Datasets:

getGO007

/

IMDbCollection

like 0

I was a bit afraid when I saw the teasers but blown away by the production value! Comedy is not just something to make you laugh. Comedy has levels to it watching Key & Peele I saw tragedy, Irony and humanity. There have been very few thought provoking comedy shows that have made me copy and paste youtube links and mail them to my friends. Key & Peele have somewhat tedious dialogs about their humdrum lives (sorry guys) But their comedic insights are brilliantly creative and should be revisited as ongoing themed webseries. I swear Jordan Peele is so dedicated to his scenes that his focus alone makes me laugh. This show is incredible and I search for new episodes of it in my comedy central on demand. Keep up the good work guys

Watching this movie is like watching paint dry, only worse. I can't believe it actually received award nominations. I can't believe the critics loved it. Am I the only one who thought this whole concept was stupid--obviously not! What were the critics thinking. Just about the worst movie ever, but I reserve that title for movies like Beowolf and a couple of others that I cannot remember the names of since they were that bad. Don't waste your time. Let your pre-teen daughters see it, but if you are an adult--skip it. If you watch this movie, remember it's 2+ hours of your life that you cannot get back.

I'm writing my review for the first time here only because I can read how those that actually reviewed this movie didn't see the point; You were warned - Wedding crashers director + Hangover writers = over 100 minutes of pure R rated fun! I must say I went to see this movie without knowing anything but that line ^^ and for the first time in my life I sat in the front row (yes, the 1st row) and I wasn't sorry I did. The movie is another body changing movie, yes, but I didn't watch Freaky Friday cause I find it to be amusing for younger audience. Seeing Hangover and having a great time made me see this movie also, and liking it. Still, this movie has a vulgar way of making you laugh and at the same time cheer for the main characters as they are changing their life to better. Acting is way better than expected, all the jokes are understood and yes, again, they are vulgar but somewhat surprising. If you liked Hangover(s) GO SEE THIS MOVIE, especially in the movie theatre cause there is nothing better than when you can laugh out along with the rest of the (younger) crowd.

The last scene of Nagraj Manjule's movie Jhund shows an aeroplane flying over a slum in Nagpur, where this reads on the wall - 'Crossing the wall is strictly prohibited.' The USP of Nagraj Majule - One tight slap on our face.

Bad editing bad acting and a poor storyline. I walked out after an hour because it was boring. Felt it was rushed to the big screen. I like marvel films but this was all about teenage angst. Save your money and wait for it on Netflix.

I usually don't review movies but MI 6 was so disappointing, I fealt that I should warn folks. Now, the acting is as good as can be expected given the terrable writing. The movie also tries to be emotional and intense at the worst times and just drags on for no reason. Very disappointing effort!

I Loved The first Iron Man but this is by far so much better in every way due to the superior Iron Man's Return as Tony Stark. He has a whole world to entertain with his moves his conversations and especially his saving the world from evil. He however gets into situations where he gets drunk and people get scared of him but his side kick Iron Man 2 is on his side to help him overcome overconfidence. There is however an evil native man trying to get his revenge after the death of his father from the mighty Iron Man. He turns himself into a electrical vaporising machine man where he starts off Tony in the Grand Prix of auto racing and goes head to head with Iron Man in front of a whole crowd and stadium. Later on he experiments on a whole army of ironic machines and sends them to kill Iron Man but Iron Man 2 his sidekick is there to help and in the end defeat the mega electrical native man. Good movie must see for all Iron Man fans !!!

I thoroughly enjoyed this first season. Planning on reading the books while waiting for Season 2!

There is no talent behind this production. Same stuff all over again. You will be bored out of your mind by the 5th episode. Tell me 1 thing that is new here? This is a little of Men in Black, Once Upon a Time, X-men and the Adams Family. Not one new idea behind this production. Not to mention the horrible acting by Ellen Page. Tom Hopper is so so, but Robert Sheehan does a very good job. Really folks, spend your time on something much more worthwhile.

The Fabelmans is truly a movie for everyone! It's a movie loving movie! An mlm! Wait...Anyhow. It is both an inspired and inspiring Spielberg instant classic loosely based on his own life. It is highly cinematic while maintaining its footing in reality. A big congratulations to the 2023 Oscar nominees for The Fabelmans. Each performance was special and memorable in some way or another, but I'm sorely disappointed at the obvious snub, Paul Dano for Best Supporting Actor, especially considering he was the standout performance. Subtle roles are often overlooked, but considering the schmaltzy nature of the film, the opportunity to finally nominate this inexplicably tremendous actor was staring them in the face...And yet they still didn't cease the opportunity. I'm surprised I didn't see it coming. Hats off to the academy, they're still killing it (joking). The color scheme suits the retro vibe, which is largely in part due to its authenticity from filming with actual film, and the cinematography is spectacular. It wraps up like a gift for the audience and left my heart full. I hoped it would end when it did, not because I was eager for it to be over, but because it was the best possible conclusion for the film. The directing feels very natural when necessary and animated when appropriate. The unnatural elements are likely intentional. It is among the films that wants to remind you that this is a cinematic experience. The score is lovely, especially the theme. The costume design is great and the writing is pretty good for the most part. Truly, it is an undeniably great movie from a technical standpoint and is both a challenging and fun experience overall. I recommend The Fabelmans.

Rarely do I admit to hating a film. I can generally find at least I few things that made it worthwhile. "There Will Be Blood," however, is an unusual exception. I did not enjoy one minute of this film, and I'm not necessarily the type of person that dislikes this type of film. From the beginning, it does not, and cannot, grab our attention. The plot deals with a series of events that cause oil man Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day-Lewis) to care more and more about his fortune and less about the people around him. His character, although played well, is nowhere near Day-Lewis' best work. The film is too real and hard to watch, and it drags on because there is not a single character we are really able to feel sorry for or care about. By the end, I found myself fast-forwarding just to get to the credits so I would be done with it. The ending, without spoiling, is terrible and not edifying. I couldn't believe it just ended there. Do not watch this film. You will not get anything out of it that I will not tell you here. Bottom line, don't let your fortune control your life and turn you into a monster. One of my least favorite films and not recommended. You'll have a hard time getting through it, and for what? * out of ****

I'd waited quite a while to watch this film and was really looking forward to watching it seen as it's kept it's really high rating for a while now. What a complete let down!!! It's a teen horror, with a teen mentality and imagination. This could have been such a good concept / film but sadly it's not. Viewers rating this film 6+ must have watched some really bad horrors to feel it deserves anything above 4 at best. A horror should frighten you, scare you, make you jump.... All this does is make you feel depressed!! I started writing this review part way through the film but now I've gotten to the end I'm even more depressed and gutted I wasted 90 minutes of my life watching this rubbish!

Without a doubt this was the least favorite of the three for me. I can't go into detail without spoilers, suffice it to say you are better off watching The Avengers repeatedly, it was a big let down for me as I have been collecting comics for over 40 years. The character of Ironman has gone in a direction which made no sense, the bad guy was a total let down on many levels, you will know what I mean when you see it, because I know you will lol. I there are so many story lines and bad guys to choose from and they came up with this plot. Sadly I will have to wait for the next Thor or Captain America movie to get my fix. So enjoy your popcorn and try to enjoy the movie.

Boring, slow, nothing meaningful, and useless acting and direction. Quit after watching 2 seasons. Really surprised by such a high rating on IMDB. Showing some strange uses of technology did not impress at all.

Credit Goes to Mr.Anurag Basu with a good story and direction. How Brilliantly narrated, and each of the characters suites as per the story. There is some flaws but its worth to watch.

Oh come on all you lot raving on about this film. It is by far the worst film I have ever had the misfortune to sit through. Basically nothing really ever happens and you are left at the end wondering when it is going to begin. Bill Murray is NOT a good actor and he is NOT funny. The only good thing in the film is Scarlet Johannsen and that is just her beauty. The characters in this film are wooden and the story is virtually non existent. I firmly believe that some people are seeing things in this film are are just not there, in fact their reaction to this film reminds me of the way some react to so called Modern Art, they are just too afraid to say that it is rubbish. They seem to believe that it makes them more intelligent to act as if there is some hidden meaning. This film is incredibly dull and has no redeeming features whatsoever.

Its so overrated and the fans overhype so much. For starters so always have the same same plot twist, eren gets kidnapped (its annoying). Cant they do anything else to make eren important. Why do they have to do this to the main character. The show is still good and has good animation i dont know about master piece.

If you want to make your Sunday enjoyable, funny and happy go for this movie, you will really appreciate it. The philosophy 'life is nothing but a sac of happiness ' proves this film. The lead character Geet is the symbol for life as we are children we have the same happiness as Geet has in the first half and then when we grow up we find some difficulties so finds Geet. Geet who is a poetic charector who gives much priority to her happiness that is why she chooses to scape from home however she realises that what she has done is not fare but that is the reality. Life is so short so use 'Carpe Diem'.

