Datasets:

luojunyu

/

SemiEvol

like 16

royal caribbean cruises ltd . 79 notes to the consolidated financial statements in 2012 , we determined the implied fair value of good- will for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 mil- lion and recognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model further discussed below . this impair- ment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impair- ment of pullmantur related assets within our consoli- dated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . during the fourth quarter of 2014 , we performed a qualitative assessment of whether it was more-likely- than-not that our royal caribbean international reporting unit 2019s fair value was less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impair- ment test . the qualitative analysis included assessing the impact of certain factors such as general economic conditions , limitations on accessing capital , changes in forecasted operating results , changes in fuel prices and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates . based on our qualitative assessment , we concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the estimated fair value of the royal caribbean international reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and thus , we did not pro- ceed to the two-step goodwill impairment test . no indicators of impairment exist primarily because the reporting unit 2019s fair value has consistently exceeded its carrying value by a significant margin , its financial performance has been solid in the face of mixed economic environments and forecasts of operating results generated by the reporting unit appear suffi- cient to support its carrying value . we also performed our annual impairment review of goodwill for pullmantur 2019s reporting unit during the fourth quarter of 2014 . we did not perform a quali- tative assessment but instead proceeded directly to the two-step goodwill impairment test . we estimated the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model . the principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results , weighted- average cost of capital , and terminal value . signifi- cantly impacting these assumptions are the transfer of vessels from our other cruise brands to pullmantur . the discounted cash flow model used our 2015 pro- jected operating results as a base . to that base , we added future years 2019 cash flows assuming multiple rev- enue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments beyond 2015 on pullmantur 2019s reporting unit . we assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario . we discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to pullmantur 2019s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital . based on the probability-weighted discounted cash flows , we deter- mined the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 52% ( 52 % ) resulting in no impairment to pullmantur 2019s goodwill . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portuguese and latin american markets , with an increasing focus on latin america . the persistent economic instability in these markets has created sig- nificant uncertainties in forecasting operating results and future cash flows used in our impairment analyses . we continue to monitor economic events in these markets for their potential impact on pullmantur 2019s business and valuation . further , the estimation of fair value utilizing discounted expected future cash flows includes numerous uncertainties which require our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues , operating costs , marketing , sell- ing and administrative expenses , interest rates , ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry 2019s competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . if there are changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impairment analyses , especially in net yields or if certain transfers of vessels from our other cruise brands to the pullmantur fleet do not take place , it is possible that an impairment charge of pullmantur 2019s reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . of these factors , the planned transfers of vessels to the pullmantur fleet is most significant to the projected future cash flows . if the transfers do not occur , we will likely fail step one of the impairment test . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 214112</td><td>$ 204866</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-26074 ( 26074 )</td><td>9246</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 188038</td><td>$ 214112</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method to compare the fair value of these indefinite-lived intan- gible assets to its carrying value . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . we used a dis- count rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . based on the results of our testing , we did not . Question: what was the mathematical range between the foreign currency translation adjustments in the years of 2013 and 2014? Answer: 35320.0 Question: in that same period, what was the total of intangible assets? Answer: 402150.0 Question: and what amount from this total is from assets recorded in 2014? Answer: 188038.0 Question: what portion, then, of that total does this amount represent? Answer: 0.46758 Question: and how much is that in percentage?

46.75817

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/01</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 117.19</td><td>$ 140.49</td><td>$ 163.54</td><td>$ 146.35</td><td>$ 148.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 77.90</td><td>$ 100.24</td><td>$ 111.15</td><td>$ 116.61</td><td>$ 135.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 88.52</td><td>$ 116.70</td><td>$ 149.06</td><td>$ 166.42</td><td>$ 182.76</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. . Question: what was the performance value of the united parcel service , inc . in 2006? Answer: 148.92 Question: and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006? Answer: 48.92 Question: what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2006? Answer: 135.02 Question: and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006? Answer: 35.02 Question: what is, then, the difference between the performance value change of the united parcel service , inc . and the one of s&p 500 index?

13.9

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

28 , 35 , or 90 days . the funds associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs or a buyer is found outside of the auction process . based on broker- dealer valuation models and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment factors , auction rate securities with an original par value of approximately $ 34 million were written-down to an estimated fair value of $ 16 million as of december 31 , 2007 . this write-down resulted in an 201cother-than-temporary 201d impairment charge of approximately $ 8 million ( pre-tax ) included in net income and a temporary impairment charge of $ 10 million ( pre-tax ) reflected as an unrealized loss within other comprehensive income for 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , these investments in auction rate securities have been in a loss position for less than six months . these auction rate securities are classified as non-current marketable securities as of december 31 , 2007 as indicated in the preceding table . 3m reviews impairments associated with the above in accordance with emerging issues task force ( eitf ) 03-1 and fsp sfas 115-1 and 124-1 , 201cthe meaning of other-than-temporary-impairment and its application to certain investments , 201d to determine the classification of the impairment as 201ctemporary 201d or 201cother-than-temporary . 201d a temporary impairment charge results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive income component of stockholders 2019 equity . such an unrealized loss does not reduce net income for the applicable accounting period because the loss is not viewed as other-than-temporary . the company believes that a portion of the impairment of its auction rate securities investments is temporary and a portion is other-than-temporary . the factors evaluated to differentiate between temporary and other-than-temporary include the projected future cash flows , credit ratings actions , and assessment of the credit quality of the underlying collateral . the balance at december 31 , 2007 for marketable securities and short-term investments by contractual maturity are shown below . actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties . dec . 31 , ( millions ) 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>dec . 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>due in one year or less</td><td>$ 231</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>due after one year through three years</td><td>545</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>due after three years through five years</td><td>221</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>due after five years</td><td>62</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total marketable securities</td><td>$ 1059</td></tr></table> predetermined intervals , usually every 7 . Question: what was the original par value of the auction rate securities, in millions? Answer: 34.0 Question: and what was the estimated fair value to which they were written down, also in millions? Answer: 16.0 Question: what was, then, the change in the value?

18.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

cost amount could have a material adverse effect on our business . these changes may include , for example , an increase or reduction in the number of persons enrolled or eligible to enroll due to the federal government 2019s decision to increase or decrease u.s . military presence around the world . in the event government reimbursements were to decline from projected amounts , our failure to reduce the health care costs associated with these programs could have a material adverse effect on our business . during 2004 , we completed a contractual transition of our tricare business . on july 1 , 2004 , our regions 2 and 5 contract servicing approximately 1.1 million tricare members became part of the new north region , which was awarded to another contractor . on august 1 , 2004 , our regions 3 and 4 contract became part of our new south region contract . on november 1 , 2004 , the region 6 contract with approximately 1 million members became part of the south region contract . the members added with the region 6 contract essentially offset the members lost four months earlier with the expiration of our regions 2 and 5 contract . for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , tricare premium revenues were approximately $ 2.4 billion , or 16.9% ( 16.9 % ) of our total premiums and aso fees . part of the tricare transition during 2004 included the carve out of the tricare senior pharmacy and tricare for life program which we previously administered on as aso basis . on june 1 , 2004 and august 1 , 2004 , administrative services under these programs were transferred to another contractor . for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , tricare administrative services fees totaled $ 50.1 million , or 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) of our total premiums and aso fees . our products marketed to commercial segment employers and members consumer-choice products over the last several years , we have developed and offered various commercial products designed to provide options and choices to employers that are annually facing substantial premium increases driven by double-digit medical cost inflation . these consumer-choice products , which can be offered on either a fully insured or aso basis , provided coverage to approximately 371100 members at december 31 , 2005 , representing approximately 11.7% ( 11.7 % ) of our total commercial medical membership as detailed below . consumer-choice membership other commercial membership commercial medical membership . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>consumer-choice membership</td><td>other commercial membership</td><td>commercial medical membership</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fully insured</td><td>184000</td><td>1815800</td><td>1999800</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>administrative services only</td><td>187100</td><td>983900</td><td>1171000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total commercial medical</td><td>371100</td><td>2799700</td><td>3170800</td></tr></table> these products are often offered to employer groups as 201cbundles 201d , where the subscribers are offered various hmo and ppo options , with various employer contribution strategies as determined by the employer . paramount to our consumer-choice product strategy , we have developed a group of innovative consumer products , styled as 201csmart 201d products , that we believe will be a long-term solution for employers . we believe this new generation of products provides more ( 1 ) choices for the individual consumer , ( 2 ) transparency of provider costs , and ( 3 ) benefit designs that engage consumers in the costs and effectiveness of health care choices . innovative tools and technology are available to assist consumers with these decisions , including the trade-offs between higher premiums and point-of-service costs at the time consumers choose their plans , and to suggest ways in which the consumers can maximize their individual benefits at the point they use their plans . we believe that when consumers can make informed choices about the cost and effectiveness of their health care , a sustainable long term solution for employers can be realized . smart products , which accounted for approximately 65.1% ( 65.1 % ) of enrollment in all of our consumer-choice plans as of december 31 , 2005 , only are sold to employers who use humana as their sole health insurance carrier. . Question: what was the value of tricare administrative services fees? Answer: 50.1 Question: what is that value times 100? Answer: 5010.0 Question: what is that value divided by .4? Answer: 12525.0 Question: what is that value divided by 1000?

12.525

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

bhge 2018 form 10-k | 39 outstanding under the commercial paper program . the maximum combined borrowing at any time under both the 2017 credit agreement and the commercial paper program is $ 3 billion . if market conditions were to change and our revenue was reduced significantly or operating costs were to increase , our cash flows and liquidity could be reduced . additionally , it could cause the rating agencies to lower our credit rating . there are no ratings triggers that would accelerate the maturity of any borrowings under our committed credit facility . however , a downgrade in our credit ratings could increase the cost of borrowings under the credit facility and could also limit or preclude our ability to issue commercial paper . should this occur , we could seek alternative sources of funding , including borrowing under the credit facility . during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , we used cash to fund a variety of activities including certain working capital needs and restructuring costs , capital expenditures , the repayment of debt , payment of dividends , distributions to ge and share repurchases . we believe that cash on hand , cash flows generated from operations and the available credit facility will provide sufficient liquidity to manage our global cash needs . cash flows cash flows provided by ( used in ) each type of activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating activities</td><td>$ 1762</td><td>$ -799 ( 799 )</td><td>$ 262</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investing activities</td><td>-578 ( 578 )</td><td>-4123 ( 4123 )</td><td>-472 ( 472 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>financing activities</td><td>-4363 ( 4363 )</td><td>10919</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td></tr></table> operating activities our largest source of operating cash is payments from customers , of which the largest component is collecting cash related to product or services sales including advance payments or progress collections for work to be performed . the primary use of operating cash is to pay our suppliers , employees , tax authorities and others for a wide range of material and services . cash flows from operating activities generated cash of $ 1762 million and used cash of $ 799 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . cash flows from operating activities increased $ 2561 million in 2018 primarily driven by better operating performance . these cash inflows were supported by strong working capital cash flows , especially in the fourth quarter of 2018 , including approximately $ 300 million for a progress collection payment from a customer . included in our cash flows from operating activities for 2018 and 2017 are payments of $ 473 million and $ 612 million , respectively , made primarily for employee severance as a result of our restructuring activities and merger and related costs . cash flows from operating activities used $ 799 million and generated $ 262 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . cash flows from operating activities decreased $ 1061 million in 2017 primarily driven by a $ 1201 million negative impact from ending our receivables monetization program in the fourth quarter , and restructuring related payments throughout the year . these cash outflows were partially offset by strong working capital cash flows , especially in the fourth quarter of 2017 . included in our cash flows from operating activities for 2017 and 2016 are payments of $ 612 million and $ 177 million , respectively , made for employee severance as a result of our restructuring activities and merger and related costs . investing activities cash flows from investing activities used cash of $ 578 million , $ 4123 million and $ 472 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . our principal recurring investing activity is the funding of capital expenditures to ensure that we have the appropriate levels and types of machinery and equipment in place to generate revenue from operations . expenditures for capital assets totaled $ 995 million , $ 665 million and $ 424 million for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , partially offset by cash flows from the sale of property , plant and equipment of $ 458 million , $ 172 million and $ 20 million in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . proceeds from the disposal of assets related primarily . Question: what was the change in cash used for operating in 2017? Answer: -799.0 Question: what was used for investing? Answer: -4123.0 Question: what is the sum?

-4922.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

corporate/other corporate/other includes global staff functions ( includes finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) and other corporate expense , global operations and technology ( o&t ) , residual corporate treasury and corporate items . at december 31 , 2009 , this segment had approximately $ 230 billion of assets , consisting primarily of the company 2019s liquidity portfolio , including $ 110 billion of cash and cash equivalents. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ -1663 ( 1663 )</td><td>$ -2680 ( 2680 )</td><td>$ -2008 ( 2008 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>-8893 ( 8893 )</td><td>422</td><td>-302 ( 302 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ -10556 ( 10556 )</td><td>$ -2258 ( 2258 )</td><td>$ -2310 ( 2310 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 1420</td><td>$ 510</td><td>$ 1813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ -11975 ( 11975 )</td><td>$ -2769 ( 2769 )</td><td>$ -4120 ( 4120 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income taxes ( benefits )</td><td>-4369 ( 4369 )</td><td>-587 ( 587 )</td><td>-1446 ( 1446 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ -7606 ( 7606 )</td><td>$ -2182 ( 2182 )</td><td>$ -2674 ( 2674 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes</td><td>-445 ( 445 )</td><td>4002</td><td>708</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ -8051 ( 8051 )</td><td>$ 1820</td><td>$ -1966 ( 1966 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>net income attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ -8051 ( 8051 )</td><td>$ 1820</td><td>$ -1968 ( 1968 )</td></tr></table> 2009 vs . 2008 revenues , net of interest expense declined , primarily due to the pretax loss on debt extinguishment related to the repayment of the $ 20 billion of tarp trust preferred securities and the pretax loss in connection with the exit from the loss-sharing agreement with the u.s . government . revenues also declined , due to the absence of the 2008 sale of citigroup global services limited recorded in o&t . this was partially offset by a pretax gain related to the exchange offers , revenues and higher intersegment eliminations . operating expenses increased , primarily due to intersegment eliminations and increases in compensation , partially offset by lower repositioning reserves . 2008 vs . 2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities . operating expenses declined , primarily due to lower restructuring charges in 2008 as well as reductions in incentive compensation and benefits expense. . Question: what were operating expenses in 2008? Answer: 510.0 Question: what were they in 2007?

1813.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increased recovery of deferred fuel and purchased power costs primarily due to an increase in april 2004 in the energy cost recovery rider and the true-ups to the 2003 and 2002 energy cost recovery rider filings . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the over-recovery of grand gulf costs due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1095.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>march 2002 settlement agreement</td><td>-154.0 ( 154.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-7.7 ( 7.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>30.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>16.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>deferred fuel cost revisions</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>7.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 998.7</td></tr></table> the march 2002 settlement agreement resolved a request for recovery of ice storm costs incurred in december 2000 with an offset of those costs for funds contributed to pay for future stranded costs . a 1997 settlement provided for the collection of earnings in excess of an 11% ( 11 % ) return on equity in a transition cost account ( tca ) to offset stranded costs if retail open access were implemented . in mid- and late december 2000 , two separate ice storms left 226000 and 212500 entergy arkansas customers , respectively , without electric power in its service area . entergy arkansas filed a proposal to recover costs plus carrying charges associated with power restoration caused by the ice storms . entergy arkansas' final storm damage cost determination reflected costs of approximately $ 195 million . the apsc approved a settlement agreement submitted in march 2002 by entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and the arkansas attorney general . in the march 2002 settlement , the parties agreed that $ 153 million of the ice storm costs would be classified as incremental ice storm expenses that can be offset against the tca on a rate class basis , and any excess of ice storm costs over the amount available in the tca would be deferred and amortized over 30 years , although such excess costs were not allowed to be included as a separate component of rate base . the allocated ice storm expenses exceeded the available tca funds by $ 15.8 million which was recorded as a regulatory asset in june 2002 . in accordance with the settlement agreement and following the apsc's approval of the 2001 earnings review related to the tca , entergy arkansas filed to return $ 18.1 million of the tca to certain large general service class customers that paid more into the tca than their allocation of storm costs . the apsc approved the return of funds to the large general service customer class in the form of refund checks in august 2002 . as part of the implementation of the march 2002 settlement agreement provisions , the tca procedure ceased with the 2001 earnings evaluation . of the remaining ice storm costs , $ 32.2 million was addressed through established ratemaking procedures , including $ 22.2 million classified as capital additions , while $ 3.8 million of the ice storm costs was not recovered through rates . the effect on net income of the march 2002 settlement agreement and 2001 earnings review was a $ 2.2 million increase in 2003 , because the decrease in net revenue was offset by the decrease in operation and maintenance expenses discussed below. . Question: what is the net change in net revenue from 2002 to 2003?

-97.2

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured . both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective . our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing , remaining developmental effort , operational performance including company- specific synergies , aftermarket retention , product life cycles , material and labor pricing , and other relevant customer , contractual and market factors . where appropriate , the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions , as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation . the adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate . projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets , liabilities , or a group of assets and liabilities . valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for property , plant and equipment . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $ 2.8 billion of goodwill , all of which is expected to be amortizable for tax purposes . substantially all of the goodwill was assigned to our rms business . the goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of our products and technologies with those of sikorsky , costs synergies resulting from the consolidation or elimination of certain functions , and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition , such as the assembled workforce of sikorsky . determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the exercise of significant judgments , including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows , long-term growth rates and discount rates . the cash flows employed in the dcf analyses are based on our best estimate of future sales , earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions , customer budgets , existing firm orders , expected future orders , contracts with suppliers , labor agreements , changes in working capital , long term business plans and recent operating performance . use of different estimates and judgments could yield different results . impact to 2015 financial results sikorsky 2019s 2015 financial results have been included in our consolidated financial results only for the period from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 . as a result , our consolidated financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2015 do not reflect a full year of sikorsky 2019s results . from the november 6 , 2015 acquisition date through december 31 , 2015 , sikorsky generated net sales of approximately $ 400 million and operating loss of approximately $ 45 million , inclusive of intangible amortization and adjustments required to account for the acquisition . we incurred approximately $ 38 million of non-recoverable transaction costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition in 2015 that were expensed as incurred . these costs are included in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . we also incurred approximately $ 48 million in costs associated with issuing the $ 7.0 billion november 2015 notes used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility used to finance the acquisition . the financing costs were recorded as a reduction of debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt . supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire years in 2015 and 2014 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 45366</td><td>$ 47369</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>3534</td><td>3475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per common share</td><td>11.39</td><td>10.97</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>11.23</td><td>10.78</td></tr></table> the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorsky with pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2014 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these . Question: what was the net sales in 2015? Answer: 45366.0 Question: and in 2014? Answer: 47369.0 Question: so what was the difference in these two values? Answer: -2003.0 Question: and the value for 2014 again?

47369.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

fair value of financial instruments the carrying amounts shown for the company 2019s cash and cash equivalents , accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short term maturity of those instruments . the fair value of the long term debt approximates its carrying value based on the variable nature of interest rates and current market rates available to the company . the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is based on the net difference between the u.s . dollars to be received or paid at the contracts 2019 settlement date and the u.s . dollar value of the foreign currency to be sold or purchased at the current forward exchange rate . recently issued accounting standards in june 2011 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued an accounting standards update which eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders 2019 equity . it requires an entity to present total comprehensive income , which includes the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income , either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements . in december 2011 , the fasb issued an amendment to this pronouncement which defers the specific requirement to present components of reclassifications of other comprehensive income on the face of the income statement . these pronouncements are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years , and interim periods within those years , beginning after december 15 , 2011 . the company believes the adoption of these pronouncements will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements . in may 2011 , the fasb issued an accounting standards update which clarifies requirements for how to measure fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements common to accounting principles generally accepted in the united states of america and international financial reporting standards . this guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after december 15 , 2011 . the company believes the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories inventories consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2011</td><td>december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished goods</td><td>$ 323606</td><td>$ 214524</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>raw materials</td><td>803</td><td>831</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total inventories</td><td>$ 324409</td><td>$ 215355</td></tr></table> 4 . acquisitions in july 2011 , the company acquired approximately 400.0 thousand square feet of office space comprising its corporate headquarters for $ 60.5 million . the acquisition included land , buildings , tenant improvements and third party lease-related intangible assets . as of the purchase date , 163.6 thousand square feet of the 400.0 thousand square feet acquired was leased to third party tenants . these leases had remaining lease terms ranging from 9 months to 15 years on the purchase date . the company intends to occupy additional space as it becomes available . since the acquisition , the company has invested $ 2.2 million in additional improvements . the acquisition included the assumption of a $ 38.6 million loan secured by the property and the remaining purchase price was paid in cash funded primarily by a $ 25.0 million term loan borrowed in may 2011 . the carrying value of the assumed loan approximated its fair value on the date of the acquisition . refer to note 7 for . Question: what was the difference between the inventory of finished goods of 2011 and 2010?

109082.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

n o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries 20 . statutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate . these regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions , such as loans or cash advances , available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities . there are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries . the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators . statutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts , investments , subsidiaries , acquis- ition expenses , fixed assets , deferred income taxes , and certain other items . the statutory capital and surplus of the u.s . subsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 . the amount of dividends available to be paid in 2010 , without prior approval from the state insurance departments , totals $ 733 million . the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s . subsidiaries as at and for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2009</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2008</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2007</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2009</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory capital and surplus</td><td>$ 9299</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 8579</td><td>$ 5801</td><td>$ 5368</td><td>$ 5321</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>statutory net income</td><td>$ 2472</td><td>$ 2196</td><td>$ 1535</td><td>$ 870</td><td>$ 818</td><td>$ 873</td></tr></table> as permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7 , certain of the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities , which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 215 million , $ 211 million , and $ 140 million at december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . the company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations . some jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements . in some countries , the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business . these licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests . jurisdictions may impose fines , censure , and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements . 21 . information provided in connection with outstanding debt of subsidiaries the following tables present condensed consolidating financial information at december 31 , 2009 , and december 31 , 2008 , and for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , for ace limited ( the parent guarantor ) and its 201csubsidiary issuer 201d , ace ina holdings , inc . the subsidiary issuer is an indirect 100 percent-owned subsidiary of the parent guarantor . investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by the parent guarantor under the equity method for purposes of the supplemental consolidating presentation . earnings of subsidiaries are reflected in the parent guarantor 2019s investment accounts and earnings . the parent guarantor fully and unconditionally guarantees certain of the debt of the subsidiary issuer. . Question: what was the net income in 2009 for bermuda subsidiaries?

