input
stringlengths 833
15.3k
| output
stringlengths 2
16
| instruction
stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|
asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .
Question: what was the balance of level 3 in 2018?
Answer: 230.0
Question: and as of 2017?
Answer: 140.0
Question: so what was the change in value during these years?
Answer: 90.0
Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?
| 0.64286 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>1.85% ( 1.85 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>26.50</td><td>28.70</td><td>27.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.60</td><td>4.19</td><td>3.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>7.8</td><td>7.8</td><td>5.0</td></tr></table> compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\fc\\delivery_1024177\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .
Question: what was the the difference in the risk free interest rate between 2004 and 2006?
| 1.58 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>1.85% ( 1.85 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>26.50</td><td>28.70</td><td>27.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.60</td><td>4.19</td><td>3.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>7.8</td><td>7.8</td><td>5.0</td></tr></table> compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\fc\\delivery_1024177\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .
Question: what was the the difference in the risk free interest rate between 2004 and 2006?
Answer: 1.58
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.52318 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
contracts as of december 31 , 2006 , which all mature in 2007 . forward contract notional amounts presented below are expressed in the stated currencies ( in thousands ) . forward currency contracts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( pay ) /receive</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . dollars</td><td>-114000 ( 114000 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>euros</td><td>-4472 ( 4472 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>singapore dollars</td><td>37180</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canadian dollars</td><td>81234</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>malaysian ringgits</td><td>85963</td></tr></table> a movement of 10% ( 10 % ) in the value of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies would impact our expected net earnings by approximately $ 0.1 million . item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data the financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are included herein , commencing on page f-1 . item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a . controls and procedures ( a ) evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures our management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report . based on that evaluation , the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the securities exchange act of 1934 is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the sec 2019s rules and forms and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to our management , including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer , as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure . a controls system cannot provide absolute assurance , however , that the objectives of the controls system are met , and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , within a company have been detected . ( b ) management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting our management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page f-2 of this annual report on form 10-k and is incorporated by reference herein . ( c ) change in internal control over financial reporting no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . item 9b . other information .
Question: what was the positive value of united states securities?
| 114000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
contracts as of december 31 , 2006 , which all mature in 2007 . forward contract notional amounts presented below are expressed in the stated currencies ( in thousands ) . forward currency contracts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( pay ) /receive</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . dollars</td><td>-114000 ( 114000 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>euros</td><td>-4472 ( 4472 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>singapore dollars</td><td>37180</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canadian dollars</td><td>81234</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>malaysian ringgits</td><td>85963</td></tr></table> a movement of 10% ( 10 % ) in the value of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies would impact our expected net earnings by approximately $ 0.1 million . item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data the financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are included herein , commencing on page f-1 . item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a . controls and procedures ( a ) evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures our management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report . based on that evaluation , the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the securities exchange act of 1934 is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the sec 2019s rules and forms and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to our management , including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer , as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure . a controls system cannot provide absolute assurance , however , that the objectives of the controls system are met , and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , within a company have been detected . ( b ) management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting our management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page f-2 of this annual report on form 10-k and is incorporated by reference herein . ( c ) change in internal control over financial reporting no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . item 9b . other information .
Question: what was the positive value of united states securities?
Answer: 114000.0
Question: what is the positive value of euros?
| 4472.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
contracts as of december 31 , 2006 , which all mature in 2007 . forward contract notional amounts presented below are expressed in the stated currencies ( in thousands ) . forward currency contracts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( pay ) /receive</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . dollars</td><td>-114000 ( 114000 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>euros</td><td>-4472 ( 4472 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>singapore dollars</td><td>37180</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canadian dollars</td><td>81234</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>malaysian ringgits</td><td>85963</td></tr></table> a movement of 10% ( 10 % ) in the value of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies would impact our expected net earnings by approximately $ 0.1 million . item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data the financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are included herein , commencing on page f-1 . item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a . controls and procedures ( a ) evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures our management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report . based on that evaluation , the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the securities exchange act of 1934 is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the sec 2019s rules and forms and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to our management , including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer , as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure . a controls system cannot provide absolute assurance , however , that the objectives of the controls system are met , and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , within a company have been detected . ( b ) management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting our management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page f-2 of this annual report on form 10-k and is incorporated by reference herein . ( c ) change in internal control over financial reporting no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . item 9b . other information .
Question: what was the positive value of united states securities?
Answer: 114000.0
Question: what is the positive value of euros?
Answer: 4472.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 118472.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
contracts as of december 31 , 2006 , which all mature in 2007 . forward contract notional amounts presented below are expressed in the stated currencies ( in thousands ) . forward currency contracts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( pay ) /receive</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . dollars</td><td>-114000 ( 114000 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>euros</td><td>-4472 ( 4472 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>singapore dollars</td><td>37180</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canadian dollars</td><td>81234</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>malaysian ringgits</td><td>85963</td></tr></table> a movement of 10% ( 10 % ) in the value of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies would impact our expected net earnings by approximately $ 0.1 million . item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data the financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are included herein , commencing on page f-1 . item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a . controls and procedures ( a ) evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures our management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report . based on that evaluation , the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the securities exchange act of 1934 is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the sec 2019s rules and forms and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to our management , including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer , as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure . a controls system cannot provide absolute assurance , however , that the objectives of the controls system are met , and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , within a company have been detected . ( b ) management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting our management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page f-2 of this annual report on form 10-k and is incorporated by reference herein . ( c ) change in internal control over financial reporting no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . item 9b . other information .
Question: what was the positive value of united states securities?
Answer: 114000.0
Question: what is the positive value of euros?
Answer: 4472.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 118472.0
Question: what is the sum of singapore and canadian dollars?
| 118414.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
contracts as of december 31 , 2006 , which all mature in 2007 . forward contract notional amounts presented below are expressed in the stated currencies ( in thousands ) . forward currency contracts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( pay ) /receive</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . dollars</td><td>-114000 ( 114000 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>euros</td><td>-4472 ( 4472 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>singapore dollars</td><td>37180</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canadian dollars</td><td>81234</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>malaysian ringgits</td><td>85963</td></tr></table> a movement of 10% ( 10 % ) in the value of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies would impact our expected net earnings by approximately $ 0.1 million . item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data the financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are included herein , commencing on page f-1 . item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a . controls and procedures ( a ) evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures our management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report . based on that evaluation , the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the securities exchange act of 1934 is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the sec 2019s rules and forms and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to our management , including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer , as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure . a controls system cannot provide absolute assurance , however , that the objectives of the controls system are met , and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , within a company have been detected . ( b ) management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting our management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page f-2 of this annual report on form 10-k and is incorporated by reference herein . ( c ) change in internal control over financial reporting no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . item 9b . other information .
Question: what was the positive value of united states securities?
Answer: 114000.0
Question: what is the positive value of euros?
Answer: 4472.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 118472.0
Question: what is the sum of singapore and canadian dollars?
Answer: 118414.0
Question: what is the total sum including malaysian ringgits?
| 204377.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
contracts as of december 31 , 2006 , which all mature in 2007 . forward contract notional amounts presented below are expressed in the stated currencies ( in thousands ) . forward currency contracts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( pay ) /receive</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . dollars</td><td>-114000 ( 114000 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>euros</td><td>-4472 ( 4472 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>singapore dollars</td><td>37180</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canadian dollars</td><td>81234</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>malaysian ringgits</td><td>85963</td></tr></table> a movement of 10% ( 10 % ) in the value of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies would impact our expected net earnings by approximately $ 0.1 million . item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data the financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are included herein , commencing on page f-1 . item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a . controls and procedures ( a ) evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures our management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report . based on that evaluation , the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the securities exchange act of 1934 is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the sec 2019s rules and forms and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to our management , including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer , as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure . a controls system cannot provide absolute assurance , however , that the objectives of the controls system are met , and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , within a company have been detected . ( b ) management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting our management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page f-2 of this annual report on form 10-k and is incorporated by reference herein . ( c ) change in internal control over financial reporting no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . item 9b . other information .
Question: what was the positive value of united states securities?
Answer: 114000.0
Question: what is the positive value of euros?
Answer: 4472.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 118472.0
Question: what is the sum of singapore and canadian dollars?
Answer: 118414.0
Question: what is the total sum including malaysian ringgits?
Answer: 204377.0
Question: what is the ratio of the sum of us and euro payments to the total?
| 0.57967 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2013 to 2012 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012 net revenue</td><td>$ 4969</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>236</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>165</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grand gulf recovery</td><td>75</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>miso deferral</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decommissioning trusts</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>2013 net revenue</td><td>$ 5524</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana , effective january 2013 , which includes an increase relating to the waterford 3 steam generator replacement project , which was placed in service in december 2012 . the net income effect of the formula rate plan increase is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 the recovery of hinds plant costs through the power management rider at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of 2013 . the net income effect of the hinds plant cost recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity on the net plant investment with the remainder offset by the hinds plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 an increase in the capacity acquisition rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective with the first billing cycle of december 2012 , relating to the hot spring plant acquisition . the net income effect of the hot spring plant cost recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity on the net plant investment with the remainder offset by the hot spring plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 increases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2013 and july 2012 . energy efficiency revenues are offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have no effect on net income ; 2022 an annual base rate increase at entergy texas , effective july 2012 , as a result of the puct 2019s order that was issued in september 2012 in the november 2011 rate case ; and 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy mississippi , effective september 2013 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate proceedings . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in the second quarter 2012 because entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana agreed to share with customers the savings from an irs settlement related to the uncertain tax position regarding the hurricane katrina and hurricane rita louisiana act 55 financing . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the tax settlement . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net change in revenues from 2012 to 2013?
| 555.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2013 to 2012 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012 net revenue</td><td>$ 4969</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>236</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>165</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grand gulf recovery</td><td>75</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>miso deferral</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decommissioning trusts</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>2013 net revenue</td><td>$ 5524</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana , effective january 2013 , which includes an increase relating to the waterford 3 steam generator replacement project , which was placed in service in december 2012 . the net income effect of the formula rate plan increase is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 the recovery of hinds plant costs through the power management rider at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of 2013 . the net income effect of the hinds plant cost recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity on the net plant investment with the remainder offset by the hinds plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 an increase in the capacity acquisition rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective with the first billing cycle of december 2012 , relating to the hot spring plant acquisition . the net income effect of the hot spring plant cost recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity on the net plant investment with the remainder offset by the hot spring plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 increases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2013 and july 2012 . energy efficiency revenues are offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have no effect on net income ; 2022 an annual base rate increase at entergy texas , effective july 2012 , as a result of the puct 2019s order that was issued in september 2012 in the november 2011 rate case ; and 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy mississippi , effective september 2013 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate proceedings . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in the second quarter 2012 because entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana agreed to share with customers the savings from an irs settlement related to the uncertain tax position regarding the hurricane katrina and hurricane rita louisiana act 55 financing . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the tax settlement . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net change in revenues from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 555.0
Question: what is the value of volume/weather divided by the net change?
| 0.07207 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property . the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value . the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 . the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid . the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type . the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required . the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property . the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) . in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs . as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million . in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts . as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets . interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above . 8 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>operating</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 22926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>23470</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>26041</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>24963</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>18734</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017 and thereafter</td><td>69044</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 185178</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: what was the rent expense for the year ended 12/31/11?
| 26.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property . the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value . the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 . the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid . the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type . the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required . the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property . the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) . in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs . as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million . in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts . as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets . interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above . 8 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>operating</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 22926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>23470</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>26041</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>24963</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>18734</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017 and thereafter</td><td>69044</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 185178</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: what was the rent expense for the year ended 12/31/11?
Answer: 26.7
Question: and for the year ended 12/31/10?
| 21.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property . the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value . the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 . the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid . the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type . the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required . the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property . the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) . in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs . as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million . in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts . as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets . interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above . 8 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>operating</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 22926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>23470</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>26041</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>24963</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>18734</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017 and thereafter</td><td>69044</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 185178</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: what was the rent expense for the year ended 12/31/11?
Answer: 26.7
Question: and for the year ended 12/31/10?
Answer: 21.3
Question: what was the difference between these two years?
| 5.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property . the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value . the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 . the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid . the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type . the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required . the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property . the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) . in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs . as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million . in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts . as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets . interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above . 8 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>operating</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 22926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>23470</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>26041</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>24963</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>18734</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017 and thereafter</td><td>69044</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 185178</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: what was the rent expense for the year ended 12/31/11?
Answer: 26.7
Question: and for the year ended 12/31/10?
Answer: 21.3
Question: what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: 5.4
Question: and the specific amount for the period ended 12/31/10 again?
| 21.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property . the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value . the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 . the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid . the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type . the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required . the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property . the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) . in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs . as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million . in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts . as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets . interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above . 8 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>operating</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 22926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>23470</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>26041</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>24963</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>18734</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017 and thereafter</td><td>69044</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 185178</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: what was the rent expense for the year ended 12/31/11?
Answer: 26.7
Question: and for the year ended 12/31/10?
Answer: 21.3
Question: what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: 5.4
Question: and the specific amount for the period ended 12/31/10 again?
Answer: 21.3
Question: so what was the percentage change?
| 0.25352 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , littoral combat ship ( lcs ) , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system and mk-41 vertical launching system . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7147</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>843</td><td>905</td><td>737</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 11700</td><td>$ 10800</td><td>$ 10700</td></tr></table> 2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales for 2014 were comparable to 2013 . net sales decreased by approximately $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) . mst 2019s operating profit for 2014 decreased $ 62 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 50 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume ( primarily ptds as final surveillance system deliveries occurred during the second quarter of 2012 ) ; about $ 195 million for various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily naval systems ) due to lower volume ; approximately $ 65 million for various training and logistics programs due to lower volume ; and about $ 55 million for the aegis program due to lower volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 155 million for the lcs program due to increased volume . mst 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 168 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlement of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; about $ 55 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily radar and halifax class modernization programs ) due to increased risk retirements ; and approximately $ 30 million for undersea systems programs due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 55 million for training and logistics programs , primarily due to the recording of approximately $ 30 million of charges mostly related to lower-of-cost-or-market considerations ; and about $ 25 million for ship and aviation systems programs ( primarily ptds ) due to lower risk retirements and volume . operating profit related to the lcs program was comparable . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 170 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . backlog backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) . backlog increased slightly in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders and lower sales on integrated warfare system and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) and lower sales on various service programs , partially offset by lower orders on ship and aviation systems ( primarily mh-60 ) . .
Question: what was the change in the backlog from 2013 to 2014?
| 900.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , littoral combat ship ( lcs ) , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system and mk-41 vertical launching system . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7147</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>843</td><td>905</td><td>737</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 11700</td><td>$ 10800</td><td>$ 10700</td></tr></table> 2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales for 2014 were comparable to 2013 . net sales decreased by approximately $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) . mst 2019s operating profit for 2014 decreased $ 62 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 50 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume ( primarily ptds as final surveillance system deliveries occurred during the second quarter of 2012 ) ; about $ 195 million for various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily naval systems ) due to lower volume ; approximately $ 65 million for various training and logistics programs due to lower volume ; and about $ 55 million for the aegis program due to lower volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 155 million for the lcs program due to increased volume . mst 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 168 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlement of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; about $ 55 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily radar and halifax class modernization programs ) due to increased risk retirements ; and approximately $ 30 million for undersea systems programs due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 55 million for training and logistics programs , primarily due to the recording of approximately $ 30 million of charges mostly related to lower-of-cost-or-market considerations ; and about $ 25 million for ship and aviation systems programs ( primarily ptds ) due to lower risk retirements and volume . operating profit related to the lcs program was comparable . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 170 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . backlog backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) . backlog increased slightly in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders and lower sales on integrated warfare system and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) and lower sales on various service programs , partially offset by lower orders on ship and aviation systems ( primarily mh-60 ) . .
Question: what was the change in the backlog from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 900.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that backlog in 2013, in percentage?
| 0.08333 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we incurred $ 695.8 million of realized investment gains and $ 310.4 million of unrealized investment losses . although financial markets significantly improved during 2009 and 2010 , they could deteriorate in the future and again result in substantial realized and unrealized losses , which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 571.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>67.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>364.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>160.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2006</td><td>287.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2008?
| 364.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we incurred $ 695.8 million of realized investment gains and $ 310.4 million of unrealized investment losses . although financial markets significantly improved during 2009 and 2010 , they could deteriorate in the future and again result in substantial realized and unrealized losses , which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 571.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>67.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>364.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>160.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2006</td><td>287.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2008?
Answer: 364.3
Question: what was the value in 2007?
| 160.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we incurred $ 695.8 million of realized investment gains and $ 310.4 million of unrealized investment losses . although financial markets significantly improved during 2009 and 2010 , they could deteriorate in the future and again result in substantial realized and unrealized losses , which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 571.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>67.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>364.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>160.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2006</td><td>287.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2008?
Answer: 364.3
Question: what was the value in 2007?
Answer: 160.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 204.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we incurred $ 695.8 million of realized investment gains and $ 310.4 million of unrealized investment losses . although financial markets significantly improved during 2009 and 2010 , they could deteriorate in the future and again result in substantial realized and unrealized losses , which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 571.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>67.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>364.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>160.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2006</td><td>287.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2008?
Answer: 364.3
Question: what was the value in 2007?
Answer: 160.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 204.3
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2007 value?
| 1.27687 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
contractual obligations fis 2019 long-term contractual obligations generally include its long-term debt , interest on long-term debt , lease payments on certain of its property and equipment and payments for data processing and maintenance . for more descriptive information regarding the company's long-term debt , see note 13 in the notes to consolidated financial statements . the following table summarizes fis 2019 significant contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : less than 1-3 3-5 more than total 1 year years years 5 years . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 4385.5</td><td>$ 153.9</td><td>$ 757.1</td><td>$ 2274.5</td><td>$ 1200.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest ( 1 )</td><td>1137.6</td><td>200.4</td><td>372.9</td><td>288.8</td><td>275.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>226.6</td><td>55.0</td><td>96.2</td><td>46.4</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>data processing and maintenance</td><td>246.7</td><td>131.7</td><td>78.9</td><td>28.4</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other contractual obligations ( 2 )</td><td>100.7</td><td>18.8</td><td>52.0</td><td>10.6</td><td>19.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 6097.1</td><td>$ 559.8</td><td>$ 1357.1</td><td>$ 2648.7</td><td>$ 1531.5</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) these calculations assume that : ( a ) applicable margins remain constant ; ( b ) all variable rate debt is priced at the one-month libor rate in effect as of december 31 , 2012 ; ( c ) no new hedging transactions are effected ; ( d ) only mandatory debt repayments are made ; and ( e ) no refinancing occurs at debt maturity . ( 2 ) amount includes the payment for labor claims related to fis' former item processing and remittance operations in brazil ( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) and amounts due to the brazilian venture partner . fis believes that its existing cash balances , cash flows from operations and borrowing programs will provide adequate sources of liquidity and capital resources to meet fis 2019 expected short-term liquidity needs and its long-term needs for the operations of its business , expected capital spending for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future and the satisfaction of these obligations and commitments . off-balance sheet arrangements fis does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risks market risk we are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates . we use certain derivative financial instruments , including interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward exchange contracts , to manage interest rate and foreign currency risk . we do not use derivatives for trading purposes , to generate income or to engage in speculative activity . interest rate risk in addition to existing cash balances and cash provided by operating activities , we use fixed rate and variable rate debt to finance our operations . we are exposed to interest rate risk on these debt obligations and related interest rate swaps . the notes ( as defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) represent substantially all of our fixed-rate long-term debt obligations . the carrying value of the notes was $ 1950.0 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 2138.2 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the potential reduction in fair value of the notes from a hypothetical 10 percent increase in market interest rates would not be material to the overall fair value of the debt . our floating rate long-term debt obligations principally relate to borrowings under the fis credit agreement ( as also defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) . an increase of 100 basis points in the libor rate would increase our annual debt service under the fis credit agreement , after we include the impact of our interest rate swaps , by $ 9.3 million ( based on principal amounts outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 ) . we performed the foregoing sensitivity analysis based on the principal amount of our floating rate debt as of december 31 , 2012 , less the principal amount of such debt that was then subject to an interest rate swap converting such debt into fixed rate debt . this sensitivity analysis is based solely on .
Question: as of december 31, 2012, what amount of the long-term debt is included in the current liabilities section of the balance sheet?
| 153.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
contractual obligations fis 2019 long-term contractual obligations generally include its long-term debt , interest on long-term debt , lease payments on certain of its property and equipment and payments for data processing and maintenance . for more descriptive information regarding the company's long-term debt , see note 13 in the notes to consolidated financial statements . the following table summarizes fis 2019 significant contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : less than 1-3 3-5 more than total 1 year years years 5 years . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 4385.5</td><td>$ 153.9</td><td>$ 757.1</td><td>$ 2274.5</td><td>$ 1200.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest ( 1 )</td><td>1137.6</td><td>200.4</td><td>372.9</td><td>288.8</td><td>275.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>226.6</td><td>55.0</td><td>96.2</td><td>46.4</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>data processing and maintenance</td><td>246.7</td><td>131.7</td><td>78.9</td><td>28.4</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other contractual obligations ( 2 )</td><td>100.7</td><td>18.8</td><td>52.0</td><td>10.6</td><td>19.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 6097.1</td><td>$ 559.8</td><td>$ 1357.1</td><td>$ 2648.7</td><td>$ 1531.5</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) these calculations assume that : ( a ) applicable margins remain constant ; ( b ) all variable rate debt is priced at the one-month libor rate in effect as of december 31 , 2012 ; ( c ) no new hedging transactions are effected ; ( d ) only mandatory debt repayments are made ; and ( e ) no refinancing occurs at debt maturity . ( 2 ) amount includes the payment for labor claims related to fis' former item processing and remittance operations in brazil ( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) and amounts due to the brazilian venture partner . fis believes that its existing cash balances , cash flows from operations and borrowing programs will provide adequate sources of liquidity and capital resources to meet fis 2019 expected short-term liquidity needs and its long-term needs for the operations of its business , expected capital spending for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future and the satisfaction of these obligations and commitments . off-balance sheet arrangements fis does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risks market risk we are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates . we use certain derivative financial instruments , including interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward exchange contracts , to manage interest rate and foreign currency risk . we do not use derivatives for trading purposes , to generate income or to engage in speculative activity . interest rate risk in addition to existing cash balances and cash provided by operating activities , we use fixed rate and variable rate debt to finance our operations . we are exposed to interest rate risk on these debt obligations and related interest rate swaps . the notes ( as defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) represent substantially all of our fixed-rate long-term debt obligations . the carrying value of the notes was $ 1950.0 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 2138.2 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the potential reduction in fair value of the notes from a hypothetical 10 percent increase in market interest rates would not be material to the overall fair value of the debt . our floating rate long-term debt obligations principally relate to borrowings under the fis credit agreement ( as also defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) . an increase of 100 basis points in the libor rate would increase our annual debt service under the fis credit agreement , after we include the impact of our interest rate swaps , by $ 9.3 million ( based on principal amounts outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 ) . we performed the foregoing sensitivity analysis based on the principal amount of our floating rate debt as of december 31 , 2012 , less the principal amount of such debt that was then subject to an interest rate swap converting such debt into fixed rate debt . this sensitivity analysis is based solely on .
Question: as of december 31, 2012, what amount of the long-term debt is included in the current liabilities section of the balance sheet?
Answer: 153.9
Question: and what is the total of that long-term debt?
| 4385.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
contractual obligations fis 2019 long-term contractual obligations generally include its long-term debt , interest on long-term debt , lease payments on certain of its property and equipment and payments for data processing and maintenance . for more descriptive information regarding the company's long-term debt , see note 13 in the notes to consolidated financial statements . the following table summarizes fis 2019 significant contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : less than 1-3 3-5 more than total 1 year years years 5 years . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 4385.5</td><td>$ 153.9</td><td>$ 757.1</td><td>$ 2274.5</td><td>$ 1200.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest ( 1 )</td><td>1137.6</td><td>200.4</td><td>372.9</td><td>288.8</td><td>275.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>226.6</td><td>55.0</td><td>96.2</td><td>46.4</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>data processing and maintenance</td><td>246.7</td><td>131.7</td><td>78.9</td><td>28.4</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other contractual obligations ( 2 )</td><td>100.7</td><td>18.8</td><td>52.0</td><td>10.6</td><td>19.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 6097.1</td><td>$ 559.8</td><td>$ 1357.1</td><td>$ 2648.7</td><td>$ 1531.5</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) these calculations assume that : ( a ) applicable margins remain constant ; ( b ) all variable rate debt is priced at the one-month libor rate in effect as of december 31 , 2012 ; ( c ) no new hedging transactions are effected ; ( d ) only mandatory debt repayments are made ; and ( e ) no refinancing occurs at debt maturity . ( 2 ) amount includes the payment for labor claims related to fis' former item processing and remittance operations in brazil ( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) and amounts due to the brazilian venture partner . fis believes that its existing cash balances , cash flows from operations and borrowing programs will provide adequate sources of liquidity and capital resources to meet fis 2019 expected short-term liquidity needs and its long-term needs for the operations of its business , expected capital spending for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future and the satisfaction of these obligations and commitments . off-balance sheet arrangements fis does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risks market risk we are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates . we use certain derivative financial instruments , including interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward exchange contracts , to manage interest rate and foreign currency risk . we do not use derivatives for trading purposes , to generate income or to engage in speculative activity . interest rate risk in addition to existing cash balances and cash provided by operating activities , we use fixed rate and variable rate debt to finance our operations . we are exposed to interest rate risk on these debt obligations and related interest rate swaps . the notes ( as defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) represent substantially all of our fixed-rate long-term debt obligations . the carrying value of the notes was $ 1950.0 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 2138.2 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the potential reduction in fair value of the notes from a hypothetical 10 percent increase in market interest rates would not be material to the overall fair value of the debt . our floating rate long-term debt obligations principally relate to borrowings under the fis credit agreement ( as also defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) . an increase of 100 basis points in the libor rate would increase our annual debt service under the fis credit agreement , after we include the impact of our interest rate swaps , by $ 9.3 million ( based on principal amounts outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 ) . we performed the foregoing sensitivity analysis based on the principal amount of our floating rate debt as of december 31 , 2012 , less the principal amount of such debt that was then subject to an interest rate swap converting such debt into fixed rate debt . this sensitivity analysis is based solely on .
