monology/jigsaw · Datasets at Hugging Face

comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic class label 2 classes	severe_toxic class label 2 classes	obscene class label 2 classes	threat class label 2 classes	insult class label 2 classes	identity_hate class label 2 classes
Shalom Semite, get the fuck out of here. I will kill you, you son of a bitch if you don't leave wikipedia. If you tell anyone I said this to you, I will rape your jew family. Choke on a bagel, you faggoty hymie cock sucker. You better fucking die, before I hunt you down and piss on your face. If you get me blocked for this, I will find you and shoot you, I just want your jew fucking self gone, you dumb motherfucking piece of shit g-d damn jew. Die! Shalom. We Came In?	1true	1true	1true	1true	1true	1true
Personal attacks Please do NOT post personal attacks on my talk page, I have deleted the one you did post. I think that's very rude and out of order. How very childish83.67.56.138	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" ""Tidied up massively"" means I tidied it up massively. Pretty simple really. Whatever problem you have with the use of ""grand slam"" to refer to a single tournament is your problem, not mine. Once you've convinced the world of sports journalism that they are getting it wrong, then you can change it here. Until then, the article reflects the usage. A simple question for you - is the title of this article ""major tennis tournament"" or is it ""grand slam""? 190.44.158.38 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" The first sentence says that media sources generally describe LaRouche as an extremist, and George and Wilcox explain why that is so. It also explains that he came from an extremist environment, where people fell out with each other very badly, and then started criticising each other. George and Wilcox thought it worth mentioning as a significant aspect of the story in their discussion of LaRouche, so I don't see why we should not mention it. 466 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Another review I'm not asking for anything formal, but I was wondering if you could read over and comment on Subfossil lemur whenever you have time. (I know you're busy, so it can wait.) It will likely be my next FAC. Also, the article mentions a coprophilous fungus (Sporormiella spp.), so it might be up your alley. ;-) Anyway, take your time. If I can finish revising Silky Sifaka for Erik Patel as I promised today, I may try to help out with whatever you have up for review. Best, – « talk » "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" , Yes, I mentioned that in the latest AfD. How do you reactivate a closed sock investigation? YO 😜 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Heres the talkpage discussion - that Jehocman has blocked me for - Hi Collect. I know you are a very considerate NPOV editor in regard to content additions in regard to BLP articles. Recently I have started to notice quite a few editors opposing any BLP considerations. Policy is quite strong from the foundation and Arbcom in regard to BLP and if this is not filtering through it may be necessary to return to Arbcom for further clarification - as your involved in many of the discussions, would you please log and keep an eye out for users that repeatedly oppose BLP considerations and for discussions that from your neutral BLP considerate position resulted in a POV support consensus. Youreallycan User:Will Beback has joined in and User:Coffeepusher has also reverted - YGM - Youreallycan Is there a problem? Does a sentence on his most famous law case actually violate BLP? Will Beback talk You are well aware of the good faith NPOV concerns that your desired addition as focusing unduly on one project in four years work is in violation of WP:UNDUE - User:Coffeepusher has now two reverts and is edit warring the disputed content into the BLP. Youreallycan Huh? Working on Wikipedia for four [sic] years is UNDUE? That's a very strange theory. I am well aware that you don't like me and that you and Collect follow me around Wikipedia opposing perfectly good edits. Will Beback talk Not you - read before you comment please. You see your own bigotry . I have no idea about you at all - No one is following you around, you attract investigation through your contributions - Youreallycan Now you're accusing me of bigotry?! Whew. Will Beback talk From an NPOV position, I am disturbed by your contributions and have already pointed that out to you - I urge you moving forward take a more BLP considerate NPOV position through your contributions - Youreallycan I honor and obey all of the Wikipedia policies. Please don't call me a bigot. I consider that to be a personal attack. Will Beback talk I am disturbed by your contributions and have already pointed that out to you - I urge you moving forward take a more BLP considerate NPOV position through your contributions. - Your wiki lawyering claims of attack are just a meaningless distraction from reality. Youreallycan My position on strong observance of the letter and spirit of WP:BLP should be pretty much clear. Collect (talk)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Frankly, at this point I'm not sure if it is significant, based on the fact it is such a large, mainstream publication (or was pre-internet days), or not for reasons you state. Obviously if other WP:RS mention this, as they may over time, it would become more significant. After I get more general input on COI issues below, and if no NPOV editors opine (including on other issues that might come up), it can be brought to the proper forum for opinions.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
"==In response to your feedback== Have you visited Wikipedia:Tutorial? talk "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I checked it but couldn't find that. -	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Paco Catholic School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Fat piece of shit you obese piece of shit. I thought of you naked last night. \| got sick.	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false
