monology/jigsaw · Datasets at Hugging Face

comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic class label 2 classes	severe_toxic class label 2 classes	obscene class label 2 classes	threat class label 2 classes	insult class label 2 classes	identity_hate class label 2 classes
Also I have worked with microarrays, we cannot do what you are suggesting yet.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Welcome! Hello, Schweboo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Unprotect Talk:Connie Garner Hallo. Please unprotect Talk:Connie Garner - you was the admin protecting it long time ago with the reason: ""protected Talk:Connie Garner‎ ‎[create=sysop] (indefinite) (Repeatedly recreated) (hist)"", but it has an article now, and I want to add a WikiProject tag. Thanks. I've unprotected the page but I do note that the article needs cleaning for WP:OVERCITE issues. Rather than putting 13 sources behind one sentence, these should be interspersed throughout the article and/or reduced to about 3 sources. It also needs some cleaning for consistency. Article subjects should be referred to by their last name throughout the article and in the article there are sentences that refer to Garner by her last name and by Connie. (｡◕‿◕｡) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Fourth Examination, 17th December, 1455. [Additional statements.] The sum of a thousand pounds, or crowns, was given by the King of England for the surrender of the Maid; and an annuity of 300 pounds to the soldier of the Duke of Burgundy who had captured her. I was appointed notary in the Trial, together with a certain Guillaume Boisguillaume. The copy of the Process was shown to me is the true Copy made. I acknowledge my own and my companion's signatures, and that it is the truth. Two other copies were made. One was given to the Inquisitor, one to the King of England, and one to the Bishop of Beauvais. This Process was made from a certain Minute written in French, by my own hand, which was given up to the Judges, and was afterwards translated from the French into Latin by Monsieur Thomas de Courcelles and myself, in the form in which it now stands, as well and as faithfully as possible, long after the death and execution of Jeanne. As for the Act of Accusation and other parts of the Process, Maitre Thomas de Courcelles had very little to do with these, nor did he greatly interfere with them. With regard to the word Nota, written above certain Articles in the Minute, there was, on the first day of the Inquiry, a great tumult in the Chapel of the Castle at Rouen, where, that day, the interrogation was held, so that Jeanne was interrupted at almost every word, while she was speaking of her apparitions: Certain secretaries were there-two or three-of the King of England, who registered, as they chose, her words and depositions, omitting all her defense and all which tended to exonerate her. I complained of this, saying it was irregular, and that I would not be responsible, as clerk, in this matter: and, therefore, on the morrow, the place of meeting was changed and convened in a certain hall of the Castle, near the Great Hall, while two English were placed to keep order. When there were difficulties as to Jeanne's answers, and some said she had not replied as I had written, I wrote Nota at the top, in order that the questions might be repeated and the difficulties removed. Although it is mentioned in the Process that the Judges stated they had received preliminary evidence, I do not remember to have seen or heard of it; but I know that, if it had been produced, it would have been inserted in the Process. Jeanne was brought to Rouen and not to Paris, because, as I think, the King of England and the principal people of his Council were there. At the beginning of the Process, I was sent for to attend a meeting held at a certain house near the Castle, at which were present the Bishop of Beauvais, the Abbe' of Fecamp, Maitre Nicolas Loyseleur, and many others. The Bishop told me it was necessary that I should serve the King: that they meant to bring a fine case against this said Jeanne, and that I was to recommend another greffier to assist me. I therefore nominated Boisguillaume. I met Lohier in the Church, on the day after the Bishop had asked him to give an opinion on the Process, and inquired what he you ght of it. He replied, that the Process was of no value, and could not be maintained, because it was conducted in the Castle and not in a legal court; that it concerned many who were not summoned; that Jeanne had no Counsel: and for many other reasons. He added that, in his opinion, it was their intention to put her to death. A certain Maitre Nicolas de Houppeville was summoned to attend the Trial; and was in great danger, because he refused. Maitre Jean Lemaitre, Sub-Inquisitor, delayed as long as possible his attendance at the Trial, and was much vexed at being compelled to attend. One day, when Jeanne was being questioned, Jean de Chatillon spoke in her favor, saying that she was not compelled to reply to the question put to her, or to that effect. This much displeased the Bishop of Beauvais and his following, and there was a great tumult at his words. The Bishop ordered him to be quiet, and to let the Judges speak. On another occasion, when some one was advising and directing Jeanne on the question of submission to the Church, the Bishop said, ""Hold your tongue, in the devil's name!"" I do not remember the name of him who was thus spoken to. One day, some one, whose name I do not remember, having spoken of Jeanne in a way which did not please the Earl of Stafford, the latter followed him, sword in hand, to some place of sanctuary; and, if they had not told Stafford that that place was sacred, he would have slain him. Those who seemed to me most affected [against Jeanne] were Beaupere, Midi, and de Touraine. One day, I went with the Bishop of Beauvais and the Earl of Warwick to the prison where Jeanne was, and we found her in irons. It was said that at night she was fastened with iron chains; but I did not see her so fas	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
don't pretend i was attacking a group. i was raising a legitimate question about whether someone in canada knew enough about the topic to edit. that would apply just as much in reverse. in fact, they clearly didn't know enough. but pls don't let the facts get in the way of the campaign now under way.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Thanks for the revert Hey, I just wanted to say thanks for reverting my user page after Gmaxwell deleted it. I know you aren't supposed to use fair use images in user namespace, but they've only been in for a day and I plan to move the article over today or tomorrow. I think what he did was definitely overkill, and very immature, and I'm glad people like you are around to clean up after people like him.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
"Hahahahaha ! You can't relate Britons to ""Americans, Canadians, New Zealanders"" etc. in the related ethnic groups box because your NOT talking about ethnic groups ! You are talking about COUNTRIES, POLITICAL BOUNDARIES, not about ethnic groups ! This article is about residents called Britons (people born in or from Britain), NOT an ethnic group. For ethnic groups, go to English ,Scottish, Welsh, Cornish people. The ethnic group box is for ethnic groups, not countries, nationalities or citizenship !!! "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Don't allow yourself to be intimidated by Alex; he's just a little anxious since left. Oh, these faggots and their mood swings!	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false
Done, see Natural Logarithm (move it to complex logarithm if you find it better)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Bánh See Bánh for more info on Vietnamese things like thatI don't know this particular one. Have you searched online yet? Yuzu would only be known to Japanese and Koreans, basically.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. talk "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I blieve the translation from the press office is very good. For someone who is not German this may not be clear, but the first paragraph states intentions, not facts. In Germany there are still people who physically hurt other people and (very few) state authorities who do not act against this, so I believe using is may be confusing. If you want to do a literal translation, the upper version is closer to the original, while the press office version is closer to the meaning. Diverse errors and unencelopedic context use I would like to ask this whole article to be checked through. While most of it seems all right, there are passages that make no sense, lack imporatant information or are plain wrong. Examples: First paragraph of Drafting process is The outbreak of the racial fanaticism in Germany cost humanity approximately 62 million people, or 2.5% of the world population. About 60% of all casualties were civilians, who died as a result of disease, starvation, genocide (in particular, the Holocaust), massacres; and aerial bombing. While the numbers may or may not be correct, what is the purpose of this paragraph? The people who died and especially the people who did not die because of the war but because of the Holocaust are very important for the way to Grundgesetz was written. But there is no connection made. The next paragraph does not make reference to this and mentions the necessity to keep history from repeating itself in a much more neutral way. Later on: Any war could and should be categorised as an ""atrocity"" but the war that Nazi Germany started brought a scale of atrocity never previously known and the statistics of World War II clearly qualify it, by far, as the most heinous atrocity in all recorded history.... Unverified claim, clearly anti-German. The figures I heard suggest that both Stalin and Mao had a higher death toll than Nazi-Germany. Correct, most of their dead were in their own country, but I do not see how that would make it any better. ...and created thereby in Germany the legal situation within which any association of persons that, by reason of their aims or the behaviour of their members or adherents, seek to undermine or abolish this constitutional order is simply illegal, and which assigns to all Germans the absolute right and duty** to resist any person seeking to undermine or abolish this constitutional order, because this demand makes on the entire German people the memory of the 62 million casualties which brought the outbreak of the racial fanaticism in Hitler’s Germany. While it is unclear where this text comes from, it does not seem to be a quote. I do not believe that this demand makes on the entire German people the memory of 62 million casualties is something that should be claimed in Wikipedia if it is not a direct or indirect quote of some political, moral or other authority. There is also context missing the the right and duty to resist. Violence by the people is only intended as a last resort and is illegal if there is functional police or military loyal to the consitution to deal with the situation. Directly below the list with senseless emphasis, there is the claim that the German consitution contains blasphemy. Huh? The preamble contains a direct reference to god, other than that there is a rule that religion and state must not interfere in each others buisiness. I am not seeing any blasphemy there. At that time, Germany was a fairly religious state. To sum it up: I believe there was some editor here that wanted to make modern Germany look bad by applying non neutral wording and some unverified claims. The german version of this article seems much better and (logically) is checked much more often than this one. I suggest either having someone who not only read the whole Grundgesetz, but also has significant political and historical knowlege check this article for further inaccuracies or using the german version, which I believe is often checked by people who know the subject, to check this one through. There should be sources to every claim and despite the atrocities in the third reich, wording should be neutral and the crimes of the Nazis should only be mentioned in a context where it makes sense. PS: Sorry for the vandalism on this discussion page. There seems to have been an error while previewing this comment. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I copied the MD-80 and MD-90 content from here to the MD-80 article and removed a lot of the DC-9 content. It needs the background redone and some clean-up, but it's a start. -	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Clinton Foundation Hi, you removed an edit I made on the clinton foundation page... the edit I made was taking out a 500+ line Apple Service Agreement that was for some reason in the middle of the Clinton Foundation page... Pretty sure my edit was legit.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I'm glab that you are willing to consider being more civil on the talk tage but your recent additions of So run away like a good boy. When you grow up, come back and talk.. are uncivil, although I appreciate that you have since promised not to repeat them. It was not my goal in the talk:astromony page to be percieved as insulting you or to be percieved as an adversary, but rather to advice against the confrontational attitude which you appear to have taken from the outset and I am sorry that my comments have been interprated as something other than they were intended. It is my hope that this whole incident will just be an unfortunate minor blip at the begining of your wiki career. Have a great time and stay cool while editing.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Just to let you know, I support your contributions, as being accurate, informative, and educational. I thank you for taking the time to type them. I have learned quite a bit from your writings, and I wish to congratulate you on work well done eh.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Unprotect my userpage! I need to edit it	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Thank you for experimenting with the page December 8 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
It's impossible that the population drop in 1 year about 7 000 persons, because Romania's population had increased since the 2002 census. I don't believe the 2002 census, simply because there are too low figures (ex. Roma population of Romania was 500 000 at the census, in reality is about 1.5 mil). Open your mind, Polaron, and read others sources than you provide, becuase not just yours are credible. Here is the official site of the Romanian tourism: []. Check all the cities population and you will see that in reality they are bigger than the census. Arthur 10 June 2006	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
WIEM encyclopedia the article in WIEM is a piece of garbage, without a single source written by unknown author. It is not a valid reference for wikipedia for any facts, and your question is ridiculous. It is your duty to prove that such order existed. I am sick repeating: during the pervious discussion I diligently lookd thru original documents and found nothing even close. I am not less than you interested to present chronology of events of these times. `'Míkka	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
CARTERNUT1! SHALL NEVER BE BANNED-ALF	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" You had offered... SSB, A while back you had offered to be an intermediary for SqueakBox and I, as we had mutually agreed not to post to each others' talk pages (an agreement of which I am still abiding at least). Well, I would like to ask his assistance with a little Wikipedia-related ... project. I need the help, it may be a little fun for him, and I am totally in good faith (and need) wanting to enlist his assistance. If you might communicate to him that I would like to run an idea past him, I would appreciate it. If so, I'll do it as he wishes; on his talk page or on mine. If not, that's fine too and my feelings won't be hurt. Thanks!!! • • • 01:13 (UTC) 27 Mar '08"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I only had it there for my own amusement. It made me laugh. Everything I do here is for my own amusement. I do not wish to offend anyone, so I removed it.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
More history? The following was added to the intro at Telescope. I am moving it here because it seems to deal with specifically Optical telescopes. I am putting it in talk because some of it does not have much to do with telescopes (camera obscura, pinhole lenses, ect.), and it is full of un-cited claims. Crystal Balls were used in China and India as lenses (possibly in the form of a camera obscura) to see at a distance as early as 400 BCE. Around 1000 CE, the Arabian astronomer and mathematician, Ibn al-Haytham, expanding and scientifically testing theories of Euclid, Ptolomey, and Aristotle, wrote about both pinhole lenses and concave lenses in his mathematical book on vision. Roger Bacon wrote about combining lenses to see at a distance in the 13th century, as did the 16th Century Italian spectacle maker, Giambattista della Porta (1538-1615), and a host of others.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Thanks Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. (Even if it was slightly more inventive than the standard vandalism out there.) Talk to me	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I think it's about time we update this =)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Fred M. Levin Hi, I noticed that you created a biographical page for a psychotherapist in the past. Perhaps you would care to opine on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fred_M._Levin_(2nd_nomination) mwalla	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
July 2007 (UTC) Probably mostly modesty. Some people would be mortified if their friends and co-workers were to find out they had been snipped, because they confuse their fertility with their virility. Maybe that particular practice had had a bad experience with a meddling relative who found out something they shouldn't. 10:00, 23	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Do you even understand how ironic this statement is? Hello, I'm Ronz. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ronz (talk) See also WP:OR and WP:BATTLE. Ronz (talk) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. What you just did, is called censorship. Censorship. You do not like my opinion, so you censored it. I made no edits, I simply expressed opinions. I did not change anything. I brought up logical statements for discussion. Who are you anyway? Who gave you the power to decide what is ""neutral?"" I do not understand what your purpose is. Haha, who are you, the Official, the Authority, the Almighty, I have to discus with you how my statements are necessary and then you, the Official, decide. How ironic, are you aware you go against everything Wikipedia is about, unregulated discussion."	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Leave in Greenfield, MA 350.org Event Incident Since there are a whole list of future ""positive"" things listed, such as kids making pretty things, people on bikes with fancy armbands, and people planting trees, I thought it would not be out-of-line to list a negative event that actually occurred at a 350.org demonstration. It's hard on the one hand to say that this event wasn't related to 350.org but then include all these other events that are just as related. There are plenty of mentions of negative signs in the articles on Tea Party and 9/12 demonstrations. Did the organizers of those events intend for those signs to be there? No. Are they worth mentioning? Yes. It's pretty notable that one of these events featured a threat to a person. Bounties on private citizens don't go up every day. This article is a lot like an ad, but I guess that's the intent of the most persistent Wikipedia editors. If it puts them in a positive light, it's totally relevant and notable. If negative, it's not notable and totally tangential. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
User UXIVAS is back – worth keepin' an eye on	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Hello Merbabu! Thanks for your reply. I was going to revert too to your version (I went and read the article on the Banda Islands and saw the references), but had to leave in a hurry. Thank you for you compliment on the map - I did loose some time with it! It is still a work in progress, though. I see that you are a member of WikiProject Indonesia, maybe you could help with more precise locations for the Portuguese presence in the area - actual possessions and for how long, areas of explorations, influence and commerce/trade. Exact locations are not easy to came by! As for the reason for the split into two articles, it was done by an user called . You can check all the relevant discussions (and participate!) in Talk:Portuguese Empire#An exploration = Empire? and Talk:Portuguese Empire#Anachronous map of the Portuguese Empire (1415-1999). Please do! Cheers! "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
A page you started has been reviewed! Thanks for creating Greater Than Fire, KevinJDrieberg! Wikipedia editor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: Greater Than Fire is up for deletion. Do you know what to do? To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page. Learn more about page curation.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Caucasoid Is it really necessary to mention that some Uyghurs are fair-skinned and have Caucasoid traits? It sounds a bit like Nazi ""science"" to me... Luis Rib Well, they do have such traits. You can phrase it a bit differently if you like. ]] 02:24, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC) It wouldn't be necessary if we lived in a world in which race (whether considered a real or constructed category) was irrelevant. Unfortunately, that's not the case. The ethnic characteristics of Uyghurs play an important role in discussions of the relationship between Uyghurs and Han Chinese and thus how ""Chinese"" Xinjiang is or should be. In order to understand the politics of Uyghur/Chinese relations, it's important to know that these characteristics are commonly discussed. 20:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC) Why Caucasoid traits? These traits are probably more Semitic than Caucasoid. 86.166.123.12 The more we try to parse this issue the thornier it gets. Read the Caucasian race entry in Wikipedia and see if you can find any way to separate Semitic from Caucasoid. The entire concept of race is in dispute, and regardless of how people ordinarily discuss differences, an encyclopedia ought to try to avoid such uninformed hypotheses in its entries. It might be better to describe, for example, a people as having blue eyes and fair skin and lacking the epicanthic fold, as well as being largely Muslim, than to try to categorize them by ""race,"" and so I'd agree that dropping ""Caucasoid"" would be smart. After all, much of the European population has at least some Mongolian ancestry, as do Iranians, Turks, Central Asians, and so on - and Uyghurs are certainly included in this distribution regardless of their ""Caucasoid traits."" And if you go back far enough, I suppose the entire world population has African ancestry. You can see how this can become like an argument about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, and has no place in an encyclopedia that is trying to be authoritative and factual. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" How is the article ""promoting or advertising"" Jones' theories? Is it not merely stating his own observations, and also information known to be factual? "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