Question: as of december 31, 2012, what amount of the long-term debt is included in the current liabilities section of the balance sheet?
Answer: 153.9
Question: and what is the total of that long-term debt?
Answer: 4385.5
Question: what percentage, then, does that amount represent in relation to this total?
| 0.03509 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
contractual obligations fis 2019 long-term contractual obligations generally include its long-term debt , interest on long-term debt , lease payments on certain of its property and equipment and payments for data processing and maintenance . for more descriptive information regarding the company's long-term debt , see note 13 in the notes to consolidated financial statements . the following table summarizes fis 2019 significant contractual obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : less than 1-3 3-5 more than total 1 year years years 5 years . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 4385.5</td><td>$ 153.9</td><td>$ 757.1</td><td>$ 2274.5</td><td>$ 1200.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest ( 1 )</td><td>1137.6</td><td>200.4</td><td>372.9</td><td>288.8</td><td>275.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>226.6</td><td>55.0</td><td>96.2</td><td>46.4</td><td>29.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>data processing and maintenance</td><td>246.7</td><td>131.7</td><td>78.9</td><td>28.4</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other contractual obligations ( 2 )</td><td>100.7</td><td>18.8</td><td>52.0</td><td>10.6</td><td>19.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 6097.1</td><td>$ 559.8</td><td>$ 1357.1</td><td>$ 2648.7</td><td>$ 1531.5</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) these calculations assume that : ( a ) applicable margins remain constant ; ( b ) all variable rate debt is priced at the one-month libor rate in effect as of december 31 , 2012 ; ( c ) no new hedging transactions are effected ; ( d ) only mandatory debt repayments are made ; and ( e ) no refinancing occurs at debt maturity . ( 2 ) amount includes the payment for labor claims related to fis' former item processing and remittance operations in brazil ( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) and amounts due to the brazilian venture partner . fis believes that its existing cash balances , cash flows from operations and borrowing programs will provide adequate sources of liquidity and capital resources to meet fis 2019 expected short-term liquidity needs and its long-term needs for the operations of its business , expected capital spending for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future and the satisfaction of these obligations and commitments . off-balance sheet arrangements fis does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risks market risk we are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates . we use certain derivative financial instruments , including interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward exchange contracts , to manage interest rate and foreign currency risk . we do not use derivatives for trading purposes , to generate income or to engage in speculative activity . interest rate risk in addition to existing cash balances and cash provided by operating activities , we use fixed rate and variable rate debt to finance our operations . we are exposed to interest rate risk on these debt obligations and related interest rate swaps . the notes ( as defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) represent substantially all of our fixed-rate long-term debt obligations . the carrying value of the notes was $ 1950.0 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 2138.2 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the potential reduction in fair value of the notes from a hypothetical 10 percent increase in market interest rates would not be material to the overall fair value of the debt . our floating rate long-term debt obligations principally relate to borrowings under the fis credit agreement ( as also defined in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements ) . an increase of 100 basis points in the libor rate would increase our annual debt service under the fis credit agreement , after we include the impact of our interest rate swaps , by $ 9.3 million ( based on principal amounts outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 ) . we performed the foregoing sensitivity analysis based on the principal amount of our floating rate debt as of december 31 , 2012 , less the principal amount of such debt that was then subject to an interest rate swap converting such debt into fixed rate debt . this sensitivity analysis is based solely on .
Question: as of december 31, 2012, what amount of the long-term debt is included in the current liabilities section of the balance sheet?
Answer: 153.9
Question: and what is the total of that long-term debt?
Answer: 4385.5
Question: what percentage, then, does that amount represent in relation to this total?
Answer: 0.03509
Question: and what percentage did that total of long-term debt represent in relation to the total contractual obligations and commitments?
| 0.71928 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the company expects to amortize $ 1.7 million of actuarial loss from accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) into net periodic benefit costs in 2011 . at december 31 , 2010 , anticipated benefit payments from the plan in future years are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 7.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>8.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>8.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>9.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>10.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016-2020</td><td>62.8</td></tr></table> savings plans . cme maintains a defined contribution savings plan pursuant to section 401 ( k ) of the internal revenue code , whereby all u.s . employees are participants and have the option to contribute to this plan . cme matches employee contributions up to 3% ( 3 % ) of the employee 2019s base salary and may make additional discretionary contributions of up to 2% ( 2 % ) of base salary . in addition , certain cme london-based employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan . for cme london-based employees , the plan provides for company contributions of 10% ( 10 % ) of earnings and does not have any vesting requirements . salary and cash bonuses paid are included in the definition of earnings . aggregate expense for all of the defined contribution savings plans amounted to $ 6.3 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 5.8 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . cme non-qualified plans . cme maintains non-qualified plans , under which participants may make assumed investment choices with respect to amounts contributed on their behalf . although not required to do so , cme invests such contributions in assets that mirror the assumed investment choices . the balances in these plans are subject to the claims of general creditors of the exchange and totaled $ 28.8 million and $ 23.4 million at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . although the value of the plans is recorded as an asset in the consolidated balance sheets , there is an equal and offsetting liability . the investment results of these plans have no impact on net income as the investment results are recorded in equal amounts to both investment income and compensation and benefits expense . supplemental savings plan 2014cme maintains a supplemental plan to provide benefits for employees who have been impacted by statutory limits under the provisions of the qualified pension and savings plan . all cme employees hired prior to january 1 , 2007 are immediately vested in their supplemental plan benefits . all cme employees hired on or after january 1 , 2007 are subject to the vesting requirements of the underlying qualified plans . total expense for the supplemental plan was $ 0.9 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 1.3 million for 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . deferred compensation plan 2014a deferred compensation plan is maintained by cme , under which eligible officers and members of the board of directors may contribute a percentage of their compensation and defer income taxes thereon until the time of distribution . nymexmembers 2019 retirement plan and benefits . nymex maintained a retirement and benefit plan under the commodities exchange , inc . ( comex ) members 2019 recognition and retention plan ( mrrp ) . this plan provides benefits to certain members of the comex division based on long-term membership , and participation is limited to individuals who were comex division members prior to nymex 2019s acquisition of comex in 1994 . no new participants were permitted into the plan after the date of this acquisition . under the terms of the mrrp , the company is required to fund the plan with a minimum annual contribution of $ 0.4 million until it is fully funded . all benefits to be paid under the mrrp are based on reasonable actuarial assumptions which are based upon the amounts that are available and are expected to be available to pay benefits . total contributions to the plan were $ 0.8 million for each of 2010 , 2009 and for the period august 23 through december 31 , 2008 . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the total obligation for the mrrp totaled $ 20.7 million and $ 20.5 million .
Question: combined, what was the total obligation for the mrrp in 2009 and 2010?
| 41.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the company expects to amortize $ 1.7 million of actuarial loss from accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) into net periodic benefit costs in 2011 . at december 31 , 2010 , anticipated benefit payments from the plan in future years are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 7.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>8.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>8.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>9.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>10.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016-2020</td><td>62.8</td></tr></table> savings plans . cme maintains a defined contribution savings plan pursuant to section 401 ( k ) of the internal revenue code , whereby all u.s . employees are participants and have the option to contribute to this plan . cme matches employee contributions up to 3% ( 3 % ) of the employee 2019s base salary and may make additional discretionary contributions of up to 2% ( 2 % ) of base salary . in addition , certain cme london-based employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan . for cme london-based employees , the plan provides for company contributions of 10% ( 10 % ) of earnings and does not have any vesting requirements . salary and cash bonuses paid are included in the definition of earnings . aggregate expense for all of the defined contribution savings plans amounted to $ 6.3 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 5.8 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . cme non-qualified plans . cme maintains non-qualified plans , under which participants may make assumed investment choices with respect to amounts contributed on their behalf . although not required to do so , cme invests such contributions in assets that mirror the assumed investment choices . the balances in these plans are subject to the claims of general creditors of the exchange and totaled $ 28.8 million and $ 23.4 million at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . although the value of the plans is recorded as an asset in the consolidated balance sheets , there is an equal and offsetting liability . the investment results of these plans have no impact on net income as the investment results are recorded in equal amounts to both investment income and compensation and benefits expense . supplemental savings plan 2014cme maintains a supplemental plan to provide benefits for employees who have been impacted by statutory limits under the provisions of the qualified pension and savings plan . all cme employees hired prior to january 1 , 2007 are immediately vested in their supplemental plan benefits . all cme employees hired on or after january 1 , 2007 are subject to the vesting requirements of the underlying qualified plans . total expense for the supplemental plan was $ 0.9 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 1.3 million for 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . deferred compensation plan 2014a deferred compensation plan is maintained by cme , under which eligible officers and members of the board of directors may contribute a percentage of their compensation and defer income taxes thereon until the time of distribution . nymexmembers 2019 retirement plan and benefits . nymex maintained a retirement and benefit plan under the commodities exchange , inc . ( comex ) members 2019 recognition and retention plan ( mrrp ) . this plan provides benefits to certain members of the comex division based on long-term membership , and participation is limited to individuals who were comex division members prior to nymex 2019s acquisition of comex in 1994 . no new participants were permitted into the plan after the date of this acquisition . under the terms of the mrrp , the company is required to fund the plan with a minimum annual contribution of $ 0.4 million until it is fully funded . all benefits to be paid under the mrrp are based on reasonable actuarial assumptions which are based upon the amounts that are available and are expected to be available to pay benefits . total contributions to the plan were $ 0.8 million for each of 2010 , 2009 and for the period august 23 through december 31 , 2008 . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the total obligation for the mrrp totaled $ 20.7 million and $ 20.5 million .
Question: combined, what was the total obligation for the mrrp in 2009 and 2010?
Answer: 41.2
Question: and the average for this vaue?
| 20.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the united states . we have 32094 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern united states gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we serve the western two- thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 2666</td><td>$ 3174</td><td>$ 2605</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>854</td><td>1344</td><td>1458</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2102</td><td>2494</td><td>2287</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy</td><td>3118</td><td>3810</td><td>3134</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>2147</td><td>3273</td><td>3077</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>2486</td><td>3023</td><td>2925</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>$ 15486</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>797</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operating revenues</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>$ 16283</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the united states , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the united states . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states of america ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . subsequent events evaluation 2013 we evaluated the effects of all subsequent events through february 5 , 2010 , the date of this report , which is concurrent with the date we file this report with the u.s . securities and exchange commission ( sec ) . 2 . significant accounting policies change in accounting principle 2013 we have historically accounted for rail grinding costs as a capital asset . beginning in the first quarter of 2010 , we will change our accounting policy for rail grinding costs .
Question: what was the freight revenue in 2009?
| 13373.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the united states . we have 32094 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern united states gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we serve the western two- thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 2666</td><td>$ 3174</td><td>$ 2605</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>854</td><td>1344</td><td>1458</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2102</td><td>2494</td><td>2287</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy</td><td>3118</td><td>3810</td><td>3134</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>2147</td><td>3273</td><td>3077</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>2486</td><td>3023</td><td>2925</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>$ 15486</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>797</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operating revenues</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>$ 16283</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the united states , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the united states . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states of america ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . subsequent events evaluation 2013 we evaluated the effects of all subsequent events through february 5 , 2010 , the date of this report , which is concurrent with the date we file this report with the u.s . securities and exchange commission ( sec ) . 2 . significant accounting policies change in accounting principle 2013 we have historically accounted for rail grinding costs as a capital asset . beginning in the first quarter of 2010 , we will change our accounting policy for rail grinding costs .
Question: what was the freight revenue in 2009?
Answer: 13373.0
Question: what is that value times 1000000?
| 13373000000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the united states . we have 32094 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern united states gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we serve the western two- thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 2666</td><td>$ 3174</td><td>$ 2605</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>854</td><td>1344</td><td>1458</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2102</td><td>2494</td><td>2287</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy</td><td>3118</td><td>3810</td><td>3134</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>2147</td><td>3273</td><td>3077</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>2486</td><td>3023</td><td>2925</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>$ 15486</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>797</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operating revenues</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>$ 16283</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the united states , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the united states . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states of america ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . subsequent events evaluation 2013 we evaluated the effects of all subsequent events through february 5 , 2010 , the date of this report , which is concurrent with the date we file this report with the u.s . securities and exchange commission ( sec ) . 2 . significant accounting policies change in accounting principle 2013 we have historically accounted for rail grinding costs as a capital asset . beginning in the first quarter of 2010 , we will change our accounting policy for rail grinding costs .
Question: what was the freight revenue in 2009?
Answer: 13373.0
Question: what is that value times 1000000?
Answer: 13373000000.0
Question: what is that value divided by the route miles?
| 416682.2459 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2014 to december 31 , 2014 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>5854930</td><td>$ 18.93</td><td>5849517</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>4266</td><td>$ 20.29</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>826744</td><td>$ 19.67</td><td>826639</td><td>$ 143559758</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6685940</td><td>$ 19.02</td><td>6676156</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 5413 withheld shares in october 2014 , 4266 withheld shares in november 2014 and 105 withheld shares in december 2014 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2014 , the board authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2014 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2014 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what portion of total stock repurchases occurred during october 2014?
| 0.87571 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2014 to december 31 , 2014 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>5854930</td><td>$ 18.93</td><td>5849517</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>4266</td><td>$ 20.29</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>826744</td><td>$ 19.67</td><td>826639</td><td>$ 143559758</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6685940</td><td>$ 19.02</td><td>6676156</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 5413 withheld shares in october 2014 , 4266 withheld shares in november 2014 and 105 withheld shares in december 2014 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2014 , the board authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2014 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2014 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what portion of total stock repurchases occurred during october 2014?
Answer: 0.87571
Question: what is the net change in the number of shares repurchased during october and november?
| 5850664.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2014 to december 31 , 2014 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>5854930</td><td>$ 18.93</td><td>5849517</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>4266</td><td>$ 20.29</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>826744</td><td>$ 19.67</td><td>826639</td><td>$ 143559758</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6685940</td><td>$ 19.02</td><td>6676156</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 5413 withheld shares in october 2014 , 4266 withheld shares in november 2014 and 105 withheld shares in december 2014 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2014 , the board authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2014 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2014 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what portion of total stock repurchases occurred during october 2014?
Answer: 0.87571
Question: what is the net change in the number of shares repurchased during october and november?
Answer: 5850664.0
Question: what fraction does this represent?
| 0.99927 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2014 to december 31 , 2014 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>5854930</td><td>$ 18.93</td><td>5849517</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>4266</td><td>$ 20.29</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>826744</td><td>$ 19.67</td><td>826639</td><td>$ 143559758</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6685940</td><td>$ 19.02</td><td>6676156</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 5413 withheld shares in october 2014 , 4266 withheld shares in november 2014 and 105 withheld shares in december 2014 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2014 , the board authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2014 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2014 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what portion of total stock repurchases occurred during october 2014?
Answer: 0.87571
Question: what is the net change in the number of shares repurchased during october and november?
Answer: 5850664.0
Question: what fraction does this represent?
Answer: 0.99927
Question: what about the percentage change?
| 99.92714 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2017</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2018</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2019</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2020</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2021</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>$ 3508789</td><td>$ 203244</td><td>$ 409257</td><td>$ 366456</td><td>$ 461309</td><td>$ 329339</td><td>$ 1739184</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>line of credit ( 2 )</td><td>56127</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>48177</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share of unconsolidated joint ventures' debt ( 3 )</td><td>91235</td><td>2444</td><td>28466</td><td>5737</td><td>11598</td><td>1236</td><td>41754</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ground leases</td><td>311120</td><td>10745</td><td>5721</td><td>5758</td><td>5793</td><td>5822</td><td>277281</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development and construction backlog costs ( 4 )</td><td>344700</td><td>331553</td><td>13147</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>43357</td><td>7502</td><td>7342</td><td>5801</td><td>4326</td><td>3906</td><td>14480</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 4355328</td><td>$ 558138</td><td>$ 466583</td><td>$ 386402</td><td>$ 531203</td><td>$ 340303</td><td>$ 2072699</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) our long-term debt consists of both secured and unsecured debt and includes both principal and interest . interest payments for variable rate debt were calculated using the interest rates as of december 31 , 2016 . repayment of our $ 250.0 million variable rate term note , which has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . ( 2 ) our unsecured line of credit has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , but is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . interest payments for our unsecured line of credit were calculated using the most recent stated interest rate that was in effect.ff ( 3 ) our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt includes both principal and interest . interest expense for variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of owned development projects and third-party construction projects . related party y transactionstt we provide property and asset management , leasing , construction and other tenant-related services to ww unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 we earned management fees of $ 4.5 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 8.5 million , leasing fees of $ 2.4 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 3.4 million and construction and development fees of $ 8.0 million , $ 6.1 million and $ 5.8 million , respectively , from these companies , prior to elimination of our ownership percentage . yy we recorded these fees based ww on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and have eliminated our ownership percentages of these fees in the consolidated financial statements . commitments and contingenciesg the partnership has guaranteed the repayment of $ 32.9 million of economic development bonds issued by various municipalities in connection with certain commercial developments . we will be required to make payments under ww our guarantees to the extent that incremental taxes from specified developments are not sufficient to pay the bond ff debt service . management does not believe that it is probable that we will be required to make any significant payments in satisfaction of these guarantees . the partnership also has guaranteed the repayment of an unsecured loan of one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2016 , the maximum guarantee exposure for this loan was approximately $ 52.1 million . we lease certain land positions with terms extending toww march 2114 , with a total future payment obligation of $ 311.1 million . the payments on these ground leases , which are classified as operating leases , are not material in any individual year . in addition to ground leases , we are party to other operating leases as part of conducting our business , including leases of office space from third parties , with a total future payment obligation of ff $ 43.4 million at december 31 , 2016 . no future payments on these leases are material in any individual year . we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . in the opinion ww of management , the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions is not expected to materially affect ff our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . we own certain parcels of land that are subject to special property tax assessments levied by quasi municipalww entities . to the extent that such special assessments are fixed and determinable , the discounted value of the fulltt .
Question: what was the management fee earned for the year ended 12/31/16?
| 4.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2017</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2018</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2019</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2020</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2021</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>$ 3508789</td><td>$ 203244</td><td>$ 409257</td><td>$ 366456</td><td>$ 461309</td><td>$ 329339</td><td>$ 1739184</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>line of credit ( 2 )</td><td>56127</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>48177</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share of unconsolidated joint ventures' debt ( 3 )</td><td>91235</td><td>2444</td><td>28466</td><td>5737</td><td>11598</td><td>1236</td><td>41754</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ground leases</td><td>311120</td><td>10745</td><td>5721</td><td>5758</td><td>5793</td><td>5822</td><td>277281</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development and construction backlog costs ( 4 )</td><td>344700</td><td>331553</td><td>13147</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>43357</td><td>7502</td><td>7342</td><td>5801</td><td>4326</td><td>3906</td><td>14480</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 4355328</td><td>$ 558138</td><td>$ 466583</td><td>$ 386402</td><td>$ 531203</td><td>$ 340303</td><td>$ 2072699</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) our long-term debt consists of both secured and unsecured debt and includes both principal and interest . interest payments for variable rate debt were calculated using the interest rates as of december 31 , 2016 . repayment of our $ 250.0 million variable rate term note , which has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . ( 2 ) our unsecured line of credit has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , but is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . interest payments for our unsecured line of credit were calculated using the most recent stated interest rate that was in effect.ff ( 3 ) our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt includes both principal and interest . interest expense for variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of owned development projects and third-party construction projects . related party y transactionstt we provide property and asset management , leasing , construction and other tenant-related services to ww unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 we earned management fees of $ 4.5 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 8.5 million , leasing fees of $ 2.4 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 3.4 million and construction and development fees of $ 8.0 million , $ 6.1 million and $ 5.8 million , respectively , from these companies , prior to elimination of our ownership percentage . yy we recorded these fees based ww on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and have eliminated our ownership percentages of these fees in the consolidated financial statements . commitments and contingenciesg the partnership has guaranteed the repayment of $ 32.9 million of economic development bonds issued by various municipalities in connection with certain commercial developments . we will be required to make payments under ww our guarantees to the extent that incremental taxes from specified developments are not sufficient to pay the bond ff debt service . management does not believe that it is probable that we will be required to make any significant payments in satisfaction of these guarantees . the partnership also has guaranteed the repayment of an unsecured loan of one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2016 , the maximum guarantee exposure for this loan was approximately $ 52.1 million . we lease certain land positions with terms extending toww march 2114 , with a total future payment obligation of $ 311.1 million . the payments on these ground leases , which are classified as operating leases , are not material in any individual year . in addition to ground leases , we are party to other operating leases as part of conducting our business , including leases of office space from third parties , with a total future payment obligation of ff $ 43.4 million at december 31 , 2016 . no future payments on these leases are material in any individual year . we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . in the opinion ww of management , the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions is not expected to materially affect ff our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . we own certain parcels of land that are subject to special property tax assessments levied by quasi municipalww entities . to the extent that such special assessments are fixed and determinable , the discounted value of the fulltt .
Question: what was the management fee earned for the year ended 12/31/16?
Answer: 4.5
Question: and the leasing fee for the same period?
| 2.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2017</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2018</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2019</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2020</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2021</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>$ 3508789</td><td>$ 203244</td><td>$ 409257</td><td>$ 366456</td><td>$ 461309</td><td>$ 329339</td><td>$ 1739184</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>line of credit ( 2 )</td><td>56127</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>48177</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share of unconsolidated joint ventures' debt ( 3 )</td><td>91235</td><td>2444</td><td>28466</td><td>5737</td><td>11598</td><td>1236</td><td>41754</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ground leases</td><td>311120</td><td>10745</td><td>5721</td><td>5758</td><td>5793</td><td>5822</td><td>277281</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development and construction backlog costs ( 4 )</td><td>344700</td><td>331553</td><td>13147</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>43357</td><td>7502</td><td>7342</td><td>5801</td><td>4326</td><td>3906</td><td>14480</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 4355328</td><td>$ 558138</td><td>$ 466583</td><td>$ 386402</td><td>$ 531203</td><td>$ 340303</td><td>$ 2072699</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) our long-term debt consists of both secured and unsecured debt and includes both principal and interest . interest payments for variable rate debt were calculated using the interest rates as of december 31 , 2016 . repayment of our $ 250.0 million variable rate term note , which has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . ( 2 ) our unsecured line of credit has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , but is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . interest payments for our unsecured line of credit were calculated using the most recent stated interest rate that was in effect.ff ( 3 ) our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt includes both principal and interest . interest expense for variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of owned development projects and third-party construction projects . related party y transactionstt we provide property and asset management , leasing , construction and other tenant-related services to ww unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 we earned management fees of $ 4.5 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 8.5 million , leasing fees of $ 2.4 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 3.4 million and construction and development fees of $ 8.0 million , $ 6.1 million and $ 5.8 million , respectively , from these companies , prior to elimination of our ownership percentage . yy we recorded these fees based ww on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and have eliminated our ownership percentages of these fees in the consolidated financial statements . commitments and contingenciesg the partnership has guaranteed the repayment of $ 32.9 million of economic development bonds issued by various municipalities in connection with certain commercial developments . we will be required to make payments under ww our guarantees to the extent that incremental taxes from specified developments are not sufficient to pay the bond ff debt service . management does not believe that it is probable that we will be required to make any significant payments in satisfaction of these guarantees . the partnership also has guaranteed the repayment of an unsecured loan of one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2016 , the maximum guarantee exposure for this loan was approximately $ 52.1 million . we lease certain land positions with terms extending toww march 2114 , with a total future payment obligation of $ 311.1 million . the payments on these ground leases , which are classified as operating leases , are not material in any individual year . in addition to ground leases , we are party to other operating leases as part of conducting our business , including leases of office space from third parties , with a total future payment obligation of ff $ 43.4 million at december 31 , 2016 . no future payments on these leases are material in any individual year . we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . in the opinion ww of management , the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions is not expected to materially affect ff our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . we own certain parcels of land that are subject to special property tax assessments levied by quasi municipalww entities . to the extent that such special assessments are fixed and determinable , the discounted value of the fulltt .