2472.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) for 2017 and 2016 , respectively: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2017</td><td>$ 140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>136</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2017</td><td>$ 278</td></tr></table> purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( 4 ) balance as of december 31 , 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . strategies to address the goal of ensuring sufficient assets to pay benefits include target allocations to a broad array of asset classes and , within asset classes , strategies are employed to provide adequate returns , diversification and liquidity . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed-income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond-like and long-dated nature of the postretirement liabilities . in 2017 , the company further increased its exposure to liability-driven investing and increased its fixed-income allocation to 50% ( 50 % ) , up from 40% ( 40 % ) , in an effort to further decrease the funded status volatility of the plan and hedge the portfolio from movements in interest rates . in 2012 , the company also implemented a de-risking strategy for the medical bargaining trust within the plan to minimize volatility . in 2017 , the company conducted a new asset-liability study that indicated medical trend inflation that outpaced the consumer price index by more than 2% ( 2 % ) for the last 20 years . given continuously rising medical costs , the company decided to increase the equity exposure of the portfolio to 30% ( 30 % ) , up from 20% ( 20 % ) , while reducing the fixed-income portion of the portfolio from 80% ( 80 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) . the company also conducted an asset-liability study for the post-retirement non-bargaining medical plan . its allocation was adjusted to make it more conservative , reducing the equity allocation from 70% ( 70 % ) to 60% ( 60 % ) and increasing the fixed- income allocation from 30% ( 30 % ) to 40% ( 40 % ) . the post-retirement medical non-bargaining plan 2019s equity allocation was reduced due to the cap on benefits for some non-union participants and resultant reduction in the plan 2019s liabilities . these changes will take place in 2018 . the company engages third party investment managers for all invested assets . managers are not permitted to invest outside of the asset class ( e.g . fixed income , equity , alternatives ) or strategy for which they have been appointed . investment management agreements and recurring performance and attribution analysis are used as tools to ensure investment managers invest solely within the investment strategy they have been provided . futures and options may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan 2019s targeted investment policy. . Question: what was the change in the balance throughout 2017?

138.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the value of the s&p in 2006 less the initial investment?

21.48

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

part ii , item 8 fourth quarter of 2007 : 0160 schlumberger sold certain workover rigs for $ 32 million , resulting in a pretax gain of $ 24 million ( $ 17 million after-tax ) which is classified in interest and other income , net in the consolidated statement of income . 4 . acquisitions acquisition of eastern echo holding plc on december 10 , 2007 , schlumberger completed the acquisition of eastern echo holding plc ( 201ceastern echo 201d ) for $ 838 million in cash . eastern echo was a dubai-based marine seismic company that did not have any operations at the time of acquisition , but had signed contracts for the construction of six seismic vessels . the purchase price has been allocated to the net assets acquired based upon their estimated fair values as follows : ( stated in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash and short-term investments</td><td>$ 266</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other current assets</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fixed income investments held to maturity</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vessels under construction</td><td>694</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accounts payable and accrued liabilities</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>-182 ( 182 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 838</td></tr></table> other acquisitions schlumberger has made other acquisitions and minority interest investments , none of which were significant on an individual basis , for cash payments , net of cash acquired , of $ 514 million during 2009 , $ 345 million during 2008 , and $ 281 million during 2007 . pro forma results pertaining to the above acquisitions are not presented as the impact was not significant . 5 . drilling fluids joint venture the mi-swaco drilling fluids joint venture is owned 40% ( 40 % ) by schlumberger and 60% ( 60 % ) by smith international , inc . schlumberger records income relating to this venture using the equity method of accounting . the carrying value of schlumberger 2019s investment in the joint venture on december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.3 billion , respectively , and is included within investments in affiliated companies on the consolidated balance sheet . schlumberger 2019s equity income from this joint venture was $ 131 million in 2009 , $ 210 million in 2008 and $ 178 million in 2007 . schlumberger received cash distributions from the joint venture of $ 106 million in 2009 , $ 57 million in 2008 and $ 46 million in 2007 . the joint venture agreement contains a provision under which either party to the joint venture may offer to sell its entire interest in the venture to the other party at a cash purchase price per percentage interest specified in an offer notice . if the offer to sell is not accepted , the offering party will be obligated to purchase the entire interest of the other party at the same price per percentage interest as the prices specified in the offer notice. . Question: what percentage did the cash and short-term investments represent in relation to the total purchase price? Answer: 0.31742 Question: and what was the total debt?

199.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( losses ) earnings ( in millions )</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2015</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>currency translation adjustments</td><td>$ -6129 ( 6129 )</td><td>$ -3929 ( 3929 )</td><td>$ -2207 ( 2207 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>pension and other benefits</td><td>-3332 ( 3332 )</td><td>-3020 ( 3020 )</td><td>-2046 ( 2046 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivatives accounted for as hedges</td><td>59</td><td>123</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total accumulated other comprehensive losses</td><td>$ -9402 ( 9402 )</td><td>$ -6826 ( 6826 )</td><td>$ -4190 ( 4190 )</td></tr></table> reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 . the movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business . in addition , $ 1 million , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . colombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products . the investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco . as a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , pmi had $ 73 million and $ 71 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement . these discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 . note 19 . rbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc . ( "rothmans" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc . ( "rbh" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand . the settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period . rothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh . the remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. . Question: what were the total accumulated other comprehensive losses in 2015?

9402.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the company 2019s stock performance the following graph compares cumulative total return of the company 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the nasdaq stock market-united states , and ( ii ) the nasdaq biotechnology index . the graph assumes ( a ) $ 100 was invested on july 31 , 2001 in each of the company 2019s common stock , the stocks comprising the nasdaq stock market-united states and the stocks comprising the nasdaq biotechnology index , and ( b ) the reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 65 month cumulative total return* among alexion pharmaceuticals , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq biotechnology index alexion pharmaceuticals , inc . nasdaq composite nasdaq biotechnology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>7/02</td><td>7/03</td><td>7/04</td><td>7/05</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alexion pharmaceuticals inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>108.38</td><td>102.64</td><td>167.89</td><td>130.56</td><td>260.41</td><td>483.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.98</td><td>142.51</td><td>164.85</td><td>168.24</td><td>187.43</td><td>204.78</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq biotechnology</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.29</td><td>146.51</td><td>176.75</td><td>186.10</td><td>183.89</td><td>187.04</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the value of the alexion pharmaceuticals inc . in march? Answer: 108.38 Question: and what was it in february? Answer: 100.0 Question: what was, then, the change over the year? Answer: 8.38 Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that value in february, in percentage?

0.0838

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

loan commitments ( unfunded loans and unused lines of credit ) , asset purchase agreements , standby letters of credit and letters of credit are issued to accommodate the financing needs of state street 2019s clients and to provide credit enhancements to special purpose entities . loan commitments are agreements by state street to lend monies at a future date . asset purchase agreements are commitments to purchase receivables or securities , subject to conditions established in the agreements , and at december 31 , 2001 , include $ 8.0 billion outstanding to special purpose entities . standby letters of credit and letters of credit commit state street to make payments on behalf of clients and special purpose entities when certain specified events occur . standby letters of credit outstanding to special purpose entities were $ 608 million at december 31 , 2001 . these loan , asset purchase and letter of credit commitments are subject to the same credit policies and reviews as loans . the amount and nature of collateral are obtained based upon management 2019s assessment of the credit risk . approximately 89% ( 89 % ) of the loan commitments and asset purchase agreements expire within one year from the date of issue . sincemany of the commitments are expected to expire or renewwithout being drawn , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . the following is a summary of the contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities on loan</td><td>$ 113047</td><td>$ 101438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loan commitments</td><td>12962</td><td>11367</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>10366</td><td>7112</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>3918</td><td>4028</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>letters of credit</td><td>164</td><td>218</td></tr></table> state street corporation 53 . Question: what was the balance of loan commitments in 2001, in millions? Answer: 12962.0 Question: and what was it in 2000, also in millions? Answer: 11367.0 Question: what was, then, the change in balance of loan commitments over the year? Answer: 1595.0 Question: what was the total balance of loan commitments in 2000, in millions?

11367.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

jpmorgan chase & co . / 2007 annual report 117 nonrecurring fair value changes the following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for which a fair value adjustment has been included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2007 , related to financial instruments held at december 31 , 2007 . year ended december 31 , 2007 ( in millions ) 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 2007 ( in millions )</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans</td><td>$ -720 ( 720 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other assets</td><td>-161 ( 161 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accounts payable accrued expense and other liabilities</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total nonrecurring fair value gains ( losses )</td><td>$ -879 ( 879 )</td></tr></table> in the above table , loans principally include changes in fair value for loans carried on the balance sheet at the lower of cost or fair value ; and accounts payable , accrued expense and other liabilities principally includes the change in fair value for unfunded lending-related commitments within the leveraged lending portfolio . level 3 assets analysis level 3 assets ( including assets measured at the lower of cost or fair value ) were 5% ( 5 % ) of total firm assets at december 31 , 2007 . these assets increased during 2007 principally during the second half of the year , when liquidity in mortgages and other credit products fell dra- matically . the increase was primarily due to an increase in leveraged loan balances within level 3 as the ability of the firm to syndicate this risk to third parties became limited by the credit environment . in addi- tion , there were transfers from level 2 to level 3 during 2007 . these transfers were principally for instruments within the mortgage market where inputs which are significant to their valuation became unob- servable during the year . subprime and alt-a whole loans , subprime home equity securities , commercial mortgage-backed mezzanine loans and credit default swaps referenced to asset-backed securities consti- tuted the majority of the affected instruments , reflecting a significant decline in liquidity in these instruments in the third and fourth quarters of 2007 , as new issue activity was nonexistent and independent pric- ing information was no longer available for these assets . transition in connection with the initial adoption of sfas 157 , the firm recorded the following on january 1 , 2007 : 2022 a cumulative effect increase to retained earnings of $ 287 million , primarily related to the release of profit previously deferred in accordance with eitf 02-3 ; 2022 an increase to pretax income of $ 166 million ( $ 103 million after-tax ) related to the incorporation of the firm 2019s creditworthiness in the valuation of liabilities recorded at fair value ; and 2022 an increase to pretax income of $ 464 million ( $ 288 million after-tax ) related to valuations of nonpublic private equity investments . prior to the adoption of sfas 157 , the firm applied the provisions of eitf 02-3 to its derivative portfolio . eitf 02-3 precluded the recogni- tion of initial trading profit in the absence of : ( a ) quoted market prices , ( b ) observable prices of other current market transactions or ( c ) other observable data supporting a valuation technique . in accor- dance with eitf 02-3 , the firm recognized the deferred profit in principal transactions revenue on a systematic basis ( typically straight- line amortization over the life of the instruments ) and when observ- able market data became available . prior to the adoption of sfas 157 the firm did not incorporate an adjustment into the valuation of liabilities carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet . commencing january 1 , 2007 , in accor- dance with the requirements of sfas 157 , an adjustment was made to the valuation of liabilities measured at fair value to reflect the credit quality of the firm . prior to the adoption of sfas 157 , privately held investments were initially valued based upon cost . the carrying values of privately held investments were adjusted from cost to reflect both positive and neg- ative changes evidenced by financing events with third-party capital providers . the investments were also subject to ongoing impairment reviews by private equity senior investment professionals . the increase in pretax income related to nonpublic private equity investments in connection with the adoption of sfas 157 was due to there being sufficient market evidence to support an increase in fair values using the sfas 157 methodology , although there had not been an actual third-party market transaction related to such investments . financial disclosures required by sfas 107 sfas 107 requires disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments and the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate their fair values . many but not all of the financial instruments held by the firm are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets . financial instruments within the scope of sfas 107 that are not carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are discussed below . additionally , certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are excluded from the scope of sfas 107 . accordingly , the fair value disclosures required by sfas 107 provide only a partial estimate of the fair value of jpmorgan chase . for example , the firm has developed long-term relationships with its customers through its deposit base and credit card accounts , commonly referred to as core deposit intangibles and credit card relationships . in the opinion of management , these items , in the aggregate , add significant value to jpmorgan chase , but their fair value is not disclosed in this note . financial instruments for which fair value approximates carrying value certain financial instruments that are not carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are carried at amounts that approxi- mate fair value due to their short-term nature and generally negligi- ble credit risk . these instruments include cash and due from banks , deposits with banks , federal funds sold , securities purchased under resale agreements with short-dated maturities , securities borrowed , short-term receivables and accrued interest receivable , commercial paper , federal funds purchased , securities sold under repurchase agreements with short-dated maturities , other borrowed funds , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . in addition , sfas 107 requires that the fair value for deposit liabilities with no stated matu- rity ( i.e. , demand , savings and certain money market deposits ) be equal to their carrying value . sfas 107 does not allow for the recog- nition of the inherent funding value of these instruments. . Question: what is the increase to pretax income of 2022 in million?

166.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) employee stock purchase plan republic employees are eligible to participate in an employee stock purchase plan . the plan allows participants to purchase our common stock for 95% ( 95 % ) of its quoted market price on the last day of each calendar quarter . for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , issuances under this plan totaled 113941 shares , 130085 shares and 141055 shares , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , shares reserved for issuance to employees under this plan totaled 0.4 million and republic held employee contributions of approximately $ 1.8 million for the purchase of common stock . 12 . stock repurchases and dividends stock repurchases stock repurchase activity during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 follows ( in millions except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>number of shares repurchased</td><td>9.6</td><td>8.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amount paid</td><td>$ 610.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average cost per share</td><td>$ 63.84</td><td>$ 48.56</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 0.5 million repurchased shares pending settlement and $ 33.8 million was unpaid and included within other accrued liabilities . in october 2017 , our board of directors added $ 2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31 , 2020 . before this , $ 98.4 million remained under a prior authorization . share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws . while the board of directors has approved the program , the timing of any purchases , the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management , at its discretion , and will depend upon market conditions and other factors . the share repurchase program may be extended , suspended or discontinued at any time . as of december 31 , 2017 , the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $ 1.8 billion . in december 2015 , our board of directors changed the status of 71272964 treasury shares to authorized and unissued . in doing so , the number of our issued shares was reduced by the stated amount . our accounting policy is to deduct the par value from common stock and to reflect the excess of cost over par value as a deduction from additional paid-in capital . the change in unissued shares resulted in a reduction of $ 2295.3 million in treasury stock , $ 0.6 million in common stock , and $ 2294.7 million in additional paid-in capital . there was no effect on our total stockholders 2019 equity position as a result of the change . dividends in october 2017 , our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $ 0.345 per share . cash dividends declared were $ 446.3 million , $ 423.8 million and $ 404.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $ 114.4 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2 , 2018 . 13 . earnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services , inc . by the weighted average number of common shares ( including vested but unissued rsus ) outstanding during the . Question: what was the change in the number of shares of the issuance under the employee stock purchase plan from 2016 to 2017? Answer: -16144.0 Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that number in 2016, in percentage?

-0.1241

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

9 . lease commitments the company leases certain land , facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2057 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximatelya $ 92.3 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 84.9 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 58.8 million in fiscal 2017 . the following is a schedule of futureff minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 2 , 2019 : operating fiscal years leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>$ 79789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>67993</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>40338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>37673</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024</td><td>32757</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>190171</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 448721</td></tr></table> 10 . commitments and contingencies from time to time , in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , among other things , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage , employment or employment benefits . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 11 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . defined contribution plans the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plans for u.s . employees was $ 47.7 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 41.4 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 35.8 million in fiscal 2017 . non-qualified deferred compensation plan the deferred compensation plan ( dcp ) allows certain members of management and other highly-compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer receipt of all or any portion of their compensation . the dcp was established to provide participants with the opportunity to defer receiving all or a portion of their compensation , which includes salary , bonus , commissions and director fees . under the dcp , the company provides all participants ( other than non-employee directors ) with company contributions equal to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible deferred contributions . the dcp is a non-qualified plan that is maintained in a rabbi trust . the fair value of the investments held in the rabbi trust are presented separately as deferred compensation plan investments , with the current portion of the investment included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . see note 2j , fair value , for further information on these investments . the deferred compensation obligation represents dcp participant accumulated deferrals and earnings thereon since the inception of the dcp net of withdrawals . the deferred compensation obligation is presented separately as deferred compensation plan liability , with the current portion of the obligation in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . the company 2019s liability under the dcp is an unsecured general obligation of the company . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Question: from 2018 to 2019, what was the change in the total rental expense under operating leases? Answer: 7.4 Question: and what was that rental expense in 2018? Answer: 84.9 Question: what percentage, then, did that change represent in relation to this 2018 amount? Answer: 0.08716 Question: and over the subsequent year of that period, what was that change in the rental expense?

-12.511

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2008 , 2007 and 2006 offering periods employees purchased 55764 , 48886 and 53210 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 30.08 , $ 33.93 and $ 24.98 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2008 , 2007 and 2006 were $ 7.89 , $ 9.09 and $ 6.79 , respectively . at december 31 , 2008 , 8.8 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk free interest rates</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) 20143.28% ( 20143.28 % )</td><td>4.98% ( 4.98 % ) 20145.05% ( 20145.05 % )</td><td>5.01% ( 5.01 % ) 20145.17% ( 20145.17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td><td>5.02% ( 5.02 % )</td><td>5.08% ( 5.08 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of the shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) 201428.51% ( 201428.51 % )</td><td>27.53% ( 27.53 % ) 201428.74% ( 201428.74 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td><td>28.22% ( 28.22 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in january 2003 , the company issued warrants to purchase approximately 11.4 million shares of its common stock in connection with an offering of 808000 units , each consisting of $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of ati 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of the company 2019s common stock . these warrants became exercisable on january 29 , 2006 at an exercise price of $ 0.01 per share . as these warrants expired on august 1 , 2008 , none were outstanding as of december 31 , in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately 1.8 million and 2.0 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these warrants will expire on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase programs 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 18.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 697.1 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase programs , as described below. . Question: what is the weighted average fair value for the espp shares of 2007? Answer: 9.09 Question: and that of 2006? Answer: 6.79 Question: what is the difference between the weighted average fair value for the espp shares of 2007 and 2006?

2.3

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

on-balance sheet securitizations the company engages in on-balance sheet securitizations . these are securitizations that do not qualify for sales treatment ; thus , the assets remain on the company 2019s balance sheet . the following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of consolidated assets and liabilities transferred in transactions from the consumer credit card , student loan , mortgage and auto businesses , accounted for as secured borrowings : in billions of dollars december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 0.3</td><td>$ 0.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>available-for-sale securities</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans</td><td>7.5</td><td>7.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allowance for loan losses</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>$ 7.8</td><td>$ 7.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 6.3</td><td>$ 5.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities</td><td>$ 6.6</td><td>$ 6.2</td></tr></table> all assets are restricted from being sold or pledged as collateral . the cash flows from these assets are the only source used to pay down the associated liabilities , which are non-recourse to the company 2019s general assets . citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits the company is active in the asset-backed commercial paper conduit business as administrator of several multi-seller commercial paper conduits , and also as a service provider to single-seller and other commercial paper conduits sponsored by third parties . the multi-seller commercial paper conduits are designed to provide the company 2019s customers access to low-cost funding in the commercial paper markets . the conduits purchase assets from or provide financing facilities to customers and are funded by issuing commercial paper to third-party investors . the conduits generally do not purchase assets originated by the company . the funding of the conduit is facilitated by the liquidity support and credit enhancements provided by the company and by certain third parties . as administrator to the conduits , the company is responsible for selecting and structuring of assets purchased or financed by the conduits , making decisions regarding the funding of the conduits , including determining the tenor and other features of the commercial paper issued , monitoring the quality and performance of the conduits 2019 assets , and facilitating the operations and cash flows of the conduits . in return , the company earns structuring fees from clients for individual transactions and earns an administration fee from the conduit , which is equal to the income from client program and liquidity fees of the conduit after payment of interest costs and other fees . this administration fee is fairly stable , since most risks and rewards of the underlying assets are passed back to the customers and , once the asset pricing is negotiated , most ongoing income , costs and fees are relatively stable as a percentage of the conduit 2019s size . the conduits administered by the company do not generally invest in liquid securities that are formally rated by third parties . the assets are privately negotiated and structured transactions that are designed to be held by the conduit , rather than actively traded and sold . the yield earned by the conduit on each asset is generally tied to the rate on the commercial paper issued by the conduit , thus passing interest rate risk to the client . each asset purchased by the conduit is structured with transaction-specific credit enhancement features provided by the third-party seller , including over- collateralization , cash and excess spread collateral accounts , direct recourse or third-party guarantees . these credit enhancements are sized with the objective of approximating a credit rating of a or above , based on the company 2019s internal risk ratings . substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of short- term commercial paper . as of december 31 , 2008 , the weighted average life of the commercial paper issued was approximately 37 days . in addition , the conduits have issued subordinate loss notes and equity with a notional amount of approximately $ 80 million and varying remaining tenors ranging from six months to seven years . the primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancement described above . in addition , there are two additional forms of credit enhancement that protect the commercial paper investors from defaulting assets . first , the subordinate loss notes issued by each conduit absorb any credit losses up to their full notional amount . it is expected that the subordinate loss notes issued by each conduit are sufficient to absorb a majority of the expected losses from each conduit , thereby making the single investor in the subordinate loss note the primary beneficiary under fin 46 ( r ) . second , each conduit has obtained a letter of credit from the company , which is generally 8-10% ( 8-10 % ) of the conduit 2019s assets . the letters of credit provided by the company total approximately $ 5.8 billion and are included in the company 2019s maximum exposure to loss . the net result across all multi-seller conduits administered by the company is that , in the event of defaulted assets in excess of the transaction-specific credit enhancement described above , any losses in each conduit are allocated in the following order : 2022 subordinate loss note holders 2022 the company 2022 the commercial paper investors the company , along with third parties , also provides the conduits with two forms of liquidity agreements that are used to provide funding to the conduits in the event of a market disruption , among other events . each asset of the conduit is supported by a transaction-specific liquidity facility in the form of an asset purchase agreement ( apa ) . under the apa , the company has agreed to purchase non-defaulted eligible receivables from the conduit at par . any assets purchased under the apa are subject to increased pricing . the apa is not designed to provide credit support to the conduit , as it generally does not permit the purchase of defaulted or impaired assets and generally reprices the assets purchased to consider potential increased credit risk . the apa covers all assets in the conduits and is considered in the company 2019s maximum exposure to loss . in addition , the company provides the conduits with program-wide liquidity in the form of short-term lending commitments . under these commitments , the company has agreed to lend to the conduits in the event of a short-term disruption in the commercial paper market , subject to specified conditions . the total notional exposure under the program-wide liquidity agreement is $ 11.3 billion and is considered in the company 2019s maximum exposure to loss . the company receives fees for providing both types of liquidity agreement and considers these fees to be on fair market terms. . Question: by how much did the available-for-sale securities change between 2007 and 2008?

