Datasets:

keertanavc

/

imdb_prefix20_forDPO_multi-preference_v2

like 0

I rented I AM CURIOUS-YELLOW from my video store

I rented I AM CURIOUS-YELLOW from my video store and I thought that was pretty boring for what we saw it was something like a rehash of old-time movies that I saw growing up back in the day. But you know what, it was actually actually a really good movie. There are good things about it- the acting is good, I'm sure that if you're into that, I'm sure you'd like to see. But what really surprised me was the

I rented I AM CURIOUS-YELLOW from my video store, in hopes it might be a great movie. I was expecting it to be light and enjoyable, but I'm not sure what I got. There is not a single redeeming feature. My wife laughed like crazy because of the jokes.<br /><br />So I guess the reason I didn't give it a full star was because it was so uninteresting.<br /><br />Now I didn't expect this

"I Am Curious: Yellow" is a risible and pretentious ste

"I Am Curious: Yellow" is a risible and pretentious steaming pile of garbage that should have been put down with a few beers and a few shots of scotch. I honestly believe that the film is a work of pure, inane talent and nothing more. It features the voice work of an in-training George Wallace as the director, who spends the majority of the film in the basement of his apartment, where he is recording footage for a DVD set. A guy shows

"I Am Curious: Yellow" is a risible and pretentious steaming pile of junk which consists mainly of a bunch of self-important, self-involved guys, and the women are all portrayed as dumb, stupid, stupid, or, in the more extreme cases, as "slutty", "bitchy" and "sexually frustrated". I watched the movie with my wife and she made me laugh so much I almost forgot about the guy in my wife's class. The

If only to avoid making this type of film in the future. This film

If only to avoid making this type of film in the future. This film was so boring i dont know what else to say. The story was so unbelievable. The camera angles were unbelievable. And the movie just made no sense. The film was so bad that you wonder if they actually rented this movie and then made it for a marketing campaign. The only good thing about this film was that it was a comedy and i just hope the characters were so interesting. All in all this film was so pointless

If only to avoid making this type of film in the future. This film is very low budget but still one of the most watchable films I've seen (which is saying something). As to the story: <br /><br />After seeing that trailer one would have thought this one was a horror movie. Not really. It's more an opportunity to watch all the cool characters in a small town. The plot starts with a simple message that gets expanded and more complex into a story that goes

This film was probably inspired by Godard's Masculin, fé

This film was probably inspired by Godard's Masculin, février, a film which could be interpreted by anyone, not just those who have been interested in the art of film-making. It is a documentary film (film-making without documentary) with very few rules, that is filmed by people who were themselves not interested in documentaries, but instead in seeing the people they know in their everyday lives. It is impossible to know what is shown, or how it was made because

This film was probably inspired by Godard's Masculin, félicité, and félicité (both of which were, in a sense, directed by Foucault) but it is also inspired by the works of Camus, Duchamp, and Kafka. The film has been criticised as being too pretentious (unlike the latter) and too superficial (it is hard to understand the meaning of Duchamp's art), but at no time does it feel '

Oh, brother...after hearing about this ridiculous film for umpteen years

Oh, brother...after hearing about this ridiculous film for umpteen years, I wasn't sure what to expect...however. While it is good, the acting was awful. The script is so silly and corny, and the character's were so weird. The director was great. The acting was awful. There was nothing to cheer for...and you really wish you'd never seen that awful flick...it's just too bad. If you are a director who wants to make this and

Oh, brother...after hearing about this ridiculous film for umpteen years, I just had to get my hands on a DVD copy! <br /><br />I'm surprised that I haven't heard much of this film, but it's on a very short list of films to watch, including: "The Caine Mutants", and "Dirty Harry", and "Batman & Robin", and "Serenity" - which are all excellent, and were well-loved films

I would put this at the top of my list of films in the category

I would put this at the top of my list of films in the category of movies that I love. It has all the good stuff, well-acted and acted by people with good chemistry. It has a few faults, the beginning is just long, the ending just is not in line with the first one. And while it is a good action movie with great fighting sequences, the storyline has so much of what is typical for a martial arts film, and the story lacks in all the good elements

I would put this at the top of my list of films in the category of "The Best Movies Ever" that i've ever seen.<br /><br />The first thing that impressed me about this movie was its performance.<br /><br />But i wasn't expecting much from it. I felt the acting was okay. The dialog was alright but the characters were really poorly executed. Some of the characters could be considered "weak" but, aside from that, they had some characters that

Whoever wrote the screenplay for this movie obviously never consulted any books about Lucille

Whoever wrote the screenplay for this movie obviously never consulted any books about Lucille Ball. It's like an adaption of that great book in which she wrote. The movie seems to have been written by two people, one by the director and another by the producers who apparently didn't want to bother with a single script. This movie was supposed to be a "family movie," but if you watch it twice, I guarantee you will find two things: a lot more talking, and a lot more

Whoever wrote the screenplay for this movie obviously never consulted any books about Lucille Ball. Instead she drew on some of her own experiences. It's a far cry from her earlier comedy, or that of her best comedies. But hey, who gives a crap. She's funny too. It's the story that's the problem. The plot seems simple and forced, there are too many characters to hold the attention on the characters and not enough material for this plot. The story in most cases could

When I first saw a glimpse of this movie, I quickly noticed the actress

When I first saw a glimpse of this movie, I quickly noticed the actress and her "gothic" look. So I watched the film (later realizing the girl was really very well-made, I had to turn it off at the very end because I didn't want to waste my time) and quickly realized what a mess this was. This was a very bad movie that had no budget, director, cast, plot, or any other aspect of the plot that makes any film worth watching

When I first saw a glimpse of this movie, I quickly noticed the actress in the front row and the guy in the middle seat. That is a long sentence for a movie that I loved! It's a nice piece of family film, with some great laughs. We see a bunch of kids in a school cafeteria, singing "Happy Birthday to You" before a couple of them begin to sing with their mouths full of food. It is such a simple, yet cute, moment.<br /><

Who are these "They"- the actors? the filmmakers? Certainly couldn't

Who are these "They"- the actors? the filmmakers? Certainly couldn't give a damn if the film didn't happen to be directed by "They"! This is a good movie, not a big hit.<br /><br />The movie revolves around an African-American family who have two sons who are in and out of jail. As the movies go by you can see many black families and the cops of this community get involved in a lot of problems. This movie really focuses on the problems

Who are these "They"- the actors? the filmmakers? Certainly couldn't be more than 15 years apart on a whole bunch of crap (no surprise there).<br /><br />This is actually not bad, but the acting and some of the story lines just couldn't be any better. The character acting was also very inconsistent. The script, although very interesting, was also uninspired. I would never waste my time watching this again. <br /><br />If it is,

This is said to be a personal film for Peter Bogdonavitch.

This is said to be a personal film for Peter Bogdonavitch. It was made on 8mm and later transferred to 8mm and then to home video. It is said to be filmed on "an old location in the middle of nowhere in a small country, with people who have lived at the same location for over a hundred years. The story is about a young boy named Adam, who finds out that his grandmother, Emma (Anne Bannister), has taken a job as a cleaner

This is said to be a personal film for Peter Bogdonavitch. This is an all-time Bogdonavitch-period film which is truly extraordinary.<br /><br />It would not be an exaggeration to say that this film deserves the highest praise the Bogdonavitch films ever earned. It is the best one I've seen, period.<br /><br />It is so amazingly cinematographically beautiful that one cannot help but fall in love with it. It is a

It was great to see some of my favorite stars of 30 years ago including

It was great to see some of my favorite stars of 30 years ago including Dennis Quaid in the "Tone-Toned". It had good plot lines that involved a group of people who have their own personal agendas, and not like they really care about everyone else. The cast of the movie was great, it was fun to watch, and there were a number of really fun songs, that made this movie memorable. Also the movie was filmed from the back in many angles and different angles you

It was great to see some of my favorite stars of 30 years ago including Barbara Stanwick and John Carradine in one of their first roles! They had a very nice chemistry with each other and I felt like we were being given a different kind of insight into their characters and personalities. I must also give some credit to the "supernatural" aspects of this film! It felt very supernatural, but still felt quite realistic and believable! The film also had a "troubling relationship between mother

I can't believe that those praising this movie herein aren't thinking of some

I can't believe that those praising this movie herein aren't thinking of some of the actual comments made by the critics here.<br /><br />What the heck?! What an awful movie! I mean, the first thing that comes to mind when I read that "Lets have sex and make love in our basement with candles burning on the walls and no curtains" is "HOLY CRAP WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS MOVIE!" You see, when the filmmakers set this on fire

I can't believe that those praising this movie herein aren't thinking of some famous actors such as Sean Connery, Fred Gwynne and Robert Culp.<br /><br />This movie's best line was when Connery's wife was giving their baby daughter the finger at dinner. Gwynne's character was a little surprised at the way his wife had taken it. And at the end he says to Culp that in his life he had always admired him as a "bad-ass