Question: what was the management fee earned for the year ended 12/31/16?
Answer: 4.5
Question: and the leasing fee for the same period?
Answer: 2.4
Question: how much combined was earned from these two fees?
| 6.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2017</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2018</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2019</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2020</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2021</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>$ 3508789</td><td>$ 203244</td><td>$ 409257</td><td>$ 366456</td><td>$ 461309</td><td>$ 329339</td><td>$ 1739184</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>line of credit ( 2 )</td><td>56127</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>48177</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share of unconsolidated joint ventures' debt ( 3 )</td><td>91235</td><td>2444</td><td>28466</td><td>5737</td><td>11598</td><td>1236</td><td>41754</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ground leases</td><td>311120</td><td>10745</td><td>5721</td><td>5758</td><td>5793</td><td>5822</td><td>277281</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development and construction backlog costs ( 4 )</td><td>344700</td><td>331553</td><td>13147</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>43357</td><td>7502</td><td>7342</td><td>5801</td><td>4326</td><td>3906</td><td>14480</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 4355328</td><td>$ 558138</td><td>$ 466583</td><td>$ 386402</td><td>$ 531203</td><td>$ 340303</td><td>$ 2072699</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) our long-term debt consists of both secured and unsecured debt and includes both principal and interest . interest payments for variable rate debt were calculated using the interest rates as of december 31 , 2016 . repayment of our $ 250.0 million variable rate term note , which has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . ( 2 ) our unsecured line of credit has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , but is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . interest payments for our unsecured line of credit were calculated using the most recent stated interest rate that was in effect.ff ( 3 ) our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt includes both principal and interest . interest expense for variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of owned development projects and third-party construction projects . related party y transactionstt we provide property and asset management , leasing , construction and other tenant-related services to ww unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 we earned management fees of $ 4.5 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 8.5 million , leasing fees of $ 2.4 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 3.4 million and construction and development fees of $ 8.0 million , $ 6.1 million and $ 5.8 million , respectively , from these companies , prior to elimination of our ownership percentage . yy we recorded these fees based ww on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and have eliminated our ownership percentages of these fees in the consolidated financial statements . commitments and contingenciesg the partnership has guaranteed the repayment of $ 32.9 million of economic development bonds issued by various municipalities in connection with certain commercial developments . we will be required to make payments under ww our guarantees to the extent that incremental taxes from specified developments are not sufficient to pay the bond ff debt service . management does not believe that it is probable that we will be required to make any significant payments in satisfaction of these guarantees . the partnership also has guaranteed the repayment of an unsecured loan of one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2016 , the maximum guarantee exposure for this loan was approximately $ 52.1 million . we lease certain land positions with terms extending toww march 2114 , with a total future payment obligation of $ 311.1 million . the payments on these ground leases , which are classified as operating leases , are not material in any individual year . in addition to ground leases , we are party to other operating leases as part of conducting our business , including leases of office space from third parties , with a total future payment obligation of ff $ 43.4 million at december 31 , 2016 . no future payments on these leases are material in any individual year . we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . in the opinion ww of management , the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions is not expected to materially affect ff our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . we own certain parcels of land that are subject to special property tax assessments levied by quasi municipalww entities . to the extent that such special assessments are fixed and determinable , the discounted value of the fulltt .
Question: what was the management fee earned for the year ended 12/31/16?
Answer: 4.5
Question: and the leasing fee for the same period?
Answer: 2.4
Question: how much combined was earned from these two fees?
Answer: 6.9
Question: and the development fee for that same period?
| 8.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2017</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2018</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2019</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2020</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2021</td><td>payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>$ 3508789</td><td>$ 203244</td><td>$ 409257</td><td>$ 366456</td><td>$ 461309</td><td>$ 329339</td><td>$ 1739184</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>line of credit ( 2 )</td><td>56127</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>2650</td><td>48177</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share of unconsolidated joint ventures' debt ( 3 )</td><td>91235</td><td>2444</td><td>28466</td><td>5737</td><td>11598</td><td>1236</td><td>41754</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ground leases</td><td>311120</td><td>10745</td><td>5721</td><td>5758</td><td>5793</td><td>5822</td><td>277281</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development and construction backlog costs ( 4 )</td><td>344700</td><td>331553</td><td>13147</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>43357</td><td>7502</td><td>7342</td><td>5801</td><td>4326</td><td>3906</td><td>14480</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 4355328</td><td>$ 558138</td><td>$ 466583</td><td>$ 386402</td><td>$ 531203</td><td>$ 340303</td><td>$ 2072699</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) our long-term debt consists of both secured and unsecured debt and includes both principal and interest . interest payments for variable rate debt were calculated using the interest rates as of december 31 , 2016 . repayment of our $ 250.0 million variable rate term note , which has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . ( 2 ) our unsecured line of credit has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , but is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . interest payments for our unsecured line of credit were calculated using the most recent stated interest rate that was in effect.ff ( 3 ) our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt includes both principal and interest . interest expense for variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of owned development projects and third-party construction projects . related party y transactionstt we provide property and asset management , leasing , construction and other tenant-related services to ww unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 we earned management fees of $ 4.5 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 8.5 million , leasing fees of $ 2.4 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 3.4 million and construction and development fees of $ 8.0 million , $ 6.1 million and $ 5.8 million , respectively , from these companies , prior to elimination of our ownership percentage . yy we recorded these fees based ww on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and have eliminated our ownership percentages of these fees in the consolidated financial statements . commitments and contingenciesg the partnership has guaranteed the repayment of $ 32.9 million of economic development bonds issued by various municipalities in connection with certain commercial developments . we will be required to make payments under ww our guarantees to the extent that incremental taxes from specified developments are not sufficient to pay the bond ff debt service . management does not believe that it is probable that we will be required to make any significant payments in satisfaction of these guarantees . the partnership also has guaranteed the repayment of an unsecured loan of one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2016 , the maximum guarantee exposure for this loan was approximately $ 52.1 million . we lease certain land positions with terms extending toww march 2114 , with a total future payment obligation of $ 311.1 million . the payments on these ground leases , which are classified as operating leases , are not material in any individual year . in addition to ground leases , we are party to other operating leases as part of conducting our business , including leases of office space from third parties , with a total future payment obligation of ff $ 43.4 million at december 31 , 2016 . no future payments on these leases are material in any individual year . we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . in the opinion ww of management , the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions is not expected to materially affect ff our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . we own certain parcels of land that are subject to special property tax assessments levied by quasi municipalww entities . to the extent that such special assessments are fixed and determinable , the discounted value of the fulltt .
Question: what was the management fee earned for the year ended 12/31/16?
Answer: 4.5
Question: and the leasing fee for the same period?
Answer: 2.4
Question: how much combined was earned from these two fees?
Answer: 6.9
Question: and the development fee for that same period?
Answer: 8.0
Question: together, how much was earned from these three fees during this time?
| 14.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units . restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years . the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period . dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares . the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions . the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares</td><td>weightedaveragegrant datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2016</td><td>1820578</td><td>$ 98</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>650942</td><td>129</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-510590 ( 510590 )</td><td>87</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-401699 ( 401699 )</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2017</td><td>1559231</td><td>116</td></tr></table> the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively . under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what compensation expense was attributable to directors in 2016 and 2017?
| 4.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units . restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years . the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period . dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares . the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions . the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares</td><td>weightedaveragegrant datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2016</td><td>1820578</td><td>$ 98</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>650942</td><td>129</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-510590 ( 510590 )</td><td>87</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-401699 ( 401699 )</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2017</td><td>1559231</td><td>116</td></tr></table> the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively . under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what compensation expense was attributable to directors in 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 4.9
Question: what about including 2015?
| 7.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
impairment of long-lived assets based on the projection of undiscounted cash flows whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable . in the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded value of the assets , the assets are written down to their estimated fair values ( see note 5 ) . asset retirement obligations 2014effective january 1 , 2003 , the company adopted statement of financial accounting standards ( 2018 2018sfas 2019 2019 ) no . 143 , 2018 2018accounting for asset retirement obligations . 2019 2019 sfas no . 143 requires the company to record the fair value of a legal liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred . when a new liability is recorded the company will capitalize the costs of the liability by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset . the liability is accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset . upon settlement of the liability , the company settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement . the company 2019s retirement obligations covered by sfas no . 143 include primarily active ash landfills , water treatment basins and the removal or dismantlement of certain plant and equipment . as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , the company had recorded liabilities of approximately $ 29 million and $ 15 million , respectively , related to asset retirement obligations . there are no assets that are legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations . upon adoption of sfas no . 143 , the company recorded an additional liability of approximately $ 13 million , a net asset of approximately $ 9 million , and a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of approximately $ 2 million , after income taxes . amounts recorded related to asset retirement obligations during the years ended december 31 , 2003 were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at december 31 2002</td><td>$ 15</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additional liability recorded from cumulative effect of accounting change</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in the timing of estimated cash flows</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31 2003</td><td>$ 29</td></tr></table> proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share have not been presented for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 because the proforma application of sfas no . 143 to prior periods would result in proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share not materially different from the actual amounts reported for those periods in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . had sfas 143 been applied during all periods presented the asset retirement obligation at january 1 , 2001 , december 31 , 2001 and december 31 , 2002 would have been approximately $ 21 million , $ 23 million and $ 28 million , respectively . included in other long-term liabilities is the accrual for the non-legal obligations for removal of assets in service at ipalco amounting to $ 361 million and $ 339 million at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . deferred financing costs 2014financing costs are deferred and amortized over the related financing period using the effective interest method or the straight-line method when it does not differ materially from the effective interest method . deferred financing costs are shown net of accumulated amortization of $ 202 million and $ 173 million as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . project development costs 2014the company capitalizes the costs of developing new construction projects after achieving certain project-related milestones that indicate the project 2019s completion is probable . these costs represent amounts incurred for professional services , permits , options , capitalized interest , and other costs directly related to construction . these costs are transferred to construction in progress when significant construction activity commences , or expensed at the time the company determines that development of a particular project is no longer probable ( see note 5 ) . .
Question: what was the net difference in asset retirement obligations between 2002 and 2003?
| 14.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
impairment of long-lived assets based on the projection of undiscounted cash flows whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable . in the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded value of the assets , the assets are written down to their estimated fair values ( see note 5 ) . asset retirement obligations 2014effective january 1 , 2003 , the company adopted statement of financial accounting standards ( 2018 2018sfas 2019 2019 ) no . 143 , 2018 2018accounting for asset retirement obligations . 2019 2019 sfas no . 143 requires the company to record the fair value of a legal liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred . when a new liability is recorded the company will capitalize the costs of the liability by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset . the liability is accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset . upon settlement of the liability , the company settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement . the company 2019s retirement obligations covered by sfas no . 143 include primarily active ash landfills , water treatment basins and the removal or dismantlement of certain plant and equipment . as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , the company had recorded liabilities of approximately $ 29 million and $ 15 million , respectively , related to asset retirement obligations . there are no assets that are legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations . upon adoption of sfas no . 143 , the company recorded an additional liability of approximately $ 13 million , a net asset of approximately $ 9 million , and a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of approximately $ 2 million , after income taxes . amounts recorded related to asset retirement obligations during the years ended december 31 , 2003 were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at december 31 2002</td><td>$ 15</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additional liability recorded from cumulative effect of accounting change</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in the timing of estimated cash flows</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31 2003</td><td>$ 29</td></tr></table> proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share have not been presented for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 because the proforma application of sfas no . 143 to prior periods would result in proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share not materially different from the actual amounts reported for those periods in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . had sfas 143 been applied during all periods presented the asset retirement obligation at january 1 , 2001 , december 31 , 2001 and december 31 , 2002 would have been approximately $ 21 million , $ 23 million and $ 28 million , respectively . included in other long-term liabilities is the accrual for the non-legal obligations for removal of assets in service at ipalco amounting to $ 361 million and $ 339 million at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . deferred financing costs 2014financing costs are deferred and amortized over the related financing period using the effective interest method or the straight-line method when it does not differ materially from the effective interest method . deferred financing costs are shown net of accumulated amortization of $ 202 million and $ 173 million as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . project development costs 2014the company capitalizes the costs of developing new construction projects after achieving certain project-related milestones that indicate the project 2019s completion is probable . these costs represent amounts incurred for professional services , permits , options , capitalized interest , and other costs directly related to construction . these costs are transferred to construction in progress when significant construction activity commences , or expensed at the time the company determines that development of a particular project is no longer probable ( see note 5 ) . .
Question: what was the net difference in asset retirement obligations between 2002 and 2003?
Answer: 14.0
Question: what is that value times 1000000?
| 14000000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
page 26 of 100 our calculation of adjusted net earnings is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to ball corporation as reported</td><td>$ 468.0</td><td>$ 387.9</td><td>$ 319.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>74.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation activities net of tax</td><td>-9.3 ( 9.3 )</td><td>13.0</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gains and equity earnings related to acquisitions net of tax</td><td>-105.9 ( 105.9 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gain on dispositions net of tax</td><td>2212</td><td>-30.7 ( 30.7 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>debt refinancing costs net of tax</td><td>5.3</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>adjusted net earnings</td><td>$ 433.0</td><td>$ 372.4</td><td>$ 337.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>per diluted share from continuing operations as reported</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ 2.05</td><td>$ 1.62</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>per diluted share as adjusted</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.96</td><td>1.74</td></tr></table> debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2010 , increased $ 216.1 million to $ 2.8 billion from $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2009 . in december 2010 , ball replaced its senior credit facilities due october 2011 with new senior credit facilities due december 2015 . the senior credit facilities bear interest at variable rates and include a $ 200 million term a loan denominated in u.s . dollars , a a351 million term b loan denominated in british sterling and a 20ac100 million term c loan denominated in euros . the facilities also include ( 1 ) a multi-currency , long-term revolving credit facility that provides the company with up to approximately $ 850 million and ( 2 ) a french multi-currency revolving facility that provides the company with up to $ 150 million . the revolving credit facilities expire in december 2015 . in november 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 5.75 percent senior notes due in may 2021 . the net proceeds from this offering were used to repay the borrowings under our term d loan facility and for general corporate purposes . in march 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 6.75 percent senior notes due in september 2020 . on that same date , the company issued a notice of redemption to call $ 509 million in 6.875 percent senior notes due december 2012 at a redemption price of 101.146 percent of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest . the redemption of the bonds occurred on april 21 , 2010 , and resulted in a charge of $ 8.1 million for the call premium and the write off of unamortized financing costs and unamortized premiums . the charge is included in the 2010 statement of earnings as a component of interest expense . at december 31 , 2010 , approximately $ 976 million was available under the company 2019s committed multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company 2019s prc operations also had approximately $ 20 million available under a committed credit facility of approximately $ 52 million . in addition to the long-term committed credit facilities , the company had $ 372 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of 2010 , of which $ 76.2 million was outstanding and due on demand , as well as approximately $ 175 million of available borrowings under its accounts receivable securitization program . in october 2010 , the company renewed its receivables sales agreement for a period of one year . the size of the new program will vary between a maximum of $ 125 million for settlement dates in january through april and a maximum of $ 175 million for settlement dates in the remaining months . given our free cash flow projections and unused credit facilities that are available until december 2015 , our liquidity is strong and is expected to meet our ongoing operating cash flow and debt service requirements . while the recent financial and economic conditions have raised concerns about credit risk with counterparties to derivative transactions , the company mitigates its exposure by spreading the risk among various counterparties and limiting exposure to any one party . we also monitor the credit ratings of our suppliers , customers , lenders and counterparties on a regular basis . we were in compliance with all loan agreements at december 31 , 2010 , and all prior years presented , and have met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about our debt and receivables sales agreements are available in notes 12 and 6 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what was the change in per diluted share earnings as adjusted from 2008 to 2009?
| 0.22 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
page 26 of 100 our calculation of adjusted net earnings is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to ball corporation as reported</td><td>$ 468.0</td><td>$ 387.9</td><td>$ 319.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>74.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation activities net of tax</td><td>-9.3 ( 9.3 )</td><td>13.0</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gains and equity earnings related to acquisitions net of tax</td><td>-105.9 ( 105.9 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gain on dispositions net of tax</td><td>2212</td><td>-30.7 ( 30.7 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>debt refinancing costs net of tax</td><td>5.3</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>adjusted net earnings</td><td>$ 433.0</td><td>$ 372.4</td><td>$ 337.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>per diluted share from continuing operations as reported</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ 2.05</td><td>$ 1.62</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>per diluted share as adjusted</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.96</td><td>1.74</td></tr></table> debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2010 , increased $ 216.1 million to $ 2.8 billion from $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2009 . in december 2010 , ball replaced its senior credit facilities due october 2011 with new senior credit facilities due december 2015 . the senior credit facilities bear interest at variable rates and include a $ 200 million term a loan denominated in u.s . dollars , a a351 million term b loan denominated in british sterling and a 20ac100 million term c loan denominated in euros . the facilities also include ( 1 ) a multi-currency , long-term revolving credit facility that provides the company with up to approximately $ 850 million and ( 2 ) a french multi-currency revolving facility that provides the company with up to $ 150 million . the revolving credit facilities expire in december 2015 . in november 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 5.75 percent senior notes due in may 2021 . the net proceeds from this offering were used to repay the borrowings under our term d loan facility and for general corporate purposes . in march 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 6.75 percent senior notes due in september 2020 . on that same date , the company issued a notice of redemption to call $ 509 million in 6.875 percent senior notes due december 2012 at a redemption price of 101.146 percent of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest . the redemption of the bonds occurred on april 21 , 2010 , and resulted in a charge of $ 8.1 million for the call premium and the write off of unamortized financing costs and unamortized premiums . the charge is included in the 2010 statement of earnings as a component of interest expense . at december 31 , 2010 , approximately $ 976 million was available under the company 2019s committed multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company 2019s prc operations also had approximately $ 20 million available under a committed credit facility of approximately $ 52 million . in addition to the long-term committed credit facilities , the company had $ 372 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of 2010 , of which $ 76.2 million was outstanding and due on demand , as well as approximately $ 175 million of available borrowings under its accounts receivable securitization program . in october 2010 , the company renewed its receivables sales agreement for a period of one year . the size of the new program will vary between a maximum of $ 125 million for settlement dates in january through april and a maximum of $ 175 million for settlement dates in the remaining months . given our free cash flow projections and unused credit facilities that are available until december 2015 , our liquidity is strong and is expected to meet our ongoing operating cash flow and debt service requirements . while the recent financial and economic conditions have raised concerns about credit risk with counterparties to derivative transactions , the company mitigates its exposure by spreading the risk among various counterparties and limiting exposure to any one party . we also monitor the credit ratings of our suppliers , customers , lenders and counterparties on a regular basis . we were in compliance with all loan agreements at december 31 , 2010 , and all prior years presented , and have met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about our debt and receivables sales agreements are available in notes 12 and 6 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what was the change in per diluted share earnings as adjusted from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 0.22
Question: and what percentage did this change represent in relation to those earnings in 2008?
| 0.12644 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
page 26 of 100 our calculation of adjusted net earnings is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to ball corporation as reported</td><td>$ 468.0</td><td>$ 387.9</td><td>$ 319.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>74.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation activities net of tax</td><td>-9.3 ( 9.3 )</td><td>13.0</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gains and equity earnings related to acquisitions net of tax</td><td>-105.9 ( 105.9 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gain on dispositions net of tax</td><td>2212</td><td>-30.7 ( 30.7 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>debt refinancing costs net of tax</td><td>5.3</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>adjusted net earnings</td><td>$ 433.0</td><td>$ 372.4</td><td>$ 337.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>per diluted share from continuing operations as reported</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ 2.05</td><td>$ 1.62</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>per diluted share as adjusted</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.96</td><td>1.74</td></tr></table> debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2010 , increased $ 216.1 million to $ 2.8 billion from $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2009 . in december 2010 , ball replaced its senior credit facilities due october 2011 with new senior credit facilities due december 2015 . the senior credit facilities bear interest at variable rates and include a $ 200 million term a loan denominated in u.s . dollars , a a351 million term b loan denominated in british sterling and a 20ac100 million term c loan denominated in euros . the facilities also include ( 1 ) a multi-currency , long-term revolving credit facility that provides the company with up to approximately $ 850 million and ( 2 ) a french multi-currency revolving facility that provides the company with up to $ 150 million . the revolving credit facilities expire in december 2015 . in november 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 5.75 percent senior notes due in may 2021 . the net proceeds from this offering were used to repay the borrowings under our term d loan facility and for general corporate purposes . in march 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 6.75 percent senior notes due in september 2020 . on that same date , the company issued a notice of redemption to call $ 509 million in 6.875 percent senior notes due december 2012 at a redemption price of 101.146 percent of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest . the redemption of the bonds occurred on april 21 , 2010 , and resulted in a charge of $ 8.1 million for the call premium and the write off of unamortized financing costs and unamortized premiums . the charge is included in the 2010 statement of earnings as a component of interest expense . at december 31 , 2010 , approximately $ 976 million was available under the company 2019s committed multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company 2019s prc operations also had approximately $ 20 million available under a committed credit facility of approximately $ 52 million . in addition to the long-term committed credit facilities , the company had $ 372 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of 2010 , of which $ 76.2 million was outstanding and due on demand , as well as approximately $ 175 million of available borrowings under its accounts receivable securitization program . in october 2010 , the company renewed its receivables sales agreement for a period of one year . the size of the new program will vary between a maximum of $ 125 million for settlement dates in january through april and a maximum of $ 175 million for settlement dates in the remaining months . given our free cash flow projections and unused credit facilities that are available until december 2015 , our liquidity is strong and is expected to meet our ongoing operating cash flow and debt service requirements . while the recent financial and economic conditions have raised concerns about credit risk with counterparties to derivative transactions , the company mitigates its exposure by spreading the risk among various counterparties and limiting exposure to any one party . we also monitor the credit ratings of our suppliers , customers , lenders and counterparties on a regular basis . we were in compliance with all loan agreements at december 31 , 2010 , and all prior years presented , and have met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about our debt and receivables sales agreements are available in notes 12 and 6 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what was the change in per diluted share earnings as adjusted from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 0.22
Question: and what percentage did this change represent in relation to those earnings in 2008?
Answer: 0.12644
Question: and concerning the receivables sales agreement, what was the increase in the size of the new program in the last 8 months of the year compared to the first 4 months in millions?
| 50.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
page 30 of 94 are included in capital spending amounts . another example is the company 2019s decision in 2007 to contribute an additional $ 44.5 million ( $ 27.3 million ) to its pension plans as part of its overall debt reduction plan . based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash flows from operating activities</td><td>$ 673.0</td><td>$ 401.4</td><td>$ 558.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>incremental pension funding net of tax</td><td>27.3</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital spending</td><td>-308.5 ( 308.5 )</td><td>-279.6 ( 279.6 )</td><td>-291.7 ( 291.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>proceeds for replacement of fire-damaged assets</td><td>48.6</td><td>61.3</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 440.4</td><td>$ 183.1</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> based on information currently available , we estimate cash flows from operating activities for 2008 to be approximately $ 650 million , capital spending to be approximately $ 350 million and free cash flow to be in the $ 300 million range . capital spending of $ 259.9 million ( net of $ 48.6 million in insurance recoveries ) in 2007 was below depreciation and amortization expense of $ 281 million . we continue to invest capital in our best performing operations , including projects to increase custom can capabilities , improve beverage can and end making productivity and add more beverage can capacity in europe , as well as expenditures in the aerospace and technologies segment . of the $ 350 million of planned capital spending for 2008 , approximately $ 180 million will be spent on top-line sales growth projects . debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2007 , decreased $ 93.1 million to $ 2358.6 million from $ 2451.7 million at december 31 , 2006 . the 2007 debt decrease from 2006 was primarily attributed to debt payments offset by higher foreign exchange rates . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 705 million was available under the company 2019s multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company also had $ 345 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of the year , of which $ 49.7 million was outstanding . on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities and during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due august 2006 primarily through the drawdown of funds under the new credit facilities . the refinancing and redemption resulted in a pretax debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) to reflect the call premium associated with the senior notes and the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs . the company has a receivables sales agreement that provides for the ongoing , revolving sale of a designated pool of trade accounts receivable of ball 2019s north american packaging operations , up to $ 250 million . the agreement qualifies as off-balance sheet financing under the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards ( sfas ) no . 140 , as amended by sfas no . 156 . net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled $ 170 million and $ 201.3 million at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 7 and 13 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what was the cash flow from operations in 2007?
| 673.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
page 30 of 94 are included in capital spending amounts . another example is the company 2019s decision in 2007 to contribute an additional $ 44.5 million ( $ 27.3 million ) to its pension plans as part of its overall debt reduction plan . based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash flows from operating activities</td><td>$ 673.0</td><td>$ 401.4</td><td>$ 558.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>incremental pension funding net of tax</td><td>27.3</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital spending</td><td>-308.5 ( 308.5 )</td><td>-279.6 ( 279.6 )</td><td>-291.7 ( 291.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>proceeds for replacement of fire-damaged assets</td><td>48.6</td><td>61.3</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 440.4</td><td>$ 183.1</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> based on information currently available , we estimate cash flows from operating activities for 2008 to be approximately $ 650 million , capital spending to be approximately $ 350 million and free cash flow to be in the $ 300 million range . capital spending of $ 259.9 million ( net of $ 48.6 million in insurance recoveries ) in 2007 was below depreciation and amortization expense of $ 281 million . we continue to invest capital in our best performing operations , including projects to increase custom can capabilities , improve beverage can and end making productivity and add more beverage can capacity in europe , as well as expenditures in the aerospace and technologies segment . of the $ 350 million of planned capital spending for 2008 , approximately $ 180 million will be spent on top-line sales growth projects . debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2007 , decreased $ 93.1 million to $ 2358.6 million from $ 2451.7 million at december 31 , 2006 . the 2007 debt decrease from 2006 was primarily attributed to debt payments offset by higher foreign exchange rates . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 705 million was available under the company 2019s multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company also had $ 345 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of the year , of which $ 49.7 million was outstanding . on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities and during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due august 2006 primarily through the drawdown of funds under the new credit facilities . the refinancing and redemption resulted in a pretax debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) to reflect the call premium associated with the senior notes and the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs . the company has a receivables sales agreement that provides for the ongoing , revolving sale of a designated pool of trade accounts receivable of ball 2019s north american packaging operations , up to $ 250 million . the agreement qualifies as off-balance sheet financing under the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards ( sfas ) no . 140 , as amended by sfas no . 156 . net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled $ 170 million and $ 201.3 million at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 7 and 13 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what was the cash flow from operations in 2007?