-0.1

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in addition to the contractual obligations given above , entergy texas expects to contribute approximately $ 17 million to its qualified pension plans and approximately $ 3.2 million to other postretirement health care and life insurance plans in 2017 , although the 2017 required pension contributions will be known with more certainty when the january 1 , 2017 valuations are completed , which is expected by april 1 , 2017 . see 201ccritical accounting estimates - qualified pension and other postretirement benefits 201d below for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding . also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy texas has $ 15.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine capital spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate for entergy texas includes specific investments such as the montgomery county power station discussed below ; transmission projects to enhance reliability , reduce congestion , and enable economic growth ; distribution spending to enhance reliability and improve service to customers , including initial investment to support advanced metering ; system improvements ; and other investments . estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints and requirements , environmental compliance , business opportunities , market volatility , economic trends , business restructuring , changes in project plans , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt in note 5 to the financial statements . as discussed above in 201ccapital structure , 201d entergy texas routinely evaluates its ability to pay dividends to entergy corporation from its earnings . sources of capital entergy texas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy texas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy texas require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indenture and other agreements . entergy texas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy texas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 681</td><td>( $ 22068 )</td><td>$ 306</td><td>$ 6287</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy texas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . the credit facility allows entergy texas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and $ 4.7 million of letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy texas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral . Question: as of december 31, 2016, what was the drawn amount from the credit facility that was set to expire in august 2021? Answer: 4.7 Question: and what was that credit facility? Answer: 150.0 Question: what percentage, then, did that amount represent?

0.03133

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 6179</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>91</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grand gulf recovery</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2017 net revenue</td><td>$ 6318</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis . Question: what was the change in value from net revenues from 2016 to 2017? Answer: 139.0 Question: what was the net revenue in 2016?

6179.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1362.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>161.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 1520.5</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. . Question: what was net revenue in 2016?

1520.5

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

table 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 4036</td><td>$ 4347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>-1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>643</td><td>987</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>8</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td><td>.73% ( .73 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.84</td><td>2.17</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td><td>$ -359 ( 359 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td><td>-930 ( 930 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>$ -1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td><td>.35% ( .35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>1.07</td><td>1.24</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k . Question: what is the provision for credit losses in 2013? Answer: 643.0 Question: what about in 2012? Answer: 987.0 Question: what is the change in provision for credit losses? Answer: -344.0 Question: what is the provision for credit losses in 2012?

987.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

table 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 4036</td><td>$ 4347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>-1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>643</td><td>987</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>8</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td><td>.73% ( .73 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.84</td><td>2.17</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td><td>$ -359 ( 359 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td><td>-930 ( 930 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>$ -1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td><td>.35% ( .35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>1.07</td><td>1.24</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k . Question: what was the value in the allowance for loan and lease losses in 2013? Answer: 3609.0 Question: what was the value in 2012? Answer: 4036.0 Question: what was the net change in value?

-427.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

customary conditions . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture . as of december 31 , 2008 , the joint venture has acquired seven properties from us and we received year-to-date net sale proceeds and financing distributions of approximately $ 251.6 million . in january 2008 , we sold a tract of land to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we hold a 50% ( 50 % ) equity interest and received a distribution , commensurate to our partner 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership interest , of approximately $ 38.3 million . in november 2008 , that unconsolidated joint venture entered a loan agreement with a consortium of banks and distributed a portion of the loan proceeds to us and our partner , with our share of the distribution totaling $ 20.4 million . uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 property investment ; 2022 recurring leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; 2022 opportunistic repurchases of outstanding debt ; and 2022 other contractual obligations . property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and we are limiting new development expenditures . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>recurring tenant improvements</td><td>$ 36885</td><td>$ 45296</td><td>$ 41895</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>recurring leasing costs</td><td>28205</td><td>32238</td><td>32983</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>9724</td><td>8402</td><td>8122</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>totals</td><td>$ 74814</td><td>$ 85936</td><td>$ 83000</td></tr></table> dividends and distributions in order to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes , we must currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our taxable income to shareholders . because depreciation is a non-cash expense , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 1.93 , $ 1.91 and $ 1.89 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute taxable earnings to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status . however , distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . in january 2009 , our board of directors resolved to decrease our annual dividend from $ 1.94 per share to $ 1.00 per share in order to retain additional cash to help meet our capital needs . we anticipate retaining additional cash of approximately $ 145.2 million per year , when compared to an annual dividend of $ 1.94 per share , as the result of this action . at december 31 , 2008 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. . Question: what was the dividend paid per share in 2008? Answer: 1.93 Question: what was it in 2007? Answer: 1.91 Question: what is the sum? Answer: 3.84 Question: what is the total sum including 2006?

5.73

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are a global integrated energy company with significant operations in the north america , africa and europe . our operations are organized into four reportable segments : 2022 exploration and production ( 201ce&p 201d ) which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis . 2022 oil sands mining ( 201cosm 201d ) which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas 2022 integrated gas ( 201cig 201d ) which markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas , such as liquefied natural gas ( 201clng 201d ) and methanol , on a worldwide basis . 2022 refining , marketing & transportation ( 201crm&t 201d ) which refines , markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products , primarily in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business . these statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain . in accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements . we hold a 60 percent interest in equatorial guinea lng holdings limited ( 201cegholdings 201d ) . as discussed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements , effective may 1 , 2007 , we ceased consolidating egholdings . our investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting . unless specifically noted , amounts presented for the integrated gas segment for periods prior to may 1 , 2007 , include amounts related to the minority interests . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 . business , item 1a . risk factors , item 6 . selected financial data and item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data . overview exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows . prices were volatile in 2009 , but not as much as in the previous year . prices in 2009 were also lower than in recent years as illustrated by the annual averages for key benchmark prices below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>$ 62.09</td><td>$ 99.75</td><td>$ 72.41</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dated brent crude oil ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>$ 61.67</td><td>$ 97.26</td><td>$ 72.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a )</td><td>$ 3.99</td><td>$ 9.04</td><td>$ 6.86</td></tr></table> henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a ) $ 3.99 $ 9.04 $ 6.86 ( a ) first-of-month price index . crude oil prices rose sharply through the first half of 2008 as a result of strong global demand , a declining dollar , ongoing concerns about supplies of crude oil , and geopolitical risk . later in 2008 , crude oil prices sharply declined as the u.s . dollar rebounded and global demand decreased as a result of economic recession . the price decrease continued into 2009 , but reversed after dropping below $ 33.98 in february , ending the year at $ 79.36 . our domestic crude oil production is about 62 percent sour , which means that it contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does . sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values . our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the dated brent crude benchmark . the differential between wti and dated brent average prices narrowed to $ 0.42 in 2009 compared to $ 2.49 in 2008 and $ 0.02 in 2007. . Question: what was the change in the average wti crude oil benchmark from 2007 to 2009? Answer: -10.32 Question: and what was that average wti crude oil benchmark in 2007? Answer: 72.41 Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2007 amount, in percentage?

-0.14252

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the fair value of performance awards is calculated using the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant . the weighted-average grant date fair value of performance awards granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 77.33 , $ 60.00 and $ 55.97 , respectively . vested performance share units approximated 148000 shares as of 2013 year end , 213000 shares as of 2012 year end and 54208 shares as of 2011 year end . performance share units of 213459 shares were paid out in 2013 and 53990 shares were paid out in 2012 ; no performance share units were paid out in 2011 . earned performance share units are generally paid out following the conclusion of the applicable performance period upon approval by the organization and executive compensation committee of the company 2019s board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) . based on the company 2019s 2013 performance , 84413 rsus granted in 2013 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2015 . based on the company 2019s 2012 performance , 95047 rsus granted in 2012 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2014 . based on the company 2019s 2011 performance , 159970 rsus granted in 2011 were earned ; these rsus vested as of fiscal 2013 year end and were paid out shortly thereafter . as a result of employee retirements , a total of 1614 of the rsus earned in 2012 and 2011 vested pursuant to the terms of the related award agreements and the underlying shares were paid out in the third quarter of 2013 . the changes to the company 2019s non-vested performance awards in 2013 are as follows : shares ( in thousands ) fair value price per share* . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( in thousands )</td><td>fair valueprice pershare*</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested performance awards at beginning of year</td><td>509</td><td>$ 59.36</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>180</td><td>77.33</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-306 ( 306 )</td><td>58.94</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancellations</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>69.23</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested performance awards at end of year</td><td>381</td><td>68.13</td></tr></table> * weighted-average as of 2013 year end there was approximately $ 12.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance awards that is expected to be recognized as a charge to earnings over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years . stock appreciation rights ( 201csars 201d ) the company also issues cash-settled and stock-settled sars to certain key non-u.s . employees . sars have a contractual term of ten years and vest ratably on the first , second and third anniversaries of the date of grant . sars are granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant . cash-settled sars provide for the cash payment of the excess of the fair market value of snap-on 2019s common stock price on the date of exercise over the grant price . cash-settled sars have no effect on dilutive shares or shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the grant price is paid in cash and not in common stock . in 2013 , the company began issuing stock-settled sars that are accounted for as equity instruments and provide for the issuance of snap-on common stock equal to the amount by which the company 2019s stock has appreciated over the exercise price . stock-settled sars have an effect on dilutive shares and shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the exercise price will be settled in shares of common stock . 2013 annual report 101 . Question: what was the difference in the number on non-vested performance awards from the beginning of the year to the end? Answer: -128.0 Question: what was the value at the start of the year? Answer: 509.0 Question: what was the percent change?

-0.25147

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

bhge 2018 form 10-k | 85 it is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months due to expiring statutes , audit activity , tax payments , and competent authority proceedings related to transfer pricing or final decisions in matters that are the subject of litigation in various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate . at december 31 , 2018 , we had approximately $ 96 million of tax liabilities , net of $ 1 million of tax assets , related to uncertain tax positions , each of which are individually insignificant , and each of which are reasonably possible of being settled within the next twelve months . we conduct business in more than 120 countries and are subject to income taxes in most taxing jurisdictions in which we operate . all internal revenue service examinations have been completed and closed through year end 2015 for the most significant u.s . returns . we believe there are no other jurisdictions in which the outcome of unresolved issues or claims is likely to be material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . we further believe that we have made adequate provision for all income tax uncertainties . note 13 . stock-based compensation in july 2017 , we adopted the bhge 2017 long-term incentive plan ( lti plan ) under which we may grant stock options and other equity-based awards to employees and non-employee directors providing services to the company and our subsidiaries . a total of up to 57.4 million shares of class a common stock are authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the lti plan over its term which expires on the date of the annual meeting of the company in 2027 . a total of 46.2 million shares of class a common stock are available for issuance as of december 31 , 2018 . stock-based compensation cost was $ 121 million and $ 37 million in 2018 and 2017 , respectively . stock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant based on the calculated fair value of the award and is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the equity grant . the compensation cost is determined based on awards ultimately expected to vest ; therefore , we have reduced the cost for estimated forfeitures based on historical forfeiture rates . forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised , if necessary , in subsequent periods to reflect actual forfeitures . there were no stock-based compensation costs capitalized as the amounts were not material . stock options we may grant stock options to our officers , directors and key employees . stock options generally vest in equal amounts over a three-year vesting period provided that the employee has remained continuously employed by the company through such vesting date . the fair value of each stock option granted is estimated using the black- scholes option pricing model . the following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model for options granted under the lti plan . the expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding . the expected life is based on a simple average of the vesting term and original contractual term of the awards . the expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our five main competitors over a six year period . the risk-free interest rate is based on the observed u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time the options were granted . the dividend yield is based on a five year history of dividend payouts in baker hughes. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>33.7% ( 33.7 % )</td><td>36.4% ( 36.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average fair value per share at grant date</td><td>$ 10.34</td><td>$ 12.32</td></tr></table> baker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements . Question: what is the total number of shares authorized for sales less those available for sale?

11.2

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2002</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>94.20</td><td>91.94</td><td>94.48</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>129.77</td><td>108.79</td><td>115.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>193.30</td><td>117.75</td><td>116.29</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>260.35</td><td>127.92</td><td>117.14</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>224.24</td><td>157.08</td><td>144.11</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. . Question: what was the value of global payments in 2003? Answer: 94.2 Question: and what was the change in this value from 2002 to that year? Answer: -5.8 Question: what is that change as a portion of the 2002 value of that stock? Answer: -0.058 Question: and throughout the subsequent year, what was the change in the value of global payments?

35.57

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 466.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenue</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>attala costs</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr></table> the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve . Question: what was the difference in net revenue between 2006 and 2007? Answer: 20.8 Question: and the amount due to volume/weather? Answer: 4.5 Question: so what percentage of the change was due to this aspect?

0.21635

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2224</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014</td><td>-305 ( 305 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1666</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. . Question: what was the 2015 net revenue? Answer: 1666.0 Question: and in 2014?

2224.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

maturities of long-term debt in each of the next five years and beyond are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 907.4</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>453.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>453.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>439.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2876.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5563.7</td></tr></table> on 4 february 2013 , we issued a $ 400.0 senior fixed-rate 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) note that matures on 3 february 2023 . additionally , on 7 august 2013 , we issued a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) eurobond for 20ac300 million ( $ 397 ) that matures on 7 august 2020 . various debt agreements to which we are a party also include financial covenants and other restrictions , including restrictions pertaining to the ability to create property liens and enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions . as of 30 september 2013 , we are in compliance with all the financial and other covenants under our debt agreements . as of 30 september 2013 , we have classified commercial paper of $ 400.0 maturing in 2014 as long-term debt because we have the ability and intent to refinance the debt under our $ 2500.0 committed credit facility maturing in 2018 . our current intent is to refinance this debt via the u.s . public or private placement markets . on 30 april 2013 , we entered into a five-year $ 2500.0 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks ( the 201c2013 credit agreement 201d ) , under which senior unsecured debt is available to us and certain of our subsidiaries . the 2013 credit agreement provides us with a source of liquidity and supports our commercial paper program . this agreement increases the previously existing facility by $ 330.0 , extends the maturity date to 30 april 2018 , and modifies the financial covenant to a maximum ratio of total debt to total capitalization ( total debt plus total equity plus redeemable noncontrolling interest ) no greater than 70% ( 70 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the 2013 credit agreement as of 30 september 2013 . the 2013 credit agreement terminates and replaces our previous $ 2170.0 revolving credit agreement dated 8 july 2010 , as subsequently amended , which was to mature 30 june 2015 and had a financial covenant of long-term debt divided by the sum of long-term debt plus equity of no greater than 60% ( 60 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the previous agreement at the time of its termination and no early termination penalties were incurred . effective 11 june 2012 , we entered into an offshore chinese renminbi ( rmb ) syndicated credit facility of rmb1000.0 million ( $ 163.5 ) , maturing in june 2015 . there are rmb250.0 million ( $ 40.9 ) in outstanding borrowings under this commitment at 30 september 2013 . additional commitments totaling $ 383.0 are maintained by our foreign subsidiaries , of which $ 309.0 was borrowed and outstanding at 30 september 2013. . Question: what was the senior fixed-rate in 2013? Answer: 0.0275 Question: and what is the sum of the number one and this percentage as a portion of the number one?

1.0275

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

higher in the first half of the year , but declined dur- ing the second half of the year reflecting the pass- through to customers of lower resin input costs . however , average margins benefitted from a more favorable mix of products sold . raw material costs were lower , primarily for resins . freight costs were also favorable , while operating costs increased . shorewood sales volumes in 2009 declined from 2008 levels reflecting weaker demand in the home entertainment segment and a decrease in tobacco segment orders as customers have shifted pro- duction outside of the united states , partially offset by higher shipments in the consumer products segment . average sales margins improved reflecting a more favorable mix of products sold . raw material costs were higher , but were partially offset by lower freight costs . operating costs were favorable , reflect- ing benefits from business reorganization and cost reduction actions taken in 2008 and 2009 . charges to restructure operations totaled $ 7 million in 2009 and $ 30 million in 2008 . entering 2010 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to increase , while average sales price real- izations should be comparable to 2009 fourth-quarter levels . raw material costs are expected to be sig- nificantly higher for wood , energy and chemicals , but planned maintenance downtime costs will decrease . foodservice sales volumes are expected to remain about flat , but average sales price realizations should improve slightly . input costs for resins should be higher , but will be partially offset by lower costs for bleached board . shorewood sales volumes are expected to decline reflecting seasonal decreases in home entertainment segment shipments . operating costs are expected to be favorable reflecting the benefits of business reorganization efforts . european consumer packaging net sales in 2009 were $ 315 million compared with $ 300 million in 2008 and $ 280 million in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 of $ 66 million increased from $ 22 million in 2008 and $ 30 million in 2007 . sales volumes in 2009 were higher than in 2008 reflecting increased ship- ments to export markets . average sales margins declined due to increased shipments to lower- margin export markets and lower average sales prices in western europe . entering 2010 , sales volumes for the first quarter are expected to remain strong . average margins should improve reflecting increased sales price realizations and a more favorable geographic mix of products sold . input costs are expected to be higher due to increased wood prices in poland and annual energy tariff increases in russia . asian consumer packaging net sales were $ 545 million in 2009 compared with $ 390 million in 2008 and $ 330 million in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 24 million compared with a loss of $ 13 million in 2008 and earnings of $ 12 million in 2007 . the improved operating earnings in 2009 reflect increased sales volumes , higher average sales mar- gins and lower input costs , primarily for chemicals . the loss in 2008 was primarily due to a $ 12 million charge to revalue pulp inventories at our shandong international paper and sun coated paperboard co. , ltd . joint venture and start-up costs associated with the joint venture 2019s new folding box board paper machine . distribution xpedx , our distribution business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to cus- tomers in many business segments . customer demand is generally sensitive to changes in general economic conditions , although the commercial printing segment is also dependent on consumer advertising and promotional spending . distribution 2019s margins are relatively stable across an economic cycle . providing customers with the best choice and value in both products and supply chain services is a key competitive factor . additionally , efficient customer service , cost-effective logistics and focused working capital management are key factors in this segment 2019s profitability . distribution in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6525</td><td>$ 7970</td><td>$ 7320</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>50</td><td>103</td><td>108</td></tr></table> distribution 2019s 2009 annual sales decreased 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 and 11% ( 11 % ) from 2007 while operating profits in 2009 decreased 51% ( 51 % ) compared with 2008 and 54% ( 54 % ) compared with 2007 . annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment totaled $ 4.1 billion in 2009 compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2008 and $ 4.7 billion in 2007 , reflecting weak economic conditions in 2009 . trade margins as a percent of sales for printing papers increased from 2008 but decreased from 2007 due to a higher mix of lower margin direct ship- ments from manufacturers . revenue from packaging products was $ 1.3 billion in 2009 compared with $ 1.7 billion in 2008 and $ 1.5 billion in 2007 . trade margins as a percent of sales for packaging products were higher than in the past two years reflecting an improved product and service mix . facility supplies annual revenue was $ 1.1 billion in 2009 , essentially . Question: what was the change in annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment from 2008 to 2009? Answer: 1.1 Question: and the percentage change?

0.21154

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

table of contents adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the years ended september 28 , 2013 , september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 ( in millions ) : the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . the company anticipates the cash used for future dividends and the share repurchase program will come from its current domestic cash , cash generated from on-going u.s . operating activities and from borrowings . as of september 28 , 2013 and september 29 , 2012 , $ 111.3 billion and $ 82.6 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly-rated securities and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer . the policy requires investments generally to be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss . during 2013 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 53.7 billion was a result of $ 37.0 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 10.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 6.5 billion . cash used in investing activities of $ 33.8 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of net purchases , sales and maturities of marketable securities of $ 24.0 billion and cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 8.2 billion . cash used in financing activities during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 22.9 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalent rights of $ 10.6 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $ 16.9 billion . during 2012 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 50.9 billion was a result of $ 41.7 billion of net income and non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 9.4 billion , partially offset by a decrease in net operating assets and liabilities of $ 299 million . cash used in investing activities during 2012 of $ 48.2 billion consisted primarily of net purchases , sales and maturities of marketable securities of $ 38.4 billion and cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 8.3 billion . cash used in financing activities during 2012 of $ 1.7 billion consisted primarily of cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalent rights of $ 2.5 billion . capital assets the company 2019s capital expenditures were $ 7.0 billion during 2013 , consisting of $ 499 million for retail store facilities and $ 6.5 billion for other capital expenditures , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and other corporate facilities and infrastructure . the company 2019s actual cash payments for capital expenditures during 2013 were $ 8.2 billion. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 146761</td><td>$ 121251</td><td>$ 81570</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property plant and equipment net</td><td>$ 16597</td><td>$ 15452</td><td>$ 7777</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 16960</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 29628</td><td>$ 19111</td><td>$ 17018</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cash generated by operating activities</td><td>$ 53666</td><td>$ 50856</td><td>$ 37529</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>$ -33774 ( 33774 )</td><td>$ -48227 ( 48227 )</td><td>$ -40419 ( 40419 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cash generated/ ( used in ) by financing activities</td><td>$ -16379 ( 16379 )</td><td>$ -1698 ( 1698 )</td><td>$ 1444</td></tr></table> . Question: what is the total long-term debt of 2013 and 2012?

16960.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

152 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k in addition to the proceedings or other matters described above , pnc and persons to whom we may have indemnification obligations , in the normal course of business , are subject to various other pending and threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages and other relief are asserted . we do not anticipate , at the present time , that the ultimate aggregate liability , if any , arising out of such other legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial position . however , we cannot now determine whether or not any claims asserted against us or others to whom we may have indemnification obligations , whether in the proceedings or other matters described above or otherwise , will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any future reporting period , which will depend on , among other things , the amount of the loss resulting from the claim and the amount of income otherwise reported for the reporting period . note 20 commitments in the normal course of business , we have various commitments outstanding , certain of which are not included on our consolidated balance sheet . the following table presents our outstanding commitments to extend credit along with significant other commitments as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . table 98 : commitments to extend credit and other commitments in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commitments to extend credit</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total commercial lending</td><td>$ 112125</td><td>$ 108256</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>home equity lines of credit</td><td>17852</td><td>17438</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit card</td><td>24911</td><td>22095</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>4753</td><td>4192</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total commitments to extend credit</td><td>159641</td><td>151981</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net outstanding standby letters ofcredit ( a )</td><td>8651</td><td>8324</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>reinsurance agreements ( b )</td><td>1654</td><td>1835</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>standby bond purchase agreements ( c )</td><td>843</td><td>790</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other commitments ( d )</td><td>1732</td><td>967</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total commitments to extendcredit and other commitments</td><td>$ 172521</td><td>$ 163897</td></tr></table> commitments to extend credit , or net unfunded loan commitments , represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions . these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates , may require payment of a fee , and contain termination clauses in the event the customer 2019s credit quality deteriorates . net outstanding standby letters of credit we issue standby letters of credit and share in the risk of standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions , in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties , such as insurance requirements and the facilitation of transactions involving capital markets product execution . approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 94% ( 94 % ) of our net outstanding standby letters of credit were rated as pass as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively , with the remainder rated as below pass . an internal credit rating of pass indicates the expected risk of loss is currently low , while a rating of below pass indicates a higher degree of risk . if the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program , then upon a draw by a beneficiary , subject to the terms of the letter of credit , we would be obligated to make payment to them . the standby letters of credit outstanding on december 31 , 2017 had terms ranging from less than one year to seven years . as of december 31 , 2017 , assets of $ 1.3 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit . in addition , a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers 2019 other obligations to us . the carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and participations in standby letters of credit was $ .2 billion at december 31 , 2017 and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. . Question: what was the change in total commitments to extend credit from 2016 to 2017?

