US Interests
You Are Here: Home → Israel Passes Controversial Jewish Nation-state Bill After Stormy Debate
Israel Passes Controversial Jewish Nation-state Bill After Stormy Debate
contact@ifamericansknew.org July 19, 2018 adalah, j streeet, Jerusalem, knesset, nation-state, Netanyahu, official language, peace now
Coalition members standing together after the nation-state bill passed on July 19, 2018. Credit: Olivier Fitoussi
Pro-Palestinian groups decry Israel's new Jewish nation-state law as "racist" and "apartheid," although Jewish Knesset members claim "it doesn't hurt the culture of minorities living in Israel." Time will tell…
by Jonathan Lis and Noa Landau, Ha'aretz
Israel passed early Thursday a controversial bill that officially defines Israel as the national homeland of the Jewish people and asserts that "the realization of the right to national self-determination in Israel is unique to the Jewish people," sparking outrage from Israel's Arab community and provoking concern from the international community.
62 lawmakers in Israel's Knesset voted in favor of the legislation and 55 opposed it. Two lawmakers, Benny Begin (Likud) and Orly Levy-Abekasis (independent) abstained.
The nation-state law also includes clauses stating that a "united Jerusalem" is the capital of Israel and that Hebrew is the country's official language. Another says that "the state sees the development of Jewish settlement as a national value and will act to encourage and promote its establishment and consolidation."
It passed after a long and stormy debate that began in the afternoon, with lawmakers voting on hundreds of clauses presented by the opposition that objected to differents parts of the bill.
Arab lawmakers tear the nation-state bill in protest after it passes in the Knesset.Olivier Fitoussi
Immediately after the law passed, Arab lawmakers tore copies in protest, and were subsequently removed from the Knesset plenum hall. Lawmaker Ayman Odeh, chairman of the Joint List, released a statement saying that Israel "declared it does not want us here" and that it had "passed a law of Jewish supremacy and told us that we will always be second-class citiziens."
"This is our country"
Speaking moments after the bill passed into law, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said: "This is a defining moment – long live the State of Israel."
Netanyahu further said that "122 years after Herzl made his vision known, with this law we determined the founding principle of our existence. Israel is the nation state of the Jewish people, and respects the rights of all of its citizens."
The prime minister also said that "in the Middle East, only Israel respects [rights]. This is our country, the Jewish state. In recent years there have been those who have tried to undermine that and question the principles of our existence. Today we made it into law: This is the country, the language, the anthem and flag."
As they left the Knesset plenum, Arab MKs from the Joint List party confronted Netanyahu. MK Ahmad Tibi and MK Ayeda Touma-Souliman yelled at Netanyahu: "You passed an apartheid law, a racist law."
MK Tibi lashed at Netanyahu: "Why are you afraid of the Arabic language?" The premier retorted by saying: "How dare you talk this way about the only democracy in the Middle East?"
Opposition head Isaac Herzog also spoke up at the plenum, saying that "it's a little sad to me that the last speech I make will be against this kind of backdrop. The question is whether the law will harm or benefit Israel. History will determine. I really hope that we won't find the fine balance between a Jewish and democratic state to be hurt."
The sponsor of the bill, MK Avi Dichter, said during debates that took place prior to the vote that "unlike the disinformation and fake news that were tossed around [regarding the bill], this basic law doesn't hurt the culture of minorities living in Israel, doesn't hurt their sabbaticals and holidays and certainly doesn't hurt the Arabic language, which remains a mother tongue for 1.5 million of Israel's citizens."
The draft bill the Knesset voted on is fundamentally different form the version the coalition had sought to advance in the past decade. Its main clauses were moderated following pressure within the coalition ranks and beyond.
Initially, the bill was intended to significantly limit the discretion of Supreme Court justices' decisions, requiring them to set the state's Jewish character above its democratic character in rulings where the two clashed. This clause was removed from the bill already in May.
The most controversial clause, which appeared to pave the way for the creation of communities segregated by nationality or religion, was removed from the legislation earlier this week.
The nation-state law establishes as a basic law, or quasi-constitutional law, a set of values, some of which already appear in existing laws. The law stipulates that Israel is the Jewish nation's historic homeland and that this nation has the singular right to national self-determination in it. The law anchors the flag, menorah, "Hatikva" anthem, Hebrew calendar, Independence Day and Jewish holidays as national symbols.
The law states that the "whole and united" Jerusalem is the state's capital, which appears today in Basic Law: Jerusalem. The nation-state law further grants the status of an official language only to Hebrew.
