Datasets:

keertanavc

/

imdb_prefix20_forDPO_multi-preference_v2

like 0

This was an incredibly stupid movie. It was possibly the worst movie I've

This was an incredibly stupid movie. It was possibly the worst movie I've ever seen in my life. The only thing positive about the whole movie was the ending. I think the director is insane to think he had a decent cast and script. It was also the dumbest movie i've ever seen in my life. This movie was like a "Shakespeare in the Park" experience. It would take a little more time than this to go into depth about the movie, but I can give you

This was an incredibly stupid movie. It was possibly the worst movie I've ever seen in my entire life. The only positive thing is the acting and the director. The worst part was the horrible song that was put into the movie.<br /><br />The movie is supposed to be a story about a group of friends of the band.<br /><br />The group consists of four (4) friends, who are: (1) The main character, (2) The girlfriend (

Sloppily directed, witless comedy that supposedly spoofs the "classic

Sloppily directed, witless comedy that supposedly spoofs the "classic" '70s series of British comedy. A man (Cameron Diaz) has a terrible life in Los Angeles and finds the local radio station's airtime very precious and has to get as far away from town as possible in order to hear what the local news station has to say. As he travels from place to place he is met with a great variety of interesting and intelligent characters including an Irish-American, a Jewish

Sloppily directed, witless comedy that supposedly spoofs the "classic German films" of director Renny Harlin. The best scenes are the one with the "giant dung beetle", as it eats up all the surrounding dirt. The cast includes Paul Lukas, William Forsythe, Maryann Harlan, Frank Caprazzo, Arthur Hill, and Max von Sydow. I would never watch this garbage and it's bad to see the first 45 minutes, but by the

Dysfunctional family goes home for the holidays and murder and mayhem result.

Dysfunctional family goes home for the holidays and murder and mayhem result. Director is excellent. He's done it all before. It is well done and very scary.<br /><br />The movie was OK. The whole movie was boring, you can't make any sense. The script had a few holes but not enough to make a film about it.<br /><br />It seemed like a lot of the family was talking in the background and not really being disturbed by anything. It

Dysfunctional family goes home for the holidays and murder and mayhem result. The only problem is, she can't read his mind!<br /><br />It's so disappointing that it's no wonder the film never got a chance to grow into a bigger picture (the ending is almost like the one in "The Shawshank Redemption"). It's funny but unfortunately, and I mean truly, it's dull. If you want a film that will amuse you, go see "Gone

If you're after the real story of early Baroque painter Artemisia

If you're after the real story of early Baroque painter Artemisia, and the fate of her lover Paul, then go right ahead. Just be prepared to be slightly let down by the acting, which is very bad. Paul would be a better character, with better acting, and the dialogue with a little better direction. The screenplay is nothing more than an excuse for the director to have a laugh (with a lot of blood, with some silly dialog, with a total absence of good performances

If you're after the real story of early Baroque painter Artemisia, you'll like this film that was directed by Arthur de Geer, produced by Charles Guggenheim, and cast by Charles Dance (with Joseph Fiennes in the supporting role). It's also the first real chance you'll have to see a full-length opera that includes a full cast (including a young Helen of Troy), not just a few actors. All in all, an amazing cinematographic presentation that

As others have noted, this movie is criminally inaccurate in its portrayal of the

As others have noted, this movie is criminally inaccurate in its portrayal of the American South. It's a movie about southern poverty and segregation, about the poor and the rural poor. It has no real characters outside of a couple of poor black men and a few white people. So in that sense, I can't really fault this movie for what it did to the history of American slavery and segregation, but I can't help but think that the filmmakers got the South wrong. But I can understand why

As others have noted, this movie is criminally inaccurate in its portrayal of the South African war, and the British army under the command of William Howe. The British forces involved in the South Africa wars, the South African War, were comprised of white man-turned-Afrikaners, which means that many of their soldiers would have been African or non-white, and that the events in the movie are completely inaccurate.<br /><br />To be clear, this is a movie that should

Artemesia takes the usual story about the art world, eg,

Artemesia takes the usual story about the art world, eg, the death of the great painter Manet, and changes it into an action-packed comedy. A gang of thugs who want to buy the best paintings of the last century (and who, coincidentally, just happen to also be the best thieves), with the aid of a guy who's been a famous dealer in some of the same paintings, try to steal most of them. One of the gang, a very charming actor

Artemesia takes the usual story about the art world, eg, a famous painter or a movie star, and sets it over a few years of lives of various characters. There's a very short-coming in this movie that I saw quite a few times, and that is that characters often do not seem to know themselves, they seem to be based on the story. We're told who the characters are and their lives at least briefly. However, the story moves at a steeper pace

The acting is good, the women are beautiful, and the men are handsome

The acting is good, the women are beautiful, and the men are handsome. This is a really cute film with a great premise which we all wish we'd seen come across once more. The acting is also good, though the script sometimes gets a bit silly, like with the "jokes." The women are also really attractive, especially Kate Beckinsale. This is the best part of the film. There are other really good things, including the music. This is really fun! <br

The acting is good, the women are beautiful, and the men are handsome but they all have a tendency to speak too much in a rush. The music is great, and it's one of the best movies of the year. This movie is all about a young man who is not good looking but is really well written by a writer named Paul W. S. Porter. One of his daughters plays the lead character, and he plays very very well with the other girls in the cast. Great,

An awful film! It must have been up against some real stinkers to

An awful film! It must have been up against some real stinkers to get this terrible rating. It really just needs a bit of the original comedy elements like the comedy, a little comedy with a cast of people, and some silly acting that I don't really enjoy. Its no-talents actors just seem to be in that one role that they are so incredibly bad at. All in all, its nothing great, but the characters and acting are okay. Maybe if you enjoyed "The Odd

An awful film! It must have been up against some real stinkers to be chosen as a nominee.<br /><br />To many, this may be one of the worse films of the year. It has a mediocre storyline and actors that lack real performance.<br /><br />There is nothing redeeming about the entire film, except a really long shot that looks like it came from a video cam, and you have to wonder what a professional was watching that one shot. The most disappointing

What did the director think? Everybody who has read the biography of Artemisia

What did the director think? Everybody who has read the biography of Artemisia must think they have the answer to the question: "Why does this actress have a belly laugh?" It is the question which drives the film. This is one film which a non-comparative critic will find fascinating, just as the viewer will be drawn to its intensity and sheer strangeness. The story and film are so alienating at times that it seems a pity there was no one else to speak for. The

What did the director think? Everybody who has read the biography of Artemisia is in a state of shock that the man who made the movie hasn't been recognized as an artist in a long time.<br /><br />The screenplay must have been awful; why would anyone go out of their way to make a movie that just so happens to contain an "artwork"? <br /><br />It was a total disaster.<br /><br />This is the worst movie I have

This flick was a blow to me. I guess little girls should aspire to

This flick was a blow to me. I guess little girls should aspire to be some one on a Mission Hill who thinks that they are so cool with her not wearing any makeup while being with the movie star Brad Pitt.<br /><br />I don't think I was in the best place to be. I had just read that the movie was being made into an animated short, and I had to wait for it to be on a video and then finally on the big screen. But after seeing

This flick was a blow to me. I guess little girls should aspire to be this. I'm sorry but its not worth wasting time watching at this time on. It's really a waste of time watching anything by this studio. The plot is unbelievable and the only things that are happening at the right time are not even remotely interesting, and for such a high budget film that is. One of the only movies with a budget that does not need a sequel! Its just boring.<br /><br

When I saw the preview, I thought: this is going to be a

When I saw the preview, I thought: this is going to be a great movie and is going to be just as good as the original. This preview just didn't do that. The preview looked nothing like the original. It is just a different kind of trailer for a different movie. It's almost like a trailer for a movie that isn't in production. There is nothing in this preview to redeem it. The first three and a half minutes are kind of cheesy and the rest of the preview

When I saw the preview, I thought: this is going to be a really, really terrible movie. The plot was poorly written and the production design was terrible, and the whole movie felt like a total waste of your time. I should have been able to see that it had all been shot on video and it was supposed to be a "movies-like" set, with lots of people around, not an actual movie set. I'm still trying to figure out how it was that the

I was disgusted by this movie. No it wasn't because of the graphic

I was disgusted by this movie. No it wasn't because of the graphic plot. It was because it was so awful. It's not that some scenes and the story were great. It's that they didn't put a decent script around them. All of the characters looked like they had been put together by some sketchy photographer. I mean it looked like the director just made them do their first TV appearance and made them be "troubled." The characters are not well written. If I

I was disgusted by this movie. No it wasn't because of the graphic violence, I can't be picky. All you have to do is go and check it out. I was so annoyed by the movie that I couldn't finish it without a headache.<br /><br />I don't think this movie deserved to be a 4. I was just so happy it came out in China. I don't know the country's culture and I can't even speak Chinese but what was it

I didn't think the French could make a bad movie, but I was

I didn't think the French could make a bad movie, but I was wrong. And I was just wrong. The story was terrible, it lacked any story at all. It had to be an incredibly lame plot involving stupid women in ridiculous situations and it's pointless characters. The cast is ridiculous and the acting is atrocious. The acting is the main reason why I don't like this film but the plot is what gives the film its power. The characters were annoying and the plot was weak.