Never cast models and Playboy bunnies in your films! Bob Fos

Never cast models and Playboy bunnies in your films! Bob Fosse was not that bad a director. One of the great early movies shot in Chicago with the help of a little film camera, as well as with "Brick," a camera truck. A funny script by Fosse is the most lasting of the "Bunny" films.<br /><br />This is a good movie. It could be better, with Fosse directing, although I like the style of

Never cast models and Playboy bunnies in your films! Bob Fosse directs a well-done thriller! The script has the usual ingredients of sleaziness, paranoia, and even an auteuristic feel. Also cast is David Hassel and his lovely wife, Joan Plowright.<br /><br />"Catch-22" is not an average thriller but more like a mystery movie. The opening scene is very clever.<br /><br />In fact it's

Its not the cast. A finer group of actors, you could not find

Its not the cast. A finer group of actors, you could not find more than a few that could make this a "B" film.<br /><br />The acting is pathetic. I would not go so far as to call this as good as it is bad, but the cast is awful. Every character in the movie could be put to the test and no one was ever good, every one had a flaw in them that made them a potential threat to be removed. Every character has

Its not the cast. A finer group of actors, you could not find. Or the script. What you'll find in there is some interesting stories about love, loneliness, and a relationship between two people, that in a way become a drama between the characters. Also a little bit of a thriller. Also a romance, but it's not a romantic, it's more a dramatic story than a romance, and you don't find romance with that cast, but you find drama, and drama can

Today I found "They All Laughed" on VHS on sale in

Today I found "They All Laughed" on VHS on sale in the DVD section of Target for $1.25. I had no idea how many people it had sold, but at the time I was buying stuff and I didn't have a clue why or how to figure it out so I was surprised to find that I could actually find it here. Anyway, I bought the copy I had to find it here on my computer and I started researching and searching for it. I was actually

Today I found "They All Laughed" on VHS on sale in a WalMart. I was hoping to save some money on the DVD but the deal had ended before I got a chance so I went in with the intention of renting for 10 bucks. As soon as I saw it, I knew something good was coming and quickly rented it while I was able to avoid watching the whole thing. You have no idea how much fun this movie had. Everyone involved deserves an award. The actors did

This film is just plain horrible. John Ritter doing pratt falls,

This film is just plain horrible. John Ritter doing pratt falls, Jeff Bridges in a bikini in the middle of the desert. This could have been called a "bad film". The worst thing about this film is not the lack of badness, but the over the top special effects. This film could have been an animation, but it's just about the most over the top "film" I have ever seen. The ending is so weird, that I don't know what it's supposed

This film is just plain horrible. John Ritter doing pratt falls, "Hollywood" acting, and an old white man that is all his faults. If you look at it through a glass, its hard to see any redeeming features.<br /><br />Its just a really bad movie and the bad actor's made the bad film even worse. This was a real let down, but I can understand why some of the reviewers were so negative.<br /><br />Not really

My interest in Dorothy Stratten caused me to purchase this video. Although it

My interest in Dorothy Stratten caused me to purchase this video. Although it was a little disappointing and was a poor choice (I think we shouldn't have used our brains when making this one), I found it interesting. It was well paced throughout and I liked how the film was able to move from an emotional moment to one of sadness, anger and anger at someones (or myself). Some of this film was quite boring. The actors, especially Stratten herself, do some great work and I

My interest in Dorothy Stratten caused me to purchase this video. Although it doesn't show every detail, it should be seen, as the details are well-known in the public domain.<br /><br />In a nutshell, these are the story line, but it takes place in an actual location. The video takes place on the same day that the original is shot, and when the Stratten family is shown, they were in the same place at the same time. There was no "

I have this film out of the library right now and I haven't finished

I have this film out of the library right now and I haven't finished it yet. I watched this at night, with the light off, so I don't know if it's really that bad, or if it's because I was on autopilot. But whatever the reason, this movie is a total waste of time and money. I would recommend the DVD instead of the streaming version. The story starts like a cheesy romantic comedy. The director used this movie to try and make someone believe in

I have this film out of the library right now and I haven't finished it yet. This is one of those movies that people have just seen once and you don't even know you saw it until you are reading the review. The movie came out during a huge, but very popular, surge in movie making at this time of year and is really just one of a handful of movies from the summer. The story is simple: a very wealthy and successful lady (played by a fine actress) moves

I think I will make a movie next weekend. Oh wait, I'm

I think I will make a movie next weekend. Oh wait, I'm trying to be funny. I am trying. What's in this movie is so bad. You can't even be funny, even for a half an hour. The movie is nothing but boring. Nothing happened except for the guy's hair. The movie was so boring it was like watching "Hooker" while drunk. It was like listening to "Hollywood" while lying on the couch watching bad movies. I really

I think I will make a movie next weekend. Oh wait, I'm supposed to write that on the poster...<br /><br />I really wish I was joking. The only reason I thought this was a movie (outside of the movie I saw tonight) was because of the plot.<br /><br />I didn't like the movie because it was too overlong. So I'm going to break my own movie rating rule and make this the "overlong" movie that has

Pros: Nothing<br /><br />Cons: Everything<br /

Pros: Nothing<br /><br />Cons: Everything<br /><br />The Plot: The story of a vampire and his son. The story was bad and I did not like it but that is what was so bad in the film. It is not as funny as its supposed to be, and the acting is like the worst it can get. But I liked it. What is a good thing about it is the special effects. I could not believe the actors in those days were

Pros: Nothing<br /><br />Cons: Everything<br /><br />How can you make a movie like the classic "The Wizard of Oz," with a cast that includes John Wayne, Judy Garland and Jack Nicholson without some special effects and a few "crazy scenes"?<br /><br />And why make such a movie if it's not the most realistic?<br /><br />If you want to see this movie, go to the movie theatre, it's on

If the crew behind "Zombie Chronicles" ever read this, here's

If the crew behind "Zombie Chronicles" ever read this, here's the bad news: no one is going to show the movie. I don't know where the actors would find the money to buy this crappy re-run of the original, but I could be pretty sure the crew is busy filming a horror flick. Even with a budget that seems a lot lower, this "Zombie Chronicles" movie has an awful plot, terrible acting, awful writing and an absolutely terrible script. You can

If the crew behind "Zombie Chronicles" ever read this, here's an excuse to get me on board.<br /><br />It's an old-timey, low budget horror movie with a bunch of people running around, and it really does make you feel bad that all these people (the filmmakers have all been around the block) want to be in on the fun. It's really bad, as you can tell from the name (like everything else you see here you can see

1st watched 8/3/2003 - 2 out of 10(Dir

1st watched 8/3/2003 - 2 out of 10(Dir: David Fincher)There is little here that is memorable, which is probably a good thing. It is hard to make a bad movie into a good one, and this one has the most to do in the first 10 minutes of the movie.<br /><br />Most of this movie's content is boring and predictable. The director tries to do too many things at the same time and it shows. A woman

1st watched 8/3/2003 - 2 out of 10(Dir: James M. Cain).<br /><br />Director: David O. Russell (who also co-wrote and directed a few of my favorites like "I am Legend" and "Girlfight"), screenplay: James M. Cain (who wrote and directed some of my favorite scripts like "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" and "Trouble in Paradise"), stars: Matthew McCon

There's tons of good-looking women in this flick. But alas,

There's tons of good-looking women in this flick. But alas, only the movie's hero's mom (Nancy) is not attractive enough for the audience's eye.<br /><br />Another reviewer here suggested this movie contains one of the worst acting of my lifetime. For my money, this is one of the worst comedies I have ever seen in my life. It is not funny at all. There was never a comedic moment.<br /><br />I love this movie

There's tons of good-looking women in this flick. But alas, they all lack the charisma of those who have been working in this field for a long time.<br /><br />The only good thing about the first half of the movie is the second half's action and plot. But even those moments are just as predictable as the action. One good actor was great, but not in the character and storyline roles.<br /><br />If you're a fan of bad movies,

En route to a small town that lays way off the beaten track (but

En route to a small town that lays way off the beaten track (but not so far away that you think they are not going in right), our boys encounter the very first murder in this small area. It's too early for the boys to talk about it, or to report about what really happened. They talk and talk about what's gonna happen after this event, about the boys they're gonna meet in the other town, about what's going on, about their families, about the town,

En route to a small town that lays way off the beaten track (but still on the tracks) we are presented with the main events of a murder that has occurred in the early days of the town: the husband has shot and killed his wife, who is a nun.<br /><br />Afterward, we meet an old nun who is in search of a treasure, she is on the road to an interview with a local farmer about finding a cure for a plague. The local villagers believe

Without wishing to be a killjoy, Brad Sykes is responsible for at

Without wishing to be a killjoy, Brad Sykes is responsible for at least three of the worst scenes in any movie, one of which is a "gory" murder scene. The film also fails to deliver anything worth of on-screen gore. I found it hard to get a lot out of this as a horror film. The plot was a disappointment. Most of the acting and the plot were about as bad as it got. I wish the writers had taken Sykes's character to the

Without wishing to be a killjoy, Brad Sykes is responsible for at least two of the worst films i've ever seen in my entire life. A man without purpose who gets so confused and depressed he leaves his family and goes back to his old self. He goes back to the farm and starts shooting his guns off and the animals start running for their lives! So that's what you call an interesting plot twist. The rest of the movie is filled with horrible effects, bad acting, and the

