Datasets:

luojunyu

/

SemiEvol

like 16

masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>34% ( 34 % )</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( "nav" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. . Question: what were the debt securities in 2018? Answer: 49.0 Question: and what were they in 2017? Answer: 28.0 Question: what was, then, the increase over the year? Answer: 21.0 Question: and what is this increase as a percentage of the 2017 debt securities? Answer: 0.75 Question: and in that same year of 2018, how much did the debt securities represent in relation to the equity ones?

1.44118

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

cgmhi also has substantial borrowing arrangements consisting of facilities that cgmhi has been advised are available , but where no contractual lending obligation exists . these arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting cgmhi 2019s short-term requirements . the company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies . it uses derivative contracts , primarily interest rate swaps , to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt . the maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged . in addition , the company uses other derivative contracts to manage the foreign exchange impact of certain debt issuances . at december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s overall weighted average interest rate for long-term debt was 3.83% ( 3.83 % ) on a contractual basis and 4.19% ( 4.19 % ) including the effects of derivative contracts . aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities are as follows : in millions of dollars 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>citigroup parent company</td><td>$ 13463</td><td>$ 17500</td><td>$ 19864</td><td>$ 21135</td><td>$ 17525</td><td>$ 102794</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other citigroup subsidiaries</td><td>55853</td><td>16198</td><td>18607</td><td>2718</td><td>4248</td><td>11691</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>citigroup global markets holdings inc .</td><td>1524</td><td>2352</td><td>1487</td><td>2893</td><td>392</td><td>11975</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>citigroup funding inc .</td><td>17632</td><td>5381</td><td>2154</td><td>1253</td><td>3790</td><td>7164</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 88472</td><td>$ 41431</td><td>$ 42112</td><td>$ 27999</td><td>$ 25955</td><td>$ 133624</td></tr></table> long-term debt at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 includes $ 24060 million and $ 23756 million , respectively , of junior subordinated debt . the company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of delaware . the trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of ( i ) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust ; ( ii ) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ( subordinated debentures ) of its parent ; and ( iii ) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto . upon approval from the federal reserve , citigroup has the right to redeem these securities . citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase ( i ) the 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xv before september 15 , 2056 , ( ii ) the 6.45% ( 6.45 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvi before december 31 , 2046 , ( iii ) the 6.35% ( 6.35 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvii before march 15 , 2057 , ( iv ) the 6.829% ( 6.829 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xviii before june 28 , 2047 , ( v ) the 7.250% ( 7.250 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xix before august 15 , 2047 , ( vi ) the 7.875% ( 7.875 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xx before december 15 , 2067 , and ( vii ) the 8.300% ( 8.300 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xxi before december 21 , 2067 unless certain conditions , described in exhibit 4.03 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on september 18 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 28 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on march 8 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on july 2 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on august 17 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 27 , 2007 , and in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on december 21 , 2007 , respectively , are met . these agreements are for the benefit of the holders of citigroup 2019s 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2034 . citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts . these subsidiary trusts have no assets , operations , revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance , administration and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts 2019 common securities . these subsidiary trusts 2019 obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by citigroup. . Question: what was the net difference of total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations from 2011 to 2012? Answer: -14113.0 Question: what was the total value in 2011? Answer: 42112.0 Question: what was the percent change?

-0.33513

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.88</td><td>$ 119.07</td><td>$ 160.23</td><td>$ 203.07</td><td>$ 189.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>109.36</td><td>109.90</td><td>141.23</td><td>167.49</td><td>137.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.18</td><td>113.38</td><td>139.17</td><td>169.98</td><td>147.82</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>113.68</td><td>115.24</td><td>129.02</td><td>157.17</td><td>150.27</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) . Question: what was the proportion of the price of jpmorgan chase in 2018 to 2017? Answer: 0.93352 Question: and subtracted from 1? Answer: 0.06648 Question: and the proportion of the s&p 500 index price in 2018 to 2017? Answer: 0.9561 Question: and subtracted from 1? Answer: 0.0439 Question: so what was the estimated variation between the percentual decrease of these two securities?

0.02258

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

indemnification and repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make-whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . in connection with pooled settlements , we typically do not repurchase loans and the consummation of such transactions generally results in us no longer having indemnification and repurchase exposure with the investor in the transaction . for the first and second-lien mortgage balances of unresolved and settled claims contained in the tables below , a significant amount of these claims were associated with sold loans originated through correspondent lender and broker origination channels . in certain instances when indemnification or repurchase claims are settled for these types of sold loans , we have recourse back to the correspondent lenders , brokers and other third-parties ( e.g. , contract underwriting companies , closing agents , appraisers , etc. ) . depending on the underlying reason for the investor claim , we determine our ability to pursue recourse with these parties and file claims with them accordingly . our historical recourse recovery rate has been insignificant as our efforts have been impacted by the inability of such parties to reimburse us for their recourse obligations ( e.g. , their capital availability or whether they remain in business ) or factors that limit our ability to pursue recourse from these parties ( e.g. , contractual loss caps , statutes of limitations ) . origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity , and , accordingly , management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements . we establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased . for the first and second- lien mortgage sold portfolio , we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made , demand patterns observed to date and/or expected in the future , and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis . to estimate the mortgage repurchase liability arising from breaches of representations and warranties , we consider the following factors : ( i ) borrower performance in our historically sold portfolio ( both actual and estimated future defaults ) , ( ii ) the level of outstanding unresolved repurchase claims , ( iii ) estimated probable future repurchase claims , considering information about file requests , delinquent and liquidated loans , resolved and unresolved mortgage insurance rescission notices and our historical experience with claim rescissions , ( iv ) the potential ability to cure the defects identified in the repurchase claims ( 201crescission rate 201d ) , and ( v ) the estimated severity of loss upon repurchase of the loan or collateral , make-whole settlement , or indemnification . see note 24 commitments and guarantees in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . the following tables present the unpaid principal balance of repurchase claims by vintage and total unresolved repurchase claims for the past five quarters . table 28 : analysis of quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims by vintage dollars in millions december 31 september 30 june 30 march 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>june 30 2012</td><td>march 31 2012</td><td>december 312011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004 & prior</td><td>$ 11</td><td>$ 15</td><td>$ 31</td><td>$ 10</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>8</td><td>10</td><td>19</td><td>12</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>23</td><td>30</td><td>56</td><td>41</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>45</td><td>137</td><td>182</td><td>100</td><td>90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2008</td><td>7</td><td>23</td><td>49</td><td>17</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 & prior</td><td>94</td><td>215</td><td>337</td><td>180</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2009 2013 2012</td><td>38</td><td>52</td><td>42</td><td>33</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 379</td><td>$ 213</td><td>$ 189</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fnma fhlmc and gnma % ( % )</td><td>94% ( 94 % )</td><td>87% ( 87 % )</td><td>86% ( 86 % )</td><td>88% ( 88 % )</td><td>91% ( 91 % )</td></tr></table> the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 79 . Question: what was the total of originations for 2012 quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims in the second quarter of 2006? Answer: 41.0 Question: and what was it in the first quarter?

28.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

page 45 of 100 ball corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 3 . acquisitions latapack-ball embalagens ltda . ( latapack-ball ) in august 2010 , the company paid $ 46.2 million to acquire an additional 10.1 percent economic interest in its brazilian beverage packaging joint venture , latapack-ball , through a transaction with the joint venture partner , latapack s.a . this transaction increased the company 2019s overall economic interest in the joint venture to 60.1 percent and expands and strengthens ball 2019s presence in the growing brazilian market . as a result of the transaction , latapack-ball became a variable interest entity ( vie ) under consolidation accounting guidelines with ball being identified as the primary beneficiary of the vie and consolidating the joint venture . latapack-ball operates metal beverage packaging manufacturing plants in tres rios , jacarei and salvador , brazil and has been included in the metal beverage packaging , americas and asia , reporting segment . in connection with the acquisition , the company recorded a gain of $ 81.8 million on its previously held equity investment in latapack-ball as a result of required purchase accounting . the following table summarizes the final fair values of the latapack-ball assets acquired , liabilities assumed and non- controlling interest recognized , as well as the related investment in latapack s.a. , as of the acquisition date . the valuation was based on market and income approaches. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 69.3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets</td><td>84.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>265.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill</td><td>100.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intangible asset</td><td>52.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-53.2 ( 53.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term liabilities</td><td>-174.1 ( 174.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 345.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ -132.9 ( 132.9 )</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interests $ ( 132.9 ) the customer relationships were identified as an intangible asset by the company and assigned an estimated life of 13.4 years . the intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis . neuman aluminum ( neuman ) in july 2010 , the company acquired neuman for approximately $ 62 million in cash . neuman had sales of approximately $ 128 million in 2009 ( unaudited ) and is the leading north american manufacturer of aluminum slugs used to make extruded aerosol cans , beverage bottles , aluminum collapsible tubes and technical impact extrusions . neuman operates two plants , one in the united states and one in canada , which employ approximately 180 people . the acquisition of neuman is not material to the metal food and household products packaging , americas , segment , in which its results of operations have been included since the acquisition date . guangdong jianlibao group co. , ltd ( jianlibao ) in june 2010 , the company acquired jianlibao 2019s 65 percent interest in a joint venture metal beverage can and end plant in sanshui ( foshan ) , prc . ball has owned 35 percent of the joint venture plant since 1992 . ball acquired the 65 percent interest for $ 86.9 million in cash ( net of cash acquired ) and assumed debt , and also entered into a long-term supply agreement with jianlibao and one of its affiliates . the company recorded equity earnings of $ 24.1 million , which was composed of equity earnings and a gain realized on the fair value of ball 2019s previous 35 percent equity investment as a result of required purchase accounting . the purchase accounting was completed during the third quarter of 2010 . the acquisition of the remaining interest is not material to the metal beverage packaging , americas and asia , segment. . Question: what percentage of the total of net assets acquired was due to goodwill? Answer: 0.28993 Question: and what percentage was due to property plant and equipment?

0.76939

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

hii expects to incur higher costs to complete ships currently under construction in avondale due to anticipated reductions in productivity . as a result , in the second quarter of 2010 , the company increased the estimates to complete lpd-23 and lpd-25 by approximately $ 210 million . the company recognized a $ 113 million pre-tax charge to operating income for these contracts in the second quarter of 2010 . hii is exploring alternative uses of the avondale facility , including alternative opportunities for the workforce . in connection with and as a result of the decision to wind down shipbuilding operations at the avondale , louisiana facility , the company began incurring and paying related employee severance and incentive compensation liabilities and expenditures , asset retirement obligation liabilities that became reasonably estimable , and amounts owed for not meeting certain requirements under its cooperative endeavor agreement with the state of louisiana . the company anticipates that it will incur substantial other restructuring and facilities shutdown related costs , including , but not limited to , severance expense , relocation expense , and asset write-downs related to the avondale facilities . these costs are expected to be allowable expenses under government accounting standards and thus should be recoverable in future years 2019 overhead costs . these future costs could approximate $ 271 million , based on management 2019s current estimate . such costs should be recoverable under existing flexibly priced contracts or future negotiated contracts in accordance with federal acquisition regulation ( 201cfar 201d ) provisions relating to the treatment of restructuring and shutdown related costs . the company is currently in discussions with the u.s . navy regarding its cost submission to support the recoverability of these costs under the far and applicable contracts , and this submission is subject to review and acceptance by the u.s . navy . the defense contract audit agency ( 201cdcaa 201d ) , a dod agency , prepared an initial audit report on the company 2019s cost proposal for restructuring and shutdown related costs of $ 310 million , which stated that the proposal was not adequately supported for the dcaa to reach a conclusion and questioned approximately $ 25 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , of the costs submitted by the company . accordingly , the dcaa did not accept the proposal as submitted . the company has submitted a revised proposal to address the concerns of the dcaa and to reflect a revised estimated total cost of $ 271 million . should the company 2019s revised proposal be challenged by the u.s . navy , the company would likely pursue prescribed dispute resolution alternatives to resolve the challenge . that process , however , would create uncertainty as to the timing and eventual allowability of the costs related to the wind down of the avondale facility . ultimately , the company anticipates these discussions with the u.s . navy will result in an agreement that is substantially in accordance with management 2019s cost recovery expectations . accordingly , hii has treated these costs as allowable costs in determining the earnings performance on its contracts in process . the actual restructuring expenses related to the wind down may be greater than the company 2019s current estimate , and any inability to recover such costs could result in a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . the company also evaluated the effect that the wind down of the avondale facilities might have on the benefit plans in which hii employees participate . hii determined that the potential impact of a curtailment in these plans was not material to its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . the table below summarizes the company 2019s liability for restructuring and shutdown related costs associated with winding down the avondale facility . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , these costs are comprised primarily of employee severance and retention and incentive bonuses . these amounts were capitalized in inventoried costs , and will be recognized as expenses in cost of product sales beginning in 2014 . ( $ in millions ) employee compensation other accruals total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>employee compensation</td><td>other accruals</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2010</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrual established</td><td>27</td><td>39</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjustments</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 27</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 66</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accrual established</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>payments</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td><td>-60 ( 60 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>adjustments</td><td>47</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 50</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 50</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the net change in the employee compensation throughout 2011? Answer: 50.0 Question: and what was it throughout 2010?

27.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g and 4g network build outs . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and , as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany and france , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage among their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 104470 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and reduce the likelihood of churn . our master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced colocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 45310 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the revenue generated from newly acquired or constructed sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass-through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>65</td><td>11595</td><td>900</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asia</td><td>43865</td><td>2330</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>665</td><td>4910</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>715</td><td>6535</td><td>5800</td></tr></table> property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment selling , general , administrative and development expenses as we increase our presence in our existing markets or expand into new markets . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our sites but can be temporarily diluted by our development activities. . Question: what is the sum of new sites acquired and constructed during 2016 in us and asia? Answer: 43930.0 Question: what is the sum including emea? Answer: 44595.0 Question: what was the number of new sites in latin america? Answer: 715.0 Question: what is the total sum?

45310.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/29/2007</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>22.55</td><td>35.17</td><td>48.50</td><td>61.07</td><td>78.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>59.03</td><td>82.25</td><td>97.32</td><td>98.63</td><td>110.78</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>54.60</td><td>82.76</td><td>108.11</td><td>95.48</td><td>109.88</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . Question: what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012?

78.92

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

commodities purchased for use in our supply chain . we manage our exposures through a combination of purchase orders , long-term contracts with suppliers , exchange-traded futures and options , and over-the-counter options and swaps . we offset our exposures based on current and projected market conditions and generally seek to acquire the inputs at as close to our planned cost as possible . we use derivatives to manage our exposure to changes in commodity prices . we do not perform the assessments required to achieve hedge accounting for commodity derivative positions . accordingly , the changes in the values of these derivatives are recorded currently in cost of sales in our consolidated statements of earnings . although we do not meet the criteria for cash flow hedge accounting , we believe that these instruments are effective in achieving our objective of providing certainty in the future price of commodities purchased for use in our supply chain . accordingly , for purposes of measuring segment operating performance these gains and losses are reported in unallocated corporate items outside of segment operating results until such time that the exposure we are managing affects earnings . at that time we reclassify the gain or loss from unallocated corporate items to segment operating profit , allowing our operating segments to realize the economic effects of the derivative without experiencing any resulting mark-to-market volatility , which remains in unallocated corporate items . unallocated corporate items for fiscal 2019 , 2018 and 2017 included: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal year 2019</td><td>fiscal year 2018</td><td>fiscal year 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net gain ( loss ) onmark-to-marketvaluation of commodity positions</td><td>$ -39.0 ( 39.0 )</td><td>$ 14.3</td><td>$ -22.0 ( 22.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net loss on commodity positions reclassified from unallocated corporate items to segmentoperating profit</td><td>10.0</td><td>11.3</td><td>32.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>netmark-to-marketrevaluation of certain grain inventories</td><td>-7.0 ( 7.0 )</td><td>6.5</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>netmark-to-marketvaluation of certain commodity positions recognized in unallocated corporate items</td><td>$ -36.0 ( 36.0 )</td><td>$ 32.1</td><td>$ 13.9</td></tr></table> net mark-to-market valuation of certain commodity positions recognized in unallocated corporate items $ ( 36.0 ) $ 32.1 $ 13.9 as of may 26 , 2019 , the net notional value of commodity derivatives was $ 312.5 million , of which $ 242.9 million related to agricultural inputs and $ 69.6 million related to energy inputs . these contracts relate to inputs that generally will be utilized within the next 12 months . interest rate risk we are exposed to interest rate volatility with regard to future issuances of fixed-rate debt , and existing and future issuances of floating-rate debt . primary exposures include u.s . treasury rates , libor , euribor , and commercial paper rates in the united states and europe . we use interest rate swaps , forward-starting interest rate swaps , and treasury locks to hedge our exposure to interest rate changes , to reduce the volatility of our financing costs , and to achieve a desired proportion of fixed rate versus floating-rate debt , based on current and projected market conditions . generally under these swaps , we agree with a counterparty to exchange the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts based on an agreed upon notional principal amount . floating interest rate exposures 2014 floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges , as are all hedges of forecasted issuances of debt . effectiveness is assessed based on either the perfectly effective hypothetical derivative method or changes in the present value of interest payments on the underlying debt . effective gains and losses deferred to aoci are reclassified into earnings over the life of the associated debt . ineffective gains and losses are recorded as net interest . the amount of hedge ineffectiveness was less than $ 1 million in fiscal 2019 , a $ 2.6 million loss in fiscal 2018 , and less than $ 1 million in fiscal 2017 . fixed interest rate exposures 2014 fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges with effectiveness assessed based on changes in the fair value of the underlying debt and derivatives , using . Question: what was the sum value of net loss on commodity positions reclassified from unallocated corporate items to segment operating profit in 2018 and 2019? Answer: 21.3 Question: what was the value of net loss on commodity positions reclassified from unallocated corporate items to segment operating profit in 2017?

32.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

utilized . in accordance with sfas no . 144 , accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , a non-cash impairment charge of $ 4.1 million was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 for the excess machinery . this charge is included as a separate line item in the company 2019s consolidated statement of operations . there was no change to useful lives and related depreciation expense of the remaining assets as the company believes these estimates are currently reflective of the period the assets will be used in operations . 7 . warranties the company generally provides a one-year warranty on sequencing , genotyping and gene expression systems . at the time revenue is recognized , the company establishes an accrual for estimated warranty expenses associated with system sales . this expense is recorded as a component of cost of product revenue . estimated warranty expenses associated with extended maintenance contracts are recorded as cost of revenue ratably over the term of the maintenance contract . changes in the company 2019s reserve for product warranties from january 1 , 2006 through december 28 , 2008 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of january 1 2006</td><td>$ 751</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions charged to cost of revenue</td><td>1379</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>repairs and replacements</td><td>-1134 ( 1134 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of december 31 2006</td><td>996</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions charged to cost of revenue</td><td>4939</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>repairs and replacements</td><td>-2219 ( 2219 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 30 2007</td><td>3716</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions charged to cost of revenue</td><td>13044</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>repairs and replacements</td><td>-8557 ( 8557 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 28 2008</td><td>$ 8203</td></tr></table> 8 . convertible senior notes on february 16 , 2007 , the company issued $ 400.0 million principal amount of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) convertible senior notes due 2014 ( the notes ) , which included the exercise of the initial purchasers 2019 option to purchase up to an additional $ 50.0 million aggregate principal amount of notes . the net proceeds from the offering , after deducting the initial purchasers 2019 discount and offering expenses , were $ 390.3 million . the company will pay 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) interest per annum on the principal amount of the notes , payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on february 15 and august 15 of each year . the company made interest payments of $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million on february 15 , 2008 and august 15 , 2008 , respectively . the notes mature on february 15 , the notes will be convertible into cash and , if applicable , shares of the company 2019s common stock , $ 0.01 par value per share , based on a conversion rate , subject to adjustment , of 45.8058 shares per $ 1000 principal amount of notes ( which represents a conversion price of $ 21.83 per share ) , only in the following circumstances and to the following extent : ( 1 ) during the five business-day period after any five consecutive trading period ( the measurement period ) in which the trading price per note for each day of such measurement period was less than 97% ( 97 % ) of the product of the last reported sale price of the company 2019s common stock and the conversion rate on each such day ; ( 2 ) during any calendar quarter after the calendar quarter ending march 30 , 2007 , if the last reported sale price of the company 2019s common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Question: what is the balance of reserve for product warranties in 2007? Answer: 3716.0 Question: what about in 2006? Answer: 996.0 Question: what is the net change? Answer: 2720.0 Question: what percentage change does this represent? Answer: 2.73092 Question: what about the balance of reserve for product warranties in 2008?

8203.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

table of contents primarily to certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no u.s . taxes are provided because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . the lower effective tax rate in 2010 as compared to 2009 is due primarily to an increase in foreign earnings on which u.s . income taxes have not been provided as such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of september 25 , 2010 , the company had deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences , tax losses , and tax credits of $ 2.4 billion , and deferred tax liabilities of $ 5.0 billion . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences , will be sufficient to fully recover the deferred tax assets . the company will continue to evaluate the realizability of deferred tax assets quarterly by assessing the need for and amount of a valuation allowance . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . all irs audit issues for years prior to 2004 have been resolved . during the third quarter of 2010 , the company reached a tax settlement with the irs for the years 2002 through 2003 . in addition , the company is subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities . management believes that adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the three years ended september 25 , 2010 ( in millions ) : as of september 25 , 2010 , the company had $ 51 billion in cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities , an increase of $ 17 billion from september 26 , 2009 . the principal component of this net increase was the cash generated by operating activities of $ 18.6 billion , which was partially offset by payments for acquisition of property , plant and equipment of $ 2 billion and payments made in connection with business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 638 million . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly rated securities , generally with a minimum rating of single-a or equivalent . as of september 25 , 2010 and september 26 , 2009 , $ 30.8 billion and $ 17.4 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 51011</td><td>$ 33992</td><td>$ 24490</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 5510</td><td>$ 3361</td><td>$ 2422</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>$ 1051</td><td>$ 455</td><td>$ 509</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 20956</td><td>$ 20049</td><td>$ 18645</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 18595</td><td>$ 10159</td><td>$ 9596</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the value of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in 2010? Answer: 51011.0 Question: what was the value in 2008? Answer: 24490.0 Question: what was the change in value? Answer: 26521.0 Question: what was the change divided by the 2008 value?

1.08293

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

part a0ii item a05 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201ctfx . 201d as of february 19 , 2019 , we had 473 holders of record of our common stock . a substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are beneficial owners whose shares are held by brokers and other financial institutions for the accounts of beneficial owners . stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2013 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>124</td><td>143</td><td>177</td><td>275</td><td>288</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>114</td><td>115</td><td>129</td><td>157</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>126</td><td>134</td><td>142</td><td>186</td><td>213</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 126 134 142 186 213 . Question: what was the price of teleflex in 2014? Answer: 124.0 Question: what was the initial investment? Answer: 100.0 Question: what is the difference of the price and initial investment? Answer: 24.0 Question: what was the initial investment?

100.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

in june 2011 , the fasb issued asu no . 2011-05 201ccomprehensive income 2013 presentation of comprehensive income . 201d asu 2011-05 requires comprehensive income , the components of net income , and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements . in both choices , an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income , each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income , and a total amount for comprehensive income . this update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity . the amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income . the amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2011 . the company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2012 . the adoption of asu 2011-05 is for presentation purposes only and had no material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at both december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2012 and prior years . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 24087 and $ 29554 in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2010 , respectively . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 , due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products have generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . product cores are included as part of the company's merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company's other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , were $ 134258 and $ 126840 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at the end of fiscal 2012 and 2011 were as follows : december 29 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 292012</td><td>december 312011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 2182419</td><td>$ 1941055</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>126190</td><td>102103</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 2308609</td><td>$ 2043158</td></tr></table> inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company completes physical inventories and other targeted inventory counts in its store locations to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory in these locations . in its distribution centers and pdq aes , the company uses a cycle counting program to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and product core inventory . reserves advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 29 , 2012 , december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 ( in thousands , except per share data ) . Question: what is the sum in the reduction of cost of sales? Answer: 53641.0 Question: what is the 2012 value over that sum?