I didn't think the French could make a bad movie, but I was wrong.<br /><br />The plot could only be summarized by the title, "The Night Watch." All of the characters are really, truly awful. Most of them come on to the screen for as little as an instant, and you know they're going to be bad. <br /><br />The opening sequence has some of them sitting around in the old club. The first few scenes have them talking about

It figures this is a French film, LOL, with the emphasis on young

It figures this is a French film, LOL, with the emphasis on young actors and "faux French" scenery to keep you in the film. What happens in that Parisian apartment, we can only assume? <br /><br />Is it possible to take a Parisian's word for this? Paris is the city of Paris, but there is no Paris, and yet another story for Hollywood, the film is supposed to tell you that it is a Parisian's apartment. OK so

It figures this is a French film, LOL, with the emphasis on young people.<br /><br />It has a plot about an art gallery being closed and the owner looking for the place that can host a film festival.<br /><br />The story goes back and forth between the first of the film festival, and the second.<br /><br />Both of these films have an interesting structure that you can enjoy.<br /><br />The first of the film festival has a

Any time a movie is so myopic in its desire to present a particular

Any time a movie is so myopic in its desire to present a particular viewpoint, you have to wonder what's really going on in the director's head. This film makes all kinds of bad claims, with the director, and a writer and editor who seems to have little time for actual story telling. The film revolves around a man who has a very odd (but not a really bad) job, which requires him to go around photographing people with his camera. <br /><br />

Any time a movie is so myopic in its desire to present a particular event and viewpoint on it that it's not possible to have an intelligent discussion on it, but at the same time it's almost impossible not to be offended by it.<br /><br />The fact that so many people on this board seem not to even realise that this movie is, in fact, very much not of interest or significance to the average Joe does me one favor. I'm not even sure I agree with

2 stars for Kay Francis -- she's wonderful! And she didn't deserve

2 stars for Kay Francis -- she's wonderful! And she didn't deserve to get the part of Kate's boyfriend, as she had more to do on-screen with her friends (the same girls that play Kay and Kate's characters in the first movie.)<br /><br />I would definitely recommend this movie, and especially the second movie, which I'll be watching. And also "The Cat in the Hat," one of my favorite movies of all time and the third movie that I

2 stars for Kay Francis -- she's wonderful! And she didn't deserve the money in the first place. She does a nice job of looking really old, though, in the later scenes.<br /><br />Great acting and she comes off as a real character. All the lines, though, are a bit contrived and the whole scene falls flat.<br /><br />The rest of the cast does a nice job too.<br /><br />I thought this movie was pretty

Wow, the plot for this film is all over the place! There is

Wow, the plot for this film is all over the place! There is no real plot, but there are a number of other aspects that get all mixed up with the main action that could be important, so you can see that the director has no idea where the film is going. The dialogue is not clear, the plot, and the acting are all not well-constructed. This is also a film that I think was mainly made for people to be entertained but not too well-constructed

Wow, the plot for this film is all over the place! There is lots of pointless, gratuitous action, pointless humor, and a movie that seems totally at least somewhat entertaining! <br /><br />So what does this movie have that a lesser film could not? First, it has all of the usual Hollywood stuff: a lot of action, lots of action, and lots of guns. Second, it has the same old clichés. It seems that when directors put a character into

The competition for the worst Warner Bros Kay Francis movie is stiff. I've

The competition for the worst Warner Bros Kay Francis movie is stiff. I've never been a Kay Francis fan, but I'll take this one for the worst. This movie has Kay Francis on a horse with some guy in a band, and he is trying to play the ukelele for the horse. That's about all. The main character doesn't actually want to play the ukelele in this movie; he wants to ride Kay's bike. The horse is OK, but the

The competition for the worst Warner Bros Kay Francis movie is stiff. I've seen worse. I've seen a lot worse. That's what a great Kay Francis flick like the film "The Haunting" is all about.<br /><br />When this movie comes on, it will always hold a special place in my heart. But then again, the last time that Kay Francis was the most hated movie is when he released his other movie, "Tulip" for the DVD release.

I read somewhere that when Kay Francis refused to take a cut in pay,

I read somewhere that when Kay Francis refused to take a cut in pay, they'd give her the equivalent of $1 million to stay in the building. And this is a great example of why women don't work in the restaurant industry. They are scared they'll be fired if they refuse to work. I thought she should have been fired for not taking the cut and for making the bad jokes. All the acting was terrible. The lead actors were pathetic. I've never heard Kay Francis in a

I read somewhere that when Kay Francis refused to take a cut in pay, the managers didn't even have a chance to say anything about it. They only got in trouble when they realized Francis wouldn't cooperate.<br /><br />Anyway, Francis and her manager are on the train to Vienna when the coach goes through an accident and gets damaged. Francis wants to make a full refund, but the manager wants her to take the remainder of the money she would have made. <br /><br

When converting a book to film, it is generally a good idea to keep

When converting a book to film, it is generally a good idea to keep as much of the original text intact as possible. The DVD box contains a section of text that is a verbatim transcription of the original text. If you find that difficult to read it should be left out. As far as this film is concerned it is not as much an adaptation as it is a recreation of the original story. It is a good excuse for the remake of a classic horror film. The original film is

When converting a book to film, it is generally a good idea to keep as close as possible to its source material. Films that attempt to make an artistic statement with no reference to the original, in addition to being unrealistic and misleading, have had a reputation for disappointing.<br /><br />This film is not, of course, a documentary. It is a musical, with the original lyrics and music inserted in the right places.<br /><br />The film begins with the words that were

One of the most disgusting films I have ever seen. I wanted to vomit

One of the most disgusting films I have ever seen. I wanted to vomit for the first half of the film, but in that first 45 minutes I am actually happy. It is the worst film I have ever seen. The director is disgusting. the cast is equally disgusting. I can't believe the cast can get ANYTHING off of anyone, they are basically all wasted. The story itself should not be taken lightly, it is pure trash. It is the same story every time. I watched it

One of the most disgusting films I have ever seen. I wanted to vomit. I can understand why there was such a long review but I am still not convinced it has any redeeming features other than this:<br /><br />A. It was the only one-on-one sex scene I've ever seen in my life, and the most revolting aspect of the film is how disgusting it is. It was sick. It's hard to describe, even to those of you who

I realize that living in the Western Plains of Wyoming during the 1900s was

I realize that living in the Western Plains of Wyoming during the 1900s was not very ideal, and the conditions could easily have been compared to that of the United States of today. It's not a long stretch to believe that one of the many reasons people came to these lands was due to these isolated and desolate lands, filled with a hardy population. These people, some of whom came here to escape from the harsh conditions found in the mountains and desert, could easily have found a better future here

I realize that living in the Western Plains of Wyoming during the 1900s was a different time, and they had more people in this area, but I don't think the film is well acted at all, I feel it is not well written, and not a very fun film to watch either. It has an annoying pace, and it can be quite annoying when you are just trying to catch every minute from the film.<br /><br />For someone to give the film a 10 for the cast

That's what my friend Brian said about this movie after about an hour of

That's what my friend Brian said about this movie after about an hour of the trailer was over. He told me a couple lines: "I was like, 'What is this movie?" He also tried to catch me watching the trailer while I was out in the grocery store, but I was already trying to do stuff. I actually got in the car with my friend to see this. I can't believe they are still making movies. That was my point with this movie. I can see why

That's what my friend Brian said about this movie after about an hour of it. It was so dumbed down to the point that it was the best movie I have seen in awhile. You can be really funny too, although you would think with an all-white cast that they would have cut a black guy in a flashback scene. It was so sad that you felt bad for a white guy who was in the flashback scenes. I feel like I'm gonna cry too. Not the funny part

The only thing I remember about this movie are two things: first, as

The only thing I remember about this movie are two things: first, as a child I loved it. Second, the sound of the actors was atrocious. They were so young, and they were so very annoying. I've never heard a movie soundtrack that sounded as cheesy as this one. This was a great movie to get the movie going for me. I watched it on Christmas day of '84. Since it was the first movie to play, I waited until the last second of the movie

The only thing I remember about this movie are two things: first, as a result of the poor lighting, and second, the dialogue that was spoken by the young boys. It sounded very childish. The director of photography made a great job with some of the scenes and the editing was very effective.<br /><br />Overall: 2 out of 10. In my opinion, it was much more entertaining than I had expected and it really didn't deserve the negative comments. The best part of this

A stale "misfits-in-the-army" saga

A stale "misfits-in-the-army" saga of a military officer, with all the usual plot twists, with a big bad, and a lot of blood and guts thrown into the mix. I have seen the good, but am still a bit unimpressed. The two leads of the film seem to have been thrown in there simply to keep people guessing. I honestly cannot remember a movie where there is a lot of sex and blood and violence, but that is a

A stale "misfits-in-the-army" saga about a bunch of ex-servicemen sent by the government to help fight in the "First World War." The film is nothing more than an excuse for a director to have a bunch of ex-servicemen in his movies. The script is so lame, but the actual script is so cliché, and so ridiculous, that it is practically impossible to look at it and not cry out in frustration. What is supposed

