text
stringlengths 0
9.73k
|
|---|
References. |
Ysgarth is a fantasy role-playing game written by Dave Nalle with contributions from other authors. It was originally released in 1979 by Ragnarok Games. The company also published subsequent editions of the game throughout the 1980s and 1990s, ending with the 6th edition in 1992. Various revisions and addenda are available on the internet, including partial versions of an unpublished 7th edition of the game. Ragnarok Games also published other board and roleplaying games, as well as a roleplaying magazine called "Abyss Quarterly". Many of those involved in the development of Ysgarth were also subsequently involved in the development of the "Quest for the Grail" Arthurian CCG published by Stone Ring Games. |
Description. |
"The Ysgarth Rule System" is a fantasy system, complex and detailed. In the first edition, Book 1, "The Fantasy Character", described character races (humans, elves, dwarves, insect-types, and reptilians), numerous characteristics, classes (fighters, mages, and hold men, and subclasses), skills, and character improvement. Book 2, "Battlecraft", describes the combat system; Book 3, "The Arcane Arts", covers the 15 schools of magic; Book 4, "Holy Orders", covers holy men, six religious orders, priestly magic, and 155 gods; Book 5, "The Fantasy World", covers world and campaign creation. "The Last Song of Hergest" is an introductory scenario. |
"Ysgarth" is generally noted, both positively and negatively, for the extreme detail of its game mechanics. It was one of the first roleplaying systems to rely heavily on skills and discard the idea of character classes and also one of the first games to rely solely on the use of 10-sided dice for percentile rolls in resolving actions. "Ysgarth" also emphasizes realistic combat resolvable in minute detail. Some have praised the mechanics as innovative, and others have damned them as cumbersome. This issue of excessive mechanics is made more complex by the fact that each edition of "Ysgarth" featured fairly radical changes in the implementation of the basic rule concepts varying in their level of complexity. The 5th edition included three completely different versions of the mechanics in a single rulebook. |
The game background is derived from Indo-European mythology overlaid on a unique cosmology involving an inter-planar diaspora and catastrophic warfare as the backdrop for the development of the world's current societies. The background material included in the 3rd and 4th editions of the rules is quite extensive and detailed as are materials included in some of the secondary worldbooks and adventure scenarios. The setting is highly magical with powerful deities and lesser supernatural beings playing significant roles in the development of the world and the lives of characters within it. |
Publication history. |
"Ysgarth" was designed by David F. Nalle and published by Ragnarok Enterprises in 1979 as three digest-sized books (56 pages total). The second edition was published in 1980 as a 100-page digest-sized book. The third edition was published in 1982 as a digest-sized box with a red cover, including six books (120 pages total). The fourth edition (1982) was published in the same format as the third edition but with a blue cover. The fifth edition was published in 1985 as a digest-sized box, including three books: "RoleCraft" (36 pages), "SpellCraft" (24 pages), and "WorldCraft" (24 pages). |
Many supplements and adventure modules were published over the course of about a dozen years when the game was particularly active, as well as games in other genres using mechanics derived from "Ysgarth". |
Reception. |
Lewis Pulsipher reviewed the second revised edition (orange cover) of "Ysgarth Rules System" in "The Space Gamer" No. 58. Pulsipher commented that "This is the closest I've seen to a simulation FRPG, and there's plenty of potential for additions to other systems, if you prefer [...] "YRS" is one of the FRP bargains of this or any year." |
Rick Swan reviewed "Ysgarth" in "Space Gamer/Fantasy Gamer" No. 83. Swan commented that "As an integrated, self-contained fantasy system, "Ysgarth" more closely resembles "Runequest" than "Dungeons and Dragons", but page for page is much tougher to digest than either one. It's a remarkable game, recommended for advanced players with dependable calculators and a lot of patience." |
Shaul Reuven Foguel was an Israeli mathematician (December 5, 1931 - December 19, 2020). Shaul Foguel was born to one of the founding families of the City of Tel Aviv and his mother Dora Malkin was a direct descendant of Saul Wahl. He received his B.S. and M.S. in Mathematics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and his PhD in Mathematics from Yale University in 1958. He wrote his dissertation under Nelson Dunford on "Studies in Spectral Operators and the Basis Problem". Shaul Foguel was Professor Emeritus of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and a supporter of the Israeli Left. He spent his retirement in New York City, where his two sons, Professor Tuval Foguel of Adelphi University, and Sy Foguel, the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway GUARD Insurance Companies live. |
Holmes is an impact crater in the Mare Australe quadrangle of Mars, located at 75.0°S latitude and 293.2°W longitude. It is 122.0 km in diameter and was named after Arthur Holmes, and the name was approved in 1973 by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature (WGPSN). |
Adelaide of Vermandois may refer to: |
The Paymaster's Son is a surviving 1913 silent short drama film directed by Francis Ford and produced by Thomas H. Ince. |