I'll preface by saying the movie is hilarious, has a ton of iconic moments, and is definitely worth the watch. But, this is a big BUT, as a woman I think it fell flat in its feminist ideas. It basically, as usual, defined womanhood by motherhood which is a critical pitfall in my opinion, especially with a prominent cast member being a trans woman - making it a pristine opportunity to at least add a single line about women stepping away from the mother's role, and how it doesn't define our femininity or us as women. The movie also failed in showing the negative effects of patriarchy on men themselves. And while its plot contained a revolution it ended with a return to status quo, as usual for Hollywood, can't change, eh? It had a very good premise to show the negatives of both matriarchy and patriarchy, and choose to present what true equality might look like, but chose not to. It made the entire message fall flat. And since this philosophy played a big role in the plot itself, I feel like it was very disappointing.

This is one of a kind Tamil movie which has extraordinary thriller plot.

So I watched the first three episodes and well, I was definitely hoping for something more. The main character Clark Gregg (Phil Coulson), well he is the same plain - simple character like in the movie (thats what i expect), but Brett Dalton (Grant Ward) for me he doesn't fit in, for now, we will see later on. And what about those two kids, odd - crazy, genius scientists, it looks like they know everything about everything, sometimes quite annoying. Melinda May, what can i say, its just Jet Li, Jackie Chan in 50 years old woman suit. And conversation between characters, sometimes out of lines, odd, and trying to be funny - failed. Still i will keep watching it and hope for some small improvements.

Stranger things is a great show. It's unique, it's fun, it's entertaining. But it isn't good enough for the lapses on time between seasons. If you're going to wait almost two years to release a new season, it needs to be superb for the viewers to feel it's worth the wait. I like it much less for its inability to truly wow us with so much time between seasons. The longer we wait as viewers the more we expect. A good watch, but not significant for this simple reason.

Every other blogger has written about it, now its my turn. I have to say I really liked Gravity. I believe it is my personal favourite film of the year so far. Cuaron and his team create a magnificent but also horrifying image of space. That on one hand gives space a very tranquil and beautiful feeling. It is all the space you could ever need with no humans getting in your way. A world that is a million miles away from the crowded morning commute for most people. Not only that but it is filled with beautiful scenes of the Earth, the Sun and other distant stars, all floating around however they choose not needing the laws of gravity to hold them back. On the other hand we witness one of the scariest places we could ever imagine to find ourselves, filled with such a dark empty coldness that it is unrecognisable to us humans. Gravity shows how space can be both of these things at once. In a way it is good to have some "space" from other human beings, but too much of it can lead to emptiness and extreme loneliness once you float off on your own. I will start with the bad news, of which there is very little. Ultimately what will happen sometimes with a film such as Gravity, is that character and story development will be disregarded in place of technical amazement. This did not happen so much with Gravity but I must admit that in some important character moments of the film I found myself more interested in how great the visuals would be when big moments happened rather than whether the characters were in danger. There are some smart attempts to introduce personal back stories which I did appreciate. However when it really matters I do not think these attempts stick so well. That being said, the characters are interesting and developed enough to want to go on this journey with them and see it through till the end. As far as what I enjoyed about the film, the main thing was obviously its photography. Never before have I felt like floating off into the air in a cinema screening, but the photography work in Gravity is so convincing and free flowing that it is very hard not to feel dizzy at the sight of its imagery. There is no up or down, no high or low, only space, and a lot of it. One of the background commentaries that I felt while watching Gravity (and not a lot of people have brought this up) is the way us humans need the earth and are only possible because of it. In Gravity the earth is always there, shining like a huge ball of hope in an otherwise dead and cold infinity. We begin to see how life and evolution would just not be possible without it. There would be no heat, no food, no breathing, but as well no control of our own bodies. Ironically space could be seen as a freeing from the frustrations of human life, when in reality (like the films characters) floating with no control of even your body is one of the least freeing things we could imagine. Gravity is more gripping in its narrative than most critics are giving it credit for. There is a human story and some genuine personal emotion, but in the end I believe Gravity is more about space itself and how humans can and are reacting with it. I also think Gravity has much to say about our animalistic need for the earth and all it provides for us. We truly could not live without it, not out there in that empty mass of nothingness anyway.

I don't quite know how to rate this one. First season feels like a book. Takes a bit to get used to, but it's real good. Second season feels more like a TV show. A bit of a mix between the first season and a usual TV show. Still very good. Third season... it's just a very very long Marvel movie. Not one of the good Marvel movies. There's a couple good fights, and everything else is just like that last Dr Strange movie... aggressively bad. Like they didn't bother watching the two previous seasons and are just trying to bore you off, so they can go do something else. Problem is, the first season hooks you in. It holds you enough that you wanna watch season 2. Then season 2 still keeps you quite interested/hooked up. But season 3... I don't care what happens anymore. I might give season 3 a chance if I hear a lot of noise about things being better, but it will have to be A LOT of positive noise.

I want so much to like this movie. Everyone else does. It's watchable, the acting is decent, the photography is superb (it's no Manhattan, but it's really, really good.), and the subject is intriguing. Yes, I get it. I understand that it's about connection and communication on levels beyond language, that two lost, misunderstood, under-appreciated souls find each other in a sea foreign tongues, mispronounced "Engrish" and Japanese kitsch. The non-verbal communication where Scarlett Johanson was just looking at Bill Murry spoke volumes on how intimacy can be built by two people put into awkward situations together. And it was cool that Bill didn't seduce her, so that makes him super nice and sympathetic. Yeah right. Like that would ever happen. I guess that was my problem with the movie, it just didn't seem plausible. On any level. But, it's still watchable.

I thought Bay's Transformers sequels were bad enough but this goes to another level. The disorientation you get trying to follow this story with near on constant flash backs, flash forwards and location changes is a migraine of epic proportions . Add the pointless back stories for the main characters who waffle on and mumble equally pointless dialogue make you want to lie down in a dark room. I assume most of the banter should be making the audience laugh or at least chuckle. It doesn't. Even Ryan Reynolds schtick barely registers. On the action front it is jaw dropping and absolutely barmy. At times the flying, disintegrating and exploding cars are fun to watch but as much as it's polished it becomes tiresome and oddly un-exciting pretty quickly. The visual gloss is blinding at times and the overly used glam slow mo tedious. The locations are for the most part the stunning Abu Dhabi even though we are told they are Las Vegas, Hong Kong or some fake Middle Eastern country and the various gun fights and battles in exotic looking buildings and on boats make Bond and Bourne look tatty in comparison but it doesn't help the muddled story and jarring experience. On the plus side the CGI is some of the most polished you will see on the screen at the moment. But this isn't enough to make this film a likeable and entertaining action movie. And some may find the gratuitous bloody violence and gun play - not to mention the amount of innocent bystanders that seem to get maimed because of the groups antics too much for their liking.

This show was really good, brilliant. Jenny Ortega and other cast members gave an outstanding performance. To see life through Wednesdays eyes and really having a better understanding of who she is, was great to see. I will say however i was disappointed in the casting choice for Gomez, Gomez is intense, vibrant, and loves intensly. Luis Guzmán is a great actor I loved him in shameless and other roles he has been in, but I do not believe he was suitable for the role of Gomez. His scenes were so off-putting. And I was disappointed, I hope moving forward with casting for Gomez they find someone who can live up to the great Raul Julia.

Interesting concept of shooting in as few takes as possible, and definitely a technological feat, that works pretty well and contributes to the immersion. That being said, there were certain points where I feel the film could've used some cuts (those sharp turns in the trenches were fuggen' rough, bro.) I'm thoroughly impressed at the insane scale of the set they built, and therefore the fact that we never see a location twice. The character pulls some real BS "i'm the protagonist, so I live", which irked me a little bit. But alas, twas still solid! the acting was excellent, definitely helped move me while watching it. Music was somewhat overbearing at times, but otherwise did the job. Spicy film. Worth watching.

3.5/5 Gravity gives us some of the most impressive visuals ever put on screen. It is also mostly accurate to the rules of space like there being no sound when debris collides with the space shuttle. We are pulled into space itself and it is a magical experience. What really brings us in is some impressive camera work as well, like showing the astronauts' perspective of what's going on in front of them, and hearing their loud breaths. Everything is fully detailed and at its place as far as sound, visuals and mostly accuracy. If there are any flaws in accuracy, mostly only astronomers would be able to tell. It won't bother anything at all to how impressively well done everything is. The movie is pretty thrilling as well. The visuals create some very realistic disaster situations that don't go over the top to coincidences, but what can really happen in space, a fragile place that can be disastrous to mankind. It does a great job at showing that. The problem however is the emotional depth the movie is and sometimes the direction it goes. It is sometimes is too busy with the visuals that it doesn't give much time for character development. There are emotional scenes that are supposed to be gripping and compelling, but they aren't really compelling unless we have a backstory that is somewhat interesting. It is kind of effective in a way, but the movie works much better if it was a more visual wonder than emotional, like 2001 A Space Odyssey. The story was not about a certain character, but mankind itself and it told its story through visuals, not emotion or dialogue. Gravity tried to do both, but too be honest, they should have just stuck to more of a visual approach or give us some interesting character background. The story is obviously about a character surviving. Let us get to know her more! If only the emotional backstory was more compelling I would be happy to be with the crowd of saying it's one of the best films of the year. But I would say it's a good movie, but not a great one. People will go to theatres expecting a visual wonder. For the most part it succeeds, but the emotional parts will distract you. But I guess people just want more eye candy and if they do, this is for them. Still I can recommend this for the thrills, and visual wonder it creates to the screen. Gravity is a tense, and very thrilling visual experience that is well shot and paced.

