doi
stringlengths 10
10
| chunk-id
stringlengths 1
4
| chunk
stringlengths 1
1.66k
| id
stringlengths 10
10
| title
stringlengths 19
148
| summary
stringlengths 345
1.92k
| source
stringlengths 31
31
| authors
sequence | categories
sequence | comment
stringlengths 4
284
⌀ | journal_ref
stringclasses 14
values | primary_category
stringclasses 16
values | published
stringlengths 8
8
| updated
stringlengths 8
8
| references
list |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1910.01108 | 0 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller,
faster, cheaper and lighter
Victor SANH, Lysandre DEBUT, Julien CHAUMOND, Thomas WOLF
Hugging Face
{victor,lysandre,julien,thomas}@huggingface.co
Abstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent
in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-theedge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains
challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.
While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific
models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show
that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97%
of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the
inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple
loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our
smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 1 | loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our
smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its
capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a
comparative on-device study.
1 Introduction
Figure 1: Parameter counts of several recently released
pretrained language models.The last two years have seen the rise
of Transfer Learning approaches in
Natural Language Processing (NLP)
with large-scale pre-trained language
models becoming a basic tool in
many NLP tasks [Devlin et al., 2018,
Radford et al., 2019, Liu et al., 2019].
While these models lead to significant improvement, they often have
several hundred million parameters
and current research1on pre-trained
models indicates that training even
larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.
The trend toward bigger models
raises several concerns. First is the
environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models’ computational requirements as mentioned
in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019]. Second, while operating these models on-device
in real-time has the potential to enable novel and interesting language processing applications, the
growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption. | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 2 | in real-time has the potential to enable novel and interesting language processing applications, the
growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.
1See for instance the recently released MegatronLM ( https://nv-adlr.github.io/MegatronLM )
EMC^2: 5th Edition Co-located with NeurIPS’19arXiv:1910.01108v4 [cs.CL] 1 Mar 2020
In this paper, we show that it is possible to reach similar performances on many downstream-tasks
using much smaller language models pre-trained with knowledge distillation, resulting in models
that are lighter and faster at inference time, while also requiring a smaller computational training
budget. Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several
downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models. We also show that our compressed models
are small enough to run on the edge, e.g. on mobile devices.
Using a triple loss, we show that a 40% smaller Transformer (Vaswani et al. [2017]) pre-trained
through distillation via the supervision of a bigger Transformer language model can achieve similar
performance on a variety of downstream tasks, while being 60% faster at inference time. Further | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 3 | through distillation via the supervision of a bigger Transformer language model can achieve similar
performance on a variety of downstream tasks, while being 60% faster at inference time. Further
ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.
We have made the trained weights available along with the training code in the Transformers2
library from HuggingFace [Wolf et al., 2019].
2 Knowledge distillation
Knowledge distillation [Bucila et al., 2006, Hinton et al., 2015] is a compression technique in which
a compact model - the student - is trained to reproduce the behaviour of a larger model - the teacher or an ensemble of models.
In supervised learning, a classification model is generally trained to predict an instance class by
maximizing the estimated probability of gold labels. A standard training objective thus involves
minimizing the cross-entropy between the model’s predicted distribution and the one-hot empirical
distribution of training labels. A model performing well on the training set will predict an output
distribution with high probability on the correct class and with near-zero probabilities on other
classes. But some of these "near-zero" probabilities are larger than others and reflect, in part, the
generalization capabilities of the model and how well it will perform on the test set3. | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 4 | generalization capabilities of the model and how well it will perform on the test set3.
Training loss The student is trained with a distillation loss over the soft target probabilities of
the teacher: Lce=P
itilog(si)where ti(resp. si) is a probability estimated by the teacher
(resp. the student). This objective results in a rich training signal by leveraging the full teacher
distribution. Following Hinton et al. [2015] we used a softmax-temperature :pi=exp(zi=T)P
jexp(zj=T)
where Tcontrols the smoothness of the output distribution and ziis the model score for the class i.
The same temperature Tis applied to the student and the teacher at training time, while at inference,
Tis set to 1 to recover a standard softmax .
The final training objective is a linear combination of the distillation loss Lcewith the supervised
training loss, in our case the masked language modeling lossLmlm [Devlin et al., 2018]. We found it
beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss (Lcos) which will tend to align the directions of the student
and teacher hidden states vectors.
3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 5 | and teacher hidden states vectors.
3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT
Student architecture In the present work, the student - DistilBERT - has the same general architecture as BERT. The token-type embeddings and the pooler are removed while the number of layers
is reduced by a factor of 2. Most of the operations used in the Transformer architecture ( linear
layer andlayer normalisation ) are highly optimized in modern linear algebra frameworks and our
investigations showed that variations on the last dimension of the tensor (hidden size dimension) have
a smaller impact on computation efficiency (for a fixed parameters budget) than variations on other
factors like the number of layers. Thus we focus on reducing the number of layers.
Student initialization In addition to the previously described optimization and architectural choices,
an important element in our training procedure is to find the right initialization for the sub-network to
converge. Taking advantage of the common dimensionality between teacher and student networks,
we initialize the student from the teacher by taking one layer out of two.
2https://github.com/huggingface/transformers
3E.g. BERT-base’s predictions for a masked token in " I think this is the beginning of a | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 6 | 3E.g. BERT-base’s predictions for a masked token in " I think this is the beginning of a
beautiful [MASK] " comprise two high probability tokens ( dayandlife) and a long tail of valid predictions
(future ,story ,world . . . ).
2
Table 1: DistilBERT retains 97% of BERT performance. Comparison on the dev sets of the
GLUE benchmark. ELMo results as reported by the authors. BERT and DistilBERT results are the
medians of 5 runs with different seeds.
Model Score CoLA MNLI MRPC QNLI QQP RTE SST-2 STS-B WNLI
ELMo 68.7 44.1 68.6 76.6 71.1 86.2 53.4 91.5 70.4 56.3
BERT-base 79.5 56.3 86.7 88.6 91.8 89.6 69.3 92.7 89.0 53.5
DistilBERT 77.0 51.3 82.2 87.5 89.2 88.5 59.9 91.3 86.9 56.3
Table 2: DistilBERT yields to comparable
performance on downstream tasks. Comparison on downstream tasks: IMDb (test accuracy) and SQuAD 1.1 (EM/F1 on dev set). | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 7 | performance on downstream tasks. Comparison on downstream tasks: IMDb (test accuracy) and SQuAD 1.1 (EM/F1 on dev set).
D: with a second step of distillation during
fine-tuning.
Model IMDb SQuAD
(acc.) (EM/F1)
BERT-base 93.46 81.2/88.5
DistilBERT 92.82 77.7/85.8
DistilBERT (D) - 79.1/86.9Table 3: DistilBERT is significantly smaller
while being constantly faster. Inference
time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of
1.
Model # param. Inf. time
(Millions) (seconds)
ELMo 180 895
BERT-base 110 668
DistilBERT 66 410
Distillation We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].
As such, DistilBERT is distilled on very large batches leveraging gradient accumulation (up to 4K
examples per batch) using dynamic masking and without the next sentence prediction objective.
Data and compute power We train DistilBERT on the same corpus as the original BERT model: | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 8 | examples per batch) using dynamic masking and without the next sentence prediction objective.
Data and compute power We train DistilBERT on the same corpus as the original BERT model:
a concatenation of English Wikipedia and Toronto Book Corpus [Zhu et al., 2015]. DistilBERT
was trained on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours. For the sake of comparison, the
RoBERTa model [Liu et al., 2019] required 1 day of training on 1024 32GB V100.
