Datasets:

tarekziade

/

profanity

like 2

Can't tell me shit, cuz ion care bitch.

Side note I would like to add that the subject is still subject to copyright investigation.

OK, cool. Keep me posted.

Tomato has been around for just a couple of months. I agree it could become a major project but needs more time. I guess HyperWRT could be considered a minor project now as it seems many HyperWRT users have hopped from HypertWRT to Tomato since Tofu wrote both. I think Tomato needs to be around longer before it is considered a major project. Talk

" Zbigniew Brzezinski pronunciation Hi, I've been enjoying your Polish audio samples. When you get some time, could you do one for Zbigniew Brzezinski? There's no urgency to it but maybe you could add it to your ""eventually"" list. He is still on American TV occasionally, and I think the US interviewers mangle his name pretty badly. 67.117.145.9 "

Good work on the Bupropion page.

"::::Oh yes, AtheismApologist knows more than the Ph.D. astrophysicist who wrote the article, as well as Lerner et al. who call the Inflaton ""hypothetical"". Hypothesizing about phase changes is hardly the same as producing a real physical mechanism to start and stop faster-than-light expansion of space. "

Your Mom Has A Penis!!!!! Wow, she is hella fat too.

" Vandalism Vandalism by I.P. address: 74.128.172.96 was removed. talk "

Another editor took down the CSD because he I misspelled Ryan as Ryan Kirkpatrick instead of Ryan kirkpatrick. There's a problem with the incident- Did it even happen? Is there any recent information this actually happened? What advice do you have? An article about something that may or may not have happened seems unencyclopedic to me till its known one way or another.

Then do it coward and get it over with.

nasty hoe

south park butters butters is a main character according to these links, thank you: [] [] [] read paragraphs 2,3, 5, 6,8 []

" Hello, to begin with, nobody ""works"" for Wikipedia as it is a volunteer project, but I am an adminstrator for the project. The problem that we have with the addition of text from non-free sources even by the copyright holder us that it is difficult to determine whether the person adding the text is who they claim to be or is the original author of the text; a further issue is that all edits to Wikipedia must by freely licensed and few commercial or governmental organisations are willing to do this. See, for example, your own assertion of copyright. Please also bear in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and that our content should be written with a neutral, dispassionate and scholarly tone. Text originally written for corporate promotion almost always needs to be rewritten to be appropriate for an encyclopedia. "

The recent bolivar devaluation occurred during holy week, a lowering purchasing power of the Venezuelan bolívar Norkys Batista, an artist who supports Henrique Capriles, was banned from performing due to her political beliefs against the state. While 500 tickets had been issued, the hotel stated it was due to her support of Henrique Capriles, the candidate running against Maduro.

Hi Hi you fucking retard. Flakes41 was not Creamy3, I am! I've never even heard of this Flakes41 joker. Eat shit and die you cum-guzzling cocksucker. Wikipedia sucks big donkey dick and so does that crusty old bitch you call your mother. Have a nice day.

". It is totally different from the football issue. I am not ""playing God"", I am applying normal practice as accepted by 99.9% of users"

about AFD. They haven't been inviting me along.

" Message to you, Mr Wales There are people I unequivocally despise. They lack morals, character, and honesty. They crush the remaining vestiges of democracy throughout the world. In case you can't tell, I'm talking about Mr. Jimbo Wales here. Let me cut to the chase: Wales says that everyone would be a lot safer if he were to monitor all of our personal communications and financial transactions—even our library records. Why on Earth does Wales need to monitor our library records? In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: Will Wales's shots to the heart of all that is wholesome buy him his long-sought victory for feckless charlatanism with its showy irreverence and glorification of all that is temeritous? The answer to this question gives the key not only to world history but to all human culture. The next time someone says that Wales's analects enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness, look that person right in the eye and reply, ""Wales is profoundly hostile to religious tolerance, democracy, and the notion of a secular civil society."" I plan to hone in on his faults with laser-like precision. This is a choice I have made; your choice is up to you. But let me remind you that when Wales says that he has a fearless dedication to reason and truth, that's just a load of spucatum tauri. It is our responsibility to ensure that he doesn't lock all the exits from our present state to the world of constructive reason. I state these facts only to give a bit of personal background as to why I fully intend to stop the Huns at the gate. That's the path that I have chosen. It's definitely not an easy path, but then again, Wales somehow manages to get away with spreading lies (society is supposed to be lenient towards impudent blackguards), distortions (his randy coalition is a respected civil-rights organization), and misplaced idealism (our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups). However, when I try to respond in kind, I get censored faster than you can say ""predisadvantageously"". Carnaptious primates are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the ""poeta nascitur, non fit"" that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that when I hear Wales say that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty, I have to wonder about him. Is he entirely bitter? Is he simply being mawkish? Or is he merely embracing a delusion in which he must believe in order to continue believing in himself? If you were to ask that of Wales, he'd certainly fling a large barrage of insults in your direction instead of actually addressing the question. He has spent untold hours trying to make empty promises. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that his strictures are a mockery of all that is fair and equitable? Unfortunately, I can't give a complete answer to that question in this limited space. But I can tell you that his tracts are not our only concern. To state the matter in a few words, unlike everyone else in the world, he seriously believes that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like him. Woo woooo! Here comes the clue train. Last stop: Wales. And that's it. Mr. Jimbo Wales is doing the very thing for which he criticizes others. "

