input
stringlengths 833
15.3k
| output
stringlengths 2
16
| instruction
stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|
december 2016 acquisition of camber and higher volumes in fleet support and oil and gas services , partially offset by lower nuclear and environmental volumes due to the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . segment operating income 2018 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was $ 32 million , compared to operating income of $ 21 million in 2017 . the increase was primarily due to an allowance for accounts receivable in 2017 on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract and higher income from operating investments at our nuclear and environmental joint ventures , partially offset by one time employee bonus payments in 2018 related to the tax act and lower performance in fleet support services . 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 . the increase was primarily due to improved performance in oil and gas services and higher volume in mdis services following the december 2016 acquisition of camber , partially offset by the establishment of an allowance for accounts receivable on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract in 2017 and the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . backlog total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 23 billion . total backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) . backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded idiq orders . for contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer . the following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>december 31 2018 total backlog</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>total backlog</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ingalls</td><td>$ 9943</td><td>$ 1422</td><td>$ 11365</td><td>$ 5920</td><td>$ 2071</td><td>$ 7991</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>newport news</td><td>6767</td><td>4144</td><td>10911</td><td>6976</td><td>5608</td><td>12584</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>technical solutions</td><td>339</td><td>380</td><td>719</td><td>478</td><td>314</td><td>792</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total backlog</td><td>$ 17049</td><td>$ 5946</td><td>$ 22995</td><td>$ 13374</td><td>$ 7993</td><td>$ 21367</td></tr></table> we expect approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of the $ 23 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , to be converted into sales in 2019 . u.s . government orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . awards 2018 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 9.8 billion . significant new awards during the period included contracts for the construction of three arleigh burke class ( ddg 51 ) destroyers , for the detail design and construction of richard m . mccool jr . ( lpd 29 ) , for procurement of long-lead-time material for enterprise ( cvn 80 ) , and for the construction of nsc 10 ( unnamed ) and nsc 11 ( unnamed ) . in addition , we received awards in 2019 valued at $ 15.2 billion for detail design and construction of the gerald r . ford class ( cvn 78 ) aircraft carriers enterprise ( cvn 80 ) and cvn 81 ( unnamed ) . 2017 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was approximately $ 8.1 billion . significant new awards during this period included the detailed design and construction contract for bougainville ( lha 8 ) and the execution contract for the rcoh of uss george washington ( cvn 73 ) . .
Question: what was the net change in value of operating income for technical solutions segment from 2017 and 2018?
| 11.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
december 2016 acquisition of camber and higher volumes in fleet support and oil and gas services , partially offset by lower nuclear and environmental volumes due to the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . segment operating income 2018 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was $ 32 million , compared to operating income of $ 21 million in 2017 . the increase was primarily due to an allowance for accounts receivable in 2017 on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract and higher income from operating investments at our nuclear and environmental joint ventures , partially offset by one time employee bonus payments in 2018 related to the tax act and lower performance in fleet support services . 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 . the increase was primarily due to improved performance in oil and gas services and higher volume in mdis services following the december 2016 acquisition of camber , partially offset by the establishment of an allowance for accounts receivable on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract in 2017 and the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . backlog total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 23 billion . total backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) . backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded idiq orders . for contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer . the following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>december 31 2018 total backlog</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>total backlog</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ingalls</td><td>$ 9943</td><td>$ 1422</td><td>$ 11365</td><td>$ 5920</td><td>$ 2071</td><td>$ 7991</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>newport news</td><td>6767</td><td>4144</td><td>10911</td><td>6976</td><td>5608</td><td>12584</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>technical solutions</td><td>339</td><td>380</td><td>719</td><td>478</td><td>314</td><td>792</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total backlog</td><td>$ 17049</td><td>$ 5946</td><td>$ 22995</td><td>$ 13374</td><td>$ 7993</td><td>$ 21367</td></tr></table> we expect approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of the $ 23 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , to be converted into sales in 2019 . u.s . government orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . awards 2018 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 9.8 billion . significant new awards during the period included contracts for the construction of three arleigh burke class ( ddg 51 ) destroyers , for the detail design and construction of richard m . mccool jr . ( lpd 29 ) , for procurement of long-lead-time material for enterprise ( cvn 80 ) , and for the construction of nsc 10 ( unnamed ) and nsc 11 ( unnamed ) . in addition , we received awards in 2019 valued at $ 15.2 billion for detail design and construction of the gerald r . ford class ( cvn 78 ) aircraft carriers enterprise ( cvn 80 ) and cvn 81 ( unnamed ) . 2017 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was approximately $ 8.1 billion . significant new awards during this period included the detailed design and construction contract for bougainville ( lha 8 ) and the execution contract for the rcoh of uss george washington ( cvn 73 ) . .
Question: what was the net change in value of operating income for technical solutions segment from 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 11.0
Question: what was the value of operating income for technical solutions segment in 2017?
| 21.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
december 2016 acquisition of camber and higher volumes in fleet support and oil and gas services , partially offset by lower nuclear and environmental volumes due to the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . segment operating income 2018 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was $ 32 million , compared to operating income of $ 21 million in 2017 . the increase was primarily due to an allowance for accounts receivable in 2017 on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract and higher income from operating investments at our nuclear and environmental joint ventures , partially offset by one time employee bonus payments in 2018 related to the tax act and lower performance in fleet support services . 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 . the increase was primarily due to improved performance in oil and gas services and higher volume in mdis services following the december 2016 acquisition of camber , partially offset by the establishment of an allowance for accounts receivable on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract in 2017 and the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . backlog total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 23 billion . total backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) . backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded idiq orders . for contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer . the following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>december 31 2018 total backlog</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>total backlog</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ingalls</td><td>$ 9943</td><td>$ 1422</td><td>$ 11365</td><td>$ 5920</td><td>$ 2071</td><td>$ 7991</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>newport news</td><td>6767</td><td>4144</td><td>10911</td><td>6976</td><td>5608</td><td>12584</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>technical solutions</td><td>339</td><td>380</td><td>719</td><td>478</td><td>314</td><td>792</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total backlog</td><td>$ 17049</td><td>$ 5946</td><td>$ 22995</td><td>$ 13374</td><td>$ 7993</td><td>$ 21367</td></tr></table> we expect approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of the $ 23 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , to be converted into sales in 2019 . u.s . government orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . awards 2018 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 9.8 billion . significant new awards during the period included contracts for the construction of three arleigh burke class ( ddg 51 ) destroyers , for the detail design and construction of richard m . mccool jr . ( lpd 29 ) , for procurement of long-lead-time material for enterprise ( cvn 80 ) , and for the construction of nsc 10 ( unnamed ) and nsc 11 ( unnamed ) . in addition , we received awards in 2019 valued at $ 15.2 billion for detail design and construction of the gerald r . ford class ( cvn 78 ) aircraft carriers enterprise ( cvn 80 ) and cvn 81 ( unnamed ) . 2017 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was approximately $ 8.1 billion . significant new awards during this period included the detailed design and construction contract for bougainville ( lha 8 ) and the execution contract for the rcoh of uss george washington ( cvn 73 ) . .
Question: what was the net change in value of operating income for technical solutions segment from 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 11.0
Question: what was the value of operating income for technical solutions segment in 2017?
Answer: 21.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.52381 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) and other electronic applications markets . the company believes the acquisition will expand its technology portfolio , channel reach and total addressable market by adding complementary products and expertise for fpga solutions and rapid asic prototyping . purchase price . synopsys paid $ 8.00 per share for all outstanding shares including certain vested options of synplicity for an aggregate cash payment of $ 223.3 million . additionally , synopsys assumed certain employee stock options and restricted stock units , collectively called 201cstock awards . 201d the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 180618</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of assumed vested or earned stock awards</td><td>4169</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition related costs</td><td>8016</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price consideration</td><td>$ 192803</td></tr></table> acquisition related costs consist primarily of professional services , severance and employee related costs and facilities closure costs of which $ 6.8 million have been paid as of october 31 , 2009 . fair value of stock awards assumed . an aggregate of 4.7 million shares of synplicity stock options and restricted stock units were exchanged for synopsys stock options and restricted stock units at an exchange ratio of 0.3392 per share . the fair value of stock options assumed was determined using a black-scholes valuation model . the fair value of stock awards vested or earned of $ 4.2 million was included as part of the purchase price . the fair value of unvested awards of $ 5.0 million will be recorded as operating expense over the remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . purchase price allocation . the company allocated $ 80.0 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets to be amortized over two to seven years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 4.8 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired , was $ 120.3 million and will not be amortized . goodwill primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of cost synergies and sales growth from the integration of synplicity 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations to provide an expansion of products and market reach . fiscal 2007 acquisitions during fiscal year 2007 , the company completed certain purchase acquisitions for cash . the company allocated the total purchase considerations of $ 54.8 million ( which included acquisition related costs of $ 1.4 million ) to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 36.6 million . acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 14.3 million are being amortized over two to nine years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 3.2 million. .
Question: what was the amount allocated to identifiable intangible assets?
| 80.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) and other electronic applications markets . the company believes the acquisition will expand its technology portfolio , channel reach and total addressable market by adding complementary products and expertise for fpga solutions and rapid asic prototyping . purchase price . synopsys paid $ 8.00 per share for all outstanding shares including certain vested options of synplicity for an aggregate cash payment of $ 223.3 million . additionally , synopsys assumed certain employee stock options and restricted stock units , collectively called 201cstock awards . 201d the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 180618</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of assumed vested or earned stock awards</td><td>4169</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition related costs</td><td>8016</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price consideration</td><td>$ 192803</td></tr></table> acquisition related costs consist primarily of professional services , severance and employee related costs and facilities closure costs of which $ 6.8 million have been paid as of october 31 , 2009 . fair value of stock awards assumed . an aggregate of 4.7 million shares of synplicity stock options and restricted stock units were exchanged for synopsys stock options and restricted stock units at an exchange ratio of 0.3392 per share . the fair value of stock options assumed was determined using a black-scholes valuation model . the fair value of stock awards vested or earned of $ 4.2 million was included as part of the purchase price . the fair value of unvested awards of $ 5.0 million will be recorded as operating expense over the remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . purchase price allocation . the company allocated $ 80.0 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets to be amortized over two to seven years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 4.8 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired , was $ 120.3 million and will not be amortized . goodwill primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of cost synergies and sales growth from the integration of synplicity 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations to provide an expansion of products and market reach . fiscal 2007 acquisitions during fiscal year 2007 , the company completed certain purchase acquisitions for cash . the company allocated the total purchase considerations of $ 54.8 million ( which included acquisition related costs of $ 1.4 million ) to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 36.6 million . acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 14.3 million are being amortized over two to nine years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 3.2 million. .
Question: what was the amount allocated to identifiable intangible assets?
Answer: 80.0
Question: what is that times 1000?
| 80000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) and other electronic applications markets . the company believes the acquisition will expand its technology portfolio , channel reach and total addressable market by adding complementary products and expertise for fpga solutions and rapid asic prototyping . purchase price . synopsys paid $ 8.00 per share for all outstanding shares including certain vested options of synplicity for an aggregate cash payment of $ 223.3 million . additionally , synopsys assumed certain employee stock options and restricted stock units , collectively called 201cstock awards . 201d the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 180618</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of assumed vested or earned stock awards</td><td>4169</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition related costs</td><td>8016</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price consideration</td><td>$ 192803</td></tr></table> acquisition related costs consist primarily of professional services , severance and employee related costs and facilities closure costs of which $ 6.8 million have been paid as of october 31 , 2009 . fair value of stock awards assumed . an aggregate of 4.7 million shares of synplicity stock options and restricted stock units were exchanged for synopsys stock options and restricted stock units at an exchange ratio of 0.3392 per share . the fair value of stock options assumed was determined using a black-scholes valuation model . the fair value of stock awards vested or earned of $ 4.2 million was included as part of the purchase price . the fair value of unvested awards of $ 5.0 million will be recorded as operating expense over the remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . purchase price allocation . the company allocated $ 80.0 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets to be amortized over two to seven years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 4.8 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired , was $ 120.3 million and will not be amortized . goodwill primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of cost synergies and sales growth from the integration of synplicity 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations to provide an expansion of products and market reach . fiscal 2007 acquisitions during fiscal year 2007 , the company completed certain purchase acquisitions for cash . the company allocated the total purchase considerations of $ 54.8 million ( which included acquisition related costs of $ 1.4 million ) to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 36.6 million . acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 14.3 million are being amortized over two to nine years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 3.2 million. .
Question: what was the amount allocated to identifiable intangible assets?
Answer: 80.0
Question: what is that times 1000?
Answer: 80000.0
Question: what was the value of total purchase price considerations?
| 192803.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) and other electronic applications markets . the company believes the acquisition will expand its technology portfolio , channel reach and total addressable market by adding complementary products and expertise for fpga solutions and rapid asic prototyping . purchase price . synopsys paid $ 8.00 per share for all outstanding shares including certain vested options of synplicity for an aggregate cash payment of $ 223.3 million . additionally , synopsys assumed certain employee stock options and restricted stock units , collectively called 201cstock awards . 201d the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 180618</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of assumed vested or earned stock awards</td><td>4169</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition related costs</td><td>8016</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price consideration</td><td>$ 192803</td></tr></table> acquisition related costs consist primarily of professional services , severance and employee related costs and facilities closure costs of which $ 6.8 million have been paid as of october 31 , 2009 . fair value of stock awards assumed . an aggregate of 4.7 million shares of synplicity stock options and restricted stock units were exchanged for synopsys stock options and restricted stock units at an exchange ratio of 0.3392 per share . the fair value of stock options assumed was determined using a black-scholes valuation model . the fair value of stock awards vested or earned of $ 4.2 million was included as part of the purchase price . the fair value of unvested awards of $ 5.0 million will be recorded as operating expense over the remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . purchase price allocation . the company allocated $ 80.0 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets to be amortized over two to seven years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 4.8 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired , was $ 120.3 million and will not be amortized . goodwill primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of cost synergies and sales growth from the integration of synplicity 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations to provide an expansion of products and market reach . fiscal 2007 acquisitions during fiscal year 2007 , the company completed certain purchase acquisitions for cash . the company allocated the total purchase considerations of $ 54.8 million ( which included acquisition related costs of $ 1.4 million ) to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 36.6 million . acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 14.3 million are being amortized over two to nine years . in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 3.2 million. .
Question: what was the amount allocated to identifiable intangible assets?
Answer: 80.0
Question: what is that times 1000?
Answer: 80000.0
Question: what was the value of total purchase price considerations?
Answer: 192803.0
Question: what is the product divided by total purchase price considerations?
| 0.41493 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) sales of businesses and investments 2013 primarily includes realized gains and losses relating to the sales of businesses , cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of entities and sales of marketable securities and investments in publicly traded and privately held companies in our rabbi trusts . during 2009 , we realized a gain of $ 15.2 related to the sale of an investment in our rabbi trusts , which was partially offset by losses realized from the sale of various businesses . losses in 2007 primarily related to the sale of several businesses within draftfcb for a loss of $ 9.3 and charges at lowe of $ 7.8 as a result of the realization of cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of several businesses . vendor discounts and credit adjustments 2013 we are in the process of settling our liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits established during the restatement we presented in our 2004 annual report on form 10-k . these adjustments reflect the reversal of certain of these liabilities as a result of settlements with clients or vendors or where the statute of limitations has lapsed . litigation settlement 2013 during may 2008 , the sec concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices , resulting in a settlement charge of $ 12.0 . investment impairments 2013 in 2007 we realized an other-than-temporary charge of $ 5.8 relating to a $ 12.5 investment in auction rate securities , representing our total investment in auction rate securities . see note 12 for further information . note 5 : intangible assets goodwill goodwill is the excess purchase price remaining from an acquisition after an allocation of purchase price has been made to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values . the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for our segments , integrated agency networks ( 201cian 201d ) and constituency management group ( 201ccmg 201d ) , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 are listed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ian</td><td>cmg</td><td>total 1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 2789.7</td><td>$ 441.9</td><td>$ 3231.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year acquisitions</td><td>99.5</td><td>1.8</td><td>101.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>28.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>30.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>-128.1 ( 128.1 )</td><td>-13.9 ( 13.9 )</td><td>-142.0 ( 142.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>$ 2790.0</td><td>$ 430.9</td><td>$ 3220.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current year acquisitions2</td><td>5.2</td><td>2014</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>14.2</td><td>2014</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>76.2</td><td>4.5</td><td>80.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 2885.6</td><td>$ 435.4</td><td>$ 3321.0</td></tr></table> 1 for all periods presented we have not recorded a goodwill impairment charge . 2 for acquisitions completed after january 1 , 2009 , amount includes contingent and deferred payments , which are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date . see note 6 for further information . see note 1 for further information regarding our annual impairment methodology . other intangible assets included in other intangible assets are assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and assets with definite lives subject to amortization . other intangible assets primarily include customer lists and trade names . intangible assets with definitive lives subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated useful lives generally between 7 and 15 years . amortization expense for other intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 19.3 , $ 14.4 and $ 8.5 , respectively . the following table provides a summary of other intangible assets , which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what was the total amortization expense for other intangible assets in 2008 and 2009?
| 33.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) sales of businesses and investments 2013 primarily includes realized gains and losses relating to the sales of businesses , cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of entities and sales of marketable securities and investments in publicly traded and privately held companies in our rabbi trusts . during 2009 , we realized a gain of $ 15.2 related to the sale of an investment in our rabbi trusts , which was partially offset by losses realized from the sale of various businesses . losses in 2007 primarily related to the sale of several businesses within draftfcb for a loss of $ 9.3 and charges at lowe of $ 7.8 as a result of the realization of cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of several businesses . vendor discounts and credit adjustments 2013 we are in the process of settling our liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits established during the restatement we presented in our 2004 annual report on form 10-k . these adjustments reflect the reversal of certain of these liabilities as a result of settlements with clients or vendors or where the statute of limitations has lapsed . litigation settlement 2013 during may 2008 , the sec concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices , resulting in a settlement charge of $ 12.0 . investment impairments 2013 in 2007 we realized an other-than-temporary charge of $ 5.8 relating to a $ 12.5 investment in auction rate securities , representing our total investment in auction rate securities . see note 12 for further information . note 5 : intangible assets goodwill goodwill is the excess purchase price remaining from an acquisition after an allocation of purchase price has been made to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values . the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for our segments , integrated agency networks ( 201cian 201d ) and constituency management group ( 201ccmg 201d ) , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 are listed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ian</td><td>cmg</td><td>total 1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 2789.7</td><td>$ 441.9</td><td>$ 3231.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year acquisitions</td><td>99.5</td><td>1.8</td><td>101.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>28.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>30.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>-128.1 ( 128.1 )</td><td>-13.9 ( 13.9 )</td><td>-142.0 ( 142.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>$ 2790.0</td><td>$ 430.9</td><td>$ 3220.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current year acquisitions2</td><td>5.2</td><td>2014</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>14.2</td><td>2014</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>76.2</td><td>4.5</td><td>80.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 2885.6</td><td>$ 435.4</td><td>$ 3321.0</td></tr></table> 1 for all periods presented we have not recorded a goodwill impairment charge . 2 for acquisitions completed after january 1 , 2009 , amount includes contingent and deferred payments , which are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date . see note 6 for further information . see note 1 for further information regarding our annual impairment methodology . other intangible assets included in other intangible assets are assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and assets with definite lives subject to amortization . other intangible assets primarily include customer lists and trade names . intangible assets with definitive lives subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated useful lives generally between 7 and 15 years . amortization expense for other intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 19.3 , $ 14.4 and $ 8.5 , respectively . the following table provides a summary of other intangible assets , which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what was the total amortization expense for other intangible assets in 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 33.7
Question: and including the value for 2007?
| 42.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) sales of businesses and investments 2013 primarily includes realized gains and losses relating to the sales of businesses , cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of entities and sales of marketable securities and investments in publicly traded and privately held companies in our rabbi trusts . during 2009 , we realized a gain of $ 15.2 related to the sale of an investment in our rabbi trusts , which was partially offset by losses realized from the sale of various businesses . losses in 2007 primarily related to the sale of several businesses within draftfcb for a loss of $ 9.3 and charges at lowe of $ 7.8 as a result of the realization of cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of several businesses . vendor discounts and credit adjustments 2013 we are in the process of settling our liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits established during the restatement we presented in our 2004 annual report on form 10-k . these adjustments reflect the reversal of certain of these liabilities as a result of settlements with clients or vendors or where the statute of limitations has lapsed . litigation settlement 2013 during may 2008 , the sec concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices , resulting in a settlement charge of $ 12.0 . investment impairments 2013 in 2007 we realized an other-than-temporary charge of $ 5.8 relating to a $ 12.5 investment in auction rate securities , representing our total investment in auction rate securities . see note 12 for further information . note 5 : intangible assets goodwill goodwill is the excess purchase price remaining from an acquisition after an allocation of purchase price has been made to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values . the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for our segments , integrated agency networks ( 201cian 201d ) and constituency management group ( 201ccmg 201d ) , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 are listed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ian</td><td>cmg</td><td>total 1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 2789.7</td><td>$ 441.9</td><td>$ 3231.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year acquisitions</td><td>99.5</td><td>1.8</td><td>101.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>28.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>30.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>-128.1 ( 128.1 )</td><td>-13.9 ( 13.9 )</td><td>-142.0 ( 142.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>$ 2790.0</td><td>$ 430.9</td><td>$ 3220.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current year acquisitions2</td><td>5.2</td><td>2014</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>14.2</td><td>2014</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>76.2</td><td>4.5</td><td>80.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 2885.6</td><td>$ 435.4</td><td>$ 3321.0</td></tr></table> 1 for all periods presented we have not recorded a goodwill impairment charge . 2 for acquisitions completed after january 1 , 2009 , amount includes contingent and deferred payments , which are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date . see note 6 for further information . see note 1 for further information regarding our annual impairment methodology . other intangible assets included in other intangible assets are assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and assets with definite lives subject to amortization . other intangible assets primarily include customer lists and trade names . intangible assets with definitive lives subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated useful lives generally between 7 and 15 years . amortization expense for other intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 19.3 , $ 14.4 and $ 8.5 , respectively . the following table provides a summary of other intangible assets , which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what was the total amortization expense for other intangible assets in 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 33.7
Question: and including the value for 2007?