One mroe question before I go to bed, I was wondering if it would be better that the ACC headquarter pictures were smaller like px260 or px310 because the readers would find it easier to skim... also it wouldnt look like we are trying to use pictures to make our page seem longer p.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
In 1965 PMR was simply renamed RCP.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I've created (based on ) I haven't tried it out yet to see if it works... will repost — dler —	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" The Marriage article is biased against objective truth, Jews and Christians. It has always been that way - with traditionalists eventually blocked and banned. There is a ""Same Sex Marriage"" article, no Traditional Marriage article. It was deleted. This is an ideological battle in the culture wars. THIS IS WAR. 75.168.209.210 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
How is asking for CORRECT REFERENCES disrupting a page? Do you support bad history?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" News suppressed on Wikipedia http://rexcurry.net/wikipedialies.html RexCurry.net is the historian who made the following discoveries covered elsewhere and on Wikipedia: 1. The USA’s first Pledge used a straight-arm salute and it was the origin of the salute of the monstrous National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazis). It was not an ancient Roman salute. http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html 2. The Pledge began with a military salute that then stretched outward toward the flag. Historic photographs are at http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html and at http://rexcurry.net/pledge_military.html Due to the way that both gestures were used, the military salute led to the Nazi salute. The Nazi salute is an extended military salute. http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html 3. The Pledge’s creator was a self-proclaimed socialist in the nationalism movement in the USA and his dogma influenced socialists in Germany, and his Pledge was the origin of their salute. ""Nazi"" means ""National Socialist German Workers' Party."" A mnemonic device is the swastika (Hakenkreuz in German). Although the swastika was an ancient symbol, it was also used sometimes by German National Socialists to represent ""S"" letters for their ""socialism."" Hitler altered his own signature to use the same stylized ""S"" letter for ""socialist."" http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-swastika.html The Pledge is part of the USA’s growing police-state. The insane government in the U.S. could cause comatose persons to Pledge dis-allegiance, desecrate the flag, and recite a declaration of independence. Remove the Pledge from the flag, remove flags from schools, remove schools from government. As a libertarian lawyer, Rex Curry provides pro bono services nationwide in schools and elsewhere, to educate the public about the news. Government schools will never teach children about their Pledge rights, nor the truth about the Pledge and its author. Most comments fail to ever mention that Francis Bellamy and his cousin Edward Bellamy were National Socialists in the USA, wrote for and supported their ""Nationalist"" and ""New Nation"" magazines, the ""Nationalist Educational Association"" and pushed their totalitarian dogma in their ""Nationalism"" clubs worldwide, including in Germany, and that the bible of their movement, Edward Bellamy's book ""Looking Backward"" was translated into every major language including the languages of those countries that became home to totalitarian socialism and the socialist Wholecaust (of which the Holocaust was a part) under the National Socialist German Workers' Party (21 million dead), the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (62 million dead), and the Peoples' Republic of China (35 million dead). It is easy to see why anyone would want to cover all of that up, but it should not be covered up. In the USA, the Bellamy dogma supported a government takeover of education. The government's schools imposed segregation by law and taught racism as official policy. The USA's behavior was an example for three decades before the Nazis. As under Nazism, the Jehovah's Witnesses, and blacks and the Jewish and others in the USA attended government schools that dictated segregation, taught racism, and persecuted children who refused to perform the straight-arm salute and robotically chant the Pledge. Some kids were expelled from government schools and had to use the many better alternatives. There were acts of violence. When Jesse Owens competed in the 1936 Olympics in Germany, his neighbors attended segregated government schools where they saluted the flag with the Nazi salute. The U.S. practice of official racism even outlasted the horrid party. And the schools and the Pledge still exist. The Pledge is still the most visible sign of the USA's growing police state. After segregation in government's schools ended, the Bellamy legacy caused more police-state racism of forced busing that destroyed communities and neighborhoods and deepened hostilities. Bellamy was a self-proclaimed national socialist in the USA, with the ""Nationalist"" magazine, and he preached what he called ""military socialism."" The federal flag darkens schools because Bellamy wanted government to take over all schools and to eliminate all of the better alternatives. Worse, Bellamy wanted the government to take over everything, not just schools. He wanted the government to impose the military system on all of society. School flags are a symbol of nationalization, militarism, and socialism. The Bellamy dogma was the same dogma that led to the ""Wholecaust"" (of which the Holocaust was a part): 62 million killed under the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; 35 million under the Peoples' Republic of China; 21 million under the National Socialist German Workers'	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
