pages
sequence | doc_path
stringlengths 36
177
|
|---|---|
[
"<fig rect=[96.30000305175781, 31.107641220092773, 416.6178894042969, 45.51484298706055]></fig>\n<fig rect=[43.20000076293945, 129.4920196533203, 153.96926879882812, 158.7119903564453]></fig>\n<fig rect=[175.5, 154.8720245361328, 215.55184936523438, 171.4920196533203]></fig>\n<fig rect=[43.380001068115234, 173.0430145263672, 414.175537109375, 453.5748291015625]></fig>\n<fig rect=[43.560001373291016, 448.7076110839844, 348.2846984863281, 567.3348388671875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[43.7400016784668, 563.3676147460938, 348.282470703125, 596.4948120117188]></fig>\n<fig rect=[58.86000061035156, 659.592041015625, 145.29200744628906, 669.2870483398438]></fig>",
"<fig rect=[50.939998626708984, 27.585948944091797, 422.9607849121094, 191.1857147216797]></fig>\n<fig rect=[118.08000183105469, 188.5059356689453, 422.85858154296875, 309.0857238769531]></fig>\n<fig rect=[118.08000183105469, 306.2259216308594, 422.6994934082031, 417.2657470703125]></fig>",
"<fig rect=[43.7400016784668, 29.09699249267578, 416.7261047363281, 85.35101318359375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[53.099998474121094, 92.09699249267578, 178.63499450683594, 106.77099609375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[45.18000030517578, 541.6524047851562, 215.70989990234375, 580.565185546875]></fig>"
] | https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-110/pdf/STATUTE-110-Pg3811.pdf |
[
"<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 35.15777587890625, 303.5270690917969, 49.46600341796875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[214.47000122070312, 114.82672119140625, 217.47000122070312, 128.11578369140625]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.79400634765625, 125.86669921875, 469.021240234375, 158.71839904785156]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.7880859375, 159.8848876953125, 527.1240234375, 450.91571044921875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[390.069091796875, 683.1466064453125, 393.069091796875, 696.4356689453125]></fig>\n<fig rect=[201.27310180664062, 694.1866455078125, 396.62109375, 721.3956909179688]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80009460449219, 721.7178344726562, 526.3561401367188, 784.5156860351562]></fig>\n<fig rect=(70.80000305175781, 70.80001831054688, 214.55999755859375, 125.52001953125)></fig>\n<fig rect=(204.72000122070312, 450.9600830078125, 390.0, 693.840087890625)></fig>",
"<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 35.15777587890625, 303.5270690917969, 49.46600341796875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[441.44989013671875, 274.39569091796875, 444.9299011230469, 289.8110046386719]></fig>\n<fig rect=[154.0682830810547, 287.14666748046875, 443.2855529785156, 338.131103515625]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 338.7467346191406, 526.8001098632812, 783.5557250976562]></fig>\n<fig rect=(153.36000061035156, 70.79998779296875, 441.3599853515625, 286.79998779296875)></fig>",
"<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 35.15777587890625, 303.5270690917969, 49.46600341796875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 71.146728515625, 508.35614013671875, 182.11566162109375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 182.33819580078125, 71.76010131835938, 186.5906982421875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[216.12820434570312, 414.3466491699219, 498.356201171875, 453.55572509765625]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 453.7734069824219, 522.3001098632812, 522.5779418945312]></fig>\n<fig rect=[466.64080810546875, 698.9866333007812, 469.64080810546875, 712.2756958007812]></fig>\n<fig rect=[144.41677856445312, 710.026611328125, 453.4647521972656, 751.8756713867188]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80877685546875, 752.2666015625, 73.80877685546875, 765.5556640625]></fig>\n<fig rect=(99.60001373291016, 186.7200927734375, 495.3600158691406, 425.04010009765625)></fig>\n<fig rect=(128.16000366210938, 522.7200927734375, 466.55999755859375, 709.6801147460938)></fig>",
"<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 35.15777587890625, 303.5270690917969, 49.46600341796875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 71.146728515625, 517.0081787109375, 209.715576171875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 392.50665283203125, 459.2301940917969, 435.0758056640625]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80009460449219, 435.637939453125, 522.0481567382812, 777.315673828125]></fig>\n<fig rect=(138.72000122070312, 209.760009765625, 456.239990234375, 403.20001220703125)></fig>",
"<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 35.15777587890625, 303.5270690917969, 49.46600341796875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 71.146728515625, 526.4521484375, 126.94598388671875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 127.13330078125, 234.98410034179688, 154.6578369140625]></fig>\n<fig rect=[400.64990234375, 639.23974609375, 403.98388671875, 651.23974609375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[148.07388305664062, 648.82666015625, 449.837890625, 704.595703125]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.79739379882812, 704.9866333007812, 516.09619140625, 782.7055053710938]></fig>\n<fig rect=(194.16000366210938, 154.55996704101562, 400.55999755859375, 648.47998046875)></fig>",
"<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 35.15777587890625, 303.5270690917969, 49.46600341796875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.80010223388672, 71.146728515625, 482.80810546875, 140.5958251953125]></fig>\n<fig rect=[448.197509765625, 320.0267333984375, 451.197509765625, 333.3157958984375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[223.61749267578125, 331.0667419433594, 374.2774963378906, 358.0357971191406]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.79750061035156, 358.666748046875, 524.38818359375, 497.2357177734375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[70.79447937011719, 503.62664794921875, 524.7601928710938, 773.9859008789062]></fig>\n<fig rect=(146.63999938964844, 140.8800048828125, 448.08001708984375, 330.7200012207031)></fig>",
"\t\r 7\t\r \n\r \r [ 4 ] http://www.jisao.washington.edu/aao/ [ 5 ] Meteorologisches Observatorium wird Klimabeobachtungsstation - 30 Jahre Temperatur- Messungen an der Antarktis-Forschungsstation Neumayer, 12. Januar 2012; http://www.awi.de/de/aktuelles_und_presse/pressemitteilungen/detail/item/folgt/?cHash=acc63058b16e59b4cee e3ab9bb04c797 [ 6 ] Die Temperatur im Bereich des antarktischen Meereisgürtels sinkt und die Meereis- Ausdehnung wächst, 11 November, 2008 ; http://klimakatastrophe.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/die-temperatur-im-bereich-des- antarktischen-meereisgurtels-sinkt-und-das-meereisausdehnung-wachst/ [ 7 ] Antarctic Sea Ice at Record High, September 12, 2007 ; http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/09/antarctic-sea-i.html [ 8 ] Interview mit Professor Dr. Heinz Miller, Stellvertretender Direktor des Alfred-Wegener-Instituts. Er beschäftigt sich als Geophysiker mit Klimarekonstruktion und Eisdynamik, 03.11.2007 ; http://www.awi.de/de/aktuelles_und_presse/bild_film_ton/tonbeitraege/miller_3112007_klim awandel/ [ 9 ] Heinrich Miller, AWI, in: Bohrer im Eis, DIE ZEIT, 06.06.2007 , S.40 [ 10 ] WIKIPEDIA: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarktischer_Eisschild [ 11 ] Eisberg voraus, http://weltenwetter.blogspot.com/search?q=Eisberg+voraus sowie: http://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/publikationen/klaus-puls-dipl-meteorologe/puls- publikation/eisberg-voraus-weltuntergang-auch/ ; "
] | https://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Puls.AA_.120124.Ka%CC%88lte-Trend.pdf |
[
"SENATE BILL REPORT ESHB 2823\nAs of Second Reading\nTitle : An act relating to redirecting existing state revenues into the state general fund. Brief Description : Redirecting existing state revenues into the state general fund. Sponsors : House Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Representative Hunter).\nBrief History: Passed House: 4/11/12, 53-45. Committee Activity : \nStaff : Brian Sims (786-7431)\nBackground : Education Construction Fund. In 2000 Washington voters approved Initiative 728, which redirected state lottery revenue from the state General Fund to several education funds, beginning July 1, 2001. From July 1, 2004, to July 1, 2009, all net lottery revenues allocated for education were deposited in the Education Construction Fund. In 2010 the Legislature created the Washington Opportunity Pathways Account. The Opportunity Pathways Account is dedicated to a number of different education programs. The 2010 legislation also redirected the deposit of state lottery revenue from the Education Construction Fund into the Opportunity Pathways Account. The 2010 legislation required the State Treasurer to transfer $102 million each year from the state General Fund into the Education Construction Fund. In recent years, including the current 2011-13 biennium, the transfers from the state General Fund have effectively been suspended.\nLiquor Excise Taxes. State sales taxes and volume taxes apply to the sale of spirits in their original package. Spirits are subject to a state volume tax of $3.7708 per liter for retail sales and $2.4408 per liter for sales to restaurants. All tax proceeds are deposited in the state General Fund. A state sales tax rate of 20.5 percent applies to spirits sold to consumers in the original package. A sales tax rate of 13.7 percent applies to spirits sold to establishments that sell the spirits on their premises. Approximately 26 percent of both liquor taxes are deposited in the Liquor Excise Tax Fund and then distributed quarterly to cities and counties on the basis of population. A portion of the counties' funding is deposited in the County Research Services Account to support municipal research services. \n––––––––––––––––––––––\nThis analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. Senate Bill Report ESHB 2823 - 1 -",