Answer: 673.0
Question: what was the cash flow from operations in 2006?
| 401.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
page 30 of 94 are included in capital spending amounts . another example is the company 2019s decision in 2007 to contribute an additional $ 44.5 million ( $ 27.3 million ) to its pension plans as part of its overall debt reduction plan . based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash flows from operating activities</td><td>$ 673.0</td><td>$ 401.4</td><td>$ 558.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>incremental pension funding net of tax</td><td>27.3</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital spending</td><td>-308.5 ( 308.5 )</td><td>-279.6 ( 279.6 )</td><td>-291.7 ( 291.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>proceeds for replacement of fire-damaged assets</td><td>48.6</td><td>61.3</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 440.4</td><td>$ 183.1</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> based on information currently available , we estimate cash flows from operating activities for 2008 to be approximately $ 650 million , capital spending to be approximately $ 350 million and free cash flow to be in the $ 300 million range . capital spending of $ 259.9 million ( net of $ 48.6 million in insurance recoveries ) in 2007 was below depreciation and amortization expense of $ 281 million . we continue to invest capital in our best performing operations , including projects to increase custom can capabilities , improve beverage can and end making productivity and add more beverage can capacity in europe , as well as expenditures in the aerospace and technologies segment . of the $ 350 million of planned capital spending for 2008 , approximately $ 180 million will be spent on top-line sales growth projects . debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2007 , decreased $ 93.1 million to $ 2358.6 million from $ 2451.7 million at december 31 , 2006 . the 2007 debt decrease from 2006 was primarily attributed to debt payments offset by higher foreign exchange rates . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 705 million was available under the company 2019s multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company also had $ 345 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of the year , of which $ 49.7 million was outstanding . on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities and during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due august 2006 primarily through the drawdown of funds under the new credit facilities . the refinancing and redemption resulted in a pretax debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) to reflect the call premium associated with the senior notes and the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs . the company has a receivables sales agreement that provides for the ongoing , revolving sale of a designated pool of trade accounts receivable of ball 2019s north american packaging operations , up to $ 250 million . the agreement qualifies as off-balance sheet financing under the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards ( sfas ) no . 140 , as amended by sfas no . 156 . net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled $ 170 million and $ 201.3 million at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 7 and 13 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what was the cash flow from operations in 2007?
Answer: 673.0
Question: what was the cash flow from operations in 2006?
Answer: 401.4
Question: what is the difference?
| 271.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
page 30 of 94 are included in capital spending amounts . another example is the company 2019s decision in 2007 to contribute an additional $ 44.5 million ( $ 27.3 million ) to its pension plans as part of its overall debt reduction plan . based on this , our consolidated free cash flow is summarized as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash flows from operating activities</td><td>$ 673.0</td><td>$ 401.4</td><td>$ 558.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>incremental pension funding net of tax</td><td>27.3</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital spending</td><td>-308.5 ( 308.5 )</td><td>-279.6 ( 279.6 )</td><td>-291.7 ( 291.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>proceeds for replacement of fire-damaged assets</td><td>48.6</td><td>61.3</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 440.4</td><td>$ 183.1</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> based on information currently available , we estimate cash flows from operating activities for 2008 to be approximately $ 650 million , capital spending to be approximately $ 350 million and free cash flow to be in the $ 300 million range . capital spending of $ 259.9 million ( net of $ 48.6 million in insurance recoveries ) in 2007 was below depreciation and amortization expense of $ 281 million . we continue to invest capital in our best performing operations , including projects to increase custom can capabilities , improve beverage can and end making productivity and add more beverage can capacity in europe , as well as expenditures in the aerospace and technologies segment . of the $ 350 million of planned capital spending for 2008 , approximately $ 180 million will be spent on top-line sales growth projects . debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2007 , decreased $ 93.1 million to $ 2358.6 million from $ 2451.7 million at december 31 , 2006 . the 2007 debt decrease from 2006 was primarily attributed to debt payments offset by higher foreign exchange rates . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 705 million was available under the company 2019s multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company also had $ 345 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of the year , of which $ 49.7 million was outstanding . on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities and during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due august 2006 primarily through the drawdown of funds under the new credit facilities . the refinancing and redemption resulted in a pretax debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) to reflect the call premium associated with the senior notes and the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs . the company has a receivables sales agreement that provides for the ongoing , revolving sale of a designated pool of trade accounts receivable of ball 2019s north american packaging operations , up to $ 250 million . the agreement qualifies as off-balance sheet financing under the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards ( sfas ) no . 140 , as amended by sfas no . 156 . net funds received from the sale of the accounts receivable totaled $ 170 million and $ 201.3 million at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 7 and 13 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what was the cash flow from operations in 2007?
Answer: 673.0
Question: what was the cash flow from operations in 2006?
Answer: 401.4
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 271.6
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.67663 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
business-related metrics as of or for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loan and lease receivables</td><td>$ 43.2</td><td>$ 37.4</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average loan and lease receivables</td><td>41.7</td><td>31.7</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automobile origination volume</td><td>27.8</td><td>25.3</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>automobile market share</td><td>6.1% ( 6.1 % )</td><td>5.7% ( 5.7 % )</td><td>40bp</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>30+ day delinquency rate</td><td>1.46</td><td>1.54</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net charge-off ratio</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.51</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>overhead ratio</td><td>35</td><td>36</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td></tr></table> crb is the no . 1 bank in the new york tri-state area and a top five bank in texas ( both ranked by retail deposits ) , providing payment , liquidity , investment , insurance and credit products and services to three primary customer segments : small busi- ness , affluent and retail . within these segments , crb serves 326000 small businesses , 433000 affluent consumers and 2.6 million mass-market consumers . crb 2019s continued focus on expanding customer relationships resulted in a 14% ( 14 % ) increase in core deposits ( for this purpose , core deposits are total deposits less time deposits ) from december 31 , 2002 , and a 77% ( 77 % ) increase in the cross-sell of chase credit products over 2002 . in 2003 , mortgage and home equity originations through crb 2019s distribution channels were $ 3.4 billion and $ 4.7 billion , respectively . branch-originated credit cards totaled 77000 , contributing to 23% ( 23 % ) of crb customers holding chase credit cards . crb is compensated by cfs 2019s credit businesses for the home finance and credit card loans it origi- nates and does not retain these balances . chase regional banking while crb continues to position itself for growth , decreased deposit spreads related to the low-rate environment and increased credit costs resulted in an 80% ( 80 % ) decline in crb operating earnings from 2002 . this decrease was partly offset by an 8% ( 8 % ) increase in total average deposits . operating revenue of $ 2.6 billion decreased by 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2002 . net interest income declined by 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 1.7 billion , primarily attributable to the lower interest rate environment . noninterest revenue decreased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 927 million due to lower deposit service fees , decreased debit card fees and one-time gains in 2002 . crb 2019s revenue does not include funding profits earned on its deposit base ; these amounts are included in the results of global treasury . operating expense of $ 2.4 billion increased by 7% ( 7 % ) from 2002 . the increase was primarily due to investments in technology within the branch network ; also contributing were higher compensation expenses related to increased staff levels and higher severance costs as a result of continued restructuring . this increase in operating caf is the largest u.s . bank originator of automobile loans and leases , with more than 2.9 million accounts . in 2003 , caf had a record number of automobile loan and lease originations , growing by 10% ( 10 % ) over 2002 to $ 27.8 billion . loan and lease receivables of $ 43.2 billion at december 31 , 2003 , were 16% ( 16 % ) higher than at the prior year-end . despite a challenging operating environment reflecting slightly declining new car sales in 2003 and increased competition , caf 2019s market share among automobile finance companies improved to 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) in 2003 from 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2002 . the increase in market share was the result of strong organic growth and an origination strategy that allies the business with manufac- turers and dealers . caf 2019s relationships with several major car manufacturers contributed to 2003 growth , as did caf 2019s dealer relationships , which increased from approximately 12700 dealers in 2002 to approximately 13700 dealers in 2003 . in 2003 , operating earnings were $ 205 million , 23% ( 23 % ) higher compared with 2002 . the increase in earnings was driven by continued revenue growth and improved operating efficiency . in 2003 , caf 2019s operating revenue grew by 23% ( 23 % ) to $ 842 million . net interest income grew by 33% ( 33 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase was driven by strong operating performance due to higher average loans and leases outstanding , reflecting continued strong origination volume and lower funding costs . operating expense of $ 292 million increased by 18% ( 18 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase in expenses was driven by higher average chase auto finance loans outstanding , higher origination volume and higher perform- ance-based incentives . caf 2019s overhead ratio improved from 36% ( 36 % ) in 2002 to 35% ( 35 % ) in 2003 , as a result of strong revenue growth , con- tinued productivity gains and disciplined expense management . credit costs increased 18% ( 18 % ) to $ 205 million , primarily reflecting a 32% ( 32 % ) increase in average loan and lease receivables . credit quality continued to be strong relative to 2002 , as evidenced by a lower net charge-off ratio and 30+ day delinquency rate . caf also comprises chase education finance , a top provider of government-guaranteed and private loans for higher education . loans are provided through a joint venture with sallie mae , a government-sponsored enterprise and the leader in funding and servicing education loans . chase education finance 2019s origination volume totaled $ 2.7 billion , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) from last year . management 2019s discussion and analysis j.p . morgan chase & co . 42 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report .
Question: what is the operating earnings increase of 2003 compared with 2002 in percent?
| 0.23 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
business-related metrics as of or for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loan and lease receivables</td><td>$ 43.2</td><td>$ 37.4</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average loan and lease receivables</td><td>41.7</td><td>31.7</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automobile origination volume</td><td>27.8</td><td>25.3</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>automobile market share</td><td>6.1% ( 6.1 % )</td><td>5.7% ( 5.7 % )</td><td>40bp</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>30+ day delinquency rate</td><td>1.46</td><td>1.54</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net charge-off ratio</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.51</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>overhead ratio</td><td>35</td><td>36</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td></tr></table> crb is the no . 1 bank in the new york tri-state area and a top five bank in texas ( both ranked by retail deposits ) , providing payment , liquidity , investment , insurance and credit products and services to three primary customer segments : small busi- ness , affluent and retail . within these segments , crb serves 326000 small businesses , 433000 affluent consumers and 2.6 million mass-market consumers . crb 2019s continued focus on expanding customer relationships resulted in a 14% ( 14 % ) increase in core deposits ( for this purpose , core deposits are total deposits less time deposits ) from december 31 , 2002 , and a 77% ( 77 % ) increase in the cross-sell of chase credit products over 2002 . in 2003 , mortgage and home equity originations through crb 2019s distribution channels were $ 3.4 billion and $ 4.7 billion , respectively . branch-originated credit cards totaled 77000 , contributing to 23% ( 23 % ) of crb customers holding chase credit cards . crb is compensated by cfs 2019s credit businesses for the home finance and credit card loans it origi- nates and does not retain these balances . chase regional banking while crb continues to position itself for growth , decreased deposit spreads related to the low-rate environment and increased credit costs resulted in an 80% ( 80 % ) decline in crb operating earnings from 2002 . this decrease was partly offset by an 8% ( 8 % ) increase in total average deposits . operating revenue of $ 2.6 billion decreased by 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2002 . net interest income declined by 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 1.7 billion , primarily attributable to the lower interest rate environment . noninterest revenue decreased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 927 million due to lower deposit service fees , decreased debit card fees and one-time gains in 2002 . crb 2019s revenue does not include funding profits earned on its deposit base ; these amounts are included in the results of global treasury . operating expense of $ 2.4 billion increased by 7% ( 7 % ) from 2002 . the increase was primarily due to investments in technology within the branch network ; also contributing were higher compensation expenses related to increased staff levels and higher severance costs as a result of continued restructuring . this increase in operating caf is the largest u.s . bank originator of automobile loans and leases , with more than 2.9 million accounts . in 2003 , caf had a record number of automobile loan and lease originations , growing by 10% ( 10 % ) over 2002 to $ 27.8 billion . loan and lease receivables of $ 43.2 billion at december 31 , 2003 , were 16% ( 16 % ) higher than at the prior year-end . despite a challenging operating environment reflecting slightly declining new car sales in 2003 and increased competition , caf 2019s market share among automobile finance companies improved to 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) in 2003 from 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2002 . the increase in market share was the result of strong organic growth and an origination strategy that allies the business with manufac- turers and dealers . caf 2019s relationships with several major car manufacturers contributed to 2003 growth , as did caf 2019s dealer relationships , which increased from approximately 12700 dealers in 2002 to approximately 13700 dealers in 2003 . in 2003 , operating earnings were $ 205 million , 23% ( 23 % ) higher compared with 2002 . the increase in earnings was driven by continued revenue growth and improved operating efficiency . in 2003 , caf 2019s operating revenue grew by 23% ( 23 % ) to $ 842 million . net interest income grew by 33% ( 33 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase was driven by strong operating performance due to higher average loans and leases outstanding , reflecting continued strong origination volume and lower funding costs . operating expense of $ 292 million increased by 18% ( 18 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase in expenses was driven by higher average chase auto finance loans outstanding , higher origination volume and higher perform- ance-based incentives . caf 2019s overhead ratio improved from 36% ( 36 % ) in 2002 to 35% ( 35 % ) in 2003 , as a result of strong revenue growth , con- tinued productivity gains and disciplined expense management . credit costs increased 18% ( 18 % ) to $ 205 million , primarily reflecting a 32% ( 32 % ) increase in average loan and lease receivables . credit quality continued to be strong relative to 2002 , as evidenced by a lower net charge-off ratio and 30+ day delinquency rate . caf also comprises chase education finance , a top provider of government-guaranteed and private loans for higher education . loans are provided through a joint venture with sallie mae , a government-sponsored enterprise and the leader in funding and servicing education loans . chase education finance 2019s origination volume totaled $ 2.7 billion , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) from last year . management 2019s discussion and analysis j.p . morgan chase & co . 42 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report .
Question: what is the operating earnings increase of 2003 compared with 2002 in percent?
Answer: 0.23
Question: what is the difference between 100% and that increase?
| 99.77 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
business-related metrics as of or for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loan and lease receivables</td><td>$ 43.2</td><td>$ 37.4</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average loan and lease receivables</td><td>41.7</td><td>31.7</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automobile origination volume</td><td>27.8</td><td>25.3</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>automobile market share</td><td>6.1% ( 6.1 % )</td><td>5.7% ( 5.7 % )</td><td>40bp</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>30+ day delinquency rate</td><td>1.46</td><td>1.54</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net charge-off ratio</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.51</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>overhead ratio</td><td>35</td><td>36</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td></tr></table> crb is the no . 1 bank in the new york tri-state area and a top five bank in texas ( both ranked by retail deposits ) , providing payment , liquidity , investment , insurance and credit products and services to three primary customer segments : small busi- ness , affluent and retail . within these segments , crb serves 326000 small businesses , 433000 affluent consumers and 2.6 million mass-market consumers . crb 2019s continued focus on expanding customer relationships resulted in a 14% ( 14 % ) increase in core deposits ( for this purpose , core deposits are total deposits less time deposits ) from december 31 , 2002 , and a 77% ( 77 % ) increase in the cross-sell of chase credit products over 2002 . in 2003 , mortgage and home equity originations through crb 2019s distribution channels were $ 3.4 billion and $ 4.7 billion , respectively . branch-originated credit cards totaled 77000 , contributing to 23% ( 23 % ) of crb customers holding chase credit cards . crb is compensated by cfs 2019s credit businesses for the home finance and credit card loans it origi- nates and does not retain these balances . chase regional banking while crb continues to position itself for growth , decreased deposit spreads related to the low-rate environment and increased credit costs resulted in an 80% ( 80 % ) decline in crb operating earnings from 2002 . this decrease was partly offset by an 8% ( 8 % ) increase in total average deposits . operating revenue of $ 2.6 billion decreased by 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2002 . net interest income declined by 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 1.7 billion , primarily attributable to the lower interest rate environment . noninterest revenue decreased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 927 million due to lower deposit service fees , decreased debit card fees and one-time gains in 2002 . crb 2019s revenue does not include funding profits earned on its deposit base ; these amounts are included in the results of global treasury . operating expense of $ 2.4 billion increased by 7% ( 7 % ) from 2002 . the increase was primarily due to investments in technology within the branch network ; also contributing were higher compensation expenses related to increased staff levels and higher severance costs as a result of continued restructuring . this increase in operating caf is the largest u.s . bank originator of automobile loans and leases , with more than 2.9 million accounts . in 2003 , caf had a record number of automobile loan and lease originations , growing by 10% ( 10 % ) over 2002 to $ 27.8 billion . loan and lease receivables of $ 43.2 billion at december 31 , 2003 , were 16% ( 16 % ) higher than at the prior year-end . despite a challenging operating environment reflecting slightly declining new car sales in 2003 and increased competition , caf 2019s market share among automobile finance companies improved to 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) in 2003 from 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2002 . the increase in market share was the result of strong organic growth and an origination strategy that allies the business with manufac- turers and dealers . caf 2019s relationships with several major car manufacturers contributed to 2003 growth , as did caf 2019s dealer relationships , which increased from approximately 12700 dealers in 2002 to approximately 13700 dealers in 2003 . in 2003 , operating earnings were $ 205 million , 23% ( 23 % ) higher compared with 2002 . the increase in earnings was driven by continued revenue growth and improved operating efficiency . in 2003 , caf 2019s operating revenue grew by 23% ( 23 % ) to $ 842 million . net interest income grew by 33% ( 33 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase was driven by strong operating performance due to higher average loans and leases outstanding , reflecting continued strong origination volume and lower funding costs . operating expense of $ 292 million increased by 18% ( 18 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase in expenses was driven by higher average chase auto finance loans outstanding , higher origination volume and higher perform- ance-based incentives . caf 2019s overhead ratio improved from 36% ( 36 % ) in 2002 to 35% ( 35 % ) in 2003 , as a result of strong revenue growth , con- tinued productivity gains and disciplined expense management . credit costs increased 18% ( 18 % ) to $ 205 million , primarily reflecting a 32% ( 32 % ) increase in average loan and lease receivables . credit quality continued to be strong relative to 2002 , as evidenced by a lower net charge-off ratio and 30+ day delinquency rate . caf also comprises chase education finance , a top provider of government-guaranteed and private loans for higher education . loans are provided through a joint venture with sallie mae , a government-sponsored enterprise and the leader in funding and servicing education loans . chase education finance 2019s origination volume totaled $ 2.7 billion , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) from last year . management 2019s discussion and analysis j.p . morgan chase & co . 42 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report .
Question: what is the operating earnings increase of 2003 compared with 2002 in percent?
Answer: 0.23
Question: what is the difference between 100% and that increase?
Answer: 99.77
Question: what is the product between the operating earnings in million of 2003 and that difference?
| 20452.85 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
r&d expense increased 36% ( 36 % ) during 2011 compared to 2010 , it declined slightly as a percentage of net sales , due to the 66% ( 66 % ) year-over-year growth in the company 2019s net sales during 2011 . r&d expense increased 34% ( 34 % ) or $ 449 million to $ 1.8 billion in 2010 compared to 2009 . this increase was due primarily to an increase in headcount and related expenses in the current year to support expanded r&d activities . also contributing to this increase in r&d expense in 2010 was the capitalization in 2009 of software development costs of $ 71 million related to mac os x snow leopard . although total r&d expense increased 34% ( 34 % ) during 2010 , it declined as a percentage of net sales given the 52% ( 52 % ) year-over-year increase in net sales in the company continues to believe that focused investments in r&d are critical to its future growth and competitive position in the marketplace and are directly related to timely development of new and enhanced products that are central to the company 2019s core business strategy . as such , the company expects to make further investments in r&d to remain competitive . selling , general and administrative expense ( 201csg&a 201d ) sg&a expense increased $ 2.1 billion or 38% ( 38 % ) to $ 7.6 billion during 2011 compared to 2010 . this increase was due primarily to the company 2019s continued expansion of its retail segment , increased headcount and related costs , higher spending on professional services and marketing and advertising programs , and increased variable costs associated with the overall growth of the company 2019s net sales . sg&a expense increased $ 1.4 billion or 33% ( 33 % ) to $ 5.5 billion in 2010 compared to 2009 . this increase was due primarily to the company 2019s continued expansion of its retail segment , higher spending on marketing and advertising programs , increased share-based compensation expenses and variable costs associated with the overall growth of the company 2019s net sales . other income and expense other income and expense for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest and dividend income</td><td>$ 519</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 407</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other expense net</td><td>-104 ( 104 )</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>-81 ( 81 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total other income and expense</td><td>$ 415</td><td>$ 155</td><td>$ 326</td></tr></table> total other income and expense increased $ 260 million or 168% ( 168 % ) to $ 415 million during 2011 compared to $ 155 million and $ 326 million in 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the year-over-year increase in other income and expense during 2011 was due primarily to higher interest income and net realized gains on sales of marketable securities . the overall decrease in other income and expense in 2010 compared to 2009 was attributable to the significant declines in interest rates on a year-over-year basis , partially offset by the company 2019s higher cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities balances . additionally the company incurred higher premium expenses on its foreign exchange option contracts , which further reduced the total other income and expense . the weighted average interest rate earned by the company on its cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities was 0.77% ( 0.77 % ) , 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) and 1.43% ( 1.43 % ) during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had no debt outstanding and accordingly did not incur any related interest expense . provision for income taxes the company 2019s effective tax rates were approximately 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) , 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) and 31.8% ( 31.8 % ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the company 2019s effective rates for these periods differ from the statutory federal income tax rate of .
Question: what was the interest and dividend income in 2011?
| 519.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
r&d expense increased 36% ( 36 % ) during 2011 compared to 2010 , it declined slightly as a percentage of net sales , due to the 66% ( 66 % ) year-over-year growth in the company 2019s net sales during 2011 . r&d expense increased 34% ( 34 % ) or $ 449 million to $ 1.8 billion in 2010 compared to 2009 . this increase was due primarily to an increase in headcount and related expenses in the current year to support expanded r&d activities . also contributing to this increase in r&d expense in 2010 was the capitalization in 2009 of software development costs of $ 71 million related to mac os x snow leopard . although total r&d expense increased 34% ( 34 % ) during 2010 , it declined as a percentage of net sales given the 52% ( 52 % ) year-over-year increase in net sales in the company continues to believe that focused investments in r&d are critical to its future growth and competitive position in the marketplace and are directly related to timely development of new and enhanced products that are central to the company 2019s core business strategy . as such , the company expects to make further investments in r&d to remain competitive . selling , general and administrative expense ( 201csg&a 201d ) sg&a expense increased $ 2.1 billion or 38% ( 38 % ) to $ 7.6 billion during 2011 compared to 2010 . this increase was due primarily to the company 2019s continued expansion of its retail segment , increased headcount and related costs , higher spending on professional services and marketing and advertising programs , and increased variable costs associated with the overall growth of the company 2019s net sales . sg&a expense increased $ 1.4 billion or 33% ( 33 % ) to $ 5.5 billion in 2010 compared to 2009 . this increase was due primarily to the company 2019s continued expansion of its retail segment , higher spending on marketing and advertising programs , increased share-based compensation expenses and variable costs associated with the overall growth of the company 2019s net sales . other income and expense other income and expense for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest and dividend income</td><td>$ 519</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 407</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other expense net</td><td>-104 ( 104 )</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>-81 ( 81 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total other income and expense</td><td>$ 415</td><td>$ 155</td><td>$ 326</td></tr></table> total other income and expense increased $ 260 million or 168% ( 168 % ) to $ 415 million during 2011 compared to $ 155 million and $ 326 million in 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the year-over-year increase in other income and expense during 2011 was due primarily to higher interest income and net realized gains on sales of marketable securities . the overall decrease in other income and expense in 2010 compared to 2009 was attributable to the significant declines in interest rates on a year-over-year basis , partially offset by the company 2019s higher cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities balances . additionally the company incurred higher premium expenses on its foreign exchange option contracts , which further reduced the total other income and expense . the weighted average interest rate earned by the company on its cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities was 0.77% ( 0.77 % ) , 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) and 1.43% ( 1.43 % ) during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had no debt outstanding and accordingly did not incur any related interest expense . provision for income taxes the company 2019s effective tax rates were approximately 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) , 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) and 31.8% ( 31.8 % ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the company 2019s effective rates for these periods differ from the statutory federal income tax rate of .