A suggestion is to use info from Ships preserved in museums to re-write the intro to the article Museum ship it is currently not inclusive, and skewed to the US concept of the floating Memorial ship. Museum ships can encompass a range of different types, whether floating, in dry dock, or as static displays in museums. Then the proposed merge would make sense.

U of A hoes w/ the booties hangin out

I don't think I follow your logic on this one Pcarbonn. If we consider the Shkedi and Jones et. al. papers to be genuine academic papers, then their findings can be included. We should not elaborate any further than their authors do about their significance in the debate. We don't have a source saying why Fleischman left the field, so it can't be included.

Some crossword grids don't have black squares instead some gridlines are bold.

" POV talk section moved POV i've tried to clean things up a bit though someone else will have to remove the vandalistically applied christianity template lest i be reported for ""edit warring"" by humus. i've added a link to the christianity and judaism portals in the ""see also"" section. these links are more fitting than claiming this is ""part of the series on christianity"" this article was very heavy on anti-jfj stuff. a lengthy ""criticism"" section as well as criticisms inserted into nearly every other section. the missionaries are ""taught to speak in hebrew"" (these people already went to hebrew school!) and jfj is known to ""target vulnerable jews"" (oh really?) and ""most of the funding comes from christians"" (well did we think it was coming from muslims and religious jews?) and the current leader ""is not jewish"" (even though his mother, father, all grandparents were apparently jewish) some of the criticisms' references were just opinion pieces from religious jews who oppose conversion. most come from biased publications that don't meet wikipedia's reliable sources standards. including these references is analogous to editing the ""buddhism"" article to say that ""all buddhists will burn in hell"" along with a reference to some fire-n-brimstone website. anyway, if all we're trying to get across is that some, even many, jewish people and groups oppose jfj we don't need to spread it all over the article. it isn't at all surprising that religious jews don't want other jews to accept jesus every missionary movement is opposed by someone. Friend, your edits pushed your delusion that J4J is just another Jewish denomination that a bunch of long-bearded Hassidim oppose. You don't seem to comprehend how the group ruffles feathers throughout the whole length and breadth of the Jewish community even among commies and even among a lot of Christians, as it is contrary to the spirit of modern ecumenicism. J4J is as much defined by the hostility to it as anything else. That is the state of play. I think that you can make a case if you feel the wording is not neutral, but you can't water down the unanimous opposition to J4J and call that ""NPOV"" Thanks for the ""friend"", nice words are always welcome, even though the rest is not. Please don't accuse me of ""pushing my delusions"". Some jewish groups may strongly oppose them, but there's no way to show that ""all"" ""mainstream"" jewish groups, including ""secular"" groups ""strongly"" oppose them, without taking the liberty of defining who ""all"" the ""mainstream"" jewish groups are, and what degree of ""opposition"" is ""strong"". Can you really not see this simple truth? Beyond that it just isn't appropriate to overwhelm this article with criticism. I outlined this above already. Statements like j4j approachs ""vulnerable jews"" are unabashedly POV and tautological. If anyone converts then its clear they were ""vulnerable"" to conversion, so if anyone approached converts, then j4j has approaches ""vulnerable jews"". It's not in question that all missionary groups are converting someone from some belief system to another, but it is only barely notable that someone opposes this conversion. Does McDonald's oppose Burger King and try to put them out of business at every turn? Yes...but who cares? Do drug smugglers ""strongly oppose"" DEA agents coming along and busting up their operations? Yes...but it would be silly to put it in an article. Everyone has opposition and it just goes without saying. Still, I wouldn't be ""strongly opposed"" to his article having a section on opposition, but nearly every corner of this article is littered with criticism that is all essentially the same. Compare this article to that of any other missionary group. In the article ""christianity"" is there a section labeled ""incompatibility with paganism"" and ""a belief that is incompatible with paganism"" and ""all pagan groups strongly oppose christianity""? Do we see ""incompatibility with catholicism"" in the protestant article? I know this analogy is not going to be satisfying, but no analogy is ever complete. What are the further objections? Yes, the group may be called ""Jews for Jesus"" and that offends people, but what would you have them call themselves? Would ""Jews that are now christians but still consider themselves jewish"" be better? They did use Jackie Mason in a pamphlet. They also used Steve Jobs and Curious George, and a whole bunch of others, but i don't see Steve Jobs supporters here furious about Jews for jesus ""deceiving"" ipod owners into believing in jesus. I've given up on the fair play of