I used to LOVE this movie as a kid but, seeing it again 20

I used to LOVE this movie as a kid but, seeing it again 20 years later has made me really think it was a really bad idea. The story is about a teen boy who is the son of a man who is in the process of going to a mental institution. He is sent to his room in the facility to be kept for an unknown purpose. This is a really boring movie, the scenes and the storyline seemed to be all so generic it just didn't appeal to me.<br /

I used to LOVE this movie as a kid but, seeing it again 20+ years later I feel like it is one of the scariest and most intense movies I have ever seen. This is not a movie you can watch any other time.<br /><br />The plot revolves around a man named Roberta. She's a high school drop-out. She's also an extremely strange and scary character that comes from a long history and has an incredible and mysterious past, but this character

Mad Magazine may have a lot of crazy people working for it...but obviously

Mad Magazine may have a lot of crazy people working for it...but obviously nobody thinks too highly of those who do. All of the people they employ seem to be the least attractive or interesting. That could be because of all the drugs they use on the staff. But, more likely, the only attractive people on staff are the people who are on staff. Most people I saw were very attractive. The one I saw was cute. All in all, I think it's a very good show and

Mad Magazine may have a lot of crazy people working for it...but obviously it doesn't have to put in the effort that some of its older (and probably the most "cool") writers do.<br /><br />The main part of the script is the same thing that was done in a much different way on a magazine of the same period (the late 80's) which can be found here:<br /><br />https://www.scribd.com/doc/11

Before I comment on this movie I just watched on YouTube, I have to

Before I comment on this movie I just watched on YouTube, I have to warn you. It's a great movie. I think it was the title that made me fall in love with it. The movie title just made everything about it. The movie begins with a shot that looks like it was made out of a camera that was not meant to be shot at. Then we get a view of the world's first human and his early days. And then it just continues. There are some interesting things

Before I comment on this movie I just watched on YouTube, I have to mention that it doesn't have a DVD copy to rent or to view, the main content is only available in a movie-stream. Even though the opening movie is available you can only play the opening movie, and that is not very well done. I would like to play it at 1.35:1 on my iPod, and see if the audio quality makes any difference. As I don't have a TV with a

There are bad movies, terrible movies even boring movies...I can watch most

There are bad movies, terrible movies even boring movies...I can watch most boring crap. So why is there this horrible movie with all the stars from the top of the world.<br /><br />The idea was a great, I'll give it a pass.<br /><br />The cast was great(with the exception of the bad guys, which was too small) and the script was a joke. One of the worst movies I've seen in a long time. Not to be

There are bad movies, terrible movies even boring movies...I can watch most movies that are boring, with just the occasional dull moment or so.<br /><br />The fact that I actually have a low opinion of this movie (like I'm supposed to be some sort of film critic), is the worst part of it. It was the second hour, and the script just seemed like random nonsense to me.<br /><br />The acting was really bad, I was like 'what are

How could I best express my feelings about this movie: hideous? a headache

How could I best express my feelings about this movie: hideous? a headache? It was nothing more than a slow-moving mess, with some of the worst acting I've ever seen in a single movie, including the one starring Will Ferrell. "What the Bleep was that you just said?", he asks as he is being subjected to some weird sexual fetish (he gets to show off his new tattoo of a woman's breast with some porno in the background of the movie). As someone

How could I best express my feelings about this movie: hideous? a headache? a slow pace that felt like going on an endless loop? and so completely devoid of any entertainment value whatsoever that the "film" in this movie was literally nothing more than a bunch of people watching each other, trying to find some kind of point, as to how something should be made. i thought the script was pretty lame but i had an idea of what was going on anyway...and i must have forgotten to turn

When I was at the movie store the other day, I passed up Bl

When I was at the movie store the other day, I passed up Blender and spent an hour or two in that mess, only to find out that the "real" movies I was looking for were so boring that I could just tell there was nothing else to watch.<br /><br />I found it rather amusing to see a random woman take a picture of this man sitting in a chair at the edge of the stage, with the door in front of his lap, and then show it

When I was at the movie store the other day, I passed up Blaine's "In the Company of Men" because it was on the shelf that was the next to the movie theater. The movie room was empty so this is not an exaggeration, as everyone at the movie theater was standing up. I would have spent the next two hours in the movie theater watching the movie theater screen and waiting for the trailer to go by.<br /><br />Now the first 20 minutes of the movie

This movie is not in anyway funny, it tries to be funny with it

This movie is not in anyway funny, it tries to be funny with it's cheesy acting, and the music is great. This movie deserves the special mention of being the first horror movie where you can actually take the time to enjoy it. It is so disturbing that you don't even want to be out there. It is the most graphic, and the scariest thing I have ever seen on a movie. The movie is great. This should not have failed on any level. It is truly

This movie is not in anyway funny, it tries to be funny with it's jokes but there is very little laughs in there. The actors are not funny, the dialogue is boring. It does not hold up to any of the other 'comedies' from the past. It is a true pity it was not in the DVD release I have on hold. A very sad shame. I can't believe the cast isn't doing a cameo in a new comedy. It's a shame not enough shows

Blonde and Blonder was unfunny.Basically, it was a rip

Blonde and Blonder was unfunny.Basically, it was a rip-off of the "Sesame Street" series.All characters were essentially the same, except one.The only ones that were the same were "Daffy Duck" and "Goblin."One of my favorite versions was about how Daffy was from California and was kidnapped and then tortured by the goblins.Another version of the story had Daffy as a "muppet" character, who would go

Blonde and Blonder was unfunny.Basically, it was a rip-off of Seinfeld(which, for me, was great) and its a story of an Asian-American husband, his blond wife, and her blonde-haired American husband.The main plot is about a Korean-American wife (played by the great Meryl Streep) who is sent to a boarding school in Canada by her Asian husband.The story line was awful.The director (Robert Zemeckis

This has got to go down as almost one of the worst movies of all

This has got to go down as almost one of the worst movies of all time (and one of the saddest) I'm talking about when it comes to awfulness, and it has nothing to do with this being some bad acting. So what is it that I like about this movie? First of all its so much easier, second it's a little bit more realistic than others it's actually pretty interesting, and finally it has a good story about a small town. Well, I do like

This has got to go down as almost one of the worst movies of all time. The plot twists had me completely bewildered and the dialogue was so poorly written that I actually found it hard to be taken seriously.<br /><br />Also, the actors were just horrible, just about everyone fell on the side of the plot. Most of them just stood there and tried to look all serious. I was actually taken out of the film by the lack of suspense.<br /><br />The

Warning: Avoid this super duper awful movie...if you watched it you

Warning: Avoid this super duper awful movie...if you watched it you would know why. It's a "poor guy on the street" kinda movie with a bunch of other poor guys getting together to form an "attention-grabbing" comedy team. And the funniest part is the ending. Not too hot but not too bad either. The characters are pretty lame, but if you look through the other cast members you can tell they are pretty lame too and they were all over this

Warning: Avoid this super duper awful movie...if you watched it you were just wasting time.<br /><br />In fact its a really hard movie to watch because of all the bad things,but it doesn't matter because it is the absolute worst movie ever,and it has so many stupid stupid things,like that retarded band scene and all the other stupid crap that you don't want to even watch.<br /><br />And the only good thing was the ending,but that

I was required to watch the movie for my work, so I didn't

I was required to watch the movie for my work, so I didn't get to see any of the special effects. The plot is basically the same. This movie is a piece of crap and I honestly can't believe a person actually gave this movie a chance. In a movie that doesn't even have anything funny to be the most basic. I'm actually surprised it was even released in Japan.<br /><br />You can tell that this movie was done so cheaply just so that they could

I was required to watch the movie for my work, so I didn't get a chance to get my full brain working. I must have watched around 60 minutes. It has to be one of the most boring and pointless of the year. I really had no idea what I was doing on any of the action, and as a result, I was very disjointed.<br /><br />In summary, I'd rate this movie as "The worst movie I've ever seen (and I

I was looking for a cute, simple comedy to pass the time but choosing

I was looking for a cute, simple comedy to pass the time but choosing to check out this movie on the big screen was just plain stupid. <br /><br />Why these kids wanted to watch this movie is beyond me. I don't know, just keep it out of the house, just keep the lights on. I think that the acting was good, they played it like it was. <br /><br />I would say this is not for kids because it is the same

I was looking for a cute, simple comedy to pass the time but choosing "The Shop at the End of the Street" was not going to be a good choice.<br /><br />I expected a comedy that was fun and made me laugh and I just got a flat, uninspired comedy.<br /><br />There's nothing funny about this film at all. It's just a boring movie about a guy who moves to an apartment complex and then gets bullied for it.<br /

What is this crap? My little cousin picked this out obviously for the overly

What is this crap? My little cousin picked this out obviously for the overly cheesy animation, the goofy backgrounds, and the obvious references to the 80's era. I guess this wasn't intended to be a retro tribute - although i guess it is a tribute in many ways. My only reason for watching this is for the very silly music and music that plays at the top of the screen while the movie is playing.<br /><br />The movie is overlong and it really does drag the movie

What is this crap? My little cousin picked this out obviously for the overly-detailed "film" graphics.<br /><br />This one is so much pointless and over-the-top, with some weird character interactions and over-the-top special effects. In a film that's over-long and repetitive, that's just boring.<br /><br />This movie is so over-the-top. As in "Fury Road," all of the characters are drawn incredibly

Sure, I like short cartoons, but I didn't like this one.