Question: what was the interest and dividend income in 2011?
Answer: 519.0
Question: and what was the total other income in that year?
| 415.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
r&d expense increased 36% ( 36 % ) during 2011 compared to 2010 , it declined slightly as a percentage of net sales , due to the 66% ( 66 % ) year-over-year growth in the company 2019s net sales during 2011 . r&d expense increased 34% ( 34 % ) or $ 449 million to $ 1.8 billion in 2010 compared to 2009 . this increase was due primarily to an increase in headcount and related expenses in the current year to support expanded r&d activities . also contributing to this increase in r&d expense in 2010 was the capitalization in 2009 of software development costs of $ 71 million related to mac os x snow leopard . although total r&d expense increased 34% ( 34 % ) during 2010 , it declined as a percentage of net sales given the 52% ( 52 % ) year-over-year increase in net sales in the company continues to believe that focused investments in r&d are critical to its future growth and competitive position in the marketplace and are directly related to timely development of new and enhanced products that are central to the company 2019s core business strategy . as such , the company expects to make further investments in r&d to remain competitive . selling , general and administrative expense ( 201csg&a 201d ) sg&a expense increased $ 2.1 billion or 38% ( 38 % ) to $ 7.6 billion during 2011 compared to 2010 . this increase was due primarily to the company 2019s continued expansion of its retail segment , increased headcount and related costs , higher spending on professional services and marketing and advertising programs , and increased variable costs associated with the overall growth of the company 2019s net sales . sg&a expense increased $ 1.4 billion or 33% ( 33 % ) to $ 5.5 billion in 2010 compared to 2009 . this increase was due primarily to the company 2019s continued expansion of its retail segment , higher spending on marketing and advertising programs , increased share-based compensation expenses and variable costs associated with the overall growth of the company 2019s net sales . other income and expense other income and expense for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest and dividend income</td><td>$ 519</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 407</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other expense net</td><td>-104 ( 104 )</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>-81 ( 81 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total other income and expense</td><td>$ 415</td><td>$ 155</td><td>$ 326</td></tr></table> total other income and expense increased $ 260 million or 168% ( 168 % ) to $ 415 million during 2011 compared to $ 155 million and $ 326 million in 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the year-over-year increase in other income and expense during 2011 was due primarily to higher interest income and net realized gains on sales of marketable securities . the overall decrease in other income and expense in 2010 compared to 2009 was attributable to the significant declines in interest rates on a year-over-year basis , partially offset by the company 2019s higher cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities balances . additionally the company incurred higher premium expenses on its foreign exchange option contracts , which further reduced the total other income and expense . the weighted average interest rate earned by the company on its cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities was 0.77% ( 0.77 % ) , 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) and 1.43% ( 1.43 % ) during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had no debt outstanding and accordingly did not incur any related interest expense . provision for income taxes the company 2019s effective tax rates were approximately 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) , 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) and 31.8% ( 31.8 % ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the company 2019s effective rates for these periods differ from the statutory federal income tax rate of .
Question: what was the interest and dividend income in 2011?
Answer: 519.0
Question: and what was the total other income in that year?
Answer: 415.0
Question: what percentage, then, did the interest and dividend income represent in relation to this one?
| 1.2506 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
r&d expense increased 36% ( 36 % ) during 2011 compared to 2010 , it declined slightly as a percentage of net sales , due to the 66% ( 66 % ) year-over-year growth in the company 2019s net sales during 2011 . r&d expense increased 34% ( 34 % ) or $ 449 million to $ 1.8 billion in 2010 compared to 2009 . this increase was due primarily to an increase in headcount and related expenses in the current year to support expanded r&d activities . also contributing to this increase in r&d expense in 2010 was the capitalization in 2009 of software development costs of $ 71 million related to mac os x snow leopard . although total r&d expense increased 34% ( 34 % ) during 2010 , it declined as a percentage of net sales given the 52% ( 52 % ) year-over-year increase in net sales in the company continues to believe that focused investments in r&d are critical to its future growth and competitive position in the marketplace and are directly related to timely development of new and enhanced products that are central to the company 2019s core business strategy . as such , the company expects to make further investments in r&d to remain competitive . selling , general and administrative expense ( 201csg&a 201d ) sg&a expense increased $ 2.1 billion or 38% ( 38 % ) to $ 7.6 billion during 2011 compared to 2010 . this increase was due primarily to the company 2019s continued expansion of its retail segment , increased headcount and related costs , higher spending on professional services and marketing and advertising programs , and increased variable costs associated with the overall growth of the company 2019s net sales . sg&a expense increased $ 1.4 billion or 33% ( 33 % ) to $ 5.5 billion in 2010 compared to 2009 . this increase was due primarily to the company 2019s continued expansion of its retail segment , higher spending on marketing and advertising programs , increased share-based compensation expenses and variable costs associated with the overall growth of the company 2019s net sales . other income and expense other income and expense for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest and dividend income</td><td>$ 519</td><td>$ 311</td><td>$ 407</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other expense net</td><td>-104 ( 104 )</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>-81 ( 81 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total other income and expense</td><td>$ 415</td><td>$ 155</td><td>$ 326</td></tr></table> total other income and expense increased $ 260 million or 168% ( 168 % ) to $ 415 million during 2011 compared to $ 155 million and $ 326 million in 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the year-over-year increase in other income and expense during 2011 was due primarily to higher interest income and net realized gains on sales of marketable securities . the overall decrease in other income and expense in 2010 compared to 2009 was attributable to the significant declines in interest rates on a year-over-year basis , partially offset by the company 2019s higher cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities balances . additionally the company incurred higher premium expenses on its foreign exchange option contracts , which further reduced the total other income and expense . the weighted average interest rate earned by the company on its cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities was 0.77% ( 0.77 % ) , 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) and 1.43% ( 1.43 % ) during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had no debt outstanding and accordingly did not incur any related interest expense . provision for income taxes the company 2019s effective tax rates were approximately 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) , 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) and 31.8% ( 31.8 % ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the company 2019s effective rates for these periods differ from the statutory federal income tax rate of .
Question: what was the interest and dividend income in 2011?
Answer: 519.0
Question: and what was the total other income in that year?
Answer: 415.0
Question: what percentage, then, did the interest and dividend income represent in relation to this one?
Answer: 1.2506
Question: and what was this percentage representation in the previous year?
| 2.00645 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
during 2009 , the company extended the contractual life of 4 million fully vested share options held by 6 employees . as a result of that modification , the company recognized additional compensation expense of $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) performance-based rsus . the company grants performance-based rsus to the company 2019s executive officers and certain employees once per year . the company may also grant performance-based rsus to certain new employees or to employees who assume positions of increasing responsibility at the time those events occur . the number of performance-based rsus that ultimately vest is dependent on one or both of the following as per the terms of the specific award agreement : the achievement of 1 ) internal profitability targets ( performance condition ) and 2 ) market performance targets measured by the comparison of the company 2019s stock performance versus a defined peer group ( market condition ) . the performance-based rsus generally cliff-vest during the company 2019s quarter-end september 30 black-out period three years from the date of grant . the ultimate number of shares of the company 2019s series a common stock issued will range from zero to stretch , with stretch defined individually under each award , net of personal income taxes withheld . the market condition is factored into the estimated fair value per unit and compensation expense for each award will be based on the probability of achieving internal profitability targets , as applicable , and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective grant , less estimated forfeitures . for performance-based rsus granted without a performance condition , compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . in april 2007 , the company granted performance-based rsus to certain employees that vest annually in equal tranches beginning october 1 , 2008 through october 1 , 2011 and include a market condition . the performance- based rsus awarded include a catch-up provision that provides for an additional year of vesting of previously unvested amounts , subject to certain maximums . compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . a summary of changes in performance-based rsus outstanding is as follows : number of weighted average fair value ( in thousands ) ( in $ ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of units ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average fair value ( in $ )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2008</td><td>1188</td><td>19.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>420</td><td>38.16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-79 ( 79 )</td><td>21.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td><td>17.28</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1415</td><td>25.24</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested for performance-based rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 2 million and $ 3 million , respectively . there were no vestings that occurred during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . fair value for the company 2019s performance-based rsus was estimated at the grant date using a monte carlo simulation approach . monte carlo simulation was utilized to randomly generate future stock returns for the company and each company in the defined peer group for each grant based on company-specific dividend yields , volatilities and stock return correlations . these returns were used to calculate future performance-based rsu vesting percentages and the simulated values of the vested performance-based rsus were then discounted to present value using a risk-free rate , yielding the expected value of these performance-based rsus . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d70731 pcn : 119000000 ***%%pcmsg|119 |00016|yes|no|02/10/2010 16:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: throughout the year of 2009, what was the increase in the balance of non vested units, in thousands?
| 227.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
during 2009 , the company extended the contractual life of 4 million fully vested share options held by 6 employees . as a result of that modification , the company recognized additional compensation expense of $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) performance-based rsus . the company grants performance-based rsus to the company 2019s executive officers and certain employees once per year . the company may also grant performance-based rsus to certain new employees or to employees who assume positions of increasing responsibility at the time those events occur . the number of performance-based rsus that ultimately vest is dependent on one or both of the following as per the terms of the specific award agreement : the achievement of 1 ) internal profitability targets ( performance condition ) and 2 ) market performance targets measured by the comparison of the company 2019s stock performance versus a defined peer group ( market condition ) . the performance-based rsus generally cliff-vest during the company 2019s quarter-end september 30 black-out period three years from the date of grant . the ultimate number of shares of the company 2019s series a common stock issued will range from zero to stretch , with stretch defined individually under each award , net of personal income taxes withheld . the market condition is factored into the estimated fair value per unit and compensation expense for each award will be based on the probability of achieving internal profitability targets , as applicable , and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective grant , less estimated forfeitures . for performance-based rsus granted without a performance condition , compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . in april 2007 , the company granted performance-based rsus to certain employees that vest annually in equal tranches beginning october 1 , 2008 through october 1 , 2011 and include a market condition . the performance- based rsus awarded include a catch-up provision that provides for an additional year of vesting of previously unvested amounts , subject to certain maximums . compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . a summary of changes in performance-based rsus outstanding is as follows : number of weighted average fair value ( in thousands ) ( in $ ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of units ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average fair value ( in $ )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2008</td><td>1188</td><td>19.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>420</td><td>38.16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-79 ( 79 )</td><td>21.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td><td>17.28</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1415</td><td>25.24</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested for performance-based rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 2 million and $ 3 million , respectively . there were no vestings that occurred during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . fair value for the company 2019s performance-based rsus was estimated at the grant date using a monte carlo simulation approach . monte carlo simulation was utilized to randomly generate future stock returns for the company and each company in the defined peer group for each grant based on company-specific dividend yields , volatilities and stock return correlations . these returns were used to calculate future performance-based rsu vesting percentages and the simulated values of the vested performance-based rsus were then discounted to present value using a risk-free rate , yielding the expected value of these performance-based rsus . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d70731 pcn : 119000000 ***%%pcmsg|119 |00016|yes|no|02/10/2010 16:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: throughout the year of 2009, what was the increase in the balance of non vested units, in thousands?
Answer: 227.0
Question: and what was that balance by the end of the year?
| 1415000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
during 2009 , the company extended the contractual life of 4 million fully vested share options held by 6 employees . as a result of that modification , the company recognized additional compensation expense of $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) performance-based rsus . the company grants performance-based rsus to the company 2019s executive officers and certain employees once per year . the company may also grant performance-based rsus to certain new employees or to employees who assume positions of increasing responsibility at the time those events occur . the number of performance-based rsus that ultimately vest is dependent on one or both of the following as per the terms of the specific award agreement : the achievement of 1 ) internal profitability targets ( performance condition ) and 2 ) market performance targets measured by the comparison of the company 2019s stock performance versus a defined peer group ( market condition ) . the performance-based rsus generally cliff-vest during the company 2019s quarter-end september 30 black-out period three years from the date of grant . the ultimate number of shares of the company 2019s series a common stock issued will range from zero to stretch , with stretch defined individually under each award , net of personal income taxes withheld . the market condition is factored into the estimated fair value per unit and compensation expense for each award will be based on the probability of achieving internal profitability targets , as applicable , and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective grant , less estimated forfeitures . for performance-based rsus granted without a performance condition , compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . in april 2007 , the company granted performance-based rsus to certain employees that vest annually in equal tranches beginning october 1 , 2008 through october 1 , 2011 and include a market condition . the performance- based rsus awarded include a catch-up provision that provides for an additional year of vesting of previously unvested amounts , subject to certain maximums . compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . a summary of changes in performance-based rsus outstanding is as follows : number of weighted average fair value ( in thousands ) ( in $ ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of units ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average fair value ( in $ )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2008</td><td>1188</td><td>19.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>420</td><td>38.16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-79 ( 79 )</td><td>21.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td><td>17.28</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1415</td><td>25.24</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested for performance-based rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 2 million and $ 3 million , respectively . there were no vestings that occurred during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . fair value for the company 2019s performance-based rsus was estimated at the grant date using a monte carlo simulation approach . monte carlo simulation was utilized to randomly generate future stock returns for the company and each company in the defined peer group for each grant based on company-specific dividend yields , volatilities and stock return correlations . these returns were used to calculate future performance-based rsu vesting percentages and the simulated values of the vested performance-based rsus were then discounted to present value using a risk-free rate , yielding the expected value of these performance-based rsus . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d70731 pcn : 119000000 ***%%pcmsg|119 |00016|yes|no|02/10/2010 16:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: throughout the year of 2009, what was the increase in the balance of non vested units, in thousands?
Answer: 227.0
Question: and what was that balance by the end of the year?
Answer: 1415000.0
Question: what was the weighted average fair value of these units?
| 25.24 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
during 2009 , the company extended the contractual life of 4 million fully vested share options held by 6 employees . as a result of that modification , the company recognized additional compensation expense of $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) performance-based rsus . the company grants performance-based rsus to the company 2019s executive officers and certain employees once per year . the company may also grant performance-based rsus to certain new employees or to employees who assume positions of increasing responsibility at the time those events occur . the number of performance-based rsus that ultimately vest is dependent on one or both of the following as per the terms of the specific award agreement : the achievement of 1 ) internal profitability targets ( performance condition ) and 2 ) market performance targets measured by the comparison of the company 2019s stock performance versus a defined peer group ( market condition ) . the performance-based rsus generally cliff-vest during the company 2019s quarter-end september 30 black-out period three years from the date of grant . the ultimate number of shares of the company 2019s series a common stock issued will range from zero to stretch , with stretch defined individually under each award , net of personal income taxes withheld . the market condition is factored into the estimated fair value per unit and compensation expense for each award will be based on the probability of achieving internal profitability targets , as applicable , and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective grant , less estimated forfeitures . for performance-based rsus granted without a performance condition , compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . in april 2007 , the company granted performance-based rsus to certain employees that vest annually in equal tranches beginning october 1 , 2008 through october 1 , 2011 and include a market condition . the performance- based rsus awarded include a catch-up provision that provides for an additional year of vesting of previously unvested amounts , subject to certain maximums . compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . a summary of changes in performance-based rsus outstanding is as follows : number of weighted average fair value ( in thousands ) ( in $ ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of units ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average fair value ( in $ )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2008</td><td>1188</td><td>19.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>420</td><td>38.16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-79 ( 79 )</td><td>21.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td><td>17.28</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1415</td><td>25.24</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested for performance-based rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 2 million and $ 3 million , respectively . there were no vestings that occurred during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . fair value for the company 2019s performance-based rsus was estimated at the grant date using a monte carlo simulation approach . monte carlo simulation was utilized to randomly generate future stock returns for the company and each company in the defined peer group for each grant based on company-specific dividend yields , volatilities and stock return correlations . these returns were used to calculate future performance-based rsu vesting percentages and the simulated values of the vested performance-based rsus were then discounted to present value using a risk-free rate , yielding the expected value of these performance-based rsus . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d70731 pcn : 119000000 ***%%pcmsg|119 |00016|yes|no|02/10/2010 16:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: throughout the year of 2009, what was the increase in the balance of non vested units, in thousands?
Answer: 227.0
Question: and what was that balance by the end of the year?
Answer: 1415000.0
Question: what was the weighted average fair value of these units?
Answer: 25.24
Question: what was, then, their total value?
| 35714600.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
during 2009 , the company extended the contractual life of 4 million fully vested share options held by 6 employees . as a result of that modification , the company recognized additional compensation expense of $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) performance-based rsus . the company grants performance-based rsus to the company 2019s executive officers and certain employees once per year . the company may also grant performance-based rsus to certain new employees or to employees who assume positions of increasing responsibility at the time those events occur . the number of performance-based rsus that ultimately vest is dependent on one or both of the following as per the terms of the specific award agreement : the achievement of 1 ) internal profitability targets ( performance condition ) and 2 ) market performance targets measured by the comparison of the company 2019s stock performance versus a defined peer group ( market condition ) . the performance-based rsus generally cliff-vest during the company 2019s quarter-end september 30 black-out period three years from the date of grant . the ultimate number of shares of the company 2019s series a common stock issued will range from zero to stretch , with stretch defined individually under each award , net of personal income taxes withheld . the market condition is factored into the estimated fair value per unit and compensation expense for each award will be based on the probability of achieving internal profitability targets , as applicable , and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective grant , less estimated forfeitures . for performance-based rsus granted without a performance condition , compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . in april 2007 , the company granted performance-based rsus to certain employees that vest annually in equal tranches beginning october 1 , 2008 through october 1 , 2011 and include a market condition . the performance- based rsus awarded include a catch-up provision that provides for an additional year of vesting of previously unvested amounts , subject to certain maximums . compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . a summary of changes in performance-based rsus outstanding is as follows : number of weighted average fair value ( in thousands ) ( in $ ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of units ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average fair value ( in $ )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2008</td><td>1188</td><td>19.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>420</td><td>38.16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-79 ( 79 )</td><td>21.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td><td>17.28</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1415</td><td>25.24</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested for performance-based rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 2 million and $ 3 million , respectively . there were no vestings that occurred during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . fair value for the company 2019s performance-based rsus was estimated at the grant date using a monte carlo simulation approach . monte carlo simulation was utilized to randomly generate future stock returns for the company and each company in the defined peer group for each grant based on company-specific dividend yields , volatilities and stock return correlations . these returns were used to calculate future performance-based rsu vesting percentages and the simulated values of the vested performance-based rsus were then discounted to present value using a risk-free rate , yielding the expected value of these performance-based rsus . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d70731 pcn : 119000000 ***%%pcmsg|119 |00016|yes|no|02/10/2010 16:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: throughout the year of 2009, what was the increase in the balance of non vested units, in thousands?
Answer: 227.0
Question: and what was that balance by the end of the year?
Answer: 1415000.0
Question: what was the weighted average fair value of these units?
Answer: 25.24
Question: what was, then, their total value?
Answer: 35714600.0
Question: and how much is that in millions?
| 35.7146 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 33775543 at december 31 , 2011 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 35304422 shares at december 31 , 2011 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2011 , we issued 731336 shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 include 27090 , 29040 , and 39552 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2011 , we incorporated two changes to certain awards under our existing long-term incentive compensation programs . first , for certain grants of incentive performance units , the future payout amount will be subject to a negative annual adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics . this adjustment is in addition to the existing financial performance metrics relative to our peers . these grants have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . second , performance-based restricted share units ( performance rsus ) were granted in 2011 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options . these performance rsus ( which are payable solely in stock ) have a service condition , an internal risk-related performance condition , and an external market condition . satisfaction of the performance condition is based on four independent one-year performance periods . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 63.25 , $ 54.59 and $ 41.16 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2010</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 363</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 56.40</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2250</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 49.95</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>623</td><td>64.21</td><td>1059</td><td>62.68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>59.54</td><td>-706 ( 706 )</td><td>51.27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td><td>52.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>830</td><td>$ 61.68</td><td>2512</td><td>$ 54.87</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 61 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was approximately $ 52 million , $ 39 million and $ 47 million , respectively . liability awards we grant annually cash-payable restricted share units to certain executives . the grants were made primarily as part of an annual bonus incentive deferral plan . while there are time- based and service-related vesting criteria , there are no market or performance criteria associated with these awards . compensation expense recognized related to these awards was recorded in prior periods as part of annual cash bonus criteria . as of december 31 , 2011 , there were 753203 of these cash- payable restricted share units outstanding . 174 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards in 2011?
| 52.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 33775543 at december 31 , 2011 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 35304422 shares at december 31 , 2011 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2011 , we issued 731336 shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 include 27090 , 29040 , and 39552 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2011 , we incorporated two changes to certain awards under our existing long-term incentive compensation programs . first , for certain grants of incentive performance units , the future payout amount will be subject to a negative annual adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics . this adjustment is in addition to the existing financial performance metrics relative to our peers . these grants have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . second , performance-based restricted share units ( performance rsus ) were granted in 2011 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options . these performance rsus ( which are payable solely in stock ) have a service condition , an internal risk-related performance condition , and an external market condition . satisfaction of the performance condition is based on four independent one-year performance periods . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 63.25 , $ 54.59 and $ 41.16 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2010</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 363</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 56.40</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2250</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 49.95</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>623</td><td>64.21</td><td>1059</td><td>62.68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>59.54</td><td>-706 ( 706 )</td><td>51.27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td><td>52.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>830</td><td>$ 61.68</td><td>2512</td><td>$ 54.87</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 61 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was approximately $ 52 million , $ 39 million and $ 47 million , respectively . liability awards we grant annually cash-payable restricted share units to certain executives . the grants were made primarily as part of an annual bonus incentive deferral plan . while there are time- based and service-related vesting criteria , there are no market or performance criteria associated with these awards . compensation expense recognized related to these awards was recorded in prior periods as part of annual cash bonus criteria . as of december 31 , 2011 , there were 753203 of these cash- payable restricted share units outstanding . 174 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards in 2011?
Answer: 52.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
| 39.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 33775543 at december 31 , 2011 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 35304422 shares at december 31 , 2011 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2011 , we issued 731336 shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 include 27090 , 29040 , and 39552 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2011 , we incorporated two changes to certain awards under our existing long-term incentive compensation programs . first , for certain grants of incentive performance units , the future payout amount will be subject to a negative annual adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics . this adjustment is in addition to the existing financial performance metrics relative to our peers . these grants have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . second , performance-based restricted share units ( performance rsus ) were granted in 2011 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options . these performance rsus ( which are payable solely in stock ) have a service condition , an internal risk-related performance condition , and an external market condition . satisfaction of the performance condition is based on four independent one-year performance periods . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 63.25 , $ 54.59 and $ 41.16 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2010</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 363</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 56.40</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2250</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 49.95</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>623</td><td>64.21</td><td>1059</td><td>62.68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>59.54</td><td>-706 ( 706 )</td><td>51.27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td><td>52.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>830</td><td>$ 61.68</td><td>2512</td><td>$ 54.87</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 61 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was approximately $ 52 million , $ 39 million and $ 47 million , respectively . liability awards we grant annually cash-payable restricted share units to certain executives . the grants were made primarily as part of an annual bonus incentive deferral plan . while there are time- based and service-related vesting criteria , there are no market or performance criteria associated with these awards . compensation expense recognized related to these awards was recorded in prior periods as part of annual cash bonus criteria . as of december 31 , 2011 , there were 753203 of these cash- payable restricted share units outstanding . 174 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards in 2011?
Answer: 52.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 39.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 91.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 33775543 at december 31 , 2011 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 35304422 shares at december 31 , 2011 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2011 , we issued 731336 shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 include 27090 , 29040 , and 39552 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2011 , we incorporated two changes to certain awards under our existing long-term incentive compensation programs . first , for certain grants of incentive performance units , the future payout amount will be subject to a negative annual adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics . this adjustment is in addition to the existing financial performance metrics relative to our peers . these grants have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . second , performance-based restricted share units ( performance rsus ) were granted in 2011 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options . these performance rsus ( which are payable solely in stock ) have a service condition , an internal risk-related performance condition , and an external market condition . satisfaction of the performance condition is based on four independent one-year performance periods . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 63.25 , $ 54.59 and $ 41.16 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2010</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 363</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 56.40</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2250</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 49.95</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>623</td><td>64.21</td><td>1059</td><td>62.68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>59.54</td><td>-706 ( 706 )</td><td>51.27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td><td>52.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>830</td><td>$ 61.68</td><td>2512</td><td>$ 54.87</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 61 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was approximately $ 52 million , $ 39 million and $ 47 million , respectively . liability awards we grant annually cash-payable restricted share units to certain executives . the grants were made primarily as part of an annual bonus incentive deferral plan . while there are time- based and service-related vesting criteria , there are no market or performance criteria associated with these awards . compensation expense recognized related to these awards was recorded in prior periods as part of annual cash bonus criteria . as of december 31 , 2011 , there were 753203 of these cash- payable restricted share units outstanding . 174 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards in 2011?