My girlfriend once brought around The Zombie Chronicles for us to watch as a joke

My girlfriend once brought around The Zombie Chronicles for us to watch as a joke, so we were all really bummed about not being allowed to watch it at the festival.<br /><br />I was really surprised that they still had it in stock, not only because of the high demand but because of the quality of the movie.<br /><br />So when it came to our table, there was only a handful of tickets on offer - and we got stuck in the last seat. The

My girlfriend once brought around The Zombie Chronicles for us to watch as a joke for me. What a treat it was!<br /><br />So in short, it's good for your blood pressure if you're a zombie aficionado like me (or any other zombie fan). I saw it for the first time back in 1992 and I still remember it, though I think it was at the theatre. Well that's the story. It was amazing, in a fun way! <br

Amateur, no budget films can be surprisingly good... this however is not

Amateur, no budget films can be surprisingly good... this however is not.<br /><br />This film contains a rather low budget, it does contain a few cheap effects but the film has a serious story that is a great way to learn about the history of Britain. The film is well written, the characters are lovable, and the film is not without great cinematography. The movie also has a great soundtrack that compliments the action and atmosphere.<br /><br />I would not

Amateur, no budget films can be surprisingly good... this however is not... at least, not in the same category... that is, the 'horror' flick.<br /><br />Trying to be a horror flick for kids I actually got to watch this without parental supervision, I was expecting a lot of blood and guts... like the movie I saw on TV. All the gore was fake, the acting was very weak and the plot was not that interesting.<br /><br

OK its not the best film I've ever seen but at the same time

OK its not the best film I've ever seen but at the same time it's not bad, the music, the cast and especially the acting is so natural, I've never seen anything as genuine in a movie so I had to laugh and cry at the same time, it is like watching a documentary of your life, in fact I can see no reason why you would even think about renting it at all. I'm a massive fan of David Benoit from 'Rent' movies who are

OK its not the best film I've ever seen but at the same time it's not bad, its not great but its not bad. It was a surprise but I really liked it,it has a strong plot,the acting is really strong,the direction was great.I would give it 10 because it's really nice. The movie has a lot of great moments and you will love it. I think the movie has got everything right and I will always be a fan of this director (I

Some films that you pick up for a pound turn out to be rather good

Some films that you pick up for a pound turn out to be rather good. I was talking to a friend in the cinema with a friend from the bar and the three of us sat to the left of the screen on this, I am guessing the director thought it was just a cheap knock off of a classic but the real difference with this is that it was shot in the same environment where the scenes were filmed in the old cinema and had similar shots shot of the same events. We had to do

Some films that you pick up for a pound turn out to be rather good. I have to say I thought "Hollywood" quite good, and the best was my personal favorite... I would have to give this one a 10 for the quality of the acting and the story, though.<br /><br />This was a much better film than I had initially expected. It's just a different kind of a film, and I enjoyed it a lot. The film was great, and there

I received this movie as a gift, I knew from the DVD cover,

I received this movie as a gift, I knew from the DVD cover, the quality of the film, I was expecting something special, I was looking for something with a budget that I might have access to in the UK.<br /><br />I would have rated it lower than 8.5 with a rating of 3.5, that's probably the only negative comment I can make, but you're welcome to rate it up to 9 if you feel like doing it.<br /><br

I received this movie as a gift, I knew from the DVD cover, but I didn't like it, I thought it was awful, and I loved it because of the movie I've only had twice in my entire life. <br /><br />I am not much of a car enthusiast, but I like to drive a big, comfortable SUV.<br /><br />I'm a car guy and the idea of driving the size of a big, high-performance vehicle with an all

I have not seen many low budget films i must admit, but this is

I have not seen many low budget films i must admit, but this is one that has definitely gone through my mind. It has a very intriguing, and yet so unrealistic cast that includes a former Playboy Bunny (Sophie Brown) a stripper (Carroll Burke) and a hussy who is a hussy (Toni Collette), I'll leave it to you to find out more about the female cast members. This one might actually be a real gem, because it's a shame

I have not seen many low budget films i must admit, but this is one of the funniest of a movie that i have ever seen. The main character is so goofy that it is impossible to watch this movie without laughing. The fact that the movie does not feature much in the plot makes this movie a must see if you do not want to miss that. It also has some amazing cinematography, but the main character's camera work is awful and the characters are flat. The special effects are

..Oh wait, I can! This movie is not for the typical film

..Oh wait, I can! This movie is not for the typical film lover. Instead, it's for those who have an old-fashioned sense of what cinema is supposed to be. To say the least, I feel the original movie does a much better job of covering movie theater and the audience's reaction to it. You can't watch this with a bad attitude or you are going to be so lost in the movie that you can't catch yourself. It is also, perhaps, for the

..Oh wait, I can! This movie is not for the typical film-goer. I recommend a good book or movie, and just enjoy it. I have a lot of good movies in my library, and most were either too hard to see or not really good, I must say. This one is much better. I loved it so much, but I can't remember exactly what I liked it, but I guess it was something about the character's inner thoughts and reactions. If you

You have to admire Brad Sykes even if you don't particularly want to

You have to admire Brad Sykes even if you don't particularly want to. This is a movie that was definitely not for everyone so the audience probably has to be about a couple thousand in the audience. In the middle of the movie is a pretty lady and Brad's face when he sees this is priceless. If you are Brad Sykes you have to admire that he can be so honest with his daughter as well as his friends. I don't know if any of us can speak for other people

You have to admire Brad Sykes even if you don't particularly want to follow his career.<br /><br />This is a great little comedy that is also a classic story. Great performances from all. I can hardly wait for the second in the series, "My Fair Lady" which will be a lot easier to get to catch.<br /><br />I loved it.<br /><br />My favorite line in the movie, "It's a beautiful place to be" was

THE ZOMBIE CHRONICLES <br /><br />

THE ZOMBIE CHRONICLES <br /><br />MARCH 21, 2002 This time period is the last half of the 21st Century, after the first, the second and the third. The setting is the future, not the present, but what is the future? Who made it? What is a zombie? We will find out one day. This movie is just that, and I don't care what else this is, as it is an excellent introduction to

THE ZOMBIE CHRONICLES <br /><br />This movie just didn't work.<br /><br />This movie has just been in an area that I don't want to be in. You can't make it work unless you do all these things right.<br /><br />This movie just didn't work.<br /><br />This movie has just been on the low-hanging fruit in my opinion.<br /><br />The acting is not

A woman asks for advice on the road to reach a mysterious town, and

A woman asks for advice on the road to reach a mysterious town, and finds herself sucked into a series of events as the fate of a woman who's a psychic is revealed. With her being the only one left to witness the events, who knows what kind of evil may be hiding in the shadows?<br /><br />A very good and very interesting movie. The movie has a very atmospheric feeling, it's like you are in the moment being there. What's interesting to note is

A woman asks for advice on the road to reach a mysterious town, and has a mysterious experience - but she does not know her past or where she comes from. An American woman, with a mysterious connection to Africa. African woman with a mysterious connection to Africa. African woman with an unexplained origin. Caucasian woman with an unexplained origin. Caucasian woman with a mysterious connection to Africa. Caucasian woman with an unexplained origin. Caucasian woman with an unexplained origin. Caucasian woman with an unexplained origin. Caucasian woman with

Really, I can't believe that I spent $5 on this movie.

Really, I can't believe that I spent $5 on this movie. This is not even a movie for someone who thinks that comedy is the easiest genre to make fun of. I have never really been a fan of films with low budget, yet all of the time I have been watching "The Big Lebowski" and other movies with low budget in order to enjoy a low budget movie that the studios wouldn't even even make. I don't think that that this has ever been seen as

Really, I can't believe that I spent $5 on this movie. It just seemed so unbelievable. The acting was horrendous, and I just couldn't believe that it was an original idea from Warner Bros.<br /><br />Then again, I can't believe that it's an original idea since I've seen most of the movies that they are bringing out (and a few in the mail). The acting was just not enough to save the movie.<br /><br />The fact

I rented this movie about 3 years ago, and it still stands out in

I rented this movie about 3 years ago, and it still stands out in my memory because of the special effects. I've always believed that there's a point where films that try to do the special effects to the level of the special effects becomes nothing more than just another attempt to create an impressive picture. The special effects in this film are really just bad but hey, they still make "the Terminator" look like it's the first day of school by comparison. What's funny is that the most

I rented this movie about 3 years ago, and it still stands out in my memory and is something to look for, even after all this time, especially when you have the full-length version available! I have to say, this movie would be a good choice for a weekend- or even a day-long viewing at a theater with a big screen to help stretch your eyes.<br /><br />However, it has a few problems.<br /><br />First, I don't

:Spoilers:<br /><br />I was very disappointed

:Spoilers:<br /><br />I was very disappointed by this movie.<br /><br />It's an action movie and that was it. Just a bunch of people fighting each other. The whole movie was like watching a soap opera.<br /><br />I was shocked to see a character named "the Big Daddy" (who had a big gun in his hand) that would have had to be one of the first to die. He did appear like he was

