paulhunterjones
My Point of View Based Upon Law, Finance, and Politics
Queen Elizabeth II of the UK
Why This Blog
Clichés-Quotations
Quotes for This Week
News from Latin America
Argentina Suffers a Stunning Defeat in America's Court of Last Resort
For more than 12 years the Republic of Argentina has battled so-called vulture funds in US federal courts. This litigation grew out of the country's massive sovereign debt default in 2001. At that time most investors did everything possible to unload their portfolios of the country's debt. Yet, there were courageous investors who were willing to speculate on the country's debt rising up from the financial abyss. A few funds invested billions into purchasing Argentina's junk bonds. Though Argentina has renegotiated much of its 2001 debt with bondholders and has paid these "exchange bondholders" pennies on their original debt, the funds who took the risk of investing in the junk bonds have refused to renegotiate the contractual terms of their bonds. These funds want to be paid what they were promised and not a penny less. Who can blame them for demanding full payment.
Most legal experts and financial advisers close to the litigation have little sympathy for the former South American economic powerhouse. Don't Cry for Me Argentina is their response when Argentina demands justice that it does not deserve. On October 26, 2012 the United States Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit decided the case of NML Capital v. the Republic of Argentina. The Court affirmed in part and remanded in part the lower court's decision of Federal Judge Griesa of the Southern District. In the case Judge Griesa ruled against Argentina in granting the applications of the Plaintiffs. Much to the chagrin of Argentina; its fiery pronunciations of sovereign integrity and legal (quasi political) arguments that it had a sovereign right to force restructuring upon debt holders were judicially debunked by the District Court.
It did not surprise anyone that Argentina appealed the court's decision to the Supreme Court. While Argentina was litigating its case before the Supreme Court Argentinians in high office were waging a battle to wind public opinion. Clearly Argentina was (is) looking to negotiate a settlement with the non-exchange bondholders. Yet the country's last formal offer of settlement was rejected on or about March 27, 2013 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit as being inadequate. I wrote at that time that Argentina was heading for another debt default. The U.S. courts are not going to let politics trump the law or their decisions. Argentina's total disregard for the judicial decisions and judgments makes a mockery of America's judicially system and the sanctity of the law.
The high court next considered and disposed of Argentina's (its banks' claim) that its foreign assets were not subject to discovery by the non-exchange bondholders. The Justice's were almost unanimous in deciding against the Latin America country. Justice Anthony Scalia writing for the court held that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act did not limit the scope of discovery available to a judgment creditor in a federal post-judgment execution proceeding against a foreign sovereign. In the well written decision Justice Scalia specifically alluded to the fact that Argentina had waived part of its immunity by choosing to litigate in the U.S. courts. The Republic of Argentina stands properly before the court like any other person. Argentina's dreaded "vulture funds" are now positioned to discovery the Republic's assets worldwide. What follows next is rather obvious; the non-exchange bondholders will seek to attach the discovered assets in hopes of satisfying their judgments.
This entry was posted in Financial Crisis, Legal and tagged Argentina, exchange holders, Judge Timothy Griesa, junk bonds, litigation, NML Capital v. Argentina, President Cristina Fernandez, sovereign debt default, U.S. Court of Appeals, U.S. Supreme Court, vulture funds on June 23, 2014 by Paul Hunter Jones.
About Paul Hunter Jones
I was raised in Great Neck, New York. In 1975 I received a B.A. degree from Alfred University. Three years later I graduated from the University of Michigan School of Law and have been practicing law in New York ever since. I am a Republican though I will vote according to the better policy or stance. Politics, law, and finance are my interests. I give special thanks to Cheryl Jones of Lexington South Carolina, my sister, and Eliana Trout Blanco of Santa Marta, Colombia, a one of the kind friend, for their contributions in the writing of this blog.
View all posts by Paul Hunter Jones →
← RIP Nelson Mandela Residents of New York City Can Again Drink Large Sugary Drinks →
Feel Free To Leave Your Thoughts Cancel reply
FoxSports College Football
Deion Sanders on why he's leading the charge for elite HBCU athletics | FOX VOICES
On Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Pro Football Hall of Famer and Jackson State head football coach Deion Sanders joins Michael Strahan and Curt Menefee to walk through how he plans to help Historically Black Colleges and Universities become a major player in college athletics going forward.
Best of Urban Meyer on Big Noon Kickoff
Relive new Jacksonville Jaguars head coach Urban Meyer's best moments on FOX Sports' Big Noon Kickoff.
New York Times Global Edition
Biden Inaugurated as 46th President January 21, 2021
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. and Kamala Devi Harris took the oath of office at a Capitol still reeling from the attack of a violent mob at a time when a deadly pandemic is still ravaging the country.
Photos From an Inauguration Day Like No Other January 21, 2021
President Biden and his inner circle wanted the ceremony to take place outside the Capitol as usual to show Americans and the world that democracy would endure despite attempts to upend it.
US Supreme Decisions
Mitchell v. Wisconsin
(United States Supreme Court) - Held that when a motorist suspected of drunk driving is unconscious and cannot be given a breath test, the exigent-circumstances doctrine generally permits a blood test without a warrant. Justice Alito announced the judgment of the Court and delivered a plurality opinion, joined by three other justices. Justice Thomas concurri […]
Department of Commerce v. New York
(United States Supreme Court) - Held that the government's decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census questionnaire did not violate the Enumeration Clause or the Census Act. However, the sole stated reason for reinstating the question "seems to have been contrived," and therefore it was appropriate to remand the case back to the […]
Translate here, if necessary
Emma Mclean Coaching
Stop Scrolling. Start Creating.
Only Worthy By Name
Musings. Reflections. Ideas. Stories.
NOOR ANAND CHAWLA
A Jaunt Through Life