he did to Weekly Jump	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Taxonomic error Mr. Shyamal, who is written in the articles of Rognes is an enormous stupidity. Because in the monograph of Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940, Diptera, vol. VI, Family Calliphoridae - Fauna of British India 83, it is mentioned: « Bengalia R.D., Myodaiores, p. 425, 1830 / Genotype, B. labiata R.D. ». This fact is confirmed per much author, among the large specialists of the world Kurahashi, Benjaphong & Omar (1997:39), Yu. Verves (2005:238). Burmanos	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
So, you're saying place signs were using C for place names with the sound /ʃ/? Or were you saying you only saw the signs with the letter C (without hearing how names are pronounced -you only said you saw C earlier)?/ ⁽ᵗᵃˡᵏ⁾	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
- I put the link here but it was immediately removed, look through this page history to get to read the uncensored truth.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
whats up gook Whats up you asian gook chink man hoe chow how much rice did you pick today? all asians are filthy dog eating pieces of excretement, we raped your countryies during korea and vietnam war.	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	1true
Unspecified source for Image:Redeemer10.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Redeemer10.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (Contr)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
See canvassing here and here.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You left me hanging! Did you give her the razor? Did she need help? LOL	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
wtf your a queer	1true	0false	1true	0false	0false	0false
" That's why I pretty clearly put the ~ in there to indicate a paraphrase of the quote I was responding to, which was substantively accurate. More importantly however, semicolons separate independent clauses. I very explicitly responded to ""Most people have never even heard of it."" At this point you're just looking for anything to harp on, and it's pretty silly. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Ask younus Harami to start counting days.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I agree. I just think that we can give a sample of what comes below, by what comes at top. This might in the end only have 2 parts, like with terrorism article. I think this ordered approach has worked well, for the definition of controversial, multifaceted, misnomeric terms. PS.If I have time, I should like to merge our discussions into an ordered tier, if that would be helpful. -vertigo	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Dear Cirt I wish to answer you here as well as on the Afd where I have replaced my comment. My comment was in no way intended to be a personal attack. Being a channer is just a choice of webforum. It really wasn't meant as an attack. However, I thought that you were very reasonable in your response(s) to me AfD, then I was quite surprised by one particular conversation on your talk page which I took as meaning that you were conversing with other 4chan members on Wikipedia. I accept that I may have misinterpreted this conversation.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
May 2011 Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nelson Frazier, Jr.. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
articles put up for deletion arent voted on, people give their opinion and then state their reasons for wanting an article kept or deleted. Then someone comes and judges the merit of each sides argument.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Please also be sure to cite a reliable source when you add or change information in any article. Thanks!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Your aggression is unwarranted. You desire the world's children to see pornography? What?! I fail to understand your anger at me. Xchanter	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
}} {{WikiProject United States \|class=Start \|importance=low	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
what do you mean why don't you keep your nose out of other people's fucking business you twat	1true	0false	1true	0false	0false	0false
It can be substantiated. I really don't care to file an RFC. I can't wait for this latest one your buddy is talking about though. In fact, once the RFC is posted, make sure everyone in the article knows, so we can all comment. Who's the sockpuppets this time? You?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Bob What's wrong with the picture? Can you make a better one? If so, please do tell.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I think you should rest for a while from WP, take a vac, it would be useful for you.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Charles Dickens. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Push my button "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" There is a problem here, is that some editors claim Detroit is not the birthplace of Techno, but do not provide citations to back up their position. At the same time, the internet is bulging at the seams with information showing that Detroit is where Techno was birthed. Certainly, Europe has adopted Techno as it's own, more than America or even Detroit ever has or did, but unless we can get some REAL citations going we need to remove, what I see as, the wishful editing claims that Techno began in Western Europe. We REQUIRE citations. I'm honestly pretty neutral in this, I enjoy techno, but I prefer other genres. I just happened to stumble across the article, read the first sentence and checked the ""citation"" for the Western Europe claim (as it was news to me) and was sent to a dead page. I searched ""techno origins"" and found numerous pages saying Detroit birthed techno and added those cites. The evidence is just flat out contradictory to what some editors (wish to) believe. Honestly I do not care, but if Wikipedia is to be a reliable source, we as a community must be honest with what the facts are, or provide evidence (in citations) for alternate claims. I won't be doing any further edits in this article, I'll leave this one alone, I can sense this could turn ugly real quick, so I leave it to people who care more than I do. Ultimately, if I'm wrong fine, no biggie, just please give good citations."	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
here is the edit you just warned me for, please stop being a busybody. this is exactly the kind of noob hate i was talking about. thanks. 86.44.33.121	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You said that the article should present the facts as found by the ICTY. And they were presented that way. I don't see what is the problem (Actually I know what the problem is, for you and your friends). On the other hand, there is a planty of sources including UN resolutions, US resolution, academic and human rights institutions as HRW and UCR, even in Serbia for instance Natasa Kandic and Fond za humanitarno pravo, which call it the Srebrenica Genocide. So, no need to lie, nor deny. Regards.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Quite possible. As I've alluded to in other posts, things often got mixed up when the explorers noted these things down. I've only ever heard Black Mountain and Mount Ainslie mentioned, but it could have been Mount Ainslie and Mount Majura. I still think the ""Nganbra"" explanation should be present in the ""Canberra"" article as well as the ""History of Canberra"" article. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
In favor of merging== Since August 2010, the underground and aboveground Cheongnyangni stations have been directly transferrable through a transfer passageway, contradicting Peterhansen2032's argument. As a rule of thumb, on transferrable stations on the Seoul Subway, the information is combined into one, even for stations with different names (e.g. Isu Station, Cheonan Station). Rather than having to go through a disambiguation page to access information on one of the stations, it would be much more efficient to integrate it into one page for convenient viewing. I support merging. ==	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Your concern at Wikipedia_talk:IP_block_exemption I have replied on that page. Briefly, it seemed that talk page consensus was leaning towards having an admin do the task instead of a checkuser, for diverse reasons. Please indicate on the talk page whether or not you agree. I will wait to take action until you reply. As I am biting my nails somewhat, please reply soon! -)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Boxer Stadium JonBroxton can you help me with a soccer stadium in San Francisco. You uploaded a great overhead photo of in 2008 and I want to do the same for Boxer Stadium and am having problems. NASA World Wind doesn't have enough data and http://msrmaps.com is a wiki copyright violation. Any suggestions?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Same thing, no difference. Fée is the Old French spelling, while Fay is the middle/modern English spelling (the word was borrowed from Old French, mind you).	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Retired numbers - Peyton Manning removal A user, who I've engaged in conversation on their talk page, removed Peyton Manning from the ""Retired numbers"" section of the article, on the grounds that it's ""assumed"" though not ""official."" My reasoning as posted on said talk page, was that Jim Irsay, the CEO of the Colts, stated pretty firmly that no player will ever wear the number 18 again (http://www.thephinsider.com/2012/3/7/2853459/peyton-manning-press-conference-transcript-2012-free-agency-nfl). There need not be an official retirement ceremony, or banner hanging in the rafters for the number to be retired. As such, I would open it up to discussion, but I feel that Manning needs to be readded, with the sourcing material included to prevent future confusion. 208.40.242.41 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Never mind I found them. But I was talking about the one on the top of your page.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hi Bading Putang ina mong bakla ka. Fuck you kang bading ka. Chumupa ka nalang gago ka. Puta puta ka. Walang magawa sa buhay! Diba asawa mo si NrDg. Chiunuchupaan mo siya. Tang ina mo mahilig ka talaga sa oten. Fuck Fuck you!!!! Bullshit na Bading. Manyak mahilig manuod ng mga bold na man to man. Fuck Fuck you. Putang ina mo Baboy na bakla. 210.4.58.35	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false
Ah, okay. Thanks for your swift response.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Bald Rock I was thinking about that!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