7660.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the fair value of our grants receivable is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using an appropriate yield curve . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of our grants receivable was classified within other current assets and other long-term assets , as applicable . our long-term debt recognized at amortized cost is comprised of our senior notes and our convertible debentures . the fair value of our senior notes is determined using active market prices , and it is therefore classified as level 1 . the fair value of our convertible long-term debt is determined using discounted cash flow models with observable market inputs , and it takes into consideration variables such as interest rate changes , comparable securities , subordination discount , and credit-rating changes , and it is therefore classified as level 2 . the nvidia corporation ( nvidia ) cross-license agreement liability in the preceding table was incurred as a result of entering into a long-term patent cross-license agreement with nvidia in january 2011 . we agreed to make payments to nvidia over six years . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of the liability arising from the agreement was classified within other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities , as applicable . the fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using our incremental borrowing rates . note 5 : cash and investments cash and investments at the end of each period were as follows : ( in millions ) dec 28 , dec 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>dec 282013</td><td>dec 292012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>available-for-sale investments</td><td>$ 18086</td><td>$ 14001</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash</td><td>854</td><td>593</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>equity method investments</td><td>1038</td><td>992</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans receivable</td><td>1072</td><td>979</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-marketable cost method investments</td><td>1270</td><td>1202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reverse repurchase agreements</td><td>800</td><td>2850</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>trading assets</td><td>8441</td><td>5685</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total cash and investments</td><td>$ 31561</td><td>$ 26302</td></tr></table> in the third quarter of 2013 , we sold our shares in clearwire corporation , which had been accounted for as available-for-sale marketable equity securities , and our interest in clearwire communications , llc ( clearwire llc ) , which had been accounted for as an equity method investment . in total , we received proceeds of $ 470 million on these transactions and recognized a gain of $ 439 million , which is included in gains ( losses ) on equity investments , net on the consolidated statements of income . proceeds received and gains recognized for each investment are included in the "available-for-sale investments" and "equity method investments" sections that follow . table of contents intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . Question: what was the change in the total of cash and investments from 2012 to 2013? Answer: 5259.0 Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that total in 2012, in percentage? Answer: 0.19995 Question: in that same year of 2013, what was the recognized gain of the proceeds from the clear wire transactions? Answer: 439.0 Question: and what was the total of those proceeds?

470.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

in june 2011 , the fasb issued asu no . 2011-05 201ccomprehensive income 2013 presentation of comprehensive income . 201d asu 2011-05 requires comprehensive income , the components of net income , and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements . in both choices , an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income , each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income , and a total amount for comprehensive income . this update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity . the amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income . the amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2011 . the company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2012 . the adoption of asu 2011-05 is for presentation purposes only and had no material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at both december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2012 and prior years . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 24087 and $ 29554 in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2010 , respectively . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 , due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products have generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . product cores are included as part of the company's merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company's other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , were $ 134258 and $ 126840 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at the end of fiscal 2012 and 2011 were as follows : december 29 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 292012</td><td>december 312011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 2182419</td><td>$ 1941055</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>126190</td><td>102103</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 2308609</td><td>$ 2043158</td></tr></table> inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company completes physical inventories and other targeted inventory counts in its store locations to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory in these locations . in its distribution centers and pdq aes , the company uses a cycle counting program to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and product core inventory . reserves advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 29 , 2012 , december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 ( in thousands , except per share data ) . Question: what is the sum in the reduction of cost of sales?

53641.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>1.85% ( 1.85 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>26.50</td><td>28.70</td><td>27.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.60</td><td>4.19</td><td>3.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>7.8</td><td>7.8</td><td>5.0</td></tr></table> compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\fc\\delivery_1024177\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) . Question: what was the risk-free interest rate in 2005? Answer: 4.19 Question: and in 2004? Answer: 3.02 Question: so what was the difference between these two years? Answer: 1.17 Question: and the value for 2004 again?

3.02

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds . ( b ) the bonds are secured by a series of collateral first mortgage bonds . ( c ) in december 2005 , entergy corporation sold 10 million equity units with a stated amount of $ 50 each . an equity unit consisted of ( 1 ) a note , initially due february 2011 and initially bearing interest at an annual rate of 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) , and ( 2 ) a purchase contract that obligated the holder of the equity unit to purchase for $ 50 between 0.5705 and 0.7074 shares of entergy corporation common stock on or before february 17 , 2009 . entergy paid the holders quarterly contract adjustment payments of 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) per year on the stated amount of $ 50 per equity unit . under the terms of the purchase contracts , entergy attempted to remarket the notes in february 2009 but was unsuccessful , the note holders put the notes to entergy , entergy retired the notes , and entergy issued 6598000 shares of common stock in the settlement of the purchase contracts . ( d ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and the note payable to nypa , and includes debt due within one year . it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms . ( f ) entergy gulf states louisiana remains primarily liable for all of the long-term debt issued by entergy gulf states , inc . that was outstanding on december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . under a debt assumption agreement with entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy texas assumed approximately 46% ( 46 % ) of this long-term debt . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 516019</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 763036</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 897367</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3625459</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 579461</td></tr></table> in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above . in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa . under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit . covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization . if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the utility operating companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur . entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have received ferc long-term financing orders authorizing long-term securities issuances . entergy arkansas has . Question: what was the net difference in debt maturities between 2011 and 2012? Answer: 2728092.0 Question: what was the value of debt maturities in 2011?

897367.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

management 2019s discussion and analysis fully phased-in capital ratios the table below presents our estimated ratio of cet1 to rwas calculated under the basel iii advanced rules and the standardized capital rules on a fully phased-in basis. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>$ 73597</td><td>$ 71267</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets net of deferred tax liabilities</td><td>-3196 ( 3196 )</td><td>-3468 ( 3468 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions</td><td>-4928 ( 4928 )</td><td>-9091 ( 9091 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other adjustments</td><td>-1213 ( 1213 )</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cet1</td><td>$ 64260</td><td>$ 58219</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basel iii advanced rwas</td><td>$ 577869</td><td>$ 594662</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>basel iii advanced cet1 ratio</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>standardized rwas</td><td>$ 627444</td><td>$ 635092</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>standardized cet1 ratio</td><td>10.2% ( 10.2 % )</td><td>9.2% ( 9.2 % )</td></tr></table> although the fully phased-in capital ratios are not applicable until 2019 , we believe that the estimated ratios in the table above are meaningful because they are measures that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the estimated fully phased-in basel iii advanced and standardized cet1 ratios are non-gaap measures as of both december 2014 and december 2013 and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies ( as of those dates ) . these estimated ratios are based on our current interpretation , expectations and understanding of the revised capital framework and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for information about our transitional capital ratios , which represent our binding ratios as of december 2014 . in the table above : 2030 the deduction for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets , net of deferred tax liabilities , represents goodwill of $ 3.65 billion and $ 3.71 billion as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , and identifiable intangible assets of $ 515 million and $ 671 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , net of associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 964 million and $ 908 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively . 2030 the deduction for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions represents the amount by which our investments in the capital of nonconsolidated financial institutions exceed certain prescribed thresholds . the decrease from december 2013 to december 2014 primarily reflects reductions in our fund investments . 2030 other adjustments primarily include the overfunded portion of our defined benefit pension plan obligation , net of associated deferred tax liabilities , and disallowed deferred tax assets , credit valuation adjustments on derivative liabilities and debt valuation adjustments , as well as other required credit risk-based deductions . supplementary leverage ratio the revised capital framework introduces a new supplementary leverage ratio for advanced approach banking organizations . under amendments to the revised capital framework , the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies approved a final rule that implements the supplementary leverage ratio aligned with the definition of leverage established by the basel committee . the supplementary leverage ratio compares tier 1 capital to a measure of leverage exposure , defined as the sum of our quarterly average assets less certain deductions plus certain off-balance-sheet exposures , including a measure of derivatives exposures and commitments . the revised capital framework requires a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ( comprised of the minimum requirement of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) and a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) buffer ) for u.s . banks deemed to be g-sibs , effective on january 1 , 2018 . certain disclosures regarding the supplementary leverage ratio are required beginning in the first quarter of 2015 . as of december 2014 , our estimated supplementary leverage ratio was 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , including tier 1 capital on a fully phased-in basis of $ 73.17 billion ( cet1 of $ 64.26 billion plus perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock of $ 9.20 billion less other adjustments of $ 290 million ) divided by total leverage exposure of $ 1.45 trillion ( total quarterly average assets of $ 873 billion plus adjustments of $ 579 billion , primarily comprised of off-balance-sheet exposure related to derivatives and commitments ) . we believe that the estimated supplementary leverage ratio is meaningful because it is a measure that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the supplementary leverage ratio is a non-gaap measure and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies . this estimated supplementary leverage ratio is based on our current interpretation and understanding of the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies 2019 final rule and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . 60 goldman sachs 2014 annual report . Question: what was the balance of common shareholders by the end of 2014? Answer: 73597.0 Question: and what was it at the beginning of the year? Answer: 71267.0 Question: what was, then, the variation over the year?

2330.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. . Question: what is the benefit payment value in 2012? Answer: 3369.0 Question: what was the benefit payment value in 2011?

3028.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

third-party sales for the engineered products and solutions segment improved 7% ( 7 % ) in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily attributable to higher third-party sales of the two acquired businesses ( $ 457 ) , primarily related to the aerospace end market , and increased demand from the industrial gas turbine end market , partially offset by lower volumes in the oil and gas end market and commercial transportation end market as well as pricing pressures in aerospace . third-party sales for this segment improved 27% ( 27 % ) in 2015 compared with 2014 , largely attributable to the third-party sales ( $ 1310 ) of the three acquired businesses ( see above ) , and higher volumes in this segment 2019s legacy businesses , both of which were primarily related to the aerospace end market . these positive impacts were slightly offset by unfavorable foreign currency movements , principally driven by a weaker euro . atoi for the engineered products and solutions segment increased $ 47 , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily related to net productivity improvements across all businesses as well as the volume increase from both the rti acquisition and organic revenue growth , partially offset by a lower margin product mix and pricing pressures in the aerospace end market . atoi for this segment increased $ 16 , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2015 compared with 2014 , principally the result of net productivity improvements across most businesses , a positive contribution from acquisitions , and overall higher volumes in this segment 2019s legacy businesses . these positive impacts were partially offset by unfavorable price and product mix , higher costs related to growth projects , and net unfavorable foreign currency movements , primarily related to a weaker euro . in 2017 , demand in the commercial aerospace end market is expected to remain strong , driven by the ramp up of new aerospace engine platforms , somewhat offset by continued customer destocking and engine ramp-up challenges . demand in the defense end market is expected to grow due to the continuing ramp-up of certain aerospace programs . additionally , net productivity improvements are anticipated while pricing pressure across all markets is likely to continue . transportation and construction solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>third-party sales</td><td>$ 1802</td><td>$ 1882</td><td>$ 2021</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>atoi</td><td>$ 176</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 180</td></tr></table> the transportation and construction solutions segment produces products that are used mostly in the nonresidential building and construction and commercial transportation end markets . such products include integrated aluminum structural systems , architectural extrusions , and forged aluminum commercial vehicle wheels , which are sold both directly to customers and through distributors . a small part of this segment also produces aluminum products for the industrial products end market . generally , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are primarily the u.s . dollar , the euro , and the brazilian real . third-party sales for the transportation and construction solutions segment decreased 4% ( 4 % ) in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily driven by lower demand from the north american commercial transportation end market , which was partially offset by rising demand from the building and construction end market . third-party sales for this segment decreased 7% ( 7 % ) in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily driven by unfavorable foreign currency movements , principally caused by a weaker euro and brazilian real , and lower volume related to the building and construction end market , somewhat offset by higher volume related to the commercial transportation end market . atoi for the transportation and construction solutions segment increased $ 10 , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2016 compared with 2015 , principally driven by net productivity improvements across all businesses and growth in the building and construction segment , partially offset by lower demand in the north american heavy duty truck and brazilian markets. . Question: what was the change in the sales for the transportation and construction solutions segment from 2016 to 2017? Answer: -80.0 Question: and what percentage does this change represent in relation to those sales in 2016? Answer: -0.04251 Question: what is the difference between that percentage change for the engineered products and solutions segment, in that same period, and this one?

0.11251

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 192.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>42.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>25.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-41.2 ( 41.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr></table> the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. . Question: what was the change in the total of electric customers between 2006 and 2007? Answer: 37000.0 Question: an what was the total of electric customers in 2006?

95000.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

unconditional purchase obligations approximately $ 390 of our long-term unconditional purchase obligations relate to feedstock supply for numerous hyco ( hydrogen , carbon monoxide , and syngas ) facilities . the price of feedstock supply is principally related to the price of natural gas . however , long-term take-or-pay sales contracts to hyco customers are generally matched to the term of the feedstock supply obligations and provide recovery of price increases in the feedstock supply . due to the matching of most long-term feedstock supply obligations to customer sales contracts , we do not believe these purchase obligations would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations . refer to note 17 , commitments and contingencies , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on our unconditional purchase obligations . the unconditional purchase obligations also include other product supply and purchase commitments and electric power and natural gas supply purchase obligations , which are primarily pass-through contracts with our customers . in addition , purchase commitments to spend approximately $ 540 for additional plant and equipment are included in the unconditional purchase obligations in 2016 . we also purchase materials , energy , capital equipment , supplies , and services as part of the ordinary course of business under arrangements that are not unconditional purchase obligations . the majority of such purchases are for raw materials and energy , which are obtained under requirements-type contracts at market prices . obligation for future contribution to an equity affiliate on 19 april 2015 , a joint venture between air products and acwa holding entered into a 20-year oxygen and nitrogen supply agreement to supply saudi aramco 2019s oil refinery and power plant being built in jazan , saudi arabia . air products owns 25% ( 25 % ) of the joint venture and guarantees the repayment of its share of an equity bridge loan . in total , we expect to invest approximately $ 100 in this joint venture . as of 30 september 2015 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 67.5 for our obligation to make future equity contributions based on advances received by the joint venture under the loan . income tax liabilities noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities as of 30 september 2015 were $ 903.3 . tax liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits as of 30 september 2015 were $ 97.5 . these tax liabilities were excluded from the contractual obligations table , as it is impractical to determine a cash impact by year given that payments will vary according to changes in tax laws , tax rates , and our operating results . in addition , there are uncertainties in timing of the effective settlement of our uncertain tax positions with respective taxing authorities . refer to note 23 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . pension benefits the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans that cover a substantial portion of its worldwide employees . the principal defined benefit pension plans 2014the u.s . salaried pension plan and the u.k . pension plan 2014were closed to new participants in 2005 and were replaced with defined contribution plans . over the long run , the shift to defined contribution plans is expected to reduce volatility of both plan expense and contributions . the fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2015 measurement date decreased to $ 3916.4 from $ 4114.6 at the end of fiscal year 2014 . the projected benefit obligation for these plans was $ 4787.8 and $ 4738.6 at the end of the fiscal years 2015 and 2014 , respectively . refer to note 16 , retirement benefits , to the consolidated financial statements for comprehensive and detailed disclosures on our postretirement benefits . pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 135.9</td><td>$ 169.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above )</td><td>35.2</td><td>5.8</td><td>19.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td><td>4.6% ( 4.6 % )</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>7.4% ( 7.4 % )</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.9% ( 3.9 % )</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the fair market value of plan assets of the benefit pension plans in 2015? Answer: 3916.4 Question: and what was it in 2014?

4114.6

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index january 3 , january 2 , january 1 , december 31 , december 29 , december 28 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>january 3 2009</td><td>january 2 2010</td><td>january 1 2011</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 29 2012</td><td>december 28 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>advance auto parts</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.28</td><td>$ 195.80</td><td>$ 206.86</td><td>$ 213.14</td><td>$ 327.63</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>119.67</td><td>134.97</td><td>134.96</td><td>150.51</td><td>197.62</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p retail index</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.28</td><td>174.70</td><td>179.79</td><td>219.77</td><td>321.02</td></tr></table> . Question: what is the net change in value of a $100 investment in s&p 500 index from 2009 to 2011? Answer: 34.97 Question: what fraction does this represent?

0.3497

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2030 purchased interests represent senior and subordinated interests , purchased in connection with secondary market-making activities , in securitization entities in which the firm also holds retained interests . 2030 substantially all of the total outstanding principal amount and total retained interests relate to securitizations during 2014 and thereafter as of december 2018 , and relate to securitizations during 2012 and thereafter as of december 2017 . 2030 the fair value of retained interests was $ 3.28 billion as of december 2018 and $ 2.13 billion as of december 2017 . in addition to the interests in the table above , the firm had other continuing involvement in the form of derivative transactions and commitments with certain nonconsolidated vies . the carrying value of these derivatives and commitments was a net asset of $ 75 million as of december 2018 and $ 86 million as of december 2017 , and the notional amount of these derivatives and commitments was $ 1.09 billion as of december 2018 and $ 1.26 billion as of december 2017 . the notional amounts of these derivatives and commitments are included in maximum exposure to loss in the nonconsolidated vie table in note 12 . the table below presents information about the weighted average key economic assumptions used in measuring the fair value of mortgage-backed retained interests. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value of retained interests</td><td>$ 3151</td><td>$ 2071</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average life ( years )</td><td>7.2</td><td>6.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>constant prepayment rate</td><td>11.9% ( 11.9 % )</td><td>9.4% ( 9.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impact of 10% ( 10 % ) adverse change</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td><td>$ -19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>impact of 20% ( 20 % ) adverse change</td><td>$ -53 ( 53 )</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>discount rate</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>4.2% ( 4.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>impact of 10% ( 10 % ) adverse change</td><td>$ -75 ( 75 )</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>impact of 20% ( 20 % ) adverse change</td><td>$ -147 ( 147 )</td><td>$ -70 ( 70 )</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 amounts do not reflect the benefit of other financial instruments that are held to mitigate risks inherent in these retained interests . 2030 changes in fair value based on an adverse variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the change in fair value is not usually linear . 2030 the impact of a change in a particular assumption is calculated independently of changes in any other assumption . in practice , simultaneous changes in assumptions might magnify or counteract the sensitivities disclosed above . 2030 the constant prepayment rate is included only for positions for which it is a key assumption in the determination of fair value . 2030 the discount rate for retained interests that relate to u.s . government agency-issued collateralized mortgage obligations does not include any credit loss . expected credit loss assumptions are reflected in the discount rate for the remainder of retained interests . the firm has other retained interests not reflected in the table above with a fair value of $ 133 million and a weighted average life of 4.2 years as of december 2018 , and a fair value of $ 56 million and a weighted average life of 4.5 years as of december 2017 . due to the nature and fair value of certain of these retained interests , the weighted average assumptions for constant prepayment and discount rates and the related sensitivity to adverse changes are not meaningful as of both december 2018 and december 2017 . the firm 2019s maximum exposure to adverse changes in the value of these interests is the carrying value of $ 133 million as of december 2018 and $ 56 million as of december 2017 . note 12 . variable interest entities a variable interest in a vie is an investment ( e.g. , debt or equity ) or other interest ( e.g. , derivatives or loans and lending commitments ) that will absorb portions of the vie 2019s expected losses and/or receive portions of the vie 2019s expected residual returns . the firm 2019s variable interests in vies include senior and subordinated debt ; loans and lending commitments ; limited and general partnership interests ; preferred and common equity ; derivatives that may include foreign currency , equity and/or credit risk ; guarantees ; and certain of the fees the firm receives from investment funds . certain interest rate , foreign currency and credit derivatives the firm enters into with vies are not variable interests because they create , rather than absorb , risk . vies generally finance the purchase of assets by issuing debt and equity securities that are either collateralized by or indexed to the assets held by the vie . the debt and equity securities issued by a vie may include tranches of varying levels of subordination . the firm 2019s involvement with vies includes securitization of financial assets , as described in note 11 , and investments in and loans to other types of vies , as described below . see note 11 for further information about securitization activities , including the definition of beneficial interests . see note 3 for the firm 2019s consolidation policies , including the definition of a vie . goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k 149 . Question: what was the fair value of retained interests in 2018? Answer: 3.28 Question: what was the value in 2017? Answer: 2.13 Question: what is the difference?

1.15

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the fair value of the interest agreements at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 was $ 3 million and $ 1 million , respectively . the company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its swap contracts . the company minimizes its credit risk on these transactions by only dealing with leading , creditworthy financial institutions and does not anticipate nonperformance . in addition , the contracts are distributed among several financial institutions , all of whom presently have investment grade credit ratings , thus minimizing credit risk concentration . stockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ -272 ( 272 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in fair value</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>75</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to earnings</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . prior to the merger of sprint corporation ( 201csprint 201d ) and nextel communications , inc . ( 201cnextel 201d ) , the company had entered into variable share forward purchase agreements ( the 201cvariable forwards 201d ) to hedge its nextel common stock . the company did not designate the variable forwards as a hedge of the sprint nextel shares received as a result of the merger . accordingly , the company recorded $ 51 million of gains for the year ended december 31 , 2005 reflecting the change in value of the variable forwards . the variable forwards were settled during the fourth quarter of 2005 . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term finance receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund and investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values. . Question: what was the stockholders 2019 equity derivative as of december 2006? Answer: 16.0 Question: and what was it in january of that same year? Answer: 2.0 Question: what was, then, the change over the year? Answer: 14.0 Question: what was the stockholders 2019 equity derivative as of january 2006?