Single-cell DNA template strand sequencing, or Strand-seq, is a technique for the selective sequencing of a daughter cell's parental template strands. |
This technique offers a wide variety of applications, including the identification of sister chromatid exchanges in the parental cell prior to segregation, the assessment of non-random segregation of sister chromatids, the identification of misoriented contigs in genome assemblies, de novo genome assembly of both haplotypes in diploid organisms including humans, whole-chromosome haplotyping, and the identification of germline and somatic genomic structural variation, the latter of which can be detected robustly even in single cells. |
Background. |
Strand-seq (single-cell and single-strand sequencing) was one of the first single-cell sequencing protocols described in 2012. This genomic technique selectively sequencings the parental template strands in single daughter cells DNA libraries. As a proof of concept study, the authors demonstrated the ability to acquire sequence information from the Watson and/or Crick chromosomal strands in an individual DNA library, depending on the mode of chromatid segregation; a typical DNA library will always contain DNA from both strands. The authors were specifically interested in showing the utility of strand-seq in detecting sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) at high-resolution. They successfully identified eight putative SCEs in the murine (mouse) embryonic stem (meS) cell line with resolution up to 23 bp. This methodology has also been shown to hold great utility in discerning patterns of non-random chromatid segregation, especially in stem cell lineages. Furthermore, SCEs have been implicated as diagnostic indicators of genome stress, information that has utility in cancer biology. Most research on this topic involves observing the assortment of chromosomal template strands through many cell development cycles and correlating non-random assortment with particular cell fates. Single-cell sequencing protocols were foundational in the development of this technique, but they differ in several aspects. |
Methodology. |
Similar methods. |
Past methods have been used to track the inheritance patterns of chromatids on a per-strand basis and elucidate the process of non-random segregation: |
Pulse-chase. |
Pulse-chase experiments have been used for determining the segregation patterns of chromosomes in addition to studying other time-dependent cellular processes. Briefly, pulse-chase assays allow researchers to track radioactively labelled molecules in the cell. In experiments used to study non-random chromosome assortment, stem cells are labeled or "pulsed" with a nucleotide analog that is incorporated in the replicated DNA strands. This allows the nascent stands to be tracked through many rounds of replication. Unfortunately, this method is found to have poor resolution as it can only be observed at the chromatid level. |
Chromosome-orientation fluorescence in situ hybridization (CO-FISH). |
CO-FISH, or strand-specific fluorescence "in situ" hybridization, facilitates strand-specific targeting of DNA with fluorescently-tagged probes. It exploits the uniform orientation of major satellites relative to the direction of telomeres, thus allowing strands to be unambiguously designated as "Watson" or "Crick" strands. Using unidirectional probes that recognize major satellite regions, coupled to fluorescently labelled dyes, individual strands can be bound. To ensure that only the template strand is labelled, the newly formed strands must be degraded by BrdU incorporation and photolysis. This protocol offers improved cytogenetic resolution, allowing researchers to observe single strands as opposed to whole chromatids with pulse-chase experiments. Moreover, non-random segregation of chromatids can be directly assayed by targeting major satellite markers. |
Wet lab protocols. |
Cells of interest are cultured either in vivo or in vitro. During S-phase cells are treated with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) which is then incorporated into their nascent DNA, acting as a substitute for thymidine. After at least one replication event has occurred, the daughter cells are synchronized at the G2 phase and individually separated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The cells are directly sorted into lysis buffer and their DNA is extracted. Having been arrested at a specified number of generations (usually one), the inheritance patterns of sister chromatids can be assessed. The following methods concentrate on the DNA sequencing of a single daughter cell's DNA. At this point the chromosomes are composed of nascent strands with BrdU in place of thymidine and the original template strands are primed for DNA sequencing library preparation. Since this protocol was published in 2012, the canonical methodology is only well described for Illumina sequencing platforms; the protocol could very easily be adapted for other sequencing platforms, depending on the application. Next, the DNA is incubated with a special dye such that when the BrdU-dye complex is excited by UV light, nascent strands are nicked by photolysis. This process inhibits polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the nascent strand, allowing only the parental template strands to be amplified. Library construction proceeds as normal for Illumina paired-end sequencing. Multiplexing PCR primers are then ligated to the PCR amplicons with hexamer barcodes identifying which cell each fragment they are derived from. Unlike single cell sequencing protocols, Strand-seq does not utilize multiple displacement amplification or MALBAC for DNA amplification. Rather, it is solely dependent on PCR. |