You are welcome. It was good fun, I learnt a lot and appreciated your encouragement and relaxed collaborative style. Yes I'll stay with the article.

Riding in that ooo bitch it's nasty

" Actually it should be directing you to MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist— AbsentBe my Valentine "

My bitch say I'm in the dog house FUCK YOU MEAN

" And you are absolutely full of shit. I made no personal attacks. Show me them now. It's good to know where your fucking priorities are. Looks like I will add a third member to my ANI report. – (talk) "

Mr. Break Grant Talk Page

" That church may be ""barely notable"" to you, as you live in Canada, but it is very notable to members of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York, as it is the oldest Catholic church in one of the five boroughs of New York City. Who are you to be the artbiter of such matters? Unlike you, I live in Staten Island, so I think that makes me a little more qualified than you are to comment on places in Staten Island. To answer your question about removing my section headers, THE ANSWER IS NO! You do not have my permission to remove my section headers, and I'd like to request that you stop making insulting and condescending comments about my edits and my revisions. Thank you. "

Hong Kong FA Cup Hi, I've noticed you've renamed a lot of articles recently from for example 2011 to 2010-11. These competitions were only played in 2011 or 2010 for instance, not over two years. The correct naming of these competitions is 2011 Hong Kong FA Cup, not 2010-11 Hong Kong FA Cup for example.

Why does nobody post anything on 'my talk' that's weird... how do you access someone else's page and comment on it... I'm new... help! ) Squeakybird

If eating the pussy makes you happy, I'm all for it. :)

The Falling Man We've got a lot of pictures on this page. Does anybody object to the removal of that one? I know it has meaning and stuff, but it seems excessive for it to be on the page. It's like a shock photo. Graphic and disturbing. I think we should just link to it's page.

Please sign your comments. Why should it be reworded? BigFishy (the snitch) didn't participate in the prank calls, there was nothing for him to be guilty over. He just didn't like what was going on and emailed Bill.

" Consensus does not mean that just because you slanted the article negatively back in May does not mean it requires consensus to correct WP:BLP problems. BLP is a core policy, and your effort to pair every scandal that McGreevey was shown to never be involved in not only fails the core policy of WP:BLP, but also WP:NPOV. David '''''' "

TheManWhoLaughs Can you believe this troll? He's the one who kept removing the secondary theme for WrestleMania 22. He's calling me a troll and say I am harassing him by putting a warning on his talk page, and says that WWE is wrong. Some people can be so annoying, especially when they think they are right. TJ Spyke So Im a troll eh? youre the one with false information. And upon that note Ill ask to stay the fuck away from me and my edits.

" Finally. Now that it has been merged, there won't be as much of a debate over the meme because we don't know how it would be included in the new article. We'll have to see what happens, but I expect the debates to calm down for a little bit. ''''''(talk) "

Invitation to a Wicnic in Gainesville on Saturday, June 22nd Greetings! Seeing that you're a member of WikiProject University of Florida, I'm inviting to the North Central Florida 2013 Great American Wiknic that will be on Saturday June 22, 2013, commencing at 1:00 pm, ten blocks north of UF campus in Gainesville,. If you're able and inclined to come, please RSVP at at this URL. Type to you later,

