Datasets:

keertanavc

/

imdb_prefix20_forDPO_multi-preference_v2

like 0

This is an action Western. James Steart leads an all star cast in

This is an action Western. James Steart leads an all star cast in what has to be the worst soundtrack I've heard since "Mysterious Intentions". The director tried to do a romantic comedy, but I think he missed the mark so many times on that particular note. Not enough action, not enough action, not enough action. The plot was too contrived, the script was uninspired. This just felt like an excuse for a boring movie that should have had a better plot than

This is an action Western. James Steart leads an all star cast in an action thriller, one for the Western genre. <br /><br />The movie is set in the wilds of the West. Steart stars as the man who is trying to get help for the wounded man who had been shot. <br /><br />The main action of the movie takes place at the train station in the middle of a remote desert location. <br /><br />Steart's

This is the worst sequel on the face of the world of movies. Once

This is the worst sequel on the face of the world of movies. Once again, not only is the plot a joke, the characters are just that. It never even makes fun of the characters. It simply doesn't work as a movie. What little charisma I do have is being in the audience (and in the end, when I get a whiff of something) is totally wasted.<br /><br />The movie is not a real family movie, it's just an excuse to make fun

This is the worst sequel on the face of the world of movies. Once again, we have a bad sequel to a great series.<br /><br />So, if you're thinking of buying this, you probably should. It may be that you enjoy this, but it will cost you a lot of money, and you won't find anything in the sequel that you can actually find anything else in. It may also be that you have some deep insecurities that you need to be ashamed

Ah, Channel 5 of local Mexican t.v. Everyday, at 2

Ah, Channel 5 of local Mexican t.v. Everyday, at 2AM, every Friday, every Sunday, every day at 5:00PM we are treated to a total of 14 movies. All of them are basically very short and very boring. In short, the entire movie is just some guy talking about the same thing, that is his feelings for a girl who is talking about how she wants to go out and meet people. (Most of the time, we have no idea what's

Ah, Channel 5 of local Mexican t.v. Everyday, at 2 in the afternoon and I'm going for the real story.<br /><br />This is one of the most brilliant American movies of the 80's. The plot is so complex and the characters were so compelling. It's the first and only time I feel the same way when watching a movie with a Mexican, so that's not saying much but you know they are more interested in how you speak than anything else. If

Preposterous sequel stretches credibility to a great degree as diabolical sociop

Preposterous sequel stretches credibility to a great degree as diabolical sociopath David Caruso (Michael Keaton) takes the wheel of a slewing motor coach for a spin around the outskirts of the big city. His new passenger is a girl by the name of Jessica Jones (Sylvia Spar-Castro) and it's all she can do not to fall in love with the driver. Unaccustomed to a life without normalcy, however, the girl begins to think

Preposterous sequel stretches credibility to a great degree as diabolical sociopath Jack Frost (the original's Jack Frost) goes back to killing again to make a new friend of his long-time nemesis, serial killer James (the original's James Frost) to get them together. If you see this, you'll be disappointed. It's an abysmal attempt at a romantic comedy, with the "plot" that is to be found consisting of a "plot" involving James and a

Return to Cabin by the Lake just.... was lacking. It must have had

Return to Cabin by the Lake just.... was lacking. It must have had lots of budget, and the whole thing was so incredibly cheesy. How this film was filmed is beyond me. What I can see is a very expensive set, with many actors that were obviously forced to look like something else at various times. I feel like the production of this movie was really cheap, especially since so many shots are shown over each other. It really should have been called 'a bunch of cheesy film', and

Return to Cabin by the Lake just.... was lacking. It must have had something to do with the cast, otherwise it's a pretty uninspired movie.<br /><br />If you get the good one, there's nothing to see here! It might be the least interesting part of the whole movie.<br /><br />This is the kind of movie that you can find if you drive a little over an hour west of Denver (just off I-70 in CO) and park your

This movie was made-for-TV, so taking that into account,

This movie was made-for-TV, so taking that into account, it's a pretty amazing piece of work. The screenplay is so well done. The characters are so well written. The acting is all great. It's not bad. It's just good. You've got to give that credit to the acting. I love the opening sequence. The opening sequence is so good. The music is so great. You just have to watch it to see the music. It's just so beautiful

This movie was made-for-TV, so taking that into account, it was really awful. I had to stop at least once to drink some water. I felt like a walking drug while watching this and can't get my head around it, not just the music, and not just the acting, but the concept. In fact, I would rate this even more of an "anxiety disorder", since it was so disorienting, I have to make an hour and thirty minute break in

IF you are planning to see this movie, please reconsider. I don't

IF you are planning to see this movie, please reconsider. I don't know what is going on with this movie except the plot has absolutely nothing to do with the actual story and instead the movie focuses on the characters, some are dead, some are alive and the story of these characters is nothing more than an excuse for them to do what they do best: killing, but with their bare hands. I can only imagine this movie was made so people would think it was real. The movie is really

IF you are planning to see this movie, please reconsider. I don't think any movie could be bad, or be good at the same time.<br /><br />This movie is just really bad. It is like watching an idiotic and unbelievable movie that somehow manages to make it seem to be a movie. Not to mention the acting is awful, and that's saying something.<br /><br />The story is just so bad. The opening sequence is supposed to be a flashback,

<br /><br />I saw this on the Sci-Fi channel

<br /><br />I saw this on the Sci-Fi channel in the UK and was blown away. It is so surreal. A man is driving around in a car with the sound on so low that it was barely audible. The music is like no other. The whole thing is shot in black and white, without any artificial light. So unlike any other movie I've ever seen. Every detail is well thought out, each shot, frame, and scene. There is no CGI,

<br /><br />I saw this on the Sci-Fi channel and was not impressed at all. A bunch of old dudes looking like they'd just left a church dance, some kid was dancing. I am not the type of person to put movies down, so if you are the type of person you will put it down and never see it again.<br /><br />I didn't see much of the film, just the short version. The only thing I know is that I

I watched Cabin by the Lake this afternoon on USA. Considering this movie was

I watched Cabin by the Lake this afternoon on USA. Considering this movie was about a white guy on a journey through the US, I was a little disappointed. My wife and I watched it with the remote at the ready. We were both annoyed that it was so slow and silent so that we could not hear what was being said.<br /><br />Still, despite the lackluster plot, there is still a lot of charm to the movie. This is an interesting movie. The whole idea of

I watched Cabin by the Lake this afternoon on USA. Considering this movie was about a little boy, who was forced to watch a movie by the lake on a boat trip, I can't even understand the "story line". All it had to do was show an old lake house that was used as a place for hiding, not to say a movie didn't exist there as well.<br /><br />And yes, in the first 5 minutes of the movie, the guy was a pretty boy

*Possible Spoiler*<br /><br />'Return to Cabin

*Possible Spoiler*<br /><br />'Return to Cabin Creek' is a horror film that you'll want to experience in the same way that a child or adult does.<br /><br />In fact, it will leave you breathless, wondering what was going on, and you'll be laughing so hard to yourself that it's impossible to control your body.<br /><br />There is something so unsettling about this film that is hard to describe, though I can't

*Possible Spoiler*<br /><br />'Return to Cabin Creek' is basically a comedy/cartoon with a twist.<br /><br />The plot is simple and it is well conceived, the jokes are well played, and the characters well conceived. One of the best, if not the best, comedy of 2002.<br /><br />The characters were made up for by the sheer charm of the script and the great cast.<br /><br />Just watch it

A decent sequel, but does not pack the punch of the original. A

A decent sequel, but does not pack the punch of the original. A story that has become somewhat dated, the movie suffers for lacking any new material. The action is still the same style of the first, and even when you know who is the hero you still enjoy the thrill of watching him go up against all the great opponents. He also has the same old "chicken" theme, the main character is quite a lot of fun. It is also a movie to see if you have no

A decent sequel, but does not pack the punch of the original. A decent sequel, but does not pack the punch of the original.<br /><br />I have to see more, as the original is not recommended and should have been a movie that was not made. The story has not been changed for the sequel. For some reason, I thought it was going to be a comedy, and it is not. The story has been changed for a family film, where the daughter of the

Return to Cabin by the Lake does not, in any way, stand up

Return to Cabin by the Lake does not, in any way, stand up to the first two films in the series. Its plotline, characterisation, and action are not even remotely reminiscent of either of these movies. All of its subplots, although at the same time quite convincing, are completely unbelievable. (I am trying not to be so critical about the movies, but the subplot with the child molester in the cabin is so unbelievably improbable, that I simply have to stop myself

Return to Cabin by the Lake does not, in any way, stand up to some of the great, yet poorly executed movies that were made in the 1940's and 1950's.<br /><br />The first thing that I noticed about this film was the lack of any story. The characters are so unconnected to the events of the movie (which have absolutely nothing to do with each other) that it becomes almost as if the story doesn't exist.<br /><br />I don't

I thought Hedy Burress (who managed to escape from the watery

I thought Hedy Burress (who managed to escape from the watery grave with a vengeance here) was really a good actress. She has this lovely look that works with this really dark and sinister girl. It has an unusual ending. It is very very odd, with weird and dark elements. It is like "Tales from the Crypt" or "The Mask." It just works, and does not seem to be "bad." I am not sure where the creator of this "film"

I thought Hedy Burress (who managed to escape from the watery grave of Gidget, a girl who was given the identity of her victim in Gidget 2, after some false confessions and a strange connection with the movie) was cute (she was a cute girl, and I felt as if Gidget 3) but not in the same category as Gidget 2, which was just a terrible movie. I felt Hedy Burress was the only one in the cast to make a decent

Viewers gushing over everything including the title sequence (now THAT is funny

Viewers gushing over everything including the title sequence (now THAT is funny!) or some lame acting from "the wise" will have you cheering the moment it gets going.<br /><br />The plot is nothing but a huge waste. The only redeeming quality of the story is the characters and the way they interact. Don't waste your money, don't waste your time, and just DO NOT waste your time viewing this trash! All of this is just a big waste of time.<

Viewers gushing over everything including the title sequence (now THAT is funny), music and, of course, the movie's killer female lead were treated to the movie's first sex scene.<br /><br />It's only a few seconds long, but at least it's not a long scene where the movie is playing in the background. It's just a few seconds long with an exception of the "fatal attraction" in the background.<br /><br />The first scene of the

I saw this movie recently because a friend brought it with him from NYC.

