Hugging face presents FineVideo π₯! Unlocking the next generation of Video understanding π
π€―3400 hours of annotated Creative Common videos with rich character descriptions, scene splits, mood, and content descriptions per scene as well as QA pairs. π₯ @mfarre processed over 2M videos of Youtube-CC to make this incredibly powerful selection.
Sorry judge, my lawyer hallucinated? π If you get an AI lawyer, you would want it to be hallucination-free!
New @Stanford-@Yale research reveals surprising findings about leading AI legal research tools. Here's what you need to know:
>> Key Findings The study tested LexisNexis (Lexis+ AI), Thomson Reuters (Westlaw AI & Ask Practical Law AI), and GPT-4, finding hallucination rates between 17-33% despite claims of being "hallucination-free".
>> Technical Deep Dive The research evaluated these tools using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture, which operates in two crucial steps:
1. Retrieval System: - Uses neural text embeddings to capture semantic meaning - Employs both lexical and semantic search mechanisms - Implements document filtering and extraction - Retrieves relevant legal documents from vast databases
2. Generation Pipeline: - Processes retrieved documents alongside original queries - Synthesizes information from multiple legal sources - Generates responses based on retrieved context - Includes citation verification mechanisms
>> Why This Matters This research exposes critical vulnerabilities in AI legal tools that lawyers increasingly rely on. It's essential for legal professionals to understand these limitations when incorporating AI into their practice.