chunk
stringlengths 128
128
| id
stringlengths 10
10
| title
stringlengths 19
148
| summary
stringlengths 345
1.92k
| source
stringlengths 31
31
| authors
sequence | text_length
int64 128
128
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Synthesis with Large Language Models
Jacob Austin*Augustus Odena*
Maxwell NyeyMaarten Bosma Henryk Michalewski David Doh | 2108.07732 | Program Synthesis with Large Language Models | This paper explores the limits of the current generation of large language
models for program synthesis in general purpose programming languages. We
evaluate a collection of such models (with between 244M and 137B parameters) on
two new benchmarks, MBPP and MathQA-Python, in both the few-shot and
fine-tuning regimes. Our benchmarks are designed to measure the ability of
these models to synthesize short Python programs from natural language
descriptions. The Mostly Basic Programming Problems (MBPP) dataset contains 974
programming tasks, designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. The
MathQA-Python dataset, a Python version of the MathQA benchmark, contains 23914
problems that evaluate the ability of the models to synthesize code from more
complex text. On both datasets, we find that synthesis performance scales
log-linearly with model size. Our largest models, even without finetuning on a
code dataset, can synthesize solutions to 59.6 percent of the problems from
MBPP using few-shot learning with a well-designed prompt. Fine-tuning on a
held-out portion of the dataset improves performance by about 10 percentage
points across most model sizes. On the MathQA-Python dataset, the largest
fine-tuned model achieves 83.8 percent accuracy. Going further, we study the
model's ability to engage in dialog about code, incorporating human feedback to
improve its solutions. We find that natural language feedback from a human
halves the error rate compared to the model's initial prediction. Additionally,
we conduct an error analysis to shed light on where these models fall short and
what types of programs are most difficult to generate. Finally, we explore the
semantic grounding of these models by fine-tuning them to predict the results
of program execution. We find that even our best models are generally unable to
predict the output of a program given a specific input. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.07732 | [
"Jacob Austin",
"Augustus Odena",
"Maxwell Nye",
"Maarten Bosma",
"Henryk Michalewski",
"David Dohan",
"Ellen Jiang",
"Carrie Cai",
"Michael Terry",
"Quoc Le",
"Charles Sutton"
] | 128 |
BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chain
Tianyu Gu
New York University
Brooklyn, NY, USA
| 1708.06733 | BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chain | Deep learning-based techniques have achieved state-of-the-art performance on
a wide variety of recognition and classification tasks. However, these networks
are typically computationally expensive to train, requiring weeks of
computation on many GPUs; as a result, many users outsource the training
procedure to the cloud or rely on pre-trained models that are then fine-tuned
for a specific task. In this paper we show that outsourced training introduces
new security risks: an adversary can create a maliciously trained network (a
backdoored neural network, or a \emph{BadNet}) that has state-of-the-art
performance on the user's training and validation samples, but behaves badly on
specific attacker-chosen inputs. We first explore the properties of BadNets in
a toy example, by creating a backdoored handwritten digit classifier. Next, we
demonstrate backdoors in a more realistic scenario by creating a U.S. street
sign classifier that identifies stop signs as speed limits when a special
sticker is added to the stop sign; we then show in addition that the backdoor
in our US street sign detector can persist even if the network is later
retrained for another task and cause a drop in accuracy of {25}\% on average
when the backdoor trigger is present. These results demonstrate that backdoors
in neural networks are both powerful and---because the behavior of neural
networks is difficult to explicate---stealthy. This work provides motivation
for further research into techniques for verifying and inspecting neural
networks, just as we have developed tools for verifying and debugging software. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.06733 | [
"Tianyu Gu",
"Brendan Dolan-Gavitt",
"Siddharth Garg"
] | 128 |
ANEMPIRICAL STUDY OF METRICS TO MEASURE
REPRESENTATIONAL HARMS IN PRE-TRAINED LANGUAGE MODELS
Saghar Hosseini
Meta AI
saghar@me | 2301.09211 | An Empirical Study of Metrics to Measure Representational Harms in Pre-Trained Language Models | Large-scale Pre-Trained Language Models (PTLMs) capture knowledge from
massive human-written data which contains latent societal biases and toxic
contents. In this paper, we leverage the primary task of PTLMs, i.e., language
modeling, and propose a new metric to quantify manifested implicit
representational harms in PTLMs towards 13 marginalized demographics. Using
this metric, we conducted an empirical analysis of 24 widely used PTLMs. Our
analysis provides insights into the correlation between the proposed metric in
this work and other related metrics for representational harm. We observe that
our metric correlates with most of the gender-specific metrics in the
literature. Through extensive experiments, we explore the connections between
PTLMs architectures and representational harms across two dimensions: depth and
width of the networks. We found that prioritizing depth over width, mitigates
representational harms in some PTLMs. Our code and data can be found at
https://github.com/microsoft/SafeNLP. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.09211 | [
"Saghar Hosseini",
"Hamid Palangi",
"Ahmed Hassan Awadallah"
] | 128 |
“I’m fully who I am”: Towards Centering Transgender and
Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language
Generation
Anaelia | 2305.09941 | "I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generation | Transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals disproportionately experience
discrimination and exclusion from daily life. Given the recent popularity and
adoption of language generation technologies, the potential to further
marginalize this population only grows. Although a multitude of NLP fairness
literature focuses on illuminating and addressing gender biases, assessing
gender harms for TGNB identities requires understanding how such identities
uniquely interact with societal gender norms and how they differ from gender
binary-centric perspectives. Such measurement frameworks inherently require
centering TGNB voices to help guide the alignment between gender-inclusive NLP
and whom they are intended to serve. Towards this goal, we ground our work in
the TGNB community and existing interdisciplinary literature to assess how the
social reality surrounding experienced marginalization of TGNB persons
contributes to and persists within Open Language Generation (OLG). This social
knowledge serves as a guide for evaluating popular large language models (LLMs)
on two key aspects: (1) misgendering and (2) harmful responses to gender
disclosure. To do this, we introduce TANGO, a dataset of template-based
real-world text curated from a TGNB-oriented community. We discover a dominance
of binary gender norms reflected by the models; LLMs least misgendered subjects
in generated text when triggered by prompts whose subjects used binary
pronouns. Meanwhile, misgendering was most prevalent when triggering generation
with singular they and neopronouns. When prompted with gender disclosures, TGNB
disclosure generated the most stigmatizing language and scored most toxic, on
average. Our findings warrant further research on how TGNB harms manifest in
LLMs and serve as a broader case study toward concretely grounding the design
of gender-inclusive AI in community voices and interdisciplinary literature. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.09941 | [
"Anaelia Ovalle",
"Palash Goyal",
"Jwala Dhamala",
"Zachary Jaggers",
"Kai-Wei Chang",
"Aram Galstyan",
"Richard Zemel",
"Rahul Gupta"
] | 128 |
Directional Bias Amplification
Angelina Wang and Olga Russakovsky
Princeton University
Abstract
Mitigating bias in machine learni | 2102.12594 | Directional Bias Amplification | Mitigating bias in machine learning systems requires refining our
understanding of bias propagation pathways: from societal structures to
large-scale data to trained models to impact on society. In this work, we focus
on one aspect of the problem, namely bias amplification: the tendency of models
to amplify the biases present in the data they are trained on. A metric for
measuring bias amplification was introduced in the seminal work by Zhao et al.
(2017); however, as we demonstrate, this metric suffers from a number of
shortcomings including conflating different types of bias amplification and
failing to account for varying base rates of protected attributes. We introduce
and analyze a new, decoupled metric for measuring bias amplification,
$\text{BiasAmp}_{\rightarrow}$ (Directional Bias Amplification). We thoroughly
analyze and discuss both the technical assumptions and normative implications
of this metric. We provide suggestions about its measurement by cautioning
against predicting sensitive attributes, encouraging the use of confidence
intervals due to fluctuations in the fairness of models across runs, and
discussing the limitations of what this metric captures. Throughout this paper,
we work to provide an interrogative look at the technical measurement of bias
amplification, guided by our normative ideas of what we want it to encompass.
Code is located at https://github.com/princetonvisualai/directional-bias-amp | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2102.12594 | [
"Angelina Wang",
"Olga Russakovsky"
] | 128 |
The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods
for Effective Instruction Tuning
Shayne Longpre∗Le Hou Tu Vu Albert Webson Hyung | 2301.13688 | The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuning | We study the design decisions of publicly available instruction tuning
methods, and break down the development of Flan 2022 (Chung et al., 2022).
Through careful ablation studies on the Flan Collection of tasks and methods,
we tease apart the effect of design decisions which enable Flan-T5 to
outperform prior work by 3-17%+ across evaluation settings. We find task
balancing and enrichment techniques are overlooked but critical to effective
instruction tuning, and in particular, training with mixed prompt settings
(zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought) actually yields stronger (2%+)
performance in all settings. In further experiments, we show Flan-T5 requires
less finetuning to converge higher and faster than T5 on single downstream
tasks, motivating instruction-tuned models as more computationally-efficient
starting checkpoints for new tasks. Finally, to accelerate research on
instruction tuning, we make the Flan 2022 collection of datasets, templates,
and methods publicly available at
https://github.com/google-research/FLAN/tree/main/flan/v2. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.13688 | [
"Shayne Longpre",
"Le Hou",
"Tu Vu",
"Albert Webson",
"Hyung Won Chung",
"Yi Tay",
"Denny Zhou",
"Quoc V. Le",
"Barret Zoph",
"Jason Wei",
"Adam Roberts"
] | 128 |
1
Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications,
Challenges and Opportunities
Carole-Jean Wu, Ramya Raghavendra, Udit Gupta, Bilge | 2111.00364 | Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunities | This paper explores the environmental impact of the super-linear growth
trends for AI from a holistic perspective, spanning Data, Algorithms, and
System Hardware. We characterize the carbon footprint of AI computing by
examining the model development cycle across industry-scale machine learning
use cases and, at the same time, considering the life cycle of system hardware.
Taking a step further, we capture the operational and manufacturing carbon
footprint of AI computing and present an end-to-end analysis for what and how
hardware-software design and at-scale optimization can help reduce the overall
carbon footprint of AI. Based on the industry experience and lessons learned,
we share the key challenges and chart out important development directions
across the many dimensions of AI. We hope the key messages and insights
presented in this paper can inspire the community to advance the field of AI in
an environmentally-responsible manner. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.00364 | [
"Carole-Jean Wu",
"Ramya Raghavendra",
"Udit Gupta",
"Bilge Acun",
"Newsha Ardalani",
"Kiwan Maeng",
"Gloria Chang",
"Fiona Aga Behram",
"James Huang",
"Charles Bai",
"Michael Gschwind",
"Anurag Gupta",
"Myle Ott",
"Anastasia Melnikov",
"Salvatore Candido",
"David Brooks",
"Geeta Chauhan",
"Benjamin Lee",
"Hsien-Hsin S. Lee",
"Bugra Akyildiz",
"Maximilian Balandat",
"Joe Spisak",
"Ravi Jain",
"Mike Rabbat",
"Kim Hazelwood"
] | 128 |
REALTOXICITY PROMPTS :
Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models
Samuel GehmanSuchin GururanganyMaarten SapYeji | 2009.11462 | RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models | Pretrained neural language models (LMs) are prone to generating racist,
sexist, or otherwise toxic language which hinders their safe deployment. We
investigate the extent to which pretrained LMs can be prompted to generate
toxic language, and the effectiveness of controllable text generation
algorithms at preventing such toxic degeneration. We create and release
RealToxicityPrompts, a dataset of 100K naturally occurring, sentence-level
prompts derived from a large corpus of English web text, paired with toxicity
scores from a widely-used toxicity classifier. Using RealToxicityPrompts, we
find that pretrained LMs can degenerate into toxic text even from seemingly
innocuous prompts. We empirically assess several controllable generation
methods, and find that while data- or compute-intensive methods (e.g., adaptive
pretraining on non-toxic data) are more effective at steering away from
toxicity than simpler solutions (e.g., banning "bad" words), no current method
is failsafe against neural toxic degeneration. To pinpoint the potential cause
of such persistent toxic degeneration, we analyze two web text corpora used to
pretrain several LMs (including GPT-2; Radford et. al, 2019), and find a
significant amount of offensive, factually unreliable, and otherwise toxic
content. Our work provides a test bed for evaluating toxic generations by LMs
and stresses the need for better data selection processes for pretraining. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.11462 | [
"Samuel Gehman",
"Suchin Gururangan",
"Maarten Sap",
"Yejin Choi",
"Noah A. Smith"
] | 128 |
SOCIAL IQA: Commonsense Reasoning about Social Interactions
Maarten Sap?}~Hannah Rashkin?}~Derek Chen~Ronan Le Bras}Yejin Choi}~ | 1904.09728 | SocialIQA: Commonsense Reasoning about Social Interactions | We introduce Social IQa, the first largescale benchmark for commonsense
reasoning about social situations. Social IQa contains 38,000 multiple choice
questions for probing emotional and social intelligence in a variety of
everyday situations (e.g., Q: "Jordan wanted to tell Tracy a secret, so Jordan
leaned towards Tracy. Why did Jordan do this?" A: "Make sure no one else could
hear"). Through crowdsourcing, we collect commonsense questions along with
correct and incorrect answers about social interactions, using a new framework
that mitigates stylistic artifacts in incorrect answers by asking workers to
provide the right answer to a different but related question. Empirical results
show that our benchmark is challenging for existing question-answering models
based on pretrained language models, compared to human performance (>20% gap).
Notably, we further establish Social IQa as a resource for transfer learning of
commonsense knowledge, achieving state-of-the-art performance on multiple
commonsense reasoning tasks (Winograd Schemas, COPA). | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.09728 | [
"Maarten Sap",
"Hannah Rashkin",
"Derek Chen",
"Ronan LeBras",
"Yejin Choi"
] | 128 |
Towards Robust Evaluations of Continual Learning
Sebastian Farquhar1Yarin Gal1
Abstract
Experiments used in current continual le | 1805.09733 | Towards Robust Evaluations of Continual Learning | Experiments used in current continual learning research do not faithfully
assess fundamental challenges of learning continually. Instead of assessing
performance on challenging and representative experiment designs, recent
research has focused on increased dataset difficulty, while still using flawed
experiment set-ups. We examine standard evaluations and show why these
evaluations make some continual learning approaches look better than they are.
We introduce desiderata for continual learning evaluations and explain why
their absence creates misleading comparisons. Based on our desiderata we then
propose new experiment designs which we demonstrate with various continual
learning approaches and datasets. Our analysis calls for a reprioritization of
research effort by the community. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.09733 | [
"Sebastian Farquhar",
"Yarin Gal"
] | 128 |
Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in
Natural Language Inference
R. Thomas McCoy,1Ellie Pavlick,2& Tal | 1902.01007 | Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inference | A machine learning system can score well on a given test set by relying on
heuristics that are effective for frequent example types but break down in more
challenging cases. We study this issue within natural language inference (NLI),
the task of determining whether one sentence entails another. We hypothesize
that statistical NLI models may adopt three fallible syntactic heuristics: the
lexical overlap heuristic, the subsequence heuristic, and the constituent
heuristic. To determine whether models have adopted these heuristics, we
introduce a controlled evaluation set called HANS (Heuristic Analysis for NLI
Systems), which contains many examples where the heuristics fail. We find that
models trained on MNLI, including BERT, a state-of-the-art model, perform very
poorly on HANS, suggesting that they have indeed adopted these heuristics. We
conclude that there is substantial room for improvement in NLI systems, and
that the HANS dataset can motivate and measure progress in this area | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.01007 | [
"R. Thomas McCoy",
"Ellie Pavlick",
"Tal Linzen"
] | 128 |
MLQA: Evaluating Cross-lingual Extractive Question Answering
Patrick Lewis*yBarlas O ˘guz*Ruty Rinott*Sebastian Riedel*yHolger S | 1910.07475 | MLQA: Evaluating Cross-lingual Extractive Question Answering | Question answering (QA) models have shown rapid progress enabled by the
availability of large, high-quality benchmark datasets. Such annotated datasets
are difficult and costly to collect, and rarely exist in languages other than
English, making training QA systems in other languages challenging. An
alternative to building large monolingual training datasets is to develop
cross-lingual systems which can transfer to a target language without requiring
training data in that language. In order to develop such systems, it is crucial
to invest in high quality multilingual evaluation benchmarks to measure
progress. We present MLQA, a multi-way aligned extractive QA evaluation
benchmark intended to spur research in this area. MLQA contains QA instances in
7 languages, namely English, Arabic, German, Spanish, Hindi, Vietnamese and
Simplified Chinese. It consists of over 12K QA instances in English and 5K in
each other language, with each QA instance being parallel between 4 languages
on average. MLQA is built using a novel alignment context strategy on Wikipedia
articles, and serves as a cross-lingual extension to existing extractive QA
datasets. We evaluate current state-of-the-art cross-lingual representations on
MLQA, and also provide machine-translation-based baselines. In all cases,
transfer results are shown to be significantly behind training-language
performance. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.07475 | [
"Patrick Lewis",
"Barlas Oğuz",
"Ruty Rinott",
"Sebastian Riedel",
"Holger Schwenk"
] | 128 |
Controlling Style in Generated Dialogue
Eric Michael Smith*, Diana Gonzalez-Rico*, Emily Dinan, Y-Lan Boureau
Facebook AI Resear | 2009.10855 | Controlling Style in Generated Dialogue | Open-domain conversation models have become good at generating
natural-sounding dialogue, using very large architectures with billions of
trainable parameters. The vast training data required to train these
architectures aggregates many different styles, tones, and qualities. Using
that data to train a single model makes it difficult to use the model as a
consistent conversational agent, e.g. with a stable set of persona traits and a
typical style of expression. Several architectures affording control mechanisms
over generation architectures have been proposed, each with different
trade-offs. However, it remains unclear whether their use in dialogue is
viable, and what the trade-offs look like with the most recent state-of-the-art
conversational architectures. In this work, we adapt three previously proposed
controllable generation architectures to open-domain dialogue generation,
controlling the style of the generation to match one among about 200 possible
styles. We compare their respective performance and tradeoffs, and show how
they can be used to provide insights into existing conversational datasets, and
generate a varied set of styled conversation replies. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.10855 | [
"Eric Michael Smith",
"Diana Gonzalez-Rico",
"Emily Dinan",
"Y-Lan Boureau"
] | 128 |
Exploring the Limits of Language Modeling
Rafal Jozefowicz RAFALJ @GOOGLE .COM
Oriol Vinyals VINYALS @GOOGLE .COM
Mike Schuster | 1602.02410 | Exploring the Limits of Language Modeling | In this work we explore recent advances in Recurrent Neural Networks for
large scale Language Modeling, a task central to language understanding. We
extend current models to deal with two key challenges present in this task:
corpora and vocabulary sizes, and complex, long term structure of language. We
perform an exhaustive study on techniques such as character Convolutional
Neural Networks or Long-Short Term Memory, on the One Billion Word Benchmark.