"Liquor Revolving Fund. The Washington State Liquor Control Board (WSLCB) was formed in 1933 by the Steele Act to regulate the importation, manufacture, distribution, and sale of alcohol. The WSLCB currently handles the purchase, distribution, and sale of liquor through a state-owned distribution center and state-owned stores and certain contract stores. Washington liquor is currently marked up and taxed prior to sale. A portion of the markup supports the operations of the retail state liquor stores and the excess profits received from sales are deposited in the Liquor Revolving Fund and returned to state and local governments. A portion of the cities' funding is deposited in the City and Town Research Services Account to support municipal research services. \nWith the passage of Initiative 1183 in November 2011, the WSLCB will cease state liquor store and liquor distribution operations by June 1, 2012. Initiative 1183 specifies that distributions from the Liquor Revolving Fund to border areas, counties, cities, towns, and the municipal research center will be made in a manner that provides each category of recipient an amount from the Liquor Revolving Fund no less than that received during comparable periods prior to the effective date of the initiative plus an additional $10 million for public safety.\nPublic Works Assistance Account. The Public Works Assistance Account is used to make loans and to give financial guarantees to local governments for public works projects. There are several sources of revenue to the account including the solid waste collection tax (SWCT), real estate excise tax (REET), public utilities tax (PUT), and loan repayments.\nSolid Waste Collection Tax. Washington imposes a separate tax on solid waste collection services by firms that collect, transfer, store, or dispose of solid waste. This tax is in lieu of the state PUT; however, solid waste collection services are also subject to state business and occupation taxes. The SWCT rate is 3.6 percent. The tax is deposited in the Public Works Assistance Account where it is dedicated to making loans and financial guarantees to local governments for public works projects. The requirement to deposit the tax into the Public Works Assistance Account was suspended in fiscal year 2011, allowing the money to be deposited into the State General Fund. \nSummary of Bill : Education Construction Fund. The annual $102 million transfer from the state General Fund into the Education Construction Fund is suspended during the 2013-15 biennium. Solid Waste Collection Tax. The requirement to deposit the SWCT into the Public Works Assistance Account (PWAA) is suspended from July 1, 2011, through June 30, 2015. During that period, funds must be deposited in the state General Fund for general purpose expenditures. During the Fiscal Years 2016, 2017, and 2018, 50 percent of the SWCT must be deposited in the general fund and 50 percent must be deposited in the PWAA.\nLiquor Excise Taxes. In fiscal year 2013, all liquor excise taxes that would normally be deposited into the Liquor Excise Tax Fund for distribution to local governments are deposited into the state General Fund. Distributions to local governments are suspended for a year to correspond to this reallocation of the tax.\nSenate Bill Report ESHB 2823 - 2 -",
"Beginning in fiscal year 2014 and every year thereafter, quarterly distributions from the Liquor Excise Tax Fund of $2.5 million are made to the state General Fund. The County Research Services Account is eliminated and any remaining monies are deposited into the state General Fund. Prior to distributing the counties' portion of the Liquor Excise Tax Fund, the State Treasurer must transfer an amount to the Liquor Revolving Fund to support legislative appropriations for county research services. \nLiquor Revolving Fund. Beginning July 1, 2012, the distributions to cities and counties from the Liquor Revolving Fund are modified. Instead of distributing monies to cities and counties by a formula based on amounts deposited in the Liquor Revolving Fund, distributions will be made as provided under Initiative 1183. The City and Town Research Services Account is eliminated and any remaining monies are deposited into the state General Fund. Prior to distributing the cities' portion of the Liquor Revolving Fund, an amount must be retained to support municipal research services consistent with Initiative 1183. \nAppropriation : None. Fiscal Note : Not requested.\nCommittee/Commission/Task Force Created : No.\nEffective Date : The bill contains several effective dates. Please refer to the bill.\nSenate Bill Report ESHB 2823 - 3 -"
] | http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2011-12/Pdf/Bill%20Reports/Senate/2823-S.E%20SBR%202ND%2012%20E2.pdf |
[
"Tijuana Brigada Weekender Team Questions and Answers \nQ What exactly is this all about? Weekender teams are organized in order to bring health care and the love of Jesus Christ to the people of Mexico while working alongside local Mexicans. While using the health care as a method of drawing in the people, we use their time with us to present the gospel of Jesus Christ. We often use a Health Fair format that includes activities that fall under three categories: health screening, health education, and evangelism. What type of health care do we give? Services that are routinely offered are dental, general medicine, chiropractic and optometry. We are always open to other specialties too. Who can be a part of the team? Anyone with a heart to help the needy! A good team has 50% non-medical people who are willing to pitch in and do anything. What if we don’t speak Spanish? This is not a problem. Obviously, life is easier if there are several bilingual team members, but it’s not impossible without them. The Weekender Manual, which you will receive once your application has been approved, includes phrases for team members to work on prior to their arrival. Is there a minimum age requirement? While a person of any age is welcome to go, a parent must accompany team members under 18 years of age. Do participants need a passport? Yes, passports are required for travel into Mexico. What does it cost? The cost for those coming on Saturday only is $50. What is included? The $50 fee for the day includes: ground transportation from the Mexican Medical office in Lemon Grove, California, to the site and back, trip insurance, snack, water, a lite lunch, outreach supplies (medicine, advertising, glasses, chairs, tables, etc.), and an administration fee. Food is generally purchased in the United States and transported to the site. What about medical liability insurance? Liability coverage is not generally purchased or used by Mexican health care workers; therefore Mexican Medical does not require it for medical team volunteers. \nwww.mexicanmedical.com ",
"Where do I start? If you are interested in serving on a Tijuana Brigada Team, download the Weekender volunteer application at www.mexicanmedical.com . Once you send in the application, along with the other requested forms, we will get in touch with you regarding details, as well as send you the Weekender Manual, which will aide in your preparation. Please note that you only need to fill out the application once. You do not need to fill out a new one every time you come. How do we share the gospel? Various methods may be used including, but not limited to: passing out tracts, showing evangelistic movies, sharing Bible stories, using puppets to tell Bible stories, working on a wordless bracelet or other crafts, and one on one evangelism with the assistance of local church members. The last station that every patient will visit is the evangelism tent where they will clearly hear the gospel presented by someone from the local Mexican church. Do we have devotions? Yes, we set aside time before the brigada to pray and spend time focusing on the Lord for guidance, wisdom and safety. \n\nWho provides health insurance? While part of your fee includes trip insurance that includes health insurance in Mexico, we ask that all participants provide their own U.S. health insurance coverage . What is a typical schedule? Saturday: 6:45 AM Meet at Mexican Medical for orientation 8:30AM- Arrive at Brigada location in Tijuana 9 AM- Start seeing patients and start children’s ministry Noonish- alternate out for lunch 3 PM- Wrap up and start tearing down 5:00PM- Head for the border crossing 8-9 PM- Arrive back at Mexican Medical Office What do I need to bring with me? If you are a medical professional please bring your diagnostic set and stethoscope. Everyone needs to bring passports, water bottles sun block and money for a possible taco stop on the way home. \nwww.mexicanmedical.com "
] | http://mexicanmedical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Brochure_TJ-Brigada-Info.pdf |
[
"Goldschmidt Conference Abstracts \n721 \nHigh-pressure microbiology in the synchrotron light I. <sub> </sub> D <sub>ANIEL</sub> <sup>1</sup> , <sub> </sub> A. <sub> </sub> P <sub>ICARD</sub> <sup>2,3</sup> , <sub> </sub> D. <sub> </sub> T <sub>ESTEMALE</sub> <sup>4</sup> <sub> AND </sub> J.-L. <sub> </sub> H <sub>AZEMANN</sub> <sup>3</sup> \nSubduction factory unroofed: Modern submarine magmatism in the North Fiji Basin, Southwest Pacifc L <sub>EONID </sub> D <sub>ANYUSHEVSKY AND </sub> T <sub>REVOR </sub> F <sub>ALLOON</sub> \nCODES CeO and School of Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania, PB 79, Hoibart, TAS 7001, Australia (*correspondence [email protected], [email protected]) An extensional setting at the southern termination of the North Fiji Backarc Basin (southwest Pacific), which occurs in response to westward roll-back of the Vanuatu trench and eastward roll-back of the Tonga trench, allows subduction- related magmas to reach the surface (seafloor) with only a minimal extent of both fractionation and crustal contamination, thus providing a unique insight into magma generation processes with the subduction factory. Volcanic rocks collected within this are during the SS10/2004, SS08/2006 and SS03/2009 voyages of the R/V “Southern Surveyor” reveal a large spectrum of subduction- related magma compositions from backarc basin basalts to boninites, calc-alkaline basalts and high-Mg adakites. All magma series have very primitive, high MgO endmembers, which contain abundant high-magnesian olivine phenocrysts (Fo 92-94) formed during the earliest stages of melt evolution. The data reveal that melts produced due to adiabatic decompression of the mantle wedge play an important role in magma genesis. Within the studied area, a number of such melts can be identified which differ in both the extent of the contribution of the subduction-derived components, and the extent of depletion of the mantle source. Also abundant are melts produced by melting of the basaltic component of the subducted oceanic crust, which extensively re-equilibrate with the surrounding mantle during their accent to the surface. These melts are also characterised by a range of compositions, range from low-Si, high-Mg to high-Si, high-Mg adakites. There is clear petrographic and geochemical evidence for extensive mixing between high-Mg adakitic and backarc basin magmas in this area, which results in formation of primitive magmas with typical calc-alkaline and boninitic affinities. Our results suggest that in less extensional settings, where unfractionated magmas rarely reach the surface, the role of this mixing in the genesis of typical calc-alkaline magmas may be more difficult to identify, however it may play an important role in subduction-related magma genesis in general. \n<sub>1</sub> Université Lyon 1, ENS de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5276, Laboratoire de Géologie de Lyon, France ([email protected]) <sub>2</sub> Max Planck Insitute for Marine Microbiology, Biogeochemistry Department, Bremen, Germany <sub>3</sub> MARUM, Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, Bremen, Germany <sub>4</sub> Institut Néel, Département MCMF, Grenoble, France The Earth’s subsurface is characterized by hostile conditions for life in terms of temperature, pressure and nutrient availability. Although our current view of the biosphere extension is restricted to shallow geological depths, deep life may enconter pressures of hundreds MPa. As an important microbial energetic process, dissimilatory metal reduction needed to be investigated as a function of pressure. We measured the effects of pressure on the reduction of Se(IV) and Fe(III) to Se(0) and Fe(II), respectively by the bacterial model Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. This strain is a mesophilic and piezosensitive counterpart of psychrophilic and piezophilic Shewanella representatives that have been frequently isolated from deep-sea environments. Kinetics and yields of Se(IV) and Fe(III) reduction were monitored in situ by X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) in an autoclave optimized for in situ XAS measurements [1]. Most measurements were performed at the BM30B beamline of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF, Grenoble, France). Early measurements on the reduction of Se(IV) were also performed in diamond anvil cell at the ID22 beamline of the ESRF. Metal reduction occurs in cultures of MR-1 at pressures in excess of 100 MPa. This shows that the metabolic activity of a microbe, despite being piezosensitive, extends far beyond its pressure limits for growth here at 50 MPa. Consequently, considering only the ability to grow in the conditions of the deep subsurface as a proof of metabolic activity may lead to an underestimation of the impact of the biosphere in deep environments. Although the exact experimental conditions do not mimic complex subsurface environments, we show here that the metabolic activity of a surface microbe potentially brought to the deep subsurface can affect significantly biogeochemical cycles as those of selenium, but more importantly those of iron and carbon. [1] Picard et al . (2011) Geobiology , 9 , 196-204. \nMineralogical Magazine www.minersoc.org "