-28933.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance , including rail grinding , are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.1 billion for 2012 , $ 2.2 billion for 2011 , and $ 2.0 billion for 2010 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 12 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2012</td><td>dec . 312011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 825</td><td>$ 819</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>376</td><td>363</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income and other taxes</td><td>368</td><td>482</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>318</td><td>284</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>213</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>172</td><td>197</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>95</td><td>90</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>556</td><td>624</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 2923</td><td>$ 3108</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the value of accrued wages and vacation in 2012?

376.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

we believe that the presentation of adjusted diluted earnings per share , which excludes withdrawal costs 2013 multiemployer pension funds , restructuring charges , loss on extinguishment of debt , and ( gain ) loss on business dispositions and impairments , net , provides an understanding of operational activities before the financial effect of certain items . we use this measure , and believe investors will find it helpful , in understanding the ongoing performance of our operations separate from items that have a disproportionate effect on our results for a particular period . we have incurred comparable charges and costs in prior periods , and similar types of adjustments can reasonably be expected to be recorded in future periods . our definition of adjusted diluted earnings per share may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies . property and equipment , net in 2017 , we anticipate receiving approximately $ 975 million of property and equipment , net of proceeds from sales of property and equipment , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>trucks and equipment</td><td>$ 350</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>landfill</td><td>330</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>containers</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>facilities and other</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property and equipment received during 2017</td><td>990</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>proceeds from sales of property and equipment</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>property and equipment received net of proceeds during 2017</td><td>$ 975</td></tr></table> results of operations revenue we generate revenue primarily from our solid waste collection operations . our remaining revenue is from other services , including transfer station , landfill disposal , recycling , and energy services . our residential and small- container commercial collection operations in some markets are based on long-term contracts with municipalities . certain of our municipal contracts have annual price escalation clauses that are tied to changes in an underlying base index such as a consumer price index . we generally provide small-container commercial and large-container industrial collection services to customers under contracts with terms up to three years . our transfer stations , landfills and , to a lesser extent , our recycling facilities generate revenue from disposal or tipping fees charged to third parties . in general , we integrate our recycling operations with our collection operations and obtain revenue from the sale of recycled commodities . our revenue from energy services consists mainly of fees we charge for the treatment of liquid and solid waste derived from the production of oil and natural gas . other revenue consists primarily of revenue from national accounts , which represents the portion of revenue generated from nationwide or regional contracts in markets outside our operating areas where the associated waste handling services are subcontracted to local operators . consequently , substantially all of this revenue is offset with related subcontract costs , which are recorded in cost of operations. . Question: what is the net of proceeds from sales of trucks and equipments? Answer: 350.0 Question: what is the total net of proceeds from sales of total ppe? Answer: 975.0 Question: what portion came from truck and equipments? Answer: 0.35897 Question: what about the net of proceeds from sales of containers? Answer: 160.0 Question: what is the ratio of sales from trucks and equipment to sales from containers?

2.1875

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( thous. )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at january 1 2009</td><td>873</td><td>$ 50.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>449</td><td>47.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td><td>43.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>53.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1060</td><td>$ 50.88</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. . Question: what was the amount of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards?

22.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the grant-date fair value of the award will be estimated using option-pricing models . in addition , certain tax effects of stock option exercises will be reported as a financing activity rather than an operating activity in the statements of cash flows . we adopted sfas 123r on january 1 , 2006 under the retrospective transition method using the black-scholes pricing model . the effect of expensing stock options under a fair value approach using the black-scholes pricing model on diluted earnings per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 is disclosed on page 69 . in addition , the classification of cash inflows from any excess tax benefit associated with exercising stock options will change from an operating activity to a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows with no impact on total cash flows . we estimate the impact of this change in classification will decrease operating cash flows ( and increase financing cash flows ) by approximately $ 15.5 million in 2005 , $ 3.7 million in 2004 , and $ 15.2 million in 2003 . stock option expense after adopting sfas 123r is not expected to be materially different than our pro forma disclosure on page 69 and is dependent on levels of stock options granted during 2006 . 3 . acquisitions in january 2006 , our commercial segment reached an agreement to acquire cha service company , or cha health , a health plan serving employer groups in kentucky , for cash consideration of approximately $ 60.0 million plus any excess statutory surplus . this transaction , which is subject to regulatory approval , is expected to close effective in the second quarter of 2006 . on december 20 , 2005 , our commercial segment acquired corphealth , inc. , or corphealth , a behavioral health care management company , for cash consideration of approximately $ 54.2 million , including transaction costs . this acquisition allows humana to integrate coverage of medical and behavior health benefits . net tangible assets acquired of $ 6.0 million primarily consisted of cash and cash equivalents . the purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value of the net tangible assets acquired by approximately $ 48.2 million . we preliminarily allocated this excess purchase price to other intangible assets of $ 8.6 million and associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 3.2 million , and non-deductible goodwill of $ 42.8 million . the other intangible assets , which consist primarily of customer contracts , have a weighted average useful life of 14.7 years . the allocation is subject to change pending completion of the valuation by a third party valuation specialist firm assisting us in evaluating the fair value of the assets acquired . on february 16 , 2005 , our government segment acquired careplus health plans of florida , or careplus , as well as its affiliated 10 medical centers and pharmacy company . careplus provides medicare advantage hmo plans and benefits to medicare advantage members in miami-dade , broward and palm beach counties . this acquisition enhances our medicare market position in south florida . we paid approximately $ 444.9 million in cash , including transaction costs . we financed the transaction with $ 294.0 million of borrowings under our credit agreement and $ 150.9 million of cash on hand . the purchase price is subject to a balance sheet settlement process with a nine month claims run-out period . this settlement , which will be reflected as an adjustment to goodwill , is not expected to be material . the fair value of the acquired tangible assets ( assumed liabilities ) consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 92116</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>premiums receivable and other current assets</td><td>6510</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>property and equipment and other assets</td><td>21315</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>medical and other expenses payable</td><td>-37375 ( 37375 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-23359 ( 23359 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>-5915 ( 5915 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net tangible assets acquired</td><td>$ 53292</td></tr></table> . Question: what is the value of cash and premiums receivable and other current assets? Answer: 98626.0 Question: what is the balance of property and equipment and other assets ? Answer: 21315.0 Question: what is the balance of total assets?

119941.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

we are continuing to invest in people and infrastructure to grow our presence in lines of businesses globally where we see an opportunity for ace to grow market share at reasonable terms . we are also continuing to invest in our enterprise risk management capability , our systems and data environment , and our research and development capabilities . critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 impairments to the carrying value of our investment portfolio ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations from claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional devel- opment on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . the reserves provide for liabilities that exist for the company as of the balance sheet date . the loss reserve also includes an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling these unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2008 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.2 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 24.2 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim payments are reliably determi- nable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry reserves of $ 106 million ( net of discount ) . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the indicated periods . ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) losses reinsurance recoverable net losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>gross losses</td><td>reinsurance recoverable</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 35517</td><td>$ 13509</td><td>$ 22008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10831</td><td>3480</td><td>7351</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9516 ( 9516 )</td><td>-3582 ( 3582 )</td><td>-5934 ( 5934 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>280</td><td>113</td><td>167</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>37112</td><td>13520</td><td>23592</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the balance of unpaid losses in the beginning of 2008? Answer: 7603.0 Question: and what was the total of losses and loss expenses paid? Answer: -6327.0 Question: what then became that balance after these losses and loss expenses paid?

1276.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

item 4 . submission of matters to a vote of security holders no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2005 . part ii item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market information our series a common stock has traded on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 2018 2018ce 2019 2019 since january 21 , 2005 . the closing sale price of our series a common stock , as reported by the new york stock exchange , on march 6 , 2006 was $ 20.98 . the following table sets forth the high and low intraday sales prices per share of our common stock , as reported by the new york stock exchange , for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2005</td><td>pricerange high</td><td>pricerange low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarterended march 312005</td><td>$ 18.65</td><td>$ 15.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter endedjune 302005</td><td>$ 18.16</td><td>$ 13.54</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter endedseptember 30 2005</td><td>$ 20.06</td><td>$ 15.88</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter endeddecember 312005</td><td>$ 19.76</td><td>$ 15.58</td></tr></table> holders no shares of celanese 2019s series b common stock are issued and outstanding . as of march 6 , 2006 , there were 51 holders of record of our series a common stock , and one holder of record of our perpetual preferred stock . by including persons holding shares in broker accounts under street names , however , we estimate our shareholder base to be approximately 6800 as of march 6 , 2006 . dividend policy in july 2005 , our board of directors adopted a policy of declaring , subject to legally available funds , a quarterly cash dividend on each share of our common stock at an annual rate initially equal to approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of the $ 16 price per share in the initial public offering of our series a common stock ( or $ 0.16 per share ) unless our board of directors , in its sole discretion , determines otherwise , commencing the second quarter of 2005 . pursuant to this policy , the company paid the quarterly dividends of $ 0.04 per share on august 11 , 2005 , november 1 , 2005 and february 1 , 2006 . based on the number of outstanding shares of our series a common stock , the anticipated annual cash dividend is approximately $ 25 million . however , there is no assurance that sufficient cash will be available in the future to pay such dividend . further , such dividends payable to holders of our series a common stock cannot be declared or paid nor can any funds be set aside for the payment thereof , unless we have paid or set aside funds for the payment of all accumulated and unpaid dividends with respect to the shares of our preferred stock , as described below . our board of directors may , at any time , modify or revoke our dividend policy on our series a common stock . we are required under the terms of the preferred stock to pay scheduled quarterly dividends , subject to legally available funds . for so long as the preferred stock remains outstanding , ( 1 ) we will not declare , pay or set apart funds for the payment of any dividend or other distribution with respect to any junior stock or parity stock and ( 2 ) neither we , nor any of our subsidiaries , will , subject to certain exceptions , redeem , purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration junior stock or parity stock through a sinking fund or otherwise , in each case unless we have paid or set apart funds for the payment of all accumulated and unpaid dividends with respect to the shares of preferred stock and any parity stock for all preceding dividend periods . pursuant to this policy , the company paid the quarterly dividends of $ 0.265625 on its 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) convertible perpetual preferred stock on august 1 , 2005 , november 1 , 2005 and february 1 , 2006 . the anticipated annual cash dividend is approximately $ 10 million. . Question: what is the average dividend per quarter based on the anticipated annual cash dividend, in millions? Answer: 6.25 Question: what is the difference between the high and low price range for the quarter ended in september 31 , 2005?

4.18

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines , inc . the asset . projected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9 , 2013 . the weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service , domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel . pro-forma impact of the merger american 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 . the pro- forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets , lease and debt fair value adjustments , the elimination of any deferred gains or losses , adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense , among others . in addition , the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger , as well as the elimination of american 2019s reorganization items , net and merger transition costs . however , the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger . accordingly , the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 . december 31 , ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 31 2013 ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 40782</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>2707</td></tr></table> 5 . basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies ( a ) basis of presentation on december 30 , 2015 , us airways merged with and into american , which is reflected in american 2019s consolidated financial statements as though the transaction had occurred on december 9 , 2013 , when a subsidiary of amr merged with and into us airways group . thus , the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 are comprised of the consolidated financial data of american and us airways . for the periods prior to december 9 , 2013 , the financial data reflects the results of american only . for financial reporting purposes , the transaction constituted a transfer of assets between entities under common control and was accounted for in a manner similar to the pooling of interests method of accounting . under this method , the carrying amount of net assets recognized in the balance sheets of each combining entity are carried forward to the balance sheet of the combined entity and no other assets or liabilities are recognized . the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , revenues and expenses , and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements . actual results could differ from those estimates . the most significant areas of judgment relate to passenger revenue recognition , impairment of goodwill , impairment of long-lived and . Question: what is the net income in 2013? Answer: 2707.0 Question: what is the total revenue?

40782.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

item 2 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2011 is shown in the following table . all facilities are leased , except for 165000 square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or part of a facility restructuring. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximate square footage</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alpharetta georgia</td><td>260000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>arlington virginia</td><td>119000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>jersey city new jersey</td><td>107000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>menlo park california</td><td>91000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>sandy utah</td><td>66000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>new york new york</td><td>39000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>chicago illinois</td><td>25000</td></tr></table> all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 28 e*trade branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 7000 square feet . we believe our facilities space is adequate to meet our needs in 2012 . item 3 . legal proceedings on october 27 , 2000 , ajaxo , inc . ( 201cajaxo 201d ) filed a complaint in the superior court for the state of california , county of santa clara . ajaxo sought damages and certain non-monetary relief for the company 2019s alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement with ajaxo pertaining to certain wireless technology that ajaxo offered the company as well as damages and other relief against the company for their alleged misappropriation of ajaxo 2019s trade secrets . following a jury trial , a judgment was entered in 2003 in favor of ajaxo against the company for $ 1.3 million for breach of the ajaxo non-disclosure agreement . although the jury found in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets , the trial court subsequently denied ajaxo 2019s requests for additional damages and relief . on december 21 , 2005 , the california court of appeal affirmed the above-described award against the company for breach of the nondisclosure agreement but remanded the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of determining what , if any , additional damages ajaxo may be entitled to as a result of the jury 2019s previous finding in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets . although the company paid ajaxo the full amount due on the above-described judgment , the case was remanded back to the trial court , and on may 30 , 2008 , a jury returned a verdict in favor of the company denying all claims raised and demands for damages against the company . following the trial court 2019s filing of entry of judgment in favor of the company on september 5 , 2008 , ajaxo filed post-trial motions for vacating this entry of judgment and requesting a new trial . by order dated november 4 , 2008 , the trial court denied these motions . on december 2 , 2008 , ajaxo filed a notice of appeal with the court of appeal of the state of california for the sixth district . oral argument on the appeal was heard on july 15 , 2010 . on august 30 , 2010 , the court of appeal affirmed the trial court 2019s verdict in part and reversed the verdict in part , remanding the case . e*trade petitioned the supreme court of california for review of the court of appeal decision . on december 16 , 2010 , the california supreme court denied the company 2019s petition for review and remanded for further proceedings to the trial court . on september 20 , 2011 , the trial court granted limited discovery at a conference on november 4 , 2011 , and set a motion schedule and trial date . the trial will continue on may 14 , 2012 . the company will continue to defend itself vigorously . on october 2 , 2007 , a class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws was filed in the united states district court for the southern district of new york against the company and its then . Question: what is the portion of not leased in alpharetta , georgia? Answer: 0.63462 Question: what is the area of the facility in menlo park california? Answer: 91000.0 Question: what about in sandy utah?

66000.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

$ 25.7 million in cash , including $ 4.2 million in taxes and 1373609 of hep 2019s common units having a fair value of $ 53.5 million . roadrunner / beeson pipelines transaction also on december 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our two newly constructed pipelines for $ 46.5 million , consisting of a 65- mile , 16-inch crude oil pipeline ( the 201croadrunner pipeline 201d ) that connects our navajo refinery lovington facility to a terminus of centurion pipeline l.p . 2019s pipeline extending between west texas and cushing , oklahoma and a 37- mile , 8-inch crude oil pipeline that connects hep 2019s new mexico crude oil gathering system to our navajo refinery lovington facility ( the 201cbeeson pipeline 201d ) . tulsa west loading racks transaction on august 1 , 2009 , hep acquired from us , certain truck and rail loading/unloading facilities located at our tulsa west facility for $ 17.5 million . the racks load refined products and lube oils produced at the tulsa west facility onto rail cars and/or tanker trucks . lovington-artesia pipeline transaction on june 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our newly constructed , 16-inch intermediate pipeline for $ 34.2 million that runs 65 miles from our navajo refinery 2019s crude oil distillation and vacuum facilities in lovington , new mexico to its petroleum refinery located in artesia , new mexico . slc pipeline joint venture interest on march 1 , 2009 , hep acquired a 25% ( 25 % ) joint venture interest in the slc pipeline , a new 95-mile intrastate pipeline system jointly owned with plains . the slc pipeline commenced operations effective march 2009 and allows various refineries in the salt lake city area , including our woods cross refinery , to ship crude oil into the salt lake city area from the utah terminus of the frontier pipeline as well as crude oil flowing from wyoming and utah via plains 2019 rocky mountain pipeline . hep 2019s capitalized joint venture contribution was $ 25.5 million . rio grande pipeline sale on december 1 , 2009 , hep sold its 70% ( 70 % ) interest in rio grande pipeline company ( 201crio grande 201d ) to a subsidiary of enterprise products partners lp for $ 35 million . results of operations of rio grande are presented in discontinued operations . in accounting for this sale , hep recorded a gain of $ 14.5 million and a receivable of $ 2.2 million representing its final distribution from rio grande . the recorded net asset balance of rio grande at december 1 , 2009 , was $ 22.7 million , consisting of cash of $ 3.1 million , $ 29.9 million in properties and equipment , net and $ 10.3 million in equity , representing bp , plc 2019s 30% ( 30 % ) noncontrolling interest . the following table provides income statement information related to hep 2019s discontinued operations : year ended december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>$ 5367</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-942 ( 942 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>4425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>14479</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-1978 ( 1978 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations net</td><td>12501</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>$ 16926</td></tr></table> transportation agreements hep serves our refineries under long-term pipeline and terminal , tankage and throughput agreements expiring in 2019 through 2026 . under these agreements , we pay hep fees to transport , store and throughput volumes of refined product and crude oil on hep 2019s pipeline and terminal , tankage and loading rack facilities that result in minimum annual payments to hep . under these agreements , the agreed upon tariff rates are subject to annual tariff rate adjustments on july 1 at a rate based upon the percentage change in producer price index ( 201cppi 201d ) or federal energy . Question: what is the value of cash? Answer: 25.7 Question: what is the value of taxes? Answer: 4.2 Question: what is the sum of cash and taxes? Answer: 29.9 Question: what is the total fair value less the sum of cash and taxes?

23.6

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

mutual and pooled funds shares of mutual funds are valued at the net asset value ( nav ) quoted on the exchange where the fund is traded and are classified as level 1 assets . units of pooled funds are valued at the per unit nav determined by the fund manager and are classified as level 2 assets . the investments are utilizing nav as a practical expedient for fair value . corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . mortgage and asset-backed securities mortgage and asset 2013backed securities are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields , credit ratings , and purpose of the underlying loan . real estate pooled funds real estate pooled funds are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying properties . estimated fair value is calculated utilizing a combination of key inputs , such as revenue and expense growth rates , terminal capitalization rates , and discount rates . these key inputs are consistent with practices prevailing within the real estate investment management industry . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying investments . the underlying investments are valued based on bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data , including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2015 were $ 137.5 . contributions resulted primarily from an assessment of long-term funding requirements of the plans and tax planning . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements and cost reduction actions . we anticipate contributing $ 100 to $ 120 to the defined benefit pension plans in 2016 . these contributions are driven primarily by benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements and actions to reorganize the business . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>international</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 129.0</td><td>$ 52.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>135.8</td><td>53.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>142.2</td><td>55.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>149.6</td><td>57.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>157.4</td><td>57.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2021 20132025</td><td>917.9</td><td>332.3</td></tr></table> these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates. . Question: what were the total projected benefit payments for the five year period ended in 2025?

917.9

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of certain of its assets and liabilities under its interest rate swap agreements held as of december 31 , 2006 and entered into during the first half of 2007 . in addition , the company paid $ 8.0 million related to a treasury rate lock agreement entered into and settled during the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the cost of the treasury rate lock is being recognized as additional interest expense over the 10-year term of the 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) notes . during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company also received $ 3.1 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under ten forward starting interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 1.4 billion , which were designated as cash flow hedges to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the certificates issued in the securitization in may 2007 . the settlement is being recognized as a reduction in interest expense over the five-year period for which the interest rate swaps were designated as hedges . the company also received $ 17.0 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under thirteen additional interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 850.0 million that managed exposure to variability of interest rates under the credit facilities but were not considered cash flow hedges for accounting purposes . this gain is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , other comprehensive ( loss ) income included the following items related to derivative financial instruments ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax</td><td>$ -4332 ( 4332 )</td><td>$ -4901 ( 4901 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred gain on the settlement of interest rate swap agreements entered into in connection with the securitization net oftax</td><td>1238</td><td>1636</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax</td><td>-16349 ( 16349 )</td><td>-486 ( 486 )</td></tr></table> during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss of approximately $ 15.8 million and $ 3.2 million , respectively ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 10.2 million and $ 2.0 million , respectively ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified an aggregate of $ 0.1 million and $ 6.2 million , respectively ( net of an income tax provision of $ 2.0 million and an income tax benefit of $ 3.3 million , respectively ) into results of operations . 9 . fair valuemeasurements the company determines the fair market values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in sfas no . 157 , which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value . the standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value . level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date . the company 2019s level 1 assets consist of available-for-sale securities traded on active markets as well as certain brazilian treasury securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets . level 2 observable inputs other than level 1 prices , such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities ; quoted prices in markets that are not active ; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. . Question: in the year of 2008, what was the aggregate net unrealized loss, including the net of a tax provision?

26.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

financial assurance we must provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities under applicable environmental regulations relating to our landfill operations for capping , closure and post-closure costs , and related to our performance under certain collection , landfill and transfer station contracts . we satisfy these financial assurance requirements by providing surety bonds , letters of credit , or insurance policies ( financial assurance instruments ) , or trust deposits , which are included in restricted cash and marketable securities and other assets in our consolidated balance sheets . the amount of the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs is determined by applicable state environmental regulations . the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs may be associated with a portion of the landfill or the entire landfill . generally , states require a third-party engineering specialist to determine the estimated capping , closure and post-closure costs that are used to determine the required amount of financial assurance for a landfill . the amount of financial assurance required can , and generally will , differ from the obligation determined and recorded under u.s . gaap . the amount of the financial assurance requirements related to contract performance varies by contract . additionally , we must provide financial assurance for our insurance program and collateral for certain performance obligations . we do not expect a material increase in financial assurance requirements during 2015 , although the mix of financial assurance instruments may change . these financial assurance instruments are issued in the normal course of business and are not considered indebtedness . because we currently have no liability for the financial assurance instruments , they are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets ; however , we record capping , closure and post-closure liabilities and insurance liabilities as they are incurred . the underlying obligations of the financial assurance instruments , in excess of those already reflected in our consolidated balance sheets , would be recorded if it is probable that we would be unable to fulfill our related obligations . we do not expect this to occur . off-balance sheet arrangements we have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations , other than operating leases and financial assurances , which are not classified as debt . we have no transactions or obligations with related parties that are not disclosed , consolidated into or reflected in our reported financial position or results of operations . we have not guaranteed any third-party debt . free cash flow we define free cash flow , which is not a measure determined in accordance with u.s . gaap , as cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment , plus proceeds from sales of property and equipment , as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows . the following table calculates our free cash flow for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1529.8</td><td>$ 1548.2</td><td>$ 1513.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases of property and equipment</td><td>-862.5 ( 862.5 )</td><td>-880.8 ( 880.8 )</td><td>-903.5 ( 903.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from sales of property and equipment</td><td>35.7</td><td>23.9</td><td>28.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 703.0</td><td>$ 691.3</td><td>$ 639.0</td></tr></table> for a discussion of the changes in the components of free cash flow , you should read our discussion regarding cash flows provided by operating activities and cash flows used in investing activities contained elsewhere in this management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. . Question: what was the ratio of the cash provided by operating activities to the free cash flow in 2014? Answer: 2.1761 Question: what was the change in free cash flow in 2013?