Bioinformatic processing. |
The majority of current applications for Strand-seq start by aligning sequenced reads to a reference genome. Alignment can be performed using a variety of short-read aligners such as BWA and Bowtie. By aligning Strand-seq reads from a single cell to the reference genome, the inherited template strands can be determined. If the cell was sequenced after more than one generation, a pattern of chromatid assortment can be ascertained for the particular cell lineage at hand. |
The Bioinformatic Analysis of Inherited Templates (BAIT) was the first bioinformatic software to exclusively analyze reads generated from the Strand-seq methodology. It begins by aligning the reads to a reference sequence, binning the genome into sections, and finally counting the number of Watson and Crick reads falling within each bin. From here, BAIT enables the identification of SCE events, misoriented contigs in the reference genome, aneuploid chromosomes and modes of sister chromatid segregation. It can also aid in assembling early-build genomes and assigning orphan scaffolds to locations within late-build genomes. Following BAIT, numerous bioinformatics tools have recently been introduced that use Strand-seq data for a variety of applications (see, for example, the following sections on haplotyping, de novo genome assembly, and discovery of structural variations in single cells, with reference to the respective linked articles). |
Limitations. |
Strand-seq requires cells undergoing cell division for BrdU labeling, and thus is not applicable to formalin-fixed specimens or non-dividing cells. But it may be applied to normal mitotic cells and tissues, organoids, as well as leukemia and tumor samples using fresh or frozen primary specimens. Strand-seq is using Illumina sequencing, and applications that require sequence information from different sequencing technologies require new protocols, or alternatively integration of data generated using distinct sequencing platforms as recently show-cased. |
Authors from the initial papers describing Strand-seq showed that they were able to attain a 23bp resolution for mapping SCEs, and other large chromosomal abnormalities are likely to share this mapping resolution (if breakpoint fine-mapping is performed). Resolution, however, is dependent on a combination of the sequencing platform used, library preparation protocols, and the number of cells analysed as well as the depth of sequencing per cell. However, it would be sensical for precision to further increase with sequencing technologies that don't incur errors in homopolymeric repeats. |
Applications and utility. |
Identifying sister chromatid exchanges. |
Strand-seq was initially proposed as a tool to identify sister chromatid exchanges. Being a process that is localized to individual cells, DNA sequencing of more than one cell would naturally scatter these effects and suggest an absence of SCE events. Moreover, classic single cell sequencing techniques are unable to show these events due to heterogeneous amplification biases and dual-strand sequence information, thereby necessitating Strand-seq. Using the reference alignment information, researchers can identify an SCE if the directionality of an inherited template strand changes. |
Identifying misoriented contigs. |
Misoriented contigs are present in reference genomes at significant rates (ex. 1% in the mouse reference genome). Strand-seq, in contrast to conventional sequencing methods, can detect these misorientations. Misoriented contigs are present where strand inheritance changes from one homozygous state to the other (ex. WW to CC, or CC to WW). Moreover, this state change is visible in every Strand-seq library, reinforcing the presence of a misoriented contig. |
Identifying non-random segregation of sister chromatids. |
Prior to the 1960s, it was assumed that sister chromatids were segregated randomly into daughter cells. However, non-random segregation of sister chromatids has been observed in mammalian cells ever since. There have been a few hypotheses proposed to explain the non-random segregation, including the Immortal Strand Hypothesis and the Silent Sister Hypothesis, one of which may hopefully be verified by methods involving Strand-seq. |
‘’Immortal Strand Hypothesis’’ |
Mutations occur every time a cell divides. Certain long-lived cells (ex. stem cells) may be particularly affected by these mutations. The Immortal Strand Hypothesis proposes that these cells avoid mutation accumulation by consistently retaining parental template strands[9]. For this hypothesis to be true, sister chromatids from each and every chromosome must segregate in a non-random fashion. Additionally, one cell will retain the exact same set of template strands after each division, giving the rest to the other cell products of the division. |
‘’Silent Sister Hypothesis’’ |
This hypothesis states that sister chromatids have differing epigenetic signatures, thereby also differing expression regulation. When replication occurs, non-random segregation of sister chromatids ensures the fates of the daughter cells. Assessing the validity of this hypothesis would require a joint analysis of Strand-seq and gene expression profiles for both daughter cells. |
Discovery of structural variations & aneuploid chromosomes. |
The output of BAIT shows the inheritance of parental template strands along the genome. Normally, two template strands are inherited for each autosome, and any deviation from this number indicates an instance of aneuploidy, which can be visualised in single cells. |