2.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the units consisted of ( i ) approximately 81.8 million preferred a units par value $ 1.00 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the preferred a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after one year or callable by the company any time after six months and contain a promote feature based upon an increase in net operating income of the properties capped at a 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) increase , ( ii ) 2000 class a preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to libor plus 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) per annum on the class a preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , ( iii ) 2627 class b-1 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-1 preferred par value and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock , equal to the cash redemption amount , as defined , ( iv ) 5673 class b-2 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-2 preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , and ( v ) 640001 class c downreit units , valued at an issuance price of $ 30.52 per unit which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock equal to the class c cash amount , as defined . the following units have been redeemed as of december 31 , 2010 : redeemed par value redeemed ( in millions ) redemption type . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>units redeemed</td><td>par value redeemed ( in millions )</td><td>redemption type</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>preferred a units</td><td>2200000</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a preferred units</td><td>2000</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 preferred units</td><td>2438</td><td>$ 24.4</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 preferred units</td><td>5576</td><td>$ 55.8</td><td>cash/charitable contribution</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class c downreit units</td><td>61804</td><td>$ 1.9</td><td>cash</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $ 110.4 million and $ 113.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2006 , the company acquired two shopping center properties located in bay shore and centereach , ny . included in noncontrolling interests was approximately $ 41.6 million , including a discount of $ 0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $ 3.8 million , in redeemable units ( the 201credeemable units 201d ) , issued by the company in connection with these transactions . the prop- erties were acquired through the issuance of $ 24.2 million of redeemable units , which are redeemable at the option of the holder ; approximately $ 14.0 million of fixed rate redeemable units and the assumption of approximately $ 23.4 million of non-recourse debt . the redeemable units consist of ( i ) 13963 class a units , par value $ 1000 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 5% ( 5 % ) per annum of the class a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2011 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2016 , and ( ii ) 647758 class b units , valued at an issuance price of $ 37.24 per unit , which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2007 , for cash or at the option of the company for common stock at a ratio of 1:1 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2026 . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until april 2016 and april 2026 for the centereach , ny , and bay shore , ny , assets , respectively . during 2007 , 30000 units , or $ 1.1 million par value , of theclass bunits were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the company . noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $ 40.4 million and $ 40.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . noncontrolling interests also includes 138015 convertible units issued during 2006 , by the company , which were valued at approxi- mately $ 5.3 million , including a fair market value adjustment of $ 0.3 million , related to an interest acquired in an office building located in albany , ny . these units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the company for the company 2019s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 . the holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the company 2019s common stock . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until january 2017. . Question: what was the change in the noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units from 2009 to 2010?

-2.7

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents information regarding group inc . 2019s regulatory capital ratios and tier 1 leverage ratio under basel i , as implemented by the federal reserve board . the information as of december 2013 reflects the revised market risk regulatory capital requirements . these changes resulted in increased regulatory capital requirements for market risk . the information as of december 2012 is prior to the implementation of these revised market risk regulatory capital requirements. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2013</td><td>as of december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>$ 72471</td><td>$ 66977</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tier 2 capital</td><td>$ 13632</td><td>$ 13429</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 86103</td><td>$ 80406</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-weighted assets</td><td>$ 433226</td><td>$ 399928</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total capital ratio</td><td>19.9% ( 19.9 % )</td><td>20.1% ( 20.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td><td>7.3% ( 7.3 % )</td></tr></table> revised capital framework the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies ( agencies ) have approved revised risk-based capital and leverage ratio regulations establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for u.s . banking organizations ( revised capital framework ) . these regulations are largely based on the basel committee 2019s december 2010 final capital framework for strengthening international capital standards ( basel iii ) and also implement certain provisions of the dodd-frank act . under the revised capital framework , group inc . is an 201cadvanced approach 201d banking organization . below are the aspects of the rules that are most relevant to the firm , as an advanced approach banking organization . definition of capital and capital ratios . the revised capital framework introduced changes to the definition of regulatory capital , which , subject to transitional provisions , became effective across the firm 2019s regulatory capital and leverage ratios on january 1 , 2014 . these changes include the introduction of a new capital measure called common equity tier 1 ( cet1 ) , and the related regulatory capital ratio of cet1 to rwas ( cet1 ratio ) . in addition , the definition of tier 1 capital has been narrowed to include only cet1 and instruments such as perpetual non- cumulative preferred stock , which meet certain criteria . certain aspects of the revised requirements phase in over time . these include increases in the minimum capital ratio requirements and the introduction of new capital buffers and certain deductions from regulatory capital ( such as investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions ) . in addition , junior subordinated debt issued to trusts is being phased out of regulatory capital . the minimum cet1 ratio is 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) on january 1 , 2015 . the minimum tier 1 capital ratio increased from 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) to 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) on january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) beginning january 1 , 2015 . the minimum total capital ratio remains unchanged at 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) . these minimum ratios will be supplemented by a new capital conservation buffer that phases in , beginning january 1 , 2016 , in increments of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per year until it reaches 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) on january 1 , 2019 . the revised capital framework also introduces a new counter-cyclical capital buffer , to be imposed in the event that national supervisors deem it necessary in order to counteract excessive credit growth . risk-weighted assets . in february 2014 , the federal reserve board informed us that we have completed a satisfactory 201cparallel run , 201d as required of advanced approach banking organizations under the revised capital framework , and therefore changes to rwas will take effect beginning with the second quarter of 2014 . accordingly , the calculation of rwas in future quarters will be based on the following methodologies : 2030 during the first quarter of 2014 2014 the basel i risk-based capital framework adjusted for certain items related to existing capital deductions and the phase-in of new capital deductions ( basel i adjusted ) ; 2030 during the remaining quarters of 2014 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced approach or the basel i adjusted calculation ; and 2030 beginning in the first quarter of 2015 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced or standardized approach . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 191 . Question: what is the difference between the tier 2 capital of december 2013 and that of december 2012? Answer: 203.0 Question: what is the tier 2 capital of december 2012? Answer: 13429.0 Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the tier 2 capital of december 2012?

0.01512

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. . Question: what is the net change in the natural gas marketed from 2010 to 2011?

-74.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , management has not provided any amounts in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes , if any . legal defense costs are expensed as incurred . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries have achieved substantial success in managing litigation . nevertheless , litigation is subject to uncertainty and significant challenges remain . it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation . altria group , inc . and each of its subsidiaries named as a defendant believe , and each has been so advised by counsel handling the respective cases , that it has valid defenses to the litigation pending against it , as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts . each of the companies has defended , and will continue to defend , vigorously against litigation challenges . however , altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions in particular cases if they believe it is in the best interests of altria group , inc . to do so . overview of altria group , inc . and/or pm usa tobacco-related litigation types and number of cases : claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories : ( i ) smoking and health cases alleging personal injury brought on behalf of individual plaintiffs ; ( ii ) smoking and health cases primarily alleging personal injury or seeking court- supervised programs for ongoing medical monitoring and purporting to be brought on behalf of a class of individual plaintiffs , including cases in which the aggregated claims of a number of individual plaintiffs are to be tried in a single proceeding ; ( iii ) health care cost recovery cases brought by governmental ( both domestic and foreign ) plaintiffs seeking reimbursement for health care expenditures allegedly caused by cigarette smoking and/or disgorgement of profits ; ( iv ) class action suits alleging that the uses of the terms 201clights 201d and 201cultra lights 201d constitute deceptive and unfair trade practices , common law or statutory fraud , unjust enrichment , breach of warranty or violations of the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act ( 201crico 201d ) ; and ( v ) other tobacco- related litigation described below . plaintiffs 2019 theories of recovery and the defenses raised in pending smoking and health , health care cost recovery and 201clights/ultra lights 201d cases are discussed below . the table below lists the number of certain tobacco-related cases pending in the united states against pm usa and , in some instances , altria group , inc . as of december 31 , 2014 , december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 . type of case number of cases pending as of december 31 , 2014 number of cases pending as of december 31 , 2013 number of cases pending as of december 31 , 2012 individual smoking and health cases ( 1 ) 67 67 77 smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation ( 2 ) 5 6 7 health care cost recovery actions ( 3 ) 1 1 1 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type of case</td><td>number of casespending as ofdecember 31 2014</td><td>number of casespending as ofdecember 31 2013</td><td>number of casespending as ofdecember 31 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>individual smoking and health cases ( 1 )</td><td>67</td><td>67</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation ( 2 )</td><td>5</td><td>6</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>health care cost recovery actions ( 3 )</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions</td><td>12</td><td>15</td><td>14</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include 2558 cases brought by flight attendants seeking compensatory damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke ( 201cets 201d ) . the flight attendants allege that they are members of an ets smoking and health class action in florida , which was settled in 1997 ( broin ) . the terms of the court-approved settlement in that case allow class members to file individual lawsuits seeking compensatory damages , but prohibit them from seeking punitive damages . also , does not include individual smoking and health cases brought by or on behalf of plaintiffs in florida state and federal courts following the decertification of the engle case ( discussed below in smoking and health litigation - engle class action ) . ( 2 ) includes as one case the 600 civil actions ( of which 346 were actions against pm usa ) that were to be tried in a single proceeding in west virginia ( in re : tobacco litigation ) . the west virginia supreme court of appeals has ruled that the united states constitution did not preclude a trial in two phases in this case . issues related to defendants 2019 conduct and whether punitive damages are permissible were tried in the first phase . trial in the first phase of this case began in april 2013 . in may 2013 , the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants on the claims for design defect , negligence , failure to warn , breach of warranty , and concealment and declined to find that the defendants 2019 conduct warranted punitive damages . plaintiffs prevailed on their claim that ventilated filter cigarettes should have included use instructions for the period 1964 - 1969 . the second phase , if any , will consist of individual trials to determine liability and compensatory damages on that claim only . in august 2013 , the trial court denied all post-trial motions . the trial court entered final judgment in october 2013 and , in november 2013 , plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal to the west virginia supreme court of appeals . on november 3 , 2014 , the west virginia supreme court of appeals affirmed the final judgment . plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing with the west virginia supreme court of appeals , which the court denied on january 8 , 2015 . ( 3 ) see health care cost recovery litigation - federal government 2019s lawsuit below . altria group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements _________________________ altria_mdc_2014form10k_nolinks_crops.pdf 68 2/25/15 5:56 pm . Question: what is the sum of the number of individual smoking and health cases and smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation in 2013? Answer: 73.0 Question: what was the number of health care cost recovery actions cases?

1.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) the following summarizes the aggregate maturities of our debt and capital leases on stated contractual maturities , excluding unamortized non-cash bond premiums and discounts net of $ 30 million as of december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 1045</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>1157</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>1546</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>705</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>4349</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total principal payments</td><td>8846</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>debt issuance costs net of accumulated amortization</td><td>-53 ( 53 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>$ 8793</td></tr></table> there are no mandatory principal payments on the revolving loan and any balance outstanding on the revolving loan will be due and payable at its scheduled maturity date , which occurs at august 10 , 2021 . fis may redeem the 2018 notes , 2020 notes , 2021 notes , 2021 euro notes , 2022 notes , 2022 gbp notes , 2023 notes , 2024 notes , 2024 euro notes , 2025 notes , 2026 notes , and 2046 notes at its option in whole or in part , at any time and from time to time , at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount to be redeemed and a make-whole amount calculated as described in the related indenture in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the date of redemption , provided no make-whole amount will be paid for redemptions of the 2020 notes , the 2021 notes , the 2021 euro notes and the 2022 gbp notes during the one month prior to their maturity , the 2022 notes during the two months prior to their maturity , the 2023 notes , the 2024 notes , the 2024 euro notes , the 2025 notes , and the 2026 notes during the three months prior to their maturity , and the 2046 notes during the six months prior to their maturity . debt issuance costs of $ 53 million , net of accumulated amortization , remain capitalized as of december 31 , 2017 , related to all of the above outstanding debt . we monitor the financial stability of our counterparties on an ongoing basis . the lender commitments under the undrawn portions of the revolving loan are comprised of a diversified set of financial institutions , both domestic and international . the failure of any single lender to perform its obligations under the revolving loan would not adversely impact our ability to fund operations . the fair value of the company 2019s long-term debt is estimated to be approximately $ 156 million higher than the carrying value as of december 31 , 2017 . this estimate is based on quoted prices of our senior notes and trades of our other debt in close proximity to december 31 , 2017 , which are considered level 2-type measurements . this estimate is subjective in nature and involves uncertainties and significant judgment in the interpretation of current market data . therefore , the values presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the company could realize or settle currently. . Question: what portion of total long-term deb is due in 12 months? Answer: 0.11884 Question: what is the value of long-term debt due in 2021? Answer: 1546.0 Question: what about the total long-term debt? Answer: 8793.0 Question: what portion is due in 2021?

0.17582

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

s c h e d u l e i v ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31 2008 2007 and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>direct amount</td><td>ceded to other companies</td><td>assumed from other companies</td><td>net amount</td><td>percentage of amount assumed to net</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 16087</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 3260</td><td>$ 13203</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 14673</td><td>$ 5834</td><td>$ 3458</td><td>$ 12297</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 13562</td><td>$ 5198</td><td>$ 3461</td><td>$ 11825</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the net amount in 2008? Answer: 13203.0 Question: what was the net amount in 2007?

12297.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. . Question: what was the fair value of the performance share units in july 2011, in millions? Answer: 8.6 Question: of that amount, how much is related to post-merger services, also in millions? Answer: 7.3 Question: what is, then, the amount of fair value of performance share units that does not relate to post-merger services, in millions? Answer: 1.3 Question: and how much does this amount represent in relation to the total fair value of performance share units, in percentage?

0.15116

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure . other sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below . 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures . the table below presents market risk for inventory positions that are not included in var . the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the underlying asset value . equity positions below relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans . these debt positions are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments . these measures do not reflect diversification benefits across asset categories or across other market risk measures . asset categories 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december in millions 2013 2012 equity 1 $ 2256 $ 2471 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>asset categories</td><td>asset categories</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity1</td><td>$ 2256</td><td>$ 2471</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt</td><td>1522</td><td>1676</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3778</td><td>$ 4147</td></tr></table> 1 . december 2012 includes $ 208 million related to our investment in the ordinary shares of icbc , which was sold in the first half of 2013 . credit spread sensitivity on derivatives and borrowings . var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives as well as changes in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected . the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 4 million and $ 3 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 8 million and $ 7 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken . interest rate sensitivity . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the firm had $ 14.90 billion and $ 6.50 billion , respectively , of loans held for investment which were accounted for at amortized cost and included in 201creceivables from customers and counterparties , 201d substantially all of which had floating interest rates . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 136 million and $ 62 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a 12-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans . see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans held for investment . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 95 . Question: as of december 2013, what was the value of the total 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount that was equity related? Answer: 2256.0 Question: and what was that total 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount? Answer: 3778.0 Question: what percentage, then, did that value represent in relation to this amount? Answer: 0.59714 Question: and what was that percentage representation of the equity related amount for the year of 2012?

0.59585

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) sfas no . 148 . in accordance with apb no . 25 , the company recognizes compensation expense based on the excess , if any , of the quoted stock price at the grant date of the award or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock . the company 2019s stock option plans are more fully described in note 14 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare-based payment 201d ( sfas 123r ) , as further described below . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company reevaluated the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options issued to employees . as a result , the company lowered its expected volatility assumption for options granted after july 1 , 2005 to approximately 30% ( 30 % ) and increased the expected life of option grants to 6.25 years using the simplified method permitted by sec sab no . 107 , 201dshare-based payment 201d ( sab no . 107 ) . the company made this change based on a number of factors , including the company 2019s execution of its strategic plans to sell non-core businesses , reduce leverage and refinance its debt , and its recent merger with spectrasite , inc . ( see note 2. ) management had previously based its volatility assumptions on historical volatility since inception , which included periods when the company 2019s capital structure was more highly leveraged than current levels and expected levels for the foreseeable future . management 2019s estimate of future volatility is based on its consideration of all available information , including historical volatility , implied volatility of publicly traded options , the company 2019s current capital structure and its publicly announced future business plans . for comparative purposes , a 10% ( 10 % ) change in the volatility assumption would change pro forma stock option expense and pro forma net loss by approximately $ 0.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . ( see note 14. ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per common share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 ( as amended ) to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net loss as reported</td><td>$ -171590 ( 171590 )</td><td>$ -247587 ( 247587 )</td><td>$ -325321 ( 325321 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : stock-based employee compensation expense net of related tax effect included in net loss as reported</td><td>7104</td><td>2297</td><td>2077</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards net of related taxeffect</td><td>-22238 ( 22238 )</td><td>-23906 ( 23906 )</td><td>-31156 ( 31156 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pro-forma net loss</td><td>$ -186724 ( 186724 )</td><td>$ -269196 ( 269196 )</td><td>$ -354400 ( 354400 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share as reported</td><td>$ -0.57 ( 0.57 )</td><td>$ -1.10 ( 1.10 )</td><td>$ -1.56 ( 1.56 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share pro-forma</td><td>$ -0.62 ( 0.62 )</td><td>$ -1.20 ( 1.20 )</td><td>$ -1.70 ( 1.70 )</td></tr></table> the company has modified certain option awards to revise vesting and exercise terms for certain terminated employees and recognized charges of $ 7.0 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 2.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively . in addition , the stock-based employee compensation amounts above for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , include approximately $ 2.4 million of unearned compensation amortization related to unvested stock options assumed in the merger with spectrasite , inc . such charges are reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense with corresponding adjustments to additional paid-in capital and unearned compensation in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas 123r , which supersedes apb no . 25 , and amends sfas no . 95 , 201cstatement of cash flows . 201d this statement addressed the accounting for share-based payments to employees , including grants of employee stock options . under the new standard . Question: what is the total pro-forma net loss in 2004, in millions?

269196.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis methodology of computing massachusetts state income taxes resulting from legislation passed in the third quarter 2008 , which resulted in an income tax benefit of approximately $ 18.8 million . these factors were partially offset by : income taxes recorded by entergy power generation , llc , prior to its liquidation , resulting from the redemption payments it received in connection with its investment in entergy nuclear power marketing , llc during the third quarter 2008 , which resulted in an income tax expense of approximately $ 16.1 million ; book and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the utility operating companies , including the flow-through treatment of the entergy arkansas write-offs discussed above . the effective income tax rate for 2007 was 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) . the reduction in the effective income tax rate versus the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) in 2007 is primarily due to : a reduction in income tax expense due to a step-up in the tax basis on the indian point 2 non-qualified decommissioning trust fund resulting from restructuring of the trusts , which reduced deferred taxes on the trust fund and reduced current tax expense ; the resolution of tax audit issues involving the 2002-2003 audit cycle ; an adjustment to state income taxes for non-utility nuclear to reflect the effect of a change in the methodology of computing new york state income taxes as required by that state's taxing authority ; book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction ; and the amortization of investment tax credits . these factors were partially offset by book and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the utility operating companies . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy's capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2008 to 2009 is primarily the result of an increase in shareholders' equity primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock , along with a decrease in borrowings under entergy corporation's revolving credit facility . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2007 to 2008 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation's revolving credit facility. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net debt to net capital at the end of the year</td><td>53.5% ( 53.5 % )</td><td>55.6% ( 55.6 % )</td><td>54.7% ( 54.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of subtracting cash from debt</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital at the end of the year</td><td>57.3% ( 57.3 % )</td><td>59.7% ( 59.7 % )</td><td>57.6% ( 57.6 % )</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the change in percentage points in debt-to-capital ratio from 2008 to 2009? Answer: -2.4 Question: in that same period, what was that change for the net amounts of those values?

-2.1

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the breakdown of aes 2019s gross margin for the years ended december 31 , 2000 and 1999 , based on the geographic region in which they were earned , is set forth below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>north america</td><td>2000 $ 844 million</td><td>% ( % ) of revenue 25% ( 25 % )</td><td>1999 $ 649 million</td><td>% ( % ) of revenue 32% ( 32 % )</td><td>% ( % ) change 30% ( 30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>south america</td><td>$ 416 million</td><td>36% ( 36 % )</td><td>$ 232 million</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>79% ( 79 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>caribbean*</td><td>$ 226 million</td><td>21% ( 21 % )</td><td>$ 75 million</td><td>24% ( 24 % )</td><td>201% ( 201 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>europe/africa</td><td>$ 371 million</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>$ 124 million</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>199% ( 199 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asia</td><td>$ 138 million</td><td>22% ( 22 % )</td><td>$ 183 million</td><td>37% ( 37 % )</td><td>( 26% ( 26 % ) )</td></tr></table> * includes venezuela and colombia . selling , general and administrative expenses selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 11 million , or 15% ( 15 % ) , to $ 82 million in 2000 from $ 71 million in 1999 . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues remained constant at 1% ( 1 % ) in both 2000 and 1999 . the increase is due to an increase in business development activities . interest expense , net net interest expense increased $ 506 million , or 80% ( 80 % ) , to $ 1.1 billion in 2000 from $ 632 million in 1999 . interest expense as a percentage of revenues remained constant at 15% ( 15 % ) in both 2000 and 1999 . interest expense increased primarily due to the interest at new businesses , including drax , tiete , cilcorp and edc , as well as additional corporate interest costs resulting from the senior debt and convertible securities issued within the past two years . other income , net other income increased $ 16 million , or 107% ( 107 % ) , to $ 31 million in 2000 from $ 15 million in 1999 . other income includes foreign currency transaction gains and losses as well as other non-operating income . the increase in other income is due primarily to a favorable legal judgment and the sale of development projects . severance and transaction costs during the fourth quarter of 2000 , the company incurred approximately $ 79 million of transaction and contractual severance costs related to the acquisition of ipalco . gain on sale of assets during 2000 , ipalco sold certain assets ( 2018 2018thermal assets 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 162 million . the transaction resulted in a gain to the company of approximately $ 31 million . of the net proceeds , $ 88 million was used to retire debt specifically assignable to the thermal assets . during 1999 , the company recorded a $ 29 million gain ( before extraordinary loss ) from the buyout of its long-term power sales agreement at placerita . the company received gross proceeds of $ 110 million which were offset by transaction related costs of $ 19 million and an impairment loss of $ 62 million to reduce the carrying value of the electric generation assets to their estimated fair value after termination of the contract . the estimated fair value was determined by an independent appraisal . concurrent with the buyout of the power sales agreement , the company repaid the related non-recourse debt prior to its scheduled maturity and recorded an extraordinary loss of $ 11 million , net of income taxes. . Question: what is the south america percent of revenue 25%? Answer: 0.36 Question: what is the south america percent of revenue 32% Answer: 0.28 Question: what is the difference in percents? Answer: 0.08 Question: what is that time 1000?

80.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

14 . capital stock shares outstanding . the following table presents information regarding capital stock: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>class a common stock authorized</td><td>1000000</td><td>1000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a common stock issued and outstanding</td><td>339235</td><td>338240</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>0.6</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>class b-4 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>0.4</td><td>0.4</td></tr></table> cme group has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding . associated trading rights . members of cme , cbot , nymex and comex own or lease trading rights which entitle them to access open outcry trading , discounts on trading fees and the right to vote on certain exchange matters as provided for by the rules of the particular exchange and cme group 2019s or the subsidiaries 2019 organizational documents . each class of cme group class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division for trading at cme . a cme trading right is a separate asset that is not part of or evidenced by the associated share of class b common stock of cme group . the class b common stock of cme group is intended only to ensure that the class b shareholders of cme group retain rights with respect to representation on the board of directors and approval rights with respect to the core rights described below . trading rights at cbot are evidenced by class b memberships in cbot , at nymex by class a memberships in nymex and at comex by comex division memberships . members of cbot , nymex and comex do not have any rights to elect members of the board of directors and are not entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on their memberships or trading permits . core rights . holders of cme group class b common shares have the right to approve changes in specified rights relating to the trading privileges at cme associated with those shares . these core rights relate primarily to trading right protections , certain trading fee protections and certain membership benefit protections . votes on changes to these core rights are weighted by class . each class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share . the approval of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of class b common stock is required in order to approve any changes to core rights . holders of shares of class a common stock do not have the right to vote on changes to core rights . voting rights . with the exception of the matters reserved to holders of cme group class b common stock , holders of cme group common stock vote together on all matters for which a vote of common shareholders is required . in these votes , each holder of shares of class a or class b common stock of cme group has one vote per share . transfer restrictions . each class of cme group class b common stock is subject to transfer restrictions contained in the certificate of incorporation of cme group . these transfer restrictions prohibit the sale or transfer of any shares of class b common stock separate from the sale of the associated trading rights . election of directors . the cme group board of directors is currently comprised of 20 members . holders of class b-1 , class b-2 and class b-3 common stock have the right to elect six directors , of which three are elected by class b-1 shareholders , two are elected by class b-2 shareholders and one is elected by class b-3 shareholders . the remaining directors are elected by the class a and class b shareholders voting as a single class. . Question: between the years of 2016 and 2017, what was the change in the number of class a common stocks issued and outstanding?

