Spaces:

open-llm-leaderboard

/

open_llm_leaderboard

like 11.7k

Running on CPU Upgrade

Hi @saishf ,

Thank you for your message! Yes, we are now checking why both gemma-2-9b-it and gemma-2-9b have low scores. I'll be back with my answer as soon as possible

here is something wrong with math as well - 0 ? Not possible

Bump (Leaving a comment because I want a notification once more information is available).

Hi all!
Happy to say that we (most likely) found the problem! (Seems to work on the base model for the subsets I tested)

At this line of our harness fork, we needed to add a patch (added to the harness on main 2 weeks ago) so that gemma2 models also start their evaluation with an added bos token systematically.

I just need to restart the evals and we should be getting updated results very soon.

That line is Gemma specific, would this mean that non Gemma models aren't Influenced by this problem? That's good news, can't wait to see the actual results.

Yep, Gemma models are a bit fickle if you don't launch them exactly like expected - it might also be affecting the recurrent gemma models, which we are looking at atm

Hi! New results should be there! Thanks for your patience and the report! :)