Our best single model significantly improves state-of-the-art perplexity from
51.3 down to 30.0 (whilst reducing the number of parameters by a factor of 20),
while an ensemble of models sets a new record by improving perplexity from 41.0
down to 23.7. We also release these models for the NLP and ML community to
study and improve upon. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.02410 | [
"Rafal Jozefowicz",
"Oriol Vinyals",
"Mike Schuster",
"Noam Shazeer",
"Yonghui Wu"
] | 128 |
ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow:
An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified
Radiology Reports
Katharina Jeblick1;2Balthasar S | 2212.14882 | ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports | The release of ChatGPT, a language model capable of generating text that
appears human-like and authentic, has gained significant attention beyond the
research community. We expect that the convincing performance of ChatGPT
incentivizes users to apply it to a variety of downstream tasks, including
prompting the model to simplify their own medical reports. To investigate this
phenomenon, we conducted an exploratory case study. In a questionnaire, we
asked 15 radiologists to assess the quality of radiology reports simplified by
ChatGPT. Most radiologists agreed that the simplified reports were factually
correct, complete, and not potentially harmful to the patient. Nevertheless,
instances of incorrect statements, missed key medical findings, and potentially
harmful passages were reported. While further studies are needed, the initial
insights of this study indicate a great potential in using large language
models like ChatGPT to improve patient-centered care in radiology and other
medical domains. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.14882 | [
"Katharina Jeblick",
"Balthasar Schachtner",
"Jakob Dexl",
"Andreas Mittermeier",
"Anna Theresa Stüber",
"Johanna Topalis",
"Tobias Weber",
"Philipp Wesp",
"Bastian Sabel",
"Jens Ricke",
"Michael Ingrisch"
] | 128 |
Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learning
Mona Sloane* 1Emanuel Moss* 2Olaitan Awomolo* 3Laura Forlano* 4
Abstract
| 2007.02423 | Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learning | This paper critically examines existing modes of participation in design
practice and machine learning. Cautioning against 'participation-washing', it
suggests that the ML community must become attuned to possibly exploitative and
extractive forms of community involvement and shift away from the prerogatives
of context-independent scalability. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.02423 | [
"Mona Sloane",
"Emanuel Moss",
"Olaitan Awomolo",
"Laura Forlano"
] | 128 |
Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing:
A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLP
Timo SchickSahana UdupayHinrich Schütze
C | 2103.00453 | Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLP | When trained on large, unfiltered crawls from the internet, language models
pick up and reproduce all kinds of undesirable biases that can be found in the
data: they often generate racist, sexist, violent or otherwise toxic language.
As large models require millions of training examples to achieve good
performance, it is difficult to completely prevent them from being exposed to
such content. In this paper, we first demonstrate a surprising finding:
pretrained language models recognize, to a considerable degree, their
undesirable biases and the toxicity of the content they produce. We refer to
this capability as self-diagnosis. Based on this finding, we then propose a
decoding algorithm that, given only a textual description of the undesired
behavior, reduces the probability of a language model producing problematic
text. We refer to this approach as self-debiasing. Self-debiasing does not rely
on manually curated word lists, nor does it require any training data or
changes to the model's parameters. While we by no means eliminate the issue of
language models generating biased text, we believe our approach to be an
important step in this direction. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.00453 | [
"Timo Schick",
"Sahana Udupa",
"Hinrich Schütze"
] | 128 |
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2023
Decomposed Prompting : A M ODULAR APPROACH FOR
SOLVING COMPLEX TASKS
Tushar Khot|, | 2210.02406 | Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Tasks | Few-shot prompting is a surprisingly powerful way to use Large Language
Models (LLMs) to solve various tasks. However, this approach struggles as the
task complexity increases or when the individual reasoning steps of the task
themselves are hard to learn, especially when embedded in more complex tasks.
To address this, we propose Decomposed Prompting, a new approach to solve
complex tasks by decomposing them (via prompting) into simpler sub-tasks that
can be delegated to a library of prompting-based LLMs dedicated to these
sub-tasks. This modular structure allows each prompt to be optimized for its
specific sub-task, further decomposed if necessary, and even easily replaced
with more effective prompts, trained models, or symbolic functions if desired.
We show that the flexibility and modularity of Decomposed Prompting allows it
to outperform prior work on few-shot prompting using GPT3. On symbolic
reasoning tasks, we can further decompose sub-tasks that are hard for LLMs into
even simpler solvable sub-tasks. When the complexity comes from the input
length, we can recursively decompose the task into the same task but with
smaller inputs. We also evaluate our approach on textual multi-step reasoning
tasks: on long-context multi-hop QA task, we can more effectively teach the
sub-tasks via our separate sub-tasks prompts; and on open-domain multi-hop QA,
we can incorporate a symbolic information retrieval within our decomposition
framework, leading to improved performance on both tasks. Datasets, Code and
Prompts available at https://github.com/allenai/DecomP. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.02406 | [
"Tushar Khot",
"Harsh Trivedi",
"Matthew Finlayson",
"Yao Fu",
"Kyle Richardson",
"Peter Clark",
"Ashish Sabharwal"
] | 128 |
AI E THICS ISSUES IN REAL WORLD : EVIDENCE FROM AI
INCIDENT DATABASE
Mengyi Wei
Technical University of Munich
[email protected] | 2206.07635 | AI Ethics Issues in Real World: Evidence from AI Incident Database | With the powerful performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) also comes
prevalent ethical issues. Though governments and corporations have curated
multiple AI ethics guidelines to curb unethical behavior of AI, the effect has
been limited, probably due to the vagueness of the guidelines. In this paper,
we take a closer look at how AI ethics issues take place in real world, in
order to have a more in-depth and nuanced understanding of different ethical
issues as well as their social impact. With a content analysis of AI Incident
Database, which is an effort to prevent repeated real world AI failures by
cataloging incidents, we identified 13 application areas which often see
unethical use of AI, with intelligent service robots, language/vision models
and autonomous driving taking the lead. Ethical issues appear in 8 different
forms, from inappropriate use and racial discrimination, to physical safety and
unfair algorithm. With this taxonomy of AI ethics issues, we aim to provide AI
practitioners with a practical guideline when trying to deploy AI applications
ethically. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.07635 | [
"Mengyi Wei",
"Zhixuan Zhou"
] | 128 |
Pre-Trained Language Models for
Interactive Decision-Making
Shuang Li1, Xavier Puig1, Chris Paxton2, Yilun Du1, Clinton Wang1, | 2202.01771 | Pre-Trained Language Models for Interactive Decision-Making | Language model (LM) pre-training is useful in many language processing tasks.
But can pre-trained LMs be further leveraged for more general machine learning
problems? We propose an approach for using LMs to scaffold learning and
generalization in general sequential decision-making problems. In this
approach, goals and observations are represented as a sequence of embeddings,
and a policy network initialized with a pre-trained LM predicts the next
action. We demonstrate that this framework enables effective combinatorial
generalization across different environments and supervisory modalities. We
begin by assuming access to a set of expert demonstrations, and show that
initializing policies with LMs and fine-tuning them via behavior cloning
improves task completion rates by 43.6% in the VirtualHome environment. Next,
we integrate an active data gathering procedure in which agents iteratively
interact with the environment, relabel past "failed" experiences with new
goals, and update their policies in a self-supervised loop. Active data
gathering further improves combinatorial generalization, outperforming the best
baseline by 25.1%. Finally, we explain these results by investigating three
possible factors underlying the effectiveness of the LM-based policy. We find
that sequential input representations (vs. fixed-dimensional feature vectors)
and LM-based weight initialization are both important for generalization.
Surprisingly, however, the format of the policy inputs encoding (e.g. as a
natural language string vs. an arbitrary sequential encoding) has little
influence. Together, these results suggest that language modeling induces
representations that are useful for modeling not just language, but also goals
and plans; these representations can aid learning and generalization even
outside of language processing. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.01771 | [
"Shuang Li",
"Xavier Puig",
"Chris Paxton",
"Yilun Du",
"Clinton Wang",
"Linxi Fan",
"Tao Chen",
"De-An Huang",
"Ekin Akyürek",
"Anima Anandkumar",
"Jacob Andreas",
"Igor Mordatch",
"Antonio Torralba",
"Yuke Zhu"
] | 128 |
BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural
Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension
Mike Lewis*, Y | 1910.13461 | BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension | We present BART, a denoising autoencoder for pretraining sequence-to-sequence
models. BART is trained by (1) corrupting text with an arbitrary noising
function, and (2) learning a model to reconstruct the original text. It uses a
standard Tranformer-based neural machine translation architecture which,
despite its simplicity, can be seen as generalizing BERT (due to the
bidirectional encoder), GPT (with the left-to-right decoder), and many other
more recent pretraining schemes. We evaluate a number of noising approaches,
finding the best performance by both randomly shuffling the order of the
original sentences and using a novel in-filling scheme, where spans of text are
replaced with a single mask token. BART is particularly effective when fine
tuned for text generation but also works well for comprehension tasks. It
matches the performance of RoBERTa with comparable training resources on GLUE
and SQuAD, achieves new state-of-the-art results on a range of abstractive
dialogue, question answering, and summarization tasks, with gains of up to 6
ROUGE. BART also provides a 1.1 BLEU increase over a back-translation system
for machine translation, with only target language pretraining. We also report
ablation experiments that replicate other pretraining schemes within the BART
framework, to better measure which factors most influence end-task performance. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.13461 | [
"Mike Lewis",
"Yinhan Liu",
"Naman Goyal",
"Marjan Ghazvininejad",
"Abdelrahman Mohamed",
"Omer Levy",
"Ves Stoyanov",
"Luke Zettlemoyer"
] | 128 |
Toward Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Learning
Cuong V . Nguyeny, Alessandro Achilley, Michael Lamy, Tal Has | 1908.01091 | Toward Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Learning | We study the relationship between catastrophic forgetting and properties of
task sequences. In particular, given a sequence of tasks, we would like to
understand which properties of this sequence influence the error rates of
continual learning algorithms trained on the sequence. To this end, we propose
a new procedure that makes use of recent developments in task space modeling as
well as correlation analysis to specify and analyze the properties we are
interested in. As an application, we apply our procedure to study two
properties of a task sequence: (1) total complexity and (2) sequential
heterogeneity. We show that error rates are strongly and positively correlated
to a task sequence's total complexity for some state-of-the-art algorithms. We
also show that, surprisingly, the error rates have no or even negative
correlations in some cases to sequential heterogeneity. Our findings suggest
directions for improving continual learning benchmarks and methods. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.01091 | [
"Cuong V. Nguyen",
"Alessandro Achille",
"Michael Lam",
"Tal Hassner",
"Vijay Mahadevan",
"Stefano Soatto"
] | 128 |
The Capacity for Moral Self-Correction in Large
Language Models
Deep Ganguli, Amanda Askell, Nicholas Schiefer, Thomas I. Liao | 2302.07459 | The Capacity for Moral Self-Correction in Large Language Models | We test the hypothesis that language models trained with reinforcement
learning from human feedback (RLHF) have the capability to "morally
self-correct" -- to avoid producing harmful outputs -- if instructed to do so.
We find strong evidence in support of this hypothesis across three different
experiments, each of which reveal different facets of moral self-correction. We
find that the capability for moral self-correction emerges at 22B model
parameters, and typically improves with increasing model size and RLHF
training. We believe that at this level of scale, language models obtain two
capabilities that they can use for moral self-correction: (1) they can follow
instructions and (2) they can learn complex normative concepts of harm like
stereotyping, bias, and discrimination. As such, they can follow instructions
to avoid certain kinds of morally harmful outputs. We believe our results are
cause for cautious optimism regarding the ability to train language models to
abide by ethical principles. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.07459 | [
"Deep Ganguli",
"Amanda Askell",
"Nicholas Schiefer",
"Thomas I. Liao",
"Kamilė Lukošiūtė",
"Anna Chen",
"Anna Goldie",
"Azalia Mirhoseini",
"Catherine Olsson",
"Danny Hernandez",
"Dawn Drain",
"Dustin Li",
"Eli Tran-Johnson",
"Ethan Perez",
"Jackson Kernion",
"Jamie Kerr",
"Jared Mueller",
"Joshua Landau",
"Kamal Ndousse",
"Karina Nguyen",
"Liane Lovitt",
"Michael Sellitto",
"Nelson Elhage",
"Noemi Mercado",
"Nova DasSarma",
"Oliver Rausch",
"Robert Lasenby",
"Robin Larson",
"Sam Ringer",
"Sandipan Kundu",
"Saurav Kadavath",
"Scott Johnston",
"Shauna Kravec",
"Sheer El Showk",
"Tamera Lanham",
"Timothy Telleen-Lawton",
"Tom Henighan",
"Tristan Hume",
"Yuntao Bai",
"Zac Hatfield-Dodds",
"Ben Mann",
"Dario Amodei",
"Nicholas Joseph",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Tom Brown",
"Christopher Olah",
"Jack Clark",
"Samuel R. Bowman",
"Jared Kaplan"
] | 128 |
Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models
with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes
Cheng-Yu Hsieh1, | 2305.02301 | Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes | Deploying large language models (LLMs) is challenging because they are memory
inefficient and compute-intensive for practical applications. In reaction,
researchers train smaller task-specific models by either finetuning with human
labels or distilling using LLM-generated labels. However, finetuning and
distillation require large amounts of training data to achieve comparable
performance to LLMs. We introduce Distilling step-by-step, a new mechanism that
(a) trains smaller models that outperform LLMs, and (b) achieves so by
leveraging less training data needed by finetuning or distillation. Our method
extracts LLM rationales as additional supervision for training small models
within a multi-task framework. We present three findings across 4 NLP
benchmarks: First, compared to both finetuning and distillation, our mechanism
achieves better performance with much fewer labeled/unlabeled training
examples. Second, compared to few-shot prompted LLMs, we achieve better
performance using substantially smaller model sizes. Third, we reduce both the
model size and the amount of data required to outperform LLMs; our finetuned
770M T5 model outperforms the few-shot prompted 540B PaLM model using only 80%
of available data on a benchmark, whereas standard finetuning the same T5 model
struggles to match even by using 100% of the dataset. We release the code at:
https://github.com/google-research/distilling-step-by-step . | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.02301 | [
"Cheng-Yu Hsieh",
"Chun-Liang Li",
"Chih-Kuan Yeh",
"Hootan Nakhost",
"Yasuhisa Fujii",
"Alexander Ratner",
"Ranjay Krishna",
"Chen-Yu Lee",
"Tomas Pfister"
] | 128 |
HellaSwag : Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?
Rowan ZellersAri HoltzmanYonatan BiskAli Farhadi~Yejin Choi~
Paul G | 1905.07830 | HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence? | Recent work by Zellers et al. (2018) introduced a new task of commonsense
natural language inference: given an event description such as "A woman sits at
a piano," a machine must select the most likely followup: "She sets her fingers
on the keys." With the introduction of BERT, near human-level performance was
reached. Does this mean that machines can perform human level commonsense
inference?
In this paper, we show that commonsense inference still proves difficult for
even state-of-the-art models, by presenting HellaSwag, a new challenge dataset.
Though its questions are trivial for humans (>95% accuracy), state-of-the-art
models struggle (<48%). We achieve this via Adversarial Filtering (AF), a data
collection paradigm wherein a series of discriminators iteratively select an
adversarial set of machine-generated wrong answers. AF proves to be
surprisingly robust. The key insight is to scale up the length and complexity
of the dataset examples towards a critical 'Goldilocks' zone wherein generated
text is ridiculous to humans, yet often misclassified by state-of-the-art
models.
Our construction of HellaSwag, and its resulting difficulty, sheds light on
the inner workings of deep pretrained models. More broadly, it suggests a new
path forward for NLP research, in which benchmarks co-evolve with the evolving
state-of-the-art in an adversarial way, so as to present ever-harder
challenges. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.07830 | [
"Rowan Zellers",
"Ari Holtzman",
"Yonatan Bisk",
"Ali Farhadi",
"Yejin Choi"
] | 128 |
Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inference
Qian Chen
University of Science and
Technology of China
[email protected] | 1609.06038 | Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inference | Reasoning and inference are central to human and artificial intelligence.
Modeling inference in human language is very challenging. With the availability
of large annotated data (Bowman et al., 2015), it has recently become feasible
to train neural network based inference models, which have shown to be very
effective. In this paper, we present a new state-of-the-art result, achieving
the accuracy of 88.6% on the Stanford Natural Language Inference Dataset.
Unlike the previous top models that use very complicated network architectures,
we first demonstrate that carefully designing sequential inference models based
on chain LSTMs can outperform all previous models. Based on this, we further
show that by explicitly considering recursive architectures in both local
inference modeling and inference composition, we achieve additional
improvement. Particularly, incorporating syntactic parsing information
contributes to our best result---it further improves the performance even when
added to the already very strong model. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.06038 | [
"Qian Chen",
"Xiaodan Zhu",
"Zhenhua Ling",
"Si Wei",
"Hui Jiang",
"Diana Inkpen"
] | 128 |
Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?