4 Experiments
General Language Understanding We assess the language understanding and generalization capabilities of DistilBERT on the General Language Understanding Evaluation (GLUE) benchmark
[Wang et al., 2018], a collection of 9 datasets for evaluating natural language understanding systems.
We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use
of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present
work). We compare the results to the baseline provided by the authors of GLUE: an ELMo (Peters
et al. [2018]) encoder followed by two BiLSTMs.4
The results on each of the 9 tasks are showed on Table 1 along with the macro-score (average of | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 9 | et al. [2018]) encoder followed by two BiLSTMs.4
The results on each of the 9 tasks are showed on Table 1 along with the macro-score (average of
individual scores). Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo
baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B). DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to
BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.
4.1 Downstream task benchmark
Downstream tasks We further study the performances of DistilBERT on several downstream tasks
under efficient inference constraints: a classification task (IMDb sentiment classification - Maas et al.
[2011]) and a question answering task (SQuAD v1.1 - Rajpurkar et al. [2016]).
As shown in Table 2, DistilBERT is only 0.6% point behind BERT in test accuracy on the IMDb
benchmark while being 40% smaller. On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.
We also studied whether we could add another step of distillation during the adaptation phase by | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 10 | We also studied whether we could add another step of distillation during the adaptation phase by
fine-tuning DistilBERT on SQuAD using a BERT model previously fine-tuned on SQuAD as a
4We use jiant [Wang et al., 2019] to compute the baseline.
3
Table 4: Ablation study. Variations are relative to the model trained with triple loss and teacher
weights initialization.
Ablation Variation on GLUE macro-score
;-Lcos-Lmlm -2.96
Lce-;-Lmlm -1.46
Lce-Lcos-; -0.31
Triple loss + random weights initialization -3.69
teacher for an additional term in the loss (knowledge distillation). In this setting, there are thus two
successive steps of distillation, one during the pre-training phase and one during the adaptation phase.
In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and
70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.
Size and inference speed
To further investigate the speed-up/size trade-off of DistilBERT, we compare (in Table 3) the number | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 11 | Size and inference speed
To further investigate the speed-up/size trade-off of DistilBERT, we compare (in Table 3) the number
of parameters of each model along with the inference time needed to do a full pass on the STSB development set on CPU (Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Haswell @2.9GHz) using a batch size of 1.
DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.
On device computation We studied whether DistilBERT could be used for on-the-edge applications
by building a mobile application for question answering. We compare the average inference time on
a recent smartphone (iPhone 7 Plus) against our previously trained question answering model based
on BERT-base. Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole
model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization). Our code is available5.
4.2 Ablation study
In this section, we investigate the influence of various components of the triple loss and the student
initialization on the performances of the distilled model. We report the macro-score on GLUE. Table 4
presents the deltas with the full triple loss: removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 12 | presents the deltas with the full triple loss: removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little
impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.
5 Related work
Task-specific distillation Most of the prior works focus on building task-specific distillation setups. Tang et al. [2019] transfer fine-tune classification model BERT to an LSTM-based classifier.
Chatterjee [2019] distill BERT model fine-tuned on SQuAD in a smaller Transformer model previously initialized from BERT. In the present work, we found it beneficial to use a general-purpose
pre-training distillation rather than a task-specific distillation. Turc et al. [2019] use the original
pretraining objective to train smaller student, then fine-tuned via distillation. As shown in the ablation study, we found it beneficial to leverage the teacher’s knowledge to pre-train with additional
distillation signal.
Multi-distillation Yang et al. [2019] combine the knowledge of an ensemble of teachers using
multi-task learning to regularize the distillation. The authors apply Multi-Task Knowledge Distillation | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 13 | multi-task learning to regularize the distillation. The authors apply Multi-Task Knowledge Distillation
to learn a compact question answering model from a set of large question answering models. An
application of multi-distillation is multi-linguality: Tsai et al. [2019] adopts a similar approach to us
by pre-training a multilingual model from scratch solely through distillation. However, as shown in
the ablation study, leveraging the teacher’s knowledge with initialization and additional losses leads
to substantial gains.
Other compression techniques have been studied to compress large models. Recent developments
in weights pruning reveal that it is possible to remove some heads in the self-attention at test time
without significantly degrading the performance Michel et al. [2019]. Some layers can be reduced
to one head. A separate line of study leverages quantization to derive smaller models (Gupta et al.
[2015]). Pruning and quantization are orthogonal to the present work.
5https://github.com/huggingface/swift-coreml-transformers
4
6 Conclusion and future work
We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster,
that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities. We showed that a general-purpose | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 14 | that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities. We showed that a general-purpose
language model can be successfully trained with distillation and analyzed the various components
with an ablation study. We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge
applications.
References
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional
transformers for language understanding. In NAACL-HLT , 2018.
Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. Language models are
unsupervised multitask learners. 2019.
Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar S. Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis,
Luke S. Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. ArXiv ,
abs/1907.11692, 2019.
Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, Noah A. Smith, and Oren Etzioni. Green ai. ArXiv , abs/1907.10597, 2019.
Emma Strubell, Ananya Ganesh, and Andrew McCallum. Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 15 | Emma Strubell, Ananya Ganesh, and Andrew McCallum. Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in
nlp. In ACL, 2019.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser,
and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In NIPS , 2017.
Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac,
Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, and Jamie Brew. Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language
processing, 2019.
Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Geoffrey E. Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeffrey Dean. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. ArXiv ,
abs/1503.02531, 2015.
Yukun Zhu, Ryan Kiros, Richard S. Zemel, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Raquel Urtasun, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 16 | Yukun Zhu, Ryan Kiros, Richard S. Zemel, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Raquel Urtasun, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja
Fidler. Aligning books and movies: Towards story-like visual explanations by watching movies and reading
books. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages 19–27, 2015.
Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R. Bowman. Glue: A
multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. In ICLR , 2018.
Matthew E. Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke
Zettlemoyer. Deep contextualized word representations. In NAACL , 2018.
Alex Wang, Ian F. Tenney, Yada Pruksachatkun, Katherin Yu, Jan Hula, Patrick Xia, Raghu Pappagari, Shuning
Jin, R. Thomas McCoy, Roma Patel, Yinghui Huang, Jason Phang, Edouard Grave, Najoung Kim, Phu Mon
Htut, Thibault F’evry, Berlin Chen, Nikita Nangia, Haokun Liu, Anhad Mohananey, Shikha Bordia, Nicolas | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 17 | Htut, Thibault F’evry, Berlin Chen, Nikita Nangia, Haokun Liu, Anhad Mohananey, Shikha Bordia, Nicolas
Patry, Ellie Pavlick, and Samuel R. Bowman. jiant 1.1: A software toolkit for research on general-purpose
text understanding models. http://jiant.info/ , 2019.
Andrew L. Maas, Raymond E. Daly, Peter T. Pham, Dan Huang, Andrew Y . Ng, and Christopher Potts. Learning
word vectors for sentiment analysis. In ACL, 2011.
Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. Squad: 100, 000+ questions for machine
comprehension of text. In EMNLP , 2016.
Raphael Tang, Yao Lu, Linqing Liu, Lili Mou, Olga Vechtomova, and Jimmy Lin. Distilling task-specific
knowledge from bert into simple neural networks. ArXiv , abs/1903.12136, 2019.
Debajyoti Chatterjee. Making neural machine reading comprehension faster. ArXiv , abs/1904.00796, 2019.
Iulia Turc, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. Well-read students learn better: The impact | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1910.01108 | 18 | Iulia Turc, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. Well-read students learn better: The impact
of student initialization on knowledge distillation. ArXiv , abs/1908.08962, 2019.