"From their website: ""In 1965 Rudolf Schenker started up the SCORPIONS in Hanover. "" Link: http://www.the-scorpions.com/english/history.asp "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Multiple languages Ethnologue states that what this article refers to as ""dialects"" are actually seperate languages. Should this article be split? "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" The Brazilian figure is based on the national census. If there is no ""racial"" census in Chile, then the figure is based on what? How can people know the percentage of whites in Chile if there's no census? "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
By the way, I don't practice Islam so I'm not a Munafiq, which means you're not allowed to stone me to death or whatever the punishment is.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
the Exeter article has a wikipedia article - so that should go back in (or maybe the exeter article needs someone to take a harder look at him...) The latter I'll be putting some maintenance tags on that article in a bit.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
PS: you're all middle-aged losers at home in your parents basements living off 50 bucks a week	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
":::::What's meaningless is your POV argument. The most politically charged event of the past 60 years, that piece of the Cold War the entire world pointed to, was the Berlin Wall. Now, a new wall is being built, garnering similar attention. What's more, almost everyone who hears of this seperation barrier instantly says, ""like the Berlin Wall?"" All other references to the Berlin Wall have been removed from the article. The link belongs. 15:49, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I grow tired of protecting articles from bully users. AMIB and this other guy, the one word I can associate with them is ""bully"". They think that they can get away with telling people that their opinions hold no weight in this matter and delete an article. Both of the users are trying to make up reasons for the article to be deleted. The first was that it was of low quality and beyond repair, the second was (and this is the worst) is that a result of keep can result in a redirect, on the basis that redirect votes add to keep, not delete and the third one is that it is unsourcable and should be deleted - unlike the majority of articles which have no sources. There is no logic to this. They didn't create for fun. I'm not in the mood to be polite with people who aren't interested in acknowledging any other view but their own. - (talk) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hi! It was great to see not only another fan of arrested development, but also a synaesthete! Good on you! You sound like a cool guy! , 19:03 11/03/06	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
for January 2006 discussion.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
ah good - swing on, in that case!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
REDIRECT Talk:Vincent O'Brien National Stakes	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Indeed, your'e right. What's so frustrating about English is that if you are not a native speaker, or at least learend it at very young age, you will get hard time to get to closer level with native speaker of English. It may be much easier for people whose native tongue is German, Dutch, some Scandinavian languages (except for Finnish) and etc-but for me at the least it's not come naturaly (but I must say that during the last years I didn't have many opportunities to practice it extensively). The English vocabulary is huge, not once there are 100 different words for the very same object with most cases it's unnecessary (probably it's related to the expansions of the British empire). I realy think that German and English are among the hardest languges to take control of. Spanise on the other hand, is very friendly..	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" To the circumcision boss said that ""banned is banned."" Son, you might want to take an Introduction to Western Civilization course at your local community college. You're so unfamiliar with the Enlightenment that you don't realize that ""banned"" is a badge of honor in the history of human progress. 82.128.204.29 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Those were attempts at tweaking it to work when logged-out. The page model is a bit different then, and in other skins. Cheers,	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hey treasury I hate to break it to you but one of the other users saw what you did. You won't be around here much longer once I get unblocked. You and ryulong think you are very clever but another user also saw you do it. Apparently you are not as smart as you think you are. You WILL be banned permanently as soon as I am unblocked and I can report what you did and the other user will confirm it that you did the same thing to their edits.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
By the way, there is no evidence, except that reported on blogs, that Sanchez is in porn videos. Sure, people could go rent them and watch, but that would be original research and he appeeared under pseudonyms. So you might as well go ahead and eliminate any mention of his porno too. Face it, that's what you want to do anyway. So you might as well get it over with. Down the memory hole at Wikipedia!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I agree. BTW, same story about Navahradak being capital is also repeated on Belarus article. I think these disputes about various national ways to present history of GDL should be on article Grand Duchy of Lithuania and everyone who wants to read more about the Duchy would click the link.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Thanks for the update, and my aplogogies for not assuming better faith about the listing errors. — Talk "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