Inversions are a class of copy-number balanced structural variation, which lead to a change in strand directionality readily visualised by Strand-seq. Strand-seq can hence be used to readily detect polymorphic inversions in humans and primates, including Megbase-sized events embedded in large segmental duplications known to be inaccessible to Illumina sequencing. |
A study published online in 2019 further demonstrated that using Strand-seq, all classes of structural variation ≥200kb including deletions, duplications, inversions, inverted duplications, balanced translocations, unbalanced translocations, breakage-fusion-bridge cycle mediated complex DNA rearrangements, and chromothripsis events are sensitively detected in single cells or subclones, using single-cell tri-channel processing (scTRIP). scTRIP works via joint modelling of read-orientation, read-depth, and haplotype-phase to discover SVs in single cells. Using scTRIP, structural variants are resolved by chromosome-length haplotype which confers higher sensitivity and specificity for single-cell structural variant calling than other current technologies. Since scTRIP does not require reads (or read pairs) transversing the boundaries (or breakpoints) of structural variants in single cells for variant calling, it does not suffer from known artefacts of single-cell methods based on whole genome amplification (i.e. so-called read chimera) which tend to confound structural variation analysis in single cells. |
Haplotyping, genome assembly & generation of high-resolution human genetic variation maps. |
Early-build genomes are quite fragmented, with unordered and unoriented contigs. Using Strand-seq provides directionality information to accompany the sequence, which ultimately helps resolve the placement of contigs. Contigs present in the same chromosome will exhibit the same directionality, provided SCE events have not occurred. Conversely, contigs present in different chromosomes will only exhibit the same directionality in 50% of the Strand-seq libraries. |
Scaffolds, successive contigs intersected by a gap, can be localized in the same manner. |
The same principle of using strand direction to distinguish large DNA molecules enables the use of Strand-seq as a tool to construct whole-chromosome haplotypes of genetic variation, from telomere to telomere. |
Recent reports have shown that Strand-seq can be computationally integrated with long-read sequencing technology, with the unique advantages of both technologies enabling the generation of highly contiguous haplotype-resolved de novo human genome assemblies. These genomic assemblies integrate all forms of genetic variation including single nucleotide variants, indels and structural variation even across complex genomic loci, and have recently been applied to generate comprehensive haplotype-aware maps of structural variation in a diversity panel of humans from distinct ancestries. |
Considerations. |
The possibility that BrdU being substituted for thymine in the genomic DNA could induce double stranded chromosomal breaks and specifically resulting in SCEs has been previously discussed in the literature. Additionally, BrdU incorporation has been suggested to interfere with strand segregation patterns. If this is the case, there would be an inflation in false positive SCEs which may be annotated. Therefore, many cells should be analyzed using the Strand-seq protocol to ensure that SCEs are in fact present in the population. For structural variants detected in single cells, detection of the same variant (on the same haplotype) in more than one cell can exclude BrdU incorporation as a possible cause. |
The number of single cell strands that need to be sequenced in order for an annotation to be accepted has yet to be proposed and is highly dependent on the questions being asked. As Strand-seq is founded on single cell sequencing techniques, one must consider the problems faced with single cell sequencing as well. These include the lacking standards for cell isolation and amplification. Even though previous Strand-seq studies isolated cells using FACS, microfluidics also serves as an attractive alternative. PCR has been shown to produce more erroneous amplification products compared to strand displacement based methods such as MDA and MALBAC, whereas the latter two techniques generate chimeric reads as a byproduct that can result in erroneous structural variation calls. MDA and MALBAC also generate more dropouts than Strand-seq during SV detection because they require reads that cross the breakpoint of an SV to enable its detection (this is not required for any of the different SV classes that Strand-seq can detect). Strand displacement amplification also tends to generate more sequence and longer products which could be beneficial for long read sequencing technologies. |
Brigadier Archer Francis Lawrence Clive, DSO and bar, MC (24 June 1903, in London – March 1995, in Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire) was a British Army officer who served during World War II. |
Family. |
Clive was the son of Lieutenant-General Sir George Sidney Clive and Madeline Buxton. He was educated at New Beacon School, Sevenoaks, Harrow School (January 1917-?) and the Royal Military College, Sandhurst. |
He was married twice; firstly on 8 February 1934 to the Honourable Penelope Isobel Portman (daughter of Gerald Berkeley Portman, 7th Viscount Portman). The couple had two children (a son and a daughter); they were divorced in 1949. His second marriage was to Olivia Mary Beatrice Stanley, on 3 October 1950. |