-856.9

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2002 space systems space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2002 2001 2000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7384</td><td>$ 6836</td><td>$ 7339</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>443</td><td>360</td><td>345</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems increased by 8% ( 8 % ) in 2002 compared to 2001 . the increase in sales for 2002 resulted from higher volume in government space of $ 370 million and commercial space of $ 180 million . in government space , increases of $ 470 million in government satellite programs and $ 130 million in ground systems activities more than offset volume declines of $ 175 million on government launch vehi- cles and $ 55 million on strategic missile programs . the increase in commercial space sales is primarily attributable to an increase in launch vehicle activities , with nine commercial launches during 2002 compared to six in 2001 . net sales for the segment decreased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2001 com- pared to 2000 . the decrease in sales for 2001 resulted from volume declines in commercial space of $ 560 million , which more than offset increases in government space of $ 60 million . in commercial space , sales declined due to volume reductions of $ 480 million in commercial launch vehicle activities and $ 80 million in satellite programs . there were six launches in 2001 compared to 14 launches in 2000 . the increase in gov- ernment space resulted from a combined increase of $ 230 mil- lion related to higher volume on government satellite programs and ground systems activities . these increases were partially offset by a $ 110 million decrease related to volume declines in government launch vehicle activity , primarily due to program maturities , and by $ 50 million due to the absence in 2001 of favorable adjustments recorded on the titan iv pro- gram in 2000 . operating profit for the segment increased 23% ( 23 % ) in 2002 as compared to 2001 , mainly driven by the commercial space business . reduced losses in commercial space during 2002 resulted in increased operating profit of $ 90 million when compared to 2001 . commercial satellite manufacturing losses declined $ 100 million in 2002 as operating performance improved and satellite deliveries increased . in the first quarter of 2001 , a $ 40 million loss provision was recorded on certain commercial satellite manufacturing contracts . due to the industry-wide oversupply and deterioration of pricing in the commercial launch market , financial results on commercial launch vehicles continue to be challenging . during 2002 , this trend led to a decline in operating profit of $ 10 million on commercial launch vehicles when compared to 2001 . this decrease was primarily due to lower profitability of $ 55 mil- lion on the three additional launches in the current year , addi- tional charges of $ 60 million ( net of a favorable contract adjustment of $ 20 million ) for market and pricing pressures and included the adverse effect of a $ 35 million adjustment for commercial launch vehicle contract settlement costs . the 2001 results also included charges for market and pricing pressures , which reduced that year 2019s operating profit by $ 145 million . the $ 10 million decrease in government space 2019s operating profit for the year is primarily due to the reduced volume on government launch vehicles and strategic missile programs , which combined to decrease operating profit by $ 80 million , partially offset by increases of $ 40 million in government satellite programs and $ 30 million in ground systems activities . operating profit for the segment increased by 4% ( 4 % ) in 2001 compared to 2000 . operating profit increased in 2001 due to a $ 35 million increase in government space partially offset by higher year-over-year losses of $ 20 million in commercial space . in government space , operating profit increased due to the impact of higher volume and improved performance in ground systems and government satellite programs . the year- to-year comparison of operating profit was not affected by the $ 50 million favorable titan iv adjustment recorded in 2000 discussed above , due to a $ 55 million charge related to a more conservative assessment of government launch vehi- cle programs that was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2000 . in commercial space , decreased operating profit of $ 15 mil- lion on launch vehicles more than offset lower losses on satel- lite manufacturing activities . the commercial launch vehicle operating results included $ 60 million in higher charges for market and pricing pressures when compared to 2000 . these negative adjustments were partially offset by $ 50 million of favorable contract adjustments on certain launch vehicle con- tracts . commercial satellite manufacturing losses decreased slightly from 2000 and included the adverse impact of a $ 40 million loss provision recorded in the first quarter of 2001 for certain commercial satellite contracts related to schedule and technical issues. . Question: what was the profit margin for lockheed martin in 2002?

0.05999

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

page 74 notes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . in 2002 , the corporation adopted fas 142 which prohibits the amortization of goodwill . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 973 million , $ 651 million after tax ( $ 1.50 per share ) . also includes a gain from the disposal of a business and charges for the corporation 2019s exit from its global telecommunications services business which is included in discontinued operations and which , on a combined basis , increased the net loss by $ 1 billion ( $ 2.38 per share ) . ( f ) the corporation defines return on invested capital ( roic ) as net income plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back the minimum pension liability . the adjustment to add back the minimum pension liability is a revision to our calculation in 2005 , which the corporation believes more closely links roic to management performance . further , the corporation believes that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively lockheed martin uses the capital invested in its operations . the corporation uses roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also uses roic as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isola- tion or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . the following calculations of roic reflect the revision to the calculation discussed above for all periods presented . ( in millions ) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 500</td><td>$ -1046 ( 1046 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td><td>378</td><td>455</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 878</td><td>$ -591 ( 591 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 7491</td><td>$ 8782</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td><td>6853</td><td>7221</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average minimum pension liability3 4 5</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td><td>341</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td><td>$ 14685</td><td>$ 16009</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>6.0% ( 6.0 % )</td><td>( 3.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments for other comprehensive losses , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability . 4 minimum pension liability values reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the caption 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual minimum pension liability adjustments to equity were : 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 million ) ; 2005 = ( $ 105 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the cur- rent year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter . lockheed martin corporation . Question: what was the increase in earnings before taxes? Answer: 173.0 Question: what was the increase in earnings after taxes?

113.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 . average assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 . other investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors . net inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 . administrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 . this change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions . changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors . our largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 . the largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program . reductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses . average headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 . advertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment . depreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans . other operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries . our cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs . our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . c a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y . during 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion . we repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 . tangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion . given the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity . t . rowe price group annual report 2010 . Question: what was the change in capital gain distributions from 2008 to 2009? Answer: -2.7 Question: and what were those capital gain distributions in 2008?

5.6

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

corporate/other corporate/other includes global staff functions ( includes finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) and other corporate expense , global operations and technology ( o&t ) , residual corporate treasury and corporate items . at december 31 , 2009 , this segment had approximately $ 230 billion of assets , consisting primarily of the company 2019s liquidity portfolio , including $ 110 billion of cash and cash equivalents. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ -1663 ( 1663 )</td><td>$ -2680 ( 2680 )</td><td>$ -2008 ( 2008 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>-8893 ( 8893 )</td><td>422</td><td>-302 ( 302 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ -10556 ( 10556 )</td><td>$ -2258 ( 2258 )</td><td>$ -2310 ( 2310 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 1420</td><td>$ 510</td><td>$ 1813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ -11975 ( 11975 )</td><td>$ -2769 ( 2769 )</td><td>$ -4120 ( 4120 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income taxes ( benefits )</td><td>-4369 ( 4369 )</td><td>-587 ( 587 )</td><td>-1446 ( 1446 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ -7606 ( 7606 )</td><td>$ -2182 ( 2182 )</td><td>$ -2674 ( 2674 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes</td><td>-445 ( 445 )</td><td>4002</td><td>708</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ -8051 ( 8051 )</td><td>$ 1820</td><td>$ -1966 ( 1966 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>net income attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ -8051 ( 8051 )</td><td>$ 1820</td><td>$ -1968 ( 1968 )</td></tr></table> 2009 vs . 2008 revenues , net of interest expense declined , primarily due to the pretax loss on debt extinguishment related to the repayment of the $ 20 billion of tarp trust preferred securities and the pretax loss in connection with the exit from the loss-sharing agreement with the u.s . government . revenues also declined , due to the absence of the 2008 sale of citigroup global services limited recorded in o&t . this was partially offset by a pretax gain related to the exchange offers , revenues and higher intersegment eliminations . operating expenses increased , primarily due to intersegment eliminations and increases in compensation , partially offset by lower repositioning reserves . 2008 vs . 2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities . operating expenses declined , primarily due to lower restructuring charges in 2008 as well as reductions in incentive compensation and benefits expense. . Question: what are the total operating expenses in 2009? Answer: 1420.0 Question: what about in 2008? Answer: 510.0 Question: what is the net change?

910.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; debt issuances ; and bank financing under new or existing facilities . system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . in february 2012 , system energy vie issued $ 50 million of 4.02% ( 4.02 % ) series h notes due february 2017 . system energy used the proceeds to purchase additional nuclear fuel . system energy has obtained a short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow , through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 200 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits . system energy has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long-term authorization extends through july 2013 . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 120424</td><td>$ 97948</td><td>$ 90507</td><td>$ 42915</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . nuclear matters system energy owns and operates grand gulf . system energy is , therefore , subject to the risks related to owning and operating a nuclear plant . these include risks from the use , storage , handling and disposal of high- level and low-level radioactive materials , regulatory requirement changes , including changes resulting from events at other plants , limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available for losses in connection with nuclear operations , and technological and financial uncertainties related to decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives , including the sufficiency of funds in decommissioning trusts . in the event of an unanticipated early shutdown of grand gulf , system energy may be required to provide additional funds or credit support to satisfy regulatory requirements for decommissioning . after the nuclear incident in japan resulting from the march 2011 earthquake and tsunami , the nrc established a task force to conduct a review of processes and regulations relating to nuclear facilities in the united states . the task force issued a near term ( 90-day ) report in july 2011 that has made recommendations , which are currently being evaluated by the nrc . it is anticipated that the nrc will issue certain orders and requests for information to nuclear plant licensees by the end of the first quarter 2012 that will begin to implement the task force 2019s recommendations . these orders may require u.s . nuclear operators , including entergy , to undertake plant modifications or perform additional analyses that could , among other things , result in increased costs and capital requirements associated with operating entergy 2019s nuclear plants. . Question: what is the system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool in 2011? Answer: 120424.0 Question: what about in 2010?

97948.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations executive summary international paper 2019s operating results in 2006 bene- fited from strong gains in pricing and sales volumes and lower operating costs . our average paper and packaging prices in 2006 increased faster than our costs for the first time in four years . the improve- ment in sales volumes reflects increased uncoated papers , corrugated box , coated paperboard and european papers shipments , as well as improved revenues from our xpedx distribution business . our manufacturing operations also made solid cost reduction improvements . lower interest expense , reflecting debt repayments in 2005 and 2006 , was also a positive factor . together , these improvements more than offset the effects of continued high raw material and distribution costs , lower real estate sales , higher net corporate expenses and lower con- tributions from businesses and forestlands divested during 2006 . looking forward to 2007 , we expect seasonally higher sales volumes in the first quarter . average paper price realizations should continue to improve as we implement previously announced price increases in europe and brazil . input costs for energy , fiber and chemicals are expected to be mixed , although slightly higher in the first quarter . operating results will benefit from the recently completed international paper/sun paperboard joint ventures in china and the addition of the luiz anto- nio paper mill to our operations in brazil . however , primarily as a result of lower real estate sales in the first quarter , we anticipate earnings from continuing operations will be somewhat lower than in the 2006 fourth quarter . significant steps were also taken in 2006 in the execution of the company 2019s transformation plan . we completed the sales of our u.s . and brazilian coated papers businesses and 5.6 million acres of u.s . forestlands , and announced definitive sale agreements for our kraft papers , beverage pack- aging and arizona chemical businesses and a majority of our wood products business , all expected to close during 2007 . through december 31 , 2006 , we have received approximately $ 9.7 billion of the estimated proceeds from divest- itures announced under this plan of approximately $ 11.3 billion , with the balance to be received as the remaining divestitures are completed in the first half of 2007 . we have strengthened our balance sheet by reducing debt by $ 6.2 billion , and returned value to our shareholders by repurchasing 39.7 million shares of our common stock for approximately $ 1.4 billion . we made a $ 1.0 billion voluntary contribution to our u.s . qualified pension fund . we have identified selective reinvestment opportunities totaling approx- imately $ 2.0 billion , including opportunities in china , brazil and russia . finally , we remain focused on our three-year $ 1.2 billion target for non-price profit- ability improvements , with $ 330 million realized during 2006 . while more remains to be done in 2007 , we have made substantial progress toward achiev- ing the objectives announced at the outset of the plan in july 2005 . results of operations industry segment operating profits are used by inter- national paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses . management believes that this measure allows a better under- standing of trends in costs , operating efficiencies , prices and volumes . industry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items . industry segment oper- ating profits are defined by the securities and exchange commission as a non-gaap financial measure , and are not gaap alternatives to net income or any other operating measure prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the united states . international paper operates in six segments : print- ing papers , industrial packaging , consumer pack- aging , distribution , forest products and specialty businesses and other . the following table shows the components of net earnings ( loss ) for each of the last three years : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industry segment operating profits</td><td>$ 2074</td><td>$ 1622</td><td>$ 1703</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>corporate items net</td><td>-746 ( 746 )</td><td>-607 ( 607 )</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate special items*</td><td>2373</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>-141 ( 141 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>-521 ( 521 )</td><td>-595 ( 595 )</td><td>-712 ( 712 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interest</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax ( provision ) benefit</td><td>-1889 ( 1889 )</td><td>407</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>discontinued operations</td><td>-232 ( 232 )</td><td>416</td><td>-273 ( 273 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>$ 1050</td><td>$ 1100</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td></tr></table> * corporate special items include gains on transformation plan forestland sales , goodwill impairment charges , restructuring and other charges , net losses on sales and impairments of businesses , insurance recoveries and reversals of reserves no longer required. . Question: what was the net change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005? Answer: -81.0 Question: what was the value of industry segment operating profits in 2004?

1703.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

table of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries method or straight-line method , as applicable . the company classifies deferred financing costs as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the long-term debt liability on the consolidated balance sheets , except for deferred financing costs associated with revolving credit facilities which are presented as an asset , within other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . derivative instruments the company has interest rate cap agreements for the purpose of hedging its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates . the interest rate cap agreements are designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk and recorded at fair value in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . the gain or loss on the derivative instruments is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss until reclassified to interest expense in the same period the hedge transaction affects earnings . fair value measurements fair value is defined under gaap as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date . a fair value hierarchy has been established for valuation inputs to prioritize the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market . each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which is determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety . these levels are : level 1 2013 observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets . level 2 2013 inputs are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets , quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities . level 3 2013 inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management 2019s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability . the fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models , discounted cash flow models and similar techniques . accumulated other comprehensive loss the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in stockholders 2019 equity are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>$ -96.1 ( 96.1 )</td><td>$ -139.6 ( 139.6 )</td><td>$ -61.1 ( 61.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>unrealized gain from hedge accounting</td><td>0.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive loss</td><td>$ -95.9 ( 95.9 )</td><td>$ -139.6 ( 139.6 )</td><td>$ -61.1 ( 61.1 )</td></tr></table> revenue recognition the company is a primary distribution channel for a large group of vendors and suppliers , including original equipment manufacturers ( 201coems 201d ) , software publishers , wholesale distributors and cloud providers . the company records revenue from sales transactions when title and risk of loss are passed to the customer , there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement for sale , delivery has occurred and/or services have been rendered , the sales price is fixed or determinable , and collectability is reasonably assured . the company 2019s shipping terms typically specify f.o.b . destination , at which time title and risk of loss have passed to the customer . revenues from the sales of hardware products and software licenses are generally recognized on a gross basis with the selling price to the customer recorded as sales and the acquisition cost of the product recorded as cost of sales . these items can be delivered to customers in a variety of ways , including ( i ) as physical product shipped from the company 2019s warehouse , ( ii ) via drop-shipment by the vendor or supplier , or ( iii ) via electronic delivery for software licenses . at the time of sale , the company records an estimate for sales returns and allowances based on historical experience . the company 2019s vendor partners warrant most of the products the company sells . the company leverages drop-shipment arrangements with many of its vendors and suppliers to deliver products to its customers without having to physically hold the inventory at its warehouses , thereby increasing efficiency and reducing . Question: what was the loss from foreign currency translation in 2017? Answer: 96.1 Question: what was it in 2016?

139.6

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.03</td><td>$ 108.98</td><td>$ 148.98</td><td>$ 163.71</td><td>$ 177.40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>76.82</td><td>102.19</td><td>140.77</td><td>153.96</td><td>154.71</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>82.94</td><td>106.78</td><td>144.79</td><td>166.76</td><td>164.15</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.44</td><td>156.78</td><td>178.22</td><td>180.67</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) . Question: what was the price for the s&p financial index in 2015? Answer: 164.15 Question: what was the change in the 2015 price and the initial $100 investment?

64.15

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2289</td><td>2289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>207</td><td>197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-849 ( 849 )</td><td>-781 ( 781 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1721</td><td>$ 1791</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2016 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.03% ( 0.03 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 100 million issued by the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities . the bonds , which were due in december 2015 , had a variable interest rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.04% ( 0.04 % ) , respectively . as of december 2015 , these $ 100 million bonds were repaid in full . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2015 was 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) . pound sterling notes the pound sterling notes consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 notes with a principal amount of a366 million accrue interest at a 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2031 . these notes are not callable . 2022 notes with a principal amount of a3455 million accrue interest at a 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2050 . these notes are callable at our option at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption at a benchmark u.k . government bond yield plus 15 basis points and accrued interest. . Question: what was the difference in vehicles under capital lease between 2014 and 2015? Answer: -12.0 Question: and the number for 2014 specifically?

86.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 192.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>42.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>25.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-41.2 ( 41.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr></table> the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. . Question: what was the number of electric customers in 2007? Answer: 132000.0 Question: and what was it in 2006? Answer: 95000.0 Question: what was, then, the change over the year? Answer: 37000.0 Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2006 number, in percentage? Answer: 0.38947 Question: in that same period, what was the net change in the revenue? Answer: 38.8 Question: and what percentage did it represent in relation to the revenue in 2010?

1.09794

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in connection with the firm 2019s prime brokerage and clearing businesses , the firm agrees to clear and settle on behalf of its clients the transactions entered into by them with other brokerage firms . the firm 2019s obligations in respect of such transactions are secured by the assets in the client 2019s account as well as any proceeds received from the transactions cleared and settled by the firm on behalf of the client . in connection with joint venture investments , the firm may issue loan guarantees under which it may be liable in the event of fraud , misappropriation , environmental liabilities and certain other matters involving the borrower . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these guarantees and indemnifications have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . other representations , warranties and indemnifications . the firm provides representations and warranties to counterparties in connection with a variety of commercial transactions and occasionally indemnifies them against potential losses caused by the breach of those representations and warranties . the firm may also provide indemnifications protecting against changes in or adverse application of certain u.s . tax laws in connection with ordinary-course transactions such as securities issuances , borrowings or derivatives . in addition , the firm may provide indemnifications to some counterparties to protect them in the event additional taxes are owed or payments are withheld , due either to a change in or an adverse application of certain non-u.s . tax laws . these indemnifications generally are standard contractual terms and are entered into in the ordinary course of business . generally , there are no stated or notional amounts included in these indemnifications , and the contingencies triggering the obligation to indemnify are not expected to occur . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these arrangements have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) and gs bank usa , subject to certain exceptions . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.60 in 2016 , $ 2.55 in 2015 and $ 2.25 in 2014 . on january 17 , 2017 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.65 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2017 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2017 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td><td>year ended december 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>36.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 165.88</td><td>$ 189.41</td><td>$ 171.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 6069</td><td>$ 4195</td><td>$ 5469</td></tr></table> 172 goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k . Question: what is the common equity dividends declared per common share in 2016? Answer: 2.6 Question: what about in 2015? Answer: 2.55 Question: what is the total dividends declared in these two years? Answer: 5.15 Question: what about the total dividends declared from 2014 to 2016?

7.4

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

pullmantur during 2013 , we operated four ships with an aggre- gate capacity of approximately 7650 berths under our pullmantur brand , offering cruise itineraries that ranged from four to 12 nights throughout south america , the caribbean and europe . one of these ships , zenith , was redeployed from pullmantur to cdf croisi e8res de france in january 2014 . pullmantur serves the contemporary segment of the spanish , portuguese and latin american cruise markets . pullmantur 2019s strategy is to attract cruise guests from these target markets by providing a variety of cruising options and onboard activities directed at couples and families traveling with children . over the last few years , pullmantur has systematically increased its focus on latin america . in recognition of this , pullmantur recently opened a regional head office in panama to place the operating management closer to its largest and fastest growing market . in order to facilitate pullmantur 2019s ability to focus on its core cruise business , in december 2013 , pullmantur reached an agreement to sell the majority of its inter- est in its land-based tour operations , travel agency and pullmantur air , the closing of which is subject to customary closing conditions . in connection with the agreement , we will retain a 19% ( 19 % ) interest in the non-core businesses . we will retain ownership of the pullmantur aircraft which will be dry leased to pullmantur air . cdf croisi e8res de france in january 2014 , we redeployed zenith from pullmantur to cdf croisi e8res de france . as a result , as of january 2014 , we operate two ships with an aggregate capac- ity of approximately 2750 berths under our cdf croisi e8res de france brand . during the summer of 2014 , cdf croisi e8res de france will operate both ships in europe and , for the first time , the brand will operate in the caribbean during the winter of 2014 . in addition , cdf croisi e8res de france offers seasonal itineraries to the mediterranean . cdf croisi e8res de france is designed to serve the contemporary seg- ment of the french cruise market by providing a brand tailored for french cruise guests . tui cruises tui cruises is designed to serve the contemporary and premium segments of the german cruise market by offering a product tailored for german guests . all onboard activities , services , shore excursions and menu offerings are designed to suit the preferences of this target market . tui cruises operates two ships , mein schiff 1 and mein schiff 2 , with an aggregate capacity of approximately 3800 berths . in addition , tui cruises has two ships on order , each with a capacity of 2500 berths , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2014 and second quarter of 2015 . tui cruises is a joint venture owned 50% ( 50 % ) by us and 50% ( 50 % ) by tui ag , a german tourism and shipping company that also owns 51% ( 51 % ) of tui travel , a british tourism company . industry cruising is considered a well-established vacation sector in the north american market , a growing sec- tor over the long-term in the european market and a developing but promising sector in several other emerging markets . industry data indicates that market penetration rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details market penetration rates for north america and europe computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : america ( 1 ) europe ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>north america ( 1 )</td><td>europe ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : international monetary fund and cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two con- secutive nights for years 2009 through 2012 . year 2013 amounts represent our estimates . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 2 ) source : international monetary fund and clia europe , formerly european cruise council , for years 2009 through 2012 . year 2013 amounts represent our estimates . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 436000 berths on approximately 269 ships at the end of 2013 . there are approximately 26 ships with an estimated 71000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2014 and 2018 , although it is also possible that ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 21.3 million cruise guests in 2013 compared to 20.9 million cruise guests carried in 2012 and 20.2 million cruise guests carried in 2011 . part i . Question: as of 2013, what was the expected number of berths that was to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2014 and 2018? Answer: 71000.0 Question: and what was the total number of berths?

436000.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

royal caribbean cruises ltd . 79 notes to the consolidated financial statements in 2012 , we determined the implied fair value of good- will for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 mil- lion and recognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model further discussed below . this impair- ment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impair- ment of pullmantur related assets within our consoli- dated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . during the fourth quarter of 2014 , we performed a qualitative assessment of whether it was more-likely- than-not that our royal caribbean international reporting unit 2019s fair value was less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impair- ment test . the qualitative analysis included assessing the impact of certain factors such as general economic conditions , limitations on accessing capital , changes in forecasted operating results , changes in fuel prices and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates . based on our qualitative assessment , we concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the estimated fair value of the royal caribbean international reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and thus , we did not pro- ceed to the two-step goodwill impairment test . no indicators of impairment exist primarily because the reporting unit 2019s fair value has consistently exceeded its carrying value by a significant margin , its financial performance has been solid in the face of mixed economic environments and forecasts of operating results generated by the reporting unit appear suffi- cient to support its carrying value . we also performed our annual impairment review of goodwill for pullmantur 2019s reporting unit during the fourth quarter of 2014 . we did not perform a quali- tative assessment but instead proceeded directly to the two-step goodwill impairment test . we estimated the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model . the principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results , weighted- average cost of capital , and terminal value . signifi- cantly impacting these assumptions are the transfer of vessels from our other cruise brands to pullmantur . the discounted cash flow model used our 2015 pro- jected operating results as a base . to that base , we added future years 2019 cash flows assuming multiple rev- enue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments beyond 2015 on pullmantur 2019s reporting unit . we assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario . we discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to pullmantur 2019s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital . based on the probability-weighted discounted cash flows , we deter- mined the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 52% ( 52 % ) resulting in no impairment to pullmantur 2019s goodwill . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portuguese and latin american markets , with an increasing focus on latin america . the persistent economic instability in these markets has created sig- nificant uncertainties in forecasting operating results and future cash flows used in our impairment analyses . we continue to monitor economic events in these markets for their potential impact on pullmantur 2019s business and valuation . further , the estimation of fair value utilizing discounted expected future cash flows includes numerous uncertainties which require our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues , operating costs , marketing , sell- ing and administrative expenses , interest rates , ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry 2019s competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . if there are changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impairment analyses , especially in net yields or if certain transfers of vessels from our other cruise brands to the pullmantur fleet do not take place , it is possible that an impairment charge of pullmantur 2019s reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . of these factors , the planned transfers of vessels to the pullmantur fleet is most significant to the projected future cash flows . if the transfers do not occur , we will likely fail step one of the impairment test . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 214112</td><td>$ 204866</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-26074 ( 26074 )</td><td>9246</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 188038</td><td>$ 214112</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method to compare the fair value of these indefinite-lived intan- gible assets to its carrying value . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . we used a dis- count rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . based on the results of our testing , we did not . Question: what is the intangible assets of 2014? Answer: 214112.0 Question: and that of 2013?