By the way, I am and always was happy to fix up any specific issues with my edits that Elf brought to my attention (provided they weren't totally unreasonable), but I received no such requests from Elf, all he would do is revert the whole lot without consultation with me first.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I find it interesting though that he removed the link to his still intact Userpage talk archive where there seems no alleged ""death threat"" issue either other than regarding his flame-wars with "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
OOT Bosses I have something I wanted to discuss with you, but I didn't to bring it up in the public talk pages. I saw that you been leaving various messages on the talk pages of other contributors. And they seem to point the blame at the article changes at myself and the other gent who worked on it. Now I'll take respnosibility, because I contributed. But, you can't very well sit there and act like you weren't part of it. We brought the idea for change up, and you agreed to it. Heck, you even did most of the work. So I'd appreciate it if in the future you didn't try to act like we did something bad against your will. And maybe I'm reading too much into this, and if that's the case, then I apologize in advance. But that's just the way it seems to me.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Notable alumni section I removed several people from this section because they do not have their own Wikipedia article, which is required to establish notability. The information I removed is: Jennifer O'Malley Dillon, executive director of the Democratic National Committee, Bob Ward, Fox 25 News Reporter,Gerry Leone, Attorney, Former DA Middlesex County and James Vallee, Attorney, Former House of Representatives Majority Leader. Thanks	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I'm sorry; I was lazy. Here's where I got the information about the diphthongal variants of , and they make it clear in the references that Wells (1982a) is Wells, J.C. Accents of English 1: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. They also say Cruttenden (2001) is Cruttenden, A. (2001) Gimson's Pronunciation of English. 6th edn. London: Arnold. A Handbook of Varieties of English (Bernd Kortmann, Edgar W. Schneider, Walter de Gruyter, 2004) is where I got the information about monophthongization in Cockney; they, in turn, referenced Wells (1982). In this case, ""Wells (1982: 309)"" refers to Wells, J.C. Accents of English 2 The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. There you go. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hmm, thanks. But it's a nasty hack really ... — Martin ( · talk)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I understand you, but you also should understand me. You shouldn't revert my work. As you can see, I don't disrupt your edits at articles Draza Mihailovic, Josip Broz Tito, or at Template:Yugoslav Axis collaborationism. I realy respect your effort and work there, and I don't revert it. I have no desire to get blocked, or to drag you into another blockade. I want to resolve all this disputes with you. As you can see I already changed Template:Politics of Yugoslavia to a neutral, non-image version. These are my proposals to you: 1) If we put in place your version of the list of Yugoslav Prime Ministers, it will remove Drago Marusic as Prime Minister in 1945, between Ivan Subasic and Tito. If you agree to left him on the list, this dispute is over. If we agree about Marusic, we can also agree about the issue ""Kingdom or DF Yugoslavia"". 2) Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was a complete different state than Serbia and Montenegro. It wasn't like Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and Kingdom of Yugoslavia, or Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia and Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. In 2003, after the adoption of the Constitutional Charter, whole system of government was changed. Even the position of the Prime Minister was abolished, and merged with the position of the President. Those two countries realy need a separate articles. Also, their armies need a separate articles. 3) Articles President of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and President of Serbia and Montenegro should remain separate. The last President of FRY was Vojislav Kostunica, from 2000 until 2003 when he was replaced by Svetozar Marovic of SCG (2003-2006). Those two offices was very different (President of FRY wasn't both head of state and head of government, like President of SCG). 4) Prime Minister of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia wasn't ""Prime Minister of Serbia and Montenegro"", but of FRY. That article should retain its current name. 5) As you can see, yesterday I changed Template:Politics of Yugoslavia to a neutral, non-image version. I hope that you agree with this version. P.S. I'm sorry if you think that people from the Balkans are uncivilized. It's not true, believe me. We aren't better or worse than other peoples. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
William Wilberforce No worries. I had noticed the question of attribution, and had a look at the Ferens site before uploading, but saw nothing about the issue. I hadn't thought to look on the Talk page. Thanks for letting me know. Regards,	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
