Q:

resumbitted paper proper citation

For a CV/ grad school application, is there any benefit to noting that after a paper my group submitted to a peer-reviewed journal it was returned with comments from reviewers and we addressed them and resubmitted?
For example,
[1] A. Author et al., Brilliant Title That Draws Attention, Submitted to J. Phys. B, [arXiv:1908.12345]. 
versus
[1] A. Author et al., Brilliant Title That Draws Attention, Re-submitted after peer-review to J. Phys. B, [arXiv:1908.12345]. 
Or something like that?

A:

I think the few different statuses you would typically indicate are:

Submitted: after submission but before you’ve received any indication that it’s being reviewed
Under review: during the entire back and forth of reviews, revisions, rebuttals, etc.
Forthcoming (also called “In press”): once it’s been accepted but hasn’t yet been published.

As for formatting, it probably doesn't matter much as long as all the relevant info is there, but a few options to consider are:

[1] A. Author et al., Brilliant Title That Draws Attention, J. Phys. B, submitted August, 2019. Under review. [arXiv:1908.12345]

or

[1] A. Author et al., Brilliant Title That Draws Attention, under review at J. Phys. B, submitted August, 2019. [arXiv:1908.12345]

I'm sure you can find other examples elsewhere (such as this post).