] | https://goldschmidtabstracts.info/2011/721.pdf |
[
"1. NAME UND SITZ Unter dem Namen «Solothurn Hilft» be Solothurn. Er ist konfessionell neutral. 2. ZIEL UND ZWECK Der Verein bezweckt kostenlose Hilfele asylsuchende Menschen. Der Verein setzt sich zum Ziel: \nUnter dem Namen «Solothurn Hilft» besteht ein Verein im Sinne von Art. 60 ff. ZGB mit Sitz in \n \nDer Verein bezweckt kostenlose Hilfeleistungen in jeglicher Form für geflüchtete und asylsuchende Menschen. Der Verein setzt sich zum Ziel: - Einen Austausch zwischen den verschiedenen Kulturen zu gewährleisten. - Unterstützend zu wirken bei der Integration und die Kommunikation und Vernetzung zu fördern. - Gegenseitige Anerkennung, Toleranz und Solidarität zu pflegen. - Den Kontakt zwischen Menschen zu fördern, die sich für die Anliegen der geflüchteten und asylsuchenden Menschen interessieren. - Der Verein betreibt Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. Der Verein verfolgt keine kommerziellen Zwecke und erstrebt keinen Gewinn. Die Organe sind \nzu fördern. \nund asylsuchenden Menschen interessieren. - Der Verein betreibt Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. \nehrenamtlich tätig. 3. MITTEL Zur Verfolgung des Vereinszwecks verfügt der - Mitgliederbeiträge - Erträge aus eigenen Veranstaltungen - Subventionen - Erträge aus Leistungsvereinbarungen - Spenden und Zuwendungen 4. MITGLIEDSCHAFT Mitglieder können natürliche und juristische P unterstützen. Mitglied ist, wer mit der Beitrittserklärung (sie beigetreten ist. \nZur Verfolgung des Vereinszwecks verfügt der Verein über folgende Mittel: \n \nMitglieder können natürliche und juristische Personen werden, die den Vereinszweck unterstützen. Mitglied ist, wer mit der Beitrittserklärung (siehe www.solothurn-hilft.ch ) dem Verein ",
"Aktive Mitglieder sind Personen, welche regelmässig (min. 5 mal pro Jahr) an den verschiedenen Projekten teilnehmen. Passivmitglieder sind Freunde*innen und Gönner*innen des Vereins, die diesen durch regelmässige Beiträge finanziell unterstützen, sowie sämtliche juristische Personen. Juristische Personen können durch die oben genannten Bedingungen Aktivmitglieder werden. 4.1 MITGLIEDERBEITRAG Die Mitgliederbeiträge werden jährlich durch die Mitgliederversammlung festgesetzt. Das Geschäftsjahr entspricht dem Kalenderjahr. Der Mitgliederbeitrag beträgt: - für Aktivmitglieder sowie Personen mit einem anerkannten Flüchtlingsstatus CHF 0.-\nverschiedenen Projekten teilnehmen. \n4.1 MITGLIEDERBEITRAG Die Mitgliederbeiträge werden jährlich durch die Mitgliederversammlu Geschäftsjahr entspricht dem Kalenderjahr. Der Mitgliederbeitrag beträgt: - für Aktivmitglieder sowie Personen mit einem anerkannten Flü /Jahr - für Passivmitglieder CHF 40.-/Jahr 4.2 ERLÖSCHEN DER MITGLIEDSCHAFT Die Mitgliedschaft erlischt - bei natürlichen Personen durch Austritt, Ausschluss oder Tod. \n/Jahr - für Pa \nDie Mitgliedschaft erlischt \n- bei juristischen Personen durch Austritt, Ausschluss oder Auflösung der juristischen Person. 4.3 AUSTRITT UND AUSSCHLUSS Ein Vereinsaustritt ist jederzeit möglich. Das Austrittsschreiben muss mindestens 4 Wochen vor der ordentlichen Mitgliederversammlung schriftlich an den Vorstand gerichtet werden. Für das angebrochene Jahr ist der volle Mitgliederbeitrag zu bezahlen. Ein Mitglied kann jederzeit wegen Verletzung der Statuten oder Verstösse gegen die Ziele des Vereins ausgeschlossen werden. Der Vorstand fällt den Ausschlussentscheid; das Mitglied kann den Ausschlussentscheid an die Mitgliederversammlung weiterziehen. Bleibt ein Mitglied trotz Mahnung den Mitgliederbeitrag schuldig, kann es vom Vorstand \nPerson. \n4.3 AUSTRITT UND AUSSCHLUSS \nFür das angebrochene Jahr ist der volle Mitgliederbeitrag zu bezahlen. \nVereins ausgeschlossen werden. Der Vorstand fällt den Ausschlussentsch Mitgliederversammlung weiterziehen. Bleibt ein Mitglied trotz Mahnung den M automatisch ausgeschlossen werden. 5. ORGANE DES VEREINS Die Organe des Vereins sind: - die Mitgliederversammlung - der Vorstand \n ",
" \n6. DIE MITGLIEDERVERSAMMLUNG \nEine ordentliche Mitgliederversammlung findet jährlich im ersten Quartal statt. Der Vorstand oder 1/5 der Aktivmitglieder können jederzeit die Einberufung einer ausserordentlichen Mitgliederversammlung unter Angaben des Zwecks verlangen. Die Versammlung hat spätestens 4 Wochen nach Eingang des Begehrens zu erfolgen. Zur Mitgliederversammlung werden sämtliche Mitglieder 14 Tage im Voraus schriftlich unter Angabe der Traktanden eingeladen. Traktandierungsanträge zuhanden der Mitgliederversammlung sind bis spätestens 3 Tage vor \nAngabe der Traktanden eingeladen. \nder Mitgliederversammlung schriftlich an den Vorstand zu richten. 6.1 AUFGABEN Der Mitgliederversammlung obliegen folgende Geschäfte: - Wahl des Präsidenten/der Präsidentin und der übrigen Vorstandsmitglieder - Genehmigung des Protokolls der letzten Mitgliederversammlung - Genehmigung des Jahresberichtes des Vorstands - Genehmigung der Jahresrechnung - Festsetzung des Mitgliederbeitrages - Entlastung des Vorstandes - Änderung der Statuten - Beschlussfassung über die Auflösung des Vereins und die Verwendung des Liquidationserlöses Jede ordnungsgemäss einberufene Mitgliederversammlung ist unabhängig von der A anwesenden Mitglieder beschlussfähig. \n6.1 AUFGABEN \n- Beschlussfassung über die Auflösung des Vereins und die Verwendung des Liquidationserlöses Jede ordnungsgemäss einberufene Mitgliederversammlung ist unabhängig von der Anzahl der anwesenden Mitglieder beschlussfähig. Die Mitglieder fassen die Beschlüsse mit dem einfachen Mehr. Bei Stimmgleichheit fällt die/der Präsident*in den Stichentscheid. Passivmitglieder sind vom Stimmrecht ausgeschlossen. Statutenänderungen benötigen die Zustimmung einer 3/4-Mehrheit der Stimmberechtigten. Über die gefassten Beschlüsse ist zumindest ein Beschlussprotokoll abzufassen. \nausgeschlossen. \n \n7. DER VORSTAND Der Vorstand besteht aus mindestens 2 Perso beträgt 1 Jahr. Eine Wiederwahl ist möglich. \nDer Vorstand besteht aus mindestens 2 Personen. Er konstituiert sich selber. Die Amtszeit beträgt 1 Jahr. Eine Wiederwahl ist möglich. Der Vorstand führt die laufenden Geschäfte und vertritt den Verein nach aussen. Er erlässt ",
"Reglemente. \nIm Vorstand sind folgende Personen vertreten: - Präsident*in - Vizepräsident*in - Finanzverantwortliche*r - Medien- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeite*r - Administrationsverantwortliche*r Eine Ämterkumulation ist möglich. \nDer Vorstand kann Arbeitsgruppen (Fachgruppen) einsetzen und für die Erreichung der Vereinsziele Personen gegen eine angemessene Entschädigung anstellen oder beauftragen. Der Vorstand verfügt über alle Kompetenzen, die nicht von Gesetzes wegen oder gemäss dieser Statuten einem anderen Organ übertragen sind. Der Vorstand versammelt sich, sooft es die Geschäfte verlangen. Jedes Vorstandsmitglied kann unter Angabe der Gründe die Einberufung einer Sitzung verlangen. Der Vorstand ist grundsätzlich ehrenamtlich tätig, er hat Anrecht auf Vergütung der effektiven \ndieser Statuten einem anderen Organ übertragen sind. \n Der Vors Spesen. \n8. ZEICHNUNGSBERECHTIGUNG Der Verein wird verpflichtet durch die Kollektivunterschri zusammen mit einem weiteren Mitglied des Vorstandes. \nDer Verein wird verpflichtet durch die Kollektivunterschrift des Präsidenten/der Präsidentin \n \n9. HAFTUNG \nFür die Schulden des Vereins haftet nur das Vereinsvermögen. Eine persönliche Haftung der Mitglieder ist ausgeschlossen, soweit untreue Geschäftsführung oder strafrechtliche \nHandlung ausgeschlossen werden können. 10. AUFLÖSUNG DES VEREINS Die Auflösung des Vereins kann durch Abstimmung ausserordentlichen Mitgliederversammlung und mi anwesenden Mitglieder beschlossen werden. \n \nDie Auflösung des Vereins kann durch Abstimmung einer ordentlichen oder ausserordentlichen Mitgliederversammlung und mit dem Stimmenmehr von 2/3 der anwesenden Mitglieder beschlossen werden. Nehmen weniger als 3/4 aller Mitglieder an der Versammlung teil, ist innerhalb eines Monats eine zweite Versammlung abzuhalten. An dieser Versammlung kann der Verein auch dann mit ",
"einfachem Mehr aufgelöst werden, wenn weniger als 3/4 der Mitglieder anwesend sind. Eine Fusion kann nur mit einer anderen wegen Gemeinnützigkeit oder öffentlichen Zwecks von der Steuerpflicht befreiten juristischen Person mit Sitz in der Schweiz erfolgen. Sie kann mit einer Dreiviertel-Mehrheit der Mitgliederversammlung beschlossen werden. Im Falle einer Auflösung werden Gewinn und Kapital einer anderen wegen Gemeinnützigkeit oder öffentlichen Zwecks steuerbefreiten juristischen Person mit Sitz in der Schweiz zugewendet. Die Verteilung des Vereinsvermögens unter die Mitglieder ist ausgeschlossen. \n \n11. INKRAFTTRETEN \nDie Revision der Statuten der Gründungsversammlung vom 9. Februar 2016 wurde von der Mitgliederversammlung vom xx.yy.2019 angenommen und ist mit diesem Datum in Kraft \ngetreten. "
] | https://solothurn-hilft.ch/partials/organisation/statutes.pdf |
[
"DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT (DMCA) NOTICE \n( ) Midwest Real Estate Data (MRED) complies with the provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). If you have a concern regarding the use of copyrighted material on any web site containing MRED listing content, please contact the agent designated to respond to reports alleging copyright infringement. Designated Agent: The designated agent for MRED to receive notification of claimed infringement under Title II of the DMCA is: Sarah Burke Rules and Regulations Manager [email protected] Midwest Real Estate Data LLC (MRED) 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 600 Lisle, Illinois 60532 630-955-2744 The DMCA specifies that all infringement claims must be in writing (either electronic mail or paper letter) and must include the following: 1. A physical or electronic signature of the copyright holder or a person authorized to act on his or her behalf; 2. A description of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed and multiple copyrighted works at a single online site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at that site; 3. A description of the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity, and information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to locate the material; 4. Information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to contact you, such as an address, telephone number, and, if available, an electronic mail address; 5. A statement that you have a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; and 6. A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that you are authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. "