you gotta let somebody love you.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Great peace-keeping! That solved the problem in my opinion. ™ "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hi Sometimes you are wright! Sometimes I am rihgt! Sometimes we are wright.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Yeah i no it sucks.	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I think he is a gay fag!!!	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	1true
Seems likely from their descriptions.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
File:CTI Measurements.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CTI Measurements.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I am really sorry about your relatives, but any reasonable person, as I know you are, should agree that the persecution of the Copts, the massacre in Luxor cannot be compared to a collapsed building. Copts are important part of Egyptian society. I am not saying that the whole section that you deleted should be included, but a few sentences should. Here's an extract from Speigel: ""Copts make up the largest Christian community in the Arab world and around 8 million Egyptians belong to the Coptic Church. They're barred from high government positions, diplomatic service and the military, as well as from many state benefits. Universities have quotas for Coptic students considerably lower than their actual percentage within the population.Building new churches isn't allowed, and the old ones are falling into disrepair thanks to a lack both of money and authorization to renovate. When girls are kidnapped and forcibly converted, the police don't intervene. Thousands of pigs were also slaughtered under the pretense of confining swine flu. Naturally all were owned by Christians. The same with Luxor's massacre. For example see article Spain. It talks about bombing in commuter trains in Madrid, Spain on 11 March 2004. Egypt should have a few sentences about the massacre in Luxor's too. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Neutrality Can we get a professional that's not employed by humanewatch.org to clean up this article PLEASE.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Why do you assume that I'm a native speaker of English? Why don't you simply accept that I'm having messages relayed from an alien planet on which, despite multifarious differences, something akin to the Roman alphabet developed in parallel, complete with 'e,' 'o,' and the 'ee'/'oo' innovation in the more advanced cultures? Why do you insist on putting something called 'regularity' (= 'one grapheme one function'?) above efficiency in conveying the full range and variety of phonemes? Stereotypically German or what?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I would value your opinion on this The recent ugly behavior of a user in Istanbul Pogrom along with my fruitful collaborating with a Turkish editor on some articles have made me think if there is a way to deal with all this mutual suspicion among Greek and Turkish wikipedians. So I came up with the idea of a wikiProject where Greek and Turkish wikipedians work together assumming good faith and trying to overcome the said suspicion. I have written a . I would greatly appreciate it if you would read it and comment on it. Could it be done? Is there any point in trying? Does it brake any wikipedia anti-cabal rules? Thank you in advance!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Reply to Mr. Burdak I am glad to see you have at least referenced that quote now - it was not at all clear before where it came from. As it does not agree with standard translations of that passage, one wonders about the unusual wording - so reminiscent of the odd ""quote"" you made from the Mahabharata the other day. But, more importantly, what about the completely false ""reference"" to ""The History of Civilizations of Central Asia, Vol. II""? Why have you (again) not replied to my pointing out of this apparent dishonesty? This is only the most recent in a very long list of false ""quotes"" and ""references"" you have made and I have exposed on these pages - as you well know. Now, I am willing to accept that maybe one or two false quotes could be the result of honest mistakes or sloppy research - but when the process is repeated over and over and over again one begins to suspect that the author is doing it deliberately and intends to deceive readers. So, quite naturally, I and others have come to mistrust any quotes you may give - especially to sources that are difficult to check. I am sorry - but you have brought this situation upon yourself. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
My user page Thanks for reverting the vandalism on it. (Talk\|Contribs)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I'm gay, I'm gay and I don't care who knows it. Sorry, I have sudden outbursts. Anyway, obviously	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Evidence Redux I'll be frank. The blocking of came a bit late for my taste. However, he was found to be in violation of the 3 revert rule, and to again quote the policy which ironically Malke was threatening people with and was himself found to be in violation of: "" A bright line exists on edit warring, known as the three-revert rule (3RR). If an administrator has not acted already by this point, then action is very likely, especially if a report is made to the noticeboard. Policy forbids edit warring generally, and editors may be blocked if they edit war, with or without breaching 3RR. "" I commend for taking the actions he did. The subsequent complaints Malke made, and his promise to cease his activity in order to get unblocked a few days later, are a matter of record on his user talk page. Malke has since deleted the notifications, but they are viewable in his talk page history, and make interesting reading. After Malke's block on August 19, 2009, I decided I needed to take a step back. For the past ten days I have busied myself with other Wikipedia subjects. I now return to this page. I suggest