I thought that they come up with this story as a prank to test Paul Bettany and that Olson woman, but stange as it maybe it kind of works and gradually the cloak is lifted and the real story is coming out. This links directly to The Avengers films, not sure if its a prequel and this is her Wanda-vision of the future.

2 hours of nothing. Oh yeah, i almost forgot, there's a singing piano scene, the most lame sex scene ever, and a gay/homoerotic game at the beach. Oh! And the most important, war planes scenes. Dude, this was the most boring movie i've seen lately. Overrated AF , i couldn't connect with any character, 0 substance, no chemistry between the actors, the script and the story is terrible. I really don't understand why this have 10 stars all over, it's just nonsense.

I just watched the 3rd episode and came here to write my review, and I'm shocked to see all these negative reviews! It's not the best MCU project but I found some of the storylines interesting. Yes it could be much better for sure, but it's not as bad as written in the reviews. Some folks are mad at Peggy becoming Captain Carter which I find weird, it's happening in an alternate universe, you guys! The series is called What If! The animation and voice acting could be much better. Apparantly this series is going to have impacts on the future MCU projects as well, So, give it a chance! Edit: Some episodes are really good, the Dr Strange episode was mind-blowing. Thor's episode was a blast.

When are they going to stop making this garbage in Hollywood. It's pathetic that this type of movie is what has become top box-office attraction for the past twenty years. Aside from good cinematography, 'The Dark Knight' is little more than an episode of 'Law and Order' with goofy costumes. I never cared about Heath Ledger, and Joaquin Phoenix did a way better, more believable job as The Joker. Heath Ledger did nothing but lick his lips every five seconds and overact the rest of the time. The only reason I watched 'Joker' was because of all the crazy press it got about how it was going to cause anarchy across the country. People actually put 'The Dark Knight' on a pedestal up there with actual real cinema like 'The Shawshank Redemption' and 'Dances with Wolves.' Years from now people will look back at how lame all these superhero movies actually are and wish they never wasted their time and money.

The writers were inspired coming up with this story, I honestly don't know how they did it. I've been an addict of good movies and TV shows since I was a kid, and Avatar takes the cake for me as the best told story of all time. I would put it up against Star Wars, The Godfather, Lord of the Rings, etc. If you lived your life based off of the principles of this show it would outdo any religion or ethics class you could find. Don't be deceived by the fact that this show was on a kids network, it's absolutely brilliant and incredibly deep. I've watched this show probably 5+ times all the way through and it only gets better with time. The characters represent all of the same struggles we all face in life; fear, hypocrisy, guilt, revenge, forgiveness, redemption. All of the characters grapple with the challenge of fulfilling their "destiny" and realizing what that means for each of them. Aang and Zuko, in particular, start their journey on one path-believing their destiny is predetermined-and realize along the way that they have agency and the power to determine their own fate. The characters learn from the past and truly "come of age" by the end. The show has love, but it doesn't distract from the story or interrupt the bond and friendship between the characters. Avatar has several attributes that set it apart from many other shows. First off, it's patient. It doesn't ever give you what you want right away. You have to wait two full seasons before you finally see the fire lord. Some of the characters don't become likable until the very end of the series. The lessons are seasons in the making. Second, the show seamlessly introduces new characters, such as Toph, and makes the viewer love them as much as the original characters. Finally, the story is perfectly paced. From beginning to end, every episode is important to the overarching story and the development of the characters. There's no fluff and they don't overdo it. It's a perfectly told trilogy that leaves you begging for more. Other shows seem like they're figuring out the story, season by season and trying to come up with more material. Avatar is well thought out and flows perfectly from beginning to end. Also most finales are a complete let down, whereas Avatar's finale is the best part of the entire story. It wraps up the story and character arcs beautifully and lives up to the build up of the previous seasons. There are few shows/movies I would say this about, but it is a truly life-changing story. If you haven't watched it, give it an honest try. I couldn't recommend this show enough.

The film overall is good and has ups and downs and some moments where you feel the emotions and everything that's going on, but it's not a movie that gives you a really exciting time. The Charakter is good and is well known (that makes you more linked with him). In Bangladesh you don't really think about the situation in your country so it's not what I thought would be in a film about fighting and war. The action scenes are nice and exciting. The film ends pretty obviously so you know there will be another film. It kinda takes the feeling and tension away you normally get on an open end film. Not a must watch.

I kid you not after watching this movie it gave me the impression that Russians are heartless people that condones misogyny and rape. I don't know if that was the kind of propaganda it was trying to portray The movie kept me wondering what was going to happen next so I can't say the movie was bad or terrible because it was actually good. Jennifer Lawrence Russian accent wasn't that great at all and maybe the sex scene was rather amateur at best. Believe it or not but the most disturbing scene in the movie was rather empowering. I won't spoil it of course but this movie isn't for the small minded or the crybabies that are whining about it. Just watch it for yourself.

I think it's pretty much legendary how off putting the 1st episode of Black Mirror is. I have had so many friends tell me they saw that first episode and didn't watch any more. That's sad because there are some truly great episodes. In particular Season 1 episode 3, Season 2 episode 4, all of season 3. But much of the rest is so-so to just poor. Season 4 was a let down. The first 3 seasons for the most part, every episode was "OMG, that really could happen if we aren't careful how we use new tech" but Season 4 had none of that. Instead it was just kind of like a Creepshow-esqe anthology of random tech based horror-ish skits. Season 5 had one interesting episode, episode 1, though it had a poor resolution. So, the good episodes are truly great, must watch TV. But the rest drags it down. As such it doesn't deserve the 9/10s many are giving in IMO.

Being a fan of Christopher Nolan's films and enjoying his other films, one was anticipating the arrival of Dunkirk. Released in 2017 and being an instant hit at the box office and seeing mostly overwhelming positive critics reviews, the anticipation got somewhat higher. As a film, Dunkirk is relatively great directed and has great visuals in cinematography, as it is well to look at. And the camera angles work well. The film is somewhat disappointing and boring in depth. There were many characters but hardly we get invested in. The film felt slightly longer than its runtime. As a film, it just didn't grab the attention and wasn't as entertaining as lead to be. Most of the film as a whole just felt slow and boring at times. Quite overrated simply because Christopher Nolan directed it.

The only bit I didn't like about this was Martin Short's character's state of life; that plot has gotten old, in every sense of word. That out of the way, everything else was just amazing. The title of review meant that I could watch it thrice: once for chemistry, second time for drawings and third time for music oh so music. Do enjoy.

I bet there is not even one character that you can like and support in this series. In the script somethings are happening that you may call them twists but actually they are not. Some unimportant characters are dying, sometimes even with an accident. They're just making similiar mistakes with the last two seasons in Game of Thrones. I am aware those logicless things happened also season five and six but you could ignore those. Real nonsense things started in Season Seven in my opinion. I know in HOTD there is not really big mistakes that we can call it nonsense. But instead I'm just calling them unnecessary. You don't need to put fake twists in the script. Actually I don't even care anyone dies in the series. Everyone can die and I won't be sad at all. There is no character that we can be with him/her. And I think there won't be. I can't see which characters will evolve like Jaime Lannister? None. Not just the characters or the storyline is unnecessary but the techincal details are too bad for an HBO show. Too bad color grading, not that great cinematography, VFX is quite good but sometimes looks horrible. Even the scores are much worse than Game of Thrones, I'm happy they're using old scores sometimes. Makeup, sound, costume design and set decoration is really good but not surprisingly good.

With no real villain in sight and with its blue collar down-to-earth approach, this unusually (though just relatively) subdued Tony Scott railway actioner proves to be surprisingly watchable. This pic's lean clean disaster fodder without much of the usual clichéd stereotyping, thereby providing an uncommon focus on plain technical aspects, avoiding the pitfalls of unbelievable melodramatics, though some trivial rudimentary emotional background on the protagonists is still at hand. That said, the pic doesn't leave much of a lasting impression, despite its immediate impact. 5 out of 10 dangerous curves

All right, I just recently watched this series on Netflix and DVD, based on my positive recollections seeing the first few episodes when it premiered on Nick back in '05. Overall, I really enjoyed revisiting, as well as finally finishing it. The animation is fluid and hands- down the best of the Japanese-influenced American shows broadcast in the country, the narrative is wonderfully paced and interesting, and the characters are memorable and engaging from square one. Props to Dante Basco and Mako especially for their portrayals of two of my new favorite characters of all time. I really dig that this was appreciated on release and has the massive following it does, as well as a good sequel series from what I hear. If you haven't seen it yet, this is a high recommendation from me to stop and immediately rent/buy this. You'll not be disappointed. Now I must post a few of my gripes with the show, -SPOILERS AHEAD- Now, overall, this show handles wonderfully when it comes to dealing life lessons and morality to young children, which was its primary audience. However, I sensed, especially in Books 2 and 3, a desperate struggle amongst the writers to avoid the mortality issue when it came to ANY character in the show, as well as most of the darker elements in the show, (see Bloodbending). In order to be lasting, and relatable, I felt it would be wise to address the fact that in shows dealing with these titanic struggles, there are losses on both sides, the Book 1 finale worked this in fine. When it came to Lake Laogai, they chickened out at outright telling the audience that a character was dying, and I believe subtlety was the best option they had and it mostly worked. However, Sozin's Comet gave the impression that the writers struggled to come up with a deus ex machina that they could write off as a fantastic element of the world. IT DID NOT RUIN THE FINALE, that's not what I have to say at all. I simply regret that fact that the writers seemed to think: "D'oh we can't kill the Fire Lord! We can't defend/promote that!" The deus did work, but it was a shot in the dark that just happened to work in context. Oh well, oh hell. When it comes to bloodbending, I simply wish they had gone all out and used it more to its darker advantages, ie REALLY DARK USAGES (see heart-stopping, SCANNERS!). Also, WHY THE HELL DIDN'T KATARA USE IT ON AZULA?!? I'm a messed up, grit-loving pop-culture buff; sue me for trying to make your children's show more interesting.