Answer: 52.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 39.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 91.0
Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards in 2010?
| 39.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 33775543 at december 31 , 2011 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 35304422 shares at december 31 , 2011 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2011 , we issued 731336 shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 include 27090 , 29040 , and 39552 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2011 , we incorporated two changes to certain awards under our existing long-term incentive compensation programs . first , for certain grants of incentive performance units , the future payout amount will be subject to a negative annual adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics . this adjustment is in addition to the existing financial performance metrics relative to our peers . these grants have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . second , performance-based restricted share units ( performance rsus ) were granted in 2011 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options . these performance rsus ( which are payable solely in stock ) have a service condition , an internal risk-related performance condition , and an external market condition . satisfaction of the performance condition is based on four independent one-year performance periods . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 63.25 , $ 54.59 and $ 41.16 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2010</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 363</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 56.40</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2250</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 49.95</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>623</td><td>64.21</td><td>1059</td><td>62.68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>59.54</td><td>-706 ( 706 )</td><td>51.27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td><td>52.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>830</td><td>$ 61.68</td><td>2512</td><td>$ 54.87</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 61 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was approximately $ 52 million , $ 39 million and $ 47 million , respectively . liability awards we grant annually cash-payable restricted share units to certain executives . the grants were made primarily as part of an annual bonus incentive deferral plan . while there are time- based and service-related vesting criteria , there are no market or performance criteria associated with these awards . compensation expense recognized related to these awards was recorded in prior periods as part of annual cash bonus criteria . as of december 31 , 2011 , there were 753203 of these cash- payable restricted share units outstanding . 174 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards in 2011?
Answer: 52.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 39.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 91.0
Question: what was the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards in 2010?
Answer: 39.0
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2010 fair value, in percentage?
| 2.33333 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market price of and dividends on the registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . our class a common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cdish . 201d the high and low closing sale prices of our class a common stock during 2014 and 2013 on the nasdaq global select market ( as reported by nasdaq ) are set forth below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 62.42</td><td>$ 54.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second quarter</td><td>65.64</td><td>56.23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third quarter</td><td>66.71</td><td>61.87</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>79.41</td><td>57.96</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 38.02</td><td>$ 34.19</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>second quarter</td><td>42.52</td><td>36.24</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>third quarter</td><td>48.09</td><td>41.66</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>57.92</td><td>45.68</td></tr></table> as of february 13 , 2015 , there were approximately 8208 holders of record of our class a common stock , not including stockholders who beneficially own class a common stock held in nominee or street name . as of february 10 , 2015 , 213247004 of the 238435208 outstanding shares of our class b common stock were beneficially held by charles w . ergen , our chairman , and the remaining 25188204 were held in trusts established by mr . ergen for the benefit of his family . there is currently no trading market for our class b common stock . dividends . on december 28 , 2012 , we paid a cash dividend of $ 1.00 per share , or approximately $ 453 million , on our outstanding class a and class b common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on december 14 , 2012 . while we currently do not intend to declare additional dividends on our common stock , we may elect to do so from time to time . payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings and capital requirements , restrictions in our debt facilities , and other factors the board of directors considers appropriate . we currently intend to retain our earnings , if any , to support future growth and expansion , although we may repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time . see further discussion under 201citem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 liquidity and capital resources 201d in this annual report on form 10-k . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see 201citem 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters 201d in this annual report on form 10-k. .
Question: what is the price of class a common stock in the fourth quarter of 2014, taking into account the highest one?
| 79.41 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market price of and dividends on the registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . our class a common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cdish . 201d the high and low closing sale prices of our class a common stock during 2014 and 2013 on the nasdaq global select market ( as reported by nasdaq ) are set forth below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 62.42</td><td>$ 54.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second quarter</td><td>65.64</td><td>56.23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third quarter</td><td>66.71</td><td>61.87</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>79.41</td><td>57.96</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 38.02</td><td>$ 34.19</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>second quarter</td><td>42.52</td><td>36.24</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>third quarter</td><td>48.09</td><td>41.66</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>57.92</td><td>45.68</td></tr></table> as of february 13 , 2015 , there were approximately 8208 holders of record of our class a common stock , not including stockholders who beneficially own class a common stock held in nominee or street name . as of february 10 , 2015 , 213247004 of the 238435208 outstanding shares of our class b common stock were beneficially held by charles w . ergen , our chairman , and the remaining 25188204 were held in trusts established by mr . ergen for the benefit of his family . there is currently no trading market for our class b common stock . dividends . on december 28 , 2012 , we paid a cash dividend of $ 1.00 per share , or approximately $ 453 million , on our outstanding class a and class b common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on december 14 , 2012 . while we currently do not intend to declare additional dividends on our common stock , we may elect to do so from time to time . payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings and capital requirements , restrictions in our debt facilities , and other factors the board of directors considers appropriate . we currently intend to retain our earnings , if any , to support future growth and expansion , although we may repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time . see further discussion under 201citem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 liquidity and capital resources 201d in this annual report on form 10-k . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see 201citem 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters 201d in this annual report on form 10-k. .
Question: what is the price of class a common stock in the fourth quarter of 2014, taking into account the highest one?
Answer: 79.41
Question: what would that be of 2013?
| 57.92 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market price of and dividends on the registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . our class a common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cdish . 201d the high and low closing sale prices of our class a common stock during 2014 and 2013 on the nasdaq global select market ( as reported by nasdaq ) are set forth below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 62.42</td><td>$ 54.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second quarter</td><td>65.64</td><td>56.23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third quarter</td><td>66.71</td><td>61.87</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>79.41</td><td>57.96</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 38.02</td><td>$ 34.19</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>second quarter</td><td>42.52</td><td>36.24</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>third quarter</td><td>48.09</td><td>41.66</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>57.92</td><td>45.68</td></tr></table> as of february 13 , 2015 , there were approximately 8208 holders of record of our class a common stock , not including stockholders who beneficially own class a common stock held in nominee or street name . as of february 10 , 2015 , 213247004 of the 238435208 outstanding shares of our class b common stock were beneficially held by charles w . ergen , our chairman , and the remaining 25188204 were held in trusts established by mr . ergen for the benefit of his family . there is currently no trading market for our class b common stock . dividends . on december 28 , 2012 , we paid a cash dividend of $ 1.00 per share , or approximately $ 453 million , on our outstanding class a and class b common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on december 14 , 2012 . while we currently do not intend to declare additional dividends on our common stock , we may elect to do so from time to time . payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings and capital requirements , restrictions in our debt facilities , and other factors the board of directors considers appropriate . we currently intend to retain our earnings , if any , to support future growth and expansion , although we may repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time . see further discussion under 201citem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 liquidity and capital resources 201d in this annual report on form 10-k . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see 201citem 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters 201d in this annual report on form 10-k. .
Question: what is the price of class a common stock in the fourth quarter of 2014, taking into account the highest one?
Answer: 79.41
Question: what would that be of 2013?
Answer: 57.92
Question: what is, then, the difference between the prices of 2014 and 2013?
| 21.49 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market price of and dividends on the registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . our class a common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cdish . 201d the high and low closing sale prices of our class a common stock during 2014 and 2013 on the nasdaq global select market ( as reported by nasdaq ) are set forth below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 62.42</td><td>$ 54.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second quarter</td><td>65.64</td><td>56.23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third quarter</td><td>66.71</td><td>61.87</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>79.41</td><td>57.96</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 38.02</td><td>$ 34.19</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>second quarter</td><td>42.52</td><td>36.24</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>third quarter</td><td>48.09</td><td>41.66</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>57.92</td><td>45.68</td></tr></table> as of february 13 , 2015 , there were approximately 8208 holders of record of our class a common stock , not including stockholders who beneficially own class a common stock held in nominee or street name . as of february 10 , 2015 , 213247004 of the 238435208 outstanding shares of our class b common stock were beneficially held by charles w . ergen , our chairman , and the remaining 25188204 were held in trusts established by mr . ergen for the benefit of his family . there is currently no trading market for our class b common stock . dividends . on december 28 , 2012 , we paid a cash dividend of $ 1.00 per share , or approximately $ 453 million , on our outstanding class a and class b common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on december 14 , 2012 . while we currently do not intend to declare additional dividends on our common stock , we may elect to do so from time to time . payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings and capital requirements , restrictions in our debt facilities , and other factors the board of directors considers appropriate . we currently intend to retain our earnings , if any , to support future growth and expansion , although we may repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time . see further discussion under 201citem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 liquidity and capital resources 201d in this annual report on form 10-k . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see 201citem 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters 201d in this annual report on form 10-k. .
Question: what is the price of class a common stock in the fourth quarter of 2014, taking into account the highest one?
Answer: 79.41
Question: what would that be of 2013?
Answer: 57.92
Question: what is, then, the difference between the prices of 2014 and 2013?
Answer: 21.49
Question: what is the price of class a common stock in the fourth quarter of 2013, taking into account the highest one?
| 57.92 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market price of and dividends on the registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . our class a common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cdish . 201d the high and low closing sale prices of our class a common stock during 2014 and 2013 on the nasdaq global select market ( as reported by nasdaq ) are set forth below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 62.42</td><td>$ 54.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second quarter</td><td>65.64</td><td>56.23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third quarter</td><td>66.71</td><td>61.87</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>79.41</td><td>57.96</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 38.02</td><td>$ 34.19</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>second quarter</td><td>42.52</td><td>36.24</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>third quarter</td><td>48.09</td><td>41.66</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>57.92</td><td>45.68</td></tr></table> as of february 13 , 2015 , there were approximately 8208 holders of record of our class a common stock , not including stockholders who beneficially own class a common stock held in nominee or street name . as of february 10 , 2015 , 213247004 of the 238435208 outstanding shares of our class b common stock were beneficially held by charles w . ergen , our chairman , and the remaining 25188204 were held in trusts established by mr . ergen for the benefit of his family . there is currently no trading market for our class b common stock . dividends . on december 28 , 2012 , we paid a cash dividend of $ 1.00 per share , or approximately $ 453 million , on our outstanding class a and class b common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on december 14 , 2012 . while we currently do not intend to declare additional dividends on our common stock , we may elect to do so from time to time . payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings and capital requirements , restrictions in our debt facilities , and other factors the board of directors considers appropriate . we currently intend to retain our earnings , if any , to support future growth and expansion , although we may repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time . see further discussion under 201citem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 liquidity and capital resources 201d in this annual report on form 10-k . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see 201citem 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters 201d in this annual report on form 10-k. .
Question: what is the price of class a common stock in the fourth quarter of 2014, taking into account the highest one?
Answer: 79.41
Question: what would that be of 2013?
Answer: 57.92
Question: what is, then, the difference between the prices of 2014 and 2013?
Answer: 21.49
Question: what is the price of class a common stock in the fourth quarter of 2013, taking into account the highest one?
Answer: 57.92
Question: how much does that difference represent in relation to this price, percentually?
| 0.37103 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
26 | 2009 annual report in fiscal 2008 , revenues in the credit union systems and services business segment increased 14% ( 14 % ) from fiscal 2007 . all revenue components within the segment experienced growth during fiscal 2008 . license revenue generated the largest dollar growth in revenue as episys ae , our flagship core processing system aimed at larger credit unions , experienced strong sales throughout the year . support and service revenue , which is the largest component of total revenues for the credit union segment , experienced 34 percent growth in eft support and 10 percent growth in in-house support . gross profit in this business segment increased $ 9344 in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 , due primarily to the increase in license revenue , which carries the highest margins . liquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company 2019s cash and cash equivalents increased to $ 118251 at june 30 , 2009 from $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 103102</td><td>$ 104222</td><td>$ 104681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash expenses</td><td>74397</td><td>70420</td><td>56348</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in receivables</td><td>21214</td><td>-2913 ( 2913 )</td><td>-28853 ( 28853 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>change in deferred revenue</td><td>21943</td><td>5100</td><td>24576</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>change in other assets and liabilities</td><td>-14068 ( 14068 )</td><td>4172</td><td>17495</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 206588</td><td>$ 181001</td><td>$ 174247</td></tr></table> year ended june 30 , cash provided by operations increased $ 25587 to $ 206588 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2009 as compared to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 . this increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in receivables compared to the same period a year ago of $ 21214 . this decrease is largely the result of fiscal 2010 annual software maintenance billings being provided to customers earlier than in the prior year , which allowed more cash to be collected before the end of the fiscal year than in previous years . further , we collected more cash overall related to revenues that will be recognized in subsequent periods in the current year than in fiscal 2008 . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2009 was $ 59227 and includes $ 3027 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . capital expenditures for fiscal 2009 were $ 31562 compared to $ 31105 for fiscal 2008 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2009 was $ 24684 compared to $ 23736 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 94675 and includes the repurchase of 3106 shares of our common stock for $ 58405 , the payment of dividends of $ 26903 and $ 13489 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 3773 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock ( through the employee stock purchase plan ) and $ 348 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2008 , net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . beginning during fiscal 2008 , us financial markets and many of the largest us financial institutions have been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . since that time , these and other such developments have resulted in a broad , global economic downturn . while we , as is the case with most companies , have experienced the effects of this downturn , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collection efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity will be minimized by cash generated by recurring sources of revenue and due to our access to available lines of credit. .
Question: what is the change in the balance of cash and cash equivalents from 2008 to 2009?
| 52686.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
26 | 2009 annual report in fiscal 2008 , revenues in the credit union systems and services business segment increased 14% ( 14 % ) from fiscal 2007 . all revenue components within the segment experienced growth during fiscal 2008 . license revenue generated the largest dollar growth in revenue as episys ae , our flagship core processing system aimed at larger credit unions , experienced strong sales throughout the year . support and service revenue , which is the largest component of total revenues for the credit union segment , experienced 34 percent growth in eft support and 10 percent growth in in-house support . gross profit in this business segment increased $ 9344 in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 , due primarily to the increase in license revenue , which carries the highest margins . liquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company 2019s cash and cash equivalents increased to $ 118251 at june 30 , 2009 from $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009 2008</td><td>year ended june 30 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 103102</td><td>$ 104222</td><td>$ 104681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash expenses</td><td>74397</td><td>70420</td><td>56348</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in receivables</td><td>21214</td><td>-2913 ( 2913 )</td><td>-28853 ( 28853 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>change in deferred revenue</td><td>21943</td><td>5100</td><td>24576</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>change in other assets and liabilities</td><td>-14068 ( 14068 )</td><td>4172</td><td>17495</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 206588</td><td>$ 181001</td><td>$ 174247</td></tr></table> year ended june 30 , cash provided by operations increased $ 25587 to $ 206588 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2009 as compared to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 . this increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in receivables compared to the same period a year ago of $ 21214 . this decrease is largely the result of fiscal 2010 annual software maintenance billings being provided to customers earlier than in the prior year , which allowed more cash to be collected before the end of the fiscal year than in previous years . further , we collected more cash overall related to revenues that will be recognized in subsequent periods in the current year than in fiscal 2008 . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2009 was $ 59227 and includes $ 3027 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . capital expenditures for fiscal 2009 were $ 31562 compared to $ 31105 for fiscal 2008 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2009 was $ 24684 compared to $ 23736 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 94675 and includes the repurchase of 3106 shares of our common stock for $ 58405 , the payment of dividends of $ 26903 and $ 13489 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 3773 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock ( through the employee stock purchase plan ) and $ 348 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2008 , net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . beginning during fiscal 2008 , us financial markets and many of the largest us financial institutions have been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . since that time , these and other such developments have resulted in a broad , global economic downturn . while we , as is the case with most companies , have experienced the effects of this downturn , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collection efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity will be minimized by cash generated by recurring sources of revenue and due to our access to available lines of credit. .
Question: what is the change in the balance of cash and cash equivalents from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 52686.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.80357 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what is the net cash provided by operating activities in 2016?
| 21808.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what is the net cash provided by operating activities in 2016?
Answer: 21808.0
Question: what about in 2015?
| 19018.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what is the net cash provided by operating activities in 2016?
Answer: 21808.0
Question: what about in 2015?
Answer: 19018.0
Question: what is the difference?
| 2790.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what is the net cash provided by operating activities in 2016?
Answer: 21808.0
Question: what about in 2015?
Answer: 19018.0
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 2790.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.1467 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) company is currently unable to estimate the impact of the amount of such changes , if any , to previously recorded uncertain tax positions . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the year ending december 31 , 2007 is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 183953</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>2598</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>5412</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-120016 ( 120016 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash advance in connection with proposed settlement</td><td>-6682 ( 6682 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-5372 ( 5372 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions as a result of the lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-669 ( 669 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 59224</td></tr></table> during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company recorded penalties and tax-related interest income of $ 2.5 million and interest income from tax refunds of $ 1.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 and january 1 , 2007 , the total unrecognized tax benefits included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets was $ 29.6 million and $ 34.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2007 and january 1 , 2007 , the total amount of accrued income tax-related interest and penalties included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets was $ 30.7 million and $ 33.2 million , respectively . in the fourth quarter of 2007 , the company entered into a tax amnesty program with the mexican tax authority . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company had met all of the administrative requirements of the program , which enabled the company to recognize certain tax benefits . this was confirmed by the mexican tax authority on february 5 , 2008 . these benefits include a reduction of uncertain tax benefits of $ 5.4 million along with penalties and interest of $ 12.5 million related to 2002 , all of which reduced income tax expense . in connection with the above program , the company paid $ 6.7 million to the mexican tax authority as a settlement offer for other uncertain tax positions related to 2003 and 2004 . this offer is currently under review by the mexican tax authority ; the company cannot yet determine the specific timing or the amount of any potential settlement . during 2007 , the statute of limitations on certain unrecognized tax benefits lapsed , which resulted in a $ 0.7 million decrease in the liability for uncertain tax benefits , all of which reduced the income tax provision . the company files numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns , including u.s . federal and state tax returns and foreign tax returns in mexico and brazil . as a result of the company 2019s ability to carry forward federal and state net operating losses , the applicable tax years remain open to examination until three years after the applicable loss carryforwards have been used or expired . however , the company has completed u.s . federal income tax examinations for tax years up to and including 2002 . the company is currently undergoing u.s . federal income tax examinations for tax years 2004 and 2005 . additionally , it is subject to examinations in various u.s . state jurisdictions for certain tax years , and is under examination in brazil for the 2001 through 2006 tax years and mexico for the 2002 tax year . sfas no . 109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2007 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 88.2 million , including approximately .
Question: what was the change in the total amount of accrued income tax-related interest and penalties included in other long-term liabilities during 2007?
| -2.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) company is currently unable to estimate the impact of the amount of such changes , if any , to previously recorded uncertain tax positions . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the year ending december 31 , 2007 is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 183953</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>2598</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>5412</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-120016 ( 120016 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash advance in connection with proposed settlement</td><td>-6682 ( 6682 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-5372 ( 5372 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions as a result of the lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-669 ( 669 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 59224</td></tr></table> during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company recorded penalties and tax-related interest income of $ 2.5 million and interest income from tax refunds of $ 1.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 and january 1 , 2007 , the total unrecognized tax benefits included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets was $ 29.6 million and $ 34.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2007 and january 1 , 2007 , the total amount of accrued income tax-related interest and penalties included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets was $ 30.7 million and $ 33.2 million , respectively . in the fourth quarter of 2007 , the company entered into a tax amnesty program with the mexican tax authority . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company had met all of the administrative requirements of the program , which enabled the company to recognize certain tax benefits . this was confirmed by the mexican tax authority on february 5 , 2008 . these benefits include a reduction of uncertain tax benefits of $ 5.4 million along with penalties and interest of $ 12.5 million related to 2002 , all of which reduced income tax expense . in connection with the above program , the company paid $ 6.7 million to the mexican tax authority as a settlement offer for other uncertain tax positions related to 2003 and 2004 . this offer is currently under review by the mexican tax authority ; the company cannot yet determine the specific timing or the amount of any potential settlement . during 2007 , the statute of limitations on certain unrecognized tax benefits lapsed , which resulted in a $ 0.7 million decrease in the liability for uncertain tax benefits , all of which reduced the income tax provision . the company files numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns , including u.s . federal and state tax returns and foreign tax returns in mexico and brazil . as a result of the company 2019s ability to carry forward federal and state net operating losses , the applicable tax years remain open to examination until three years after the applicable loss carryforwards have been used or expired . however , the company has completed u.s . federal income tax examinations for tax years up to and including 2002 . the company is currently undergoing u.s . federal income tax examinations for tax years 2004 and 2005 . additionally , it is subject to examinations in various u.s . state jurisdictions for certain tax years , and is under examination in brazil for the 2001 through 2006 tax years and mexico for the 2002 tax year . sfas no . 109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2007 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 88.2 million , including approximately .
Question: what was the change in the total amount of accrued income tax-related interest and penalties included in other long-term liabilities during 2007?
Answer: -2.5
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to that total amount in the beginning of the year, in percentage?
| -0.0753 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
we prepare estimates of research and development costs for projects in clinical development , which include direct costs and allocations of certain costs such as indirect labor , non-cash compensation expense , and manufacturing and other costs related to activities that benefit multiple projects , and , under our collaboration with bayer healthcare , the portion of bayer healthcare 2019s vegf trap-eye development expenses that we are obligated to reimburse . our estimates of research and development costs for clinical development programs are shown below : project costs year ended december 31 , increase ( decrease ) ( in millions ) 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>project costs ( in millions )</td><td>project costs 2009</td><td>2008</td><td>( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>arcalyst ae</td><td>$ 67.7</td><td>$ 39.2</td><td>$ 28.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vegf trap-eye</td><td>109.8</td><td>82.7</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aflibercept</td><td>23.3</td><td>32.1</td><td>-8.8 ( 8.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>regn88</td><td>36.9</td><td>21.4</td><td>15.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other antibody candidates in clinical development</td><td>74.4</td><td>27.4</td><td>47.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other research programs & unallocated costs</td><td>86.7</td><td>72.1</td><td>14.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total research and development expenses</td><td>$ 398.8</td><td>$ 274.9</td><td>$ 123.9</td></tr></table> for the reasons described above in results of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , under the caption 201cresearch and development expenses 201d , and due to the variability in the costs necessary to develop a pharmaceutical product and the uncertainties related to future indications to be studied , the estimated cost and scope of the projects , and our ultimate ability to obtain governmental approval for commercialization , accurate and meaningful estimates of the total cost to bring our product candidates to market are not available . similarly , we are currently unable to reasonably estimate if our product candidates will generate material product revenues and net cash inflows . in 2008 , we received fda approval for arcalyst ae for the treatment of caps , a group of rare , inherited auto-inflammatory diseases that affect a very small group of people . we currently do not expect to generate material product revenues and net cash inflows from the sale of arcalyst ae for the treatment of caps . selling , general , and administrative expenses selling , general , and administrative expenses increased to $ 52.9 million in 2009 from $ 48.9 million in 2008 . in 2009 , we incurred ( i ) higher compensation expense , ( ii ) higher patent-related costs , ( iii ) higher facility-related costs due primarily to increases in administrative headcount , and ( iv ) higher patient assistance costs related to arcalyst ae . these increases were partly offset by ( i ) lower marketing costs related to arcalyst ae , ( ii ) a decrease in administrative recruitment costs , and ( iii ) lower professional fees related to various corporate matters . cost of goods sold during 2008 , we began recognizing revenue and cost of goods sold from net product sales of arcalyst ae . cost of goods sold in 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.7 million and $ 0.9 million , respectively , and consisted primarily of royalties and other period costs related to arcalyst ae commercial supplies . in 2009 and 2008 , arcalyst ae shipments to our customers consisted of supplies of inventory manufactured and expensed as research and development costs prior to fda approval in 2008 ; therefore , the costs of these supplies were not included in costs of goods sold . other income and expense investment income decreased to $ 4.5 million in 2009 from $ 18.2 million in 2008 , due primarily to lower yields on , and lower balances of , cash and marketable securities . in addition , in 2009 and 2008 , deterioration in the credit quality of specific marketable securities in our investment portfolio subjected us to the risk of not being able to recover these securities 2019 carrying values . as a result , in 2009 and 2008 , we recognized charges of $ 0.1 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively , related to these securities , which we considered to be other than temporarily impaired . in 2009 and 2008 , these charges were either wholly or partly offset by realized gains of $ 0.2 million and $ 1.2 million , respectively , on sales of marketable securities during the year. .
