Vol. 104 No. 4 (2019): April, 2019
Targeted next generation sequencing reveals high mutation…
Online Only Articles
Targeted next generation sequencing reveals high mutation frequency of CREBBP, BCL2 and KMT2D in high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements
Solène M. Evrard
Sarah Péricart
David Grand
Nadia Amara
Frédéric Escudié
Julia Gilhodes
Pierre Bories
Alexandra Traverse-Glehen
Romain Dubois
Pierre Brousset
Marie Parrens
Camille Laurent
Pathology and Cytology Department, CHU Toulouse, IUCT Oncopole;Toulouse III Paul Sabatier University;Inserm, UMR1037 Centre de Recherche en Cancerologie de Toulouse, laboratoire d'excellence TOUCAN
Pathology and Cytology Department, CHU Toulouse, IUCT Oncopole
Department of Biostatistics, IUCT-Oncopole, CHU Toulouse
Regional Cancer Network Onco-occitanie, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, INSERM 1052, Pierre-Bénite
Institut de Pathologie, CHU Lille, Avenue Oscar Lambret
Pathology, CHU Bordeaux, Inserm U1053, France
Vol. 104 No. 4 (2019): April, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.198572
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, representing approximately 30-40% of all cases.1 The update of the 4th edition of the 2017 WHO classification provides new concepts in the classification of DLBCL.1 Importantly, the category "B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between DLBCL and Burkitt Lymphoma" is being replaced by two new categories: high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements so-called double-hit (DH) or triple-hit (TH) lymphomas, and HGBL, not otherwise specified (NOS) without MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 translocations. Patients with MYC/BCL2 DHL or MYC/BCL2/BCL6 THL will usually have an aggressive clinical course despite the fact that most cases have the germinal center B (GCB) cell-of-origin (COO) which is known to be associated with a better prognosis than the activated B-cell (ABC) subtype.2 Patients with MYC/BCL6 DHL may have a GCB or ABC COO, and most studies, but not all, reported an aggressive clinical course as well.32 To the best of our knowledge, genomic characterization of a patient cohort diagnosed with MYC/BCL2 DHL, MYC/BCL6 DHL or MYC/BCL2/BCL6 THL has not yet been reported. To identify molecular variants, we performed targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of FFPE samples of DHL/THL for mutations on 43 genes known to be important for lymphomagenesis (Online Supplementary Table S1) based on an extensive literature review of NGS studies on DLBCL NOS.104
We thus studied 20 adult patients diagnosed with DHL harboring MYC and BCL2 (n=15) or MYC and BCL6 (n=2) rearrangements and 3 THL. Based on the Hans algorithm, 18 patients were classified as GCB, and 2 as non-GCB.11 Clinical, immunohistochemical and cytogenetic features of DHL/THLs are summarized in Table 1. All FFPE samples were analyzed and sequenced using our NGS Lymphopanel of 43 genes (see Online Supplementary Material).
Table 1.Clinical, immunohistochemical and cytogenetic features of DHL/THL patients.