we talk a bit about what happened, and I also suggest we take a look at what happened here this month, edit by edit. It continues to seem clear to me that Malke was editing with obsession towards an agenda; his obsession got him in hot water with the admins. Soon, Wikipedia policy is going to change, as many here know. I'd welcome some reasonable discussion, and renewed work on the article. On closer examination of the history pages of the main article, it appears some of Malke's biased edits, through sheer volume, are still in effect. I propose going through every edit of his, see exactly what changes of his have survived, and put back all relevant, sourced material. Once that is effected, we can pick up the chore of dealing with further improvements. Having just returned to WP from an extended absence, I am not fully familiar with what has occurred with this article, but cursory skimming of the talk page reminds me of some of the frustrations which led me to leave WP more than a year ago. I recognize Malke's concerns. Material that is added back should strictly follow WP:BLP, ie., it should be directly relevant to Rove, not defamatory, and should be sourced by reliable secondary sources. Malke's concerns were one thing, his methods another. Admins blocked him not only due to his violation of the three edit rule, but because he was deleting paragraphs of properly sourced material, and as the admins noted (to quote directly from Malke's talk page history, since he has since, for obvious reasons, deleted all reference to his blocking): - *An impartial administrator just did; I don't know you from Adam, and haven't so much as looked at the contents of your edits; all that matters is that you broke WP:3RR, and received a short block for it; if you want to be unblocked, all you have to do is agree to stop edit warring, regardless of whether you think it is justified or not. :==( o ) '''I highly commend the admins, and urge others to support their work. These admins had not been involved here previously; they took firm, direct action on a disruptive editor, Malke, who was judged to be making ""untrue"" statements regarding his efforts. I again suggest we move past this period of turmoil and examine what changes were made to this article by an editor whose tactics earned him a block and who, in my view, obse	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia is hosted in the US, so US laws on copyright, etc. are enforcable. That's just the way it is, and we need to avoid legal action being taken against the foundation. To be honest, I don't see big differences in behaviour of editors by nationality, so far as nationality is apparent - I suspect that there are just more Americans here than any other nationality, simply due to sizes of populations of English-speakers, so any group of editors is likely to have more Americans than anything else, including the helpful, constructive, thoughtful ones. I think, however, that there are a higher proportion of editors here now than ever before who have little interest in adding and improving content, preferring to delete, argue, try to raise the bar on notability and fair use guidelines to allow more to be deleted, etc., but I don't see this as a wholly US phenomenon. 08:15	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Your discarding of vandalism complaints Re a recent vandalism report I submitted , the user in question has received numerous complaints, including from bots, and has resumed the same independent activity after being blocked a couple weeks ago. The user is rarely using authoritative references but apparently only what turns up first on Google. I'd feel differently if the vandal were responding at all to any complaints or if the user weren't making dozens of similar edits each day. I've learned my lesson from you and I won't complain about this user again, and I certainly won't report any others that regularly trash WP with similar types of rumors and fake references, so I don't expect a reply from you, but I think you are making a serious mistake by not treating this as vandalism and immediately imposing restraints. —	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Merge is now complete. I removed a section recently added about the content of a current issue, leaving in the text and references about the magazine itself. -	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Trust me, Mr. wants the world to know he's gay. I'm on him hte minute he gets home from school. I wish you no ill will, but my son was on the computor at 3:16 this morning. That won't fly. He is learning a lot from these on-line debates. Are you?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
See the news out today in the press: Un parque nacional español se cuela entre los 10 más visitados del mundo. He says the Teide is the 9th most visited in the world today. Do you have anything to say?.83.40.237.202	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
We needs must be very careful to present these in historical context and without original synthesis, but they are notable to the topic of how parapsychology interacts with other disciplines. A less controversial (and less notable) parallel might be how music theorists have viewed the use of synthesizers in rock music over the last few decades. - 2/0 (cont.)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Vergina Sun the pic is within fair use as it was made by a person i know and given to the public domain. that's a non-issue.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
(talk • contribs)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Also, please have a look at Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and don't create artciles unless you can demonstrate that their subjects satisfy those guidelines.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I notice you reported me for saying I'm webmeister. Um, why? Because I am. I really am the member ""webmeister"" from that forum. What do you particularly wrong with that? "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