Sure, I like short cartoons, but I didn't like this one. It's short because it doesn't have many scenes, and it's short because it's boring. Don't watch the first 10 minutes and see if you can get an idea what I'm talking about. It's a short. The animation is bad. The characters have bad backgrounds. The plot is silly. The plot needs a lot of explaining (the ending?). And the story has no point. The only other short that

Sure, I like short cartoons, but I didn't like this one. What's wrong with the animation? It's just bad. It's terrible. The story and the acting don't match. All the characters are weak. You'd have to be a real moron to believe that you're watching a good movie.<br /><br />The acting is pretty bad at best. The plot, well, is predictable but predictable. The characters are weak at best. This movie isn't even

Add to the list of caricatures: a Southern preacher and "congregation

Add to the list of caricatures: a Southern preacher and "congregation lady" with what seems a total lack of intelligence on her part. But in the meantime, the script is just so unbelievable. In fact the script for the whole show was done on one phone (probably the same one used at the church with the young man who is in the first half of the movie). The cast were, in my opinion, excellent, although I don't know why anyone didn't just use their real

Add to the list of caricatures: a Southern preacher and "congregation" leader who's played as a caricature of all black men. And the fact that she's white. No wonder there was so much outrage about her casting. <br /><br />Then again, this is an area where I think the script and director was probably not all that creative. All in all, though, I found it more than a little embarrassing to see a black woman with a black man in it.

Even thought I'm not the biggest of Cher fans, this movie was her

Even thought I'm not the biggest of Cher fans, this movie was her best effort as a lead actress. The acting is absolutely perfect. <br /><br />I wish more actresses did this. But in spite of the actors who do not act well, the movie does not seem to be as fake as many "reality shows" would have made you think. I did not think it was a drama, but I think it is still very entertaining. It's a very well-done movie

Even thought I'm not the biggest of Cher fans, this movie was her first one I could not stay away from. I was the same way. This movie was so realistic and true, that it truly broke my heart.<br /><br />One scene that I think really made me cry. It was Cher. Cher playing a prostitute, in her most vulnerable state, trying to hide from the authorities. The scene of her talking to a cop on the street, before the police break the window

Generally over rated movie which boasts a strong cast and some clever dialog and of

Generally over rated movie which boasts a strong cast and some clever dialog and of course, some great acting and the most unbelievable acting, I think the movie was the worst movie of 2008. I can't believe that some people think this movie is bad. I thought it was great, but I won't spoil it here.<br /><br />I've seen "The Wire", "The Departed", "Wishful Thinking", "The Long, Hot Summer" and "Nip" and

Generally over rated movie which boasts a strong cast and some clever dialog and of course an incredibly well casted crew. The movie never fails to make me laugh with the best of them.<br /><br />What does the cast have going for them and what do they play for? Well let's face it, everyone has their faults and I can't say that every cast member in this movie is the bad guy. I can't really explain why the acting was so bad, I don't know

Ok, first the good: Cher's performance and the cinematography. Although

Ok, first the good: Cher's performance and the cinematography. Although the editing is bad, it's nothing that really could not be made by some combination of a VHS copy and some very poor production values. Then there's the bad: the main character is a horrible buffoon, and one which the audience should be ashamed for. There is nothing funny happening in his every moment. His character is not even a guy that is believable. The only reason that he doesn't get a punch

Ok, first the good: Cher's performance and the cinematography. Although her performance was not the best and I was disappointed with Cher, the cinematography, which was great on that subject was good, and there was some nice moments. The songs were pretty good in one way, but the other way was not as well put together. I would give an 8, but it was really more about Cher. The plot of the story does not make for the most interesting, but does have some nice

I watched this movie for a project on love. please tell Nicolas Cage to

I watched this movie for a project on love. please tell Nicolas Cage to come out and sing it to me like he did in "Lil Wayne's" video with the other rappers. This movie made me cry. you should have seen the scene where I see him singing with a really nice girl, and it was just beautiful. i liked the songs. i was crying like three times, and I was talking to the guy who was like "you got to stop crying. its not going to

I watched this movie for a project on love. please tell Nicolas Cage to not do it, he should have more of a career in films. i'm sure someone needs help from him. i would never advise you to see this movie but i do have to say this was one of the worst movies i've ever seen. i would never watch Nicolas Cage as this movie is pretty damn bad. the only thing that i can think of is his role in this movie. he really couldn't keep his

I don't care how many nominations this junk got for best this and that

I don't care how many nominations this junk got for best this and that, this is one of the top 10 scenes you'll see in a movie. I saw it twice this weekend (if you can call that many a day), first at the local library and the second at the same place near the theater where it opened and was able to watch both scenes at the same time. The first was a full-length scene, the second a mini scene.<br /><br />Now I understand

I don't care how many nominations this junk got for best this and that. This is a really, really bad movie. I don't care if your a big fan of horror or not. This is just really crappy, and even the worst of the supporting cast is terrible. The acting is really, really bad, and the story is really just an excuse for the writer to take a story that he has decided to throw away in favor of "superhero" characters and add all of his special

This show is painful to watch...<br /><br />It is

This show is painful to watch...<br /><br />It is not that it is horrible...but it's horrible. You will not get through this show and I'm sure you will not like it. The show is not meant to be enjoyed in any way, nor should the producer of the show be praised for creating an enjoyable show. The show was not meant to be enjoyed. It should have been shown on a channel that is more suitable for an entertainment show. The show should have

This show is painful to watch...<br /><br />It is almost laughable from a script point of view. The only people in the cast have to be in the show because the producers said they are needed for their scenes. The writing is atrocious. The directing is appalling. The plot is contrived and contrived.<br /><br />I don't know why anyone liked it, I really didn't.<br /><br />I would suggest to read a script and not

I'll admit I've only watched a handful of episodes, but each one

I'll admit I've only watched a handful of episodes, but each one of them has left an impression on me. Not that this was ever particularly good, just because I was expecting more. Even now, I still don't entirely grasp the emotional level of each episode but it still leaves me wanting more. What really caught my attention was how they handled the relationship between Hank and Peggy. It was one of those situations where you feel like you have to be the "good guy" or "bad

I'll admit I've only watched a handful of episodes, but each one of them was worth watching. The episodes are about the same character, so it's always nice to see them all. The animation is the best of the series and the background is superb. One of my favorite episodes is the first where the character is shown for the first time. As it is now, the animation was just terrible. The character designs were awful and the background felt like some sort of an amusement park. This

What I hate about this show is how poorly the leads are written. These

What I hate about this show is how poorly the leads are written. These characters are all very bland, not because they are poorly written but rather how poorly written they are. They all seem to be trying so hard to make it look like they are trying to be funny that they are just coming off as stupid. The writers can't write good lines. There is no charisma anywhere. They try to be so dramatic and believable that you just can't help but think they are trying to be dramatic.

What I hate about this show is how poorly the leads are written. These people are just trying to get attention so they have to try to make things appear interesting or compelling. There is no chemistry at all. This is not to say the writers are bad. It is just the way they choose to write their characters that makes them seem pointless. The only character development is between the two main characters.<br /><br />In the first half hour, we were told what the main character was going

Well, what can you say about sitcoms. There often quite lame,

Well, what can you say about sitcoms. There often quite lame, boring shows. So when people are making fun of a show, it's always fun to watch. They don't do it the same way a "real" show does it. It's not necessarily funny, its the same idea, but one that isn't even funny. The show is stupid. It doesn't have any humor, and it is the stupidest show I've ever seen. My favorite part of the show

Well, what can you say about sitcoms. There often quite lame, pointless nonsense, and often no characters. We get a movie here, which is really really, really bad and I am not kidding. No story, no plot, just some ridiculousness. I hate it. That is what the movie is really about. In the movie there is no reason to exist, and not the reasons that you feel that this is actually your everyday life. But it's like, well, whatever,

This was disappointing. It started well enough but as it went on and lost

This was disappointing. It started well enough but as it went on and lost a little bit of its original charm, things went downhill. One of the best roles ever by a veteran (that the director, Frank Warren, could have thrown to anyone) was played by Ray Milland, who was also quite flat as this lead character (which is also played, at best, by Paulie Curtis and the lovely Linda Park). The plot was good, but it had no impact whatsoever. Some may have

This was disappointing. It started well enough but as it went on and lost it's momentum it just became a pile of rubbish. They didn't know what to make of this film because the director and writer seem to have written from a script that is not really based on cinema so to me it feels as though the film was made off an idea that has been around for quite a while and the story is not really a story but a bunch of rants that aren't written in the script that have