Howz the JOSH? Its on Peak, Sir... This how a patriotic movie should be.. make your blood boil and keep tempo on and on till the end.... There would be hardly anybody who has not heard about surgical strike which India did, but stunning game like videography, editing makes it at par with any Hollywood or classic war movie. The movie begins with myanmar terrorist base strike and ends with PoK surgical strike and in between not for a single minute movie let you feel, that you are moving away from core theme... Was very proud to see indian army, govt using technology and being well equipped. In one scene, where 8 year girls does war cry on seeing her father martyr body, that moment, the current of patriotism runs down from head to toe and back of audience along with the soldiers... @VickyKaushal09 gets into the skin of hair of the character... simply love the devotion and passion he has for. One should salute to his source of inspiration. He carries the movie solely on front and @AdityaDharFilms holds it from behind...rest all characters walk in the flow of the current. People say its BJP Propaganda movie... they are wrong on many counts (who cares for cold blooded people, and their soul is already been sold to...)... i will list 2... People accept the theory in Hollywood movie, if US President is actively involved in the matter of defense and strategical and tactful decisions..,.. why can't Indian PM be involved? We should feel proud that NaMo, the PM gets into skin of everything, and he had balls to do so... 2ndly, this movie celebrates the passion, love, enthusiasm for & of country... You may say.. post watching this movie.

Love the series and massive Cruise fan, so was very excited to see this. Unfortunately this is step backwards for MI. A shadow of the past few films. 9s and 10s are ridiculous scores for this. Must be kids rating this or liars.

Season one very good, season two...well, I'm hoping season 3 goes back to the formula that works!! --The above lines are what I wrote in my first review, but now, the fact that the only reason I watched the show is leaving...I have no interest in watching it. In days passed we would not have known HC was leaving show at end of S3...bc 'they' knew he may be 'a,' if not 'the' main reason many will check show out. Writers strike!!! Why? I smell nothing but doodoo everywhere. It's like 80% of shows on Prime/Netflix cannot muster up a good S2 and 99% chance a S3 will not make it. So, now, I do t watch any new shows unless I find a very compelling reason. I have started to watch new shows like this--I watch first episodes then if I'm 50/50 I jump to the last episode and believe me if a show is good, then I go back and watch entire season. Lastly, I'm ethiopian and yes it's nice to see a black character or two but movies today...man...black elves and black targaryeans...I think black American should concentrate on writing great material and practice and practice...bc I'm sure they must be tired of doing slave movies oh it's like the English and their Victorian films...one always depicts their anguish and triumph, if any, and the other, all triumph! Well folks, be well!

Had such high hopes for this movie after reading so many IMDb reviews praising its visuals and story line.. Ended up as another movie that completely summed up its value in its trailer. First 15 minutes had us totally, but like the fate of the crew the remaining story just crashed and burned, leaving us wondering why this movie had such a high rating. Honestly speechless at the user ranking of the movie of 2013. My wife and I honestly tried to forgive and hang on to this experience after looking forward to its release. Such a shame that two talented and acclaimed actors gave in to such a technically flawed and emotionally desperate script. Apollo 13, Europa, and even Dark Star had this movie in spades :(

'THE CHANGE-UP': Three Stars (Out of Five) It's not the 80's anymore and Hollywood is still making body changing movies! If you had to make one though who better to cast in it than Ryan Reynolds and Jason Bateman (two of my favorite actors)?! A movie where Reynolds is an unemployed slacker pothead and Bateman is a work obsessed family man who switch bodies actually doesn't sound that bad. It is pretty bad still though for the first half of it's running length. Despite having two of the best funny men in the business, most of the jokes fall a little flat for almost all of the film's setup (Reynolds and Bateman do manage to squeeze some laughs out of the mostly dull material though). Then when the film gets to the cheesy stuff, the heart of the film and the real character development, it actually starts to work! The directing gets a little better, the performances start to shine through and the writing begins to polish itself out. It takes half a film to get there but 'THE CHANGE-UP' is mostly worth the effort. The film is directed by David Dobkin (who also directed the popular buddy films 'WEDDING CRASHERS' and 'SHANGHAI KNIGHTS'). It's written by Jon Lucas and Scott Moore (part of the team behind 'THE HANGOVER'). All of the ingredients are there for the perfect juvenile male bonding adventure but I think the 'body switching' formula kind of dooms the film a little from the start (at least in the start). It revolves around two best friends, Mitch (Reynolds) and Dave (Bateman), who have grown apart due to their lives taking vastly different paths. Both men envy the other though and when they wish for each other's lives while pissing in a fountain one night their wishes come true. Leslie Mann (otherwise known as Mrs. Apatow) and Olivia Wilde co-star as the men's two love interests, one is Dave's wife and the other is his co-worker. Things of course get very complicated and trouble ensues (which then of course leads to emotional evolvement and surprisingly strong character growth). The film really does make you care for it's two lead characters and watching their emotional growth does really work. That's thanks in part to the directing and somewhat well written screenplay but more so Reynold's and Bateman's performances (I think). They've proved that they not only have a knack for comedic timing but also dramatic chops when given the right material as well. With this film when the drama kicks in the comedy also picks up and flows better. At first the jokes are pretty standard and overused (they're also extremely crude and disturbing) but as the characters start to get more interesting and involving the jokes get funnier and more meaningful as well. If you're a Ryan Reynolds or Jason Bateman fan (or a fan of body switching movies) you'll almost certainly enjoy this film at least some what, despite it's rocky take off. Watch our review show 'MOVIE TALK' at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXu8bs0LI9A

Not clever, not engaging, not interesting, not thrilling just really really boring

I have always loved fantasy, but I have not played the Witcher games or read the books. First series was ok, but very hard to follow. Second series in incomprehensible and so very boring. How do you even make a series about magic and monsters so extremely boring?

Not just Tom Cruise, but the whole Mission Impossible franchise is getting old. I'd never watch another one, except that my kid likes it, so I get dragged into seeing them all. The action gets more and more implausible, the stories more and more ridiculous (and confusing, with double- triple- and probably even quadruple-agents), and the stars get older and older. Even the action gets numbing after 25% of the way thru the movie. And the worst sin of all is that this one is way, way, way too long.

Third best film ever no matter what most amazing thrilling dramatic and emotional and sad film ever no matter what.

Wasted opportunity that failed to flesh out the supporting ghouls. Would've served better as a tv series.

First thing that comes to mind when you start watching this movie is how Sandra Bullock ruined her face so badly. Her plastic surgery is so bad that she looks like she's wearing a mask. Put her face together with her stuck-up, crazy-liberal personality and you have a person of little worth. She does nothing to redeem herself with her acting in this movie. On the other hand you have another wacko liberal, George Clooney, whose acting is still barely fit for a cheap TV sitcom. It takes little common sense to know how dumb the idea of this whole movie is. Here these astronauts are speeding around space in space suits, navigating their way around doomed space stations, etc... No amount of movie magic can make the elements of this movie believable. It's just a really, really poor movie. There are certainly worse movies, but this one barely meets the margin of the absolute worst movie categories. Obviously these wacky bunch of Hollywood liberals have become so arrogant that they expect their movies to be hailed as the greatest just because they are in them.

It is a shallow series which tries to copy elements from many other series and movies. There is no logical story line with many loopholes. I wonder how people are going gaga over this at max average series.

Please dont waste your time!!!...movie is terrible

INCEPTION is a film in which you want to go in knowing nothing because it's best seen with no prior knowledge. So I'm just going to not say a word about the plot and have the film unfold in front of you, sometimes literally. It's pretty difficult to explain what INCEPTION really is because it's damn packed with so many interesting ideas. Really, when you come out of the theater, you'll only think, "What did I just see?" The film is filled with so much ambition and so many original ideas that it captivates you. In fact, I think this is the fastest 150 minute film I've ever seen because it felt like 80 minutes! I really wanted to see more when the credits rolled. Unfortunately, INCEPTION isn't a perfect film. It falls short on its ambition. Some ideas weren't as developed as I hope they would be and others weren't presented clear enough. In fact, it's as if the characters spoke in another type of jargon exclusively made for psychologists pursuing in the career of dreams. Also, the story isn't all that special. Another common complaint you might hear about the film is that the characters are flat. It's true. The film presents us with six or seven characters but does absolutely nothing with them. Leonardo DiCaprio's character is the only character that's fleshed out. In some cases, I didn't care for the characters when their lives were at stake. Still, the performances by the ensemble cast are really good. I enjoyed Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, and Tom Hardy in their roles a lot. I might not be the only person to notice this but I thought Leonardo DiCaprio played the exact same character as he did in SHUTTER ISLAND. I couldn't get past Ken Watanabe's thick accent. It was hard to understand him in many of his scenes. Marion Cotillard did a great job, though. The film is also visually intricate, if that makes sense and even that description doesn't give the film justice. Again, it's really hard to explain. The visual effects were really excellent along with the action scenes but don't expect this film to be filled with action. The soundtrack by Hans Zimmer (AKA: One of the best composers ever) is fantastic, much like Zimmer's other soundtracks. Overall, INCEPTION is a flawed but seriously excellent film that presents some very, very, very interesting ideas. It's a wholly original film, which is great considering the amount of remakes, re-imaginings, sequels, prequels, etc. that we've gotten in the past few years, let alone this year. The characters could have been fleshed out a lot more. Still, I was absolutely engaged throughout by the story, and Christopher Nolan's ingenious script and direction just sucks you in. This is the perfect cure for this year's lackluster summer.