SharedIPEDU\|Cresskill Public Schools (Cresskill, NJ)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You should edit your user page to contain humor if you're going to keep that disclaimer. 129.15.127.253	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I have posted nothing on the article page as this would presumably be a Conflict of Interest, and have made here suggestions of the way in which the book may be used only because requested - my view remains that it should be done by an editor who does not have COI. I think that now we've moved on from the efforts to exclude a source through (wrong) application of the Notability guidelines we're left with Neutrality of Point of View as the main issue. Wikipedia reports what is out there and a decision to exclude entirely from an article an appropriate source which has a view on much that is in the article (as well as topics the article excludes) appears to be a bias. The idea that the only book of lit crit on Beedle the Bard has nothing whatsoever to add to an encyclopaedia article on the topic is incredible. I don't think COIN is central to the issue as it now stands; rather the central issue is NPV. I think there are wider issues which it would be interesting to discuss - for example had my username not been essentially my real name a post on the talk page a year ago saying ""hi guys, this book exists and has something to say about the article"" would not have generated this negative discussion. I suggest MedCab is a way forward because it can consider all issues, while COIN considers only one issue and probably one which is not central. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Study some linguistics before you say something idiotic like ""since when do verbs have plurals."" Moron."	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
May 2008 Testing, mememe. Little O'l Lady Who?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
This is the note I have added to the 1612 in Ireland discussion page: This deletion is a bit quick off the mark and fails to take any notice of context, particularly my trying to add birth and death entries to Years in Ireland. I am adding content to all the Years in Ireland articles as I find it and will be adding more to this, as I will to other such articles. It also allows others to add content in the collaborative way that is supposed to be Wiki - deletion this speedy allows no opportunity for this. Please have a modicum of patience - this speedy deletion approach is a very bad policy when applied in this way. NB this is not the same as 1612 itself.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
SS Yongala Hey there, I found an article about SS Yongala, which I have started doing some additional work on. Thought you may be interested in helping. It needs a fair amount of work such coordinates, info box, editing, typos etc. Anyway, if you are interested, I look forward to your imput. Cheers	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
THE ARTICLE TITLED THE ELLIOTT ARGUMENT IS VERY WELL SOURCED, NOTEABLE, HAS TONS OF REFERENCES, AND SEEMS TO MEET ALL THE CRITERIA. IT IN NO WAY IS ATTACKING ANY GROUP BUT RATHER IS A FORMAL ARGUMENT THAT IS NEUTRAL AND HAS A STRONG FOOTING IN THE CREATIONISM VS ATHEISM DEBATING SCENE. IT WILL UNDOUBTABLY WILL BE SWAMPED BY ATHEISTS TRYING TO TAKE IT DOWN AND SITE REASONS WHY IT SHOULD NOT BE ON WIKIPEDIA. I ASK THAT YOU PLEASE KEEP IT UP IN ALL FAIRNESS AS A LOT OF WORK HAS WENT INTO THE CREATION OF THIS ARTICLE AND THE FORMAL ARGUMENT ITSELF. REMINDER IF IT WASN'T WORTHY AND NO ONE CARED ABOUT IT, IT WOULDNT BE SUCH A TALKED ABOUT TOPIC/ARTICLE OF CONVERSATION. THANK YOU, AND I HOPE I HAVE MET ALL YOUR STANDARDS. ALSO, ATHEISTS PLEASE DO NOT EDIT OR ATTEMPT TO CENSOR THSI ARTICLE, BUT RATHER IF YOU CAN FEEL YOU CAN DEFEAT THE ARGUMENT LEAVE IT UP AS PROOF THAT IT IS FLAWED...THANK YOU AGAIN	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Forget it. After reading your other discussions with The Egyptian Liberal, you obviously have a different agenda than providing straightforward information as in an encyclopedia. Which is why both of you are being reported. I'm totally shocked and appalled.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
AfD nomination of Word by word dictionary I have nominated Word by word dictionary, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Word by word dictionary. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
LoL!! you're GAY!! you will never know how good it feels to fuck a woman up the ass!!	1true	1true	1true	0false	1true	1true
I am fed up with editors and administrators ignoring requests for assistance in removing personal attacks by dismissing inappropriate behaviour as 'that's just the way he is'. If Mr Steadman's ego is so fragile that he cannot participate in an online debate without getting hysterical, then perhaps he shouldn't do it. I want these comments removed. If not, then I will refer you to arbitaration for abuse of admin privileges, I will refer Mr Steadman for his CIV/AGF and NO PERSONAL ATTACKS - to get his page deleted or improved and to have him sanctioned. You keep on playing the guilt card and telling me to move on - I have, I have kept away from him - all I want is for someone to prevent him from attacking me. Please sort it.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Don Patch's Parents and Childhood == I think I know who Don Patch's parents are and what he looked like in his childhood from this pic. ==	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
No problem, I understand. Cheers,— • (yo?); 16:12, February 16, 2009 (UTC)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Age Yeah it said that Snake was aged because of FoxDie, but the actual reason was faulty cloning of the sixties.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
There is of course more than enough information on templates at Wikipedia:Templates. But what you are looking to do is to just add , or the like, to something you are already familiar editing with. To put two historical populations tables together you would use a table (Help:Table). To put Template:Historical populations into the template space for a city specific table, you would be using Template:Historical populations as a meta-template, which it is currently not designed for. I suggest asking at Template talk:Historical populations that it can be used in the template space by adding , or similar, to it.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I did not attack anybody. What do you think was an attack? Seems really lame to just accuse, without evidence. My questioning others' motives for unwarranted deletes base upon their own biases, might have been misconstrued.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Comment: Can we successfully close and move the article now? There is a clear consensus in supporting a move, opposition is limited, with the major point of opposition being that a non-consensus that this article should be deleted because Other Stuff Is Non-Notable. Obviously that is not what is being discussed here, and so their opposition is void. It's also been 15 days since the issue opened, and three days since any new comments.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Yawn. How about we dont? - Raja	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hey alabamoy boy why dont you stick your head up your fucking ass and see how far it fucking fits you fucking asshole	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false
Hello Category:WelcomeBotResearch Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for writing the article Kingston liu. Unfortunately, it doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, and has, as a result, been marked for deletion. However, please do not be disheartened by what may or may not happen to your first article, if indeed it is deleted - please continue to edit Wikipedia and add articles which conform with the inclusion criteria. For help, see Help:Contents. To find out what will probably be deleted, see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Thanks, and if you have any questions, please ask them on my user talk page. To do this, click on my name (just after this sentence) and click discussion at the top and then the (+) button at the top.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" About your improvements; good work, in general. I am still feeling lost about the description of Henry Cow's music being 'intense', a change from 'intensities'. Any music can be 'intense' for an aficionado. Me, I think Frith is intense. D ... Something more descriptive is needed. Regarding the presence of Beppe Colli, I do not see his notability, and the web magazine Clouds and Clocks is not mentioned elsewhere, by other media sources. When I Google ""clouds and clocks"", I get a 1965 lecture on rationality by Sir Karl Raimund Popper, and I get a children's book on encopresis, the soiling of pants. Similarly, Beppe Colli does not get mentioned elsewhere. The man and the website are not notable. Applying the same criteria to Babyblaue Seiten and the German reviewer Achim Breiling, I find that Breiling is a medical researcher who has published papers about genes, proteins and cloning, and has written prog rock reviews for the New Gibraltar Encyclopedia of Music in addition to a bunch of them at Babyblaue. CDBaby lists Babyblaue Seiten as a source, and an article exists about that review site in the German Wikipedia. It looks like Breiling in Babyblaue is somewhat more reliable a source than Colli in Clouds. Although Colli's observations are interesting, I cannot see keeping them. It's too bad, because he is the only reviewer who hinted at the CD having some loudness war characteristics, a step down from the dynamic spaciousness of the LP. About the ""bursts with"" quote from van Peer, the word 'eradicates' was wrong. Van Peer wrote 'eradiates', which is not a word, but he may have intended this construction as a neologism. That, or he misspelled 'radiates'. In any event, I returned 'eradiates' to the article, and added a [sic] template. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Wouldn't a better title be ""crypto-as-a-service? At least it would position the Crypto Cloud computing in the Cloud stack. Also there are recent publications on that subject."	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Great to hear that! So, what can I do to help? Do I need to ""Retag"" articles with the new tag? Let me know ) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Image Tagging Image:Mesa in Maricopa County map.png This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading Image:Mesa in Maricopa County map.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
(Meanwhile, I just noticed that an enterprising, scrupulous editor has supplied everything anyone could possible desire in terms of primary, secondary and - for all I know - tertiary sources. So the article's in good shape. Well done, whoever you are - and I apologize in advance that at least one person on this page will accuse you of being my sock puppet. Nothing to see here, Qworty. Move along now.)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
The tables will reflect the extent of influence of KONY 2012, the 20 cultural and 12 political figures should also be added to the introduction as well as the info box.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
, are you dumber than you look? asshole.	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false
I get your reasoning, but my friend Annie Munson who does the same genre started recording in 1989 but didn't make an album untill 1995, yet she says that her coreer started in 1989. i thought it'd be the same with deadmau5, but i do understand your reasoning. i can't find anything in the article other than the name of an album that acknowledges that he was active in 1998 at all. 199.101.61.190	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false