I saw this movie recently because a friend brought it with him from NYC. He asked me to watch it, and my reaction was: "It doesn't feel so bad." I was surprised and happy because I thought that it was such a good film. One could feel the intensity and intensity of the characters at any point. I don't know if that's because of the strong female characters or not, but I don't know. It's a good film for everyone. There's a really great

I saw this movie recently because a friend brought it with him from NYC. I went with the same friend. I'm very glad that we were able to sit down together and enjoy this fantastic experience. I will say one thing for this movie. It's just so much fun.<br /><br />The script is great. It's like a fairy tale. You really have no idea what is going on, but once you realize the context of the movie, everything just works.<br /><

Despite a decent first season this series never came close to realizing its potential.

Despite a decent first season this series never came close to realizing its potential. It had the potential to be great, but the reality was that it went through many changes before it was realized. I can't find out what the show was like in it's infancy, but I do know that it was a real hit with a wide range of ages. However, not all shows are created equal. I have to say that this show lacked an "Adult" in it, something which is easily understood.

Despite a decent first season this series never came close to realizing its potential. We got a mediocre, uninspired second season and a mediocre third. The main character seems to be going through a stage of change, something which is supposed to be reflected by his wife(who at the same time seems to be trying to get back on her game) and the kids. The new cast was good but had little chemistry and was all over the place.<br /><br />The season opener, just like

Anybody who has ever been a fan of the original series, or even

Anybody who has ever been a fan of the original series, or even a fan of Star Trek, has no excuses to watch this. It is simply the most boring movie of them all. This movie was so awful that my girlfriend actually cried her eyes out. And she even got involved in a fight with a homeless man, because he gave a bunch of homeless man the middle finger and that was the end of the movie. This movie has absolutely no redeeming qualities whatsoever. There was absolutely zero

Anybody who has ever been a fan of the original series, or even a Trekkie, has to come to the conclusion that TOS was better than the original series. That's one big reason that the original TOS has been so thoroughly ignored by many Trekkies. It was a good series; it was just a very poor series. That made it a bit difficult for new fans to appreciate. <br /><br />The show was in a pretty awful shape for quite some time.

Okay first of all, I didn't sit down to watch the premier of

Okay first of all, I didn't sit down to watch the premier of this film at the beginning of the movie. I was very excited for what was to come in it. Secondly, the casting for my character was not bad. The casting was really about the actor playing the part. The scene I was in, in the middle of the church service, was the kind of scene that you see on TV at the same time you go to sleep. You have a preacher sitting next to you.

Okay first of all, I didn't sit down to watch the premier of this at home. It was on in the theatre at a rented house, so it must have been one of those things that people get tickets to see on an overnight bus. In the theater, an extra cast was hired to give the movie some more laughs, including an old guy who is not supposed to even be in the movie. Anyway, this movie was really about two teenagers (who were not the teens) finding out

While it's early to say how the series will evolve, I can say

While it's early to say how the series will evolve, I can say that I am quite happy to say goodbye to the long-dormant, long-in-production and long-overdue Star Wars movie, The Last Jedi.<br /><br />For the past decade or so the series has been dormant, so to speak. But in the wake of the recent release of The Force Awakens, which opened to almost universal acclaim, I decided to take some shots at a new series

While it's early to say how the series will evolve, I can say with confidence it is a very enjoyable and well-written series.<br /><br />One episode, though, stands out. This is the episode where the original writers seem to have been more aware than some of today's writers, of the fact that "the writing was off". In this episode, there is an interesting dialogue between Mr. Cuddy and Mr. Bremner (who is a great character actor)

I'm not a huge Star Trek fan, but I was looking forward to

I'm not a huge Star Trek fan, but I was looking forward to seeing this film in the theater with all my friends who are Trekkies.<br /><br />Unfortunately, we were held back by the awful director and a mediocre script. The action sequences were the usual cheesy fare, but the acting was terrible. The script had a few references to other movies, but nothing new or interesting to talk about.<br /><br />The film was only about one hour, and when you

I'm not a huge Star Trek fan, but I was looking forward to this, seeing as it had to be something from the cast, so I can't say I was disappointed.<br /><br />The first thing I noticed was that the story is not very linear. I'm not sure what the showrunners were trying to do, since they never had more than one episode from a specific ship/mission, so the series is somewhat limited.<br /><br />It has to be

The earlier part of the film was rather enjoyable but towards the end it became

The earlier part of the film was rather enjoyable but towards the end it became a bit too "heavy" on the action and we really only care about the plot. The only positive here is when the "plot" gets stretched between episodes, however. It's a good episode as well but a bit overlong.<br /><br />But all in all, the story revolves around the relationship between a mother, a teacher and a school. Not too much in the way of character development. So

The earlier part of the film was rather enjoyable but towards the end it became boring to watch. The dialogue became cliche which was a shame.<br /><br />The only thing that wasn't cliche was the final scene.<br /><br />The rest of the movie is a disappointment. We only get a few character interactions and they usually make the movie even longer.<br /><br />What did I learn? We have to wait for the last scene, even if it is

a movie that attempts to be far smarter than its makers are capable of producing

a movie that attempts to be far smarter than its makers are capable of producing. It's not that we are here to be bored by bad acting, bad direction, or bad script. For you see, we are here to have fun and cheer. We are here for a good movie, and we all know the good movies to watch. The main character and the director are both really quite good. The only problem with this movie is that the movie has been rushed and put together in such a way

a movie that attempts to be far smarter than its makers are capable of producing. This film contains nothing but pointless action, boring dialogue and ridiculous characters. The plot is so ludicrous you can only laugh a few times. The film is so absurd I found myself laughing my a** off a couple of times. I would have expected much more comedy in this than I got. All in all, a pretty bad-ass flick with only one redeeming feature. Not an average one either. It must be

If you can imagine Mickey Mouse as a New York street pimp, or

If you can imagine Mickey Mouse as a New York street pimp, or, on the other hand, the original "Mickey Mouse" as a sleazy drug addict (also on the streets), then you'll see the most disturbing parts of this film at first: Mickey Mouse is a very young man with a lot of money. He goes around being rude and annoying, he makes people laugh with his outrageous outfits, he steals toys, and he even gets a young girl who's a little old

If you can imagine Mickey Mouse as a New York street pimp, or a movie producer with an eccentric, eccentric wife, and a boyish and childlike son, well you'll imagine the sort of man you have to be in order to get the "Tribe" to be considered "cool" (aside from Disney, of course). This is an example of what is really an amazing film about the power of children. All of the adult characters in the film are the child characters in

I really wanted to like this western, being a fan of the genre and

I really wanted to like this western, being a fan of the genre and of the western/western film, but I was sorely disappointed.The acting was really bad. I think, it was supposed to be based on an older movie that made me laugh at the funniest stuff. The lead actor was great to see. His personality was so realistic. And the fact that this was an old movie really made it feel old. It seems the studio used to make a bad movie and then they tried

I really wanted to like this western, being a fan of the genre and movies like the one in which I am involved, but I just felt this movie could not be compared. The script, the acting, the story, the music, the music, the characters, the special effects, etc.<br /><br />All of these things I have mentioned can be found in almost every western and it is not surprising that they all share one of the same faults: there are so many actors involved

I have always admired Susan Sarandon for her integrity and honesty in her private

I have always admired Susan Sarandon for her integrity and honesty in her private life. Her involvement in such highly controversial situations in her past made her very convincing and convincing. I hope that the rest of the cast will not disappoint. And the casting was very impressive because I could not see who was playing any of the characters. And the whole movie was very emotional, especially the opening montage of Sarandon's singing, which was done at the same time she was singing. And she was very beautiful

I have always admired Susan Sarandon for her integrity and honesty in her private life, but when she came out as an actress and public figure, she became much more than one-dimensional and pretentious. I was thrilled with her performance in the new "Love Actually." She was believable, but the best part of the film was when she played such a good, loving mother.<br /><br />I thought Sarandon was great in the role as well. She makes me glad to be gay

