look at the specific new protocols, withinGlossip. All different protocols, of other jurisdiction will survive, be that alternate lethal injection methods, gas, hanging and firing squad, which exist in other states, the federal government and the military.
Based upon the facts, detailed within the 10th Circuit ruling (1/12/15), against the plaintiffs, it appears most likely that SCOTUS will reject their appeals, as well, and accept Ok new protocol.
In addition, it appears possible, if not likely, that Ok will adopt a nitrogen gas (NG) protocol, prior to the SCOTUS decision. NG has already been approved in an Ok legislative committee. NG has none of the downsides of any other method, NG is a completely painless execution method, as well as providing an endless supply, which cannot be withheld (1) and which may be adopted by all states, which wish to minimize delay, legal challenge and costs.
NCR: Archbishop Thomas Wenski, of Miami stated, "… the use of the death penalty devalues human life and diminishes respect for human dignity. We bishops continue to say, we cannot teach killing is wrong by killing."
Sharp reply: For about 2000 years the Church has taught that the death penalty is based upon the value of innocent life and an abiding respect for the dignity of man (2).
What the Archbishop is, now saying, is that for 2000 years the Church supported that which devalued human life and that which diminished respect for human dignity, a claim which no knowledgeable Catholic can or should accept.
The Archbishop is just repeating standard anti death penalty nonsense which has no respect for Catholic teachings and tradition.
One wonders – why he raises false anti death penalty teachings above Catholic teachings, a common problem for many of the bishops.
The Archbishop states: "We bishops continue to say, 'we cannot teach killing is wrong by killing'. "
Sadly, they do.
The Bishops are just repeating, again, common anti death penalty nonsense.
We all know that murder is wrong, even if there is no sanction.
The Bishops are unaware that sanction doesn't teach that murder is wrong – Church morality and tradition, as well as clear biblical texts teach that murder is wrong.
Sanction is the outcome of that moral teaching. Those are the rational and traditional teachings, which, somehow, the bishops have discarded and replaced with this anti death penalty nonsense. How and why?
Execution of murderers has never been declared immoral by the Church and never will be (2). The foundation for the death penalty is justice, just as with all sanctions for all crimes.
These inexplicable gaffs may cause good Catholics to wonder when reason and tradition vanished.
NCR: Boston Cardinal Seán O'Malley stated: "Society can protect itself in ways other than the use of the death penalty,"
Sharp reply: Cardinal, the proper standard is what sanction is most just for the crime committed, what the Church has called the primary consideration (CCC 1995, 2003) and what sanction provides greater protection for innocents.
The death penalty provides greater protection for innocents, in three ways, than does a life sentence (3).
One example:
There is no proof of an innocent executed in the US, at least since the 1930s (3).
Just since 1973, from 14,000 – 28,000 innocents have been murdered by those known murderers that we have allowed to murder, again – recidivist murderers ( two recidivism studies covering two different periods) (3)
My guess is that none of the Bishops are aware, because they haven't looked, as with EV and CCC.
NCR: "the universal Catechism of the Catholic Church . . . include a de facto prohibition against capital punishment."
Sharp reply: First, the de facto prohibition is based upon several errors (4).
Secondly, as the most recent death penalty teachings have been confirmed, by the Church, as being a prudential judgment, any Catholic may reject the Church's latest teaching on the death penalty (4), honor the Church's teachings of the previous 2000 years, and seek more executions, based within justice and the fact that executions offer greater protections for innocent lives (4).
NCR:
1) Intro. Basic pro death penalty review:
The Death Penalty: Justice and Saving More Innocents
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/05/the-death-penalty-justice-saving-more.html
2) For more than 2000 years, there has been Catholic support for the death penalty, from Popes, Saints, Doctors and Fathers of the Church, church leadership, biblical scholars and theologians that, in breadth and depth, overwhelms any teachings to the contrary, particularly those wrongly dependent upon secular concerns such as defense of society and the poor standards of criminal justice systems in protecting the innocent.
The Death Penalty: Mercy, Expiation, Redemption & Salvation
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-death-penalty-mercy-expiation.html
See Catholic references within:
New Testament Death Penalty Support Overwhelming
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2014/01/new-testament-death-penalty-support.html
3) The Death Penalty: Do Innocents Matter? A Review of All Innocence Issueshttp://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-death-penalty-do-innocents-matter.html
4) Current Problems: Catholic Death Penalty Teaching: Most recent Catechism (last amended 2003)
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2014_10_26_archive.html
admin March 8, 2015 Uncategorized No Comments
← The Homicide Survivors' Fairness-for-Victims Manifesto
The Pervasive Political Rot of the American Government vs. Capital Punishment →
DONALD TRUMP'S SPECTACULAR LEGACY FAILURE: An Illegitimate Federal Judiciary
Research shows Police more likely to shoot whites than blacks
EQUAL JUSTICE for VICTIMS
What President Trump Should Say in His State of the Union Address
The UN-AMERICAN, ANTI-CONSTITUTION LEFT vs. KAVANAUGH: The Underlying Evil of Desperate Smears by Democracy's Losers
Categories Select Category Alexander Adams (2) California (3) Cameron Todd Willingham (11) Colorado (1) Death Penalty (123) Dennis McGuire (1) Dudley Sharp – Justice Matters (91) Illinois (2) Juvenile Crime (3) Lester Jackson PhD (42) Lethal Injection (4) Maryland (1) Media (15) Montana (1) New Hampshire (1) New Jersey (1) New Mexico (8) New York Times (9) ObamaCare (3) Parole (3) Recidivism (10) Richardson (4) sentencing (10) Supreme Court (39) Texas (18) Troy Davis (3) Uncategorized (12) Vicitms Rights (13) Victims (23) Video Posts (2)
Archives Select Month June 2021 June 2020 June 2019 February 2019 October 2018 August 2018 May 2018 March 2018 March 2017 December 2016 September 2016 June 2016 March 2016 May 2015 March 2015 October 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 October 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 February 2013 December 2012 October 2012 September 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 January 2012 September 2011 August 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 January 2009 July 2007 October 2006 August 2006 June 2006 April 2006 March 2006
Copyright © 2022 Death Penalty Articles Presented by Homicide Survivors Theme by: ThemeGrill Powered by: WordPress