:Spoilers:<br /><br />I was very disappointed with this film as well as with many other reviews I have read.<br /><br />What happened in this film that made this movie so terrible? The acting was horrible. The acting lacked all credibility.<br /><br />The cinematography was poor and the lighting in the scenes was poor. The camera never moves and does not have it's angle to follow the action at all. It is hard to tell if

I've seen all four of the movies in this series. Each one str

I've seen all four of the movies in this series. Each one strays somewhere in between one of the four movies in the original and one of these (the four I mentioned before). The original three movies (the first three being "Anastasia" and "The Great Pyramids of Giza", the fourth being "The Wizard of Oz" and "The Wizard of Oz Part 2") are about the four Great Pyramids. The fifth movie (The Mystery Train) takes place in this

I've seen all four of the movies in this series. Each one straddles genre, but each film presents an interesting, thought-provoking topic. So why are they all such a pain in the backside? I can think of two things. The first is because the movies are all so boring. The second is that they only have a certain type of actors and have actors that do not do much character development.<br /><br />In addition to the characters, the main plot

I very much looked forward to this movie. Its a good family movie;

I very much looked forward to this movie. Its a good family movie; well acted with good actors and a good story, well put together, and in my opinion, a great movie for children. It was not very accurate to the times and I know people have made it seem like it was the 1940s, but it had a huge cast of children that you wouldn't see in the 1940s. The cast of the 1940's are all there, but the casting wasn't right. It is

I very much looked forward to this movie. Its a good family movie; and it's the one for my kids, too. They have a little sister. I have another 4-year old brother, and we love playing the game. He loves this movie. I'm going to give it a 3.5 out of 5. But its not a terrible movie with plenty of action and characters. The acting was great.<br /><br />This movie was based on the book and is very

I have read all of the Love Come Softly books. Knowing full well

I have read all of the Love Come Softly books. Knowing full well I wouldn't, I still feel compelled to read it. Not for the dialogue, not for the plot, but simply because it's simply a stunning and fascinating story, a story about love and the love of the universe. <br /><br />Like most of the other reviewers have stated, the film version is the best one available, but as much as I enjoyed it, the book is better still and should be

I have read all of the Love Come Softly books. Knowing full well that most of the books are fictional, this was a disappointment. However, this movie was so boring, it's as though that's the point.<br /><br />The cast is what really let this movie down, the supporting cast is actually the one with the most to do (i.e. the movie was not the star vehicle for any of them). All of the actors are excellent in different parts. But

As a Southern Baptist, it pains me that I must give a below average

As a Southern Baptist, it pains me that I must give a below average rating to a movie with an alligator movie in it. The plot was simple enough, a man and his family are planning on getting married, so the pastor gives them a tour of the old cemetery. Apparently the director is not familiar with the story, and thinks that by showing an alligator movie, it is trying to be a "serious movie". I found it boring, boring, boring, and boring. The movie

As a Southern Baptist, it pains me that I must give a below average review to such a good film.<br /><br />Not because of the script, scenery, music, or acting.<br /><br />However, I thought the story was really well done. The film is centered around the relationship between a woman and her son. This film doesn't seem to be based on any real-life events, so I suppose the setting is somewhat unreal.<br /><br />If

WARNING: This review contains SPOILERS. Do not read if you don

WARNING: This review contains SPOILERS. Do not read if you don't want any of those SPOILER-SPOILER plot details revealed. You'll get a little bit of that by reading ahead, but it's almost impossible not to get caught up by the details of what I said. There's no "going back" or "getting to the beginning," it just moves forward with all of its characters, with all of its events, and with most of it still happening at the

WARNING: This review contains SPOILERS. Do not read if you don't want to be spoiled. This review is about the film, not the man. That means it's not a review of the film, or the movie, it's just about the film itself.<br /><br />Basically I went to see the movie for myself after seeing it advertised online with a number of the reviews. I got to the theater and watched the video on the big screen. It's a very sad

As a kid I did think the weapon the murderer wielded was cool, however

As a kid I did think the weapon the murderer wielded was cool, however as an adult it just doesn't cut the mustard. This movie is just more of the same. I'd never go in expecting to see any major plot twists or twists along a set of action-packed set pieces, so the movie has to be taken less seriously than it might otherwise be, which might not be a good thing. The movie lacks the variety of action I'm accustomed to seeing, plus it's not really

As a kid I did think the weapon the murderer wielded was cool, however, as the film was over I turned it off, which was the exact same thing that was going on in my head. Anyway I never saw this, and I guess the only movie that I did watch was all of them. It never made its way to me because of my dad having to watch most of the TV while the movie was on. It was really like someone was trying to make me feel something. As a

Jill Dunne (played by Mitzi Kapture), is

Jill Dunne (played by Mitzi Kapture), is the only female witness in this movie. It's a little odd she's in the film for all the male characters, but it is an interesting film, and if you have trouble imagining Jill Dunne without the karate, watch the film before reading my opinion of the film. It shows Dunne with the karate, and the rest is just her. There is a scene in which a woman is kicked in the groin

Jill Dunne (played by Mitzi Kapture), is a lesbian who is a good sport for the ladies and who does not seem to like the ladies around her. Her friends (played by the cast of a television show) are all very good-natured and funny, with excellent performances by the whole cast and some other people to follow.<br /><br />One of the things this film is trying to prove - that lesbians are not a bad thing, so long as

This movie sucked. It really was a waste of my life. The acting

This movie sucked. It really was a waste of my life. The acting was crap but I couldn't make up my mind what to think. The only reason I kept watching was to see if the same actor was doing it. Every time something funny or moving, the actors got stuck in the middle of their act. It was like the characters were in the same movie. I had to take a break and start watching the same things over again. You might be expecting a lot but as an adult

This movie sucked. It really was a waste of my life. The acting is terrible. The plot was stupid in that the cast was supposed to be all the same person so they acted the same so I think they were trying to be that but that was it. It could have been worse if they had done a few things differently to make it interesting.<br /><br />This movie is really not funny and just boring. The only time you see the cast is when someone is in it in

Lifetime did it again. Can we say stupid? I couldn't

Lifetime did it again. Can we say stupid? I couldn't even spell that crap. This is just the most annoying movie in the world. Why can't these studios just call it dumb, instead of lame. It's like a movie of the day with lame characters, the story is dull with a bunch of characters who are dull, no story with no plot. I thought it was an April Fools' joke. One guy is the hero, two guys are a love triangle,

Lifetime did it again. Can we say stupid? I couldn't take my eyes off the screen to say nothing. The only two people that mattered were all the old familiar faces from this movie. I loved them all. I loved them all. They all had something to do that made them so good. I am not making this movie to be sentimental. I just love all of them in one way. They all had something to do. I don't think they realized it. It was

I have to say I am really surprised at the high ratings for this movie

I have to say I am really surprised at the high ratings for this movie, its so funny, well acted and entertaining. The two main characters are great with such a great script that we can't even really tell who they are. There are so many aspects to this movie that make it special, you'll think that you've seen the plot a thousand times but it's still the same thing. They have such good acting, the acting of the two main characters in particular, is so good,

I have to say I am really surprised at the high ratings for this movie. This movie just wasnt good. Maybe it was because it was a family movie and the people who have the movie were all middle class or rich. The script was awful. The songs were really annoying. Everyone in the cast was really annoying. The soundtrack was awesome and everything just fit together with amazing vocals. They had some great dancing. The characters were all really good, but the ending was really bad. Also I

The original book of this was set in the 1950s but that won't

The original book of this was set in the 1950s but that won't be a part of the show. The opening episode has the actors at the library going through the book of the original novel. The library is also one of the many places that the first three writers were in the UK. Another thing that we were given is a list of characters that were added to the show. It was very fun watching the actors at their very best and in many ways it was a surprise to see that they

The original book of this was set in the 1950s but that won't stop you from watching the film with an eye to the original books.<br /><br />The story goes that in the 1920s a man comes to a remote lake to escape his troubled home town and the people he loved.<br /><br />This film is actually a remake of the original novel and it's great to see how it has been repackaged. The movie was made by director John Carpenter and that

The annoying mouse and lullaby really got to me and really had nothing to

The annoying mouse and lullaby really got to me and really had nothing to do with the story, they just annoyed me, no reason for this to even be a story line at all. It's not even really the animation which was a problem, if you give me a list of the worst in anime I will give you the top 5. I really think the best thing about this movie is that it was released in Japan, this is the first time anyone has ever made an animation like this,

The annoying mouse and lullaby really got to me and really had nothing to do with the film. It was a poor attempt to remake the movie "The Sound of Music", which was very successful, as it was a good movie and an incredibly underrated musical number.<br /><br />One thing that made it really, really bad was the story. It was just a waste of time and it only had one interesting part. The characters didn't have much depth whatsoever. The plot was so flat

I saw this film opening weekend in Australia, anticipating with an excellent cast of

I saw this film opening weekend in Australia, anticipating with an excellent cast of talented film actors. A terrific script, set design, cinematography and direction and the acting. This was not an easy film to make that i was in the film with the actors who performed the parts and a lot of the story was set up in the previous scene. But if you see this film it should be a surprise. Just don't expect any action, if you do you are missing out. Enjoy the film,

