Q:

Elasticsearch highlighting: "multi-match" query on custom "_all"-fields created with "copy_to"

(Elasticsearch 5.2.2)
I'm having some trouble getting highlighting to work correctly.
My mapping has 2 custom created _all-fields myall1 and myall2 that are created via copy_to:
"mytype": {
  "_all": {
    "enabled": false
  },
  "properties": {
    "myall": {
        "type": "text",
        "analyzer": "standard",
        "store": true
    },
    "myall2": {
        "type": "text",
        "analyzer": "standard",
        "store": true
    },
    "field1": {
        "type": "text",
        "copy_to": "myall1",
        "analyzer": "keyword"
    },
    "field2": {
        "type": "text",
        "copy_to": "myall2",
        "analyzer": "keyword"
    }
}

A document would look like this:
{
  "field1": "example text",
  "field2": "another text"
}

Now I'm running a multi_match-query that boosts myall1 by 3:
POST /myindex/mytype/_search
{
  "query": {
    "bool": {
      "must": {
        "multi_match": {
          "fields": ["myall1^3", "myall2"],
          "type": "cross_fields",
          "query": "example text",
          "operator": "and"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

This works quite well. The problem is that I cannot highlight the original source-fields in the result.
I'm adding the following to the query the same way it is done in the ES-docs "_all example":
  ,
  "highlight": {
    "pre_tags": ["<span class='highlight'>"],
    "post_tags": ["</span>"],
    "fields": {
      "*": {"require_field_match": false}
    }
  }

This gives me only the highlighting in "myall1" and "myall2", NOT in the original fields "field1" and "field2".
If I do something similar by using the _all-field, everything works as expected.
The main difference is: I'm using multi_match while the examples use query_string.
Playing with "store":true and "analyzer":"standard" didn't help.
As my actual document uses nested-objects that must be searchable, I might not be able to do a completely different query-approach.
Is this by design or am I missing something?
Using the "_all"-field instead would not allow me to boost results the way I'm trying to implement it.

A:

Fixed it.
Seems that highlighting of the original fields requires them to use the same analyzer as the "copy-to" target field does.
Otherwise they simply won't show up.
I was using "analyzer":"keyword" before as I did not plan to do actual queries on those fields.
Now everything works as expected.