Answer: 42.2
Question: so what was the average value during this time?
| 14.06667 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) sales of businesses and investments 2013 primarily includes realized gains and losses relating to the sales of businesses , cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of entities and sales of marketable securities and investments in publicly traded and privately held companies in our rabbi trusts . during 2009 , we realized a gain of $ 15.2 related to the sale of an investment in our rabbi trusts , which was partially offset by losses realized from the sale of various businesses . losses in 2007 primarily related to the sale of several businesses within draftfcb for a loss of $ 9.3 and charges at lowe of $ 7.8 as a result of the realization of cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of several businesses . vendor discounts and credit adjustments 2013 we are in the process of settling our liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits established during the restatement we presented in our 2004 annual report on form 10-k . these adjustments reflect the reversal of certain of these liabilities as a result of settlements with clients or vendors or where the statute of limitations has lapsed . litigation settlement 2013 during may 2008 , the sec concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices , resulting in a settlement charge of $ 12.0 . investment impairments 2013 in 2007 we realized an other-than-temporary charge of $ 5.8 relating to a $ 12.5 investment in auction rate securities , representing our total investment in auction rate securities . see note 12 for further information . note 5 : intangible assets goodwill goodwill is the excess purchase price remaining from an acquisition after an allocation of purchase price has been made to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values . the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for our segments , integrated agency networks ( 201cian 201d ) and constituency management group ( 201ccmg 201d ) , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 are listed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ian</td><td>cmg</td><td>total 1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 2789.7</td><td>$ 441.9</td><td>$ 3231.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year acquisitions</td><td>99.5</td><td>1.8</td><td>101.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>28.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>30.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>-128.1 ( 128.1 )</td><td>-13.9 ( 13.9 )</td><td>-142.0 ( 142.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>$ 2790.0</td><td>$ 430.9</td><td>$ 3220.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current year acquisitions2</td><td>5.2</td><td>2014</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>14.2</td><td>2014</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>76.2</td><td>4.5</td><td>80.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 2885.6</td><td>$ 435.4</td><td>$ 3321.0</td></tr></table> 1 for all periods presented we have not recorded a goodwill impairment charge . 2 for acquisitions completed after january 1 , 2009 , amount includes contingent and deferred payments , which are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date . see note 6 for further information . see note 1 for further information regarding our annual impairment methodology . other intangible assets included in other intangible assets are assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and assets with definite lives subject to amortization . other intangible assets primarily include customer lists and trade names . intangible assets with definitive lives subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated useful lives generally between 7 and 15 years . amortization expense for other intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 19.3 , $ 14.4 and $ 8.5 , respectively . the following table provides a summary of other intangible assets , which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what was the total amortization expense for other intangible assets in 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 33.7
Question: and including the value for 2007?
Answer: 42.2
Question: so what was the average value during this time?
Answer: 14.06667
Question: in 2007, what was the percentage of the investment impairments to the investment in auction rate securities?
| 0.464 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 86% ( 86 % ) and 94% ( 94 % ) as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ 82.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>-20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>20.6</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we did not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2018 . we had $ 673.5 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2018 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2018 and 2017 , we had interest income of $ 21.8 and $ 19.4 , respectively . based on our 2018 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 6.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2018 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most favorably impacted our results during the year ended december 31 , 2018 were the euro and british pound sterling . the foreign currencies that most adversely impacted our results during the year ended december 31 , of 2018 were the argentine peso and brazilian real . based on 2018 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2018 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other .
Question: in the year of 2018, what was the impact to the fair market value of the 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates?
| -91.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 86% ( 86 % ) and 94% ( 94 % ) as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ 82.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>-20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>20.6</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we did not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2018 . we had $ 673.5 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2018 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2018 and 2017 , we had interest income of $ 21.8 and $ 19.4 , respectively . based on our 2018 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 6.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2018 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most favorably impacted our results during the year ended december 31 , 2018 were the euro and british pound sterling . the foreign currencies that most adversely impacted our results during the year ended december 31 , of 2018 were the argentine peso and brazilian real . based on 2018 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2018 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other .
Question: in the year of 2018, what was the impact to the fair market value of the 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates?
Answer: -91.3
Question: and what was that for the decrease in interest rates?
| 82.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 86% ( 86 % ) and 94% ( 94 % ) as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ 82.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>-20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>20.6</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we did not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2018 . we had $ 673.5 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2018 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2018 and 2017 , we had interest income of $ 21.8 and $ 19.4 , respectively . based on our 2018 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 6.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2018 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most favorably impacted our results during the year ended december 31 , 2018 were the euro and british pound sterling . the foreign currencies that most adversely impacted our results during the year ended december 31 , of 2018 were the argentine peso and brazilian real . based on 2018 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2018 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other .
Question: in the year of 2018, what was the impact to the fair market value of the 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates?
Answer: -91.3
Question: and what was that for the decrease in interest rates?
Answer: 82.5
Question: how much, then, did the increase amount represent in relation to this decrease one?
| -1.10667 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 86% ( 86 % ) and 94% ( 94 % ) as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ 82.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>-20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>20.6</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we did not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2018 . we had $ 673.5 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2018 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2018 and 2017 , we had interest income of $ 21.8 and $ 19.4 , respectively . based on our 2018 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 6.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2018 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most favorably impacted our results during the year ended december 31 , 2018 were the euro and british pound sterling . the foreign currencies that most adversely impacted our results during the year ended december 31 , of 2018 were the argentine peso and brazilian real . based on 2018 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2018 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other .
Question: in the year of 2018, what was the impact to the fair market value of the 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates?
Answer: -91.3
Question: and what was that for the decrease in interest rates?
Answer: 82.5
Question: how much, then, did the increase amount represent in relation to this decrease one?
Answer: -1.10667
Question: and for that year and the one before, what was the total interest income, in millions?
| 41.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 86% ( 86 % ) and 94% ( 94 % ) as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ 82.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>-20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>20.6</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we did not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2018 . we had $ 673.5 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2018 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2018 and 2017 , we had interest income of $ 21.8 and $ 19.4 , respectively . based on our 2018 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 6.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2018 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most favorably impacted our results during the year ended december 31 , 2018 were the euro and british pound sterling . the foreign currencies that most adversely impacted our results during the year ended december 31 , of 2018 were the argentine peso and brazilian real . based on 2018 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2018 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other .
Question: in the year of 2018, what was the impact to the fair market value of the 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates?
Answer: -91.3
Question: and what was that for the decrease in interest rates?
Answer: 82.5
Question: how much, then, did the increase amount represent in relation to this decrease one?
Answer: -1.10667
Question: and for that year and the one before, what was the total interest income, in millions?
Answer: 41.2
Question: and what was the average between the two years?
| 20.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
table 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 4036</td><td>$ 4347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>-1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>643</td><td>987</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>8</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td><td>.73% ( .73 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.84</td><td>2.17</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td><td>$ -359 ( 359 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td><td>-930 ( 930 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>$ -1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td><td>.35% ( .35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>1.07</td><td>1.24</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the value in the allowance for loan and lease losses in 2013?
| 3609.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
table 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 4036</td><td>$ 4347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>-1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>643</td><td>987</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>8</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td><td>.73% ( .73 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.84</td><td>2.17</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td><td>$ -359 ( 359 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td><td>-930 ( 930 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>$ -1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td><td>.35% ( .35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>1.07</td><td>1.24</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the value in the allowance for loan and lease losses in 2013?
Answer: 3609.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
| 4036.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
table 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 4036</td><td>$ 4347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>-1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>643</td><td>987</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>8</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td><td>.73% ( .73 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.84</td><td>2.17</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td><td>$ -359 ( 359 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td><td>-930 ( 930 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>$ -1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td><td>.35% ( .35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>1.07</td><td>1.24</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the value in the allowance for loan and lease losses in 2013?
Answer: 3609.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
Answer: 4036.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
| -427.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
table 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 4036</td><td>$ 4347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>-1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>643</td><td>987</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>8</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td><td>.73% ( .73 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.84</td><td>2.17</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td><td>$ -359 ( 359 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td><td>-930 ( 930 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>$ -1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td><td>.35% ( .35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>1.07</td><td>1.24</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the value in the allowance for loan and lease losses in 2013?
Answer: 3609.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
Answer: 4036.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: -427.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
| 4036.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
table 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 4036</td><td>$ 4347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>-1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>-1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>643</td><td>987</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit</td><td>8</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 3609</td><td>$ 4036</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )</td><td>.57% ( .57 % )</td><td>.73% ( .73 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans</td><td>1.84</td><td>2.17</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>commercial lending net charge-offs</td><td>$ -249 ( 249 )</td><td>$ -359 ( 359 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>consumer lending net charge-offs</td><td>-828 ( 828 )</td><td>-930 ( 930 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net charge-offs</td><td>$ -1077 ( 1077 )</td><td>$ -1289 ( 1289 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>commercial lending</td><td>.22% ( .22 % )</td><td>.35% ( .35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>consumer lending ( a )</td><td>1.07</td><td>1.24</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the value in the allowance for loan and lease losses in 2013?
Answer: 3609.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
Answer: 4036.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: -427.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
Answer: 4036.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the value in 2012?
| -0.1058 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s . we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 3018</td><td>$ 2666</td><td>$ 3174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>1271</td><td>854</td><td>1344</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2425</td><td>2102</td><td>2494</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy</td><td>3489</td><td>3118</td><td>3810</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>2639</td><td>2147</td><td>3273</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>3227</td><td>2486</td><td>3023</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 16069</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>896</td><td>770</td><td>852</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operating revenues</td><td>$ 16965</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position . investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the sum of other revenue for 2009 and 2010?
| 1666.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s . we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 3018</td><td>$ 2666</td><td>$ 3174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>1271</td><td>854</td><td>1344</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2425</td><td>2102</td><td>2494</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy</td><td>3489</td><td>3118</td><td>3810</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>2639</td><td>2147</td><td>3273</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>3227</td><td>2486</td><td>3023</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 16069</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>896</td><td>770</td><td>852</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operating revenues</td><td>$ 16965</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position . investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the sum of other revenue for 2009 and 2010?
Answer: 1666.0
Question: what is the value in 2008?
| 852.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s . we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 3018</td><td>$ 2666</td><td>$ 3174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>1271</td><td>854</td><td>1344</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2425</td><td>2102</td><td>2494</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy</td><td>3489</td><td>3118</td><td>3810</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>2639</td><td>2147</td><td>3273</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>3227</td><td>2486</td><td>3023</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 16069</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>896</td><td>770</td><td>852</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operating revenues</td><td>$ 16965</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position . investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the sum of other revenue for 2009 and 2010?
Answer: 1666.0
Question: what is the value in 2008?
Answer: 852.0
Question: what is the sum including 2008?
| 2518.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s . we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 3018</td><td>$ 2666</td><td>$ 3174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>1271</td><td>854</td><td>1344</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2425</td><td>2102</td><td>2494</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy</td><td>3489</td><td>3118</td><td>3810</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>2639</td><td>2147</td><td>3273</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>3227</td><td>2486</td><td>3023</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 16069</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>896</td><td>770</td><td>852</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operating revenues</td><td>$ 16965</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position . investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the sum of other revenue for 2009 and 2010?
Answer: 1666.0
Question: what is the value in 2008?
Answer: 852.0
Question: what is the sum including 2008?
Answer: 2518.0
Question: what is the average?
| 839.33333 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements note 9 . collateralized agreements and financings collateralized agreements are securities purchased under agreements to resell ( resale agreements or reverse repurchase agreements ) and securities borrowed . collateralized financings are securities sold under agreements to repurchase ( repurchase agreements ) , securities loaned and other secured financings . the firm enters into these transactions in order to , among other things , facilitate client activities , invest excess cash , acquire securities to cover short positions and finance certain firm activities . collateralized agreements and financings are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis when a legal right of setoff exists . interest on collateralized agreements and collateralized financings is recognized over the life of the transaction and included in 201cinterest income 201d and 201cinterest expense , 201d respectively . see note 23 for further information about interest income and interest expense . the table below presents the carrying value of resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowed and loaned transactions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td><td>as of december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under agreements toresell1</td><td>$ 141334</td><td>$ 187789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed2</td><td>136893</td><td>153341</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under agreements torepurchase1</td><td>171807</td><td>164502</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitiesloaned2</td><td>13765</td><td>7182</td></tr></table> in millions 2012 2011 securities purchased under agreements to resell 1 $ 141334 $ 187789 securities borrowed 2 136893 153341 securities sold under agreements to repurchase 1 171807 164502 securities loaned 2 13765 7182 1 . substantially all resale and repurchase agreements are carried at fair value under the fair value option . see note 8 for further information about the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine fair value . 2 . as of december 2012 and december 2011 , $ 38.40 billion and $ 47.62 billion of securities borrowed , and $ 1.56 billion and $ 107 million of securities loaned were at fair value , respectively . resale and repurchase agreements a resale agreement is a transaction in which the firm purchases financial instruments from a seller , typically in exchange for cash , and simultaneously enters into an agreement to resell the same or substantially the same financial instruments to the seller at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date . a repurchase agreement is a transaction in which the firm sells financial instruments to a buyer , typically in exchange for cash , and simultaneously enters into an agreement to repurchase the same or substantially the same financial instruments from the buyer at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date . the financial instruments purchased or sold in resale and repurchase agreements typically include u.s . government and federal agency , and investment-grade sovereign obligations . the firm receives financial instruments purchased under resale agreements , makes delivery of financial instruments sold under repurchase agreements , monitors the market value of these financial instruments on a daily basis , and delivers or obtains additional collateral due to changes in the market value of the financial instruments , as appropriate . for resale agreements , the firm typically requires delivery of collateral with a fair value approximately equal to the carrying value of the relevant assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition . even though repurchase and resale agreements involve the legal transfer of ownership of financial instruments , they are accounted for as financing arrangements because they require the financial instruments to be repurchased or resold at the maturity of the agreement . however , 201crepos to maturity 201d are accounted for as sales . a repo to maturity is a transaction in which the firm transfers a security under an agreement to repurchase the security where the maturity date of the repurchase agreement matches the maturity date of the underlying security . therefore , the firm effectively no longer has a repurchase obligation and has relinquished control over the underlying security and , accordingly , accounts for the transaction as a sale . the firm had no repos to maturity outstanding as of december 2012 or december 2011 . 152 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the amount of securities borrowed by the end of 2012, in billions?
| 38.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements note 9 . collateralized agreements and financings collateralized agreements are securities purchased under agreements to resell ( resale agreements or reverse repurchase agreements ) and securities borrowed . collateralized financings are securities sold under agreements to repurchase ( repurchase agreements ) , securities loaned and other secured financings . the firm enters into these transactions in order to , among other things , facilitate client activities , invest excess cash , acquire securities to cover short positions and finance certain firm activities . collateralized agreements and financings are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis when a legal right of setoff exists . interest on collateralized agreements and collateralized financings is recognized over the life of the transaction and included in 201cinterest income 201d and 201cinterest expense , 201d respectively . see note 23 for further information about interest income and interest expense . the table below presents the carrying value of resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowed and loaned transactions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td><td>as of december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under agreements toresell1</td><td>$ 141334</td><td>$ 187789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed2</td><td>136893</td><td>153341</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under agreements torepurchase1</td><td>171807</td><td>164502</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitiesloaned2</td><td>13765</td><td>7182</td></tr></table> in millions 2012 2011 securities purchased under agreements to resell 1 $ 141334 $ 187789 securities borrowed 2 136893 153341 securities sold under agreements to repurchase 1 171807 164502 securities loaned 2 13765 7182 1 . substantially all resale and repurchase agreements are carried at fair value under the fair value option . see note 8 for further information about the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine fair value . 2 . as of december 2012 and december 2011 , $ 38.40 billion and $ 47.62 billion of securities borrowed , and $ 1.56 billion and $ 107 million of securities loaned were at fair value , respectively . resale and repurchase agreements a resale agreement is a transaction in which the firm purchases financial instruments from a seller , typically in exchange for cash , and simultaneously enters into an agreement to resell the same or substantially the same financial instruments to the seller at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date . a repurchase agreement is a transaction in which the firm sells financial instruments to a buyer , typically in exchange for cash , and simultaneously enters into an agreement to repurchase the same or substantially the same financial instruments from the buyer at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date . the financial instruments purchased or sold in resale and repurchase agreements typically include u.s . government and federal agency , and investment-grade sovereign obligations . the firm receives financial instruments purchased under resale agreements , makes delivery of financial instruments sold under repurchase agreements , monitors the market value of these financial instruments on a daily basis , and delivers or obtains additional collateral due to changes in the market value of the financial instruments , as appropriate . for resale agreements , the firm typically requires delivery of collateral with a fair value approximately equal to the carrying value of the relevant assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition . even though repurchase and resale agreements involve the legal transfer of ownership of financial instruments , they are accounted for as financing arrangements because they require the financial instruments to be repurchased or resold at the maturity of the agreement . however , 201crepos to maturity 201d are accounted for as sales . a repo to maturity is a transaction in which the firm transfers a security under an agreement to repurchase the security where the maturity date of the repurchase agreement matches the maturity date of the underlying security . therefore , the firm effectively no longer has a repurchase obligation and has relinquished control over the underlying security and , accordingly , accounts for the transaction as a sale . the firm had no repos to maturity outstanding as of december 2012 or december 2011 . 152 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the amount of securities borrowed by the end of 2012, in billions?
Answer: 38.4
Question: and what was it in the end of 2011?
| 47.62 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements note 9 . collateralized agreements and financings collateralized agreements are securities purchased under agreements to resell ( resale agreements or reverse repurchase agreements ) and securities borrowed . collateralized financings are securities sold under agreements to repurchase ( repurchase agreements ) , securities loaned and other secured financings . the firm enters into these transactions in order to , among other things , facilitate client activities , invest excess cash , acquire securities to cover short positions and finance certain firm activities . collateralized agreements and financings are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis when a legal right of setoff exists . interest on collateralized agreements and collateralized financings is recognized over the life of the transaction and included in 201cinterest income 201d and 201cinterest expense , 201d respectively . see note 23 for further information about interest income and interest expense . the table below presents the carrying value of resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowed and loaned transactions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td><td>as of december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under agreements toresell1</td><td>$ 141334</td><td>$ 187789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed2</td><td>136893</td><td>153341</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under agreements torepurchase1</td><td>171807</td><td>164502</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitiesloaned2</td><td>13765</td><td>7182</td></tr></table> in millions 2012 2011 securities purchased under agreements to resell 1 $ 141334 $ 187789 securities borrowed 2 136893 153341 securities sold under agreements to repurchase 1 171807 164502 securities loaned 2 13765 7182 1 . substantially all resale and repurchase agreements are carried at fair value under the fair value option . see note 8 for further information about the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine fair value . 2 . as of december 2012 and december 2011 , $ 38.40 billion and $ 47.62 billion of securities borrowed , and $ 1.56 billion and $ 107 million of securities loaned were at fair value , respectively . resale and repurchase agreements a resale agreement is a transaction in which the firm purchases financial instruments from a seller , typically in exchange for cash , and simultaneously enters into an agreement to resell the same or substantially the same financial instruments to the seller at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date . a repurchase agreement is a transaction in which the firm sells financial instruments to a buyer , typically in exchange for cash , and simultaneously enters into an agreement to repurchase the same or substantially the same financial instruments from the buyer at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date . the financial instruments purchased or sold in resale and repurchase agreements typically include u.s . government and federal agency , and investment-grade sovereign obligations . the firm receives financial instruments purchased under resale agreements , makes delivery of financial instruments sold under repurchase agreements , monitors the market value of these financial instruments on a daily basis , and delivers or obtains additional collateral due to changes in the market value of the financial instruments , as appropriate . for resale agreements , the firm typically requires delivery of collateral with a fair value approximately equal to the carrying value of the relevant assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition . even though repurchase and resale agreements involve the legal transfer of ownership of financial instruments , they are accounted for as financing arrangements because they require the financial instruments to be repurchased or resold at the maturity of the agreement . however , 201crepos to maturity 201d are accounted for as sales . a repo to maturity is a transaction in which the firm transfers a security under an agreement to repurchase the security where the maturity date of the repurchase agreement matches the maturity date of the underlying security . therefore , the firm effectively no longer has a repurchase obligation and has relinquished control over the underlying security and , accordingly , accounts for the transaction as a sale . the firm had no repos to maturity outstanding as of december 2012 or december 2011 . 152 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the amount of securities borrowed by the end of 2012, in billions?
Answer: 38.4
Question: and what was it in the end of 2011?
Answer: 47.62
Question: what was, then, the change throughout the year, in billions?
| -9.22 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements note 9 . collateralized agreements and financings collateralized agreements are securities purchased under agreements to resell ( resale agreements or reverse repurchase agreements ) and securities borrowed . collateralized financings are securities sold under agreements to repurchase ( repurchase agreements ) , securities loaned and other secured financings . the firm enters into these transactions in order to , among other things , facilitate client activities , invest excess cash , acquire securities to cover short positions and finance certain firm activities . collateralized agreements and financings are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis when a legal right of setoff exists . interest on collateralized agreements and collateralized financings is recognized over the life of the transaction and included in 201cinterest income 201d and 201cinterest expense , 201d respectively . see note 23 for further information about interest income and interest expense . the table below presents the carrying value of resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowed and loaned transactions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td><td>as of december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under agreements toresell1</td><td>$ 141334</td><td>$ 187789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed2</td><td>136893</td><td>153341</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under agreements torepurchase1</td><td>171807</td><td>164502</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitiesloaned2</td><td>13765</td><td>7182</td></tr></table> in millions 2012 2011 securities purchased under agreements to resell 1 $ 141334 $ 187789 securities borrowed 2 136893 153341 securities sold under agreements to repurchase 1 171807 164502 securities loaned 2 13765 7182 1 . substantially all resale and repurchase agreements are carried at fair value under the fair value option . see note 8 for further information about the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine fair value . 2 . as of december 2012 and december 2011 , $ 38.40 billion and $ 47.62 billion of securities borrowed , and $ 1.56 billion and $ 107 million of securities loaned were at fair value , respectively . resale and repurchase agreements a resale agreement is a transaction in which the firm purchases financial instruments from a seller , typically in exchange for cash , and simultaneously enters into an agreement to resell the same or substantially the same financial instruments to the seller at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date . a repurchase agreement is a transaction in which the firm sells financial instruments to a buyer , typically in exchange for cash , and simultaneously enters into an agreement to repurchase the same or substantially the same financial instruments from the buyer at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date . the financial instruments purchased or sold in resale and repurchase agreements typically include u.s . government and federal agency , and investment-grade sovereign obligations . the firm receives financial instruments purchased under resale agreements , makes delivery of financial instruments sold under repurchase agreements , monitors the market value of these financial instruments on a daily basis , and delivers or obtains additional collateral due to changes in the market value of the financial instruments , as appropriate . for resale agreements , the firm typically requires delivery of collateral with a fair value approximately equal to the carrying value of the relevant assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition . even though repurchase and resale agreements involve the legal transfer of ownership of financial instruments , they are accounted for as financing arrangements because they require the financial instruments to be repurchased or resold at the maturity of the agreement . however , 201crepos to maturity 201d are accounted for as sales . a repo to maturity is a transaction in which the firm transfers a security under an agreement to repurchase the security where the maturity date of the repurchase agreement matches the maturity date of the underlying security . therefore , the firm effectively no longer has a repurchase obligation and has relinquished control over the underlying security and , accordingly , accounts for the transaction as a sale . the firm had no repos to maturity outstanding as of december 2012 or december 2011 . 152 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the amount of securities borrowed by the end of 2012, in billions?