Vinu Sankar Sadasivan
[email protected] Kumar
[email protected]
Sriram Balasubramanian | 2303.11156 | Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected? | In this paper, both empirically and theoretically, we show that several
AI-text detectors are not reliable in practical scenarios. Empirically, we show
that paraphrasing attacks, where a light paraphraser is applied on top of a
large language model (LLM), can break a whole range of detectors, including
ones using watermarking schemes as well as neural network-based detectors and
zero-shot classifiers. Our experiments demonstrate that retrieval-based
detectors, designed to evade paraphrasing attacks, are still vulnerable to
recursive paraphrasing. We then provide a theoretical impossibility result
indicating that as language models become more sophisticated and better at
emulating human text, the performance of even the best-possible detector
decreases. For a sufficiently advanced language model seeking to imitate human
text, even the best-possible detector may only perform marginally better than a
random classifier. Our result is general enough to capture specific scenarios
such as particular writing styles, clever prompt design, or text paraphrasing.
We also extend the impossibility result to include the case where pseudorandom
number generators are used for AI-text generation instead of true randomness.
We show that the same result holds with a negligible correction term for all
polynomial-time computable detectors. Finally, we show that even LLMs protected
by watermarking schemes can be vulnerable against spoofing attacks where
adversarial humans can infer hidden LLM text signatures and add them to
human-generated text to be detected as text generated by the LLMs, potentially
causing reputational damage to their developers. We believe these results can
open an honest conversation in the community regarding the ethical and reliable
use of AI-generated text. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.11156 | [
"Vinu Sankar Sadasivan",
"Aounon Kumar",
"Sriram Balasubramanian",
"Wenxiao Wang",
"Soheil Feizi"
] | 128 |
EXPLOITING STRUCTURED KNOWLEDGE IN TEXT VIA
GRAPH -GUIDED REPRESENTATION LEARNING
Tao Shen
University of Technology Sydney
tao. | 2004.14224 | Exploiting Structured Knowledge in Text via Graph-Guided Representation Learning | In this work, we aim at equipping pre-trained language models with structured
knowledge. We present two self-supervised tasks learning over raw text with the
guidance from knowledge graphs. Building upon entity-level masked language
models, our first contribution is an entity masking scheme that exploits
relational knowledge underlying the text. This is fulfilled by using a linked
knowledge graph to select informative entities and then masking their mentions.
In addition we use knowledge graphs to obtain distractors for the masked
entities, and propose a novel distractor-suppressed ranking objective which is
optimized jointly with masked language model. In contrast to existing
paradigms, our approach uses knowledge graphs implicitly, only during
pre-training, to inject language models with structured knowledge via learning
from raw text. It is more efficient than retrieval-based methods that perform
entity linking and integration during finetuning and inference, and generalizes
more effectively than the methods that directly learn from concatenated graph
triples. Experiments show that our proposed model achieves improved performance
on five benchmark datasets, including question answering and knowledge base
completion tasks. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.14224 | [
"Tao Shen",
"Yi Mao",
"Pengcheng He",
"Guodong Long",
"Adam Trischler",
"Weizhu Chen"
] | 128 |
OPT-IML
: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta
Learning through the Lens of Generalization
Srinivasan Iyer, Xi Victoria Lin | 2212.12017 | OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalization | Recent work has shown that fine-tuning large pre-trained language models on a
collection of tasks described via instructions, a.k.a. instruction-tuning,
improves their zero and few-shot generalization to unseen tasks. However, there
is a limited understanding of the performance trade-offs of different decisions
made during the instruction-tuning process. These decisions include the scale
and diversity of the instruction-tuning benchmark, different task sampling
strategies, fine-tuning with and without demonstrations, training using
specialized datasets for reasoning and dialogue, and finally, the fine-tuning
objectives themselves. In this paper, we characterize the effect of
instruction-tuning decisions on downstream task performance when scaling both
model and benchmark sizes. To this end, we create OPT-IML Bench: a large
benchmark for Instruction Meta-Learning (IML) of 2000 NLP tasks consolidated
into task categories from 8 existing benchmarks, and prepare an evaluation
framework to measure three types of model generalizations: to tasks from fully
held-out categories, to held-out tasks from seen categories, and to held-out
instances from seen tasks. Through the lens of this framework, we first present
insights about instruction-tuning decisions as applied to OPT-30B and further
exploit these insights to train OPT-IML 30B and 175B, which are
instruction-tuned versions of OPT. OPT-IML demonstrates all three
generalization abilities at both scales on four different evaluation benchmarks
with diverse tasks and input formats -- PromptSource, FLAN,
Super-NaturalInstructions, and UnifiedSKG. Not only does it significantly
outperform OPT on all benchmarks but is also highly competitive with existing
models fine-tuned on each specific benchmark. We release OPT-IML at both
scales, together with the OPT-IML Bench evaluation framework. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.12017 | [
"Srinivasan Iyer",
"Xi Victoria Lin",
"Ramakanth Pasunuru",
"Todor Mihaylov",
"Daniel Simig",
"Ping Yu",
"Kurt Shuster",
"Tianlu Wang",
"Qing Liu",
"Punit Singh Koura",
"Xian Li",
"Brian O'Horo",
"Gabriel Pereyra",
"Jeff Wang",
"Christopher Dewan",
"Asli Celikyilmaz",
"Luke Zettlemoyer",
"Ves Stoyanov"
] | 128 |
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2019
DECOUPLED WEIGHT DECAY REGULARIZATION
Ilya Loshchilov & Frank Hutter
University of | 1711.05101 | Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization | L$_2$ regularization and weight decay regularization are equivalent for
standard stochastic gradient descent (when rescaled by the learning rate), but
as we demonstrate this is \emph{not} the case for adaptive gradient algorithms,
such as Adam. While common implementations of these algorithms employ L$_2$
regularization (often calling it "weight decay" in what may be misleading due
to the inequivalence we expose), we propose a simple modification to recover
the original formulation of weight decay regularization by \emph{decoupling}
the weight decay from the optimization steps taken w.r.t. the loss function. We
provide empirical evidence that our proposed modification (i) decouples the
optimal choice of weight decay factor from the setting of the learning rate for
both standard SGD and Adam and (ii) substantially improves Adam's
generalization performance, allowing it to compete with SGD with momentum on
image classification datasets (on which it was previously typically
outperformed by the latter). Our proposed decoupled weight decay has already
been adopted by many researchers, and the community has implemented it in
TensorFlow and PyTorch; the complete source code for our experiments is
available at https://github.com/loshchil/AdamW-and-SGDW | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.05101 | [
"Ilya Loshchilov",
"Frank Hutter"
] | 128 |
THECURSE OF RECURSION :
TRAINING ON GENERATED DATA MAKES MODELS FORGET
Ilia Shumailov*
University of OxfordZakhar Shumaylov*
Uni | 2305.17493 | The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forget | Stable Diffusion revolutionised image creation from descriptive text. GPT-2,
GPT-3(.5) and GPT-4 demonstrated astonishing performance across a variety of
language tasks. ChatGPT introduced such language models to the general public.
It is now clear that large language models (LLMs) are here to stay, and will
bring about drastic change in the whole ecosystem of online text and images. In
this paper we consider what the future might hold. What will happen to GPT-{n}
once LLMs contribute much of the language found online? We find that use of
model-generated content in training causes irreversible defects in the
resulting models, where tails of the original content distribution disappear.
We refer to this effect as Model Collapse and show that it can occur in
Variational Autoencoders, Gaussian Mixture Models and LLMs. We build
theoretical intuition behind the phenomenon and portray its ubiquity amongst
all learned generative models. We demonstrate that it has to be taken seriously
if we are to sustain the benefits of training from large-scale data scraped
from the web. Indeed, the value of data collected about genuine human
interactions with systems will be increasingly valuable in the presence of
content generated by LLMs in data crawled from the Internet. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.17493 | [
"Ilia Shumailov",
"Zakhar Shumaylov",
"Yiren Zhao",
"Yarin Gal",
"Nicolas Papernot",
"Ross Anderson"
] | 128 |
mPLUG-Owl
: Modularization Empowers Large
Language Models with Multimodality
Qinghao Ye, Haiyang Xu, Guohai Xu, Jiabo Ye, Mi | 2304.14178 | mPLUG-Owl: Modularization Empowers Large Language Models with Multimodality | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive zero-shot abilities
on a variety of open-ended tasks, while recent research has also explored the
use of LLMs for multi-modal generation. In this study, we introduce mPLUG-Owl,
a novel training paradigm that equips LLMs with multi-modal abilities through
modularized learning of foundation LLM, a visual knowledge module, and a visual
abstractor module. This approach can support multiple modalities and facilitate
diverse unimodal and multimodal abilities through modality collaboration. The
training paradigm of mPLUG-Owl involves a two-stage method for aligning image
and text, which learns visual knowledge with the assistance of LLM while
maintaining and even improving the generation abilities of LLM. In the first
stage, the visual knowledge module and abstractor module are trained with a
frozen LLM module to align the image and text. In the second stage,
language-only and multi-modal supervised datasets are used to jointly fine-tune
a low-rank adaption (LoRA) module on LLM and the abstractor module by freezing
the visual knowledge module. We carefully build a visually-related instruction
evaluation set OwlEval. Experimental results show that our model outperforms
existing multi-modal models, demonstrating mPLUG-Owl's impressive instruction
and visual understanding ability, multi-turn conversation ability, and
knowledge reasoning ability. Besides, we observe some unexpected and exciting
abilities such as multi-image correlation and scene text understanding, which
makes it possible to leverage it for harder real scenarios, such as vision-only
document comprehension. Our code, pre-trained model, instruction-tuned models,
and evaluation set are available at https://github.com/X-PLUG/mPLUG-Owl. The
online demo is available at https://www.modelscope.cn/studios/damo/mPLUG-Owl. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.14178 | [
"Qinghao Ye",
"Haiyang Xu",
"Guohai Xu",
"Jiabo Ye",
"Ming Yan",
"Yiyang Zhou",
"Junyang Wang",
"Anwen Hu",
"Pengcheng Shi",
"Yaya Shi",
"Chenliang Li",
"Yuanhong Xu",
"Hehong Chen",
"Junfeng Tian",
"Qian Qi",
"Ji Zhang",
"Fei Huang"
] | 128 |
Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and
Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech
Fan Huang
huang | 2302.07736 | Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech | Recent studies have alarmed that many online hate speeches are implicit. With
its subtle nature, the explainability of the detection of such hateful speech
has been a challenging problem. In this work, we examine whether ChatGPT can be
used for providing natural language explanations (NLEs) for implicit hateful
speech detection. We design our prompt to elicit concise ChatGPT-generated NLEs
and conduct user studies to evaluate their qualities by comparison with
human-written NLEs. We discuss the potential and limitations of ChatGPT in the
context of implicit hateful speech research. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.07736 | [
"Fan Huang",
"Haewoon Kwak",
"Jisun An"
] | 128 |
Impact of Pretraining Term Frequencies on Few-Shot Reasoning
Yasaman Razeghi1Robert L. Logan IV1Matt Gardner2Sameer Singh1 3
Abs | 2202.07206 | Impact of Pretraining Term Frequencies on Few-Shot Reasoning | Pretrained Language Models (LMs) have demonstrated ability to perform
numerical reasoning by extrapolating from a few examples in few-shot settings.
However, the extent to which this extrapolation relies on robust reasoning is
unclear. In this paper, we investigate how well these models reason with terms
that are less frequent in the pretraining data. In particular, we examine the
correlations between the model performance on test instances and the frequency
of terms from those instances in the pretraining data. We measure the strength
of this correlation for a number of GPT-based language models (pretrained on
the Pile dataset) on various numerical deduction tasks (e.g., arithmetic and
unit conversion). Our results consistently demonstrate that models are more
accurate on instances whose terms are more prevalent, in some cases above
$70\%$ (absolute) more accurate on the top 10\% frequent terms in comparison to
the bottom 10\%. Overall, although LMs exhibit strong performance at few-shot
numerical reasoning tasks, our results raise the question of how much models
actually generalize beyond pretraining data, and we encourage researchers to
take the pretraining data into account when interpreting evaluation results. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.07206 | [
"Yasaman Razeghi",
"Robert L. Logan IV",
"Matt Gardner",
"Sameer Singh"
] | 128 |
Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networks
Leslie N. Smith
U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Code 5514
4555 Overlook Ave | 1506.01186 | Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networks | It is known that the learning rate is the most important hyper-parameter to
tune for training deep neural networks. This paper describes a new method for
setting the learning rate, named cyclical learning rates, which practically
eliminates the need to experimentally find the best values and schedule for the
global learning rates. Instead of monotonically decreasing the learning rate,
this method lets the learning rate cyclically vary between reasonable boundary
values. Training with cyclical learning rates instead of fixed values achieves
improved classification accuracy without a need to tune and often in fewer
iterations. This paper also describes a simple way to estimate "reasonable
bounds" -- linearly increasing the learning rate of the network for a few
epochs. In addition, cyclical learning rates are demonstrated on the CIFAR-10
and CIFAR-100 datasets with ResNets, Stochastic Depth networks, and DenseNets,
and the ImageNet dataset with the AlexNet and GoogLeNet architectures. These
are practical tools for everyone who trains neural networks. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.01186 | [
"Leslie N. Smith"
] | 128 |
Technical Report 2022-10-06 (v1)
GLM-130B: A NOPEN BILINGUAL PRE-TRAINED
MODEL
Aohan Zengz, Xiao Liuz, Zhengxiao Duz, Zihan Wa | 2210.02414 | GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Model | We introduce GLM-130B, a bilingual (English and Chinese) pre-trained language
model with 130 billion parameters. It is an attempt to open-source a 100B-scale
model at least as good as GPT-3 and unveil how models of such a scale can be
successfully pre-trained. Over the course of this effort, we face numerous
unexpected technical and engineering challenges, particularly on loss spikes
and disconvergence. In this paper, we introduce the training process of
GLM-130B including its design choices, training strategies for both efficiency
and stability, and engineering efforts. The resultant GLM-130B model offers
significant outperformance over GPT-3 175B on a wide range of popular English
benchmarks while the performance advantage is not observed in OPT-175B and
BLOOM-176B. It also consistently and significantly outperforms ERNIE TITAN 3.0
260B -- the largest Chinese language model -- across related benchmarks.
Finally, we leverage a unique scaling property of GLM-130B to reach INT4
quantization, without quantization aware training and with almost no
performance loss, making it the first among 100B-scale models. More
importantly, the property allows its effective inference on 4$\times$RTX 3090
(24G) or 8$\times$RTX 2080 Ti (11G) GPUs, the most ever affordable GPUs
required for using 100B-scale models. The GLM-130B model weights are publicly
accessible and its code, training logs, related toolkit, and lessons learned
are open-sourced at https://github.com/THUDM/GLM-130B . | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.02414 | [
"Aohan Zeng",
"Xiao Liu",
"Zhengxiao Du",
"Zihan Wang",
"Hanyu Lai",
"Ming Ding",
"Zhuoyi Yang",
"Yifan Xu",
"Wendi Zheng",
"Xiao Xia",
"Weng Lam Tam",
"Zixuan Ma",
"Yufei Xue",
"Jidong Zhai",
"Wenguang Chen",
"Peng Zhang",
"Yuxiao Dong",
"Jie Tang"
] | 128 |
Language Models that Seek for Knowledge:
Modular Search & Generation for Dialogue and Prompt Completion
Kurt Shuster
Facebook AI | 2203.13224 | Language Models that Seek for Knowledge: Modular Search & Generation for Dialogue and Prompt Completion | Language models (LMs) have recently been shown to generate more factual
responses by employing modularity (Zhou et al., 2021) in combination with
retrieval (Adolphs et al., 2021). We extend the recent approach of Adolphs et
al. (2021) to include internet search as a module. Our SeeKeR (Search
engine->Knowledge->Response) method thus applies a single LM to three modular
tasks in succession: search, generating knowledge, and generating a final
response. We show that, when using SeeKeR as a dialogue model, it outperforms
the state-of-the-art model BlenderBot 2 (Chen et al., 2021) on open-domain
knowledge-grounded conversations for the same number of parameters, in terms of
consistency, knowledge and per-turn engagingness. SeeKeR applied to topical
prompt completions as a standard language model outperforms GPT2 (Radford et
al., 2019) and GPT3 (Brown et al., 2020) in terms of factuality and topicality,
despite GPT3 being a vastly larger model. Our code and models are made publicly
available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.13224 | [
"Kurt Shuster",
"Mojtaba Komeili",
"Leonard Adolphs",
"Stephen Roller",
"Arthur Szlam",
"Jason Weston"
] | 128 |
Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models
from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision
Zhiqing Sun1Yikang Shen2Qinhong | 2305.03047 | Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision | Recent AI-assistant agents, such as ChatGPT, predominantly rely on supervised
fine-tuning (SFT) with human annotations and reinforcement learning from human
feedback (RLHF) to align the output of large language models (LLMs) with human
intentions, ensuring they are helpful, ethical, and reliable. However, this
dependence can significantly constrain the true potential of AI-assistant
agents due to the high cost of obtaining human supervision and the related
issues on quality, reliability, diversity, self-consistency, and undesirable
biases. To address these challenges, we propose a novel approach called
SELF-ALIGN, which combines principle-driven reasoning and the generative power
of LLMs for the self-alignment of AI agents with minimal human supervision. Our
approach encompasses four stages: first, we use an LLM to generate synthetic
prompts, and a topic-guided method to augment the prompt diversity; second, we
use a small set of human-written principles for AI models to follow, and guide
the LLM through in-context learning from demonstrations (of principles
application) to produce helpful, ethical, and reliable responses to user's
queries; third, we fine-tune the original LLM with the high-quality
self-aligned responses so that the resulting model can generate desirable
responses for each query directly without the principle set and the
demonstrations anymore; and finally, we offer a refinement step to address the
issues of overly-brief or indirect responses. Applying SELF-ALIGN to the
LLaMA-65b base language model, we develop an AI assistant named Dromedary. With
fewer than 300 lines of human annotations (including < 200 seed prompts, 16
generic principles, and 5 exemplars for in-context learning). Dromedary
significantly surpasses the performance of several state-of-the-art AI systems,
including Text-Davinci-003 and Alpaca, on benchmark datasets with various
settings. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.03047 | [
"Zhiqing Sun",
"Yikang Shen",
"Qinhong Zhou",
"Hongxin Zhang",
"Zhenfang Chen",
"David Cox",
"Yiming Yang",
"Chuang Gan"
] | 128 |
Hi, my name is Martha:
Using names to measure and mitigate bias in generative dialogue models
Eric Michael Smith, Adina Williams | 2109.03300 | Hi, my name is Martha: Using names to measure and mitigate bias in generative dialogue models | All AI models are susceptible to learning biases in data that they are
trained on. For generative dialogue models, being trained on real human
conversations containing unbalanced gender and race/ethnicity references can
lead to models that display learned biases, which we define here broadly as any
measurable differences in the distributions of words or semantic content of
conversations based on demographic groups. We measure the strength of such
biases by producing artificial conversations between two copies of a dialogue
model, conditioning one conversational partner to state a name commonly
associated with a certain gender and/or race/ethnicity. We find that larger
capacity models tend to exhibit more gender bias and greater stereotyping of
occupations by gender. We show that several methods of tuning these dialogue
models, specifically name scrambling, controlled generation, and unlikelihood
training, are effective in reducing bias in conversation, including on a
downstream conversational task. Name scrambling is also effective in lowering
differences in token usage across conversations where partners have names
associated with different genders or races/ethnicities. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.03300 | [
"Eric Michael Smith",
"Adina Williams"
] | 128 |
How Many Data Samples is an Additional Instruction Worth?