995.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o 2019reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 215</td><td>$ 283</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 269</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>144</td><td>158</td><td>197</td><td>206</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 187</td></tr></table> . Question: what is the change in value of an investment in s&p500 from 2016 to 2017?

30.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

13 . rentals and leases the company leases sales and administrative office facilities , distribution centers , research and manufacturing facilities , as well as vehicles and other equipment under operating leases . total rental expense under the company 2019s operating leases was $ 239 million in 2017 and $ 221 million in both 2016 and 2015 . as of december 31 , 2017 , identifiable future minimum payments with non-cancelable terms in excess of one year were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 131</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>115</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 617</td></tr></table> the company enters into operating leases for vehicles whose non-cancelable terms are one year or less in duration with month-to-month renewal options . these leases have been excluded from the table above . the company estimates payments under such leases will approximate $ 62 million in 2018 . these vehicle leases have guaranteed residual values that have historically been satisfied by the proceeds on the sale of the vehicles . 14 . research and development expenditures research expenditures that relate to the development of new products and processes , including significant improvements and refinements to existing products , are expensed as incurred . such costs were $ 201 million in 2017 , $ 189 million in 2016 and $ 191 million in 2015 . the company did not participate in any material customer sponsored research during 2017 , 2016 or 2015 . 15 . commitments and contingencies the company is subject to various claims and contingencies related to , among other things , workers 2019 compensation , general liability ( including product liability ) , automobile claims , health care claims , environmental matters and lawsuits . the company is also subject to various claims and contingencies related to income taxes , which are discussed in note 12 . the company also has contractual obligations including lease commitments , which are discussed in note 13 . the company records liabilities where a contingent loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated . if the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range , the company records the most probable estimate of the loss or the minimum amount when no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount . the company discloses a contingent liability even if the liability is not probable or the amount is not estimable , or both , if there is a reasonable possibility that a material loss may have been incurred . insurance globally , the company has insurance policies with varying deductibility levels for property and casualty losses . the company is insured for losses in excess of these deductibles , subject to policy terms and conditions and has recorded both a liability and an offsetting receivable for amounts in excess of these deductibles . the company is self-insured for health care claims for eligible participating employees , subject to certain deductibles and limitations . the company determines its liabilities for claims on an actuarial basis . litigation and environmental matters the company and certain subsidiaries are party to various lawsuits , claims and environmental actions that have arisen in the ordinary course of business . these include from time to time antitrust , commercial , patent infringement , product liability and wage hour lawsuits , as well as possible obligations to investigate and mitigate the effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain chemical substances at various sites , such as superfund sites and other operating or closed facilities . the company has established accruals for certain lawsuits , claims and environmental matters . the company currently believes that there is not a reasonably possible risk of material loss in excess of the amounts accrued related to these legal matters . because litigation is inherently uncertain , and unfavorable rulings or developments could occur , there can be no certainty that the company may not ultimately incur charges in excess of recorded liabilities . a future adverse ruling , settlement or unfavorable development could result in future charges that could have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s results of operations or cash flows in the period in which they are recorded . the company currently believes that such future charges related to suits and legal claims , if any , would not have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position . environmental matters the company is currently participating in environmental assessments and remediation at approximately 45 locations , the majority of which are in the u.s. , and environmental liabilities have been accrued reflecting management 2019s best estimate of future costs . potential insurance reimbursements are not anticipated in the company 2019s accruals for environmental liabilities. . Question: what were the total r&e expenses in millions for 2017? Answer: 201.0 Question: and in 2016?

189.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: . Question: what was the average value of de@r in 2002? Answer: 10.8 Question: what was the average value of de@r in 2001? Answer: 6.4 Question: what is the difference? Answer: 4.4 Question: what was the average value of de@r in 2001?

6.4

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) . as a result of the reverse stock split , every three shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share . the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares . the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 . on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation . the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders . the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date . the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation . see disposition of retained shares in note c to the consolidated financial statements in part ii item 8 of this form 10-k . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 . the prices listed below for those dates prior to november 1 , 2016 reflect stock trading prices of alcoa inc . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to the company 2019s post-separation prices. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter</td><td>2017 high</td><td>2017 low</td><td>2017 dividend</td><td>2017 high</td><td>2017 low</td><td>dividend</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first</td><td>$ 30.69</td><td>$ 18.64</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 30.66</td><td>$ 18.42</td><td>$ 0.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second</td><td>28.65</td><td>21.76</td><td>0.06</td><td>34.50</td><td>26.34</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third</td><td>26.84</td><td>22.67</td><td>0.06</td><td>32.91</td><td>27.09</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )</td><td>27.85</td><td>22.74</td><td>0.06</td><td>32.10</td><td>16.75</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>year</td><td>$ 30.69</td><td>$ 18.64</td><td>$ 0.24</td><td>$ 34.50</td><td>$ 16.75</td><td>$ 0.36</td></tr></table> the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12271 as of february 16 , 2018. . Question: what is the highest stock price in the second quarter of 2017?

28.65

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

table of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2001</td><td>667085793</td><td>-94361099 ( 94361099 )</td><td>572724694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>1752833</td><td>1752833</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>4800</td><td>4800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>8385</td><td>1399686</td><td>1408071</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2001</td><td>667094178</td><td>-91203780 ( 91203780 )</td><td>575890398</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2677842</td><td>2677842</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>10490</td><td>2243400</td><td>2253890</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition of technoguide</td><td>2013</td><td>1347485</td><td>1347485</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance december 31 2002</td><td>667104668</td><td>-84931553 ( 84931553 )</td><td>582173115</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2464088</td><td>2464088</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>1320</td><td>1306305</td><td>1307625</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>667105988</td><td>-81157660 ( 81157660 )</td><td>585948328</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k . Question: what percentage of the shares outstanding did the the acquisition of technoguide account for? Answer: 0.00231 Question: and during this same period, what was the total amount of shares issued to directors?

11800.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 12 . share repurchases and dividends share repurchases share repurchase activity during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 follows ( in millions except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>number of shares repurchased</td><td>10.7</td><td>9.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amount paid</td><td>$ 736.9</td><td>$ 610.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average cost per share</td><td>$ 69.06</td><td>$ 63.84</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no repurchased shares pending settlement . in october 2017 , our board of directors added $ 2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31 , 2020 . share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws . while the board of directors has approved the program , the timing of any purchases , the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management , at its discretion , and will depend upon market conditions and other factors . the share repurchase program may be extended , suspended or discontinued at any time . as of december 31 , 2018 , the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $ 1.1 billion . dividends in october 2018 , our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $ 0.375 per share . cash dividends declared were $ 468.4 million , $ 446.3 million and $ 423.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $ 121.0 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2 , 2019 . 13 . earnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services , inc . by the weighted average number of common shares ( including vested but unissued rsus ) outstanding during the period . diluted earnings per share is based on the combined weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding , which include , where appropriate , the assumed exercise of employee stock options , unvested rsus and unvested psus at the expected attainment levels . we use the treasury stock method in computing diluted earnings per share. . Question: what is the amount of cash dividend declared in 2018? Answer: 468.4 Question: what about in 2017? Answer: 446.3 Question: what is the sum for these years? Answer: 914.7 Question: how about the cash dividend declared in 2016?

423.8

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: . Question: what is the daily earnings at risk in 2002? Answer: 15.2 Question: what about in 2001?

5.5

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td><td>december 312014</td><td>december 312015</td><td>december 312016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 154.94</td><td>$ 220.70</td><td>$ 168.17</td><td>$ 130.24</td><td>$ 133.81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 150.40</td><td>$ 217.35</td><td>$ 175.04</td><td>$ 127.80</td><td>$ 137.83</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 155.17</td><td>$ 222.44</td><td>$ 178.89</td><td>$ 133.79</td><td>$ 142.07</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.41</td><td>$ 146.98</td><td>$ 163.72</td><td>$ 162.53</td><td>$ 178.02</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 134.98</td><td>$ 220.77</td><td>$ 253.19</td><td>$ 243.93</td><td>$ 271.11</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference . item 6 . selected financial data . the table set forth below presents our selected financial information for each of the past five years ( in millions , except per share amounts ) . the selected statement of operations information for each of the three years ended december 31 , 2016 and the selected balance sheet information as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 have been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the information in item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , 201d the audited consolidated financial statements included in item 8 , 201cfinancial statements and supplementary data , 201d and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report on form 10-k . the selected statement of operations information for each of the two years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 and the selected balance sheet information as of december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 have been derived from financial statements not included in this annual report on form 10-k . 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 selected statement of operations information : revenues $ 6497 $ 6394 $ 6265 $ 5535 $ 4487 operating income 2058 1985 2061 1975 1859 income from continuing operations , net of taxes 1218 1048 1137 1077 956 loss from discontinued operations , net of taxes 2014 2014 2014 2014 ( 11 ) net income 1218 1048 1137 1077 945 net income available to discovery communications , inc . 1194 1034 1139 1075 943 basic earnings per share available to discovery communications , inc . series a , b and c common stockholders : continuing operations $ 1.97 $ 1.59 $ 1.67 $ 1.50 $ 1.27 discontinued operations 2014 2014 2014 2014 ( 0.01 ) net income 1.97 1.59 1.67 1.50 1.25 diluted earnings per share available to discovery communications , inc . series a , b and c common stockholders : continuing operations $ 1.96 $ 1.58 $ 1.66 $ 1.49 $ 1.26 discontinued operations 2014 2014 2014 2014 ( 0.01 ) net income 1.96 1.58 1.66 1.49 1.24 weighted average shares outstanding : basic 401 432 454 484 498 diluted 610 656 687 722 759 selected balance sheet information : cash and cash equivalents $ 300 $ 390 $ 367 $ 408 $ 1201 total assets 15758 15864 15970 14934 12892 long-term debt : current portion 82 119 1107 17 31 long-term portion 7841 7616 6002 6437 5174 total liabilities 10348 10172 9619 8701 6599 redeemable noncontrolling interests 243 241 747 36 2014 equity attributable to discovery communications , inc . 5167 5451 5602 6196 6291 total equity $ 5167 $ 5451 $ 5604 $ 6197 $ 6293 2022 income per share amounts may not sum since each is calculated independently . 2022 on september 30 , 2016 , the company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $ 62 million related to its investment in lionsgate . on december 2 , 2016 , the company acquired a 39% ( 39 % ) minority interest in group nine media , a newly formed media holding company , in exchange for contributions of $ 100 million and the company's digital network businesses seeker and sourcefed , resulting in a gain of $ 50 million upon deconsolidation of the businesses . ( see note 4 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. ) . Question: what was the value of the disca in 2016?

133.81

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs . these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries . borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 . commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding . effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s . was increased by $ 2.0 billion . as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion . we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements . sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions . these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse . the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets . we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing . pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions . the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively . the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows . for further details , see item 8 , note 23 . sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements . debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 . our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature . for further details , see item 8 , note 7 . indebtedness . the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 . see item 8 , note 16 . fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt . the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors . on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s . securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period . our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>-</td><td>face value</td><td>interest rate</td><td>issuance</td><td>maturity</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>$ 500</td><td>1.250% ( 1.250 % )</td><td>august 2015</td><td>august 2017</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>$ 750</td><td>3.375% ( 3.375 % )</td><td>august 2015</td><td>august 2025</td></tr></table> in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs . these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries . borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 . commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding . effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s . was increased by $ 2.0 billion . as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion . we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements . sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions . these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse . the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets . we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing . pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions . the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively . the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows . for further details , see item 8 , note 23 . sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements . debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 . our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature . for further details , see item 8 , note 7 . indebtedness . the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 . see item 8 , note 16 . fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt . the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors . on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s . securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period . our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. . Question: what was the change in the total debt from 2014 to 2015? Answer: -1.0 Question: and what was that total debt in 2014? Answer: 29.5 Question: what percentage, then, did that change represent in relation to this 2014 amount?

-0.0339

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

notes to consolidated financial statements sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 29.24 billion and $ 32.41 billion as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 870 million and $ 300 million of protection had been provided as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of corporate loans and commercial mortgage loans . contingent and forward starting resale and securities borrowing agreements/forward starting repurchase and secured lending agreements the firm enters into resale and securities borrowing agreements and repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . investment commitments the firm 2019s investment commitments consist of commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . these commitments include $ 659 million and $ 872 million as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively , related to real estate private investments and $ 6.46 billion and $ 6.47 billion as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively , related to corporate and other private investments . of these amounts , $ 5.48 billion and $ 6.21 billion as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively , relate to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements , principally for office space , expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . in millions december 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 387</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>340</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>280</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>222</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2019 - thereafter</td><td>1195</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2695</td></tr></table> rent charged to operating expense was $ 324 million for 2013 , $ 374 million for 2012 and $ 475 million for 2011 . operating leases include office space held in excess of current requirements . rent expense relating to space held for growth is included in 201coccupancy . 201d the firm records a liability , based on the fair value of the remaining lease rentals reduced by any potential or existing sublease rentals , for leases where the firm has ceased using the space and management has concluded that the firm will not derive any future economic benefits . costs to terminate a lease before the end of its term are recognized and measured at fair value on termination . contingencies legal proceedings . see note 27 for information about legal proceedings , including certain mortgage-related matters . certain mortgage-related contingencies . there are multiple areas of focus by regulators , governmental agencies and others within the mortgage market that may impact originators , issuers , servicers and investors . there remains significant uncertainty surrounding the nature and extent of any potential exposure for participants in this market . 182 goldman sachs 2013 annual report . Question: what was the sum of rent charged to operating expense for 2012 and 2013?

698.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

cash flows from operations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal year 2018</td><td>fiscal year 2017</td><td>fiscal year 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrollinginterests</td><td>$ 2163.0</td><td>$ 1701.1</td><td>$ 1736.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>618.8</td><td>603.6</td><td>608.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>after-taxearnings from joint ventures</td><td>-84.7 ( 84.7 )</td><td>-85.0 ( 85.0 )</td><td>-88.4 ( 88.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>distributions of earnings from joint ventures</td><td>113.2</td><td>75.6</td><td>75.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock-based compensation</td><td>77.0</td><td>95.7</td><td>89.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-504.3 ( 504.3 )</td><td>183.9</td><td>120.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit plan contributions</td><td>-31.8 ( 31.8 )</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>-47.8 ( 47.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit plan costs</td><td>4.6</td><td>35.7</td><td>118.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>divestitures loss ( gain )</td><td>-</td><td>13.5</td><td>-148.2 ( 148.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>restructuring impairment and other exit costs</td><td>126.0</td><td>117.0</td><td>107.2</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>changes in current assets and liabilities excluding the effects of acquisitions anddivestitures</td><td>542.1</td><td>-194.2 ( 194.2 )</td><td>298.5</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>other net</td><td>-182.9 ( 182.9 )</td><td>-86.3 ( 86.3 )</td><td>-105.6 ( 105.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2841.0</td><td>$ 2415.2</td><td>$ 2764.2</td></tr></table> in fiscal 2018 , cash provided by operations was $ 2.8 billion compared to $ 2.4 billion in fiscal 2017 . the $ 426 million increase was primarily driven by the $ 462 million increase in net earnings and the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities , partially offset by a $ 688 million change in deferred income taxes . the change in deferred income taxes was primarily related to the $ 638 million provisional benefit from revaluing our net u.s . deferred tax liabilities to reflect the new u.s . corporate tax rate as a result of the tcja . the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in accounts payable of $ 476 million related to the extension of payment terms and timing of payments , and $ 264 million of changes in other current liabilities primarily driven by changes in income taxes payable , trade and advertising accruals , and incentive accruals . we strive to grow core working capital at or below the rate of growth in our net sales . for fiscal 2018 , core working capital decreased 27 percent , compared to a net sales increase of 1 percent . in fiscal 2017 , core working capital increased 9 percent , compared to a net sales decline of 6 percent , and in fiscal 2016 , core working capital decreased 41 percent , compared to net sales decline of 6 percent . in fiscal 2017 , our operations generated $ 2.4 billion of cash , compared to $ 2.8 billion in fiscal 2016 . the $ 349 million decrease was primarily driven by a $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities . the $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in other current liabilities driven by changes in income taxes payable , a decrease in incentive accruals , and changes in trade and advertising accruals due to reduced spending . the change in current assets and liabilities was also impacted by the timing of accounts payable . additionally , we recorded a $ 14 million loss on a divestiture during fiscal 2017 , compared to a $ 148 million net gain on divestitures during fiscal 2016 , and classified the related cash flows as investing activities. . Question: what was the value for earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and non controlling interests in 2018?

2163.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

consolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2012 was $ 3.0 billion compared with $ 3.1 billion for 2011 . revenue growth of 8 percent and a decline in the provision for credit losses were more than offset by a 16 percent increase in noninterest expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . further detail is included in the net interest income , noninterest income , provision for credit losses and noninterest expense portions of this consolidated income statement review . net interest income table 2 : net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31dollars in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 9640</td><td>$ 8700</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.94% ( 3.94 % )</td><td>3.92% ( 3.92 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis and analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income in item 8 of this report and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion of purchased impaired loans in the consolidated balance sheet review in this item 7 for additional information . the increase in net interest income in 2012 compared with 2011 was primarily due to the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition , organic loan growth and lower funding costs . purchase accounting accretion remained stable at $ 1.1 billion in both periods . the net interest margin was 3.94% ( 3.94 % ) for 2012 and 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) for 2011 . the increase in the comparison was primarily due to a decrease in the weighted-average rate accrued on total interest- bearing liabilities of 29 basis points , largely offset by a 21 basis point decrease on the yield on total interest-earning assets . the decrease in the rate on interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to the runoff of maturing retail certificates of deposit and the redemption of additional trust preferred and hybrid capital securities during 2012 , in addition to an increase in fhlb borrowings and commercial paper as lower-cost funding sources . the decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets was primarily due to lower rates on new loan volume and lower yields on new securities in the current low rate environment . with respect to the first quarter of 2013 , we expect net interest income to decline by two to three percent compared to fourth quarter 2012 net interest income of $ 2.4 billion , due to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion of up to $ 50 to $ 60 million , including lower expected cash recoveries . for the full year 2013 , we expect net interest income to decrease compared with 2012 , assuming an expected decline in purchase accounting accretion of approximately $ 400 million , while core net interest income is expected to increase in the year-over-year comparison . we believe our net interest margin will come under pressure in 2013 , due to the expected decline in purchase accounting accretion and assuming that the current low rate environment continues . noninterest income noninterest income totaled $ 5.9 billion for 2012 and $ 5.6 billion for 2011 . the overall increase in the comparison was primarily due to an increase in residential mortgage loan sales revenue driven by higher loan origination volume , gains on sales of visa class b common shares and higher corporate service fees , largely offset by higher provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations . asset management revenue , including blackrock , totaled $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . this increase was primarily due to higher earnings from our blackrock investment . discretionary assets under management increased to $ 112 billion at december 31 , 2012 compared with $ 107 billion at december 31 , 2011 driven by stronger average equity markets , positive net flows and strong sales performance . for 2012 , consumer services fees were $ 1.1 billion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 . the decline reflected the regulatory impact of lower interchange fees on debit card transactions partially offset by customer growth . as further discussed in the retail banking portion of the business segments review section of this item 7 , the dodd-frank limits on interchange rates were effective october 1 , 2011 and had a negative impact on revenue of approximately $ 314 million in 2012 and $ 75 million in 2011 . this impact was partially offset by higher volumes of merchant , customer credit card and debit card transactions and the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition . corporate services revenue increased by $ .3 billion , or 30 percent , to $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ .9 billion in 2011 due to higher commercial mortgage servicing revenue and higher merger and acquisition advisory fees in 2012 . the major components of corporate services revenue are treasury management revenue , corporate finance fees , including revenue from capital markets-related products and services , and commercial mortgage servicing revenue , including commercial mortgage banking activities . see the product revenue portion of this consolidated income statement review for further detail . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 39 . Question: what is the net change in net interest income from 2011 to 2012? Answer: 940.0 Question: what is the net interest income in 2011? Answer: 8700.0 Question: what percentage change does this represent? Answer: 0.10805 Question: what is the negative impact on revenue from dodd-frank limits on interchange rates in 2012? Answer: 314.0 Question: what about in 2011? Answer: 75.0 Question: what is the total for these years?

389.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 536.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>18.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 555.3</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. . Question: what was the total increase in the volume/weather segment from 2009 to 2010? Answer: 18900000.0 Question: and what is the average of this increase per gwh increased in the billed electricity usage?

18068.83365

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure . other sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below . 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures . the table below presents market risk for inventory positions that are not included in var . the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the underlying asset value . equity positions below relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans . these debt positions are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments . these measures do not reflect diversification benefits across asset categories or across other market risk measures . asset categories 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december in millions 2013 2012 equity 1 $ 2256 $ 2471 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>asset categories</td><td>asset categories</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity1</td><td>$ 2256</td><td>$ 2471</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt</td><td>1522</td><td>1676</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3778</td><td>$ 4147</td></tr></table> 1 . december 2012 includes $ 208 million related to our investment in the ordinary shares of icbc , which was sold in the first half of 2013 . credit spread sensitivity on derivatives and borrowings . var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives as well as changes in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected . the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 4 million and $ 3 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 8 million and $ 7 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken . interest rate sensitivity . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the firm had $ 14.90 billion and $ 6.50 billion , respectively , of loans held for investment which were accounted for at amortized cost and included in 201creceivables from customers and counterparties , 201d substantially all of which had floating interest rates . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 136 million and $ 62 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a 12-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans . see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans held for investment . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 95 . Question: as of december 2013, what was the value of the total 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount that was equity related? Answer: 2256.0 Question: and what was that total 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount? Answer: 3778.0 Question: what percentage, then, did that value represent in relation to this amount?