Answer: 38.4
Question: and what was it in the end of 2011?
Answer: 47.62
Question: what was, then, the change throughout the year, in billions?
Answer: -9.22
Question: in that same period, what was the change in the total of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, in millions?
| 7305.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits in 2013?
| 85.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits in 2013?
Answer: 85.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
| 82.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits in 2013?
Answer: 85.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
Answer: 82.0
Question: what is the difference?
| 3.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits in 2013?
Answer: 85.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
Answer: 82.0
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 3.0
Question: what was the 2012 value?
| 82.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits in 2013?
Answer: 85.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
Answer: 82.0
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 3.0
Question: what was the 2012 value?
Answer: 82.0
Question: what is the net change divided by that value?
| 0.03659 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the impairment tests performed for intangible assets as of july 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 indicated no impairment charges were required . estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 156</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>126</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>91</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>24</td></tr></table> indefinite-lived acquired management contracts in july 2013 , in connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , the company acquired $ 231 million of indefinite-lived management contracts . in march 2012 , in connection with the claymore transaction , the company acquired $ 163 million of indefinite-lived etp management contracts . finite-lived acquired management contracts in october 2013 , in connection with the mgpa transaction , the company acquired $ 29 million of finite-lived management contracts with a weighted-average estimated useful life of approximately eight years . in september 2012 , in connection with the srpep transaction , the company acquired $ 40 million of finite- lived management contracts with a weighted-average estimated useful life of approximately 10 years . 11 . other assets at march 31 , 2013 , blackrock held an approximately one- third economic equity interest in private national mortgage acceptance company , llc ( 201cpnmac 201d ) , which is accounted for as an equity method investment and is included in other assets on the consolidated statements of financial condition . on may 8 , 2013 , pennymac became the sole managing member of pnmac in connection with an initial public offering of pennymac ( the 201cpennymac ipo 201d ) . as a result of the pennymac ipo , blackrock recorded a noncash , nonoperating pre-tax gain of $ 39 million related to the carrying value of its equity method investment . subsequent to the pennymac ipo , the company contributed 6.1 million units of its investment to a new donor advised fund ( the 201ccharitable contribution 201d ) . the fair value of the charitable contribution was $ 124 million and is included in general and administration expenses on the consolidated statements of income . in connection with the charitable contribution , the company also recorded a noncash , nonoperating pre-tax gain of $ 80 million related to the contributed investment and a tax benefit of approximately $ 48 million . the carrying value and fair value of the company 2019s remaining interest ( approximately 20% ( 20 % ) or 16 million shares and units ) was approximately $ 127 million and $ 273 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 . the fair value of the company 2019s interest reflected the pennymac stock price at december 31 , 2013 ( level 1 input ) . 12 . borrowings short-term borrowings the carrying value of short-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 included $ 100 million under the 2012 revolving credit facility . 2013 revolving credit facility . in march 2011 , the company entered into a five-year $ 3.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility ( the 201c2011 credit facility 201d ) . in march 2012 , the 2011 credit facility was amended to extend the maturity date by one year to march 2017 and in april 2012 the amount of the aggregate commitment was increased to $ 3.785 billion ( the 201c2012 credit facility 201d ) . in march 2013 , the company 2019s credit facility was amended to extend the maturity date by one year to march 2018 and the amount of the aggregate commitment was increased to $ 3.990 billion ( the 201c2013 credit facility 201d ) . the 2013 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2013 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 4.990 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2013 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2013 . the 2013 credit facility provides back- up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities . at december 31 , 2013 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2013 credit facility . commercial paper program . on october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.0 billion . on may 13 , 2011 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that may be borrowed under the cp program to $ 3.5 billion . on may 17 , 2012 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount to $ 3.785 billion . in april 2013 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.990 billion . the commercial paper program is currently supported by the 2013 credit facility . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding. .
Question: what is the net change in the maximum aggregate amount that may be borrowed under the cp program from 2009 to 2011?
| 0.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the impairment tests performed for intangible assets as of july 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 indicated no impairment charges were required . estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 156</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>126</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>91</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>24</td></tr></table> indefinite-lived acquired management contracts in july 2013 , in connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , the company acquired $ 231 million of indefinite-lived management contracts . in march 2012 , in connection with the claymore transaction , the company acquired $ 163 million of indefinite-lived etp management contracts . finite-lived acquired management contracts in october 2013 , in connection with the mgpa transaction , the company acquired $ 29 million of finite-lived management contracts with a weighted-average estimated useful life of approximately eight years . in september 2012 , in connection with the srpep transaction , the company acquired $ 40 million of finite- lived management contracts with a weighted-average estimated useful life of approximately 10 years . 11 . other assets at march 31 , 2013 , blackrock held an approximately one- third economic equity interest in private national mortgage acceptance company , llc ( 201cpnmac 201d ) , which is accounted for as an equity method investment and is included in other assets on the consolidated statements of financial condition . on may 8 , 2013 , pennymac became the sole managing member of pnmac in connection with an initial public offering of pennymac ( the 201cpennymac ipo 201d ) . as a result of the pennymac ipo , blackrock recorded a noncash , nonoperating pre-tax gain of $ 39 million related to the carrying value of its equity method investment . subsequent to the pennymac ipo , the company contributed 6.1 million units of its investment to a new donor advised fund ( the 201ccharitable contribution 201d ) . the fair value of the charitable contribution was $ 124 million and is included in general and administration expenses on the consolidated statements of income . in connection with the charitable contribution , the company also recorded a noncash , nonoperating pre-tax gain of $ 80 million related to the contributed investment and a tax benefit of approximately $ 48 million . the carrying value and fair value of the company 2019s remaining interest ( approximately 20% ( 20 % ) or 16 million shares and units ) was approximately $ 127 million and $ 273 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 . the fair value of the company 2019s interest reflected the pennymac stock price at december 31 , 2013 ( level 1 input ) . 12 . borrowings short-term borrowings the carrying value of short-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 included $ 100 million under the 2012 revolving credit facility . 2013 revolving credit facility . in march 2011 , the company entered into a five-year $ 3.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility ( the 201c2011 credit facility 201d ) . in march 2012 , the 2011 credit facility was amended to extend the maturity date by one year to march 2017 and in april 2012 the amount of the aggregate commitment was increased to $ 3.785 billion ( the 201c2012 credit facility 201d ) . in march 2013 , the company 2019s credit facility was amended to extend the maturity date by one year to march 2018 and the amount of the aggregate commitment was increased to $ 3.990 billion ( the 201c2013 credit facility 201d ) . the 2013 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2013 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 4.990 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2013 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2013 . the 2013 credit facility provides back- up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities . at december 31 , 2013 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2013 credit facility . commercial paper program . on october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.0 billion . on may 13 , 2011 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that may be borrowed under the cp program to $ 3.5 billion . on may 17 , 2012 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount to $ 3.785 billion . in april 2013 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.990 billion . the commercial paper program is currently supported by the 2013 credit facility . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding. .
Question: what is the net change in the maximum aggregate amount that may be borrowed under the cp program from 2009 to 2011?
Answer: 0.5
Question: what was the change over the 2009 value?
| 0.16667 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for pass-through to tenants the tenant 2019s share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2011 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 1807885</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>1718403</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>1609279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>1425804</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1232154</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>6045584</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 8482000 , $ 7912000 and $ 8394000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues in any of the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . former bradlees locations pursuant to a master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we are due $ 5000000 per annum of additional rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop is contesting our right to reallocate and claims that we are no longer entitled to the additional rent . on november 7 , 2011 , the court determined that we have a continuing right to allocate the annual rent to unexpired leases covered by the master agreement and guaranty and directed entry of a judgment in our favor ordering stop & shop to pay us the unpaid annual rent ( see note 20 2013 commitments and contingencies 2013 litigation ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , we have a $ 41983000 receivable from stop and shop. .
Question: what was the total of percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales in 2011?
| 8482000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for pass-through to tenants the tenant 2019s share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2011 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 1807885</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>1718403</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>1609279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>1425804</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1232154</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>6045584</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 8482000 , $ 7912000 and $ 8394000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues in any of the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . former bradlees locations pursuant to a master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we are due $ 5000000 per annum of additional rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop is contesting our right to reallocate and claims that we are no longer entitled to the additional rent . on november 7 , 2011 , the court determined that we have a continuing right to allocate the annual rent to unexpired leases covered by the master agreement and guaranty and directed entry of a judgment in our favor ordering stop & shop to pay us the unpaid annual rent ( see note 20 2013 commitments and contingencies 2013 litigation ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , we have a $ 41983000 receivable from stop and shop. .
Question: what was the total of percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales in 2011?
Answer: 8482000.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
| 7912000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for pass-through to tenants the tenant 2019s share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2011 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 1807885</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>1718403</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>1609279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>1425804</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1232154</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>6045584</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 8482000 , $ 7912000 and $ 8394000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues in any of the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . former bradlees locations pursuant to a master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we are due $ 5000000 per annum of additional rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop is contesting our right to reallocate and claims that we are no longer entitled to the additional rent . on november 7 , 2011 , the court determined that we have a continuing right to allocate the annual rent to unexpired leases covered by the master agreement and guaranty and directed entry of a judgment in our favor ordering stop & shop to pay us the unpaid annual rent ( see note 20 2013 commitments and contingencies 2013 litigation ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , we have a $ 41983000 receivable from stop and shop. .
Question: what was the total of percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales in 2011?
Answer: 8482000.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 7912000.0
Question: what was, then, the total of percentage rentals in both years combined?
| 16394000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for pass-through to tenants the tenant 2019s share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2011 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 1807885</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>1718403</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>1609279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>1425804</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1232154</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>6045584</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 8482000 , $ 7912000 and $ 8394000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues in any of the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . former bradlees locations pursuant to a master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we are due $ 5000000 per annum of additional rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop is contesting our right to reallocate and claims that we are no longer entitled to the additional rent . on november 7 , 2011 , the court determined that we have a continuing right to allocate the annual rent to unexpired leases covered by the master agreement and guaranty and directed entry of a judgment in our favor ordering stop & shop to pay us the unpaid annual rent ( see note 20 2013 commitments and contingencies 2013 litigation ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , we have a $ 41983000 receivable from stop and shop. .
Question: what was the total of percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales in 2011?
Answer: 8482000.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 7912000.0
Question: what was, then, the total of percentage rentals in both years combined?
Answer: 16394000.0
Question: and in the subsequent year of that period, what was the future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options?
| 1807885.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for pass-through to tenants the tenant 2019s share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2011 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 1807885</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>1718403</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>1609279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>1425804</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1232154</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>6045584</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 8482000 , $ 7912000 and $ 8394000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues in any of the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . former bradlees locations pursuant to a master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we are due $ 5000000 per annum of additional rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop is contesting our right to reallocate and claims that we are no longer entitled to the additional rent . on november 7 , 2011 , the court determined that we have a continuing right to allocate the annual rent to unexpired leases covered by the master agreement and guaranty and directed entry of a judgment in our favor ordering stop & shop to pay us the unpaid annual rent ( see note 20 2013 commitments and contingencies 2013 litigation ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , we have a $ 41983000 receivable from stop and shop. .
Question: what was the total of percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales in 2011?
Answer: 8482000.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 7912000.0
Question: what was, then, the total of percentage rentals in both years combined?
Answer: 16394000.0
Question: and in the subsequent year of that period, what was the future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options?
Answer: 1807885.0
Question: what was that revenue in 2013?
| 1718403.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for pass-through to tenants the tenant 2019s share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2011 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 1807885</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>1718403</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>1609279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>1425804</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1232154</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>6045584</td></tr></table> these amounts do not include percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 8482000 , $ 7912000 and $ 8394000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues in any of the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . former bradlees locations pursuant to a master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we are due $ 5000000 per annum of additional rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop is contesting our right to reallocate and claims that we are no longer entitled to the additional rent . on november 7 , 2011 , the court determined that we have a continuing right to allocate the annual rent to unexpired leases covered by the master agreement and guaranty and directed entry of a judgment in our favor ordering stop & shop to pay us the unpaid annual rent ( see note 20 2013 commitments and contingencies 2013 litigation ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , we have a $ 41983000 receivable from stop and shop. .
Question: what was the total of percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales in 2011?
Answer: 8482000.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 7912000.0
Question: what was, then, the total of percentage rentals in both years combined?
Answer: 16394000.0
Question: and in the subsequent year of that period, what was the future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options?
Answer: 1807885.0
Question: what was that revenue in 2013?
Answer: 1718403.0
Question: in which of these two years, then, was it greater?
| yes | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station in march 2016 and a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the formula rate plan revenues and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 1237 gwh , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in industrial usage primarily due to an increase in demand from existing customers and expansion projects in the chemicals industry . 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 2408.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>62.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-6.7 ( 6.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>-17.2 ( 17.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-9.0 ( 9.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 2438.4</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage and an increase in volume during the unbilled period . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the net change in revenues from 2015 to 2016?
| 29.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station in march 2016 and a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the formula rate plan revenues and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 1237 gwh , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in industrial usage primarily due to an increase in demand from existing customers and expansion projects in the chemicals industry . 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 2408.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>62.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-6.7 ( 6.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>-17.2 ( 17.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-9.0 ( 9.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 2438.4</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage and an increase in volume during the unbilled period . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the net change in revenues from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 29.6
Question: what were net revenues in 2015?
| 2408.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station in march 2016 and a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the formula rate plan revenues and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 1237 gwh , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in industrial usage primarily due to an increase in demand from existing customers and expansion projects in the chemicals industry . 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 2408.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>62.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-6.7 ( 6.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>-17.2 ( 17.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-9.0 ( 9.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 2438.4</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage and an increase in volume during the unbilled period . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the net change in revenues from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 29.6
Question: what were net revenues in 2015?
Answer: 2408.8
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.01229 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 146.54</td><td>$ 159.23</td><td>$ 148.89</td><td>$ 182.70</td><td>$ 195.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 132.38</td><td>$ 150.49</td><td>$ 152.55</td><td>$ 170.79</td><td>$ 208.06</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 141.38</td><td>$ 176.83</td><td>$ 147.19</td><td>$ 179.37</td><td>$ 213.49</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the value of the united parcel service inc . considering its value in 2017 and the original amount invested in it in 2012?
| 95.75 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 146.54</td><td>$ 159.23</td><td>$ 148.89</td><td>$ 182.70</td><td>$ 195.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 132.38</td><td>$ 150.49</td><td>$ 152.55</td><td>$ 170.79</td><td>$ 208.06</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 141.38</td><td>$ 176.83</td><td>$ 147.19</td><td>$ 179.37</td><td>$ 213.49</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the value of the united parcel service inc . considering its value in 2017 and the original amount invested in it in 2012?
Answer: 95.75
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to this original amount, in percentage?
| 0.9575 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in april 2009 , the fasb issued additional guidance under asc 820 which provides guidance on estimat- ing the fair value of an asset or liability ( financial or nonfinancial ) when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased , and on identifying transactions that are not orderly . the application of the requirements of this guidance did not have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements . in august 2009 , the fasb issued asu 2009-05 , 201cmeasuring liabilities at fair value , 201d which further amends asc 820 by providing clarification for cir- cumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available . the company included the disclosures required by this guidance in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in june 2006 , the fasb issued guidance under asc 740 , 201cincome taxes 201d ( formerly fin 48 ) . this guid- ance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in tax returns . specifically , the financial statement effects of a tax position may be recognized only when it is determined that it is 201cmore likely than not 201d that , based on its technical merits , the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax authority . the amount recognized shall be measured as the largest amount of tax benefits that exceed a 50% ( 50 % ) probability of being recognized . this guidance also expands income tax disclosure requirements . international paper applied the provisions of this guidance begin- ning in the first quarter of 2007 . the adoption of this guidance resulted in a charge to the beginning bal- ance of retained earnings of $ 94 million at the date of adoption . note 3 industry segment information financial information by industry segment and geo- graphic area for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 is presented on pages 47 and 48 . effective january 1 , 2008 , the company changed its method of allocating corpo- rate overhead expenses to its business segments to increase the expense amounts allocated to these businesses in reports reviewed by its chief executive officer to facilitate performance comparisons with other companies . accordingly , the company has revised its presentation of industry segment operat- ing profit to reflect this change in allocation method , and has adjusted all comparative prior period information on this basis . note 4 earnings per share attributable to international paper company common shareholders basic earnings per common share from continuing operations are computed by dividing earnings from continuing operations by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding . diluted earnings per common share from continuing oper- ations are computed assuming that all potentially dilutive securities , including 201cin-the-money 201d stock options , were converted into common shares at the beginning of each year . in addition , the computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the inclusion of contingently convertible securities in periods when dilutive . a reconciliation of the amounts included in the computation of basic earnings per common share from continuing operations , and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations is as fol- in millions except per share amounts 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 663</td><td>$ -1269 ( 1269 )</td><td>$ 1215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations 2013 assumingdilution</td><td>$ 663</td><td>$ -1269 ( 1269 )</td><td>$ 1215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average common shares outstanding</td><td>425.3</td><td>421.0</td><td>428.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of dilutive securities restricted performance share plan ( a )</td><td>2.7</td><td>2013</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stock options ( b )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>0.4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution</td><td>428.0</td><td>421.0</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations</td><td>$ 1.56</td><td>$ -3.02 ( 3.02 )</td><td>$ 2.83</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations</td><td>$ 1.55</td><td>$ -3.02 ( 3.02 )</td><td>$ 2.81</td></tr></table> average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution 428.0 421.0 433.0 basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations $ 1.56 $ ( 3.02 ) $ 2.83 diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations $ 1.55 $ ( 3.02 ) $ 2.81 ( a ) securities are not included in the table in periods when anti- dilutive . ( b ) options to purchase 22.2 million , 25.1 million and 17.5 million shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , were not included in the computation of diluted common shares outstanding because their exercise price exceeded the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for each respective reporting date . note 5 restructuring and other charges this footnote discusses restructuring and other charges recorded for each of the three years included in the period ended december 31 , 2009 . it .
Question: what is the sum of earnings (loss) from continuing operations in 2008 and 2009?
| -606.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in april 2009 , the fasb issued additional guidance under asc 820 which provides guidance on estimat- ing the fair value of an asset or liability ( financial or nonfinancial ) when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased , and on identifying transactions that are not orderly . the application of the requirements of this guidance did not have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements . in august 2009 , the fasb issued asu 2009-05 , 201cmeasuring liabilities at fair value , 201d which further amends asc 820 by providing clarification for cir- cumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available . the company included the disclosures required by this guidance in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in june 2006 , the fasb issued guidance under asc 740 , 201cincome taxes 201d ( formerly fin 48 ) . this guid- ance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in tax returns . specifically , the financial statement effects of a tax position may be recognized only when it is determined that it is 201cmore likely than not 201d that , based on its technical merits , the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax authority . the amount recognized shall be measured as the largest amount of tax benefits that exceed a 50% ( 50 % ) probability of being recognized . this guidance also expands income tax disclosure requirements . international paper applied the provisions of this guidance begin- ning in the first quarter of 2007 . the adoption of this guidance resulted in a charge to the beginning bal- ance of retained earnings of $ 94 million at the date of adoption . note 3 industry segment information financial information by industry segment and geo- graphic area for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 is presented on pages 47 and 48 . effective january 1 , 2008 , the company changed its method of allocating corpo- rate overhead expenses to its business segments to increase the expense amounts allocated to these businesses in reports reviewed by its chief executive officer to facilitate performance comparisons with other companies . accordingly , the company has revised its presentation of industry segment operat- ing profit to reflect this change in allocation method , and has adjusted all comparative prior period information on this basis . note 4 earnings per share attributable to international paper company common shareholders basic earnings per common share from continuing operations are computed by dividing earnings from continuing operations by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding . diluted earnings per common share from continuing oper- ations are computed assuming that all potentially dilutive securities , including 201cin-the-money 201d stock options , were converted into common shares at the beginning of each year . in addition , the computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the inclusion of contingently convertible securities in periods when dilutive . a reconciliation of the amounts included in the computation of basic earnings per common share from continuing operations , and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations is as fol- in millions except per share amounts 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 663</td><td>$ -1269 ( 1269 )</td><td>$ 1215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations 2013 assumingdilution</td><td>$ 663</td><td>$ -1269 ( 1269 )</td><td>$ 1215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average common shares outstanding</td><td>425.3</td><td>421.0</td><td>428.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of dilutive securities restricted performance share plan ( a )</td><td>2.7</td><td>2013</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stock options ( b )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>0.4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution</td><td>428.0</td><td>421.0</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations</td><td>$ 1.56</td><td>$ -3.02 ( 3.02 )</td><td>$ 2.83</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations</td><td>$ 1.55</td><td>$ -3.02 ( 3.02 )</td><td>$ 2.81</td></tr></table> average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution 428.0 421.0 433.0 basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations $ 1.56 $ ( 3.02 ) $ 2.83 diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations $ 1.55 $ ( 3.02 ) $ 2.81 ( a ) securities are not included in the table in periods when anti- dilutive . ( b ) options to purchase 22.2 million , 25.1 million and 17.5 million shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , were not included in the computation of diluted common shares outstanding because their exercise price exceeded the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for each respective reporting date . note 5 restructuring and other charges this footnote discusses restructuring and other charges recorded for each of the three years included in the period ended december 31 , 2009 . it .
Question: what is the sum of earnings (loss) from continuing operations in 2008 and 2009?