204866.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

a lump sum buyout cost of approximately $ 1.1 million . total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , was approximately $ 893000 , $ 856000 and $ 823000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2001 , 2002 and 2003 , respectively . during the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2000 , the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $ 644000 for the lease of office furniture . these leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased at its fair market value . rental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2001 , 2002 and 2003 was approximately $ 215000 , $ 215000 and $ 127000 respectively . during fiscal 2000 , the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $ 221000 . this lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased at the stipulated buyout price . future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2003 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ending march 31,</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 781</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>776</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>776</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>769</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2008</td><td>772</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1480</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5354</td></tr></table> from time to time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types . while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on the company . 7 . stock option and purchase plans all stock options granted by the company under the below-described plans were granted at the fair value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant . outstanding stock options , if not exercised , expire 10 years from the date of grant . the 1992 combination stock option plan ( the combination plan ) , as amended , was adopted in september 1992 as a combination and restatement of the company 2019s then outstanding incentive stock option plan and nonqualified plan . a total of 2670859 options were awarded from the combination plan during its ten-year restatement term that ended on may 1 , 2002 . as of march 31 , 2003 , 1286042 of these options remain outstanding and eligible for future exercise . these options are held by company employees and generally become exercisable ratably over five years . the 1998 equity incentive plan , ( the equity incentive plan ) , was adopted by the company in august 1998 . the equity incentive plan provides for grants of options to key employees , directors , advisors and consultants as either incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options as determined by the company 2019s board of directors . a maximum of 1000000 shares of common stock may be awarded under this plan . options granted under the equity incentive plan are exercisable at such times and subject to such terms as the board of directors may specify at the time of each stock option grant . options outstanding under the equity incentive plan have vesting periods of 3 to 5 years from the date of grant . the 2000 stock incentive plan , ( the 2000 plan ) , was adopted by the company in august 2000 . the 2000 plan provides for grants of options to key employees , directors , advisors and consultants to the company or its subsidiaries as either incentive or nonqualified stock options as determined by the company 2019s board of directors . up to 1400000 shares of common stock may be awarded under the 2000 plan and are exercisable at such times and subject to such terms as the board of directors may specify at the time of each stock option grant . options outstanding under the 2000 plan generally vested 4 years from the date of grant . the company has a nonqualified stock option plan for non-employee directors ( the directors 2019 plan ) . the directors 2019 plan , as amended , was adopted in july 1989 and provides for grants of options to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock to non-employee directors of the company . up to 400000 shares of common stock may be awarded under the directors 2019 plan . options outstanding under the directors 2019 plan have vesting periods of 1 to 5 years from the date of grant . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) march 31 , 2003 page 25 . Question: what is the minimum future lease payments due in 2004? Answer: 781.0 Question: what is the value for those due in 2005? Answer: 776.0 Question: what is the sum?

1557.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 94417</td><td>$ 10258</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill acquired as part of acquisition</td><td>2014</td><td>84159</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>working capital settlement</td><td>-1225 ( 1225 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impairment loss</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 93192</td><td>$ 94417</td></tr></table> goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment . goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate . the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value . an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified . the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit . in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach . under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data . other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 . the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon . with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable . we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. . Question: what is the goodwill acquired as part of acquisition in 2016? Answer: 84159.0 Question: what about the balance of goodwill in 2016? Answer: 94417.0 Question: what portion of the goodwill balance in 2016 is related to acquisition? Answer: 0.89135 Question: what about the balance of goodwill at the end of 2017? Answer: 93192.0 Question: what about at the beginning of 2016? Answer: 10258.0 Question: what is the net change during this time?

82934.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

9 . lease commitments the company leases certain land , facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2057 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximatelya $ 92.3 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 84.9 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 58.8 million in fiscal 2017 . the following is a schedule of futureff minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 2 , 2019 : operating fiscal years leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>$ 79789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>67993</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>40338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>37673</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024</td><td>32757</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>190171</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 448721</td></tr></table> 10 . commitments and contingencies from time to time , in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , among other things , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage , employment or employment benefits . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 11 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . defined contribution plans the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plans for u.s . employees was $ 47.7 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 41.4 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 35.8 million in fiscal 2017 . non-qualified deferred compensation plan the deferred compensation plan ( dcp ) allows certain members of management and other highly-compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer receipt of all or any portion of their compensation . the dcp was established to provide participants with the opportunity to defer receiving all or a portion of their compensation , which includes salary , bonus , commissions and director fees . under the dcp , the company provides all participants ( other than non-employee directors ) with company contributions equal to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible deferred contributions . the dcp is a non-qualified plan that is maintained in a rabbi trust . the fair value of the investments held in the rabbi trust are presented separately as deferred compensation plan investments , with the current portion of the investment included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . see note 2j , fair value , for further information on these investments . the deferred compensation obligation represents dcp participant accumulated deferrals and earnings thereon since the inception of the dcp net of withdrawals . the deferred compensation obligation is presented separately as deferred compensation plan liability , with the current portion of the obligation in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . the company 2019s liability under the dcp is an unsecured general obligation of the company . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Question: from 2018 to 2019, what was the change in the total rental expense under operating leases?

7.4

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

note 9 : stock based compensation the company has granted stock option and restricted stock unit ( 201crsus 201d ) awards to non-employee directors , officers and other key employees of the company pursuant to the terms of its 2007 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2007 plan 201d ) . the total aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2007 plan is 15.5 . as of december 31 , 2015 , 8.4 shares were available for grant under the 2007 plan . shares issued under the 2007 plan may be authorized-but-unissued shares of company stock or reacquired shares of company stock , including shares purchased by the company on the open market . the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award . the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>stock options</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>rsus</td><td>8</td><td>10</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>espp</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock-based compensation</td><td>11</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stock-based compensation expense net of tax</td><td>$ 7</td><td>$ 8</td><td>$ 8</td></tr></table> there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued . the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period . all awards granted in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 are classified as equity . the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus . for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs . the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to common stockholders 2019 equity or the statement of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows . the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures . the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary . stock options in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant . these awards have no performance vesting conditions and the grant date fair value is amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and is included in operations and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. . Question: what was the percentage of stock-based compensation consisting of stock options?

0.18182

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-12.0 ( 12.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-7.4 ( 7.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 959.2</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. . Question: what was the net revenue in 2008? Answer: 959.2 Question: and what was it in 2007? Answer: 991.1 Question: what was, then, the change over the year? Answer: -31.9 Question: and what percentage of this change did the purchased power capacity represent?

0.37618

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) operating income increased during 2017 when compared to 2016 , comprised of a decrease in revenue of $ 42.1 , as discussed above , a decrease in salaries and related expenses of $ 28.0 and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 16.9 . the decrease in salaries and related expenses was primarily due to lower discretionary bonuses and incentive expense as well as a decrease in base salaries , benefits and tax . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to decreases in adjustments to contingent acquisition obligations , as compared to the prior year . operating income increased during 2016 when compared to 2015 due to an increase in revenue of $ 58.8 , as discussed above , and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 3.7 , partially offset by an increase in salaries and related expenses of $ 38.8 . the increase in salaries and related expenses was attributable to an increase in base salaries , benefits and tax primarily due to increases in our workforce to support business growth over the last twelve months . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to lower production expenses related to pass-through costs , which are also reflected in revenue , for certain projects in which we acted as principal that decreased in size or did not recur during the current year . corporate and other certain corporate and other charges are reported as a separate line item within total segment operating income and include corporate office expenses , as well as shared service center and certain other centrally managed expenses that are not fully allocated to operating divisions . salaries and related expenses include salaries , long-term incentives , annual bonuses and other miscellaneous benefits for corporate office employees . office and general expenses primarily include professional fees related to internal control compliance , financial statement audits and legal , information technology and other consulting services that are engaged and managed through the corporate office . office and general expenses also include rental expense and depreciation of leasehold improvements for properties occupied by corporate office employees . a portion of centrally managed expenses are allocated to operating divisions based on a formula that uses the planned revenues of each of the operating units . amounts allocated also include specific charges for information technology-related projects , which are allocated based on utilization . corporate and other expenses decreased during 2017 by $ 20.6 to $ 126.6 compared to 2016 , primarily due to lower annual incentive expense . corporate and other expenses increased during 2016 by $ 5.4 to $ 147.2 compared to 2015 . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 887.3</td><td>$ 1023.2</td><td>$ 848.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital2</td><td>-29.9 ( 29.9 )</td><td>-414.9 ( 414.9 )</td><td>-99.9 ( 99.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities</td><td>24.4</td><td>-95.5 ( 95.5 )</td><td>-60.4 ( 60.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 881.8</td><td>$ 512.8</td><td>$ 688.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-196.2 ( 196.2 )</td><td>-263.9 ( 263.9 )</td><td>-199.7 ( 199.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-1004.9 ( 1004.9 )</td><td>-666.4 ( 666.4 )</td><td>-490.9 ( 490.9 )</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , net losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities due to the seasonality of our business , we typically use cash from working capital in the first nine months of a year , with the largest impact in the first quarter , and generate cash from working capital in the fourth quarter , driven by the seasonally strong media spending by our clients . quarterly and annual working capital results are impacted by the fluctuating annual media spending budgets of our clients as well as their changing media spending patterns throughout each year across various countries. . Question: what was the sum of cash provided by operating activities and cash used in investing activities?

685.6

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

for fiscal year 2005 , the effective tax rate includes the impact of $ 11.6 million tax expense associated with repatriation of approximately $ 185.0 million of foreign earnings under the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . for fiscal year 2004 , the effective tax rate reflects the tax benefit derived from higher earnings in low-tax jurisdictions . during fiscal year 2006 , primarily due to a tax accounting method change , there was a decrease of $ 83.2 million in the current deferred tax assets , and a corresponding increase in non-current deferred tax assets . in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 , we changed our tax accounting method on our tax return for fiscal year 2005 with respect to the current portion of deferred revenue to follow the recognition of revenue under u.s . generally accepted accounting principles . this accounting method change , as well as other adjustments made to our taxable income upon the filing of the fiscal year 2005 tax return , resulted in an increase in our operating loss ( nol ) carryforwards . in may 2006 , the tax increase prevention and reconciliation act of 2005 was enacted , which provides a three-year exception to current u.s . taxation of certain foreign intercompany income . this provision will first apply to synopsys in fiscal year 2007 . management estimates that had such provisions been applied for fiscal 2006 , our income tax expense would have been reduced by approximately $ 3 million . in december 2006 , the tax relief and health care act of 2006 was enacted , which retroactively extended the research and development credit from january 1 , 2006 . as a result , we will record an expected increase in our fiscal 2006 research and development credit of between $ 1.5 million and $ 1.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 . revision of prior year financial statements . as part of our remediation of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting identified in fiscal 2005 relating to accounting for income taxes we implemented additional internal control and review procedures . through such procedures , in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 , we identified four errors totaling $ 8.2 million which affected our income tax provision in fiscal years 2001 through 2005 . we concluded that these errors were not material to any prior year financial statements . although the errors are not material to prior periods , we elected to revise prior year financial statements to correct such errors . the fiscal periods in which the errors originated , and the resulting change in provision ( benefit ) for income taxes for each year , are reflected in the following table : year ended october 31 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2001</td><td>2002</td><td>2003</td><td>2004</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 205</td><td>$ 1833</td><td>$ 5303</td><td>$ -748 ( 748 )</td><td>$ 1636</td></tr></table> the errors were as follows : ( 1 ) synopsys inadvertently provided a $ 1.4 million tax benefit for the write- off of goodwill relating to an acquisition in fiscal 2002 ; ( 2 ) synopsys did not accrue interest and penalties for certain foreign tax contingency items in the amount of $ 3.2 million ; ( 3 ) synopsys made certain computational errors relating to foreign dividends of $ 2.3 million ; and ( 4 ) synopsys did not record a valuation allowance relating to certain state tax credits of $ 1.3 million . as result of this revision , non-current deferred tax assets decreased by $ 8.1 million and current taxes payable increased by $ 0.2 million . retained earnings decreased by $ 8.2 million and additional paid in capital decreased by $ 0.1 million . see item 9a . controls and procedures for a further discussion of our remediation of the material weakness . tax effects of stock awards . in november 2005 , fasb issued a staff position ( fsp ) on fas 123 ( r ) -3 , transition election related to accounting for the tax effects of share-based payment awards . effective upon issuance , this fsp describes an alternative transition method for calculating the tax effects of share-based compensation pursuant to sfas 123 ( r ) . the alternative transition method includes simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool ( apic pool ) related to the tax effects of employee stock based compensation , and to determine the subsequent impact on the apic pool and the statement of cash flows of the tax effects of employee share-based compensation . Question: what is the provision for income taxes caused by errors in 2003? Answer: 5303.0 Question: what was it in 2002? Answer: 1833.0 Question: what is the ratio of 2003 to 2002?

2.89307

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

we are exposed to market risk stemming from changes in interest and foreign exchange rates and commod- ity and equity prices . changes in these factors could cause fl uctuations in our earnings and cash fl ows . in the normal course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into vari- ous hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . th e counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative fi nancial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements on page 61 of this report . value at risk th e estimates in the table below are intended to mea- sure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . th e models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confi - dence level . th e var calculation used historical interest and for- eign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . th e market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . th e calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely cor- relates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally off set by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . th e positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; com- modity swaps , futures and options ; and equity instru- ments . th e calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are off set by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . th e table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 28 , 2017 , and may 29 , 2016 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 28 , 2017. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fair value impact may 28 2017</td><td>fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2017</td><td>fair value impact may 29 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate instruments</td><td>$ 25.1</td><td>$ 26.5</td><td>$ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency instruments</td><td>24.6</td><td>22.9</td><td>27.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity instruments</td><td>3.2</td><td>2.5</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity instruments</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.7</td></tr></table> quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk 44 general mills . Question: what is the fair value impact of interest rate instruments? Answer: 26.5 Question: what is the value of foreign currency instruments? Answer: 22.9 Question: what is the sum?

49.4

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . the accruals for deferred tax assets and liabilities are subject to a significant amount of judgment by management and are reviewed and adjusted routinely based on changes in facts and circumstances . material changes in these accruals may occur in the future , based on the progress of ongoing tax audits , changes in legislation and resolution of pending tax matters . forward-looking estimates we are providing our 2011 forward-looking estimates in this section . these estimates were based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information used to prepare our december 31 , 2010 , reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . the forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , gas and ngls during 2011 will be similar to 2010 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to our canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using an estimated average 2011 exchange rate of $ 0.95 dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . during 2011 , our operations are substantially comprised of our ongoing north america onshore operations . we also have international operations in brazil and angola that we are divesting . we have entered into agreements to sell our assets in brazil for $ 3.2 billion and our assets in angola for $ 70 million , plus contingent consideration . as a result of these divestitures , all revenues , expenses and capital related to our international operations are reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements . additionally , all forward-looking estimates in this document exclude amounts related to our international operations , unless otherwise noted . north america onshore operating items the following 2011 estimates relate only to our north america onshore assets . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2011 . we estimate that our combined oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 236 to 240 mmboe . ( mmbbls ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>oil ( mmbbls )</td><td>gas ( bcf )</td><td>ngls ( mmbbls )</td><td>total ( mmboe )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>17</td><td>736</td><td>34</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>28</td><td>199</td><td>3</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>north america onshore</td><td>45</td><td>935</td><td>37</td><td>238</td></tr></table> oil and gas prices we expect our 2011 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating areas to differ from the nymex price as set forth in the following table . the expected ranges for prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the financial contracts presented in the 201ccommodity price risk management 201d section below . the nymex price for oil is determined using the monthly average of settled prices on each trading day for benchmark west texas intermediate crude oil delivered at cushing , oklahoma . the nymex price for gas is determined using the first-of-month south louisiana henry hub price index as published monthly in inside . Question: what was the total production from canada?

64.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

at december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>$ 142</td><td>$ 106</td><td>$ 84</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations ( a )</td><td>3266</td><td>761</td><td>583</td><td>463</td><td>422</td><td>1690</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3408</td><td>$ 867</td><td>$ 667</td><td>$ 526</td><td>$ 467</td><td>$ 1781</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 2.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . rent expense was $ 154 million , $ 168 million and $ 185 million for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , international paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters . where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction . environmental proceedings cercla and state actions international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , including the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) . many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources . while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties . remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable . international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 95 million in the aggregate as of december 31 , 2014 . cass lake : one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minnesota . during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a remediation feasibility study . in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million . the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 50 million to address the selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy . in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy decision would be delayed . in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean- up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and significantly higher than amounts currently recorded . in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to perform a natural resource damage assessment . it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred . other remediation costs in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 41 million as of december 31 , 2014 . other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . legal proceedings environmental kalamazoo river : the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./ portage creek/kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan . the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the kalamazoo river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st . regis paper company ( st . regis ) . the company is a successor in interest to st . regis . although the company has not received any orders from the epa , in december 2014 , the epa sent the company a letter demanding payment of $ 19 million to reimburse the epa for costs associated with a time critical removal action of pcb contaminated sediments from a portion of the site . the company 2019s cercla liability has not been finally determined with respect to this or any other portion of the site and we have declined to reimburse the epa at this time . as noted below , the company is involved in allocation/ apportionment litigation with regard to the site . accordingly , it is premature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site . the company was named as a defendant by georgia- pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the site . the suit . Question: what was the total amount of lease obligations in 2015?

142.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

part ii , item 7 until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.74% ( 4.74 % ) . the proceeds from these notes were used to repay commercial paper borrowings . 0160 on april 20 , 2006 , the schlumberger board of directors approved a share repurchase program of up to 40 million shares of common stock to be acquired in the open market before april 2010 , subject to market conditions . this program was completed during the second quarter of 2008 . on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 , of which $ 1.43 billion had been repurchased as of december 31 , 2009 . the following table summarizes the activity under these share repurchase programs during 2009 , 2008 and ( stated in thousands except per share amounts and prices ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total cost of shares purchased</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 500097</td><td>7825.0</td><td>$ 63.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 1818841</td><td>21064.7</td><td>$ 86.35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1355000</td><td>16336.1</td><td>$ 82.95</td></tr></table> 0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 5.3 billion in 2009 , $ 6.9 billion in 2008 and $ 6.3 billion in 2007 . the decline in cash flow from operations in 2009 as compared to 2008 was primarily driven by the decrease in net income experienced in 2009 and the significant pension plan contributions made during 2009 , offset by an improvement in working capital requirements . the improvement in 2008 as compared to 2007 was driven by the net income increase experienced in 2008 offset by required investments in working capital . the reduction in cash flows experienced by some of schlumberger 2019s customers as a result of global economic conditions could have significant adverse effects on their financial condition . this could result in , among other things , delay in , or nonpayment of , amounts that are owed to schlumberger , which could have a material adverse effect on schlumberger 2019s results of operations and cash flows . at times in recent quarters , schlumberger has experienced delays in payments from certain of its customers . schlumberger operates in approximately 80 countries . at december 31 , 2009 , only three of those countries individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one represented greater than 0160 during 2008 and 2007 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved increases in the quarterly dividend of 20% ( 20 % ) and 40% ( 40 % ) , respectively . total dividends paid during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 1.0 billion , $ 964 million and $ 771 million , respectively . 0160 capital expenditures were $ 2.4 billion in 2009 , $ 3.7 billion in 2008 and $ 2.9 billion in 2007 . capital expenditures in 2008 and 2007 reflected the record activity levels experienced in those years . the decrease in capital expenditures in 2009 as compared to 2008 is primarily due to the significant activity decline during 2009 . oilfield services capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 2.4 billion for the full year 2010 as compared to $ 1.9 billion in 2009 and $ 3.0 billion in 2008 . westerngeco capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 0.3 billion for the full year 2010 as compared to $ 0.5 billion in 2009 and $ 0.7 billion in 2008. . Question: what is the fraction of shares purchased in 2008 over 2009? Answer: 3.63698 Question: what is the value of shares that remain to be purchased as of december 31 , 2009 and approved by the boards for repurchase? Answer: 6.57 Question: what proportion of the approved fund for repurchases is not used?

0.82125

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2013 versus 2012 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.39 billion for 2013 , 13% ( 13 % ) lower than 2012 . the decrease compared with 2012 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , partially offset by lower interest expense on financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , at fair value and collateralized financings . 2012 versus 2011 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 . the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value and collateralized agreements . see 201cstatistical disclosures 2014 distribution of assets , liabilities and shareholders 2019 equity 201d for further information about our sources of net interest income . operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity . compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits . discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment . the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff ( which includes employees , consultants and temporary staff ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 12613</td><td>$ 12944</td><td>$ 12223</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees</td><td>2341</td><td>2208</td><td>2463</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>market development</td><td>541</td><td>509</td><td>640</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>communications and technology</td><td>776</td><td>782</td><td>828</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>1322</td><td>1738</td><td>1865</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>occupancy</td><td>839</td><td>875</td><td>1030</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>professional fees</td><td>930</td><td>867</td><td>992</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>insurance reserves1</td><td>176</td><td>598</td><td>529</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other expenses</td><td>2931</td><td>2435</td><td>2072</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total non-compensation expenses</td><td>9856</td><td>10012</td><td>10419</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 22469</td><td>$ 22956</td><td>$ 22642</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total staff at period-end</td><td>32900</td><td>32400</td><td>33300</td></tr></table> 1 . related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d in the consolidated statements of earnings . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 45 . Question: what was the difference in total staff between the year ended december 2013 and december 2012? Answer: 500.0 Question: and the percentage change?

0.01543

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the municipal bond portfolio is comprised of tax exempt bonds and is diversified across states and sectors . the portfolio has an average credit quality of double-a . the short-term bond funds invest in fixed income securities , including corporate bonds , mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities . the company holds investments in ars . interest on these securities is exempt from u.s . federal income tax and the interest rate on the securities typically resets every 35 days . the securities are fully collateralized by student loans with guarantees , ranging from approximately 95% ( 95 % ) to 98% ( 98 % ) of principal and interest , by the u.s . government via the department of education . beginning on february 11 , 2008 , the auction mechanism that normally provided liquidity to the ars investments began to fail . since mid-february 2008 , all investment positions in the company 2019s ars investment portfolio have experienced failed auctions . the securities for which auctions have failed have continued to pay interest in accordance with the contractual terms of such instruments and will continue to accrue interest and be auctioned at each respective reset date until the auction succeeds , the issuer redeems the securities or they mature . during 2008 , ars were reclassified as level 3 from level 2 . as of december 31 , 2010 , the ars market remained illiquid , but issuer call and redemption activity in the ars student loan sector has occurred periodically since the auctions began to fail . during 2010 and 2009 , the company did not sell any ars in the auction market , but there were calls at par . the table below includes a roll-forward of the company 2019s ars investments from january 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2010 . significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value december 31 2008</td><td>$ 192</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>calls at par</td><td>-28 ( 28 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recovery of unrealized losses due to issuer calls</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increase in fair value</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value december 31 2009</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>calls at par</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>recovery of unrealized losses due to issuer calls</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>increase in fair value</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fair value december 31 2010</td><td>$ 106</td></tr></table> the company evaluated the estimated impairment of its ars portfolio to determine if it was other-than- temporary . the company considered several factors including , but not limited to , the following : ( 1 ) the reasons for the decline in value ( changes in interest rates , credit event , or market fluctuations ) ; ( 2 ) assessments as to whether it is more likely than not that it will hold and not be required to sell the investments for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery of the cost basis ; ( 3 ) whether the decline is substantial ; and ( 4 ) the historical and anticipated duration of the events causing the decline in value . the evaluation for other-than-temporary impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process , which is subject to various risks and uncertainties . the risks and uncertainties include changes in credit quality , market liquidity , timing and amounts of issuer calls and interest rates . as of december 31 , 2010 , the company believed that the unrealized losses on the ars were not related to credit quality but rather due to the lack of liquidity in the market . the company believes that it is more . Question: what was the total of significant unobservable inputs in 2009? Answer: 180.0 Question: and what was that total in 2008? Answer: 192.0 Question: what was, then, the change over the year? Answer: -12.0 Question: and what is this change as percentage of the 2008 total? Answer: -0.0625 Question: what was the decline in the the significant unobservable inputs in that period?