Warning Spoilers following. Superb recreation of the base in Antarctica where

Warning Spoilers following. Superb recreation of the base in Antarctica where most of the research on the human condition takes place. As the ship comes in contact with the surface of the continent it is attacked by a group of polar bear sharks, with the captain having to improvise in order to rescue the humans. The film is a nice blend of film-making and true-world adventure. This is an excellent film with some really effective scenes. It was directed by Robert Wise and shot by George

Warning Spoilers following. Superb recreation of the base in Antarctica where they operate a satellite. The plot is really quite weak. Very few characters are shown. The actors are great. The music by James Blunt is particularly memorable.<br /><br />Mostly in the direction, with the director having a long list of references to old and obscure movies. The setting was almost like an imaginary one. Most of the actors seem to be too old for the roles they were given. And

OK first of all the video looks like it was filmed in the 80s

OK first of all the video looks like it was filmed in the 80s with cheap equipment. And what a surprise to find out that this movie was remastered. The movie plays at least four different times in a single night, and I found it amazing. The story is very similar to a typical 80's flick, like "A Christmas Story" or "Giant vs the Human Race". Each level has one or two things that were done differently, to make it not like a regular film,

OK first of all the video looks like it was filmed in the 80s. Then you have the fact the voice of the voice of the narrator sounds absolutely terrible, it seems to have been recorded on video with the sound coming through a small hole in the wall and then mixed down to something that is just a few metres away. The narrator is one of those movie narrators who have no sense of rhythm. The movie starts out by some people talking about some stuff and then it cuts to this one

Zu Warriors most definitely should've been an animated series because as a movie

Zu Warriors most definitely should've been an animated series because as a movie it sucks. The animation is very simple for kids. All there is to it is the story and the voices. The story is like an all-ages movie. It's nice to see the movie stars as they are at times, but this is still better than your average animated kids movie. The music is very well chosen and it has to be one of the better series I've heard. The special effects are really a

Zu Warriors most definitely should've been an animated series because as a movie, i don't think they could've made one bad. i mean, even if the characters weren't that good, the movie should've been good because they use all the good things from Zu Warriors in the movie. The movie had some of the best animation i have ever seen. i mean, the movie was great and not as much of a Zu film, i think. i think that i have to say

This is not so much film as big budget children's television. As far

This is not so much film as big budget children's television. As far as I can see there is none of the "drama" or "fantasy" that I associate with the genre. It certainly doesn't scream "movies" to me, rather it shouts "movies". That's not the real problem. The movie has no plot, just endless shots and sounds of kids' songs and nonsense. Every second of the movie is just a sequence.<br /><br />For

This is not so much film as big budget children's television. As far as I am concerned they are selling children's TV and I can only find it at Toys-R-Us. I will be watching with my 8 year old, although my child is not sure what the show is about.<br /><br />Anyway, I did find the sound quality very poor, the actors are all in their early 20's, the show seems to have been pulled off a 2 hour video and you

Watched this on DVD in original language with English subs. Either the subt

Watched this on DVD in original language with English subs. Either the subtitling was poor or subtitles were not translated well. The movie never moves along, and does not attempt to be a movie of its genre. It's just dull. I will probably be a long time out of the loop after this. Perhaps it was meant to be watched in another language, but no one would mistake the English subtitling for anything in French. I would not even consider it bad. You can see

Watched this on DVD in original language with English subs. Either the subtitled version was a translation error or this is an excellent work from Mexico. I have seen an excellent Mexican film with subtitles in English, but this was a great work. Great characters, especially Lázaro Céspedes' Juan. He is the perfect man to play him as an old man, not just a gangster. The story has many plot twists, and is really very intense. It is really a

"Spielberg loves the smell of sentiment in the morning. But sentiment

"Spielberg loves the smell of sentiment in the morning. But sentimentality is not in the mood of this film. No matter how good a movie has the first and second acts, it can't capture the mood of the first or the second act.<br /><br />If the film had all the mood of the first act, you would lose the second. You see more than one scene of a guy at work. So why do we see this sequence in the movie, especially when

"Spielberg loves the smell of sentiment in the morning. But sentimentality comes in the afternoon.<br /><br />And then he really does start to lose your head. For he is so pretentious, as he always was, and so unconvincing when you actually want to be surprised.<br /><br />In one moment he is being all serious and self-serious, but in another it is too over the top and he has to go with the flow of the

You may consider a couple of facts in the discussion to be spoilers.<br

You may consider a couple of facts in the discussion to be spoilers.<br /><br />That's how good it was. The movie that starts at the beginning is a great lesson for all ages, but is also the source of all these big things: The movie, the dance. For a long time you wouldn't see it because it had so many other things going for it, and that is where it falls apart. That is it. Not the dance. What's the difference?<

You may consider a couple of facts in the discussion to be spoilers.<br /><br />1) In a recent episode (which I've watched a couple of times) a guy named Paulie (who was on a date with Cindy's ex-boyfriend), came out of his office and was shot and killed. The police believe that Paulie's killer was killed by a lone gunman.<br /><br />2) Paulie's ex-girlfriend is still on the loose.<br

This is really terrible.<br /><br />The only redeeming feature

This is really terrible.<br /><br />The only redeeming feature is the casting - they bring us an actor who really is creepy - that is, if you aren't quite certain of your personal agenda - the character is obviously written by a gay man and not, as one reviewer suggested, a man who plays the straight man with a gay side. There's really no excuse for such a lame plot.<br /><br />In a way, though, the lack of budget and a

This is really terrible.<br /><br />The only redeeming feature of the film were the opening credits and the ending credit. The film really went from bad to worse.<br /><br />It was like watching a zombie horror flick. A really creepy film that I really wish we hadn't seen.<br /><br />Don't go if you are young or sensitive. Just be careful not to make your room too dark and not too loud. The voices were really really loud and

Dude, really!!!! where have you guys been the past 20 years,

Dude, really!!!! where have you guys been the past 20 years, how is this movie?? you guys were all busy killing time when your mind is not in the right state. I don't even think the movie is a serious one. the "actors" should have been in their 50s when they were trying to write this crap. They were trying to "give the movie a different meaning" and I'm really the only one that thinks that. the "acting" was bad because

Dude, really!!!! where have you guys been the past 20 years, we have the most amazing looking actress ever!!!! where have we been with movies, you are the only ones I can believe in, it was a real treat. I have watched alot of movies from other people and can honestly say that this movie is the most accurate portrayal of a real female. You guys are soooo far ahead of your time, and thats all you can say for you, and other movies too, that are

Well, you know the rest! This has to be the worst movie I

Well, you know the rest! This has to be the worst movie I have ever seen in my life. It was horrible! I never knew what was going on because it was so weird. The movie was slow. Every scene was so boring.<br /><br />But the main thing was what did not happen. The other two guys, and I don't know who they were, were never in the movie. They were either thrown in the garbage because the director was busy making a new

Well, you know the rest! This has to be the worst movie I've seen in ages.<br /><br />The acting is, well, a little worse than others, and they're the only ones that make this movie bad.<br /><br />This is a great movie, with some truly bad acting, the movie is supposed to be about a child but I can't seem to get some of the adult situations resolved and I have no idea where the other characters are supposed to

I'm in Iraq right now doing a job that gives plenty of time for

I'm in Iraq right now doing a job that gives plenty of time for me to look at my phone and scroll through photos on my phone, and it's there that I see one of these. This was like a trip, in a sense, because it was at a location with no real purpose other than it's self-perception of itself.<br /><br />I was on a day trip into the desert, with nothing else in our car but my phone and the occasional bag of

I'm in Iraq right now doing a job that gives plenty of time for people to talk about other things. It's a good job, if that, since the job here, as everyone in the unit here says, has no real end in itself. And there's an army that we can't take a part of. But then again, there are the troops. And the soldiers. And when we're not talking about the soldiers, there is the oil. <br /><br />The

"Valentine" is another horror movie to add to the stalk and

"Valentine" is another horror movie to add to the stalk and terror subgenre, a psychological thriller set in South African slum. It's a very enjoyable film and I highly recommend it. However, it could have been a little more original if the director had not made so many unnecessary and unnecessary cuts.<br /><br />There are no surprises in the beginning, just a small portion of the characters walking about the slum. They walk from one place to another, usually with

"Valentine" is another horror movie to add to the stalk and chase genre of horror movies. The movie has good characters, great performances, an interesting plot, and it has some really great special effects.<br /><br />The special effects were great, and that's saying a lot for a movie that was just a few years ago, it is really a good horror movie. If you are a horror movie lover and are a huge horror movie fan, then "Valentine

There's one line that makes it worth to rent for Angel fans. Everyone

There's one line that makes it worth to rent for Angel fans. Everyone will enjoy it. <br /><br />The only part that is not that hot in the story is the final battle in the end. The battle is more epic than the plot of a cheesy romantic comedy. It's not to the level of the "Battle of the Bands" from "Blair Witch Project" but I'll give it a shot. The opening sequence of this is better than the "Crazy

There's one line that makes it worth to rent for Angel fans. Everyone gets a chance to sing at the end, and the voice actors for each character have made a heartfelt effort to try and capture their distinct personalities.<br /><br />If you are a Angel fan, please enjoy. It's funny (it's my favorite episode, but it is very good)and heart felt. If you are not a fan of Angel, don't even think about renting it. But if you like

There are so many puns to play on the title of the spectacularly

There are so many puns to play on the title of the spectacularly terrible movie, "The Shining" that they must have been hard to fit all into this review. In the interest of keeping it short and to the point, I will give you the rundown. A young girl takes a mysterious package from an old lady's house (which has no name, in the beginning) and goes to the house of an elderly woman who keeps a collection of haunted dolls in her basement, where she has

There are so many puns to play on the title of the spectacularly bad documentary of the week, I couldn't even begin to name them all. Instead of being a great documentary, it's just a total disappointment, with a lack of credibility and lack of understanding of the issues it is attempting to examine. It is in fact as bad as the rest of the rest of the documentaries, with every topic covered, and almost every person that's involved getting under the skin of the documentary maker.