Ze Yang, Linjun Shou, Ming Gong, Wutao Lin, and Daxin Jiang. Model compression with multi-task knowledge
distillation for web-scale question answering system. ArXiv , abs/1904.09636, 2019.
Henry Tsai, Jason Riesa, Melvin Johnson, Naveen Arivazhagan, Xin Li, and Amelia Archer. Small and practical
bert models for sequence labeling. In EMNLP-IJCNLP , 2019.
Paul Michel, Omer Levy, and Graham Neubig. Are sixteen heads really better than one? In NeurIPS , 2019.
Suyog Gupta, Ankur Agrawal, Kailash Gopalakrishnan, and Pritish Narayanan. Deep learning with limited
numerical precision. In ICML , 2015.
5 | 1910.01108 | DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter | As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more
prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in
on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference
budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a
smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which
can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its
larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation
for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during
the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a
BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding
capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by
larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining
language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster
and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities
for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative
on-device study. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01108 | [
"Victor Sanh",
"Lysandre Debut",
"Julien Chaumond",
"Thomas Wolf"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | February 2020 - Revision: fix bug in evaluation metrics, updated
metrics, argumentation unchanged. 5 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. Accepted at
the 5th Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing
- NeurIPS 2019 | null | cs.CL | 20191002 | 20200301 | [
{
"id": "1910.01108"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 0 | Constructing Datasets
for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents
Johannes Welbl1Pontus Stenetorp1Sebastian Riedel1;2
1University College London,2Bloomsbury AI
fj.welbl,p.stenetorp,s.riedel [email protected]
Abstract
Most Reading Comprehension methods limit
themselves to queries which can be answered
using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to combine disjoint
pieces of textual evidence would extend the
scope of machine comprehension methods,
but currently no resources exist to train and
test this capability. We propose a novel task to
encourage the development of models for text
understanding across multiple documents and
to investigate the limits of existing methods.
In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence – effectively performing multihop, alias multi-step, inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task,
given a collection of query-answer pairs and
thematically linked documents. Two datasets
from different domains are induced,1and we
identify potential pitfalls and devise circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive models and find | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 1 | thematically linked documents. Two datasets
from different domains are induced,1and we
identify potential pitfalls and devise circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive models and find
that one can integrate information across documents. However, both models struggle to select relevant information; and providing documents guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models outperform several strong baselines, their
best accuracy reaches 54.5% on an annotated
test set, compared to human performance at
85.0%, leaving ample room for improvement.
1 Introduction
Devising computer systems capable of answering
questions about knowledge described using text has
1Available at http://qangaroo.cs.ucl.ac.uk
The Hanging Gardens, in [Mumbai], also known as Pherozeshah Mehta Gardens, are terraced gardens … They provide sunset views over the [Arabian Sea] …
Mumbai (also known as Bombay, the official name until 1995) is the capital city of the Indian state of Maharashtra. It is the most populous city in India …Q: (Hanging gardens of Mumbai, country, ?) Options: {Iran, India, Pakistan, Somalia, …} | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 2 | The Arabian Sea is a region of the northern Indian Ocean bounded on the north by Pakistan and Iran, on the west by northeastern Somalia and the Arabian Peninsula, and on the east by India …Figure 1: A sample from the W IKIHOPdataset where it
is necessary to combine information spread across multiple documents to infer the correct answer.
been a longstanding challenge in Natural Language
Processing (NLP). Contemporary end-to-end Reading Comprehension (RC) methods can learn to extract the correct answer span within a given text
and approach human-level performance (Kadlec et
al., 2016; Seo et al., 2017a). However, for existing datasets, relevant information is often concentrated locally within a single sentence, emphasizing
the role of locating, matching, and aligning information between query and support text. For example,
Weissenborn et al. (2017) observed that a simple binary word-in-query indicator feature boosted the relative accuracy of a baseline model by 27.9%.
We argue that, in order to further the ability of machine comprehension methods to extract knowledge
from text, we must move beyond a scenario where
relevant information is coherently and explicitly
stated within a single document. Methods with this | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 3 | from text, we must move beyond a scenario where
relevant information is coherently and explicitly
stated within a single document. Methods with this
capability would aid Information Extraction (IE) applications, such as discovering drug-drug interac-arXiv:1710.06481v2 [cs.CL] 11 Jun 2018
tions (Gurulingappa et al., 2012) by connecting protein interactions reported across different publications. They would also benefit search (Carpineto and
Romano, 2012) and Question Answering (QA) applications (Lin and Pantel, 2001) where the required
information cannot be found in a single location.
Figure 1 shows an example from W IKIPEDIA ,
where the goal is to identify the country property
of the Hanging Gardens of Mumbai . This cannot be
inferred solely from the article about them without
additional background knowledge, as the answer is
not stated explicitly. However, several of the linked
articles mention the correct answer India (and other
countries), but cover different topics (e.g. Mumbai ,
Arabian Sea , etc.). Finding the answer requires
multi-hop reasoning: figuring out that the Hanging
Gardens are located in Mumbai , and then, from a
second document, that Mumbai is a city in India . | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 4 | Gardens are located in Mumbai , and then, from a
second document, that Mumbai is a city in India .
We define a novel RC task in which a model
should learn to answer queries by combining evidence stated across documents. We introduce a
methodology to induce datasets for this task and derive two datasets. The first, W IKIHOP, uses sets of
WIKIPEDIA articles where answers to queries about
specific properties of an entity cannot be located in
the entity’s article. In the second dataset, M EDHOP,
the goal is to establish drug-drug interactions based
on scientific findings about drugs and proteins and
their interactions, found across multiple M EDLINE
abstracts. For both datasets we draw upon existing
Knowledge Bases (KBs), W IKIDATA and D RUGBANK, as ground truth, utilizing distant supervision (Mintz et al., 2009) to induce the data – similar
to Hewlett et al. (2016) and Joshi et al. (2017).
We establish that for 74.1% and 68.0% of the
samples, the answer can be inferred from the given
documents by a human annotator. Still, constructing multi-document datasets is challenging; we encounter and prescribe remedies for several pitfalls | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 5 | samples, the answer can be inferred from the given
documents by a human annotator. Still, constructing multi-document datasets is challenging; we encounter and prescribe remedies for several pitfalls
associated with their assembly – for example, spurious co-locations of answers and specific documents.
For both datasets we then establish several strong
baselines and evaluate the performance of two previously proposed competitive RC models (Seo et al.,
2017a; Weissenborn et al., 2017). We find that one
can integrate information across documents, but neither excels at selecting relevant information from a
larger documents set, as their accuracy increases sig-nificantly when given only documents guaranteed to
be relevant. The best model reaches 54.5% on an
annotated test set, compared to human performance
at 85.0%, indicating ample room for improvement.
In summary, our key contributions are as follows:
Firstly, proposing a cross-document multi-step RC
task, as well as a general dataset induction strategy. Secondly, assembling two datasets from different domains and identifying dataset construction
pitfalls and remedies. Thirdly, establishing multiple
baselines, including two recently proposed RC models, as well as analysing model behaviour in detail
through ablation studies.
2 Task and Dataset Construction Method
We will now formally define the multi-hop RC task, | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 6 | through ablation studies.
2 Task and Dataset Construction Method
We will now formally define the multi-hop RC task,
and a generic methodology to construct multi-hop
RC datasets. Later, in Sections 3 and 4 we will
demonstrate how this method is applied in practice
by creating datasets for two different domains.