Answer: -606.0
Question: what are earnings (loss) in 2008?
| 1215.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in april 2009 , the fasb issued additional guidance under asc 820 which provides guidance on estimat- ing the fair value of an asset or liability ( financial or nonfinancial ) when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased , and on identifying transactions that are not orderly . the application of the requirements of this guidance did not have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements . in august 2009 , the fasb issued asu 2009-05 , 201cmeasuring liabilities at fair value , 201d which further amends asc 820 by providing clarification for cir- cumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available . the company included the disclosures required by this guidance in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in june 2006 , the fasb issued guidance under asc 740 , 201cincome taxes 201d ( formerly fin 48 ) . this guid- ance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in tax returns . specifically , the financial statement effects of a tax position may be recognized only when it is determined that it is 201cmore likely than not 201d that , based on its technical merits , the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax authority . the amount recognized shall be measured as the largest amount of tax benefits that exceed a 50% ( 50 % ) probability of being recognized . this guidance also expands income tax disclosure requirements . international paper applied the provisions of this guidance begin- ning in the first quarter of 2007 . the adoption of this guidance resulted in a charge to the beginning bal- ance of retained earnings of $ 94 million at the date of adoption . note 3 industry segment information financial information by industry segment and geo- graphic area for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 is presented on pages 47 and 48 . effective january 1 , 2008 , the company changed its method of allocating corpo- rate overhead expenses to its business segments to increase the expense amounts allocated to these businesses in reports reviewed by its chief executive officer to facilitate performance comparisons with other companies . accordingly , the company has revised its presentation of industry segment operat- ing profit to reflect this change in allocation method , and has adjusted all comparative prior period information on this basis . note 4 earnings per share attributable to international paper company common shareholders basic earnings per common share from continuing operations are computed by dividing earnings from continuing operations by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding . diluted earnings per common share from continuing oper- ations are computed assuming that all potentially dilutive securities , including 201cin-the-money 201d stock options , were converted into common shares at the beginning of each year . in addition , the computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the inclusion of contingently convertible securities in periods when dilutive . a reconciliation of the amounts included in the computation of basic earnings per common share from continuing operations , and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations is as fol- in millions except per share amounts 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 663</td><td>$ -1269 ( 1269 )</td><td>$ 1215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations 2013 assumingdilution</td><td>$ 663</td><td>$ -1269 ( 1269 )</td><td>$ 1215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average common shares outstanding</td><td>425.3</td><td>421.0</td><td>428.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of dilutive securities restricted performance share plan ( a )</td><td>2.7</td><td>2013</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stock options ( b )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>0.4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution</td><td>428.0</td><td>421.0</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations</td><td>$ 1.56</td><td>$ -3.02 ( 3.02 )</td><td>$ 2.83</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations</td><td>$ 1.55</td><td>$ -3.02 ( 3.02 )</td><td>$ 2.81</td></tr></table> average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution 428.0 421.0 433.0 basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations $ 1.56 $ ( 3.02 ) $ 2.83 diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations $ 1.55 $ ( 3.02 ) $ 2.81 ( a ) securities are not included in the table in periods when anti- dilutive . ( b ) options to purchase 22.2 million , 25.1 million and 17.5 million shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , were not included in the computation of diluted common shares outstanding because their exercise price exceeded the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for each respective reporting date . note 5 restructuring and other charges this footnote discusses restructuring and other charges recorded for each of the three years included in the period ended december 31 , 2009 . it .
Question: what is the sum of earnings (loss) from continuing operations in 2008 and 2009?
Answer: -606.0
Question: what are earnings (loss) in 2008?
Answer: 1215.0
Question: what is the total sum for the 3 years?
| 609.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . significant revenue arrangements ( continued ) $ 7 million of development and commercialization milestone payments . additionally , kissei agreed to reimburse the company for certain development costs , including a portion of costs for phase 2 trials of vx-702 . research funding ended under this program in june 2000 , and the company has received the full amount of research funding specified under the agreement . kissei has exclusive rights to develop and commercialize vx-702 in japan and certain far east countries and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . the company retains exclusive marketing rights outside the far east and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . in addition , the company will have the right to supply bulk drug material to kissei for sale in its territory and will receive royalties or drug supply payments on future product sales , if any . in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 6.4 million , $ 7.3 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively , was recognized as revenue under this agreement . the $ 7.3 million of revenue recognized in 2005 includes a $ 2.5 million milestone paid upon kissei 2019s completion of regulatory filings in preparation for phase 1 clinical development of vx-702 in japan . p . employee benefits the company has a 401 ( k ) retirement plan ( the 201cvertex 401 ( k ) plan 201d ) in which substantially all of its permanent employees are eligible to participate . participants may contribute up to 60% ( 60 % ) of their annual compensation to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan , subject to statutory limitations . the company may declare discretionary matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan that are payable in the form of vertex common stock . the match is paid in the form of fully vested interests in a vertex common stock fund . employees have the ability to transfer funds from the company stock fund as they choose . the company declared matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan as follows ( in thousands ) : q . related party transactions as of december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , the company had a loan outstanding to a former officer of the company in the amount of $ 36000 , $ 36000 , $ 97000 , respectively , which was initially advanced in april 2002 . the loan balance is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . in 2001 , the company entered into a four year consulting agreement with a director of the company for the provision of part-time consulting services over a period of four years , at the rate of $ 80000 per year commencing in january 2002 . the consulting agreement terminated in january 2006 . r . contingencies the company has certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities . the company accrues a reserve for contingent liabilities when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31,</td><td>$ 3341</td><td>$ 2894</td><td>$ 2492</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issued during the year ended december 31,</td><td>91</td><td>215</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issuable as of the year ended december 31,</td><td>28</td><td>19</td><td>57</td></tr></table> discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31 , $ 3341 $ 2894 $ 2492 shares issued during the year ended december 31 , 91 215 239 shares issuable as of the year ended december 31 , 28 19 57 .
Question: what was the total of share issuable in 2006?
| 28.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . significant revenue arrangements ( continued ) $ 7 million of development and commercialization milestone payments . additionally , kissei agreed to reimburse the company for certain development costs , including a portion of costs for phase 2 trials of vx-702 . research funding ended under this program in june 2000 , and the company has received the full amount of research funding specified under the agreement . kissei has exclusive rights to develop and commercialize vx-702 in japan and certain far east countries and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . the company retains exclusive marketing rights outside the far east and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . in addition , the company will have the right to supply bulk drug material to kissei for sale in its territory and will receive royalties or drug supply payments on future product sales , if any . in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 6.4 million , $ 7.3 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively , was recognized as revenue under this agreement . the $ 7.3 million of revenue recognized in 2005 includes a $ 2.5 million milestone paid upon kissei 2019s completion of regulatory filings in preparation for phase 1 clinical development of vx-702 in japan . p . employee benefits the company has a 401 ( k ) retirement plan ( the 201cvertex 401 ( k ) plan 201d ) in which substantially all of its permanent employees are eligible to participate . participants may contribute up to 60% ( 60 % ) of their annual compensation to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan , subject to statutory limitations . the company may declare discretionary matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan that are payable in the form of vertex common stock . the match is paid in the form of fully vested interests in a vertex common stock fund . employees have the ability to transfer funds from the company stock fund as they choose . the company declared matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan as follows ( in thousands ) : q . related party transactions as of december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , the company had a loan outstanding to a former officer of the company in the amount of $ 36000 , $ 36000 , $ 97000 , respectively , which was initially advanced in april 2002 . the loan balance is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . in 2001 , the company entered into a four year consulting agreement with a director of the company for the provision of part-time consulting services over a period of four years , at the rate of $ 80000 per year commencing in january 2002 . the consulting agreement terminated in january 2006 . r . contingencies the company has certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities . the company accrues a reserve for contingent liabilities when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31,</td><td>$ 3341</td><td>$ 2894</td><td>$ 2492</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issued during the year ended december 31,</td><td>91</td><td>215</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issuable as of the year ended december 31,</td><td>28</td><td>19</td><td>57</td></tr></table> discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31 , $ 3341 $ 2894 $ 2492 shares issued during the year ended december 31 , 91 215 239 shares issuable as of the year ended december 31 , 28 19 57 .
Question: what was the total of share issuable in 2006?
Answer: 28.0
Question: and what was that in 2005?
| 19.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . significant revenue arrangements ( continued ) $ 7 million of development and commercialization milestone payments . additionally , kissei agreed to reimburse the company for certain development costs , including a portion of costs for phase 2 trials of vx-702 . research funding ended under this program in june 2000 , and the company has received the full amount of research funding specified under the agreement . kissei has exclusive rights to develop and commercialize vx-702 in japan and certain far east countries and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . the company retains exclusive marketing rights outside the far east and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . in addition , the company will have the right to supply bulk drug material to kissei for sale in its territory and will receive royalties or drug supply payments on future product sales , if any . in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 6.4 million , $ 7.3 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively , was recognized as revenue under this agreement . the $ 7.3 million of revenue recognized in 2005 includes a $ 2.5 million milestone paid upon kissei 2019s completion of regulatory filings in preparation for phase 1 clinical development of vx-702 in japan . p . employee benefits the company has a 401 ( k ) retirement plan ( the 201cvertex 401 ( k ) plan 201d ) in which substantially all of its permanent employees are eligible to participate . participants may contribute up to 60% ( 60 % ) of their annual compensation to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan , subject to statutory limitations . the company may declare discretionary matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan that are payable in the form of vertex common stock . the match is paid in the form of fully vested interests in a vertex common stock fund . employees have the ability to transfer funds from the company stock fund as they choose . the company declared matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan as follows ( in thousands ) : q . related party transactions as of december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , the company had a loan outstanding to a former officer of the company in the amount of $ 36000 , $ 36000 , $ 97000 , respectively , which was initially advanced in april 2002 . the loan balance is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . in 2001 , the company entered into a four year consulting agreement with a director of the company for the provision of part-time consulting services over a period of four years , at the rate of $ 80000 per year commencing in january 2002 . the consulting agreement terminated in january 2006 . r . contingencies the company has certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities . the company accrues a reserve for contingent liabilities when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31,</td><td>$ 3341</td><td>$ 2894</td><td>$ 2492</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issued during the year ended december 31,</td><td>91</td><td>215</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issuable as of the year ended december 31,</td><td>28</td><td>19</td><td>57</td></tr></table> discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31 , $ 3341 $ 2894 $ 2492 shares issued during the year ended december 31 , 91 215 239 shares issuable as of the year ended december 31 , 28 19 57 .
Question: what was the total of share issuable in 2006?
Answer: 28.0
Question: and what was that in 2005?
Answer: 19.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 9.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . significant revenue arrangements ( continued ) $ 7 million of development and commercialization milestone payments . additionally , kissei agreed to reimburse the company for certain development costs , including a portion of costs for phase 2 trials of vx-702 . research funding ended under this program in june 2000 , and the company has received the full amount of research funding specified under the agreement . kissei has exclusive rights to develop and commercialize vx-702 in japan and certain far east countries and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . the company retains exclusive marketing rights outside the far east and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . in addition , the company will have the right to supply bulk drug material to kissei for sale in its territory and will receive royalties or drug supply payments on future product sales , if any . in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 6.4 million , $ 7.3 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively , was recognized as revenue under this agreement . the $ 7.3 million of revenue recognized in 2005 includes a $ 2.5 million milestone paid upon kissei 2019s completion of regulatory filings in preparation for phase 1 clinical development of vx-702 in japan . p . employee benefits the company has a 401 ( k ) retirement plan ( the 201cvertex 401 ( k ) plan 201d ) in which substantially all of its permanent employees are eligible to participate . participants may contribute up to 60% ( 60 % ) of their annual compensation to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan , subject to statutory limitations . the company may declare discretionary matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan that are payable in the form of vertex common stock . the match is paid in the form of fully vested interests in a vertex common stock fund . employees have the ability to transfer funds from the company stock fund as they choose . the company declared matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan as follows ( in thousands ) : q . related party transactions as of december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , the company had a loan outstanding to a former officer of the company in the amount of $ 36000 , $ 36000 , $ 97000 , respectively , which was initially advanced in april 2002 . the loan balance is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . in 2001 , the company entered into a four year consulting agreement with a director of the company for the provision of part-time consulting services over a period of four years , at the rate of $ 80000 per year commencing in january 2002 . the consulting agreement terminated in january 2006 . r . contingencies the company has certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities . the company accrues a reserve for contingent liabilities when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31,</td><td>$ 3341</td><td>$ 2894</td><td>$ 2492</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issued during the year ended december 31,</td><td>91</td><td>215</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issuable as of the year ended december 31,</td><td>28</td><td>19</td><td>57</td></tr></table> discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31 , $ 3341 $ 2894 $ 2492 shares issued during the year ended december 31 , 91 215 239 shares issuable as of the year ended december 31 , 28 19 57 .
Question: what was the total of share issuable in 2006?
Answer: 28.0
Question: and what was that in 2005?
Answer: 19.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 9.0
Question: what was the total of share issuable in 2005?
| 19.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . significant revenue arrangements ( continued ) $ 7 million of development and commercialization milestone payments . additionally , kissei agreed to reimburse the company for certain development costs , including a portion of costs for phase 2 trials of vx-702 . research funding ended under this program in june 2000 , and the company has received the full amount of research funding specified under the agreement . kissei has exclusive rights to develop and commercialize vx-702 in japan and certain far east countries and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . the company retains exclusive marketing rights outside the far east and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . in addition , the company will have the right to supply bulk drug material to kissei for sale in its territory and will receive royalties or drug supply payments on future product sales , if any . in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 6.4 million , $ 7.3 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively , was recognized as revenue under this agreement . the $ 7.3 million of revenue recognized in 2005 includes a $ 2.5 million milestone paid upon kissei 2019s completion of regulatory filings in preparation for phase 1 clinical development of vx-702 in japan . p . employee benefits the company has a 401 ( k ) retirement plan ( the 201cvertex 401 ( k ) plan 201d ) in which substantially all of its permanent employees are eligible to participate . participants may contribute up to 60% ( 60 % ) of their annual compensation to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan , subject to statutory limitations . the company may declare discretionary matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan that are payable in the form of vertex common stock . the match is paid in the form of fully vested interests in a vertex common stock fund . employees have the ability to transfer funds from the company stock fund as they choose . the company declared matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan as follows ( in thousands ) : q . related party transactions as of december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , the company had a loan outstanding to a former officer of the company in the amount of $ 36000 , $ 36000 , $ 97000 , respectively , which was initially advanced in april 2002 . the loan balance is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . in 2001 , the company entered into a four year consulting agreement with a director of the company for the provision of part-time consulting services over a period of four years , at the rate of $ 80000 per year commencing in january 2002 . the consulting agreement terminated in january 2006 . r . contingencies the company has certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities . the company accrues a reserve for contingent liabilities when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31,</td><td>$ 3341</td><td>$ 2894</td><td>$ 2492</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issued during the year ended december 31,</td><td>91</td><td>215</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issuable as of the year ended december 31,</td><td>28</td><td>19</td><td>57</td></tr></table> discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31 , $ 3341 $ 2894 $ 2492 shares issued during the year ended december 31 , 91 215 239 shares issuable as of the year ended december 31 , 28 19 57 .
Question: what was the total of share issuable in 2006?
Answer: 28.0
Question: and what was that in 2005?
Answer: 19.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 9.0
Question: what was the total of share issuable in 2005?
Answer: 19.0
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2005 total, in percentage?
| 0.47368 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) stock-based compensation 2014the company complies with the provisions of sfas no . 148 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation 2014transition and disclosure 2014an amendment of sfas no . 123 , 201d which provides optional transition guidance for those companies electing to voluntarily adopt the accounting provisions of sfas no . 123 . the company continues to use accounting principles board opinion no . 25 ( apb no . 25 ) , 201caccounting for stock issued to employees , 201d to account for equity grants and awards to employees , officers and directors and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 148 . in accordance with apb no . 25 , the company recognizes compensation expense based on the excess , if any , of the quoted stock price at the grant date of the award or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock . the company 2019s stock option plans are more fully described in note 13 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , 201cshare-based payment 201d ( sfas no . 123r ) , described below . the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 ( as amended ) to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net loss as reported</td><td>$ -247587 ( 247587 )</td><td>$ -325321 ( 325321 )</td><td>$ -1163540 ( 1163540 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : stock-based employee compensation expense associated with modifications net of related tax effect included in net loss asreported</td><td>2297</td><td>2077</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards net of related taxeffect</td><td>-23906 ( 23906 )</td><td>-31156 ( 31156 )</td><td>-38126 ( 38126 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pro-forma net loss</td><td>$ -269196 ( 269196 )</td><td>$ -354400 ( 354400 )</td><td>$ -1201666 ( 1201666 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported</td><td>$ -1.10 ( 1.10 )</td><td>$ -1.56 ( 1.56 )</td><td>$ -5.95 ( 5.95 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share pro-forma</td><td>$ -1.20 ( 1.20 )</td><td>$ -1.70 ( 1.70 )</td><td>$ -6.15 ( 6.15 )</td></tr></table> during the year ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , the company modified certain option awards to accelerate vesting and recorded charges of $ 3.0 million and $ 2.3 million , respectively , and corresponding increases to additional paid in capital in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . fair value of financial instruments 2014the carrying values of the company 2019s financial instruments , with the exception of long-term obligations , including current portion , reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 . as of december 31 , 2004 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.3 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . as of december 31 , 2003 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.4 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . fair values are based primarily on quoted market prices for those or similar instruments . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . under the plan , the company matching contribution for periods prior to june 30 , 2004 was 35% ( 35 % ) up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . effective july 1 , 2004 , the plan was amended to increase the company match to 50% ( 50 % ) up to a maximum 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . the company contributed approximately $ 533000 , $ 825000 and $ 979000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , which is a revision of sfas no . 123 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation , 201d and supersedes apb no . 25 , accounting for .
Question: what is the ratio of the the carrying amount to the fair value of long-term obligations in 2004/
| 0.91667 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) stock-based compensation 2014the company complies with the provisions of sfas no . 148 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation 2014transition and disclosure 2014an amendment of sfas no . 123 , 201d which provides optional transition guidance for those companies electing to voluntarily adopt the accounting provisions of sfas no . 123 . the company continues to use accounting principles board opinion no . 25 ( apb no . 25 ) , 201caccounting for stock issued to employees , 201d to account for equity grants and awards to employees , officers and directors and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 148 . in accordance with apb no . 25 , the company recognizes compensation expense based on the excess , if any , of the quoted stock price at the grant date of the award or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock . the company 2019s stock option plans are more fully described in note 13 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , 201cshare-based payment 201d ( sfas no . 123r ) , described below . the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 ( as amended ) to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net loss as reported</td><td>$ -247587 ( 247587 )</td><td>$ -325321 ( 325321 )</td><td>$ -1163540 ( 1163540 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : stock-based employee compensation expense associated with modifications net of related tax effect included in net loss asreported</td><td>2297</td><td>2077</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards net of related taxeffect</td><td>-23906 ( 23906 )</td><td>-31156 ( 31156 )</td><td>-38126 ( 38126 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pro-forma net loss</td><td>$ -269196 ( 269196 )</td><td>$ -354400 ( 354400 )</td><td>$ -1201666 ( 1201666 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported</td><td>$ -1.10 ( 1.10 )</td><td>$ -1.56 ( 1.56 )</td><td>$ -5.95 ( 5.95 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share pro-forma</td><td>$ -1.20 ( 1.20 )</td><td>$ -1.70 ( 1.70 )</td><td>$ -6.15 ( 6.15 )</td></tr></table> during the year ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , the company modified certain option awards to accelerate vesting and recorded charges of $ 3.0 million and $ 2.3 million , respectively , and corresponding increases to additional paid in capital in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . fair value of financial instruments 2014the carrying values of the company 2019s financial instruments , with the exception of long-term obligations , including current portion , reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 . as of december 31 , 2004 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.3 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . as of december 31 , 2003 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.4 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . fair values are based primarily on quoted market prices for those or similar instruments . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . under the plan , the company matching contribution for periods prior to june 30 , 2004 was 35% ( 35 % ) up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . effective july 1 , 2004 , the plan was amended to increase the company match to 50% ( 50 % ) up to a maximum 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . the company contributed approximately $ 533000 , $ 825000 and $ 979000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , which is a revision of sfas no . 123 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation , 201d and supersedes apb no . 25 , accounting for .
Question: what is the ratio of the the carrying amount to the fair value of long-term obligations in 2004/
Answer: 0.91667
Question: what is the net change in the 401k contributions from 2002 to 2003?
| -154000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) stock-based compensation 2014the company complies with the provisions of sfas no . 148 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation 2014transition and disclosure 2014an amendment of sfas no . 123 , 201d which provides optional transition guidance for those companies electing to voluntarily adopt the accounting provisions of sfas no . 123 . the company continues to use accounting principles board opinion no . 25 ( apb no . 25 ) , 201caccounting for stock issued to employees , 201d to account for equity grants and awards to employees , officers and directors and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 148 . in accordance with apb no . 25 , the company recognizes compensation expense based on the excess , if any , of the quoted stock price at the grant date of the award or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock . the company 2019s stock option plans are more fully described in note 13 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , 201cshare-based payment 201d ( sfas no . 123r ) , described below . the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 ( as amended ) to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net loss as reported</td><td>$ -247587 ( 247587 )</td><td>$ -325321 ( 325321 )</td><td>$ -1163540 ( 1163540 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : stock-based employee compensation expense associated with modifications net of related tax effect included in net loss asreported</td><td>2297</td><td>2077</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards net of related taxeffect</td><td>-23906 ( 23906 )</td><td>-31156 ( 31156 )</td><td>-38126 ( 38126 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pro-forma net loss</td><td>$ -269196 ( 269196 )</td><td>$ -354400 ( 354400 )</td><td>$ -1201666 ( 1201666 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported</td><td>$ -1.10 ( 1.10 )</td><td>$ -1.56 ( 1.56 )</td><td>$ -5.95 ( 5.95 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share pro-forma</td><td>$ -1.20 ( 1.20 )</td><td>$ -1.70 ( 1.70 )</td><td>$ -6.15 ( 6.15 )</td></tr></table> during the year ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , the company modified certain option awards to accelerate vesting and recorded charges of $ 3.0 million and $ 2.3 million , respectively , and corresponding increases to additional paid in capital in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . fair value of financial instruments 2014the carrying values of the company 2019s financial instruments , with the exception of long-term obligations , including current portion , reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 . as of december 31 , 2004 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.3 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . as of december 31 , 2003 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.4 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . fair values are based primarily on quoted market prices for those or similar instruments . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . under the plan , the company matching contribution for periods prior to june 30 , 2004 was 35% ( 35 % ) up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . effective july 1 , 2004 , the plan was amended to increase the company match to 50% ( 50 % ) up to a maximum 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . the company contributed approximately $ 533000 , $ 825000 and $ 979000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , which is a revision of sfas no . 123 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation , 201d and supersedes apb no . 25 , accounting for .