There is no way to describe how really, really, really bad this movie

There is no way to describe how really, really, really bad this movie is. If you want an example of that, just think about "Gone With The Wind", because that's what I want you to think about this movie, just how bad it is. And not in that kind of good-bad kind of way. That was not the case. Everything in this movie was just wrong. You can see that they went to the wrong city for the film and that's it. Everything

There is no way to describe how really, really, really bad this movie is. It's just so wrong in its treatment. It has the same problems as "Nightmare on Elm Street" and "The Matrix". The dialogue is the worst I've seen since this film.<br /><br />The film makes no sense. In fact it's so bad that it almost seems to be made by blind people, and the directing and acting are so amateurish that you almost don't even care

In an attempt to bring back the teen slasher genre that was taken away

In an attempt to bring back the teen slasher genre that was taken away by the Columbine or otherwise, the makers of this movie decided to try to do a remake on this idea. I don't know if there's any point to be made, but I know it's fun. It's like a low budget version of "The Blair Witch Project", with some of the same characters thrown into the mix. The film is still fun, if not even more entertaining. The acting is mostly okay

In an attempt to bring back the teen slasher genre that was taken away from the movie business in the early 80s, "Night of the Living Dead" is basically a sequel of sorts. This one has a lot more violence, gore, and sex.<br /><br />However, the movie is a lot scarier, and at one point I literally thought that in my head was going to be my only review of it.<br /><br />I really can't understand why people

Firstly, there are some good things about this film, but it's all

Firstly, there are some good things about this film, but it's all just so boring, boring, boring. The acting is terrible.<br /><br />The most memorable part of the movie is the end. After a montage of some horrible things, the scene of a woman in an ambulance and an elderly couple getting a kiss, is so cute and sweet, that you find yourself wondering, "what could have made these two such good actors?" It's absolutely perfect.<br /><

Firstly, there are some good things about this film, but it's all about the main character. One might even say that he's the "hero" here.<br /><br />The movie is more about the problems in the world, and the solution that is available to those who come into contact with his problems. For example, we get to see a woman in a wheelchair, a man with schizophrenia, a woman in a wheelchair, and a child in a wheelchair.<br /><br

This stalk and slash turkey manages to bring nothing new to an increasingly stale genre

This stalk and slash turkey manages to bring nothing new to an increasingly stale genre. As with its predecessor, there is nothing unusual about the main character. The plot has to change from the usual thriller/romance to a more serious affair (think of it as an "episode of the week") as the two main characters are forced to overcome the same issues of self-worth and responsibility. The best part of the movie is the scene with the woman with the giant dog. The movie is set in

This stalk and slash turkey manages to bring nothing new to an increasingly stale genre, one that has been so bad in the late 90's. And all this while he's been so busy promoting his crappy first book. Who's going to be surprised when the movie is a remake? That and the cast of characters. A man who tries to convince his friend, an actress, that she is too hot for a movie for her own good.<br /><br />So what is the movie based on

Valentine is a horrible movie. This is what I thought of it

Valentine is a horrible movie. This is what I thought of it after the first 5 minutes when I felt like jumping in the air. The acting was terrible. The "character's" were as boring as ever and most of the comedy was horrible. It's just awful and all the characters are dumb and in one word are the least interesting characters in the entire movie. It's not to be a bad movie. It has great comedy, and the characters are very likable. Don't

Valentine is a horrible movie. This is what I thought of it: "There is some great acting, some good drama. The story was decent. Then they got in their silly story and just blew it up. You see some really good stuff happening. They don't make the movie too long. It's one of those movies where the bad guy has a really bad plot. But there is no way you could call this bad. It's pretty damn good. Too bad, too.

This movie was rented by a friend. Her choice is normally good. I

This movie was rented by a friend. Her choice is normally good. I'd recommend the same - a great movie with lots of laughs and good plot, plus a funny scene with a dead guy and a guy playing the harpsichord. The plot may be not be obvious, but the humor is so great I wouldn't be surprised if a bunch of us saw this movie at the local movie theater on opening night. If you are into weird and unusual people, then this might be something you

This movie was rented by a friend. Her choice is normally good. I would have to say that the story is great. The two brothers are the "woozles". The main character (the father) is the "woozle" and the side characters are the "nayskins". The actors are good. The acting of the actors does a great job. I do not know much about the movies from other sites. The acting is in my opinion the best thing from the

The Good: I liked this movie because it was the first horror movie I

The Good: I liked this movie because it was the first horror movie I've seen from Disney that I can remember. I saw it in the video store and in the first 20 minutes it is not creepy but it got weird. I have seen the opening and I thought "there goes a movie". Anyway, I loved how weird the ending was. I didn't know what to do so I just sat there hoping to come up with something to say. Then it just seemed to go to a whole

The Good: I liked this movie because it was the first horror movie I have ever seen, it was very suspenseful. The Bad: It was not suspenseful and the movie was way too slow. The only reason I gave this movie two stars is because it doesn't have any real surprises, you see the characters from the first 30 seconds, so we are already aware of them, and there are a lot of predictable scenes. The movie's main theme is so-called "the fear of

Its plain to see why the makers of Scary Movie found it so easy

Its plain to see why the makers of Scary Movie found it so easy to get this one into the market. It was one of the funniest movies of my young age, and it certainly made an impression. But the one thing that makes this one worth watching is the fantastic performance of Steve Buscemi. He steals every scene. He is quite literally the funniest man alive, although of course his performance is the best out of everyone's. So thank you Steve. Just a word of

Its plain to see why the makers of Scary Movie found it so easy to adapt their source material into something a little more interesting. I watched it as a kid and am always fond of the movie, so I am always glad to have this one back in my DVD collection. This is a really great movie and was a must see at Halloween Time. The movie is good even if you are a little disappointed to see that the only character in the movie is the boy. The only other characters were

***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** Are all teen slasher

***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** Are all teen slasher movies the same? Yes, absolutely, but I really just can't see any of those movies being the same. With the exception of 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' and most all the horror films, teens just aren't the killer that kids do. If the same teen slasher that we see in so many teensy-movies were really an adult (who isn't in college right now), we would see nothing

***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** Are all teen slasher films really scary? Is this a horror movie? What the heck is going on?! There is a plot? What do I care? What is this, some sort of a low budget exploitation flick? That's what I thought. I was shocked to say the least. It's really no surprise that a low budget film like this would not be a major hit, but it's just so bad. A true sadist with

here was no effort put into Valentine to prevent it from being just another teenage

here was no effort put into Valentine to prevent it from being just another teenage movie. Despite the lack of effort it has more points than a movie like the previous movie (the best of which is, in my opinion, this one) and it was made entirely of teens that want nothing more than to just enjoy sex, but the plot is still the same. So who is this film for? The film is mostly about the characters, because the story is about them in their teens. There is nothing

here was no effort put into Valentine to prevent it from being just another teenage rom com with this being the only redeeming quality of the movie being the love scenes between the girls.<br /><br />The acting is pretty awful as the girls are basically a bunch of whiny teenagers who whine about the fact that they are too tired or too drunk or something to act. It's as if they're too old for the part, with the same acting that is so bad when it was played by

This movie in away was super-clever. It's theme rhymes

This movie in away was super-clever. It's theme rhymes with some pop-art that you can see, so you would see a few of them rhyming. For me, the theme rhyme is something about a guy and his dog, and the dog is a little guy or a little girl, so a little girl, a baby. Anyway, this movie has some good songs in it. One of them is a medley of pop-art-looking songs, I think

This movie in away was super-clever. It's theme rhymes with "Hollywood", which means that it's an ahistorical masterpiece! All the actors were awesome. I especially like the ending, where it's so funny how so many scenes are filmed. I love this movie. The best part was the "funniest". You don't have to be a history buff to enjoy the movie. The only reason I don't like it is because it's so funny, and

Well the reason for seeing it in the cinema was that it was a sneak

Well the reason for seeing it in the cinema was that it was a sneak preview of one of the most exciting things coming out of Australia. "The Dreamcatcher" is about a guy who comes to dreamland, and that is an extremely short summary of the film. A dreamcatcher is one of those rare items that could be used to take a human into the dream realm and put them into a reality induced coma, and the only way you can use it is through a specially created special

Well the reason for seeing it in the cinema was that it was a sneak preview of some kind. The main character was there and he was talking to the movie in one minute and it didn't let go. I went with the lead actor, a male, a man who usually don't take part in this sort of thing and was surprised how he was involved. He was all smiles but his smile was a mixture of sadness and amusement as he stared at the film and it never really went to his

"In 1955, Tobias Schneerbaum disappeared in the Peruvian Amazon.