Also I have worked with microarrays, we cannot do what you are suggesting yet.

0false

Welcome! Hello, Schweboo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

0false

" Unprotect Talk:Connie Garner Hallo. Please unprotect Talk:Connie Garner - you was the admin protecting it long time ago with the reason: ""protected Talk:Connie Garner‎ ‎[create=sysop] (indefinite) (Repeatedly recreated) (hist)"", but it has an article now, and I want to add a WikiProject tag. Thanks. I've unprotected the page but I do note that the article needs cleaning for WP:OVERCITE issues. Rather than putting 13 sources behind one sentence, these should be interspersed throughout the article and/or reduced to about 3 sources. It also needs some cleaning for consistency. Article subjects should be referred to by their last name throughout the article and in the article there are sentences that refer to Garner by her last name and by Connie. (｡◕‿◕｡) "

0false

" Fourth Examination, 17th December, 1455. [Additional statements.] The sum of a thousand pounds, or crowns, was given by the King of England for the surrender of the Maid; and an annuity of 300 pounds to the soldier of the Duke of Burgundy who had captured her. I was appointed notary in the Trial, together with a certain Guillaume Boisguillaume. The copy of the Process was shown to me is the true Copy made. I acknowledge my own and my companion's signatures, and that it is the truth. Two other copies were made. One was given to the Inquisitor, one to the King of England, and one to the Bishop of Beauvais. This Process was made from a certain Minute written in French, by my own hand, which was given up to the Judges, and was afterwards translated from the French into Latin by Monsieur Thomas de Courcelles and myself, in the form in which it now stands, as well and as faithfully as possible, long after the death and execution of Jeanne. As for the Act of Accusation and other parts of the Process, Maitre Thomas de Courcelles had very little to do with these, nor did he greatly interfere with them. With regard to the word Nota, written above certain Articles in the Minute, there was, on the first day of the Inquiry, a great tumult in the Chapel of the Castle at Rouen, where, that day, the interrogation was held, so that Jeanne was interrupted at almost every word, while she was speaking of her apparitions: Certain secretaries were there-two or three-of the King of England, who registered, as they chose, her words and depositions, omitting all her defense and all which tended to exonerate her. I complained of this, saying it was irregular, and that I would not be responsible, as clerk, in this matter: and, therefore, on the morrow, the place of meeting was changed and convened in a certain hall of the Castle, near the Great Hall, while two English were placed to keep order. When there were difficulties as to Jeanne's answers, and some said she had not replied as I had written, I wrote Nota at the top, in order that the questions might be repeated and the difficulties removed. Although it is mentioned in the Process that the Judges stated they had received preliminary evidence, I do not remember to have seen or heard of it; but I know that, if it had been produced, it would have been inserted in the Process. Jeanne was brought to Rouen and not to Paris, because, as I think, the King of England and the principal people of his Council were there. At the beginning of the Process, I was sent for to attend a meeting held at a certain house near the Castle, at which were present the Bishop of Beauvais, the Abbe' of Fecamp, Maitre Nicolas Loyseleur, and many others. The Bishop told me it was necessary that I should serve the King: that they meant to bring a fine case against this said Jeanne, and that I was to recommend another greffier to assist me. I therefore nominated Boisguillaume. I met Lohier in the Church, on the day after the Bishop had asked him to give an opinion on the Process, and inquired what he you ght of it. He replied, that the Process was of no value, and could not be maintained, because it was conducted in the Castle and not in a legal court; that it concerned many who were not summoned; that Jeanne had no Counsel: and for many other reasons. He added that, in his opinion, it was their intention to put her to death. A certain Maitre Nicolas de Houppeville was summoned to attend the Trial; and was in great danger, because he refused. Maitre Jean Lemaitre, Sub-Inquisitor, delayed as long as possible his attendance at the Trial, and was much vexed at being compelled to attend. One day, when Jeanne was being questioned, Jean de Chatillon spoke in her favor, saying that she was not compelled to reply to the question put to her, or to that effect. This much displeased the Bishop of Beauvais and his following, and there was a great tumult at his words. The Bishop ordered him to be quiet, and to let the Judges speak. On another occasion, when some one was advising and directing Jeanne on the question of submission to the Church, the Bishop said, ""Hold your tongue, in the devil's name!"" I do not remember the name of him who was thus spoken to. One day, some one, whose name I do not remember, having spoken of Jeanne in a way which did not please the Earl of Stafford, the latter followed him, sword in hand, to some place of sanctuary; and, if they had not told Stafford that that place was sacred, he would have slain him. Those who seemed to me most affected [against Jeanne] were Beaupere, Midi, and de Touraine. One day, I went with the Bishop of Beauvais and the Earl of Warwick to the prison where Jeanne was, and we found her in irons. It was said that at night she was fastened with iron chains; but I did not see her so fas

0false

don't pretend i was attacking a group. i was raising a legitimate question about whether someone in canada knew enough about the topic to edit. that would apply just as much in reverse. in fact, they clearly didn't know enough. but pls don't let the facts get in the way of the campaign now under way.

0false

Thanks for the revert Hey, I just wanted to say thanks for reverting my user page after Gmaxwell deleted it. I know you aren't supposed to use fair use images in user namespace, but they've only been in for a day and I plan to move the article over today or tomorrow. I think what he did was definitely overkill, and very immature, and I'm glad people like you are around to clean up after people like him.

0false

"Hahahahaha ! You can't relate Britons to ""Americans, Canadians, New Zealanders"" etc. in the related ethnic groups box because your NOT talking about ethnic groups ! You are talking about COUNTRIES, POLITICAL BOUNDARIES, not about ethnic groups ! This article is about residents called Britons (people born in or from Britain), NOT an ethnic group. For ethnic groups, go to English ,Scottish, Welsh, Cornish people. The ethnic group box is for ethnic groups, not countries, nationalities or citizenship !!! "

0false

Don't allow yourself to be intimidated by Alex; he's just a little anxious since left. Oh, these faggots and their mood swings!

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

Done, see Natural Logarithm (move it to complex logarithm if you find it better)

0false

Bánh See Bánh for more info on Vietnamese things like thatI don't know this particular one. Have you searched online yet? Yuzu would only be known to Japanese and Koreans, basically.

0false

" Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. talk "

0false

" I blieve the translation from the press office is very good. For someone who is not German this may not be clear, but the first paragraph states intentions, not facts. In Germany there are still people who physically hurt other people and (very few) state authorities who do not act against this, so I believe using is may be confusing. If you want to do a literal translation, the upper version is closer to the original, while the press office version is closer to the meaning. Diverse errors and unencelopedic context use I would like to ask this whole article to be checked through. While most of it seems all right, there are passages that make no sense, lack imporatant information or are plain wrong. Examples: First paragraph of Drafting process is The outbreak of the racial fanaticism in Germany cost humanity approximately 62 million people, or 2.5% of the world population. About 60% of all casualties were civilians, who died as a result of disease, starvation, genocide (in particular, the Holocaust), massacres; and aerial bombing. While the numbers may or may not be correct, what is the purpose of this paragraph? The people who died and especially the people who did not die because of the war but because of the Holocaust are very important for the way to Grundgesetz was written. But there is no connection made. The next paragraph does not make reference to this and mentions the necessity to keep history from repeating itself in a much more neutral way. Later on: Any war could and should be categorised as an ""atrocity"" but the war that Nazi Germany started brought a scale of atrocity never previously known and the statistics of World War II clearly qualify it, by far, as the most heinous atrocity in all recorded history.... Unverified claim, clearly anti-German. The figures I heard suggest that both Stalin and Mao had a higher death toll than Nazi-Germany. Correct, most of their dead were in their own country, but I do not see how that would make it any better. ...and created thereby in Germany the legal situation within which any association of persons that, by reason of their aims or the behaviour of their members or adherents, seek to undermine or abolish this constitutional order is simply illegal, and which assigns to all Germans the absolute right and duty** to resist any person seeking to undermine or abolish this constitutional order, because this demand makes on the entire German people the memory of the 62 million casualties which brought the outbreak of the racial fanaticism in Hitler’s Germany. While it is unclear where this text comes from, it does not seem to be a quote. I do not believe that this demand makes on the entire German people the memory of 62 million casualties is something that should be claimed in Wikipedia if it is not a direct or indirect quote of some political, moral or other authority. There is also context missing the the right and duty to resist. Violence by the people is only intended as a last resort and is illegal if there is functional police or military loyal to the consitution to deal with the situation. Directly below the list with senseless emphasis, there is the claim that the German consitution contains blasphemy. Huh? The preamble contains a direct reference to god, other than that there is a rule that religion and state must not interfere in each others buisiness. I am not seeing any blasphemy there. At that time, Germany was a fairly religious state. To sum it up: I believe there was some editor here that wanted to make modern Germany look bad by applying non neutral wording and some unverified claims. The german version of this article seems much better and (logically) is checked much more often than this one. I suggest either having someone who not only read the whole Grundgesetz, but also has significant political and historical knowlege check this article for further inaccuracies or using the german version, which I believe is often checked by people who know the subject, to check this one through. There should be sources to every claim and despite the atrocities in the third reich, wording should be neutral and the crimes of the Nazis should only be mentioned in a context where it makes sense. PS: Sorry for the vandalism on this discussion page. There seems to have been an error while previewing this comment. "

0false

I copied the MD-80 and MD-90 content from here to the MD-80 article and removed a lot of the DC-9 content. It needs the background redone and some clean-up, but it's a start. -

0false

Clinton Foundation Hi, you removed an edit I made on the clinton foundation page... the edit I made was taking out a 500+ line Apple Service Agreement that was for some reason in the middle of the Clinton Foundation page... Pretty sure my edit was legit.