You either love it or hate it and I love it. What a perfect cast, really well directed and produced. Everyone gets a Star. Normally you have a favorite character but in this case all three are favorites. I'd hate to sing the praises of any one of the leads. Robbing Tiger to pay Josh while throwing Wolf to the wolves just wouldn't be right. Well, time to go..

i went to watch fan with my girlfriend and im not a srk fan , i don't usually watch bollywood movies but i thrilled with fan , srk is back with powerpacked performance after box office duds like dilwale, happy new year srk played the role of his fan , vfx is good , the main reason to watch the film is srk's acting , Srk as Gaurav stole my heart! Superb portrayal of a cute & true fan by srk . VFX effects made the movie magic to watch 1st half is awesome and 2nd half is also good , ending is unexpected , overall a nice movie to watch after airlift and neerja , bollywood is evolving

*possible spoilers* I first want to say that splitting the final movie into 2 parts was a stroke of genius, because it reduces the likelihood of the plot being completely butchered, which is what happened with all of the HP movies except the first two. As anyone who has read Deathly Hallows knows, much of the beginning involves the trio on the lam, hiding out in the woods, and doing a whole lot of nothing. Fortunately, DH part 1 doesn't deviate too much from the book, save for a completely unnecessary just-friends dance scene between Harry and Hermione. The scene in Godric's Hollow is creepy and nerve-wracking, just like in the book, although not quite as wonderfully terrifying as the cave scene in HBP. The scene in Malfoy Manor is also quite exciting, although again, the meat and potatoes of DH will be in Part 2. The acting in DH part 1 is wonderfully done, with no real exceptions. Helen Botham Carter is back as the deliciously evil Bellatrix Lestrange and Ralph Finnes once again captures his iconic role as Voldemort just right. Dobby (forgot who the voice actor was) really shines in this movie, and Imelda Staunton is back for a brief reprise of arguably the most despicable fictional character of all time; Dolores Umbridge. Overall, yes this movie suffers from a serious lack of action, but that's because that's how it is in the book. So no real complaints on my part.

And all three stars are for the Greenwood soundtrack, which is the best part of this movie. I've seen all five Academy Award nominated films for 2007, and this one is by far the worst. Daniel Day Lewis is a great actor, and he can't save this boring script, which meanders aimlessly through the years of his characters life without really digging deep into it, or any other characters for that matter. It also seems like every P.T Andersen movie since Boogie Nights (brilliant I might add) gets progressively worse, and with "blood" he's really hit bottom. I really wanted to like this movie, and was ready to give up several times, but stuck it out. I would rather have watched Juno or Michael Clayton again. And I can think of a couple of movies which should have been nominated for Best Picture over this one. Save your money, and more importantly, your time.

What If is a show that sounds weird in concept but once you start watching it, it starts kind of bad but quickly gets a lot better, the first episode and the Black Panther episode sucked but the rest of them were great. The Ant-Man episode explored a real dark side of Hank Pym that we never saw before, and the zombies episode was surprisingly heartfelt and really sad. But I really wanna talk about the last 2 episodes and the Doctor Strange one, they explored fantastic multiverse stuff and it really did a great job of tying into Multiverse of Madness. The finale in this show takes the characters in the darkest directions they've been in a while and the animation in this show is beautiful. I recommend checking it out and I'm gonna give What If a B+.

A reliable critic warned me when he recommended Netflix's Russian Doll. It starts out wonky, he told me. The lead actress is visibly trying a little too hard to be funny and Jewish (sic), failing to strike him as either, and the tone isn't quite mastered. Once you get used to the somewhat quirky characters, and the mixture of tones gets truly good, I'd say you're in for a witty and intriguingly strange take on the Groundhog Day formula. I'll take whatever's not Happy Death Day. Having just finished Umbrella Academy, which I mostly liked, this wasn't a shabby one to pick next. In the series, Natasha Lyonne (one of the creators alongside Amy Poehler and Leslye Headland) plays Nadya Vulvokov, whose story begins in the lavatory of her friend's apartment, where her 36th birthday party is being held. At one point during the night, she leaves the apartment and ends up passing the street without looking. She is run over and killed. Then, she's right back in the bathroom. Indeed, Nadya appears to be trapped in a time loop that resets every time she dies, which keeps happening in ways that suggest the very Universe wants her trapped in the time loop. Trying to figure out if she's simply had the wrong drugs and then just what the hell is going on, she meets Alan (Charlie Barnett), and discovers that she isn't the only stuck in time. Both of our leads are interesting in their own right and are just weird enough that we can still feel for them. There is also Greta Lee as Nadya's unthinkably sweet party host, Brendan Sexton III (of Black Hawk Down) as a local bum, and Jeremy Bobb, who's crying out to be cast as Jack Nicholson in a biopic about the production of The Shining. Can the good folk behind Disaster Artist make this happen? Russian Doll ends on a finale that, while not paving the way for any sort of sequel, invites much speculation. It reminded me of Primer, although not quite as insanely confusing. As you'd expect, there is already much guessing. I'm fine with understanding just as much about the time travel aspect as the characters we follow (Nadya and Alan might still have some questions at the time of this writing). What I can tell you is that Russian Doll is well-shot, lushly colored, full of distinct characters, and quite snappy in its pacing and sense of humor, while leaving room for the sort of existential musings a scenario like this would inspire. As familiar as it is in some respects, you likely won't be able to predict everything. Its use of pre-existing music also has some thought behind it. The last Netflix original I praised was Maniac, which was also a visually interesting, masterful combo of extremely hilarious anf extremely sad (albeit thoughtful). It shared problems in common with Russian Doll too; there are a few lines of dialogue that try to connect with Kids Today™, despite decidedly not being written by Kids Today™. All the same, 2019 is looking to be another good Netflix year

The bloody lock down has created much problems. Among which was the wait for these movies. However, this edition, the makers have made a bit of a mess. Tom Hardy, looked bored. Although the energy he puts playing the character is hard, being serious on one hand with Eddie and playing the venom. But the characters were over done a little / over played. Now comes the villains: Woody Harrelson: stupid & Naomie Harris: senseless The only good part of the movie was the additional scene in the end, which i am really looking forward.

The Shazam guy is very cringy. He's a good actor, but I don't think he fits the part... A very childish movie.

I was quite underwhelmed by CA:CW. For starters, I found the story vacuous and that the motivations leading to the conflict did not to strike a chord with me: so much so that I could no longer remember them anymore on the following day! Yes, combat scenes are impressive and daftly edited for a brisk pace, but they are so plentiful - and the characters so many - that occasionally it gets complicated to work out who's fighting who and exactly why. This, in fact, may well be the main problem with CA:CW - there's now so many heroes with so much back-story in other movies, that the whole thing is beginning to collapse under its own weight.

I went into Talk to Me with very high expectations, and honestly...the film exceeded them. This is one of the best horror films of 2023 and probably the best A24 horror film I've seen since...Midsommar. Yeah, it's that good. Talk to Me is an example of how to take a relatively straightforward premise and do something fresh and exciting with it. Unlike say, The Boogeyman, this movie doesn't feel like it's treading in place, hitting the exact same beats as other movies, even if we may have seen some of it before. Part of this has to do with the energy the film captures; it's hard to explain, but there's a distinct "teenage energy" that Talk to Me nails, and something I always like when I see it on screen. It's entirely believable to me that these people we're seeing are teenagers and they'd act the way they do (mistakes and all). There's a zippy, fun, fast-paced nature to the movie that I adore and the complete opposite of the slow, boring horror that most associate with the "elevated" subgenre. A lot of this wouldn't be possible without the cast. Sophie Wilde, who plays our scream queen Mia (an iconic horror heroine name), is INCREDIBLE. Her eyes alone are probably enough reason for her casting (when they black out, it's a legitimately terrifying visual), but luckily, she excels in displaying every emotion and delivering a complex performance for a complex character. Mia is likeable, she's funny, sweet, vulnerable...but there's a darkness to her that's undeniable and Wilde captures it PERFECTLY. Women really do excel in horror films, honestly. The entire cast is great, but I have to shout out Zoe Terakes and Chris Alsio, who were electric any time they were on screen. I love it when movies have great side characters and these two were so fun to watch, I honestly wish they were in the film longer. The only performance I didn't completely love was Miranda Otto, who I think overstayed her welcome at points. There's also Joe Bird, who...well, let's just say gives an extremely...physical performance. Getting this out of the way, what happens to his character is absolutely horrific. I can't stress enough how disturbing this movie can be at times and how unbelievably effective it is in the horror department. Right now, ghoulish imagery from this movie flashes in my head as I'm writing this. The make up and effects are top tier, with a wet, gross look to the creatures and oodles of extremely effective gore. I can't go on enough about the make up is; even the blacked out eyes look way scarier than I imagined they would and reminded me of...The Sadness (yes, that one - the Taiwanese movie) of all movies. In fact, there are A LOT of aspects of The Sadness that appear in this film as well, to its benefit. The film also wears the inspiration of Evil Dead (my favourite horror franchise) on its sleeve; those two franchises are not bad inspirations. Like in those films, the dead aren't just shuffling, quiet corpses...but devious, clever, evil, and perverted. Yes. (If you've seen The Sadness, you'll understand. Part of this has to do with the excellent cinematography and sound mixing, which feels violent and jarring at times. Every time the camera spins and follows a character, it feels like they're being whipped around and the sound that accompanies everything just elevates the tension. This is not a jump scare movie; it's a movie that keeps you unsettled from the jump. If I had any issues with Talk to Me, it's that I wish it was longer. I wouldn't have minded a scene or two elaborating on The Hand and where it came from or just characters hanging out, honestly. Given how good everyone is, fleshing the character's world and contexts would've been welcome. But as it stands, this is just a well put together, tight film that I'd watch again and show to as many people as possible. It's that good. And yes, even after seeing the movie, I would most definitely hold the hand, light the candle, and say "talk to me." (Oh and minor point, I loved how Australian this movie was).