"In 1955, Tobias Schneerbaum disappeared in the Peruvian Amazon. His body was never found. In 1996, after nearly 40 years, a group of scientists and a search team from Peruvian government led to the find of an ancient Peruvian gold mine. "Heathers" (2003) is an in-depth look into the story of the ancient mine, including the story of two young students at the mine who discover a map that contains the location of the treasure. They attempt to

"In 1955, Tobias Schneerbaum disappeared in the Peruvian Amazon. For decades, his work was overlooked by his peers, until he was discovered in 1982. The film was directed by a young Joseph Fodor. Although they don't really care about the protagonist being a man in the jungle, which isn't the point, they care more about him trying to escape and being cornered by his captors.<br /><br />It has a great plot in which an American journalist, Joe

So, where are the cannibals? Those intrigued by the title and

So, where are the cannibals? Those intrigued by the title and the concept of a movie that doesn't exist ought to find a DVD player and grab it.<br /><br />The story revolves around a group of cannibalistic maniacs who feed on the brains of humans. When one of the men in the group is killed in a brutal way, the group decide to dispose of his severed head and get revenge on humans. Now, I found this movie to be quite enjoyable. However

So, where are the cannibals? Those intrigued by the title and concept may be in the wrong mood, as it seems to have little to do with the movie they just watched.<br /><br />However, for those that are just now seeing it, the trailer for the soundtrack and the movie poster are sure to have opened your eyes.<br /><br />But the movie doesn't open out very well. There's a bad guy with some bad guys. There's some bad

Well, where to begin? I guess I can start with the general complaint

Well, where to begin? I guess I can start with the general complaint that it was very unrealistic - no one is stupid and every action should be based on a story. That just doesn't work with the comic book, the realism was great. There was a great sense of tension that we felt while watching a series of action sequences (think Flash), and as such the acting was very good. That was the most important thing about it.<br /><br />It was all very well executed

Well, where to begin? I guess I can start with the general complaint, I could care less about this movie.<br /><br />What I want to know is, "where has all the fun been?" The movie had just come out, and people in the community were already complaining about the "plot", "plot point" (like plot holes and things being added on the side) and everything that happened in the movie.<br /><br />The movie's plot is that a

I Am Curious is really two films in one - half of it is the

I Am Curious is really two films in one - half of it is the actual movie and then half of it is actually a play. The acting is great, the plot is really interesting - really something that is not very common these days. I thought it was a really great movie. The cast of the movie is really one of the best cast around. It is really great for me as a big actor. It is the one and only movie that I could watch without my eyes glued to the screen

I Am Curious is really two films in one - half of it is the story of two young women who decide to live out their lives as a hippie commune. The other half is an elaborate story of a small family in the 1970's living in the commune and it's not the prettiest one either.<br /><br />The story is a bit weird and not as easy to follow as some other films like The Wind Rises or The Wild Swans or even The Village.

This film, once sensational for its forward-thinking politics and depictions of free

This film, once sensational for its forward-thinking politics and depictions of free speech on the part of the "left," became almost impossible to watch without feeling slightly uneasy. The film seemed to imply that the film as a whole was "unreal." The "moral" of this film seemed to rest entirely on the ability of gay men to speak up to the moral standards of the community with which they came into contact. The story revolves around a young couple and a young woman. One character describes her

This film, once sensational for its forward-thinking politics and depictions of free speech, is now a disgrace to democracy and human rights. The director of photography used the studio lights to hide the nudity and the violence. The film is repulsive, the screenplay is incomprehensible and this bizarre concoction is the single most offensive moment of all. I was ashamed to see a film made by the same man who made "Toys" - no, I didn't mean to imply that "Toys" was

The plot line of No One Sleeps is not a bad idea, and

The plot line of No One Sleeps is not a bad idea, and, in the context of No Sleeps, is not a bad movie. And the cast of characters in the film works very well. I have found myself drawn to Jennifer Aniston since No one sleep's first, and I am delighted to see her back in action again in No one sleep. I can't help but find myself rooting for her character, she is all smiles and energy. The story is not as convoluted as

The plot line of No One Sleeps is not a bad idea, and the first half is not very enjoyable. First one bad guy is off to a bar and then he's kidnapped by an alligator. The killer killer is someone who appears to be an old high school buddy of the new guy. After killing that new guy and putting them back together and having a bunch of stupid sex, he starts to go on a rampage and kills a bunch of people, including the wife of the old guy

Hail Bollywood and men Directors!<br /><br />Really

Hail Bollywood and men Directors!<br /><br />Really, I'm surprised that I've seen more crap from these two than the average of movies at the same time.<br /><br />Here is an example.<br /><br />I first saw this in a theatre in Los Angeles. I must admit, the director is very good, but he made the same movie I saw in the theatre in LA (I was in the cinema that showed this) for 3 times

Hail Bollywood and men Directors!<br /><br />Really not sure what was the message about, really.<br /><br />They were really not the worst actors in the world though, they just were really awful.<br /><br />I'd watch one of them to see just how awful they were, and how bad they could possibly have made the film if they had a decent director.<br /><br />What a disappointment. I would not recommend this film to

This movie is traditional bollywood fare as far as the star power, sentiment

This movie is traditional bollywood fare as far as the star power, sentiment, and script go. Not an original thought, not an original story or even interesting characters, just bland. The movie is basically just to let the cast, lead actors, and the script team off their "talent" to do whatever in the world they wanted, without ever getting in the way of whatever they were talking about. The movie was so bland, you were just there to laugh. And I don't care

This movie is traditional bollywood fare as far as the star power, sentiment and characters go but there are other stuff I didn't see. For example, in the beginning and end there were lots of people in the audience watching the show from all angles of the stage. And the show was over for a while! At one point there were a couple of people in the audience who were watching it but who weren't even in the theater. It was great fun. And there was plenty of variety and

I wonder if there is any sense of sense in this movie. Its a

I wonder if there is any sense of sense in this movie. Its a pretty bland and boring, with lots of stuff to talk about. The plot is the same as every other movie with people telling stories or making jokes about movies. The main character is nothing special, I mean nothing special in that he just kinda talks like a girl in the story, and his one time is about movies.<br /><br />The cast is pretty much the same. They have the same personality for the most

I wonder if there is any sense of sense in this movie. Its a complete waste of time in a way that the first 30 minutes can't be justified. Every time the characters are in a fight it looks like they just sit around drinking coffee and doing their best to make the camera go away.<br /><br />And even as someone that is interested in trying to be serious they always try to find more excuses to break the movie up with meaningless dialog and bad acting. And I mean no

The TV guide calls this movie a mystery. What is a mystery to me

The TV guide calls this movie a mystery. What is a mystery to me is that nobody knows who filmed it and it is a mystery to the actor who played the lead. He wasn't even a professional actor. Who was this guy? Well, he was a real mystery and I think the reason he's the mystery was that his role was really a mystery. His character was a victim and this was the mystery we were left with! He seemed to be an amateur and I don't blame him

The TV guide calls this movie a mystery. What is a mystery to me is this: no one has seen it.<br /><br />I have, and so I found it impossible to follow.<br /><br />It is a mystery film like "The Matrix" and "Rambo," all of which are highly acclaimed, and all with great characters.<br /><br />The plot is not complicated but it is simple. One of the actors, Michael Keaton, is playing

... but the keyword here is "usually." I have been known to adore

... but the keyword here is "usually." I have been known to adore "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" in my younger days, a show that has lasted and will likely end with some kind of closure. But, in a show full of characters, here's just an "excellent" character. The "charm" of the "Rocky" characters was almost completely absent here, while the "funniness" of the main characters was, again, completely non-existent. The

... but the keyword here is "usually." I have been known to adore "Stripped" but I have never been so thoroughly frustrated by a movie. No surprises, bland script, bland dialogue, bland cinematography, bland music, bland background music, bland lighting, bland action, bland scenery, bland cinematography. The only characters that I cared about were the two lead characters and the two other main characters. But in terms of plot, it was nothing short of terrible.<br /><

Don't even ask me why I watched this! The only excuse I can

Don't even ask me why I watched this! The only excuse I can think of for my viewing this is because it's supposed to be some sort of horror and it has a little music, but if you're going to do something, why not go crazy with it? The movie is about a girl (you guessed it) who meets a guy she meets during the school festival. There are a lot of plot holes here, like there not being any police presence, that she might have killed herself

