Datasets:

TheFinAI

/

flare-convfinqa

like 1

Follow

The Fin AI 51

convfinqa1300

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: page 59 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 13 . debt and interest costs ( continued ) long-term debt obligations outstanding at december 31 , 2007 , have maturities of $ 127.1 million , $ 160 million , $ 388.4 million , $ 625.1 million and $ 550.3 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and $ 456.1 million thereafter . ball provides letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure liabilities recorded in connection with industrial development revenue bonds and certain self-insurance arrangements . letters of credit outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 41 million and $ 52.4 million , respectively . the notes payable and senior credit facilities are guaranteed on a full , unconditional and joint and several basis by certain of the company 2019s domestic wholly owned subsidiaries . certain foreign denominated tranches of the senior credit facilities are similarly guaranteed by certain of the company 2019s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries . note 22 contains further details as well as condensed , consolidating financial information for the company , segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments , share repurchases , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . on march 27 , 2006 , ball expanded its senior secured credit facilities with the addition of a $ 500 million term d loan facility due in installments through october 2011 . also on march 27 , 2006 , ball issued at a price of 99.799 percent $ 450 million of 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) senior notes ( effective yield to maturity of 6.65 percent ) due in march 2018 . the proceeds from these financings were used to refinance existing u.s . can debt with ball corporation debt at lower interest rates , acquire certain north american plastic container net assets from alcan and reduce seasonal working capital debt . ( see note 3 for further details of the acquisitions. ) on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities to extend debt maturities at lower interest rate spreads and provide the company with additional borrowing capacity for future growth . during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due in august 2006 . the refinancing and senior note redemptions resulted in a debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) for the related call premium and unamortized debt issuance costs . a summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest costs before refinancing costs</td><td>$ 155.8</td><td>$ 142.5</td><td>$ 102.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt refinancing costs</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>19.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total interest costs</td><td>155.8</td><td>142.5</td><td>121.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amounts capitalized</td><td>-6.4 ( 6.4 )</td><td>-8.1 ( 8.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>interest expense</td><td>$ 149.4</td><td>$ 134.4</td><td>$ 116.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest paid during the year ( a )</td><td>$ 153.9</td><td>$ 125.4</td><td>$ 138.5</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 6.6 million paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of the company 2019s senior and senior subordinated notes. . Conversations: q0: what was the total amount of senior notes issued in 2006? 450.0 q1: and converted to the hundred millions? 450000000.0 Question: and the effective yield to maturity? Answer:

0.06625

convfinqa1301

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: page 59 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 13 . debt and interest costs ( continued ) long-term debt obligations outstanding at december 31 , 2007 , have maturities of $ 127.1 million , $ 160 million , $ 388.4 million , $ 625.1 million and $ 550.3 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and $ 456.1 million thereafter . ball provides letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure liabilities recorded in connection with industrial development revenue bonds and certain self-insurance arrangements . letters of credit outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 41 million and $ 52.4 million , respectively . the notes payable and senior credit facilities are guaranteed on a full , unconditional and joint and several basis by certain of the company 2019s domestic wholly owned subsidiaries . certain foreign denominated tranches of the senior credit facilities are similarly guaranteed by certain of the company 2019s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries . note 22 contains further details as well as condensed , consolidating financial information for the company , segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries . the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments , share repurchases , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . on march 27 , 2006 , ball expanded its senior secured credit facilities with the addition of a $ 500 million term d loan facility due in installments through october 2011 . also on march 27 , 2006 , ball issued at a price of 99.799 percent $ 450 million of 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) senior notes ( effective yield to maturity of 6.65 percent ) due in march 2018 . the proceeds from these financings were used to refinance existing u.s . can debt with ball corporation debt at lower interest rates , acquire certain north american plastic container net assets from alcan and reduce seasonal working capital debt . ( see note 3 for further details of the acquisitions. ) on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities to extend debt maturities at lower interest rate spreads and provide the company with additional borrowing capacity for future growth . during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due in august 2006 . the refinancing and senior note redemptions resulted in a debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) for the related call premium and unamortized debt issuance costs . a summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest costs before refinancing costs</td><td>$ 155.8</td><td>$ 142.5</td><td>$ 102.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt refinancing costs</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>19.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total interest costs</td><td>155.8</td><td>142.5</td><td>121.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amounts capitalized</td><td>-6.4 ( 6.4 )</td><td>-8.1 ( 8.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>interest expense</td><td>$ 149.4</td><td>$ 134.4</td><td>$ 116.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest paid during the year ( a )</td><td>$ 153.9</td><td>$ 125.4</td><td>$ 138.5</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 6.6 million paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of the company 2019s senior and senior subordinated notes. . Conversations: q0: what was the total amount of senior notes issued in 2006? 450.0 q1: and converted to the hundred millions? 450000000.0 q2: and the effective yield to maturity? 0.06625 Question: so what are the expected annual cash interest costs? Answer:

29812500.0

convfinqa1302

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company reviews property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives . if such assets are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market price , if any , or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique . if such assets are not impaired , but their useful lives have decreased , the remaining net book value is depreciated over the revised useful life . we have not recorded any material impairment charges related to our property , plant and equipment in fiscal 2016 , fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014 . f . goodwill and intangible assets goodwill the company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually , as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level ( operating segment or one level below an operating segment ) on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter ( on or about august 1 ) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist . for the company 2019s latest annual impairment assessment that occurred as of july 31 , 2016 , the company identified its reporting units to be its seven operating segments . the performance of the test involves a two-step process . the first step of the quantitative impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values , including goodwill . the company determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of the income and market approaches . under the income approach , the company uses a discounted cash flow methodology which requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenues , gross profit margins , operating income margins , working capital cash flow , perpetual growth rates , and long-term discount rates , among others . for the market approach , the company uses the guideline public company method . under this method the company utilizes information from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting units , to create valuation multiples that are applied to the operating performance of the reporting unit being tested , in order to obtain their respective fair values . in order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated reporting unit fair values , the company reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units determined , as described above , to its current market capitalization , allowing for a reasonable control premium . if the carrying amount of a reporting unit , calculated using the above approaches , exceeds the reporting unit 2019s fair value , the company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss . the second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit 2019s goodwill with the carrying value of that reporting unit . there was no impairment of goodwill in any of the fiscal years presented . the company 2019s next annual impairment assessment will be performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending october 28 , 2017 ( fiscal 2017 ) unless indicators arise that would require the company to reevaluate at an earlier date . the following table presents the changes in goodwill during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 1636526</td><td>$ 1642438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisition of hittite ( note 6 ) ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-1105 ( 1105 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill adjustment related to other acquisitions ( 2 )</td><td>44046</td><td>3663</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-1456 ( 1456 )</td><td>-8470 ( 8470 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 1679116</td><td>$ 1636526</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount in fiscal 2015 represents changes to goodwill as a result of finalizing the acquisition accounting related to the hittite acquisition . ( 2 ) represents goodwill related to other acquisitions that were not material to the company on either an individual or aggregate basis . intangible assets the company reviews finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining . Conversations: Question: what was the balance of goodwill in 2015? Answer:

1636526.0

convfinqa1303

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company reviews property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives . if such assets are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market price , if any , or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique . if such assets are not impaired , but their useful lives have decreased , the remaining net book value is depreciated over the revised useful life . we have not recorded any material impairment charges related to our property , plant and equipment in fiscal 2016 , fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014 . f . goodwill and intangible assets goodwill the company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually , as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level ( operating segment or one level below an operating segment ) on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter ( on or about august 1 ) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist . for the company 2019s latest annual impairment assessment that occurred as of july 31 , 2016 , the company identified its reporting units to be its seven operating segments . the performance of the test involves a two-step process . the first step of the quantitative impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values , including goodwill . the company determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of the income and market approaches . under the income approach , the company uses a discounted cash flow methodology which requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenues , gross profit margins , operating income margins , working capital cash flow , perpetual growth rates , and long-term discount rates , among others . for the market approach , the company uses the guideline public company method . under this method the company utilizes information from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting units , to create valuation multiples that are applied to the operating performance of the reporting unit being tested , in order to obtain their respective fair values . in order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated reporting unit fair values , the company reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units determined , as described above , to its current market capitalization , allowing for a reasonable control premium . if the carrying amount of a reporting unit , calculated using the above approaches , exceeds the reporting unit 2019s fair value , the company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss . the second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit 2019s goodwill with the carrying value of that reporting unit . there was no impairment of goodwill in any of the fiscal years presented . the company 2019s next annual impairment assessment will be performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending october 28 , 2017 ( fiscal 2017 ) unless indicators arise that would require the company to reevaluate at an earlier date . the following table presents the changes in goodwill during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 1636526</td><td>$ 1642438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisition of hittite ( note 6 ) ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-1105 ( 1105 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill adjustment related to other acquisitions ( 2 )</td><td>44046</td><td>3663</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-1456 ( 1456 )</td><td>-8470 ( 8470 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 1679116</td><td>$ 1636526</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount in fiscal 2015 represents changes to goodwill as a result of finalizing the acquisition accounting related to the hittite acquisition . ( 2 ) represents goodwill related to other acquisitions that were not material to the company on either an individual or aggregate basis . intangible assets the company reviews finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining . Conversations: q0: what was the balance of goodwill in 2015? 1636526.0 Question: and what was that balance in 2014? Answer:

1642438.0

convfinqa1304

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company reviews property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives . if such assets are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market price , if any , or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique . if such assets are not impaired , but their useful lives have decreased , the remaining net book value is depreciated over the revised useful life . we have not recorded any material impairment charges related to our property , plant and equipment in fiscal 2016 , fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014 . f . goodwill and intangible assets goodwill the company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually , as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level ( operating segment or one level below an operating segment ) on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter ( on or about august 1 ) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist . for the company 2019s latest annual impairment assessment that occurred as of july 31 , 2016 , the company identified its reporting units to be its seven operating segments . the performance of the test involves a two-step process . the first step of the quantitative impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values , including goodwill . the company determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of the income and market approaches . under the income approach , the company uses a discounted cash flow methodology which requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenues , gross profit margins , operating income margins , working capital cash flow , perpetual growth rates , and long-term discount rates , among others . for the market approach , the company uses the guideline public company method . under this method the company utilizes information from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting units , to create valuation multiples that are applied to the operating performance of the reporting unit being tested , in order to obtain their respective fair values . in order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated reporting unit fair values , the company reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units determined , as described above , to its current market capitalization , allowing for a reasonable control premium . if the carrying amount of a reporting unit , calculated using the above approaches , exceeds the reporting unit 2019s fair value , the company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss . the second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit 2019s goodwill with the carrying value of that reporting unit . there was no impairment of goodwill in any of the fiscal years presented . the company 2019s next annual impairment assessment will be performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending october 28 , 2017 ( fiscal 2017 ) unless indicators arise that would require the company to reevaluate at an earlier date . the following table presents the changes in goodwill during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 1636526</td><td>$ 1642438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisition of hittite ( note 6 ) ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-1105 ( 1105 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill adjustment related to other acquisitions ( 2 )</td><td>44046</td><td>3663</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-1456 ( 1456 )</td><td>-8470 ( 8470 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 1679116</td><td>$ 1636526</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount in fiscal 2015 represents changes to goodwill as a result of finalizing the acquisition accounting related to the hittite acquisition . ( 2 ) represents goodwill related to other acquisitions that were not material to the company on either an individual or aggregate basis . intangible assets the company reviews finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining . Conversations: q0: what was the balance of goodwill in 2015? 1636526.0 q1: and what was that balance in 2014? 1642438.0 Question: what was, then, the change over the year? Answer:

-5912.0

convfinqa1305

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company reviews property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives . if such assets are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market price , if any , or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique . if such assets are not impaired , but their useful lives have decreased , the remaining net book value is depreciated over the revised useful life . we have not recorded any material impairment charges related to our property , plant and equipment in fiscal 2016 , fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014 . f . goodwill and intangible assets goodwill the company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually , as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level ( operating segment or one level below an operating segment ) on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter ( on or about august 1 ) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist . for the company 2019s latest annual impairment assessment that occurred as of july 31 , 2016 , the company identified its reporting units to be its seven operating segments . the performance of the test involves a two-step process . the first step of the quantitative impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values , including goodwill . the company determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of the income and market approaches . under the income approach , the company uses a discounted cash flow methodology which requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenues , gross profit margins , operating income margins , working capital cash flow , perpetual growth rates , and long-term discount rates , among others . for the market approach , the company uses the guideline public company method . under this method the company utilizes information from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting units , to create valuation multiples that are applied to the operating performance of the reporting unit being tested , in order to obtain their respective fair values . in order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated reporting unit fair values , the company reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units determined , as described above , to its current market capitalization , allowing for a reasonable control premium . if the carrying amount of a reporting unit , calculated using the above approaches , exceeds the reporting unit 2019s fair value , the company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss . the second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit 2019s goodwill with the carrying value of that reporting unit . there was no impairment of goodwill in any of the fiscal years presented . the company 2019s next annual impairment assessment will be performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending october 28 , 2017 ( fiscal 2017 ) unless indicators arise that would require the company to reevaluate at an earlier date . the following table presents the changes in goodwill during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 1636526</td><td>$ 1642438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisition of hittite ( note 6 ) ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-1105 ( 1105 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill adjustment related to other acquisitions ( 2 )</td><td>44046</td><td>3663</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-1456 ( 1456 )</td><td>-8470 ( 8470 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 1679116</td><td>$ 1636526</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount in fiscal 2015 represents changes to goodwill as a result of finalizing the acquisition accounting related to the hittite acquisition . ( 2 ) represents goodwill related to other acquisitions that were not material to the company on either an individual or aggregate basis . intangible assets the company reviews finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining . Conversations: q0: what was the balance of goodwill in 2015? 1636526.0 q1: and what was that balance in 2014? 1642438.0 q2: what was, then, the change over the year? -5912.0 Question: what was the balance of goodwill in 2014? Answer:

1642438.0

convfinqa1306

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company reviews property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives . if such assets are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market price , if any , or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique . if such assets are not impaired , but their useful lives have decreased , the remaining net book value is depreciated over the revised useful life . we have not recorded any material impairment charges related to our property , plant and equipment in fiscal 2016 , fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014 . f . goodwill and intangible assets goodwill the company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually , as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level ( operating segment or one level below an operating segment ) on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter ( on or about august 1 ) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist . for the company 2019s latest annual impairment assessment that occurred as of july 31 , 2016 , the company identified its reporting units to be its seven operating segments . the performance of the test involves a two-step process . the first step of the quantitative impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values , including goodwill . the company determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of the income and market approaches . under the income approach , the company uses a discounted cash flow methodology which requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenues , gross profit margins , operating income margins , working capital cash flow , perpetual growth rates , and long-term discount rates , among others . for the market approach , the company uses the guideline public company method . under this method the company utilizes information from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting units , to create valuation multiples that are applied to the operating performance of the reporting unit being tested , in order to obtain their respective fair values . in order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated reporting unit fair values , the company reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units determined , as described above , to its current market capitalization , allowing for a reasonable control premium . if the carrying amount of a reporting unit , calculated using the above approaches , exceeds the reporting unit 2019s fair value , the company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss . the second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit 2019s goodwill with the carrying value of that reporting unit . there was no impairment of goodwill in any of the fiscal years presented . the company 2019s next annual impairment assessment will be performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending october 28 , 2017 ( fiscal 2017 ) unless indicators arise that would require the company to reevaluate at an earlier date . the following table presents the changes in goodwill during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 1636526</td><td>$ 1642438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisition of hittite ( note 6 ) ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-1105 ( 1105 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill adjustment related to other acquisitions ( 2 )</td><td>44046</td><td>3663</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-1456 ( 1456 )</td><td>-8470 ( 8470 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 1679116</td><td>$ 1636526</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount in fiscal 2015 represents changes to goodwill as a result of finalizing the acquisition accounting related to the hittite acquisition . ( 2 ) represents goodwill related to other acquisitions that were not material to the company on either an individual or aggregate basis . intangible assets the company reviews finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining . Conversations: q0: what was the balance of goodwill in 2015? 1636526.0 q1: and what was that balance in 2014? 1642438.0 q2: what was, then, the change over the year? -5912.0 q3: what was the balance of goodwill in 2014? 1642438.0 Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2014 balance, in percentage? Answer:

-0.0036

convfinqa1307

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements recognizing customer revenue , the company must assess the collectability of both the amounts billed and the portion recognized on a straight-line basis . this assessment takes customer credit risk and business and industry conditions into consideration to ultimately determine the collectability of the amounts billed . to the extent the amounts , based on management 2019s estimates , may not be collectible , recognition is deferred until such point as the uncertainty is resolved . any amounts which were previously recognized as revenue and subsequently determined to be uncollectible are charged to bad debt expense . accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts related to estimated losses resulting from a customer 2019s inability to make required payments and reserves for amounts invoiced whose collectability is not reasonably assured . these allowances are generally estimated based on payment patterns , days past due and collection history , and incorporate changes in economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical trends , such as customers in bankruptcy , liquidation or reorganization . receivables are written-off against the allowances when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1,</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td><td>$ 8850</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>16219</td><td>26771</td><td>12059</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recoveries and other</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td><td>-9733 ( 9733 )</td><td>-9427 ( 9427 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31,</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td></tr></table> the company 2019s largest international customer is iusacell , which is the brand name under which a group of companies controlled by grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201cgrupo iusacell 201d ) operates . iusacell represented approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the company 2019s total revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2010 . grupo iusacell has been engaged in a refinancing of a majority of its u.s . dollar denominated debt , and in connection with this process , two of the legal entities of the group , including grupo iusacell , voluntarily filed for a pre-packaged concurso mercantil ( a process substantially equivalent to chapter 11 of u.s . bankruptcy law ) with the backing of a majority of their financial creditors in december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , iusacell notes receivable , net , and related assets ( which include financing lease commitments and a deferred rent asset that are primarily long-term in nature ) were $ 19.7 million and $ 51.2 million , respectively . functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with its largest international customer , iusacell , which included , among other changes , converting all of iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company has determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional . Conversations: Question: what was the net difference in the balance of allowances from 2009 to 2010? Answer:

-6015.0

convfinqa1308

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements recognizing customer revenue , the company must assess the collectability of both the amounts billed and the portion recognized on a straight-line basis . this assessment takes customer credit risk and business and industry conditions into consideration to ultimately determine the collectability of the amounts billed . to the extent the amounts , based on management 2019s estimates , may not be collectible , recognition is deferred until such point as the uncertainty is resolved . any amounts which were previously recognized as revenue and subsequently determined to be uncollectible are charged to bad debt expense . accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts related to estimated losses resulting from a customer 2019s inability to make required payments and reserves for amounts invoiced whose collectability is not reasonably assured . these allowances are generally estimated based on payment patterns , days past due and collection history , and incorporate changes in economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical trends , such as customers in bankruptcy , liquidation or reorganization . receivables are written-off against the allowances when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1,</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td><td>$ 8850</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>16219</td><td>26771</td><td>12059</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recoveries and other</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td><td>-9733 ( 9733 )</td><td>-9427 ( 9427 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31,</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td></tr></table> the company 2019s largest international customer is iusacell , which is the brand name under which a group of companies controlled by grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201cgrupo iusacell 201d ) operates . iusacell represented approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the company 2019s total revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2010 . grupo iusacell has been engaged in a refinancing of a majority of its u.s . dollar denominated debt , and in connection with this process , two of the legal entities of the group , including grupo iusacell , voluntarily filed for a pre-packaged concurso mercantil ( a process substantially equivalent to chapter 11 of u.s . bankruptcy law ) with the backing of a majority of their financial creditors in december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , iusacell notes receivable , net , and related assets ( which include financing lease commitments and a deferred rent asset that are primarily long-term in nature ) were $ 19.7 million and $ 51.2 million , respectively . functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with its largest international customer , iusacell , which included , among other changes , converting all of iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company has determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional . Conversations: q0: what was the net difference in the balance of allowances from 2009 to 2010? -6015.0 Question: what was the percent change? Answer:

-0.2109

convfinqa1309

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we incurred $ 695.8 million of realized investment gains and $ 310.4 million of unrealized investment losses . although financial markets significantly improved during 2009 and 2010 , they could deteriorate in the future and again result in substantial realized and unrealized losses , which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 571.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>67.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>364.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>160.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2006</td><td>287.9</td></tr></table> . Conversations: Question: what was the ratio of the realized investment gains to the unrealized investment losses in 2008? Answer:

2.24162

convfinqa1310

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we incurred $ 695.8 million of realized investment gains and $ 310.4 million of unrealized investment losses . although financial markets significantly improved during 2009 and 2010 , they could deteriorate in the future and again result in substantial realized and unrealized losses , which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 571.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>67.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>364.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>160.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2006</td><td>287.9</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the ratio of the realized investment gains to the unrealized investment losses in 2008? 2.24162 Question: what would be the net value of investment gains if all unrealized losses were realized in 2008? Answer:

385.4

convfinqa1311

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/02</td><td>12/03</td><td>12/04</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>260.29</td><td>307.61</td><td>429.22</td><td>461.32</td><td>73.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p super cap diversified financials</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.29</td><td>156.28</td><td>170.89</td><td>211.13</td><td>176.62</td></tr></table> 2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . Conversations: Question: what was the value of e*trade financial corp for year ended 12/07? Answer:

73.05

convfinqa1312

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/02</td><td>12/03</td><td>12/04</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>260.29</td><td>307.61</td><td>429.22</td><td>461.32</td><td>73.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p super cap diversified financials</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.29</td><td>156.28</td><td>170.89</td><td>211.13</td><td>176.62</td></tr></table> 2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . Conversations: q0: what was the value of e*trade financial corp for year ended 12/07? 73.05 Question: what is that less an assumed $100 initial investment? Answer:

-26.95

convfinqa1313

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/02</td><td>12/03</td><td>12/04</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>260.29</td><td>307.61</td><td>429.22</td><td>461.32</td><td>73.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p super cap diversified financials</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.29</td><td>156.28</td><td>170.89</td><td>211.13</td><td>176.62</td></tr></table> 2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . Conversations: q0: what was the value of e*trade financial corp for year ended 12/07? 73.05 q1: what is that less an assumed $100 initial investment? -26.95 Question: what is that divided by 100? Answer:

-0.2695

convfinqa1314

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2289</td><td>2289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>207</td><td>197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-849 ( 849 )</td><td>-781 ( 781 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1721</td><td>$ 1791</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2016 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.03% ( 0.03 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 100 million issued by the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities . the bonds , which were due in december 2015 , had a variable interest rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.04% ( 0.04 % ) , respectively . as of december 2015 , these $ 100 million bonds were repaid in full . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2015 was 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) . pound sterling notes the pound sterling notes consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 notes with a principal amount of a366 million accrue interest at a 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2031 . these notes are not callable . 2022 notes with a principal amount of a3455 million accrue interest at a 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2050 . these notes are callable at our option at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption at a benchmark u.k . government bond yield plus 15 basis points and accrued interest. . Conversations: Question: what was the difference in vehicles under capital lease between 2014 and 2015? Answer:

-12.0

convfinqa1315

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2289</td><td>2289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>207</td><td>197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-849 ( 849 )</td><td>-781 ( 781 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1721</td><td>$ 1791</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2016 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.03% ( 0.03 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 100 million issued by the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities . the bonds , which were due in december 2015 , had a variable interest rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.04% ( 0.04 % ) , respectively . as of december 2015 , these $ 100 million bonds were repaid in full . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2015 was 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) . pound sterling notes the pound sterling notes consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 notes with a principal amount of a366 million accrue interest at a 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2031 . these notes are not callable . 2022 notes with a principal amount of a3455 million accrue interest at a 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2050 . these notes are callable at our option at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption at a benchmark u.k . government bond yield plus 15 basis points and accrued interest. . Conversations: q0: what was the difference in vehicles under capital lease between 2014 and 2015? -12.0 Question: and the number for 2014 specifically? Answer:

86.0

convfinqa1316

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2289</td><td>2289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>207</td><td>197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-849 ( 849 )</td><td>-781 ( 781 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1721</td><td>$ 1791</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2016 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.03% ( 0.03 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 100 million issued by the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities . the bonds , which were due in december 2015 , had a variable interest rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.04% ( 0.04 % ) , respectively . as of december 2015 , these $ 100 million bonds were repaid in full . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2015 was 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) . pound sterling notes the pound sterling notes consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 notes with a principal amount of a366 million accrue interest at a 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2031 . these notes are not callable . 2022 notes with a principal amount of a3455 million accrue interest at a 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2050 . these notes are callable at our option at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption at a benchmark u.k . government bond yield plus 15 basis points and accrued interest. . Conversations: q0: what was the difference in vehicles under capital lease between 2014 and 2015? -12.0 q1: and the number for 2014 specifically? 86.0 Question: and the percentage change? Answer:

-0.13953

convfinqa1317

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 8 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042</td><td>$ 5642</td><td>$ 5308</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2013 to 2036</td><td>1080</td><td>1239</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other debt</td><td>478</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>7200</td><td>6966</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less : unamortized discounts</td><td>-892 ( 892 )</td><td>-506 ( 506 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt net of unamortized discounts</td><td>6308</td><td>6460</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less : current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-150 ( 150 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 6158</td><td>$ 6460</td></tr></table> in december 2012 , we issued notes totaling $ 1.3 billion with a fixed interest rate of 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) maturing in december 2042 ( the new notes ) in exchange for outstanding notes totaling $ 1.2 billion with interest rates ranging from 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) to 8.50% ( 8.50 % ) maturing in 2023 to 2040 ( the old notes ) . in connection with the exchange , we paid a premium of $ 393 million , of which $ 225 million was paid in cash and $ 168 million was in the form of new notes . this premium , in addition to $ 194 million in remaining unamortized discounts related to the old notes , will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the new notes using the effective interest method . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the new notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the new notes is payable on june 15 and december 15 of each year , beginning on june 15 , 2013 . the new notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . on september 9 , 2011 , we issued $ 2.0 billion of long-term notes in a registered public offering consisting of $ 500 million maturing in 2016 with a fixed interest rate of 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) , $ 900 million maturing in 2021 with a fixed interest rate of 3.35% ( 3.35 % ) , and $ 600 million maturing in 2041 with a fixed interest rate of 4.85% ( 4.85 % ) . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the notes is payable on march 15 and september 15 of each year , beginning on march 15 , 2012 . in october 2011 , we used a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of our $ 500 million long-term notes maturing in 2013 . in 2011 , we repurchased $ 84 million of our long-term notes through open-market purchases . we paid premiums of $ 48 million in connection with the early extinguishments of debt , which were recognized in other non-operating income ( expense ) , net . in august 2011 , we entered into a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility with a group of banks and terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility that was to expire in june 2012 . the credit facility expires august 2016 , and we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the credit facility by an additional amount up to $ 500 million . there were no borrowings outstanding under either facility through december 31 , 2012 . borrowings under the credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the credit facility . the leverage ratio covenant excludes the adjustments recognized in stockholders 2019 equity related to postretirement benefit plans . as of december 31 , 2012 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the credit facility , as well as in our debt agreements . we have agreements in place with banking institutions to provide for the issuance of commercial paper . there were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding during 2012 or 2011 . if we were to issue commercial paper , the borrowings would be supported by the credit facility . during the next five years , we have scheduled long-term debt maturities of $ 150 million due in 2013 and $ 952 million due in 2016 . interest payments were $ 378 million in 2012 , $ 326 million in 2011 , and $ 337 million in 2010. . Conversations: Question: what is the net change in value of total long-term debt from 2011 to 2012? Answer:

234.0

convfinqa1318

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 8 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042</td><td>$ 5642</td><td>$ 5308</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2013 to 2036</td><td>1080</td><td>1239</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other debt</td><td>478</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>7200</td><td>6966</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less : unamortized discounts</td><td>-892 ( 892 )</td><td>-506 ( 506 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt net of unamortized discounts</td><td>6308</td><td>6460</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less : current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-150 ( 150 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 6158</td><td>$ 6460</td></tr></table> in december 2012 , we issued notes totaling $ 1.3 billion with a fixed interest rate of 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) maturing in december 2042 ( the new notes ) in exchange for outstanding notes totaling $ 1.2 billion with interest rates ranging from 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) to 8.50% ( 8.50 % ) maturing in 2023 to 2040 ( the old notes ) . in connection with the exchange , we paid a premium of $ 393 million , of which $ 225 million was paid in cash and $ 168 million was in the form of new notes . this premium , in addition to $ 194 million in remaining unamortized discounts related to the old notes , will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the new notes using the effective interest method . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the new notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the new notes is payable on june 15 and december 15 of each year , beginning on june 15 , 2013 . the new notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . on september 9 , 2011 , we issued $ 2.0 billion of long-term notes in a registered public offering consisting of $ 500 million maturing in 2016 with a fixed interest rate of 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) , $ 900 million maturing in 2021 with a fixed interest rate of 3.35% ( 3.35 % ) , and $ 600 million maturing in 2041 with a fixed interest rate of 4.85% ( 4.85 % ) . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the notes is payable on march 15 and september 15 of each year , beginning on march 15 , 2012 . in october 2011 , we used a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of our $ 500 million long-term notes maturing in 2013 . in 2011 , we repurchased $ 84 million of our long-term notes through open-market purchases . we paid premiums of $ 48 million in connection with the early extinguishments of debt , which were recognized in other non-operating income ( expense ) , net . in august 2011 , we entered into a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility with a group of banks and terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility that was to expire in june 2012 . the credit facility expires august 2016 , and we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the credit facility by an additional amount up to $ 500 million . there were no borrowings outstanding under either facility through december 31 , 2012 . borrowings under the credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the credit facility . the leverage ratio covenant excludes the adjustments recognized in stockholders 2019 equity related to postretirement benefit plans . as of december 31 , 2012 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the credit facility , as well as in our debt agreements . we have agreements in place with banking institutions to provide for the issuance of commercial paper . there were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding during 2012 or 2011 . if we were to issue commercial paper , the borrowings would be supported by the credit facility . during the next five years , we have scheduled long-term debt maturities of $ 150 million due in 2013 and $ 952 million due in 2016 . interest payments were $ 378 million in 2012 , $ 326 million in 2011 , and $ 337 million in 2010. . Conversations: q0: what is the net change in value of total long-term debt from 2011 to 2012? 234.0 Question: what is that divided by the 2011 value? Answer:

0.03359

convfinqa1319

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. . Conversations: Question: what was the net reserves as of 12/31/12? Answer:

425.7

convfinqa1320

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. . Conversations: q0: what was the net reserves as of 12/31/12? 425.7 Question: and for the period ended 12/31/11? Answer:

480.2

convfinqa1321

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. . Conversations: q0: what was the net reserves as of 12/31/12? 425.7 q1: and for the period ended 12/31/11? 480.2 Question: what was the difference between these two balances? Answer:

-54.5

convfinqa1322

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. . Conversations: q0: what was the net reserves as of 12/31/12? 425.7 q1: and for the period ended 12/31/11? 480.2 q2: what was the difference between these two balances? -54.5 Question: and the balance as of 12/31/11 again? Answer:

480.2

convfinqa1323

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. . Conversations: q0: what was the net reserves as of 12/31/12? 425.7 q1: and for the period ended 12/31/11? 480.2 q2: what was the difference between these two balances? -54.5 q3: and the balance as of 12/31/11 again? 480.2 Question: so what was the percentage change? Answer:

-0.11349

convfinqa1324

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>57</td><td>38</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>1</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td><td>13</td><td>-78 ( 78 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-116 ( 116 )</td><td>-31 ( 31 )</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2013</td><td>258</td><td>443</td><td>701</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2013 , devon had 701 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 17 percent decrease as compared to 2012 and represents 24 percent of total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 95 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 147 mmboe , or 18 percent , of the 2012 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.9 billion for 2013 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 78 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which devon does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas in the cana-woodford shale in western oklahoma , carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2013 related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 441 mmboe and 429 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2013 2013 reserves increased 94 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices . of this increase , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 19 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2012 2013 reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 2013 reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions , with the largest revisions being made in the cana-woodford shale , barnett shale and carthage . Conversations: Question: what is the balance of proved undeveloped reserves in 2012 in us? Answer:

407.0

convfinqa1325

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>57</td><td>38</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>1</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td><td>13</td><td>-78 ( 78 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-116 ( 116 )</td><td>-31 ( 31 )</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2013</td><td>258</td><td>443</td><td>701</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2013 , devon had 701 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 17 percent decrease as compared to 2012 and represents 24 percent of total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 95 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 147 mmboe , or 18 percent , of the 2012 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.9 billion for 2013 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 78 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which devon does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas in the cana-woodford shale in western oklahoma , carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2013 related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 441 mmboe and 429 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2013 2013 reserves increased 94 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices . of this increase , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 19 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2012 2013 reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 2013 reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions , with the largest revisions being made in the cana-woodford shale , barnett shale and carthage . Conversations: q0: what is the balance of proved undeveloped reserves in 2012 in us? 407.0 Question: what about int 2013? Answer:

258.0

convfinqa1326

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>57</td><td>38</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>1</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td><td>13</td><td>-78 ( 78 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-116 ( 116 )</td><td>-31 ( 31 )</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2013</td><td>258</td><td>443</td><td>701</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2013 , devon had 701 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 17 percent decrease as compared to 2012 and represents 24 percent of total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 95 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 147 mmboe , or 18 percent , of the 2012 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.9 billion for 2013 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 78 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which devon does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas in the cana-woodford shale in western oklahoma , carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2013 related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 441 mmboe and 429 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2013 2013 reserves increased 94 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices . of this increase , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 19 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2012 2013 reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 2013 reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions , with the largest revisions being made in the cana-woodford shale , barnett shale and carthage . Conversations: q0: what is the balance of proved undeveloped reserves in 2012 in us? 407.0 q1: what about int 2013? 258.0 Question: what is the net change? Answer:

149.0

convfinqa1327

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>57</td><td>38</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>1</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td><td>13</td><td>-78 ( 78 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-116 ( 116 )</td><td>-31 ( 31 )</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2013</td><td>258</td><td>443</td><td>701</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2013 , devon had 701 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 17 percent decrease as compared to 2012 and represents 24 percent of total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 95 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 147 mmboe , or 18 percent , of the 2012 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.9 billion for 2013 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 78 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which devon does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas in the cana-woodford shale in western oklahoma , carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2013 related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 441 mmboe and 429 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2013 2013 reserves increased 94 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices . of this increase , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 19 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2012 2013 reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 2013 reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions , with the largest revisions being made in the cana-woodford shale , barnett shale and carthage . Conversations: q0: what is the balance of proved undeveloped reserves in 2012 in us? 407.0 q1: what about int 2013? 258.0 q2: what is the net change? 149.0 Question: what fraction change does this represent? Answer:

0.36609

convfinqa1328

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>57</td><td>38</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>1</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td><td>13</td><td>-78 ( 78 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-116 ( 116 )</td><td>-31 ( 31 )</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2013</td><td>258</td><td>443</td><td>701</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2013 , devon had 701 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 17 percent decrease as compared to 2012 and represents 24 percent of total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 95 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 147 mmboe , or 18 percent , of the 2012 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.9 billion for 2013 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 78 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which devon does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas in the cana-woodford shale in western oklahoma , carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2013 related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 441 mmboe and 429 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2013 2013 reserves increased 94 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices . of this increase , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 19 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2012 2013 reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 2013 reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions , with the largest revisions being made in the cana-woodford shale , barnett shale and carthage . Conversations: q0: what is the balance of proved undeveloped reserves in 2012 in us? 407.0 q1: what about int 2013? 258.0 q2: what is the net change? 149.0 q3: what fraction change does this represent? 0.36609 Question: what about percentage change? Answer:

36.60934

convfinqa1329

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations state street corporation | 90 table 30 : total deposits average balance december 31 years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>client deposits</td><td>$ 180149</td><td>$ 176693</td><td>$ 158996</td><td>$ 156029</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wholesale cds</td><td>4747</td><td>10470</td><td>4812</td><td>14456</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total deposits</td><td>$ 184896</td><td>$ 187163</td><td>$ 163808</td><td>$ 170485</td></tr></table> short-term funding our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 2.84 billion and $ 4.40 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad 1.40 billion , or approximately $ 1.11 billion as of december 31 , 2017 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding we have the ability to issue debt and equity securities under our current universal shelf registration to meet current commitments and business needs , including accommodating the transaction and cash management needs of our clients . in addition , state street bank , a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company , also has authorization to issue up to $ 5 billion in unsecured senior debt and an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include : 2022 diverse and stable core earnings ; 2022 relative market position ; 2022 strong risk management ; 2022 strong capital ratios ; 2022 diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; 2022 strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and 2022 preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by : 2022 providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors ; 2022 increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products ; 2022 serving markets ; and 2022 engaging in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital markets , which could increase the related cost of funds . in turn , this could cause the sudden and large-scale withdrawal of unsecured deposits by our clients , which could lead to draw-downs of unfunded commitments to extend credit or trigger requirements under securities purchase commitments ; or require additional collateral or force terminations of certain trading derivative contracts . a majority of our derivative contracts have been entered into under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings . we assess the impact of these arrangements by determining the collateral that would be required assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . the additional collateral or termination payments related to our net derivative liabilities under these arrangements that could have been called by counterparties in the event of a downgrade in our credit ratings below levels specified in the agreements is disclosed in note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , of this form 10-k . other funding sources , such as secured financing transactions and other margin requirements , for which there are no explicit triggers , could also be adversely affected. . Conversations: Question: as of december 31, 2017, what was the value of cad equivalent to one american dollar? Answer:

1.26126

convfinqa1330

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations state street corporation | 90 table 30 : total deposits average balance december 31 years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>client deposits</td><td>$ 180149</td><td>$ 176693</td><td>$ 158996</td><td>$ 156029</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wholesale cds</td><td>4747</td><td>10470</td><td>4812</td><td>14456</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total deposits</td><td>$ 184896</td><td>$ 187163</td><td>$ 163808</td><td>$ 170485</td></tr></table> short-term funding our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 2.84 billion and $ 4.40 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad 1.40 billion , or approximately $ 1.11 billion as of december 31 , 2017 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding we have the ability to issue debt and equity securities under our current universal shelf registration to meet current commitments and business needs , including accommodating the transaction and cash management needs of our clients . in addition , state street bank , a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company , also has authorization to issue up to $ 5 billion in unsecured senior debt and an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include : 2022 diverse and stable core earnings ; 2022 relative market position ; 2022 strong risk management ; 2022 strong capital ratios ; 2022 diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; 2022 strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and 2022 preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by : 2022 providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors ; 2022 increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products ; 2022 serving markets ; and 2022 engaging in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital markets , which could increase the related cost of funds . in turn , this could cause the sudden and large-scale withdrawal of unsecured deposits by our clients , which could lead to draw-downs of unfunded commitments to extend credit or trigger requirements under securities purchase commitments ; or require additional collateral or force terminations of certain trading derivative contracts . a majority of our derivative contracts have been entered into under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings . we assess the impact of these arrangements by determining the collateral that would be required assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . the additional collateral or termination payments related to our net derivative liabilities under these arrangements that could have been called by counterparties in the event of a downgrade in our credit ratings below levels specified in the agreements is disclosed in note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , of this form 10-k . other funding sources , such as secured financing transactions and other margin requirements , for which there are no explicit triggers , could also be adversely affected. . Conversations: q0: as of december 31, 2017, what was the value of cad equivalent to one american dollar? 1.26126 Question: and concerning the balance of collateral in the form of high-quality investment securities, what was the decline between this year and the one before? Answer:

1.56

convfinqa1331

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations state street corporation | 90 table 30 : total deposits average balance december 31 years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>client deposits</td><td>$ 180149</td><td>$ 176693</td><td>$ 158996</td><td>$ 156029</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wholesale cds</td><td>4747</td><td>10470</td><td>4812</td><td>14456</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total deposits</td><td>$ 184896</td><td>$ 187163</td><td>$ 163808</td><td>$ 170485</td></tr></table> short-term funding our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 2.84 billion and $ 4.40 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad 1.40 billion , or approximately $ 1.11 billion as of december 31 , 2017 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding we have the ability to issue debt and equity securities under our current universal shelf registration to meet current commitments and business needs , including accommodating the transaction and cash management needs of our clients . in addition , state street bank , a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company , also has authorization to issue up to $ 5 billion in unsecured senior debt and an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include : 2022 diverse and stable core earnings ; 2022 relative market position ; 2022 strong risk management ; 2022 strong capital ratios ; 2022 diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; 2022 strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and 2022 preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by : 2022 providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors ; 2022 increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products ; 2022 serving markets ; and 2022 engaging in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital markets , which could increase the related cost of funds . in turn , this could cause the sudden and large-scale withdrawal of unsecured deposits by our clients , which could lead to draw-downs of unfunded commitments to extend credit or trigger requirements under securities purchase commitments ; or require additional collateral or force terminations of certain trading derivative contracts . a majority of our derivative contracts have been entered into under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings . we assess the impact of these arrangements by determining the collateral that would be required assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . the additional collateral or termination payments related to our net derivative liabilities under these arrangements that could have been called by counterparties in the event of a downgrade in our credit ratings below levels specified in the agreements is disclosed in note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , of this form 10-k . other funding sources , such as secured financing transactions and other margin requirements , for which there are no explicit triggers , could also be adversely affected. . Conversations: q0: as of december 31, 2017, what was the value of cad equivalent to one american dollar? 1.26126 q1: and concerning the balance of collateral in the form of high-quality investment securities, what was the decline between this year and the one before? 1.56 Question: what is this decline as a percentage of that balance in 2016? Answer:

0.5493

convfinqa1332

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 10 . commitments and contingencies credit-related commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments , which are off-balance sheet , include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential loss associated with indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit is equal to the total gross contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following table summarizes the total gross contractual amounts of credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 365251</td><td>$ 324590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asset purchase agreements ( 1 )</td><td>8211</td><td>31780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unfunded commitments to extend credit</td><td>18078</td><td>20981</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4784</td><td>6061</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount for 2009 excludes agreements related to the commercial paper conduits , which were consolidated in may 2009 ; see note 11 . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements . securities finance : on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . we generally indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . in this regard , we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 375.92 billion and $ 333.07 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , presented in the table above . the collateral held by us is invested on behalf of our customers in accordance with their guidelines . in certain cases , the collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the customer against loss of the principal invested . we require the repurchase agreement counterparty to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . of the collateral of $ 375.92 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 333.07 billion at december 31 , 2008 referenced above , $ 77.73 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 68.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements . we held , as agent , cash and securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 82.62 billion and $ 71.87 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 , respectively . legal proceedings : in the ordinary course of business , we and our subsidiaries are involved in disputes , litigation and regulatory inquiries and investigations , both pending and threatened . these matters , if resolved adversely against us , may result in monetary damages , fines and penalties or require changes in our business practices . the resolution of these proceedings is inherently difficult to predict . however , we do not believe that the amount of any judgment , settlement or other action arising from any pending proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , although the outcome of certain of the matters described below may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period in which such matter is resolved . Conversations: Question: what was the change in the amount kept as collateral between 2008 and 2009? Answer:

42.85

convfinqa1333

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 10 . commitments and contingencies credit-related commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments , which are off-balance sheet , include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential loss associated with indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit is equal to the total gross contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following table summarizes the total gross contractual amounts of credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 365251</td><td>$ 324590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asset purchase agreements ( 1 )</td><td>8211</td><td>31780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unfunded commitments to extend credit</td><td>18078</td><td>20981</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4784</td><td>6061</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount for 2009 excludes agreements related to the commercial paper conduits , which were consolidated in may 2009 ; see note 11 . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements . securities finance : on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . we generally indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . in this regard , we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 375.92 billion and $ 333.07 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , presented in the table above . the collateral held by us is invested on behalf of our customers in accordance with their guidelines . in certain cases , the collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the customer against loss of the principal invested . we require the repurchase agreement counterparty to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . of the collateral of $ 375.92 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 333.07 billion at december 31 , 2008 referenced above , $ 77.73 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 68.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements . we held , as agent , cash and securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 82.62 billion and $ 71.87 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 , respectively . legal proceedings : in the ordinary course of business , we and our subsidiaries are involved in disputes , litigation and regulatory inquiries and investigations , both pending and threatened . these matters , if resolved adversely against us , may result in monetary damages , fines and penalties or require changes in our business practices . the resolution of these proceedings is inherently difficult to predict . however , we do not believe that the amount of any judgment , settlement or other action arising from any pending proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , although the outcome of certain of the matters described below may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period in which such matter is resolved . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the amount kept as collateral between 2008 and 2009? 42.85 Question: and the percentage change of this value? Answer:

0.12865

convfinqa1334

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 10 . commitments and contingencies credit-related commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments , which are off-balance sheet , include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential loss associated with indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit is equal to the total gross contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following table summarizes the total gross contractual amounts of credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 365251</td><td>$ 324590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asset purchase agreements ( 1 )</td><td>8211</td><td>31780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unfunded commitments to extend credit</td><td>18078</td><td>20981</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4784</td><td>6061</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount for 2009 excludes agreements related to the commercial paper conduits , which were consolidated in may 2009 ; see note 11 . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements . securities finance : on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . we generally indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . in this regard , we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 375.92 billion and $ 333.07 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , presented in the table above . the collateral held by us is invested on behalf of our customers in accordance with their guidelines . in certain cases , the collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the customer against loss of the principal invested . we require the repurchase agreement counterparty to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . of the collateral of $ 375.92 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 333.07 billion at december 31 , 2008 referenced above , $ 77.73 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 68.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements . we held , as agent , cash and securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 82.62 billion and $ 71.87 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 , respectively . legal proceedings : in the ordinary course of business , we and our subsidiaries are involved in disputes , litigation and regulatory inquiries and investigations , both pending and threatened . these matters , if resolved adversely against us , may result in monetary damages , fines and penalties or require changes in our business practices . the resolution of these proceedings is inherently difficult to predict . however , we do not believe that the amount of any judgment , settlement or other action arising from any pending proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , although the outcome of certain of the matters described below may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period in which such matter is resolved . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the amount kept as collateral between 2008 and 2009? 42.85 q1: and the percentage change of this value? 0.12865 Question: what is the change in the indemnified securities financing between 2008 and 2009? Answer:

40661.0

convfinqa1335

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 10 . commitments and contingencies credit-related commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments , which are off-balance sheet , include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential loss associated with indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit is equal to the total gross contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following table summarizes the total gross contractual amounts of credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 365251</td><td>$ 324590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asset purchase agreements ( 1 )</td><td>8211</td><td>31780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unfunded commitments to extend credit</td><td>18078</td><td>20981</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4784</td><td>6061</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount for 2009 excludes agreements related to the commercial paper conduits , which were consolidated in may 2009 ; see note 11 . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements . securities finance : on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . we generally indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . in this regard , we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 375.92 billion and $ 333.07 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , presented in the table above . the collateral held by us is invested on behalf of our customers in accordance with their guidelines . in certain cases , the collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the customer against loss of the principal invested . we require the repurchase agreement counterparty to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . of the collateral of $ 375.92 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 333.07 billion at december 31 , 2008 referenced above , $ 77.73 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 68.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements . we held , as agent , cash and securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 82.62 billion and $ 71.87 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 , respectively . legal proceedings : in the ordinary course of business , we and our subsidiaries are involved in disputes , litigation and regulatory inquiries and investigations , both pending and threatened . these matters , if resolved adversely against us , may result in monetary damages , fines and penalties or require changes in our business practices . the resolution of these proceedings is inherently difficult to predict . however , we do not believe that the amount of any judgment , settlement or other action arising from any pending proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , although the outcome of certain of the matters described below may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period in which such matter is resolved . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the amount kept as collateral between 2008 and 2009? 42.85 q1: and the percentage change of this value? 0.12865 q2: what is the change in the indemnified securities financing between 2008 and 2009? 40661.0 Question: and the percentage change during this time? Answer:

0.12527

convfinqa1336

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.03</td><td>$ 108.98</td><td>$ 148.98</td><td>$ 163.71</td><td>$ 177.40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>76.82</td><td>102.19</td><td>140.77</td><td>153.96</td><td>154.71</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>82.94</td><td>106.78</td><td>144.79</td><td>166.76</td><td>164.15</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.44</td><td>156.78</td><td>178.22</td><td>180.67</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) . Conversations: Question: what is the change in value of the s&p from 2010 to 2015? Answer:

80.67

convfinqa1337

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.03</td><td>$ 108.98</td><td>$ 148.98</td><td>$ 163.71</td><td>$ 177.40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>76.82</td><td>102.19</td><td>140.77</td><td>153.96</td><td>154.71</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>82.94</td><td>106.78</td><td>144.79</td><td>166.76</td><td>164.15</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.44</td><td>156.78</td><td>178.22</td><td>180.67</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) . Conversations: q0: what is the change in value of the s&p from 2010 to 2015? 80.67 Question: assuming an initial investment of $100, what was the percent change? Answer:

0.8067

convfinqa1338

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p smallcap 600 index and the s&p 600 electrical equipment index , all of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2002 to december 31 , 2007 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/02</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/03</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/04</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/05</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>a o smith corp</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.23</td><td>115.36</td><td>138.20</td><td>150.26</td><td>142.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p smallcap 600 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.79</td><td>170.22</td><td>183.30</td><td>211.01</td><td>210.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 600 electrical equipment</td><td>100.00</td><td>126.12</td><td>152.18</td><td>169.07</td><td>228.83</td><td>253.33</td></tr></table> 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index s&p 600 electrical equipment . Conversations: Question: what was the change in the value of a o smith corp from 2002 to 2007? Answer:

42.72

convfinqa1339

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p smallcap 600 index and the s&p 600 electrical equipment index , all of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2002 to december 31 , 2007 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/02</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/03</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/04</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/05</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>a o smith corp</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.23</td><td>115.36</td><td>138.20</td><td>150.26</td><td>142.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p smallcap 600 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.79</td><td>170.22</td><td>183.30</td><td>211.01</td><td>210.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 600 electrical equipment</td><td>100.00</td><td>126.12</td><td>152.18</td><td>169.07</td><td>228.83</td><td>253.33</td></tr></table> 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index s&p 600 electrical equipment . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the value of a o smith corp from 2002 to 2007? 42.72 Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to the original value in 2002? Answer:

0.4272

convfinqa1340

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p smallcap 600 index and the s&p 600 electrical equipment index , all of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2002 to december 31 , 2007 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/02</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/03</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/04</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/05</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>a o smith corp</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.23</td><td>115.36</td><td>138.20</td><td>150.26</td><td>142.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p smallcap 600 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.79</td><td>170.22</td><td>183.30</td><td>211.01</td><td>210.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 600 electrical equipment</td><td>100.00</td><td>126.12</td><td>152.18</td><td>169.07</td><td>228.83</td><td>253.33</td></tr></table> 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index s&p 600 electrical equipment . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the value of a o smith corp from 2002 to 2007? 42.72 q1: and how much does that change represent in relation to the original value in 2002? 0.4272 Question: what was the value of the s&p 600 electrical equipment in 2007? Answer:

253.33

convfinqa1341

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p smallcap 600 index and the s&p 600 electrical equipment index , all of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2002 to december 31 , 2007 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/02</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/03</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/04</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/05</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>a o smith corp</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.23</td><td>115.36</td><td>138.20</td><td>150.26</td><td>142.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p smallcap 600 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.79</td><td>170.22</td><td>183.30</td><td>211.01</td><td>210.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 600 electrical equipment</td><td>100.00</td><td>126.12</td><td>152.18</td><td>169.07</td><td>228.83</td><td>253.33</td></tr></table> 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index s&p 600 electrical equipment . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the value of a o smith corp from 2002 to 2007? 42.72 q1: and how much does that change represent in relation to the original value in 2002? 0.4272 q2: what was the value of the s&p 600 electrical equipment in 2007? 253.33 Question: and what was the change in that value between 2002 and 2007? Answer:

153.33

convfinqa1342

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p smallcap 600 index and the s&p 600 electrical equipment index , all of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2002 to december 31 , 2007 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/02</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/03</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/04</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/05</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>a o smith corp</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.23</td><td>115.36</td><td>138.20</td><td>150.26</td><td>142.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p smallcap 600 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.79</td><td>170.22</td><td>183.30</td><td>211.01</td><td>210.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 600 electrical equipment</td><td>100.00</td><td>126.12</td><td>152.18</td><td>169.07</td><td>228.83</td><td>253.33</td></tr></table> 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index s&p 600 electrical equipment . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the value of a o smith corp from 2002 to 2007? 42.72 q1: and how much does that change represent in relation to the original value in 2002? 0.4272 q2: what was the value of the s&p 600 electrical equipment in 2007? 253.33 q3: and what was the change in that value between 2002 and 2007? 153.33 Question: how much, then, does this change represent in relation to the original value of that stock in 2002? Answer:

1.5333

convfinqa1343

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p smallcap 600 index and the s&p 600 electrical equipment index , all of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2002 to december 31 , 2007 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/02</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/03</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/04</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/05</td><td>baseperiod 12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>a o smith corp</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.23</td><td>115.36</td><td>138.20</td><td>150.26</td><td>142.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p smallcap 600 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.79</td><td>170.22</td><td>183.30</td><td>211.01</td><td>210.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 600 electrical equipment</td><td>100.00</td><td>126.12</td><td>152.18</td><td>169.07</td><td>228.83</td><td>253.33</td></tr></table> 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index s&p 600 electrical equipment . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the value of a o smith corp from 2002 to 2007? 42.72 q1: and how much does that change represent in relation to the original value in 2002? 0.4272 q2: what was the value of the s&p 600 electrical equipment in 2007? 253.33 q3: and what was the change in that value between 2002 and 2007? 153.33 q4: how much, then, does this change represent in relation to the original value of that stock in 2002? 1.5333 Question: and what was the difference between the return (or the change representation) of the a o smith corp and the one of the s&p 600 electrical equipment? Answer:

-1.1061

convfinqa1344

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: royal caribbean cruises ltd . 15 from two to 17 nights throughout south america , the caribbean and europe . additionally , we announced that majesty of the seas will be redeployed from royal caribbean international to pullmantur in 2016 . pullmantur serves the contemporary segment of the spanish , portuguese and latin american cruise mar- kets . pullmantur 2019s strategy is to attract cruise guests from these target markets by providing a variety of cruising options and onboard activities directed at couples and families traveling with children . over the last few years , pullmantur has systematically increased its focus on latin america and has expanded its pres- ence in that market . in order to facilitate pullmantur 2019s ability to focus on its core cruise business , on march 31 , 2014 , pullmantur sold the majority of its interest in its non-core busi- nesses . these non-core businesses included pullmantur 2019s land-based tour operations , travel agency and 49% ( 49 % ) interest in its air business . in connection with the sale agreement , we retained a 19% ( 19 % ) interest in each of the non-core businesses as well as 100% ( 100 % ) ownership of the aircraft which are being dry leased to pullmantur air . see note 1 . general and note 6 . other assets to our consolidated financial statements under item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for further details . cdf croisi e8res de france we currently operate two ships with an aggregate capacity of approximately 2800 berths under our cdf croisi e8res de france brand . cdf croisi e8res de france offers seasonal itineraries to the mediterranean , europe and caribbean . during the winter season , zenith is deployed to the pullmantur brand for sailings in south america . cdf croisi e8res de france is designed to serve the contemporary segment of the french cruise market by providing a brand tailored for french cruise guests . tui cruises tui cruises is a joint venture owned 50% ( 50 % ) by us and 50% ( 50 % ) by tui ag , a german tourism and shipping com- pany , and is designed to serve the contemporary and premium segments of the german cruise market by offering a product tailored for german guests . all onboard activities , services , shore excursions and menu offerings are designed to suit the preferences of this target market . tui cruises operates three ships , mein schiff 1 , mein schiff 2 and mein schiff 3 , with an aggregate capacity of approximately 6300 berths . in addition , tui cruises currently has three newbuild ships on order at the finnish meyer turku yard with an aggregate capacity of approximately 7500 berths : mein schiff 4 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2015 , mein schiff 5 , scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2016 and mein schiff 6 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2017 . in november 2014 , we formed a strategic partnership with ctrip.com international ltd . ( 201cctrip 201d ) , a chinese travel service provider , to operate a new cruise brand known as skysea cruises . skysea cruises will offer a custom-tailored product for chinese cruise guests operating the ship purchased from celebrity cruises . the new cruise line will begin service in the second quarter of 2015 . we and ctrip each own 35% ( 35 % ) of the new company , skysea holding , with the balance being owned by skysea holding management and a private equity fund . industry cruising is considered a well-established vacation sector in the north american market , a growing sec- tor over the long term in the european market and a developing but promising sector in several other emerging markets . industry data indicates that market penetration rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details market penetration rates for north america and europe computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : america ( 1 ) europe ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>north america ( 1 )</td><td>europe ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and cruise lines international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . rates are based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 2 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and clia europe , formerly european cruise council . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 457000 berths on approximately 283 ships at the end of 2014 . there are approximately 33 ships with an estimated 98650 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2015 and 2019 , although it is also possible that ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 22.0 million cruise guests in 2014 compared to 21.3 million cruise guests carried in 2013 and 20.9 million cruise guests carried in 2012 . part i . Conversations: Question: what is the total global cruise guests in 2014? Answer:

22.0

convfinqa1345

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: royal caribbean cruises ltd . 15 from two to 17 nights throughout south america , the caribbean and europe . additionally , we announced that majesty of the seas will be redeployed from royal caribbean international to pullmantur in 2016 . pullmantur serves the contemporary segment of the spanish , portuguese and latin american cruise mar- kets . pullmantur 2019s strategy is to attract cruise guests from these target markets by providing a variety of cruising options and onboard activities directed at couples and families traveling with children . over the last few years , pullmantur has systematically increased its focus on latin america and has expanded its pres- ence in that market . in order to facilitate pullmantur 2019s ability to focus on its core cruise business , on march 31 , 2014 , pullmantur sold the majority of its interest in its non-core busi- nesses . these non-core businesses included pullmantur 2019s land-based tour operations , travel agency and 49% ( 49 % ) interest in its air business . in connection with the sale agreement , we retained a 19% ( 19 % ) interest in each of the non-core businesses as well as 100% ( 100 % ) ownership of the aircraft which are being dry leased to pullmantur air . see note 1 . general and note 6 . other assets to our consolidated financial statements under item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for further details . cdf croisi e8res de france we currently operate two ships with an aggregate capacity of approximately 2800 berths under our cdf croisi e8res de france brand . cdf croisi e8res de france offers seasonal itineraries to the mediterranean , europe and caribbean . during the winter season , zenith is deployed to the pullmantur brand for sailings in south america . cdf croisi e8res de france is designed to serve the contemporary segment of the french cruise market by providing a brand tailored for french cruise guests . tui cruises tui cruises is a joint venture owned 50% ( 50 % ) by us and 50% ( 50 % ) by tui ag , a german tourism and shipping com- pany , and is designed to serve the contemporary and premium segments of the german cruise market by offering a product tailored for german guests . all onboard activities , services , shore excursions and menu offerings are designed to suit the preferences of this target market . tui cruises operates three ships , mein schiff 1 , mein schiff 2 and mein schiff 3 , with an aggregate capacity of approximately 6300 berths . in addition , tui cruises currently has three newbuild ships on order at the finnish meyer turku yard with an aggregate capacity of approximately 7500 berths : mein schiff 4 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2015 , mein schiff 5 , scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2016 and mein schiff 6 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2017 . in november 2014 , we formed a strategic partnership with ctrip.com international ltd . ( 201cctrip 201d ) , a chinese travel service provider , to operate a new cruise brand known as skysea cruises . skysea cruises will offer a custom-tailored product for chinese cruise guests operating the ship purchased from celebrity cruises . the new cruise line will begin service in the second quarter of 2015 . we and ctrip each own 35% ( 35 % ) of the new company , skysea holding , with the balance being owned by skysea holding management and a private equity fund . industry cruising is considered a well-established vacation sector in the north american market , a growing sec- tor over the long term in the european market and a developing but promising sector in several other emerging markets . industry data indicates that market penetration rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details market penetration rates for north america and europe computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : america ( 1 ) europe ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>north america ( 1 )</td><td>europe ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and cruise lines international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . rates are based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 2 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and clia europe , formerly european cruise council . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 457000 berths on approximately 283 ships at the end of 2014 . there are approximately 33 ships with an estimated 98650 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2015 and 2019 , although it is also possible that ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 22.0 million cruise guests in 2014 compared to 21.3 million cruise guests carried in 2013 and 20.9 million cruise guests carried in 2012 . part i . Conversations: q0: what is the total global cruise guests in 2014? 22.0 Question: what about in 2012? Answer:

20.9

convfinqa1346

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: royal caribbean cruises ltd . 15 from two to 17 nights throughout south america , the caribbean and europe . additionally , we announced that majesty of the seas will be redeployed from royal caribbean international to pullmantur in 2016 . pullmantur serves the contemporary segment of the spanish , portuguese and latin american cruise mar- kets . pullmantur 2019s strategy is to attract cruise guests from these target markets by providing a variety of cruising options and onboard activities directed at couples and families traveling with children . over the last few years , pullmantur has systematically increased its focus on latin america and has expanded its pres- ence in that market . in order to facilitate pullmantur 2019s ability to focus on its core cruise business , on march 31 , 2014 , pullmantur sold the majority of its interest in its non-core busi- nesses . these non-core businesses included pullmantur 2019s land-based tour operations , travel agency and 49% ( 49 % ) interest in its air business . in connection with the sale agreement , we retained a 19% ( 19 % ) interest in each of the non-core businesses as well as 100% ( 100 % ) ownership of the aircraft which are being dry leased to pullmantur air . see note 1 . general and note 6 . other assets to our consolidated financial statements under item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for further details . cdf croisi e8res de france we currently operate two ships with an aggregate capacity of approximately 2800 berths under our cdf croisi e8res de france brand . cdf croisi e8res de france offers seasonal itineraries to the mediterranean , europe and caribbean . during the winter season , zenith is deployed to the pullmantur brand for sailings in south america . cdf croisi e8res de france is designed to serve the contemporary segment of the french cruise market by providing a brand tailored for french cruise guests . tui cruises tui cruises is a joint venture owned 50% ( 50 % ) by us and 50% ( 50 % ) by tui ag , a german tourism and shipping com- pany , and is designed to serve the contemporary and premium segments of the german cruise market by offering a product tailored for german guests . all onboard activities , services , shore excursions and menu offerings are designed to suit the preferences of this target market . tui cruises operates three ships , mein schiff 1 , mein schiff 2 and mein schiff 3 , with an aggregate capacity of approximately 6300 berths . in addition , tui cruises currently has three newbuild ships on order at the finnish meyer turku yard with an aggregate capacity of approximately 7500 berths : mein schiff 4 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2015 , mein schiff 5 , scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2016 and mein schiff 6 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2017 . in november 2014 , we formed a strategic partnership with ctrip.com international ltd . ( 201cctrip 201d ) , a chinese travel service provider , to operate a new cruise brand known as skysea cruises . skysea cruises will offer a custom-tailored product for chinese cruise guests operating the ship purchased from celebrity cruises . the new cruise line will begin service in the second quarter of 2015 . we and ctrip each own 35% ( 35 % ) of the new company , skysea holding , with the balance being owned by skysea holding management and a private equity fund . industry cruising is considered a well-established vacation sector in the north american market , a growing sec- tor over the long term in the european market and a developing but promising sector in several other emerging markets . industry data indicates that market penetration rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details market penetration rates for north america and europe computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : america ( 1 ) europe ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>north america ( 1 )</td><td>europe ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and cruise lines international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . rates are based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 2 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and clia europe , formerly european cruise council . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 457000 berths on approximately 283 ships at the end of 2014 . there are approximately 33 ships with an estimated 98650 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2015 and 2019 , although it is also possible that ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 22.0 million cruise guests in 2014 compared to 21.3 million cruise guests carried in 2013 and 20.9 million cruise guests carried in 2012 . part i . Conversations: q0: what is the total global cruise guests in 2014? 22.0 q1: what about in 2012? 20.9 Question: what is the difference among these years? Answer:

1.1

convfinqa1347

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: royal caribbean cruises ltd . 15 from two to 17 nights throughout south america , the caribbean and europe . additionally , we announced that majesty of the seas will be redeployed from royal caribbean international to pullmantur in 2016 . pullmantur serves the contemporary segment of the spanish , portuguese and latin american cruise mar- kets . pullmantur 2019s strategy is to attract cruise guests from these target markets by providing a variety of cruising options and onboard activities directed at couples and families traveling with children . over the last few years , pullmantur has systematically increased its focus on latin america and has expanded its pres- ence in that market . in order to facilitate pullmantur 2019s ability to focus on its core cruise business , on march 31 , 2014 , pullmantur sold the majority of its interest in its non-core busi- nesses . these non-core businesses included pullmantur 2019s land-based tour operations , travel agency and 49% ( 49 % ) interest in its air business . in connection with the sale agreement , we retained a 19% ( 19 % ) interest in each of the non-core businesses as well as 100% ( 100 % ) ownership of the aircraft which are being dry leased to pullmantur air . see note 1 . general and note 6 . other assets to our consolidated financial statements under item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for further details . cdf croisi e8res de france we currently operate two ships with an aggregate capacity of approximately 2800 berths under our cdf croisi e8res de france brand . cdf croisi e8res de france offers seasonal itineraries to the mediterranean , europe and caribbean . during the winter season , zenith is deployed to the pullmantur brand for sailings in south america . cdf croisi e8res de france is designed to serve the contemporary segment of the french cruise market by providing a brand tailored for french cruise guests . tui cruises tui cruises is a joint venture owned 50% ( 50 % ) by us and 50% ( 50 % ) by tui ag , a german tourism and shipping com- pany , and is designed to serve the contemporary and premium segments of the german cruise market by offering a product tailored for german guests . all onboard activities , services , shore excursions and menu offerings are designed to suit the preferences of this target market . tui cruises operates three ships , mein schiff 1 , mein schiff 2 and mein schiff 3 , with an aggregate capacity of approximately 6300 berths . in addition , tui cruises currently has three newbuild ships on order at the finnish meyer turku yard with an aggregate capacity of approximately 7500 berths : mein schiff 4 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2015 , mein schiff 5 , scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2016 and mein schiff 6 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2017 . in november 2014 , we formed a strategic partnership with ctrip.com international ltd . ( 201cctrip 201d ) , a chinese travel service provider , to operate a new cruise brand known as skysea cruises . skysea cruises will offer a custom-tailored product for chinese cruise guests operating the ship purchased from celebrity cruises . the new cruise line will begin service in the second quarter of 2015 . we and ctrip each own 35% ( 35 % ) of the new company , skysea holding , with the balance being owned by skysea holding management and a private equity fund . industry cruising is considered a well-established vacation sector in the north american market , a growing sec- tor over the long term in the european market and a developing but promising sector in several other emerging markets . industry data indicates that market penetration rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details market penetration rates for north america and europe computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : america ( 1 ) europe ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>north america ( 1 )</td><td>europe ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and cruise lines international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . rates are based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 2 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and clia europe , formerly european cruise council . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 457000 berths on approximately 283 ships at the end of 2014 . there are approximately 33 ships with an estimated 98650 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2015 and 2019 , although it is also possible that ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 22.0 million cruise guests in 2014 compared to 21.3 million cruise guests carried in 2013 and 20.9 million cruise guests carried in 2012 . part i . Conversations: q0: what is the total global cruise guests in 2014? 22.0 q1: what about in 2012? 20.9 q2: what is the difference among these years? 1.1 Question: what is the total global cruise guests in 2012? Answer:

20.9

convfinqa1348

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: royal caribbean cruises ltd . 15 from two to 17 nights throughout south america , the caribbean and europe . additionally , we announced that majesty of the seas will be redeployed from royal caribbean international to pullmantur in 2016 . pullmantur serves the contemporary segment of the spanish , portuguese and latin american cruise mar- kets . pullmantur 2019s strategy is to attract cruise guests from these target markets by providing a variety of cruising options and onboard activities directed at couples and families traveling with children . over the last few years , pullmantur has systematically increased its focus on latin america and has expanded its pres- ence in that market . in order to facilitate pullmantur 2019s ability to focus on its core cruise business , on march 31 , 2014 , pullmantur sold the majority of its interest in its non-core busi- nesses . these non-core businesses included pullmantur 2019s land-based tour operations , travel agency and 49% ( 49 % ) interest in its air business . in connection with the sale agreement , we retained a 19% ( 19 % ) interest in each of the non-core businesses as well as 100% ( 100 % ) ownership of the aircraft which are being dry leased to pullmantur air . see note 1 . general and note 6 . other assets to our consolidated financial statements under item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for further details . cdf croisi e8res de france we currently operate two ships with an aggregate capacity of approximately 2800 berths under our cdf croisi e8res de france brand . cdf croisi e8res de france offers seasonal itineraries to the mediterranean , europe and caribbean . during the winter season , zenith is deployed to the pullmantur brand for sailings in south america . cdf croisi e8res de france is designed to serve the contemporary segment of the french cruise market by providing a brand tailored for french cruise guests . tui cruises tui cruises is a joint venture owned 50% ( 50 % ) by us and 50% ( 50 % ) by tui ag , a german tourism and shipping com- pany , and is designed to serve the contemporary and premium segments of the german cruise market by offering a product tailored for german guests . all onboard activities , services , shore excursions and menu offerings are designed to suit the preferences of this target market . tui cruises operates three ships , mein schiff 1 , mein schiff 2 and mein schiff 3 , with an aggregate capacity of approximately 6300 berths . in addition , tui cruises currently has three newbuild ships on order at the finnish meyer turku yard with an aggregate capacity of approximately 7500 berths : mein schiff 4 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2015 , mein schiff 5 , scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2016 and mein schiff 6 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2017 . in november 2014 , we formed a strategic partnership with ctrip.com international ltd . ( 201cctrip 201d ) , a chinese travel service provider , to operate a new cruise brand known as skysea cruises . skysea cruises will offer a custom-tailored product for chinese cruise guests operating the ship purchased from celebrity cruises . the new cruise line will begin service in the second quarter of 2015 . we and ctrip each own 35% ( 35 % ) of the new company , skysea holding , with the balance being owned by skysea holding management and a private equity fund . industry cruising is considered a well-established vacation sector in the north american market , a growing sec- tor over the long term in the european market and a developing but promising sector in several other emerging markets . industry data indicates that market penetration rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details market penetration rates for north america and europe computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : america ( 1 ) europe ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>north america ( 1 )</td><td>europe ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and cruise lines international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . rates are based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 2 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and clia europe , formerly european cruise council . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 457000 berths on approximately 283 ships at the end of 2014 . there are approximately 33 ships with an estimated 98650 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2015 and 2019 , although it is also possible that ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 22.0 million cruise guests in 2014 compared to 21.3 million cruise guests carried in 2013 and 20.9 million cruise guests carried in 2012 . part i . Conversations: q0: what is the total global cruise guests in 2014? 22.0 q1: what about in 2012? 20.9 q2: what is the difference among these years? 1.1 q3: what is the total global cruise guests in 2012? 20.9 Question: what fraction does this represent? Answer:

0.05263

convfinqa1349

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: royal caribbean cruises ltd . 15 from two to 17 nights throughout south america , the caribbean and europe . additionally , we announced that majesty of the seas will be redeployed from royal caribbean international to pullmantur in 2016 . pullmantur serves the contemporary segment of the spanish , portuguese and latin american cruise mar- kets . pullmantur 2019s strategy is to attract cruise guests from these target markets by providing a variety of cruising options and onboard activities directed at couples and families traveling with children . over the last few years , pullmantur has systematically increased its focus on latin america and has expanded its pres- ence in that market . in order to facilitate pullmantur 2019s ability to focus on its core cruise business , on march 31 , 2014 , pullmantur sold the majority of its interest in its non-core busi- nesses . these non-core businesses included pullmantur 2019s land-based tour operations , travel agency and 49% ( 49 % ) interest in its air business . in connection with the sale agreement , we retained a 19% ( 19 % ) interest in each of the non-core businesses as well as 100% ( 100 % ) ownership of the aircraft which are being dry leased to pullmantur air . see note 1 . general and note 6 . other assets to our consolidated financial statements under item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for further details . cdf croisi e8res de france we currently operate two ships with an aggregate capacity of approximately 2800 berths under our cdf croisi e8res de france brand . cdf croisi e8res de france offers seasonal itineraries to the mediterranean , europe and caribbean . during the winter season , zenith is deployed to the pullmantur brand for sailings in south america . cdf croisi e8res de france is designed to serve the contemporary segment of the french cruise market by providing a brand tailored for french cruise guests . tui cruises tui cruises is a joint venture owned 50% ( 50 % ) by us and 50% ( 50 % ) by tui ag , a german tourism and shipping com- pany , and is designed to serve the contemporary and premium segments of the german cruise market by offering a product tailored for german guests . all onboard activities , services , shore excursions and menu offerings are designed to suit the preferences of this target market . tui cruises operates three ships , mein schiff 1 , mein schiff 2 and mein schiff 3 , with an aggregate capacity of approximately 6300 berths . in addition , tui cruises currently has three newbuild ships on order at the finnish meyer turku yard with an aggregate capacity of approximately 7500 berths : mein schiff 4 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2015 , mein schiff 5 , scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2016 and mein schiff 6 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2017 . in november 2014 , we formed a strategic partnership with ctrip.com international ltd . ( 201cctrip 201d ) , a chinese travel service provider , to operate a new cruise brand known as skysea cruises . skysea cruises will offer a custom-tailored product for chinese cruise guests operating the ship purchased from celebrity cruises . the new cruise line will begin service in the second quarter of 2015 . we and ctrip each own 35% ( 35 % ) of the new company , skysea holding , with the balance being owned by skysea holding management and a private equity fund . industry cruising is considered a well-established vacation sector in the north american market , a growing sec- tor over the long term in the european market and a developing but promising sector in several other emerging markets . industry data indicates that market penetration rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details market penetration rates for north america and europe computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : america ( 1 ) europe ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>north america ( 1 )</td><td>europe ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and cruise lines international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . rates are based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 2 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and clia europe , formerly european cruise council . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 457000 berths on approximately 283 ships at the end of 2014 . there are approximately 33 ships with an estimated 98650 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2015 and 2019 , although it is also possible that ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 22.0 million cruise guests in 2014 compared to 21.3 million cruise guests carried in 2013 and 20.9 million cruise guests carried in 2012 . part i . Conversations: q0: what is the total global cruise guests in 2014? 22.0 q1: what about in 2012? 20.9 q2: what is the difference among these years? 1.1 q3: what is the total global cruise guests in 2012? 20.9 q4: what fraction does this represent? 0.05263 Question: what about the percentage change? Answer:

5.26316

convfinqa1350

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 9 . junior subordinated debt securities payable in accordance with the provisions of the junior subordinated debt securities which were issued on march 29 , 2004 , holdings elected to redeem the $ 329897 thousand of 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) junior subordinated debt securities outstanding on may 24 , 2013 . as a result of the early redemption , the company incurred pre-tax expense of $ 7282 thousand related to the immediate amortization of the remaining capitalized issuance costs on the trust preferred securities . interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense incurred</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 8181</td></tr></table> holdings considered the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities , taken together , constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by holdings of capital trust ii 2019s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities . 10 . reinsurance and trust agreements certain subsidiaries of group have established trust agreements , which effectively use the company 2019s investments as collateral , as security for assumed losses payable to certain non-affiliated ceding companies . at december 31 , 2015 , the total amount on deposit in trust accounts was $ 454384 thousand . on april 24 , 2014 , the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re limited ( 201ckilimanjaro 201d ) , a bermuda based special purpose reinsurer , to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover specified named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 250000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeastern united states . the second agreement provides up to $ 200000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic and northeast regions of the united states and puerto rico as well as reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic , northeast and west regions of the united states , puerto rico and british columbia . on november 18 , 2014 , the company entered into a collateralized reinsurance agreement with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . this agreement is a multi-year reinsurance contract which covers specified earthquake events . the agreement provides up to $ 500000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . on december 1 , 2015 the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 300000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms and earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . the second agreement provides up to $ 325000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms and earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . kilimanjaro has financed the various property catastrophe reinsurance coverage by issuing catastrophe bonds to unrelated , external investors . on april 24 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 450000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2014-1 notes 201d ) . on november 18 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 500000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2014-2 notes 201d ) . on december 1 , 2015 , kilimanjaro issued $ 625000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2015-1 notes ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the series 2014-1 notes , the series 2014-2 notes and the series 2015-1 notes are held in reinsurance trust throughout the duration of the applicable reinsurance agreements and invested solely in us government money market funds with a rating of at least 201caaam 201d by standard & poor 2019s. . Conversations: Question: what was the total value of the notes issued by kilimanjaro in 2014? Answer:

950000.0

convfinqa1351

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 9 . junior subordinated debt securities payable in accordance with the provisions of the junior subordinated debt securities which were issued on march 29 , 2004 , holdings elected to redeem the $ 329897 thousand of 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) junior subordinated debt securities outstanding on may 24 , 2013 . as a result of the early redemption , the company incurred pre-tax expense of $ 7282 thousand related to the immediate amortization of the remaining capitalized issuance costs on the trust preferred securities . interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense incurred</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 8181</td></tr></table> holdings considered the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities , taken together , constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by holdings of capital trust ii 2019s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities . 10 . reinsurance and trust agreements certain subsidiaries of group have established trust agreements , which effectively use the company 2019s investments as collateral , as security for assumed losses payable to certain non-affiliated ceding companies . at december 31 , 2015 , the total amount on deposit in trust accounts was $ 454384 thousand . on april 24 , 2014 , the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re limited ( 201ckilimanjaro 201d ) , a bermuda based special purpose reinsurer , to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover specified named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 250000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeastern united states . the second agreement provides up to $ 200000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic and northeast regions of the united states and puerto rico as well as reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic , northeast and west regions of the united states , puerto rico and british columbia . on november 18 , 2014 , the company entered into a collateralized reinsurance agreement with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . this agreement is a multi-year reinsurance contract which covers specified earthquake events . the agreement provides up to $ 500000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . on december 1 , 2015 the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 300000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms and earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . the second agreement provides up to $ 325000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms and earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . kilimanjaro has financed the various property catastrophe reinsurance coverage by issuing catastrophe bonds to unrelated , external investors . on april 24 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 450000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2014-1 notes 201d ) . on november 18 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 500000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2014-2 notes 201d ) . on december 1 , 2015 , kilimanjaro issued $ 625000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2015-1 notes ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the series 2014-1 notes , the series 2014-2 notes and the series 2015-1 notes are held in reinsurance trust throughout the duration of the applicable reinsurance agreements and invested solely in us government money market funds with a rating of at least 201caaam 201d by standard & poor 2019s. . Conversations: q0: what was the total value of the notes issued by kilimanjaro in 2014? 950000.0 Question: including the notes issued in 2015, what becomes this total for the two years? Answer:

1575000.0

convfinqa1352

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 9 . junior subordinated debt securities payable in accordance with the provisions of the junior subordinated debt securities which were issued on march 29 , 2004 , holdings elected to redeem the $ 329897 thousand of 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) junior subordinated debt securities outstanding on may 24 , 2013 . as a result of the early redemption , the company incurred pre-tax expense of $ 7282 thousand related to the immediate amortization of the remaining capitalized issuance costs on the trust preferred securities . interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense incurred</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 8181</td></tr></table> holdings considered the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities , taken together , constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by holdings of capital trust ii 2019s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities . 10 . reinsurance and trust agreements certain subsidiaries of group have established trust agreements , which effectively use the company 2019s investments as collateral , as security for assumed losses payable to certain non-affiliated ceding companies . at december 31 , 2015 , the total amount on deposit in trust accounts was $ 454384 thousand . on april 24 , 2014 , the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re limited ( 201ckilimanjaro 201d ) , a bermuda based special purpose reinsurer , to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover specified named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 250000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeastern united states . the second agreement provides up to $ 200000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic and northeast regions of the united states and puerto rico as well as reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic , northeast and west regions of the united states , puerto rico and british columbia . on november 18 , 2014 , the company entered into a collateralized reinsurance agreement with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . this agreement is a multi-year reinsurance contract which covers specified earthquake events . the agreement provides up to $ 500000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . on december 1 , 2015 the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 300000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms and earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . the second agreement provides up to $ 325000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms and earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . kilimanjaro has financed the various property catastrophe reinsurance coverage by issuing catastrophe bonds to unrelated , external investors . on april 24 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 450000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2014-1 notes 201d ) . on november 18 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 500000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2014-2 notes 201d ) . on december 1 , 2015 , kilimanjaro issued $ 625000 thousand of notes ( 201cseries 2015-1 notes ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the series 2014-1 notes , the series 2014-2 notes and the series 2015-1 notes are held in reinsurance trust throughout the duration of the applicable reinsurance agreements and invested solely in us government money market funds with a rating of at least 201caaam 201d by standard & poor 2019s. . Conversations: q0: what was the total value of the notes issued by kilimanjaro in 2014? 950000.0 q1: including the notes issued in 2015, what becomes this total for the two years? 1575000.0 Question: and concerning the redeemed amount of junior subordinated debt, what was its annual interest expense? Answer:

20453.614

convfinqa1353

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis setting any of entergy louisiana's rates . therefore , to the extent entergy louisiana's use of the proceeds would ordinarily have reduced its rate base , no change in rate base shall be reflected for ratemaking purposes . the sec approval for additional return of equity capital is now expired . entergy louisiana's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 40549</td><td>( $ 41317 )</td><td>$ 18854</td><td>$ 3812</td></tr></table> money pool activity used $ 81.9 million of entergy louisiana's operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 60.2 million in 2003 , and used $ 15.0 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities the decrease of $ 25.1 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2004 was primarily due to decreased spending on customer service projects , partially offset by increases in spending on transmission projects and fossil plant projects . the increase of $ 56.0 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2003 was primarily due to increased spending on customer service , transmission , and nuclear projects . financing activities the decrease of $ 404.4 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2004 was primarily due to : 2022 the net issuance of $ 98.0 million of long-term debt in 2004 compared to the retirement of $ 261.0 million in 2022 a principal payment of $ 14.8 million in 2004 for the waterford lease obligation compared to a principal payment of $ 35.4 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 29.0 million in common stock dividends paid . the decrease of $ 105.5 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2003 was primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 125.9 million in common stock dividends paid ; and 2022 the repurchase of $ 120 million of common stock from entergy corporation in 2002 . the decrease in net cash used in 2003 was partially offset by the following : 2022 the retirement in 2003 of $ 150 million of 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) series first mortgage bonds compared to the net retirement of $ 134.6 million of first mortgage bonds in 2002 ; and 2022 principal payments of $ 35.4 million in 2003 for the waterford 3 lease obligation compared to principal payments of $ 15.9 million in 2002 . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details of long-term debt . uses of capital entergy louisiana requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. . Conversations: Question: what was the difference in receivables from between 2001 and 2002? Answer:

15042.0

convfinqa1354

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis setting any of entergy louisiana's rates . therefore , to the extent entergy louisiana's use of the proceeds would ordinarily have reduced its rate base , no change in rate base shall be reflected for ratemaking purposes . the sec approval for additional return of equity capital is now expired . entergy louisiana's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 40549</td><td>( $ 41317 )</td><td>$ 18854</td><td>$ 3812</td></tr></table> money pool activity used $ 81.9 million of entergy louisiana's operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 60.2 million in 2003 , and used $ 15.0 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities the decrease of $ 25.1 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2004 was primarily due to decreased spending on customer service projects , partially offset by increases in spending on transmission projects and fossil plant projects . the increase of $ 56.0 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2003 was primarily due to increased spending on customer service , transmission , and nuclear projects . financing activities the decrease of $ 404.4 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2004 was primarily due to : 2022 the net issuance of $ 98.0 million of long-term debt in 2004 compared to the retirement of $ 261.0 million in 2022 a principal payment of $ 14.8 million in 2004 for the waterford lease obligation compared to a principal payment of $ 35.4 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 29.0 million in common stock dividends paid . the decrease of $ 105.5 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2003 was primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 125.9 million in common stock dividends paid ; and 2022 the repurchase of $ 120 million of common stock from entergy corporation in 2002 . the decrease in net cash used in 2003 was partially offset by the following : 2022 the retirement in 2003 of $ 150 million of 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) series first mortgage bonds compared to the net retirement of $ 134.6 million of first mortgage bonds in 2002 ; and 2022 principal payments of $ 35.4 million in 2003 for the waterford 3 lease obligation compared to principal payments of $ 15.9 million in 2002 . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details of long-term debt . uses of capital entergy louisiana requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. . Conversations: q0: what was the difference in receivables from between 2001 and 2002? 15042.0 Question: and the percentage change? Answer:

3.94596

convfinqa1355

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: as noted above , as a result of these sales , these regulated subsidiaries are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented . therefore , the amounts , statistics and tables presented in this section refer only to on-going operations , unless otherwise noted . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenue for 2012 and number of customers from continuing operations as well as an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2012 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operating revenues ( in millions ) $ 639.0</td><td>% ( % ) of total 24.9% ( 24.9 % )</td><td>number of customers 639838</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>estimated population served ( in millions ) 2.5</td><td>% ( % ) of total 21.9% ( 21.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>557.7</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>658153</td><td>20.8% ( 20.8 % )</td><td>2.2</td><td>19.3% ( 19.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>missouri</td><td>279.5</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td><td>455730</td><td>14.4% ( 14.4 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>13.2% ( 13.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>256.4</td><td>10.0% ( 10.0 % )</td><td>308014</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.5% ( 10.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indiana</td><td>198.7</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>289068</td><td>9.2% ( 9.2 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.5% ( 10.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>california</td><td>193.3</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>174188</td><td>5.5% ( 5.5 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>125.0</td><td>4.9% ( 4.9 % )</td><td>172159</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2249.6</td><td>87.7% ( 87.7 % )</td><td>2697150</td><td>85.4% ( 85.4 % )</td><td>9.8</td><td>86.0% ( 86.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>314.8</td><td>12.3% ( 12.3 % )</td><td>461076</td><td>14.6% ( 14.6 % )</td><td>1.6</td><td>14.0% ( 14.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2564.4</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3158226</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>11.4</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois . ( b ) west virginia-american water company , which we refer to as wvawc , and its subsidiary bluefield valley water works company . ( c ) includes data from our operating subsidiaries in the following states : georgia , hawaii , iowa , kentucky , maryland , michigan , new york , tennessee , and virginia . approximately 87.7% ( 87.7 % ) of operating revenue from our regulated businesses in 2012 was generated from approximately 2.7 million customers in our seven largest states , as measured by operating revenues . in fiscal year 2012 , no single customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of our annual operating revenue . overview of networks , facilities and water supply our regulated businesses operate in approximately 1500 communities in 16 states in the united states . our primary operating assets include approximately 80 surface water treatment plants , 500 groundwater treatment plants , 1000 groundwater wells , 100 wastewater treatment facilities , 1200 treated water storage facilities , 1300 pumping stations , 90 dams and 46000 miles of mains and collection pipes . our regulated utilities own substantially all of the assets used by our regulated businesses . we generally own the land and physical assets used to store , extract and treat source water . typically , we do not own the water itself , which is held in public trust and is allocated to us through contracts and allocation rights granted by federal and state agencies or through the ownership of water rights pursuant to local law . maintaining the reliability of our networks is a key activity of our regulated businesses . we have ongoing infrastructure renewal programs in all states in which our regulated businesses operate . these programs consist of both rehabilitation of existing mains and replacement of mains that have reached the end of their useful service lives . our ability to meet the existing and future water demands of our customers depends on an adequate supply of water . drought , governmental restrictions , overuse of sources of water , the protection of threatened species or habitats or other factors may limit the availability of ground and surface water . we employ a variety of measures to ensure that we have adequate sources of water supply , both in the short-term and over the long-term . the geographic diversity of our service areas tends to mitigate some of the economic effect of weather extremes we . Conversations: Question: what was the total operating revenue in the regulated business, in millions of dollars? Answer:

2564.4

convfinqa1356

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: as noted above , as a result of these sales , these regulated subsidiaries are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented . therefore , the amounts , statistics and tables presented in this section refer only to on-going operations , unless otherwise noted . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenue for 2012 and number of customers from continuing operations as well as an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2012 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operating revenues ( in millions ) $ 639.0</td><td>% ( % ) of total 24.9% ( 24.9 % )</td><td>number of customers 639838</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>estimated population served ( in millions ) 2.5</td><td>% ( % ) of total 21.9% ( 21.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>557.7</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>658153</td><td>20.8% ( 20.8 % )</td><td>2.2</td><td>19.3% ( 19.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>missouri</td><td>279.5</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td><td>455730</td><td>14.4% ( 14.4 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>13.2% ( 13.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>256.4</td><td>10.0% ( 10.0 % )</td><td>308014</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.5% ( 10.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indiana</td><td>198.7</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>289068</td><td>9.2% ( 9.2 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.5% ( 10.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>california</td><td>193.3</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>174188</td><td>5.5% ( 5.5 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>125.0</td><td>4.9% ( 4.9 % )</td><td>172159</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2249.6</td><td>87.7% ( 87.7 % )</td><td>2697150</td><td>85.4% ( 85.4 % )</td><td>9.8</td><td>86.0% ( 86.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>314.8</td><td>12.3% ( 12.3 % )</td><td>461076</td><td>14.6% ( 14.6 % )</td><td>1.6</td><td>14.0% ( 14.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2564.4</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3158226</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>11.4</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois . ( b ) west virginia-american water company , which we refer to as wvawc , and its subsidiary bluefield valley water works company . ( c ) includes data from our operating subsidiaries in the following states : georgia , hawaii , iowa , kentucky , maryland , michigan , new york , tennessee , and virginia . approximately 87.7% ( 87.7 % ) of operating revenue from our regulated businesses in 2012 was generated from approximately 2.7 million customers in our seven largest states , as measured by operating revenues . in fiscal year 2012 , no single customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of our annual operating revenue . overview of networks , facilities and water supply our regulated businesses operate in approximately 1500 communities in 16 states in the united states . our primary operating assets include approximately 80 surface water treatment plants , 500 groundwater treatment plants , 1000 groundwater wells , 100 wastewater treatment facilities , 1200 treated water storage facilities , 1300 pumping stations , 90 dams and 46000 miles of mains and collection pipes . our regulated utilities own substantially all of the assets used by our regulated businesses . we generally own the land and physical assets used to store , extract and treat source water . typically , we do not own the water itself , which is held in public trust and is allocated to us through contracts and allocation rights granted by federal and state agencies or through the ownership of water rights pursuant to local law . maintaining the reliability of our networks is a key activity of our regulated businesses . we have ongoing infrastructure renewal programs in all states in which our regulated businesses operate . these programs consist of both rehabilitation of existing mains and replacement of mains that have reached the end of their useful service lives . our ability to meet the existing and future water demands of our customers depends on an adequate supply of water . drought , governmental restrictions , overuse of sources of water , the protection of threatened species or habitats or other factors may limit the availability of ground and surface water . we employ a variety of measures to ensure that we have adequate sources of water supply , both in the short-term and over the long-term . the geographic diversity of our service areas tends to mitigate some of the economic effect of weather extremes we . Conversations: q0: what was the total operating revenue in the regulated business, in millions of dollars? 2564.4 Question: and how much is that, in dollars? Answer:

2564400000.0

convfinqa1357

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: as noted above , as a result of these sales , these regulated subsidiaries are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented . therefore , the amounts , statistics and tables presented in this section refer only to on-going operations , unless otherwise noted . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenue for 2012 and number of customers from continuing operations as well as an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2012 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operating revenues ( in millions ) $ 639.0</td><td>% ( % ) of total 24.9% ( 24.9 % )</td><td>number of customers 639838</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>estimated population served ( in millions ) 2.5</td><td>% ( % ) of total 21.9% ( 21.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>557.7</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>658153</td><td>20.8% ( 20.8 % )</td><td>2.2</td><td>19.3% ( 19.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>missouri</td><td>279.5</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td><td>455730</td><td>14.4% ( 14.4 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>13.2% ( 13.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>256.4</td><td>10.0% ( 10.0 % )</td><td>308014</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.5% ( 10.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indiana</td><td>198.7</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>289068</td><td>9.2% ( 9.2 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.5% ( 10.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>california</td><td>193.3</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>174188</td><td>5.5% ( 5.5 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>125.0</td><td>4.9% ( 4.9 % )</td><td>172159</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2249.6</td><td>87.7% ( 87.7 % )</td><td>2697150</td><td>85.4% ( 85.4 % )</td><td>9.8</td><td>86.0% ( 86.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>314.8</td><td>12.3% ( 12.3 % )</td><td>461076</td><td>14.6% ( 14.6 % )</td><td>1.6</td><td>14.0% ( 14.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2564.4</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3158226</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>11.4</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois . ( b ) west virginia-american water company , which we refer to as wvawc , and its subsidiary bluefield valley water works company . ( c ) includes data from our operating subsidiaries in the following states : georgia , hawaii , iowa , kentucky , maryland , michigan , new york , tennessee , and virginia . approximately 87.7% ( 87.7 % ) of operating revenue from our regulated businesses in 2012 was generated from approximately 2.7 million customers in our seven largest states , as measured by operating revenues . in fiscal year 2012 , no single customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of our annual operating revenue . overview of networks , facilities and water supply our regulated businesses operate in approximately 1500 communities in 16 states in the united states . our primary operating assets include approximately 80 surface water treatment plants , 500 groundwater treatment plants , 1000 groundwater wells , 100 wastewater treatment facilities , 1200 treated water storage facilities , 1300 pumping stations , 90 dams and 46000 miles of mains and collection pipes . our regulated utilities own substantially all of the assets used by our regulated businesses . we generally own the land and physical assets used to store , extract and treat source water . typically , we do not own the water itself , which is held in public trust and is allocated to us through contracts and allocation rights granted by federal and state agencies or through the ownership of water rights pursuant to local law . maintaining the reliability of our networks is a key activity of our regulated businesses . we have ongoing infrastructure renewal programs in all states in which our regulated businesses operate . these programs consist of both rehabilitation of existing mains and replacement of mains that have reached the end of their useful service lives . our ability to meet the existing and future water demands of our customers depends on an adequate supply of water . drought , governmental restrictions , overuse of sources of water , the protection of threatened species or habitats or other factors may limit the availability of ground and surface water . we employ a variety of measures to ensure that we have adequate sources of water supply , both in the short-term and over the long-term . the geographic diversity of our service areas tends to mitigate some of the economic effect of weather extremes we . Conversations: q0: what was the total operating revenue in the regulated business, in millions of dollars? 2564.4 q1: and how much is that, in dollars? 2564400000.0 Question: what is then, the average operating revenue per customer in that regulated business? Answer:

811.97482

convfinqa1358

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the weighted average fair value of options granted during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was estimated to be $ 7.84 , $ 7.18 and $ 3.84 , respectively , using the black-scholes option pricing model with the assumptions below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free interest rate</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility</td><td>35.6% ( 35.6 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>26.0% ( 26.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected life ( years )</td><td>4.4</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.3</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards is $ 129.3 million and $ 93.5 million , respectively , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.7 years as of both year ends . the company granted a total of 1.5 million restricted stock awards at prices ranging from $ 25.76 to $ 28.15 on various dates in 2010 . these awards vest annually over three years . the company also granted 0.9 million performance restricted stock units during 2010 . these performance restricted stock units have been granted at the maximum achievable level and the number of shares that can vest is based on specific revenue and ebitda goals for periods from 2010 through 2012 . during 2009 , we granted 0.5 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 22.55 that vest annually over 3 years . on october 1 , 2009 , the company granted 0.4 million restricted stock units at a price of $ 24.85 per share that vested over six months . on march 20 , 2008 , we granted 0.4 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 38.75 that were to vest quarterly over 2 years . on july 2 , 2008 , 0.2 million of these shares were canceled and assumed by lps . the remaining unvested restricted shares were converted by the conversion factor of 1.7952 . these awards vested as of october 1 , 2009 , under the change in control provisions due to the metavante acquisition . on october 27 , 2008 , we granted 0.8 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 14.35 that vest annually over 3 years . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , we have approximately 2.2 million and 1.4 million unvested restricted shares remaining . as of december 31 , 2010 we also have 0.6 million of restricted stock units that have not vested . share repurchase plans on october 25 , 2006 , our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to $ 200.0 million worth of our common stock ( the 201cold plan 201d ) . on april 17 , 2008 , our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to an additional $ 250.0 million worth of our common stock ( the 201cnew plan 201d ) . under the new plan we repurchased 5.8 million shares of our stock for $ 226.2 million , at an average price of $ 38.97 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we also repurchased an additional 0.2 million shares of our stock for $ 10.0 million at an average price of $ 40.56 under the old plan . during 2007 , the company repurchased 1.6 million shares at an average price of $ 49.15 under the old plan . on february 4 , 2010 our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to 15.0 million shares of our common stock in the open market , at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions , through january 31 , 2013 . we repurchased 1.4 million shares of our common stock for $ 32.2 million , at an average price of $ 22.97 through march 31 , 2010 . no additional shares were repurchased under this plan during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . approximately 13.6 million shares of our common stock remain available to repurchase under this plan as of december 31 , 2010 . on may 25 , 2010 , our board of directors authorized a leveraged recapitalization plan to repurchase up to $ 2.5 billion of our common stock at a price range of $ 29.00 2014 $ 31.00 per share of common stock through a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer ( the 201ctender offer 201d ) . the tender offer commenced on july 6 , 2010 and expired on august 3 , 2010 . the tender offer was oversubscribed at $ 29.00 , resulting in the purchase of 86.2 million shares , including 6.4 million shares underlying previously unexercised stock options . the repurchased shares were added to treasury stock . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : g26369 pcn : 087000000 ***%%pcmsg|87 |00008|yes|no|03/28/2011 17:32|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| . Conversations: Question: what was the change in the fair value of the options from 2009 to 2010? Answer:

0.66

convfinqa1359

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the weighted average fair value of options granted during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was estimated to be $ 7.84 , $ 7.18 and $ 3.84 , respectively , using the black-scholes option pricing model with the assumptions below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free interest rate</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility</td><td>35.6% ( 35.6 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>26.0% ( 26.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected life ( years )</td><td>4.4</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.3</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards is $ 129.3 million and $ 93.5 million , respectively , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.7 years as of both year ends . the company granted a total of 1.5 million restricted stock awards at prices ranging from $ 25.76 to $ 28.15 on various dates in 2010 . these awards vest annually over three years . the company also granted 0.9 million performance restricted stock units during 2010 . these performance restricted stock units have been granted at the maximum achievable level and the number of shares that can vest is based on specific revenue and ebitda goals for periods from 2010 through 2012 . during 2009 , we granted 0.5 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 22.55 that vest annually over 3 years . on october 1 , 2009 , the company granted 0.4 million restricted stock units at a price of $ 24.85 per share that vested over six months . on march 20 , 2008 , we granted 0.4 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 38.75 that were to vest quarterly over 2 years . on july 2 , 2008 , 0.2 million of these shares were canceled and assumed by lps . the remaining unvested restricted shares were converted by the conversion factor of 1.7952 . these awards vested as of october 1 , 2009 , under the change in control provisions due to the metavante acquisition . on october 27 , 2008 , we granted 0.8 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 14.35 that vest annually over 3 years . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , we have approximately 2.2 million and 1.4 million unvested restricted shares remaining . as of december 31 , 2010 we also have 0.6 million of restricted stock units that have not vested . share repurchase plans on october 25 , 2006 , our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to $ 200.0 million worth of our common stock ( the 201cold plan 201d ) . on april 17 , 2008 , our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to an additional $ 250.0 million worth of our common stock ( the 201cnew plan 201d ) . under the new plan we repurchased 5.8 million shares of our stock for $ 226.2 million , at an average price of $ 38.97 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we also repurchased an additional 0.2 million shares of our stock for $ 10.0 million at an average price of $ 40.56 under the old plan . during 2007 , the company repurchased 1.6 million shares at an average price of $ 49.15 under the old plan . on february 4 , 2010 our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to 15.0 million shares of our common stock in the open market , at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions , through january 31 , 2013 . we repurchased 1.4 million shares of our common stock for $ 32.2 million , at an average price of $ 22.97 through march 31 , 2010 . no additional shares were repurchased under this plan during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . approximately 13.6 million shares of our common stock remain available to repurchase under this plan as of december 31 , 2010 . on may 25 , 2010 , our board of directors authorized a leveraged recapitalization plan to repurchase up to $ 2.5 billion of our common stock at a price range of $ 29.00 2014 $ 31.00 per share of common stock through a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer ( the 201ctender offer 201d ) . the tender offer commenced on july 6 , 2010 and expired on august 3 , 2010 . the tender offer was oversubscribed at $ 29.00 , resulting in the purchase of 86.2 million shares , including 6.4 million shares underlying previously unexercised stock options . the repurchased shares were added to treasury stock . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : g26369 pcn : 087000000 ***%%pcmsg|87 |00008|yes|no|03/28/2011 17:32|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the fair value of the options from 2009 to 2010? 0.66 Question: and what is this change as a percentage of that fair value in 2009? Answer:

0.09192

convfinqa1360

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the weighted average fair value of options granted during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was estimated to be $ 7.84 , $ 7.18 and $ 3.84 , respectively , using the black-scholes option pricing model with the assumptions below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free interest rate</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility</td><td>35.6% ( 35.6 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>26.0% ( 26.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected life ( years )</td><td>4.4</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.3</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards is $ 129.3 million and $ 93.5 million , respectively , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.7 years as of both year ends . the company granted a total of 1.5 million restricted stock awards at prices ranging from $ 25.76 to $ 28.15 on various dates in 2010 . these awards vest annually over three years . the company also granted 0.9 million performance restricted stock units during 2010 . these performance restricted stock units have been granted at the maximum achievable level and the number of shares that can vest is based on specific revenue and ebitda goals for periods from 2010 through 2012 . during 2009 , we granted 0.5 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 22.55 that vest annually over 3 years . on october 1 , 2009 , the company granted 0.4 million restricted stock units at a price of $ 24.85 per share that vested over six months . on march 20 , 2008 , we granted 0.4 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 38.75 that were to vest quarterly over 2 years . on july 2 , 2008 , 0.2 million of these shares were canceled and assumed by lps . the remaining unvested restricted shares were converted by the conversion factor of 1.7952 . these awards vested as of october 1 , 2009 , under the change in control provisions due to the metavante acquisition . on october 27 , 2008 , we granted 0.8 million shares of restricted stock at a price of $ 14.35 that vest annually over 3 years . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , we have approximately 2.2 million and 1.4 million unvested restricted shares remaining . as of december 31 , 2010 we also have 0.6 million of restricted stock units that have not vested . share repurchase plans on october 25 , 2006 , our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to $ 200.0 million worth of our common stock ( the 201cold plan 201d ) . on april 17 , 2008 , our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to an additional $ 250.0 million worth of our common stock ( the 201cnew plan 201d ) . under the new plan we repurchased 5.8 million shares of our stock for $ 226.2 million , at an average price of $ 38.97 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we also repurchased an additional 0.2 million shares of our stock for $ 10.0 million at an average price of $ 40.56 under the old plan . during 2007 , the company repurchased 1.6 million shares at an average price of $ 49.15 under the old plan . on february 4 , 2010 our board of directors approved a plan authorizing repurchases of up to 15.0 million shares of our common stock in the open market , at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions , through january 31 , 2013 . we repurchased 1.4 million shares of our common stock for $ 32.2 million , at an average price of $ 22.97 through march 31 , 2010 . no additional shares were repurchased under this plan during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . approximately 13.6 million shares of our common stock remain available to repurchase under this plan as of december 31 , 2010 . on may 25 , 2010 , our board of directors authorized a leveraged recapitalization plan to repurchase up to $ 2.5 billion of our common stock at a price range of $ 29.00 2014 $ 31.00 per share of common stock through a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer ( the 201ctender offer 201d ) . the tender offer commenced on july 6 , 2010 and expired on august 3 , 2010 . the tender offer was oversubscribed at $ 29.00 , resulting in the purchase of 86.2 million shares , including 6.4 million shares underlying previously unexercised stock options . the repurchased shares were added to treasury stock . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : g26369 pcn : 087000000 ***%%pcmsg|87 |00008|yes|no|03/28/2011 17:32|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| . Conversations: q0: what was the change in the fair value of the options from 2009 to 2010? 0.66 q1: and what is this change as a percentage of that fair value in 2009? 0.09192 Question: and in the last year of that period, for a stock price of $ 22.97, what would be the amount of the dividend per share? Answer:

0.16079

convfinqa1361

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td><td>$ 1356</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>234</td><td>203</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2010 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : consulting services : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . outsourcing services : 2022 benefits outsourcing applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core hr process transactions as well as other complementary services such as absence management , flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy . beginning in late 2008 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace . weak economic conditions globally continued throughout 2010 . the prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate . while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting . Conversations: Question: what was the difference in operating income between 2009 and 2010? Answer:

31.0

convfinqa1362

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td><td>$ 1356</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>234</td><td>203</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2010 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : consulting services : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . outsourcing services : 2022 benefits outsourcing applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core hr process transactions as well as other complementary services such as absence management , flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy . beginning in late 2008 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace . weak economic conditions globally continued throughout 2010 . the prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate . while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting . Conversations: q0: what was the difference in operating income between 2009 and 2010? 31.0 Question: and the growth rate during this time? Answer:

0.15271

convfinqa1363

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stock option gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation plan and earnings on those deferred amounts . as a result of certain provisions of the american jobs creation act , participants had the opportunity until december 31 , 2005 to elect to withdraw amounts previously deferred . 11 . lease commitments the company leases certain of its facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2022 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $ 43 million in fiscal 2007 , $ 45 million in fiscal 2006 and $ 44 million in fiscal 2005 . the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 3 , 2007 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 30774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 25906</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 13267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 5430</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3842</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>$ 12259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91478</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies tentative settlement of the sec 2019s previously announced stock option investigation in the company 2019s 2004 form 10-k filing , the company disclosed that the securities and exchange com- mission ( sec ) had initiated an inquiry into its stock option granting practices , focusing on options that were granted shortly before the issuance of favorable financial results . on november 15 , 2005 , the company announced that it had reached a tentative settlement with the sec . at all times since receiving notice of this inquiry , the company has cooperated with the sec . in november 2005 , the company and its president and ceo , mr . jerald g . fishman , made an offer of settlement to the staff of the sec . the settlement has been submitted to the commission for approval . there can be no assurance a final settlement will be so approved . the sec 2019s inquiry focused on two separate issues . the first issue concerned the company 2019s disclosure regarding grants of options to employees and directors prior to the release of favorable financial results . specifically , the issue related to options granted to employees ( including officers ) of the company on november 30 , 1999 and to employees ( including officers ) and directors of the company on november 10 , 2000 . the second issue concerned the grant dates for options granted to employees ( including officers ) in 1998 and 1999 , and the grant date for options granted to employees ( including officers ) and directors in 2001 . specifically , the settlement would conclude that the appropriate grant date for the september 4 , 1998 options should have been september 8th ( which is one trading day later than the date that was used to price the options ) ; the appropriate grant date for the november 30 , 1999 options should have been november 29th ( which is one trading day earlier than the date that was used ) ; and the appropriate grant date for the july 18 , 2001 options should have been july 26th ( which is five trading days after the original date ) . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Conversations: Question: what was the value of operating leases in 2008? Answer:

30774.0

convfinqa1364

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stock option gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation plan and earnings on those deferred amounts . as a result of certain provisions of the american jobs creation act , participants had the opportunity until december 31 , 2005 to elect to withdraw amounts previously deferred . 11 . lease commitments the company leases certain of its facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2022 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $ 43 million in fiscal 2007 , $ 45 million in fiscal 2006 and $ 44 million in fiscal 2005 . the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 3 , 2007 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 30774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 25906</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 13267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 5430</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3842</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>$ 12259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91478</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies tentative settlement of the sec 2019s previously announced stock option investigation in the company 2019s 2004 form 10-k filing , the company disclosed that the securities and exchange com- mission ( sec ) had initiated an inquiry into its stock option granting practices , focusing on options that were granted shortly before the issuance of favorable financial results . on november 15 , 2005 , the company announced that it had reached a tentative settlement with the sec . at all times since receiving notice of this inquiry , the company has cooperated with the sec . in november 2005 , the company and its president and ceo , mr . jerald g . fishman , made an offer of settlement to the staff of the sec . the settlement has been submitted to the commission for approval . there can be no assurance a final settlement will be so approved . the sec 2019s inquiry focused on two separate issues . the first issue concerned the company 2019s disclosure regarding grants of options to employees and directors prior to the release of favorable financial results . specifically , the issue related to options granted to employees ( including officers ) of the company on november 30 , 1999 and to employees ( including officers ) and directors of the company on november 10 , 2000 . the second issue concerned the grant dates for options granted to employees ( including officers ) in 1998 and 1999 , and the grant date for options granted to employees ( including officers ) and directors in 2001 . specifically , the settlement would conclude that the appropriate grant date for the september 4 , 1998 options should have been september 8th ( which is one trading day later than the date that was used to price the options ) ; the appropriate grant date for the november 30 , 1999 options should have been november 29th ( which is one trading day earlier than the date that was used ) ; and the appropriate grant date for the july 18 , 2001 options should have been july 26th ( which is five trading days after the original date ) . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Conversations: q0: what was the value of operating leases in 2008? 30774.0 Question: what is that divided by 1000? Answer:

30.774

convfinqa1365

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stock option gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation plan and earnings on those deferred amounts . as a result of certain provisions of the american jobs creation act , participants had the opportunity until december 31 , 2005 to elect to withdraw amounts previously deferred . 11 . lease commitments the company leases certain of its facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2022 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $ 43 million in fiscal 2007 , $ 45 million in fiscal 2006 and $ 44 million in fiscal 2005 . the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 3 , 2007 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 30774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 25906</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 13267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 5430</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3842</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>$ 12259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91478</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies tentative settlement of the sec 2019s previously announced stock option investigation in the company 2019s 2004 form 10-k filing , the company disclosed that the securities and exchange com- mission ( sec ) had initiated an inquiry into its stock option granting practices , focusing on options that were granted shortly before the issuance of favorable financial results . on november 15 , 2005 , the company announced that it had reached a tentative settlement with the sec . at all times since receiving notice of this inquiry , the company has cooperated with the sec . in november 2005 , the company and its president and ceo , mr . jerald g . fishman , made an offer of settlement to the staff of the sec . the settlement has been submitted to the commission for approval . there can be no assurance a final settlement will be so approved . the sec 2019s inquiry focused on two separate issues . the first issue concerned the company 2019s disclosure regarding grants of options to employees and directors prior to the release of favorable financial results . specifically , the issue related to options granted to employees ( including officers ) of the company on november 30 , 1999 and to employees ( including officers ) and directors of the company on november 10 , 2000 . the second issue concerned the grant dates for options granted to employees ( including officers ) in 1998 and 1999 , and the grant date for options granted to employees ( including officers ) and directors in 2001 . specifically , the settlement would conclude that the appropriate grant date for the september 4 , 1998 options should have been september 8th ( which is one trading day later than the date that was used to price the options ) ; the appropriate grant date for the november 30 , 1999 options should have been november 29th ( which is one trading day earlier than the date that was used ) ; and the appropriate grant date for the july 18 , 2001 options should have been july 26th ( which is five trading days after the original date ) . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Conversations: q0: what was the value of operating leases in 2008? 30774.0 q1: what is that divided by 1000? 30.774 Question: what is the value of rental expense in 2007? Answer:

43.0

convfinqa1366

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stock option gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation plan and earnings on those deferred amounts . as a result of certain provisions of the american jobs creation act , participants had the opportunity until december 31 , 2005 to elect to withdraw amounts previously deferred . 11 . lease commitments the company leases certain of its facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2022 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $ 43 million in fiscal 2007 , $ 45 million in fiscal 2006 and $ 44 million in fiscal 2005 . the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 3 , 2007 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 30774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 25906</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 13267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 5430</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3842</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>$ 12259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91478</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies tentative settlement of the sec 2019s previously announced stock option investigation in the company 2019s 2004 form 10-k filing , the company disclosed that the securities and exchange com- mission ( sec ) had initiated an inquiry into its stock option granting practices , focusing on options that were granted shortly before the issuance of favorable financial results . on november 15 , 2005 , the company announced that it had reached a tentative settlement with the sec . at all times since receiving notice of this inquiry , the company has cooperated with the sec . in november 2005 , the company and its president and ceo , mr . jerald g . fishman , made an offer of settlement to the staff of the sec . the settlement has been submitted to the commission for approval . there can be no assurance a final settlement will be so approved . the sec 2019s inquiry focused on two separate issues . the first issue concerned the company 2019s disclosure regarding grants of options to employees and directors prior to the release of favorable financial results . specifically , the issue related to options granted to employees ( including officers ) of the company on november 30 , 1999 and to employees ( including officers ) and directors of the company on november 10 , 2000 . the second issue concerned the grant dates for options granted to employees ( including officers ) in 1998 and 1999 , and the grant date for options granted to employees ( including officers ) and directors in 2001 . specifically , the settlement would conclude that the appropriate grant date for the september 4 , 1998 options should have been september 8th ( which is one trading day later than the date that was used to price the options ) ; the appropriate grant date for the november 30 , 1999 options should have been november 29th ( which is one trading day earlier than the date that was used ) ; and the appropriate grant date for the july 18 , 2001 options should have been july 26th ( which is five trading days after the original date ) . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Conversations: q0: what was the value of operating leases in 2008? 30774.0 q1: what is that divided by 1000? 30.774 q2: what is the value of rental expense in 2007? 43.0 Question: what is the simplified operating lease value less the 2007 rental expense? Answer:

-12.226

convfinqa1367

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stock option gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation plan and earnings on those deferred amounts . as a result of certain provisions of the american jobs creation act , participants had the opportunity until december 31 , 2005 to elect to withdraw amounts previously deferred . 11 . lease commitments the company leases certain of its facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2022 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $ 43 million in fiscal 2007 , $ 45 million in fiscal 2006 and $ 44 million in fiscal 2005 . the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 3 , 2007 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 30774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 25906</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 13267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 5430</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3842</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>$ 12259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91478</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies tentative settlement of the sec 2019s previously announced stock option investigation in the company 2019s 2004 form 10-k filing , the company disclosed that the securities and exchange com- mission ( sec ) had initiated an inquiry into its stock option granting practices , focusing on options that were granted shortly before the issuance of favorable financial results . on november 15 , 2005 , the company announced that it had reached a tentative settlement with the sec . at all times since receiving notice of this inquiry , the company has cooperated with the sec . in november 2005 , the company and its president and ceo , mr . jerald g . fishman , made an offer of settlement to the staff of the sec . the settlement has been submitted to the commission for approval . there can be no assurance a final settlement will be so approved . the sec 2019s inquiry focused on two separate issues . the first issue concerned the company 2019s disclosure regarding grants of options to employees and directors prior to the release of favorable financial results . specifically , the issue related to options granted to employees ( including officers ) of the company on november 30 , 1999 and to employees ( including officers ) and directors of the company on november 10 , 2000 . the second issue concerned the grant dates for options granted to employees ( including officers ) in 1998 and 1999 , and the grant date for options granted to employees ( including officers ) and directors in 2001 . specifically , the settlement would conclude that the appropriate grant date for the september 4 , 1998 options should have been september 8th ( which is one trading day later than the date that was used to price the options ) ; the appropriate grant date for the november 30 , 1999 options should have been november 29th ( which is one trading day earlier than the date that was used ) ; and the appropriate grant date for the july 18 , 2001 options should have been july 26th ( which is five trading days after the original date ) . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Conversations: q0: what was the value of operating leases in 2008? 30774.0 q1: what is that divided by 1000? 30.774 q2: what is the value of rental expense in 2007? 43.0 q3: what is the simplified operating lease value less the 2007 rental expense? -12.226 Question: what is the 2007 rental expense? Answer:

43.0

convfinqa1368

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stock option gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation plan and earnings on those deferred amounts . as a result of certain provisions of the american jobs creation act , participants had the opportunity until december 31 , 2005 to elect to withdraw amounts previously deferred . 11 . lease commitments the company leases certain of its facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2022 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $ 43 million in fiscal 2007 , $ 45 million in fiscal 2006 and $ 44 million in fiscal 2005 . the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 3 , 2007 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 30774</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 25906</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 13267</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 5430</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 3842</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>$ 12259</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91478</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies tentative settlement of the sec 2019s previously announced stock option investigation in the company 2019s 2004 form 10-k filing , the company disclosed that the securities and exchange com- mission ( sec ) had initiated an inquiry into its stock option granting practices , focusing on options that were granted shortly before the issuance of favorable financial results . on november 15 , 2005 , the company announced that it had reached a tentative settlement with the sec . at all times since receiving notice of this inquiry , the company has cooperated with the sec . in november 2005 , the company and its president and ceo , mr . jerald g . fishman , made an offer of settlement to the staff of the sec . the settlement has been submitted to the commission for approval . there can be no assurance a final settlement will be so approved . the sec 2019s inquiry focused on two separate issues . the first issue concerned the company 2019s disclosure regarding grants of options to employees and directors prior to the release of favorable financial results . specifically , the issue related to options granted to employees ( including officers ) of the company on november 30 , 1999 and to employees ( including officers ) and directors of the company on november 10 , 2000 . the second issue concerned the grant dates for options granted to employees ( including officers ) in 1998 and 1999 , and the grant date for options granted to employees ( including officers ) and directors in 2001 . specifically , the settlement would conclude that the appropriate grant date for the september 4 , 1998 options should have been september 8th ( which is one trading day later than the date that was used to price the options ) ; the appropriate grant date for the november 30 , 1999 options should have been november 29th ( which is one trading day earlier than the date that was used ) ; and the appropriate grant date for the july 18 , 2001 options should have been july 26th ( which is five trading days after the original date ) . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . Conversations: q0: what was the value of operating leases in 2008? 30774.0 q1: what is that divided by 1000? 30.774 q2: what is the value of rental expense in 2007? 43.0 q3: what is the simplified operating lease value less the 2007 rental expense? -12.226 q4: what is the 2007 rental expense? 43.0 Question: what is the ratio of the net lease value to the 2007 rental expense? Answer:

-0.28433

convfinqa1369

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: conduit assets by asset origin . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in billions )</td><td>2008 amount</td><td>2008 percent of total conduit assets</td><td>2008 amount</td><td>percent of total conduit assets</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 11.09</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td><td>$ 12.14</td><td>42% ( 42 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>australia</td><td>4.30</td><td>17</td><td>6.10</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>great britain</td><td>1.97</td><td>8</td><td>2.93</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>spain</td><td>1.71</td><td>7</td><td>1.90</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>italy</td><td>1.66</td><td>7</td><td>1.86</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>portugal</td><td>0.62</td><td>3</td><td>0.70</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>germany</td><td>0.57</td><td>3</td><td>0.70</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>netherlands</td><td>0.40</td><td>2</td><td>0.55</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>belgium</td><td>0.29</td><td>1</td><td>0.31</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>greece</td><td>0.27</td><td>1</td><td>0.31</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other</td><td>1.01</td><td>5</td><td>1.26</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total conduit assets</td><td>$ 23.89</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 28.76</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> the conduits meet the definition of a vie , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) . we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the conduits , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) , and do not record them in our consolidated financial statements . we hold no direct or indirect ownership interest in the conduits , but we provide subordinated financial support to them through contractual arrangements . standby letters of credit absorb certain actual credit losses from the conduit assets ; our commitment under these letters of credit totaled $ 1.00 billion and $ 1.04 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . liquidity asset purchase agreements provide liquidity to the conduits in the event they cannot place commercial paper in the ordinary course of their business ; these facilities , which require us to purchase assets from the conduits at par , would provide the needed liquidity to repay maturing commercial paper if there was a disruption in the asset-backed commercial paper market . the aggregate commitment under the liquidity asset purchase agreements was approximately $ 23.59 billion and $ 28.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we did not accrue for any losses associated with either our commitment under the standby letters of credit or the liquidity asset purchase agreements in our consolidated statement of condition at december 31 , 2008 or 2007 . during the first quarter of 2008 , pursuant to the contractual terms of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits , we were required to purchase $ 850 million of conduit assets . the purchase was the result of various factors , including the continued illiquidity in the commercial paper markets . the securities were purchased at prices determined in accordance with existing contractual terms in the liquidity asset purchase agreements , and which exceeded their fair value . accordingly , during the first quarter of 2008 , the securities were written down to their fair value through a $ 12 million reduction of processing fees and other revenue in our consolidated statement of income , and are carried at fair value in securities available for sale in our consolidated statement of condition . none of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits were drawn upon during the remainder of 2008 , and no draw-downs on the standby letters of credit occurred during 2008 . the conduits generally sell commercial paper to independent third-party investors . however , we sometimes purchase commercial paper from the conduits . as of december 31 , 2008 , we held an aggregate of approximately $ 230 million of commercial paper issued by the conduits , and $ 2 million at december 31 , 2007 . in addition , approximately $ 5.70 billion of u.s . conduit-issued commercial paper had been sold to the cpff . the cpff is scheduled to expire on october 31 , 2009 . the weighted-average maturity of the conduits 2019 commercial paper in the aggregate was approximately 25 days as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 20 days as of december 31 , 2007 . each of the conduits has issued first-loss notes to independent third parties , which third parties absorb first- dollar losses related to credit risk . aggregate first-loss notes outstanding at december 31 , 2008 for the four conduits totaled $ 67 million , compared to $ 32 million at december 31 , 2007 . actual credit losses of the conduits . Conversations: Question: what is the value of conduit assets in the united states in 2008? Answer:

11.09

convfinqa1370

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: conduit assets by asset origin . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in billions )</td><td>2008 amount</td><td>2008 percent of total conduit assets</td><td>2008 amount</td><td>percent of total conduit assets</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 11.09</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td><td>$ 12.14</td><td>42% ( 42 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>australia</td><td>4.30</td><td>17</td><td>6.10</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>great britain</td><td>1.97</td><td>8</td><td>2.93</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>spain</td><td>1.71</td><td>7</td><td>1.90</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>italy</td><td>1.66</td><td>7</td><td>1.86</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>portugal</td><td>0.62</td><td>3</td><td>0.70</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>germany</td><td>0.57</td><td>3</td><td>0.70</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>netherlands</td><td>0.40</td><td>2</td><td>0.55</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>belgium</td><td>0.29</td><td>1</td><td>0.31</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>greece</td><td>0.27</td><td>1</td><td>0.31</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other</td><td>1.01</td><td>5</td><td>1.26</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total conduit assets</td><td>$ 23.89</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 28.76</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> the conduits meet the definition of a vie , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) . we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the conduits , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) , and do not record them in our consolidated financial statements . we hold no direct or indirect ownership interest in the conduits , but we provide subordinated financial support to them through contractual arrangements . standby letters of credit absorb certain actual credit losses from the conduit assets ; our commitment under these letters of credit totaled $ 1.00 billion and $ 1.04 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . liquidity asset purchase agreements provide liquidity to the conduits in the event they cannot place commercial paper in the ordinary course of their business ; these facilities , which require us to purchase assets from the conduits at par , would provide the needed liquidity to repay maturing commercial paper if there was a disruption in the asset-backed commercial paper market . the aggregate commitment under the liquidity asset purchase agreements was approximately $ 23.59 billion and $ 28.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we did not accrue for any losses associated with either our commitment under the standby letters of credit or the liquidity asset purchase agreements in our consolidated statement of condition at december 31 , 2008 or 2007 . during the first quarter of 2008 , pursuant to the contractual terms of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits , we were required to purchase $ 850 million of conduit assets . the purchase was the result of various factors , including the continued illiquidity in the commercial paper markets . the securities were purchased at prices determined in accordance with existing contractual terms in the liquidity asset purchase agreements , and which exceeded their fair value . accordingly , during the first quarter of 2008 , the securities were written down to their fair value through a $ 12 million reduction of processing fees and other revenue in our consolidated statement of income , and are carried at fair value in securities available for sale in our consolidated statement of condition . none of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits were drawn upon during the remainder of 2008 , and no draw-downs on the standby letters of credit occurred during 2008 . the conduits generally sell commercial paper to independent third-party investors . however , we sometimes purchase commercial paper from the conduits . as of december 31 , 2008 , we held an aggregate of approximately $ 230 million of commercial paper issued by the conduits , and $ 2 million at december 31 , 2007 . in addition , approximately $ 5.70 billion of u.s . conduit-issued commercial paper had been sold to the cpff . the cpff is scheduled to expire on october 31 , 2009 . the weighted-average maturity of the conduits 2019 commercial paper in the aggregate was approximately 25 days as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 20 days as of december 31 , 2007 . each of the conduits has issued first-loss notes to independent third parties , which third parties absorb first- dollar losses related to credit risk . aggregate first-loss notes outstanding at december 31 , 2008 for the four conduits totaled $ 67 million , compared to $ 32 million at december 31 , 2007 . actual credit losses of the conduits . Conversations: q0: what is the value of conduit assets in the united states in 2008? 11.09 Question: what is the value in 2007? Answer:

12.14

convfinqa1371

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: conduit assets by asset origin . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in billions )</td><td>2008 amount</td><td>2008 percent of total conduit assets</td><td>2008 amount</td><td>percent of total conduit assets</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 11.09</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td><td>$ 12.14</td><td>42% ( 42 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>australia</td><td>4.30</td><td>17</td><td>6.10</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>great britain</td><td>1.97</td><td>8</td><td>2.93</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>spain</td><td>1.71</td><td>7</td><td>1.90</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>italy</td><td>1.66</td><td>7</td><td>1.86</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>portugal</td><td>0.62</td><td>3</td><td>0.70</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>germany</td><td>0.57</td><td>3</td><td>0.70</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>netherlands</td><td>0.40</td><td>2</td><td>0.55</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>belgium</td><td>0.29</td><td>1</td><td>0.31</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>greece</td><td>0.27</td><td>1</td><td>0.31</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other</td><td>1.01</td><td>5</td><td>1.26</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total conduit assets</td><td>$ 23.89</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 28.76</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> the conduits meet the definition of a vie , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) . we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the conduits , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) , and do not record them in our consolidated financial statements . we hold no direct or indirect ownership interest in the conduits , but we provide subordinated financial support to them through contractual arrangements . standby letters of credit absorb certain actual credit losses from the conduit assets ; our commitment under these letters of credit totaled $ 1.00 billion and $ 1.04 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . liquidity asset purchase agreements provide liquidity to the conduits in the event they cannot place commercial paper in the ordinary course of their business ; these facilities , which require us to purchase assets from the conduits at par , would provide the needed liquidity to repay maturing commercial paper if there was a disruption in the asset-backed commercial paper market . the aggregate commitment under the liquidity asset purchase agreements was approximately $ 23.59 billion and $ 28.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we did not accrue for any losses associated with either our commitment under the standby letters of credit or the liquidity asset purchase agreements in our consolidated statement of condition at december 31 , 2008 or 2007 . during the first quarter of 2008 , pursuant to the contractual terms of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits , we were required to purchase $ 850 million of conduit assets . the purchase was the result of various factors , including the continued illiquidity in the commercial paper markets . the securities were purchased at prices determined in accordance with existing contractual terms in the liquidity asset purchase agreements , and which exceeded their fair value . accordingly , during the first quarter of 2008 , the securities were written down to their fair value through a $ 12 million reduction of processing fees and other revenue in our consolidated statement of income , and are carried at fair value in securities available for sale in our consolidated statement of condition . none of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits were drawn upon during the remainder of 2008 , and no draw-downs on the standby letters of credit occurred during 2008 . the conduits generally sell commercial paper to independent third-party investors . however , we sometimes purchase commercial paper from the conduits . as of december 31 , 2008 , we held an aggregate of approximately $ 230 million of commercial paper issued by the conduits , and $ 2 million at december 31 , 2007 . in addition , approximately $ 5.70 billion of u.s . conduit-issued commercial paper had been sold to the cpff . the cpff is scheduled to expire on october 31 , 2009 . the weighted-average maturity of the conduits 2019 commercial paper in the aggregate was approximately 25 days as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 20 days as of december 31 , 2007 . each of the conduits has issued first-loss notes to independent third parties , which third parties absorb first- dollar losses related to credit risk . aggregate first-loss notes outstanding at december 31 , 2008 for the four conduits totaled $ 67 million , compared to $ 32 million at december 31 , 2007 . actual credit losses of the conduits . Conversations: q0: what is the value of conduit assets in the united states in 2008? 11.09 q1: what is the value in 2007? 12.14 Question: what is the net change in value? Answer:

-1.05

convfinqa1372

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: conduit assets by asset origin . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in billions )</td><td>2008 amount</td><td>2008 percent of total conduit assets</td><td>2008 amount</td><td>percent of total conduit assets</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 11.09</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td><td>$ 12.14</td><td>42% ( 42 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>australia</td><td>4.30</td><td>17</td><td>6.10</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>great britain</td><td>1.97</td><td>8</td><td>2.93</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>spain</td><td>1.71</td><td>7</td><td>1.90</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>italy</td><td>1.66</td><td>7</td><td>1.86</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>portugal</td><td>0.62</td><td>3</td><td>0.70</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>germany</td><td>0.57</td><td>3</td><td>0.70</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>netherlands</td><td>0.40</td><td>2</td><td>0.55</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>belgium</td><td>0.29</td><td>1</td><td>0.31</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>greece</td><td>0.27</td><td>1</td><td>0.31</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other</td><td>1.01</td><td>5</td><td>1.26</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total conduit assets</td><td>$ 23.89</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 28.76</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> the conduits meet the definition of a vie , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) . we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the conduits , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) , and do not record them in our consolidated financial statements . we hold no direct or indirect ownership interest in the conduits , but we provide subordinated financial support to them through contractual arrangements . standby letters of credit absorb certain actual credit losses from the conduit assets ; our commitment under these letters of credit totaled $ 1.00 billion and $ 1.04 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . liquidity asset purchase agreements provide liquidity to the conduits in the event they cannot place commercial paper in the ordinary course of their business ; these facilities , which require us to purchase assets from the conduits at par , would provide the needed liquidity to repay maturing commercial paper if there was a disruption in the asset-backed commercial paper market . the aggregate commitment under the liquidity asset purchase agreements was approximately $ 23.59 billion and $ 28.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we did not accrue for any losses associated with either our commitment under the standby letters of credit or the liquidity asset purchase agreements in our consolidated statement of condition at december 31 , 2008 or 2007 . during the first quarter of 2008 , pursuant to the contractual terms of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits , we were required to purchase $ 850 million of conduit assets . the purchase was the result of various factors , including the continued illiquidity in the commercial paper markets . the securities were purchased at prices determined in accordance with existing contractual terms in the liquidity asset purchase agreements , and which exceeded their fair value . accordingly , during the first quarter of 2008 , the securities were written down to their fair value through a $ 12 million reduction of processing fees and other revenue in our consolidated statement of income , and are carried at fair value in securities available for sale in our consolidated statement of condition . none of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits were drawn upon during the remainder of 2008 , and no draw-downs on the standby letters of credit occurred during 2008 . the conduits generally sell commercial paper to independent third-party investors . however , we sometimes purchase commercial paper from the conduits . as of december 31 , 2008 , we held an aggregate of approximately $ 230 million of commercial paper issued by the conduits , and $ 2 million at december 31 , 2007 . in addition , approximately $ 5.70 billion of u.s . conduit-issued commercial paper had been sold to the cpff . the cpff is scheduled to expire on october 31 , 2009 . the weighted-average maturity of the conduits 2019 commercial paper in the aggregate was approximately 25 days as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 20 days as of december 31 , 2007 . each of the conduits has issued first-loss notes to independent third parties , which third parties absorb first- dollar losses related to credit risk . aggregate first-loss notes outstanding at december 31 , 2008 for the four conduits totaled $ 67 million , compared to $ 32 million at december 31 , 2007 . actual credit losses of the conduits . Conversations: q0: what is the value of conduit assets in the united states in 2008? 11.09 q1: what is the value in 2007? 12.14 q2: what is the net change in value? -1.05 Question: what is the percent change? Answer:

-0.08649

convfinqa1373

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 45 and $ 36 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 4.1 million , $ 1.7 million and $ 1.4 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expenses for restricted stock of $ 5.7 million , $ 2.7 million , and $ 1.6 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . as of may 31 , 2008 , there was $ 15.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25 thousand or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . for periods prior to october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan was the lower of 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the first day or the last day of the quarterly purchase period . with the quarterly purchase period beginning on october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period ( the 201cpurchase date 201d ) . at may 31 , 2008 , 0.7 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.7 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 8 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . for the quarterly purchases after october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan is based on the 15% ( 15 % ) discount on the purchase date . for purchases prior to october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan was estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes valuation model using the following weighted average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rates</td><td>4.93% ( 4.93 % )</td><td>3.72% ( 3.72 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>37.02% ( 37.02 % )</td><td>26.06% ( 26.06 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yields</td><td>0.19% ( 0.19 % )</td><td>0.34% ( 0.34 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected lives</td><td>3 months</td><td>3 months</td></tr></table> the risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a zero coupon united states treasury security with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option from the date of the grant . our assumption on expected volatility is based on our historical volatility . the dividend yield assumption is calculated using our average stock price over the preceding year and the annualized amount of our current quarterly dividend . since the purchase price for shares under the plan is based on the market value on the first day or last day of the quarterly purchase period , we use an expected life of three months to determine the fair value of each designated share. . Conversations: Question: what was the difference in the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards from 2006 to 2007? Answer:

9.0

convfinqa1374

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 45 and $ 36 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 4.1 million , $ 1.7 million and $ 1.4 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expenses for restricted stock of $ 5.7 million , $ 2.7 million , and $ 1.6 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . as of may 31 , 2008 , there was $ 15.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25 thousand or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . for periods prior to october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan was the lower of 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the first day or the last day of the quarterly purchase period . with the quarterly purchase period beginning on october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period ( the 201cpurchase date 201d ) . at may 31 , 2008 , 0.7 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.7 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 8 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . for the quarterly purchases after october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan is based on the 15% ( 15 % ) discount on the purchase date . for purchases prior to october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan was estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes valuation model using the following weighted average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rates</td><td>4.93% ( 4.93 % )</td><td>3.72% ( 3.72 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>37.02% ( 37.02 % )</td><td>26.06% ( 26.06 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yields</td><td>0.19% ( 0.19 % )</td><td>0.34% ( 0.34 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected lives</td><td>3 months</td><td>3 months</td></tr></table> the risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a zero coupon united states treasury security with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option from the date of the grant . our assumption on expected volatility is based on our historical volatility . the dividend yield assumption is calculated using our average stock price over the preceding year and the annualized amount of our current quarterly dividend . since the purchase price for shares under the plan is based on the market value on the first day or last day of the quarterly purchase period , we use an expected life of three months to determine the fair value of each designated share. . Conversations: q0: what was the difference in the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards from 2006 to 2007? 9.0 Question: what was the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards in 2006? Answer:

36.0

convfinqa1375

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 45 and $ 36 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 4.1 million , $ 1.7 million and $ 1.4 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expenses for restricted stock of $ 5.7 million , $ 2.7 million , and $ 1.6 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . as of may 31 , 2008 , there was $ 15.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25 thousand or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . for periods prior to october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan was the lower of 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the first day or the last day of the quarterly purchase period . with the quarterly purchase period beginning on october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period ( the 201cpurchase date 201d ) . at may 31 , 2008 , 0.7 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.7 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 8 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . for the quarterly purchases after october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan is based on the 15% ( 15 % ) discount on the purchase date . for purchases prior to october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan was estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes valuation model using the following weighted average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rates</td><td>4.93% ( 4.93 % )</td><td>3.72% ( 3.72 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>37.02% ( 37.02 % )</td><td>26.06% ( 26.06 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yields</td><td>0.19% ( 0.19 % )</td><td>0.34% ( 0.34 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected lives</td><td>3 months</td><td>3 months</td></tr></table> the risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a zero coupon united states treasury security with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option from the date of the grant . our assumption on expected volatility is based on our historical volatility . the dividend yield assumption is calculated using our average stock price over the preceding year and the annualized amount of our current quarterly dividend . since the purchase price for shares under the plan is based on the market value on the first day or last day of the quarterly purchase period , we use an expected life of three months to determine the fair value of each designated share. . Conversations: q0: what was the difference in the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards from 2006 to 2007? 9.0 q1: what was the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards in 2006? 36.0 Question: what is the percentage change? Answer:

0.25

convfinqa1376

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during fiscal 2006 , we repurchased 19 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 892 million , of which $ 7 million settled after the end of our fiscal year . in fiscal 2005 , we repurchased 17 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 771 million . a total of 146 million shares were held in treasury at may 28 , 2006 . we also used cash from operations to repay $ 189 million in outstanding debt in fiscal 2006 . in fiscal 2005 , we repaid nearly $ 2.2 billion of debt , including the purchase of $ 760 million principal amount of our 6 percent notes due in 2012 . fiscal 2005 debt repurchase costs were $ 137 million , consisting of $ 73 million of noncash interest rate swap losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehen- sive income , $ 59 million of purchase premium and $ 5 million of noncash unamortized cost of issuance expense . capital structure in millions may 28 , may 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 282006</td><td>may 292005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes payable</td><td>$ 1503</td><td>$ 299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2131</td><td>1638</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>2415</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>6049</td><td>6192</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interests</td><td>1136</td><td>1133</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>5772</td><td>5676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 12957</td><td>$ 13001</td></tr></table> we have $ 2.1 billion of long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months and classified as current , including $ 131 million that may mature in fiscal 2007 based on the put rights of those note holders . we believe that cash flows from operations , together with available short- and long- term debt financing , will be adequate to meet our liquidity and capital needs for at least the next 12 months . on october 28 , 2005 , we repurchased a significant portion of our zero coupon convertible debentures pursuant to put rights of the holders for an aggregate purchase price of $ 1.33 billion , including $ 77 million of accreted original issue discount . these debentures had an aggregate prin- cipal amount at maturity of $ 1.86 billion . we incurred no gain or loss from this repurchase . as of may 28 , 2006 , there were $ 371 million in aggregate principal amount at matu- rity of the debentures outstanding , or $ 268 million of accreted value . we used proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper to fund the purchase price of the deben- tures . we also have reclassified the remaining zero coupon convertible debentures to long-term debt based on the october 2008 put rights of the holders . on march 23 , 2005 , we commenced a cash tender offer for our outstanding 6 percent notes due in 2012 . the tender offer resulted in the purchase of $ 500 million principal amount of the notes . subsequent to the expiration of the tender offer , we purchased an additional $ 260 million prin- cipal amount of the notes in the open market . the aggregate purchases resulted in the debt repurchase costs as discussed above . our minority interests consist of interests in certain of our subsidiaries that are held by third parties . general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) , our subsidiary , holds the manufac- turing assets and intellectual property associated with the production and retail sale of big g ready-to-eat cereals , progresso soups and old el paso products . in may 2002 , one of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 150000 class a preferred membership interests in gmc to an unrelated third-party investor in exchange for $ 150 million , and in october 2004 , another of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 835000 series b-1 preferred membership interests in gmc in exchange for $ 835 million . all interests in gmc , other than the 150000 class a interests and 835000 series b-1 interests , but including all managing member inter- ests , are held by our wholly owned subsidiaries . in fiscal 2003 , general mills capital , inc . ( gm capital ) , a subsidiary formed for the purpose of purchasing and collecting our receivables , sold $ 150 million of its series a preferred stock to an unrelated third-party investor . the class a interests of gmc receive quarterly preferred distributions at a floating rate equal to ( i ) the sum of three- month libor plus 90 basis points , divided by ( ii ) 0.965 . this rate will be adjusted by agreement between the third- party investor holding the class a interests and gmc every five years , beginning in june 2007 . under certain circum- stances , gmc also may be required to be dissolved and liquidated , including , without limitation , the bankruptcy of gmc or its subsidiaries , failure to deliver the preferred distributions , failure to comply with portfolio requirements , breaches of certain covenants , lowering of our senior debt rating below either baa3 by moody 2019s or bbb by standard & poor 2019s , and a failed attempt to remarket the class a inter- ests as a result of a breach of gmc 2019s obligations to assist in such remarketing . in the event of a liquidation of gmc , each member of gmc would receive the amount of its then current capital account balance . the managing member may avoid liquidation in most circumstances by exercising an option to purchase the class a interests . the series b-1 interests of gmc are entitled to receive quarterly preferred distributions at a fixed rate of 4.5 percent per year , which is scheduled to be reset to a new fixed rate through a remarketing in october 2007 . beginning in october 2007 , the managing member of gmc may elect to repurchase the series b-1 interests for an amount equal to the holder 2019s then current capital account balance plus any applicable make-whole amount . gmc is not required to purchase the series b-1 interests nor may these investors put these interests to us . the series b-1 interests will be exchanged for shares of our perpetual preferred stock upon the occurrence of any of the following events : our senior unsecured debt rating falling below either ba3 as rated by moody 2019s or bb- as rated by standard & poor 2019s or fitch , inc. . Conversations: Question: in the year of 2006, what was the amount of the current portion of long-term debt? Answer:

2131.0

convfinqa1377

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during fiscal 2006 , we repurchased 19 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 892 million , of which $ 7 million settled after the end of our fiscal year . in fiscal 2005 , we repurchased 17 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 771 million . a total of 146 million shares were held in treasury at may 28 , 2006 . we also used cash from operations to repay $ 189 million in outstanding debt in fiscal 2006 . in fiscal 2005 , we repaid nearly $ 2.2 billion of debt , including the purchase of $ 760 million principal amount of our 6 percent notes due in 2012 . fiscal 2005 debt repurchase costs were $ 137 million , consisting of $ 73 million of noncash interest rate swap losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehen- sive income , $ 59 million of purchase premium and $ 5 million of noncash unamortized cost of issuance expense . capital structure in millions may 28 , may 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 282006</td><td>may 292005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes payable</td><td>$ 1503</td><td>$ 299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2131</td><td>1638</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>2415</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>6049</td><td>6192</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interests</td><td>1136</td><td>1133</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>5772</td><td>5676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 12957</td><td>$ 13001</td></tr></table> we have $ 2.1 billion of long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months and classified as current , including $ 131 million that may mature in fiscal 2007 based on the put rights of those note holders . we believe that cash flows from operations , together with available short- and long- term debt financing , will be adequate to meet our liquidity and capital needs for at least the next 12 months . on october 28 , 2005 , we repurchased a significant portion of our zero coupon convertible debentures pursuant to put rights of the holders for an aggregate purchase price of $ 1.33 billion , including $ 77 million of accreted original issue discount . these debentures had an aggregate prin- cipal amount at maturity of $ 1.86 billion . we incurred no gain or loss from this repurchase . as of may 28 , 2006 , there were $ 371 million in aggregate principal amount at matu- rity of the debentures outstanding , or $ 268 million of accreted value . we used proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper to fund the purchase price of the deben- tures . we also have reclassified the remaining zero coupon convertible debentures to long-term debt based on the october 2008 put rights of the holders . on march 23 , 2005 , we commenced a cash tender offer for our outstanding 6 percent notes due in 2012 . the tender offer resulted in the purchase of $ 500 million principal amount of the notes . subsequent to the expiration of the tender offer , we purchased an additional $ 260 million prin- cipal amount of the notes in the open market . the aggregate purchases resulted in the debt repurchase costs as discussed above . our minority interests consist of interests in certain of our subsidiaries that are held by third parties . general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) , our subsidiary , holds the manufac- turing assets and intellectual property associated with the production and retail sale of big g ready-to-eat cereals , progresso soups and old el paso products . in may 2002 , one of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 150000 class a preferred membership interests in gmc to an unrelated third-party investor in exchange for $ 150 million , and in october 2004 , another of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 835000 series b-1 preferred membership interests in gmc in exchange for $ 835 million . all interests in gmc , other than the 150000 class a interests and 835000 series b-1 interests , but including all managing member inter- ests , are held by our wholly owned subsidiaries . in fiscal 2003 , general mills capital , inc . ( gm capital ) , a subsidiary formed for the purpose of purchasing and collecting our receivables , sold $ 150 million of its series a preferred stock to an unrelated third-party investor . the class a interests of gmc receive quarterly preferred distributions at a floating rate equal to ( i ) the sum of three- month libor plus 90 basis points , divided by ( ii ) 0.965 . this rate will be adjusted by agreement between the third- party investor holding the class a interests and gmc every five years , beginning in june 2007 . under certain circum- stances , gmc also may be required to be dissolved and liquidated , including , without limitation , the bankruptcy of gmc or its subsidiaries , failure to deliver the preferred distributions , failure to comply with portfolio requirements , breaches of certain covenants , lowering of our senior debt rating below either baa3 by moody 2019s or bbb by standard & poor 2019s , and a failed attempt to remarket the class a inter- ests as a result of a breach of gmc 2019s obligations to assist in such remarketing . in the event of a liquidation of gmc , each member of gmc would receive the amount of its then current capital account balance . the managing member may avoid liquidation in most circumstances by exercising an option to purchase the class a interests . the series b-1 interests of gmc are entitled to receive quarterly preferred distributions at a fixed rate of 4.5 percent per year , which is scheduled to be reset to a new fixed rate through a remarketing in october 2007 . beginning in october 2007 , the managing member of gmc may elect to repurchase the series b-1 interests for an amount equal to the holder 2019s then current capital account balance plus any applicable make-whole amount . gmc is not required to purchase the series b-1 interests nor may these investors put these interests to us . the series b-1 interests will be exchanged for shares of our perpetual preferred stock upon the occurrence of any of the following events : our senior unsecured debt rating falling below either ba3 as rated by moody 2019s or bb- as rated by standard & poor 2019s or fitch , inc. . Conversations: q0: in the year of 2006, what was the amount of the current portion of long-term debt? 2131.0 Question: and what was the total capital structure of total debt? Answer:

6049.0

convfinqa1378

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during fiscal 2006 , we repurchased 19 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 892 million , of which $ 7 million settled after the end of our fiscal year . in fiscal 2005 , we repurchased 17 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 771 million . a total of 146 million shares were held in treasury at may 28 , 2006 . we also used cash from operations to repay $ 189 million in outstanding debt in fiscal 2006 . in fiscal 2005 , we repaid nearly $ 2.2 billion of debt , including the purchase of $ 760 million principal amount of our 6 percent notes due in 2012 . fiscal 2005 debt repurchase costs were $ 137 million , consisting of $ 73 million of noncash interest rate swap losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehen- sive income , $ 59 million of purchase premium and $ 5 million of noncash unamortized cost of issuance expense . capital structure in millions may 28 , may 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 282006</td><td>may 292005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes payable</td><td>$ 1503</td><td>$ 299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2131</td><td>1638</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>2415</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>6049</td><td>6192</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interests</td><td>1136</td><td>1133</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>5772</td><td>5676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 12957</td><td>$ 13001</td></tr></table> we have $ 2.1 billion of long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months and classified as current , including $ 131 million that may mature in fiscal 2007 based on the put rights of those note holders . we believe that cash flows from operations , together with available short- and long- term debt financing , will be adequate to meet our liquidity and capital needs for at least the next 12 months . on october 28 , 2005 , we repurchased a significant portion of our zero coupon convertible debentures pursuant to put rights of the holders for an aggregate purchase price of $ 1.33 billion , including $ 77 million of accreted original issue discount . these debentures had an aggregate prin- cipal amount at maturity of $ 1.86 billion . we incurred no gain or loss from this repurchase . as of may 28 , 2006 , there were $ 371 million in aggregate principal amount at matu- rity of the debentures outstanding , or $ 268 million of accreted value . we used proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper to fund the purchase price of the deben- tures . we also have reclassified the remaining zero coupon convertible debentures to long-term debt based on the october 2008 put rights of the holders . on march 23 , 2005 , we commenced a cash tender offer for our outstanding 6 percent notes due in 2012 . the tender offer resulted in the purchase of $ 500 million principal amount of the notes . subsequent to the expiration of the tender offer , we purchased an additional $ 260 million prin- cipal amount of the notes in the open market . the aggregate purchases resulted in the debt repurchase costs as discussed above . our minority interests consist of interests in certain of our subsidiaries that are held by third parties . general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) , our subsidiary , holds the manufac- turing assets and intellectual property associated with the production and retail sale of big g ready-to-eat cereals , progresso soups and old el paso products . in may 2002 , one of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 150000 class a preferred membership interests in gmc to an unrelated third-party investor in exchange for $ 150 million , and in october 2004 , another of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 835000 series b-1 preferred membership interests in gmc in exchange for $ 835 million . all interests in gmc , other than the 150000 class a interests and 835000 series b-1 interests , but including all managing member inter- ests , are held by our wholly owned subsidiaries . in fiscal 2003 , general mills capital , inc . ( gm capital ) , a subsidiary formed for the purpose of purchasing and collecting our receivables , sold $ 150 million of its series a preferred stock to an unrelated third-party investor . the class a interests of gmc receive quarterly preferred distributions at a floating rate equal to ( i ) the sum of three- month libor plus 90 basis points , divided by ( ii ) 0.965 . this rate will be adjusted by agreement between the third- party investor holding the class a interests and gmc every five years , beginning in june 2007 . under certain circum- stances , gmc also may be required to be dissolved and liquidated , including , without limitation , the bankruptcy of gmc or its subsidiaries , failure to deliver the preferred distributions , failure to comply with portfolio requirements , breaches of certain covenants , lowering of our senior debt rating below either baa3 by moody 2019s or bbb by standard & poor 2019s , and a failed attempt to remarket the class a inter- ests as a result of a breach of gmc 2019s obligations to assist in such remarketing . in the event of a liquidation of gmc , each member of gmc would receive the amount of its then current capital account balance . the managing member may avoid liquidation in most circumstances by exercising an option to purchase the class a interests . the series b-1 interests of gmc are entitled to receive quarterly preferred distributions at a fixed rate of 4.5 percent per year , which is scheduled to be reset to a new fixed rate through a remarketing in october 2007 . beginning in october 2007 , the managing member of gmc may elect to repurchase the series b-1 interests for an amount equal to the holder 2019s then current capital account balance plus any applicable make-whole amount . gmc is not required to purchase the series b-1 interests nor may these investors put these interests to us . the series b-1 interests will be exchanged for shares of our perpetual preferred stock upon the occurrence of any of the following events : our senior unsecured debt rating falling below either ba3 as rated by moody 2019s or bb- as rated by standard & poor 2019s or fitch , inc. . Conversations: q0: in the year of 2006, what was the amount of the current portion of long-term debt? 2131.0 q1: and what was the total capital structure of total debt? 6049.0 Question: what percentage, then, of the total structure did that amount represent? Answer:

0.35229

convfinqa1379

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during fiscal 2006 , we repurchased 19 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 892 million , of which $ 7 million settled after the end of our fiscal year . in fiscal 2005 , we repurchased 17 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 771 million . a total of 146 million shares were held in treasury at may 28 , 2006 . we also used cash from operations to repay $ 189 million in outstanding debt in fiscal 2006 . in fiscal 2005 , we repaid nearly $ 2.2 billion of debt , including the purchase of $ 760 million principal amount of our 6 percent notes due in 2012 . fiscal 2005 debt repurchase costs were $ 137 million , consisting of $ 73 million of noncash interest rate swap losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehen- sive income , $ 59 million of purchase premium and $ 5 million of noncash unamortized cost of issuance expense . capital structure in millions may 28 , may 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 282006</td><td>may 292005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes payable</td><td>$ 1503</td><td>$ 299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2131</td><td>1638</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>2415</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>6049</td><td>6192</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interests</td><td>1136</td><td>1133</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>5772</td><td>5676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 12957</td><td>$ 13001</td></tr></table> we have $ 2.1 billion of long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months and classified as current , including $ 131 million that may mature in fiscal 2007 based on the put rights of those note holders . we believe that cash flows from operations , together with available short- and long- term debt financing , will be adequate to meet our liquidity and capital needs for at least the next 12 months . on october 28 , 2005 , we repurchased a significant portion of our zero coupon convertible debentures pursuant to put rights of the holders for an aggregate purchase price of $ 1.33 billion , including $ 77 million of accreted original issue discount . these debentures had an aggregate prin- cipal amount at maturity of $ 1.86 billion . we incurred no gain or loss from this repurchase . as of may 28 , 2006 , there were $ 371 million in aggregate principal amount at matu- rity of the debentures outstanding , or $ 268 million of accreted value . we used proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper to fund the purchase price of the deben- tures . we also have reclassified the remaining zero coupon convertible debentures to long-term debt based on the october 2008 put rights of the holders . on march 23 , 2005 , we commenced a cash tender offer for our outstanding 6 percent notes due in 2012 . the tender offer resulted in the purchase of $ 500 million principal amount of the notes . subsequent to the expiration of the tender offer , we purchased an additional $ 260 million prin- cipal amount of the notes in the open market . the aggregate purchases resulted in the debt repurchase costs as discussed above . our minority interests consist of interests in certain of our subsidiaries that are held by third parties . general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) , our subsidiary , holds the manufac- turing assets and intellectual property associated with the production and retail sale of big g ready-to-eat cereals , progresso soups and old el paso products . in may 2002 , one of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 150000 class a preferred membership interests in gmc to an unrelated third-party investor in exchange for $ 150 million , and in october 2004 , another of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 835000 series b-1 preferred membership interests in gmc in exchange for $ 835 million . all interests in gmc , other than the 150000 class a interests and 835000 series b-1 interests , but including all managing member inter- ests , are held by our wholly owned subsidiaries . in fiscal 2003 , general mills capital , inc . ( gm capital ) , a subsidiary formed for the purpose of purchasing and collecting our receivables , sold $ 150 million of its series a preferred stock to an unrelated third-party investor . the class a interests of gmc receive quarterly preferred distributions at a floating rate equal to ( i ) the sum of three- month libor plus 90 basis points , divided by ( ii ) 0.965 . this rate will be adjusted by agreement between the third- party investor holding the class a interests and gmc every five years , beginning in june 2007 . under certain circum- stances , gmc also may be required to be dissolved and liquidated , including , without limitation , the bankruptcy of gmc or its subsidiaries , failure to deliver the preferred distributions , failure to comply with portfolio requirements , breaches of certain covenants , lowering of our senior debt rating below either baa3 by moody 2019s or bbb by standard & poor 2019s , and a failed attempt to remarket the class a inter- ests as a result of a breach of gmc 2019s obligations to assist in such remarketing . in the event of a liquidation of gmc , each member of gmc would receive the amount of its then current capital account balance . the managing member may avoid liquidation in most circumstances by exercising an option to purchase the class a interests . the series b-1 interests of gmc are entitled to receive quarterly preferred distributions at a fixed rate of 4.5 percent per year , which is scheduled to be reset to a new fixed rate through a remarketing in october 2007 . beginning in october 2007 , the managing member of gmc may elect to repurchase the series b-1 interests for an amount equal to the holder 2019s then current capital account balance plus any applicable make-whole amount . gmc is not required to purchase the series b-1 interests nor may these investors put these interests to us . the series b-1 interests will be exchanged for shares of our perpetual preferred stock upon the occurrence of any of the following events : our senior unsecured debt rating falling below either ba3 as rated by moody 2019s or bb- as rated by standard & poor 2019s or fitch , inc. . Conversations: q0: in the year of 2006, what was the amount of the current portion of long-term debt? 2131.0 q1: and what was the total capital structure of total debt? 6049.0 q2: what percentage, then, of the total structure did that amount represent? 0.35229 Question: and in the year before, what was the aggregate purchase price of the repurchased shares of common stock? Answer:

771.0

convfinqa1380

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during fiscal 2006 , we repurchased 19 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 892 million , of which $ 7 million settled after the end of our fiscal year . in fiscal 2005 , we repurchased 17 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 771 million . a total of 146 million shares were held in treasury at may 28 , 2006 . we also used cash from operations to repay $ 189 million in outstanding debt in fiscal 2006 . in fiscal 2005 , we repaid nearly $ 2.2 billion of debt , including the purchase of $ 760 million principal amount of our 6 percent notes due in 2012 . fiscal 2005 debt repurchase costs were $ 137 million , consisting of $ 73 million of noncash interest rate swap losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehen- sive income , $ 59 million of purchase premium and $ 5 million of noncash unamortized cost of issuance expense . capital structure in millions may 28 , may 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 282006</td><td>may 292005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes payable</td><td>$ 1503</td><td>$ 299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2131</td><td>1638</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>2415</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>6049</td><td>6192</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interests</td><td>1136</td><td>1133</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>5772</td><td>5676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 12957</td><td>$ 13001</td></tr></table> we have $ 2.1 billion of long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months and classified as current , including $ 131 million that may mature in fiscal 2007 based on the put rights of those note holders . we believe that cash flows from operations , together with available short- and long- term debt financing , will be adequate to meet our liquidity and capital needs for at least the next 12 months . on october 28 , 2005 , we repurchased a significant portion of our zero coupon convertible debentures pursuant to put rights of the holders for an aggregate purchase price of $ 1.33 billion , including $ 77 million of accreted original issue discount . these debentures had an aggregate prin- cipal amount at maturity of $ 1.86 billion . we incurred no gain or loss from this repurchase . as of may 28 , 2006 , there were $ 371 million in aggregate principal amount at matu- rity of the debentures outstanding , or $ 268 million of accreted value . we used proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper to fund the purchase price of the deben- tures . we also have reclassified the remaining zero coupon convertible debentures to long-term debt based on the october 2008 put rights of the holders . on march 23 , 2005 , we commenced a cash tender offer for our outstanding 6 percent notes due in 2012 . the tender offer resulted in the purchase of $ 500 million principal amount of the notes . subsequent to the expiration of the tender offer , we purchased an additional $ 260 million prin- cipal amount of the notes in the open market . the aggregate purchases resulted in the debt repurchase costs as discussed above . our minority interests consist of interests in certain of our subsidiaries that are held by third parties . general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) , our subsidiary , holds the manufac- turing assets and intellectual property associated with the production and retail sale of big g ready-to-eat cereals , progresso soups and old el paso products . in may 2002 , one of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 150000 class a preferred membership interests in gmc to an unrelated third-party investor in exchange for $ 150 million , and in october 2004 , another of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 835000 series b-1 preferred membership interests in gmc in exchange for $ 835 million . all interests in gmc , other than the 150000 class a interests and 835000 series b-1 interests , but including all managing member inter- ests , are held by our wholly owned subsidiaries . in fiscal 2003 , general mills capital , inc . ( gm capital ) , a subsidiary formed for the purpose of purchasing and collecting our receivables , sold $ 150 million of its series a preferred stock to an unrelated third-party investor . the class a interests of gmc receive quarterly preferred distributions at a floating rate equal to ( i ) the sum of three- month libor plus 90 basis points , divided by ( ii ) 0.965 . this rate will be adjusted by agreement between the third- party investor holding the class a interests and gmc every five years , beginning in june 2007 . under certain circum- stances , gmc also may be required to be dissolved and liquidated , including , without limitation , the bankruptcy of gmc or its subsidiaries , failure to deliver the preferred distributions , failure to comply with portfolio requirements , breaches of certain covenants , lowering of our senior debt rating below either baa3 by moody 2019s or bbb by standard & poor 2019s , and a failed attempt to remarket the class a inter- ests as a result of a breach of gmc 2019s obligations to assist in such remarketing . in the event of a liquidation of gmc , each member of gmc would receive the amount of its then current capital account balance . the managing member may avoid liquidation in most circumstances by exercising an option to purchase the class a interests . the series b-1 interests of gmc are entitled to receive quarterly preferred distributions at a fixed rate of 4.5 percent per year , which is scheduled to be reset to a new fixed rate through a remarketing in october 2007 . beginning in october 2007 , the managing member of gmc may elect to repurchase the series b-1 interests for an amount equal to the holder 2019s then current capital account balance plus any applicable make-whole amount . gmc is not required to purchase the series b-1 interests nor may these investors put these interests to us . the series b-1 interests will be exchanged for shares of our perpetual preferred stock upon the occurrence of any of the following events : our senior unsecured debt rating falling below either ba3 as rated by moody 2019s or bb- as rated by standard & poor 2019s or fitch , inc. . Conversations: q0: in the year of 2006, what was the amount of the current portion of long-term debt? 2131.0 q1: and what was the total capital structure of total debt? 6049.0 q2: what percentage, then, of the total structure did that amount represent? 0.35229 q3: and in the year before, what was the aggregate purchase price of the repurchased shares of common stock? 771.0 Question: what was the individual price of each of those shares? Answer:

17.0

convfinqa1381

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during fiscal 2006 , we repurchased 19 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 892 million , of which $ 7 million settled after the end of our fiscal year . in fiscal 2005 , we repurchased 17 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 771 million . a total of 146 million shares were held in treasury at may 28 , 2006 . we also used cash from operations to repay $ 189 million in outstanding debt in fiscal 2006 . in fiscal 2005 , we repaid nearly $ 2.2 billion of debt , including the purchase of $ 760 million principal amount of our 6 percent notes due in 2012 . fiscal 2005 debt repurchase costs were $ 137 million , consisting of $ 73 million of noncash interest rate swap losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehen- sive income , $ 59 million of purchase premium and $ 5 million of noncash unamortized cost of issuance expense . capital structure in millions may 28 , may 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 282006</td><td>may 292005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes payable</td><td>$ 1503</td><td>$ 299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2131</td><td>1638</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>2415</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>6049</td><td>6192</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interests</td><td>1136</td><td>1133</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>5772</td><td>5676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 12957</td><td>$ 13001</td></tr></table> we have $ 2.1 billion of long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months and classified as current , including $ 131 million that may mature in fiscal 2007 based on the put rights of those note holders . we believe that cash flows from operations , together with available short- and long- term debt financing , will be adequate to meet our liquidity and capital needs for at least the next 12 months . on october 28 , 2005 , we repurchased a significant portion of our zero coupon convertible debentures pursuant to put rights of the holders for an aggregate purchase price of $ 1.33 billion , including $ 77 million of accreted original issue discount . these debentures had an aggregate prin- cipal amount at maturity of $ 1.86 billion . we incurred no gain or loss from this repurchase . as of may 28 , 2006 , there were $ 371 million in aggregate principal amount at matu- rity of the debentures outstanding , or $ 268 million of accreted value . we used proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper to fund the purchase price of the deben- tures . we also have reclassified the remaining zero coupon convertible debentures to long-term debt based on the october 2008 put rights of the holders . on march 23 , 2005 , we commenced a cash tender offer for our outstanding 6 percent notes due in 2012 . the tender offer resulted in the purchase of $ 500 million principal amount of the notes . subsequent to the expiration of the tender offer , we purchased an additional $ 260 million prin- cipal amount of the notes in the open market . the aggregate purchases resulted in the debt repurchase costs as discussed above . our minority interests consist of interests in certain of our subsidiaries that are held by third parties . general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) , our subsidiary , holds the manufac- turing assets and intellectual property associated with the production and retail sale of big g ready-to-eat cereals , progresso soups and old el paso products . in may 2002 , one of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 150000 class a preferred membership interests in gmc to an unrelated third-party investor in exchange for $ 150 million , and in october 2004 , another of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 835000 series b-1 preferred membership interests in gmc in exchange for $ 835 million . all interests in gmc , other than the 150000 class a interests and 835000 series b-1 interests , but including all managing member inter- ests , are held by our wholly owned subsidiaries . in fiscal 2003 , general mills capital , inc . ( gm capital ) , a subsidiary formed for the purpose of purchasing and collecting our receivables , sold $ 150 million of its series a preferred stock to an unrelated third-party investor . the class a interests of gmc receive quarterly preferred distributions at a floating rate equal to ( i ) the sum of three- month libor plus 90 basis points , divided by ( ii ) 0.965 . this rate will be adjusted by agreement between the third- party investor holding the class a interests and gmc every five years , beginning in june 2007 . under certain circum- stances , gmc also may be required to be dissolved and liquidated , including , without limitation , the bankruptcy of gmc or its subsidiaries , failure to deliver the preferred distributions , failure to comply with portfolio requirements , breaches of certain covenants , lowering of our senior debt rating below either baa3 by moody 2019s or bbb by standard & poor 2019s , and a failed attempt to remarket the class a inter- ests as a result of a breach of gmc 2019s obligations to assist in such remarketing . in the event of a liquidation of gmc , each member of gmc would receive the amount of its then current capital account balance . the managing member may avoid liquidation in most circumstances by exercising an option to purchase the class a interests . the series b-1 interests of gmc are entitled to receive quarterly preferred distributions at a fixed rate of 4.5 percent per year , which is scheduled to be reset to a new fixed rate through a remarketing in october 2007 . beginning in october 2007 , the managing member of gmc may elect to repurchase the series b-1 interests for an amount equal to the holder 2019s then current capital account balance plus any applicable make-whole amount . gmc is not required to purchase the series b-1 interests nor may these investors put these interests to us . the series b-1 interests will be exchanged for shares of our perpetual preferred stock upon the occurrence of any of the following events : our senior unsecured debt rating falling below either ba3 as rated by moody 2019s or bb- as rated by standard & poor 2019s or fitch , inc. . Conversations: q0: in the year of 2006, what was the amount of the current portion of long-term debt? 2131.0 q1: and what was the total capital structure of total debt? 6049.0 q2: what percentage, then, of the total structure did that amount represent? 0.35229 q3: and in the year before, what was the aggregate purchase price of the repurchased shares of common stock? 771.0 q4: what was the individual price of each of those shares? 17.0 Question: what, then, can be concluded to have been the total number of those shares in 2005? Answer:

45.35294

convfinqa1382

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: to determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2011</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>465</td><td>60.70</td><td>1534</td><td>60.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>64.21</td><td>-831 ( 831 )</td><td>45.47</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>60.27</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>60.51</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>1119</td><td>$ 61.14</td><td>3061</td><td>$ 60.04</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 . Conversations: Question: what was the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012? Answer:

60.68

convfinqa1383

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: to determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2011</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>465</td><td>60.70</td><td>1534</td><td>60.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>64.21</td><td>-831 ( 831 )</td><td>45.47</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>60.27</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>60.51</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>1119</td><td>$ 61.14</td><td>3061</td><td>$ 60.04</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 . Conversations: q0: what was the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012? 60.68 Question: and what was it for 2011? Answer:

63.25

convfinqa1384

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: to determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2011</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>465</td><td>60.70</td><td>1534</td><td>60.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>64.21</td><td>-831 ( 831 )</td><td>45.47</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>60.27</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>60.51</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>1119</td><td>$ 61.14</td><td>3061</td><td>$ 60.04</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 . Conversations: q0: what was the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012? 60.68 q1: and what was it for 2011? 63.25 Question: what was, then, the total of that fair value for both years combined? Answer:

123.93

convfinqa1385

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: to determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2011</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>465</td><td>60.70</td><td>1534</td><td>60.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>64.21</td><td>-831 ( 831 )</td><td>45.47</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>60.27</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>60.51</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>1119</td><td>$ 61.14</td><td>3061</td><td>$ 60.04</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 . Conversations: q0: what was the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012? 60.68 q1: and what was it for 2011? 63.25 q2: what was, then, the total of that fair value for both years combined? 123.93 Question: what was the the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2010? Answer:

54.59

convfinqa1386

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: to determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2011</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>465</td><td>60.70</td><td>1534</td><td>60.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>64.21</td><td>-831 ( 831 )</td><td>45.47</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>60.27</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>60.51</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>1119</td><td>$ 61.14</td><td>3061</td><td>$ 60.04</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 . Conversations: q0: what was the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012? 60.68 q1: and what was it for 2011? 63.25 q2: what was, then, the total of that fair value for both years combined? 123.93 q3: what was the the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2010? 54.59 Question: including, then, 2010, what then becomes that total of that fair value for the three years? Answer:

178.52

convfinqa1387

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: to determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2011</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>465</td><td>60.70</td><td>1534</td><td>60.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>64.21</td><td>-831 ( 831 )</td><td>45.47</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>60.27</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>60.51</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>1119</td><td>$ 61.14</td><td>3061</td><td>$ 60.04</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 . Conversations: q0: what was the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012? 60.68 q1: and what was it for 2011? 63.25 q2: what was, then, the total of that fair value for both years combined? 123.93 q3: what was the the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2010? 54.59 q4: including, then, 2010, what then becomes that total of that fair value for the three years? 178.52 Question: and what is the average of this fair value between those three years? Answer:

59.50667

convfinqa1388

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . we made no further grants under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . we will make no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option plan . the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 14.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015 ( in thousands )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 30809</td><td>$ 21056</td><td>$ 29793</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ 9879</td><td>$ 6907</td><td>$ 7126</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 and thereafter either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . the performance units granted to certain executives in fiscal 2014 were based on a one-year performance period . after the compensation committee certified the performance results , 25% ( 25 % ) of the performance units converted to unrestricted shares . the remaining 75% ( 75 % ) converted to restricted shares that vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the conversion date . the performance units granted to certain executives during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 were based on a three-year performance period . after the compensation committee certifies the performance results for the three-year period , performance units earned will convert into unrestricted common stock . the compensation committee may set a range of possible performance-based outcomes for performance units . depending on the achievement of the performance measures , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . for awards with only performance conditions , we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the performance period using the grant date fair value of the award , which is based on the number of shares expected to be earned according to the level of achievement of performance goals . if the number of shares expected to be earned were to change at any time during the performance period , we would make a cumulative adjustment to share-based compensation expense based on the revised number of shares expected to be earned . global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report 2013 83 . Conversations: Question: in 2016, how much did the income tax benefit represent in relation to the share-based compensation expense? Answer:

0.32065

convfinqa1389

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . we made no further grants under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . we will make no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option plan . the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 14.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015 ( in thousands )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 30809</td><td>$ 21056</td><td>$ 29793</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ 9879</td><td>$ 6907</td><td>$ 7126</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 and thereafter either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . the performance units granted to certain executives in fiscal 2014 were based on a one-year performance period . after the compensation committee certified the performance results , 25% ( 25 % ) of the performance units converted to unrestricted shares . the remaining 75% ( 75 % ) converted to restricted shares that vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the conversion date . the performance units granted to certain executives during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 were based on a three-year performance period . after the compensation committee certifies the performance results for the three-year period , performance units earned will convert into unrestricted common stock . the compensation committee may set a range of possible performance-based outcomes for performance units . depending on the achievement of the performance measures , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . for awards with only performance conditions , we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the performance period using the grant date fair value of the award , which is based on the number of shares expected to be earned according to the level of achievement of performance goals . if the number of shares expected to be earned were to change at any time during the performance period , we would make a cumulative adjustment to share-based compensation expense based on the revised number of shares expected to be earned . global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report 2013 83 . Conversations: q0: in 2016, how much did the income tax benefit represent in relation to the share-based compensation expense? 0.32065 Question: and what was the change in that income tax benefit since 2014? Answer:

2753.0

convfinqa1390

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . we made no further grants under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . we will make no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option plan . the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 14.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for our share-based awards and stock options ( in thousands ) : 2016 2015 2014 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015 ( in thousands )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 30809</td><td>$ 21056</td><td>$ 29793</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ 9879</td><td>$ 6907</td><td>$ 7126</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 and thereafter either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . the performance units granted to certain executives in fiscal 2014 were based on a one-year performance period . after the compensation committee certified the performance results , 25% ( 25 % ) of the performance units converted to unrestricted shares . the remaining 75% ( 75 % ) converted to restricted shares that vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the conversion date . the performance units granted to certain executives during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 were based on a three-year performance period . after the compensation committee certifies the performance results for the three-year period , performance units earned will convert into unrestricted common stock . the compensation committee may set a range of possible performance-based outcomes for performance units . depending on the achievement of the performance measures , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . for awards with only performance conditions , we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the performance period using the grant date fair value of the award , which is based on the number of shares expected to be earned according to the level of achievement of performance goals . if the number of shares expected to be earned were to change at any time during the performance period , we would make a cumulative adjustment to share-based compensation expense based on the revised number of shares expected to be earned . global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report 2013 83 . Conversations: q0: in 2016, how much did the income tax benefit represent in relation to the share-based compensation expense? 0.32065 q1: and what was the change in that income tax benefit since 2014? 2753.0 Question: what is this change as a percentage of that benefit in 2014? Answer:

0.38633

convfinqa1391

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: information about stock options at december 31 , 2007 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2007shares in thousandsrange of exercise prices</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>options outstanding weighted- averageexercise price</td><td>options outstanding weighted-average remaining contractual life ( in years )</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 37.43 2013 $ 46.99</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td><td>4.0</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>47.00 2013 56.99</td><td>3634</td><td>53.43</td><td>5.4</td><td>3022</td><td>53.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>57.00 2013 66.99</td><td>3255</td><td>60.32</td><td>5.2</td><td>2569</td><td>58.96</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>67.00 2013 76.23</td><td>5993</td><td>73.03</td><td>5.5</td><td>3461</td><td>73.45</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>14326</td><td>$ 62.15</td><td>5.3</td><td>10496</td><td>$ 59.95</td></tr></table> ( a ) the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 4.2 years . at december 31 , 2007 , there were approximately 13788000 options in total that were vested and are expected to vest . the weighted-average exercise price of such options was $ 62.07 per share , the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 5.2 years , and the aggregate intrinsic value at december 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 92 million . stock options granted in 2005 include options for 30000 shares that were granted to non-employee directors that year . no such options were granted in 2006 or 2007 . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2007 include 20944 deferred stock units awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment under sfas 123r until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vestings or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on all awarded units on the date of grant . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 11.37 , $ 10.75 and $ 9.83 per option , respectively . to determine stock-based compensation expense under sfas 123r , the grant-date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction made for estimated forfeitures . at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 options for 10743000 and 13582000 shares of common stock , respectively , were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 58.38 and $ 56.58 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 52 million , $ 111 million and $ 31 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2007 the aggregate intrinsic value of all options outstanding and exercisable was $ 94 million and $ 87 million , respectively . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 111 million , $ 233 million and $ 98 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 39 million , $ 82 million and $ 34 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2007 , 2006 or 2005 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 40116726 at december 31 , 2007 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 41787400 shares at december 31 , 2007 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans , the employee stock purchase plan as described below , and a director plan . during 2007 , we issued approximately 2.1 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we intend to utilize treasury stock for future stock option exercises . as discussed in note 1 accounting policies , we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of sfas 123 prospectively to all employee awards including stock options granted , modified or settled after january 1 , 2003 . as permitted under sfas 123 , we recognized compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . total compensation expense recognized related to pnc stock options in 2007 was $ 29 million compared with $ 31 million in 2006 and $ 29 million in 2005 . pro forma effects a table is included in note 1 accounting policies that sets forth pro forma net income and basic and diluted earnings per share as if compensation expense had been recognized under sfas 123 and 123r , as amended , for stock options for 2005 . for purposes of computing stock option expense and 2005 pro forma results , we estimated the fair value of stock options using the black-scholes option pricing model . the model requires the use of numerous assumptions , many of which are very subjective . therefore , the 2005 pro forma results are estimates of results of operations as if compensation expense had been recognized for all stock-based compensation awards and are not indicative of the impact on future periods. . Conversations: Question: what was the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007? Answer:

52.0

convfinqa1392

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: information about stock options at december 31 , 2007 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2007shares in thousandsrange of exercise prices</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>options outstanding weighted- averageexercise price</td><td>options outstanding weighted-average remaining contractual life ( in years )</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 37.43 2013 $ 46.99</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td><td>4.0</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>47.00 2013 56.99</td><td>3634</td><td>53.43</td><td>5.4</td><td>3022</td><td>53.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>57.00 2013 66.99</td><td>3255</td><td>60.32</td><td>5.2</td><td>2569</td><td>58.96</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>67.00 2013 76.23</td><td>5993</td><td>73.03</td><td>5.5</td><td>3461</td><td>73.45</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>14326</td><td>$ 62.15</td><td>5.3</td><td>10496</td><td>$ 59.95</td></tr></table> ( a ) the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 4.2 years . at december 31 , 2007 , there were approximately 13788000 options in total that were vested and are expected to vest . the weighted-average exercise price of such options was $ 62.07 per share , the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 5.2 years , and the aggregate intrinsic value at december 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 92 million . stock options granted in 2005 include options for 30000 shares that were granted to non-employee directors that year . no such options were granted in 2006 or 2007 . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2007 include 20944 deferred stock units awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment under sfas 123r until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vestings or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on all awarded units on the date of grant . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 11.37 , $ 10.75 and $ 9.83 per option , respectively . to determine stock-based compensation expense under sfas 123r , the grant-date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction made for estimated forfeitures . at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 options for 10743000 and 13582000 shares of common stock , respectively , were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 58.38 and $ 56.58 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 52 million , $ 111 million and $ 31 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2007 the aggregate intrinsic value of all options outstanding and exercisable was $ 94 million and $ 87 million , respectively . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 111 million , $ 233 million and $ 98 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 39 million , $ 82 million and $ 34 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2007 , 2006 or 2005 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 40116726 at december 31 , 2007 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 41787400 shares at december 31 , 2007 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans , the employee stock purchase plan as described below , and a director plan . during 2007 , we issued approximately 2.1 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we intend to utilize treasury stock for future stock option exercises . as discussed in note 1 accounting policies , we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of sfas 123 prospectively to all employee awards including stock options granted , modified or settled after january 1 , 2003 . as permitted under sfas 123 , we recognized compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . total compensation expense recognized related to pnc stock options in 2007 was $ 29 million compared with $ 31 million in 2006 and $ 29 million in 2005 . pro forma effects a table is included in note 1 accounting policies that sets forth pro forma net income and basic and diluted earnings per share as if compensation expense had been recognized under sfas 123 and 123r , as amended , for stock options for 2005 . for purposes of computing stock option expense and 2005 pro forma results , we estimated the fair value of stock options using the black-scholes option pricing model . the model requires the use of numerous assumptions , many of which are very subjective . therefore , the 2005 pro forma results are estimates of results of operations as if compensation expense had been recognized for all stock-based compensation awards and are not indicative of the impact on future periods. . Conversations: q0: what was the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007? 52.0 Question: and in 2006? Answer:

111.0

convfinqa1393

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: information about stock options at december 31 , 2007 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2007shares in thousandsrange of exercise prices</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>options outstanding weighted- averageexercise price</td><td>options outstanding weighted-average remaining contractual life ( in years )</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 37.43 2013 $ 46.99</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td><td>4.0</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>47.00 2013 56.99</td><td>3634</td><td>53.43</td><td>5.4</td><td>3022</td><td>53.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>57.00 2013 66.99</td><td>3255</td><td>60.32</td><td>5.2</td><td>2569</td><td>58.96</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>67.00 2013 76.23</td><td>5993</td><td>73.03</td><td>5.5</td><td>3461</td><td>73.45</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>14326</td><td>$ 62.15</td><td>5.3</td><td>10496</td><td>$ 59.95</td></tr></table> ( a ) the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 4.2 years . at december 31 , 2007 , there were approximately 13788000 options in total that were vested and are expected to vest . the weighted-average exercise price of such options was $ 62.07 per share , the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 5.2 years , and the aggregate intrinsic value at december 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 92 million . stock options granted in 2005 include options for 30000 shares that were granted to non-employee directors that year . no such options were granted in 2006 or 2007 . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2007 include 20944 deferred stock units awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment under sfas 123r until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vestings or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on all awarded units on the date of grant . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 11.37 , $ 10.75 and $ 9.83 per option , respectively . to determine stock-based compensation expense under sfas 123r , the grant-date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction made for estimated forfeitures . at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 options for 10743000 and 13582000 shares of common stock , respectively , were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 58.38 and $ 56.58 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 52 million , $ 111 million and $ 31 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2007 the aggregate intrinsic value of all options outstanding and exercisable was $ 94 million and $ 87 million , respectively . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 111 million , $ 233 million and $ 98 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 39 million , $ 82 million and $ 34 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2007 , 2006 or 2005 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 40116726 at december 31 , 2007 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 41787400 shares at december 31 , 2007 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans , the employee stock purchase plan as described below , and a director plan . during 2007 , we issued approximately 2.1 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we intend to utilize treasury stock for future stock option exercises . as discussed in note 1 accounting policies , we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of sfas 123 prospectively to all employee awards including stock options granted , modified or settled after january 1 , 2003 . as permitted under sfas 123 , we recognized compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . total compensation expense recognized related to pnc stock options in 2007 was $ 29 million compared with $ 31 million in 2006 and $ 29 million in 2005 . pro forma effects a table is included in note 1 accounting policies that sets forth pro forma net income and basic and diluted earnings per share as if compensation expense had been recognized under sfas 123 and 123r , as amended , for stock options for 2005 . for purposes of computing stock option expense and 2005 pro forma results , we estimated the fair value of stock options using the black-scholes option pricing model . the model requires the use of numerous assumptions , many of which are very subjective . therefore , the 2005 pro forma results are estimates of results of operations as if compensation expense had been recognized for all stock-based compensation awards and are not indicative of the impact on future periods. . Conversations: q0: what was the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007? 52.0 q1: and in 2006? 111.0 Question: so what was the total value for these two years combined? Answer:

163.0

convfinqa1394

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: information about stock options at december 31 , 2007 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2007shares in thousandsrange of exercise prices</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>options outstanding weighted- averageexercise price</td><td>options outstanding weighted-average remaining contractual life ( in years )</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 37.43 2013 $ 46.99</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td><td>4.0</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>47.00 2013 56.99</td><td>3634</td><td>53.43</td><td>5.4</td><td>3022</td><td>53.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>57.00 2013 66.99</td><td>3255</td><td>60.32</td><td>5.2</td><td>2569</td><td>58.96</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>67.00 2013 76.23</td><td>5993</td><td>73.03</td><td>5.5</td><td>3461</td><td>73.45</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>14326</td><td>$ 62.15</td><td>5.3</td><td>10496</td><td>$ 59.95</td></tr></table> ( a ) the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 4.2 years . at december 31 , 2007 , there were approximately 13788000 options in total that were vested and are expected to vest . the weighted-average exercise price of such options was $ 62.07 per share , the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 5.2 years , and the aggregate intrinsic value at december 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 92 million . stock options granted in 2005 include options for 30000 shares that were granted to non-employee directors that year . no such options were granted in 2006 or 2007 . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2007 include 20944 deferred stock units awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment under sfas 123r until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vestings or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on all awarded units on the date of grant . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 11.37 , $ 10.75 and $ 9.83 per option , respectively . to determine stock-based compensation expense under sfas 123r , the grant-date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction made for estimated forfeitures . at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 options for 10743000 and 13582000 shares of common stock , respectively , were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 58.38 and $ 56.58 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 52 million , $ 111 million and $ 31 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2007 the aggregate intrinsic value of all options outstanding and exercisable was $ 94 million and $ 87 million , respectively . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 111 million , $ 233 million and $ 98 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 39 million , $ 82 million and $ 34 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2007 , 2006 or 2005 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 40116726 at december 31 , 2007 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 41787400 shares at december 31 , 2007 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans , the employee stock purchase plan as described below , and a director plan . during 2007 , we issued approximately 2.1 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we intend to utilize treasury stock for future stock option exercises . as discussed in note 1 accounting policies , we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of sfas 123 prospectively to all employee awards including stock options granted , modified or settled after january 1 , 2003 . as permitted under sfas 123 , we recognized compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . total compensation expense recognized related to pnc stock options in 2007 was $ 29 million compared with $ 31 million in 2006 and $ 29 million in 2005 . pro forma effects a table is included in note 1 accounting policies that sets forth pro forma net income and basic and diluted earnings per share as if compensation expense had been recognized under sfas 123 and 123r , as amended , for stock options for 2005 . for purposes of computing stock option expense and 2005 pro forma results , we estimated the fair value of stock options using the black-scholes option pricing model . the model requires the use of numerous assumptions , many of which are very subjective . therefore , the 2005 pro forma results are estimates of results of operations as if compensation expense had been recognized for all stock-based compensation awards and are not indicative of the impact on future periods. . Conversations: q0: what was the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007? 52.0 q1: and in 2006? 111.0 q2: so what was the total value for these two years combined? 163.0 Question: and adding in 2005 as well? Answer:

194.0

convfinqa1395

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and credit facilities of certain subsidiaries . the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 857.3 and $ 619.4 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities was $ 395.6 and $ 336.5 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 76.9</td><td>$ 31.6</td><td>$ 25.1</td><td>$ 8.9</td><td>$ 26.9</td><td>$ 11.4</td><td>$ 180.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>34.7</td><td>76.5</td><td>32.9</td><td>3.9</td><td>3.1</td><td>4.2</td><td>155.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 111.6</td><td>$ 108.1</td><td>$ 58.0</td><td>$ 12.8</td><td>$ 30.0</td><td>$ 15.6</td><td>$ 336.1</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2016 . these estimated payments of $ 25.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2017 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2018 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 4 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters in the normal course of business , we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company is in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies . the company confirmed that one of its standalone domestic agencies has been contacted by the department of justice antitrust division for documents regarding video production practices and is cooperating with the government. . Conversations: Question: what is the value of total redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates in? Answer:

155.3

convfinqa1396

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and credit facilities of certain subsidiaries . the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 857.3 and $ 619.4 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities was $ 395.6 and $ 336.5 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 76.9</td><td>$ 31.6</td><td>$ 25.1</td><td>$ 8.9</td><td>$ 26.9</td><td>$ 11.4</td><td>$ 180.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>34.7</td><td>76.5</td><td>32.9</td><td>3.9</td><td>3.1</td><td>4.2</td><td>155.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 111.6</td><td>$ 108.1</td><td>$ 58.0</td><td>$ 12.8</td><td>$ 30.0</td><td>$ 15.6</td><td>$ 336.1</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2016 . these estimated payments of $ 25.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2017 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2018 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 4 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters in the normal course of business , we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company is in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies . the company confirmed that one of its standalone domestic agencies has been contacted by the department of justice antitrust division for documents regarding video production practices and is cooperating with the government. . Conversations: q0: what is the value of total redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates in? 155.3 Question: what about the total contingent acquisition payments? Answer:

336.1

convfinqa1397

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and credit facilities of certain subsidiaries . the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 857.3 and $ 619.4 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities was $ 395.6 and $ 336.5 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 76.9</td><td>$ 31.6</td><td>$ 25.1</td><td>$ 8.9</td><td>$ 26.9</td><td>$ 11.4</td><td>$ 180.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>34.7</td><td>76.5</td><td>32.9</td><td>3.9</td><td>3.1</td><td>4.2</td><td>155.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 111.6</td><td>$ 108.1</td><td>$ 58.0</td><td>$ 12.8</td><td>$ 30.0</td><td>$ 15.6</td><td>$ 336.1</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2016 . these estimated payments of $ 25.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2017 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2018 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 4 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters in the normal course of business , we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company is in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies . the company confirmed that one of its standalone domestic agencies has been contacted by the department of justice antitrust division for documents regarding video production practices and is cooperating with the government. . Conversations: q0: what is the value of total redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates in? 155.3 q1: what about the total contingent acquisition payments? 336.1 Question: what proportion does this represent? Answer:

0.46206

convfinqa1398

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and credit facilities of certain subsidiaries . the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 857.3 and $ 619.4 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities was $ 395.6 and $ 336.5 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 76.9</td><td>$ 31.6</td><td>$ 25.1</td><td>$ 8.9</td><td>$ 26.9</td><td>$ 11.4</td><td>$ 180.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>34.7</td><td>76.5</td><td>32.9</td><td>3.9</td><td>3.1</td><td>4.2</td><td>155.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 111.6</td><td>$ 108.1</td><td>$ 58.0</td><td>$ 12.8</td><td>$ 30.0</td><td>$ 15.6</td><td>$ 336.1</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2016 . these estimated payments of $ 25.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2017 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2018 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 4 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters in the normal course of business , we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company is in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies . the company confirmed that one of its standalone domestic agencies has been contacted by the department of justice antitrust division for documents regarding video production practices and is cooperating with the government. . Conversations: q0: what is the value of total redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates in? 155.3 q1: what about the total contingent acquisition payments? 336.1 q2: what proportion does this represent? 0.46206 Question: what amount was guaranteed by parent company for lease obligations in 2016? Answer:

857.3

convfinqa1399

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and credit facilities of certain subsidiaries . the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 857.3 and $ 619.4 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities was $ 395.6 and $ 336.5 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 76.9</td><td>$ 31.6</td><td>$ 25.1</td><td>$ 8.9</td><td>$ 26.9</td><td>$ 11.4</td><td>$ 180.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>34.7</td><td>76.5</td><td>32.9</td><td>3.9</td><td>3.1</td><td>4.2</td><td>155.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 111.6</td><td>$ 108.1</td><td>$ 58.0</td><td>$ 12.8</td><td>$ 30.0</td><td>$ 15.6</td><td>$ 336.1</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2016 . these estimated payments of $ 25.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2017 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2018 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 4 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters in the normal course of business , we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company is in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies . the company confirmed that one of its standalone domestic agencies has been contacted by the department of justice antitrust division for documents regarding video production practices and is cooperating with the government. . Conversations: q0: what is the value of total redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates in? 155.3 q1: what about the total contingent acquisition payments? 336.1 q2: what proportion does this represent? 0.46206 q3: what amount was guaranteed by parent company for lease obligations in 2016? 857.3 Question: what about guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities ? Answer:

395.6