In Glass Onion, a bunch of people are invited for a murder mystery weekend on a billionaire's island. Among them, detective Benoit Blanc, previously seen in Knives Out. Knives out was an engaging mystery with some mild satirical swipes at the wealthy. Glass Onion retains the mystery, and it's a clever, twisty one, but it seriously doubles down on the satire, taking down overrated tech bros (a species well-played by Ed Norton) and idiot influencers while making a clear case that the corrupting influence of money rules the world. The cast is excellent, particularly Janelle Monae as a seething ex-partner and Kate Hudson as a dim-witted, faded model. The dialogue is sharp and funny, and there is an absolutely hilarious scene of Benoit dismantling the murder weekend in two minutes that is in itself worth the price of admission. The mystery is a good one. You might figure out whodunit, but you're unlikely to figure out all the tricky details. I feel a little embarrassed that I didn't pick up a clever series of clues pointing to the billionaire's character, but I admit it was all in plain site. Apparently some people objected that the movie cleverly edited out information that it revealed at a later time, which is the kind of critique you make if you have absolutely no experience with the genre. As for me, I just admired how neatly it made those edits, and how wondrous it was to see the entirety revealed. Yes, the ending is absurd wish fulfillment, but it's fun. Some people say either Knives Out or Glass Onion is the better movie, but for me they are, while very different, equally enjoyable. I highly recommend them both.

Actually, yes listen to the critics. I feel sorry for Tom Hardy for being strapped to this piece of trash (but not too sorry considering how much money he pulls in). While superhero movies based on comic books can be fun, they're kind of the McDonald's of the movie world - not very challenging and mostly action with not much to think about, and Venom rates pretty low on the superhero movie scale. Even Tom Hardy's talent couldn't overcome a bad script with lame jokes and a boring formulated plot kept alive by special effects.

How is a serial killer and a next-gen symbiote trying to evolve thru destruction THAT weak versus Venom. Won't be watching the 3rd one because of how they wasted such a good setup from the first one and misused Shriek, Kletus, and Carnage for some donkey disney marvel points. Save yourself some time from this borefest. Read a reddit plot summary, much more interesting. Hell even the trailer was better. 2007 level dry humor with papercut as the closest thing to carnage I saw.

Boring. Cant continue watching it sorry but just boring cant understand why and how .

This is the first time I have seen a Tamil movie and I must say I am blown away. I have seen a lot of movies in hollywood and bollywood, I admit that in terms of psycho thrillers this one rates amongst the best in the world. Top notch direction and screen play, a terrific background score and acting makes this thriller a must watch.

Terrible, overhyped film that people think makes them smart for saying they liked it. A complete waste of time. Nolan does it again. Plus, it's a ripoff of "Dreamscape".

The most well rounded show in history. Heroes, sidekicks, villains, antiheroes, humor, suspense, sympathy, socioeconomic issues, it checks all of the boxes. Well done.

WARNING: VOAF (Very Overrated Audience Film) has struck cinema in the form of Thor with a over-bloated 7.9 IMDb rating in what has been described as an "epic" superhero film. The only epic thing about Thor is what a bore it was and where I felt myself drifting towards sleep halfway through. Seriously looking on here I shook my head with disbelief at the statistical ratings of nearly 40 per cent of ten out of ten and written reviews of a no less given rating of four (apart from one reviewer). The thing is I have to be honest with how I felt about this movie. I won't go into the plot really because other people on here have already given a synopsis and I can't be asked to waste my time writing one. Sufficed to say the story is very simplistic with no real twists and has all the usual clichés of the "bad brother" and the "damsel in distress" falling for the "hero." But hey this is not really much of a criticism as there are plenty of films out there that follow the same formula, but at least they were enjoyable like Spiderman or the Batman films, the old or new ones. What I will say that I did enjoy with this film, which stopped me giving this a turkey and ultimately becoming as worse as the truly dreadful I Am Number Four is the special effects, which I have to say were quite impressive. Some of the scenery was breathtaking, the 3D in certain scenes was well implemented and Anthony Hopkins gave a great performance. However these small positives are drowned into oblivion by the scale of terrible things about Thor. First off the rest of the performances are terrible across the board. Chris Hemsworth as Thor was ridiculously bad and just sounded like he wanted to be elsewhere. He might look the part in costume but he cannot act and didn't convince me for a second as the hero. This wasn't helped by the script, which made his character stupid (at first) but then he supposedly redeems himself. But for me he was just annoying as you don't come to care about him or any of the other characters. Tom Hiddleston as Thor's brother Loki carried no weight as the villain as he just sounded so dull and my Natalie Portman! She seems to have lost her brain since her extraordinary performance in Black Swan. She gives the most cringe-worthy and wooden performance out of the whole cast. She laughs like a hyena and smiles like a retarded idiot and I just wanted to slap her as she goes all luvy dubby eyed over Thor (what does she see in him!? There is no romantic chemistry between her and him whatsoever). All the other cast are just as bad in under-performing and again wishing like they were somewhere else and who could blame them with such a bad script. It carried no emotional weight or substance and was just dry and repetitive. All the characters are essentially cardboard cut outs with no depth (though some of the reviewers say there is!) so I didn't care about them. When Thor in one scene is supposedly killed, I kept wishing it would come true but it dosen't. There is very little action and even when there is the Michael Bay trait appears with you hardly being able to see what is happening because the camera is so close up with lack of continuity editing. Furthermore the 3D itself though impressively implemented in a few scenes was mostly bad. I could actually at certain points take off my 3D glasses and see where it was in 2D as there was no distorted image. It's as though Kenneth Branagh the director decided after a while he couldn't be asked to properly implement the entire film in 3D and thought "well the audience won't notice." Well he hasn't fooled me. If he thinks audiences are that gullible in that respect when it comes to poor 3D he's wrong. What makes me laugh though is that he in an interview said he added the comedy moments to make sure audiences didn't take the film seriously, but the comedy wasn't funny and the whole film literally had the tone of trying to be serious, which I think is part of it's big downfall for me. The scene where you think Thor dies and there is sad music is just for me sickeningly insincere. (A similar scene to one in I Am Number Four). When it comes down to it is that Thor is just another Hollywood glossy movie that pitches itself as delivering everything (but for most audience viewers it has) but really delivers nothing. Hollywood has duped us all and they should be ashamed of themselves. If you want to waste £7.80 or more if you see it in the evening or weekend on this travesty of a film, don't say I didn't warn you. You watch it as your own peril. The only saving grace surely for how awful this film is will be bought to light by the film critics when reviewed this Friday, which will hopefully help counterbalance the very overrated opinions of Thor from audience reviewers on here.

The worst movie I have watched since George Clooney's Midnight Sky. The plot is ridiculous and borders on a zombie movie. The flashback technique is overdone. There is no explanation for the myriad of unexplained phenomena What was Sandra Bullock thinking to take this role. The gore is right our of a horror movie - think Friday the 13th without the suspense. The only saving grace is the acting of the two young children. They were great. I can't believe I sat through all 2 hours waiting for it to make some sense. It never did and ended without an ending.

The show started slow, and the first two episodes were "too cheezy", then everything changes, and the pace picks up after episode 3. It looks like we are on for a rollercoaster, and so far I really liked what I have seen. Do not get distracted with the early looks.

Just finished the last season and I've got to say this show has gone further and further down in quality. The first few seasons were very good, funny, relatable characters and plot but this last and even the 4 season, at least for me, has some predictable and cheesy jokes and dialogue, it turned out to be more boring than entertaining. All things considered, it's an okay tv series.