In all FFPE DHL/THL cases, our NGS Lymphopanel identified 438 alterations on 40 genes important for lymphomagenesis. Of these, 197/438 (45%) alterations localized on 33 genes are non-synonymous and predict amino-acid substitutions or truncation of the proteins (Figure 1A and Online Supplementary Tables S2-S3). Missense mutations are the most frequent, 145/197 (74%), followed by 17 (9%) splice-site mutations and 17 (9%) frameshift insertions/deletions. All samples harbor non-synonymous somatic alterations with a minimum of 5 alterations identified in patients #15 and #16 and a maximum of 18 alterations detected in patient #6. The most frequently mutated genes are CREBBP (16/20 cases) followed by BCL2 (12/20), KMT2D (12/20), MYC (9/20), EZH2 (8/20), IGLL5 (8/20), FOXO1 (6/20) and SOCS1 (6/20) (Figure 1A). Mutations of these genes have previously been reported in DLBCL NOS, especially in GCB-DLBCL.1612104 Interestingly, the percentage of DHL/THL with mutations on these 8 genes is significantly higher than that reported in DLBCL NOS (Figure 1B and Online Supplementary Table S4).1612104 As most DHL and all THL were classified as GC subtype, we compared the mutation rates between GCB-DLBCL and DHL/THL with GC subtype (GCB-DHL/THL). Figure 1C shows that the percentage of GCB-DHL/THL with CREBBP, BCL2, KMT2D, MYC, EZH2 and FOXO1 mutations is significantly higher than that reported in GCB-DLBCL (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.05, P<0.001, P<0.05 and P<0.01 respectively; Online Supplementary Table S5). These results suggest that the mutation rate of these 6 genes in DHL/THL is not due only to COO classification.161412108
Figure 1.Molecular characterization of DHL. A: Genes mutated in the 20 DHL/THL. Somatic events are reported as colored symbols, with an optional white number signaling multiple events in the same category. Genes are listed in rows on the left and are listed by mutation frequency. The genes in bold are the most frequently mutated genes in DHL/THL. The 20 DHL/THL patients are described in distinct columns, grouped by their double or triple translocations and their COO subtypes. The right panel visually summarizes the number of patients having a mutation for each gene. At the bottom, the total number of variants found for each patient is indicated. B: Frequency of gene mutations in DHL/THL (in blue) compared to frequency of gene mutations in DLBCL NOS described in literature (studies that used WGS or WES are in purple, studies with targeted NGS or high-throughput sequencing are in orange). C: Frequency of gene mutations in GCB-DHL/THL (in blue) compared to frequency of gene mutations in GCB-DLBCL described in the literature (studies that used WGS or WES are in purple, studies with targeted NGS or high-throughput sequencing are in orange). D: AID mutation frequencies (percentage of total variants located at preferential DGYW/WRCH target sites) calculated for genes highly mutated in DHL/THL. E: AID target site mutation rates (percentage of sequenced DGYW/WRCH AID target sites in each gene effectively mutated) calculated for genes highly mutated in DHL/THL. NA: not available.
The CREBBP gene is frequently mutated in most DHL/THL cases (16/20 cases) (Figure 1A). CREBBP mutations are detected in all cases of THL and only in DHL with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements. Twenty-eight somatic alterations are identified: 17 missense mutations, 10 truncating mutations and 1 in-frame deletion. More than 50% of missense mutations and all the truncating mutations are located before and/or in the acetyltransferase HAT domain with predicted loss of protein function. Thus, most of the somatic alterations on CREBBP alter its acetyltransferase activity, leading to constitutive activation of the BCL6 oncoprotein and to a decrease in p53 tumor suppressor activity.
In addition, the BCL2 gene is frequently and highly mutated (28 mutations) in our cohort (12/20 cases), notably in MYC and BCL2 rearranged DHL (12/18 patients) (Figure 1A-C). Similarly, numerous mutations of MYC (20 mutations) are found in 9/20 DHL/THL and mostly in MYC and BCL2 translocated DHL. These results are consistent with previous studies on DLBCL NOS with isolated translocations showing a strong positive correlation of MYC and BCL2 mutations and their respective translocations.17
As described in most GCB-DLBCL, DHL/THL harbor mutations on the KMT2D (12/20) and EZH2 (8/20) genes. Intriguingly, the frequencies of KMT2D and EZH2 mutations are significantly higher in DHL/THL compared to both DLBCL NOS (Figure 1B) (P<0.01 and P<0.0001, respectively) and the GCB subtype (Figure 1C) (P<0.05). KMT2D mutations are detected in both MYC/BCL2 and MYC/BCL6 DHLs and in THLs and are mostly frameshift deletions or stop gain alterations leading to a loss of protein function. All 8 EZH2 mutations are only found in MYC/BCL2 DHL and 6/8 are hotspot Y646 mutations.