12.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

table of contents the notional amounts for outstanding derivative instruments provide one measure of the transaction volume outstanding and do not represent the amount of the company 2019s exposure to credit or market loss . the credit risk amounts represent the company 2019s gross exposure to potential accounting loss on derivative instruments that are outstanding or unsettled if all counterparties failed to perform according to the terms of the contract , based on then-current currency or interest rates at each respective date . the company 2019s exposure to credit loss and market risk will vary over time as currency and interest rates change . although the table above reflects the notional and credit risk amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments , it does not reflect the gains or losses associated with the exposures and transactions that the instruments are intended to hedge . the amounts ultimately realized upon settlement of these financial instruments , together with the gains and losses on the underlying exposures , will depend on actual market conditions during the remaining life of the instruments . the company generally enters into master netting arrangements , which are designed to reduce credit risk by permitting net settlement of transactions with the same counterparty . to further limit credit risk , the company generally enters into collateral security arrangements that provide for collateral to be received or posted when the net fair value of certain financial instruments fluctuates from contractually established thresholds . the company presents its derivative assets and derivative liabilities at their gross fair values in its consolidated balance sheets . the net cash collateral received by the company related to derivative instruments under its collateral security arrangements was $ 1.0 billion as of september 26 , 2015 and $ 2.1 billion as of september 27 , 2014 . under master netting arrangements with the respective counterparties to the company 2019s derivative contracts , the company is allowed to net settle transactions with a single net amount payable by one party to the other . as of september 26 , 2015 and september 27 , 2014 , the potential effects of these rights of set-off associated with the company 2019s derivative contracts , including the effects of collateral , would be a reduction to both derivative assets and derivative liabilities of $ 2.2 billion and $ 1.6 billion , respectively , resulting in net derivative liabilities of $ 78 million and $ 549 million , respectively . accounts receivable receivables the company has considerable trade receivables outstanding with its third-party cellular network carriers , wholesalers , retailers , value-added resellers , small and mid-sized businesses and education , enterprise and government customers . the company generally does not require collateral from its customers ; however , the company will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk . in addition , when possible , the company attempts to limit credit risk on trade receivables with credit insurance for certain customers or by requiring third-party financing , loans or leases to support credit exposure . these credit-financing arrangements are directly between the third-party financing company and the end customer . as such , the company generally does not assume any recourse or credit risk sharing related to any of these arrangements . as of september 26 , 2015 , the company had one customer that represented 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total trade receivables , which accounted for 12% ( 12 % ) . as of september 27 , 2014 , the company had two customers that represented 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total trade receivables , one of which accounted for 16% ( 16 % ) and the other 13% ( 13 % ) . the company 2019s cellular network carriers accounted for 71% ( 71 % ) and 72% ( 72 % ) of trade receivables as of september 26 , 2015 and september 27 , 2014 , respectively . vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of components to these vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these components directly from suppliers . vendor non-trade receivables from three of the company 2019s vendors accounted for 38% ( 38 % ) , 18% ( 18 % ) and 14% ( 14 % ) of total vendor non-trade receivables as of september 26 , 2015 and three of the company 2019s vendors accounted for 51% ( 51 % ) , 16% ( 16 % ) and 14% ( 14 % ) of total vendor non-trade receivables as of september 27 , 2014 . note 3 2013 consolidated financial statement details the following tables show the company 2019s consolidated financial statement details as of september 26 , 2015 and september 27 , 2014 ( in millions ) : property , plant and equipment , net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>land and buildings</td><td>$ 6956</td><td>$ 4863</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>machinery equipment and internal-use software</td><td>37038</td><td>29639</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>leasehold improvements</td><td>5263</td><td>4513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross property plant and equipment</td><td>49257</td><td>39015</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>-26786 ( 26786 )</td><td>-18391 ( 18391 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total property plant and equipment net</td><td>$ 22471</td><td>$ 20624</td></tr></table> apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 53 . Question: what was the change in leasehold improvements between 2014 and 2015?

750.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

new term loan a facility , with the remaining unpaid principal amount of loans under the new term loan a facility due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 . principal amounts outstanding under the new revolving loan facility are due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 , subject to earlier repayment pursuant to the springing maturity date described above . in addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the borrowings , we are obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee at a rate determined by reference to a total leverage ratio , with a maximum commitment fee of 40% ( 40 % ) of the applicable margin for eurocurrency loans . in july 2016 , breakaway four , ltd. , as borrower , and nclc , as guarantor , entered into a supplemental agreement , which amended the breakaway four loan to , among other things , increase the aggregate principal amount of commitments under the multi-draw term loan credit facility from 20ac590.5 million to 20ac729.9 million . in june 2016 , we took delivery of seven seas explorer . to finance the payment due upon delivery , we had export credit financing in place for 80% ( 80 % ) of the contract price . the associated $ 373.6 million term loan bears interest at 3.43% ( 3.43 % ) with a maturity date of june 30 , 2028 . principal and interest payments shall be paid semiannually . in december 2016 , nclc issued $ 700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior unsecured notes due december 2021 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) in a private offering ( the 201coffering 201d ) at par . nclc used the net proceeds from the offering , after deducting the initial purchasers 2019 discount and estimated fees and expenses , together with cash on hand , to purchase its outstanding 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 having an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $ 680 million . the redemption of the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 was completed in january 2017 . nclc will pay interest on the notes at 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) per annum , semiannually on june 15 and december 15 of each year , commencing on june 15 , 2017 , to holders of record at the close of business on the immediately preceding june 1 and december 1 , respectively . nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or part , at any time prior to december 15 , 2018 , at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but not including , the redemption date and a 201cmake-whole premium . 201d nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or in part , on or after december 15 , 2018 , at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the notes . at any time ( which may be more than once ) on or prior to december 15 , 2018 , nclc may choose to redeem up to 40% ( 40 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes at a redemption price equal to 104.750% ( 104.750 % ) of the face amount thereof with an amount equal to the net proceeds of one or more equity offerings , so long as at least 60% ( 60 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes issued remains outstanding following such redemption . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants that limit nclc 2019s ability ( and its restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability ) to , among other things : ( i ) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares ; ( ii ) pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments ; ( iii ) create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other distributions to nclc from its restricted subsidiaries ; ( iv ) create liens on certain assets to secure debt ; ( v ) make certain investments ; ( vi ) engage in transactions with affiliates ; ( vii ) engage in sales of assets and subsidiary stock ; and ( viii ) transfer all or substantially all of its assets or enter into merger or consolidation transactions . the indenture governing the notes also provides for events of default , which , if any of them occurs , would permit or require the principal , premium ( if any ) , interest and other monetary obligations on all of the then-outstanding notes to become due and payable immediately . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2016 was $ 276.9 million which included $ 34.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 27.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 221.9 million which included $ 36.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 12.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 151.8 million which included $ 32.3 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and $ 15.4 million of expenses related to financing transactions in connection with the acquisition of prestige . certain of our debt agreements contain covenants that , among other things , require us to maintain a minimum level of liquidity , as well as limit our net funded debt-to-capital ratio , maintain certain other ratios and restrict our ability to pay dividends . substantially all of our ships and other property and equipment are pledged as collateral for certain of our debt . we believe we were in compliance with these covenants as of december 31 , 2016 . the following are scheduled principal repayments on long-term debt including capital lease obligations as of december 31 , 2016 for each of the next five years ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 560193</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>554846</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>561687</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>1153733</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>2193823</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1490322</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 6514604</td></tr></table> we had an accrued interest liability of $ 32.5 million and $ 34.2 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. . Question: what was the value that can be deducted from future income tax due to amortization in 2016? Answer: 34.7 Question: what was the value in 2015? Answer: 36.7 Question: what is the sum of those years?

71.4

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

shareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( percents )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.00% ( 2.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.31</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>22.26</td><td>22.91</td><td>21.68</td></tr></table> pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and . Question: from 2016 to 2017, what was the variation in the total amount spent on share repurchase? Answer: -180.3 Question: and what is this variation as a percentage of that amount in 2016?

-0.33383

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2011 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2016 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana inc. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , goodyear tire & rubber co. , johnson controls international plc , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company index</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>delphi automotive plc ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 177.58</td><td>$ 283.02</td><td>$ 347.40</td><td>$ 414.58</td><td>$ 331.43</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 ( 2 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.04</td><td>188.67</td><td>203.06</td><td>198.34</td><td>202.30</td></tr></table> dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 and $ 0.29 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2015 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , in january 2017 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 15 , 2017 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 6 , 2017. . Question: what was the dividend per share in 2016? Answer: 0.29 Question: what was the dividend per share in 2015? Answer: 0.25 Question: what was the net difference? Answer: 0.04 Question: what was the dividend per share in 2015? Answer: 0.25 Question: what was the percent change?

0.16

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 . cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years . restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant . compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant . the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006</td><td>1107455</td><td>$ 45.86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>852353</td><td>63.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-51206 ( 51206 )</td><td>56.93</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-63624 ( 63624 )</td><td>49.65</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007</td><td>1844978</td><td>$ 53.61</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years . there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. . Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares? Answer: 852353.0 Question: and what was it for vested ones? Answer: 51206.0 Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one? Answer: 16.64557 Question: and in that same year, what was the fair value of these vested shares, in millions? Answer: 3.4 Question: what was it for 2005? Answer: 0.6 Question: what was, then, the total combined fair value for both years, in millions?

4.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value , and our results of operations could be materially impacted . there were no stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 . the weighted-average grant-date fair value per option during the year ended december 31 , 2013 was $ 4.14 . the fair value of each option grant has been estimated with the following weighted-average assumptions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility1</td><td>40.2% ( 40.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected term ( years ) 2</td><td>6.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate3</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected dividend yield4</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td></tr></table> expected volatility 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.2% ( 40.2 % ) expected term ( years ) 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.9 risk-free interest rate 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) expected dividend yield 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4% ( 2.4 % ) 1 the expected volatility used to estimate the fair value of stock options awarded is based on a blend of : ( i ) historical volatility of our common stock for periods equal to the expected term of our stock options and ( ii ) implied volatility of tradable forward put and call options to purchase and sell shares of our common stock . 2 the estimate of our expected term is based on the average of : ( i ) an assumption that all outstanding options are exercised upon achieving their full vesting date and ( ii ) an assumption that all outstanding options will be exercised at the midpoint between the current date ( i.e. , the date awards have ratably vested through ) and their full contractual term . in determining the estimate , we considered several factors , including the historical option exercise behavior of our employees and the terms and vesting periods of the options . 3 the risk-free interest rate is determined using the implied yield currently available for zero-coupon u.s . government issuers with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the options . 4 the expected dividend yield was calculated based on an annualized dividend of $ 0.30 per share in 2013 . stock-based compensation we grant other stock-based compensation awards such as stock-settled awards , cash-settled awards and performance- based awards ( settled in cash or shares ) to certain key employees . the number of shares or units received by an employee for performance-based awards depends on company performance against specific performance targets and could range from 0% ( 0 % ) to 300% ( 300 % ) of the target amount of shares originally granted . incentive awards are subject to certain restrictions and vesting requirements as determined by the compensation committee . the fair value of the shares on the grant date is amortized over the vesting period , which is generally three years . upon completion of the vesting period for cash-settled awards , the grantee is entitled to receive a payment in cash based on the fair market value of the corresponding number of shares of common stock . no monetary consideration is paid by a recipient for any incentive award . the fair value of cash-settled awards is adjusted each quarter based on our share price . the holders of stock-settled awards have absolute ownership interest in the underlying shares of common stock prior to vesting , which includes the right to vote and receive dividends . dividends declared on common stock are accrued during the vesting period and paid when the award vests . the holders of cash-settled and performance-based awards have no ownership interest in the underlying shares of common stock until the awards vest and the shares of common stock are issued. . Question: how many stock options were granted in 2014?

0.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the personnel committee set the entergy achievement multiplier at 140% ( 140 % ) of target . under the terms of the executive incentive plan , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive ( including mr . denault and mr . smith , but not the other named executive officers ) , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee , through the exercise of negative discretion , a mechanism to take into consideration the specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2009 , the committee exercised its negative discretion to eliminate the management effectiveness factor , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive award for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . smith ) is awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer's supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy's chief executive officer . the following table shows the executive and management incentive plans payments as a percentage of base salary for 2008 : named exeutive officer target percentage base salary 2008 annual incentive award . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>named exeutive officer</td><td>target</td><td>percentage base salary</td><td>2008 annual incentive award</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>j . wayne leonard</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>168% ( 168 % )</td><td>$ 2169720</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leo p . denault</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 617400</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>richard j . smith</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 632100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>e . renae conley</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>102% ( 102 % )</td><td>$ 415000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>hugh t . mcdonald</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>$ 160500</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>joseph f . domino</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 230000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>roderick k . west</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>80% ( 80 % )</td><td>$ 252000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>haley fisackerly</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td><td>$ 125700</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>theodore h . bunting jr .</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>117% ( 117 % )</td><td>$ 400023</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>carolyn shanks</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 229134</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>jay a . lewis</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>$ 128505</td></tr></table> while ms . shanks and mr . lewis are no longer ceo-entergy mississippi and principal financial officer for the subsidiaries , respectively , ms . shanks continues to participate in the executive incentive plan , and mr . lewis continues to participate in the management incentive plan as they remain employees of entergy since the contemplated enexus separation has not occurred and enexus remains a subsidiary of entergy . nuclear retention plan some of entergy's executives , but not any of the named executive officers , participate in a special retention plan for officers and other leaders with special expertise in the nuclear industry . the committee authorized the plan to attract and retain management talent in the nuclear power field , a field which requires unique technical and other expertise that is in great demand in the utility industry . the plan provides for bonuses to be paid over a three-year employment period . subject to continued employment with a participating company , a participating employee is eligible to receive a special cash bonus consisting of three payments , each consisting of an amount from 15% ( 15 % ) to 30% ( 30 % ) of such participant's base salary. . Question: what is the highest annual incentive award in 2008? Answer: 2169720.0 Question: what about the lowest? Answer: 125700.0 Question: what is the difference among the highest and the lowest annual incentive award? Answer: 2044020.0 Question: what is the second highest annual incentive award?

632100.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2006 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>3/31/2006</td><td>3/31/2007</td><td>3/31/2008</td><td>3/31/2009</td><td>3/31/2010</td><td>3/31/2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>abiomed inc</td><td>100</td><td>105.89</td><td>101.86</td><td>37.98</td><td>80.00</td><td>112.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite index</td><td>100</td><td>103.50</td><td>97.41</td><td>65.33</td><td>102.49</td><td>118.86</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849</td><td>100</td><td>88.78</td><td>84.26</td><td>46.12</td><td>83.47</td><td>91.35</td></tr></table> this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. . Question: what was the value of the nasdaq composite index in 2009? Answer: 65.33 Question: what was the value in 2006?

100.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2015 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )</td><td>total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms</td><td>approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2015</td><td>1658771</td><td>$ 62.12</td><td>842059</td><td>816712</td><td>$ 2.0 billion</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2015</td><td>2412467</td><td>$ 71.08</td><td>212878</td><td>2199589</td><td>$ 1.8 billion</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2015</td><td>7008414</td><td>$ 70.31</td><td>980</td><td>7007434</td><td>$ 1.3 billion</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>11079652</td><td>$ 69.25</td><td>1055917</td><td>10023735</td><td>$ 1.3 billion</td></tr></table> ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2015 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors approved our purchase of $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( with no expiration date ) , which was in addition to the remaining amount available under our $ 3 billion program previously authorized . during the third quarter of 2015 , we completed our purchases under the $ 3 billion program . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had $ 1.3 billion remaining available for purchase under the $ 2.5 billion program. . Question: what is the total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs during october 2015?

842059.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

consist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2012 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 39 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest product principal interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interestonlyproduct</td><td>principalandinterestproduct</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 1338</td><td>$ 221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>2048</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>2024</td><td>654</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1571</td><td>504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>3075</td><td>697</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 and thereafter</td><td>5497</td><td>4825</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>$ 15553</td><td>$ 7376</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes approximately $ 166 million , $ 208 million , $ 213 million , $ 61 million , $ 70 million and $ 526 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2012 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.86% ( 3.86 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.96% ( 5.96 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 91 . Question: what percentage of the total of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods is represented by the ones scheduled to end in 2017? Answer: 0.19771 Question: and what is the value of the interest only products home equity lines that are scheduled to end in 2015?

1338.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

alexion pharmaceuticals , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) in 2006 , we completed a final phase iii trial of pexelizumab . after reviewing results from that trial , we along with p&g , determined not to pursue further development of pexelizumab . effective march 30 , 2007 , we and p&g mutually agreed to terminate the collaboration agreement . as the relevant agreement has been terminated in march 2007 , the remaining portion of the $ 10000 non-refundable up-front license fee , or $ 5343 , was recognized as revenue in the year ended december 31 , 2007 and is included in contract research revenues . license and research and development agreements we have entered into a number of license , research and development and manufacturing development agreements since our inception . these agreements have been made with various research institutions , universities , contractors , collaborators , and government agencies in order to advance and obtain technologies and services related to our business . license agreements generally provide for an initial fee followed by annual minimum royalty payments . additionally , certain agreements call for future payments upon the attainment of agreed upon milestones , such as , but not limited to , investigational new drug , or ind , application or approval of biologics license application . these agreements require minimum royalty payments based on sales of products developed from the applicable technologies , if any . clinical and manufacturing development agreements generally provide for us to fund manufacturing development and on-going clinical trials . clinical trial and development agreements include contract services and outside contractor services including contracted clinical site services related to patient enrolment for our clinical trials . manufacturing development agreements include clinical manufacturing and manufacturing development and scale-up . we have executed a large-scale product supply agreement with lonza sales ag for the long-term commercial manufacture of soliris ( see note 9 ) . in order to maintain our rights under these agreements , we may be required to provide a minimum level of funding or support . we may elect to terminate these arrangements . accordingly , we recognize the expense and related obligation related to these arrangements over the period of performance . the minimum fixed payments ( assuming non-termination of the above agreements ) as of december 31 , 2007 , for each of the next five years are as follows : years ending december 31 , license agreements clinical and manufacturing development agreements . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ending december 31,</td><td>license agreements</td><td>clinical and manufacturing development agreements</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 707</td><td>$ 2860</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>552</td><td>3750</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>322</td><td>7500</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>300</td><td>7500</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>300</td><td>7500</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the net change in license agreements from 2008 to 2009? Answer: -155.0 Question: what was the value in 2008? Answer: 707.0 Question: what is the net change divided by the 2008 value?

-0.21924

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>155.99</td><td>215.10</td><td>270.83</td><td>350.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.32</td><td>164.84</td><td>167.06</td><td>187.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>151.58</td><td>198.02</td><td>174.88</td><td>201.26</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . Question: what was the performance price of the cadence design system in 2010? Answer: 155.99 Question: and what was the change in that price since 2009?

55.99

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

note 12 2013 stock-based compensation during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 189 million , $ 167 million , and $ 157 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated costs on our statements of earnings . the net impact to earnings for the respective years was $ 122 million , $ 108 million , and $ 101 million . as of december 31 , 2013 , we had $ 132 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years . we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 827 million , $ 440 million , and $ 116 million during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 were reduced by $ 158 million , $ 96 million , and $ 56 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements . stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) , or other stock units . the exercise price of options to purchase common stock may not be less than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant . no award of stock options may become fully vested prior to the third anniversary of the grant , and no portion of a stock option grant may become vested in less than one year . the minimum vesting period for restricted stock or stock units payable in stock is three years . award agreements may provide for shorter or pro-rated vesting periods or vesting following termination of employment in the case of death , disability , divestiture , retirement , change of control , or layoff . the maximum term of a stock option or any other award is 10 years . at december 31 , 2013 , inclusive of the shares reserved for outstanding stock options , rsus and psus , we had 20.4 million shares reserved for issuance under the plans . at december 31 , 2013 , 4.7 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans . we issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options or when restrictions on rsus and psus have been satisfied . the following table summarizes activity related to nonvested rsus during 2013 : number of rsus ( in thousands ) weighted average grant-date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of rsus ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value pershare</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2012</td><td>4822</td><td>$ 79.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1356</td><td>89.24</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-2093 ( 2093 )</td><td>79.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-226 ( 226 )</td><td>81.74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2013</td><td>3859</td><td>$ 82.42</td></tr></table> rsus are valued based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant . employees who are granted rsus receive the right to receive shares of stock after completion of the vesting period , however , the shares are not issued , and the employees cannot sell or transfer shares prior to vesting and have no voting rights until the rsus vest , generally three years from the date of the award . employees who are granted rsus receive dividend-equivalent cash payments only upon vesting . for these rsu awards , the grant-date fair value is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant less a discount to reflect the delay in payment of dividend-equivalent cash payments . we recognize the grant-date fair value of rsus , less estimated forfeitures , as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period , which beginning with the rsus granted in 2013 is shorter than the vesting period if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or will become retirement eligible before the end of the vesting period . stock options we generally recognize compensation cost for stock options ratably over the three-year vesting period . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , there were 10.2 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.65 ) and 20.6 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.15 ) stock options outstanding . stock options outstanding at december 31 , 2013 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately five years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 663 million , and we expect nearly all of these stock options to vest . of the stock options outstanding , 7.7 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 84.37 ) have vested as of december 31 , 2013 and those stock options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately four years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 497 million . there were 10.1 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 82.72 ) stock options exercised during 2013 . we did not grant stock options to employees during 2013. . Question: what was the value of nonvested rsus at the end of 2013? Answer: 3859.0 Question: what was the value at the start? Answer: 4822.0 Question: what was the net change in value?

-963.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007 program</td><td>2003 program</td><td>2001 program</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>liability at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 12.6</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>$ 31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments</td><td>19.1</td><td>-0.5 ( 0.5 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td><td>13.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-7.2 ( 7.2 )</td><td>-3.1 ( 3.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>liability at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 11.9</td><td>$ 9.0</td><td>$ 8.7</td><td>$ 29.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net charges and adjustments</td><td>4.3</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.7</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-15.0 ( 15.0 )</td><td>-4.1 ( 4.1 )</td><td>-3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>-22.6 ( 22.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liability at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 5.7</td><td>$ 5.9</td><td>$ 12.8</td></tr></table> 1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. . Question: what was the total liability by the end of 2008? Answer: 29.6 Question: and what was it by the end of 2007? Answer: 12.8 Question: what was, then, the change over the year? Answer: 16.8 Question: what was the total liability by the end of 2008?