Question: what is the ratio of the the carrying amount to the fair value of long-term obligations in 2004/
Answer: 0.91667
Question: what is the net change in the 401k contributions from 2002 to 2003?
Answer: -154000.0
Question: what percentage change does this rerpesent?
| -0.1573 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what was the value of natural gas marketing (bcf) in 2012?
| 709.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what was the value of natural gas marketing (bcf) in 2012?
Answer: 709.0
Question: what was the value in 2011?
| 845.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what was the value of natural gas marketing (bcf) in 2012?
Answer: 709.0
Question: what was the value in 2011?
Answer: 845.0
Question: what is the net change?
| -136.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what was the value of natural gas marketing (bcf) in 2012?
Answer: 709.0
Question: what was the value in 2011?
Answer: 845.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -136.0
Question: what was the 2011 value?
| 845.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what was the value of natural gas marketing (bcf) in 2012?
Answer: 709.0
Question: what was the value in 2011?
Answer: 845.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -136.0
Question: what was the 2011 value?
Answer: 845.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2011 value?
| -0.16095 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>masco</td><td>$ 128.21</td><td>$ 120.32</td><td>$ 102.45</td><td>$ 165.80</td><td>$ 229.59</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 125.92</td><td>$ 144.58</td><td>$ 147.60</td><td>$ 171.04</td><td>$ 225.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p industrials index</td><td>$ 120.19</td><td>$ 151.89</td><td>$ 150.97</td><td>$ 173.87</td><td>$ 243.73</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p consumer durables & apparel index</td><td>$ 136.29</td><td>$ 177.91</td><td>$ 191.64</td><td>$ 232.84</td><td>$ 316.28</td></tr></table> in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .
Question: what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2010?
| 144.58 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>masco</td><td>$ 128.21</td><td>$ 120.32</td><td>$ 102.45</td><td>$ 165.80</td><td>$ 229.59</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 125.92</td><td>$ 144.58</td><td>$ 147.60</td><td>$ 171.04</td><td>$ 225.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p industrials index</td><td>$ 120.19</td><td>$ 151.89</td><td>$ 150.97</td><td>$ 173.87</td><td>$ 243.73</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p consumer durables & apparel index</td><td>$ 136.29</td><td>$ 177.91</td><td>$ 191.64</td><td>$ 232.84</td><td>$ 316.28</td></tr></table> in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .
Question: what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2010?
Answer: 144.58
Question: and what was it in 2009?
| 125.92 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>masco</td><td>$ 128.21</td><td>$ 120.32</td><td>$ 102.45</td><td>$ 165.80</td><td>$ 229.59</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 125.92</td><td>$ 144.58</td><td>$ 147.60</td><td>$ 171.04</td><td>$ 225.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p industrials index</td><td>$ 120.19</td><td>$ 151.89</td><td>$ 150.97</td><td>$ 173.87</td><td>$ 243.73</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p consumer durables & apparel index</td><td>$ 136.29</td><td>$ 177.91</td><td>$ 191.64</td><td>$ 232.84</td><td>$ 316.28</td></tr></table> in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .
Question: what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2010?
Answer: 144.58
Question: and what was it in 2009?
Answer: 125.92
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 1.14819 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>masco</td><td>$ 128.21</td><td>$ 120.32</td><td>$ 102.45</td><td>$ 165.80</td><td>$ 229.59</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 125.92</td><td>$ 144.58</td><td>$ 147.60</td><td>$ 171.04</td><td>$ 225.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p industrials index</td><td>$ 120.19</td><td>$ 151.89</td><td>$ 150.97</td><td>$ 173.87</td><td>$ 243.73</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p consumer durables & apparel index</td><td>$ 136.29</td><td>$ 177.91</td><td>$ 191.64</td><td>$ 232.84</td><td>$ 316.28</td></tr></table> in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .
Question: what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2010?
Answer: 144.58
Question: and what was it in 2009?
Answer: 125.92
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 1.14819
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2009 performance value of that stock, in percentage?
| 0.00912 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
changes in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in citi 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 27 million and a gain of $ 10 million , respectively . certain investments in unallocated precious metals citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts ( gold , silver , platinum and palladium ) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities . under asc 815 , the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument . citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract , and reports the debt host contract within trading account assets on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.9 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods . as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities , citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties . when citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment , citi 2019s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal . the forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative , at fair value through earnings . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately $ 13.7 billion and $ 10.3 billion in notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method and other investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in citi 2019s investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments . all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . citigroup also elected the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . these securities are classified as trading account assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in principal transactions . effective january 1 , 2018 under asu 2016-01 and asu 2018-03 , a fair value option election is no longer required to measure these non-marketable equity securities through earnings . see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . certain mortgage loans held-for-sale citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans hfs . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans hfs carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 312018</td><td>december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 556</td><td>$ 426</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of ( less than ) unpaid principal balance</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> the changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . there was no net change in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue in the consolidated statement of income. .
Question: what was the net change in carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet from 2017 to 2018?
| 130.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
changes in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in citi 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 27 million and a gain of $ 10 million , respectively . certain investments in unallocated precious metals citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts ( gold , silver , platinum and palladium ) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities . under asc 815 , the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument . citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract , and reports the debt host contract within trading account assets on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.9 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods . as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities , citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties . when citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment , citi 2019s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal . the forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative , at fair value through earnings . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately $ 13.7 billion and $ 10.3 billion in notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method and other investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in citi 2019s investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments . all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . citigroup also elected the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . these securities are classified as trading account assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in principal transactions . effective january 1 , 2018 under asu 2016-01 and asu 2018-03 , a fair value option election is no longer required to measure these non-marketable equity securities through earnings . see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . certain mortgage loans held-for-sale citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans hfs . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans hfs carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 312018</td><td>december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 556</td><td>$ 426</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of ( less than ) unpaid principal balance</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> the changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . there was no net change in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue in the consolidated statement of income. .
Question: what was the net change in carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 130.0
Question: what was the 2018 value?
| 426.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
changes in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in citi 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 27 million and a gain of $ 10 million , respectively . certain investments in unallocated precious metals citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts ( gold , silver , platinum and palladium ) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities . under asc 815 , the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument . citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract , and reports the debt host contract within trading account assets on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.9 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods . as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities , citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties . when citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment , citi 2019s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal . the forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative , at fair value through earnings . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately $ 13.7 billion and $ 10.3 billion in notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method and other investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in citi 2019s investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments . all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . citigroup also elected the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . these securities are classified as trading account assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in principal transactions . effective january 1 , 2018 under asu 2016-01 and asu 2018-03 , a fair value option election is no longer required to measure these non-marketable equity securities through earnings . see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . certain mortgage loans held-for-sale citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans hfs . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans hfs carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 312018</td><td>december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 556</td><td>$ 426</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of ( less than ) unpaid principal balance</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> the changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . there was no net change in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue in the consolidated statement of income. .
Question: what was the net change in carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 130.0
Question: what was the 2018 value?
Answer: 426.0
Question: what is the change divided by the 2018 value?
| 0.30516 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements 196 jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report credit and funding adjustments when determining the fair value of an instrument , it may be necessary to record adjustments to the firm 2019s estimates of fair value in order to reflect counterparty credit quality , the firm 2019s own creditworthiness , and the impact of funding : 2022 credit valuation adjustments ( 201ccva 201d ) are taken to reflect the credit quality of a counterparty in the valuation of derivatives . cva are necessary when the market price ( or parameter ) is not indicative of the credit quality of the counterparty . as few classes of derivative contracts are listed on an exchange , derivative positions are predominantly valued using models that use as their basis observable market parameters . an adjustment therefore may be necessary to reflect the credit quality of each derivative counterparty to arrive at fair value . the firm estimates derivatives cva using a scenario analysis to estimate the expected credit exposure across all of the firm 2019s positions with each counterparty , and then estimates losses as a result of a counterparty credit event . the key inputs to this methodology are ( i ) the expected positive exposure to each counterparty based on a simulation that assumes the current population of existing derivatives with each counterparty remains unchanged and considers contractual factors designed to mitigate the firm 2019s credit exposure , such as collateral and legal rights of offset ; ( ii ) the probability of a default event occurring for each counterparty , as derived from observed or estimated cds spreads ; and ( iii ) estimated recovery rates implied by cds , adjusted to consider the differences in recovery rates as a derivative creditor relative to those reflected in cds spreads , which generally reflect senior unsecured creditor risk . as such , the firm estimates derivatives cva relative to the relevant benchmark interest rate . 2022 dva is taken to reflect the credit quality of the firm in the valuation of liabilities measured at fair value . the dva calculation methodology is generally consistent with the cva methodology described above and incorporates jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread as observed through the cds market to estimate the probability of default and loss given default as a result of a systemic event affecting the firm . structured notes dva is estimated using the current fair value of the structured note as the exposure amount , and is otherwise consistent with the derivative dva methodology . 2022 the firm incorporates the impact of funding in its valuation estimates where there is evidence that a market participant in the principal market would incorporate it in a transfer of the instrument . as a result , the fair value of collateralized derivatives is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows at the relevant overnight indexed swap ( 201cois 201d ) rate given the underlying collateral agreement with the counterparty . effective in 2013 , the firm implemented a fva framework to incorporate the impact of funding into its valuation estimates for uncollateralized ( including partially collateralized ) over- the-counter ( 201cotc 201d ) derivatives and structured notes . the firm 2019s fva framework leverages its existing cva and dva calculation methodologies , and considers the fact that the firm 2019s own credit risk is a significant component of funding costs . the key inputs are : ( i ) the expected funding requirements arising from the firm 2019s positions with each counterparty and collateral arrangements ; ( ii ) for assets , the estimated market funding cost in the principal market ; and ( iii ) for liabilities , the hypothetical market funding cost for a transfer to a market participant with a similar credit standing as the firm . upon the implementation of the fva framework in 2013 , the firm recorded a one time $ 1.5 billion loss in principal transactions revenue that was recorded in the cib . while the fva framework applies to both assets and liabilities , the loss on implementation largely related to uncollateralized derivative receivables given that the impact of the firm 2019s own credit risk , which is a significant component of funding costs , was already incorporated in the valuation of liabilities through the application of dva . the following table provides the credit and funding adjustments , excluding the effect of any associated hedging activities , reflected within the consolidated balance sheets as of the dates indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>derivative receivables balance ( a )</td><td>$ 78975</td><td>$ 65759</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivative payables balance ( a )</td><td>71116</td><td>57314</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivatives cva ( b )</td><td>-2674 ( 2674 )</td><td>-2352 ( 2352 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c )</td><td>-380 ( 380 )</td><td>-322 ( 322 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>structured notes balance ( a ) ( d )</td><td>53772</td><td>48808</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>structured notes dva and fva ( b ) ( e )</td><td>1152</td><td>952</td></tr></table> derivative receivables balance ( a ) $ 78975 $ 65759 derivative payables balance ( a ) 71116 57314 derivatives cva ( b ) ( 2674 ) ( 2352 ) derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c ) ( 380 ) ( 322 ) structured notes balance ( a ) ( d ) 53772 48808 structured notes dva and fva ( b ) ( e ) 1152 952 ( a ) balances are presented net of applicable cva and dva/fva . ( b ) positive cva and dva/fva represent amounts that increased receivable balances or decreased payable balances ; negative cva and dva/fva represent amounts that decreased receivable balances or increased payable balances . ( c ) at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included derivatives dva of $ 714 million and $ 715 million , respectively . ( d ) structured notes are predominantly financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that are measured at fair value based on the firm 2019s election under the fair value option . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included $ 943 million and $ 1.1 billion , respectively , of financial instruments with no embedded derivative for which the fair value option has also been elected . for further information on these elections , see note 4 . ( e ) at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included structured notes dva of $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively. .
Question: what was the total of structured notes dva and fva in 2014, in billions?
| 1.152 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements 196 jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report credit and funding adjustments when determining the fair value of an instrument , it may be necessary to record adjustments to the firm 2019s estimates of fair value in order to reflect counterparty credit quality , the firm 2019s own creditworthiness , and the impact of funding : 2022 credit valuation adjustments ( 201ccva 201d ) are taken to reflect the credit quality of a counterparty in the valuation of derivatives . cva are necessary when the market price ( or parameter ) is not indicative of the credit quality of the counterparty . as few classes of derivative contracts are listed on an exchange , derivative positions are predominantly valued using models that use as their basis observable market parameters . an adjustment therefore may be necessary to reflect the credit quality of each derivative counterparty to arrive at fair value . the firm estimates derivatives cva using a scenario analysis to estimate the expected credit exposure across all of the firm 2019s positions with each counterparty , and then estimates losses as a result of a counterparty credit event . the key inputs to this methodology are ( i ) the expected positive exposure to each counterparty based on a simulation that assumes the current population of existing derivatives with each counterparty remains unchanged and considers contractual factors designed to mitigate the firm 2019s credit exposure , such as collateral and legal rights of offset ; ( ii ) the probability of a default event occurring for each counterparty , as derived from observed or estimated cds spreads ; and ( iii ) estimated recovery rates implied by cds , adjusted to consider the differences in recovery rates as a derivative creditor relative to those reflected in cds spreads , which generally reflect senior unsecured creditor risk . as such , the firm estimates derivatives cva relative to the relevant benchmark interest rate . 2022 dva is taken to reflect the credit quality of the firm in the valuation of liabilities measured at fair value . the dva calculation methodology is generally consistent with the cva methodology described above and incorporates jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread as observed through the cds market to estimate the probability of default and loss given default as a result of a systemic event affecting the firm . structured notes dva is estimated using the current fair value of the structured note as the exposure amount , and is otherwise consistent with the derivative dva methodology . 2022 the firm incorporates the impact of funding in its valuation estimates where there is evidence that a market participant in the principal market would incorporate it in a transfer of the instrument . as a result , the fair value of collateralized derivatives is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows at the relevant overnight indexed swap ( 201cois 201d ) rate given the underlying collateral agreement with the counterparty . effective in 2013 , the firm implemented a fva framework to incorporate the impact of funding into its valuation estimates for uncollateralized ( including partially collateralized ) over- the-counter ( 201cotc 201d ) derivatives and structured notes . the firm 2019s fva framework leverages its existing cva and dva calculation methodologies , and considers the fact that the firm 2019s own credit risk is a significant component of funding costs . the key inputs are : ( i ) the expected funding requirements arising from the firm 2019s positions with each counterparty and collateral arrangements ; ( ii ) for assets , the estimated market funding cost in the principal market ; and ( iii ) for liabilities , the hypothetical market funding cost for a transfer to a market participant with a similar credit standing as the firm . upon the implementation of the fva framework in 2013 , the firm recorded a one time $ 1.5 billion loss in principal transactions revenue that was recorded in the cib . while the fva framework applies to both assets and liabilities , the loss on implementation largely related to uncollateralized derivative receivables given that the impact of the firm 2019s own credit risk , which is a significant component of funding costs , was already incorporated in the valuation of liabilities through the application of dva . the following table provides the credit and funding adjustments , excluding the effect of any associated hedging activities , reflected within the consolidated balance sheets as of the dates indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>derivative receivables balance ( a )</td><td>$ 78975</td><td>$ 65759</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivative payables balance ( a )</td><td>71116</td><td>57314</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivatives cva ( b )</td><td>-2674 ( 2674 )</td><td>-2352 ( 2352 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c )</td><td>-380 ( 380 )</td><td>-322 ( 322 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>structured notes balance ( a ) ( d )</td><td>53772</td><td>48808</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>structured notes dva and fva ( b ) ( e )</td><td>1152</td><td>952</td></tr></table> derivative receivables balance ( a ) $ 78975 $ 65759 derivative payables balance ( a ) 71116 57314 derivatives cva ( b ) ( 2674 ) ( 2352 ) derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c ) ( 380 ) ( 322 ) structured notes balance ( a ) ( d ) 53772 48808 structured notes dva and fva ( b ) ( e ) 1152 952 ( a ) balances are presented net of applicable cva and dva/fva . ( b ) positive cva and dva/fva represent amounts that increased receivable balances or decreased payable balances ; negative cva and dva/fva represent amounts that decreased receivable balances or increased payable balances . ( c ) at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included derivatives dva of $ 714 million and $ 715 million , respectively . ( d ) structured notes are predominantly financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that are measured at fair value based on the firm 2019s election under the fair value option . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included $ 943 million and $ 1.1 billion , respectively , of financial instruments with no embedded derivative for which the fair value option has also been elected . for further information on these elections , see note 4 . ( e ) at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included structured notes dva of $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively. .
Question: what was the total of structured notes dva and fva in 2014, in billions?
Answer: 1.152
Question: and what was the total of structured notes dva in that year, also in billions?
| 1.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements 196 jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report credit and funding adjustments when determining the fair value of an instrument , it may be necessary to record adjustments to the firm 2019s estimates of fair value in order to reflect counterparty credit quality , the firm 2019s own creditworthiness , and the impact of funding : 2022 credit valuation adjustments ( 201ccva 201d ) are taken to reflect the credit quality of a counterparty in the valuation of derivatives . cva are necessary when the market price ( or parameter ) is not indicative of the credit quality of the counterparty . as few classes of derivative contracts are listed on an exchange , derivative positions are predominantly valued using models that use as their basis observable market parameters . an adjustment therefore may be necessary to reflect the credit quality of each derivative counterparty to arrive at fair value . the firm estimates derivatives cva using a scenario analysis to estimate the expected credit exposure across all of the firm 2019s positions with each counterparty , and then estimates losses as a result of a counterparty credit event . the key inputs to this methodology are ( i ) the expected positive exposure to each counterparty based on a simulation that assumes the current population of existing derivatives with each counterparty remains unchanged and considers contractual factors designed to mitigate the firm 2019s credit exposure , such as collateral and legal rights of offset ; ( ii ) the probability of a default event occurring for each counterparty , as derived from observed or estimated cds spreads ; and ( iii ) estimated recovery rates implied by cds , adjusted to consider the differences in recovery rates as a derivative creditor relative to those reflected in cds spreads , which generally reflect senior unsecured creditor risk . as such , the firm estimates derivatives cva relative to the relevant benchmark interest rate . 2022 dva is taken to reflect the credit quality of the firm in the valuation of liabilities measured at fair value . the dva calculation methodology is generally consistent with the cva methodology described above and incorporates jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread as observed through the cds market to estimate the probability of default and loss given default as a result of a systemic event affecting the firm . structured notes dva is estimated using the current fair value of the structured note as the exposure amount , and is otherwise consistent with the derivative dva methodology . 2022 the firm incorporates the impact of funding in its valuation estimates where there is evidence that a market participant in the principal market would incorporate it in a transfer of the instrument . as a result , the fair value of collateralized derivatives is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows at the relevant overnight indexed swap ( 201cois 201d ) rate given the underlying collateral agreement with the counterparty . effective in 2013 , the firm implemented a fva framework to incorporate the impact of funding into its valuation estimates for uncollateralized ( including partially collateralized ) over- the-counter ( 201cotc 201d ) derivatives and structured notes . the firm 2019s fva framework leverages its existing cva and dva calculation methodologies , and considers the fact that the firm 2019s own credit risk is a significant component of funding costs . the key inputs are : ( i ) the expected funding requirements arising from the firm 2019s positions with each counterparty and collateral arrangements ; ( ii ) for assets , the estimated market funding cost in the principal market ; and ( iii ) for liabilities , the hypothetical market funding cost for a transfer to a market participant with a similar credit standing as the firm . upon the implementation of the fva framework in 2013 , the firm recorded a one time $ 1.5 billion loss in principal transactions revenue that was recorded in the cib . while the fva framework applies to both assets and liabilities , the loss on implementation largely related to uncollateralized derivative receivables given that the impact of the firm 2019s own credit risk , which is a significant component of funding costs , was already incorporated in the valuation of liabilities through the application of dva . the following table provides the credit and funding adjustments , excluding the effect of any associated hedging activities , reflected within the consolidated balance sheets as of the dates indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>derivative receivables balance ( a )</td><td>$ 78975</td><td>$ 65759</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivative payables balance ( a )</td><td>71116</td><td>57314</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivatives cva ( b )</td><td>-2674 ( 2674 )</td><td>-2352 ( 2352 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c )</td><td>-380 ( 380 )</td><td>-322 ( 322 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>structured notes balance ( a ) ( d )</td><td>53772</td><td>48808</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>structured notes dva and fva ( b ) ( e )</td><td>1152</td><td>952</td></tr></table> derivative receivables balance ( a ) $ 78975 $ 65759 derivative payables balance ( a ) 71116 57314 derivatives cva ( b ) ( 2674 ) ( 2352 ) derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c ) ( 380 ) ( 322 ) structured notes balance ( a ) ( d ) 53772 48808 structured notes dva and fva ( b ) ( e ) 1152 952 ( a ) balances are presented net of applicable cva and dva/fva . ( b ) positive cva and dva/fva represent amounts that increased receivable balances or decreased payable balances ; negative cva and dva/fva represent amounts that decreased receivable balances or increased payable balances . ( c ) at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included derivatives dva of $ 714 million and $ 715 million , respectively . ( d ) structured notes are predominantly financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that are measured at fair value based on the firm 2019s election under the fair value option . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included $ 943 million and $ 1.1 billion , respectively , of financial instruments with no embedded derivative for which the fair value option has also been elected . for further information on these elections , see note 4 . ( e ) at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included structured notes dva of $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively. .
Question: what was the total of structured notes dva and fva in 2014, in billions?
Answer: 1.152
Question: and what was the total of structured notes dva in that year, also in billions?