Mutations of FOXO1 found in 6/20 cases are exclusively detected in patients with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements (DHL or THL) (Figure 1 A-C). Among them, 5 FOXO1 mutations are found within the first exon of FOXO1 encoding the entire N-terminal region and part of the Forkhead box domain. All 5 mutations are hotspot mutations: R19 (n=2), R21 (n=1) and T24 (n=2), previously described in DLBCL NOS.18 SOCS1 mutations are only found in MYC and BCL2 rearranged DHL (6/20). The 8 mutations of the SOCS1 gene detected spread throughout the coding region and among them, 7 are non-truncating mutations (Figure 1A-C). Furthermore, 40% of DHL/THL (n=8/20) display at least one mutation on IGLL5 known to be recurrently mutated in DLBCL.7 Most alterations detected on IGLL5 are missense mutations (14/16). Moreover, 40% of synonymous and non-synonymous mutations on IGLL5 are located at DGYW/WRCH target sites, suggestive of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) activity.
We thus assessed the impact of AID involvement on the lymphopanel genes. To address this question, we looked at the percentage of mutations potentially induced by aberrant somatic hypermutation (SHM) occurring within the DGYW/WRCH DNA sequence motifs. Among the highly mutated genes, IGLL5, SOCS1, MYC and BCL2 have the highest AID mutation frequency (40%, 38%, 30% and 27%, respectively) whereas KMT2D, FOXO1 and EZH2 show no AID induced mutations (Figure 1D). Moreover, the percentage of sequenced DGYW/WRCH AID target sites mutated on these genes is also higher on IGLL5, SOCS1, MYC and BCL2 whereas CREBBP shows a very low AID target site mutation rate compared to its AID mutation frequency (0.4% vs. 8% of mutation rates) (Figure 1E).
We then studied the functional significance of these DHL/THL genetic alterations using 8 predefined signaling pathways (Online Supplementary Table S1). As shown in Figure 2, DHL/THL mutations are mainly involved in apoptosis/cell-cycle (35% of total variants) and epigenetic regulation pathways (32% of total variants mostly occurring on the CREBBP gene), known to be associated with a poor prognosis in lymphoma patients.139 Interestingly, the number of alterations in the apoptosis/cell cycle pathway is significantly higher in DHL/THL than in DLBCL NOS and GCB-DLBCL according to the Dubois et al. study, (70/197 vs. 209/1064; P<0.001 and 42/87 vs. 118/450; P<0.001, respectively).9 In contrast, mutations on exon 34 of NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 have been reported in 9% of DLBCL NOS cases while the sequencing of the same region showed no mutation in all DHL/THL cases.13 In addition to NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 genes, further analyses of other genes involved in NOTCH signaling are needed to study the genomic alterations of this pathway in DHL/THL.
Figure 2.Mutation pathway frequencies. Mutation frequencies per gene are shown as a percentage of the total number of variants.
To our knowledge, our data provide a comprehensive profile of genomic alterations of DHL/THL in which the CREBBP gene appears to be the most frequently mutated. Based on an extensive literature review of targeted-NGS studies in DLBCL, we were able to datamine only 7 DHL/THL cases from the Karube et al. study.13 They also showed a high mutation rate of CREBBP in 6 DHL/THL cases, which exclusively harbored MYC/BCL2 translocations. These results extend those that we obtained in our cohort. Furthermore, our lymphopanel highlights the high frequency of mutations on CREBBP and FOXO1 known to be associated with a poor prognosis in DLBCL patients illustrated by the significantly worse overall survival (OS) of DHL/THL patients as compared to the OS of DLBCL NOS patients from 3 different cohorts (P<0.0001) (Online Supplementary Figure S1). We also found a high frequency of SOCS1 non-truncating mutations which have been associated with a poor outcome in DLBCL patients, but needs to be confirmed in larger cohorts.1910
In conclusion, our study describes for the first time the mutational landscape of DHL/THL, a poorly studied subtype of aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Using FFPE samples of 20 DHL/THL cases, we identified numerous mutations on genes involved in apoptosis/cell-cycle and epigenetic regulation pathways. Our lymphopanel of 43 genes identifies a distinct mutational signature of DHL/THL with a higher a level of CREBBP, BCL2, KMT2D, MYC, EZH2 and FOXO1 mutations than in GCB DLBCL-NOS. Finally, our findings may provide a rationale for therapeutic strategies in patients with the most clinically aggressive DLBCL subgroup.
Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues.Google Scholar
Landsburg DJ, Petrich AM, Abramson JS. Impact of oncogene rearrangement patterns on outcomes in patients with double-hit non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer. 2016; 122(4):559-564. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29781Google Scholar
Li S, Desai P, Lin P. MYC/BCL6 double-hit lymphoma (DHL): a tumour associated with an aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis. Histopathology. 2016; 68(7):1090-1098. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12884Google Scholar
Lohr JG, Stojanov P, Lawrence MS. Discovery and prioritization of somatic mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by whole-exome sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(10):3879-3884. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121343109Google Scholar
Morin RD, Mungall K, Pleasance E. Mutational and structural analysis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using whole-genome sequencing. Blood. 2013; 122(7):1256-1265. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-02-483727Google Scholar
Pasqualucci L, Trifonov V, Fabbri G. Analysis of the coding genome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Nat Genet. 2011; 43(9):830-837. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ng.892Google Scholar
de Miranda NFCC, Georgiou K, Chen L. Exome sequencing reveals novel mutation targets in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas derived from Chinese patients. Blood. 2014; 124(16):2544-2553. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-12-546309Google Scholar
Zhang J, Grubor V, Love CL. Genetic heterogeneity of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(4):1398-1403. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205299110Google Scholar
Dubois S, Viailly P-J, Mareschal S. Next-generation sequencing in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma highlights molecular divergence and therapeutic opportunities: a LYSA Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22(12):2919-2928. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2305Google Scholar
Juskevicius D, Jucker D, Klingbiel D, Mamot C, Dirnhofer S, Tzankov A. Mutations of CREBBP and SOCS1 are independent prognostic factors in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: mutational analysis of the SAKK 38/07 prospective clinical trial cohort. J Hematol Oncol. 2017; 10(1):70. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0438-7Google Scholar
Hans CP, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood. 2004; 103(1):275-282. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-05-1545Google Scholar
Hung SS, Meissner B, Chavez EA. Assessment of capture and amplicon-based approaches for the development of a targeted next-generation sequencing pipeline to personalize lymphoma management. J Mol Diagn. 2018; 20(2):203-214. Google Scholar
Karube K, Enjuanes A, Dlouhy I. Integrating genomic alterations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies new relevant pathways and potential therapeutic targets. Leukemia. 2018; 32(3):675-684. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.251Google Scholar
Reddy A, Zhang J, Davis NS. Genetic and functional drivers of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Cell. 2017; 171(2):481-494.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.027Google Scholar
Chapuy B, Stewart C, Dunford AJ. Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma are associated with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes. Nat Med. 2018; 24(5):679-690. Google Scholar
Schmitz R, Wright GW, Huang DW. Genetics and pathogenesis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(15):1396-1407. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801445Google Scholar
Ennishi D, Mottok A, Ben-Neriah S. Genetic profiling of MYC and BCL2 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma determines cell-of-origin–specific clinical impact. Blood. 2017; 129(20):2760-2770. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-11-747022Google Scholar
Trinh DL, Scott DW, Morin RD. Analysis of FOXO1 mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2013; 121(18):3666-3674. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-01-479865Google Scholar
Schif B, Lennerz JK, Kohler CW. SOCS1 mutation subtypes predict divergent outcomes in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Oncotarget. 2013; 4(1):35-47. PubMedGoogle Scholar
2018.198572.EVRARD_SUPPL.pdf
Vol. 104 No. 4 (2019): April, 2019 : Online Only Articles
Solène M. Evrard, Sarah Péricart, David Grand, Nadia Amara, Frédéric Escudié, Julia Gilhodes, Pierre Bories, Alexandra Traverse-Glehen, Romain Dubois, Pierre Brousset, Marie Parrens, Camille Laurent. Targeted next generation sequencing reveals high mutation frequency of CREBBP, BCL2 and KMT2D in high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements. Haematologica 2019;104(4):e154-e157; https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.198572.