Get over it. This is Lost in Space not child's day on new sound stage. I dont have very many problems with the new series. I think Maureen is a little too empowered, but toned it down a lot by #10. John plays the typical dad who's been away too much and doesn't know his kids. As a single father who raised a child pretty much alone from 2 to 18 I am kind of offended by the concept that Dad has to committ to work or family not both. A better take would have been Mom as the absentee and John as the stay at home. Then run from there. "Dr. Smith" is nice and sociopathic. As a former corrections officer I have to say she plays the unreformed ex-con just right. Always remember, in prisons the good guys are the guards, no matter how shown in most movies. Judy is a little too mature for 18. A few years older would have been more believable. The Judys of the 60s and the 90s fit this part better. I have no issue with her mixed race and thought that was explained well enough. Just too young for the role. Everyones lack of concern for safety is pitiful. Its an alien world with who knows what out there. Why is there not a workaround for weapons from the 3d printers on the Jupiters. The colony leader should have that information. Why are children allowed to roam around freely? ITS AN ALIEN WORLD!!! Stargate SGU does this a whole lot better. There are always redshirts protecting the main characters. Give the show a chance. Netflix is certainly where its at anymore. Its certainly not the SyFy channel anymore and not the main networks.

Great movie , great story , the fighting scenes were amazing. all actors made a great job, and everything was perfect . I really enjoyed watching it and recommend it to all. 8/10

Civil War should have been called the Avengers Civil War, but things would've turned out different with Thor and the Hulk. Great fighting scene of the back and then during another great fight scene we get the Black Panther! Holy cow! He owns this movie! Marvel just can't stop kicking it up. Oh we're not done yet we get a taste of our friendly...you know the rest. The kid is awesome! Culminate treachery and having to chose sides they should have come out with a second part, no Thanos or other worldly intervention just the crew going at it! Lots of fun action and new characters! Go see it!

This film is like a 10 year old wanted to make a murder mystery film. Everything is done in such a way that it either can be changed later to fit the purpose of the scene or it tries to seems smart by inventing scenarios instead of playing the scenario... I just lost interest in the film after 40min...where the big plot-twist happens... These kinds of films are fun to watch when everything is presented to you during the film and in the last 10 minutes you get the answers of how everything was put together to get to that answer, in this movie there is nothing like that. Even the movie says multiple times it's dumb and stupid at the end.

When I watched the first episode of Avatar: The Last Airbender, i was left drooling for more content. I was stunned at the visual, writing and everything else in between. The Show is made by American Producers in a Anime style. a quick Description with no spoilers. The Avatar, the only person who can master all four elements (Water, Earth, Fire and Air), has been frozen in Ice for over 100 Years. He is found by two Water Tribe Children who becomes Aang's best friends. The series is suitable for all ages and consist of Fun, Exciting and Fresh Adventures every episode, with it's serious and mysterious background plots and stories, creeping up to the Final episodes of each season. Which by the way are my favourite part of the Show. It's Funny, Clever, Mysterious, Soul Cleansing you name it. This Review probably sounds a lot like everyone else's, but I hope it helped Bottom Line (Literally), The Show is a much watch, sit down and enjoy with your family, maybe a quick episode during your lunch break or even a binge day by yourself. No matter how you watch it, you're 100% going be satisfied at the end.

Much like with Thor Ragnarok, there is a lot of hyperbolic praise thrown at Logan, most of which is undeserved. Previous two Wolverine movies were terrible and the bar is very low, one can't help but feel there's some overcompensating at work. Throwing words like "masterpiece" is really pushing it. Makes you wonder if these people watch anything other than capesh1t. A year earlier, a Mel Gibson movie called Blood Father came out with a very similar story, minus the mutants. Now, the accusation of outright plagiarism is unfounded, but Logan, let's say "borrows" heavily from it. The movie's central theme is a half-baked allegory for growing old and dying, sprinkled with CGI blood. In order to expand on this allegory, the best thing the filmmakers could come up with is for Logan to fight a younger clone of himself. The intent is obvious, but the result is underwhelming and anticlimactic. An honourable if failed attempt to add some depth to a movie about a guy who has retractable claws in his knuckles and who can heal himself almost instantly. The primary antagonist Donald Pierce, played by Boyd Holbrook is the weakest part of the movie, he doesn't have enough screen presence and his performance is forgettable. The director probably didn't want anyone to overshadow Jackman, but a more memorable villain would've added instead of detracted from the storyline. The last hurrah for Hugh Jackman's Wolverine, until Marvel Studios decides they want him to reprise the role.

I liked this series but too often was I confused by what was happening on screen. I'm not a Marvel fan, but I watched it because everyone said it was a great show. It would have been better to maybe explain more through the show for non Marvel fans. I think I would have enjoyed it more if this was the case. The acting was great and I liked the sitcom based ones. That made it more enjoyable.

After reading all the hype surrounding There Will Be Blood (Daniel-Day Lewis's Academy Award nominated performance, Paul Thomas Anderson's directing, the cinematography etc) I expected the pièce de résistance of 2007 cinema. However, it was actually more disappointing than American Gangster. Sure I may (and most probably have) missed the point of TWBB, but even if I did get it, I doubt I would have been any more entertained. It really was boring. The story, the characters, the setting, everything. Well, everything except Daniel Day-Lewis. His performance as conflicted small-time oil baron Daniel Plainview is exceptional. So is his mantastic moustache. If the whole film was stripped down to him offering profound monologues on various turn-of-the-century American Midwest sets, it would be acceptable. He really was the only factor maintaining my interest in the film, although he should still lose the Academy Award to Viggo Mortensen. However, if there was an award for hobbling duck walks, Day-Lewis would win by a mile. One particularly irritating aspect of TWBB is the character Eli Sunday, played by Paul Dano. Yes, I realise he's supposed to be irritating; that does not make his screeching voice or perpetual presence any easier to accommodate. Though evidently supposed to be a focal point of TWBB, his very existence drags the already unpromising premise (Oil! Wow!) into insipid mess territory. I cheered (well I didn't, but I could have) every time something bad happened to him, which was not often enough. Another annoying character is Plainview's 'son', H.W, who we're supposed to feel sorry for, for some reason. Considering his total absence of character development and the way he magically ages about ten years near the end of the film, the only feeling he evokes is puzzlement and indifference. And they're pretty much the only people I can recall. Oh, except for Plainview's long lost 'brother', the human equivalent of a plank of wood with a moustache drawn on by a Biro which has been chewed on incessantly by a moron. Other than Daniel Day-Lewis, the only positive aspect that can be taken from TWBB is the score composed by Jonny Greenwood of Radiohead. Paranoid and edgy, it fits the bleak atmosphere of the film perfectly. Actually, I would rather just listen to the score on its own. Although then it would remind me that I watched this in the first place. Great, everything is ruined. So, don't bother watching this turgid shambles unless for some reason you derive some kind of sadomasochistic pleasure from boring yourself stupid. Instead, just download the soundtrack instead and listen to it free from lingering, unwanted vestiges of There Will Be Blood invading your thoughts. To amend a quote by Plainview, "That wasN'T one goddamn helluva show."

Definitely think this should have been released all together in 1 season. The first episode was losing me and I started fast forwarding to better parts of the show. I did the same thing in the 2nd episode. I think I know what's happening now but I literally almost stopped watching after the first episode like someone else said. Hoping it gets better with more action and excitement.

It isn't bad. And it was nice to see Batman on the big screen again. Like, really nice, after "Batman & Robin", we all wanted to see it done right. Or at least redeemed a little. And it did sort of do that. The origin story was entertaining enough. Watching Batman leave and do the transformation thing was interesting, and his constant lies to Morgan Freeman added a nice touch to the character. It got even better when he was trying to really create the Batman that we all know, love, and probably read. But then, it takes a nose dive. The Batman voice stank. Bale never seemed to find his footing and made for a bad Bruce Wayne and a sort of weird Batman. And the last act, the final showdown, the big plot...well, it sort of leaves you rolling your eyes in frustration. All of that for an end this corny? You were promising us gold and...seriously, this is the grand plan? Get off it! I am pretty sure that people that remember it well, remember it primarily for the second act. But one great act in a three act movie doesn't exactly make the film good. It just makes it moderately watchable. Still, compared to "Batman Forever" and "Batman & Robin" it was nice to see the Dark Knight Dark again.

Quite a boring movie. There was no interesting script. Same old stories , over and over again. Save your money and watch something else. Totally wasted my time.

Christopher Nolan has officially jumped the shark. I enjoyed Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, but I was waiting and waiting for something to happen in The Dark Knight Rises. Inception was okay, but overly long and Interstellar was eagerly anticipated, until I watched it. Interstellar has a strong emphasis on family - it's written through the script like writing in seaside rock. Nolan seems to have confused thoughtful with dull. As the venerable Doctor of Film, Mark Kermode often says: "it needed someone to go through the script with a chainsaw." Although this isn't strictly fair, as the script is (although both wordy and "worthy") not the issue here - it's the pace of the shots. Lots and lots of quiet time, with long takes of the actors doing nothing, but gazing into the middle distance, reflecting on their predicament in a thoughtful way. Not a bad movie, thought provoking and in one scene, heart-breaking, but could've lost 30 minutes without trying too hard. Not the revolutionary movie it's supposed to be.

Am I the only person who pays attention in movies? I guess I am, because a lot of people say this movie wasn't at all predictable. But it was completely predictable if you even remotely paid attention. It's not a bad movie, but it would help if they would stop giving so many hints early on and make it so that the plot twist is actually a surprise.

