The NYT's advocacy for imperialism
The NYT is a regular target on the pages of Miscellany101 and it is an easy one. Its reporters lie, make articles up, for which some are punished or disciplined and others not, or tow an administration's line, if it serves the purpose of corporate and ethnic imperialism.
Allison Weir has outed the NYT's story on the Gaza Flotilla inquiry that will supposedly be handled by the Israeli government. The writer of the Times' story is both an Israeli and one with suspected ties to the murderous IDF so you can only imagine the slant of that piece. You can read Weir's revelations about that story here. The Times has a habit of using Israelis to write pieces on Israel and they see nothing wrong with that. I suggest therefore that they hire a Palestinian to write articles on Gaza and the Israeli blockade of that territory, but I'm sure that will never fly.
The second article more brazen than the first is the sophomoric grandstanding of the Times about the story of Afghanistan's supposed wealth of natural resources. We are pretty much on record for saying that the two wars fought by America in Iraq and Afghanistan are about regime change and control of the natural resources therein, so the Times' announcement is not earth shattering as far as we are concerned, but the timing is what we find immensely dubious as do others as well.
The way in which the story was presented — with on-the-record quotations from the Commander in Chief of CENTCOM, no less — and the weird promotion of a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense to Undersecretary of Defense suggest a broad and deliberate information operation designed to influence public opinion on the course of the war. Indeed, as every reader of Jared Diamond's popular works of geographic determinism knows well, a country rich in mineral resources will tend toward stability over time, assuming it has a strong, central, and stable government.
Risen's story notes that the minerals discovery comes at a propitious time. He focuses on lithium, a critical component of electronics. One official tells him that Afghanistan could become the "Saudi Arabia of lithium" — a comparison to oil. (I can see it now: "We must wean ourselves off our dependence on foreign lithium!")
What better way to remind people about the country's potential bright future — and by people I mean the Chinese, the Russians, the Pakistanis, and the Americans — than by publicizing or re-publicizing valid (but already public) information about the region's potential wealth?
The Obama administration and the military know that a page-one, throat-clearing New York Times story will get instant worldwide attention. The story is accurate, but the news is not that new; let's think a bit harder about the context.
This "news" about the riches of Afghanistan precedes another Times story which talks about the problems the Afghan mission is facing and how it might be somewhat difficult to meet the Obama administration's deadline of withdrawal from that war ravaged country (What better way to insure circulation levels than to beat the drums for more war?) as if to prepare their readership for the bad news by re-cycling a story about the riches at the US' disposal if we only stay the course. Why anyone bothers to read the Times is unfathomable; my suggestion is you don't!
Filed under Uncategorized Tagged with Afghanistan, Allison Weir, David Sanger, Ethan Bronner, Gaza blockade, Gaza flotilla, imperialism, James Risen, journalism, mineral wealth, New York Times, War on terror, withdrawal, yellow journalism
Liar, Liar, pants on fire! The NYT and its yellow journalism
We've chronicled many places here on the pages of Miscellany101 how the New York Times has been used by it's racist, Islamophobic elites to falsely and misleadingly incite public passions against the Muslim minority for the sake of public dissension and war, and they are at it again! I really don't understand how newspapers can keep finding harlots to lie and prostitute themselves for the good of the established elites but they somehow manage to keep up a pretty good stable of men and women willing to dispense and even take the kool-aid laced ethnic, religious and racial bigotry that keeps our country fueled for war. This latest blunder began with Elisabeth Bumiller's piece that appeared in the NYT in May of last year that erroneously stated a high recidivism rate among Guantanamo detainees. Making stuff wholesale out of sack cloth and ashes Bumiller, like her predecessor, Judith Miller, created a story that was picked up and run with by the likes of Dick Darth Vader Cheney in such a blatant disregard for reality that even the NYT had to backtrack, retract and mea culpa themselves out of another embarrassing situation.
……the article on which he based that statement was seriously flawed and greatly overplayed. It demonstrated again the dangers when editors run with exclusive leaked material in politically charged circumstances and fail to push back skeptically. The lapse is especially unfortunate at The Times, given its history in covering the run-up to the Iraq war.The article seemed to adopt the Pentagon's contention that freed prisoners had "returned" to terrorism, ignoring independent reporting by the Times and others that some of them may not have been involved in terrorism before but were radicalized at Guantánamo. It failed to distinguish between former prisoners suspected of new acts of terrorism — more than half the cases — and those supposedly confirmed to have rejoined jihad against the West. Had only confirmed cases been considered, one in seven would have changed to one in 20.
Unfortunately, the NYT lied to us the public again. Yes, their article was seriously flawed alright…..so much so that they decided to run it again and by the same person! What's worse, the Times buried this caveat deep in the article, "the White House had 'been presented with no information that suggests that any of the detainees transferred by this administration have returned to the fight'" which appeared at the very bottom of the page, in the tenth paragraph of a twelve paragraph piece. Why is the NYT so intent in promoting war in as distant and remote a place as Yemen? Do they think such a misadventure will increase their circulation at a time when advertising dollars and bureau budgets are tight? Not hardly. The NYT has an explicit interest like most of the other security consultants, analysts, contractors and assorted acronymed groups in keeping this Nation at war because if it's not profitable for some of them, it's profitable for others who in turn trickle down the profits they get from deceiving government and the Nation to fight in far away places. It's the old you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours symbiosis of truth, warfare and lies. The NYT is pretty good at making that a seamless transition. They've been doing it for far too long.
Filed under Uncategorized Tagged with Dick Cheney, Elisabeth Bumiller, New York Times, War on terror, yellow journalism, Yemen
Yellow journalism at its finest from a Murdoch "rag"
The Sun newspaper in England ran a story with a photo given to it by one of the local British rednecks/islamophobes of a British bus driver praying in the bus he drove. The article stated quite clearly the driver had forced everyone off his bus and inconvenienced them so that he could pray. Turns out it was all a lie and it seems The Sun newspaper makes a hobby of lying and inciting public passions against Muslim residents of the UK.
Here is more evidence of the Sun paper doing the same thing, entirely making up a story of supposed Muslim excess when there wasn't anything to it. By the time the smoke clears what's left is a public that is misinformed, angry and mistrustful of one another and an industry that has profited from lies and deception.
I wish Mr. Raulynaitis had received a lot more than the paltry sum of 30,000 pounds for the Sun's lies. The Sun is owned by K. Rupert Murdoch's News Corp which had revenues of 25 billion USD in 2006. I would have suggested to Mr. Raulynaitis that would be a great figure from which to start bargaining in settling his lawsuit against the Sun.
Filed under Uncategorized Tagged with Islam, Muslim in the UK, Politics, Rupert Murdoch, terror, The Sun tabloid newspaper, UK, yellow journalism