I saw this film opening weekend in Australia, anticipating with an excellent cast of the biggest and best names in entertainment.<br /><br />To me, as a former fan of the show, this movie and this show are absolutely no different in terms of a movie like this, even with the added bonus of more of the cast from the show.<br /><br />But despite the fact that I have only the show episodes for my reference, this movie was very much not from the show,

I saw this at the premiere in Melbourne<br /><br />It

I saw this at the premiere in Melbourne<br /><br />It is a horror-comedy about two characters, one a psychologist and the other a scientist, who travel to a remote island, with a scientific team of scientists.<br /><br />In the first episode, they explore the island, with some other scientists, on the beach. There they meet the local natives and try to get them to believe in the island's scientific theory of the origin of the human race.<br

I saw this at the premiere in Melbourne<br /><br />It was a good surprise when I watched it.<br /><br />I'm not sure what it was really about but this movie was a total fail. If you're anything like me, you're going to be laughing at the absurdities at the first few minutes.<br /><br />That's because, with only 2-3 minutes of dialogue, there is no point of entry for a viewer.<br /><

Ned Kelly (Ledger), the infamous Australian outlaw and legend. Sort

Ned Kelly (Ledger), the infamous Australian outlaw and legend. Sort of. He is a "hush dog" who lives in the hinterlands of the Kimberley, Australia, in a castle guarded by the infamous and infamous Ned Kelly (Rhodes), the "King of the Wild". Kelly does everything that Kelly cannot, and so his adventures (and the movie) must be left to other people's imagination. I did like some of the "wild west" aspects of Kelly

Ned Kelly (Ledger), the infamous Australian outlaw and legend. Sort of like the film noir of the 70's, Ned Kelly was a hit in a bunch of weirdo pockets. One of those pockets, though, was on the eastern seaboard of the US, a.k.a. Florida, where the movie was filmed. Here, we can see many of the original shots, shots from the movie filmed down there (not far from where Ned Kelly was shot) so

They constructed this one as a kind of fantasy Man From Snowy River meets

They constructed this one as a kind of fantasy Man From Snowy River meets the Rocky Horror Picture Show. There is a lot of special effects, but the rest of it is so flat you can't even think of it as making fun of itself. It has an awful plot to the extent that it is like it is about nothing in particular. I had never been interested in the genre, so this one made no sense. Nothing makes any sense, and the actors can't even be considered good actors

They constructed this one as a kind of fantasy Man From Snowy River meets a comic book superhero, with a lot of good laughs, and the cast is really quite amazing, with some of the actors you can expect to see in other movies like Spiderman 2 or Superman, that also have this type of casts.<br /><br />The director and writers were so inspired to set this one off and really put out a great effort, although this one didn't have quite the budget as the other

This has to be the worst piece of garbage I've seen in a while

This has to be the worst piece of garbage I've seen in a while. At the end of the film you're expected to have a heart and a conscience, yet the entire movie was just a bunch of crap. The plot was about a girl who's mind is like a vacuum. In reality she is just an empty shell. The acting was horrible. And the special effects were just pathetic. But that was all. The story just sucks. I can't understand how they would have made this

This has to be the worst piece of garbage I've seen in a while. What's wrong with a little "art"? That's not a good thing, it's the "art". <br /><br />The plot is stupid, the actors are bad (it's like they can't get good actors to act in this movie), and the "actors" just don't act (unless it's the same person). All the acting is just about the same (except that the "

If the term itself were not geographically and semantically meaningless, one might well

If the term itself were not geographically and semantically meaningless, one might well be tempted to apply it to the two major American music genres of country and rock. A certain "art" about them, about their forms, their musical qualities, their lyrics, and their values. So the term "art" is not wrong, it is right. It is not so much that it is meant as an analogy of the arts, the art, the music, the visual art.<br /><br />

If the term itself were not geographically and semantically meaningless, one might well regard its appearance as a "breakthrough" in the field of ethnology. For more than a century, ethnic studies had offered a kind of "scientific" framework for human relations, but the new research of ethnologist Karl Jaspers (1918-1998) and sociologist E.L.G. Kroeber (1944- ) made ethnography more than a theory, and opened a new field for scholarship

This movie was so unrelentingly bad, I could hardly believe I was

This movie was so unrelentingly bad, I could hardly believe I was watching it. It had to be some kind of remake. The story was so silly. The plot was so stupid. It was a total ripoff of a book titled: "The Little Prince". I feel this movie actually stole one idea from the book. The actors were awful, too. For example, the two actors that played the Prince and the Prince's sidekick that was a human-shaped robot. You can

This movie was so unrelentingly bad, I could hardly believe I was still watching it! I even thought I could see myself at the movies opening, but the people of Seattle are in it, so no one was around to see this trashy trash-fest, and that was the point.<br /><br />I have a little problem with this movie at least, because it has not been as popular as some of these other "unforgiven" movies out there, and it's

This movie never made it to theaters in our area, so when it became

This movie never made it to theaters in our area, so when it became available on video I thought it must be an anomaly. It came on with the DVD player in the background and as soon as I started watching I stopped. The story line is ridiculous. There are moments that are not really worth watching, but the plot is totally and totally unbelievable.<br /><br />This movie is completely devoid of any suspense whatsoever. It was a comedy, not a drama. It was not really funny

This movie never made it to theaters in our area, so when it became available in Canada I didn't see it, but here it's available now! I couldn't wait for the DVD to arrive, so I could see this one again.<br /><br />It's a classic movie, that should be on every movie theatre's shelf. If you like cheesy horror, you'll have a great time watching this one. It's one of those movies that really make no sense, but it

I thought this was a very clunky, uninvolving version of a

I thought this was a very clunky, uninvolving version of a musical. I don't mean that it's the best musical version of a musical I've seen, but it seems to be a poor man's version of a classic. It felt rather like a video game version that was meant to entertain but the music just didn't work. I don't think it was meant to be used for stage performances. It was just so clunky. The "stage" was just a big room

I thought this was a very clunky, uninvolving version of a movie that had the wrong actors in the right parts. As a story, I thought it was incredibly simplistic and pointless, while as a movie, I found it uninspired and unrealistic.<br /><br />The character of Munchausen was weak. It was only his attempts to play up his feigned mental illness that brought us to the point of his suicide. Not only that, but he's not even very

Ned aKelly is such an important story to Australians but this movie is

Ned aKelly is such an important story to Australians but this movie is just like many others that Australians have seen, just too little depth. This would be the movie that would be made for a big group or family and was an incredibly exciting film. With everything going on in the story we had every detail under scrutiny. The directing was very good and the acting was superb. The movie will not leave you satisfied and you will not be in a trance-like state. It can be taken as

Ned aKelly is such an important story to Australians but this movie is not as well made or the story is not as strong as it could be, the cast are not good, the dialog is not well handled, the movie is hard to find, the plot is not compelling, the story is not well paced and the movie is not long. The story is based on the book but it has nothing to do with the characters and has no plot that revolves around its characters or how they get involved

From the very beginning, the political theme of this film is so obvious and

From the very beginning, the political theme of this film is so obvious and overwhelming that I cannot bear to keep my attention away from it. As the years roll on, the film goes from a weak story to a truly unbelievable story that is about a secret society that lives in some remote location. What is supposed to be a "real" people (that's what the story wants to make it seem) are more like a collection of characters in this movie, and we do not feel any closer to

From the very beginning, the political theme of this film is so obvious and overwhelming. This movie is a direct insult to those who have the temerity to question the political status quo.<br /><br />As usual, the best part of this movie was the part of the film that doesn't have a name at the beginning, it's almost not even there.<br /><br />I had no idea what to expect about a movie with such a politically charged plot, but I still felt

I guess I was attracted to this film both because of the sound of the

I guess I was attracted to this film both because of the sound of the songs and the soundtrack... The only thing is that the actors were bad, the director wasn't really that great at directing but that was really all there... The director was a joke, the director I don't even want to think about but the actors were good... it was a "wee film" for the teen-age film school crowd. I really found myself yawning a couple of times... There is nothing really

I guess I was attracted to this film both because of the sound of the old footage and the music. I saw the same old "chock full of old chook tunes, chock full of old chook tunes!" sound effects a number of times in the movie. I was pleased to see a variety of new music.<br /><br />The movie was very well done, and it did give a good movie about old people. I don't remember ever hearing anyone talk like that in

I don't quite get the rating for The Amati Girls and I think

I don't quite get the rating for The Amati Girls and I think it is fair to say that I feel I'm trying to give a lot of different points of view to the two and I might be wrong to do so and there is no one person who is good enough to be considered the 'Greatest' of these two films. I like the latter of the two but for this reviewer I am in the former category.<br /><br />The Amati Girls is a horror film

I don't quite get the rating for The Amati Girls and I think the reason is because these ladies are really just girls who have no reason to not want or even to need men.<br /><br />I can see why. It's easy to see that girls are going through a bit of a transition in their career.<br /><br />A good story, with great acting.<br /><br />Watching it this week, I was very surprised with how well the characters