] | http://www.mredllc.com/comms/resources/DMCA_Notice.pdf |
[
"<fig rect=[212.68310546875, 65.09510803222656, 399.3071594238281, 77.839111328125]></fig>\n<fig rect=[324.4193115234375, 477.5830078125, 576.6083374023438, 570.8760375976562]></fig>\n<fig rect=[36.4193000793457, 477.5830078125, 288.7063293457031, 601.4760131835938]></fig>\n<fig rect=[36.4193000793457, 526.9459838867188, 55.025306701660156, 534.5059814453125]></fig>\n<fig rect=[230.89700317382812, 744.7508544921875, 575.9999389648438, 752.8218994140625]></fig>\n<fig rect=(35.0400390625, 86.39999389648438, 577.2000122070312, 443.5199890136719)></fig>"
] | https://images.restorationhardware.com/content/catalog/tearsheets/Furniture_WickerCare.pdf |
[
"<fig rect=[60.94490051269531, 131.89202880859375, 493.0257873535156, 230.83929443359375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[60.94490051269531, 303.9916076660156, 266.572998046875, 337.0956115722656]></fig>\n<fig rect=[60.94490051269531, 715.0211181640625, 528.4473876953125, 770.5718994140625]></fig>\n<fig rect=(420.2786560058594, 30.058135986328125, 565.2744750976562, 129.38531494140625)></fig>",
"GWPF REPORTS\nViews expressed in the publications of the Global Warming Policy Foundation are those of the authors, not those of the GWPF, its Trustees, its Academic Advisory Council members or its Directors.\nTHE GLOBAL WARMING POLICY FOUNDATION Director Dr Benny Peiser\nBOARD OF TRUSTEES\nSir Martin Jacomb Henri Lepage Baroness Nicholson Lord Turnbull\nLord Lawson (Chairman) Lord Barnett Lord Donoughue Lord Fellowes Rt Rev Peter Forster Bishop of Chester\nACADEMIC ADVISORY COUNCIL\nProfessor Richard Lindzen Professor Ross McKitrick Professor Robert Mendelsohn Professor Sir Alan Peacock Professor Ian Plimer Professor Gwyn Prins Professor B P Radhakrishna Professor Paul Reiter Dr Matt Ridley Sir Alan Rudge Professor Philip Stott Professor Richard Tol Dr David Whitehouse\nProfessor David Henderson (Chairman) Adrian Berry (Viscount Camrose) Sir Samuel Brittan Sir Ian Byatt Professor Robert Carter Professor Vincent Courtillot Professor Freeman Dyson Christian Gerondeau Dr Indur Goklany Professor William Happer Professor Terence Kealey Professor Anthony Kelly Professor Deepak Lal",
"<sub>The Truth About Greenhouse Gases </sub>\nThe Truth About Greenhouse Gases \nProfessor William Happer William Happer is the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton University. He is a member of the GWPF’s Academic Advisory Council.\n<sub>1</sub>",
"The Truth About Greenhouse Gases <sub>1</sub>\n“The object of the Author in the following pages has been to collect the most remarkable instances of those moral epidemics which have been excited, sometimes by one cause and sometimes by another, and to show how easily the masses have been led astray, and how imitative and gregarious men are, even in their infatuations and crimes,” wrote Charles Mackay in the preface to the first edition of his Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds . I want to discuss a contemporary moral epidemic: the notion that increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, notably carbon dioxide, will have disastrous \nconsequences for mankind and for the planet. This contemporary “climate crusade” has much in common with the medieval crusades Mackay describes, with true believers, opportunists, cynics, money-hungry governments, manipulators of various types, and even children’s crusades.\nCarbon dioxide \nI am a strong supporter of a clean environment. We need to be vigilant to keep our land, air and waters free of real pollution, particulates, heavy metals, pathogens, but carbon dioxide (CO2) is not one of these pollutants. Carbon is the stuff of life. Our bodies are made of carbon. Every day a normal human exhales around 1 kg of CO2 -- the simplest chemically stable molecule of carbon in the earth’s atmosphere. Before the industrial period, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere was about 270 parts per million (ppm). At the present time, the concentration is about 390 ppm, 0.039% of all atmospheric molecules and less than 1% of that in our breath. About fifty million years ago, a brief moment in the long history of life on earth, geological evidence indicates, CO2 levels were several thousand ppm, much higher than now. And life flourished abundantly.\n1 “The Truth About Greenhouse Gases” appeared in the June/July issue of First Things (www.firstthings.com) and a slightly revised version is published here with permission. \n<sub>2</sub>",
"<sub>The Truth About Greenhouse Gases </sub>\nNow the Environmental Protection Agency wants to regulate atmospheric CO2 as a “pollutant.” According to my Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, to pollute is “to make or render unclean, to defile, to desecrate, to profane.” By breathing are we rendering the air unclean, defiling or desecrating it? Efforts are underway to remedy the old-fashioned, restrictive definition of pollution. The current Wikipedia entry on air pollution, for example, now asserts that pollution includes: “carbon dioxide (C02)—a colorless, odorless, non-toxic greenhouse gas associated with ocean acidification, emitted from sources such as combustion, cement production, and respiration.” \nWallis Simpson, the woman for whom King Edward VIII renounced the British throne, supposedly said “A woman can’t be too rich or too thin.” But in reality, you can get too much or too little of a good thing. Whether we should be glad or worried about increasing levels of CO2 depends on quantitative numbers, not just qualitative considerations.\nAs far as green plants are concerned, CO2 is not a pollutant, but part of their daily bread—like water, sunlight, nitrogen, and other essential elements. Most green plants evolved at CO2 levels of several thousand ppm, many times higher than now. Plants grow better and have better flowers and fruit at higher CO2 levels. Commercial greenhouse operators recognize this when they artificially increase the CO2 concentrations inside their greenhouses to over 1000 ppm. \nHow close is the current atmosphere to the upper or lower limit for CO2—or to some optimum intermediate level? Did we have just the right concentration of CO2 at the preindustrial level of 270 ppm? Reading breathless media reports about CO2 “pollution” and about minimizing our “carbon footprints,” one might think that the earth cannot have \ntoo little CO2, a bit like Wallis Simpson’s view on thinness. This view was overstated, as we have seen from the sad effects anorexia in so many young women. Various geo-engineering schemes are being discussed for scrubbing CO2 from the air. Why not scrub it all out? Humans would be perfectly healthy in a world with no atmospheric CO2 -- except that we would have nothing to eat and a few other minor inconveniences -- most plants stop growing if CO2 levels drop much below 150 ppm. If we \n<sub>3</sub>",
"want to continue to be fed and clothed by the products of green plants we can have too little CO2. The preindustrial value of 270 ppm CO2 may well have been below the optimum level, we are probably better off with our current 390 ppm, and we would be better off with still more CO2. For example, there is evidence that California orange groves are about 30 percent more productive today than they were 150 years ago because of the increase of atmospheric CO2.\nAlthough humans and many other animals would do just fine with no CO2 at all in the air, there is an upper limit that we can tolerate. Inhaling air with a CO2 concentration of a few per cent, similar to the \nconcentration of the air we exhale, hinders the diffusional exchange of CO2 between the blood and gas in the lung. Both the United States Navy (for submariners) and NASA (for astronauts) have performed extensive studies of human tolerance to CO2. As a result of these studies, the Navy recommends an upper limit of about 8000 ppm for cruises of ninety days, and NASA recommends an upper limit of 5000 ppm for missions of one thousand days, both assuming a total pressure of one atmosphere. Higher levels are acceptable for missions of only a few days.\nWe conclude that atmospheric CO2 levels should be above about 150 ppm to avoid harming green plants and below about 5000 ppm to avoid harming people. That is a big range, and our atmosphere is much closer to the lower end than the upper end. We were not that far from CO2 anorexia when massive burning of fossil fuels began. At the current rate of burning fossil fuels, we are adding about 2 ppm of CO2 per year to the atmosphere, so getting from our current level to 1000 ppm would take about 300 years—and 1000 ppm is still less than what most plants would prefer, and much less than either the NASA or the Navy limit.\nYet there are strident calls for immediately stopping further increases in CO2 levels and reducing the current level (with 1990 levels the arbitrary benchmark). As we have discussed, animals would not even notice a doubling of CO2 and plants would love it. The supposed reason for limiting CO2 is to stop global warming—or since the predicted warming has failed to be nearly as large as computer models forecast—to stop climate change. Climate change itself has been embarrassingly \n<sub>4</sub>",
"<sub>The Truth About Greenhouse Gases </sub>\nuneventful, so another rationale for reducing CO2 is now promoted: to stop the hypothetical increase of extreme climate events like hurricanes or tornados. But dispassionate data show that the frequency of extreme events has hardly changed and in some cases has decreased in the 150 years that it has taken CO2 levels to increase from 270 ppm to 390 ppm.\nThe effects of CO2 \nLet me turn to some of the problems the non-pollutant CO2 is supposed to cause. CO2 does indeed cause some warming of our planet, and we should thank Providence for that, because without the greenhouse warming of CO2 and its more potent partners, water vapor and clouds, the earth would be too cold to sustain its current abundance of life. Other things being equal, more CO2 will cause more warming. The question is how much warming, and whether the increased CO2 and the warming it causes will be good or bad for the planet. More CO2 is supposed to cause cities to flood, parched agriculture, tropical diseases in Alaska, etc., and even an epidemic of kidney stones.\nThe argument starts something like this. CO2 levels have increased from about 270 ppm to 390 ppm over the past 150 years or so, and the earth has warmed by about 0.8 C during that time. Therefore the warming is due to CO2. But correlation is not causation. The local rooster crows every morning at sunrise, but that does not mean the rooster caused the sun to rise. The sun will still rise on Monday if you decide to have the rooster for Sunday dinner.\nThere have been many warmings and coolings in the past when the CO2 levels did not change. A well known example is the medieval warming, about the year 1000, when the Vikings settled Greenland (when it was greener) and wine was exported from England. This warm period was followed by the “Little Ice Age” when the Thames would frequently freeze over during the winter. There is no evidence for significant increase of CO2 at the Medieval Warm Period, nor for a significant decrease at the time of the subsequent Little Ice Age. Documented famines with millions of deaths occurred during the Little Ice Age because of crop failures due \n<sub>5</sub>",