Ravsehaj Singh PuriSwaroop MishraMihir Parmar Chitta Baral
Arizona S | 2203.09161 | How Many Data Samples is an Additional Instruction Worth? | Recently introduced instruction-paradigm empowers non-expert users to
leverage NLP resources by defining a new task in natural language.
Instruction-tuned models have significantly outperformed multitask learning
models (without instruction); however they are far from state-of-the-art
task-specific models. Conventional approaches to improve model performance via
creating datasets with large number of task instances or architectural changes
in the model may not be feasible for non-expert users. However, they can write
alternate instructions to represent an instruction task. Is
Instruction-augmentation helpful? We augment a subset of tasks in the expanded
version of NATURAL INSTRUCTIONS with additional instructions and find that it
significantly improves model performance (up to 35%), especially in the
low-data regime. Our results indicate that an additional instruction can be
equivalent to ~200 data samples on average across tasks. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.09161 | [
"Ravsehaj Singh Puri",
"Swaroop Mishra",
"Mihir Parmar",
"Chitta Baral"
] | 128 |
Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Models
DEEP GANGULI∗, DANNY HERNANDEZ∗, LIANE LOVITT∗, NOVA DASSARMA†, TOM HENIG | 2202.07785 | Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Models | Large-scale pre-training has recently emerged as a technique for creating
capable, general purpose, generative models such as GPT-3, Megatron-Turing NLG,
Gopher, and many others. In this paper, we highlight a counterintuitive
property of such models and discuss the policy implications of this property.
Namely, these generative models have an unusual combination of predictable loss
on a broad training distribution (as embodied in their "scaling laws"), and
unpredictable specific capabilities, inputs, and outputs. We believe that the
high-level predictability and appearance of useful capabilities drives rapid
development of such models, while the unpredictable qualities make it difficult
to anticipate the consequences of model deployment. We go through examples of
how this combination can lead to socially harmful behavior with examples from
the literature and real world observations, and we also perform two novel
experiments to illustrate our point about harms from unpredictability.
Furthermore, we analyze how these conflicting properties combine to give model
developers various motivations for deploying these models, and challenges that
can hinder deployment. We conclude with a list of possible interventions the AI
community may take to increase the chance of these models having a beneficial
impact. We intend this paper to be useful to policymakers who want to
understand and regulate AI systems, technologists who care about the potential
policy impact of their work, and academics who want to analyze, critique, and
potentially develop large generative models. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.07785 | [
"Deep Ganguli",
"Danny Hernandez",
"Liane Lovitt",
"Nova DasSarma",
"Tom Henighan",
"Andy Jones",
"Nicholas Joseph",
"Jackson Kernion",
"Ben Mann",
"Amanda Askell",
"Yuntao Bai",
"Anna Chen",
"Tom Conerly",
"Dawn Drain",
"Nelson Elhage",
"Sheer El Showk",
"Stanislav Fort",
"Zac Hatfield-Dodds",
"Scott Johnston",
"Shauna Kravec",
"Neel Nanda",
"Kamal Ndousse",
"Catherine Olsson",
"Daniela Amodei",
"Dario Amodei",
"Tom Brown",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Chris Olah",
"Jack Clark"
] | 128 |
TALM: Tool Augmented Language Models
Aaron Parisi Yao Zhao Noah Fiedel
faarontp ;yaozhaoyz ;nfiedelg
@google.com
Abstract
Transf | 2205.12255 | TALM: Tool Augmented Language Models | Transformer based language models (LMs) demonstrate increasing performance
with scale across a wide variety of tasks. Scale alone however cannot enable
models to solve tasks that require access to ephemeral, changing, or private
data that was unavailable at training time. Many useful tasks may also benefit
from LMs being able to access APIs that read or modify state. In this work, we
present Tool Augmented Language Models (TALM), combining a text-only approach
to augment language models with non-differentiable tools, and an iterative
"self-play" technique to bootstrap performance starting from few tool
demonstrations. TALM exhibits strong performance on both a knowledge-heavy QA
task and a reasoning oriented math task with simple tools. At a given model
scale, TALM significantly outperforms non-augmented LMs. We further demonstrate
that TALM successfully performs out-of-distribution inferences on both QA and
math tasks, where non-augmented LMs fail. Our results suggest that Tool
Augmented Language Models are a promising direction to enrich LMs'
capabilities, with less dependence on scale. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.12255 | [
"Aaron Parisi",
"Yao Zhao",
"Noah Fiedel"
] | 128 |
Neural Generation Meets Real People: Towards
Emotionally Engaging Mixed-Initiative Conversations
Ashwin Paranjape, Abigail See, | 2008.12348 | Neural Generation Meets Real People: Towards Emotionally Engaging Mixed-Initiative Conversations | We present Chirpy Cardinal, an open-domain dialogue agent, as a research
platform for the 2019 Alexa Prize competition. Building an open-domain
socialbot that talks to real people is challenging - such a system must meet
multiple user expectations such as broad world knowledge, conversational style,
and emotional connection. Our socialbot engages users on their terms -
prioritizing their interests, feelings and autonomy. As a result, our socialbot
provides a responsive, personalized user experience, capable of talking
knowledgeably about a wide variety of topics, as well as chatting
empathetically about ordinary life. Neural generation plays a key role in
achieving these goals, providing the backbone for our conversational and
emotional tone. At the end of the competition, Chirpy Cardinal progressed to
the finals with an average rating of 3.6/5.0, a median conversation duration of
2 minutes 16 seconds, and a 90th percentile duration of over 12 minutes. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.12348 | [
"Ashwin Paranjape",
"Abigail See",
"Kathleen Kenealy",
"Haojun Li",
"Amelia Hardy",
"Peng Qi",
"Kaushik Ram Sadagopan",
"Nguyet Minh Phu",
"Dilara Soylu",
"Christopher D. Manning"
] | 128 |
Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG
530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Model
Shaden Smithx,y, Mostofa | 2201.11990 | Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Model | Pretrained general-purpose language models can achieve state-of-the-art
accuracies in various natural language processing domains by adapting to
downstream tasks via zero-shot, few-shot and fine-tuning techniques. Because of
their success, the size of these models has increased rapidly, requiring
high-performance hardware, software, and algorithmic techniques to enable
training such large models. As the result of a joint effort between Microsoft
and NVIDIA, we present details on the training of the largest monolithic
transformer based language model, Megatron-Turing NLG 530B (MT-NLG), with 530
billion parameters. In this paper, we first focus on the infrastructure as well
as the 3D parallelism methodology used to train this model using DeepSpeed and
Megatron. Next, we detail the training process, the design of our training
corpus, and our data curation techniques, which we believe is a key ingredient
to the success of the model. Finally, we discuss various evaluation results, as
well as other interesting observations and new properties exhibited by MT-NLG.
We demonstrate that MT-NLG achieves superior zero-, one-, and few-shot learning
accuracies on several NLP benchmarks and establishes new state-of-the-art
results. We believe that our contributions will help further the development of
large-scale training infrastructures, large-scale language models, and natural
language generations. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.11990 | [
"Shaden Smith",
"Mostofa Patwary",
"Brandon Norick",
"Patrick LeGresley",
"Samyam Rajbhandari",
"Jared Casper",
"Zhun Liu",
"Shrimai Prabhumoye",
"George Zerveas",
"Vijay Korthikanti",
"Elton Zhang",
"Rewon Child",
"Reza Yazdani Aminabadi",
"Julie Bernauer",
"Xia Song",
"Mohammad Shoeybi",
"Yuxiong He",
"Michael Houston",
"Saurabh Tiwary",
"Bryan Catanzaro"
] | 128 |
MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark
Niklas Muennighoff1, Nouamane Tazi1, Loïc Magne1, Nils Reimers2*
1Hugging Face2cohere.ai
| 2210.07316 | MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark | Text embeddings are commonly evaluated on a small set of datasets from a
single task not covering their possible applications to other tasks. It is
unclear whether state-of-the-art embeddings on semantic textual similarity
(STS) can be equally well applied to other tasks like clustering or reranking.
This makes progress in the field difficult to track, as various models are
constantly being proposed without proper evaluation. To solve this problem, we
introduce the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB). MTEB spans 8 embedding
tasks covering a total of 58 datasets and 112 languages. Through the
benchmarking of 33 models on MTEB, we establish the most comprehensive
benchmark of text embeddings to date. We find that no particular text embedding
method dominates across all tasks. This suggests that the field has yet to
converge on a universal text embedding method and scale it up sufficiently to
provide state-of-the-art results on all embedding tasks. MTEB comes with
open-source code and a public leaderboard at
https://github.com/embeddings-benchmark/mteb. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.07316 | [
"Niklas Muennighoff",
"Nouamane Tazi",
"Loïc Magne",
"Nils Reimers"
] | 128 |
arXiv:2112.05682v3 [cs.LG] 10 Oct 2022SELF-ATTENTION DOES NOTNEEDO(n2)MEMORY
A P REPRINT
Markus N. Rabe and Charles Staats
Goo | 2112.05682 | Self-attention Does Not Need $O(n^2)$ Memory | We present a very simple algorithm for attention that requires $O(1)$ memory
with respect to sequence length and an extension to self-attention that
requires $O(\log n)$ memory. This is in contrast with the frequently stated
belief that self-attention requires $O(n^2)$ memory. While the time complexity
is still $O(n^2)$, device memory rather than compute capability is often the
limiting factor on modern accelerators. Thus, reducing the memory requirements
of attention allows processing of longer sequences than might otherwise be
feasible. We provide a practical implementation for accelerators that requires
$O(\sqrt{n})$ memory, is numerically stable, and is within a few percent of the
runtime of the standard implementation of attention. We also demonstrate how to
differentiate the function while remaining memory-efficient. For sequence
length 16384, the memory overhead of self-attention is reduced by 59X for
inference and by 32X for differentiation. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.05682 | [
"Markus N. Rabe",
"Charles Staats"
] | 128 |
arXiv:2007.07399v1 [cs.CY] 14 Jul 2020Bringing the People Back In: Contesting Benchmark Machine L earning
Datasets
Emily Dento | 2007.07399 | Bringing the People Back In: Contesting Benchmark Machine Learning Datasets | In response to algorithmic unfairness embedded in sociotechnical systems,
significant attention has been focused on the contents of machine learning
datasets which have revealed biases towards white, cisgender, male, and Western
data subjects. In contrast, comparatively less attention has been paid to the
histories, values, and norms embedded in such datasets. In this work, we
outline a research program - a genealogy of machine learning data - for
investigating how and why these datasets have been created, what and whose
values influence the choices of data to collect, the contextual and contingent
conditions of their creation. We describe the ways in which benchmark datasets
in machine learning operate as infrastructure and pose four research questions
for these datasets. This interrogation forces us to "bring the people back in"
by aiding us in understanding the labor embedded in dataset construction, and
thereby presenting new avenues of contestation for other researchers
encountering the data. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.07399 | [
"Emily Denton",
"Alex Hanna",
"Razvan Amironesei",
"Andrew Smart",
"Hilary Nicole",
"Morgan Klaus Scheuerman"
] | 128 |
arXiv:1902.09666v2 [cs.CL] 16 Apr 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social M edia
Marcos Zampieri1, She | 1902.09666 | Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Media | As offensive content has become pervasive in social media, there has been
much research in identifying potentially offensive messages. However, previous
work on this topic did not consider the problem as a whole, but rather focused
on detecting very specific types of offensive content, e.g., hate speech,
cyberbulling, or cyber-aggression. In contrast, here we target several
different kinds of offensive content. In particular, we model the task
hierarchically, identifying the type and the target of offensive messages in
social media. For this purpose, we complied the Offensive Language
Identification Dataset (OLID), a new dataset with tweets annotated for
offensive content using a fine-grained three-layer annotation scheme, which we
make publicly available. We discuss the main similarities and differences
between OLID and pre-existing datasets for hate speech identification,
aggression detection, and similar tasks. We further experiment with and we
compare the performance of different machine learning models on OLID. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.09666 | [
"Marcos Zampieri",
"Shervin Malmasi",
"Preslav Nakov",
"Sara Rosenthal",
"Noura Farra",
"Ritesh Kumar"
] | 128 |
Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models
Hyung Won Chung∗Le Hou∗Shayne Longpre∗Barret Zoph†Yi Tay†
William Fedus†Yunxuan Li | 2210.11416 | Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models | Finetuning language models on a collection of datasets phrased as
instructions has been shown to improve model performance and generalization to
unseen tasks. In this paper we explore instruction finetuning with a particular
focus on (1) scaling the number of tasks, (2) scaling the model size, and (3)
finetuning on chain-of-thought data. We find that instruction finetuning with
the above aspects dramatically improves performance on a variety of model
classes (PaLM, T5, U-PaLM), prompting setups (zero-shot, few-shot, CoT), and
evaluation benchmarks (MMLU, BBH, TyDiQA, MGSM, open-ended generation). For
instance, Flan-PaLM 540B instruction-finetuned on 1.8K tasks outperforms PALM
540B by a large margin (+9.4% on average). Flan-PaLM 540B achieves
state-of-the-art performance on several benchmarks, such as 75.2% on five-shot
MMLU. We also publicly release Flan-T5 checkpoints, which achieve strong
few-shot performance even compared to much larger models, such as PaLM 62B.
Overall, instruction finetuning is a general method for improving the
performance and usability of pretrained language models. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.11416 | [
"Hyung Won Chung",
"Le Hou",
"Shayne Longpre",
"Barret Zoph",
"Yi Tay",
"William Fedus",
"Yunxuan Li",
"Xuezhi Wang",
"Mostafa Dehghani",
"Siddhartha Brahma",
"Albert Webson",
"Shixiang Shane Gu",
"Zhuyun Dai",
"Mirac Suzgun",
"Xinyun Chen",
"Aakanksha Chowdhery",
"Alex Castro-Ros",
"Marie Pellat",
"Kevin Robinson",
"Dasha Valter",
"Sharan Narang",
"Gaurav Mishra",
"Adams Yu",
"Vincent Zhao",
"Yanping Huang",
"Andrew Dai",
"Hongkun Yu",
"Slav Petrov",
"Ed H. Chi",
"Jeff Dean",
"Jacob Devlin",
"Adam Roberts",
"Denny Zhou",
"Quoc V. Le",
"Jason Wei"
] | 128 |
What’s in the Box?