0false

I'm glab that you are willing to consider being more civil on the talk tage but your recent additions of So run away like a good boy. When you grow up, come back and talk.. are uncivil, although I appreciate that you have since promised not to repeat them. It was not my goal in the talk:astromony page to be percieved as insulting you or to be percieved as an adversary, but rather to advice against the confrontational attitude which you appear to have taken from the outset and I am sorry that my comments have been interprated as something other than they were intended. It is my hope that this whole incident will just be an unfortunate minor blip at the begining of your wiki career. Have a great time and stay cool while editing.

0false

Just to let you know, I support your contributions, as being accurate, informative, and educational. I thank you for taking the time to type them. I have learned quite a bit from your writings, and I wish to congratulate you on work well done eh.

0false

Unprotect my userpage! I need to edit it

0false

Thank you for experimenting with the page December 8 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.

0false

It's impossible that the population drop in 1 year about 7 000 persons, because Romania's population had increased since the 2002 census. I don't believe the 2002 census, simply because there are too low figures (ex. Roma population of Romania was 500 000 at the census, in reality is about 1.5 mil). Open your mind, Polaron, and read others sources than you provide, becuase not just yours are credible. Here is the official site of the Romanian tourism: []. Check all the cities population and you will see that in reality they are bigger than the census. Arthur 10 June 2006

0false

WIEM encyclopedia the article in WIEM is a piece of garbage, without a single source written by unknown author. It is not a valid reference for wikipedia for any facts, and your question is ridiculous. It is your duty to prove that such order existed. I am sick repeating: during the pervious discussion I diligently lookd thru original documents and found nothing even close. I am not less than you interested to present chronology of events of these times. `'Míkka

0false

CARTERNUT1! SHALL NEVER BE BANNED-ALF

0false

" You had offered... SSB, A while back you had offered to be an intermediary for SqueakBox and I, as we had mutually agreed not to post to each others' talk pages (an agreement of which I am still abiding at least). Well, I would like to ask his assistance with a little Wikipedia-related ... project. I need the help, it may be a little fun for him, and I am totally in good faith (and need) wanting to enlist his assistance. If you might communicate to him that I would like to run an idea past him, I would appreciate it. If so, I'll do it as he wishes; on his talk page or on mine. If not, that's fine too and my feelings won't be hurt. Thanks!!! • • • 01:13 (UTC) 27 Mar '08"

0false

I only had it there for my own amusement. It made me laugh. Everything I do here is for my own amusement. I do not wish to offend anyone, so I removed it.

0false

More history? The following was added to the intro at Telescope. I am moving it here because it seems to deal with specifically Optical telescopes. I am putting it in talk because some of it does not have much to do with telescopes (camera obscura, pinhole lenses, ect.), and it is full of un-cited claims. Crystal Balls were used in China and India as lenses (possibly in the form of a camera obscura) to see at a distance as early as 400 BCE. Around 1000 CE, the Arabian astronomer and mathematician, Ibn al-Haytham, expanding and scientifically testing theories of Euclid, Ptolomey, and Aristotle, wrote about both pinhole lenses and concave lenses in his mathematical book on vision. Roger Bacon wrote about combining lenses to see at a distance in the 13th century, as did the 16th Century Italian spectacle maker, Giambattista della Porta (1538-1615), and a host of others.

0false

Thanks Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. (Even if it was slightly more inventive than the standard vandalism out there.) Talk to me

0false

I think it's about time we update this =)

0false

Fred M. Levin Hi, I noticed that you created a biographical page for a psychotherapist in the past. Perhaps you would care to opine on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fred_M._Levin_(2nd_nomination) mwalla

0false

July 2007 (UTC) Probably mostly modesty. Some people would be mortified if their friends and co-workers were to find out they had been snipped, because they confuse their fertility with their virility. Maybe that particular practice had had a bad experience with a meddling relative who found out something they shouldn't. 10:00, 23

0false

" Do you even understand how ironic this statement is? Hello, I'm Ronz. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ronz (talk) See also WP:OR and WP:BATTLE. Ronz (talk) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. What you just did, is called censorship. Censorship. You do not like my opinion, so you censored it. I made no edits, I simply expressed opinions. I did not change anything. I brought up logical statements for discussion. Who are you anyway? Who gave you the power to decide what is ""neutral?"" I do not understand what your purpose is. Haha, who are you, the Official, the Authority, the Almighty, I have to discus with you how my statements are necessary and then you, the Official, decide. How ironic, are you aware you go against everything Wikipedia is about, unregulated discussion."

0false

" Leave in Greenfield, MA 350.org Event Incident Since there are a whole list of *future* ""positive"" things listed, such as kids making pretty things, people on bikes with fancy armbands, and people planting trees, I thought it would not be out-of-line to list a negative event that *actually* occurred at a 350.org demonstration. It's hard on the one hand to say that this event wasn't related to 350.org but then include all these other events that are just as related. There are plenty of mentions of negative signs in the articles on Tea Party and 9/12 demonstrations. Did the organizers of those events intend for those signs to be there? No. Are they worth mentioning? Yes. It's pretty notable that one of these events featured a threat to a person. Bounties on private citizens don't go up every day. This article is a lot like an ad, but I guess that's the intent of the most persistent Wikipedia editors. If it puts them in a positive light, it's totally relevant and notable. If negative, it's not notable and totally tangential. "

0false

User UXIVAS is back – worth keepin' an eye on

0false

" Hello Merbabu! Thanks for your reply. I was going to revert too to your version (I went and read the article on the Banda Islands and saw the references), but had to leave in a hurry. Thank you for you compliment on the map - I did loose some time with it! It is still a work in progress, though. I see that you are a member of WikiProject Indonesia, maybe you could help with more precise locations for the Portuguese presence in the area - actual possessions and for how long, areas of explorations, influence and commerce/trade. Exact locations are not easy to came by! As for the reason for the split into two articles, it was done by an user called . You can check all the relevant discussions (and participate!) in Talk:Portuguese Empire#An exploration = Empire? and Talk:Portuguese Empire#Anachronous map of the Portuguese Empire (1415-1999). Please do! Cheers! "

0false

A page you started has been reviewed! Thanks for creating Greater Than Fire, KevinJDrieberg! Wikipedia editor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: Greater Than Fire is up for deletion. Do you know what to do? To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page. Learn more about page curation.

0false

" Caucasoid Is it really necessary to mention that some Uyghurs are fair-skinned and have Caucasoid traits? It sounds a bit like Nazi ""science"" to me... Luis Rib Well, they do have such traits. You can phrase it a bit differently if you like. ]] 02:24, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC) It wouldn't be necessary if we lived in a world in which race (whether considered a real or constructed category) was irrelevant. Unfortunately, that's not the case. The ethnic characteristics of Uyghurs play an important role in discussions of the relationship between Uyghurs and Han Chinese and thus how ""Chinese"" Xinjiang is or should be. In order to understand the politics of Uyghur/Chinese relations, it's important to know that these characteristics are commonly discussed. 20:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC) Why Caucasoid traits? These traits are probably more Semitic than Caucasoid. 86.166.123.12 The more we try to parse this issue the thornier it gets. Read the Caucasian race entry in Wikipedia and see if you can find any way to separate Semitic from Caucasoid. The entire concept of race is in dispute, and regardless of how people ordinarily discuss differences, an encyclopedia ought to try to avoid such uninformed hypotheses in its entries. It might be better to describe, for example, a people as having blue eyes and fair skin and lacking the epicanthic fold, as well as being largely Muslim, than to try to categorize them by ""race,"" and so I'd agree that dropping ""Caucasoid"" would be smart. After all, much of the European population has at least some Mongolian ancestry, as do Iranians, Turks, Central Asians, and so on - and Uyghurs are certainly included in this distribution regardless of their ""Caucasoid traits."" And if you go back far enough, I suppose the entire world population has African ancestry. You can see how this can become like an argument about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, and has no place in an encyclopedia that is trying to be authoritative and factual. "

0false

" How is the article ""promoting or advertising"" Jones' theories? Is it not merely stating his own observations, and also information known to be factual? "

0false

he did to Weekly Jump

0false

Taxonomic error Mr. Shyamal, who is written in the articles of Rognes is an enormous stupidity. Because in the monograph of Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940, Diptera, vol. VI, Family Calliphoridae - Fauna of British India 83, it is mentioned: « Bengalia R.D., Myodaiores, p. 425, 1830 / Genotype, B. labiata R.D. ». This fact is confirmed per much author, among the large specialists of the world Kurahashi, Benjaphong & Omar (1997:39), Yu. Verves (2005:238). Burmanos

0false

So, you're saying place signs were using C for place names with the sound /ʃ/? Or were you saying you only saw the signs with the letter C (without hearing how names are pronounced -you only said you saw C earlier)?/ ⁽ᵗᵃˡᵏ⁾

0false

- I put the link here but it was immediately removed, look through this page history to get to read the uncensored truth.