"to cold weather. The earth has been warming in fits and starts since the end of the Little Ice Age, a few centuries ago, and humanity’s quality of life has improved accordingly.\nA rare case of good correlation between CO2 levels and temperature is provided by ice-core records of the cycles of glacial and interglacial periods of the last million years of so. But these records show that changes in temperature preceded changes in CO2 levels, so that CO2 levels were an effect of temperature changes. Much of this was probably due to outgassing of CO2 from the warming oceans or the reverse on cooling. The most recent continental ice sheets began to melt some twenty \nthousand years ago. During the “Younger Dryas” some 12,000 years ago, the earth very dramatically cooled and warmed -- as much 10 C in fifty years -- with no apparent change in CO2 levels, and with life -- including our human ancestors -- surviving the rapid change in temperature just fine.\nThe earth’s climate has always been changing. Our present global warming is not at all unusual by the standards of geological history, and the mild warming is probably benefiting the biosphere. Indeed, there is very little correlation between the estimates of CO2 levels in the atmosphere and the estimates of the earth’s temperature over the past 550 million years (the “phanerozoic” period). The message is clear that several factors must influence the earth’s temperature, and that while CO2 is one of these factors, it is seldom the dominant one. Other factors that influence the earth’s temperature are spontaneous variations of the complicated fluid flow patterns in the oceans and atmosphere of the earth (perhaps influenced by continental drift), volcanoes, variations of the earth’s orbital parameters (ellipticity, spin-axis orientation, etc.), asteroid and comet impacts, variations in the sun’s output (not only the visible radiation but the amount of ultraviolet light, and the solar wind with its magnetic field), variations in cosmic rays leading to variations in cloud cover, and other causes.\n<sub>6</sub>",
"<sub>The Truth About Greenhouse Gases </sub>\nThe Hockey Stick \nThe existence of the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period was an embarrassment to the global-warming establishment because it showed that the current warming is almost indistinguishable from previous warmings and coolings that had nothing to do with burning of fossil fuels. The organization charged with producing scientific support for the climate crusade, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), finally found a solution. They rewrote the climate history of the past 1000 years with the celebrated “hockey stick” temperature record. The first IPCC report, issued in 1990, showed both the Medieval Warm \nPeriod and the Little Ice Age very clearly. In the IPCC’s 2001 report was a graph that purported to show the earth’s mean temperature since the year 1000. A yet more extreme version of the hockey stick graph made the cover of the 50th Anniversary Report of the United Nation’s World Meteorological Organization. To the surprise of everyone who knew about the strong evidence for the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period, the graph showed a nearly constant temperature from the year 1000 until about 150 years ago, when the temperature began to rise abruptly like the blade of a hockey stick. The inference was that this was due to the anthropogenic “pollutant” CO2. \nThis damnatia memoriae of inconvenient truths was simply expunged from the 2001 IPCC report, much as Trotsky and Yezhov were removed from Stalin’s photographs by accommodating dark-room specialists in the later years of the dictator’s reign. There was no explanation for why both the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age, very clearly shown in the 1990 report, had simply disappeared eleven years later.\nThe IPCC and its worshipful supporters did their best to promote the \nhockey-stick temperature curve. But as John Adams remarked, “Facts are stubborn things, and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” The hockey stick curve caught the attention of two Canadians, Steve McIntyre, a retired mining consultant, and an academic statistician, Ross McKitrick. As they began to look more carefully at the original data—much of it from tree rings—and at the \n<sub>7</sub>",
"analysis that led to the hockey stick, they became more and more puzzled. By hard, remarkably detailed, and persistent work over many years, consistently frustrated in their efforts to obtain original data and data-analysis methods, they showed that the hockey stick was not supported by observational data. An excellent, recent history of this episode is Andrew Montford’s The Hockey Stick Illusion .\nAbout the time of the Copenhagen Climate Conference in the fall of 2009, another nasty thing happened to the global-warming establishment. A Russian server released large numbers of e-mails and other files from computers of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the \nUniversity of East Anglia. Among the files released were e-mails between members of the power structure of the climate crusade, “the team.” These files were, or should have been, very embarrassing to their senders and recipients. A senior scientist from CRU wrote, for example: “PS, I’m getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a Freedom Of Information Act.” One of the most consistent themes of the e-mails is the need to hide raw data from anyone outside the team. Why the obsession on withholding data? Because the hockey stick lost credibility when it was possible to see the raw, unmanipulated data on which it was based.\nPeer review\nA traditional way to maintain integrity in science is through peer review, the anonymous examination of a scientific paper by qualified, competing scientists before publication. In a responsible peer review, the authors may be required to make substantial revisions to correct any flaws in the science or methodology before their paper is published. But peer review has completely failed in climate science. Global warming alarmists have something like Gadaffi’s initial air superiority over rag-tag opponents in Libya. Consider this comment from one of the most respected IPCC leaders, as revealed in the CRU e-mails: “I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin [Trenberth] and I will keep them out somehow—even if we have to redefine what \n<sub>8</sub>",
"<sub>The Truth About Greenhouse Gases </sub>\nthe peer-review literature is.” And consider the CRU e-mail comment on a journal that committed the mortal sin of publishing one of the heretical papers: “I think we have to stop considering Climate Research as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal.” \nPeer review in climate science means that the ”team” recommends publication of each other’s work, and tries to keep any off-message paper from being accepted for publication. Why this obsession with cleansing the “scientific” literature of any opposing views? Because \nit allows climate extremists to claim that they represent all of science and anyone who questions their message is at war with all of science, except for a few “flat-earthers”, “deniers,” or others scorned with carefully researched epithets, designed to discredit dissenting scientific opinion. All of this reminds me of the opposition in medieval Western Europe to the translation of the Bible into the vernacular. The Scriptures were useless for the large numbers of people who could read their own language, but who had not been privileged to learn to read Latin, Greek or Hebrew. The Climategate e-mails show the same fierce determination of “the team” to deny the general scientific public the chance to form their own conclusions about raw data --the old and the new testaments of science.\nIn the last half of the 18th century, “the Age of Enlightenment,” the founding fathers of the United States studied all political systems known to them, from the classical Greek city states to the Dutch republic. They hoped to select the best form of government for their new nation. One of them, James Madison, reminds his fellow citizens in The Federalist Papers: (The Federalist 10) “No man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause, because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity. With equal, nay with greater reason, a body of men are unfit to be both judges and parties at the same time.” Madison goes on to observe that the smaller the community, the more likely that parties and judges will be one and the same. Climate scientists are trying to convince the world that they are so righteous that they can judge their own cause. The notion that climate science should \n<sub>9</sub>",
"be immune to criticism from anyone outside of the “team” is warmly supported by the large numbers of people who stand to benefit from global warming hysteria, as well as by a few who have a sincere and touching faith in the incorruptibility of science.\nLet me summarize how the key issues appear to me, a working scientist with a better background than most in the physics of climate. CO2 really is a greenhouse gas and, other things being equal, adding CO2 to the atmosphere by burning coal, oil, and natural gas will modestly increase the surface temperature of the earth. Other things being equal, doubling the CO2 concentration, from our current 390 ppm to 780 ppm will directly cause about one degree Celsius warming. At the current rate of CO2 increase in the atmosphere —about 2 ppm per year— it would take about 195 years to achieve this doubling. The combination of a slightly warmer earth and more CO2 will greatly increase the production of food, wood, fiber, and other products by green plants, so the increased CO2 will be good for the planet, and will easily outweigh any negative effects. Supposed calamities like the accelerated rise of sea level, ocean acidification, more extreme climate, tropical diseases near the poles, etc. are greatly exaggerated.\n“Mitigation” and control efforts that have been proposed will enrich a favoured few with good political ties—at the expense of the great majority of mankind, including, especially, the poor and the citizens of developing nations. These efforts will make almost no change in earth’s temperature. Spain’s recent experiment with green energy destroyed several pre-existing jobs for every green job it created, and it was one of the reasons for the near bankruptcy of the country. \nClimate models\nThe frightening warnings that alarmists raise about the effects of doubling CO2 are based on computer models. These models assume that the direct warming effect of CO2 is multiplied by a large and positive “feedback factor” from CO2-induced changes in water vapor and clouds, which supposedly contribute much more to the greenhouse \n<sub>10</sub>",