Answer: 1.4
Question: what, then, was the total of structured notes fva only, in billions?
| -0.248 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis interest expense was $ 17 million less in 2004 than in 2003 reflecting the year over year reduction in debt of $ 316 million . other charges declined $ 30 million in 2004 due to a combination of lower environmental remediation , legal and workers compensation expenses and the absence of certain 2003 charges . other earnings were $ 28 million higher in 2004 due primarily to higher earnings from our equity affiliates . the effective tax rate for 2004 was 30.29% ( 30.29 % ) compared to 34.76% ( 34.76 % ) for the full year 2003 . the reduction in the rate for 2004 reflects the benefit of the subsidy offered pursuant to the medicare act not being subject to tax , the continued improvement in the geographical mix of non- u.s . earnings and the favorable resolution during 2004 of matters related to two open u.s . federal income tax years . net income in 2004 totaled $ 683 million , an increase of $ 189 million over 2003 , and earnings per share 2013 diluted increased $ 1.06 to $ 3.95 per share . results of business segments net sales operating income ( millions ) 2004 2003 2004 2003 ( 1 ) coatings $ 5275 $ 4835 $ 777 $ 719 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>net sales 2004</td><td>net sales 2003</td><td>net sales 2004</td><td>2003 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>coatings</td><td>$ 5275</td><td>$ 4835</td><td>$ 777</td><td>$ 719</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>glass</td><td>2204</td><td>2150</td><td>169</td><td>71</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2034</td><td>1771</td><td>291</td><td>228</td></tr></table> chemicals 2034 1771 291 228 ( 1 ) operating income by segment for 2003 has been revised to reflect a change in the allocation method for certain pension and other postretirement benefit costs in 2004 ( see note 22 , 201cbusiness segment information 201d , under item 8 of this form 10-k ) . coatings sales increased $ 440 million or 9% ( 9 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 6% ( 6 % ) from improved volumes across all our coatings businesses and 4% ( 4 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european operations . sales declined 1% ( 1 % ) due to lower selling prices , principally in our automotive business . operating income increased $ 58 million in 2004 . factors increasing operating income were the higher sales volume ( $ 135 million ) and the favorable effects of currency translation described above and improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 20 million . factors decreasing operating income were inflationary cost increases of $ 82 million and lower selling prices . glass sales increased $ 54 million or 3% ( 3 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 6% ( 6 % ) from improved volumes primarily from our performance glazings ( flat glass ) , fiber glass , and automotive original equipment businesses net of lower volumes in our automotive replacement glass business . sales also increased 2% ( 2 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european fiber glass operations . sales declined 5% ( 5 % ) due to lower selling prices across all our glass businesses . operating income in 2004 increased $ 98 million . factors increasing operating income were improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 110 million , higher sales volume ( $ 53 million ) described above , higher equity earnings and the gains on the sale/leaseback of precious metals of $ 19 million . the principal factor decreasing operating income was lower selling prices . fiber glass volumes were up 15% ( 15 % ) for the year , although pricing declined . with the shift of electronic printed wiring board production to asia and the volume and pricing gains there , equity earnings from our joint venture serving that region grew in 2004 . these factors combined with focused cost reductions and manufacturing efficiencies to improve the operating performance of this business , as we continue to position it for future growth in profitability . chemicals sales increased $ 263 million or 15% ( 15 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 10% ( 10 % ) from improved volumes in our commodity and specialty businesses and 4% ( 4 % ) due to higher selling prices for our commodity products . sales also increased 1% ( 1 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european operations . operating income increased $ 63 million in 2004 . factors increasing operating income were the higher selling prices for our commodity products and the higher sales volume ( $ 73 million ) described above , improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 25 million and lower environmental expenses . factors decreasing 2004 operating income were inflationary cost increases of $ 40 million and higher energy costs of $ 79 million . other significant factors the company 2019s pension and other postretirement benefit costs for 2004 were $ 45 million lower than in 2003 . this decrease reflects the market driven growth in pension plan assets that occurred in 2003 , the impact of the $ 140 million in cash contributed to the pension plans by the company in 2004 and the benefit of the subsidy offered pursuant to the medicare act , as discussed in note 12 , 201cpension and other postretirement benefits , 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k . commitments and contingent liabilities , including environmental matters ppg is involved in a number of lawsuits and claims , both actual and potential , including some that it has asserted against others , in which substantial monetary damages are sought . see item 3 , 201clegal proceedings 201d of this form 10-k and note 13 , 201ccommitments and contingent liabilities , 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for a description of certain of these lawsuits , including a description of the proposed ppg settlement arrangement for asbestos claims announced on may 14 , 2002 . as discussed in item 3 and note 13 , although the result of any future litigation of such lawsuits and claims is inherently unpredictable , management believes that , in the aggregate , the outcome of all lawsuits and claims involving ppg , including asbestos-related claims in the event the ppg settlement arrangement described in note 13 does not become effective , will not have a material effect on ppg 2019s consolidated financial position or liquidity ; however , any such outcome may be material to the results of operations of any particular period in which costs , if any , are recognized . the company has been named as a defendant , along with various other co-defendants , in a number of antitrust lawsuits filed in federal and state courts . these suits allege that ppg acted with competitors to fix prices and allocate markets in the flat glass and automotive refinish industries . 22 2005 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what is the difference between the number 1 that represents 100% and the sales increase?
| 0.98 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis interest expense was $ 17 million less in 2004 than in 2003 reflecting the year over year reduction in debt of $ 316 million . other charges declined $ 30 million in 2004 due to a combination of lower environmental remediation , legal and workers compensation expenses and the absence of certain 2003 charges . other earnings were $ 28 million higher in 2004 due primarily to higher earnings from our equity affiliates . the effective tax rate for 2004 was 30.29% ( 30.29 % ) compared to 34.76% ( 34.76 % ) for the full year 2003 . the reduction in the rate for 2004 reflects the benefit of the subsidy offered pursuant to the medicare act not being subject to tax , the continued improvement in the geographical mix of non- u.s . earnings and the favorable resolution during 2004 of matters related to two open u.s . federal income tax years . net income in 2004 totaled $ 683 million , an increase of $ 189 million over 2003 , and earnings per share 2013 diluted increased $ 1.06 to $ 3.95 per share . results of business segments net sales operating income ( millions ) 2004 2003 2004 2003 ( 1 ) coatings $ 5275 $ 4835 $ 777 $ 719 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>net sales 2004</td><td>net sales 2003</td><td>net sales 2004</td><td>2003 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>coatings</td><td>$ 5275</td><td>$ 4835</td><td>$ 777</td><td>$ 719</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>glass</td><td>2204</td><td>2150</td><td>169</td><td>71</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2034</td><td>1771</td><td>291</td><td>228</td></tr></table> chemicals 2034 1771 291 228 ( 1 ) operating income by segment for 2003 has been revised to reflect a change in the allocation method for certain pension and other postretirement benefit costs in 2004 ( see note 22 , 201cbusiness segment information 201d , under item 8 of this form 10-k ) . coatings sales increased $ 440 million or 9% ( 9 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 6% ( 6 % ) from improved volumes across all our coatings businesses and 4% ( 4 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european operations . sales declined 1% ( 1 % ) due to lower selling prices , principally in our automotive business . operating income increased $ 58 million in 2004 . factors increasing operating income were the higher sales volume ( $ 135 million ) and the favorable effects of currency translation described above and improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 20 million . factors decreasing operating income were inflationary cost increases of $ 82 million and lower selling prices . glass sales increased $ 54 million or 3% ( 3 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 6% ( 6 % ) from improved volumes primarily from our performance glazings ( flat glass ) , fiber glass , and automotive original equipment businesses net of lower volumes in our automotive replacement glass business . sales also increased 2% ( 2 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european fiber glass operations . sales declined 5% ( 5 % ) due to lower selling prices across all our glass businesses . operating income in 2004 increased $ 98 million . factors increasing operating income were improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 110 million , higher sales volume ( $ 53 million ) described above , higher equity earnings and the gains on the sale/leaseback of precious metals of $ 19 million . the principal factor decreasing operating income was lower selling prices . fiber glass volumes were up 15% ( 15 % ) for the year , although pricing declined . with the shift of electronic printed wiring board production to asia and the volume and pricing gains there , equity earnings from our joint venture serving that region grew in 2004 . these factors combined with focused cost reductions and manufacturing efficiencies to improve the operating performance of this business , as we continue to position it for future growth in profitability . chemicals sales increased $ 263 million or 15% ( 15 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 10% ( 10 % ) from improved volumes in our commodity and specialty businesses and 4% ( 4 % ) due to higher selling prices for our commodity products . sales also increased 1% ( 1 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european operations . operating income increased $ 63 million in 2004 . factors increasing operating income were the higher selling prices for our commodity products and the higher sales volume ( $ 73 million ) described above , improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 25 million and lower environmental expenses . factors decreasing 2004 operating income were inflationary cost increases of $ 40 million and higher energy costs of $ 79 million . other significant factors the company 2019s pension and other postretirement benefit costs for 2004 were $ 45 million lower than in 2003 . this decrease reflects the market driven growth in pension plan assets that occurred in 2003 , the impact of the $ 140 million in cash contributed to the pension plans by the company in 2004 and the benefit of the subsidy offered pursuant to the medicare act , as discussed in note 12 , 201cpension and other postretirement benefits , 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k . commitments and contingent liabilities , including environmental matters ppg is involved in a number of lawsuits and claims , both actual and potential , including some that it has asserted against others , in which substantial monetary damages are sought . see item 3 , 201clegal proceedings 201d of this form 10-k and note 13 , 201ccommitments and contingent liabilities , 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for a description of certain of these lawsuits , including a description of the proposed ppg settlement arrangement for asbestos claims announced on may 14 , 2002 . as discussed in item 3 and note 13 , although the result of any future litigation of such lawsuits and claims is inherently unpredictable , management believes that , in the aggregate , the outcome of all lawsuits and claims involving ppg , including asbestos-related claims in the event the ppg settlement arrangement described in note 13 does not become effective , will not have a material effect on ppg 2019s consolidated financial position or liquidity ; however , any such outcome may be material to the results of operations of any particular period in which costs , if any , are recognized . the company has been named as a defendant , along with various other co-defendants , in a number of antitrust lawsuits filed in federal and state courts . these suits allege that ppg acted with competitors to fix prices and allocate markets in the flat glass and automotive refinish industries . 22 2005 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what is the difference between the number 1 that represents 100% and the sales increase?
Answer: 0.98
Question: what is the glass net sales of 2003?
| 2150.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis interest expense was $ 17 million less in 2004 than in 2003 reflecting the year over year reduction in debt of $ 316 million . other charges declined $ 30 million in 2004 due to a combination of lower environmental remediation , legal and workers compensation expenses and the absence of certain 2003 charges . other earnings were $ 28 million higher in 2004 due primarily to higher earnings from our equity affiliates . the effective tax rate for 2004 was 30.29% ( 30.29 % ) compared to 34.76% ( 34.76 % ) for the full year 2003 . the reduction in the rate for 2004 reflects the benefit of the subsidy offered pursuant to the medicare act not being subject to tax , the continued improvement in the geographical mix of non- u.s . earnings and the favorable resolution during 2004 of matters related to two open u.s . federal income tax years . net income in 2004 totaled $ 683 million , an increase of $ 189 million over 2003 , and earnings per share 2013 diluted increased $ 1.06 to $ 3.95 per share . results of business segments net sales operating income ( millions ) 2004 2003 2004 2003 ( 1 ) coatings $ 5275 $ 4835 $ 777 $ 719 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>net sales 2004</td><td>net sales 2003</td><td>net sales 2004</td><td>2003 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>coatings</td><td>$ 5275</td><td>$ 4835</td><td>$ 777</td><td>$ 719</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>glass</td><td>2204</td><td>2150</td><td>169</td><td>71</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>2034</td><td>1771</td><td>291</td><td>228</td></tr></table> chemicals 2034 1771 291 228 ( 1 ) operating income by segment for 2003 has been revised to reflect a change in the allocation method for certain pension and other postretirement benefit costs in 2004 ( see note 22 , 201cbusiness segment information 201d , under item 8 of this form 10-k ) . coatings sales increased $ 440 million or 9% ( 9 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 6% ( 6 % ) from improved volumes across all our coatings businesses and 4% ( 4 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european operations . sales declined 1% ( 1 % ) due to lower selling prices , principally in our automotive business . operating income increased $ 58 million in 2004 . factors increasing operating income were the higher sales volume ( $ 135 million ) and the favorable effects of currency translation described above and improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 20 million . factors decreasing operating income were inflationary cost increases of $ 82 million and lower selling prices . glass sales increased $ 54 million or 3% ( 3 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 6% ( 6 % ) from improved volumes primarily from our performance glazings ( flat glass ) , fiber glass , and automotive original equipment businesses net of lower volumes in our automotive replacement glass business . sales also increased 2% ( 2 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european fiber glass operations . sales declined 5% ( 5 % ) due to lower selling prices across all our glass businesses . operating income in 2004 increased $ 98 million . factors increasing operating income were improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 110 million , higher sales volume ( $ 53 million ) described above , higher equity earnings and the gains on the sale/leaseback of precious metals of $ 19 million . the principal factor decreasing operating income was lower selling prices . fiber glass volumes were up 15% ( 15 % ) for the year , although pricing declined . with the shift of electronic printed wiring board production to asia and the volume and pricing gains there , equity earnings from our joint venture serving that region grew in 2004 . these factors combined with focused cost reductions and manufacturing efficiencies to improve the operating performance of this business , as we continue to position it for future growth in profitability . chemicals sales increased $ 263 million or 15% ( 15 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 10% ( 10 % ) from improved volumes in our commodity and specialty businesses and 4% ( 4 % ) due to higher selling prices for our commodity products . sales also increased 1% ( 1 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european operations . operating income increased $ 63 million in 2004 . factors increasing operating income were the higher selling prices for our commodity products and the higher sales volume ( $ 73 million ) described above , improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 25 million and lower environmental expenses . factors decreasing 2004 operating income were inflationary cost increases of $ 40 million and higher energy costs of $ 79 million . other significant factors the company 2019s pension and other postretirement benefit costs for 2004 were $ 45 million lower than in 2003 . this decrease reflects the market driven growth in pension plan assets that occurred in 2003 , the impact of the $ 140 million in cash contributed to the pension plans by the company in 2004 and the benefit of the subsidy offered pursuant to the medicare act , as discussed in note 12 , 201cpension and other postretirement benefits , 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k . commitments and contingent liabilities , including environmental matters ppg is involved in a number of lawsuits and claims , both actual and potential , including some that it has asserted against others , in which substantial monetary damages are sought . see item 3 , 201clegal proceedings 201d of this form 10-k and note 13 , 201ccommitments and contingent liabilities , 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for a description of certain of these lawsuits , including a description of the proposed ppg settlement arrangement for asbestos claims announced on may 14 , 2002 . as discussed in item 3 and note 13 , although the result of any future litigation of such lawsuits and claims is inherently unpredictable , management believes that , in the aggregate , the outcome of all lawsuits and claims involving ppg , including asbestos-related claims in the event the ppg settlement arrangement described in note 13 does not become effective , will not have a material effect on ppg 2019s consolidated financial position or liquidity ; however , any such outcome may be material to the results of operations of any particular period in which costs , if any , are recognized . the company has been named as a defendant , along with various other co-defendants , in a number of antitrust lawsuits filed in federal and state courts . these suits allege that ppg acted with competitors to fix prices and allocate markets in the flat glass and automotive refinish industries . 22 2005 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what is the difference between the number 1 that represents 100% and the sales increase?
Answer: 0.98
Question: what is the glass net sales of 2003?
Answer: 2150.0
Question: what is the product between that difference and that glass net sales of 2003?
| 2107.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
baker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements bhge 2017 form 10-k | 85 the total intrinsic value of rsus ( defined as the value of the shares awarded at the current market price ) vested and outstanding in 2017 was $ 17 million and $ 38 million , respectively . the total fair value of rsus vested in 2017 was $ 19 million . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was $ 98 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested rsus , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years . note 12 . equity common stock we are authorized to issue 2 billion shares of class a common stock , 1.25 billion shares of class b common stock and 50 million shares of preferred stock each of which have a par value of $ 0.0001 per share . on july 3 , 2017 , each share of baker hughes common stock was converted into one share of class a common stock in the company . the number of class a common stock and class b common stock shares outstanding at december 31 , 2017 is 422 million and 707 million , respectively . we have not issued any preferred stock . ge owns all the issued and outstanding class b common stock . each share of class a and class b common stock and the associated membership interest in bhge llc form a paired interest . while each share of class b common stock has equal voting rights to a share of class a common stock , it has no economic rights , meaning holders of class b common stock have no right to dividends and any assets in the event of liquidation of the company . former baker hughes stockholders immediately after the completion of the transactions received a special one-time cash dividend of $ 17.50 per share paid by the company to holders of record of the company's class a common stock . in addition , during 2017 the company declared and paid regular dividends of $ 0.17 per share and $ 0.18 per share to holders of record of the company's class a common stock during the quarters ended september 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively . the following table presents the changes in number of shares outstanding ( in thousands ) : class a common class b common . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>class a common stock</td><td>class b common stock</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2016</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issue of shares on business combination at july 3 2017</td><td>427709</td><td>717111</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>issue of shares upon vesting of restricted stock units ( 1 )</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>issue of shares on exercises of stock options ( 1 )</td><td>256</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock repurchase program ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>-6047 ( 6047 )</td><td>-10126 ( 10126 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2017</td><td>422208</td><td>706985</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) share amounts reflected above are net of shares withheld to satisfy the employee's tax withholding obligation . ( 2 ) on november 2 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized bhge llc to repurchase up to $ 3 billion of its common units from the company and ge . the proceeds of this repurchase are to be used by bhge to repurchase class a common stock of the company on the open market , which if fully implemented would result in the repurchase of approximately $ 1.1 billion of class a common stock . the class b common stock of the company , that is paired with repurchased common units , was repurchased by the company at par value . the $ 3 billion repurchase authorization is the aggregate authorization for repurchases of class a and class b common stock together with its paired unit . bhge llc had authorization remaining to repurchase up to approximately $ 2.5 billion of its common units from bhge and ge at december 31 , 2017 . ( 3 ) during 2017 , we repurchased and canceled 6046735 shares of class a common stock for a total of $ 187 million . we also repurchased and canceled 10126467 shares of class b common stock from ge which is paired together with common units of bhge llc for $ 314 million. .
Question: as of december 31, 2017, how much did the balance of class a common stock represent in relation to the one of class b common stock?
| 0.5972 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
baker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements bhge 2017 form 10-k | 85 the total intrinsic value of rsus ( defined as the value of the shares awarded at the current market price ) vested and outstanding in 2017 was $ 17 million and $ 38 million , respectively . the total fair value of rsus vested in 2017 was $ 19 million . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was $ 98 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested rsus , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years . note 12 . equity common stock we are authorized to issue 2 billion shares of class a common stock , 1.25 billion shares of class b common stock and 50 million shares of preferred stock each of which have a par value of $ 0.0001 per share . on july 3 , 2017 , each share of baker hughes common stock was converted into one share of class a common stock in the company . the number of class a common stock and class b common stock shares outstanding at december 31 , 2017 is 422 million and 707 million , respectively . we have not issued any preferred stock . ge owns all the issued and outstanding class b common stock . each share of class a and class b common stock and the associated membership interest in bhge llc form a paired interest . while each share of class b common stock has equal voting rights to a share of class a common stock , it has no economic rights , meaning holders of class b common stock have no right to dividends and any assets in the event of liquidation of the company . former baker hughes stockholders immediately after the completion of the transactions received a special one-time cash dividend of $ 17.50 per share paid by the company to holders of record of the company's class a common stock . in addition , during 2017 the company declared and paid regular dividends of $ 0.17 per share and $ 0.18 per share to holders of record of the company's class a common stock during the quarters ended september 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively . the following table presents the changes in number of shares outstanding ( in thousands ) : class a common class b common . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>class a common stock</td><td>class b common stock</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2016</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issue of shares on business combination at july 3 2017</td><td>427709</td><td>717111</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>issue of shares upon vesting of restricted stock units ( 1 )</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>issue of shares on exercises of stock options ( 1 )</td><td>256</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock repurchase program ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>-6047 ( 6047 )</td><td>-10126 ( 10126 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2017</td><td>422208</td><td>706985</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) share amounts reflected above are net of shares withheld to satisfy the employee's tax withholding obligation . ( 2 ) on november 2 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized bhge llc to repurchase up to $ 3 billion of its common units from the company and ge . the proceeds of this repurchase are to be used by bhge to repurchase class a common stock of the company on the open market , which if fully implemented would result in the repurchase of approximately $ 1.1 billion of class a common stock . the class b common stock of the company , that is paired with repurchased common units , was repurchased by the company at par value . the $ 3 billion repurchase authorization is the aggregate authorization for repurchases of class a and class b common stock together with its paired unit . bhge llc had authorization remaining to repurchase up to approximately $ 2.5 billion of its common units from bhge and ge at december 31 , 2017 . ( 3 ) during 2017 , we repurchased and canceled 6046735 shares of class a common stock for a total of $ 187 million . we also repurchased and canceled 10126467 shares of class b common stock from ge which is paired together with common units of bhge llc for $ 314 million. .
Question: as of december 31, 2017, how much did the balance of class a common stock represent in relation to the one of class b common stock?
Answer: 0.5972
Question: and what is this class b balance as a percentage of the total number of authorized shares of that stock, in that same date?
| 0.5656 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) high quality financial institutions . such balances may be in excess of fdic insured limits . to manage the related credit exposure , we continually monitor the credit worthiness of the financial institutions where we have deposits . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we provide services , as well as the dispersion of our operations across many geographic areas . we provide services to small-container , large-container , municipal and residential , and energy services customers in the united states and puerto rico . we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers , but generally do not require collateral to support customer receivables . we establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors including the credit risk of specific customers , age of receivables outstanding , historical trends , economic conditions and other information . accounts receivable , net accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal , energy services and other services . our receivables are recorded when billed or when the related revenue is earned , if earlier , and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash . the carrying value of our receivables , net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , represents their estimated net realizable value . provisions for doubtful accounts are evaluated on a monthly basis and are recorded based on our historical collection experience , the age of the receivables , specific customer information and economic conditions . we also review outstanding balances on an account-specific basis . in general , reserves are provided for accounts receivable in excess of 90 days outstanding . past due receivable balances are written-off when our collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting amounts due . the following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td><td>$ 38.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions charged to expense</td><td>30.6</td><td>20.4</td><td>22.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accounts written-off</td><td>-35.7 ( 35.7 )</td><td>-23.1 ( 23.1 )</td><td>-14.9 ( 14.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 38.9</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td></tr></table> restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 141.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities of which $ 71.4 million supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability . additionally , we obtain funds through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds for the purpose of financing qualifying expenditures at our landfills , transfer stations , collection and recycling centers . the funds are deposited directly into trust accounts by the bonding authorities at the time of issuance . as the use of these funds is contractually restricted , and we do not have the ability to use these funds for general operating purposes , they are classified as restricted cash and marketable securities in our consolidated balance sheets . in the normal course of business , we may be required to provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities in connection with municipal residential collection contracts , closure or post- closure of landfills , environmental remediation , environmental permits , and business licenses and permits as a financial guarantee of our performance . at several of our landfills , we satisfy financial assurance requirements by depositing cash into restricted trust funds or escrow accounts . property and equipment we record property and equipment at cost . expenditures for major additions and improvements to facilities are capitalized , while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred . when property is retired or .