Task Formalization A model is given a query q, a
set of supporting documents Sq, and a set of candidate answers Cq– all of which are mentioned in Sq.
The goal is to identify the correct answer a2Cq
by drawing on the support documents Sq. Queries
could potentially have several true answers when not
constrained to rely on a specific set of support documents – e.g., queries about the parent of a certain
individual. However, in our setup each sample has
only one true answer among CqandSq. Note that
even though we will utilize background information
during dataset assembly, such information will not
be available to a model: the document set will be
provided in random order and without any metadata.
While certainly beneficial, this would distract from
our goal of fostering end-to-end RC methods that infer facts by combining separate facts stated in text.
Dataset Assembly We assume that there exists a
document corpus D, together with a KB containing | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 7 | Dataset Assembly We assume that there exists a
document corpus D, together with a KB containing
fact triples (s; r; o )– with subject entity s, relation r,
and object entity o. For example, one such fact
could be (Hanging Gardens ofMumbai, country,
India) . We start with individual KB facts and transform them into query-answer pairs by leaving the
object slot empty, i.e. q= (s; r;?)anda=o.
Next, we define a directed bipartite graph, where
vertices on one side correspond to documents in
D, and vertices on the other side are entities from
the KB – see Figure 2 for an example. A document node dis connected to an entity eifeis mentioned in d, though there may be further constraints
when defining the graph connectivity. For a given
(q; a)pair, the candidates Cqand support documents SqDare identified by traversing the bipartite graph using breadth-first search; the documents
visited will become the support documents Sq.
As the traversal starting point, we use the node
belonging to the subject entity sof the query q. As
traversal end points, we use the set of all entity nodes | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 8 | belonging to the subject entity sof the query q. As
traversal end points, we use the set of all entity nodes
that are type-consistent answers to q.2Note that
whenever there is another fact (s; r; o0)in the KB,
i.e. a fact producing the same qbut with a different
a, we will not include o0into the set of end points
for this sample. This ensures that precisely one of
the end points corresponds to a correct answer to q.3
When traversing the graph starting at s, several
end points will be visited, though generally not all;
those visited define the candidate set Cq. If however
the correct answer ais not among them we discard
the(q; a)pair. The documents visited to reach the
end points will define the support document set Sq.
That is, Sqcomprises chains of documents leading
not only from the query subject to the correct answer, but also to type-consistent false candidates.
With this methodology, relevant textual evidence
for(q; a)will be spread across documents along
the chain connecting sanda– ensuring that multihop reasoning goes beyond resolving co-reference
within a single document. Note that including
other type-consistent candidates alongside aas end | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 9 | the chain connecting sanda– ensuring that multihop reasoning goes beyond resolving co-reference
within a single document. Note that including
other type-consistent candidates alongside aas end
points in the graph traversal – and thus into the support documents – renders the task considerably more
challenging (Jia and Liang, 2017). Models could
otherwise identify ain the documents by simply
relying on type-consistency heuristics. It is worth
pointing out that by introducing alternative candidates we counterbalance a type-consistency bias, in
contrast to Hermann et al. (2015) and Hill et al.
(2016) who instead rely on entity masking.
2To determine entities which are type-consistent for a
query q, we consider all entities which are observed as object
in a fact with ras relation type – including the correct answer.
3Here we rely on a closed-world assumption; that is, we assume that the facts in the KB state all true facts.
Documents
EntitiesKB
(s, r, o)(s, r, o0)(s0,r ,o00)soo0o00
Figure 2: A bipartite graph connecting entities and documents mentioning them. Bold edges are those traversed | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 10 | Figure 2: A bipartite graph connecting entities and documents mentioning them. Bold edges are those traversed
for the first fact in the small KB on the right; yellow highlighting indicates documents in Sqand candidates in Cq.
Check and cross indicate correct and false candidates.
3 W IKIHOP
WIKIPEDIA contains an abundance of humancurated, multi-domain information and has several structured resources such as infoboxes and
WIKIDATA (Vrande ˇci´c, 2012) associated with it.
WIKIPEDIA has thus been used for a wealth of research to build datasets posing queries about a single
sentence (Morales et al., 2016; Levy et al., 2017) or
article (Yang et al., 2015; Hewlett et al., 2016; Rajpurkar et al., 2016). However, no attempt has been
made to construct a cross-document multi-step RC
dataset based on W IKIPEDIA .
A recently proposed RC dataset is W IKIREADING (Hewlett et al., 2016), where W IKIDATA tuples (item, property, answer) are aligned with
the W IKIPEDIA articles regarding their item . The
tuples define a slot filling task with the goal of predicting the answer , given an article andproperty . | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 11 | tuples define a slot filling task with the goal of predicting the answer , given an article andproperty .
One problem with using W IKIREADING as an extractive RC dataset is that 54.4% of the samples
do not state the answer explicitly in the given article (Hewlett et al., 2016). However, we observed
that some of the articles accessible by following hyperlinks from the given article often state the answer,
alongside other plausible candidates.
3.1 Assembly
We now apply the methodology from Section 2
to create a multi-hop dataset with W IKIPEDIA as
the document corpus and W IKIDATA as structured
knowledge triples. In this setup, (item, property,
answer) WIKIDATA tuples correspond to (s; r; o )
triples, and the item andproperty of each sample
together form our query q– e.g., (Hanging Gardens
of Mumbai, country, ?) . Similar to Yang et al. (2015)
we only use the first paragraph of an article, as relevant information is more often stated in the beginning. Starting with all samples in W IKIREADING ,
we first remove samples where the answer is stated
explicitly in the W IKIPEDIA article about the item .4 | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 12 | we first remove samples where the answer is stated
explicitly in the W IKIPEDIA article about the item .4
The bipartite graph is structured as follows:
(1) for edges from articles to entities: all articles
mentioning an entity eare connected to e; (2) for
edges from entities to articles: each entity eis only
connected to the W IKIPEDIA article about the entity.
Traversing the graph is then equivalent to iteratively
following hyperlinks to new articles about the anchor text entities.
For a given query-answer pair, the item entity
is chosen as the starting point for the graph traversal. A traversal will always pass through the article
about the item , since this is the only document connected from there. The end point set includes the
correct answer alongside other type-consistent candidate expressions, which are determined by considering allfacts belonging to W IKIREADING training samples, selecting those triples with the same
property as inqand keeping their answer expressions. As an example, for the W IKIDATA property
country , this would be the set fFrance ;Russia ; :::g.
We executed graph traversal up to a maximum chain
length of 3 documents. To not pose unreasonable
computational constraints, samples with more than
64 different support documents or 100 candidates | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 13 | We executed graph traversal up to a maximum chain
length of 3 documents. To not pose unreasonable
computational constraints, samples with more than
64 different support documents or 100 candidates
are removed, discarding 1% of the samples.
3.2 Mitigating Dataset Biases
Dataset creation is always fraught with the risk of
inducing unintended errors and biases (Chen et al.,
2016; Schwartz et al., 2017). As Hewlett et al.
(2016) only carried out limited analysis of their
WIKIREADING dataset, we present an analysis of
the downstream effects we observe on W IKIHOP.
Candidate Frequency Imbalance A first observation is that there is a significant bias in the answer
distribution of W IKIREADING . For example, in the
majority of the samples the property country has
theUnited States of America as the answer. A simple
4We thus use a disjoint subset of W IKIREADING compared
to Levy et al. (2017) to construct W IKIHOP.majority class baseline would thus prove successful,
but would tell us little about multi-hop reasoning. To
combat this issue, we subsampled the dataset to ensure that samples of any one particular answer candidate make up no more than 0:1%of the dataset, | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 14 | combat this issue, we subsampled the dataset to ensure that samples of any one particular answer candidate make up no more than 0:1%of the dataset,
and omitted articles about the United States .