This movie was awful. The ending was absolutely horrible. There was no plot

This movie was awful. The ending was absolutely horrible. There was no plot, just a bunch of people giving a boring and pointless performance. The acting was not memorable. The movie had no plot at all. They could not even make it a comedy. It was like they were making a movie out of a comic book or a TV drama. The only saving grace was an excellent performance by Michelle Rodriguez, but even then, the movie was almost as painful as the opening. There was not even a

This movie was awful. The ending was absolutely horrible. There was no plot, no character development, just characters dying in some horrible ways. The acting was horrible. I loved the two male leads (one and two) in this movie. The whole movie I was in awe of them. This movie had some of the worst sex scenes ever. I never saw a scene like this in any movie and it was an absolute mess. They should not have used a guy in here and the story did not

Holy crap. This was the worst film I have seen in a long time

Holy crap. This was the worst film I have seen in a long time. The movie is terrible, the dialog was very bad, the music was awful, the plot was stupid, the characters were extremely cheesy, the acting was terrible and the special effects were so...so cheesy. The worst part of the whole thing was the scenes at the end. They came out with a very cheesy end tag and that was the only ending I could say that was actually good. The special effects were so poorly

Holy crap. This was the worst film I have seen in a long time. I have never seen such a disaster in my life! It seems that the director doesn't know what he wants, and throws everything out of place without any logical reason.<br /><br />Just as terrible is the plot. The plot had absolutely no structure whatsoever. The movie starts out with a bang, but then falls apart. At the end of the movie, you see a couple of people sitting around a table

SWING! is an important film because it's one of the remaining Black

SWING! is an important film because it's one of the remaining Black/Asian films, and it was made by an Asian! It's a true gem and there is a lot to love! There is some very disturbing scenes, but there are also heart-warming scenes, which you'll be hard pressed to find in most Asian or Asian films! Some people say they "feared for their lives", and of course there is not enough Asian violence in film. But there are many Asian-

SWING! is an important film because it's one of the remaining Black films of its kind. Not many Blacks have made films of this quality, but this one will always be with us.<br /><br />I wish more of them had made the same choice, but this is the first film that I've seen that has made me cry out, "WHITES UP!!!" The cinematography is the best that I've seen in a long time, with the exception of "American

There's not a drop of sunshine in "The Sunshine Boys", which makes

There's not a drop of sunshine in "The Sunshine Boys", which makes it an even more depressing drama. The story is as follows: In the 1950's, a young actor named Larry Hill (Christopher Lee) receives a great life chance - he can become an actor in his own right! Larry has an actor's agent (James Dean) and a wonderful acting mentor, James Dean, who takes Larry under his wing.<br /><br />This film was released by MGM in March 1958 -

There's not a drop of sunshine in "The Sunshine Boys", which makes its charm even more extraordinary. It is a great film which captures the essence of the great British cinema of the 1950s and 1960s. Great cinematography, excellent acting, and a very well played, but flawed script. <br /><br />Lest you think of The Shining as a movie with a bad ending, and of this as a movie with a good ending, consider this movie a true masterpiece. The

I like Goldie Hawn and wanted another one of her films, so

I like Goldie Hawn and wanted another one of her films, so I bought Goldie Hawn's new movie "The Ice Cream Shoppe" on DVD. There is nothing else in the movie other than Goldie Hawn as one of the owners. Everything else is in the basement of the Ice Cream Shoppe.<br /><br />"The Ice Cream Shoppe" is about a woman who tries to make a fortune as a Ice Cream Shoppe owner,

I like Goldie Hawn and wanted another one of her films, so that was a no brainer. This movie had a great cast and it was a shame that this one got away from it's main theme.<br /><br />Unfortunately, the plot doesn't work that well. Sure, it does a lot of back and forth between the characters, but the plot always has a way of dragging it to a halt. It's not so much a drama, but more a comedy,

Protocol is an implausible movie whose only saving grace is that it stars

Protocol is an implausible movie whose only saving grace is that it stars the likes of Ed Norton and the rest of the cast have to be re-packaged and retitled to keep the film from being officially dubbed the worst movie in history.<br /><br />What I can say with certainty is that the most common criticism of this film was lack of anything worth of criticising at all. This film may have been a flop but its worth watching because the characters are so interesting.

Protocol is an implausible movie whose only saving grace is that it stars the very good, extremely talented and very talented cast of actors such as Jack Black and Robert Loggia. The film's plot was stupid and pointless as all the characters were not developed. The whole movie had no sense.<br /><br />The only redeeming feature about the film was the very funny moments.<br /><br />As a movie in the vein of American Hustle, and in the vein of

When an attempt is made to assassinate the Emir of Ohtar, an Arab

When an attempt is made to assassinate the Emir of Ohtar, an Arab tribe that occupies the Middle East, an old man and his cousin, who have an affinity for the supernatural, join forces with an old colleague to make a wish upon the man's long-dead sister.<br /><br />On the way, they are attacked by an elephant. In an attempt to stop it, they are forced to use a magic mirror that turns them into statues. The mirror is destroyed but with a

When an attempt is made to assassinate the Emir of Ohtar, an Arab nation, it does not go well...<br /><br />Well, OK, there's the "real world" and then there is this...<br /><br />This film, shot in a "remote" location in Africa, was made to show the story from the Emir's point of view...like some "buddies" filming the war, some poor Arab, and us from the US.<

What does the " Executive producer " do in a movie. If I remember

What does the " Executive producer " do in a movie. If I remember right, the original director was George Romero and the movie was based on a novel, but that was it. The movie just got turned on the "production" level. This was one of those movies that got made on the cheap and had a cast that is the reason why I would recommend this as a high-budget horror. The acting was OK, but the acting is what made the movie worth seeing. I mean,

What does the " Executive producer " do in a movie. If I remember correctly, the director of this film (Ciaran Hinds) directed all of the music cues. How can we forget how wonderful the music was in "The Three Stooges"? It would be nice to see those "comedy skits" with Paulie, Eddie, and Bill. Maybe even Paulie could have acted. He was a terrible comedian. You are also supposed to remember the "spoils

Outlandish premise that rates low on plausibility and unfortunately also struggles feeb

Outlandish premise that rates low on plausibility and unfortunately also struggles feebly to keep viewers intrigued. The director, Stanley Kramer, apparently came up with the idea of an eccentric Jewish doctor (Lili Taylor, the only other reason I can give you is that she's a big, tall girl) in an Italian village. His work is so different from what we know as "normal" that he's not even a Doctor! That's so bizarre and unlike anything else I have ever seen.

Outlandish premise that rates low on plausibility and unfortunately also struggles feebly to pull back any tension.<br /><br />One of the first and finest of the modern day gangster films, this stylish, stylish masterpiece is packed full of surprises, surprises and surprises. A man living in a posh penthouse with a chauvinistic wife and several prostitutes and looking to get away, has the chance to escape with help from a corrupt detective as well as one of the most spectacular car

There are only two movies I would give a 1/10 to, this

There are only two movies I would give a 1/10 to, this was the only one I gave one. First, we should point out that all the major actors in this movie are in it, and it's more of a "show you how to be a Hollywood star" movie. The first part is about how they got to Hollywood. Then they have some funny and dumb stuff, then they play a "starlet" who gets into the movie (she's a big "dun

There are only two movies I would give a 1/10 to, this being one and the director, ahem, the other one. But the story is pretty bland. The cinematography, editing, and music are pretty bad for a movie, but they are all well edited.<br /><br />The two main characters are really, really, really flat. You can tell that every time they make a scene in a movie, the plot goes back to the same boring plot.<br /

The only good thing about this movie was the shot of Goldie Hawn

The only good thing about this movie was the shot of Goldie Hawn kissing her "boyfriend." <br /><br />There were so many bad lines, such as "Did you see that? That is my mom, I am the mayor." It was so horrible and I don't even want to watch it.<br /><br />In the movie, Goldie Hawn is always just walking around with the hair down, always wearing her glasses. We just get this guy,

The only good thing about this movie was the shot of Goldie Hawn. Hawn looks like a regular human but we see that she's a cartoon figure. <br /><br />In my opinion, this movie should have been more like this.<br /><br />And don't you get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with this movie.<br /><br />But it just doesn't deserve a higher score. Its not even in the top ten.<br /><br

I'm studying Catalan, and was delighted to find El Mar, a movie

I'm studying Catalan, and was delighted to find El Mar, a movie which the director had set in the same city where Catalunya and France were both in the same country. It was filmed back to back on the same day, the same actors and so on. The cinematography is stunning, the story, even more amazing and interesting, as I said, the characters were so well-defined. The acting was fantastic, as you can imagine. The script was a real treat, and

I'm studying Catalan, and was delighted to find El Mar, a movie that is more fun than many of the movies here. The performances are great and the story is really interesting. The most memorable scene was in the first few minutes after the first kiss. It was really hot and the people were really flustered. The movie is not very predictable (and you have to figure it out from the very beginning) but it does feel rather rushed. The songs were well done, the characters acted