" Newest vandalisms by Tajik as anon IP He persianises the article Timurid dynasty with thousands of lies and with exploiting the memory of the dead of the Armnenian genocide to discredit me suggesting me as a Turk to better discredit me with the Armenian genocide and let his version ""win"" via this kind of discrediting. Shame on you, Tajik. You exploit this tragedy for your psychopathic wikipedia vandalisms. He vandalises against sources like Thackston and Manz and Amitav Ghosh. Additionally the meaning ""Timuriyan"" was not used by the Timurides themselves. This is the current word with which someone calls the Timurides today in the streets of Teheran. All these vandalisms did occur though he is blocked. Of course it is another IP (also 82.83.xx.xx, de:User:Phoenix2 and also his old sock puppet de:User:Christoffel, whith which he said racist stuff, that he could not say with his ordinal account), he has dynamic IPs. Here you can also see that he ""fought"" with the IP 84.58.xx.xx here on this page and also at german Wikipedia in the Timurides article (same stuff). (just for the records. bye) "

If i deleted something valid by mistake, apologies. TABThis user is a recent changes patroller with Twinkle!

" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. (talk) "

It's unattractive when girls act ghetto

@sexy_rexy25 98 civic lx "stick" green with shitty paint on some beaner ass wheels with 180k miles no AC and no insurance how's that?

Stafford trash without Megatron fantasyfootballproblems

" Talkback message from Tito Dutta ☸Dutta "

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Talk

" Doug, this simpleton, who thinks the execrable Rodney Castleden is a reliable source, has added in numerous factual errors and blatant lies to the article (like Gildas saying of Ambrosius ""though brave on foot, he was braver still on horseback.""; nowhere does Gildas say this!). Please revert back to the previous version of the article, which has been relatively stable for years. "

" Hey thanks for addressing that merge! I knew it should probably go elsewhere...and just took the queue for the destination from the teen page. I'm a pageant-newbie, so excuse my misdirection on that puppy! Thanks much! † Would it be better to redirect Miss New Jersey's Outstanding Teen, rather than deleting it? † Good idea. Will do so myself. In fact, it may be worth redirecting the rest of them as well. Good teamwork sorting this one out... hadn't thought of redirecting ) Btw the State Pageants article itself is up for afd but judging from the discussion it's fairly likely to be kept... should be closing in the next couple of days. Excellent! Wikipedia at it's best! Two editors working together as a team to make things better! I'll take a look a the AfD, and perhaps weigh in. Anytime you need help with anything, I'm always glad to assist a positive editor like yourself! Nice meeting you! † "

More early releases I may know this, but do you know some of the classics that aren't part of the 1984-1987 & should be? 1984: Bambi, 3 Caballeros, Fun & Fancy Free, Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh, Rescuers & Fox & the Hound, 1985: Jungle Book, 1986: none & 1987: none.

" Sorry that you feel this way, Malangali. I don't suppose that I can persuade you, but I did try and do my homework. Iringa is not offically designated a city at present (unlike Mwanza, Dar and Arusha); you asserted this in the article, but it is simply factually incorrect. A seperate question is whether Iringa can be referred to as a city outside of the Tz government's definition. OK. First, I assure you that ""urban"" can imply either town or city, particularly when contrasted with ""rural"": see urban area. I checked two English language travel guides for Tanzania, both of whom use ""town"". Moreover, I contacted some Tanzanians in Iringa, who agreed that it was ""town"" rather than a ""city"" (not that personal anecdotes are a reliable source in Wikipedia, just to try and convince you that the ""town"" thing is not just from some deluded mzungu insisting on a patronising colonial viewpoint, or whatever it is you've decided I am doing). I don't believe in individual ownership of Wikipedia articles. However, ""city"" is not the best word here, and it's entirely reasonable for me to oppose it. Again, I regret clashing with you on this, and I'm very happy to discuss and change my mind on things, and I'm glad you've improved this article, but I'm afraid I will not simply agree with whatever you say just because I'm English and you (I presume) are a Tanzanian. "

About 700 euros, if you buy it from a greek mathematician-turned-hacker-turned-spy. See story:

" Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dogmaticeclectic reported by User:ViperSnake151 (Result: ). Thank you.  Talk  "

" (UTC) I agreed with . Frankly speaking, looks completely right. The general remarks should be written in one article. However, it seems that crazy(, stupid, criminal) admins have already dispersed almost all of decent general editors in the world, who can edit and satisfy . 11:34, 6 March 2015"

People r retarded for thinking you can eat "clean" food all day and lose weight. Calories are calories people.