Document-Answer Correlations A problem
unique to our multi-document setting is the possibility of spurious correlations between candidates and
documents induced by the graph traversal method.
In fact, if we were notto address this issue, a model
designed to exploit these regularities could achieve
74.6% accuracy (detailed in Section 6).
Concretely, we observed that certain documents
frequently co-occur with the correct answer, independently of the query. For example, if the article
about London is present in Sq, the answer is likely
to be the United Kingdom , independent of the query
type or entity in question. Appendix C contains a
list with several additional examples.
We designed a statistic to measure this effect
and then used it to sub-sample the dataset. The
statistic counts how often a candidate cis observed
as the correct answer when a certain document is
present in Sqacross training set samples. More formally, for a given document dand answer candidatec, letcooccurrence (d; c)denote the total count
of how often dco-occurs with cin a sample where
cis also the correct answer. We use this statistic | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 15 | of how often dco-occurs with cin a sample where
cis also the correct answer. We use this statistic
to filter the dataset, by discarding samples with at
least one document-candidate pair (d; c)for which
cooccurrence (d; c)>20.
4 M EDHOP
Following the same general methodology, we next
construct a second dataset for the domain of molecular biology – a field that has been undergoing exponential growth in the number of publications (Cohen and Hunter, 2004). The promise of applying
NLP methods to cope with this increase has led to
research efforts in IE (Hirschman et al., 2005; Kim
et al., 2011) and QA for biomedical text (Hersh et
al., 2007; Nentidis et al., 2017). There are a plethora
of manually curated structured resources (Ashburner
et al., 2000; The UniProt Consortium, 2017) which
can either serve as ground truth or to induce training
data using distant supervision (Craven and Kumlien,
1999; Bobic et al., 2012). Existing RC datasets are
either severely limited in size (Hersh et al., 2007)
or cover a very diverse set of query types (Nentidis | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 16 | either severely limited in size (Hersh et al., 2007)
or cover a very diverse set of query types (Nentidis
et al., 2017), complicating the application of neural models that have seen successes for other domains (Wiese et al., 2017).
A task that has received significant attention is
detecting Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs). Existing DDI efforts have focused on explicit mentions
of interactions in single sentences (Gurulingappa
et al., 2012; Percha et al., 2012; Segura-Bedmar
et al., 2013). However, as shown by Peng et al.
(2017), cross-sentence relation extraction increases
the number of available relations. It is thus likely
that cross-document interactions would further improve recall, which is of particular importance considering interactions that are never stated explicitly
– but rather need to be inferred from separate pieces
of evidence. The promise of multi-hop methods is
finding and combining individual observations that
can suggest previously unobserved DDIs, aiding the
process of making scientific discoveries, yet not directly from experiments, but by inferring them from
established public knowledge (Swanson, 1986).
DDIs are caused by Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) chains, forming biomedical pathways.
If we consider PPI chains across documents, | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 17 | DDIs are caused by Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) chains, forming biomedical pathways.
If we consider PPI chains across documents,
we find examples like in Figure 3. Here the
first document states that the drug Leuprolide
causes GnRH receptor -induced synaptic potentiations, which can be blocked by the protein
Progonadoliberin-1 . The last document states that
another drug, Triptorelin , is a superagonist of the
same protein. It is therefore likely to affect the potency of Leuprolide , describing a way in which the
two drugs interact. Besides the true interaction there
is also a false candidate Urofollitropin for which,
although mentioned together with GnRH receptor
within one document, there is no textual evidence
indicating interactions with Leuprolide .
4.1 Assembly
We construct M EDHOPusing D RUGBANK (Law
et al., 2014) as structured knowledge resource and
research paper abstracts from M EDLINE as documents. There is only one relation type for D RUGBANK facts, interacts with , that connects pairs of
drugs – an example of a M EDHOPquery would thus
Q: (Leuprolide, interacts_with, ?) Options: {Triptorelin, Urofollitropin} | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 18 | Q: (Leuprolide, interacts_with, ?) Options: {Triptorelin, Urofollitropin}
Leuprolide ... elicited a long-lasting potentiation of excitatory postsynaptic currents… [GnRH receptor]-induced synaptic potentiation was blocked … by [Progonadoliberin-1], a specific [GnRH receptor] antagonist…
Analyses of gene expression demonstrated a dynamic response to the Progonadoliberin-1 superagonist Triptorelin.
… our research to study the distribution, co-localization of Urofollitropin and its receptor[,] and co-localization of Urofollitropin and GnRH receptor…Figure 3: A sample from the M EDHOPdataset.
be(Leuprolide, interacts with, ?) . We start
by processing the 2016 M EDLINE release using the
preprocessing pipeline employed for the BioNLP
2011 Shared Task (Stenetorp et al., 2011). We restrict the set of entities in the bipartite graph to
drugs in D RUGBANK and human proteins in S WISS PROT (Bairoch et al., 2004). That is, the graph has
drugs and proteins on one side, and M EDLINE abstracts on the other. | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 19 | drugs and proteins on one side, and M EDLINE abstracts on the other.
The edge structure is as follows: (1) There is an
edge from a document to all proteins mentioned in it.
(2) There is an edge between a document and a drug,
if this document also mentions a protein known to be
a target for the drug according to D RUGBANK. This
edge is bidirectional, i.e. it can be traversed both
ways, since there is no canonical document describing each drug – thus one can “hop” to any document
mentioning the drug and its target. (3) There is an
edge from a protein pto a document mentioning p,
but only if the document also mentions another proteinp0which is known to interact with paccording to
REACTOME (Fabregat et al., 2016). Given our distant supervision assumption, these additionally constraining requirements err on the side of precision.
As a mention, similar to Percha et al. (2012), we
consider any exact match of a name variant of a
drug or human protein in D RUGBANK or S WISS PROT. For a given DDI (drug 1, interacts with,
drug 2), we then select drug 1as the starting point
for the graph traversal. As possible end points, we
consider any other drug, apart from drug 1and those | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 20 | drug 2), we then select drug 1as the starting point
for the graph traversal. As possible end points, we
consider any other drug, apart from drug 1and those
interacting with drug 1other than drug 2. Similar to
WIKIHOP, we exclude samples with more than 64
support documents and impose a maximum document length of 300 tokens plus title.
Document Sub-sampling The bipartite graph for
MEDHOPis orders of magnitude more densely connected than for W IKIHOP. This can lead to potentially large support document sets Sq, to a degree
where it becomes computationally infeasible for a
majority of existing RC models. After the traversal has finished, we subsample documents by first
adding a set of documents that connects the drug in
the query with its answer. We then iteratively add
documents to connect alternative candidates until we
reach the limit of 64 documents – while ensuring
that all candidates have the same number of paths
through the bipartite graph.
Mitigating Candidate Frequency Imbalance
Some drugs interact with more drugs than others
–Aspirin for example interacts with 743 other
drugs, but Isotretinoin with only 34. This leads
to similar candidate frequency imbalance issues
as with W IKIHOP– but due to its smaller size | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 21 | drugs, but Isotretinoin with only 34. This leads
to similar candidate frequency imbalance issues
as with W IKIHOP– but due to its smaller size
MEDHOPis difficult to sub-sample. Nevertheless
we can successfully combat this issue by masking
entity names, detailed in Section 6.2.