Military career. |
After graduating from Sandhurst, Clive was commissioned as a second lieutenant into the Grenadier Guards on 1 February 1923. Promoted on 1 February 1925 to lieutenant, from May 1928 to August 1930, he was attached to the Sudan Defence Force (SDF). Returning to England, from 1938 to 1939 he attended the Staff College, Camberley. |
From September 1939 until July 1940, he served with the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), first as a General Staff Officer, 3rd grade (GSO3), then from March 1940 as a brigade major. He was awarded the Military Cross in July 1940 for his services with the BEF. Clive then served at the War Office as a General Staff Officer, 2nd grade (GSO2), until 15 February 1941, when, promoted to the acting rank of lieutenant colonel, he was appointed Commanding Officer (CO) of the 6th Battalion, Grenadier Guards. The battalion was a war-raised unit composed mainly of civilian soldiers who had volunteered for the army, along with a few Regulars. After training in England the battalion was sent overseas in June 1942, arriving in Syria where, in October, it was assigned to Brigadier Julian Gascoigne's 201st Guards Brigade. Together with the rest of the brigade, Clive's battalion was sent to Tunisia to become part of the British Eighth Army, where it was engaged in the final stages of the Tunisian Campaign, notably at the Battle of the Mareth Line in mid-March, where the battalion suffered heavily. For his service with the Grenadiers in North Africa, he received his first Distinguished Service Order. |
For six months between 12 August 1943 and 13 February 1944, Clive performed staff officer (GS01) roles with 203 Military Mission and then with the 21st Army Group. After this, he became commander of the 24th Guards Brigade, as a temporary brigadier, in Italy until the end of October 1944. For his service in Italy, he was awarded a bar to his DSO. Clive was a member of the Military Mission to South Africa between 1945 and 1946. |
Clive retired from active service, with the honorary rank of brigadier, late of the Grenadier Guards, on 9 December 1947, being listed in the Regular Army Reserve of Officers until 24 September 1958. He was appointed a Justice of the Peace in 1953 and Deputy Lieutenant for Herefordshire on 24 May 1960. |
The Director of the Royal Greenwich Observatory was the senior scientist responsible for the administration of the Royal Greenwich Observatory from 1972 until the institution's closure in 1998. |
History. |
Executive responsibility for the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, London, |
had rested with the Astronomer Royal from the institution's foundation |
in 1675. This practice continued when the observatory moved to |
Herstmonceux Castle in 1948 and was renamed the Royal Greenwich |
Observatory. |
However, the title Astronomer Royal was separated from directorship of |
the observatory after the retirement of Richard Woolley in 1971. |
Following this, Margaret Burbidge was appointed Director, and Sir Martin Ryle |
(1918–1984) was appointed Astronomer Royal in an honorary |
capacity. The Astronomer Royal no longer had any association with the |
observatory after this time. |
Directors took action to modernise the institution and to establish a |
new observatory on the island of La Palma |
in the Canary Islands. |
The Director oversaw the move of the Royal Greenwich Observatory from Herstmonceux |
to Cambridge in 1990, and continued in charge until the observatory was closed by the |
Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council in 1998. The post expired with |
the institution. |
Holders of the office. |
The Directors of the Royal Greenwich Observatory as a post distinct from |
Astronomer Royal were: |
The archaeology of trade and exchange is a sub-discipline of archaeology that identifies how material goods and ideas moved across human populations. The terms “trade” and “exchange” have slightly different connotations: trade focuses on the long-distance circulation of material goods; exchange considers the transfer of persons and ideas. |
One part of archaeology considers pre-modern societies. Markets, currency, craft production, ownership and concepts such as buying and selling had different meanings in those societies. Earlier economies were strongly defined by religious, ethnic and geographic constraints. Exchange could be used to strengthen social bonds instead of creating wealth. The archaeology of trade therefore includes the transfer of ideas and social practices in addition to the exchange of physical goods. |
The archaeology of trade and exchange considers how trade influenced social development and power structures. |
Influences on ancient trade and exchange. |
The theory and practice of the archaeology of trade and exchange have been influenced by several important schools of thought. |
Political economy. |
The field of political economy deals with the interplay between political institutions and economic activity. This interdisciplinary field has contributions from economics, political science and sociology. Archaeologists who study political economy focus on how political structure, leadership and administration affect economic activity and how the economy can affect the strength and organization of political institutions. |
Economic anthropology. |
Economic anthropology is the study of the social context of economic transactions to explore the varied connections between culture and economy. Fields of research in economic anthropology include exchange, gift-giving and forms of currency. The study of economic anthropology also includes non-capitalist societies. |