One thing that astonished me about this film (and not in a good way

One thing that astonished me about this film (and not in a good way) was the amount of nudity. You can't help but sympathize with this lady. You can almost feel the loneliness. The sex scenes are also quite disappointing and in the end the story was dragged out for no reason. The acting in the film was average, and that is the worst part. This is another story about an old woman in a rural village who has decided to turn into a human statue. There is no

One thing that astonished me about this film (and not in a good way): how terrible the acting was. The cinematography and set design were awful, the editing and sound were horrible, and so on. The dialog was terrible, the direction was horrible (or at least, the direction is horrible), and that was the least of the problems. The characters were flat and not terribly convincing.<br /><br />The characters in this film were just about the same as most of the generic "

(SPOILERS IN THIS)<br /><br />"R

(SPOILERS IN THIS)<br /><br />"Rise of the Guardians" is nothing short of a marvel, with a cast of strong actors and a stunningly convincing plot, with its many twists and turns, and a terrific script, with its great use of detail and characterization, with its poignant themes, and great writing.<br /><br />The only bad part of the movie is the introduction of a strange black cat that is a monster, the same creature that appeared

(SPOILERS IN THIS)<br /><br />"Rivers of Time", I would say, is one of my favorite films of the 1970's. It was based on an Australian novel, but had all its actors and actresses in Australia and many were very young. Its a wonderful film, in it's most interesting aspect. Not like "Mystery Train", where it was almost like a comedy, but it was very thought provoking and with the right amount of heart.<br /

Overall an extremely disappointing picture. Very, very slow build up to the basic

Overall an extremely disappointing picture. Very, very slow build up to the basic premise: Two guys who are on a family trip and have their room taken away by some kind of supernatural curse and a whole bunch of creepy, mysterious, and downright scary things happen. It's kind of like a dream-like vision of the movie, with the two main characters waking up from nightmares where they're supposed to be in the movie and they're getting transported to a strange mansion that is supposed to house some kind

Overall an extremely disappointing picture. Very, very slow build up to the basic story that was the reason why I bought this film and you could see where the story was going (with this movie) I never thought the characters were going to become relevant. I just thought the story was boring. There were moments of moments where I thought the plot was about to get turned upside down which just didn't happen. Overall the movie was boring to the point where I thought I was going to be bored of my

This game was made by Sega. Being made by Sega I didn't expect

This game was made by Sega. Being made by Sega I didn't expect it to be good, I just wanted to play it. I thought it was great, but I was expecting to be blown away and think I was really looking forward to this. It is good, but nothing new. A good game I would have to say is Metal Gear. I think the best of the game is probably the final fight against Bison. But the game was very much like the original, you are not

This game was made by Sega. Being made by Sega I didn't expect it to be particularly good. My expectations are low. The graphics were pretty bad. The animation was also pretty bad. The gameplay is pretty bad. A lot of people complain about the graphics because they're like, "oh the animation's so bad, I really don't want to play this game". The animations are just too short. I was waiting for the animation to be complete and then the game started, because all

We don't have this on television in England but I walked it over the

We don't have this on television in England but I walked it over the summer just like everyone else. It's a shame it's not in the UK. Great atmosphere. My mates and I would have loved it. I just saw it in the cinema, and in the theatre as well. The director is awesome. It's a great horror film. The story has everything you want in a horror movie; violence, suspense, and suspense of the killer, and also the chase. My favourite scene

We don't have this on television in England but I walked it over the Atlantic and it is great! It is a bit long but I like the music in it so it keeps you interested. The best part is when you can see the light from the planet below as you have to fly into space to see it. You can see it in the night sky. The lights at the ends of the world appear over Australia and the world's oceans. This is the way of the universe in the book

** HERE BE SPOILERS ** <br /><br />Recap

** HERE BE SPOILERS ** <br /><br />Recap: (1st): She got to be a better fighter than all the bad guys, and she saved the day on her wedding day when she killed the man who killed her father.<br /><br />Her next mission: (2nd): She's the only one in the war who hasn't been killed, and she finds out who was with her father. They were kidnapped, and she, as a secret agent

** HERE BE SPOILERS ** <br /><br />Recap: <br /><br />"Lest you be so surprised and outraged you will say that she is a monster. Just look at her. And look at a human being. And you will see how the world has not evolved in all those centuries between, between the dark ages when she was so cruel and horrible and a great hero when she was more kindhearted and compassionate and beautiful.<br /><br />It

Just a stilted rip-off of the infinitely better "Murder

Just a stilted rip-off of the infinitely better "Murder Her Love" with a few very minor additions, this is a weak attempt to make a sequel of "Hustle & Flow", the best movie of 2002. The idea behind the film is simple, but you get an impression that it's trying to be something totally different. The movie seems to take an awful sequel to the level of "Hustle & Flow" and tries to make it so much worse, making

Just a stilted rip-off of the infinitely better "Murder at the House of the Self-Important Prince of Peace", this film is nothing short of a disgrace. In contrast to "A Time to Kill", this flick is almost entirely dull.<br /><br />The screenplay by Mike Judge and Scott Stewart does nothing for the script, and the story itself is weak. Its too easy to get involved and it never feels worth seeing. The only redeeming quality is Michael Keaton

This is an "anthology" horror film. It's made up of

This is an "anthology" horror film. It's made up of four "parvenu" directors of horror (the writer of this movie had to have had more than one directing job) as well as a cast of unknown actors. That is all. (Note that the "characters" in this movie are "spoilers"). One of the directors is James Whale (who was also the writer of "The Shining"), whose first two (and therefore two) work were the two

This is an "anthology" horror film. It's made up of a short run of short films which are so good I hardly care what's in them. It's made up of no good or bad in this "special edition" of the classic movie. It has some of the most memorable sequences of the 80's - a house that turns into a giant, a man who is possessed by an evil demon and a creepy creepy creepy creepy man.<br /><br />My wife and I

(Spoilers)<br /><br />I was very curious

(Spoilers)<br /><br />I was very curious about this movie and I haven't sat through it yet but I decided to give it a go. It was a shame I didn't put any money in. I was extremely disappointed by how slow it was, the characters all sounded pretty similar and the plot felt very predictable. It was very much like the others where the same thing was happening over and over in the same way, not by the actions the characters took but by

(Spoilers)<br /><br />I was very curious about these two movies after the first one.<br /><br />Both were very good. Both made it worth seeing.<br /><br />But, the movie with all of its music and a great cast is a different story. In fact, it was a more boring movie.<br /><br />If you watch it after the first one, you would just enjoy the other parts more.<br /><br

If you've ever been harassed on the Underground by a Christian who says,

If you've ever been harassed on the Underground by a Christian who says, "Jesus is the only way," or "No one else is good, except Jesus," you may be familiar with the title of this film, which includes the words, "God Is Love," "One Thing Only," "God Is Love" and, on a number of occasions, "Jesus Is Love." The director and writer of the film, David Lynch, may have thought of it as a vehicle for some of the

If you've ever been harassed on the Underground by a Christian who says, "Jesus is the only true one," or even a man who insists that God is racist, you really shouldn't see this film. The "sodomite" Christian comes across as the biggest hypocrite ever to walk the face of the earth. He talks about a "higher morality" and in the end tells you to believe in him. I can't believe a director that works at the University of North Carolina didn

An old intellectual talks about what he considers art in movies. You get your

An old intellectual talks about what he considers art in movies. You get your best idea from what seems like a poor excuse for an excuse. The scene in which he gets into the car and drives through a bridge looks like a scene from a low-budget movie for a low budget bridge. What an awful excuse for an excuse. My point here is that these are really really bad movies from the 70s - or so you would think. Why not make a film that was actually bad. Then again

An old intellectual talks about what he considers art in movies. You get your film for the money. The idea is to put a nice, easy-to-follow storyline on top of a low budget so the viewer doesn't even feel too bad about having to sit through it.<br /><br />What a joke! Not only are the plot and the acting a joke, but the writing, cinematography, and editing are also a joke.<br /><br />The story is not supposed

Already his first claim, that desires are always artificial, is totally fallacious

Already his first claim, that desires are always artificial, is totally fallacious. He is so self-involved in the whole of his existence that any act or statement by any of his self-identifying characters or events is automatically taken as proof of a desire to be a "true" person. It is really a self-centered assertion that he has this desire to be a true person. He has no other motive or reasons why he wants to be this person in fact. He has no other

Already his first claim, that desires are always artificial, is totally fallacious. The desire was present. What he failed to mention is that this desire was not present when he made the film. There was no desire or need to make the film. In fact, no one in the world even recognizes what was in the mind of the man who decided to go ahead with his film. This "film", in every sense of the word, was a failure, and that's the difference.<br /

This film is predictable; it is more predictable then a Vinnie Testaver

This film is predictable; it is more predictable then a Vinnie Testaverde film. The story is just like any other film, no plot twists. There is not really a plot. All we see is a very well done cinematography and music style to a lot of the songs. All of these songs come from different artists. It is actually not all that bad, I was actually surprised to see some pretty songs in the songs. The main character is pretty cute for a teenage girl. She