5 Dataset Analysis
Table 1 shows the dataset sizes. Note that W IKIHOPinherits the train, development, and test set
splits from W IKIREADING – i.e., the full dataset
creation, filtering, and sub-sampling pipeline is executed on each set individually. Also note that subsampling according to document-answer correlation
significantly reduces the size of W IKIHOPfrom
528K training samples to 44K. While in terms of
samples, both W IKIHOPand M EDHOPare smaller
than other large-scale RC datasets, such as SQuAD
and W IKIREADING , the supervised learning signal
available per sample is arguably greater. One could,
for example, re-frame the task as binary path classification: given two entities and a document path | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 22 | available per sample is arguably greater. One could,
for example, re-frame the task as binary path classification: given two entities and a document path
connecting them, determine whether a given relation holds. For such a case, W IKIHOPand M EDHOPwould have more than 1M and 150K paths to
be classified, respectively. Instead, in our formulation, this corresponds to each single sample containing the supervised learning signal from an average
of 19.5 and 59.8 unique document paths.
Table 2 shows statistics on the number of candidates and documents per sample on the respective
training sets. For M EDHOP, the majority of samples have 9 candidates, due to the way documentsTrain Dev Test Total
WIKIHOP 43,738 5,129 2,451 51,318
MEDHOP 1,620 342 546 2,508
Table 1: Dataset sizes for our respective datasets.
min max avg median
# cand. – WH 2 79 19.8 14
# docs. – WH 3 63 13.7 11
# tok/doc – WH 4 2,046 100.4 91
# cand. – MH 2 9 8.9 9
# docs. – MH 5 64 36.4 29
# tok/doc – MH 5 458 253.9 264 | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 23 | # cand. – MH 2 9 8.9 9
# docs. – MH 5 64 36.4 29
# tok/doc – MH 5 458 253.9 264
Table 2: Candidates and documents per sample and document length statistics. WH: W IKIHOP; MH: M EDHOP.
are selected up until a maximum of 64 documents is
reached. Few samples have less than 9 candidates,
and samples would have far more false candidates if
more than 64 support documents were included. The
number of query types in W IKIHOPis 277, whereas
in M EDHOPthere is only one: interacts with .
5.1 Qualitative Analysis
To establish the quality of the data and analyze potential distant supervision errors, we sampled and
annotated 100 samples from each development set.
WIKIHOP Table 3 lists characteristics along with
the proportion of samples that exhibit them. For
45%, the true answer either uniquely follows from
multiple texts directly or is suggested as likely. For
26%, more than one candidate is plausibly supported by the documents, including the correct answer. This is often due to hypernymy, where
the appropriate level of granularity for the answer is difficult to predict – e.g. (west suffolk,
administrative entity, ?) with candidates | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 24 | the appropriate level of granularity for the answer is difficult to predict – e.g. (west suffolk,
administrative entity, ?) with candidates
suffolk and england . This is a direct consequence of including type-consistent false answer
candidates from W IKIDATA , which can lead to questions with several true answers. For 9% of the
cases a single document suffices; these samples
contain a document that states enough information
about item and answer together. For example,
the query (Louis Auguste, father, ?) has the
correct answer Louis XIV of France , and French
Unique multi-step answer. 36%
Likely multi-step unique answer. 9%
Multiple plausible answers. 15%
Ambiguity due to hypernymy. 11%
Only single document required. 9%
Answer does not follow. 12%
WIKIDATA /WIKIPEDIA discrepancy. 8%
Table 3: Qualitiative analysis of W IKIHOPsamples.
king Louis XIV is mentioned within the same document as Louis Auguste . Finally, although our
task is significantly more complex than most previous tasks where distant supervision has been applied, the distant supervision assumption is only violated for 20% of the samples – a proportion similar to previous work (Riedel et al., 2010). These | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 25 | cases can either be due to conflicting information between W IKIDATA and W IKIPEDIA (8%), e.g. when
the date of birth for a person differs between W IKIDATA and what is stated in the W IKIPEDIA article,
or because the answer is consistent but cannot be
inferred from the support documents (12%). When
answering 100 questions, the annotator knew the answer prior to reading the documents for 9%, and produced the correct answer after reading the document
sets for 74% of the cases. On 100 questions of a validated portion of the Dev set (see Section 5.3), 85%
accuracy was reached.
MEDHOP Since both document complexity and
number of documents per sample were significantly
larger compared to W IKIHOP, (see Figure 4 in Appendix B) it was not feasible to ask an annotator to read allsupport documents for 100 samples.
We opted to verify the dataset quality by providing
only the subset of documents relevant to support the
correct answer, i.e., those traversed along the path
reaching the answer. The annotator was asked if the
answer to the query “follows” ,“is likely” , or“does
not follow” , given the relevant documents. 68% of | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 26 | answer to the query “follows” ,“is likely” , or“does
not follow” , given the relevant documents. 68% of
the cases were considered as “follows” or as “is
likely” . The majority of cases violating the distant
supervision assumption were due to lacking a necessary PPI in one of the connecting documents.5.2 Crowdsourced Human Annotation
We asked human annotators on Amazon Mechanical
Turk to evaluate samples of the W IKIHOPdevelopment set. Similar to our qualitative analysis of M EDHOP, annotators were shown the query-answer pair
as a fact and the chain of relevant documents leading
to the answer. They were then instructed to answer
(1) whether they knew the fact before; (2) whether
the fact follows from the texts (with options “fact
follows” ,“fact is likely” , and “fact does not follow” ); and (3); whether a single or several of the
documents are required. Each sample was shown to
three annotators and a majority vote was used to aggregate the annotations. Annotators were familiar
with the fact 4.6% of the time; prior knowledge of
the fact is thus not likely to be a confounding effect
on the other judgments. Inter-annotator agreement | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 27 | with the fact 4.6% of the time; prior knowledge of
the fact is thus not likely to be a confounding effect
on the other judgments. Inter-annotator agreement
as measured by Fleiss’ kappa is 0.253 in (2), and
0.281 in (3) – indicating a fair overall agreement, according to Landis and Koch (1977). Overall, 9.5%
of samples have no clear majority in (2).
Among samples with a majority judgment, 59.8%
are cases where the fact “follows” , for 14.2% the
fact is judged as “likely” , and as “not follow” for
25.9%. This again provides good justification for
the distant supervision strategy.
Among the samples with a majority vote for (2)
of either “follows” or“likely” , 55.9% were marked
with a majority vote as requiring multiple documents to infer the fact, and 44.1% as requiring only
a single document. The latter number is larger than
initially expected, given the construction of samples
through graph traversal. However, when inspecting
cases judged as “single” more closely, we observed | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 28 | initially expected, given the construction of samples
through graph traversal. However, when inspecting
cases judged as “single” more closely, we observed
that many indeed provide a clear hint about the correct answer within one document, but without stating it explicitly. For example, for the fact (witold
cichy, country ofcitizenship, poland) with
documents d1: Witold Cichy (born March 15, 1986
in Wodzisaw lski) is a Polish footballer[...] andd2:
Wodzisaw lski[...] is a town in Silesian Voivodeship,
southern Poland[...] , the information provided in d1
suffices for a human given the background knowledge that Polish is an attribute related to Poland , removing the need for d2to infer the answer.