"<sub>The Truth About Greenhouse Gases </sub>\nwarming of the earth than CO2. But there is observational evidence that the feedback factor is small and may even be negative. Climate models appear to fit the temperature rise over the last 150 years very well. But the values of various parameters like clouds and the concentrations of anthropogenic aerosols are adjusted to get the best fit to past observations. The real values of most parameters, and the physics of how they affect the earth’s climate, are in most cases only roughly known, too roughly to supply data accurate enough for computer predictions. The great mathematician John von Neumann once said, “With four parameters I can fit an elephant, and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.” Climate models have dozens of parameters, not unlike the epicycles of Ptolemaic astronomy. And they have done poorly at predicting the future. No model predicted the lack of net warming of the earth’s temperature that we have experienced over the past ten years.\nIn my judgment, and in that of many other scientists familiar with the issues, the main problem with models could well be their treatment of clouds and water vapor, changes of which can affect the earth’s temperature as much or more than changing levels of CO2. \nWhat is wrong with climate science?\nWhat, besides the bias toward a particular, desired result, is wrong with the science? Scientific progress proceeds by the interplay of theory and observation. Theory explains observations and makes predictions about what will be observed in the future. Observations anchor our understanding and weed out the theories that do not work. This has been the scientific method for more than three hundred years. Recently, the advent of the computer has made possible another branch of inquiry: computer simulation models. Properly used, computer models can enhance and speed up scientific progress. But they are not meant to replace theory and observation and to serve as an authority of their own. We know they fail in economics. All of the proposed controls that would have such a significant impact on the world’s economic future are based on computer models that are so complex and chaotic that many runs are needed before we can get an “average” answer. Yet the models \n<sub>11</sub>",
"have failed the simple scientific test of prediction. We don’t even have a theory for how accurate the models should be.\nThere are many honest, hardworking climate scientists who are trying to understand the effects of CO2 on climate, but their work has fallen under suspicion because of the hockey-stick scandal and many other exaggerations about the dangers of increasing CO2. What has transformed climate science from a normal intellectual discipline to a matter of so much controversy?\nA major problem has been the co-option of climate science by politics, ambition, greed, and what seems to be a hereditary human need for a righteous cause. What better cause than saving the planet, especially if one can get ample, secure funding at the same time? Huge amounts of money are available from governments and wealthy foundations for climate institutes and for climate-related research. Funding for climate studies is second only to funding for biological sciences. Large academic empires, prizes, elections to honorary societies, fellowships, consulting fees and other perquisites go to those researchers whose results may help “save the planet.” Every day we read about some real or contrived environmental or ecological effect “proved” to arise from global warming. The total of such claimed effects now runs in the hundreds, all the alleged result of an unexceptional century-long warming of less than one degree Celsius. Government subsidies, loan guarantees, and captive customers go to green companies. Carbon-tax revenues flow to governments. As the great Russian poet Pushkin said in his novella Dubrovsky, “If there happens to be a trough, there will be pigs.” Any doubt about apocalyptic climate scenarios could remove many troughs.\nMany Americans still remember the wise words of President Eisenhower in his farewell address of 1960, where he warned us against the “military- industrial complex.” Few remember the following paragraphs in the same speech:\n“Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades. In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing \n<sub>12</sub>",
"<sub>The Truth About Greenhouse Gases </sub>\nshare is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government. Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers. The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite. It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.” \nDoes this sound familiar? What would Eisenhower say about the frenzy over supposed human-induced climate change and the amazing scientific, industrial and governmental crusade that has coalesced around it?\nWhat about those who doubt the scientific basis of these claims, or who simply don’t like what is being done to the scientific method they were taught to apply and uphold? Publications of contrary research results in mainstream journals are rare. The occasional heretical article is the result of an inevitable, protracted battle with those who support the dogma and who control the levers of peer review. As mentioned above, we know from the Climategate emails that the team conspired to prevent contrary publications from seeing the light of day and even discussed getting rid of an editor who seemed to be inclined to admit such contentious material. \nSkeptics’ motives are publicly impugned; denigrating names are used routinely in media reports and in the blogosphere; and we now see attempts to use the same tactics that Big Brother applied to Winston \n<sub>13</sub>",
"Smith in Orwell’s 1984. In 2009, a conference of “ecopsychologists” was held at the University of West England to discuss the obvious psychological problems resident in those who do not adhere to the global warming dogma. These ecopsychologists, who knew almost nothing themselves about climate science, told us that scientists and members of the general population who express objective doubt about alarmist views of global warming are suffering from a kind of mental illness. We know from the Soviet experience that a totalitarian society can find it convenient to consider dissidents to be mentally deranged and act accordingly. \nThe role of scientific societies \nThe management of most scientific societies has enthusiastically signed on to the global warming bandwagon. This is not surprising, since government, as well as many states and foundations, generously fund those who reinforce their desired outcomes under the cover of saving the planet. Certain private industries are also involved: those positioned to profit from enacted controls as well as financial institutions heavily invested in “green technologies” – technologies whose rationale disappears the moment global warming is widely understood to be a non-problem. There are known connections and movements of people involved in government policy, scientific societies, private industry and foundations -- all with the common thread of influencing the outcome of a set of programs and investments underpinned by the supposed threat of global warming. \nMy own trade union, the American Physical Society (APS), is a good example, but hardly the worst. An APS Council statement issued on November 18, 2007 states: “The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now.” This is pretty strong language for physicists, for whom skepticism about evidence was once considered a virtue, and nothing was incontrovertible.\n<sub>14</sub>",
"<sub>The Truth About Greenhouse Gases </sub>\nIn the fall of 2009 a petition, organized by a Fellow of the American Physical Society, Roger Cohen, and containing the signatures of hundreds of distinguished APS members, was presented to the APS management with a request that at least the truly embarrassing word “incontrovertible” be taken out of the statement. The APS management’s response was to threaten the petitioners, while grudgingly appointing a committee to consider the request. It was exactly what James Madison warned against. The committee included members whose careers depended on global warming alarmism, and the predictable result was that not one word was changed. Bad as the actions of the APS leadership were, they were far better than those of most other scientific societies -- that rejected any reconsideration of extreme statements by the society leadership on climate.\nThe situation is even more lamentable for the general public, which is fed a constant stream of propaganda by specialists in environmental issues from the mainstream media and well-funded alarmist blogs. Not unlike functionaries of Orwell’s Ministry of Truth in 1984, with its motto “Ignorance is Strength,” many of the environmental news media dutifully and uncritically promote the party line of the climate crusade. \nBut Abraham Lincoln got it right when he (supposedly) said, “You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.” The situation is slowly getting better. Skeptics are more numerous and better organized than before. In a few cases, leading former adherents have publicly and courageously spoken out against the dogma and its core of establishment promoters. The IPCC itself has come under severe criticism by the international scientific establishment for its series of bizarre errors and organizational failings. Under pressure from a dissident group of Fellows, the Royal Society moved to meaningfully moderate its former radically alarmist position on global warming. And perhaps most important of all, public skepticism has increased significantly, and with it has come a major drop in support of the climate crusade’s attempt to seize control of the “pollutant,” CO2.\n<sub>15</sub>",
"Conclusion\nI began with a quote from the preface of the first edition of Mackay’s Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds , and I will end with a quote from the preface of the second edition: “Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one.” In our efforts to conserve the beautiful planet that is our home, we should not fixate on CO2. We should instead focus on issues like damage to local landscapes and waterways by strip mining, inadequate cleanup, hazards to underground miners, the excessive release of real pollutants \nsuch as mercury, other heavy metals, organic carcinogens, etc. Much of the potential harm from strip mining can be eliminated, for example, by requirements that the land be restored to a condition that is as least as good as, and preferably better than, when the mining began. And it is high time that we assess great expanses of windmills and solar-panels in the previously unspoiled open spaces of the world with the same objectiveness that we apply to other human perturbations of nature. Looking at once beautiful hilltops, now cluttered with windmills, I am reminded of an exchange between Winston Churchill and a woman who indignantly said, “Sir, you are drunk.” Churchill responded, “Madam, you are ugly. In the morning I shall be sober.” The hilltops will be ugly for a long, long time.\nLife is about making decisions and decisions are about trade-offs. We can choose to promote investment in technology that addresses real problems and scientific research that will let us cope with real problems more efficiently. Or we can be caught up in a crusade that seeks to suppress energy use, economic growth, and the benefits that come from the creation of wealth for all of mankind.\n<sub>16</sub>",
