Tag Archives: Wes Bentley
Film Review: Mission: Impossible – Fallout (2018)
October 23, 2020 by Talking Pulp in Film Review, Reviews and tagged 2010s, 2018, action, adventure, Alec Baldwin, Angela Bassett, China, Christopher McQuarrie, film, France, Henry Cavill, J.J. Abrams, Michelle Monaghan, Mission: Impossible, Norway, Rebecca Ferguson, review, Sean Harris, Simon Pegg, spy, thriller, Tom Cruise, UK, Vanessa Kirby, Ving Rhames, Wes Bentley | Leave a comment
Also known as: M:I-6, Mission: Impossible VI (alternative titles)
Release Date: July 12th, 2018 (Paris premiere)
Directed by: Christopher McQuarrie
Written by: Christopher McQuarrie
Based on: Mission: Impossible by Bruce Geller
Music by: Lorne Balfe
Cast: Tom Cruise, Henry Cavill, Simon Pegg, Ving Rhames, Alec Baldwin, Rebecca Ferguson, Sean Harris, Angela Bassett, Michelle Monaghan, Vanessa Kirby, Wes Bentley, Frederick Schmidt, Ross O'Hennessy, Wolf Blitzer (cameo)
TC Productions, Bad Robot Productions, Skydance Media, Paramount Pictures, 147 Minutes
"There cannot be peace without first a great suffering. The greater the suffering, the greater the peace. The end you've always feared… is coming. It's coming, and the blood will be on your hands." – Solomon Lane
These movies are so damn good! Well, at least from the third one forward. I'm still sour about my initial experience with M:I-2 from twenty years ago.
Anyway, this one is a hair below the previous chapter but it's still a near perfect, spy thriller masterpiece.
There is really only one negative with this film and that's the exclusion of Jeremy Renner. However, Renner had become too busy with his work as Hawkeye in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, so his absence is understandable. Also, adding Henry Cavill to the cast was a massive plus, even if he doesn't survive beyond this chapter… or so, one would assume.
Other than Renner, this brings back everyone from the previous film, as well as bringing back Michelle Monaghan in a role that was thankfully bigger than just an uncredited cameo like in the fourth movie.
This one also adds in Angela Bassett as the CIA director, who is a secondary antagonist until she sees the light and learns to trust America's greatest hero, Ethan Hunt. We're also introduced to a new character, played by Vanessa Kirby, who I sincerely hope returns in future films. Not just because she's f'n gorgeous but because her character is really damn interesting, badass and I'd just like to see her get to develop more, as they keep pumping out these movies because Tom Cruise is ageless.
The plot feels a little heavy and overloaded but thankfully, by the end, everything kind of falls into place in a good way. I also felt like this didn't just build off of its direct predecessor by featuring the same villain and key characters but it also sets up the future, as the main villain is still alive and one would assume that he will come back into play again, almost becoming Mission: Impossible's equivalent to James Bond's Ernst Stavro Blofeld. Plus, Sean Harris is f'n chilling as hell in this role and despite him being a monster, I want to see more of him. Although, I do eventually want to see him catch a bullet or an even more over-the-top death.
I think that my favorite thing about this film, though, was the rivalry and personal war that developed between Tom Cruise's Ethan Hunt and Henry Cavill's August Walker. While Cavill dies, their final battle was so damn enjoyable that I wish he hadn't. And no, I don't think they'll bring him back because that'd be stupid, based off of how he gets taken out, but killing him was a mistake due to how well he and Cruise worked together.
Additionally, the action in this chapter is top notch and nothing short of what you would expect.
I also feel like I need to give props to the film's score by Lorne Balfe, who successfully experimented with the classic Mission: Impossible theme in multiple parts of the picture. I liked his fresh take on the score, as it felt like it belonged and didn't come off as a composer trying too hard to stand out and make his own mark. It meshed well with what we've become used to over the last few films and just built off of that.
Mission: Impossible – Fallout is impressive. But most importantly it was entertaining as hell and a shit ton of fun.
I'm also just going to come out and say that this series, after the disastrous second chapter, is my favorite film series post-2000. They're consistently great, always leave me impressed and make me yearn for more.
Pairs well with: the other Mission: Impossible films.