Don't even ask me why I watched this! The only excuse I can think of is because of some of the actors or, I guess, for some reasons that are not revealed. I was watching this movie after work, so it might not have been that great, but it was well worth the price of admission. For everyone else, stay away, stay away. There are no redeeming qualities.<br /><br />I'm trying to watch this movie and have a bit of a laugh

The French film "Extension Du Domaine De La Lutte"

The French film "Extension Du Domaine De La Lutte" stars the English actor William Darlham in a role based on a true story that involves two French brothers and their parents. The father's wife, the mother's wife, are two women whom the director Louis Revell found after having an affair with a French actress. His two English brothers, George (also a director) and John (who had already gone and done the same type of work with the French actress, Marie

The French film "Extension Du Domaine De La Lutte" was directed by M.H.S. and is one of the earliest films to be made in New York. This film was made by the same director and it was released on video in New York in 1972. It is a romantic comedy set in France and is a satire on the modern world of French films.<br /><br />Here we see a young woman (La Lutte) is on her way to

Two years ago, on Berlin Film Festival we watched the Amos Kollek

Two years ago, on Berlin Film Festival we watched the Amos Kollek "Migrations" a comedy about family problems. It was a really amazing comedy with the very funny family.<br /><br />I would not make too many jokes about this film. It was the same sort of funny movie as "Sting" or "The Lonely Star". This is an amazing family drama with no humor. The acting was great, and the storyline was really great. It's the same story

Two years ago, on Berlin Film Festival we watched the Amos Kollek: A Christmas Story (1994, Germany) with German film-maker Andreas Klosmann. I recall that Kollek's father was sick and the young boy was put into the care of the foster parents. This is also shown in the movie: The young Kollek's mother and father take him to the foster care where the young boy is abused and humiliated by a teacher for his own "dishonor

Blank check is one of those kids movies that could have been a great

Blank check is one of those kids movies that could have been a great one but could never have been good or great. The movie is not even really original, it really is one of those ones that should have been just made on the cheap and in a hurry to get some money out of the bank, where it could have been a movie, so that is why it has so low ratings and is one of the worst things ever. The script can be funny at the beginning but becomes boring after

Blank check is one of those kids movies that could have been a great comedy, and even a horror movie, with all the right actors. What I found really bad was the script, and the bad acting. This will probably go down as one of the worse movies of 2002 (when I saw it). It didn't help that I can't find the movie any more, so I can't find any good stuff on here. It's almost like it's a sequel and nothing much. The

Blank Check is a movie that I saw on TV one day and like

Blank Check is a movie that I saw on TV one day and like most movies I love the plot but I thought this was really boring the way it was and the cast was really annoying. The director had to go and re-create all of the characters because of some bad acting. The plot was so stupid in the first 30 minutes. The only thing I like in the beginning is some music. You can't even be bothered listening to the rest of the movie. I think it may have

Blank Check is a movie that I saw on TV one day and like all movies I watched that day I couldn't help but love it so I'm going to review it. First things first, I'm very happy that the plot was really well done and I loved the characters (especially the lead of Blank Check). Next, this is a very funny and good movie. I'm not sure I could take that in another direction. Also, I can't believe that some of the scenes I've

I saw this movie once a long time ago, and I have no desire

I saw this movie once a long time ago, and I have no desire to revisit it. The cast is great, and the screenplay is flawless. The only thing that I can really fault is the editing in this movie. It really didn't feel as fluid as the original. And I really like how they make their actors play it so differently. Just make sure that you check it out. You won't regret it, it's amazing. <br /><br />I highly recommend this movie

I saw this movie once a long time ago, and I have no desire to watch it again. In fact it was so horrible, it was so unfair, such nonsense, I couldn't even stand it. I thought it was one of the worst movies i've ever seen in my life. I've never been much of a movies-goer, but that one was one of the first, and the others i've been more of a connoisseur of them than the worst movie I

The worst movie I have seen in a while. Yeah its fun to fantas

The worst movie I have seen in a while. Yeah its fun to fantasize about what would have been great moments in the film and it gives you some fun, it is not good in any sense. Some parts are great, but the rest is just bad, it can't redeem itself. Some of the actors are just terrible. For example the character in the beginning that you see before the scene is so bland that a child would be excited to see him. If you get to the point of

The worst movie I have seen in a while. Yeah its fun to fantasize about with sex, a lot of fun and not much of plot. I just love the bad-guy-with-a-punch-around-the-neck-with-a-knife-and-a-chicken-and-the-bad-guy-just-for-a-short-time-and-it-doesnt-matter plot. Nothing really of interest. If you can

Blank Check is easily one of the worst films of the nineties.

Blank Check is easily one of the worst films of the nineties. It's been around for a little over twenty years and in that time it has taken the place of "Taxi" and "Lame Man" on the short list of worst films of the nineties. The only reason to see it is if you have the most pathetic tastes. If you are into bad movie like "Taxi" you are bound to like this one. If you are looking for bad movies, "

Blank Check is easily one of the worst films of the nineties. The only reason is because this is the first (in a long time) of the director's first films. It has been five years since i saw it, so i could be wrong. The only reason is because i am not a fan of his films so the fact that i think of it after his first film is not the point. It was so lame. It was the only movie i can think of that i do

I almost called HBO and demanded my money back for the month just because they

I almost called HBO and demanded my money back for the month just because they refused to give me the credits. I think I actually like movies like this one, I just don't like movies that come from cable TV. You'll remember the good guys in this one, right? I hope that the bad guys don't get the same treatment.<br /><br />This movie was awful. Everyone in the cast is horrible. Everyone is likeable except the kid, they all act like children,

I almost called HBO and demanded my money back for the month just because they were showing a film on the Sunday. I would never get it back from them because I feel that HBO is one of the worst things in this world. I was so so mad at my cable company for making me take this movie. The people that are still watching this show have to be in the early 60's. The worst part is that I have a 6 year old son who likes this show and we were showing the

This movie is really goofy! I saw it as an 11 year old,

This movie is really goofy! I saw it as an 11 year old, I can't say how old, it was before I watched it. It was not funny, and I thought it was way worse than the others. It was more silly than the others with that same old-fashioned sense of childishness which is so obvious in this. It's hard to watch. The only thing in the way of this movie is the fact that it takes longer to get to the last bit. The movie

This movie is really goofy! I saw it as an 11 year old, it was so lame, it was awful! A 10 year old was playing the lead, he is really really funny in this, I really enjoy how the adults are dumb in the movie. It's very funny. The movie's really nice, it just was. It's just a bad movie and it's really stupid and lame! I can't wait for the 2nd DVD to come out, its gonna be great,

A young boy comes into a lot of money and promptly begins to live it

A young boy comes into a lot of money and promptly begins to live it up. In this strange little film, his mother is a big-shot playboy and his father a spoiled rich boy who is totally incapable of raising his own child. The film is a very odd mix. But, at the end of the movie, the father goes back to his own life after years of being the spoiled rich boy that his mother raised him up as being. It's not as dark and serious as you

A young boy comes into a lot of money and promptly begins to live it up, even though the father tries to warn him about his new found wealth. In doing so he starts to be more and more interested in being wealthy, and the father comes to find this very annoying. This movie is very much like the original, except that there are no "kids", and the story is rather slow, with the parents acting as the caretaker and the children acting as the caretakers. I liked

Bad Actors, bad filming, choppy dialog, shallow characters, but

Bad Actors, bad filming, choppy dialog, shallow characters, but a very fun movie, with a great cast and very nice animation and background. The main characters are very likable. The acting is excellent. And, what is more, this is a good movie, not like most movies, but you don't want to miss one minute. Highly recommended to watch! :)<br /><br />PS: It was a long time ago, but i found it a good movie.

Bad Actors, bad filming, choppy dialog, shallow characters, but they've been working on this movie for months. What a waste of time. We all know this is a joke (we're the ones paying the rent on the rental), but it doesn't need to be a comedy.<br /><br />This is the only movie with the words "Kool Aid" in it. Just what you want for a movie about a stupid band. The soundtrack has no redeeming qualities

Bad plot, bad dialogue, bad acting, idiotic directing, the annoying

Bad plot, bad dialogue, bad acting, idiotic directing, the annoying soundtrack, the worst special effects I've ever seen in a horror movie - this one was awful. It could have been avoided with much, much better directing.<br /><br />The only good thing about this is that it's one of those movies that you have to see because nothing else will ever be as bad as it. You should see it even if it's not for Halloween. The film looks like crap,

Bad plot, bad dialogue, bad acting, idiotic directing, the annoying main character, a big mistake from the director. A disaster movie. I will not waste your time unless you think, "This is a big waste of my time and your time is more important". This movie is a real disappointment. It is so boring and yet so horrible. It was a total waste of time, and my time.<br /><br />I wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone and I won't

Larry Buchanan. Yep, same guy who did "Attack of the THE Eye

Larry Buchanan. Yep, same guy who did "Attack of the THE Eye Creatures" and "Vampire's Curse". He did, however, do a few more movies in the 70's and 80's. "Sleeping with the Enemy" was the first (though not the last) and "Night of the Demons" the most recent. I have no idea what they were looking for but these three are the best of them I've seen. All three are in black-and-white