Question: what were the research and development costs related to vegf trap-eye in 2009?
| 27.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
we prepare estimates of research and development costs for projects in clinical development , which include direct costs and allocations of certain costs such as indirect labor , non-cash compensation expense , and manufacturing and other costs related to activities that benefit multiple projects , and , under our collaboration with bayer healthcare , the portion of bayer healthcare 2019s vegf trap-eye development expenses that we are obligated to reimburse . our estimates of research and development costs for clinical development programs are shown below : project costs year ended december 31 , increase ( decrease ) ( in millions ) 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>project costs ( in millions )</td><td>project costs 2009</td><td>2008</td><td>( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>arcalyst ae</td><td>$ 67.7</td><td>$ 39.2</td><td>$ 28.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vegf trap-eye</td><td>109.8</td><td>82.7</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aflibercept</td><td>23.3</td><td>32.1</td><td>-8.8 ( 8.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>regn88</td><td>36.9</td><td>21.4</td><td>15.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other antibody candidates in clinical development</td><td>74.4</td><td>27.4</td><td>47.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other research programs & unallocated costs</td><td>86.7</td><td>72.1</td><td>14.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total research and development expenses</td><td>$ 398.8</td><td>$ 274.9</td><td>$ 123.9</td></tr></table> for the reasons described above in results of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , under the caption 201cresearch and development expenses 201d , and due to the variability in the costs necessary to develop a pharmaceutical product and the uncertainties related to future indications to be studied , the estimated cost and scope of the projects , and our ultimate ability to obtain governmental approval for commercialization , accurate and meaningful estimates of the total cost to bring our product candidates to market are not available . similarly , we are currently unable to reasonably estimate if our product candidates will generate material product revenues and net cash inflows . in 2008 , we received fda approval for arcalyst ae for the treatment of caps , a group of rare , inherited auto-inflammatory diseases that affect a very small group of people . we currently do not expect to generate material product revenues and net cash inflows from the sale of arcalyst ae for the treatment of caps . selling , general , and administrative expenses selling , general , and administrative expenses increased to $ 52.9 million in 2009 from $ 48.9 million in 2008 . in 2009 , we incurred ( i ) higher compensation expense , ( ii ) higher patent-related costs , ( iii ) higher facility-related costs due primarily to increases in administrative headcount , and ( iv ) higher patient assistance costs related to arcalyst ae . these increases were partly offset by ( i ) lower marketing costs related to arcalyst ae , ( ii ) a decrease in administrative recruitment costs , and ( iii ) lower professional fees related to various corporate matters . cost of goods sold during 2008 , we began recognizing revenue and cost of goods sold from net product sales of arcalyst ae . cost of goods sold in 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.7 million and $ 0.9 million , respectively , and consisted primarily of royalties and other period costs related to arcalyst ae commercial supplies . in 2009 and 2008 , arcalyst ae shipments to our customers consisted of supplies of inventory manufactured and expensed as research and development costs prior to fda approval in 2008 ; therefore , the costs of these supplies were not included in costs of goods sold . other income and expense investment income decreased to $ 4.5 million in 2009 from $ 18.2 million in 2008 , due primarily to lower yields on , and lower balances of , cash and marketable securities . in addition , in 2009 and 2008 , deterioration in the credit quality of specific marketable securities in our investment portfolio subjected us to the risk of not being able to recover these securities 2019 carrying values . as a result , in 2009 and 2008 , we recognized charges of $ 0.1 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively , related to these securities , which we considered to be other than temporarily impaired . in 2009 and 2008 , these charges were either wholly or partly offset by realized gains of $ 0.2 million and $ 1.2 million , respectively , on sales of marketable securities during the year. .
Question: what were the research and development costs related to vegf trap-eye in 2009?
Answer: 27.1
Question: and what were they in 2008?
| 82.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
we prepare estimates of research and development costs for projects in clinical development , which include direct costs and allocations of certain costs such as indirect labor , non-cash compensation expense , and manufacturing and other costs related to activities that benefit multiple projects , and , under our collaboration with bayer healthcare , the portion of bayer healthcare 2019s vegf trap-eye development expenses that we are obligated to reimburse . our estimates of research and development costs for clinical development programs are shown below : project costs year ended december 31 , increase ( decrease ) ( in millions ) 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>project costs ( in millions )</td><td>project costs 2009</td><td>2008</td><td>( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>arcalyst ae</td><td>$ 67.7</td><td>$ 39.2</td><td>$ 28.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vegf trap-eye</td><td>109.8</td><td>82.7</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aflibercept</td><td>23.3</td><td>32.1</td><td>-8.8 ( 8.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>regn88</td><td>36.9</td><td>21.4</td><td>15.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other antibody candidates in clinical development</td><td>74.4</td><td>27.4</td><td>47.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other research programs & unallocated costs</td><td>86.7</td><td>72.1</td><td>14.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total research and development expenses</td><td>$ 398.8</td><td>$ 274.9</td><td>$ 123.9</td></tr></table> for the reasons described above in results of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , under the caption 201cresearch and development expenses 201d , and due to the variability in the costs necessary to develop a pharmaceutical product and the uncertainties related to future indications to be studied , the estimated cost and scope of the projects , and our ultimate ability to obtain governmental approval for commercialization , accurate and meaningful estimates of the total cost to bring our product candidates to market are not available . similarly , we are currently unable to reasonably estimate if our product candidates will generate material product revenues and net cash inflows . in 2008 , we received fda approval for arcalyst ae for the treatment of caps , a group of rare , inherited auto-inflammatory diseases that affect a very small group of people . we currently do not expect to generate material product revenues and net cash inflows from the sale of arcalyst ae for the treatment of caps . selling , general , and administrative expenses selling , general , and administrative expenses increased to $ 52.9 million in 2009 from $ 48.9 million in 2008 . in 2009 , we incurred ( i ) higher compensation expense , ( ii ) higher patent-related costs , ( iii ) higher facility-related costs due primarily to increases in administrative headcount , and ( iv ) higher patient assistance costs related to arcalyst ae . these increases were partly offset by ( i ) lower marketing costs related to arcalyst ae , ( ii ) a decrease in administrative recruitment costs , and ( iii ) lower professional fees related to various corporate matters . cost of goods sold during 2008 , we began recognizing revenue and cost of goods sold from net product sales of arcalyst ae . cost of goods sold in 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.7 million and $ 0.9 million , respectively , and consisted primarily of royalties and other period costs related to arcalyst ae commercial supplies . in 2009 and 2008 , arcalyst ae shipments to our customers consisted of supplies of inventory manufactured and expensed as research and development costs prior to fda approval in 2008 ; therefore , the costs of these supplies were not included in costs of goods sold . other income and expense investment income decreased to $ 4.5 million in 2009 from $ 18.2 million in 2008 , due primarily to lower yields on , and lower balances of , cash and marketable securities . in addition , in 2009 and 2008 , deterioration in the credit quality of specific marketable securities in our investment portfolio subjected us to the risk of not being able to recover these securities 2019 carrying values . as a result , in 2009 and 2008 , we recognized charges of $ 0.1 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively , related to these securities , which we considered to be other than temporarily impaired . in 2009 and 2008 , these charges were either wholly or partly offset by realized gains of $ 0.2 million and $ 1.2 million , respectively , on sales of marketable securities during the year. .
Question: what were the research and development costs related to vegf trap-eye in 2009?
Answer: 27.1
Question: and what were they in 2008?
Answer: 82.7
Question: how much, then, did the 2009 costs represent in relation to these 2008 ones?
| 0.32769 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
we prepare estimates of research and development costs for projects in clinical development , which include direct costs and allocations of certain costs such as indirect labor , non-cash compensation expense , and manufacturing and other costs related to activities that benefit multiple projects , and , under our collaboration with bayer healthcare , the portion of bayer healthcare 2019s vegf trap-eye development expenses that we are obligated to reimburse . our estimates of research and development costs for clinical development programs are shown below : project costs year ended december 31 , increase ( decrease ) ( in millions ) 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>project costs ( in millions )</td><td>project costs 2009</td><td>2008</td><td>( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>arcalyst ae</td><td>$ 67.7</td><td>$ 39.2</td><td>$ 28.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vegf trap-eye</td><td>109.8</td><td>82.7</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aflibercept</td><td>23.3</td><td>32.1</td><td>-8.8 ( 8.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>regn88</td><td>36.9</td><td>21.4</td><td>15.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other antibody candidates in clinical development</td><td>74.4</td><td>27.4</td><td>47.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other research programs & unallocated costs</td><td>86.7</td><td>72.1</td><td>14.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total research and development expenses</td><td>$ 398.8</td><td>$ 274.9</td><td>$ 123.9</td></tr></table> for the reasons described above in results of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , under the caption 201cresearch and development expenses 201d , and due to the variability in the costs necessary to develop a pharmaceutical product and the uncertainties related to future indications to be studied , the estimated cost and scope of the projects , and our ultimate ability to obtain governmental approval for commercialization , accurate and meaningful estimates of the total cost to bring our product candidates to market are not available . similarly , we are currently unable to reasonably estimate if our product candidates will generate material product revenues and net cash inflows . in 2008 , we received fda approval for arcalyst ae for the treatment of caps , a group of rare , inherited auto-inflammatory diseases that affect a very small group of people . we currently do not expect to generate material product revenues and net cash inflows from the sale of arcalyst ae for the treatment of caps . selling , general , and administrative expenses selling , general , and administrative expenses increased to $ 52.9 million in 2009 from $ 48.9 million in 2008 . in 2009 , we incurred ( i ) higher compensation expense , ( ii ) higher patent-related costs , ( iii ) higher facility-related costs due primarily to increases in administrative headcount , and ( iv ) higher patient assistance costs related to arcalyst ae . these increases were partly offset by ( i ) lower marketing costs related to arcalyst ae , ( ii ) a decrease in administrative recruitment costs , and ( iii ) lower professional fees related to various corporate matters . cost of goods sold during 2008 , we began recognizing revenue and cost of goods sold from net product sales of arcalyst ae . cost of goods sold in 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.7 million and $ 0.9 million , respectively , and consisted primarily of royalties and other period costs related to arcalyst ae commercial supplies . in 2009 and 2008 , arcalyst ae shipments to our customers consisted of supplies of inventory manufactured and expensed as research and development costs prior to fda approval in 2008 ; therefore , the costs of these supplies were not included in costs of goods sold . other income and expense investment income decreased to $ 4.5 million in 2009 from $ 18.2 million in 2008 , due primarily to lower yields on , and lower balances of , cash and marketable securities . in addition , in 2009 and 2008 , deterioration in the credit quality of specific marketable securities in our investment portfolio subjected us to the risk of not being able to recover these securities 2019 carrying values . as a result , in 2009 and 2008 , we recognized charges of $ 0.1 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively , related to these securities , which we considered to be other than temporarily impaired . in 2009 and 2008 , these charges were either wholly or partly offset by realized gains of $ 0.2 million and $ 1.2 million , respectively , on sales of marketable securities during the year. .
Question: what were the research and development costs related to vegf trap-eye in 2009?
Answer: 27.1
Question: and what were they in 2008?
Answer: 82.7
Question: how much, then, did the 2009 costs represent in relation to these 2008 ones?
Answer: 0.32769
Question: and for those same years, what was that ratio for the research and development costs related to arcalyst ae?
| 0.72704 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
security ownership of 5% ( 5 % ) holders , directors , nominees and executive officers shares of common stock percent of common stock name of beneficial owner beneficially owned ( 1 ) outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>name of beneficial owner</td><td>shares of common stock beneficially owned ( 1 )</td><td>-</td><td>percent of common stock outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity investments</td><td>56583870</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>6.49% ( 6.49 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>steven p . jobs</td><td>5546451</td><td>-</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>william v . campbell</td><td>112900</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>timothy d . cook</td><td>13327</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>millard s . drexler</td><td>230000</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tony fadell</td><td>288702</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>albert a . gore jr .</td><td>70000</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ronald b . johnson</td><td>1450620</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>arthur d . levinson</td><td>365015</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>peter oppenheimer</td><td>14873</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>eric e . schmidt</td><td>12284</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>jerome b . york</td><td>90000</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons )</td><td>8352396</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>1.00% ( 1.00 % )</td></tr></table> all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons ) 8352396 ( 13 ) 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) ( 1 ) represents shares of the company 2019s common stock held and options held by such individuals that were exercisable at the table date or within 60 days thereafter . this does not include options or restricted stock units that vest more than 60 days after the table date . ( 2 ) based on a form 13g/a filed february 14 , 2007 by fmr corp . fmr corp . lists its address as 82 devonshire street , boston , ma 02109 , in such filing . ( 3 ) includes 110000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . campbell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 4 ) excludes 600000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 5 ) includes 40000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . drexler holds indirectly and 190000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . drexler has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 6 ) includes 275 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell holds indirectly , 165875 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days after the table date , 1157 shares of the company 2019s common stock held by mr . fadell 2019s spouse , and 117375 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell 2019s spouse has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days after the table date . excludes 210000 unvested restricted stock units held by mr . fadell and 40000 unvested restricted stock units held by mr . fadell 2019s spouse . ( 7 ) consists of 70000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . gore has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 8 ) includes 1300000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . johnson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 9 ) includes 2000 shares of the company 2019s common stock held by dr . levinson 2019s spouse and 110000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that dr . levinson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 10 ) excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units. .
Question: what is the sum of total executive shares owned plus the unvested shares of mr. johnson?
| 8802396.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
security ownership of 5% ( 5 % ) holders , directors , nominees and executive officers shares of common stock percent of common stock name of beneficial owner beneficially owned ( 1 ) outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>name of beneficial owner</td><td>shares of common stock beneficially owned ( 1 )</td><td>-</td><td>percent of common stock outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity investments</td><td>56583870</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>6.49% ( 6.49 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>steven p . jobs</td><td>5546451</td><td>-</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>william v . campbell</td><td>112900</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>timothy d . cook</td><td>13327</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>millard s . drexler</td><td>230000</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tony fadell</td><td>288702</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>albert a . gore jr .</td><td>70000</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ronald b . johnson</td><td>1450620</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>arthur d . levinson</td><td>365015</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>peter oppenheimer</td><td>14873</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>eric e . schmidt</td><td>12284</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>jerome b . york</td><td>90000</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons )</td><td>8352396</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>1.00% ( 1.00 % )</td></tr></table> all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons ) 8352396 ( 13 ) 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) ( 1 ) represents shares of the company 2019s common stock held and options held by such individuals that were exercisable at the table date or within 60 days thereafter . this does not include options or restricted stock units that vest more than 60 days after the table date . ( 2 ) based on a form 13g/a filed february 14 , 2007 by fmr corp . fmr corp . lists its address as 82 devonshire street , boston , ma 02109 , in such filing . ( 3 ) includes 110000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . campbell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 4 ) excludes 600000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 5 ) includes 40000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . drexler holds indirectly and 190000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . drexler has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 6 ) includes 275 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell holds indirectly , 165875 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days after the table date , 1157 shares of the company 2019s common stock held by mr . fadell 2019s spouse , and 117375 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell 2019s spouse has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days after the table date . excludes 210000 unvested restricted stock units held by mr . fadell and 40000 unvested restricted stock units held by mr . fadell 2019s spouse . ( 7 ) consists of 70000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . gore has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 8 ) includes 1300000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . johnson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 9 ) includes 2000 shares of the company 2019s common stock held by dr . levinson 2019s spouse and 110000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that dr . levinson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 10 ) excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units. .
Question: what is the sum of total executive shares owned plus the unvested shares of mr. johnson?
Answer: 8802396.0
Question: what are the total of unvested shares of mr. johnson?
| 450000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
security ownership of 5% ( 5 % ) holders , directors , nominees and executive officers shares of common stock percent of common stock name of beneficial owner beneficially owned ( 1 ) outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>name of beneficial owner</td><td>shares of common stock beneficially owned ( 1 )</td><td>-</td><td>percent of common stock outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity investments</td><td>56583870</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>6.49% ( 6.49 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>steven p . jobs</td><td>5546451</td><td>-</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>william v . campbell</td><td>112900</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>timothy d . cook</td><td>13327</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>millard s . drexler</td><td>230000</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tony fadell</td><td>288702</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>albert a . gore jr .</td><td>70000</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ronald b . johnson</td><td>1450620</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>arthur d . levinson</td><td>365015</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>peter oppenheimer</td><td>14873</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>eric e . schmidt</td><td>12284</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>jerome b . york</td><td>90000</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons )</td><td>8352396</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>1.00% ( 1.00 % )</td></tr></table> all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons ) 8352396 ( 13 ) 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) ( 1 ) represents shares of the company 2019s common stock held and options held by such individuals that were exercisable at the table date or within 60 days thereafter . this does not include options or restricted stock units that vest more than 60 days after the table date . ( 2 ) based on a form 13g/a filed february 14 , 2007 by fmr corp . fmr corp . lists its address as 82 devonshire street , boston , ma 02109 , in such filing . ( 3 ) includes 110000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . campbell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 4 ) excludes 600000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 5 ) includes 40000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . drexler holds indirectly and 190000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . drexler has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 6 ) includes 275 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell holds indirectly , 165875 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days after the table date , 1157 shares of the company 2019s common stock held by mr . fadell 2019s spouse , and 117375 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell 2019s spouse has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days after the table date . excludes 210000 unvested restricted stock units held by mr . fadell and 40000 unvested restricted stock units held by mr . fadell 2019s spouse . ( 7 ) consists of 70000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . gore has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 8 ) includes 1300000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . johnson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 9 ) includes 2000 shares of the company 2019s common stock held by dr . levinson 2019s spouse and 110000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that dr . levinson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 10 ) excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units. .
Question: what is the sum of total executive shares owned plus the unvested shares of mr. johnson?
Answer: 8802396.0
Question: what are the total of unvested shares of mr. johnson?
Answer: 450000.0
Question: what is the total shared owned plus total unvested shares?
| 9252396.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
security ownership of 5% ( 5 % ) holders , directors , nominees and executive officers shares of common stock percent of common stock name of beneficial owner beneficially owned ( 1 ) outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>name of beneficial owner</td><td>shares of common stock beneficially owned ( 1 )</td><td>-</td><td>percent of common stock outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity investments</td><td>56583870</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>6.49% ( 6.49 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>steven p . jobs</td><td>5546451</td><td>-</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>william v . campbell</td><td>112900</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>timothy d . cook</td><td>13327</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>millard s . drexler</td><td>230000</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tony fadell</td><td>288702</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>albert a . gore jr .</td><td>70000</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ronald b . johnson</td><td>1450620</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>arthur d . levinson</td><td>365015</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>peter oppenheimer</td><td>14873</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>eric e . schmidt</td><td>12284</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>jerome b . york</td><td>90000</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons )</td><td>8352396</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>1.00% ( 1.00 % )</td></tr></table> all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons ) 8352396 ( 13 ) 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) ( 1 ) represents shares of the company 2019s common stock held and options held by such individuals that were exercisable at the table date or within 60 days thereafter . this does not include options or restricted stock units that vest more than 60 days after the table date . ( 2 ) based on a form 13g/a filed february 14 , 2007 by fmr corp . fmr corp . lists its address as 82 devonshire street , boston , ma 02109 , in such filing . ( 3 ) includes 110000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . campbell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 4 ) excludes 600000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 5 ) includes 40000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . drexler holds indirectly and 190000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . drexler has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 6 ) includes 275 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell holds indirectly , 165875 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days after the table date , 1157 shares of the company 2019s common stock held by mr . fadell 2019s spouse , and 117375 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell 2019s spouse has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days after the table date . excludes 210000 unvested restricted stock units held by mr . fadell and 40000 unvested restricted stock units held by mr . fadell 2019s spouse . ( 7 ) consists of 70000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . gore has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 8 ) includes 1300000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . johnson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 9 ) includes 2000 shares of the company 2019s common stock held by dr . levinson 2019s spouse and 110000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that dr . levinson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 10 ) excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units. .
Question: what is the sum of total executive shares owned plus the unvested shares of mr. johnson?
Answer: 8802396.0
Question: what are the total of unvested shares of mr. johnson?
Answer: 450000.0
Question: what is the total shared owned plus total unvested shares?
Answer: 9252396.0
Question: what are the unvested shares by mr. fadell?
| 210000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
security ownership of 5% ( 5 % ) holders , directors , nominees and executive officers shares of common stock percent of common stock name of beneficial owner beneficially owned ( 1 ) outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>name of beneficial owner</td><td>shares of common stock beneficially owned ( 1 )</td><td>-</td><td>percent of common stock outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity investments</td><td>56583870</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>6.49% ( 6.49 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>steven p . jobs</td><td>5546451</td><td>-</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>william v . campbell</td><td>112900</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>timothy d . cook</td><td>13327</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>millard s . drexler</td><td>230000</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tony fadell</td><td>288702</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>albert a . gore jr .</td><td>70000</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ronald b . johnson</td><td>1450620</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>arthur d . levinson</td><td>365015</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>peter oppenheimer</td><td>14873</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>eric e . schmidt</td><td>12284</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>jerome b . york</td><td>90000</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons )</td><td>8352396</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>1.00% ( 1.00 % )</td></tr></table> all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons ) 8352396 ( 13 ) 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) ( 1 ) represents shares of the company 2019s common stock held and options held by such individuals that were exercisable at the table date or within 60 days thereafter . this does not include options or restricted stock units that vest more than 60 days after the table date . ( 2 ) based on a form 13g/a filed february 14 , 2007 by fmr corp . fmr corp . lists its address as 82 devonshire street , boston , ma 02109 , in such filing . ( 3 ) includes 110000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . campbell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 4 ) excludes 600000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 5 ) includes 40000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . drexler holds indirectly and 190000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . drexler has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 6 ) includes 275 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell holds indirectly , 165875 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days after the table date , 1157 shares of the company 2019s common stock held by mr . fadell 2019s spouse , and 117375 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell 2019s spouse has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days after the table date . excludes 210000 unvested restricted stock units held by mr . fadell and 40000 unvested restricted stock units held by mr . fadell 2019s spouse . ( 7 ) consists of 70000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . gore has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 8 ) includes 1300000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . johnson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units . ( 9 ) includes 2000 shares of the company 2019s common stock held by dr . levinson 2019s spouse and 110000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that dr . levinson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 10 ) excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units. .
Question: what is the sum of total executive shares owned plus the unvested shares of mr. johnson?
Answer: 8802396.0
Question: what are the total of unvested shares of mr. johnson?
Answer: 450000.0
Question: what is the total shared owned plus total unvested shares?
Answer: 9252396.0
Question: what are the unvested shares by mr. fadell?
Answer: 210000.0
Question: what is the total sum?
| 9462396.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc verdicts have been appealed , there remains a risk that such relief may not be obtainable in all cases . this risk has been substantially reduced given that 47 states and puerto rico limit the dollar amount of bonds or require no bond at all . as discussed below , however , tobacco litigation plaintiffs have challenged the constitutionality of florida 2019s bond cap statute in several cases and plaintiffs may challenge state bond cap statutes in other jurisdictions as well . such challenges may include the applicability of state bond caps in federal court . states , including florida , may also seek to repeal or alter bond cap statutes through legislation . although altria group , inc . cannot predict the outcome of such challenges , it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome of one or more such challenges . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when they determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , except to the extent discussed elsewhere in this note 18 . contingencies : ( i ) management has concluded that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , management has not provided any amounts in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes , if any . litigation defense costs are expensed as incurred . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries have achieved substantial success in managing litigation . nevertheless , litigation is subject to uncertainty and significant challenges remain . it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation . altria group , inc . and each of its subsidiaries named as a defendant believe , and each has been so advised by counsel handling the respective cases , that it has valid defenses to the litigation pending against it , as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts . each of the companies has defended , and will continue to defend , vigorously against litigation challenges . however , altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions in particular cases if they believe it is in the best interests of altria group , inc . to do so . overview of altria group , inc . and/or pm usa tobacco- related litigation types and number of cases : claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories : ( i ) smoking and health cases alleging personal injury brought on behalf of individual plaintiffs ; ( ii ) smoking and health cases primarily alleging personal injury or seeking court-supervised programs for ongoing medical monitoring and purporting to be brought on behalf of a class of individual plaintiffs , including cases in which the aggregated claims of a number of individual plaintiffs are to be tried in a single proceeding ; ( iii ) health care cost recovery cases brought by governmental ( both domestic and foreign ) plaintiffs seeking reimbursement for health care expenditures allegedly caused by cigarette smoking and/or disgorgement of profits ; ( iv ) class action suits alleging that the uses of the terms 201clights 201d and 201cultra lights 201d constitute deceptive and unfair trade practices , common law or statutory fraud , unjust enrichment , breach of warranty or violations of the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act ( 201crico 201d ) ; and ( v ) other tobacco-related litigation described below . plaintiffs 2019 theories of recovery and the defenses raised in pending smoking and health , health care cost recovery and 201clights/ultra lights 201d cases are discussed below . the table below lists the number of certain tobacco-related cases pending in the united states against pm usa and , in some instances , altria group , inc . as of december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>individual smoking and health cases ( 1 )</td><td>92</td><td>70</td><td>65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation ( 2 )</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>health care cost recovery actions ( 3 )</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions</td><td>3</td><td>8</td><td>11</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include 2414 cases brought by flight attendants seeking compensatory damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke ( 201cets 201d ) . the flight attendants allege that they are members of an ets smoking and health class action in florida , which was settled in 1997 ( broin ) . the terms of the court-approved settlement in that case allowed class members to file individual lawsuits seeking compensatory damages , but prohibited them from seeking punitive damages . also , does not include individual smoking and health cases brought by or on behalf of plaintiffs in florida state and federal courts following the decertification of the engle case ( discussed below in smoking and health litigation - engle class action ) . ( 2 ) includes as one case the 30 civil actions that were to be tried in six consolidated trials in west virginia ( in re : tobacco litigation ) . pm usa is a defendant in nine of the 30 cases . the parties have agreed to resolve the cases for an immaterial amount and have so notified the court . ( 3 ) see health care cost recovery litigation - federal government 2019s lawsuit below . international tobacco-related cases : as of january 29 , 2018 , pm usa is a named defendant in 10 health care cost recovery actions in canada , eight of which also name altria group , inc . as a defendant . pm usa and altria group , inc . are also named defendants in seven smoking and health class actions filed in various canadian provinces . see guarantees and other similar matters below for a discussion of the distribution agreement between altria group , inc . and pmi that provides for indemnities for certain liabilities concerning tobacco products. .