A Preliminary Analysis of
Undesirable Content in the Common Crawl Corpus
Alexandra (Sasha) Luccioni
Universit | 2105.02732 | What's in the Box? A Preliminary Analysis of Undesirable Content in the Common Crawl Corpus | Whereas much of the success of the current generation of neural language
models has been driven by increasingly large training corpora, relatively
little research has been dedicated to analyzing these massive sources of
textual data. In this exploratory analysis, we delve deeper into the Common
Crawl, a colossal web corpus that is extensively used for training language
models. We find that it contains a significant amount of undesirable content,
including hate speech and sexually explicit content, even after filtering
procedures. We discuss the potential impacts of this content on language models
and conclude with future research directions and a more mindful approach to
corpus collection and analysis. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.02732 | [
"Alexandra Sasha Luccioni",
"Joseph D. Viviano"
] | 128 |
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2019
FLOW QA: G RASPING FLOW IN HISTORY FOR
CONVERSATIONAL MACHINE COMPREHENSION
Hsin-Yu | 1810.06683 | FlowQA: Grasping Flow in History for Conversational Machine Comprehension | Conversational machine comprehension requires the understanding of the
conversation history, such as previous question/answer pairs, the document
context, and the current question. To enable traditional, single-turn models to
encode the history comprehensively, we introduce Flow, a mechanism that can
incorporate intermediate representations generated during the process of
answering previous questions, through an alternating parallel processing
structure. Compared to approaches that concatenate previous questions/answers
as input, Flow integrates the latent semantics of the conversation history more
deeply. Our model, FlowQA, shows superior performance on two recently proposed
conversational challenges (+7.2% F1 on CoQA and +4.0% on QuAC). The
effectiveness of Flow also shows in other tasks. By reducing sequential
instruction understanding to conversational machine comprehension, FlowQA
outperforms the best models on all three domains in SCONE, with +1.8% to +4.4%
improvement in accuracy. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.06683 | [
"Hsin-Yuan Huang",
"Eunsol Choi",
"Wen-tau Yih"
] | 128 |
Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training
David Patterson 1 , 2 , Joseph Gonzalez 2 , Quoc L | 2104.10350 | Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training | The computation demand for machine learning (ML) has grown rapidly recently,
which comes with a number of costs. Estimating the energy cost helps measure
its environmental impact and finding greener strategies, yet it is challenging
without detailed information. We calculate the energy use and carbon footprint
of several recent large models-T5, Meena, GShard, Switch Transformer, and
GPT-3-and refine earlier estimates for the neural architecture search that
found Evolved Transformer. We highlight the following opportunities to improve
energy efficiency and CO2 equivalent emissions (CO2e): Large but sparsely
activated DNNs can consume <1/10th the energy of large, dense DNNs without
sacrificing accuracy despite using as many or even more parameters. Geographic
location matters for ML workload scheduling since the fraction of carbon-free
energy and resulting CO2e vary ~5X-10X, even within the same country and the
same organization. We are now optimizing where and when large models are
trained. Specific datacenter infrastructure matters, as Cloud datacenters can
be ~1.4-2X more energy efficient than typical datacenters, and the ML-oriented
accelerators inside them can be ~2-5X more effective than off-the-shelf
systems. Remarkably, the choice of DNN, datacenter, and processor can reduce
the carbon footprint up to ~100-1000X. These large factors also make
retroactive estimates of energy cost difficult. To avoid miscalculations, we
believe ML papers requiring large computational resources should make energy
consumption and CO2e explicit when practical. We are working to be more
transparent about energy use and CO2e in our future research. To help reduce
the carbon footprint of ML, we believe energy usage and CO2e should be a key
metric in evaluating models, and we are collaborating with MLPerf developers to
include energy usage during training and inference in this industry standard
benchmark. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.10350 | [
"David Patterson",
"Joseph Gonzalez",
"Quoc Le",
"Chen Liang",
"Lluis-Miquel Munguia",
"Daniel Rothchild",
"David So",
"Maud Texier",
"Jeff Dean"
] | 128 |
Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as
Linear Models Under Gradient Descent
Jaehoon Lee, Lechao Xiao, Samuel S. Schoenhol | 1902.06720 | Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descent | A longstanding goal in deep learning research has been to precisely
characterize training and generalization. However, the often complex loss
landscapes of neural networks have made a theory of learning dynamics elusive.
In this work, we show that for wide neural networks the learning dynamics
simplify considerably and that, in the infinite width limit, they are governed
by a linear model obtained from the first-order Taylor expansion of the network
around its initial parameters. Furthermore, mirroring the correspondence
between wide Bayesian neural networks and Gaussian processes, gradient-based
training of wide neural networks with a squared loss produces test set
predictions drawn from a Gaussian process with a particular compositional
kernel. While these theoretical results are only exact in the infinite width
limit, we nevertheless find excellent empirical agreement between the
predictions of the original network and those of the linearized version even
for finite practically-sized networks. This agreement is robust across
different architectures, optimization methods, and loss functions. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.06720 | [
"Jaehoon Lee",
"Lechao Xiao",
"Samuel S. Schoenholz",
"Yasaman Bahri",
"Roman Novak",
"Jascha Sohl-Dickstein",
"Jeffrey Pennington"
] | 128 |
Quantifying the Carbon Emissions
of Machine Learning
Alexandre Lacoste
Element AI
[email protected] Luccioni
Mila, | 1910.09700 | Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learning | From an environmental standpoint, there are a few crucial aspects of training
a neural network that have a major impact on the quantity of carbon that it
emits. These factors include: the location of the server used for training and
the energy grid that it uses, the length of the training procedure, and even
the make and model of hardware on which the training takes place. In order to
approximate these emissions, we present our Machine Learning Emissions
Calculator, a tool for our community to better understand the environmental
impact of training ML models. We accompany this tool with an explanation of the
factors cited above, as well as concrete actions that individual practitioners
and organizations can take to mitigate their carbon emissions. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.09700 | [
"Alexandre Lacoste",
"Alexandra Luccioni",
"Victor Schmidt",
"Thomas Dandres"
] | 128 |
On the Multilingual Capabilities of Very Large-Scale English Language
Models
Jordi Armengol-Estapé, Ona de Gibert Bonet, and Mai | 2108.13349 | On the Multilingual Capabilities of Very Large-Scale English Language Models | Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) have recently been scaled to
unprecedented sizes in the history of machine learning. These models, solely
trained on the language modeling objective, have been shown to exhibit
outstanding few-shot learning capabilities in a number of different tasks.
Nevertheless, aside from anecdotal experiences, little is known regarding their
multilingual capabilities, given the fact that the pre-training corpus is
almost entirely composed of English text. In this work, we investigate the
multilingual skills of GPT-3, focusing on one language that barely appears in
the pre-training corpus, Catalan, which makes the results especially
meaningful; we assume that our results may be relevant for other languages as
well. We find that the model shows an outstanding performance, particularly in
generative tasks, with predictable limitations mostly in language understanding
tasks but still with remarkable results given the zero-shot scenario. We
investigate its potential and limits in extractive question-answering and
natural language generation, as well as the effect of scale in terms of model
size. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.13349 | [
"Jordi Armengol-Estapé",
"Ona de Gibert Bonet",
"Maite Melero"
] | 128 |
ERNIE 3.0: L ARGE -SCALE KNOWLEDGE ENHANCED
PRE-TRAINING FOR LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING AND
GENERATION
Yu SunShuohuan WangShikun F | 2107.02137 | ERNIE 3.0: Large-scale Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generation | Pre-trained models have achieved state-of-the-art results in various Natural
Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Recent works such as T5 and GPT-3 have shown
that scaling up pre-trained language models can improve their generalization
abilities. Particularly, the GPT-3 model with 175 billion parameters shows its
strong task-agnostic zero-shot/few-shot learning capabilities. Despite their
success, these large-scale models are trained on plain texts without
introducing knowledge such as linguistic knowledge and world knowledge. In
addition, most large-scale models are trained in an auto-regressive way. As a
result, this kind of traditional fine-tuning approach demonstrates relatively
weak performance when solving downstream language understanding tasks. In order
to solve the above problems, we propose a unified framework named ERNIE 3.0 for
pre-training large-scale knowledge enhanced models. It fuses auto-regressive
network and auto-encoding network, so that the trained model can be easily
tailored for both natural language understanding and generation tasks with
zero-shot learning, few-shot learning or fine-tuning. We trained the model with
10 billion parameters on a 4TB corpus consisting of plain texts and a
large-scale knowledge graph. Empirical results show that the model outperforms
the state-of-the-art models on 54 Chinese NLP tasks, and its English version
achieves the first place on the SuperGLUE benchmark (July 3, 2021), surpassing
the human performance by +0.8% (90.6% vs. 89.8%). | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.02137 | [
"Yu Sun",
"Shuohuan Wang",
"Shikun Feng",
"Siyu Ding",
"Chao Pang",
"Junyuan Shang",
"Jiaxiang Liu",
"Xuyi Chen",
"Yanbin Zhao",
"Yuxiang Lu",
"Weixin Liu",
"Zhihua Wu",
"Weibao Gong",
"Jianzhong Liang",
"Zhizhou Shang",
"Peng Sun",
"Wei Liu",
"Xuan Ouyang",
"Dianhai Yu",
"Hao Tian",
"Hua Wu",
"Haifeng Wang"
] | 128 |
arXiv:1911.03914v1 [cs.CL] 10 Nov 2019Zero-Shot Fine-Grained Style Transfer: Leveraging Distri buted
Continuous Style Represen | 1911.03914 | Zero-Shot Fine-Grained Style Transfer: Leveraging Distributed Continuous Style Representations to Transfer To Unseen Styles | Text style transfer is usually performed using attributes that can take a
handful of discrete values (e.g., positive to negative reviews). In this work,
we introduce an architecture that can leverage pre-trained consistent
continuous distributed style representations and use them to transfer to an
attribute unseen during training, without requiring any re-tuning of the style
transfer model. We demonstrate the method by training an architecture to
transfer text conveying one sentiment to another sentiment, using a
fine-grained set of over 20 sentiment labels rather than the binary
positive/negative often used in style transfer. Our experiments show that this
model can then rewrite text to match a target sentiment that was unseen during
training. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.03914 | [
"Eric Michael Smith",
"Diana Gonzalez-Rico",
"Emily Dinan",
"Y-Lan Boureau"
] | 128 |
arXiv:1605.09090v1 [cs.CL] 30 May 2016Learning Natural LanguageInference using Bidirectional L STM modeland
Inner-Attention
Ya | 1605.09090 | Learning Natural Language Inference using Bidirectional LSTM model and Inner-Attention | In this paper, we proposed a sentence encoding-based model for recognizing
text entailment. In our approach, the encoding of sentence is a two-stage
process. Firstly, average pooling was used over word-level bidirectional LSTM
(biLSTM) to generate a first-stage sentence representation. Secondly, attention
mechanism was employed to replace average pooling on the same sentence for
better representations. Instead of using target sentence to attend words in
source sentence, we utilized the sentence's first-stage representation to
attend words appeared in itself, which is called "Inner-Attention" in our paper
. Experiments conducted on Stanford Natural Language Inference (SNLI) Corpus
has proved the effectiveness of "Inner-Attention" mechanism. With less number
of parameters, our model outperformed the existing best sentence encoding-based
approach by a large margin. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.09090 | [
"Yang Liu",
"Chengjie Sun",
"Lei Lin",
"Xiaolong Wang"
] | 128 |
PRE-TRAINED SUMMARIZATION DISTILLATION
Sam Shleifer
Hugging Face
[email protected] M. Rush
Hugging Face and Cornell U | 2010.13002 | Pre-trained Summarization Distillation | Recent state-of-the-art approaches to summarization utilize large pre-trained
Transformer models. Distilling these models to smaller student models has
become critically important for practical use; however there are many different
distillation methods proposed by the NLP literature. Recent work on distilling
BERT for classification and regression tasks shows strong performance using
direct knowledge distillation. Alternatively, machine translation practitioners
distill using pseudo-labeling, where a small model is trained on the
translations of a larger model. A third, simpler approach is to 'shrink and
fine-tune' (SFT), which avoids any explicit distillation by copying parameters
to a smaller student model and then fine-tuning. We compare these three
approaches for distillation of Pegasus and BART, the current and former state
of the art, pre-trained summarization models, and find that SFT outperforms
knowledge distillation and pseudo-labeling on the CNN/DailyMail dataset, but
under-performs pseudo-labeling on the more abstractive XSUM dataset. PyTorch
Code and checkpoints of different sizes are available through Hugging Face
transformers here http://tiny.cc/4iy0tz. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.13002 | [
"Sam Shleifer",
"Alexander M. Rush"
] | 128 |
Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control
Jacky Liang, Wenlong Huang, Fei Xia, Peng Xu, Karol Hausman, Bria | 2209.07753 | Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control | Large language models (LLMs) trained on code completion have been shown to be
capable of synthesizing simple Python programs from docstrings [1]. We find
that these code-writing LLMs can be re-purposed to write robot policy code,
given natural language commands. Specifically, policy code can express
functions or feedback loops that process perception outputs (e.g.,from object
detectors [2], [3]) and parameterize control primitive APIs. When provided as
input several example language commands (formatted as comments) followed by
corresponding policy code (via few-shot prompting), LLMs can take in new
commands and autonomously re-compose API calls to generate new policy code
respectively. By chaining classic logic structures and referencing third-party
libraries (e.g., NumPy, Shapely) to perform arithmetic, LLMs used in this way
can write robot policies that (i) exhibit spatial-geometric reasoning, (ii)
generalize to new instructions, and (iii) prescribe precise values (e.g.,
velocities) to ambiguous descriptions ("faster") depending on context (i.e.,
behavioral commonsense). This paper presents code as policies: a robot-centric
formulation of language model generated programs (LMPs) that can represent
reactive policies (e.g., impedance controllers), as well as waypoint-based
policies (vision-based pick and place, trajectory-based control), demonstrated
across multiple real robot platforms. Central to our approach is prompting
hierarchical code-gen (recursively defining undefined functions), which can
write more complex code and also improves state-of-the-art to solve 39.8% of
problems on the HumanEval [1] benchmark. Code and videos are available at
https://code-as-policies.github.io | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.07753 | [
"Jacky Liang",
"Wenlong Huang",
"Fei Xia",
"Peng Xu",
"Karol Hausman",
"Brian Ichter",
"Pete Florence",
"Andy Zeng"
] | 128 |
Unnatural Instructions:
Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Labor
Or Honovich Thomas ScialomOmer Levy Timo Schick
| 2212.09689 | Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Labor | Instruction tuning enables pretrained language models to perform new tasks
from inference-time natural language descriptions. These approaches rely on
vast amounts of human supervision in the form of crowdsourced datasets or user
interactions. In this work, we introduce Unnatural Instructions: a large
dataset of creative and diverse instructions, collected with virtually no human
labor. We collect 64,000 examples by prompting a language model with three seed
examples of instructions and eliciting a fourth. This set is then expanded by
prompting the model to rephrase each instruction, creating a total of
approximately 240,000 examples of instructions, inputs, and outputs.
Experiments show that despite containing a fair amount of noise, training on
Unnatural Instructions rivals the effectiveness of training on open-source
manually-curated datasets, surpassing the performance of models such as T0++
and Tk-Instruct across various benchmarks. These results demonstrate the
potential of model-generated data as a cost-effective alternative to
crowdsourcing for dataset expansion and diversification. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.09689 | [
"Or Honovich",
"Thomas Scialom",
"Omer Levy",
"Timo Schick"
] | 128 |
Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners:
Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents
Wenlong Huang
UC BerkeleyPieter Abbee | 2201.07207 | Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents | Can world knowledge learned by large language models (LLMs) be used to act in
interactive environments? In this paper, we investigate the possibility of
grounding high-level tasks, expressed in natural language (e.g. "make
breakfast"), to a chosen set of actionable steps (e.g. "open fridge"). While
prior work focused on learning from explicit step-by-step examples of how to
act, we surprisingly find that if pre-trained LMs are large enough and prompted
appropriately, they can effectively decompose high-level tasks into mid-level
plans without any further training. However, the plans produced naively by LLMs
often cannot map precisely to admissible actions. We propose a procedure that
conditions on existing demonstrations and semantically translates the plans to
admissible actions. Our evaluation in the recent VirtualHome environment shows
that the resulting method substantially improves executability over the LLM
baseline. The conducted human evaluation reveals a trade-off between
executability and correctness but shows a promising sign towards extracting
actionable knowledge from language models. Website at
https://huangwl18.github.io/language-planner | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.07207 | [
"Wenlong Huang",
"Pieter Abbeel",
"Deepak Pathak",
"Igor Mordatch"
] | 128 |
Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models
Nicholas Carlini1Florian Tramèr2Eric Wallace3Matthew Jagielski4
Ariel Herber | 2012.07805 | Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models | It has become common to publish large (billion parameter) language models
that have been trained on private datasets. This paper demonstrates that in
such settings, an adversary can perform a training data extraction attack to
recover individual training examples by querying the language model.
We demonstrate our attack on GPT-2, a language model trained on scrapes of
the public Internet, and are able to extract hundreds of verbatim text
sequences from the model's training data. These extracted examples include
(public) personally identifiable information (names, phone numbers, and email
addresses), IRC conversations, code, and 128-bit UUIDs. Our attack is possible
even though each of the above sequences are included in just one document in
the training data.
We comprehensively evaluate our extraction attack to understand the factors
that contribute to its success. Worryingly, we find that larger models are more
vulnerable than smaller models. We conclude by drawing lessons and discussing
possible safeguards for training large language models. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.07805 | [
"Nicholas Carlini",
"Florian Tramer",
"Eric Wallace",
"Matthew Jagielski",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Katherine Lee",
"Adam Roberts",
"Tom Brown",
"Dawn Song",
"Ulfar Erlingsson",
"Alina Oprea",
"Colin Raffel"
] | 128 |
Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Images, Graphs and Text: A Review
Han Xu1Yao Ma2Haochen Liu3Debayan Deb4Hui Liu5Jiliang Tang | 1909.08072 | Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Images, Graphs and Text: A Review | Deep neural networks (DNN) have achieved unprecedented success in numerous
machine learning tasks in various domains. However, the existence of
adversarial examples has raised concerns about applying deep learning to
safety-critical applications. As a result, we have witnessed increasing
interests in studying attack and defense mechanisms for DNN models on different
data types, such as images, graphs and text. Thus, it is necessary to provide a
systematic and comprehensive overview of the main threats of attacks and the
success of corresponding countermeasures. In this survey, we review the state
of the art algorithms for generating adversarial examples and the
countermeasures against adversarial examples, for the three popular data types,
i.e., images, graphs and text. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.08072 | [
"Han Xu",
"Yao Ma",
"Haochen Liu",
"Debayan Deb",
"Hui Liu",
"Jiliang Tang",
"Anil K. Jain"
] | 128 |
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2021
A D ISTRIBUTIONAL APPROACH TO
CONTROLLED TEXT GENERATION
Muhammad Khalifa yy
Cair | 2012.11635 | A Distributional Approach to Controlled Text Generation | We propose a Distributional Approach for addressing Controlled Text
Generation from pre-trained Language Models (LMs). This approach permits to
specify, in a single formal framework, both "pointwise" and "distributional"
constraints over the target LM -- to our knowledge, the first model with such
generality -- while minimizing KL divergence from the initial LM distribution.