5.3 Validated Test Sets
While training models on distantly supervised data
is useful, one should ideally evaluate methods on a
manually validated test set. We thus identified subsets of the respective test sets for which the correct
answer can be inferred from the text. This is in contrast to prior work such as Hermann et al. (2015),
Hill et al. (2016), and Hewlett et al. (2016), who
evaluate only on distantly supervised samples. For | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 29 | Hill et al. (2016), and Hewlett et al. (2016), who
evaluate only on distantly supervised samples. For
WIKIHOP, we applied the same annotation strategy
as described in Section 5.2. The validated test set
consists of those samples labeled by a majority of
annotators (at least 2 of 3) as “follows” , and requiring“multiple” documents. While desirable, crowdsourcing is not feasible for M EDHOPsince it requires specialist knowledge. In addition, the number
of document paths is 3x larger, which along with
the complexity of the documents greatly increases
the annotation time. We thus manually annotated
20% of the M EDHOPtest set and identified the samples for which the text implies the correct answer
and where multiple documents are required.
6 Experiments
This section describes experiments on W IKIHOP
and M EDHOPwith the goal of establishing the performance of several baseline models, including recent neural RC models. We empirically demonstrate
the importance of mitigating dataset biases, probe
whether multi-step behavior is beneficial for solving the task, and investigate if RC models can learn
to perform lexical abstraction. Training will be conducted on the respective training sets, and evaluation | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 30 | to perform lexical abstraction. Training will be conducted on the respective training sets, and evaluation
on both the full test set and validated portion (Section 5.3) allowing for a comparison between the two.
6.1 Models
Random Selects a random candidate; note that the
number of candidates differs between samples.
Max-mention Predicts the most frequently mentioned candidate in the support documents Sqof a
sample – randomly breaking ties.
Majority-candidate-per-query-type Predicts the
candidate c2Cqthat was most frequently observed
as the true answer in the training set, given the querytype of q. For W IKIHOP, the query type is the propertypof the query; for M EDHOPthere is only the
single query type – interacts with .
TF-IDF Retrieval-based models are known to be
strong QA baselines if candidate answers are provided (Clark et al., 2016; Welbl et al., 2017). They
search for individual documents based on keywords
in the question, but typically do not combine information across documents. The purpose of this baseline is to see if it is possible to identify the correct
answer from a single document alone through lexical correlations. The model forms its prediction as
follows: For each candidate c, the concatenation of
the query qwithcis fed as an ORquery into the | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 31 | follows: For each candidate c, the concatenation of
the query qwithcis fed as an ORquery into the
whoosh text retrieval engine.5It then predicts the
candidate with the highest TF-IDF similarity score:
arg max
c2Cq[max
s2Sq(TF-IDF (q+c; s))] (1)
Document-cue During dataset construction we
observed that certain document-answer pairs appear
more frequently than others, to the effect that the
correct candidate is often indicated solely by the
presence of certain documents in Sq. This baseline
captures how easy it is for a model to exploit these
informative document-answer co-occurrences. It
predicts the candidate with highest score across Cq:
arg max
c2Cq[max
d2Sq(cooccurrence (d; c))] (2)
Extractive RC models: FastQA and BiDAF In
our experiments we evaluate two recently proposed
LSTM -based extractive QA models: the Bidirectional Attention Flow model ( BiDAF , Seo et al.
(2017a)), and FastQA (Weissenborn et al., 2017),
which have shown a robust performance across several datasets. These models predict an answer span | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 32 | (2017a)), and FastQA (Weissenborn et al., 2017),
which have shown a robust performance across several datasets. These models predict an answer span
within a single document. We adapt them to a multidocument setting by sequentially concatenating all
d2Sqin random order into a superdocument,
adding document separator tokens. During training,
the first answer mention in the concatenated document serves as the gold span.6At test time, we measured accuracy based on the exact match between
5https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Whoosh/
6We also tested assigning the gold span randomly to any
one of the mention of the answer, with insignificant changes.
the prediction and answer, both lowercased, after removing articles, trailing white spaces and punctuation, in the same way as Rajpurkar et al. (2016).
To rule out any signal stemming from the order of
documents in the superdocument, this order is randomized both at training and test time. In a preliminary experiment we also trained models using different random document order permutations, but found
that performance did not change significantly.
ForBiDAF , the default hyperparameters from the
implementation of Seo et al. (2017a) are used, with | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 33 | ForBiDAF , the default hyperparameters from the
implementation of Seo et al. (2017a) are used, with
pretrained GloVe (Pennington et al., 2014) embeddings. However, we restrict the maximum document length to 8,192 tokens and hidden size to 20,
and train for 5,000 iterations with batchsize 16 in order to fit the model into memory.7ForFastQA we
use the implementation provided by the authors, also
with pre-trained GloVe embeddings, no characterembeddings, no maximum support length, hidden
size 50, and batch size 64 for 50 epochs.
While BiDAF andFastQA were initially developed and tested on single-hop RC datasets, their usage of bidirectional LSTMs and attention over the
full sequence theoretically gives them the capacity
to integrate information from different locations in
the (super-)document. In addition, BiDAF employs
iterative conditioning across multiple layers, potentially making it even better suited to integrate information found across the sequence.
6.2 Lexical Abstraction: Candidate Masking
The presence of lexical regularities among answers is a problem in RC dataset assembly – a
phenomenon already observed by Hermann et al.
(2015). When comprehending a text, the correct answer should become clear from its context – rather | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 34 | phenomenon already observed by Hermann et al.
(2015). When comprehending a text, the correct answer should become clear from its context – rather
than from an intrinsic property of the answer expression. To evaluate the ability of models to rely
on context alone, we created masked versions of
the datasets: we replace any candidate expression
randomly using 100 unique placeholder tokens, e.g.
“Mumbai is the most populous city in MASK7 . ”
Masking is consistent within one sample, but generally different for the same expression across samples. This not only removes answer frequency cues,
7The superdocument has a larger number of tokens compared to e.g. SQuAD , thus the additional memory requirements.Model Unfiltered Filtered
Document-cue 74.6 36.7
Maj. candidate 41.2 38.8
TF-IDF 43.8 25.6
Train set size 527,773 43,738
Table 4: Accuracy comparison for simple baseline models on W IKIHOPbefore andafter filtering.
it also removes statistical correlations between frequent answer strings and support documents. Models consequently cannot base their prediction on intrinsic properties of the answer expression, but have
to rely on the context surrounding the mentions.
6.3 Results and Discussion | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 35 | to rely on the context surrounding the mentions.
6.3 Results and Discussion
Table 5 shows the experimental outcomes for W IKIHOPand M EDHOP, together with results for the
masked setting; we will first discuss the former. A
first observation is that candidate mention frequency
does not produce better predictions than a random
guess. Predicting the answer most frequently observed at training time achieves strong results: as
much as 38.8% / 44.2% and 58.4% / 67.3% on the
two datasets, for the full and validated test sets respectively. That is, a simple frequency statistic together with answer type constraints alone is a relatively strong predictor, and the strongest overall for
the“unmasked” version of M EDHOP.
The TF-IDF retrieval baseline clearly performs
better than random for W IKIHOP, but is not very
strong overall. That is, the question tokens are helpful to detect relevant documents, but exploiting only
this information compares poorly to the other baselines. On the other hand, as no co-mention of an
interacting drug pair occurs within any single document in M EDHOP, the TF-IDF baseline performs
worse than random. We conclude that lexical matching with a single support document is not enough to
build a strong predictive model for both datasets. | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 36 | worse than random. We conclude that lexical matching with a single support document is not enough to
build a strong predictive model for both datasets.