Question: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2016?
| 44.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) high quality financial institutions . such balances may be in excess of fdic insured limits . to manage the related credit exposure , we continually monitor the credit worthiness of the financial institutions where we have deposits . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we provide services , as well as the dispersion of our operations across many geographic areas . we provide services to small-container , large-container , municipal and residential , and energy services customers in the united states and puerto rico . we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers , but generally do not require collateral to support customer receivables . we establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors including the credit risk of specific customers , age of receivables outstanding , historical trends , economic conditions and other information . accounts receivable , net accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal , energy services and other services . our receivables are recorded when billed or when the related revenue is earned , if earlier , and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash . the carrying value of our receivables , net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , represents their estimated net realizable value . provisions for doubtful accounts are evaluated on a monthly basis and are recorded based on our historical collection experience , the age of the receivables , specific customer information and economic conditions . we also review outstanding balances on an account-specific basis . in general , reserves are provided for accounts receivable in excess of 90 days outstanding . past due receivable balances are written-off when our collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting amounts due . the following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td><td>$ 38.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions charged to expense</td><td>30.6</td><td>20.4</td><td>22.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accounts written-off</td><td>-35.7 ( 35.7 )</td><td>-23.1 ( 23.1 )</td><td>-14.9 ( 14.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 38.9</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td></tr></table> restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 141.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities of which $ 71.4 million supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability . additionally , we obtain funds through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds for the purpose of financing qualifying expenditures at our landfills , transfer stations , collection and recycling centers . the funds are deposited directly into trust accounts by the bonding authorities at the time of issuance . as the use of these funds is contractually restricted , and we do not have the ability to use these funds for general operating purposes , they are classified as restricted cash and marketable securities in our consolidated balance sheets . in the normal course of business , we may be required to provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities in connection with municipal residential collection contracts , closure or post- closure of landfills , environmental remediation , environmental permits , and business licenses and permits as a financial guarantee of our performance . at several of our landfills , we satisfy financial assurance requirements by depositing cash into restricted trust funds or escrow accounts . property and equipment we record property and equipment at cost . expenditures for major additions and improvements to facilities are capitalized , while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred . when property is retired or .
Question: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2016?
Answer: 44.0
Question: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2017?
| 46.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) high quality financial institutions . such balances may be in excess of fdic insured limits . to manage the related credit exposure , we continually monitor the credit worthiness of the financial institutions where we have deposits . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we provide services , as well as the dispersion of our operations across many geographic areas . we provide services to small-container , large-container , municipal and residential , and energy services customers in the united states and puerto rico . we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers , but generally do not require collateral to support customer receivables . we establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors including the credit risk of specific customers , age of receivables outstanding , historical trends , economic conditions and other information . accounts receivable , net accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal , energy services and other services . our receivables are recorded when billed or when the related revenue is earned , if earlier , and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash . the carrying value of our receivables , net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , represents their estimated net realizable value . provisions for doubtful accounts are evaluated on a monthly basis and are recorded based on our historical collection experience , the age of the receivables , specific customer information and economic conditions . we also review outstanding balances on an account-specific basis . in general , reserves are provided for accounts receivable in excess of 90 days outstanding . past due receivable balances are written-off when our collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting amounts due . the following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td><td>$ 38.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions charged to expense</td><td>30.6</td><td>20.4</td><td>22.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accounts written-off</td><td>-35.7 ( 35.7 )</td><td>-23.1 ( 23.1 )</td><td>-14.9 ( 14.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 38.9</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td></tr></table> restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 141.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities of which $ 71.4 million supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability . additionally , we obtain funds through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds for the purpose of financing qualifying expenditures at our landfills , transfer stations , collection and recycling centers . the funds are deposited directly into trust accounts by the bonding authorities at the time of issuance . as the use of these funds is contractually restricted , and we do not have the ability to use these funds for general operating purposes , they are classified as restricted cash and marketable securities in our consolidated balance sheets . in the normal course of business , we may be required to provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities in connection with municipal residential collection contracts , closure or post- closure of landfills , environmental remediation , environmental permits , and business licenses and permits as a financial guarantee of our performance . at several of our landfills , we satisfy financial assurance requirements by depositing cash into restricted trust funds or escrow accounts . property and equipment we record property and equipment at cost . expenditures for major additions and improvements to facilities are capitalized , while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred . when property is retired or .
Question: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2016?
Answer: 44.0
Question: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2017?
Answer: 46.7
Question: what is the net change?
| -2.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) high quality financial institutions . such balances may be in excess of fdic insured limits . to manage the related credit exposure , we continually monitor the credit worthiness of the financial institutions where we have deposits . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we provide services , as well as the dispersion of our operations across many geographic areas . we provide services to small-container , large-container , municipal and residential , and energy services customers in the united states and puerto rico . we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers , but generally do not require collateral to support customer receivables . we establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors including the credit risk of specific customers , age of receivables outstanding , historical trends , economic conditions and other information . accounts receivable , net accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal , energy services and other services . our receivables are recorded when billed or when the related revenue is earned , if earlier , and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash . the carrying value of our receivables , net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , represents their estimated net realizable value . provisions for doubtful accounts are evaluated on a monthly basis and are recorded based on our historical collection experience , the age of the receivables , specific customer information and economic conditions . we also review outstanding balances on an account-specific basis . in general , reserves are provided for accounts receivable in excess of 90 days outstanding . past due receivable balances are written-off when our collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting amounts due . the following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td><td>$ 38.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions charged to expense</td><td>30.6</td><td>20.4</td><td>22.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accounts written-off</td><td>-35.7 ( 35.7 )</td><td>-23.1 ( 23.1 )</td><td>-14.9 ( 14.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 38.9</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td></tr></table> restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 141.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities of which $ 71.4 million supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability . additionally , we obtain funds through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds for the purpose of financing qualifying expenditures at our landfills , transfer stations , collection and recycling centers . the funds are deposited directly into trust accounts by the bonding authorities at the time of issuance . as the use of these funds is contractually restricted , and we do not have the ability to use these funds for general operating purposes , they are classified as restricted cash and marketable securities in our consolidated balance sheets . in the normal course of business , we may be required to provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities in connection with municipal residential collection contracts , closure or post- closure of landfills , environmental remediation , environmental permits , and business licenses and permits as a financial guarantee of our performance . at several of our landfills , we satisfy financial assurance requirements by depositing cash into restricted trust funds or escrow accounts . property and equipment we record property and equipment at cost . expenditures for major additions and improvements to facilities are capitalized , while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred . when property is retired or .
Question: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2016?
Answer: 44.0
Question: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2017?
Answer: 46.7
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -2.7
Question: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2017?
| 46.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) high quality financial institutions . such balances may be in excess of fdic insured limits . to manage the related credit exposure , we continually monitor the credit worthiness of the financial institutions where we have deposits . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we provide services , as well as the dispersion of our operations across many geographic areas . we provide services to small-container , large-container , municipal and residential , and energy services customers in the united states and puerto rico . we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers , but generally do not require collateral to support customer receivables . we establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors including the credit risk of specific customers , age of receivables outstanding , historical trends , economic conditions and other information . accounts receivable , net accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal , energy services and other services . our receivables are recorded when billed or when the related revenue is earned , if earlier , and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash . the carrying value of our receivables , net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , represents their estimated net realizable value . provisions for doubtful accounts are evaluated on a monthly basis and are recorded based on our historical collection experience , the age of the receivables , specific customer information and economic conditions . we also review outstanding balances on an account-specific basis . in general , reserves are provided for accounts receivable in excess of 90 days outstanding . past due receivable balances are written-off when our collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting amounts due . the following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td><td>$ 38.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions charged to expense</td><td>30.6</td><td>20.4</td><td>22.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accounts written-off</td><td>-35.7 ( 35.7 )</td><td>-23.1 ( 23.1 )</td><td>-14.9 ( 14.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 38.9</td><td>$ 44.0</td><td>$ 46.7</td></tr></table> restricted cash and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 141.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities of which $ 71.4 million supports our insurance programs for workers 2019 compensation , commercial general liability , and commercial auto liability . additionally , we obtain funds through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds for the purpose of financing qualifying expenditures at our landfills , transfer stations , collection and recycling centers . the funds are deposited directly into trust accounts by the bonding authorities at the time of issuance . as the use of these funds is contractually restricted , and we do not have the ability to use these funds for general operating purposes , they are classified as restricted cash and marketable securities in our consolidated balance sheets . in the normal course of business , we may be required to provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities in connection with municipal residential collection contracts , closure or post- closure of landfills , environmental remediation , environmental permits , and business licenses and permits as a financial guarantee of our performance . at several of our landfills , we satisfy financial assurance requirements by depositing cash into restricted trust funds or escrow accounts . property and equipment we record property and equipment at cost . expenditures for major additions and improvements to facilities are capitalized , while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred . when property is retired or .
Question: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2016?
Answer: 44.0
Question: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2017?
Answer: 46.7
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -2.7
Question: what was the balance in the account for allowance of doubtful accounts in 2017?
Answer: 46.7
Question: what was the percent change?
| -0.05782 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*************************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*************************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*************************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*************************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*************************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ********************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td><td>aggregate debt maturities</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 13.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>11.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>8.9</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>8.0</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>7.2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1.1</td><td>267.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total obligations and commitments</td><td>$ 49.8</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*************************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*************************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*************************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*************************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*************************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ********************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. .
Question: what is the total expense for all operating leases in 2004?
| 14.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*************************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*************************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*************************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*************************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*************************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ********************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td><td>aggregate debt maturities</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 13.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>11.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>8.9</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>8.0</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>7.2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1.1</td><td>267.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total obligations and commitments</td><td>$ 49.8</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*************************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*************************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*************************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*************************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*************************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ********************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. .
Question: what is the total expense for all operating leases in 2004?
Answer: 14.0
Question: what about in 2003?
| 12.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*************************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*************************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*************************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*************************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*************************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ********************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td><td>aggregate debt maturities</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 13.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>11.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>8.9</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>8.0</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>7.2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1.1</td><td>267.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total obligations and commitments</td><td>$ 49.8</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*************************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*************************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*************************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*************************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*************************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ********************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. .
Question: what is the total expense for all operating leases in 2004?
Answer: 14.0
Question: what about in 2003?
Answer: 12.3
Question: what is the difference in total expense for all operating leases?
| 1.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*************************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*************************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*************************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*************************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*************************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ********************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td><td>aggregate debt maturities</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 13.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>11.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>8.9</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>8.0</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>7.2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1.1</td><td>267.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total obligations and commitments</td><td>$ 49.8</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*************************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*************************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*************************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*************************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*************************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ********************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. .
Question: what is the total expense for all operating leases in 2004?
Answer: 14.0
Question: what about in 2003?
Answer: 12.3
Question: what is the difference in total expense for all operating leases?
Answer: 1.7
Question: what is the total expense for all operating leases in 2003?
| 12.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*************************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*************************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*************************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*************************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*************************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ********************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td><td>aggregate debt maturities</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 13.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>11.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>8.9</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>8.0</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>7.2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1.1</td><td>267.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total obligations and commitments</td><td>$ 49.8</td><td>$ 267.1</td></tr></table> edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum lease payments ( including interest ) under noncancelable operating leases and aggregate debt maturities at december 31 , 2004 were as follows ( in millions ) : aggregate operating debt leases maturities 2005*************************************************************** $ 13.1 $ 2014 2006*************************************************************** 11.5 2014 2007*************************************************************** 8.9 2014 2008*************************************************************** 8.0 2014 2009*************************************************************** 7.2 2014 thereafter ********************************************************** 1.1 267.1 total obligations and commitments************************************** $ 49.8 $ 267.1 included in debt at december 31 , 2004 and 2003 were unsecured notes denominated in japanese yen of a57.0 billion ( us$ 67.1 million ) and a56.0 billion ( us$ 55.8 million ) , respectively . certain facilities and equipment are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates . most of the operating leases contain renewal options . total expense for all operating leases was $ 14.0 million , $ 12.3 million , and $ 6.8 million for the years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 11 . financial instruments and risk management fair values of financial instruments the consolidated financial statements include financial instruments whereby the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical basis . financial instruments of the company consist of cash deposits , accounts and other receivables , investments in unconsolidated affiliates , accounts payable , certain accrued liabilities and debt . the fair values of certain investments in unconsolidated affiliates are estimated based on quoted market prices . for other investments , various methods are used to estimate fair value , including external valuations and discounted cash flows . the carrying amount of the company 2019s long-term debt approximates fair market value based on prevailing market rates . the company 2019s other financial instruments generally approximate their fair values based on the short-term nature of these instruments. .
Question: what is the total expense for all operating leases in 2004?
Answer: 14.0
Question: what about in 2003?
Answer: 12.3
Question: what is the difference in total expense for all operating leases?
Answer: 1.7
Question: what is the total expense for all operating leases in 2003?
Answer: 12.3
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.13821 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 114 jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable counterparties to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange- traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 24673</td><td>$ 28302</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>869</td><td>1294</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>16151</td><td>23271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity</td><td>7882</td><td>4939</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>6948</td><td>6272</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>56523</td><td>64078</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td><td>-22705 ( 22705 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 40415</td><td>$ 41373</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained . derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 56.5 billion and $ 64.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . derivative receivables decreased predominantly as a result of client- driven market-making activities in cib markets , which reduced foreign exchange and interest rate derivative receivables , and increased equity derivative receivables , driven by market movements . derivative receivables amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 16.1 billion and $ 22.7 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative transactions , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 29.0 billion and $ 31.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 40.4 billion and $ 41.4 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates cva to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential .
Question: in 2017, what was the amount of the total net of cash collateral that was foreign exchange?
| 16151.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 114 jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable counterparties to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange- traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 24673</td><td>$ 28302</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>869</td><td>1294</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>16151</td><td>23271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity</td><td>7882</td><td>4939</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>6948</td><td>6272</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>56523</td><td>64078</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td><td>-22705 ( 22705 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 40415</td><td>$ 41373</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained . derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 56.5 billion and $ 64.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . derivative receivables decreased predominantly as a result of client- driven market-making activities in cib markets , which reduced foreign exchange and interest rate derivative receivables , and increased equity derivative receivables , driven by market movements . derivative receivables amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 16.1 billion and $ 22.7 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative transactions , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 29.0 billion and $ 31.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 40.4 billion and $ 41.4 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates cva to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential .
Question: in 2017, what was the amount of the total net of cash collateral that was foreign exchange?
Answer: 16151.0
Question: and what was that total of net of cash collateral?
| 56523.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 114 jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable counterparties to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange- traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 24673</td><td>$ 28302</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>869</td><td>1294</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>16151</td><td>23271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity</td><td>7882</td><td>4939</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>6948</td><td>6272</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>56523</td><td>64078</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td><td>-22705 ( 22705 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 40415</td><td>$ 41373</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained . derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 56.5 billion and $ 64.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . derivative receivables decreased predominantly as a result of client- driven market-making activities in cib markets , which reduced foreign exchange and interest rate derivative receivables , and increased equity derivative receivables , driven by market movements . derivative receivables amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 16.1 billion and $ 22.7 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative transactions , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 29.0 billion and $ 31.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 40.4 billion and $ 41.4 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates cva to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential .
Question: in 2017, what was the amount of the total net of cash collateral that was foreign exchange?
Answer: 16151.0
Question: and what was that total of net of cash collateral?
Answer: 56523.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
| 0.28574 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 114 jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable counterparties to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange- traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 24673</td><td>$ 28302</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>869</td><td>1294</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>16151</td><td>23271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity</td><td>7882</td><td>4939</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>6948</td><td>6272</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>56523</td><td>64078</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td><td>-22705 ( 22705 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 40415</td><td>$ 41373</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained . derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 56.5 billion and $ 64.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . derivative receivables decreased predominantly as a result of client- driven market-making activities in cib markets , which reduced foreign exchange and interest rate derivative receivables , and increased equity derivative receivables , driven by market movements . derivative receivables amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 16.1 billion and $ 22.7 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative transactions , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 29.0 billion and $ 31.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 40.4 billion and $ 41.4 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates cva to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential .
Question: in 2017, what was the amount of the total net of cash collateral that was foreign exchange?
Answer: 16151.0
Question: and what was that total of net of cash collateral?
Answer: 56523.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
Answer: 0.28574
Question: and concerning the total of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets, how much did the total in that year represent in relation to the one in the previous, or 2016?
| 1.13451 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
item 15 . exhibits , financial statement schedules . ( continued ) kinder morgan , inc . form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>kinder morgan liquids terminals llc-n.j . development revenue bonds due january 15 2018 kinder morgan columbus llc-5.50% ( llc-5.50 % ) ms development revenue note due september 1 2022</td><td>25.0 8.2</td><td>25.0 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kinder morgan operating l.p . 201cb 201d-jackson-union cos . il revenue bonds due april 1 2024</td><td>23.7</td><td>23.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international marine terminals-plaquemines la revenue bonds due march 15 2025</td><td>40.0</td><td>40.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other miscellaneous subsidiary debt</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unamortized debt discount on long-term debt</td><td>-20.3 ( 20.3 )</td><td>-21.2 ( 21.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-1263.3 ( 1263.3 )</td><td>-596.6 ( 596.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt 2013 kmp</td><td>$ 10282.8</td><td>$ 10007.5</td></tr></table> ____________ ( a ) as a result of the implementation of asu 2009-17 , effective january 1 , 2010 , we ( i ) include the transactions and balances of our business trust , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , in our consolidated financial statements and ( ii ) no longer include our junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued to the capital trusts ( see note 18 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d ) . ( b ) kmp issued its $ 500 million in principal amount of 9.00% ( 9.00 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2019 in december 2008 . each holder of the notes has the right to require kmp to repurchase all or a portion of the notes owned by such holder on february 1 , 2012 at a purchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes tendered by the holder plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the repurchase date . on and after february 1 , 2012 , interest will cease to accrue on the notes tendered for repayment . a holder 2019s exercise of the repurchase option is irrevocable . kinder morgan kansas , inc . the 2028 and 2098 debentures and the 2012 and 2015 senior notes are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . the 2027 debentures are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option after november 1 , 2004 at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . on september 2 , 2010 , kinder morgan kansas , inc . paid the remaining $ 1.1 million principal balance outstanding on kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) series debentures , due 2013 . kinder morgan finance company , llc on december 20 , 2010 , kinder morgan finance company , llc , a wholly owned subsidiary of kinder morgan kansas , inc. , completed a public offering of senior notes . it issued a total of $ 750 million in principal amount of 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) senior notes due january 15 , 2018 . net proceeds received from the issuance of the notes , after underwriting discounts and commissions , were $ 744.2 million , which were used to retire the principal amount of the 5.35% ( 5.35 % ) senior notes that matured on january 5 , 2011 . the 2011 , 2016 , 2018 and 2036 senior notes issued by kinder morgan finance company , llc are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . each series of these notes is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by kinder morgan kansas , inc . on a senior unsecured basis as to principal , interest and any additional amounts required to be paid as a result of any withholding or deduction for canadian taxes . capital trust securities kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s business trusts , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , are obligated for $ 12.7 million of 8.56% ( 8.56 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2027 and $ 14.4 million of 7.63% ( 7.63 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2028 , respectively , which it guarantees . the 2028 securities are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices as defined in the associated prospectus . the 2027 securities are redeemable in whole or in part at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option and at any time in certain limited circumstances upon the occurrence of certain events and at prices , all defined in the associated prospectus supplements . upon redemption by kinder morgan kansas , inc . or at maturity of the junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures , it must use the proceeds to make redemptions of the capital trust securities on a pro rata basis. .
Question: what was the proportion of unamortized debt discount on long-term debt to total long-term debt?
| 0.00212 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
item 15 . exhibits , financial statement schedules . ( continued ) kinder morgan , inc . form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>kinder morgan liquids terminals llc-n.j . development revenue bonds due january 15 2018 kinder morgan columbus llc-5.50% ( llc-5.50 % ) ms development revenue note due september 1 2022</td><td>25.0 8.2</td><td>25.0 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kinder morgan operating l.p . 201cb 201d-jackson-union cos . il revenue bonds due april 1 2024</td><td>23.7</td><td>23.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international marine terminals-plaquemines la revenue bonds due march 15 2025</td><td>40.0</td><td>40.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other miscellaneous subsidiary debt</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unamortized debt discount on long-term debt</td><td>-20.3 ( 20.3 )</td><td>-21.2 ( 21.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-1263.3 ( 1263.3 )</td><td>-596.6 ( 596.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt 2013 kmp</td><td>$ 10282.8</td><td>$ 10007.5</td></tr></table> ____________ ( a ) as a result of the implementation of asu 2009-17 , effective january 1 , 2010 , we ( i ) include the transactions and balances of our business trust , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , in our consolidated financial statements and ( ii ) no longer include our junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued to the capital trusts ( see note 18 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d ) . ( b ) kmp issued its $ 500 million in principal amount of 9.00% ( 9.00 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2019 in december 2008 . each holder of the notes has the right to require kmp to repurchase all or a portion of the notes owned by such holder on february 1 , 2012 at a purchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes tendered by the holder plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the repurchase date . on and after february 1 , 2012 , interest will cease to accrue on the notes tendered for repayment . a holder 2019s exercise of the repurchase option is irrevocable . kinder morgan kansas , inc . the 2028 and 2098 debentures and the 2012 and 2015 senior notes are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . the 2027 debentures are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option after november 1 , 2004 at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . on september 2 , 2010 , kinder morgan kansas , inc . paid the remaining $ 1.1 million principal balance outstanding on kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) series debentures , due 2013 . kinder morgan finance company , llc on december 20 , 2010 , kinder morgan finance company , llc , a wholly owned subsidiary of kinder morgan kansas , inc. , completed a public offering of senior notes . it issued a total of $ 750 million in principal amount of 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) senior notes due january 15 , 2018 . net proceeds received from the issuance of the notes , after underwriting discounts and commissions , were $ 744.2 million , which were used to retire the principal amount of the 5.35% ( 5.35 % ) senior notes that matured on january 5 , 2011 . the 2011 , 2016 , 2018 and 2036 senior notes issued by kinder morgan finance company , llc are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices defined in the associated prospectus supplements . each series of these notes is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by kinder morgan kansas , inc . on a senior unsecured basis as to principal , interest and any additional amounts required to be paid as a result of any withholding or deduction for canadian taxes . capital trust securities kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s business trusts , k n capital trust i and k n capital trust iii , are obligated for $ 12.7 million of 8.56% ( 8.56 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2027 and $ 14.4 million of 7.63% ( 7.63 % ) capital trust securities maturing on april 15 , 2028 , respectively , which it guarantees . the 2028 securities are redeemable in whole or in part , at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option at any time , at redemption prices as defined in the associated prospectus . the 2027 securities are redeemable in whole or in part at kinder morgan kansas , inc . 2019s option and at any time in certain limited circumstances upon the occurrence of certain events and at prices , all defined in the associated prospectus supplements . upon redemption by kinder morgan kansas , inc . or at maturity of the junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures , it must use the proceeds to make redemptions of the capital trust securities on a pro rata basis. .