0.59714

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

the table below details cash capital investments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 . millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>track</td><td>$ 1487</td><td>$ 1472</td><td>$ 1328</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capacity and commercial facilities</td><td>510</td><td>509</td><td>347</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>locomotives and freight cars</td><td>135</td><td>98</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>110</td><td>90</td><td>76</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2242</td><td>$ 2169</td><td>$ 1876</td></tr></table> in 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases . these investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies . we designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity . we expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 . we expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 . for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively . the increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income . the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis . earnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes . fixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges . see exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges . financing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the "facilities" ) . the facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper . neither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 . commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers . these facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 . we expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities . retained earnings available . Question: what was the cash capital investments in track in 2006? Answer: 1487.0 Question: and for 2005? Answer: 1472.0 Question: so what was the difference between these two years?

15.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

domestic utility companies and system energy notes to respective financial statements derived from another portion of the entity that continues to apply sfas 71 should not be written off ; rather , they should be considered regulatory assets of the segment that will continue to apply sfas 71 . see note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for discussion of transition to competition activity in the retail regulatory jurisdictions served by the domestic utility companies . only texas currently has an enacted retail open access law , but entergy believes that significant issues remain to be addressed by regulators , and the enacted law does not provide sufficient detail to reasonably determine the impact on entergy gulf states' regulated operations . cash and cash equivalents entergy considers all unrestricted highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents . investments with original maturities of more than three months are classified as other temporary investments on the balance sheet . investments entergy applies the provisions of sfas 115 , 201caccounting for investments for certain debt and equity securities , 201d in accounting for investments in decommissioning trust funds . as a result , entergy records the decommissioning trust funds at their fair value on the balance sheet . as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the fair value of the securities held in such funds differs from the amounts deposited plus the earnings on the deposits by the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>$ 35.3</td><td>$ 69.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy gulf states</td><td>$ 1.4</td><td>$ 18.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>( $ 0.3 )</td><td>$ 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>system energy</td><td>( $ 14.5 )</td><td>( $ 1.6 )</td></tr></table> in accordance with the regulatory treatment for decommissioning trust funds , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states ( for the regulated portion of river bend ) , and entergy louisiana have recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/ ( losses ) on investment securities in accumulated depreciation . for the nonregulated portion of river bend , entergy gulf states has recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/ ( losses ) in other deferred credits . system energy's offsetting amount of unrealized gains/ ( losses ) on investment securities is in other regulatory liabilities . derivatives and hedging entergy implemented sfas 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities 201d on january 1 , 2001 . the statement requires that all derivatives be recognized in the balance sheet , either as assets or liabilities , at fair value . the changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income , depending on whether a derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction and , if it is , the type of hedge transaction . for cash-flow hedge transactions in which entergy is hedging the variability of cash flows related to a variable-rate asset , liability , or forecasted transaction , changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are reported in other comprehensive income . the gains and losses on the derivative instrument that are reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified as earnings in the periods in which earnings are impacted by the variability of the cash flows of the hedged item . the ineffective portions of all hedges are recognized in current- period earnings . contracts for commodities that will be delivered in quantities expected to be used or sold in the ordinary course of business , including certain purchases and sales of power and fuel , are not classified as derivatives. . Question: what was the change in the difference in the fair value of the securities held in decommissioning trust funds and the amounts deposited plus the earnings on the deposits from 2001 to 2002 for entergy arkansas?

34.5

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2005 through december 31 , 2010 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 12.66 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . performance graph 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2005 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>masco</td><td>$ 101.79</td><td>$ 76.74</td><td>$ 42.81</td><td>$ 54.89</td><td>$ 51.51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 115.61</td><td>$ 121.95</td><td>$ 77.38</td><td>$ 97.44</td><td>$ 111.89</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p industrials index</td><td>$ 113.16</td><td>$ 126.72</td><td>$ 76.79</td><td>$ 92.30</td><td>$ 116.64</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p consumer durables & apparel index</td><td>$ 106.16</td><td>$ 84.50</td><td>$ 56.13</td><td>$ 76.51</td><td>$ 99.87</td></tr></table> in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , we repurchased and retired three million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . we did not purchase any shares during the three months ended december 31 , 2010. . Question: what was the difference between the price of masco in 2010 and the starting value as of 12/31/05? Answer: -48.49 Question: so what was the percentage growth during that time? Answer: -0.4849 Question: what was the difference between the price of the s&p 500 in 2010 and the starting value as of 12/31/05?

11.89

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

related employer payroll tax costs ) . the contributions of these amounts are due by march 15 of the calendar year following the year in which the company realizes the benefits of the deductions . this arrangement has been accounted for as contingent consideration . pre-2009 business combinations were accounted for under a former accounting standard which , among other aspects , precluded the recognition of certain contingent consideration as of the business combination date . instead , under the former accounting standard , contingent consideration is accounted for as additional purchase price ( goodwill ) at the time the contingency is resolved . as of december 31 , 2013 , the company accrued $ 20.9 million related to this arrangement within other current liabilities , as the company realized the tax benefit of the compensation deductions during the 2013 tax year . the company made the related cash contribution during the first quarter of 2014 . 11 . earnings per share the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net income . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters' exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares are fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options , coworker stock purchase plan units and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average shares - basic</td><td>170.6</td><td>156.6</td><td>145.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average shares - diluted</td><td>172.8</td><td>158.7</td><td>145.8</td></tr></table> there was an insignificant amount of potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that could be granted under the rdu plan was 28500 . as of december 31 , 2014 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus vested daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . all outstanding rdus were vested as of december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the "debt pool" ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credited the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 0.1 table of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements . Question: what was the total of weighted-average diluted shares in 2014? Answer: 172.8 Question: and what was it in 2013? Answer: 158.7 Question: what was, then, the total of weighted-average diluted shares for the two years? Answer: 331.5 Question: what was the total of weighted-average diluted shares in 2012? Answer: 145.8 Question: including, then, 2012, what would be the total of weighted-average diluted shares for the three years, in millions?

477.3

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi peer group ( 1 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 108.50</td><td>$ 122.80</td><td>$ 132.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 106.20</td><td>$ 132.50</td><td>$ 150.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 120.40</td><td>$ 143.50</td><td>$ 152.60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>$ 130.80</td><td>$ 145.60</td><td>$ 170.80</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>$ 156.80</td><td>$ 172.70</td><td>$ 208.10</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. . Question: what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2012 to 2013? Answer: 8.5 Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that price in 2012?

0.085

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , littoral combat ship ( lcs ) , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system and mk-41 vertical launching system . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7147</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>843</td><td>905</td><td>737</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 11700</td><td>$ 10800</td><td>$ 10700</td></tr></table> 2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales for 2014 were comparable to 2013 . net sales decreased by approximately $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) . mst 2019s operating profit for 2014 decreased $ 62 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 50 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume ( primarily ptds as final surveillance system deliveries occurred during the second quarter of 2012 ) ; about $ 195 million for various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily naval systems ) due to lower volume ; approximately $ 65 million for various training and logistics programs due to lower volume ; and about $ 55 million for the aegis program due to lower volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 155 million for the lcs program due to increased volume . mst 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 168 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlement of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; about $ 55 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily radar and halifax class modernization programs ) due to increased risk retirements ; and approximately $ 30 million for undersea systems programs due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 55 million for training and logistics programs , primarily due to the recording of approximately $ 30 million of charges mostly related to lower-of-cost-or-market considerations ; and about $ 25 million for ship and aviation systems programs ( primarily ptds ) due to lower risk retirements and volume . operating profit related to the lcs program was comparable . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 170 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . backlog backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) . backlog increased slightly in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders and lower sales on integrated warfare system and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) and lower sales on various service programs , partially offset by lower orders on ship and aviation systems ( primarily mh-60 ) . . Question: what was the change in net sales for mst from 2012 to 2013?

-426.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

korea engineering plastics co. , ltd . founded in 1987 , kepco is the leading producer of pom in south korea . kepco is a venture between celanese's ticona business ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) , mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) and mitsubishi corporation ( 10% ( 10 % ) ) . kepco has polyacetal production facilities in ulsan , south korea , compounding facilities for pbt and nylon in pyongtaek , south korea , and participates with polyplastics and mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . in a world-scale pom facility in nantong , china . polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) , and celanese's ticona business ( 45% ( 45 % ) ) . established in 1964 , polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp in the asia-pacific region , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( 201cpps 201d ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . established in 1992 , fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings , llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of kureha chemical industry co. , ltd . of japan ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold an approximate 30% ( 30 % ) ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china . these include the nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd. , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . with an estimated 30% ( 30 % ) share of the world's cigarette production and consumption , china is the world's largest and fastest growing area for acetate tow products according to the 2009 stanford research institute international chemical economics handbook . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . in december 2009 , we announced plans with china national tobacco to expand our acetate flake and tow capacity at our venture's nantong facility and we received formal approval for the expansions , each by 30000 tons , during 2010 . since their inception in 1986 , the china acetate ventures have completed 12 expansions , leading to earnings growth and increased dividends . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow . during 2011 , we made contributions of $ 8 million related to the capacity expansions in nantong and have committed contributions of $ 9 million in 2012 . in 2010 , we made contributions of $ 12 million . our chinese acetate ventures pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year , based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several infraserv groups in germany that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . the table below represents our equity investments in infraserv ventures as of december 31 , 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ownership % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> . Question: what was the total of cash dividends in 2011? Answer: 78.0 Question: and what was it in 2010? Answer: 71.0 Question: what was, then, the increase over the year? Answer: 7.0 Question: and how much does this increase represent in relation to the 2010 total? Answer: 0.09859 Question: and throughout the precedent year, what was the change in that total of cash dividends?

15.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

capital resources and liquidity capital resources overview capital has historically been generated by earnings from citi 2019s operating businesses . citi may also augment its capital through issuances of common stock , convertible preferred stock , preferred stock , equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans , and , in the case of regulatory capital , through the issuance of subordinated debt underlying trust preferred securities . in addition , the impact of future events on citi 2019s business results , such as corporate and asset dispositions , as well as changes in accounting standards , also affect citi 2019s capital levels . generally , capital is used primarily to support assets in citi 2019s businesses and to absorb market , credit , or operational losses . while capital may be used for other purposes , such as to pay dividends or repurchase common stock , citi 2019s ability to utilize its capital for these purposes is currently restricted due to its agreements with the u.s . government , generally for so long as the u.s . government continues to hold citi 2019s common stock or trust preferred securities . see also 201csupervision and regulation 201d below . citigroup 2019s capital management framework is designed to ensure that citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with citi 2019s risk profile and all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines , as well as external rating agency considerations . the capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated , legal entity , and country level . senior management is responsible for the capital management process mainly through citigroup 2019s finance and asset and liability committee ( finalco ) , with oversight from the risk management and finance committee of citigroup 2019s board of directors . the finalco is composed of the senior-most management of citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity matters . among other things , finalco 2019s responsibilities include : determining the financial structure of citigroup and its principal subsidiaries ; ensuring that citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized in consultation with its regulators ; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for citigroup and individual businesses ; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for citigroup ; and monitoring interest rate risk , corporate and bank liquidity , and the impact of currency translation on non-u.s . earnings and capital . capital ratios citigroup is subject to the risk-based capital guidelines issued by the federal reserve board . historically , capital adequacy has been measured , in part , based on two risk-based capital ratios , the tier 1 capital and total capital ( tier 1 capital + tier 2 capital ) ratios . tier 1 capital consists of the sum of 201ccore capital elements , 201d such as qualifying common stockholders 2019 equity , as adjusted , qualifying noncontrolling interests , and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts , principally reduced by goodwill , other disallowed intangible assets , and disallowed deferred tax assets . total capital also includes 201csupplementary 201d tier 2 capital elements , such as qualifying subordinated debt and a limited portion of the allowance for credit losses . both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets . further , in conjunction with the conduct of the 2009 supervisory capital assessment program ( scap ) , u.s . banking regulators developed a new measure of capital termed 201ctier 1 common , 201d which has been defined as tier 1 capital less non-common elements , including qualifying perpetual preferred stock , qualifying noncontrolling interests , and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts . citigroup 2019s risk-weighted assets are principally derived from application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the measurement of credit risk . pursuant to these guidelines , on-balance-sheet assets and the credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance-sheet exposures ( such as financial guarantees , unfunded lending commitments , letters of credit , and derivatives ) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk-weight categories based upon the perceived credit risk associated with the obligor , or if relevant , the guarantor , the nature of the collateral , or external credit ratings . risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account . excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets , such as goodwill and deferred tax assets , to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital . see 201ccomponents of capital under regulatory guidelines 201d below . citigroup is also subject to a leverage ratio requirement , a non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy , which is defined as tier 1 capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average total assets . to be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , a bank holding company must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) , and a leverage ratio of at least 3% ( 3 % ) , and not be subject to a federal reserve board directive to maintain higher capital levels . the following table sets forth citigroup 2019s regulatory capital ratios as of december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 . citigroup regulatory capital ratios . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>at year end</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 common</td><td>9.60% ( 9.60 % )</td><td>2.30% ( 2.30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>11.67</td><td>11.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total capital ( tier 1 capital and tier 2 capital )</td><td>15.25</td><td>15.70</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>leverage</td><td>6.89</td><td>6.08</td></tr></table> as noted in the table above , citigroup was 201cwell capitalized 201d under the federal bank regulatory agency definitions at year end for both 2009 and 2008. . Question: by how much did the tier 1 common ratio change between 2008 and 2009?

7.3

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td><td>10/30/2016</td><td>10/29/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>171.03</td><td>207.01</td><td>165.34</td><td>293.64</td><td>586.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.18</td><td>149.14</td><td>156.89</td><td>163.97</td><td>202.72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>131.94</td><td>167.25</td><td>160.80</td><td>193.36</td><td>288.96</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite . Question: what was the price of applied materials in 2015?

165.34

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

our debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 . ( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 . ( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( e ) u.s . dollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products . there is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees . at december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>-</td><td>face value ( e )</td><td>interest rate</td><td>issuance</td><td>maturity</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 )</td><td>1.875% ( 1.875 % )</td><td>march 2014</td><td>march 2021</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 )</td><td>2.875% ( 2.875 % )</td><td>march 2014</td><td>march 2026</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( b )</td><td>20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 )</td><td>2.875% ( 2.875 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>may 2029</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>swiss franc notes</td><td>( c )</td><td>chf275 ( approximately $ 311 )</td><td>0.750% ( 0.750 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>december 2019</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>swiss franc notes</td><td>( b )</td><td>chf250 ( approximately $ 283 )</td><td>1.625% ( 1.625 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>may 2024</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 500</td><td>1.250% ( 1.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2017</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 750</td><td>3.250% ( 3.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2024</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 750</td><td>4.250% ( 4.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2044</td></tr></table> our debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 . ( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 . ( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( e ) u.s . dollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products . there is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees . at december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. . Question: what is the value of euro notes with march 2021 maturities? Answer: 1029.0 Question: what is the value with march 2026 maturities? Answer: 1372.0 Question: what is the sum? Answer: 2401.0 Question: what is the value of euro notes with may 2029 maturities? Answer: 697.0 Question: what is the total sum of the 3?

3098.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

put options we currently have outstanding put option agreements with other shareholders of our air products san fu company , ltd . and indura s.a . subsidiaries . the put options give the shareholders the right to sell stock in the subsidiaries based on pricing terms in the agreements . refer to note 17 , commitments and contingencies , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . due to the uncertainty of whether these options would be exercised and the related timing , we excluded the potential payments from the contractual obligations table . pension benefits we sponsor defined benefit pension plans that cover a substantial portion of our worldwide employees . the principal defined benefit pension plans 2014the u.s . salaried pension plan and the u.k . pension plan 2014were closed to new participants in 2005 and were replaced with defined contribution plans . over the long run , the shift to defined contribution plans is expected to reduce volatility of both plan expense and contributions . for 2013 , the fair market value of pension plan assets for our defined benefit plans as of the measurement date increased to $ 3800.8 from $ 3239.1 in 2012 . the projected benefit obligation for these plans as of the measurement date was $ 4394.0 and $ 4486.5 in 2013 and 2012 , respectively . refer to note 16 , retirement benefits , to the consolidated financial statements for comprehensive and detailed disclosures on our postretirement benefits . pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense</td><td>$ 169.7</td><td>$ 120.4</td><td>$ 114.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above )</td><td>19.8</td><td>8.2</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td><td>8.0% ( 8.0 % )</td><td>8.0% ( 8.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td><td>3.9% ( 3.9 % )</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td></tr></table> 2013 vs . 2012 the increase in pension expense , excluding special items , was primarily attributable to the 100 bp decrease in weighted average discount rate , resulting in higher amortization of actuarial losses . the increase was partially offset by a higher expected return on plan assets and contributions in 2013 . special items of $ 19.8 primarily included $ 12.4 for pension settlement losses and $ 6.9 for special termination benefits relating to the 2013 business restructuring and cost reduction plan . 2012 vs . 2011 pension expense in 2012 , excluding special items , was comparable to 2011 expense as a result of no change in the weighted average discount rate from year to year . 2014 outlook pension expense is estimated to be approximately $ 140 to $ 145 , excluding special items , in 2014 , a decrease of $ 5 to $ 10 from 2013 , resulting primarily from an increase in discount rates , partially offset by unfavorable impacts associated with changes in mortality and inflation assumptions . pension settlement losses of $ 10 to $ 25 are expected , dependent on the timing of retirements . in 2014 , pension expense will include approximately $ 118 for amortization of actuarial losses compared to $ 143 in 2013 . net actuarial gains of $ 370.4 were recognized in 2013 , resulting primarily from an approximately 65 bp increase in the weighted average discount rate as well as actual asset returns above expected returns . actuarial gains/losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets , different from expected returns , would impact the actuarial gains/losses and resulting amortization in years beyond 2014 . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2013 and 2012 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 300.8 and $ 76.4 , respectively . contributions for 2013 include voluntary contributions for u.s . plans of $ 220.0. . Question: what was the difference of cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans between 2012 and 2013? Answer: 3.93717 Question: what is that times 100?

393.71728

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

basel iii ( full implementation ) citigroup 2019s capital resources under basel iii ( full implementation ) citi currently estimates that its effective minimum common equity tier 1 capital , tier 1 capital and total capital ratio requirements under the u.s . basel iii rules , on a fully implemented basis and assuming a 3% ( 3 % ) gsib surcharge , may be 10% ( 10 % ) , 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) and 13.5% ( 13.5 % ) , respectively . further , under the u.s . basel iii rules , citi must also comply with a 4% ( 4 % ) minimum tier 1 leverage ratio requirement and an effective 5% ( 5 % ) minimum supplementary leverage ratio requirement . the following tables set forth the capital tiers , total risk-weighted assets , risk-based capital ratios , quarterly adjusted average total assets , total leverage exposure and leverage ratios , assuming full implementation under the u.s . basel iii rules , for citi as of december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . citigroup capital components and ratios under basel iii ( full implementation ) december 31 , 2015 december 31 , 2014 ( 1 ) in millions of dollars , except ratios advanced approaches standardized approach advanced approaches standardized approach . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars except ratios</td><td>december 31 2015 advanced approaches</td><td>december 31 2015 standardized approach</td><td>december 31 2015 advanced approaches</td><td>standardized approach</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common equity tier 1 capital</td><td>$ 146865</td><td>$ 146865</td><td>$ 136597</td><td>$ 136597</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>164036</td><td>164036</td><td>148066</td><td>148066</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total capital ( tier 1 capital + tier 2 capital ) ( 2 )</td><td>186097</td><td>198655</td><td>165454</td><td>178413</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total risk-weighted assets</td><td>1216277</td><td>1162884</td><td>1292605</td><td>1228488</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>common equity tier 1 capital ratio ( 3 ) ( 4 )</td><td>12.07% ( 12.07 % )</td><td>12.63% ( 12.63 % )</td><td>10.57% ( 10.57 % )</td><td>11.12% ( 11.12 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio ( 3 ) ( 4 )</td><td>13.49</td><td>14.11</td><td>11.45</td><td>12.05</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total capital ratio ( 3 ) ( 4 )</td><td>15.30</td><td>17.08</td><td>12.80</td><td>14.52</td></tr></table> common equity tier 1 capital ratio ( 3 ) ( 4 ) 12.07% ( 12.07 % ) 12.63% ( 12.63 % ) 10.57% ( 10.57 % ) 11.12% ( 11.12 % ) tier 1 capital ratio ( 3 ) ( 4 ) 13.49 14.11 11.45 12.05 total capital ratio ( 3 ) ( 4 ) 15.30 17.08 12.80 14.52 in millions of dollars , except ratios december 31 , 2015 december 31 , 2014 ( 1 ) quarterly adjusted average total assets ( 5 ) $ 1724710 $ 1835637 total leverage exposure ( 6 ) 2317849 2492636 tier 1 leverage ratio ( 4 ) 9.51% ( 9.51 % ) 8.07% ( 8.07 % ) supplementary leverage ratio ( 4 ) 7.08 5.94 ( 1 ) restated to reflect the retrospective adoption of asu 2014-01 for lihtc investments , consistent with current period presentation . ( 2 ) under the advanced approaches framework eligible credit reserves that exceed expected credit losses are eligible for inclusion in tier 2 capital to the extent the excess reserves do not exceed 0.6% ( 0.6 % ) of credit risk-weighted assets , which differs from the standardized approach in which the allowance for credit losses is eligible for inclusion in tier 2 capital up to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) of credit risk-weighted assets , with any excess allowance for credit losses being deducted in arriving at credit risk-weighted assets . ( 3 ) as of december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , citi 2019s common equity tier 1 capital , tier 1 capital , and total capital ratios were the lower derived under the basel iii advanced approaches framework . ( 4 ) citi 2019s basel iii capital ratios and related components , on a fully implemented basis , are non-gaap financial measures . citi believes these ratios and the related components provide useful information to investors and others by measuring citi 2019s progress against future regulatory capital standards . ( 5 ) tier 1 leverage ratio denominator . ( 6 ) supplementary leverage ratio denominator. . Question: what is the tier 1 capital ratio for advance approaches in 2015? Answer: 13.49 Question: what about for the standardized approach? Answer: 14.11 Question: what is the net change? Answer: -0.62 Question: what about the total capital ratio for advance approaches in 2015? Answer: 15.3 Question: and total capital ratio for the standardized approach?