29.6

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

notes to consolidated financial statements 192 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report consolidation analysis the multi-seller conduits administered by the firm were not consoli- dated at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , because each conduit had issued expected loss notes ( 201celns 201d ) , the holders of which are com- mitted to absorbing the majority of the expected loss of each respective conduit . implied support the firm did not have and continues not to have any intent to pro- tect any eln holders from potential losses on any of the conduits 2019 holdings and has no plans to remove any assets from any conduit unless required to do so in its role as administrator . should such a transfer occur , the firm would allocate losses on such assets between itself and the eln holders in accordance with the terms of the applicable eln . expected loss modeling in determining the primary beneficiary of the conduits the firm uses a monte carlo 2013based model to estimate the expected losses of each of the conduits and considers the relative rights and obliga- tions of each of the variable interest holders . the firm 2019s expected loss modeling treats all variable interests , other than the elns , as its own to determine consolidation . the variability to be considered in the modeling of expected losses is based on the design of the enti- ty . the firm 2019s traditional multi-seller conduits are designed to pass credit risk , not liquidity risk , to its variable interest holders , as the assets are intended to be held in the conduit for the longer term . under fin 46 ( r ) , the firm is required to run the monte carlo-based expected loss model each time a reconsideration event occurs . in applying this guidance to the conduits , the following events , are considered to be reconsideration events , as they could affect the determination of the primary beneficiary of the conduits : 2022 new deals , including the issuance of new or additional variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 changes in usage , including the change in the level of outstand- ing variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 modifications of asset purchase agreements ; and 2022 sales of interests held by the primary beneficiary . from an operational perspective , the firm does not run its monte carlo-based expected loss model every time there is a reconsideration event due to the frequency of their occurrence . instead , the firm runs its expected loss model each quarter and includes a growth assump- tion for each conduit to ensure that a sufficient amount of elns exists for each conduit at any point during the quarter . as part of its normal quarterly modeling , the firm updates , when applicable , the inputs and assumptions used in the expected loss model . specifically , risk ratings and loss given default assumptions are continually updated . the total amount of expected loss notes out- standing at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , were $ 136 million and $ 130 million , respectively . management has concluded that the model assumptions used were reflective of market participants 2019 assumptions and appropriately considered the probability of changes to risk ratings and loss given defaults . qualitative considerations the multi-seller conduits are primarily designed to provide an effi- cient means for clients to access the commercial paper market . the firm believes the conduits effectively disperse risk among all parties and that the preponderance of the economic risk in the firm 2019s multi- seller conduits is not held by jpmorgan chase . consolidated sensitivity analysis on capital the table below shows the impact on the firm 2019s reported assets , lia- bilities , tier 1 capital ratio and tier 1 leverage ratio if the firm were required to consolidate all of the multi-seller conduits that it admin- isters at their current carrying value . december 31 , 2008 ( in billions , except ratios ) reported pro forma ( a ) ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>reported</td><td>pro forma ( a ) ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>assets</td><td>$ 2175.1</td><td>$ 2218.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities</td><td>2008.2</td><td>2051.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>6.9</td><td>6.8</td></tr></table> ( a ) the table shows the impact of consolidating the assets and liabilities of the multi- seller conduits at their current carrying value ; as such , there would be no income statement or capital impact at the date of consolidation . if the firm were required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the conduits at fair value , the tier 1 capital ratio would be approximately 10.8% ( 10.8 % ) . the fair value of the assets is primarily based upon pricing for comparable transactions . the fair value of these assets could change significantly because the pricing of conduit transactions is renegotiated with the client , generally , on an annual basis and due to changes in current market conditions . ( b ) consolidation is assumed to occur on the first day of the quarter , at the quarter-end levels , in order to provide a meaningful adjustment to average assets in the denomi- nator of the leverage ratio . the firm could fund purchases of assets from vies should it become necessary . 2007 activity in july 2007 , a reverse repurchase agreement collateralized by prime residential mortgages held by a firm-administered multi-seller conduit was put to jpmorgan chase under its deal-specific liquidity facility . the asset was transferred to and recorded by jpmorgan chase at its par value based on the fair value of the collateral that supported the reverse repurchase agreement . during the fourth quarter of 2007 , additional information regarding the value of the collateral , including performance statistics , resulted in the determi- nation by the firm that the fair value of the collateral was impaired . impairment losses were allocated to the eln holder ( the party that absorbs the majority of the expected loss from the conduit ) in accor- dance with the contractual provisions of the eln note . on october 29 , 2007 , certain structured cdo assets originated in the second quarter of 2007 and backed by subprime mortgages were transferred to the firm from two firm-administered multi-seller conduits . it became clear in october that commercial paper investors and rating agencies were becoming increasingly concerned about cdo assets backed by subprime mortgage exposures . because of these concerns , and to ensure the continuing viability of the two conduits as financing vehicles for clients and as investment alternatives for commercial paper investors , the firm , in its role as administrator , transferred the cdo assets out of the multi-seller con- duits . the structured cdo assets were transferred to the firm at . Question: what is the balance of reported liabilities? Answer: 2008.2 Question: what about the balance of assets? Answer: 2175.1 Question: what is the debt-to-assets ratio? Answer: 0.92327 Question: what is the total expected loss notes outstanding in 2008? Answer: 136.0 Question: what about in 2007? Answer: 130.0 Question: what is the ratio of expected loss notes outstanding in 2008 to 2007?

1.04615

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan . marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant . through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares . in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted . stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan . no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan . similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price . under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options . in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted . stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan . no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan . beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers . all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited . as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards . restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan . in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package . the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment . marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes . the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment . prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon . the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent . common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan . all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors . when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units . stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million . in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million . tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million . cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 . stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees . the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average exercise price per share</td><td>$ 60.94</td><td>$ 37.84</td><td>$ 25.14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected annual dividends per share</td><td>$ 0.96</td><td>$ 0.80</td><td>$ 0.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life in years</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.1</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted</td><td>$ 17.24</td><td>$ 10.19</td><td>$ 6.15</td></tr></table> . Question: how much did the weighted average exercise price per share increase between 2005 and 2007? Answer: 35.8 Question: so what was the percentage change during this time? Answer: 1.42403 Question: what were the total tax benefits for deductions in 2007 and 2006 in excess of the stock-based compensation expense for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested?

66.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

dividends for a summary of the cash dividends paid on citi 2019s outstanding common stock during 2009 and 2010 , see note 33 to the consolidated financial statements . for so long as the u.s . government holds any citigroup trust preferred securities acquired pursuant to the exchange offers consummated in 2009 , citigroup has agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $ 0.01 per quarter , subject to certain customary exceptions . further , any dividend on citi 2019s outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with citi 2019s obligations to any remaining outstanding citigroup preferred stock . performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2010 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>citigroup</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>s&p financial index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006</td><td>119.55</td><td>115.79</td><td>119.19</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2007</td><td>66.10</td><td>122.15</td><td>96.98</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2008</td><td>15.88</td><td>76.96</td><td>43.34</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2009</td><td>7.85</td><td>97.33</td><td>50.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2010</td><td>11.22</td><td>111.99</td><td>56.96</td></tr></table> . Question: what is the difference between the value of citigroup in 2010 and the original value invested in it, in 2005? Answer: -88.78 Question: what was, then, the return in relation to this original value, in percentage? Answer: -0.8878 Question: what is the difference between the value of citigroup in 2010 and the original value invested in it, in 2005? Answer: -43.04 Question: and what was, then, the return in relation to this original value, in percentage? Answer: -0.4304 Question: what is the difference between the return of the citigroup stock and the one of the s&p 500 index?

42.1522

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized at level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . commodities are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav.aa thenavaa valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the navaa is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the navaa is based on valuationmodels and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds forwhich thenavaa is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . there were no material contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans during 2017 . we will make contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions.as a result of these contributions , we do not expect any material qualified defined benefit cash funding will be required until 2021.we plan to fund these contributions using a mix of cash on hand and commercial paper . while we do not anticipate a need to do so , our capital structure and resources would allow us to issue new debt if circumstances change . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023 2013 2027</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 2450</td><td>$ 2480</td><td>$ 2560</td><td>$ 2630</td><td>$ 2700</td><td>$ 14200</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>820</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans wemaintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , wematchmost employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 613 million in 2017 , $ 617 million in 2016 and $ 393 million in 2015 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 35.5 million and 36.9 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016. . Question: what is the difference in employee total matching contributions in 2016? Answer: 617.0 Question: what about in 2015? Answer: 393.0 Question: what is the difference?

224.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

( a ) excludes discontinued operations . ( b ) earnings before interest expense and taxes as a percent of average total assets . ( c ) total debt as a percent of the sum of total debt , shareholders 2019 equity and non-current deferred income tax liabilities . the results above include the impact of the specified items detailed below . additional discussion regarding the specified items in fiscal years 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are provided in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>years ended september 30 2017</td><td>years ended september 30 2016</td><td>years ended september 30 2015</td><td>years ended september 30 2014</td><td>years ended september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total specified items</td><td>$ 1466</td><td>$ 1261</td><td>$ 1186</td><td>$ 153</td><td>$ 442</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>after-tax impact of specified items</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 892</td><td>$ 786</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impact of specified items on diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ -4.34 ( 4.34 )</td><td>$ -4.10 ( 4.10 )</td><td>$ -3.79 ( 3.79 )</td><td>$ -0.51 ( 0.51 )</td><td>$ -1.40 ( 1.40 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impact of dilution from share issuances</td><td>$ -0.54 ( 0.54 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -0.02 ( 0.02 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following commentary should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes . within the tables presented throughout this discussion , certain columns may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes . percentages and earnings per share amounts presented are calculated from the underlying amounts . references to years throughout this discussion relate to our fiscal years , which end on september 30 . company overview description of the company and business segments becton , dickinson and company ( 201cbd 201d ) is a global medical technology company engaged in the development , manufacture and sale of a broad range of medical supplies , devices , laboratory equipment and diagnostic products used by healthcare institutions , life science researchers , clinical laboratories , the pharmaceutical industry and the general public . the company's organizational structure is based upon two principal business segments , bd medical ( 201cmedical 201d ) and bd life sciences ( 201clife sciences 201d ) . bd 2019s products are manufactured and sold worldwide . our products are marketed in the united states and internationally through independent distribution channels and directly to end-users by bd and independent sales representatives . we organize our operations outside the united states as follows : europe ; ema ( which includes the commonwealth of independent states , the middle east and africa ) ; greater asia ( which includes japan and asia pacific ) ; latin america ( which includes mexico , central america , the caribbean , and south america ) ; and canada . we continue to pursue growth opportunities in emerging markets , which include the following geographic regions : eastern europe , the middle east , africa , latin america and certain countries within asia pacific . we are primarily focused on certain countries whose healthcare systems are expanding , in particular , china and india . strategic objectives bd remains focused on delivering sustainable growth and shareholder value , while making appropriate investments for the future . bd management operates the business consistent with the following core strategies : 2022 to increase revenue growth by focusing on our core products , services and solutions that deliver greater benefits to patients , healthcare workers and researchers; . Question: what was the value of total specified items as of 9/30/17?

1466.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 . other assets other assets as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>$ 84313</td><td>$ 90643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investments</td><td>63526</td><td>76589</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>security and other deposits</td><td>11692</td><td>16087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>prepaid royalties</td><td>12059</td><td>9026</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred compensation plan assets</td><td>9045</td><td>7560</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>restricted cash</td><td>4650</td><td>7361</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>prepaid land lease</td><td>3209</td><td>3185</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>prepaid rent</td><td>1377</td><td>2658</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other</td><td>1394</td><td>3420</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other assets</td><td>$ 191265</td><td>$ 216529</td></tr></table> acquired rights to use technology purchased during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was $ 6.0 million and $ 100.4 million , respectively . of the cost for fiscal 2008 , an estimated $ 56.4 million was related to future licensing rights and has been capitalized and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives up to fifteen years . of the remaining costs for fiscal 2008 , we estimated that $ 27.2 million was related to historical use of licensing rights which was expensed as cost of sales and the residual of $ 16.8 million for fiscal 2008 was expensed as general and administrative costs . in connection with these licensing arrangements , we have the ability to acquire additional rights to use technology in the future . see note 17 for further information regarding our contractual commitments . in general , acquired rights to use technology are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 15 years . included in investments are our indirect investments through our limited partnership interest in adobe ventures of approximately $ 37.1 million and $ 39.0 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which is consolidated in accordance with the provisions for consolidating variable interest entities . the partnership is controlled by granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures . we are the primary beneficiary of adobe ventures and bear virtually all of the risks and rewards related to our ownership . our investment in adobe ventures does not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . adobe ventures carries its investments in equity securities at estimated fair value and investment gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of income . substantially all of the investments held by adobe ventures at november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 are not publicly traded and , therefore , there is no established market for these securities . in order to determine the fair value of these investments , we use the most recent round of financing involving new non-strategic investors or estimates of current market value made by granite ventures . it is our policy to evaluate the fair value of these investments held by adobe ventures , as well as our direct investments , on a regular basis . this evaluation includes , but is not limited to , reviewing each company 2019s cash position , financing needs , earnings and revenue outlook , operational performance , management and ownership changes and competition . in the case of privately-held companies , this evaluation is based on information that we request from these companies . this information is not subject to the same disclosure regulations as u.s . publicly traded companies and as such , the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and the accuracy of the data received from these companies . see note 4 for further information regarding adobe ventures . also included in investments are our direct investments in privately-held companies of approximately $ 26.4 million and $ 37.6 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which are accounted for based on the cost method . we assess these investments for impairment in value as circumstances dictate . see note 4 for further information regarding our cost method investments . we entered into a purchase and sale agreement , effective may 12 , 2008 , for the acquisition of real property located in waltham , massachusetts . we purchased the property upon completion of construction of an office building shell and core , parking structure , and site improvements . the purchase price for the property was $ 44.7 million and closed on june 16 , 2009 . we made an initial deposit of $ 7.0 million which was included in security and other deposits as of november 28 , 2008 and the remaining balance was paid at closing . this deposit was held in escrow until closing and then applied to the purchase price. . Question: what is the net change in the balance of other assets from 2008 to 2009?

-25264.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

during fiscal 2013 , we entered into an asr with a financial institution to repurchase an aggregate of $ 125 million of our common stock . in exchange for an up-front payment of $ 125 million , the financial institution committed to deliver a number of shares during the asr 2019s purchase period , which ended on march 30 , 2013 . the total number of shares delivered under this asr was 2.5 million at an average price of $ 49.13 per share . during fiscal 2013 , in addition to shares repurchased under the asr , we repurchased and retired 1.1 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 50.3 million , or an average of $ 44.55 per share , including commissions . note 10 2014share-based awards and options non-qualified stock options and restricted stock have been granted to officers , key employees and directors under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan ( the 201c2005 plan 201d ) , the amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . there were no further grants made under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . there will be no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 7.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for stock options , restricted stock , performance units , tsr units , and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan ( each as described below ) . 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 21.1</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ 18.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ -6.9 ( 6.9 )</td><td>$ -7.1 ( 7.1 )</td><td>$ -5.6 ( 5.6 )</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock and restricted stock units we grant restricted stock and restricted stock units . restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 will either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted up to three types of performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . 80 2013 global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report . Question: what is the share-based compensation expense in 2015? Answer: 21.1 Question: and in 2014? Answer: 29.8 Question: so what was the difference between these two years?

-8.7

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>total cumulative return</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>edwards lifesciences</td><td>$ 127.54</td><td>$ 93.01</td><td>$ 180.17</td><td>$ 223.42</td><td>$ 265.06</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment index</td><td>117.42</td><td>150.28</td><td>181.96</td><td>194.37</td><td>207.46</td></tr></table> . Question: what is the increase in value of an investment in edwards lifesciences from 2011 to 2016? Answer: 165.06 Question: what percentage change does this represent? Answer: 1.6506 Question: what about the value of an investment in s&p500 in 2016? Answer: 198.18 Question: what is the net increase? Answer: 98.18 Question: what percentage change does this represenet?

0.9818

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>2140511</td><td>$ 20.54</td><td>2139507</td><td>$ 227368014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1126378</td><td>$ 22.95</td><td>1124601</td><td>$ 201557625</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1881992</td><td>$ 22.97</td><td>1872650</td><td>$ 158553178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5148881</td><td>$ 21.96</td><td>5136758</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. . Question: what were the total number of shares purchased in october? Answer: 2140511.0 Question: what was the total number of shares purchased in november? Answer: 1126378.0 Question: what is the sum value? Answer: 3266889.0 Question: how many months are october and november?

2.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 102.53</td><td>$ 222.09</td><td>$ 301.96</td><td>$ 296.67</td><td>$ 459.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 78.53</td><td>$ 162.82</td><td>$ 225.95</td><td>$ 217.56</td><td>$ 327.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 83.69</td><td>$ 165.75</td><td>$ 229.31</td><td>$ 235.63</td><td>$ 365.63</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 74.86</td><td>$ 92.42</td><td>$ 104.24</td><td>$ 104.23</td><td>$ 118.21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 68.79</td><td>$ 100.70</td><td>$ 121.35</td><td>$ 138.19</td><td>$ 190.58</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. . Question: combined, what was the price of discb and disck for 12/31/12

692.74

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 172</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 227</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>132</td><td>151</td><td>153</td><td>171</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>136</td><td>156</td><td>154</td><td>189</td><td>230</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>151</td><td>195</td><td>231</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the value of the s&p500 index in 2015?

153.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

15 . leases in january 1996 , the company entered into a lease agreement with an unrelated third party for a new corporate office facility , which the company occupied in february 1997 . in may 2004 , the company entered into the first amendment to this lease agreement , effective january 1 , 2004 . the lease was extended from an original period of 10 years , with an option for five additional years , to a period of 18 years from the inception date , with an option for five additional years . the company incurred lease rental expense related to this facility of $ 1.3 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the future minimum lease payments are $ 1.4 million per annum from january 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2014 . the future minimum lease payments from january 1 , 2015 through december 31 , 2019 will be determined based on prevailing market rental rates at the time of the extension , if elected . the amended lease also provided for the lessor to reimburse the company for up to $ 550000 in building refurbishments completed through march 31 , 2006 . these amounts have been recorded as a reduction of lease expense over the remaining term of the lease . the company has also entered into various noncancellable operating leases for equipment and office space . office space lease expense totaled $ 9.3 million , $ 6.3 million and $ 4.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases for office space in effect at december 31 , 2008 are $ 8.8 million in 2009 , $ 6.6 million in 2010 , $ 3.0 million in 2011 , $ 1.8 million in 2012 and $ 1.1 million in 2013 . 16 . royalty agreements the company has entered into various renewable , nonexclusive license agreements under which the company has been granted access to the licensor 2019s technology and the right to sell the technology in the company 2019s product line . royalties are payable to developers of the software at various rates and amounts , which generally are based upon unit sales or revenue . royalty fees are reported in cost of goods sold and were $ 6.3 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 3.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . 17 . geographic information revenue to external customers is attributed to individual countries based upon the location of the customer . revenue by geographic area is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2008</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2007</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 151688</td><td>$ 131777</td><td>$ 94282</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>germany</td><td>68390</td><td>50973</td><td>34567</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>japan</td><td>66960</td><td>50896</td><td>35391</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada</td><td>8033</td><td>4809</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other european</td><td>127246</td><td>108971</td><td>70184</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other international</td><td>56022</td><td>37914</td><td>24961</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total revenue</td><td>$ 478339</td><td>$ 385340</td><td>$ 263640</td></tr></table> . Question: what is the total future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases for office space for 2009 and 2010? Answer: 15.4 Question: what about if 2011 is added? Answer: 18.4 Question: and if 2012 is added? Answer: 20.2 Question: what about if 2013 is added Answer: 21.3 Question: what is the average for these four years? Answer: 5.325 Question: what is the revenue generated in united states in 2008? Answer: 151688.0 Question: what about the total revenue in 2008? Answer: 478339.0 Question: what portion of revenue is generated in united states?

0.31711

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

december 31 , 2015 carrying amount accumulated amortization . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>gross carrying amount</td><td>accumulated amortization</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>computer software</td><td>$ 793</td><td>$ -643 ( 643 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>patents and licenses</td><td>110</td><td>-98 ( 98 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other intangibles ( f )</td><td>961</td><td>-64 ( 64 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total amortizable intangible assets</td><td>1864</td><td>-805 ( 805 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks</td><td>45</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total other intangible assets</td><td>$ 1909</td><td>$ -805 ( 805 )</td></tr></table> computer software consists primarily of software costs associated with an enterprise business solution ( ebs ) within arconic to drive common systems among all businesses . amortization expense related to the intangible assets in the tables above for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 was $ 65 , $ 67 , and $ 55 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of approximately $ 56 to $ 64 annually from 2017 to 2021 . f . acquisitions and divestitures pro forma results of the company , assuming all acquisitions described below were made at the beginning of the earliest prior period presented , would not have been materially different from the results reported . 2016 divestitures . in april 2016 , arconic completed the sale of the remmele medical business to lisi medical for $ 102 in cash ( $ 99 net of transaction costs ) , which was included in proceeds from the sale of assets and businesses on the accompanying statement of consolidated cash flows . this business , which was part of the rti international metals inc . ( rti ) acquisition ( see below ) , manufactures precision-machined metal products for customers in the minimally invasive surgical device and implantable device markets . since this transaction occurred within a year of the completion of the rti acquisition , no gain was recorded on this transaction as the excess of the proceeds over the carrying value of the net assets of this business was reflected as a purchase price adjustment ( decrease to goodwill of $ 44 ) to the final allocation of the purchase price related to arconic 2019s acquisition of rti . while owned by arconic , the operating results and assets and liabilities of this business were included in the engineered products and solutions segment . this business generated sales of approximately $ 20 from january 1 , 2016 through the divestiture date , april 29 , 2016 , and , at the time of the divestiture , had approximately 330 employees . this transaction is no longer subject to post-closing adjustments . 2015 acquisitions . in march 2015 , arconic completed the acquisition of an aerospace structural castings company , tital , for $ 204 ( 20ac188 ) in cash ( an additional $ 1 ( 20ac1 ) was paid in september 2015 to settle working capital in accordance with the purchase agreement ) . tital , a privately held company with approximately 650 employees based in germany , produces aluminum and titanium investment casting products for the aerospace and defense markets . the purpose of this acquisition is to capture increasing demand for advanced jet engine components made of titanium , establish titanium-casting capabilities in europe , and expand existing aluminum casting capacity . the assets , including the associated goodwill , and liabilities of this business were included within arconic 2019s engineered products and solutions segment since the date of acquisition . based on the preliminary allocation of the purchase price , goodwill of $ 118 was recorded for this transaction . in the first quarter of 2016 , the allocation of the purchase price was finalized , based , in part , on the completion of a third-party valuation of certain assets acquired , resulting in a $ 1 reduction of the initial goodwill amount . none of the $ 117 in goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes and no other intangible assets were identified . this transaction is no longer subject to post-closing adjustments . in july 2015 , arconic completed the acquisition of rti , a u.s . company that was publicly traded on the new york stock exchange under the ticker symbol 201crti . 201d arconic purchased all outstanding shares of rti common stock in a stock-for-stock transaction valued at $ 870 ( based on the $ 9.96 per share july 23 , 2015 closing price of arconic 2019s . Question: what is the gross carrying amount for computer software as of dec 31, 2015? Answer: 793.0 Question: what about the accumulated depreciation related to computer software?

