Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
#1
by
ArthurZ
HF staff
- opened
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -4,4 +4,56 @@ tags:
|
|
4 |
- pytorch
|
5 |
- diffusers
|
6 |
- unconditional-image-generation
|
7 |
-
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
- pytorch
|
5 |
- diffusers
|
6 |
- unconditional-image-generation
|
7 |
+
---
|
8 |
+
|
9 |
+
# Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPM)
|
10 |
+
|
11 |
+
**Paper**: [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239)
|
12 |
+
|
13 |
+
**Authors**: Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter Abbeel
|
14 |
+
|
15 |
+
**Abstract**:
|
16 |
+
|
17 |
+
*We present high quality image synthesis results using diffusion probabilistic models, a class of latent variable models inspired by considerations from nonequilibrium thermodynamics. Our best results are obtained by training on a weighted variational bound designed according to a novel connection between diffusion probabilistic models and denoising score matching with Langevin dynamics, and our models naturally admit a progressive lossy decompression scheme that can be interpreted as a generalization of autoregressive decoding. On the unconditional CIFAR10 dataset, we obtain an Inception score of 9.46 and a state-of-the-art FID score of 3.17. On 256x256 LSUN, we obtain sample quality similar to ProgressiveGAN.*
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
## Inference
|
20 |
+
|
21 |
+
**DDPM** models can use *discrete noise schedulers* such as:
|
22 |
+
|
23 |
+
- [scheduling_ddpm](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/src/diffusers/schedulers/scheduling_ddpm.py)
|
24 |
+
- [scheduling_ddim](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/src/diffusers/schedulers/scheduling_ddim.py)
|
25 |
+
- [scheduling_pndm](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/src/diffusers/schedulers/scheduling_pndm.py)
|
26 |
+
|
27 |
+
for inference. Note that while the *ddpm* scheduler yields the highest quality, it also takes the longest.
|
28 |
+
For a good trade-off between quality and inference speed you might want to consider the *ddim* or *pndm* schedulers instead.
|
29 |
+
|
30 |
+
See the following code:
|
31 |
+
|
32 |
+
```python
|
33 |
+
# !pip install diffusers
|
34 |
+
from diffusers import DDPMPipeline, DDIMPipeline, PNDMPipeline
|
35 |
+
|
36 |
+
model_id = "google/ddpm-cifar10-32"
|
37 |
+
|
38 |
+
# load model and scheduler
|
39 |
+
ddpm = DDPMPipeline.from_pretrained(model_id) # you can replace DDPMPipeline with DDIMPipeline or PNDMPipeline for faster inference
|
40 |
+
|
41 |
+
# run pipeline in inference (sample random noise and denoise)
|
42 |
+
image = ddpm()["sample"]
|
43 |
+
|
44 |
+
|
45 |
+
# save image
|
46 |
+
image[0].save("ddpm_generated_image.png")
|
47 |
+
```
|
48 |
+
|
49 |
+
For more in-detail information, please have a look at the [official inference example](_) # <- TODO(PVP) add link
|
50 |
+
|
51 |
+
## Training
|
52 |
+
|
53 |
+
If you want to train your own model, please have a look at the [official training example]( ) # <- TODO(PVP) add link
|
54 |
+
|
55 |
+
## Samples
|
56 |
+
1. ![sample_1](https://huggingface.co/google/ddpm-church-256/resolve/main/generated_image_0.png)
|
57 |
+
2. ![sample_2](https://huggingface.co/google/ddpm-church-256/resolve/main/generated_image_1.png)
|
58 |
+
3. ![sample_3](https://huggingface.co/google/ddpm-church-256/resolve/main/generated_image_2.png)
|
59 |
+
4. ![sample_4](https://huggingface.co/google/ddpm-church-256/resolve/main/generated_image_3.png)
|