TheDocument-cue baseline can predict more than
a third of the samples correctly, for both datasets,
even after sub-sampling frequent document-answer
pairs for W IKIHOP. The relative strength of this
and other baselines proves to be an important issue when designing multi-hop datasets, which we
addressed through the measures described in SecWIKIHOP MEDHOP
standard masked standard masked
Model test test* test test* test test* test test*
Random 11.5 12.2 12.2 13.0 13.9 20.4 14.1 22.4
Max-mention 10.6 15.9 13.9 20.1 9.5 16.3 9.2 16.3
Majority-candidate-per-query-type 38.8 44.2 12.0 13.7 58.4 67.3 10.4 6.1
TF-IDF 25.6 36.7 14.4 24.2 9.0 14.3 8.8 14.3
Document-cue 36.7 41.7 7.4 20.3 44.9 53.1 15.2 16.3 | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 37 | Document-cue 36.7 41.7 7.4 20.3 44.9 53.1 15.2 16.3
FastQA 25.7 27.2 35.8 38.0 23.1 24.5 31.3 30.6
BiDAF 42.9 49.7 54.5 59.8 47.8 61.2 33.7 42.9
Table 5: Test accuracies for the W IKIHOPand M EDHOPdatasets, both in standard (unmasked) and masked setup.
Columns marked with asterisk are for the validated portion of the dataset.
WIKIHOP MEDHOP
standard gold chain standard gold chain
Model test test* test test* test test* test test*
BiDAF 42.9 49.7 57.9 63.4 47.8 61.2 86.4 89.8
BiDAF mask 54.5 59.8 81.2 85.7 33.7 42.9 99.3 100.0
FastQA 25.7 27.2 44.5 53.5 23.1 24.5 54.6 59.2
FastQA mask 35.8 38.0 65.3 70.0 31.3 30.6 51.8 55.1
Table 6: Test accuracy comparison when only using documents leading to the correct answer (gold chain). Columns | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 38 | Table 6: Test accuracy comparison when only using documents leading to the correct answer (gold chain). Columns
with asterisk hold results for the validated samples.
tion 3.2. In Table 4 we compare the two relevant
baselines on W IKIHOPbefore and after applying
filtering measures. The absolute strength of these
baselines before filtering shows how vital addressing this issue is: 74.6% accuracy could be reached
through exploiting the cooccurrence (d; c)statistic
alone. This underlines the paramount importance of
investigating and addressing dataset biases that otherwise would confound seemingly strong RC model
performance. The relative drop demonstrates that
the measures undertaken successfully mitigate the
issue. A downside to aggressive filtering is a significantly reduced dataset size, rendering it infeasible
for smaller datasets like M EDHOP.
Among the two neural models, BiDAF is overall
strongest across both datasets – this is in contrast to
the reported results for SQuAD where their performance is nearly indistinguishable. This is possibly
due to the iterative latent interactions in the BiDAF
architecture: we hypothesize that these are of increased importance for our task, where informationis distributed across documents. It is worth emphasizing that unlike the other baselines, both FastQA
andBiDAF predict the answer by extracting a span | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 39 | andBiDAF predict the answer by extracting a span
from the support documents without relying on the
candidate options Cq.
In the masked setup all baseline models reliant on
lexical cues fail in the face of the randomized answer
expressions, since the same answer option has different placeholders in different samples. Especially
on M EDHOP, where dataset sub-sampling is not a
viable option, masking proves to be a valuable alternative, effectively circumventing spurious statistical
correlations that RC models can learn to exploit.
Both neural RC models are able to largely retain
or even improve their strong performance when answers are masked: they are able to leverage the textual context of the candidate expressions. To understand differences in model behavior between W IKIHOPand M EDHOP, it is worth noting that drug
mentions in M EDHOPare normalized to a unique
single-word identifier, and performance drops under
WIKIHOP MEDHOP
test test* test test*
BiDAF 54.5 59.8 33.7 42.9
BiDAF rem 44.6 57.7 30.4 36.7
FastQA 35.8 38.0 31.3 30.6
FastQA rem 38.0 41.2 28.6 24.5
Table 7: Test accuracy (masked) when only documents | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 40 | FastQA rem 38.0 41.2 28.6 24.5
Table 7: Test accuracy (masked) when only documents
containing answer candidates are given ( rem).
masking. In contrast, for the open-domain setting of
WIKIHOP, a reduction of the answer vocabulary to
100 random single-token mask expressions clearly
helps the model in selecting a candidate span, compared to the multi-token candidate expressions in the
unmasked setting. Overall, although both neural RC
models clearly outperform the other baselines, they
still have large room for improvement compared to
human performance at 74% / 85% for W IKIHOP.
Comparing results on the full and validated test
sets, we observe that the results consistently improve
on the validated sets. This suggests that the training
set contains the signal necessary to make inference
on valid samples at test time, and that noisy samples
are harder to predict.
6.4 Using only relevant documents
We conducted further experiments to examine the
RC models when presented with only the relevant
documents in Sq, i.e., the chain of documents leading to the correct answer. This allows us to investigate the hypothetical performance of the models if
they were able to select and read only relevant documents: Table 6 summarizes these results. Models
improve greatly in this gold chain setup, with up | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 41 | they were able to select and read only relevant documents: Table 6 summarizes these results. Models
improve greatly in this gold chain setup, with up
to 81.2% / 85.7% on W IKIHOPin the masked setting for BiDAF . This demonstrates that RC models
are capable of identifying the answer when few or
no plausible false candidates are mentioned, which
is particularly evident for M EDHOP, where documents tend to discuss only single drug candidates.
In the masked gold chain setup, models can then
pick up on what the masking template looks like
and achieve almost perfect scores. Conversely, these
results also show that the models’ answer selection process is not robust to the introduction of unrelated documents with type-consistent candidates.This indicates that learning to intelligently select relevant documents before RC may be among the most
promising directions for future model development.
6.5 Removing relevant documents
To investigate if the neural RC models can draw
upon information requiring multi-step inference we
designed an experiment where we discard all documents that do not contain candidate mentions, including the first documents traversed. Table 7 shows
the results: we can observe that performance drops
across the board for BiDAF . There is a significant
drop of 3.3%/6.2% on M EDHOP, and 10.0%/2.1% | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
1710.06481 | 42 | drop of 3.3%/6.2% on M EDHOP, and 10.0%/2.1%
on W IKIHOP, demonstrating that BiDAF , is able
to leverage cross-document information. FastQA
shows a slight increase of 2.2%/3.2% for W IKIHOP
and a decrease of 2.7%/4.1% on M EDHOP. While
inconclusive, it is clear that FastQA with fewer latent interactions than BiDAF has problems integrating cross-document information.
7 Related Work
Related Datasets End-to-end text-based QA has
witnessed a surge in interest with the advent of largescale datasets, which have been assembled based
on F REEBASE (Berant et al., 2013; Bordes et al.,
2015), W IKIPEDIA (Yang et al., 2015; Rajpurkar
et al., 2016; Hewlett et al., 2016), web search
queries (Nguyen et al., 2016), news articles (Hermann et al., 2015; Onishi et al., 2016), books (Hill
et al., 2016; Paperno et al., 2016), science exams (Welbl et al., 2017), and trivia (Boyd-Graber | 1710.06481 | Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents | Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be
answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to
combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine
comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test
this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models
for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits
of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence -
effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a
methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of
query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from
different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise
circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive
models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However,
both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents
guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models
outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared
to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06481 | [
"Johannes Welbl",
"Pontus Stenetorp",
"Sebastian Riedel"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI"
] | This paper directly corresponds to the TACL version
(https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/1325) apart from minor
changes in wording, additional footnotes, and appendices | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(TACL), Vol 6 (2018), pages 287-302 | cs.CL | 20171017 | 20180611 | [
{
"id": "1710.06481"
}
] |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
No dataset card yet
New: Create and edit this dataset card directly on the website!
Contribute a Dataset Card- Downloads last month
- 237