This film is predictable; it is more predictable then a Vinnie Testaverdi movie.<br /><br />It is about a guy named Richard Withers who has a sister named Jennifer and his parents are called the Withers, the Withers are in fact Richard's uncle and aunt, and the Withers are the uncle and aunt who has custody of Jennifer.<br /><br />They are trying to control Richard with a charm game in which a lot of money is

This movie had the potential to be far more than it was. But it

This movie had the potential to be far more than it was. But it fell apart for the director. For the director and the cast and the writer, there were all these great ideas which went to waste. I have no idea why they felt the need to make this one. I've seen plenty of movies like this and the worst movie is usually the movie that I don't get but this is so-so. The screenplay and scriptwriters were not only unable to turn their initial ideas and ideas

This movie had the potential to be far more than it was. But it just lacked the proper material to work with.<br /><br />This movie is what happened when Hollywood missed an opportunity to make a horror movie that really scares the crap out of you. You can't really blame the filmmakers for trying to make a movie that is like the old black and white film noir or the vampire movie and they got it in the end. This has to be the first time that a movie has

Admittedly, I find Al Pacino to be a guilty pleasure. He

Admittedly, I find Al Pacino to be a guilty pleasure. He really gives his best effort to do a good job in his movie, while still feeling like he has to over act. I can see him in a lot of comedic roles, but in this one he is a complete unknown. I really can't blame him for it. But it was a shame he couldn't pull off much as a comedian.<br /><br />The acting is really bad, the camera work is crap

Admittedly, I find Al Pacino to be a guilty pleasure. He's been known to work with better people that most people in the movie business, and he's very versatile.<br /><br />This is one of his most underrated films, as it is his most popular one.<br /><br />It was a true shame that the ending was so disappointing.<br /><br />While we all know how to be disappointed, this movie was not for you because it was not

Wow. This is really not that good. <br /><br />

Wow. This is really not that good. <br /><br />I have no idea why anyone wanted to go there. At one point a guy goes into a cave with an axe to crack open a giant chest. I can't remember which chest was opened, but I thought the guy was supposed to be trying to open it. There was no music or anything else interesting about the movie.<br /><br />Then there was no dancing. There was just a lot of people walking around

Wow. This is really not that good. <br /><br />I didn't know who the director was. I was expecting a pretty cheesy slasher comedy, but, as the main character, I honestly didn't even see what he was shooting at the time. I got to laugh a few times, but then he just seemed like a real jerky guy.<br /><br />I think it was a nice surprise to see a good cast, some good characters and an interesting story

I was lured to see this movie by its starpower, but ultimately that

I was lured to see this movie by its starpower, but ultimately that's what drew me here. As the main character, a young man named Max (played by a young James Waugh), gets a scholarship to attend the prestigious St. Paul's Preparatory School in New York, his father, a stuttering artist, begins to struggle with his own vision of art. Along with his school pals, Max's best friend, Danny (played by a young John Belushi), the two are

I was lured to see this movie by its starpower, but ultimately that's where the movie faltered. The cast members are all really bad: first of all, there are several actors and actresses (the director, director, etc), most of whom don't even try, and in a scene in which one of them is being shot, all the actors and actresses (including the director and the director, who is never the same person) talk to each other in the same scene, thus making

Wow, a movie about NYC politics seemingly written by someone who has never set

Wow, a movie about NYC politics seemingly written by someone who has never set foot in Manhattan and yet somehow managed to cram it with a number of well-timed plot twists that actually make me think that there might be some Hollywood magic involved. It is a true work of genius that has no flaws in the slightest, and the film is nothing short of awesome. I have to give it 3 out of 3, simply because I could not resist watching the film twice, so that's one point out

Wow, a movie about NYC politics seemingly written by someone who has never set foot in the city. The two leading actors who made this movie can only be described as two incredibly selfish, self-centered people who, while well-meaning, have been absolutely awful. The whole movie was spent discussing the two main characters' past and current personalities in a few moments, so the movie would have been much better off with an extra half an hour of screen time to sit through this movie's dialogue. The

> What a dud. It began with some promise, then became unfocused

> What a dud. It began with some promise, then became unfocused, and is still not over. At one point in the film the actors were the only one of the actors that were not being paid, then there was a line on one of the cars where a young woman was talking to a female passenger that was never repeated and there was the whole scene with a young girl getting in some crap in her room at the hotel and she was like a big surprise, and there were no music

> What a dud. It began with some promise, then became unfocused and boring.<br /><br />A story line that is nothing less than flat, but it was so predictable that I didn't actually care about anything. A really annoying guy who was funny at first, and then just kinda disappeared. That was basically it.<br /><br />But that last third is so annoying that even a kid can enjoy it.<br /><br />The movie's only redeeming point

Don't get me wrong, the movie is beautiful, the shots are stunning

Don't get me wrong, the movie is beautiful, the shots are stunning, and the music is truly great. But I think most people should just watch "Jurassic Park". Yes, the plot has similarities with "Titanic", but the movie is actually so much better. What a difference between the two movies. "Titanic" was so over-the-top and unreal, and "Jurassic Park" is so realistic.<br /><br />To get back

Don't get me wrong, the movie is beautiful, the shots are stunning and the acting is amazing. But all together all the movie just didn't satisfy. The acting was lackluster and I had a bad time caring about what the other characters were doing.<br /><br />I feel like the movie had a good story, I was in awe of how great of an acting, but the story is just so unbelievable. And that's the only way I can explain it. I honestly felt like

I can't believe I am so angry after seeing this that I am about

I can't believe I am so angry after seeing this that I am about to waste my energy on defending this crap. This is a very short comment. This is a very short movie. <br /><br />This was not a movie for me, and there is no shame in that. I was in the same boat with this movie. Nothing really happens in this film, nothing interesting for us movie fans, but it is not bad. I would not even have considered myself a film expert

I can't believe I am so angry after seeing this that I am about to write so much. And I am a huge fan of indie horror. I just bought a copy of it and I can't wait for it to finally be released on DVD. I'm going to put this review up because I want to save a couple of people out there that don't know about this movie.<br /><br />I went to the movie theater and sat there for 3 hours before the movie started.

Yesterday was Earth Day (April 22, 2009) in the US and other

Yesterday was Earth Day (April 22, 2009) in the US and other places (not to be confused with Earth Day in some parts of the world) and on the TV we saw the "Earth Day" show. This is a show on VH1 (and maybe other places) with music by Frank Zappa and shows that "Earth Day" was actually a hit. For a long time it was the only music on TV, and some time around it was also one of the rare shows

Yesterday was Earth Day (April 22, 2009) in the US and other countries and Earth Day, the day that is celebrated by everyone at home.<br /><br />The Earth Day Society are one of the oldest societies which do not need to go on an annual basis.<br /><br />The Earth Day Society (EDS) has been around since 1978 and was founded to celebrate the Earth's Day, and promote a healthy, happy and sustainable society.<br /><br />To

i don't know why, but after all the hype on NPR i thought

i don't know why, but after all the hype on NPR i thought this was an overrated masterpiece. The acting is so-so and boring, the plot is just stupid. I don't even remember the last half hour, like a movie made on a TV show, with characters that nobody wants to speak about. The most important point i had was the ending. You have no idea what all the characters are trying to accomplish here? There is nothing to see besides two guys and the end

i don't know why, but after all the hype on NPR i thought to watch the film and hear what they had to say. As they gave me the same introduction as if i was a fool. The movie just made no sense. I can't believe people think they have a good movie. What a disappointment. Why they had to change the ending from the movie i'm not sure, but it's like they had a script that wasnt finished. It just makes the movie look like crap

A lot of death happens in the wild. You don't need to be

A lot of death happens in the wild. You don't need to be a wild child to understand that. The film is very violent. The worst gore effects are when there are people with their arms down on the ground like in the opening sequence.<br /><br />Some of the sequences are so bad that they were a waste of time. Some of the characters were just terrible.<br /><br />I'm not trying to sound harsh but the character's development, that's the first

A lot of death happens in the wild. You don't need to be an auteur to see what is happening. I thought the film was great. I thought it was really beautiful in that respect. It has an atmospheric feel about it and that is what this film strives for.<br /><br />To the average viewer, it is more a psychological study than a horror film.<br /><br />The script is a little too obvious. The characters are too obvious. I saw

My title above says it all. Let me make it clearer. If you

My title above says it all. Let me make it clearer. If you want to give yourself the best chance of ever having a romantic break you must learn how to talk, smile and smile and smile as much as possible. You must also learn how to smile while reading a book. I have been writing "book reviews" for years and this is the first I've written for a site with such high social media engagement. I'm the same age as the other reviewers but I feel this is a

My title above says it all. Let me make it clearer. If you have not had enough sex education you should watch and you are not looking for it. You should watch it because it makes you question your own morality and not because you want sex advice. It's a nice documentary and a nice treat for people who love film. It will take some things on board, it will be the best movie of all time, it will have some drama and humor, it will be sexy. Watch it

For those who'd like to see this movie? I'd say: go

For those who'd like to see this movie? I'd say: go for it.<br /><br />Now that I've read the comments and the negative ones, I'll add one more opinion on it: it's not a bad movie. Not a horrible movie either, not even a bad movie. It just isn't a bad movie. It's a pretty good movie. However, it does go on for 2 hours.<br /><br />It really just goes on and on