Israeli lawmakers discuss and vote on the nation-state bill. Credit: נועם ריבקין / דובר
Another controversial clause stipulates that the state will invest resources in preserving Israel's affiliation to world Jewry, but not in Israel. This wording was demanded by the ultra-Orthodox parties to prevent the state from linking up with the Reform and Conservative communities in Israel.
Palestinian rights groups react
Adalah Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, released in response: "The nation-state law is a colonial law with features of apartheid, which is prohibited by international law because it contradicts the international treaty that bans apartheid crimes. It creates various avenues for segregation in land and housing and incentives based on the principle of 'advancing Jewish settlement' both in civil life and in obtaining citizenship based on the law of return and in language and in cultural rights in the name of self-definition."
As part of the protest against the law, Peace Now activists waved a black flag in the Knesset balcony during the debate, until security guards made them leave the room. Joint List chairman Ayman Odeh also raised a black flag during the debate against the legislation.
"As [the 1956 massacre] in Kafr Qassem was a blatantly illegal order, with a black flag over it, so is a black flag hoisted over this evil law," he said.
J Street's president and founder, Jeremy Ben-Ami, harshly criticized the nation-state bill and Netanyahu's government: "It was born in sin, its only purpose is to send a message to the Arab community, the LGBT community and other minorities in Israel, that they are not and never will be equal citizens. Two months ago we celebrated the 70th anniversary of the Israeli Declaration of Independence, where it was written that the State of Israel 'will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or gender.' Today Netanyahu's government is trying to ignore those words and the values that they represent."
On Monday, Netanyahu said the bill was "very important to guarantee the foundations of our existence, which is Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people" – though critics say he is mainly keen to drum up support before the next Knesset election, due by November next year.
Enter your email address below to receive our latest articles right in your inbox.
Human rights org B'Tselem defies Israeli orders to stop teaching about apartheid
Last-minute land theft: Israel released plans for for 2,500 new settler homes hours before inauguration
Israeli court wants to ban film about Israel's 2002 massacre of Palestinian refugees
Balloons: A rudimentary weapon of Palestinian desperation
2020 US Elections
Headlines from Palestine news broadcasts
IAK news & analysis
Israel Lobby
Israelcentric defin of antisemitism
Israeli governmental policies
Neoconservatives
Pro-Israel Think Tanks
Progressive Except Palestine
Trump / Governmental actions
Educational materials on Israel-Palestine
"This provocative book documents a history that is essential in understanding today's world. Scholarly, yet readable, it is a must for all Americans."
—James Abourezk, former U.S. SenatorOrder Against Our Better Judgment
by Alison Weir on Amazon.com Read reviews and an excerpt at AgainstOurBetterJudgment.comTo invite Alison to give a presentation in your city, please contact us.
Land Lost
Read more at: IfAmericansKnew.org
Source: IsraelPalestineTimeline.org
HEADLINES FROM THE REGION
Israeli Soldiers Abduct Fifteen Palestinians In West Bank January 21, 2021
Pregnant Palestinian Woman Miscarries After Inhaling Tear Gas Fired by Israeli Military January 21, 2021
Soldiers Abduct Two Palestinians In Jerusalem January 21, 2021
Palestinian Prisoner Dies After 14 Years in Israeli Jail January 21, 2021
Israel Bulldozes Structures in Al-Arakib Village for the 182nd Time January 20, 2021
Israeli Soldiers Abduct A Senior Palestinian Official And His Assistant Near Jerusalem January 20, 2021
Abu Rodeina Denounces Israel's Latest Colonialist Plans January 20, 2021
Fifteen More Detainees Contract Coronavirus In Ramon Israeli Prison January 20, 2021
Latest Conflict Victims
Bashar Zubeidat January 12, 2021
Mohammad Eyada Salahuddin January 12, 2021
'Aahed Abdul-Rahman Ekhlayyel January 6, 2021
Esther Horgan December 22, 2020
Mahmoud Omar Kamil December 22, 2020
Ali Ayman Abu Alia December 5, 2020
Nour Jamal Shqeir November 26, 2020
Sagi Ben-David November 13, 2020
Tweets by ifamericansknew
Our work is made possible by the support of our readers. Consider making a donation today:
We believe in the free marketplace of ideas and post information we think is valuable for people to read. The posting of articles from organizations or individuals does not necessarily denote agreement with or endorsement of the political positions or philosophies espoused by these highly diverse sources. Read the If Americans Knew statement on our mission and principles to learn more.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work is archived here under fair use law for educational and research purposes in accordance with our nonprofit educational mission. The opinions rendered are the authors' and not necessarily those of this website.
Content on this site is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.