Film Review: Ghost Rider (2007)
September 4, 2020 by Talking Pulp in Film Review, Reviews and tagged 2000s, 2007, action, Australia, biker, Blackheart, comics, Donal Logue, Eva Mendes, fantasy, film, Ghost Rider, horror, Mark Steven Johnson, Marvel, Mephisto, Nicolas Cage, occult, Peter Fonda, Phantom Rider, Rebel Wilson, review, Sam Elliott, superhero, thriller, Wes Bentley | 2 Comments
Also known as: El vengador fantasma (several Spanish speaking countries)
Release Date: January 15th, 2007 (Ukraine)
Directed by: Mark Steven Johnson
Written by: Mark Steven Johnson
Based on: Johnny Blaze by Roy Thomas, Gary Friedrich, Mike Ploog
Music by: Christopher Young
Cast: Nicolas Cage, Eva Mendes, Wes Bentley, Sam Elliott, Donal Logue, Peter Fonda, Brett Cullen, Rebel Wilson
Relativity Media, Crystal Sky Pictures, Columbia Pictures, 110 Minutes, 123 Minutes (Extended Cut)
"Any man that's got the guts to sell his soul for love has got the power to change the world. You didn't do it for greed, you did it for the right reason. Maybe that puts God on your side. To them that makes you dangerous, makes you unpredictable. That's the best thing you can be right now." – Caretaker
Even though 2003's Daredevil received pretty bad reviews, under-performed and left most moviegoers feeling disappointed, it's director was still given the character of Ghost Rider to adapt into another live-action Marvel movie.
While I liked the Director's Cut of Daredevil for the most part, Ghost Rider is an atrocious motion picture from top-to-bottom. Honestly, this came out when Nicolas Cage seemed to run out of gas and saw his career trending downward fast. Honestly, this and its sequel could've been the nail in the coffin.
This is terribly acted, except for the scenes with Sam Elliott and the minimal appearances by Peter Fonda. They can't save the rest of the movie, however, as Cage, Eva Mendes and Wes Bentley don't really seem to give a shit about anything. Even Donal Logue severely under-performed and he's a guy that I tend to expect a lot from, as he's proven, time and time again, that he's a more than capable actor with good range and convincing performances.
The special effects can't save the film either, as they're generally pretty generic mid-'00s CGI shit. Hell, the villains don't look the way they're supposed to look and it just adds to this movie's cheapness.
It's a vapid, shit film, a complete waste of time and could only be upstaged in its awfulness by its even worse sequel.
I guess I'll have to review that flaming turd soon.
Pairs well with: its sequel and other terrible comic book adaptations of the era.
Film Review: Jonah Hex (2010)
August 8, 2018 by Talking Pulp in Film Review, Reviews and tagged 2010, 2010s, action, adventure, Aidan Quinn, comics, DC Comics, drama, fantasy, film, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, John Malkovich, Jonah Hex, Josh Brolin, Lance Reddick, Megan Fox, Michael Fassbender, Michael Shannon, review, sci-fi, superhero, thriller, Tom Wopat, war, Wes Bentley, western, Will Arnett | Leave a comment
Release Date: June 17th, 2010 (Hollywood premiere)
Directed by: Jimmy Hayward
Written by: Neveldine/Taylor, William Farmer
Based on: Jonah Hex by John Albano, Tony Dezuniga
Music by: Marco Beltrami, Mastodon
Cast: Josh Brolin, John Malkovich, Megan Fox, Michael Fassbender, Will Arnett, Michael Shannon, Wes Bentley, Aidan Quinn, Lance Reddick, Tom Wopat, Jeffrey Dean Morgan
DC Comics, Legendary Pictures, Mad Chance, Weed Road Pictures, Warner Bros., 81 Minutes
"War and me took to each other real well. It felt like it had meaning. The feeling of doing what you thought was right. But it wasn't. Folks can believe what they like, but eventually a man's gotta decide if he's gonna do what's right. That choice cost me more than I bargained for." – Jonah Hex
This has a measly 4.7 rating on IMDb. I'm calling bullshit on that. This is not as bad as a 4.7 would imply but I'll get into why.
This film came out, it didn't look exciting, it didn't generate the right kind of buzz and it just sort of fizzled out immediately. To be honest, I didn't support its theatrical run and sort of forgot about it until a friend and I were talking about Josh Brolin and his multiple comic book roles. So I figured that I'd check it out, eight years later.
What I didn't know, at the time, is that this thing has a pretty stacked cast. Not only do you have Brolin and Megan Fox, probably the hottest starlet circa 2010, but you also have John Malkovich, Michael Fassbender, Will Arnett, Michael Shannon, Wes Bentley, Aidan Quinn, Lance Reddick, Tom Wopat and an uncredited Jeffrey Dean Morgan. This is a movie full of manly men with talent.
There is a lot working for this movie but there is also a lot working against it, which is why it wasn't successful. Well, and the trailers made it look goofier than it actually was.