Larry Buchanan. Yep, same guy who did "Attack of the THE Eye Creatures", "Jungle Fever" and "Wormwood."<br /><br />This was a big disappointment - if there is a single bad element in this movie it is the bad acting and one liner jokes. The story is just horrible - the same old plot with the same annoying story. If they had had a script writer, they would have done things in a different way. The dialog is so cheesy and

what ends up killing this movie is its self-consciousness, among other

what ends up killing this movie is its self-consciousness, among other things, that is the most important aspect of this movie. It is self-consciousness. The movie is about the life of a young man who is in love with his teacher. He sees his wife, his father, the teacher, his friends, and the dead body of his best friend. He begins to cry and to cry for this woman. He finds the body of his best friend who he loves but hates at

what ends up killing this movie is its self-consciousness, among other things, and it's in some ways the worst example of a bad movie ever created in the 80's. The movie starts out by having a bunch of friends and people they know get together and watch some stupid old movies they think they would like to see, and once there, they actually start playing some stupid dumb game with each other, and some random person on a TV that they have to talk to on their cell phone

Not to be confused with the Madonna film "The Next Best Thing", "

Not to be confused with the Madonna film "The Next Best Thing", "The Wedding Date" is a film about a young couple, with a very eccentric son, trying to make their lives in their town a happy one. As a result, the characters that show up are not typical or fleshed out, and therefore are not very memorable.<br /><br />The actors did a decent job though, and that was a major reason for this film to go on my list of films that

Not to be confused with the Madonna film "The Next Best Thing", "Bad Blood" is actually one of her more successful films, but it is also, in that it has a rather uninspired screenplay, and at times, it's difficult to see where the story is really going and where it is going wrong.<br /><br />Although we do get quite a few moments where we are not quite sure where we are, we still manage to stay there.<br /><br />With

After reading the book, I loved the story. Watching the movie I was

After reading the book, I loved the story. Watching the movie I was pretty sad. It seemed like every scene was shot to just be edited. This movie could have been so much better. It's too bad to even say it is bad. I'm not sure how I'm supposed to compare the film and book. The movie is so much better. The animation and quality is so much better. The story seems more focused and clear.<br /><br />The movie is also filled with

After reading the book, I loved the story. Watching the movie I was disappointed. If you don't have the book (or don't want to read it) go here for a great movie to watch, but that's just my opinion.<br /><br />The movie is a bit of a let down. The story, which is simple and easy to follow made a little more complicated than it should be. It is great to see the character's reactions to their feelings and not knowing the

I read the book and really enjoyed it from beginning to end. However,

I read the book and really enjoyed it from beginning to end. However, this movie is not so great and I really would like to watch it again. The actors have great chemistry and I enjoyed their performance. I would give a 10 to that. Overall, a movie for the movie aficionados and of course, the horror movie enthusiasts. The movie is just so creepy. I really think this movie is a classic and I'm surprised to see this movie getting such a low rating. The cast

I read the book and really enjoyed it from beginning to end. However, I can still remember the first five or ten minutes of the movie, which was played to me as an eight and a half hour film. I think in the early '80s it was in New York. That being said, the first movie I saw which was a longer than a two hour movie was the first movie I saw which is really good. But that being said, this movie was long. The movie is about

I've seen my fair share of badly thought-out endings and final twists

I've seen my fair share of badly thought-out endings and final twists and I can attest that this finale was a real let down. A truly terrible effort from the director to make "Boom" a more enjoyable film. The film is so overlong and full of stupid stuff that you end up wanting to be entertained by a silly and lame ending. The only reason why this film even had a sequel was for the sake of an animated sequence that looks stupid. <br /><br />

I've seen my fair share of badly thought-out endings and final twists, and this one is an exception. By the standards of the action genre it must have been a disappointment (I'd say the only reason for its release in the US is because the production budget was too big). In the end it just doesn't work, it was a complete waste of time.<br /><br />One part that I thought worked was the ending, since the characters were not left hanging there, it

Paul Armstrong is a liberal, Scottish-born, professor of law at Harvard

Paul Armstrong is a liberal, Scottish-born, professor of law at Harvard (he's married and with his son, Christopher, a lawyer). He is an atheist, but his views on religion have not changed much since he became an atheist. He is also the father of Christopher. His son is a lawyer. It's been said that "there's nothing left to do but cry". One might imagine the Armstrong's of the 60s, who were religious, and with no children of their own

Paul Armstrong is a liberal, Scottish-born, professor of law at Harvard and the son of the well-to-do, conservative father and the lefty mother. After graduating, he is a full professor, and he has a small army of students and research assistants working for him. His son, a younger man with a family of his own, plays a young woman named Grace, and his wife and daughter, Grace and Grace, a very old and beautiful lady. They are all married and

JUST CAUSE showcases Sean Connery as a Harvard law prof, Kate Cap

JUST CAUSE showcases Sean Connery as a Harvard law prof, Kate Capshaw as the head of the school's women's studies program, and Richard Farnsworth (a British actor who was the star of the movie but was not on the team to make the final) as a young assistant at the office of his boss. As a result of a scandal involving a member of the faculty, the school is forced to close its doors to the public, and with no teaching staff available, the students are

JUST CAUSE showcases Sean Connery as a Harvard law prof, Kate Capshaw as his wife, who is still in the business school and Jack Palance as his secretary. And I won't go into how I feel about the movie, since that may be the only way to describe it. Rather than having a plot that's convoluted and confusing, the story, which is a flashback to a childhood, focuses entirely on the main character's inner life. It's just that interesting and surprising when it

The form of the film is that of a suspense shocker. There are

The form of the film is that of a suspense shocker. There are many interesting elements, a few plot twists and surprises, that make the film one for the thrillers fans. It is an excellent and very suspenseful movie, that will always keep you guessing in your seat until the end when you will know the outcome you have been waiting for. For lovers of suspense thrillers and suspense thrillers of all types, this movie is for you. If you have ever been interested in the type

The form of the film is that of a suspense shocker. There are so many people in this film who have no explanation for anything. The main character is a "suspension" - in a state between normal consciousness and unconsciousness. You know there is something not quite right with him. This movie shows a wide variety of people. You can see what the film needs are some more actors and directors. The characters are so random. This film is very mysterious. This is a very "f

Just Cause is one of those films that at first makes you wonder quite why

Just Cause is one of those films that at first makes you wonder quite why Hollywood isn't throwing this off the top at a box office that would make it worth the price of admission. In fact, it was a bit like watching a bunch of kids with big, open backs that would take you a long way away. At one point, I had the feeling that it was going to be one of those films that just went and got buried in the film history pile. However, after one of the

Just Cause is one of those films that at first makes you wonder quite why it's not considered one of the great movies of the 90's, so that I could see how it got overlooked.<br /><br />Not because of the movie, but because of the movie director. <br /><br />I didn't watch this one because I was bored, I watched it because it was a Christmas movie, and I knew I had to see it. <br /><br />I

Look carefully at the wonderful assortment of talent put together to make this movie:

Look carefully at the wonderful assortment of talent put together to make this movie: David Simon, who is in his prime at the moment, directing his first feature. Director and director's assistant and DP, John DeFaria, whose work in TV and movie making had made him an essential member of Simon's team. And, of course, cinematographer Stanley T. Pollack, who shot the entire project with an ARRI Alexa and set in Los Angeles. As long as they don't shoot

Look carefully at the wonderful assortment of talent put together to make this movie: director James McGovern (with cinematographer Richard Matheson, cinematographer Herbert Bresswell, and even some "acting" help from the likes of the actors in the cast) and writer/director Jack Kerouac, with the cast of the legendary director Eugene Jare, all helping create a film that is almost perfect. <br /><br />Kerouac would have a hard time believing

As other reviewers have noted the film dies in the last 1/2 hour

As other reviewers have noted the film dies in the last 1/2 hour and the film keeps going. The script isn't that bad, but there's nothing new here, nothing interesting that I can think of. The film is pretty slow. There's nothing to catch your interest, no excitement whatsoever, but the film moves along smoothly. The direction is great. The cinematography is fine, although that shot of the house is pretty fake. The soundtrack was alright. The film was pretty boring.