Question: what are the number of individual smoking and health cases in 2016?
| 70.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc verdicts have been appealed , there remains a risk that such relief may not be obtainable in all cases . this risk has been substantially reduced given that 47 states and puerto rico limit the dollar amount of bonds or require no bond at all . as discussed below , however , tobacco litigation plaintiffs have challenged the constitutionality of florida 2019s bond cap statute in several cases and plaintiffs may challenge state bond cap statutes in other jurisdictions as well . such challenges may include the applicability of state bond caps in federal court . states , including florida , may also seek to repeal or alter bond cap statutes through legislation . although altria group , inc . cannot predict the outcome of such challenges , it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome of one or more such challenges . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when they determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , except to the extent discussed elsewhere in this note 18 . contingencies : ( i ) management has concluded that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , management has not provided any amounts in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes , if any . litigation defense costs are expensed as incurred . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries have achieved substantial success in managing litigation . nevertheless , litigation is subject to uncertainty and significant challenges remain . it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation . altria group , inc . and each of its subsidiaries named as a defendant believe , and each has been so advised by counsel handling the respective cases , that it has valid defenses to the litigation pending against it , as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts . each of the companies has defended , and will continue to defend , vigorously against litigation challenges . however , altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions in particular cases if they believe it is in the best interests of altria group , inc . to do so . overview of altria group , inc . and/or pm usa tobacco- related litigation types and number of cases : claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories : ( i ) smoking and health cases alleging personal injury brought on behalf of individual plaintiffs ; ( ii ) smoking and health cases primarily alleging personal injury or seeking court-supervised programs for ongoing medical monitoring and purporting to be brought on behalf of a class of individual plaintiffs , including cases in which the aggregated claims of a number of individual plaintiffs are to be tried in a single proceeding ; ( iii ) health care cost recovery cases brought by governmental ( both domestic and foreign ) plaintiffs seeking reimbursement for health care expenditures allegedly caused by cigarette smoking and/or disgorgement of profits ; ( iv ) class action suits alleging that the uses of the terms 201clights 201d and 201cultra lights 201d constitute deceptive and unfair trade practices , common law or statutory fraud , unjust enrichment , breach of warranty or violations of the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act ( 201crico 201d ) ; and ( v ) other tobacco-related litigation described below . plaintiffs 2019 theories of recovery and the defenses raised in pending smoking and health , health care cost recovery and 201clights/ultra lights 201d cases are discussed below . the table below lists the number of certain tobacco-related cases pending in the united states against pm usa and , in some instances , altria group , inc . as of december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>individual smoking and health cases ( 1 )</td><td>92</td><td>70</td><td>65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation ( 2 )</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>health care cost recovery actions ( 3 )</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions</td><td>3</td><td>8</td><td>11</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include 2414 cases brought by flight attendants seeking compensatory damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke ( 201cets 201d ) . the flight attendants allege that they are members of an ets smoking and health class action in florida , which was settled in 1997 ( broin ) . the terms of the court-approved settlement in that case allowed class members to file individual lawsuits seeking compensatory damages , but prohibited them from seeking punitive damages . also , does not include individual smoking and health cases brought by or on behalf of plaintiffs in florida state and federal courts following the decertification of the engle case ( discussed below in smoking and health litigation - engle class action ) . ( 2 ) includes as one case the 30 civil actions that were to be tried in six consolidated trials in west virginia ( in re : tobacco litigation ) . pm usa is a defendant in nine of the 30 cases . the parties have agreed to resolve the cases for an immaterial amount and have so notified the court . ( 3 ) see health care cost recovery litigation - federal government 2019s lawsuit below . international tobacco-related cases : as of january 29 , 2018 , pm usa is a named defendant in 10 health care cost recovery actions in canada , eight of which also name altria group , inc . as a defendant . pm usa and altria group , inc . are also named defendants in seven smoking and health class actions filed in various canadian provinces . see guarantees and other similar matters below for a discussion of the distribution agreement between altria group , inc . and pmi that provides for indemnities for certain liabilities concerning tobacco products. .
Question: what are the number of individual smoking and health cases in 2016?
Answer: 70.0
Question: what are the number of smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation in 2016?
| 5.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc verdicts have been appealed , there remains a risk that such relief may not be obtainable in all cases . this risk has been substantially reduced given that 47 states and puerto rico limit the dollar amount of bonds or require no bond at all . as discussed below , however , tobacco litigation plaintiffs have challenged the constitutionality of florida 2019s bond cap statute in several cases and plaintiffs may challenge state bond cap statutes in other jurisdictions as well . such challenges may include the applicability of state bond caps in federal court . states , including florida , may also seek to repeal or alter bond cap statutes through legislation . although altria group , inc . cannot predict the outcome of such challenges , it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome of one or more such challenges . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when they determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , except to the extent discussed elsewhere in this note 18 . contingencies : ( i ) management has concluded that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , management has not provided any amounts in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes , if any . litigation defense costs are expensed as incurred . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries have achieved substantial success in managing litigation . nevertheless , litigation is subject to uncertainty and significant challenges remain . it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation . altria group , inc . and each of its subsidiaries named as a defendant believe , and each has been so advised by counsel handling the respective cases , that it has valid defenses to the litigation pending against it , as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts . each of the companies has defended , and will continue to defend , vigorously against litigation challenges . however , altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions in particular cases if they believe it is in the best interests of altria group , inc . to do so . overview of altria group , inc . and/or pm usa tobacco- related litigation types and number of cases : claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories : ( i ) smoking and health cases alleging personal injury brought on behalf of individual plaintiffs ; ( ii ) smoking and health cases primarily alleging personal injury or seeking court-supervised programs for ongoing medical monitoring and purporting to be brought on behalf of a class of individual plaintiffs , including cases in which the aggregated claims of a number of individual plaintiffs are to be tried in a single proceeding ; ( iii ) health care cost recovery cases brought by governmental ( both domestic and foreign ) plaintiffs seeking reimbursement for health care expenditures allegedly caused by cigarette smoking and/or disgorgement of profits ; ( iv ) class action suits alleging that the uses of the terms 201clights 201d and 201cultra lights 201d constitute deceptive and unfair trade practices , common law or statutory fraud , unjust enrichment , breach of warranty or violations of the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act ( 201crico 201d ) ; and ( v ) other tobacco-related litigation described below . plaintiffs 2019 theories of recovery and the defenses raised in pending smoking and health , health care cost recovery and 201clights/ultra lights 201d cases are discussed below . the table below lists the number of certain tobacco-related cases pending in the united states against pm usa and , in some instances , altria group , inc . as of december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>individual smoking and health cases ( 1 )</td><td>92</td><td>70</td><td>65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation ( 2 )</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>health care cost recovery actions ( 3 )</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions</td><td>3</td><td>8</td><td>11</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include 2414 cases brought by flight attendants seeking compensatory damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke ( 201cets 201d ) . the flight attendants allege that they are members of an ets smoking and health class action in florida , which was settled in 1997 ( broin ) . the terms of the court-approved settlement in that case allowed class members to file individual lawsuits seeking compensatory damages , but prohibited them from seeking punitive damages . also , does not include individual smoking and health cases brought by or on behalf of plaintiffs in florida state and federal courts following the decertification of the engle case ( discussed below in smoking and health litigation - engle class action ) . ( 2 ) includes as one case the 30 civil actions that were to be tried in six consolidated trials in west virginia ( in re : tobacco litigation ) . pm usa is a defendant in nine of the 30 cases . the parties have agreed to resolve the cases for an immaterial amount and have so notified the court . ( 3 ) see health care cost recovery litigation - federal government 2019s lawsuit below . international tobacco-related cases : as of january 29 , 2018 , pm usa is a named defendant in 10 health care cost recovery actions in canada , eight of which also name altria group , inc . as a defendant . pm usa and altria group , inc . are also named defendants in seven smoking and health class actions filed in various canadian provinces . see guarantees and other similar matters below for a discussion of the distribution agreement between altria group , inc . and pmi that provides for indemnities for certain liabilities concerning tobacco products. .
Question: what are the number of individual smoking and health cases in 2016?
Answer: 70.0
Question: what are the number of smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation in 2016?
Answer: 5.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 75.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc verdicts have been appealed , there remains a risk that such relief may not be obtainable in all cases . this risk has been substantially reduced given that 47 states and puerto rico limit the dollar amount of bonds or require no bond at all . as discussed below , however , tobacco litigation plaintiffs have challenged the constitutionality of florida 2019s bond cap statute in several cases and plaintiffs may challenge state bond cap statutes in other jurisdictions as well . such challenges may include the applicability of state bond caps in federal court . states , including florida , may also seek to repeal or alter bond cap statutes through legislation . although altria group , inc . cannot predict the outcome of such challenges , it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome of one or more such challenges . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when they determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , except to the extent discussed elsewhere in this note 18 . contingencies : ( i ) management has concluded that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , management has not provided any amounts in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes , if any . litigation defense costs are expensed as incurred . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries have achieved substantial success in managing litigation . nevertheless , litigation is subject to uncertainty and significant challenges remain . it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation . altria group , inc . and each of its subsidiaries named as a defendant believe , and each has been so advised by counsel handling the respective cases , that it has valid defenses to the litigation pending against it , as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts . each of the companies has defended , and will continue to defend , vigorously against litigation challenges . however , altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions in particular cases if they believe it is in the best interests of altria group , inc . to do so . overview of altria group , inc . and/or pm usa tobacco- related litigation types and number of cases : claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories : ( i ) smoking and health cases alleging personal injury brought on behalf of individual plaintiffs ; ( ii ) smoking and health cases primarily alleging personal injury or seeking court-supervised programs for ongoing medical monitoring and purporting to be brought on behalf of a class of individual plaintiffs , including cases in which the aggregated claims of a number of individual plaintiffs are to be tried in a single proceeding ; ( iii ) health care cost recovery cases brought by governmental ( both domestic and foreign ) plaintiffs seeking reimbursement for health care expenditures allegedly caused by cigarette smoking and/or disgorgement of profits ; ( iv ) class action suits alleging that the uses of the terms 201clights 201d and 201cultra lights 201d constitute deceptive and unfair trade practices , common law or statutory fraud , unjust enrichment , breach of warranty or violations of the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act ( 201crico 201d ) ; and ( v ) other tobacco-related litigation described below . plaintiffs 2019 theories of recovery and the defenses raised in pending smoking and health , health care cost recovery and 201clights/ultra lights 201d cases are discussed below . the table below lists the number of certain tobacco-related cases pending in the united states against pm usa and , in some instances , altria group , inc . as of december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>individual smoking and health cases ( 1 )</td><td>92</td><td>70</td><td>65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation ( 2 )</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>health care cost recovery actions ( 3 )</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions</td><td>3</td><td>8</td><td>11</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include 2414 cases brought by flight attendants seeking compensatory damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke ( 201cets 201d ) . the flight attendants allege that they are members of an ets smoking and health class action in florida , which was settled in 1997 ( broin ) . the terms of the court-approved settlement in that case allowed class members to file individual lawsuits seeking compensatory damages , but prohibited them from seeking punitive damages . also , does not include individual smoking and health cases brought by or on behalf of plaintiffs in florida state and federal courts following the decertification of the engle case ( discussed below in smoking and health litigation - engle class action ) . ( 2 ) includes as one case the 30 civil actions that were to be tried in six consolidated trials in west virginia ( in re : tobacco litigation ) . pm usa is a defendant in nine of the 30 cases . the parties have agreed to resolve the cases for an immaterial amount and have so notified the court . ( 3 ) see health care cost recovery litigation - federal government 2019s lawsuit below . international tobacco-related cases : as of january 29 , 2018 , pm usa is a named defendant in 10 health care cost recovery actions in canada , eight of which also name altria group , inc . as a defendant . pm usa and altria group , inc . are also named defendants in seven smoking and health class actions filed in various canadian provinces . see guarantees and other similar matters below for a discussion of the distribution agreement between altria group , inc . and pmi that provides for indemnities for certain liabilities concerning tobacco products. .
Question: what are the number of individual smoking and health cases in 2016?
Answer: 70.0
Question: what are the number of smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation in 2016?
Answer: 5.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 75.0
Question: what is the sum including health care cost recovery actions?
| 76.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc verdicts have been appealed , there remains a risk that such relief may not be obtainable in all cases . this risk has been substantially reduced given that 47 states and puerto rico limit the dollar amount of bonds or require no bond at all . as discussed below , however , tobacco litigation plaintiffs have challenged the constitutionality of florida 2019s bond cap statute in several cases and plaintiffs may challenge state bond cap statutes in other jurisdictions as well . such challenges may include the applicability of state bond caps in federal court . states , including florida , may also seek to repeal or alter bond cap statutes through legislation . although altria group , inc . cannot predict the outcome of such challenges , it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome of one or more such challenges . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when they determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , except to the extent discussed elsewhere in this note 18 . contingencies : ( i ) management has concluded that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , management has not provided any amounts in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes , if any . litigation defense costs are expensed as incurred . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries have achieved substantial success in managing litigation . nevertheless , litigation is subject to uncertainty and significant challenges remain . it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation . altria group , inc . and each of its subsidiaries named as a defendant believe , and each has been so advised by counsel handling the respective cases , that it has valid defenses to the litigation pending against it , as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts . each of the companies has defended , and will continue to defend , vigorously against litigation challenges . however , altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions in particular cases if they believe it is in the best interests of altria group , inc . to do so . overview of altria group , inc . and/or pm usa tobacco- related litigation types and number of cases : claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories : ( i ) smoking and health cases alleging personal injury brought on behalf of individual plaintiffs ; ( ii ) smoking and health cases primarily alleging personal injury or seeking court-supervised programs for ongoing medical monitoring and purporting to be brought on behalf of a class of individual plaintiffs , including cases in which the aggregated claims of a number of individual plaintiffs are to be tried in a single proceeding ; ( iii ) health care cost recovery cases brought by governmental ( both domestic and foreign ) plaintiffs seeking reimbursement for health care expenditures allegedly caused by cigarette smoking and/or disgorgement of profits ; ( iv ) class action suits alleging that the uses of the terms 201clights 201d and 201cultra lights 201d constitute deceptive and unfair trade practices , common law or statutory fraud , unjust enrichment , breach of warranty or violations of the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act ( 201crico 201d ) ; and ( v ) other tobacco-related litigation described below . plaintiffs 2019 theories of recovery and the defenses raised in pending smoking and health , health care cost recovery and 201clights/ultra lights 201d cases are discussed below . the table below lists the number of certain tobacco-related cases pending in the united states against pm usa and , in some instances , altria group , inc . as of december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>individual smoking and health cases ( 1 )</td><td>92</td><td>70</td><td>65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation ( 2 )</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>health care cost recovery actions ( 3 )</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions</td><td>3</td><td>8</td><td>11</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include 2414 cases brought by flight attendants seeking compensatory damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke ( 201cets 201d ) . the flight attendants allege that they are members of an ets smoking and health class action in florida , which was settled in 1997 ( broin ) . the terms of the court-approved settlement in that case allowed class members to file individual lawsuits seeking compensatory damages , but prohibited them from seeking punitive damages . also , does not include individual smoking and health cases brought by or on behalf of plaintiffs in florida state and federal courts following the decertification of the engle case ( discussed below in smoking and health litigation - engle class action ) . ( 2 ) includes as one case the 30 civil actions that were to be tried in six consolidated trials in west virginia ( in re : tobacco litigation ) . pm usa is a defendant in nine of the 30 cases . the parties have agreed to resolve the cases for an immaterial amount and have so notified the court . ( 3 ) see health care cost recovery litigation - federal government 2019s lawsuit below . international tobacco-related cases : as of january 29 , 2018 , pm usa is a named defendant in 10 health care cost recovery actions in canada , eight of which also name altria group , inc . as a defendant . pm usa and altria group , inc . are also named defendants in seven smoking and health class actions filed in various canadian provinces . see guarantees and other similar matters below for a discussion of the distribution agreement between altria group , inc . and pmi that provides for indemnities for certain liabilities concerning tobacco products. .
Question: what are the number of individual smoking and health cases in 2016?
Answer: 70.0
Question: what are the number of smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation in 2016?
Answer: 5.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 75.0
Question: what is the sum including health care cost recovery actions?
Answer: 76.0
Question: what is the number of 201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions?
| 8.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc verdicts have been appealed , there remains a risk that such relief may not be obtainable in all cases . this risk has been substantially reduced given that 47 states and puerto rico limit the dollar amount of bonds or require no bond at all . as discussed below , however , tobacco litigation plaintiffs have challenged the constitutionality of florida 2019s bond cap statute in several cases and plaintiffs may challenge state bond cap statutes in other jurisdictions as well . such challenges may include the applicability of state bond caps in federal court . states , including florida , may also seek to repeal or alter bond cap statutes through legislation . although altria group , inc . cannot predict the outcome of such challenges , it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome of one or more such challenges . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when they determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , except to the extent discussed elsewhere in this note 18 . contingencies : ( i ) management has concluded that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , management has not provided any amounts in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes , if any . litigation defense costs are expensed as incurred . altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries have achieved substantial success in managing litigation . nevertheless , litigation is subject to uncertainty and significant challenges remain . it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation . altria group , inc . and each of its subsidiaries named as a defendant believe , and each has been so advised by counsel handling the respective cases , that it has valid defenses to the litigation pending against it , as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts . each of the companies has defended , and will continue to defend , vigorously against litigation challenges . however , altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions in particular cases if they believe it is in the best interests of altria group , inc . to do so . overview of altria group , inc . and/or pm usa tobacco- related litigation types and number of cases : claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories : ( i ) smoking and health cases alleging personal injury brought on behalf of individual plaintiffs ; ( ii ) smoking and health cases primarily alleging personal injury or seeking court-supervised programs for ongoing medical monitoring and purporting to be brought on behalf of a class of individual plaintiffs , including cases in which the aggregated claims of a number of individual plaintiffs are to be tried in a single proceeding ; ( iii ) health care cost recovery cases brought by governmental ( both domestic and foreign ) plaintiffs seeking reimbursement for health care expenditures allegedly caused by cigarette smoking and/or disgorgement of profits ; ( iv ) class action suits alleging that the uses of the terms 201clights 201d and 201cultra lights 201d constitute deceptive and unfair trade practices , common law or statutory fraud , unjust enrichment , breach of warranty or violations of the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act ( 201crico 201d ) ; and ( v ) other tobacco-related litigation described below . plaintiffs 2019 theories of recovery and the defenses raised in pending smoking and health , health care cost recovery and 201clights/ultra lights 201d cases are discussed below . the table below lists the number of certain tobacco-related cases pending in the united states against pm usa and , in some instances , altria group , inc . as of december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>individual smoking and health cases ( 1 )</td><td>92</td><td>70</td><td>65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation ( 2 )</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>health care cost recovery actions ( 3 )</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions</td><td>3</td><td>8</td><td>11</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include 2414 cases brought by flight attendants seeking compensatory damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke ( 201cets 201d ) . the flight attendants allege that they are members of an ets smoking and health class action in florida , which was settled in 1997 ( broin ) . the terms of the court-approved settlement in that case allowed class members to file individual lawsuits seeking compensatory damages , but prohibited them from seeking punitive damages . also , does not include individual smoking and health cases brought by or on behalf of plaintiffs in florida state and federal courts following the decertification of the engle case ( discussed below in smoking and health litigation - engle class action ) . ( 2 ) includes as one case the 30 civil actions that were to be tried in six consolidated trials in west virginia ( in re : tobacco litigation ) . pm usa is a defendant in nine of the 30 cases . the parties have agreed to resolve the cases for an immaterial amount and have so notified the court . ( 3 ) see health care cost recovery litigation - federal government 2019s lawsuit below . international tobacco-related cases : as of january 29 , 2018 , pm usa is a named defendant in 10 health care cost recovery actions in canada , eight of which also name altria group , inc . as a defendant . pm usa and altria group , inc . are also named defendants in seven smoking and health class actions filed in various canadian provinces . see guarantees and other similar matters below for a discussion of the distribution agreement between altria group , inc . and pmi that provides for indemnities for certain liabilities concerning tobacco products. .
Question: what are the number of individual smoking and health cases in 2016?
Answer: 70.0
Question: what are the number of smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation in 2016?
Answer: 5.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 75.0
Question: what is the sum including health care cost recovery actions?
Answer: 76.0
Question: what is the number of 201clights/ultra lights 201d class actions?
Answer: 8.0
Question: what is the total sum of claims?
| 84.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.05</td><td>$ 97.04</td><td>$ 121.73</td><td>$ 161.39</td><td>$ 170.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj us containers & packaging</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 106.73</td><td>$ 66.91</td><td>$ 93.98</td><td>$ 110.23</td><td>$ 110.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 105.49</td><td>$ 66.46</td><td>$ 84.05</td><td>$ 96.71</td><td>$ 98.75</td></tr></table> copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .
Question: what was the change in the performance value of the dj us containers & packaging from 2006 to 2008?
| -33.09 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.05</td><td>$ 97.04</td><td>$ 121.73</td><td>$ 161.39</td><td>$ 170.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj us containers & packaging</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 106.73</td><td>$ 66.91</td><td>$ 93.98</td><td>$ 110.23</td><td>$ 110.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 105.49</td><td>$ 66.46</td><td>$ 84.05</td><td>$ 96.71</td><td>$ 98.75</td></tr></table> copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .
Question: what was the change in the performance value of the dj us containers & packaging from 2006 to 2008?
Answer: -33.09
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2006?
| -0.3309 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) applicable indenture . the issuers may also redeem the 2015 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , on or after june 1 , 2010 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . in addition , at any time prior to june 1 , 2008 , the issuers may redeem up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of either or both of the 2010 senior notes and 2015 senior notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at redemption prices equal to 106.750% ( 106.750 % ) and 107.125% ( 107.125 % ) , respectively , of the principal amount thereof , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2014 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , ( i ) prior to october 15 , 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture and ( ii ) on or after october 15 , 2009 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2009 senior notes and the 2012 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date and a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture . if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2007 , we had outstanding 121 mortgage loans totaling $ 1.57 billion that are collateralized by the underlying assets of the properties . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 59.4 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the loans generally bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except for 15 loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 32.0 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates ranging from 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) to 7.3% ( 7.3 % ) per annum as of december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , the weighted average annual rate on fixed rate debt was 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and the weighted average annual rate on the variable rate debt was 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) . the loans had a weighted average maturity of 7.0 years as of december 31 , 2007 . sunrise 2019s portion of total debt was $ 157.1 million as of december 31 , scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2007 , our indebtedness had the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 193101</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>605762</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>282138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>303191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>527221</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1436263</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total maturities</td><td>3347676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unamortized fair value adjustment</td><td>19669</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>unamortized commission fees and discounts</td><td>-6846 ( 6846 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>senior notes payable and other debt</td><td>$ 3360499</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the percentage of total maturities making up senior notes payable and other debt?
| 0.99618 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) applicable indenture . the issuers may also redeem the 2015 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , on or after june 1 , 2010 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . in addition , at any time prior to june 1 , 2008 , the issuers may redeem up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of either or both of the 2010 senior notes and 2015 senior notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at redemption prices equal to 106.750% ( 106.750 % ) and 107.125% ( 107.125 % ) , respectively , of the principal amount thereof , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2014 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , ( i ) prior to october 15 , 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture and ( ii ) on or after october 15 , 2009 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2009 senior notes and the 2012 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date and a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture . if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2007 , we had outstanding 121 mortgage loans totaling $ 1.57 billion that are collateralized by the underlying assets of the properties . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 59.4 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the loans generally bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except for 15 loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 32.0 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates ranging from 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) to 7.3% ( 7.3 % ) per annum as of december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , the weighted average annual rate on fixed rate debt was 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and the weighted average annual rate on the variable rate debt was 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) . the loans had a weighted average maturity of 7.0 years as of december 31 , 2007 . sunrise 2019s portion of total debt was $ 157.1 million as of december 31 , scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2007 , our indebtedness had the following maturities ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 193101</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>605762</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>282138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>303191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>527221</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1436263</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total maturities</td><td>3347676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unamortized fair value adjustment</td><td>19669</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>unamortized commission fees and discounts</td><td>-6846 ( 6846 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>senior notes payable and other debt</td><td>$ 3360499</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the percentage of total maturities making up senior notes payable and other debt?
Answer: 0.99618
Question: and the percentage of the maturities that are part of the total maturities in 2008?
| 0.05768 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|