The biggest problem with this picture is running time. Now I have to assume that this fell victim to producer meddling, being behind schedule or a writers' strike. Reason being, this film should not have been just 81 minutes. It feels like there is a half hour missing from the movie and there probably is. Maybe a lot of scenes came out so bad that they got cut and this is the only way they could have salvaged the film. Whatever the reason, this picture lacks character development, story development and any real emotional weight or deeper context.
That aside, however, this is a balls to the wall action fest with some cool ideas and the kernel of something that could have been really damn good had it been managed much better.
Brolin was good as Hex. Fox was incredibly hot as the eye candy, which is all she needs to be. Malkovich was a formidable villain but just didn't have the time to properly shine and the same goes for Fassbender, really.
Ultimately, this felt like a completely wasted opportunity. It had some very good pieces but the puzzle was left unfinished with most of the pieces hammered into the wrong place.
I still think that there is more going right for this film than wrong and I can't give it a rating below a 5 out of 10. The film just feels unfinished and I wish they would have spent the time to work out the noticeable kinks and given us something more worthy of this film's roster of onscreen talent.
Pairs well with: Other sci-fi/comic book/western hybrids: Cowboys & Aliens, Wild Wild West and The Adventures of Brisco County Jr. Also, the Jonah Hex episodes of Legends of Tomorrow.
Film Review: Interstellar (2014)
June 7, 2017 by Talking Pulp in Film Review, Reviews and tagged 2010s, 2014, adventure, Anne Hathaway, Casey Affleck, Christopher Nolan, drama, Ellen Burstyn, film, Hans Zimmer, Jessica Chastain, John Lithgow, Matt Damon, Matthew McConaughey, Michael Caine, review, sci-fi, Timothée Chalamet, Topher Grace, UK, Wes Bentley, William Devane | Leave a comment
Release Date: October 26th, 2014 (TCL Chinese Theatre premiere)
Written by: Jonathan Nolan, Christopher Nolan
Cast: Matthew McConaughey, Anne Hathaway, Jessica Chastain, Bill Irwin, Ellen Burstyn, Michael Caine, John Lithgow, Mackenzie Foy, Casey Affleck, Topher Grace, Matt Damon, Timothée Chalamet, Wes Bentley, William Devane
Legendary Pictures, Syncopy, Lynda Obst Productions, Paramount Pictures, 169 Minutes
"We used to look up at the sky and wonder at our place in the stars. Now we just look down, and worry about our place in the dirt." – Cooper
Man, where to begin?
Let me kick this off by saying that overall I did like this film. It wasn't this generation's 2001: A Space Odyssey, as I had hoped and granted, those are massive shoes to fill, but this was a fairly okay effort by Christopher Nolan at trying to emulate Stanley Kubrick. And I say that because this film felt like Nolan trying to create his 2001 and his brother, who co-wrote the film, admitted to channeling 2001 while penning this story. Unfortunately, it fell short of coming close to the level of grandeur and wonder that is Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey. Also, it falls short of what Nolan has proven his skill level is capable of.
As far as visuals and sound, this film knocks it out of the park. I deliberately didn't see this in IMAX, as I wanted to be wowed on a regular screen because that is how the majority of eyes will see this picture and to compare it to the amazing visual effects of other films throughout history, I wanted to see it on a level playing field and not on steroids. And truthfully, I've come to look at the IMAX thing as a fad like 3D. Until it is the norm in every theater, it isn't what I consider the industry standard. It's certainly a cool experience but films that rely on it, as greatly as Nolan has been over his last few films, just tell me that they are pushing their visual style and effects over their film as a whole: sparkle over substance. And that is what this film was. I got to the point where I was like, "Fuck these bells and whistles, just show me the damn film!"
There were amazingly shot sequences that used practical effects, which gave a lot of the important visual elements a sense of realism that can't be manufactured digitally. This didn't feel like a cartoon like the recent Star Trek films, it felt cold, dreary and authentic. In that regard, it had the real organic and realistic soul that 2001 had in 1968.
The score to the film and the sound in general were perfect. It definitely has an Oscar-caliber vibe to it and if the film isn't nominated for the score by Hans Zimmer and for a best sound category, that would be a pretty shitty snub by the Academy. Additionally, it definitely deserves a nomination for visual effects.
The pace and editing of the film was pretty disjointed as things would pop in and out of the film that just didn't seem to fit or be necessary. I feel like a two hour version of this film would play much better. The time spent with Matt Damon's character on a dangerous planet is way too drawn out.
