Would you pay $5/yr for HN?
mdasen: No.Basically, part of the value (most?) of HN is that there are other people here.  Charging $5 would mean less content submitted and fewer comments.  If the NYTimes or WSJ tries to charge, it doesn't significantly change the content of their sites since they're both created top-down by paid writers and editors.When you're trying to monetize user-generated content, you can't try to do so in a way that will mean less user-generated content.  This is the same problem that Facebook has - their value is that you have so many users and content from those users, but if they start charging they won't have so many users and people will find another site to replace Facebook with.  Sure, one could make the argument that here a $5 fee could keep out some of the less desirable people, but it would also eliminate many of those who make the site desirable.  It's not that the content doesn't have enough value to be worth $5 to me, it's that once you start charging money, the value of the content drops as many won't pay for it.