Q:

Represent generic class inheritance in UML

Is this the correct way to represent the following code in a UML Class Diagram?
CODE:
public class CustomerRepository 
    : EntityFrameworkRepository<Customer>, ICustomerRepository 
{ }

UML:

A:

EDIT:
Realised first answer wasn't correct after posting.  The UML spec says (section 7.3.4):

A bound element has the same graphical notation as other Elements of
  that kind. A TemplateBinding is shown as a dashed arrow with the tail
  on the bound element and the arrowhead on the template and the keyword
  «bind». The binding information may be displayed as a comma-separated
  list of template parameter substitutions

I tried to create an example in MagicDraw:

For some reason it wouldn't let me enter the bind clause (contents of angle brackets on the dashed arrow): it should read <RepositoryType -> Customer>.  Also the RepositoryType parameter shouldn't be of type String (tool again).
The key point is: the parameter binding is specified on the binding relationship, not in the parameterised class.  Which means you can have multiple bindings with different types.
hth - apologies for the confusion.