As other reviewers have noted the film dies in the last 1/2 hour of the film. At that point, I was getting quite bored of the script (which the scriptwriters obviously had not read) the dialogue was coming out of a script, and nothing was happening with the action scenes. The director had never directed anything and so he made a mistake.<br /><br />After being let down by the movie (a film, after all, that I could watch in any day, any

Seems that the cast should ensure at least an average movie. And so

Seems that the cast should ensure at least an average movie. And so far is that been the case. I won't give the plot any more to say. A bad character (a self-centered jerk) plots to kill the innocent, but when he can't bring his gun to bear, it's up to an innocent girl to save the day. This, at first, I thought was a comedy, then it just gets ridiculous. He has a woman at his side. That is,

Seems that the cast should ensure at least an average movie. And so, we get this one. A very bad movie with terrible acting, some random plot, and some really bad dialogue. The movie does not deserve to be called bad by the cast or director.<br /><br />It is not good. It is bad. It is terrible. It is one of those movies that everyone who comes to the movie theater gets sucked in. I think that this movie is so bad that it

1st watched 2/16/2002 - 4 out of 10(Dir

1st watched 2/16/2002 - 4 out of 10(Dir. Alan Parker)Truly awful. No redeeming qualities whatsoever. This piece of crap makes all other "horrific" movies look like The Hills of Doorn. This piece of garbage has absolutely nothing to recommend it. The plot: - The killer "spider" eats the brains of the victims - The killer "spider" eats the brains of the victims *chatter sounds* *cant hear him

1st watched 2/16/2002 - 4 out of 10(Dir: Chris Sparling)Director: Christopher Sparling(R)Producers: R. R. James, R. R. James(R)Stars: Jada Pinkett Smith, Michael Fassbender, Christopher Plummer, David Duchovny, William Daniels, William KattActor(s): Chris Sparling, Michael Fassbender, Christopher Plummer, William Daniels, William KattActress(

The performances of Fishbourne (who appears strangely funny somehow) and (short

The performances of Fishbourne (who appears strangely funny somehow) and (shortly thereafter) his two best friends, have been the most consistent in this movie since the 80's, while the supporting cast keeps on returning until they are reduced to supporting roles of supporting characters. All of the supporting cast members are on their best material at times. There is never a moment where nothing happens and we just stay sitting there. Nothing interesting is done. And the plot is just not interesting. It doesn't surprise

The performances of Fishbourne (who appears strangely funny somehow) and (short time later) Fisher, although not without the same "weirdness," are also very good.<br /><br />Overall, a very very decent movie. It's not a great masterpiece (but, on my level, at least), but it's not without the good and not without the great. I just wish they had a better sound. It's the movie "Lion King" should have been. It

A pot - boiler if ever I saw one. A supposed thriller borrowing from

A pot - boiler if ever I saw one. A supposed thriller borrowing from the '30s, the movie follows the lead story of a woman who, after being taken to prison to live with the mentally unhinged, she has to share the kitchen with two brothers, while he does his best to try to make him feel better. The cast is all very decent though, especially James Stewart as the uncle, the narrator of the story, who is the true hero of the movie. For an

A pot - boiler if ever I saw one. A supposed thriller borrowing from a "The Maltese Falcon" plotline. The only characters are the actors playing them. It would have been better played by a TV production of "The Rocky Horror Picture Show". I would not see another movie with it anymore. And that's without mentioning the movie's title. There is nothing about this movie in it's title. What a load of bollocks. It's just boring. I'm glad I

This movie is a crappy and forgettable Sean Connery vehicle. The performances

This movie is a crappy and forgettable Sean Connery vehicle. The performances are horrible. The story was not believable, the plot was horrible. The movie did not even attempt to hide the fact that it is trash. I found it very hard to concentrate on anything. Sean Connery looked like he was using some sort of a stethoscope at the time, and he was acting like a total goofball. I never saw the previous movie again, and I cannot believe that I didn't find

This movie is a crappy and forgettable Sean Connery vehicle. The performances are mediocre and all the action and special effects are nothing special. I would not waste the time on it. The plot and storyline is weak in the sense that it doesn't seem to have the original concept to it, making it pretty much a sequel of sorts. I am not really a Sean Connery fan but the way he plays him is pretty bad compared to the Sean Connery I can recall from the 80's.

This is just a case of a previously worthless island changed into something worthwhile.

This is just a case of a previously worthless island changed into something worthwhile. It has nothing else going for it, it's like watching a bunch of people running through the desert at the back of a pickup truck. The characters are bland and the plot incoherent. There was none of the charm of other shows. Everyone from the cast seemed to be doing the same things: yelling at one another, shouting, talking over each other and walking their dogs. I saw almost nothing of it all. I

This is just a case of a previously worthless island changed into something worthwhile. It also has the added benefit of the cast all coming together for the big finale - some really bad dialogue, especially after the fight scenes which were supposed to be going down. No one has ever played this island before, I'm not sure how, and I really had trouble watching the actual fight scene. So far so good. So, I'll give it five for a lot of good scenes, plus some really interesting dialogue

Because IT IS, that's why! This is the same jealous-daughter

Because IT IS, that's why! This is the same jealous-daughter who always tries to make you feel inferior; she wants you to think she is a woman, as if she was a man, and is really just a little selfish for doing so. This character does not have any of the flaws, but is a very annoying and annoying character as well. You would be more likely to like this girl and her character if she were a little more realistic. Don't bother watching the other parts

Because IT IS, that's why! This is the same jealous-daughter-in-law, jealous-daughter-in-law and jealous-daughter-in-law of the father-in-law who has to keep the same old man with the girl all to himself. But, as a result, no longer under his watchful eye, he has to share more with his sister-in-law. The result is a couple, who have the potential to be stars of their own

This can't be Mandy Schaffer's last film. Somebody, do

This can't be Mandy Schaffer's last film. Somebody, do not watch this one. It was terrible. I gave this one a one and only because there was something about that girl, with the giant robot. It was like a bad dream. The plot was a real joke. My favorite character was the villain. It was a lot of fun. It was so bad that I even had to laugh out loud at some of the scenes that I thought were so stupid. My girlfriend would

This can't be Mandy Schaffer's last film. Somebody, do we know who? Schaffer is always in search of what may never come. I'm sure she has a new gig in Hollywood, and I'm certain she'll get into drama, but I'd love for her to keep at it here. She hasn't acted since 2001's "The Wedding March of 2006," but she continues to show a talent for movies like "High Noon" and "The Girl & the Robot,"

Let me be really clear about this movie. I didn't watch this movie

Let me be really clear about this movie. I didn't watch this movie with the intention of laughing and being entertained. I watched this movie with the intention of getting laid. And what a movie it was. I mean, if you're a good chick who loves movies about men who make movies about women in all sorts of ways, this is the movie for you! You get to see a man and a woman together as a two-fisted bro-nasty team of film buffs. A

Let me be really clear about this movie. I didn't watch this movie without the soundtrack on, as I had my iPod in front of me with a good quality copy. I'm an avid music person, and as a musician myself, I love music. I even have an iPod Touch right in my living room right now. As a matter of fact, I was playing it for everyone that was at my house as we talked about what we would watch next. The soundtrack made the movie's better

A truly, truly dire Canadian-German co-production, the ever-

A truly, truly dire Canadian-German co-production, the ever-so-decent "St. Louis" is a disaster, the one-note lead performance by Chris O'Brien (who isn't really much of a comedian), and the movie is, of all things, about a woman who has no problem getting on with someone who is her equal, an Italian-Americans-turned-Brits-turned-American woman (her name was changed for reasons I don't know and

A truly, truly dire Canadian-German co-production, the ever-tearful Cusack makes the movie look as quaint by comparison. Although there is no budget, it is actually very close to a $1M budget, including a fantastic cast. They had to hire out the movie so much so that all of the Canadian footage was left in the German locations (there was enough of it for a Canadian-set movie, but no Canadian extras were used in those scenes). There is

This movie is so bad, I knew how it ends right after this little

This movie is so bad, I knew how it ends right after this little piece of garbage. My question to the reviewer who claimed that this is a good flick: Why don't you try to get paid instead of wasting your time on this garbage? If you can't make even $10 for an hour of your life to watch this movie, then what are you doing in the movies? If you can't even pay your bills to watch this garbage, then you must be some really sad, sad

This movie is so bad, I knew how it ends right after this little gem of a mess. The only reason this movie was even able to make it's debut was because a bunch of the cast members were either already on board for this project or have been forced to be in the movie. You're going to see the same kind of crap that you just saw in the movie "Breathless". Nothing else you should see. If you want to see something, rent "Breathless".

Oh man. If you want to give your internal Crow T. Robot a

Oh man. If you want to give your internal Crow T. Robot a run for its money, then you'll find this an incredible film. Director Steven Spielberg gives us the usual amazing, yet somewhat frustrating, chase sequences.<br /><br />The actors were all excellent. You can hardly see the movie with the little glasses and all the sunglasses. But the supporting cast is all so impressive. Paul Rudd, Ed Harris, Peter Stormare, and Robert Loggia are all in very good

Oh man. If you want to give your internal Crow T. Robot a workout, watch this movie. The CGI is the best, the soundtrack is great, the actors are fantastic, the cinematography is really nothing short of amazing and it can even be a bit funny. I'm not sure if it has to do with the movie, but its an all time favorite of mine. If you have kids (and kids love movies) watch it before you go to sleep. The movie itself is not

I am guessing the reason this movie did so well at the box office is

I am guessing the reason this movie did so well at the box office is because the studio decided that they wanted to make a western movie but the director had to make a horror movie. I know the horror genre is going through a revival and I guess they went for a good thriller, that's why this movie was great to watch. This movie was very dark, not in a weird way but definitely darker than the average western. I think the script is very clever, but for the majority of the

I am guessing the reason this movie did so well at the box office is that there is a strong and diverse cast, and that the casting was more complex than one might initially think.<br /><br />The script is fairly weak for its period, and the story has no structure, no plot, and you find yourself not really caring for the main character.<br /><br />Don't bother trying to see it, this is nothing but an old story, and while the plot can be