Be nice leave me alone

I'm pleased you now appear to be making constructive edits. Take a look at Wikipedia: Disruptive editing and ease off with the messing around. You have made some good edits in the past, but these are ruined by your other activity. Just a piece of friendly advice. 86.147.218.231

At this point there is no need to merge, single or no single. It is not a requirement to have a single release to have its own article. The song charting on a national music chart (in the top 10 no less), nearly entirely on digital downloads, makes it notable IMO.

, 17 September 2006 (UTC) What? My use of CAPITALS? That has nothing to do with reason! I am emphasising my point and certain words. Your edits are a grammatical travesty, do not adhere to wikipedia's neutrality policy, and are terribly written. Not to mention that they do not make sense. I would expect better from you. 22:49

Typing Monkey, you asked why Sanchez's other accounts weren't blocked. The reason is because Wikipedia's administrators have promoted and protected him. They've permitted him to break all of their rules, and to write his own biography. They will never enforce their rules with him. They've removed documented evidence of his prostitution from the article, and have greatly minimized his pornography career to the extent that nearly 40 movies that Sanchez filmed have been reduced to only six mentions. The more I look at Wikipedia, the more I am convinced that this site is little more than a promotional vehicle for whoever has a connection to one or two influential friends. The senior staff turns a blind eye, most likely because they are looking for ways to eventually sell the whole thing for billions of dollars. Someone better watch out, because Wikipedia is rotting from the inside out.

" They are all the same guy; considering they all edit the same pages, including your's. Thanks Majo. (The Forest Whispers My Name) "

. I also think it would behoove the editors who were deceived by DI's fraudulent linkage to revisit their role in propagating DI's deception, and do what they can to ameliorate the harm already done

Zereshk vs Pecher Could you please have a look at [this

@KayciMalynn I know nigs

you know you just dont want the truth of San Diego coming out. your quite obviously a commie!

" Hello, Sutherll and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! |}"

Hello Robbie Just want to let you know I'm still here and watching U68.57.193.169

" Pet Shop Boys Collaboration Dear. Why do you delete the list of collaboration? it was a lot of work doing the list! This collaboration list is a remarkable part of Pet Shop Boys' work!!! It was discussed on and Further it is verifiable! Its source: why do you say ""doesnt belong here""???? it does! greets."

It's obvious you don't know what you're talking about. It's Nuremberg in english. Not Nuernberg. If you can't get your arguement right, don't say anything at all.

Youth Does anyone else agree that the youth of Didcot, namely the chavs, are creating a serious problem in Didcot? Until recently, it seemed as if everything was calming down...but now, there are stabbings and everything occuring. Is it just the chavs to blame, or is it the youth population as a whole?

" I'm not following Dennis' logic here. The reference entirely supports the information in the National alliance article (and by the way, that newspaper is at least a worthy enough source as the defunct obscure newspaper where Redwood's letter to the editor appeared that is quoted at length. This is what the Friedman article says: He also suggested consulting with Political Research Associates (PRA), a left-liberal investigative outfit with deep roots in the counterintelligence movement. Among its top researchers is former Public Eye editor Chip Berlet. PRA has been funded, in large part, by Richard Denis-a multi-millionaire Chicago commodities trader who was also one of the largest individual contributors to the Democratic Party in 1993. Bragging that he and researchers had worked with PRA ""for many years,"" King said: ""They have the best files in the country on political cults."" ......... Berlet, like King, has suspiciously changed his public views on NAP over the years. In 1984, when he first took over as editor of Public Eye, Berlet told Newman in a phone interview set up at Berlet's request to set the record straight regarding the Public Eye's 1977 accusation that Newman was a cultist and a LaRouchite, ""I'm the new kid on the block at Public Eye. I'm the new editor as opposed to the old editor, and if there was some way I could avoid having to write articles about this ongoing topic [NAP], I would. Our analysis of your group has changed over the past few years, drastically with my assumption to editor."" The next issue of Public Eye contained the following editor's note: ""As you will learn from a forthcoming article on Fred Newman and the IWP [International Workers Party, a group that Newman had headed up in the mid seventies], the Public Eye no longer feels it is accurate to call Newman's political network a cult."" That ""forthcoming"" article, however, never appeared. Instead, three years later, right after Democratic Party high roller Denis contributed $75,000 to PRA, Berlet's Clouds Blur the Rainbow did. The article clearly cites this in a NPOV manner as a claim that was made in a Newman publication, not as fact, just like the claims of Redwood and every other critic and self-styled ""expert"" whose opinions permeate this article to a ridiculous extent already. "

(the concerned ones)

I am in love with Wikipedia, and really, I'm tired of being a lurker. So here I am, ready to be a full-fledged member of this community. I hope to be a contributing member for many years.