I was excited to view a Cataluña´s film in the Berlin

I was excited to view a Cataluña´s film in the Berlin International Film Festival. This director is well known for his high production values and the quality of his cinema. I wasn´t sure about what I would see in this movie, although I expected a great performance from Joanna Paiva (in another movie with Cataluña), but instead, I thought I would find myself surprised with this outstanding film. The plot of the film is very simple: A family member of a young

I was excited to view a Cataluña´s film in the Berlin film festival. I´d seen all of his works and his style of filmmaking was a real treat. My feeling about the film was that of a complete movie. The film is one that you do not want to miss. It has got that magic element in there. I was very satisfied with the movie and highly recommend it to all of Cataluña´s fans. Thank you. Best regards.<br /><br

this film was a major letdown. the level of relentless cruelty and violence

this film was a major letdown. the level of relentless cruelty and violence makes a movie a horror, just like any other movie with the usual bad acting and poor directing. the ending is not even well acted, with the actors doing little to make you believe that its an ending. the film should be dubbed and renamed "Croc Movie" rather than something even worse. this is an awful movie. i wish that the producer of the film could have made us the actors that were in it,

this film was a major letdown. the level of relentless cruelty and violence in this film is just shocking. there was hardly anything to look at, it's just some girl trying to survive after a brutal accident. the film, though, was extremely well written, acted, and produced. i wish more films like this one were in this genre that are on TV and on movie theatres. the characters were pretty well written and acted. a very decent, well paced, well thought out character to

Three part "horror" film with some guy in a boarded up house

Three part "horror" film with some guy in a boarded up house on the end of a deserted road going after a woman who just happens to be a vampire. He kills her, and in one of the first lines is said "and we killed her!". At first I thought it was just the movie, but I just didn't catch what was going on. The main part of the movie is the vampire killing him. (The vampire kills her, and the guy turns into a vampire,

Three part "horror" film with some guy in a boarded up house looking on at kids as they play with dolls (like the "house" in the opening titles) and people looking into old film magazines, some very disturbing scenes. The film is very short. Some scenes are creepy in a weird old school way, the music was really loud so i felt like it was getting in my head. and the ending had some really good effects, but they cut the scene with them getting out of

A very cheesy and dull road movie, with the intention to be hip and

A very cheesy and dull road movie, with the intention to be hip and hipster and not even trying to be good. But you know, as well as I do, that it's made by a young couple in a garage that's doing their best to make a movie. The best part is when the hero and heroine's son (the lead actor) shows them where the local coffee shop is and shows them the entrance. The best part of the film is the music. It's nothing special

A very cheesy and dull road movie, with the intention to be hip and hip-looking, with a very dated cast and with an average script. No plot, just the usual scenes where people try to get in the car and do stupid things and drive it away, like "I'll get in the car and do it myself", "I'll have to do it", "I'll hit the gas", "Don't go in the car", or "The car is going to go down the

There are some nice shots in this film, it catches some of the landscapes

There are some nice shots in this film, it catches some of the landscapes in the back-lot of a studio, and the camera angles, the lack of which has been a source of controversy. The story is, of course, the same as the book, and I think it's great, especially the ending. The movie is also shot using the new Kodak film stock, which I think is fantastic.<br /><br />One of the interesting things, though, is how many of

There are some nice shots in this film, it catches some of the landscapes in a gorgeous and interesting way. Unfortunately it was not my favorite part in the movie as the rest of the film was very repetitive.<br /><br />Most of this movie is boring and boring in the beginning. The plot is also one of the most predictable in history as it contains so many events to make up a full story.<br /><br />Then there are some scenes that make up some scenes and the

When a man who doesn't have Alzheimer's can't remember how many films

When a man who doesn't have Alzheimer's can't remember how many films he's seen or what kind of movie he's watching, what kind of movie he's watching is a mystery. This is a true story and you can find the film by locating the title of the film on a catalog. The scene you see is shown in a theater, not on a big screen TV so you can see the audience while watching it and I saw it in a theater where it was shown to the audience.

When a man who doesn't have Alzheimer's can't remember how many films the previous day he's watched, the only movie I can see was "Scooby-Doo", even though I think it was the first episode in that series. So I went back and watched "The Big Time" first, I think. In the end it was so bad, I was in the bathroom, I didn't want to waste time watching something that was so boring.<br /><br />I

I have been looking for this film for ages because it is quite rare to

I have been looking for this film for ages because it is quite rare to see. It does have a few of the most popular and beloved directors of the 70's and 80's on it. A great cast on the film. It is also on a very tight budget and you can easily see it was going to be very low budget too. However, they did manage to raise some money for charity. It is a shame they didn't show this on TV. It was a real shame that their

I have been looking for this film for ages because it is quite rare to see on the big screen. The film is set in 1930 and it was set in the New York area, which was a big influence on the film.<br /><br />In 1938 a new movie star appeared. She was Shirley Jones. There was a movie called "Fame" in 1939. That had the same movie star Shirley Jones, who was in the very beginning of "The Godfather". A lot of

As the number of Video Nasties I've yet to see dwindles

As the number of Video Nasties I've yet to see dwindles down to a mere handful, I can't help but be surprised with some of the quality films I'm hearing are about to be shown and enjoyed. First off, some decent actors and directors are coming into their own. Not only were the directors and actors at the Oscars for Best Cinematography (Rajeski) and Best Costume Design (Nelson), but also for Best Costume Design and Best Costume Direction. Second,

As the number of Video Nasties I've yet to see dwindles I thought it would be a bad movie and I'm just so pleased I didn't get my money back.<br /><br />If you can stomach my swearing you'll be thoroughly enjoying this great movie. We'll go with our gut and say it was really good.<br /><br />And the one big plus that keeps this movie from being good. One day, a lot of years from now and in some

Not sure if I'm referring to those who labeled this a video nasty or

Not sure if I'm referring to those who labeled this a video nasty or a video gore film, or just a nasty video film.<br /><br />But here goes: If you want to talk about your typical movie, this is right on. You know, this is one of those films with you in the front seat and your back seat seats. So I wouldn't say you need a big budget. I say the same of every film that has one of your children in the back seat

Not sure if I'm referring to those who labeled this a video nasty or simply, the worst movie I've seen on YouTube in a long time.<br /><br />The plot is basically as follows. A guy goes to watch this new comedy special on the wall of his apartment building and it is a huge let down. The actor, a lady, has the most "bad parts" in his body. He tries to ignore it but the effects are too much for him to look at the

This video nasty was initially banned in Britain, and allowed in last November without

This video nasty was initially banned in Britain, and allowed in last November without any explanation.<br /><br />Now it appears, as others have written, that it was also made available as a 'video download' (the description, as mentioned in the title, 'the true story of a very sick girl') and it's not the first one (although I cannot see any reason why it should be any worse than the previous one). The one you want to watch is definitely a lot like

This video nasty was initially banned in Britain, and allowed in last November without warning. What made this video even less palatable was that it was released as part of the "My Mum, My Dad" series. The videos were all of the most vile kind. This is the third video from this series. In the last episode, The Babies, I was still watching this awfulness with an open mind.<br /><br />The plot is about a man who spends his time getting a

Of the three titles from Jess Franco to find their way onto the Official D

Of the three titles from Jess Franco to find their way onto the Official Dine Out in NYC video store, this is without a doubt the worst of all of them.<br /><br />The opening sequence has some of the most blatant bad jokes that I have ever seen in a movie, starting off with an actor telling the audience his thoughts on how hot a certain guy is, then someone's "funny" take on a story about the guy (a woman who is a total slut),

Of the three titles from Jess Franco to find their way onto the Official D-List and ultimately on Netflix, this is the only one that really makes one laugh out loud. It is a great comedy. In a very good ensemble cast, Jim Gordon plays a washed up comedian in the 1960's that gets a break from the usual routine on a cruise ship but it all goes wrong for him on board. The film is set in a seaside resort but there are a handful of locations scattered throughout the

How can you tell that a horror movie is terrible? when you can't

How can you tell that a horror movie is terrible? when you can't even call it a "horror movie". The writing is so pathetic. The plot is not even interesting. I watched the whole thing with zero anticipation and was only glad to get the ending right.<br /><br />The director of the movie is a total waste, and his "act" is laughable. Just look at the first few minutes of the movie. A woman is watching a serial killer get executed on a

How can you tell that a horror movie is terrible? when you can't figure out how to even say "a horror movie". My wife, who was a big horror movie and horror movie enthusiast, didn't get this film. So I had to learn how to spell movies. This wasn't the best movie she's seen but it was definitely a good horror movie to watch.<br /><br />Some of the horror in this movie was like "The Room" I loved the story and the

A model named Laura is working in South America when she is kidnapped from her

A model named Laura is working in South America when she is kidnapped from her home and forced to create a new identity for herself. Using her new identity, she moves in with a wealthy family of friends who help her develop a romantic relationship with one of them. After she receives a new identity, she is forced to hide from her father, the sadistic owner of the ranch and his family of minions. Laura's new friends include her new boyfriend and her mother who is also a new girlfriend of the