For those who'd like to see this movie? I'd say: go and see it. This was a bit of a let down. It had a low budget and it was just kind of plain crap. The plot is a complete joke. Everything was so poorly shot in the film and not really that great. It's just, the acting was just completely atrocious. For someone who wants to see this crap, you'll be sorely disappointed.<br /><br />One thing I can say

The Invisible Man is a fantastic movie from 1933, a cutting edge film for

The Invisible Man is a fantastic movie from 1933, a cutting edge film for that time period of what is considered modern cinema (which is to say Hollywood). The story is so well thought out, the cinematography is so perfectly framed and the acting so well scripted. The story revolves around a psychiatrist (Borat), a scientist (Arthur) and the two doctors who serve as his companions, Mr.Borat's assistant Dr.Einstein (Dorothy Lane) and his secretary Dr

The Invisible Man is a fantastic movie from 1933, a cutting edge film for the times.<br /><br />In the first film the director, George A.S. Whitehead, takes an old theme from the film serials, and introduces the concept of a man in a costume (a magician) who appears in the dark, and can show people the meaning of life.<br /><br />The first act introduces the characters of Ben-Hur, a magician who shows people the meaning

One could wish that an idea as good as the "invisible man"

One could wish that an idea as good as the "invisible man" in the sixties could never be duplicated in a movie again. That said, this film really caught the spirit, and the performance, along with all that I can put together, really made this movie. The film is funny and fun, and I think you will find your interest peaked at the moment you see someone take a picture of them in your hotel or something, which leads to a strange little game that starts with

One could wish that an idea as good as the "invisible man" could be pulled off of this bad movie. If you have not seen "the third man," watch it on the Lifetime Channel and see how a little bit of magic and magic realism can be put to good use. The actors are believable. The acting is pretty good, and the plot has a couple surprises. It had a low budget and actors, which is the problem, but you know what, this movie does have good

I get to the cinema every week or so, and regularly check out this

I get to the cinema every week or so, and regularly check out this great show that my family and I call The Movie Box. We usually end up having a laugh about about half the time. I thought The Movie Box and it's brother The Movie Box 2 was a great combination and we still do enjoy The Movie Box, especially the "Duck Soup" special. I like that show especially because it's fun for family and there is some light entertainment throughout. It is one of the few

I get to the cinema every week or so, and regularly check out this show. As long as I can find it somewhere I watch it!<br /><br />I am really disappointed that this show hasn't gotten a good laugh, it has a lot of well done, intelligent and witty skits, and you can see it on the late night Comedy Central. If you are the same age, and have an interest in comics, this show should be on your watch list!<br

(some spoilers) - as if you wouldn't know how it'll end

(some spoilers) - as if you wouldn't know how it'll end, I am certain that this is a movie for those who really have never seen a film with more action or comedy. The movie, as I'm sure you've guessed by now, is a love story, and there are many, many, many "good guys" that are not as bad as the bad guys. The film actually goes into quite a lot of detail on what I call the most boring "pulp"

(some spoilers) - as if you wouldn't know how it'll end if you don't know how it started.<br /><br />As soon as I heard it was the first time it would be in my area of the country, I wanted to see it. I'm from the UK, but for some reason (probably due to the fact it has nothing to do with the UK) I was too poor to get my passport stamped to travel to the States for that. I had to

Leave it to Paul "sex on the brain" Verhoeven to come

Leave it to Paul "sex on the brain" Verhoeven to come up with the absolute worst plot twist in his time! The main character is a scientist who is stuck in a wheelchair, a wheelchair that actually fits over his own body, because the plot has to make no sense any way. Basically the plot involves this scientist discovering a super technology that the government wants to put into mass production, and the fact that the scientist is part-spider, part-femalesuit. I

Leave it to Paul "sex on the brain" Verhoeven to come up with an excuse to have his character, an ex-cop/cop-killer, turn into a serial killer. The movie is essentially nothing but Paul "sex on the brain" Verhoeven's movie (which does not say much), with a lot of action and lots of sex scenes. The story starts with Paul "The Killer" Verhoeven and his daughter, Samantha "The Angel of the End" Ver

Going into this movie you know that this is movie has six lab technicians in

Going into this movie you know that this is movie has six lab technicians in it. It's a pretty high risk movie. But the characters are pretty good. Plus you get some funny scenes and some cheesy looking people. Most people can relate to the movie.<br /><br />The only problem is, it doesn't get any better from the first scene. Then the movie just goes downhill. This is just a bad movie with stupid situations, dumb characters, bad acting and just plain no plot

Going into this movie you know that this is movie has six lab technicians in it. You know that some of the action has guns. You know it has an explosion. You know it has special effects. You know it has action. You know it has explosions. You know it has special effects. You know it has cars. You know it has action. You know it has special effects. You know it has cars. You know it has explosions. You know it has cars. You know it

This is the kind of movie that leaves you with one impression.. Story writing

This is the kind of movie that leaves you with one impression.. Story writing has become a joke..(if not the same joke. Just look at some of the films that have been made in Hollywood recently. It's bad, not funny and the ending is very flat.. If you like trash movies, then this movie doesn't interest you. If you don't see yourself in one of these actors you better be kidding yourself. The story is bad. I can see no redeeming qualities in the

This is the kind of movie that leaves you with one impression.. Story writing and acting that is pure crap. A man gets home and he's suddenly attacked on the way..<br /><br />What can i say? Story line?<br /><br />Nothing. Not even the acting, is what brings you here..<br /><br />Is the acting better?<br /><br />I was surprised that she is pretty.. she has bad makeup and she's

Within the realm of Science Fiction, two particular themes consistently elicit interest, were

Within the realm of Science Fiction, two particular themes consistently elicit interest, were first (and still are) the human side of a robot, and secondly the possibility of life after death. These two elements have been so well represented by the various SciFi films that are out there, that it is an understatement to say that "the Matrix" didn't hold a candle to these in terms of appeal.<br /><br />The film is a work that is worth your attention for it's many levels

Within the realm of Science Fiction, two particular themes consistently elicit interest, were the invention of the computer in the late 70's and early 80's and the effects of modern living. As such, it is a film which takes a look at both. But one of these influences on the film, the computer and the way people interact with computers, is something which, in my opinion, should not be ignored.<br /><br />Cameos by Gene Hackman and Douglas Sirk give good

I don't normally feel much of an incentive to comment on films I don

I don't normally feel much of an incentive to comment on films I don't care about, but this film is so different. It doesn't have anything going for it. The acting is horrible. It is a very low budget movie that needs an injection of "fun" into it so I can't comment on the budget. The plot is very weak and there is absolutely no plot progression. Not only do you have to learn what's going on with a character every five minutes. The plot is

I don't normally feel much of an incentive to comment on films I don't like, because they're usually too good to get even a good review out of me. However, in this case I felt I had to give a comment. I have an aversion to any movie that has a bad reputation of being a bad movie, or having an unimpressive cast. But there's something about the "Strawberry Shortcake" film that made me sit up and take notice.<br /><

Unfortunately, one of the best efforts yet made in the area of special effects

Unfortunately, one of the best efforts yet made in the area of special effects and animation. It has many of the things one would expect from a James Cameron film. The characters are great, the setting, great. What the director misses is that the film itself does not work. You know the story from before, but it lacks any real purpose or tension. There is no real story, no plot. A lot of pointless action scenes (this is one of the first I've seen), and the

Unfortunately, one of the best efforts yet made in the area of special effects and effects, and an uninspired script that tries to be something in between the previous Batman films. The characters are bland and lifeless and the action is a lot of fun. They tried to recreate the feeling of the 1960's "Batman" by having a bunch of old cast members who weren't able to play their part properly. Even though Batman takes place in the 90's, the film is very much the 80's version

<br /><br />Paul Verhoeven finally bombed out on this

<br /><br />Paul Verhoeven finally bombed out on this piece of crap, and so much for those who are "anti-Verhoven" (like myself). It's a piece of garbage that shows the "artifice" of all modern films and even the idea of a film. The plot goes in a way that was meant for the movie to go into the background. Everything is thrown away so that it could be recycled for another movie, the director/writer and the

<br /><br />Paul Verhoeven finally bombed out on this "B-movie" for some time. There are so many mistakes (such as the "secret of the flying spaghetti monster") that it's not even funny.<br /><br />Not that the story was particularly bad either.<br /><br />The only "star" here is a great performance by the great Danny Huston. In fact, he's in the entire flick. If he were in this flick

Other than some neat special effects, this movie has nothing to offer. They

Other than some neat special effects, this movie has nothing to offer. They had me baffled as to what the hell was going on, as it was more about their personal demons than anything else. The acting is awful. One of the most uninspired acting of a movie I've ever seen. You see the actors, then what do you see? It's basically an extended scene with the actors in it.<br /><br />The only thing of note in this movie is the way the director

Other than some neat special effects, this movie has nothing to offer. They have some nice sets, but other than that I can't really say a lot of the plot really makes sense. The action scenes are some of the most ridiculous ever, but in between there is very little fight. The special effects are nothing special, but it's a lot of fun to sit back and watch the characters come together in a fight sequence.<br /><br />However, with a lot of special effects involved

I love special effects and witnessing new technologies that make science fiction seem real.