643.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

middleton's reported cigars shipment volume for 2012 decreased 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) due primarily to changes in trade inventories , partially offset by volume growth as a result of retail share gains . in the cigarette category , marlboro's 2012 retail share performance continued to benefit from the brand-building initiatives supporting marlboro's new architecture . marlboro's retail share for 2012 increased 0.6 share points versus 2011 to 42.6% ( 42.6 % ) . in january 2013 , pm usa expanded distribution of marlboro southern cut nationally . marlboro southern cut is part of the marlboro gold family . pm usa's 2012 retail share increased 0.8 share points versus 2011 , reflecting retail share gains by marlboro and by l&m in discount . these gains were partially offset by share losses on other portfolio brands . in the machine-made large cigars category , black & mild's retail share for 2012 increased 0.5 share points . the brand benefited from new untipped cigarillo varieties that were introduced in 2011 , black & mild seasonal offerings and the 2012 third-quarter introduction of black & mild jazz untipped cigarillos into select geographies . in december 2012 , middleton announced plans to launch nationally black & mild jazz cigars in both plastic tip and wood tip in the first quarter of 2013 . the following discussion compares smokeable products segment results for the year ended december 31 , 2011 with the year ended december 31 , 2010 . net revenues , which include excise taxes billed to customers , decreased $ 221 million ( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) ) due to lower shipment volume ( $ 1051 million ) , partially offset by higher net pricing ( $ 830 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments . operating companies income increased $ 119 million ( 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) ) , due primarily to higher net pricing ( $ 831 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments , marketing , administration , and research savings reflecting cost reduction initiatives ( $ 198 million ) and 2010 implementation costs related to the closure of the cabarrus , north carolina manufacturing facility ( $ 75 million ) , partially offset by lower volume ( $ 527 million ) , higher asset impairment and exit costs due primarily to the 2011 cost reduction program ( $ 158 million ) , higher per unit settlement charges ( $ 120 million ) , higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments ( $ 87 million ) and higher fda user fees ( $ 73 million ) . for 2011 , total smokeable products shipment volume decreased 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 . pm usa's reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume declined 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 due primarily to retail share losses and one less shipping day , partially offset by changes in trade inventories . after adjusting for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day , pm usa's 2011 domestic cigarette shipment volume was estimated to be down approximately 4% ( 4 % ) versus 2010 . pm usa believes that total cigarette category volume for 2011 decreased approximately 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) versus 2010 , when adjusted primarily for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day . pm usa's total premium brands ( marlboro and other premium brands ) shipment volume decreased 4.3% ( 4.3 % ) . marlboro's shipment volume decreased 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) versus 2010 . in the discount brands , pm usa's shipment volume decreased 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) . pm usa's shipments of premium cigarettes accounted for 93.7% ( 93.7 % ) of its reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume for 2011 , down from 93.9% ( 93.9 % ) in 2010 . middleton's 2011 reported cigars shipment volume was unchanged versus 2010 . for 2011 , pm usa's retail share of the cigarette category declined 0.8 share points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) due primarily to retail share losses on marlboro . marlboro's 2011 retail share decreased 0.6 share points . in 2010 , marlboro delivered record full-year retail share results that were achieved at lower margin levels . middleton retained a leading share of the tipped cigarillo segment of the machine-made large cigars category , with a retail share of approximately 84% ( 84 % ) in 2011 . for 2011 , middleton's retail share of the cigar category increased 0.3 share points to 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) versus 2010 . black & mild's 2011 retail share increased 0.5 share points , as the brand benefited from new product introductions . during the fourth quarter of 2011 , middleton broadened its untipped cigarillo portfolio with new aroma wrap 2122 foil pouch packaging that accompanied the national introduction of black & mild wine . this new fourth- quarter packaging roll-out also included black & mild sweets and classic varieties . during the second quarter of 2011 , middleton entered into a contract manufacturing arrangement to source the production of a portion of its cigars overseas . middleton entered into this arrangement to access additional production capacity in an uncertain competitive environment and an excise tax environment that potentially benefits imported large cigars over those manufactured domestically . smokeless products segment the smokeless products segment's operating companies income grew during 2012 driven by higher pricing , copenhagen and skoal's combined volume and retail share performance and effective cost management . the following table summarizes smokeless products segment shipment volume performance : shipment volume for the years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( cans and packs in millions )</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>copenhagen</td><td>392.5</td><td>354.2</td><td>327.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>skoal</td><td>288.4</td><td>286.8</td><td>274.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>copenhagenandskoal</td><td>680.9</td><td>641.0</td><td>601.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>82.4</td><td>93.6</td><td>122.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total smokeless products</td><td>763.3</td><td>734.6</td><td>724.4</td></tr></table> volume includes cans and packs sold , as well as promotional units , but excludes international volume , which is not material to the smokeless products segment . other includes certain usstc and pm usa smokeless products . new types of smokeless products , as well as new packaging configurations . Question: what was the difference in total shipment volume between 2010 and 2011?

10.2

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

international networks international networks generated revenues of $ 3.0 billion and adjusted oibda of $ 848 million during 2016 , which represented 47% ( 47 % ) and 35% ( 35 % ) of our total consolidated revenues and adjusted oibda , respectively . our international networks segment principally consists of national and pan-regional television networks and brands that are delivered across multiple distribution platforms . this segment generates revenue from operations in virtually every pay-tv market in the world through an infrastructure that includes operational centers in london , warsaw , milan , singapore and miami . global brands include discovery channel , animal planet , tlc , id , science channel and turbo ( known as velocity in the u.s. ) , along with brands exclusive to international networks , including eurosport , real time , dmax and discovery kids . as of december 31 , 2016 , international networks operated over 400 unique distribution feeds in over 40 languages with channel feeds customized according to language needs and advertising sales opportunities . international networks also has fta and broadcast networks in europe and the middle east and broadcast networks in germany , norway and sweden , and continues to pursue further international expansion . fta networks generate a significant portion of international networks' revenue . the penetration and growth rates of television services vary across countries and territories depending on numerous factors including the dominance of different television platforms in local markets . while pay-tv services have greater penetration in certain markets , fta or broadcast television is dominant in others . international networks has a large international distribution platform for its 37 networks , with as many as 13 networks distributed in any particular country or territory across the more than 220 countries and territories around the world . international networks pursues distribution across all television platforms based on the specific dynamics of local markets and relevant commercial agreements . in addition to the global networks described in the overview section above , we operate networks internationally that utilize the following brands : 2022 eurosport is the leading sports entertainment provider across europe with the following tv brands : eurosport , eurosport 2 and eurosportnews , reaching viewers across europe and asia , as well as eurosport digital , which includes eurosport player and eurosport.com . 2022 viewing subscribers reached by each brand as of december 31 , 2016 were as follows : eurosport : 133 million ; eurosport 2 : 65 million ; and eurosportnews : 9 million . 2022 eurosport telecasts live sporting events with both local and pan-regional appeal and its events focus on winter sports , cycling and tennis , including the tour de france and it is the home of grand slam tennis with all four tournaments . important local sports rights include bundesliga and motogp . in addition , eurosport has increasingly invested in more exclusive and localized rights to drive local audience and commercial relevance . 2022 we have acquired the exclusive broadcast rights across all media platforms throughout europe for the four olympic games between 2018 and 2024 for 20ac1.3 billion ( $ 1.5 billion as of december 31 , 2016 ) . the broadcast rights exclude france for the olympic games in 2018 and 2020 , and exclude russia . in addition to fta broadcasts for the olympic games , many of these events are set to air on eurosport's pay-tv and digital platforms . 2022 on november 2 , 2016 , we announced a long-term agreement and joint venture partnership with bamtech ( "mlbam" ) a technology services and video streaming company , and subsidiary of major league baseball's digital business , that includes the formation of bamtech europe , a joint venture that will provide digital technology services to a broad set of both sports and entertainment clients across europe . 2022 as of december 31 , 2016 , dmax reached approximately 103 million viewers through fta networks , according to internal estimates . 2022 dmax is a men 2019s factual entertainment channel in asia and europe . 2022 discovery kids reached approximately 121 million viewers , according to internal estimates , as of december 31 , 2016 . 2022 discovery kids is a leading children's network in latin america and asia . our international networks segment also owns and operates the following regional television networks , which reached the following number of subscribers and viewers via pay and fta or broadcast networks , respectively , as of december 31 , 2016 : television service international subscribers/viewers ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>television service</td><td>internationalsubscribers/viewers ( millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quest</td><td>fta</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nordic broadcast networks ( a )</td><td>broadcast</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>giallo</td><td>fta</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>frisbee</td><td>fta</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>focus</td><td>fta</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>k2</td><td>fta</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deejay tv</td><td>fta</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>discovery hd world</td><td>pay</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shed</td><td>pay</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>discovery history</td><td>pay</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>discovery world</td><td>pay</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>discovery en espanol ( u.s. )</td><td>pay</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>discovery familia ( u.s. )</td><td>pay</td><td>6</td></tr></table> ( a ) number of subscribers corresponds to the sum of the subscribers to each of the nordic broadcast networks in sweden , norway , finland and denmark subject to retransmission agreements with pay-tv providers . the nordic broadcast networks include kanal 5 , kanal 9 , and kanal 11 in sweden , tv norge , max , fem and vox in norway , tv 5 , kutonen , and frii in finland , and kanal 4 , kanal 5 , 6'eren , and canal 9 in denmark . similar to u.s . networks , a significant source of revenue for international networks relates to fees charged to operators who distribute our linear networks . such operators primarily include cable and dth satellite service providers . international television markets vary in their stages of development . some markets , such as the u.k. , are more advanced digital television markets , while others remain in the analog environment with varying degrees of investment from operators to expand channel capacity or convert to digital technologies . common practice in some markets results in long-term contractual distribution relationships , while customers in other markets renew contracts annually . distribution revenue for our international networks segment is largely dependent on the number of subscribers that receive our networks or content , the rates negotiated in the distributor agreements , and the market demand for the content that we provide . the other significant source of revenue for international networks relates to advertising sold on our television networks and across distribution platforms , similar to u.s . networks . advertising revenue is dependent upon a number of factors , including the development of pay and fta television markets , the number of subscribers to and viewers of our channels , viewership demographics , the popularity of our programming , and our ability to sell commercial time over a portfolio of channels on multiple platforms . in certain markets , our advertising sales business operates with in-house sales teams , while we rely on external sales representation services in other markets . in developing television markets , advertising revenue growth results from continued subscriber growth , our localization strategy , and the shift of advertising spending from traditional broadcast networks to channels . Question: what was the sum of eurosport and eurosport 2 viewing subscribers? Answer: 198.0 Question: what is the sum plus those from eurosport news?

207.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and uncommitted lines of credit of certain subsidiaries . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 824.5 and $ 829.2 , respectively , the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to uncommitted lines of credit was $ 349.1 and $ 308.8 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees related to daylight overdrafts , primarily utilized to manage intra-day overdrafts due to timing of transactions under cash pooling arrangements without resulting in incremental borrowings , was $ 207.8 and $ 182.2 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 65.7</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>$ 23.6</td><td>$ 4.7</td><td>$ 10.2</td><td>$ 2.7</td><td>$ 126.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>30.1</td><td>30.6</td><td>42.9</td><td>5.7</td><td>3.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>115.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 95.8</td><td>$ 50.6</td><td>$ 66.5</td><td>$ 10.4</td><td>$ 13.7</td><td>$ 5.2</td><td>$ 242.2</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2018 . these estimated payments of $ 24.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2019 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2020 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value , in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 5 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities arising in the normal course of business . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company has been in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies , and that settlement was fully executed in april 2018 . the company has previously provided for such settlement in its consolidated financial statements. . Question: what was the change in redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates from 2021 to 2022?

37.2

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

notes to consolidated financial statements 4 . the sum of the quarters 2019 earnings per common share may not equal the annual amounts due to the averaging effect of the number of shares and share equivalents throughout the year . 5 . during the fourth quarter of 2016 , net revenues included losses of approximately $ 60 million on sales and markdowns of legacy limited partnership investments in third-party-sponsored funds within the invest- ment management business segment . the fourth quarter of 2016 also included a $ 70 million provision within the wealth management busi- ness segment related to certain brokerage service reporting activities . employee share-based awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>2017 quarter first</td><td>2017 quarter second</td><td>2017 quarter third</td><td>2017 quarter fourth</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discrete tax benefit</td><td>$ 112</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 11</td><td>$ 16</td></tr></table> 24 . subsequent events the firm has evaluated subsequent events for adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements through the date of this report and has not identified any recordable or disclos- able events not otherwise reported in these financial state- ments or the notes thereto . 175 december 2017 form 10-k . Question: what is the total discrete tax benefit from employee share-based awards in the first quarter of 2017?

112.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

restrictive covenants the terms of the 2017 credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and dispose of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges , a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that , we will not during any time when a default is continuing , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable the company to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , we were in compliance with all such covenants . junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures in june a02005 , the company and the operating partnership issued $ 100.0 a0million in unsecured trust preferred securities through a newly formed trust , sl a0green capital trust i , or the trust , which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the operating partnership . the securities mature in 2035 and bear interest at a floating rate of 125 a0basis points over the three-month libor . interest payments may be deferred for a period of up to eight consecutive quarters if the operating partnership exercises its right to defer such payments . the trust preferred securities are redeemable at the option of the operating partnership , in whole or in part , with no prepayment premium . we do not consolidate the trust even though it is a variable interest entity as we are not the primary beneficiary . because the trust is not consolidated , we have recorded the debt on our consolidated balance sheets and the related payments are classified as interest expense . interest rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our variable rate debt . our exposure to interest rate fluctuations are managed through either the use of interest rate derivative instru- ments and/or through our variable rate debt and preferred equity investments . a hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for a02017 would increase our consolidated annual interest cost , net of interest income from variable rate debt and preferred equity investments , by $ 2.7 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by $ 17.2 a0million . at december a031 , 2017 , 61.5% ( 61.5 % ) of our $ 2.1 a0bil- lion debt and preferred equity portfolio is indexed to libor . we recognize most derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges are adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is considered a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recog- nized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is immediately recognized in a0earnings . our long-term debt of $ 4.3 a0billion bears interest at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . our variable rate debt and variable rate joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2017 bore interest based on a spread of libor plus 100 a0basis points to libor plus 415 a0basis points . contractual obligations the combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , the 2017 credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as-of-right extension options and put options , estimated interest expense , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2017 are as follows ( in a0thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages and other loans</td><td>$ 153593</td><td>$ 42289</td><td>$ 703018</td><td>$ 11656</td><td>$ 208003</td><td>$ 1656623</td><td>$ 2775182</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mra facilities</td><td>90809</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>90809</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>40000</td><td>40000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unsecured term loans</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>1500000</td><td>1500000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>800000</td><td>100000</td><td>1400000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capital lease</td><td>2387</td><td>2411</td><td>2620</td><td>2794</td><td>2794</td><td>819894</td><td>832900</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ground leases</td><td>31049</td><td>31066</td><td>31436</td><td>31628</td><td>29472</td><td>703254</td><td>857905</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>226815</td><td>218019</td><td>184376</td><td>163648</td><td>155398</td><td>281694</td><td>1229950</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>200250</td><td>717682</td><td>473809</td><td>449740</td><td>223330</td><td>2119481</td><td>4184292</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total</td><td>$ 954903</td><td>$ 1011467</td><td>$ 1645259</td><td>$ 659466</td><td>$ 1418997</td><td>$ 7320946</td><td>$ 13011038</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the capital lease payment in 2019? Answer: 2411.0 Question: and in 2018? Answer: 2387.0 Question: so what was the difference in this value between the two years? Answer: 24.0 Question: and the rate of increase during this time?

0.01005

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 28 , 2013 , december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 ( in thousands , except per share data ) in july 2012 , the fasb issued asu no . 2012-02 201cintangible-goodwill and other 2013 testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment . 201d asu 2012-02 modifies the requirement to test intangible assets that are not subject to amortization based on events or changes in circumstances that might indicate that the asset is impaired now requiring the test only if it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired . furthermore , asu 2012-02 provides entities the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than the carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test . asu 2012-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after september 15 , 2012 and early adoption is permitted . the adoption of asu 2012-02 had no impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at both december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2013 and prior years . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 5572 and $ 24087 in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 , respectively . the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products have generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . in fiscal 2011 , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) method . product cores are included as part of the company 2019s merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company 2019s other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , were $ 161519 and $ 134258 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at the end of fiscal 2013 and 2012 were as follows : december 28 , december 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 282013</td><td>december 292012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 2424795</td><td>$ 2182419</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>131762</td><td>126190</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 2556557</td><td>$ 2308609</td></tr></table> inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company completes physical inventories and other targeted inventory counts in its store locations to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory in these locations . in its distribution centers and pdq aes , the company uses a cycle counting program to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and product core inventory . reserves for estimated shrink are established based on the results of physical inventories conducted by the company with the assistance of an independent third party in substantially all of the company 2019s stores over the course of the year , other targeted inventory counts in its stores , results from recent cycle counts in its distribution facilities and historical and current loss trends. . Question: what is the sum of the reduction of cost of sales in 2013 and 2012? Answer: 29659.0 Question: what was the reduction in 2013? Answer: 24708.0 Question: what is that less the total sum?

-4951.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

item 6 . selected financial data the following table represents our selected financial data . the table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this report . the table below reflects immaterial error corrections discussed in note 2 : summary of significant accounting policies in item 8. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6708</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>2014</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>358</td><td>100</td><td>241</td><td>203</td><td>-2332 ( 2332 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>146</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>131</td><td>119</td><td>-2397 ( 2397 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6392</td><td>6069</td><td>5270</td><td>5097</td><td>4821</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1779</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>4341</td><td>3838</td><td>1637</td><td>1708</td><td>1823</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>170</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.10</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.91</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr></table> basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.96 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.91 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure . ( 3 ) on march 30 , 2011 , the record date of the stock distribution associated with the spin-off from northrop grumman , approximately 48.8 million shares of $ 0.01 par value hii common stock were distributed to northrop grumman stockholders . this share amount was utilized for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings ( loss ) per share for the three months ended march 31 , 2011 , and all prior periods , as no common stock of the company existed prior to march 30 , 2011 , and the impact of dilutive securities in the three month period ended march 31 , 2011 , was not meaningful. . Question: what is the net change in value of total assets from 2008 to 2012?

1571.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

stock-based compensation 2013 we have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options , nonvested retention shares , and nonvested stock units . we refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as 201cretention awards 201d . we issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings , while new shares are issued when retention shares vest . we adopted fasb statement no . 123 ( r ) , share-based payment ( fas 123 ( r ) ) , on january 1 , 2006 . fas 123 ( r ) requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors , including stock options . compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards ( generally the vesting period ) . the fair value of retention awards is the stock price on the date of grant , while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . we elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by fas 123 ( r ) and did not restate financial results for prior periods . we did not make an adjustment for the cumulative effect of these estimated forfeitures , as the impact was not material . as a result of the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we recognized expense for stock options in 2006 , in addition to retention awards , which were expensed prior to 2006 . stock-based compensation expense for the year ended december 31 , 2006 was $ 22 million , after tax , or $ 0.08 per basic and diluted share . this includes $ 9 million for stock options and $ 13 million for retention awards for 2006 . before taxes , stock-based compensation expense included $ 14 million for stock options and $ 21 million for retention awards for 2006 . we recorded $ 29 million of excess tax benefits as an inflow of financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . prior to the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we applied the recognition and measurement principles of accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , accounting for stock issued to employees , and related interpretations . no stock- based employee compensation expense related to stock option grants was reflected in net income , as all options granted under those plans had a grant price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . stock-based compensation expense related to retention shares , stock units , and other incentive plans was reflected in net income . the following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense year ended december 31 , millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td><td>$ 604</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td><td>$ 582</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 2.33</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td><td>$ 2.25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td><td>$ 2.30</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td><td>$ 2.22</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the . Question: what is the difference between earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma and 2013 diluted pro forma in 2005?

0.04

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

investment policy , which is described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . we calculate the expense associated with the pension plan and the assumptions and methods that we use include a policy of reflecting trust assets at their fair market value . on an annual basis , we review the actuarial assumptions related to the pension plan , including the discount rate , the rate of compensation increase and the expected return on plan assets . the discount rate and compensation increase assumptions do not significantly affect pension expense . however , the expected long-term return on assets assumption does significantly affect pension expense . our expected long- term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension expense has been 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) for the past three years . the expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption established by considering historical and anticipated returns of the asset classes invested in by the pension plan and the allocation strategy currently in place among those classes . while this analysis gives appropriate consideration to recent asset performance and historical returns , the assumption represents a long-term prospective return . we review this assumption at each measurement date and adjust it if warranted . for purposes of setting and reviewing this assumption , 201clong- term 201d refers to the period over which the plan 2019s projected benefit obligation will be disbursed . while year-to-year annual returns can vary significantly ( rates of return for the reporting years of 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 were +20.61% ( +20.61 % ) , -32.91% ( -32.91 % ) , and +7.57% ( +7.57 % ) , respectively ) , the assumption represents our estimate of long-term average prospective returns . our selection process references certain historical data and the current environment , but primarily utilizes qualitative judgment regarding future return expectations . recent annual returns may differ but , recognizing the volatility and unpredictability of investment returns , we generally do not change the assumption unless we modify our investment strategy or identify events that would alter our expectations of future returns . to evaluate the continued reasonableness of our assumption , we examine a variety of viewpoints and data . various studies have shown that portfolios comprised primarily of us equity securities have returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) over long periods of time , while us debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation of equities and bonds produces a result between 8% ( 8 % ) and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns , and in many cases low returns in recent time periods are followed by higher returns in future periods ( and vice versa ) . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from other observers . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2009 was 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) , unchanged from 2008 . during 2010 , we intend to decrease the midpoint of the plan 2019s target allocation range for equities by approximately five percentage points . as a result of this change and taking into account all other factors described above , pnc will change the expected long-term return on plan assets to 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) for determining net periodic pension cost for 2010 . under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to change by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2010 estimated expense as a baseline . change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2010 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2010pensionexpense ( inmillions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 3</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 41 million in 2010 compared with pretax expense of $ 117 million in 2009 . this year-over-year reduction was primarily due to the amortization impact of the favorable 2009 investment returns as compared with the expected long-term return assumption . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we expect that the minimum required contributions under the law will be zero for 2010 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various . Question: what was the pretax expense in 2009, in millions? Answer: 117.0 Question: and what was it in 2010, also in millions? Answer: 41.0 Question: by what amount, then, did it decrease over the year?

76.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

s c h e d u l e i v ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31 2008 2007 and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>direct amount</td><td>ceded to other companies</td><td>assumed from other companies</td><td>net amount</td><td>percentage of amount assumed to net</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 16087</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 3260</td><td>$ 13203</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 14673</td><td>$ 5834</td><td>$ 3458</td><td>$ 12297</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 13562</td><td>$ 5198</td><td>$ 3461</td><td>$ 11825</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> . Question: in the year of 2008, how much did the direct amount represent in relation to the amount ceded to other companies? Answer: 2.61833 Question: and what was this amount ceded in 2007? Answer: 5834.0 Question: what was the direct amount in this same year? Answer: 14673.0 Question: what percentage, then, did the amount ceded represent in relation to the direct amount in 2007?

0.3976

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

we also record an inventory obsolescence reserve , which represents the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value , based on various product sales projections . this reserve is calcu- lated using an estimated obsolescence percentage applied to the inventory based on age , historical trends and requirements to support forecasted sales . in addition , and as necessary , we may establish specific reserves for future known or anticipated events . pension and other post-retirement benefit costs we offer the following benefits to some or all of our employees : a domestic trust-based noncontributory qual- ified defined benefit pension plan ( 201cu.s . qualified plan 201d ) and an unfunded , non-qualified domestic noncon- tributory pension plan to provide benefits in excess of statutory limitations ( collectively with the u.s . qualified plan , the 201cdomestic plans 201d ) ; a domestic contributory defined contribution plan ; international pension plans , which vary by country , consisting of both defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans ; deferred compensation arrangements ; and certain other post- retirement benefit plans . the amounts needed to fund future payouts under our defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans are subject to numerous assumptions and variables . cer- tain significant variables require us to make assumptions that are within our control such as an anticipated discount rate , expected rate of return on plan assets and future compensation levels . we evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial advisors and select assumptions that we believe reflect the economics underlying our pension and post-retirement obligations . while we believe these assumptions are within accepted industry ranges , an increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control could have a direct impact on reported net earnings . the discount rate for each plan used for determining future net periodic benefit cost is based on a review of highly rated long-term bonds . for fiscal 2013 , we used a discount rate for our domestic plans of 3.90% ( 3.90 % ) and vary- ing rates on our international plans of between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) . the discount rate for our domestic plans is based on a bond portfolio that includes only long-term bonds with an aa rating , or equivalent , from a major rating agency . as of june 30 , 2013 , we used an above-mean yield curve , rather than the broad-based yield curve we used before , because we believe it represents a better estimate of an effective settlement rate of the obligation , and the timing and amount of cash flows related to the bonds included in this portfolio are expected to match the estimated defined benefit payment streams of our domestic plans . the benefit obligation of our domestic plans would have been higher by approximately $ 34 mil- lion at june 30 , 2013 had we not used the above-mean yield curve . for our international plans , the discount rate in a particular country was principally determined based on a yield curve constructed from high quality corporate bonds in each country , with the resulting portfolio having a duration matching that particular plan . for fiscal 2013 , we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for our u.s . qualified plan and varying rates of between 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for our international plans . in determining the long-term rate of return for a plan , we consider the historical rates of return , the nature of the plan 2019s investments and an expectation for the plan 2019s investment strategies . see 201cnote 12 2014 pension , deferred compensation and post-retirement benefit plans 201d of notes to consolidated financial statements for details regarding the nature of our pension and post-retirement plan invest- ments . the difference between actual and expected return on plan assets is reported as a component of accu- mulated other comprehensive income . those gains/losses that are subject to amortization over future periods will be recognized as a component of the net periodic benefit cost in such future periods . for fiscal 2013 , our pension plans had actual return on assets of approximately $ 74 million as compared with expected return on assets of approximately $ 64 million . the resulting net deferred gain of approximately $ 10 million , when combined with gains and losses from previous years , will be amortized over periods ranging from approximately 7 to 22 years . the actual return on plan assets from our international pen- sion plans exceeded expectations , primarily reflecting a strong performance from fixed income and equity invest- ments . the lower than expected return on assets from our u.s . qualified plan was primarily due to weakness in our fixed income investments , partially offset by our strong equity returns . a 25 basis-point change in the discount rate or the expected rate of return on plan assets would have had the following effect on fiscal 2013 pension expense : 25 basis-point 25 basis-point increase decrease ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>25 basis-point increase</td><td>25 basis-point decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discount rate</td><td>$ -3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>$ 3.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected return on assets</td><td>$ -2.5 ( 2.5 )</td><td>$ 2.7</td></tr></table> our post-retirement plans are comprised of health care plans that could be impacted by health care cost trend rates , which may have a significant effect on the amounts the est{e lauder companies inc . 115 . Question: what was the low rate for international plans? Answer: 0.0225 Question: what was the high rate for international plans?