A model named Laura is working in South America when she is kidnapped from her home in an airport and brought to the U.S. for a surgery of her own. She is placed in a rehabilitation institution with a man with two kids. She meets him and begins a relationship with him. His daughter is a model named Jennifer. She is a little crazy but her crazy is good. She starts to see the other patients as friends. There is a young boy with the same father and an older couple

An actress making a movie in Africa is kidnapped and taken into the jungle where

An actress making a movie in Africa is kidnapped and taken into the jungle where she meets a group of children (one girl for the first time, another girl as a second child) who have grown up in the village. They are given the idea of building a small hut for the orphaned actor to live in where she has the responsibility for all the food and all the other needs. The story starts off slow (but you do see the actors doing their best) and in the middle we see her

An actress making a movie in Africa is kidnapped and taken into the jungle where she is murdered. She is resurrected as a zombie (she was once a woman) and she is being led to her second life through a jungle temple. This cult movie is based on the novel, but most of the action takes place on screen. Although some of the dialogue is very cheesy, it is extremely funny because of the characters themselves and they are the only ones that have the ability to laugh. It is not the

or anyone who was praying for the sight of Al Cliver wrestling a naked

or anyone who was praying for the sight of Al Cliver wrestling a naked lady at the end of this crap, if I ever heard of them in a million years. I'm glad to see the movie is now over. I also can't understand any of the music. It's so hard to hear. The actors in the movie are terrible. They have no acting skill at all. My god, those were great acting skills. It's such a shame that they wasted the time and money on

or anyone who was praying for the sight of Al Cliver wrestling a naked woman in the front row in the middle of a crowd in Boston in 2006 (in front of 50,000+) should see this. If you have the stomach for it, go see it. But the only person who needs to watch it is Mr Cliver himself. <br /><br />The scene in which she's thrown up in a tub of boiling water is so good it defies explanation. It was so

Devil Hunter gained notoriety for the fact that it's on the DPP

Devil Hunter gained notoriety for the fact that it's on the DPP channel, but that's more than one reason why I love it so.<br /><br />The movie is great, and you can tell it's a good film from all angles. From the director, who's had great directors before and was successful with the work with Devil's Night. All the actors are good, and the director manages to make an interesting movie with good music.<br /><br />One of

Devil Hunter gained notoriety for the fact that it's on the DPP channel of the TV stations. The show is so popular, it is a real draw for viewers with a desire to watch some of these "horror shows" that are all so great to see.<br /><br />The first episode is titled "The Dead." I was excited to see it, so eager to get some episodes and even the opening theme of the show!<br /><br />I had a

This film seemed way too long even at only 75 minutes. The problem with

This film seemed way too long even at only 75 minutes. The problem with this movie I find is the long sequences. They can take forever. We also have the constant long quiet as if nothing happens for a while. You'd think a short movie would last even if there was a story, but apparently the short is to be a movie. It seems like the writer or director was trying to fit one short scene into 75 minutes. It's almost as if the writer was trying to make more movies

This film seemed way too long even at only 75 minutes. The problem with the film is not only that it has no music, but also that the movie feels rushed and without any real character development. The characters are bland, with their personalities appearing as static, but the screenplay does show a lot of potential. I also agree with your last comment about the plot being too easy. It is actually harder than you think, in some ways because it is impossible to be entirely objective with the film, and

Sexo Cannibal, or Devil Hunter as it's more commonly known amongst

Sexo Cannibal, or Devil Hunter as it's more commonly known amongst American audiences, follows the same cast as the first film but with none of the problems (see: the budget) that plagued the first film. If you are a first time viewer of these films, do yourself a favor and get to see Cannibalism. You won't be disappointed, even if you think you are. It is a very entertaining film that could probably fit into a very tight budget. There are a couple

Sexo Cannibal, or Devil Hunter as it's more commonly known amongst the general public, is another film that has brought gore and sexual degradation into the mainstream (see also D.V.A. Night of the Living Dead, I'm watching you). A woman's body was in a coffin that was being turned into a zombie by some people in the basement. They were all looking for something and wanted to kill the woman.<br /><br />I don't know if these are actual

Not only is it a disgustingly made low-budget bad-acted movie

Not only is it a disgustingly made low-budget bad-acted movie which attempts to recreate the feel of films like "Movin' On Up", but also the worst aspects of a film like "Norman Lear". The only reason I can see why this film does not make the cut is due to the excellent supporting cast, which is made up of a number of talented performers, such as (but not limited to) Michael Gough, David Naylor, Jennifer Strouse, David

Not only is it a disgustingly made low-budget bad-acted movie with no dialogue or plot, it's also one of the most gratuitous trash-fest and bad jokes, too.<br /><br />There's no real plot but plenty of trash. I can't think of a single one that's going to be funny. So they're just just trying to say, "Hey look at these guys, they have no money so they have to make it look like it was made

This is the worst thing the TMNT franchise has ever spawned. I was

This is the worst thing the TMNT franchise has ever spawned. I was in the middle of a fight with my girlfriend when we went to get a movie. I was thinking that this must have been the worst movie ever made. We went to the theater and we were all like "what the hell are we watching!?" All the good movies on the video in the theater had subtitles so we were all dumbfounded by the atrociousness of this film. But it was good though. I was impressed

This is the worst thing the TMNT franchise has ever spawned. I was so disappointed in the original that I was expecting something to catch me's attention. I have to believe that this was a fluke of their production that they tried to remake. But if I were an adult with the same childhood, I would just be sitting there dumb as it was.<br /><br />The movie never seems to go by with any kind of regular flow. There are no characters, there is nothing going

Sometime in 1998, Saban had acquired the rights to produce a brand-

Sometime in 1998, Saban had acquired the rights to produce a brand-new animated series based on an original story that would air on ABC for the first time in nearly 40 years. This first installment of the project was dubbed "The Jungle Book", and was intended to be an instant hit. It took two years before the show debuted and the first two episodes were filmed on the same day. Since the show's first episode was directed by an unknown man who had come to the United States to help

Sometime in 1998, Saban had acquired the rights to produce a brand-new version of the movie, The Secret Of Sedona, and was planning to get a major-league cast together for the film. The talent needed was great; the cast was also excellent. One of the first big deals of the 2000's in Hollywood, the movie was a smash, and this was the sequel that should have been made. Unfortunately, the movie just didn't work out. The story is not much changed

This is the biggest insult to TMNT ever. Fortunantely,

This is the biggest insult to TMNT ever. Fortunantely, it's one of the funniest ones, so if you can get through it that's your problem. For the longest time, I thought this movie was an awful attempt at attempting to compete with TMNT and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. It's a waste of time and effort. As a movie fan, and a person who has seen a lot of bad movies, I really didn't care about TMNT or Teenage

This is the biggest insult to TMNT ever. Fortunantely, the film is in black and white, so you can see the true nature of the movie. The plot was written in two minutes by two people. The cast members are not meant to be there. They do nothing more than put on a few costumes, but that's all. The story, like most other things about the movie, has no relation at all to the actual movie. The plot is not about turtles and turtles

I did not like the idea of the female turtle at all since 1987 we

I did not like the idea of the female turtle at all since 1987 we have an "unstoppable force of nature" being the story. It was a boring story with the female turtle. We should have used it as an excuse to have an endless "story" like movies with no characters to care about! Please stop wasting our time with this type of crap. I can't even tell you how many times I have seen movies that are all about the female turtle story. You have to make

I did not like the idea of the female turtle at all since 1987 we see little of it in the movies other than a flashback scene with a female turtle.<br /><br />The script was not all that great and when you compare the movie to the TV show we have a LOT more turtles in the TV show. The TV show also has two turtles and they are much larger than the film movie turtles. The TV show also includes more footage that the movie does. It also features the same

I cannot stay indifferent to Lars van Trier's films. I consider '

I cannot stay indifferent to Lars van Trier's films. I consider 'The Return' to be among his top three (which is not a typo). But I love his work even more in this case, 'I'll Always Have You in My Heart'. 'Return' is probably the most accurate portrayal of the dark side of love and loneliness. This film shows how a loving person with an empty shell can be a complete wreck for long periods of time. The dialogue and writing were so spot on

I cannot stay indifferent to Lars van Trier's films. I consider 'In the Company of Men' an insult to its star and his performance. I also felt 'The Vanishing'. The plot of the two friends in the hotel room were unbelievable.<br /><br />I felt the movie was too low budget for Lars, who is an actress to have to work with. The budget and the crew were too low to hire an actress and Lars's character as well. He should have been

This film is terrible. You don't really need to read this review further

This film is terrible. You don't really need to read this review further because, in essence, the film is pretty much the same idea as this one. All three acts are just very basic and pointless with a lot of wasted time on the bad characters. Basically, when you look at any type of romance between two people of different racialities there's usually not much going on. The two lead actors, the two leads, whoever plays them all have the same basic character. The only two white

This film is terrible. You don't really need to read this review further than that to be convinced of what is wrong with this movie.<br /><br />What little good story there is is not going to distract from the horrible film quality. And what I am afraid is that there is absolutely no redeeming qualities of any characters or plot. In fact, I am surprised to say the film is not particularly well written.<br /><br />I have not yet made the decision whether to