"<fig rect=[74.17320251464844, 119.3314208984375, 359.2318115234375, 201.5921630859375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[74.17320251464844, 217.3314208984375, 369.58184814453125, 383.5921630859375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[74.17320251464844, 399.3314208984375, 364.9417419433594, 467.5921630859375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[74.17320251464844, 503.3314208984375, 364.1709289550781, 587.5921630859375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[74.17320251464844, 678.46533203125, 352.6817626953125, 702.72607421875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[74.17320251464844, 714.46533203125, 324.88525390625, 810.72607421875]></fig>\n<fig rect=(432.1420593261719, 668.9766235351562, 530.0787353515625, 736.066650390625)></fig>"
] | http://thegwpf.org/images/stories/gwpf-reports/happer-the_truth_about_greenhouse_gases.pdf |
[
"42 45 44 43 41 40 39 38 37 36 35\n1. Распечатайте этот листок на принтере А4 в 100% размере 2. Убедитесь, что эталонный отрезок внизу равен 5 см. 3. Положите листок на твердую, ровную поверхность 4. Поместите правую ступню на листок 5. Проверьте чтобы пятка заканчивалась на “Линии пятки” 6. Посмотрите на какой отметке находится конец большого пальца ноги. Цифра слева - ваш размер обуви. ИЗМЕРИТЕЛЬ РАЗМЕРА НОГИ\nВНИМАНИЕ!!! Перед началом опеределения размера ноги измерьте отрезок слева линейкой. Отрезок должен быть равен 5 см. Если размер отличается более чем на 2мм, размер будет определен неверно!\nЛиния пятки"
] | http://www.board-strana.ru/images/promo/footmeter.pdf |
[
"Roteiro do que é verificado quando a dissertação ou tese chega na biblioteca para ser inserida na Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações (BDTD) da UEPG. Roteiro de revisão das dissertações e teses enviadas para publicação na TEDE \n Item Existe Observações \n( ) Sim ( ) Não \nMargens padronizadas ( ) Sim ( ) Não Papel A4 padrão ( ) Sim ( ) Não Espaçamento 1, 5cm ( ) Sim ( ) Não \n( ) Sim ( ) Não ( ) Sim ( ) Não ( ) Sim ( ) Não ( ) Sim ( ) Não ( ) Sim ( ) Nã ( ) Sim ( ) Não \nFolhas pré-textuais completas Folhas pré-textuais na ordem correta Resumo e Abstracts entre 250 e 500 palavras Resumo e Abstracts com palavras-chave e/ou keywords Listas e sumários na mesma ordem do texto e na mesma grafia Ficha catalográfica padronizada e local correto? \nReferências completas ( ) Sim ( ) Não \n( ) Sim ( ) Não \nAutores citados no texto na lista de referências \nEstrutura das ( ) Sim ( ) Não ",
"ilustrações corretas Citações padronizadas Páginas pós-textuais na ordem correta Termo de autorização Para publicação eletrônica BDTD Arquivo desprotegido formato PDF \nCitações padronizadas ( ) Sim ( ) Não \n( ) Sim ( ) Não ( ) Sim ( ) Não \n( ) Sim ( ) Não \n"
] | https://tede2.uepg.br/jspui/doc2.pdf |
[
"<fig rect=[323.1600036621094, 38.7047119140625, 563.2415771484375, 78.74375915527344]></fig>\n<fig rect=[54.0, 87.16502380371094, 362.5604248046875, 106.46379089355469]></fig>\n<fig rect=[54.0, 112.60569763183594, 126.71479034423828, 708.7056274414062]></fig>\n<fig rect=[56.579986572265625, 120.98379516601562, 382.5849304199219, 199.1069793701172]></fig>\n<fig rect=[74.45999908447266, 236.56927490234375, 365.4992370605469, 379.9985046386719]></fig>\n<fig rect=[375.1199951171875, 366.20379638671875, 377.50042724609375, 377.1838073730469]></fig>\n<fig rect=[394.97998046875, 101.87942504882812, 545.02734375, 392.6481628417969]></fig>\n<fig rect=[56.040000915527344, 390.8636779785156, 377.24664306640625, 455.5423583984375]></fig>\n<fig rect=[211.74591064453125, 472.17071533203125, 255.53927612304688, 508.29071044921875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[270.13751220703125, 557.918212890625, 377.66229248046875, 637.2449951171875]></fig>\n<fig rect=[212.44432067871094, 598.4592895507812, 228.76968383789062, 608.9592895507812]></fig>\n<fig rect=[150.5758056640625, 654.0112915039062, 169.05368041992188, 664.5112915039062]></fig>\n<fig rect=[174.36000061035156, 661.3385009765625, 373.168212890625, 733.0050048828125]></fig>\n<fig rect=[394.9800109863281, 397.8594055175781, 551.2298583984375, 716.9849853515625]></fig>\n<fig rect=[394.9800109863281, 731.4450073242188, 397.4623107910156, 742.4249877929688]></fig>\n<fig rect=[54.0, 727.5237426757812, 524.4028930664062, 765.3828125]></fig>\n<fig rect=(49.54316711425781, 21.78643798828125, 195.79315185546875, 76.53643798828125)></fig>",
"Postsecondary Enrollment for 2011 Graduates: District Report Where did most 2011 graduates enroll after high school graduation? \n \nWhere did most 2011 graduates enroll after high school graduation? How did postsecondary enrollment compare for 2011 and 2010 graduates of high schools? Postsecondary institution Number Percenta Austin Community College 1168 Texas State University - San Marcos 255 University Of Texas - Austin 224 University Of Texas - San Antonio 136 Texas A&M University 86 St Edwards University 64 Blinn College 48 University of North Texas 35 Texas Tech University 33 Everest Institute - Austin 28 Source . National Student Clearinghouse, July 2012 Top ten colleges. Forty-one percent of AISD graduates enrolled in college were enrolled in Austin Community College (ACC) the year after graduation. In 2011, Texas Tech University and Everest Institute replaced the University of Houston and Texas Christian University on the “Top 10 List” of colleges for AISD graduates. <sub> </sub> Comparison by high school. Almost every AISD high school experienced an increase in postsecondary enrollment for its graduates, compared with enrollment the prior year. Seven high schools had an increase of 5 percentage points or more. Postsecondary enrollment in 4-year institutions for the 2011 graduates of Garza High School increased 12 percentage points, from 7% to 19%. 22% 25% 26% 28% 13% 28% 46% 32% 28% 29% 29% 24% 34% 22% 18% 39% 12% 75% 20% 7% 14% 27% 50% 44% 50% 21% 44% 43% 65% 40% 87% 48% 53% 46% 54% 80% 72% 75% 55% 34% 32% 33% 29% 12% 31% 39% 32% 37% 30% 34% 27% 35% 17% 14% 42% 17% 75% 30% 19% 12% 24% 53% 40% 55% 24% 51% 46% 75% 46% 87% 61% 57% 44% 61% 83% 74% 82% 59% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100 Travis Reagan McCallum Lanier LASA LBJ Garza Eastside Crockett Bowie Austin Anderson Akins Class of 2010 2-year Class of 2010 4-year Class of 2011 2-year Class of 2011 4-ye Percentage of Graduates Enrolled Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Source . National Student Clearinghouse, July 2012. Note Each enrollment percentage was rounded to the nearest whole number and the total percentage enrolled may\nPostsecondary institution Number Percentage Austin Community College 1168 41% Texas State University - San Marcos 255 9% University Of Texas - Austin 224 8% University Of Texas - San Antonio 136 5% Texas A&M University 86 3% St Edwards University 64 2% Blinn College 48 2% University of North Texas 35 1% Texas Tech University 33 1% Everest Institute - Austin 28 1% Source . National Student Clearinghouse, July 2012 \n Top ten colleges. Forty-one percent of AISD graduates enrolled in college were enrolled in Austin Community College (ACC) the year after graduation. In 2011, Texas Tech University and Everest Institute replaced the University of Houston and Texas Christian University on the “Top 10 List” of colleges for AISD graduates. <sub> </sub>\nm\nHow did postsecondary enrollment compare for 2011 and 2010 graduates of high schools? \n Comparison by high school. Almost every AISD high school experienced an increase in postsecondary enrollment for its graduates, compared with enrollment the prior year. Seven high schools had an increase of 5 percentage points or more. Postsecondary enrollment in 4-year institutions for the 2011 graduates of Garza High School increased 12 percentage points, from 7% to 19%. Percentage of Graduates Enrolled\nPercentage of Graduates Enrolled Class of 2010 Class of 2011 \nPage 2 of 8 -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Class of 2010 2-year Class of 2010 4-year Class of 2011 2-year Class of 2011 4-year Source . National Student Clearinghouse, July 2012. Note. Each enrollment percentage was rounded to the nearest whole number, and the total percentage enrolled may differ from the sum of 2- and 4- year enrollment percentages. \n",
"Postsecondary Enrollment for 2011 Graduates: District Report \n \nHow did postsecondary enrollment vary by student demographic groups? \nComparison by student groups. Postsecondary enrollment increased for all race/ethnicity groups in the Class of 2011, compared with comparable data for Class of 2010. Postsecondary enrollment rates increased the most for Hispanic and African American graduates (i.e., by 19 and 15 percentage points, respectively). The postsecondary enrollment of limited English proficient (LEP) graduates increased by 9 percentage points for the Class of 2011, compared with postsecondary enrollment of LEP graduates in the Class of 2010. Postsecondary enrollment for Career and Technical Education (CTE) students and non-CTE students was similar for the Class of 2011. Economically disadvantaged students were more likely to be enrolled in a postsecondary institution if they also were categorized as a CTE concentrator ( Pazera, 2011 ). \nPercentage of Graduates Enrolled Class of 2010 Class of 2011 \n \n 32% 27% 30% 27% 24% 27% 31% 25% 23% 31% 31% 19% 7% 28% 28% 34% 35% 5% 38% 4% 41% 19% 48% 51% 21% 32% 67% 60% 32% 37% 65% 62% 35% 66% 28% 68% 50% 73% 74% 52% 63% 86% 67% 60% 65% 36% 30% 28% 32% 34% 31% 37% 26% 22% 37% 35% 29% 27% 33% 31% 31% 31% 38% 5% 40% 4% 39% 20% 53% 57% 22% 29% 58% 37% 36% 34% 39% 68% 69% 33% 72% 37% 70% 57% 78% 79% 59% 64% 87% 64% 69% 65% 70% CTE concentrator Non-CTE concentrator Special education (SPED) Not SPED Limited English proficienct (LEP) Not LEP Economically disadvantaged Not Economically disadvantaged White Hispanic African American Asian/Pacific Islander American Indian/ Alaskan Native Two or more races Male Female\n-100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2-year 4-year 2-year 4-year \nPage 3 of 8 Source . National Student Clearinghouse, July 2012. Notes . Two or more races was reported for the first time for the Class of 2011. CTE concentrators are students who have taken a sequence of career and technical education courses. For more information about CTE, refer to this report . \n",