The optimal target distribution is then uniquely determined as an explicit EBM
(Energy-Based Model) representation. From that optimal representation we then
train a target controlled Autoregressive LM through an adaptive distributional
variant of Policy Gradient. We conduct a first set of experiments over
pointwise constraints showing the advantages of our approach over a set of
baselines, in terms of obtaining a controlled LM balancing constraint
satisfaction with divergence from the initial LM. We then perform experiments
over distributional constraints, a unique feature of our approach,
demonstrating its potential as a remedy to the problem of Bias in Language
Models. Through an ablation study, we show the effectiveness of our adaptive
technique for obtaining faster convergence. (Code available at
https://github.com/naver/gdc) | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.11635 | [
"Muhammad Khalifa",
"Hady Elsahar",
"Marc Dymetman"
] | 128 |
Towards Zero-Label Language Learning
Zirui Wang Adams Wei Yu Orhan Firat Yuan Cao
Google AI
{ziruiw,adamsyuwei,orhanf,yuancao}@g | 2109.09193 | Towards Zero-Label Language Learning | This paper explores zero-label learning in Natural Language Processing (NLP),
whereby no human-annotated data is used anywhere during training and models are
trained purely on synthetic data. At the core of our framework is a novel
approach for better leveraging the powerful pretrained language models.
Specifically, inspired by the recent success of few-shot inference on GPT-3, we
present a training data creation procedure named Unsupervised Data Generation
(UDG), which leverages few-shot prompts to synthesize high-quality training
data without real human annotations. Our method enables zero-label learning as
we train task-specific models solely on the synthetic data, yet we achieve
better or comparable results from strong baseline models trained on
human-labeled data. Furthermore, when mixed with labeled data, our approach
serves as a highly effective data augmentation procedure, achieving new
state-of-the-art results on the SuperGLUE benchmark. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.09193 | [
"Zirui Wang",
"Adams Wei Yu",
"Orhan Firat",
"Yuan Cao"
] | 128 |
Ethical and social risks of harm from
Language Models
Laura Weidinger1, John Mellor1, Maribeth Rauh1, Conor Griffin1, Jonathan Ues | 2112.04359 | Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models | This paper aims to help structure the risk landscape associated with
large-scale Language Models (LMs). In order to foster advances in responsible
innovation, an in-depth understanding of the potential risks posed by these
models is needed. A wide range of established and anticipated risks are
analysed in detail, drawing on multidisciplinary expertise and literature from
computer science, linguistics, and social sciences.
We outline six specific risk areas: I. Discrimination, Exclusion and
Toxicity, II. Information Hazards, III. Misinformation Harms, V. Malicious
Uses, V. Human-Computer Interaction Harms, VI. Automation, Access, and
Environmental Harms. The first area concerns the perpetuation of stereotypes,
unfair discrimination, exclusionary norms, toxic language, and lower
performance by social group for LMs. The second focuses on risks from private
data leaks or LMs correctly inferring sensitive information. The third
addresses risks arising from poor, false or misleading information including in
sensitive domains, and knock-on risks such as the erosion of trust in shared
information. The fourth considers risks from actors who try to use LMs to cause
harm. The fifth focuses on risks specific to LLMs used to underpin
conversational agents that interact with human users, including unsafe use,
manipulation or deception. The sixth discusses the risk of environmental harm,
job automation, and other challenges that may have a disparate effect on
different social groups or communities.
In total, we review 21 risks in-depth. We discuss the points of origin of
different risks and point to potential mitigation approaches. Lastly, we
discuss organisational responsibilities in implementing mitigations, and the
role of collaboration and participation. We highlight directions for further
research, particularly on expanding the toolkit for assessing and evaluating
the outlined risks in LMs. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.04359 | [
"Laura Weidinger",
"John Mellor",
"Maribeth Rauh",
"Conor Griffin",
"Jonathan Uesato",
"Po-Sen Huang",
"Myra Cheng",
"Mia Glaese",
"Borja Balle",
"Atoosa Kasirzadeh",
"Zac Kenton",
"Sasha Brown",
"Will Hawkins",
"Tom Stepleton",
"Courtney Biles",
"Abeba Birhane",
"Julia Haas",
"Laura Rimell",
"Lisa Anne Hendricks",
"William Isaac",
"Sean Legassick",
"Geoffrey Irving",
"Iason Gabriel"
] | 128 |
GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional
Computation and Automatic Sharding
Dmitry Lepikhin
[email protected] L | 2006.16668 | GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Sharding | Neural network scaling has been critical for improving the model quality in
many real-world machine learning applications with vast amounts of training
data and compute. Although this trend of scaling is affirmed to be a sure-fire
approach for better model quality, there are challenges on the path such as the
computation cost, ease of programming, and efficient implementation on parallel
devices. GShard is a module composed of a set of lightweight annotation APIs
and an extension to the XLA compiler. It provides an elegant way to express a
wide range of parallel computation patterns with minimal changes to the
existing model code. GShard enabled us to scale up multilingual neural machine
translation Transformer model with Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts beyond 600
billion parameters using automatic sharding. We demonstrate that such a giant
model can efficiently be trained on 2048 TPU v3 accelerators in 4 days to
achieve far superior quality for translation from 100 languages to English
compared to the prior art. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.16668 | [
"Dmitry Lepikhin",
"HyoukJoong Lee",
"Yuanzhong Xu",
"Dehao Chen",
"Orhan Firat",
"Yanping Huang",
"Maxim Krikun",
"Noam Shazeer",
"Zhifeng Chen"
] | 128 |
Supervising Model Attention with Human Explanations for
Robust Natural Language Inference
Joe Stacey1, Yonatan Belinkov2, Marek | 2104.08142 | Supervising Model Attention with Human Explanations for Robust Natural Language Inference | Natural Language Inference (NLI) models are known to learn from biases and
artefacts within their training data, impacting how well they generalise to
other unseen datasets. Existing de-biasing approaches focus on preventing the
models from learning these biases, which can result in restrictive models and
lower performance. We instead investigate teaching the model how a human would
approach the NLI task, in order to learn features that will generalise better
to previously unseen examples. Using natural language explanations, we
supervise the model's attention weights to encourage more attention to be paid
to the words present in the explanations, significantly improving model
performance. Our experiments show that the in-distribution improvements of this
method are also accompanied by out-of-distribution improvements, with the
supervised models learning from features that generalise better to other NLI
datasets. Analysis of the model indicates that human explanations encourage
increased attention on the important words, with more attention paid to words
in the premise and less attention paid to punctuation and stop-words. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.08142 | [
"Joe Stacey",
"Yonatan Belinkov",
"Marek Rei"
] | 128 |
How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts?
Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection
Biyang Guo1y, Xin Zhang2, Ziyuan Wang1, M | 2301.07597 | How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection | The introduction of ChatGPT has garnered widespread attention in both
academic and industrial communities. ChatGPT is able to respond effectively to
a wide range of human questions, providing fluent and comprehensive answers
that significantly surpass previous public chatbots in terms of security and
usefulness. On one hand, people are curious about how ChatGPT is able to
achieve such strength and how far it is from human experts. On the other hand,
people are starting to worry about the potential negative impacts that large
language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT could have on society, such as fake news,
plagiarism, and social security issues. In this work, we collected tens of
thousands of comparison responses from both human experts and ChatGPT, with
questions ranging from open-domain, financial, medical, legal, and
psychological areas. We call the collected dataset the Human ChatGPT Comparison
Corpus (HC3). Based on the HC3 dataset, we study the characteristics of
ChatGPT's responses, the differences and gaps from human experts, and future
directions for LLMs. We conducted comprehensive human evaluations and
linguistic analyses of ChatGPT-generated content compared with that of humans,
where many interesting results are revealed. After that, we conduct extensive
experiments on how to effectively detect whether a certain text is generated by
ChatGPT or humans. We build three different detection systems, explore several
key factors that influence their effectiveness, and evaluate them in different
scenarios. The dataset, code, and models are all publicly available at
https://github.com/Hello-SimpleAI/chatgpt-comparison-detection. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.07597 | [
"Biyang Guo",
"Xin Zhang",
"Ziyuan Wang",
"Minqi Jiang",
"Jinran Nie",
"Yuxuan Ding",
"Jianwei Yue",
"Yupeng Wu"
] | 128 |
Towards Robust Toxic Content Classification
Keita Kurita
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
[email protected]. | 1912.06872 | Towards Robust Toxic Content Classification | Toxic content detection aims to identify content that can offend or harm its
recipients. Automated classifiers of toxic content need to be robust against
adversaries who deliberately try to bypass filters. We propose a method of
generating realistic model-agnostic attacks using a lexicon of toxic tokens,
which attempts to mislead toxicity classifiers by diluting the toxicity signal
either by obfuscating toxic tokens through character-level perturbations, or by
injecting non-toxic distractor tokens. We show that these realistic attacks
reduce the detection recall of state-of-the-art neural toxicity detectors,
including those using ELMo and BERT, by more than 50% in some cases. We explore
two approaches for defending against such attacks. First, we examine the effect
of training on synthetically noised data. Second, we propose the Contextual
Denoising Autoencoder (CDAE): a method for learning robust representations that
uses character-level and contextual information to denoise perturbed tokens. We
show that the two approaches are complementary, improving robustness to both
character-level perturbations and distractors, recovering a considerable
portion of the lost accuracy. Finally, we analyze the robustness
characteristics of the most competitive methods and outline practical
considerations for improving toxicity detectors. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.06872 | [
"Keita Kurita",
"Anna Belova",
"Antonios Anastasopoulos"
] | 128 |
Swag : A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for
Grounded Commonsense Inference
Rowan ZellersYonatan BiskRoy Schwartz~Yejin Choi | 1808.05326 | SWAG: A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for Grounded Commonsense Inference | Given a partial description like "she opened the hood of the car," humans can
reason about the situation and anticipate what might come next ("then, she
examined the engine"). In this paper, we introduce the task of grounded
commonsense inference, unifying natural language inference and commonsense
reasoning.
We present SWAG, a new dataset with 113k multiple choice questions about a
rich spectrum of grounded situations. To address the recurring challenges of
the annotation artifacts and human biases found in many existing datasets, we
propose Adversarial Filtering (AF), a novel procedure that constructs a
de-biased dataset by iteratively training an ensemble of stylistic classifiers,
and using them to filter the data. To account for the aggressive adversarial
filtering, we use state-of-the-art language models to massively oversample a
diverse set of potential counterfactuals. Empirical results demonstrate that
while humans can solve the resulting inference problems with high accuracy
(88%), various competitive models struggle on our task. We provide
comprehensive analysis that indicates significant opportunities for future
research. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.05326 | [
"Rowan Zellers",
"Yonatan Bisk",
"Roy Schwartz",
"Yejin Choi"
] | 128 |
QA MELEON
: Multilingual QA with Only 5 Examples
Priyanka Agrawal∗Chris Alberti∗Fantine Huot Joshua Maynez
Ji Ma Sebastian Rude | 2211.08264 | QAmeleon: Multilingual QA with Only 5 Examples | The availability of large, high-quality datasets has been one of the main
drivers of recent progress in question answering (QA). Such annotated datasets
however are difficult and costly to collect, and rarely exist in languages
other than English, rendering QA technology inaccessible to underrepresented
languages. An alternative to building large monolingual training datasets is to
leverage pre-trained language models (PLMs) under a few-shot learning setting.
Our approach, QAmeleon, uses a PLM to automatically generate multilingual data
upon which QA models are trained, thus avoiding costly annotation. Prompt
tuning the PLM for data synthesis with only five examples per language delivers
accuracy superior to translation-based baselines, bridges nearly 60% of the gap
between an English-only baseline and a fully supervised upper bound trained on
almost 50,000 hand labeled examples, and always leads to substantial
improvements compared to fine-tuning a QA model directly on labeled examples in
low resource settings. Experiments on the TyDiQA-GoldP and MLQA benchmarks show
that few-shot prompt tuning for data synthesis scales across languages and is a
viable alternative to large-scale annotation. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.08264 | [
"Priyanka Agrawal",
"Chris Alberti",
"Fantine Huot",
"Joshua Maynez",
"Ji Ma",
"Sebastian Ruder",
"Kuzman Ganchev",
"Dipanjan Das",
"Mirella Lapata"
] | 128 |
TOXIGEN: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial
and Implicit Hate Speech Detection
Warning: this paper discusse | 2203.09509 | ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detection | Toxic language detection systems often falsely flag text that contains
minority group mentions as toxic, as those groups are often the targets of
online hate. Such over-reliance on spurious correlations also causes systems to
struggle with detecting implicitly toxic language. To help mitigate these
issues, we create ToxiGen, a new large-scale and machine-generated dataset of
274k toxic and benign statements about 13 minority groups. We develop a
demonstration-based prompting framework and an adversarial
classifier-in-the-loop decoding method to generate subtly toxic and benign text
with a massive pretrained language model. Controlling machine generation in
this way allows ToxiGen to cover implicitly toxic text at a larger scale, and
about more demographic groups, than previous resources of human-written text.
We conduct a human evaluation on a challenging subset of ToxiGen and find that
annotators struggle to distinguish machine-generated text from human-written
language. We also find that 94.5% of toxic examples are labeled as hate speech
by human annotators. Using three publicly-available datasets, we show that
finetuning a toxicity classifier on our data improves its performance on
human-written data substantially. We also demonstrate that ToxiGen can be used
to fight machine-generated toxicity as finetuning improves the classifier
significantly on our evaluation subset. Our code and data can be found at
https://github.com/microsoft/ToxiGen. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.09509 | [
"Thomas Hartvigsen",
"Saadia Gabriel",
"Hamid Palangi",
"Maarten Sap",
"Dipankar Ray",
"Ece Kamar"
] | 128 |
Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language
Thomas Davidson,1Dana Warmsley,2Michael Macy,1,3Ingmar We | 1703.04009 | Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language | A key challenge for automatic hate-speech detection on social media is the
separation of hate speech from other instances of offensive language. Lexical
detection methods tend to have low precision because they classify all messages
containing particular terms as hate speech and previous work using supervised
learning has failed to distinguish between the two categories. We used a
crowd-sourced hate speech lexicon to collect tweets containing hate speech
keywords. We use crowd-sourcing to label a sample of these tweets into three
categories: those containing hate speech, only offensive language, and those
with neither. We train a multi-class classifier to distinguish between these
different categories. Close analysis of the predictions and the errors shows
when we can reliably separate hate speech from other offensive language and
when this differentiation is more difficult. We find that racist and homophobic
tweets are more likely to be classified as hate speech but that sexist tweets
are generally classified as offensive. Tweets without explicit hate keywords
are also more difficult to classify. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.04009 | [
"Thomas Davidson",
"Dana Warmsley",
"Michael Macy",
"Ingmar Weber"
] | 128 |
Cloze-driven Pretraining of Self-attention Networks
Alexei Baevski, Sergey Edunov, Yinhan Liu, Luke Zettlemoyer, Michael Auli
| 1903.07785 | Cloze-driven Pretraining of Self-attention Networks | We present a new approach for pretraining a bi-directional transformer model
that provides significant performance gains across a variety of language
understanding problems. Our model solves a cloze-style word reconstruction
task, where each word is ablated and must be predicted given the rest of the
text. Experiments demonstrate large performance gains on GLUE and new state of
the art results on NER as well as constituency parsing benchmarks, consistent
with the concurrently introduced BERT model. We also present a detailed
analysis of a number of factors that contribute to effective pretraining,
including data domain and size, model capacity, and variations on the cloze
objective. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.07785 | [
"Alexei Baevski",
"Sergey Edunov",
"Yinhan Liu",
"Luke Zettlemoyer",
"Michael Auli"
] | 128 |
Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models
via Counterfactual Evaluation
Po-Sen Huang♦Huan Zhang~♥♦Ray JiangRobert Stanforth
| 1911.03064 | Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual Evaluation | Advances in language modeling architectures and the availability of large
text corpora have driven progress in automatic text generation. While this
results in models capable of generating coherent texts, it also prompts models
to internalize social biases present in the training corpus. This paper aims to
quantify and reduce a particular type of bias exhibited by language models:
bias in the sentiment of generated text. Given a conditioning context (e.g., a
writing prompt) and a language model, we analyze if (and how) the sentiment of
the generated text is affected by changes in values of sensitive attributes
(e.g., country names, occupations, genders) in the conditioning context using a
form of counterfactual evaluation. We quantify sentiment bias by adopting
individual and group fairness metrics from the fair machine learning
literature, and demonstrate that large-scale models trained on two different
corpora (news articles, and Wikipedia) exhibit considerable levels of bias. We
then propose embedding and sentiment prediction-derived regularization on the
language model's latent representations. The regularizations improve fairness
metrics while retaining comparable levels of perplexity and semantic
similarity. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.03064 | [
"Po-Sen Huang",
"Huan Zhang",
"Ray Jiang",
"Robert Stanforth",
"Johannes Welbl",
"Jack Rae",
"Vishal Maini",
"Dani Yogatama",
"Pushmeet Kohli"
] | 128 |
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2016
DEEP COMPRESSION : C OMPRESSING DEEP NEURAL
NETWORKS WITH PRUNING , TRAINED QUANTIZ | 1510.00149 | Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Coding | Neural networks are both computationally intensive and memory intensive,
making them difficult to deploy on embedded systems with limited hardware
resources. To address this limitation, we introduce "deep compression", a three
stage pipeline: pruning, trained quantization and Huffman coding, that work
together to reduce the storage requirement of neural networks by 35x to 49x
without affecting their accuracy. Our method first prunes the network by
learning only the important connections. Next, we quantize the weights to
enforce weight sharing, finally, we apply Huffman coding. After the first two
steps we retrain the network to fine tune the remaining connections and the
quantized centroids. Pruning, reduces the number of connections by 9x to 13x;
Quantization then reduces the number of bits that represent each connection
from 32 to 5. On the ImageNet dataset, our method reduced the storage required
by AlexNet by 35x, from 240MB to 6.9MB, without loss of accuracy. Our method
reduced the size of VGG-16 by 49x from 552MB to 11.3MB, again with no loss of
accuracy. This allows fitting the model into on-chip SRAM cache rather than
off-chip DRAM memory. Our compression method also facilitates the use of
complex neural networks in mobile applications where application size and
download bandwidth are constrained. Benchmarked on CPU, GPU and mobile GPU,
compressed network has 3x to 4x layerwise speedup and 3x to 7x better energy
efficiency. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.00149 | [
"Song Han",
"Huizi Mao",
"William J. Dally"
] | 128 |
GUESS THE INSTRUCTION !