0false

whats up gook Whats up you asian gook chink man hoe chow how much rice did you pick today? all asians are filthy dog eating pieces of excretement, we raped your countryies during korea and vietnam war.

1true

0false

1true

Unspecified source for Image:Redeemer10.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Redeemer10.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (Contr)

0false

See canvassing here and here.

0false

You left me hanging! Did you give her the razor? Did she need help? LOL

0false

wtf your a queer

1true

0false

1true

0false

" That's why I pretty clearly put the ~ in there to indicate a paraphrase of the quote I was responding to, which was substantively accurate. More importantly however, semicolons separate independent clauses. I very explicitly responded to ""Most people have never even heard of it."" At this point you're just looking for anything to harp on, and it's pretty silly. "

0false

Ask younus Harami to start counting days.

0false

I agree. I just think that we can give a sample of what comes below, by what comes at top. This might in the end only have 2 parts, like with terrorism article. I think this ordered approach has worked well, for the definition of controversial, multifaceted, misnomeric terms. PS.If I have time, I should like to merge our discussions into an ordered tier, if that would be helpful. -vertigo

0false

Dear Cirt I wish to answer you here as well as on the Afd where I have replaced my comment. My comment was in no way intended to be a personal attack. Being a channer is just a choice of webforum. It really wasn't meant as an attack. However, I thought that you were very reasonable in your response(s) to me AfD, then I was quite surprised by one particular conversation on your talk page which I took as meaning that you were conversing with other 4chan members on Wikipedia. I accept that I may have misinterpreted this conversation.

0false

May 2011 Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nelson Frazier, Jr.. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

0false

articles put up for deletion arent voted on, people give their opinion and then state their reasons for wanting an article kept or deleted. Then someone comes and judges the merit of each sides argument.

0false

Please also be sure to cite a reliable source when you add or change information in any article. Thanks!

0false

Your aggression is unwarranted. You desire the world's children to see pornography? What?! I fail to understand your anger at me. Xchanter

1true

0false

}} {{WikiProject United States |class=Start |importance=low

0false

what do you mean why don't you keep your nose out of other people's fucking business you twat

1true

0false

1true

0false

It can be substantiated. I really don't care to file an RFC. I can't wait for this latest one your buddy is talking about though. In fact, once the RFC is posted, make sure everyone in the article knows, so we can all comment. Who's the sockpuppets this time? You?

0false

Bob What's wrong with the picture? Can you make a better one? If so, please do tell.

0false

I think you should rest for a while from WP, take a vac, it would be useful for you.

0false

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Charles Dickens. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Push my button "

0false

" There is a problem here, is that some editors claim Detroit is not the birthplace of Techno, but do not provide citations to back up their position. At the same time, the internet is bulging at the seams with information showing that Detroit is where Techno was birthed. Certainly, Europe has adopted Techno as it's own, more than America or even Detroit ever has or did, but unless we can get some REAL citations going we need to remove, what I see as, the wishful editing claims that Techno began in Western Europe. We REQUIRE citations. I'm honestly pretty neutral in this, I enjoy techno, but I prefer other genres. I just happened to stumble across the article, read the first sentence and checked the ""citation"" for the Western Europe claim (as it was news to me) and was sent to a dead page. I searched ""techno origins"" and found numerous pages saying Detroit birthed techno and added those cites. The evidence is just flat out contradictory to what some editors (wish to) believe. Honestly I do not care, but if Wikipedia is to be a reliable source, we as a community must be honest with what the facts are, or provide evidence (in citations) for alternate claims. I won't be doing any further edits in this article, I'll leave this one alone, I can sense this could turn ugly real quick, so I leave it to people who care more than I do. Ultimately, if I'm wrong fine, no biggie, just please give good citations."

0false

here is the edit you just warned me for, please stop being a busybody. this is exactly the kind of noob hate i was talking about. thanks. 86.44.33.121

0false

You said that the article should present the facts as found by the ICTY. And they were presented that way. I don't see what is the problem (Actually I know what the problem is, for you and your friends). On the other hand, there is a planty of sources including UN resolutions, US resolution, academic and human rights institutions as HRW and UCR, even in Serbia for instance Natasa Kandic and Fond za humanitarno pravo, which call it the Srebrenica Genocide. So, no need to lie, nor deny. Regards.

0false

" Quite possible. As I've alluded to in other posts, things often got mixed up when the explorers noted these things down. I've only ever heard Black Mountain and Mount Ainslie mentioned, but it could have been Mount Ainslie and Mount Majura. I still think the ""Nganbra"" explanation should be present in the ""Canberra"" article as well as the ""History of Canberra"" article. "

0false

In favor of merging== Since August 2010, the underground and aboveground Cheongnyangni stations have been directly transferrable through a transfer passageway, contradicting Peterhansen2032's argument. As a rule of thumb, on transferrable stations on the Seoul Subway, the information is combined into one, even for stations with different names (e.g. Isu Station, Cheonan Station). Rather than having to go through a disambiguation page to access information on one of the stations, it would be much more efficient to integrate it into one page for convenient viewing. I support merging. ==

0false

Your concern at Wikipedia_talk:IP_block_exemption I have replied on that page. Briefly, it seemed that talk page consensus was leaning towards having an admin do the task instead of a checkuser, for diverse reasons. Please indicate on the talk page whether or not you agree. I will wait to take action until you reply. As I am biting my nails somewhat, please reply soon! -)

0false

Boxer Stadium JonBroxton can you help me with a soccer stadium in San Francisco. You uploaded a great overhead photo of in 2008 and I want to do the same for Boxer Stadium and am having problems. NASA World Wind doesn't have enough data and http://msrmaps.com is a wiki copyright violation. Any suggestions?

0false

Same thing, no difference. Fée is the Old French spelling, while Fay is the middle/modern English spelling (the word was borrowed from Old French, mind you).

0false

" Retired numbers - Peyton Manning removal A user, who I've engaged in conversation on their talk page, removed Peyton Manning from the ""Retired numbers"" section of the article, on the grounds that it's ""assumed"" though not ""official."" My reasoning as posted on said talk page, was that Jim Irsay, the CEO of the Colts, stated pretty firmly that no player will ever wear the number 18 again (http://www.thephinsider.com/2012/3/7/2853459/peyton-manning-press-conference-transcript-2012-free-agency-nfl). There need not be an official retirement ceremony, or banner hanging in the rafters for the number to be retired. As such, I would open it up to discussion, but I feel that Manning needs to be readded, with the sourcing material included to prevent future confusion. 208.40.242.41 "

0false

Never mind I found them. But I was talking about the one on the top of your page.

0false

Hi Bading Putang ina mong bakla ka. Fuck you kang bading ka. Chumupa ka nalang gago ka. Puta puta ka. Walang magawa sa buhay! Diba asawa mo si NrDg. Chiunuchupaan mo siya. Tang ina mo mahilig ka talaga sa oten. Fuck Fuck you!!!! Bullshit na Bading. Manyak mahilig manuod ng mga bold na man to man. Fuck Fuck you. Putang ina mo Baboy na bakla. 210.4.58.35

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

Ah, okay. Thanks for your swift response.

0false

Bald Rock I was thinking about that!

0false

SharedIPEDU|Cresskill Public Schools (Cresskill, NJ)

0false

You should edit your user page to contain humor if you're going to keep that disclaimer. 129.15.127.253

0false

" I have posted nothing on the article page as this would presumably be a Conflict of Interest, and have made here suggestions of the way in which the book may be used only because requested - my view remains that it should be done by an editor who does not have COI. I think that now we've moved on from the efforts to exclude a source through (wrong) application of the Notability guidelines we're left with Neutrality of Point of View as the main issue. Wikipedia reports what is out there and a decision to exclude entirely from an article an appropriate source which has a view on much that is in the article (as well as topics the article excludes) appears to be a bias. The idea that the only book of lit crit on Beedle the Bard has nothing whatsoever to add to an encyclopaedia article on the topic is incredible. I don't think COIN is central to the issue as it now stands; rather the central issue is NPV. I think there are wider issues which it would be interesting to discuss - for example had my username not been essentially my real name a post on the talk page a year ago saying ""hi guys, this book exists and has something to say about the article"" would not have generated this negative discussion. I suggest MedCab is a way forward because it can consider all issues, while COIN considers only one issue and probably one which is not central. "

0false

" Study some linguistics before you say something idiotic like ""since when do verbs have plurals."" Moron."