Good racing scenes, ruined by flat characters (what was the point of Miles's wife being there) and a terrible hamming up by Christian Bale, apparently using his own English accent, but managing to make himself sound like Dick van Dyke in Mary Poppins. Very sexist too.

Love this show! Don't know the game, haven't read the books but great characters, compelling storyline and as for Cavill.....brilliant!! He's so different to all the other characters he's played, it's refreshing and ironically has quite a bit of humour.

It's look like a bad dream from the first seen it didn't snap in my head

The characters are far too much stereotypes. You've got the rough, tough cop, constantly smoking his e-cigarette, you've got the black tough but fair police chief, you've got the (too) young (too) dashing detective who naturally gets treated badly by the chewy worn out cop, and you got a town full of stupid, unlikable people who do nothing but wait for a neighbor or a policeman to walk in without knocking so they can share a beer together. Kate Winslet's "Mare" is probably the most over-the-top and unlikable character of all time. Rude, bitter, mentally unstable, burnt out and ready to check into the nearest asylum with a bag full of almost unbearable tragedies. But her character fits well in a town, full of weirdos and beer-drinking people who everything but working. Everything is out of place. People live together under the most bizarre and unlikely circumstances, they are all related and know each other, which BTW is an dusty cliché. To top it all off, the homes are ugly inside and out. And yes, you get a bit woke too. It's -20's after all.

The Power of the Dog is impressive with great performances, beautiful cinematography and a compelling script. The Power of the Dog is impressive with great performances, beautiful cinematography and a compelling script.

I had my doubt about this show for awhile even after it was widely talked about after release. See, I never liked much anime. But after a YouTube clip caught my attention I decided to check it out. The very first episode inticed me and i found myself immediately wanting to watch the 2nd, then the 3rd, and you get my point. The script is well written along with the plot. It builds up great to make your eyes be wide open expecting dramatic story created through chaos and the human desperation for survival. The only thing the prevents me from putting down a 10/10 is that the English Dub is not the original and I have to look for the episodes of my language. Besides that, however, the show itself is absolutely and extremely hooking. 👍

This movie is awesome, please must watch this movie

At its core, "Venom" is the story of Tom Hardy making friends with an intelligent goo from outer space. That earns some points for weirdness. Sadly, the movie as a whole is not bold enough to fully embrace its weirdness, constantly undercutting the inherent darkness and brutality of the Venom character with cheesy humor and tired superhero movie tropes. There are some things that work okay in this movie, though none work exceptionally well. The cast is maybe its strongest asset, but makes the uninspired script all the more annoying. Seeing Michelle Williams, an amazing actress who has been incredible in almost everything I ever saw her in, be reduced to "the girl" is saddening. Riz Ahmed, though I admire his being cast as the mad scientist character in theory, is very believable as the scientist but could have been a lot madder. And Tom Hardy is clearly trying to give Eddie Brock some dimensionality, but in some scenes, it seems like he's not taking this whole thing very seriously. I can't blame him. The script to a superhero movie doesn't need to be devoid of any clichés or familiar tropes, but if it employs them in such a liberal manner as in "Venom," there needs to be some self-awareness in it. Ruben Fleischer seems like the perfect director to make a script like this one work, because "Zombieland" was a very self-aware movie, and on top of that, it had good sense of character and even drama, in spite of its inherent silliness. But for some reason, he can't do the trick for "Venom." I could forgive the film for its other flaws if he had played it more for camp, but as it is, the movie seems like an unintentional parody. You might enjoy it on that level. Much of the dialogue, especially in the first half, is filled with cheesy one-liners and clichéd jokes that, while they did get a few chuckles from me, it was mostly for the wrong reasons. There is a particularly painful scene of Eddie Brock embarrassing himself in a fancy restaurant that reminded me of early-2000s mainstream comedies in the worst possible way. Overall, although a few of the funny scenes in the film are genuinely entertaining, it's mainly because of the talented actors in the piece and the details they bring to the table. But generally, the jokes in "Venom" more often fail than they don't. Another aspect of the film that could have redeemed some of its narrative and tonal flaws is the action. But here lies maybe the biggest weakness of the film: there is not that much action in it, and what little we get is awfully staged and edited. Even during the one-on-one fights in the first act, the director fails to make the stunts look like Tom Hardy is actually doing them -- which he might have, in which case this flaw is all the more unforgivable. Later, when the action goes bigger, we are treated to an atrocious chase sequence in which the filmmakers completely fail to give us any sense of location, so all we see are random shots of cars, faces, and streetlights, with no indication as to where those things are in relation to our main character. And for the finale, they decide to pull out every tired superhero movie cliché in the book. I could list them, but that might count as a spoiler, though if you've seen any superhero movie in the last ten years, suffice it to say, you will not be surprised by anything in the last 20 minutes of "Venom." Or rather, the last 40 minutes, because the credits sequence alone is 20 minutes long, during which the filmmakers saw fit to give us an almost comically formulaic mid-credits scene (if you consider the fact that the movie has a mid-credits scene a spoiler, you might enjoy the last fight scene) and an ad for an upcoming kids' movie. Classy. Although I did not like "Venom," it should be noted that I did have fun watching it. It is, like "Suicide Squad" two years ago, an entertaining trainwreck, and for that matter, it might even be one of those cheesy blockbusters that might be redeemed in couple years' time. But today, it feels very derivative and uninspired.

There is no doubt that Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 is the weakest entry in the Harry Potter franchise, which furthermore makes me doubt the weird decision of splitting this adaption into two separate films, since basically nothing ever happens in its 2 hour 26 running time. The cinematography is once again astonishing. While not as good as Azkaban's or Half-Blood Prince's cinematography, cinematographer Eduardo Serra does manage to create some beautiful images in this film, but in truth these are images for the sake of being images and not much else, since our three heroes spend hours in some forest in the outdoors while the direction focuses on a couple bits of melodrama & inner struggles, which ofcourse succeeds greatly as a time filler, but in the end it has little context. It starts off with this weird escape from the Dursleys towards the Weasley home ( which i thought was destroyed in Half-Blood Prince, but i guess nothing has to make sense in this movie ), even though the Dursleys was not the place we left off in Half-Blood Prince, making me even doubt how they got there in the first place without the death eaters interfering. Ofcourse, with tension for the sake of being tension they somehow do manage to find the crew when they travel back from the Dursleys, and after some death and injuries they afterwards decide to have a wedding party, which in itself is ofcourse asking for trouble, and it makes little sense in the context of what is happening. We also have a scene at the start to show how 'evil' Voldemort is and how we are supposed to hate him, with some unknown woman who is supposedly a teacher at Hogwarts as captive being killed for liking muggle-wizard connections. Unfortunately, this is not a very subtle way of forcing the audience to direct their emotions of hatred towards him, and since films should always leave that choice to the viewer themselves, or atleast pick a known character to be killed, this scene, like most in Part 1, is a time filler and nothing else. It is a film that is very different from previous Potter films since it seems to be a documentary about forests and outdoor scenery instead of something that is supposed to have an actual plot. The connection between the three main characters has never been worse as it was in the Deathly Hallows: Part 1. All three of them bicker and argue amongst themselves and none of them create any sympathy for the viewer, except maybe Hermione ( Emma Watson ). The biggest problem with this motion picture is that it is simply going nowhere. All the melodrama between Harry, Ron & Hermione is just such obvious filler while they try to charm the audience with its cinematography that it becomes an obvious wasted effort, and after the ending you will probably wonder 'Is that it?', since absolutely nothing happens. It has often been cited as 'Too slow', but that is not the problem at all. The problem is the entire plot is so vacuous of structure and payoff, and while most slow movies have a general core for its narrative or seem to be going somewhere, literally nothing ever brings a payoff in Deathly Hallows Part 1, it simply drowns in all its melodrama and the need to split the novel into two parts. The few action sequences that are there feature a lot of shakycam like Harry Potter has turned into a Jason Bourne film so you can no longer have any idea about what is going on. It hurts the eyes to watch, and it also hurts the eyes to witness this sluggish bunch of nonsense that never goes anywhere. If you enjoy documentairies with great cinematography about forests and general outdoor scenery, this is the film to watch. Otherwise, as something that is not intended as purely a time filler, and having an actual narrative structure, it fails on every aspect, since absolutely nothing seems to happen during the entire course of the film.

This movie is my favorite movie of all time. It goes under all of the movie categories. It's a romantic tragdomedy (tragdedy/comedy) I believe that anyone who sees this movie will be quite moved by it. It is about a college boy, who has a crazy and troubled history, who meets a drunk girl on the subway. Her feet are on the edge of the subway, where she could be hurt, but the boy pulls her away quickly before the train can hurt her. I don't want to spoil anything, so this is as far as it is going to go. I suggest that you see the trailer, found at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZQCHWOM9bw If you would be interested in watching this movie without having to order it or anything, you can watch it on YouTube, here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLZW2No4dT0 It has 14 ten minute parts to it, and after each segment is finished, you should press the next segment to see the rest. EX. At the end of part 1/14, watch 2/14. At the end of 2/14, watch 3/14. Simple. Also, it is in Korean with English subtitles. It's a great movie, and it would be a time well spent to watch it. I hope you enjoy it!!!