As I said it shouldn't that hard to find a reference for. Added it back with a reference.Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44)

" Liberal POV ""The package includes provisions for lowering import tariffs and agricultural subsidies, making it easier for developing countries to compete with the developed world in global markets."" This sentence has a clear economic liberal viewpoint. Who can guarantee these countries will really be more competitive? There are some schools of thought that disagree on this notion; to cite a few: protectionism, developmentalism and economic nationalism. I changed the wording to make it clear that this is a POV, but this was reverted. Some feedback on it would be good. "

dont listen to anonmoos.

" It is not a quote taken out of context. The entire book talks about which race/nationality is preferable to the other and how certain ""lesser"" races/nationalities ought to be kept from making a large impact on the collective gene pool. Why don't you read The Old World in the New? ( ) Even a brief skim over the material shows it to be a book dedicated to cataloging the different races and nationalities and their respective detrimental or beneficial impacts . Here are the section headings of one of the chapters (American Blood and Immigrant Blood) within the book: ""Primitive types among the foreign-born"" ""How immigration will affect good looks in this country"" ""Effect of crossing on personal beauty"" ""Stature and physique of the newer immigrants"" ""Do they revitalize the American people?"" ""Race morals of the Southern European stocks"" ""Are the immigrants good samples of their own people?"" ""Appraisal of the different ethnic strains in the American people"" ""Rating of the present immigrant streams"" ""How immigration has affected the fecundity of Americans"" ""Evading a degrading competition by race suicide"" ""The triumph of the low-standard elements over the high-standard elements"" This is obviously not a matter of conjecture or personal opinion. The book might as well be called Eugenics For Dummies."

"Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! "

" The link for this article is now Though the web site uses ""PCMag.com"" the digital editions still use ""PC Magazine."" |talk "

You seem to have me confused with

Great lead battle and then Ricky hits Danica for a yellow. Oh boy. NASCAR

Rated as Stub class: No photograph Little biographical information List of roles incomplete

" The second is by far the commoner technique, but the first has the benefit of satisfying the last paragraph of WP:CITEVAR. "

Ah come on. Not even jokes are tolerated? On an anonymus user page. Fine. Mr. Lilithborne doesn't molest goats. But perhaps Rams...

" I believe the quote on your menu needs to be updated. For factuality, maybe to something similar to: ""The encyclopedia that anyone can edit, until a bitter neckbearded man in his mid 30's who was made admin by men with a similar disposition takes it upon himself to revert that edit in order to maintain his personal ideal of a what a public website should be like while disregarding the opinions of thousands of other people who oppose him, writing them off as idiots who don't know what they're doing"" (or something like that) It's a little lengthy, but definitely more accurate. You should consider it. - "

First, if you think refs to Tome of horrors could save these articles from being deleted (or more likely redirected) in AfDs, you're wrong. Tome of Horrors is material officially licenced and authored by Wizards of the Coast, it is thus a primary source affiliated to the subject or its creator, it cannot be used to establish notability and won't be of any use in AfDs. It is not your inclusion of these refs that prompted me to redirect the articles, but the fact that they are non-notable because based only on primary sources, and that there is already a consensus at the D&D; project and at several AfDs to redirect. There are hundreds of these non-notable monster articles so yes, redirects are more convenient and less time-consuming than 400 AfDs, but don't delude yourself into thinking they would survive AfDs otherwise. Add refs from Tome of Horrors if you want, but it won't save articles from redirection, whether by bold editing or AfD. If there was no ground to redirect them, then you wouldn't be afraid to draw attention on them.

Picture? The picture featured in the articles doesn't really have anything, or show anything, to do with popularity. And it kind of makes me sick looking at it (Because of the swirling effect.) does anyone else agree it should be removed?