1true

0false

May 2008 Testing, mememe. Little O'l Lady Who?

0false

This is the note I have added to the 1612 in Ireland discussion page: This deletion is a bit quick off the mark and fails to take any notice of context, particularly my trying to add birth and death entries to Years in Ireland. I am adding content to all the Years in Ireland articles as I find it and will be adding more to this, as I will to other such articles. It also allows others to add content in the collaborative way that is supposed to be Wiki - deletion this speedy allows no opportunity for this. Please have a modicum of patience - this speedy deletion approach is a very bad policy when applied in this way. NB this is not the same as 1612 itself.

0false

SS Yongala Hey there, I found an article about SS Yongala, which I have started doing some additional work on. Thought you may be interested in helping. It needs a fair amount of work such coordinates, info box, editing, typos etc. Anyway, if you are interested, I look forward to your imput. Cheers

0false

THE ARTICLE TITLED THE ELLIOTT ARGUMENT IS VERY WELL SOURCED, NOTEABLE, HAS TONS OF REFERENCES, AND SEEMS TO MEET ALL THE CRITERIA. IT IN NO WAY IS ATTACKING ANY GROUP BUT RATHER IS A FORMAL ARGUMENT THAT IS NEUTRAL AND HAS A STRONG FOOTING IN THE CREATIONISM VS ATHEISM DEBATING SCENE. IT WILL UNDOUBTABLY WILL BE SWAMPED BY ATHEISTS TRYING TO TAKE IT DOWN AND SITE REASONS WHY IT SHOULD NOT BE ON WIKIPEDIA. I ASK THAT YOU PLEASE KEEP IT UP IN ALL FAIRNESS AS A LOT OF WORK HAS WENT INTO THE CREATION OF THIS ARTICLE AND THE FORMAL ARGUMENT ITSELF. REMINDER IF IT WASN'T WORTHY AND NO ONE CARED ABOUT IT, IT WOULDNT BE SUCH A TALKED ABOUT TOPIC/ARTICLE OF CONVERSATION. THANK YOU, AND I HOPE I HAVE MET ALL YOUR STANDARDS. ALSO, ATHEISTS PLEASE DO NOT EDIT OR ATTEMPT TO CENSOR THSI ARTICLE, BUT RATHER IF YOU CAN FEEL YOU CAN DEFEAT THE ARGUMENT LEAVE IT UP AS PROOF THAT IT IS FLAWED...THANK YOU AGAIN

0false

Forget it. After reading your other discussions with The Egyptian Liberal, you obviously have a different agenda than providing straightforward information as in an encyclopedia. Which is why both of you are being reported. I'm totally shocked and appalled.

0false

AfD nomination of Word by word dictionary I have nominated Word by word dictionary, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Word by word dictionary. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

0false

LoL!! you're GAY!! you will never know how good it feels to fuck a woman up the ass!!

1true

0false

1true

I am fed up with editors and administrators ignoring requests for assistance in removing personal attacks by dismissing inappropriate behaviour as 'that's just the way he is'. If Mr Steadman's ego is so fragile that he cannot participate in an online debate without getting hysterical, then perhaps he shouldn't do it. I want these comments removed. If not, then I will refer you to arbitaration for abuse of admin privileges, I will refer Mr Steadman for his CIV/AGF and NO PERSONAL ATTACKS - to get his page deleted or improved and to have him sanctioned. You keep on playing the guilt card and telling me to move on - I have, I have kept away from him - all I want is for someone to prevent him from attacking me. Please sort it.

0false

Don Patch's Parents and Childhood == I think I know who Don Patch's parents are and what he looked like in his childhood from this pic. ==

0false

No problem, I understand. Cheers,— • (yo?); 16:12, February 16, 2009 (UTC)

0false

Age Yeah it said that Snake was aged because of FoxDie, but the actual reason was faulty cloning of the sixties.

0false

There is of course more than enough information on templates at Wikipedia:Templates. But what you are looking to do is to just add , or the like, to something you are already familiar editing with. To put two historical populations tables together you would use a table (Help:Table). To put Template:Historical populations into the template space for a city specific table, you would be using Template:Historical populations as a meta-template, which it is currently not designed for. I suggest asking at Template talk:Historical populations that it can be used in the template space by adding , or similar, to it.

0false

I did not attack anybody. What do you think was an attack? Seems really lame to just accuse, without evidence. My questioning others' motives for unwarranted deletes base upon their own biases, might have been misconstrued.

0false

Comment: Can we successfully close and move the article now? There is a clear consensus in supporting a move, opposition is limited, with the major point of opposition being that a non-consensus that this article should be deleted because Other Stuff Is Non-Notable. Obviously that is not what is being discussed here, and so their opposition is void. It's also been 15 days since the issue opened, and three days since any new comments.

0false

Yawn. How about we dont? - Raja

0false

Hey alabamoy boy why dont you stick your head up your fucking ass and see how far it fucking fits you fucking asshole

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

Hello Category:WelcomeBotResearch Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for writing the article Kingston liu. Unfortunately, it doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, and has, as a result, been marked for deletion. However, please do not be disheartened by what may or may not happen to your first article, if indeed it is deleted - please continue to edit Wikipedia and add articles which conform with the inclusion criteria. For help, see Help:Contents. To find out what will probably be deleted, see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Thanks, and if you have any questions, please ask them on my user talk page. To do this, click on my name (just after this sentence) and click discussion at the top and then the (+) button at the top.

0false

" About your improvements; good work, in general. I am still feeling lost about the description of Henry Cow's music being 'intense', a change from 'intensities'. Any music can be 'intense' for an aficionado. Me, I think Frith is intense. D ... Something more descriptive is needed. Regarding the presence of Beppe Colli, I do not see his notability, and the web magazine Clouds and Clocks is not mentioned elsewhere, by other media sources. When I Google ""clouds and clocks"", I get a 1965 lecture on rationality by Sir Karl Raimund Popper, and I get a children's book on encopresis, the soiling of pants. Similarly, Beppe Colli does not get mentioned elsewhere. The man and the website are not notable. Applying the same criteria to Babyblaue Seiten and the German reviewer Achim Breiling, I find that Breiling is a medical researcher who has published papers about genes, proteins and cloning, and has written prog rock reviews for the New Gibraltar Encyclopedia of Music in addition to a bunch of them at Babyblaue. CDBaby lists Babyblaue Seiten as a source, and an article exists about that review site in the German Wikipedia. It looks like Breiling in Babyblaue is somewhat more reliable a source than Colli in Clouds. Although Colli's observations are interesting, I cannot see keeping them. It's too bad, because he is the only reviewer who hinted at the CD having some loudness war characteristics, a step down from the dynamic spaciousness of the LP. About the ""bursts with"" quote from van Peer, the word 'eradicates' was wrong. Van Peer wrote 'eradiates', which is not a word, but he may have intended this construction as a neologism. That, or he misspelled 'radiates'. In any event, I returned 'eradiates' to the article, and added a [sic] template. "

0false

" Wouldn't a better title be ""crypto-as-a-service? At least it would position the Crypto Cloud computing in the Cloud stack. Also there are recent publications on that subject."

0false

" Great to hear that! So, what can I do to help? Do I need to ""Retag"" articles with the new tag? Let me know ) "

0false

" Image Tagging Image:Mesa in Maricopa County map.png This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading Image:Mesa in Maricopa County map.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. "

0false

(Meanwhile, I just noticed that an enterprising, scrupulous editor has supplied everything anyone could possible desire in terms of primary, secondary and - for all I know - tertiary sources. So the article's in good shape. Well done, whoever you are - and I apologize in advance that at least one person on this page will accuse you of being my sock puppet. Nothing to see here, Qworty. Move along now.)

0false

The tables will reflect the extent of influence of KONY 2012, the 20 cultural and 12 political figures should also be added to the introduction as well as the info box.

0false

, are you dumber than you look? asshole.

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

I get your reasoning, but my friend Annie Munson who does the same genre started recording in 1989 but didn't make an album untill 1995, yet she says that her coreer started in 1989. i thought it'd be the same with deadmau5, but i do understand your reasoning. i can't find anything in the article other than the name of an album that acknowledges that he was active in 1998 at all. 199.101.61.190

0false