Spaces:
Running
on
Zero
Phi-3 GMS8K Example 1
😃: Asdfjklfd is applying for a new job and bought a new set of business clothes to wear to the interview. They went to a department store with a budget of $321857 and spent $18238 on a t-shirt, $124901 on pants, $8841 on a coat, $13481 on socks, and $2338 on a belt. They also purchased a necklace, but lost the receipt. They have $1423 left from their budget. How much did Asdfjklfd pay for the necklace?
🤖: To find out how much Asdfjklfd paid for the necklace, we need to calculate the total amount spent on the items with receipts and subtract that from the initial budget. Then we add the remaining amount to see how much was spent in total. Finally, we subtract this total spent from the initial budget to find out the cost of the necklace.
First, let's add up the costs of the items with receipts:
T-shirt: $18,238
Pants: $124,901
Coat: $8,841
Socks: $13,481
Belt: $2,338
Total spent on items with receipts = $18,238 + $124,901 + $8,841 + $13,481 + $2,338
Total spent on items with receipts = $167,897
Now, let's add the remaining amount to see how much was spent in total:
Total spent on items with receipts: $167,897
Remaining amount: $14,230
Total spent including the necklace = $167,897 + $14,230
Total spent including the necklace = $182,127
Finally, let's subtract the total spent including the necklace from the initial budget to find out the cost of the necklace:
Initial budget: $321,857
Total spent including the necklace: $182,127
Cost of the necklace = Initial budget - Total spent including the necklace
Cost of the necklace = $321,857 - $182,127
Cost of the necklace = $139,730
However, this result doesn't make sense because the cost of the necklace is more than the initial budget, which is not possible. It seems there might have been a mistake in the calculation. Let's re-evaluate the numbers.
The correct calculation should be:
Total spent including the necklace = Total spent on items with receipts + Cost of the necklace
$167
Time taken to first token: 0.10 seconds
Tokens per second: 15.04
What does this show?
some training data artifact talking itself out of a relatively sensible solution.
can be repro'd with smaller numbers for another gsm8k problem (filling aquarium and spilling water).