When delving into the story of this film, it is a convoluted mess. Yes, things are pretty straightforward but there are a few minor plot twists and developments that come out of nowhere and don't fit the overall narrative of the film. For instance, Matthew McConaughey's character Cooper has a son who, for whatever reason, is obsessed with staying on his M.I.A. father's farm even though it is killing his wife and child. This is a bizarre side story that just doesn't fit within the film. And after his sister burns his crops and tries to kidnap his family, after he punched her husband in the face, he just stands there like a mute retard when confronted by her babbling about her dad's magic watch sending Morse code through space and time through the power of love. It was reminiscent of the plot to a bad 80s music video.
Another bizarre plot twist that we are introduced to is when Anne Hathaway's character Amelia Brand uncharacteristically pushes for the explorers to use the last of their fuel to visit the planet with her former lover on it. After being a hardcore scientist and being bred for this mission, probably all of her adult life, she is willing to throw all of humanity away on her own selfish heart. This just doesn't fit her character leading up to that point and this also leads to the film pushing the concept that love is a dimension that can transcend space, time and every other barrier. Love is a force similar to gravity. The film lost me with this mystic woo. It suddenly felt like a Manga written by a 12 year-old girl.
And speaking of mystic woo, we come to discover that getting sucked into a black hole brings a person to some weird alien-crafted maze of windows that look into Cooper's daughter's bedroom at different points in time. This led to Cooper reaching out through love to send messages to his daughter years prior, which earlier in the film, were dismissed as a ghost. Cooper discovers that the ghost was real and he was the ghost. Cue panic-ridden crying and yelling by McConaughey for fifteen minutes as he is stuck behind his daughter's mystic bookshelf in the center of a black hole.
The film confusingly represents love as a force like gravity and somehow love can make a wristwatch's second hand talk to someone in the past with Morse code.
What is somewhat irritating is that Christopher Nolan consulted with a very knowledgeable physicist on this film but the scientific accuracy was pretty shitty. What I had hoped would be a scientific film where we might encounter another intelligence beyond our scope of comprehension, was instead a fantasy film wrapped in fairy tale where the superior intelligence was just fifth dimensional human beings trying to help their own race evolve and get off of a dying planet. I'd have to write a series of blogs or a book even on the amount of paradoxes here.
In regards to the black hole sequence, Nolan used his physics expert to help him create a realistic scenario and to make the sequence visually authentic. What we got was neither. Now while the black hole looked absolutely fucking amazing and grandiose, when McConaughey flew into it, we never experienced spaghettification. Also, black holes are so powerful that even light cannot escape them, hence the name "black hole".
As McConaughey pilots his craft into the core of the cosmic maelstrom, we can still see things and the lights inside the ship give a nice cool glow in the cockpit. Maybe it is hard to tell a visual story in darkness but I feel like a black screen with the sounds of a ship being torn apart would have been more haunting, more realistic and added more credence and authenticity. What we got was Nolan's version of the lone astronaut entering the monolith, except this one finds himself behind his daughter's bookshelf. It wasn't anywhere near as cool and epic as where David Bowman went in 2001: A Space Odyssey. Hell, it wasn't even as cool as where the crew went in Disney's 1979 film The Black Hole. At least they flew through Hell filled with evil robots.
It is worth noting that this film also borrowed from 2001 in the character of the computer/robot named TARS, who was this film's version of HAL 9000. Except TARS didn't kill astronauts, he just joked about it and served more of an R2-D2 role.
In the end, Matthew McConaughey's mission is a failure, in a sense, but I guess it inspired his aging daughter to work hard on equations and save humankind from their dying world. Her work leads to humans ending up on some Saturn-orbiting space station that is a complete rip-off of the cylindrical spaceship Rama from Arthur C. Clarke's Rendezvous With Rama. Being that Clarke penned the original 2001 novel and all its sequels, this brings Nolan's "borrowing" of Clarke's ideas and concepts full circle.
What you have, in my estimation, is a good looking, often times visually amazing film, that unfortunately sells itself short by tapping into the Stanley Kubrick/Arthur C. Clarke well too often. The major difference, is that Kubrick took risks and did things that challenged filmmaking and changed it forever. Nolan played it safe and didn't leave us with anything daring, as he seemed to be more interested in making a commercial success and an homage, as opposed to something more authentic and true to his heart. However, this is the difference between Kubrick and Nolan. One is the professor, the other is a really good student that idolizes the professor a bit too much.
Is the film worth a watch? Definitely. Is it destined to be a beloved classic? Probably to some but it lacks the depth and originality to truly make it stand on its own legs.
Pairs well with: other Nolan films that don't feature Batman.