17.08

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

prior to its adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the company recorded compensation expense for restricted stock awards on a straight-line basis over their vesting period . if an employee forfeited the award prior to vesting , the company reversed out the previously expensed amounts in the period of forfeiture . as required upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the company must base its accruals of compensation expense on the estimated number of awards for which the requisite service period is expected to be rendered . actual forfeitures are no longer recorded in the period of forfeiture . in 2005 , the company recorded a pre-tax credit of $ 2.8 million in cumulative effect of accounting change , that represents the amount by which compensation expense would have been reduced in periods prior to adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) for restricted stock awards outstanding on july 1 , 2005 that are anticipated to be forfeited . a summary of non-vested restricted stock award and restricted stock unit activity is presented below : shares ( in thousands ) weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2006:</td><td>2878</td><td>$ 13.01</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issued</td><td>830</td><td>$ 22.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>released ( vested )</td><td>-514 ( 514 )</td><td>$ 15.93</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canceled</td><td>-1197 ( 1197 )</td><td>$ 13.75</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2007:</td><td>1997</td><td>$ 15.91</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2007 , there was $ 15.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards . this cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years . the total fair value of restricted shares and restricted stock units vested was $ 11.0 million , $ 7.5 million and $ 4.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the shareholders of the company previously approved the 2002 employee stock purchase plan ( 201c2002 purchase plan 201d ) , and reserved 5000000 shares of common stock for sale to employees at a price no less than 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning of the one-year offering period or the end of each of the six-month purchase periods . under sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the 2002 purchase plan was considered compensatory . effective august 1 , 2005 , the company changed the terms of its purchase plan to reduce the discount to 5% ( 5 % ) and discontinued the look-back provision . as a result , the purchase plan was not compensatory beginning august 1 , 2005 . for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company recorded $ 0.4 million in compensation expense for its employee stock purchase plan for the period in which the 2002 plan was considered compensatory until the terms were changed august 1 , 2005 . at december 31 , 2007 , 757123 shares were available for purchase under the 2002 purchase plan . 401 ( k ) plan the company has a 401 ( k ) salary deferral program for eligible employees who have met certain service requirements . the company matches certain employee contributions ; additional contributions to this plan are at the discretion of the company . total contribution expense under this plan was $ 5.7 million , $ 5.7 million and $ 5.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively. . Question: what was the change in the total contribution expense under the plan from 2005 to 2006? Answer: 0.5 Question: and what was that contribution expense in 2005?

5.2

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

cash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 271577</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>147500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>31000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>10700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fixed assets</td><td>1680</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>4230</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>466687</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-38949 ( 38949 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 427738</td></tr></table> the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. . Question: for the acquired technology segment, what was the expected annual amortization expense, in thousands?

1528.57143

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 101.76</td><td>$ 98.20</td><td>$ 78.76</td><td>$ 84.87</td><td>$ 110.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.79</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.82</td><td>$ 111.38</td><td>$ 87.52</td><td>$ 103.79</td><td>$ 131.59</td></tr></table> . Question: what is the value of an investment in ups in 2010? Answer: 110.57 Question: what is the change in the value from 2005 to 2010? Answer: 10.57 Question: what growth rate does this represent?

0.1057

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years . stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives . the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria . annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached . a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td><td>2728290</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>192563</td><td>92729</td><td>185333</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-3267 ( 3267 )</td><td>-200284 ( 200284 )</td><td>-1167 ( 1167 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>2994197</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vested during the year</td><td>21074</td><td>408800</td><td>66299</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>compensation expense recorded</td><td>$ 6713155</td><td>$ 6930381</td><td>$ 17365401</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year</td><td>$ 17386949</td><td>$ 7023942</td><td>$ 21768084</td></tr></table> weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options . we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 . a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price . the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years . during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan . the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year . in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) . the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively . substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on . Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?

27.3

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

note 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s . other inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method . fifo cost approximates current replacement cost . inventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market . inventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value . inventories at december 31 consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished products</td><td>$ 988.1</td><td>$ 1211.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>work in process</td><td>2628.2</td><td>2697.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>raw materials and supplies</td><td>506.5</td><td>488.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total ( approximates replacement cost )</td><td>4122.8</td><td>4397.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>increase ( reduction ) to lifo cost</td><td>-11.0 ( 11.0 )</td><td>60.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>inventories</td><td>$ 4111.8</td><td>$ 4458.3</td></tr></table> inventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . note 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments . wholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required . we seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance . a large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions . we monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations . major financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities . in accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer . we are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings . we consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents . the cost of these investments approximates fair value . our equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense . 2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer . any change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense . 2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value . any change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense . we review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis . our derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged . management reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. . Question: what was the total in raw materials and supplies in 2018? Answer: 506.5 Question: and what was it in 2017? Answer: 488.8 Question: what was, then, the change over the year? Answer: 17.7 Question: what was the total in raw materials and supplies in 2017? Answer: 488.8 Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2017 total, in percentage?

0.03621

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds . these awards vested in january 2015 . the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited . in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded . in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) . distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period . during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan . the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service . because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date . rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years . rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant . rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>14.93% ( 14.93 % )</td><td>17.78% ( 17.78 % )</td><td>19.37% ( 19.37 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.07% ( 1.07 % )</td><td>0.75% ( 0.75 % )</td><td>0.40% ( 0.40 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grant date fair value per share</td><td>$ 62.10</td><td>$ 45.45</td><td>$ 40.13</td></tr></table> the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years . the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. . Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015? Answer: 62.1 Question: and what was it in 2013? Answer: 40.13 Question: what was, then, the change over the year? Answer: 21.97 Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2013 fair value? Answer: 0.54747 Question: and only during the last year of that period, what was the change in that fair value?

16.65

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

intermodal 2013 decreased volumes and fuel surcharges reduced freight revenue from intermodal shipments in 2009 versus 2008 . volume from international traffic decreased 24% ( 24 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 , reflecting economic conditions , continued weak imports from asia , and diversions to non-uprr served ports . additionally , continued weakness in the domestic housing and automotive sectors translated into weak demand in large sectors of the international intermodal market , which also contributed to the volume decline . conversely , domestic traffic increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . a new contract with hub group , inc. , which included additional shipments , was executed in the second quarter of 2009 and more than offset the impact of weak market conditions in the second half of 2009 . price increases and fuel surcharges generated higher revenue in 2008 , partially offset by lower volume levels . international traffic declined 11% ( 11 % ) in 2008 , reflecting continued softening of imports from china and the loss of a customer contract . notably , the peak intermodal shipping season , which usually starts in the third quarter , was particularly weak in 2008 . additionally , continued weakness in domestic housing and automotive sectors translated into weak demand in large sectors of the international intermodal market , which also contributed to lower volumes . domestic traffic declined 3% ( 3 % ) in 2008 due to the loss of a customer contract and lower volumes from less-than-truckload shippers . additionally , the flood-related embargo on traffic in the midwest during the second quarter hindered intermodal volume levels in 2008 . mexico business 2013 each of our commodity groups include revenue from shipments to and from mexico . revenue from mexico business decreased 26% ( 26 % ) in 2009 versus 2008 to $ 1.2 billion . volume declined in five of our six commodity groups , down 19% ( 19 % ) in 2009 , driven by 32% ( 32 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) reductions in industrial products and automotive shipments , respectively . conversely , energy shipments increased 9% ( 9 % ) in 2009 versus 2008 , partially offsetting these declines . revenue from mexico business increased 13% ( 13 % ) to $ 1.6 billion in 2008 compared to 2007 . price improvements and fuel surcharges contributed to these increases , partially offset by a 4% ( 4 % ) decline in volume in 2008 compared to 2007 . operating expenses millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2008 v 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4063</td><td>$ 4457</td><td>$ 4526</td><td>( 9 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 2 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>1763</td><td>3983</td><td>3104</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>1614</td><td>1902</td><td>1856</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1444</td><td>1387</td><td>1321</td><td>4</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1180</td><td>1326</td><td>1368</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>687</td><td>840</td><td>733</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 10751</td><td>$ 13895</td><td>$ 12908</td><td>( 23 ) % ( % )</td><td>8% ( 8 % )</td></tr></table> 2009 intermodal revenue international domestic . Question: what was the yearly decline in international traffic in 2009? Answer: 0.11 Question: and what was it in 2008? Answer: 0.24 Question: what was, then, the total yearly decline in international traffic in both of those years?

0.35

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

pipeline transportation 2013 we own a system of pipelines through marathon pipe line llc ( 201cmpl 201d ) and ohio river pipe line llc ( 201corpl 201d ) , our wholly-owned subsidiaries . our pipeline systems transport crude oil and refined products primarily in the midwest and gulf coast regions to our refineries , our terminals and other pipeline systems . our mpl and orpl wholly-owned and undivided interest common carrier systems consist of 1737 miles of crude oil lines and 1825 miles of refined product lines comprising 32 systems located in 11 states . the mpl common carrier pipeline network is one of the largest petroleum pipeline systems in the united states , based on total barrels delivered . our common carrier pipeline systems are subject to state and federal energy regulatory commission regulations and guidelines , including published tariffs for the transportation of crude oil and refined products . third parties generated 13 percent of the crude oil and refined product shipments on our mpl and orpl common carrier pipelines in 2009 . our mpl and orpl common carrier pipelines transported the volumes shown in the following table for each of the last three years . pipeline barrels handled ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( thousands of barrels per day )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>crude oil trunk lines</td><td>1279</td><td>1405</td><td>1451</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>refined products trunk lines</td><td>953</td><td>960</td><td>1049</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>2232</td><td>2365</td><td>2500</td></tr></table> we also own 196 miles of private crude oil pipelines and 850 miles of private refined products pipelines , and we lease 217 miles of common carrier refined product pipelines . we have partial ownership interests in several pipeline companies that have approximately 780 miles of crude oil pipelines and 3600 miles of refined products pipelines , including about 970 miles operated by mpl . in addition , mpl operates most of our private pipelines and 985 miles of crude oil and 160 miles of natural gas pipelines owned by our e&p segment . our major refined product pipelines include the owned and operated cardinal products pipeline and the wabash pipeline . the cardinal products pipeline delivers refined products from kenova , west virginia , to columbus , ohio . the wabash pipeline system delivers product from robinson , illinois , to various terminals in the area of chicago , illinois . other significant refined product pipelines owned and operated by mpl extend from : robinson , illinois , to louisville , kentucky ; garyville , louisiana , to zachary , louisiana ; and texas city , texas , to pasadena , texas . in addition , as of december 31 , 2009 , we had interests in the following refined product pipelines : 2022 65 percent undivided ownership interest in the louisville-lexington system , a petroleum products pipeline system extending from louisville to lexington , kentucky ; 2022 60 percent interest in muskegon pipeline llc , which owns a refined products pipeline extending from griffith , indiana , to north muskegon , michigan ; 2022 50 percent interest in centennial pipeline llc , which owns a refined products system connecting the gulf coast region with the midwest market ; 2022 17 percent interest in explorer pipeline company , a refined products pipeline system extending from the gulf coast to the midwest ; and 2022 6 percent interest in wolverine pipe line company , a refined products pipeline system extending from chicago , illinois , to toledo , ohio . our major owned and operated crude oil lines run from : patoka , illinois , to catlettsburg , kentucky ; patoka , illinois , to robinson , illinois ; patoka , illinois , to lima , ohio ; lima , ohio to canton , ohio ; samaria , michigan , to detroit , michigan ; and st . james , louisiana , to garyville , louisiana . as of december 31 , 2009 , we had interests in the following crude oil pipelines : 2022 51 percent interest in loop llc , the owner and operator of loop , which is the only u.s . deepwater oil port , located 18 miles off the coast of louisiana , and a crude oil pipeline connecting the port facility to storage caverns and tanks at clovelly , louisiana ; 2022 59 percent interest in locap llc , which owns a crude oil pipeline connecting loop and the capline system; . Question: what is the value of crude oil trunk lines handled in 2009? Answer: 1279.0 Question: what about the total pipeline barrels? Answer: 2232.0 Question: what portion does this represent? Answer: 0.57303 Question: what is the net change in the total pipeline barrels from 2007 to 2009?

268.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

page 20 of 100 segment sales were $ 100.7 million lower in 2009 than in 2008 , primarily as a result of the impact of lower aluminum prices partially offset by an increase in sales volumes . the higher sales volumes in 2009 were the result of incremental volumes from the four plants purchased from ab inbev , partially offset by certain plant closures and lower sales volumes in the existing business . segment earnings in 2010 were $ 122.3 million higher than in 2009 primarily due to a net $ 85 million impact related to the higher sales volumes and $ 45 million of product mix and improved manufacturing performance associated with higher production . also adding to the 2010 improvement was the effect of a $ 7 million out-of-period inventory charge in 2009 . the details of the out-of-period adjustment are included in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included within item 8 of this report . segment earnings in 2009 were higher than in 2008 due to $ 12 million of earnings contribution from the four acquired plants and approximately $ 21 million of savings associated with plant closures . partially offsetting these favorable impacts were lower carbonated soft drink and beer can sales volumes ( excluding the newly acquired plants ) and approximately $ 25 million related to higher cost inventories in the first half of 2009 . metal beverage packaging , europe . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1697.6</td><td>$ 1739.5</td><td>$ 1868.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment earnings</td><td>$ 212.9</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation costs ( a )</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total segment earnings</td><td>$ 209.7</td><td>$ 214.8</td><td>$ 230.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) further details of these items are included in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . the metal beverage packaging , europe , segment includes metal beverage packaging products manufactured in europe . ball packaging europe has manufacturing plants located in germany , the united kingdom , france , the netherlands , poland and serbia , and is the second largest metal beverage container business in europe . segment sales in 2010 decreased $ 41.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange effects of $ 93 million and price and mix changes , partially offset by higher sales volumes . segment sales in 2009 as compared to 2008 were $ 129.2 million lower due to $ 110 million of unfavorable foreign exchange effects , partially offset by better commercial terms . sales volumes in 2009 were essentially flat compared to those in the prior year . segment earnings in 2010 decreased $ 1.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily the result of a $ 28 million increase related to higher sales volumes , offset by $ 18 million of negative effects from foreign currency translation and $ 12 million of higher inventory and other costs . while 2009 sales volumes were consistent with the prior year , the adverse effects of foreign currency translation , both within europe and on the conversion of the euro to the u.s . dollar , reduced segment earnings by $ 8 million . also contributing to lower segment earnings were higher cost inventory carried into 2009 and a change in sales mix , partially offset by better commercial terms in some of our contracts . on january 18 , 2011 , ball acquired aerocan s.a.s . ( aerocan ) , a leading european supplier of aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , for 20ac222.4 million ( approximately $ 300 million ) in cash and assumed debt . aerocan manufactures extruded aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , and the aluminum slugs used to make them , for customers in the personal care , pharmaceutical , beverage and food industries . it operates three aerosol can manufacturing plants 2013 one each in the czech republic , france and the united kingdom 2013 and is a 51 percent owner of a joint venture aluminum slug plant in france . the four plants employ approximately 560 people . the acquisition of aerocan will allow ball to enter a growing part of the metal packaging industry and to broaden the company 2019s market development efforts into a new customer base. . Question: what was the total of net sales metal beverage packaging in 2010?

1697.6

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. . Question: what was the total intangibles in 2005? Answer: 2723872.0 Question: and in 2004? Answer: 1502747.0 Question: so what was the difference in this value between the two years? Answer: 1221125.0 Question: and the value for 2004 again?

1502747.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

we cannot assure you that the gener restructuring will be completed or that the terms thereof will not be changed materially . in addition , gener is in the process of restructuring the debt of its subsidiaries , termoandes s.a . ( 2018 2018termoandes 2019 2019 ) and interandes , s.a . ( 2018 2018interandes 2019 2019 ) , and expects that the maturities of these obligations will be extended . under-performing businesses during 2003 we sold or discontinued under-performing businesses and construction projects that did not meet our investment criteria or did not provide reasonable opportunities to restructure . it is anticipated that there will be less ongoing activity related to write-offs of development or construction projects and impairment charges in the future . the businesses , which were affected in 2003 , are listed below . impairment project name project type date location ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>project name</td><td>project type</td><td>date</td><td>location</td><td>impairment ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ede este ( 1 )</td><td>operating</td><td>december 2003</td><td>dominican republic</td><td>$ 60</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wolf hollow</td><td>operating</td><td>december 2003</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 120</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>granite ridge</td><td>operating</td><td>december 2003</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 201</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>colombia i</td><td>operating</td><td>november 2003</td><td>colombia</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>zeg</td><td>construction</td><td>december 2003</td><td>poland</td><td>$ 23</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>bujagali</td><td>construction</td><td>august 2003</td><td>uganda</td><td>$ 76</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>el faro</td><td>construction</td><td>april 2003</td><td>honduras</td><td>$ 20</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) see note 4 2014discontinued operations . improving credit quality our de-leveraging efforts reduced parent level debt by $ 1.2 billion in 2003 ( including the secured equity-linked loan previously issued by aes new york funding l.l.c. ) . we refinanced and paid down near-term maturities by $ 3.5 billion and enhanced our year-end liquidity to over $ 1 billion . our average debt maturity was extended from 2009 to 2012 . at the subsidiary level we continue to pursue limited recourse financing to reduce parent credit risk . these factors resulted in an overall reduced cost of capital , improved credit statistics and expanded access to credit at both aes and our subsidiaries . liquidity at the aes parent level is an important factor for the rating agencies in determining whether the company 2019s credit quality should improve . currency and political risk tend to be biggest variables to sustaining predictable cash flow . the nature of our large contractual and concession-based cash flow from these businesses serves to mitigate these variables . in 2003 , over 81% ( 81 % ) of cash distributions to the parent company were from u.s . large utilities and worldwide contract generation . on february 4 , 2004 , we called for redemption of $ 155049000 aggregate principal amount of outstanding 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 , which represents the entire outstanding principal amount of the 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 , and $ 34174000 aggregate principal amount of outstanding 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 . the 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 and the 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 were redeemed on march 8 , 2004 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date . the mandatory redemption of the 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 was being made with a portion of our 2018 2018adjusted free cash flow 2019 2019 ( as defined in the indenture pursuant to which the notes were issued ) for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2003 as required by the indenture and was made on a pro rata basis . on february 13 , 2004 we issued $ 500 million of unsecured senior notes . the unsecured senior notes mature on march 1 , 2014 and are callable at our option at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the unsecured senior notes plus a make-whole premium . the unsecured senior notes were issued at a price of 98.288% ( 98.288 % ) and pay interest semi-annually at an annual . Question: what is the sum of impairment projects in the construction of zeg and bujagali? Answer: 99.0 Question: what is the sum including el faro?

119.0

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

corporate/other corporate/other includes certain unallocated costs of global staff functions ( including finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) , other corporate expenses and unallocated global operations and technology expenses and income taxes , as well as corporate treasury , certain north america legacy consumer loan portfolios , other legacy assets and discontinued operations ( for additional information on corporate/other , see 201ccitigroup segments 201d above ) . at december 31 , 2018 , corporate/other had $ 91 billion in assets , an increase of 17% ( 17 % ) from the prior year . in millions of dollars 2018 2017 2016 % ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017 % ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>% ( % ) change2018 vs . 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change2017 vs . 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ 2254</td><td>$ 2000</td><td>$ 3045</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>( 34 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>-171 ( 171 )</td><td>1132</td><td>2188</td><td>nm</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ 2083</td><td>$ 3132</td><td>$ 5233</td><td>( 33 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 2272</td><td>$ 3814</td><td>$ 5042</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 24 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net credit losses</td><td>$ 21</td><td>$ 149</td><td>$ 435</td><td>( 86 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 66 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>credit reserve build ( release )</td><td>-218 ( 218 )</td><td>-317 ( 317 )</td><td>-456 ( 456 )</td><td>31</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>provision ( release ) for unfunded lending commitments</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>2014</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>provision for benefits and claims</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>98</td><td>71</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>$ -202 ( 202 )</td><td>$ -175 ( 175 )</td><td>$ 69</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ -507 ( 507 )</td><td>$ 122</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>income taxes ( benefits )</td><td>-113 ( 113 )</td><td>19064</td><td>-455 ( 455 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 126</td><td>$ -19571 ( 19571 )</td><td>$ 577</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-111 ( 111 )</td><td>-58 ( 58 )</td><td>93</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ -19682 ( 19682 )</td><td>$ 519</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>noncontrolling interests</td><td>11</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ -19676 ( 19676 )</td><td>$ 521</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr></table> nm not meaningful 2018 vs . 2017 net income was $ 107 million in 2018 , compared to a net loss of $ 19.7 billion in the prior year , primarily driven by the $ 19.8 billion one-time , non-cash charge recorded in the tax line in 2017 due to the impact of tax reform . results in 2018 included the one-time benefit of $ 94 million in the tax line , related to tax reform . for additional information , see 201csignificant accounting policies and significant estimates 2014income taxes 201d below . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform in 2018 and 2017 , net income decreased 92% ( 92 % ) , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses , lower cost of credit and tax benefits related to the reorganization of certain non-u.s . subsidiaries . the tax benefits were largely offset by the release of a foreign currency translation adjustment ( cta ) from aoci to earnings ( for additional information on the cta release , see note 19 to the consolidated financial statements ) . revenues decreased 33% ( 33 % ) , driven by the continued wind-down of legacy assets . expenses decreased 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily driven by the wind-down of legacy assets , lower infrastructure costs and lower legal expenses . provisions decreased $ 27 million to a net benefit of $ 202 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 86% ( 86 % ) to $ 21 million , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the net reserve release declined by $ 96 million to $ 221 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures . 2017 vs . 2016 the net loss was $ 19.7 billion , compared to net income of $ 521 million in the prior year , primarily driven by the one-time impact of tax reform . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform , net income declined 69% ( 69 % ) to $ 168 million , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses and lower cost of credit . revenues declined 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily reflecting the continued wind-down of legacy assets and the absence of gains related to debt buybacks in 2016 . revenues included approximately $ 750 million in gains on asset sales in the first quarter of 2017 , which more than offset a roughly $ 300 million charge related to the exit of citi 2019s u.s . mortgage servicing operations in the quarter . expenses declined 24% ( 24 % ) , reflecting the wind-down of legacy assets and lower legal expenses , partially offset by approximately $ 100 million in episodic expenses primarily related to the exit of the u.s . mortgage servicing operations . also included in expenses is an approximately $ 255 million provision for remediation costs related to a card act matter in 2017 . provisions decreased $ 244 million to a net benefit of $ 175 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses and a lower provision for benefits and claims , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 66% ( 66 % ) , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the decline in the provision for benefits and claims was primarily due to lower insurance activity . the net reserve release declined $ 147 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures. . Question: what is the net change in total revenues net of interest expense from 2016 to 2018? Answer: -3150.0 Question: what about the total revenues net of interest expense in 2016? Answer: 5233.0 Question: what percentage change does this represent? Answer: -0.60195 Question: what is the operating expenses in 2018? Answer: 2272.0 Question: what about in 2016? Answer: 5042.0 Question: net change in operating expenses? Answer: -2770.0 Question: what percentage change does this represent?

-0.54939

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.89</td><td>$ 139.55</td><td>$ 124.88</td><td>$ 127.08</td><td>$ 122.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 128.68</td><td>$ 142.68</td><td>$ 149.69</td><td>$ 173.33</td><td>$ 182.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 131.84</td><td>$ 168.39</td><td>$ 188.00</td><td>$ 206.46</td><td>$ 209.40</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. . Question: what was the value of the ups in 2004? Answer: 139.55 Question: and what was it in 2003? Answer: 119.89 Question: what was, then, the change over the year?

19.66

Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.