FLIPPED LEARNING MAKES LANGUAGE MODELS
STRONGER ZERO-SHOT LEARNERS
Seonghyeon Ye1∗Doyoung Kim1Joel Jang1 | 2210.02969 | Guess the Instruction! Flipped Learning Makes Language Models Stronger Zero-Shot Learners | Meta-training, which fine-tunes the language model (LM) on various downstream
tasks by maximizing the likelihood of the target label given the task
instruction and input instance, has improved the zero-shot task generalization
performance. However, meta-trained LMs still struggle to generalize to
challenging tasks containing novel labels unseen during meta-training. In this
paper, we propose Flipped Learning, an alternative method of meta-training
which trains the LM to generate the task instruction given the input instance
and label. During inference, the LM trained with Flipped Learning, referred to
as Flipped, selects the label option that is most likely to generate the task
instruction. On 14 tasks of the BIG-bench benchmark, the 11B-sized Flipped
outperforms zero-shot T0-11B and even a 16 times larger 3-shot GPT-3 (175B) on
average by 8.4% and 9.7% points, respectively. Flipped gives particularly large
improvements on tasks with unseen labels, outperforming T0-11B by up to +20%
average F1 score. This indicates that the strong task generalization of Flipped
comes from improved generalization to novel labels. We release our code at
https://github.com/seonghyeonye/Flipped-Learning. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.02969 | [
"Seonghyeon Ye",
"Doyoung Kim",
"Joel Jang",
"Joongbo Shin",
"Minjoon Seo"
] | 128 |
Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the
MATH Dataset
Dan Hendrycks
UC BerkeleyCollin Burns
UC BerkeleySaurav Kadavath
UC | 2103.03874 | Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset | Many intellectual endeavors require mathematical problem solving, but this
skill remains beyond the capabilities of computers. To measure this ability in
machine learning models, we introduce MATH, a new dataset of 12,500 challenging
competition mathematics problems. Each problem in MATH has a full step-by-step
solution which can be used to teach models to generate answer derivations and
explanations. To facilitate future research and increase accuracy on MATH, we
also contribute a large auxiliary pretraining dataset which helps teach models
the fundamentals of mathematics. Even though we are able to increase accuracy
on MATH, our results show that accuracy remains relatively low, even with
enormous Transformer models. Moreover, we find that simply increasing budgets
and model parameter counts will be impractical for achieving strong
mathematical reasoning if scaling trends continue. While scaling Transformers
is automatically solving most other text-based tasks, scaling is not currently
solving MATH. To have more traction on mathematical problem solving we will
likely need new algorithmic advancements from the broader research community. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.03874 | [
"Dan Hendrycks",
"Collin Burns",
"Saurav Kadavath",
"Akul Arora",
"Steven Basart",
"Eric Tang",
"Dawn Song",
"Jacob Steinhardt"
] | 128 |
Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners
Takeshi Kojima
The University of Tokyo
[email protected] Sha | 2205.11916 | Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners | Pretrained large language models (LLMs) are widely used in many sub-fields of
natural language processing (NLP) and generally known as excellent few-shot
learners with task-specific exemplars. Notably, chain of thought (CoT)
prompting, a recent technique for eliciting complex multi-step reasoning
through step-by-step answer examples, achieved the state-of-the-art
performances in arithmetics and symbolic reasoning, difficult system-2 tasks
that do not follow the standard scaling laws for LLMs. While these successes
are often attributed to LLMs' ability for few-shot learning, we show that LLMs
are decent zero-shot reasoners by simply adding "Let's think step by step"
before each answer. Experimental results demonstrate that our Zero-shot-CoT,
using the same single prompt template, significantly outperforms zero-shot LLM
performances on diverse benchmark reasoning tasks including arithmetics
(MultiArith, GSM8K, AQUA-RAT, SVAMP), symbolic reasoning (Last Letter, Coin
Flip), and other logical reasoning tasks (Date Understanding, Tracking Shuffled
Objects), without any hand-crafted few-shot examples, e.g. increasing the
accuracy on MultiArith from 17.7% to 78.7% and GSM8K from 10.4% to 40.7% with
large InstructGPT model (text-davinci-002), as well as similar magnitudes of
improvements with another off-the-shelf large model, 540B parameter PaLM. The
versatility of this single prompt across very diverse reasoning tasks hints at
untapped and understudied fundamental zero-shot capabilities of LLMs,
suggesting high-level, multi-task broad cognitive capabilities may be extracted
by simple prompting. We hope our work not only serves as the minimal strongest
zero-shot baseline for the challenging reasoning benchmarks, but also
highlights the importance of carefully exploring and analyzing the enormous
zero-shot knowledge hidden inside LLMs before crafting finetuning datasets or
few-shot exemplars. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.11916 | [
"Takeshi Kojima",
"Shixiang Shane Gu",
"Machel Reid",
"Yutaka Matsuo",
"Yusuke Iwasawa"
] | 128 |
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2023
DRAFT , SKETCH ,AND PROVE : GUIDING FORMAL
THEOREM PROVERS WITH INFORMAL PROOFS
Alb | 2210.12283 | Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofs | The formalization of existing mathematical proofs is a notoriously difficult
process. Despite decades of research on automation and proof assistants,
writing formal proofs remains arduous and only accessible to a few experts.
While previous studies to automate formalization focused on powerful search
algorithms, no attempts were made to take advantage of available informal
proofs. In this work, we introduce Draft, Sketch, and Prove (DSP), a method
that maps informal proofs to formal proof sketches, and uses the sketches to
guide an automated prover by directing its search to easier sub-problems. We
investigate two relevant setups where informal proofs are either written by
humans or generated by a language model. Our experiments and ablation studies
show that large language models are able to produce well-structured formal
sketches that follow the same reasoning steps as the informal proofs. Guiding
an automated prover with these sketches enhances its performance from 20.9% to
39.3% on a collection of mathematical competition problems. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.12283 | [
"Albert Q. Jiang",
"Sean Welleck",
"Jin Peng Zhou",
"Wenda Li",
"Jiacheng Liu",
"Mateja Jamnik",
"Timothée Lacroix",
"Yuhuai Wu",
"Guillaume Lample"
] | 128 |
Transcending Scaling Laws with 0.1% Extra Compute
Yi Tay Jason Wei Hyung Won Chung Vinh Q. Tran David R. So Siamak Shakeri
Xavie | 2210.11399 | Transcending Scaling Laws with 0.1% Extra Compute | Scaling language models improves performance but comes with significant
computational costs. This paper proposes UL2R, a method that substantially
improves existing language models and their scaling curves with a relatively
tiny amount of extra compute. The key idea is to continue training a
state-of-the-art large language model (e.g., PaLM) on a few more steps with
UL2's mixture-of-denoiser objective. We show that, with almost negligible extra
computational costs and no new sources of data, we are able to substantially
improve the scaling properties of large language models on downstream metrics.
In this paper, we continue training PaLM with UL2R, introducing a new set of
models at 8B, 62B, and 540B scale which we call U-PaLM. Impressively, at 540B
scale, we show an approximately 2x computational savings rate where U-PaLM
achieves the same performance as the final PaLM 540B model at around half its
computational budget (i.e., saving $\sim$4.4 million TPUv4 hours). We further
show that this improved scaling curve leads to 'emergent abilities' on
challenging BIG-Bench tasks -- for instance, U-PaLM does much better than PaLM
on some tasks or demonstrates better quality at much smaller scale (62B as
opposed to 540B). Overall, we show that U-PaLM outperforms PaLM on many
few-shot setups, i.e., English NLP tasks (e.g., commonsense reasoning, question
answering), reasoning tasks with chain-of-thought (e.g., GSM8K), multilingual
tasks (MGSM, TydiQA), MMLU and challenging BIG-Bench tasks. Finally, we provide
qualitative examples showing the new capabilities of U-PaLM for single and
multi-span infilling. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.11399 | [
"Yi Tay",
"Jason Wei",
"Hyung Won Chung",
"Vinh Q. Tran",
"David R. So",
"Siamak Shakeri",
"Xavier Garcia",
"Huaixiu Steven Zheng",
"Jinfeng Rao",
"Aakanksha Chowdhery",
"Denny Zhou",
"Donald Metzler",
"Slav Petrov",
"Neil Houlsby",
"Quoc V. Le",
"Mostafa Dehghani"
] | 128 |
Analyzing Dynamic Adversarial Training Data in the Limit
Eric Wallace1Adina Williams2yRobin Jia2;3yDouwe Kiela2y
1University of | 2110.08514 | Analyzing Dynamic Adversarial Training Data in the Limit | To create models that are robust across a wide range of test inputs, training
datasets should include diverse examples that span numerous phenomena. Dynamic
adversarial data collection (DADC), where annotators craft examples that
challenge continually improving models, holds promise as an approach for
generating such diverse training sets. Prior work has shown that running DADC
over 1-3 rounds can help models fix some error types, but it does not
necessarily lead to better generalization beyond adversarial test data. We
argue that running DADC over many rounds maximizes its training-time benefits,
as the different rounds can together cover many of the task-relevant phenomena.
We present the first study of longer-term DADC, where we collect 20 rounds of
NLI examples for a small set of premise paragraphs, with both adversarial and
non-adversarial approaches. Models trained on DADC examples make 26% fewer
errors on our expert-curated test set compared to models trained on
non-adversarial data. Our analysis shows that DADC yields examples that are
more difficult, more lexically and syntactically diverse, and contain fewer
annotation artifacts compared to non-adversarial examples. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.08514 | [
"Eric Wallace",
"Adina Williams",
"Robin Jia",
"Douwe Kiela"
] | 128 |
Forthcoming in The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics The Challenge of Value Alignment: from Fairer Algorithms to AI Safety I | 2101.06060 | The Challenge of Value Alignment: from Fairer Algorithms to AI Safety | This paper addresses the question of how to align AI systems with human
values and situates it within a wider body of thought regarding technology and
value. Far from existing in a vacuum, there has long been an interest in the
ability of technology to 'lock-in' different value systems. There has also been
considerable thought about how to align technologies with specific social
values, including through participatory design-processes. In this paper we look
more closely at the question of AI value alignment and suggest that the power
and autonomy of AI systems gives rise to opportunities and challenges in the
domain of value that have not been encountered before. Drawing important
continuities between the work of the fairness, accountability, transparency and
ethics community, and work being done by technical AI safety researchers, we
suggest that more attention needs to be paid to the question of 'social value
alignment' - that is, how to align AI systems with the plurality of values
endorsed by groups of people, especially on the global level. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.06060 | [
"Iason Gabriel",
"Vafa Ghazavi"
] | 128 |
Thou Shalt Not Hate: Countering Online Hate Speech
Binny Mathew, Punyajoy Saha,1Hardik Tharad, Subham Rajgaria, Prajwal Singhan | 1808.04409 | Thou shalt not hate: Countering Online Hate Speech | Hate content in social media is ever-increasing. While Facebook, Twitter,
Google have attempted to take several steps to tackle the hateful content, they
have mostly been unsuccessful. Counterspeech is seen as an effective way of
tackling the online hate without any harm to the freedom of speech. Thus, an
alternative strategy for these platforms could be to promote counterspeech as a
defense against hate content. However, in order to have a successful promotion
of such counterspeech, one has to have a deep understanding of its dynamics in
the online world. Lack of carefully curated data largely inhibits such
understanding. In this paper, we create and release the first ever dataset for
counterspeech using comments from YouTube. The data contains 13,924 manually
annotated comments where the labels indicate whether a comment is a
counterspeech or not. This data allows us to perform a rigorous measurement
study characterizing the linguistic structure of counterspeech for the first
time. This analysis results in various interesting insights such as: the
counterspeech comments receive much more likes as compared to the
non-counterspeech comments, for certain communities majority of the
non-counterspeech comments tend to be hate speech, the different types of
counterspeech are not all equally effective and the language choice of users
posting counterspeech is largely different from those posting non-counterspeech
as revealed by a detailed psycholinguistic analysis. Finally, we build a set of
machine learning models that are able to automatically detect counterspeech in
YouTube videos with an F1-score of 0.71. We also build multilabel models that
can detect different types of counterspeech in a comment with an F1-score of
0.60. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.04409 | [
"Binny Mathew",
"Punyajoy Saha",
"Hardik Tharad",
"Subham Rajgaria",
"Prajwal Singhania",
"Suman Kalyan Maity",
"Pawan Goyal",
"Animesh Mukherje"
] | 128 |
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2017
SNAPSHOT ENSEMBLES : TRAIN 1,GETMFOR FREE
Gao Huang, Yixuan Li, Geoff Pleiss
Corn | 1704.00109 | Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for free | Ensembles of neural networks are known to be much more robust and accurate
than individual networks. However, training multiple deep networks for model
averaging is computationally expensive. In this paper, we propose a method to
obtain the seemingly contradictory goal of ensembling multiple neural networks
at no additional training cost. We achieve this goal by training a single
neural network, converging to several local minima along its optimization path
and saving the model parameters. To obtain repeated rapid convergence, we
leverage recent work on cyclic learning rate schedules. The resulting
technique, which we refer to as Snapshot Ensembling, is simple, yet
surprisingly effective. We show in a series of experiments that our approach is
compatible with diverse network architectures and learning tasks. It
consistently yields lower error rates than state-of-the-art single models at no
additional training cost, and compares favorably with traditional network
ensembles. On CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 our DenseNet Snapshot Ensembles obtain
error rates of 3.4% and 17.4% respectively. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.00109 | [
"Gao Huang",
"Yixuan Li",
"Geoff Pleiss",
"Zhuang Liu",
"John E. Hopcroft",
"Kilian Q. Weinberger"
] | 128 |
Layer Normalization
Jimmy Lei Ba
University of Toronto
[email protected] Ryan Kiros
University of Toronto
[email protected] | 1607.06450 | Layer Normalization | Training state-of-the-art, deep neural networks is computationally expensive.
One way to reduce the training time is to normalize the activities of the
neurons. A recently introduced technique called batch normalization uses the
distribution of the summed input to a neuron over a mini-batch of training
cases to compute a mean and variance which are then used to normalize the
summed input to that neuron on each training case. This significantly reduces
the training time in feed-forward neural networks. However, the effect of batch
normalization is dependent on the mini-batch size and it is not obvious how to
apply it to recurrent neural networks. In this paper, we transpose batch
normalization into layer normalization by computing the mean and variance used
for normalization from all of the summed inputs to the neurons in a layer on a
single training case. Like batch normalization, we also give each neuron its
own adaptive bias and gain which are applied after the normalization but before
the non-linearity. Unlike batch normalization, layer normalization performs
exactly the same computation at training and test times. It is also
straightforward to apply to recurrent neural networks by computing the
normalization statistics separately at each time step. Layer normalization is
very effective at stabilizing the hidden state dynamics in recurrent networks.
Empirically, we show that layer normalization can substantially reduce the
training time compared with previously published techniques. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.06450 | [
"Jimmy Lei Ba",
"Jamie Ryan Kiros",
"Geoffrey E. Hinton"
] | 128 |
ACL 2022
Cross-Task Generalization
via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructions
Swaroop Mishra3Daniel Khashabi1Chitta Baral3 | 2104.08773 | Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructions | Humans (e.g., crowdworkers) have a remarkable ability in solving different
tasks, by simply reading textual instructions that define them and looking at a
few examples. Despite the success of the conventional supervised learning on
individual datasets, such models often struggle with generalization across
tasks (e.g., a question-answering system cannot solve classification tasks). A
long-standing challenge in AI is to build a model that learns a new task by
understanding the human-readable instructions that define it. To study this, we
introduce NATURAL INSTRUCTIONS, a dataset of 61 distinct tasks, their
human-authored instructions, and 193k task instances (input-output pairs). The
instructions are obtained from crowdsourcing instructions used to create
existing NLP datasets and mapped to a unified schema. Using this meta-dataset,
we measure cross-task generalization by training models on seen tasks and
measuring generalization to the remaining unseen ones. We adopt generative
pre-trained language models to encode task-specific instructions along with
input and generate task output. Our results indicate that models benefit from
instructions when evaluated in terms of generalization to unseen tasks (19%
better for models utilizing instructions). These models, however, are far
behind an estimated performance upperbound indicating significant room for more
progress in this direction. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.08773 | [
"Swaroop Mishra",
"Daniel Khashabi",
"Chitta Baral",
"Hannaneh Hajishirzi"
] | 128 |
Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Models
Abubakar Abid1, Maheen Farooqi2, James Zou3
1Department of Electrical Engi | 2101.05783 | Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Models | It has been observed that large-scale language models capture undesirable
societal biases, e.g. relating to race and gender; yet religious bias has been
relatively unexplored. We demonstrate that GPT-3, a state-of-the-art contextual
language model, captures persistent Muslim-violence bias. We probe GPT-3 in
various ways, including prompt completion, analogical reasoning, and story
generation, to understand this anti-Muslim bias, demonstrating that it appears
consistently and creatively in different uses of the model and that it is
severe even compared to biases about other religious groups. For instance,
"Muslim" is analogized to "terrorist" in 23% of test cases, while "Jewish" is
mapped to "money" in 5% of test cases. We quantify the positive distraction
needed to overcome this bias with adversarial text prompts, and find that use
of the most positive 6 adjectives reduces violent completions for "Muslims"
from 66% to 20%, but which is still higher than for other religious groups. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.05783 | [
"Abubakar Abid",
"Maheen Farooqi",
"James Zou"
] | 128 |
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2019
DARTS: D IFFERENTIABLE ARCHITECTURE SEARCH
Hanxiao Liu
CMU
[email protected] | 1806.09055 | DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Search | This paper addresses the scalability challenge of architecture search by
formulating the task in a differentiable manner. Unlike conventional approaches
of applying evolution or reinforcement learning over a discrete and
non-differentiable search space, our method is based on the continuous
relaxation of the architecture representation, allowing efficient search of the
architecture using gradient descent. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10,
ImageNet, Penn Treebank and WikiText-2 show that our algorithm excels in
discovering high-performance convolutional architectures for image
classification and recurrent architectures for language modeling, while being
orders of magnitude faster than state-of-the-art non-differentiable techniques.