Question: what was the proportion of unamortized debt discount on long-term debt to total long-term debt?
Answer: 0.00212
Question: and as a percentage?
| 0.00212 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued uncertain tax positions : the company is subject to income tax in certain jurisdictions outside the u.s. , principally canada and mexico . the statute of limitations on assessment of tax varies from three to seven years depending on the jurisdiction and tax issue . tax returns filed in each jurisdiction are subject to examination by local tax authorities . the company is currently under audit by the canadian revenue agency , mexican tax authority and the u.s . internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) . in october 2011 , the irs issued a notice of proposed adjustment , which proposes pursuant to section 482 of the code , to disallow a capital loss claimed by krs on the disposition of common shares of valad property ltd. , an australian publicly listed company . because the adjustment is being made pursuant to section 482 of the code , the irs believes it can assert a 100 percent 201cpenalty 201d tax pursuant to section 857 ( b ) ( 7 ) of the code and disallow the capital loss deduction . the notice of proposed adjustment indicates the irs 2019 intention to impose the 100 percent 201cpenalty 201d tax on the company in the amount of $ 40.9 million and disallowing the capital loss claimed by krs . the company and its outside counsel have considered the irs 2019 assessment and believe that there is sufficient documentation establishing a valid business purpose for the transfer , including recent case history showing support for similar positions . accordingly , the company strongly disagrees with the irs 2019 position on the application of section 482 of the code to the disposition of the shares , the imposition of the 100 percent penalty tax and the simultaneous assertion of the penalty tax and disallowance of the capital loss deduction . the company received a notice of proposed assessment and filed a written protest and requested an irs appeals office conference . an appeals hearing was attended by management and its attorneys , the irs compliance group and an irs appeals officer in november , 2014 , at which time irs compliance presented arguments in support of their position , as noted herein . management and its attorneys presented rebuttal arguments in support of its position . the matter is currently under consideration by the appeals officer . the company intends to vigorously defend its position in this matter and believes it will prevail . resolutions of these audits are not expected to have a material effect on the company 2019s financial statements . during 2013 , the company early adopted asu 2013-11 prospectively and reclassified a portion of its reserve for uncertain tax positions . the reserve for uncertain tax positions included amounts related to the company 2019s canadian operations . the company has unrecognized tax benefits reported as deferred tax assets and are available to settle adjustments made with respect to the company 2019s uncertain tax positions in canada . the company reduced its reserve for uncertain tax positions by $ 12.3 million associated with its canadian operations and reduced its deferred tax assets in accordance with asu 2013-11 . the company does not believe that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2014 , will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months . as of december 31 , 2014 , the company 2019s canadian uncertain tax positions , which reduce its deferred tax assets , aggregated $ 10.4 million . the liability for uncertain tax benefits principally consists of estimated foreign , federal and state income tax liabilities in years for which the statute of limitations is open . open years range from 2008 through 2014 and vary by jurisdiction and issue . the aggregate changes in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 were as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>201 4</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 4590</td><td>$ 16890</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases for tax positions related to current year</td><td>59</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduction due to adoption of asu 2013-11 ( a )</td><td>-</td><td>-12315 ( 12315 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 4649</td><td>$ 4590</td></tr></table> ( a ) this amount was reclassified against the related deferred tax asset relating to the company 2019s early adoption of asu 2013-11 as discussed above. .
Question: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in the end of 2014?
| 4649.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued uncertain tax positions : the company is subject to income tax in certain jurisdictions outside the u.s. , principally canada and mexico . the statute of limitations on assessment of tax varies from three to seven years depending on the jurisdiction and tax issue . tax returns filed in each jurisdiction are subject to examination by local tax authorities . the company is currently under audit by the canadian revenue agency , mexican tax authority and the u.s . internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) . in october 2011 , the irs issued a notice of proposed adjustment , which proposes pursuant to section 482 of the code , to disallow a capital loss claimed by krs on the disposition of common shares of valad property ltd. , an australian publicly listed company . because the adjustment is being made pursuant to section 482 of the code , the irs believes it can assert a 100 percent 201cpenalty 201d tax pursuant to section 857 ( b ) ( 7 ) of the code and disallow the capital loss deduction . the notice of proposed adjustment indicates the irs 2019 intention to impose the 100 percent 201cpenalty 201d tax on the company in the amount of $ 40.9 million and disallowing the capital loss claimed by krs . the company and its outside counsel have considered the irs 2019 assessment and believe that there is sufficient documentation establishing a valid business purpose for the transfer , including recent case history showing support for similar positions . accordingly , the company strongly disagrees with the irs 2019 position on the application of section 482 of the code to the disposition of the shares , the imposition of the 100 percent penalty tax and the simultaneous assertion of the penalty tax and disallowance of the capital loss deduction . the company received a notice of proposed assessment and filed a written protest and requested an irs appeals office conference . an appeals hearing was attended by management and its attorneys , the irs compliance group and an irs appeals officer in november , 2014 , at which time irs compliance presented arguments in support of their position , as noted herein . management and its attorneys presented rebuttal arguments in support of its position . the matter is currently under consideration by the appeals officer . the company intends to vigorously defend its position in this matter and believes it will prevail . resolutions of these audits are not expected to have a material effect on the company 2019s financial statements . during 2013 , the company early adopted asu 2013-11 prospectively and reclassified a portion of its reserve for uncertain tax positions . the reserve for uncertain tax positions included amounts related to the company 2019s canadian operations . the company has unrecognized tax benefits reported as deferred tax assets and are available to settle adjustments made with respect to the company 2019s uncertain tax positions in canada . the company reduced its reserve for uncertain tax positions by $ 12.3 million associated with its canadian operations and reduced its deferred tax assets in accordance with asu 2013-11 . the company does not believe that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2014 , will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months . as of december 31 , 2014 , the company 2019s canadian uncertain tax positions , which reduce its deferred tax assets , aggregated $ 10.4 million . the liability for uncertain tax benefits principally consists of estimated foreign , federal and state income tax liabilities in years for which the statute of limitations is open . open years range from 2008 through 2014 and vary by jurisdiction and issue . the aggregate changes in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 were as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>201 4</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 4590</td><td>$ 16890</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases for tax positions related to current year</td><td>59</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduction due to adoption of asu 2013-11 ( a )</td><td>-</td><td>-12315 ( 12315 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 4649</td><td>$ 4590</td></tr></table> ( a ) this amount was reclassified against the related deferred tax asset relating to the company 2019s early adoption of asu 2013-11 as discussed above. .
Question: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in the end of 2014?
Answer: 4649.0
Question: and what was it in the beginning of that year?
| 4590.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued uncertain tax positions : the company is subject to income tax in certain jurisdictions outside the u.s. , principally canada and mexico . the statute of limitations on assessment of tax varies from three to seven years depending on the jurisdiction and tax issue . tax returns filed in each jurisdiction are subject to examination by local tax authorities . the company is currently under audit by the canadian revenue agency , mexican tax authority and the u.s . internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) . in october 2011 , the irs issued a notice of proposed adjustment , which proposes pursuant to section 482 of the code , to disallow a capital loss claimed by krs on the disposition of common shares of valad property ltd. , an australian publicly listed company . because the adjustment is being made pursuant to section 482 of the code , the irs believes it can assert a 100 percent 201cpenalty 201d tax pursuant to section 857 ( b ) ( 7 ) of the code and disallow the capital loss deduction . the notice of proposed adjustment indicates the irs 2019 intention to impose the 100 percent 201cpenalty 201d tax on the company in the amount of $ 40.9 million and disallowing the capital loss claimed by krs . the company and its outside counsel have considered the irs 2019 assessment and believe that there is sufficient documentation establishing a valid business purpose for the transfer , including recent case history showing support for similar positions . accordingly , the company strongly disagrees with the irs 2019 position on the application of section 482 of the code to the disposition of the shares , the imposition of the 100 percent penalty tax and the simultaneous assertion of the penalty tax and disallowance of the capital loss deduction . the company received a notice of proposed assessment and filed a written protest and requested an irs appeals office conference . an appeals hearing was attended by management and its attorneys , the irs compliance group and an irs appeals officer in november , 2014 , at which time irs compliance presented arguments in support of their position , as noted herein . management and its attorneys presented rebuttal arguments in support of its position . the matter is currently under consideration by the appeals officer . the company intends to vigorously defend its position in this matter and believes it will prevail . resolutions of these audits are not expected to have a material effect on the company 2019s financial statements . during 2013 , the company early adopted asu 2013-11 prospectively and reclassified a portion of its reserve for uncertain tax positions . the reserve for uncertain tax positions included amounts related to the company 2019s canadian operations . the company has unrecognized tax benefits reported as deferred tax assets and are available to settle adjustments made with respect to the company 2019s uncertain tax positions in canada . the company reduced its reserve for uncertain tax positions by $ 12.3 million associated with its canadian operations and reduced its deferred tax assets in accordance with asu 2013-11 . the company does not believe that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2014 , will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months . as of december 31 , 2014 , the company 2019s canadian uncertain tax positions , which reduce its deferred tax assets , aggregated $ 10.4 million . the liability for uncertain tax benefits principally consists of estimated foreign , federal and state income tax liabilities in years for which the statute of limitations is open . open years range from 2008 through 2014 and vary by jurisdiction and issue . the aggregate changes in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 were as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>201 4</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 4590</td><td>$ 16890</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases for tax positions related to current year</td><td>59</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduction due to adoption of asu 2013-11 ( a )</td><td>-</td><td>-12315 ( 12315 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 4649</td><td>$ 4590</td></tr></table> ( a ) this amount was reclassified against the related deferred tax asset relating to the company 2019s early adoption of asu 2013-11 as discussed above. .
Question: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in the end of 2014?
Answer: 4649.0
Question: and what was it in the beginning of that year?
Answer: 4590.0
Question: what was, then, the change in that balance throughout 2014?
| 59.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued uncertain tax positions : the company is subject to income tax in certain jurisdictions outside the u.s. , principally canada and mexico . the statute of limitations on assessment of tax varies from three to seven years depending on the jurisdiction and tax issue . tax returns filed in each jurisdiction are subject to examination by local tax authorities . the company is currently under audit by the canadian revenue agency , mexican tax authority and the u.s . internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) . in october 2011 , the irs issued a notice of proposed adjustment , which proposes pursuant to section 482 of the code , to disallow a capital loss claimed by krs on the disposition of common shares of valad property ltd. , an australian publicly listed company . because the adjustment is being made pursuant to section 482 of the code , the irs believes it can assert a 100 percent 201cpenalty 201d tax pursuant to section 857 ( b ) ( 7 ) of the code and disallow the capital loss deduction . the notice of proposed adjustment indicates the irs 2019 intention to impose the 100 percent 201cpenalty 201d tax on the company in the amount of $ 40.9 million and disallowing the capital loss claimed by krs . the company and its outside counsel have considered the irs 2019 assessment and believe that there is sufficient documentation establishing a valid business purpose for the transfer , including recent case history showing support for similar positions . accordingly , the company strongly disagrees with the irs 2019 position on the application of section 482 of the code to the disposition of the shares , the imposition of the 100 percent penalty tax and the simultaneous assertion of the penalty tax and disallowance of the capital loss deduction . the company received a notice of proposed assessment and filed a written protest and requested an irs appeals office conference . an appeals hearing was attended by management and its attorneys , the irs compliance group and an irs appeals officer in november , 2014 , at which time irs compliance presented arguments in support of their position , as noted herein . management and its attorneys presented rebuttal arguments in support of its position . the matter is currently under consideration by the appeals officer . the company intends to vigorously defend its position in this matter and believes it will prevail . resolutions of these audits are not expected to have a material effect on the company 2019s financial statements . during 2013 , the company early adopted asu 2013-11 prospectively and reclassified a portion of its reserve for uncertain tax positions . the reserve for uncertain tax positions included amounts related to the company 2019s canadian operations . the company has unrecognized tax benefits reported as deferred tax assets and are available to settle adjustments made with respect to the company 2019s uncertain tax positions in canada . the company reduced its reserve for uncertain tax positions by $ 12.3 million associated with its canadian operations and reduced its deferred tax assets in accordance with asu 2013-11 . the company does not believe that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2014 , will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months . as of december 31 , 2014 , the company 2019s canadian uncertain tax positions , which reduce its deferred tax assets , aggregated $ 10.4 million . the liability for uncertain tax benefits principally consists of estimated foreign , federal and state income tax liabilities in years for which the statute of limitations is open . open years range from 2008 through 2014 and vary by jurisdiction and issue . the aggregate changes in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 were as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>201 4</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of year</td><td>$ 4590</td><td>$ 16890</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases for tax positions related to current year</td><td>59</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reduction due to adoption of asu 2013-11 ( a )</td><td>-</td><td>-12315 ( 12315 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance end of year</td><td>$ 4649</td><td>$ 4590</td></tr></table> ( a ) this amount was reclassified against the related deferred tax asset relating to the company 2019s early adoption of asu 2013-11 as discussed above. .
Question: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in the end of 2014?
Answer: 4649.0
Question: and what was it in the beginning of that year?
Answer: 4590.0
Question: what was, then, the change in that balance throughout 2014?
Answer: 59.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that balance in the beginning of that year, in percentage?
| 0.01285 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
corporate/other corporate/other includes certain unallocated costs of global staff functions ( including finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) , other corporate expenses and unallocated global operations and technology expenses and income taxes , as well as corporate treasury , certain north america legacy consumer loan portfolios , other legacy assets and discontinued operations ( for additional information on corporate/other , see 201ccitigroup segments 201d above ) . at december 31 , 2018 , corporate/other had $ 91 billion in assets , an increase of 17% ( 17 % ) from the prior year . in millions of dollars 2018 2017 2016 % ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017 % ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>% ( % ) change2018 vs . 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change2017 vs . 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ 2254</td><td>$ 2000</td><td>$ 3045</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>( 34 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>-171 ( 171 )</td><td>1132</td><td>2188</td><td>nm</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ 2083</td><td>$ 3132</td><td>$ 5233</td><td>( 33 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 2272</td><td>$ 3814</td><td>$ 5042</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 24 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net credit losses</td><td>$ 21</td><td>$ 149</td><td>$ 435</td><td>( 86 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 66 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>credit reserve build ( release )</td><td>-218 ( 218 )</td><td>-317 ( 317 )</td><td>-456 ( 456 )</td><td>31</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>provision ( release ) for unfunded lending commitments</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>2014</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>provision for benefits and claims</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>98</td><td>71</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>$ -202 ( 202 )</td><td>$ -175 ( 175 )</td><td>$ 69</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ -507 ( 507 )</td><td>$ 122</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>income taxes ( benefits )</td><td>-113 ( 113 )</td><td>19064</td><td>-455 ( 455 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 126</td><td>$ -19571 ( 19571 )</td><td>$ 577</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-111 ( 111 )</td><td>-58 ( 58 )</td><td>93</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ -19682 ( 19682 )</td><td>$ 519</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>noncontrolling interests</td><td>11</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ -19676 ( 19676 )</td><td>$ 521</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr></table> nm not meaningful 2018 vs . 2017 net income was $ 107 million in 2018 , compared to a net loss of $ 19.7 billion in the prior year , primarily driven by the $ 19.8 billion one-time , non-cash charge recorded in the tax line in 2017 due to the impact of tax reform . results in 2018 included the one-time benefit of $ 94 million in the tax line , related to tax reform . for additional information , see 201csignificant accounting policies and significant estimates 2014income taxes 201d below . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform in 2018 and 2017 , net income decreased 92% ( 92 % ) , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses , lower cost of credit and tax benefits related to the reorganization of certain non-u.s . subsidiaries . the tax benefits were largely offset by the release of a foreign currency translation adjustment ( cta ) from aoci to earnings ( for additional information on the cta release , see note 19 to the consolidated financial statements ) . revenues decreased 33% ( 33 % ) , driven by the continued wind-down of legacy assets . expenses decreased 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily driven by the wind-down of legacy assets , lower infrastructure costs and lower legal expenses . provisions decreased $ 27 million to a net benefit of $ 202 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 86% ( 86 % ) to $ 21 million , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the net reserve release declined by $ 96 million to $ 221 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures . 2017 vs . 2016 the net loss was $ 19.7 billion , compared to net income of $ 521 million in the prior year , primarily driven by the one-time impact of tax reform . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform , net income declined 69% ( 69 % ) to $ 168 million , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses and lower cost of credit . revenues declined 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily reflecting the continued wind-down of legacy assets and the absence of gains related to debt buybacks in 2016 . revenues included approximately $ 750 million in gains on asset sales in the first quarter of 2017 , which more than offset a roughly $ 300 million charge related to the exit of citi 2019s u.s . mortgage servicing operations in the quarter . expenses declined 24% ( 24 % ) , reflecting the wind-down of legacy assets and lower legal expenses , partially offset by approximately $ 100 million in episodic expenses primarily related to the exit of the u.s . mortgage servicing operations . also included in expenses is an approximately $ 255 million provision for remediation costs related to a card act matter in 2017 . provisions decreased $ 244 million to a net benefit of $ 175 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses and a lower provision for benefits and claims , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 66% ( 66 % ) , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the decline in the provision for benefits and claims was primarily due to lower insurance activity . the net reserve release declined $ 147 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures. .
Question: what is the net change in total revenues net of interest expense from 2016 to 2018?
| -3150.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
corporate/other corporate/other includes certain unallocated costs of global staff functions ( including finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) , other corporate expenses and unallocated global operations and technology expenses and income taxes , as well as corporate treasury , certain north america legacy consumer loan portfolios , other legacy assets and discontinued operations ( for additional information on corporate/other , see 201ccitigroup segments 201d above ) . at december 31 , 2018 , corporate/other had $ 91 billion in assets , an increase of 17% ( 17 % ) from the prior year . in millions of dollars 2018 2017 2016 % ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017 % ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>% ( % ) change2018 vs . 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change2017 vs . 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest revenue</td><td>$ 2254</td><td>$ 2000</td><td>$ 3045</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>( 34 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-interest revenue</td><td>-171 ( 171 )</td><td>1132</td><td>2188</td><td>nm</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total revenues net of interest expense</td><td>$ 2083</td><td>$ 3132</td><td>$ 5233</td><td>( 33 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 2272</td><td>$ 3814</td><td>$ 5042</td><td>( 40 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 24 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net credit losses</td><td>$ 21</td><td>$ 149</td><td>$ 435</td><td>( 86 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 66 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>credit reserve build ( release )</td><td>-218 ( 218 )</td><td>-317 ( 317 )</td><td>-456 ( 456 )</td><td>31</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>provision ( release ) for unfunded lending commitments</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>2014</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>provision for benefits and claims</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>98</td><td>71</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims</td><td>$ -202 ( 202 )</td><td>$ -175 ( 175 )</td><td>$ 69</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ -507 ( 507 )</td><td>$ 122</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>income taxes ( benefits )</td><td>-113 ( 113 )</td><td>19064</td><td>-455 ( 455 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>income ( loss ) from continuing operations</td><td>$ 126</td><td>$ -19571 ( 19571 )</td><td>$ 577</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-111 ( 111 )</td><td>-58 ( 58 )</td><td>93</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ -19682 ( 19682 )</td><td>$ 519</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>noncontrolling interests</td><td>11</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ -19676 ( 19676 )</td><td>$ 521</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr></table> nm not meaningful 2018 vs . 2017 net income was $ 107 million in 2018 , compared to a net loss of $ 19.7 billion in the prior year , primarily driven by the $ 19.8 billion one-time , non-cash charge recorded in the tax line in 2017 due to the impact of tax reform . results in 2018 included the one-time benefit of $ 94 million in the tax line , related to tax reform . for additional information , see 201csignificant accounting policies and significant estimates 2014income taxes 201d below . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform in 2018 and 2017 , net income decreased 92% ( 92 % ) , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses , lower cost of credit and tax benefits related to the reorganization of certain non-u.s . subsidiaries . the tax benefits were largely offset by the release of a foreign currency translation adjustment ( cta ) from aoci to earnings ( for additional information on the cta release , see note 19 to the consolidated financial statements ) . revenues decreased 33% ( 33 % ) , driven by the continued wind-down of legacy assets . expenses decreased 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily driven by the wind-down of legacy assets , lower infrastructure costs and lower legal expenses . provisions decreased $ 27 million to a net benefit of $ 202 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 86% ( 86 % ) to $ 21 million , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the net reserve release declined by $ 96 million to $ 221 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures . 2017 vs . 2016 the net loss was $ 19.7 billion , compared to net income of $ 521 million in the prior year , primarily driven by the one-time impact of tax reform . excluding the one-time impact of tax reform , net income declined 69% ( 69 % ) to $ 168 million , reflecting lower revenues , partially offset by lower expenses and lower cost of credit . revenues declined 40% ( 40 % ) , primarily reflecting the continued wind-down of legacy assets and the absence of gains related to debt buybacks in 2016 . revenues included approximately $ 750 million in gains on asset sales in the first quarter of 2017 , which more than offset a roughly $ 300 million charge related to the exit of citi 2019s u.s . mortgage servicing operations in the quarter . expenses declined 24% ( 24 % ) , reflecting the wind-down of legacy assets and lower legal expenses , partially offset by approximately $ 100 million in episodic expenses primarily related to the exit of the u.s . mortgage servicing operations . also included in expenses is an approximately $ 255 million provision for remediation costs related to a card act matter in 2017 . provisions decreased $ 244 million to a net benefit of $ 175 million , primarily due to lower net credit losses and a lower provision for benefits and claims , partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release . net credit losses declined 66% ( 66 % ) , primarily reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity and the continued wind-down of the north america mortgage portfolio . the decline in the provision for benefits and claims was primarily due to lower insurance activity . the net reserve release declined $ 147 million , and reflected the continued wind-down of the legacy north america mortgage portfolio and divestitures. .
Question: what is the net change in total revenues net of interest expense from 2016 to 2018?
Answer: -3150.0
Question: what about the total revenues net of interest expense in 2016?
| 5233.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|