"Postsecondary Enrollment for 2011 Graduates: District Report \n \nDid enr What w Predic learn w model gradua greate predic 2011. H Sourc Most st institut graduat 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Aspirat student college reporte who co institut \nDid enrollment vary according to “predictors of postsecondary enrollment? \n Predictors of enrollment. DRE staff conducted a study (2008) using data from the AISD Class of 2007 to learn which student characteristics predicted enrollment in a postsecondary institution. This study was modeled after research from the Chicago Consortium of School Research . Overall, the percentages of graduates who met predictive criteria and enrolled in a postsecondary institution the following year were greater than those who did not meet predictive criteria. This figure lists the predictors from the AISD predictive study that continued to be strong influences on postsecondary enrolment applied to the Class of 2011. Percentage of Graduates Enrolled\n Percentage of Graduates Enrolled Did not meet criteria Met criteria \n30% 32% 39% 30% 30% 33% 42% 35% 26% 33% 33% 19% 71% 67% 66% 63% 63% 53% 31% 22% 34% 34% 31% 30% 49% 64% 50% 47% 46% 32% 80% 86% 84% 81% 77% 62% \n High interaction w/ campus adult At least 4 college applications Completed FAFSA Top quartile senior year Good attendance senior year Passed 8th grade math TAKS\n-100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2-year 4-year 2-year 4-year\n <sub> </sub> Source s. AISD academic , NSC enrollment, federal FAFSA completion, andAISD High School Exit Survey records, 2012. \nWhat was the “aspiration gap” for the Class of 2011? \n Aspiration gap . Aspiring to go to college requires students to complete preparation milestones. Assuming students have been preparing academically, district staff make concerted efforts to help seniors complete college admissions and financial aid applications. On the district’s senior exit survey * , most seniors reported making college enrollment plans and applying to college. However, the percentages of students who completed the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) or enrolled in a postsecondary institution were lower than those who planned to enroll or filled out a college application. \n Most students who completed postsecondary enrollment milestones enrolled in a postsecondary institution. FAFSA completion appears to be an important factor in their enrollment, given that 84% of graduates who enrolled had completed a FAFSA . Intended to enroll* Applied* Completed FAFSA Enrolled Class of 2011 92% 90% 54% 68% Class of 2010 92% 87% 54% 62% \n44% 47% 50% 36% 33% 32% 34% 31% 23% 22% 16% 32% Intended to enroll* Applied* FAFSA Enrolled\n Not enrolled 2-year college 4-year college\n31% \nPage 4 of 8 ",
"Postsecondary Enrollment for 2011 Graduates: District Report \n \nDid college-goers from the Class of 2010 persist in their postsecondary enrollment for a second year? \n College freshman persistence ra in a postsecondary institution th graduates who did not enroll in a were found enrolled for the first students from the Class of 2010, high school graduation, an overa Class of 201 First-time Postseconda Enrollment in 2011-20 Enrolled, 22% ( n =334) Never enrolled, 78% ( n =1,200) 1st Year After Graduation 2 <sub>nd</sub> Year After Graduation Source . National Student Clearinghous\n College freshman persistence rate . Eighty-one percent of graduates from the Class of 2010 who enrolled in a postsecondary institution the year after high school enrolled for a second year. Of the AISD graduates who did not enroll in a postsecondary institution the year after high school graduation, 22% were found enrolled for the first time in the second year. Including both returning and first-time enrolling students from the Class of 2010, 59% were enrolled in a postsecondary institution in the second year after high school graduation, an overall decrease of 3% from the previous year. \nClass of 2010 Postsecondary Enrollment in 2010-2011 ( N = 4,073) \nNot enrolled by spring, 38% ( n =1,534) \nEnrolled by spring, 62% ( n =2,539) \n\n First-time Postsecondary Enrollment in 2011-2012 \n Postsecondary Enrollment Persistence in 2011-2012 \n Class of 2010 Postsecondary Enrollment in 2011-2012 \nNo longer enrolled, 19% ( n =471 ) \nStill enrolled, 81% ( n =2,068) \nNot enrolled, 41% (n=1,671) \n\nEnrolled, 59%( n =2,402) \n1st Year After Graduation 2 <sub>nd</sub> Year After Graduation \n\n\nSource . National Student Clearinghouse, July 2012. \nPage 5 of 8 ",
"Postsecondary Enrollment for 2011 Graduates: District Report \n \nDid postsecondary persistence \nDid postsecondary persistence differ among 2010 graduates at the local, state, and national levels? \nLocal, state, and national persistence rates . AISD’s college persistence rate exceeded state and national persistence rates of college freshmen. The National Center for Higher Education Management Systems reported 77% of first-year college students from the Class of 2010 across the nation returned to college for a second year, and in Texas, 73% of first-year college students from the Class of 2010 returned to college for a second year. Overall, students enrolled in 4-year institutions had higher return rates the following year than did students who were enrolled in 2-year institutions. \nClass of 2010 Postsecondary Persistence in 2011-2012 \nNational: 2-year institution Texas: 2-year institution AISD : 2-year institution National : 4-year institution Texas : 4-year institution AISD : 4-year institution AISD: All institutions\n54% 54% 70% 77% 73% 91% 81% \n0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%\n\nd d ff f Source . National Student Clearinghouse, July 2012. \nDid postsecondary persistence differ for 2010 graduates from various high schools? \nCampus persistence rates. Postsecondary persistence rates varied for the 2010 graduates according to the high school they attended. The high schools with the highest persistence rates also had the highest initial enrollment rates. Cl f P d P i i\nClass of 2010 Postsecondary Persistence in 2011-2012 \nTravis Reagan McCallum Lanier LASA LBJ Garza Eastside Crockett Bowie Austin Anderson Akins District\n72% 71% 84% 70% 96% 68% 73% 65% 74% 89% 83% 89% 76% 81% \n0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%\nSource . National Student Clearinghouse, July 2012. \n\nPage 6 of 8 ",
"Postsecondary Enrollment for 2011 Graduates: District Report Did postsecondary persistence differ among student groups? \n \nP a I A p c p y y \nPersistence by student groups. Rates of enrollment in a postsecondary institution in the second year after high school graduation varied among student groups within the Class of 2010. White, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaskan Native students had higher persistence rates than did African American and Hispanic students. Persistence rates among economically-disadvantaged, limited English proficient (LEP), and special education (SPED) students were lower than for students not meeting those criteria. While the relationship is not clearly understood at this time, it should be noted that greater percentages of Hispanic, economically disadvantaged, CTE concentrator, and LEP graduates enrolled in 2- year institutions than did their counterparts, and the persistence rates of all students who attended 2- year institutions were lower than for those attending 4-year institutions. \nClass of 2010 Postsecondary Enrollment Persistence in 2011-2012 \n CTE concentrator Non-CTE concentrators Special education Not special education Limited English profient Not limited English profient Economically disadvantaged Not economically disadvantaged White Hispanic African American Asian/Pacific Islander American Indian/Alaskan Native Male Female\n79% 82% 61% 83% 67% 83% 73% 86% 87% 76% 76% 94% 90% 78% 84% \n0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%\n \nSource . National Student Clearinghouse, July 2012. \nPage 7 of 8 ",
"<fig rect=[54.0, 24.98379135131836, 339.2252197265625, 85.24500274658203]></fig>\n<fig rect=[324.0091552734375, 38.42330551147461, 562.7889404296875, 49.40330505371094]></fig>\n<fig rect=[69.54000091552734, 92.36380004882812, 124.78043365478516, 103.34379577636719]></fig>\n<fig rect=[69.54000091552734, 117.80380249023438, 454.4557189941406, 128.78379821777344]></fig>\n<fig rect=[69.54000854492188, 133.21969604492188, 555.59228515625, 380.9394226074219]></fig>\n<fig rect=[69.1204833984375, 580.9649658203125, 179.20095825195312, 619.6636352539062]></fig>\n<fig rect=[198.716552734375, 580.9649658203125, 295.3000793457031, 649.3049926757812]></fig>\n<fig rect=[318.7799987792969, 580.9649658203125, 412.2452697753906, 634.0050048828125]></fig>\n<fig rect=[111.84332275390625, 651.5462036132812, 375.11956787109375, 693.8843994140625]></fig>\n<fig rect=[241.1999969482422, 698.2650146484375, 245.74525451660156, 722.625]></fig>\n<fig rect=[54.021820068359375, 740.9675903320312, 560.4061889648438, 765.1083374023438]></fig>\n<fig rect=(428.9437255859375, 571.592529296875, 553.3937377929688, 697.6925048828125)></fig>"
] | https://www.austinisd.org/sites/default/files/dre-reports/rb/12.28RB_Postsecondary_Enrollment_for_2011_Graduates_Austin_Independent_School_District_0.pdf |
[
"DEVIS : N°31688 DATE : 22.03.22 Code client : xxxx Adresse client : CONFIDENTIEL Nom : CONFIDENTIEL Adresse : CONFIDENTIEL\nExemple de Devis de couverture à Teuillac\nEntreprise de rénovation Situé à Teuillac Mail : [email protected] Devis de couverture à Teuillac\nSurface : La surface totale du chantier est de 16 m²\n \nProjet : Notre client souhaite réaliser : Pose de toiture bac acier et charpente . Dépose et repose d'ardoise . \nPose de toiture bac acier et charpente x 8m² Dépose et repose d'ardoise x 8m²\n( 1120 € 1200 €\nTOTAL 2320 €\nTotal HT = 2320 € TVA = 5.5 % TOTAL TTC = 2447.6 € Merci de nous retourner un exemplaire de pour accord et commande>> Pour l'entreprise : CONFIDENTIEL Notre site : https://gironde-couverture.pro\nAcompte de 20% à la commande : 464 € Accompte de 30% au début des travaux : 696 € Solde à la livraison, paiement comptant dès réception\nMerci de nous retourner un exemplaire de ce devis signé avec votre nom et revêtu de la mention <<Bon\nPour le client : à Teuillac, le 22.03.22 Bon pour accord et commande CONFIDENTIEL"
] | https://gironde-couverture.pro/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/devis-a-Teuillac-de-couverture-60724.pdf |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
YAML Metadata
Warning:
empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
(https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/datasets-cards)
Some stats for random 10 WAT files from CC (see GitHub for more info)
Stats for the links
| Number of PDF links |
|---|
| 131379 |
| Number of working PDF links from 10k sample |
|---|
| 3904 |
| sum(num_words) |
|---|
| 384953 |
| sum(num_tokens) |
|---|
| 715422 |
| avg(num_words) |
|---|
| 6999.145454545454 |
| avg(num_tokens) |
|---|
| 13007.672727272728 |
Stats for extracted data (for 100 random URLs)
1 process:
| total_processing_time | No error | FSTimeoutError | FileDataError cannot open broken document | Empty doc | ValueError Protocol not known: "http | TypeError _request() got an unexpected keyword argument 'target_options' | FileNotFoundError |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 147.385 | 54 | 17 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
5 processes:
| total_processing_time | No error | FSTimeoutError | FileDataError cannot open broken document | Empty doc | ValueError Protocol not known: "http | FileNotFoundError | TypeError _request() got an unexpected keyword argument 'target_options' |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.9343 | 53 | 17 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 1 |
10 processes:
| total_processing_time | No error | FSTimeoutError | Empty doc | FileDataError cannot open broken document | FileNotFoundError | TypeError _request() got an unexpected keyword argument 'target_options' | ValueError Protocol not known: "http |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.9258 | 55 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 2 |
- Downloads last month
- 7