Our implementation has been made publicly available to facilitate further
research on efficient architecture search algorithms. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.09055 | [
"Hanxiao Liu",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Yiming Yang"
] | 128 |
1Adversarial Training for Large Neural Language Models
Xiaodong Liuy, Hao Chengy, Pengcheng Hez, Weizhu Chenz, Yu Wangy, Hoifung | 2004.08994 | Adversarial Training for Large Neural Language Models | Generalization and robustness are both key desiderata for designing machine
learning methods. Adversarial training can enhance robustness, but past work
often finds it hurts generalization. In natural language processing (NLP),
pre-training large neural language models such as BERT have demonstrated
impressive gain in generalization for a variety of tasks, with further
improvement from adversarial fine-tuning. However, these models are still
vulnerable to adversarial attacks. In this paper, we show that adversarial
pre-training can improve both generalization and robustness. We propose a
general algorithm ALUM (Adversarial training for large neural LangUage Models),
which regularizes the training objective by applying perturbations in the
embedding space that maximizes the adversarial loss. We present the first
comprehensive study of adversarial training in all stages, including
pre-training from scratch, continual pre-training on a well-trained model, and
task-specific fine-tuning. ALUM obtains substantial gains over BERT on a wide
range of NLP tasks, in both regular and adversarial scenarios. Even for models
that have been well trained on extremely large text corpora, such as RoBERTa,
ALUM can still produce significant gains from continual pre-training, whereas
conventional non-adversarial methods can not. ALUM can be further combined with
task-specific fine-tuning to attain additional gains. The ALUM code is publicly
available at https://github.com/namisan/mt-dnn. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.08994 | [
"Xiaodong Liu",
"Hao Cheng",
"Pengcheng He",
"Weizhu Chen",
"Yu Wang",
"Hoifung Poon",
"Jianfeng Gao"
] | 128 |
Toxicity in Multilingual Machine Translation at Scale
Marta R. Costa-jussà y, Eric Smithy, Christophe Ropers y, Daniel Lichty, J | 2210.03070 | Toxicity in Multilingual Machine Translation at Scale | Machine Translation systems can produce different types of errors, some of
which are characterized as critical or catastrophic due to the specific
negative impact that they can have on users. In this paper we focus on one type
of critical error: added toxicity. We evaluate and analyze added toxicity when
translating a large evaluation dataset (HOLISTICBIAS, over 472k sentences,
covering 13 demographic axes) from English into 164 languages. An automatic
toxicity evaluation shows that added toxicity across languages varies from 0%
to 5%. The output languages with the most added toxicity tend to be
low-resource ones, and the demographic axes with the most added toxicity
include sexual orientation, gender and sex, and ability. We also perform human
evaluation on a subset of 8 translation directions, confirming the prevalence
of true added toxicity. We use a measurement of the amount of source
contribution to the translation, where a low source contribution implies
hallucination, to interpret what causes toxicity. Making use of the input
attributions allows us to explain toxicity, because the source contributions
significantly correlate with toxicity for 84% of languages studied. Given our
findings, our recommendations to reduce added toxicity are to curate training
data to avoid mistranslations, mitigate hallucination and check unstable
translations. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.03070 | [
"Marta R. Costa-jussà",
"Eric Smith",
"Christophe Ropers",
"Daniel Licht",
"Jean Maillard",
"Javier Ferrando",
"Carlos Escolano"
] | 128 |
Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances
JESSE DODGE, Allen Institute for AI, USA
TAYLOR PREWITT, University of W | 2206.05229 | Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances | By providing unprecedented access to computational resources, cloud computing
has enabled rapid growth in technologies such as machine learning, the
computational demands of which incur a high energy cost and a commensurate
carbon footprint. As a result, recent scholarship has called for better
estimates of the greenhouse gas impact of AI: data scientists today do not have
easy or reliable access to measurements of this information, precluding
development of actionable tactics. Cloud providers presenting information about
software carbon intensity to users is a fundamental stepping stone towards
minimizing emissions. In this paper, we provide a framework for measuring
software carbon intensity, and propose to measure operational carbon emissions
by using location-based and time-specific marginal emissions data per energy
unit. We provide measurements of operational software carbon intensity for a
set of modern models for natural language processing and computer vision, and a
wide range of model sizes, including pretraining of a 6.1 billion parameter
language model. We then evaluate a suite of approaches for reducing emissions
on the Microsoft Azure cloud compute platform: using cloud instances in
different geographic regions, using cloud instances at different times of day,
and dynamically pausing cloud instances when the marginal carbon intensity is
above a certain threshold. We confirm previous results that the geographic
region of the data center plays a significant role in the carbon intensity for
a given cloud instance, and find that choosing an appropriate region can have
the largest operational emissions reduction impact. We also show that the time
of day has notable impact on operational software carbon intensity. Finally, we
conclude with recommendations for how machine learning practitioners can use
software carbon intensity information to reduce environmental impact. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.05229 | [
"Jesse Dodge",
"Taylor Prewitt",
"Remi Tachet Des Combes",
"Erika Odmark",
"Roy Schwartz",
"Emma Strubell",
"Alexandra Sasha Luccioni",
"Noah A. Smith",
"Nicole DeCario",
"Will Buchanan"
] | 128 |
UNKs Everywhere:
Adapting Multilingual Language Models to New Scripts
Jonas Pfeiffer1, Ivan Vuli ´c2, Iryna Gurevych1, Sebastian | 2012.15562 | UNKs Everywhere: Adapting Multilingual Language Models to New Scripts | Massively multilingual language models such as multilingual BERT offer
state-of-the-art cross-lingual transfer performance on a range of NLP tasks.
However, due to limited capacity and large differences in pretraining data
sizes, there is a profound performance gap between resource-rich and
resource-poor target languages. The ultimate challenge is dealing with
under-resourced languages not covered at all by the models and written in
scripts unseen during pretraining. In this work, we propose a series of novel
data-efficient methods that enable quick and effective adaptation of pretrained
multilingual models to such low-resource languages and unseen scripts. Relying
on matrix factorization, our methods capitalize on the existing latent
knowledge about multiple languages already available in the pretrained model's
embedding matrix. Furthermore, we show that learning of the new dedicated
embedding matrix in the target language can be improved by leveraging a small
number of vocabulary items (i.e., the so-called lexically overlapping tokens)
shared between mBERT's and target language vocabulary. Our adaptation
techniques offer substantial performance gains for languages with unseen
scripts. We also demonstrate that they can yield improvements for low-resource
languages written in scripts covered by the pretrained model. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.15562 | [
"Jonas Pfeiffer",
"Ivan Vulić",
"Iryna Gurevych",
"Sebastian Ruder"
] | 128 |
An Analysis of the Automatic Bug Fixing
Performance of ChatGPT
Dominik Sobania
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Email: dsoban | 2301.08653 | An Analysis of the Automatic Bug Fixing Performance of ChatGPT | To support software developers in finding and fixing software bugs, several
automated program repair techniques have been introduced. Given a test suite,
standard methods usually either synthesize a repair, or navigate a search space
of software edits to find test-suite passing variants. Recent program repair
methods are based on deep learning approaches. One of these novel methods,
which is not primarily intended for automated program repair, but is still
suitable for it, is ChatGPT. The bug fixing performance of ChatGPT, however, is
so far unclear. Therefore, in this paper we evaluate ChatGPT on the standard
bug fixing benchmark set, QuixBugs, and compare the performance with the
results of several other approaches reported in the literature. We find that
ChatGPT's bug fixing performance is competitive to the common deep learning
approaches CoCoNut and Codex and notably better than the results reported for
the standard program repair approaches. In contrast to previous approaches,
ChatGPT offers a dialogue system through which further information, e.g., the
expected output for a certain input or an observed error message, can be
entered. By providing such hints to ChatGPT, its success rate can be further
increased, fixing 31 out of 40 bugs, outperforming state-of-the-art. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.08653 | [
"Dominik Sobania",
"Martin Briesch",
"Carol Hanna",
"Justyna Petke"
] | 128 |
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2023
INCODER : A G ENERATIVE MODEL FOR
CODE INFILLING AND SYNTHESIS
Daniel Fried ᠵAr | 2204.05999 | InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesis | Code is seldom written in a single left-to-right pass and is instead
repeatedly edited and refined. We introduce InCoder, a unified generative model
that can perform program synthesis (via left-to-right generation) as well as
editing (via infilling). InCoder is trained to generate code files from a large
corpus of permissively licensed code, where regions of code have been randomly
masked and moved to the end of each file, allowing code infilling with
bidirectional context. Our model is the first generative model that is able to
directly perform zero-shot code infilling, which we evaluate on challenging
tasks such as type inference, comment generation, and variable re-naming. We
find that the ability to condition on bidirectional context substantially
improves performance on these tasks, while still performing comparably on
standard program synthesis benchmarks in comparison to left-to-right only
models pretrained at similar scale. The InCoder models and code are publicly
released. https://sites.google.com/view/incoder-code-models | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.05999 | [
"Daniel Fried",
"Armen Aghajanyan",
"Jessy Lin",
"Sida Wang",
"Eric Wallace",
"Freda Shi",
"Ruiqi Zhong",
"Wen-tau Yih",
"Luke Zettlemoyer",
"Mike Lewis"
] | 128 |
ONEEPOCH ISALLYOUNEED
Aran Komatsuzaki
School of Mathematics
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
akomatsuzaki | 1906.06669 | One Epoch Is All You Need | In unsupervised learning, collecting more data is not always a costly process
unlike the training. For example, it is not hard to enlarge the 40GB WebText
used for training GPT-2 by modifying its sampling methodology considering how
many webpages there are in the Internet. On the other hand, given that training
on this dataset already costs tens of thousands of dollars, training on a
larger dataset naively is not cost-wise feasible. In this paper, we suggest to
train on a larger dataset for only one epoch unlike the current practice, in
which the unsupervised models are trained for from tens to hundreds of epochs.
Furthermore, we suggest to adjust the model size and the number of iterations
to be performed appropriately. We show that the performance of Transformer
language model becomes dramatically improved in this way, especially if the
original number of epochs is greater. For example, by replacing the training
for 10 epochs with the one epoch training, this translates to 1.9-3.3x speedup
in wall-clock time in our settings and more if the original number of epochs is
greater. Under one epoch training, no overfitting occurs, and regularization
method does nothing but slows down the training. Also, the curve of test loss
over iterations follows power-law extensively. We compare the wall-clock time
of the training of models with different parameter budget under one epoch
training, and we show that size/iteration adjustment based on our proposed
heuristics leads to 1-2.7x speedup in our cases. With the two methods combined,
we achieve 3.3-5.1x speedup. Finally, we speculate various implications of one
epoch training and size/iteration adjustment. In particular, based on our
analysis we believe that we can reduce the cost to train the state-of-the-art
models as BERT and GPT-2 dramatically, maybe even by the factor of 10. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.06669 | [
"Aran Komatsuzaki"
] | 128 |
UL2: Unifying Language Learning Paradigms
Yi Tay∗Mostafa Dehghani
Vinh Q. Tran]Xavier Garcia]Jason Wei]Xuezhi Wang]Hyung Won Ch | 2205.05131 | UL2: Unifying Language Learning Paradigms | Existing pre-trained models are generally geared towards a particular class
of problems. To date, there seems to be still no consensus on what the right
architecture and pre-training setup should be. This paper presents a unified
framework for pre-training models that are universally effective across
datasets and setups. We begin by disentangling architectural archetypes with
pre-training objectives -- two concepts that are commonly conflated. Next, we
present a generalized & unified perspective for self-supervision in NLP and
show how different pre-training objectives can be cast as one another and how
interpolating between different objectives can be effective. We then propose
Mixture-of-Denoisers (MoD), a pre-training objective that combines diverse
pre-training paradigms together. We furthermore introduce a notion of mode
switching, wherein downstream fine-tuning is associated with specific
pre-training schemes. We conduct extensive ablative experiments to compare
multiple pre-training objectives and find that our method pushes the
Pareto-frontier by outperforming T5 & GPT-like models across multiple diverse
setups. By scaling our model up to 20B parameters, we achieve SOTA performance
on 50 well-established supervised finetuning based NLP tasks. Our model also
achieve strong results at in-context learning, outperforming 175B GPT-3 on
zero-shot SuperGLUE and tripling the performance of T5-XXL on one-shot
summarization. On 0-shot MMLU, UL2 20B outperforms T0 and T5 models. UL2 20B
also works well with chain-of-thought prompting and reasoning, making it an
appealing choice for research into reasoning at a small to medium scale of 20B
parameters. Finally, we apply FLAN instruction tuning to the UL2 20B model,
achieving MMLU and Big-Bench scores competitive to FLAN-PaLM 62B. We release
Flax-based T5X checkpoints for the UL2 20B & Flan-UL2 20B. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.05131 | [
"Yi Tay",
"Mostafa Dehghani",
"Vinh Q. Tran",
"Xavier Garcia",
"Jason Wei",
"Xuezhi Wang",
"Hyung Won Chung",
"Siamak Shakeri",
"Dara Bahri",
"Tal Schuster",
"Huaixiu Steven Zheng",
"Denny Zhou",
"Neil Houlsby",
"Donald Metzler"
] | 128 |
On the Opportunities and Risks of
Foundation Models
Rishi Bommasani* Drew A. Hudson Ehsan Adeli Russ Altman Simran Arora
Sydney | 2108.07258 | On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models | AI is undergoing a paradigm shift with the rise of models (e.g., BERT,
DALL-E, GPT-3) that are trained on broad data at scale and are adaptable to a
wide range of downstream tasks. We call these models foundation models to
underscore their critically central yet incomplete character. This report
provides a thorough account of the opportunities and risks of foundation
models, ranging from their capabilities (e.g., language, vision, robotics,
reasoning, human interaction) and technical principles(e.g., model
architectures, training procedures, data, systems, security, evaluation,
theory) to their applications (e.g., law, healthcare, education) and societal
impact (e.g., inequity, misuse, economic and environmental impact, legal and
ethical considerations). Though foundation models are based on standard deep
learning and transfer learning, their scale results in new emergent
capabilities,and their effectiveness across so many tasks incentivizes
homogenization. Homogenization provides powerful leverage but demands caution,
as the defects of the foundation model are inherited by all the adapted models
downstream. Despite the impending widespread deployment of foundation models,
we currently lack a clear understanding of how they work, when they fail, and
what they are even capable of due to their emergent properties. To tackle these
questions, we believe much of the critical research on foundation models will
require deep interdisciplinary collaboration commensurate with their
fundamentally sociotechnical nature. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.07258 | [
"Rishi Bommasani",
"Drew A. Hudson",
"Ehsan Adeli",
"Russ Altman",
"Simran Arora",
"Sydney von Arx",
"Michael S. Bernstein",
"Jeannette Bohg",
"Antoine Bosselut",
"Emma Brunskill",
"Erik Brynjolfsson",
"Shyamal Buch",
"Dallas Card",
"Rodrigo Castellon",
"Niladri Chatterji",
"Annie Chen",
"Kathleen Creel",
"Jared Quincy Davis",
"Dora Demszky",
"Chris Donahue",
"Moussa Doumbouya",
"Esin Durmus",
"Stefano Ermon",
"John Etchemendy",
"Kawin Ethayarajh",
"Li Fei-Fei",
"Chelsea Finn",
"Trevor Gale",
"Lauren Gillespie",
"Karan Goel",
"Noah Goodman",
"Shelby Grossman",
"Neel Guha",
"Tatsunori Hashimoto",
"Peter Henderson",
"John Hewitt",
"Daniel E. Ho",
"Jenny Hong",
"Kyle Hsu",
"Jing Huang",
"Thomas Icard",
"Saahil Jain",
"Dan Jurafsky",
"Pratyusha Kalluri",
"Siddharth Karamcheti",
"Geoff Keeling",
"Fereshte Khani",
"Omar Khattab",
"Pang Wei Koh",
"Mark Krass",
"Ranjay Krishna",
"Rohith Kuditipudi",
"Ananya Kumar",
"Faisal Ladhak",
"Mina Lee",
"Tony Lee",
"Jure Leskovec",
"Isabelle Levent",
"Xiang Lisa Li",
"Xuechen Li",
"Tengyu Ma",
"Ali Malik",
"Christopher D. Manning",
"Suvir Mirchandani",
"Eric Mitchell",
"Zanele Munyikwa",
"Suraj Nair",
"Avanika Narayan",
"Deepak Narayanan",
"Ben Newman",
"Allen Nie",
"Juan Carlos Niebles",
"Hamed Nilforoshan",
"Julian Nyarko",
"Giray Ogut",
"Laurel Orr",
"Isabel Papadimitriou",
"Joon Sung Park",
"Chris Piech",
"Eva Portelance",
"Christopher Potts",
"Aditi Raghunathan",
"Rob Reich",
"Hongyu Ren",
"Frieda Rong",
"Yusuf Roohani",
"Camilo Ruiz",
"Jack Ryan",
"Christopher Ré",
"Dorsa Sadigh",
"Shiori Sagawa",
"Keshav Santhanam",
"Andy Shih",
"Krishnan Srinivasan",
"Alex Tamkin",
"Rohan Taori",
"Armin W. Thomas",
"Florian Tramèr",
"Rose E. Wang",
"William Wang",
"Bohan Wu",
"Jiajun Wu",
"Yuhuai Wu",
"Sang Michael Xie",
"Michihiro Yasunaga",
"Jiaxuan You",
"Matei Zaharia",
"Michael Zhang",
"Tianyi Zhang",
"Xikun Zhang",
"Yuhui Zhang",
"Lucia Zheng",
"Kaitlyn Zhou",
"Percy Liang"
] | 128 |