I love special effects and witnessing new technologies that make science fiction seem real. So, when I saw a movie that used CGI and an acting to keep the camera focused on actors, a completely different experience. There was nothing in this film or anyone in this film to care about. I was very surprised by this movie. I have watched a lot of movies and had watched the majority of them with a very clear eye to the characters, but I don't think I have seen this movie or a movie

I love special effects and witnessing new technologies that make science fiction seem real. And so it was with me when I watched "The Invisible Ray" (1993) in the movie theater of a Japanese hotel in Tokyo. But, this was, I thought, a bad mistake! It is, in fact, a bad movie. Bad for so many reasons - the story was ridiculous; the ending was stupid, and the cast (and acting) was terrible.<br /><br />That said, if

The buzz for this film has always been about the fabulous graphics that make Kevin

The buzz for this film has always been about the fabulous graphics that make Kevin Bacon look like a big jerk. And boy oh boy, was I a bit disappointed. It is only a few frames away from being a masterpiece, but just doesn't have the wow factor. I felt the entire thing was made to look so fake that the background felt a bit dull. Nothing really stands out but Bacon. Maybe it was the fact that it was all in black with nothing behind him and I just think it

The buzz for this film has always been about the fabulous graphics that make Kevin C. Clark seem so cartoonishly cool and in control at the same time - i would never get caught dead seeing this movie in person, but i have a feeling that i will soon.<br /><br />i was expecting more from this film - and sure enough the graphics were as close to the graphics in the late 80's series as we would have come back in the late 80's. there was something that made

This movie is worth watching if you enjoy marvelling over special effects.

This movie is worth watching if you enjoy marvelling over special effects. There is little plot, and the characters are all pretty and stupid.<br /><br />It should be watched and rewatched a little bit to see if it is a movie worth watching, or to see if it is just a dumb movie you're just going to watch to see if it is clever. Its fun. But watch this one and you might just find that one of the stupidest movies you've ever

This movie is worth watching if you enjoy marvelling over special effects. i watched it at about 7, and i have to say, this is one that i would have watched twice. the plot is nothing but an excuse to see a good acting, especially by the actors, the characterisations are good. it has a good plot, the acting is also very good, as you would expect from these movies, the movie is so good, that you will not even feel bad if you have finished

Shortly after seeing this film I questioned the mental competence of every actor and actress

Shortly after seeing this film I questioned the mental competence of every actor and actress that I had ever seen in my life. My main issue is with the acting by both Peter Caine and John Carradine. Both of them have to portray an older man and a female lead who are not remotely convincing. There is nothing in the film to recommend. I am more intrigued by the story and the script by Paul Reiser. I believe that Reiser was a wonderful writer, director, editor, and

Shortly after seeing this film I questioned the mental competence of every actor and actress. I am still wondering why this film never made it to the top of the U.S. box office.<br /><br />I am glad that I am not one of them!<br /><br />This movie has one thing, and that's the biggest talent, David Arquette. His face is always on, and his voice (as always) is always perfect for the scene. A real

Another violent, angry fantasy from Paul Verhoeven. Verhoeven is

Another violent, angry fantasy from Paul Verhoeven. Verhoeven is really showing off his skills here, and in this action thriller you see some really nasty stuff as well as some great stuff, the first thing that really caught my attention was the cinematography. It's hard to believe, but I found it very realistic, but there's a certain realism with some of the action sequences that makes them more violent than the action in the movies that go before. The plot also has some really neat

Another violent, angry fantasy from Paul Verhoeven. Verhoeven is really making this look like some kind of a cheesy, bad action film. I'm surprised that he hasn't already done a remake of "Die Hard". It's not that I'm a huge fan of Paul Verhoeven, or John Lasseter, but at least this one is worth watching. There isn't much suspense, no surprise plot twists and, well, I was just really disappointed with the direction. All

To describe this film as garbage is unfair. At least rooting through garbage can

To describe this film as garbage is unfair. At least rooting through garbage can be done by people. Not everyone does this by the standards of the most modern movies.<br /><br />In my opinion it is because of all the horrible choices by the directors and the script. I wouldn't want to have my back to a car that wasn't moving and I didn't even get to see some scenes. At the same time it was the same director that was making so many bad choices that I

To describe this film as garbage is unfair. At least rooting through garbage can be enjoyable. This is a film which will bring you the most entertainment when the script is good. With a bit of an ending, and a few good characters, this is a solid movie which can not be criticised.<br /><br />It is a pity that this film was never released in the UK and was the only film I've seen this year which has my sympathy.<br /><br />However, I

That's what I found myself saying time after time in the remarkably inept 3

That's what I found myself saying time after time in the remarkably inept 3D presentation of the film. First off, I had to look away for 2 seconds when the 3D scene showed a red-haired girl in a red-curtained car - even then I kept looking at my watch to see whether I was looking at the right channel. This kind of visual presentation is something I wish more films would do, like the old Japanese horror film "The Cat Returns".<br /><

That's what I found myself saying time after time in the remarkably inept 3-D movie. A guy jumps through hoops to get an egg, which he eats on the way. As he is leaving the scene and the movie jumps back in time for a dramatic moment that is just never there. The special effects are bad and the movie seems to be doing the same thing all the time.<br /><br />The most annoying thing about this movie was the fact that the film would change its resolution

I rarely make these comments but I felt compelled to spare others the pain I

I rarely make these comments but I felt compelled to spare others the pain I caused myself by writing this article on a Saturday. My reaction is not as innocent as most people presume because I think, in the past few days, I've seen a few things which I thought were very disturbing. However, these things, as far as I can see, are all very superficial. I think we're all sick of our own way of perceiving reality, and I can't even understand how we fail to

I rarely make these comments but I felt compelled to spare others the pain I'd felt listening to this "documentary". While I was not completely satisfied with the film, I found it difficult to watch and the movie would have been quite dull if they had made it look as it really was. The film is obviously not very good, especially during the movie and it has never had much appeal. Not to speak of the music. <br /><br />I can't believe I haven't heard

This picture started out with good intentions, Bacon the scientist out to test the

This picture started out with good intentions, Bacon the scientist out to test the new artificial heart. Unfortunately, he didn't have a heart transplant so he developed the artificial heart he needed. The results were spectacular and by the end, he was one of the only scientists in history to successfully repair a human heart. He went on to create better artificial hearts to help soldiers and scientists. He and his sister, Rosetta, live a happy life with the help of their best friend, John Locke.<br

This picture started out with good intentions, Bacon the scientist out to test the theory of the age of the Earth. It's pretty much what a scientist's dream could've been, but it falls flat and is pretty much a total disappointment. It's more interesting that the "The Bionic Man" in the first. It's a fun adventure, and I like Bacon's take on the character of the scientist. The supporting cast is a small yet very interesting group of people, including his friend,

C'mon guys some previous reviewers have nearly written a novel commenting on this

C'mon guys some previous reviewers have nearly written a novel commenting on this movie. I have a copy of the film and have been going through its dialogue on Google to help sort out any inconsistencies. The plot was just a whole bunch of "what a**holes do I have to tell my kid" type scenarios thrown on the screen. The actor playing the main antagonist was the best part of the movie, and he seemed to be the only one in the cast that seemed to even try to act

C'mon guys some previous reviewers have nearly written a novel commenting on this gem. Why not do the same? One of the most memorable characters of the series. They must have had a lot of fun writing this one.<br /><br />It was a really, really fun episode to watch. And I love the music in this episode. I love the part where Jake is doing the music for his song, and the fact that Jake has a song on "the piano" and it's

Okay, now what the hell is this supposed to be? Is it a

Okay, now what the hell is this supposed to be? Is it a sequel to the original "Astonishing" with some major changes and better actors, or is it a completely new script? Forgive me, but I just think that the script is just stupid. It is not even funny. This movie is as lame as any other Hollywood horror movie that is out there. And the actors, all of them have to look dumb every time they are in this movie. A lot of actors

Okay, now what the hell is this supposed to be? Is it a movie about a man going down the pub to kill people? Is it one about a guy who keeps his girlfriend as he goes down the pub to kill people? Who knows, just be glad it is not one of the old horror-movie schtats, or you might get to see a couple of bad actors here and there. This movie was a total flop.<br /><br />The only redeeming feature

I saw this when it was in the theater, it started out so strong

I saw this when it was in the theater, it started out so strong but then suddenly fell apart like a house of cards. It doesn't give a damn about the story you hear it going around the halls. Just as all the scenes are a blur it takes over every single frame of the movie and nothing about the film that's just thrown in just to throw a big surprise at you like what happens later on or why so many people are so interested in what's going on.<br /><

I saw this when it was in the theater, it started out so strong, I wasn't sure if it was about someone or about a movie.<br /><br />the movie really just kept going but the ending was just so predictable and unbelievable. this movie never made any sense, I didn't know what was going on at all, I thought it was so boring and pointless. it was just too bad, and it felt like everything was so obvious.<br /><br />I'm