0.07

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

bhge 2018 form 10-k | 31 business environment the following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations , financial condition and liquidity position as of and for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes of the company . we operate in more than 120 countries helping customers find , evaluate , drill , produce , transport and process hydrocarbon resources . our revenue is predominately generated from the sale of products and services to major , national , and independent oil and natural gas companies worldwide , and is dependent on spending by our customers for oil and natural gas exploration , field development and production . this spending is driven by a number of factors , including our customers' forecasts of future energy demand and supply , their access to resources to develop and produce oil and natural gas , their ability to fund their capital programs , the impact of new government regulations and most importantly , their expectations for oil and natural gas prices as a key driver of their cash flows . oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 )</td><td>$ 71.34</td><td>$ 54.12</td><td>$ 43.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 )</td><td>65.23</td><td>50.80</td><td>43.29</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 )</td><td>3.15</td><td>2.99</td><td>2.52</td></tr></table> brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 ) $ 71.34 $ 54.12 $ 43.64 wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) 65.23 50.80 43.29 natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) 3.15 2.99 2.52 ( 1 ) energy information administration ( eia ) europe brent spot price per barrel ( 2 ) eia cushing , ok wti ( west texas intermediate ) spot price ( 3 ) eia henry hub natural gas spot price per million british thermal unit 2018 demonstrated the volatility of the oil and gas market . through the first three quarters of 2018 , we experienced stability in the north american and international markets . however , in the fourth quarter of 2018 commodity prices dropped nearly 40% ( 40 % ) resulting in increased customer uncertainty . from an offshore standpoint , through most of 2018 , we saw multiple large offshore projects reach positive final investment decisions , and the lng market and outlook improved throughout 2018 , driven by increased demand globally . in 2018 , the first large north american lng positive final investment decision was reached . outside of north america , customer spending is highly driven by brent oil prices , which increased on average throughout the year . average brent oil prices increased to $ 71.34/bbl in 2018 from $ 54.12/bbl in 2017 , and ranged from a low of $ 50.57/bbl in december 2018 , to a high of $ 86.07/bbl in october 2018 . for the first three quarters of 2018 , brent oil prices increased sequentially . however , in the fourth quarter , brent oil prices declined 39% ( 39 % ) versus the end of the third quarter , as a result of increased supply from the u.s. , worries of a global economic slowdown , and lower than expected production cuts . in north america , customer spending is highly driven by wti oil prices , which similar to brent oil prices , on average increased throughout the year . average wti oil prices increased to $ 65.23/bbl in 2018 from $ 50.80/bbl in 2017 , and ranged from a low of $ 44.48/bbl in december 2018 , to a high of $ 77.41/bbl in june 2018 . in north america , natural gas prices , as measured by the henry hub natural gas spot price , averaged $ 3.15/ mmbtu in 2018 , representing a 6% ( 6 % ) increase over the prior year . throughout the year , henry hub natural gas spot prices ranged from a high of $ 6.24/mmbtu in january 2018 to a low of $ 2.49/mmbtu in february 2018 . according to the u.s . department of energy ( doe ) , working natural gas in storage at the end of 2018 was 2705 billion cubic feet ( bcf ) , which was 15.6% ( 15.6 % ) , or 421 bcf , below the corresponding week in 2017. . Question: what was the net change in the brent oil price from 2016 to 2017? Answer: 10.48 Question: what was the price in 2016? Answer: 43.64 Question: what is the percent change?

0.24015

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

performance graph the following graph compares the total return , assuming reinvestment of dividends , on an investment in the company , based on performance of the company's common stock , with the total return of the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index and the dow jones united states travel and leisure index for a five year period by measuring the changes in common stock prices from december 31 , 2012 to december 31 , 2017. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd .</td><td>100.00</td><td>142.11</td><td>251.44</td><td>313.65</td><td>260.04</td><td>385.47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones us travel & leisure</td><td>100.00</td><td>145.48</td><td>169.28</td><td>179.27</td><td>192.85</td><td>238.77</td></tr></table> the stock performance graph assumes for comparison that the value of the company's common stock and of each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results. . Question: what is the sum of the prices of royal caribbean cruises and the s&p 500 in 2017?

593.61

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. . Question: what was the backlog in 2007? Answer: 21200.0 Question: and what was it in 2006? Answer: 19700.0 Question: what was, then, the change over the year? Answer: 1500.0 Question: what was the backlog in 2006? Answer: 19700.0 Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2006 backlog, in percentage?

0.07614

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets . . . . . . . . . . $ 141 $ 137 sources of supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities . . . . . . . . . 8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal . . . . . . . . . 313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 303 total utility plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18099 16891 nonutility property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-37 ( 37 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amounts written off</td><td>38</td><td>43</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>recoveries of amounts written off</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ -39 ( 39 )</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td></tr></table> . Question: in 2013, as part of the company's noncollectable amounts, how much did those amounts written off represent in relation to the recovered ones? Answer: 6.14286 Question: and from that year to 2015, what was the increase in the property, plant and equipment depreciation expense?

31.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2015 and 2014. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2015</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 101.88</td><td>$ 93.21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>98.64</td><td>91.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>101.54</td><td>86.83</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>104.12</td><td>87.23</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 84.90</td><td>$ 78.38</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>90.73</td><td>80.10</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>99.90</td><td>89.05</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>106.31</td><td>90.20</td></tr></table> on february 19 , 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 87.32 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 19 , 2016 , we had 423897556 outstanding shares of common stock and 159 registered holders . dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) . generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) . we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a , issued in may 2014 ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) . dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors . the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant . we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 2.3 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2016 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we declared the following cash distributions: . Question: what was the change in the price of shares from the highest value, during the quarter ended december 31 , 2015, to the closing price on february 19 , 2016?

-16.8

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

operating profit for the segment decreased by 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . for the year , operating profit declines in defense more than offset an increase in civil , while operating profit at intelligence essentially was unchanged . the $ 27 million decrease in operating profit at defense primarily was attributable to a decrease in the level of favorable performance adjustments on mission and combat systems activities in 2010 . the $ 19 million increase in civil principally was due to higher volume on enterprise civilian services . operating profit for the segment decreased by 3% ( 3 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . operating profit declines in civil and intelligence partially were offset by growth in defense . the decrease of $ 29 million in civil 2019s operating profit primarily was attributable to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on enterprise civilian services programs in 2009 compared to 2008 . the decrease in operating profit of $ 27 million at intelligence mainly was due to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on security solution activities in 2009 compared to 2008 . the increase in defense 2019s operating profit of $ 29 million mainly was due to volume and improved performance in mission and combat systems . the decrease in backlog during 2010 compared to 2009 mainly was due to higher sales volume on enterprise civilian service programs at civil , including volume associated with the dris 2010 program , and mission and combat system programs at defense . backlog decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 due to u.s . government 2019s exercise of the termination for convenience clause on the tsat mission operations system ( tmos ) contract at defense , which resulted in a $ 1.6 billion reduction in orders . this decline more than offset increased orders on enterprise civilian services programs at civil . we expect is&gs will experience a low single digit percentage decrease in sales for 2011 as compared to 2010 . this decline primarily is due to completion of most of the work associated with the dris 2010 program . operating profit in 2011 is expected to decline in relationship to the decline in sales volume , while operating margins are expected to be comparable between the years . space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the design , research and development , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems , including activities related to the planned replacement of the space shuttle . government satellite programs include the advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , the mobile user objective system ( muos ) , the global positioning satellite iii ( gps iii ) system , the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , and the geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) . strategic and missile defense programs include the targets and countermeasures program and the fleet ballistic missile program . space transportation includes the nasa orion program and , through ownership interests in two joint ventures , expendable launch services ( united launch alliance , or ula ) and space shuttle processing activities for the u.s . government ( united space alliance , or usa ) . the space shuttle is expected to complete its final flight mission in 2011 and our involvement with its launch and processing activities will end at that time . space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8246</td><td>$ 8654</td><td>$ 8027</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>972</td><td>972</td><td>953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>11.2% ( 11.2 % )</td><td>11.9% ( 11.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>17800</td><td>16800</td><td>17900</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems decreased by 5% ( 5 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . sales declined in all three lines of business during the year . the $ 253 million decrease in space transportation principally was due to lower volume on the space shuttle external tank , commercial launch vehicle activity and other human space flight programs , which partially were offset by higher volume on the orion program . there were no commercial launches in 2010 compared to one commercial launch in 2009 . strategic & defensive missile systems ( s&dms ) sales declined $ 147 million principally due to lower volume on defensive missile programs . the $ 8 million sales decline in satellites primarily was attributable to lower volume on commercial satellites , which partially were offset by higher volume on government satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2010 and one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 . net sales for space systems increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . during the year , sales growth at satellites and space transportation offset a decline in s&dms . the sales growth of $ 707 million in satellites was due to higher volume in government satellite activities , which partially was offset by lower volume in commercial satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 and two deliveries in 2008 . the increase in sales of $ 21 million in space transportation primarily was due to higher volume on the orion program , which more than offset a decline in the space shuttle 2019s external tank program . there was one commercial launch in both 2009 and 2008 . s&dms 2019 sales decreased by $ 102 million mainly due to lower volume on defensive missile programs , which more than offset growth in strategic missile programs. . Question: what is the net sales in 2010? Answer: 8246.0 Question: what is the operating profit in 2010?

972.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

on may 20 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 600 million of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior notes due may 2045 . the 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) notes due may 2045 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . on september 30 , 2015 , $ 600 million of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior notes issued by aon corporation matured and were repaid . on november 13 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 400 million of 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) senior notes due march 2021 . the 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) notes due march 2021 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . credit facilities as of december 31 , 2015 , we had two committed credit facilities outstanding : our $ 400 million u.s . credit facility expiring in march 2017 ( the "2017 facility" ) and $ 900 million multi-currency u.s . credit facility expiring in february 2020 ( the "2020 facility" ) . the 2020 facility was entered into on february 2 , 2015 and replaced the previous 20ac650 million european credit facility . each of these facilities is intended to support our commercial paper obligations and our general working capital needs . in addition , each of these facilities includes customary representations , warranties and covenants , including financial covenants that require us to maintain specified ratios of adjusted consolidated ebitda to consolidated interest expense and consolidated debt to adjusted consolidated ebitda , tested quarterly . at december 31 , 2015 , we did not have borrowings under either the 2017 facility or the 2020 facility , and we were in compliance with the financial covenants and all other covenants contained therein during the twelve months ended december 31 , 2015 . effective february 2 , 2016 , the 2020 facility terms were extended for 1 year and will expire in february 2021 our total debt-to-ebitda ratio at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , is calculated as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>1422</td><td>1431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>273</td><td>255</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>267</td><td>334</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation of fixed assets</td><td>229</td><td>242</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of intangible assets</td><td>314</td><td>352</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total ebitda</td><td>2505</td><td>2614</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total debt</td><td>5737</td><td>5582</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total debt-to-ebitda ratio</td><td>2.3</td><td>2.1</td></tr></table> we use ebitda , as defined by our financial covenants , as a non-gaap measure . this supplemental information related to ebitda represents a measure not in accordance with u.s . gaap and should be viewed in addition to , not instead of , our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto . shelf registration statement on september 3 , 2015 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the sec , registering the offer and sale from time to time of an indeterminate amount of , among other securities , debt securities , preference shares , class a ordinary shares and convertible securities . our ability to access the market as a source of liquidity is dependent on investor demand , market conditions and other factors. . Question: what was the total ebitda in 2015? Answer: 2505.0 Question: and what was the amortization of intangible assets in that same year? Answer: 314.0 Question: what is, then, the difference between the total ebitda and this amortization, in 2015? Answer: 2191.0 Question: and what is the difference between this value and the depreciation of fixed assets of 2015?

1962.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

considered to be the primary beneficiary of either entity and have therefore deconsolidated both entities . at december 31 , 2010 , we held a 36% ( 36 % ) interest in juniperus which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting . our potential loss at december 31 , 2010 is limited to our investment of $ 73 million in juniperus , which is recorded in investments in the consolidated statements of financial position . we have not provided any financing to juniperus other than previously contractually required amounts . juniperus and jchl had combined assets and liabilities of $ 121 million and $ 22 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2008 . for the year ended december 31 , 2009 , we recognized $ 36 million of pretax income from juniperus and jchl . we recognized $ 16 million of after-tax income , after allocating the appropriate share of net income to the non-controlling interests . we previously owned an 85% ( 85 % ) economic equity interest in globe re limited ( 2018 2018globe re 2019 2019 ) , a vie , which provided reinsurance coverage for a defined portfolio of property catastrophe reinsurance contracts underwritten by a third party for a limited period which ended june 1 , 2009 . we consolidated globe re as we were deemed to be the primary beneficiary . in connection with the winding up of its operations , globe re repaid its $ 100 million of short-term debt and our equity investment from available cash in 2009 . we recognized $ 2 million of after-tax income from globe re in 2009 , taking into account the share of net income attributable to non-controlling interests . globe re was fully liquidated in the third quarter of 2009 . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions ( formerly risk and insurance brokerage services ) acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions ( formerly consulting ) partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 6423</td><td>$ 6305</td><td>$ 6197</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1194</td><td>900</td><td>846</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>18.6% ( 18.6 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>13.7% ( 13.7 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated with employment levels , corporate revenue and asset values . during 2010 we continued to see a 2018 2018soft market 2019 2019 , which began in 2007 , in our retail brokerage product line . in a soft market , premium rates flatten or decrease , along with commission revenues , due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity . changes in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry , as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the . Question: what was the sum of revenues for 2009 and 2010? Answer: 12728.0 Question: what were revenues in 2008? Answer: 6197.0 Question: what is the total sum including 2008?

18925.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

item 1 . business cna financial corporation 2013 ( continued ) unpredictability in the law , insurance underwriting is expected to continue to be difficult in commercial lines , professional liability and other specialty coverages . the dodd-frank wall street reform and consumer protection act expands the federal presence in insurance oversight and may increase the regulatory requirements to which cna may be subject . the act 2019s requirements include streamlining the state-based regulation of reinsurance and nonadmitted insurance ( property or casualty insurance placed from insurers that are eligible to accept insurance , but are not licensed to write insurance in a particular state ) . the act also establishes a new federal insurance office within the u.s . department of the treasury with powers over all lines of insurance except health insurance , certain long term care insurance and crop insurance , to , among other things , monitor aspects of the insurance industry , identify issues in the regulation of insurers that could contribute to a systemic crisis in the insurance industry or the overall financial system , coordinate federal policy on international insurance matters and preempt state insurance measures under certain circumstances . the act calls for numerous studies and contemplates further regulation . the patient protection and affordable care act and the related amendments in the health care and education reconciliation act may increase cna 2019s operating costs and underwriting losses . this landmark legislation may lead to numerous changes in the health care industry that could create additional operating costs for cna , particularly with respect to workers 2019 compensation and long term care products . these costs might arise through the increased use of health care services by claimants or the increased complexities in health care bills that could require additional levels of review . in addition , due to the expected number of new participants in the health care system and the potential for additional malpractice claims , cna may experience increased underwriting risk in the lines of business that provide management and professional liability insurance to individuals and businesses engaged in the health care industry . the lines of business that provide professional liability insurance to attorneys , accountants and other professionals who advise clients regarding the health care reform legislation may also experience increased underwriting risk due to the complexity of the legislation . properties : the chicago location owned by ccc , a wholly owned subsidiary of cna , houses cna 2019s principal executive offices . cna owns or leases office space in various cities throughout the united states and in other countries . the following table sets forth certain information with respect to cna 2019s principal office locations : location ( square feet ) principal usage 333 s . wabash avenue 763322 principal executive offices of cna chicago , illinois 401 penn street 190677 property and casualty insurance offices reading , pennsylvania 2405 lucien way 116948 property and casualty insurance offices maitland , florida 40 wall street 114096 property and casualty insurance offices new york , new york 1100 ward avenue 104478 property and casualty insurance offices honolulu , hawaii 101 s . phillips avenue 83616 property and casualty insurance offices sioux falls , south dakota 600 n . pearl street 65752 property and casualty insurance offices dallas , texas 1249 s . river road 50366 property and casualty insurance offices cranbury , new jersey 4267 meridian parkway 46903 data center aurora , illinois 675 placentia avenue 46571 property and casualty insurance offices brea , california cna leases its office space described above except for the chicago , illinois building , the reading , pennsylvania building , and the aurora , illinois building , which are owned. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>size ( square feet )</td><td>principal usage</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>333 s . wabash avenuechicago illinois</td><td>763322</td><td>principal executive offices of cna</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>401 penn streetreading pennsylvania</td><td>190677</td><td>property and casualty insurance offices</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2405 lucien waymaitland florida</td><td>116948</td><td>property and casualty insurance offices</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>40 wall streetnew york new york</td><td>114096</td><td>property and casualty insurance offices</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>1100 ward avenuehonolulu hawaii</td><td>104478</td><td>property and casualty insurance offices</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>101 s . phillips avenuesioux falls south dakota</td><td>83616</td><td>property and casualty insurance offices</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>600 n . pearl streetdallas texas</td><td>65752</td><td>property and casualty insurance offices</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>1249 s . river roadcranbury new jersey</td><td>50366</td><td>property and casualty insurance offices</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>4267 meridian parkwayaurora illinois</td><td>46903</td><td>data center</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>675 placentia avenuebrea california</td><td>46571</td><td>property and casualty insurance offices</td></tr></table> item 1 . business cna financial corporation 2013 ( continued ) unpredictability in the law , insurance underwriting is expected to continue to be difficult in commercial lines , professional liability and other specialty coverages . the dodd-frank wall street reform and consumer protection act expands the federal presence in insurance oversight and may increase the regulatory requirements to which cna may be subject . the act 2019s requirements include streamlining the state-based regulation of reinsurance and nonadmitted insurance ( property or casualty insurance placed from insurers that are eligible to accept insurance , but are not licensed to write insurance in a particular state ) . the act also establishes a new federal insurance office within the u.s . department of the treasury with powers over all lines of insurance except health insurance , certain long term care insurance and crop insurance , to , among other things , monitor aspects of the insurance industry , identify issues in the regulation of insurers that could contribute to a systemic crisis in the insurance industry or the overall financial system , coordinate federal policy on international insurance matters and preempt state insurance measures under certain circumstances . the act calls for numerous studies and contemplates further regulation . the patient protection and affordable care act and the related amendments in the health care and education reconciliation act may increase cna 2019s operating costs and underwriting losses . this landmark legislation may lead to numerous changes in the health care industry that could create additional operating costs for cna , particularly with respect to workers 2019 compensation and long term care products . these costs might arise through the increased use of health care services by claimants or the increased complexities in health care bills that could require additional levels of review . in addition , due to the expected number of new participants in the health care system and the potential for additional malpractice claims , cna may experience increased underwriting risk in the lines of business that provide management and professional liability insurance to individuals and businesses engaged in the health care industry . the lines of business that provide professional liability insurance to attorneys , accountants and other professionals who advise clients regarding the health care reform legislation may also experience increased underwriting risk due to the complexity of the legislation . properties : the chicago location owned by ccc , a wholly owned subsidiary of cna , houses cna 2019s principal executive offices . cna owns or leases office space in various cities throughout the united states and in other countries . the following table sets forth certain information with respect to cna 2019s principal office locations : location ( square feet ) principal usage 333 s . wabash avenue 763322 principal executive offices of cna chicago , illinois 401 penn street 190677 property and casualty insurance offices reading , pennsylvania 2405 lucien way 116948 property and casualty insurance offices maitland , florida 40 wall street 114096 property and casualty insurance offices new york , new york 1100 ward avenue 104478 property and casualty insurance offices honolulu , hawaii 101 s . phillips avenue 83616 property and casualty insurance offices sioux falls , south dakota 600 n . pearl street 65752 property and casualty insurance offices dallas , texas 1249 s . river road 50366 property and casualty insurance offices cranbury , new jersey 4267 meridian parkway 46903 data center aurora , illinois 675 placentia avenue 46571 property and casualty insurance offices brea , california cna leases its office space described above except for the chicago , illinois building , the reading , pennsylvania building , and the aurora , illinois building , which are owned. . Question: what is the total size of the data center location in illinois? Answer: 46903.0 Question: what about the size of principal executive offices of cna? Answer: 763322.0 Question: what is the total of these two? Answer: 810225.0 Question: what is the percentage change?

0.05789

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized at level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . commodities are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav.aa thenavaa valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the navaa is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the navaa is based on valuationmodels and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds forwhich thenavaa is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . there were no material contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans during 2017 . we will make contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions.as a result of these contributions , we do not expect any material qualified defined benefit cash funding will be required until 2021.we plan to fund these contributions using a mix of cash on hand and commercial paper . while we do not anticipate a need to do so , our capital structure and resources would allow us to issue new debt if circumstances change . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023 2013 2027</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 2450</td><td>$ 2480</td><td>$ 2560</td><td>$ 2630</td><td>$ 2700</td><td>$ 14200</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>820</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans wemaintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , wematchmost employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 613 million in 2017 , $ 617 million in 2016 and $ 393 million in 2015 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 35.5 million and 36.9 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016. . Question: what is the difference in employee total matching contributions in 2016? Answer: 617.0 Question: what about in 2015?

393.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had $ 295.4 million and $ 295.0 million net , respectively ( $ 300.0 million aggregate principal amount ) outstanding under the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the carrying value includes a discount of $ 4.6 million and $ 5.0 million , respectively . 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes 2014the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes due 2010 ( 201c5.0% ( 201c5.0 % ) notes 201d ) matured on february 15 , 2010 , and interest was payable semiannually on february 15 and august 15 of each year . the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes were convertible at any time into shares of the company 2019s class a common stock ( 201ccommon stock 201d ) at a conversion price of $ 51.50 per share , subject to adjustment in certain cases . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had none and $ 59.7 million outstanding , respectively , under the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes . ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes 2014the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were issued with a maturity of december 1 , 2011 and interest was payable semi-annually in arrears on june 1 and december 1 of each year . the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by the company and substantially all of the wholly owned domestic restricted subsidiaries of ati and the company , other than spectrasite and its subsidiaries . the notes ranked junior in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of ati , the sister guarantors ( as defined in the indenture relating to the notes ) and their domestic restricted subsidiaries . the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were structurally senior in right of payment to all other existing and future indebtedness of the company , including the company 2019s senior notes , convertible notes and the revolving credit facility and term loan . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , ati issued a notice for the redemption of the principal amount of its outstanding ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . in accordance with the redemption provisions and the indenture for the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes , the notes were redeemed at a price equal to 100.00% ( 100.00 % ) of the principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest up to , but excluding , september 23 , 2010 , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 0.3 million . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had none and $ 0.3 million , respectively , outstanding under the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . capital lease obligations and notes payable 2014the company 2019s capital lease obligations and notes payable approximated $ 46.3 million and $ 59.0 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . these obligations bear interest at rates ranging from 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) to 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) and mature in periods ranging from less than one year to approximately seventy years . maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , aggregate carrying value of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 74896</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>625884</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>618</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>1750479</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>600489</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2541858</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total cash obligations</td><td>5594224</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unamortized discounts and premiums net</td><td>-6836 ( 6836 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance as of december 31 2010</td><td>$ 5587388</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the change in the balance of capital lease obligations and notes payable between 2009 and 2010? Answer: -12.7 Question: and the percentage change?

-0.21525

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.