Should a tech founder look for a non-tech co-founder?
mdasen: It's a double edged sword.On the positive: they're good at marketing, getting in people's faces, getting the word out, getting people on board, etc.  I just can't talk to advertisers so I'd end up with AdWords getting less revenue.  I'd be bad at promoting the thing so there'd be fewer users.On the negative: most of them have no f'in clue what makes any sense in technology.  They don't use it enough.  Their ideas will be something like, "maybe we should do something like eBay, but with a better rating system".  They'll come up with a lot of nonsense that isn't useful - but they don't know that since they just don't use computers and the internet as much as we do.  Of course, they're a bit arrogant (it's why they're good in part one) so they think you should be following their lead.You need to find someone that can do part 1 without being so full of themselves that they think they know how to build a webapp and that you're just code in human form.  It's hard because most of those types like to think of themselves as the "idea person" rather than doing the work of promoting, forming partnerships, etc.  Their "idea" is crap and been done before.  You need someone to do the non-code heavy lifting.