Commonwealth - from England? Rather a lot of the people who went and lived in the Bay Colony would have preferred that England had not recently ceased being its first Commonwealth. Might that be the reason the state eventually took that style and continued in that fashion? From this distance one of the striking features of the commonwealth is the presence of the FSF HQ there, and another is that recently it was the least craven state WRT Microsoft. The liberal tradition is remarked upon. Medically, the town of Framingham is one of the most carefully studied populations and much work on prevention of cardiovascular disease is at least partly based on it. Worthy of note and cross-linking perhaps? I don't live anywhere near it, so I'll leave this here for thought. 09:45, 30 May 2005 (BST)

Thank you for the email, yet I am unable to open the deleted article. Could you please just send through the actual article in the email Thanks

Still doing it! Report me for calling you a child, and then repeatedly call me a child! This is awesome! I couldn't have written it better! Are people taking notes? -

Additional information I wonder if we could embellish the narrative on this election. There were at least three very important developments in this race. 1. It was the first presidential election in which the national ticket was nominated in conventions. The Anti-Masonic, National Republican, and Democratic Parties held national conventions. 2. One of the major issues was nullification (the idea that states could 'nullify' or veto congressional legislation). Calhoun refused to run with Jackson for this reason, and South Carolina entered a brief anti-Democratic phase. Calhoun resigned as VP, the first person to do that, and became an anti-administration U.S. Senator. 3. Another major issue was the National Bank. Clay forced a vote on extending the charter of the Bank in the summer of 1832. Jackson vetoed it. Clay felt that the Bank would be critical to economic development. Jackson did not have a specific policy - Van Buren later created the independent treasury system which laid the groundwork for the banking system which is still in place.

Why it is so hard considering solipsism wrong? If even accepting that super-dubious statement of that 'The only thing i know existing is my mind'[1], and even further, accepting (blindly) conception of 'All of world can be my illusion', and then realising not all of world is directly controlled to you you think there's 'BUM'. But stop, you CAN'T know whether 'BUM' exists. Then, solipsist say 'world is my illusion' but HOW can one know IF the illusion EXISTS? If we state, that the only thing EXISTING is your mind, you can't go then stating something else exists, like even works of that mind. If you state [1], you live in nothing, but how parts of nothing can be different to each other? But since you get 'The only thing i know existing is my mind' statement, and 'I think, therefore I am' conclusion i can ask four questions: -Why if I THINK, then i am? -Why it is stated that I THINK? -Why I KNOW my mind exists? -Why i know that my mind EXISTS? those can be summed with: -Why is my mind is supposed to be the ONLY thing to exist? -Why i know only one thing exists? -Why my mind is that the only thing existing? etc As you can see, solipsism is unable to answer any of these, as it is only concerned about those statement and conclusion. 82.209.225.33

ok I filled out a form. Thanks for taking the time to let me know what's up

Not sure how NIST defines the international survey foot, nor do I particularly care, but here is the result of dividing 1/39.37 and represents the actual relation between U.S. Survey and International feet: 2.54000508001016002032004064008128016256032512065024130048260096520193040386080772161544323088646177292354584709169418338836677673355346710693421386842773685547371094742189484378968757937515875031750063500127000254000. . . Notice the value is doubled until it repeats back to the same series after 210 digits. While 2 ppm, 4 ppt, 8 ppqu (1.000002000004000008000016. . . )etc. may diminish in importance rapidly, when measuring a particularly large distance with a high degree of resolution required, that differential could conceivably come into play. Practically 1.000002 is close enough, but that doesn't make it the definition of the survey unit compared with the international equivalent, 1/39.37 meter defines the survey inch. 1.000002 is an approximation.

Thank You Thank You for the unblock. LoveMonkey

"==Regarding edits made during March 27 2008== Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - talk "

" Yes or no, does your first comment contain the insinuation that I'm 'advocating' something?     ←   ZScarpia   "

" WhoIs Templates Trust me, let it go. It isn't worth getting into a big war over a WhoIs template. I did the same thing on User talk:94.192.38.247 and got admonished and blocked for it. Clearly people in the higher powers of Wikipedia see WhoIs templates as something OK to blank even though it says on WP:BLANKING they aren't. Just let it go, I don't want to see another editor blocked over something silly. - • Talk • "

" Opening ""Unlike earlier concepts and definitions of war—with defined nations, boundaries, standing armies, and navies—the ""War on Terrorism"" has largely been dominated by the use of special forces, intelligence, police work, diplomacy, and propaganda."" I wasn't aware that propaganda was a part of the war on terror. Evidence? Support? "