73 – Masada and end of Jewish-Roman War	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
If some people are anti-catholic then their just biggots.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You ignored him too	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
, as User:Dr.K wasn't saying it in the article	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
LaserActive Hi SchuminWeb, I am confused by your removal of the LaserActive link to the virtual LaserActive museum. Did you have a chance to explore that a little (like on the left, check various sections)? Cheers, -CyRo	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Lists of Islamic Jihads	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" URL Update (update to my previous, and only, post) I checked today and verified that the ""original"" 'chucknorrisfacts' URL is working (vs. the 'replacement' URL mentioned in my previous post 'thechucknorrisfacts'.)"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
A person living in Canada has just as much right as anyone else in the world to research and own a particular dog (or anything else). You, nor the Koolie Club of Australia, have patented sole rights to these dogs. Wikipedia is all about correct information and NOT theories and your own ideas of what happened, what was and what will be.... Wikipedia is based on facts, which clearly has been stated on the German Coolie page and not the Australian Koolie page.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Thank you. Given the misuse of tools here and the itchy trigger finger as exemplified by the thread above, this ""admin"" needs to be examined by Arbcom. I'm not surprised to see a thread already open at ANI discussing it's recent behavioural trends. I won't be initiating anything but will most certainly be presenting evidence at the appropriate time. In the meantime someone needs to tell this ""admin"" to calm the fuck down and stop removing comments mad by editors on their own talk pages. That's a blockable offence, especially when they were told to never post here again. INVOLVED much? "	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Based on the above discussion it is abundantly clear that there is no consensus for insertion of the third criteria repeatedly inserted by disruptive edits ignoring the talk page completely. Also unacceptable is editing the list based on the new criteria within the same edit that changed it.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
If it's irrelevant I'll remove it. The sentence adds nothing at all to anyone's understanding of the murder.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Grant specifically says that ""no attempt to enforce the rule of nonrecognition as regards East Jerusalem seems to have been made at U.N. level. No occasion for enforcement has been afforded in regard to the Golan Heights"". Also, Grant is the only guy I could find who calls UN General Assembly resolutions ""regimes of non-recognition"" and I believe that using this term is misleading and not neutral. So not ""sourced reliably"" and not ""written in a neutral style"". I would also suggest that reverting after a specific BRD request, even if only doing it once or twice per day is edit warring and disruptive. I'm sure ArbCom frowns on that sort of thing as well. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Or, I could scan the articles and place them online in a directory on my webserver....what is the community's pleasure?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I have just followed from your edit exchange on the article Blu-Ray Disc to find the exchange above. Sadly, you appear to know little about the subject, and to be fair, it has become confusing because much of the terminology has become abused. First, European Blu-Ray discs are not produced in 24p format. That is almost exclusively the preserve of the American regions. Secondly, the Blu-Ray format does not support the proper 1080 progressive high definition formats (1080/50p and 1080/60p (and I include the 59.95p in that). This is because the data rate is not fast enough for these formats. The European sourced discs that state 1080p on the packaging are discs produced from film originated material and is one of the abuses of the term progressive. The term progressive strictly defines a video format where the lines of video information are recorded in strict numerical order, 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 ... 1078 - 1079 -1080. Alternatively, there is the interlaced format which displays the odd lines ony first (odd field) and then follows them by the even lines (even field). (You probably know this already). 1 - 3 - 5 - 7 ... 1077 - 1079 - 2 - 4 - 6 ... 1078 - 1080 They are actually stored in the digital video frame the other way around due to the digital video format's origins in the NTSC world. In true video source material, the even field displays a time slice that is 20 milliseconds later than the odd field and the two together give a comlete video frame. This is also largely true in the Americas, except the even field precedes the odd field by ~16.6 miliiseconds. There is a largish group of enthusiasts (if that's the right word) who have become somewhat anally retentive over the progressive video formats and who have convinced themselves that progressive is the only way to go. The reality is that any improvement in the visual perception of the video is marginal at best and certainly not worth the doubling of the required digital data to support it. But for them, everything has to be progressive. I shall coin the word 'progressivists' for this discussion. When film originated material is transferred to video in Europe, the film is run slightly fast by 4% which allows one film frame to occupy both the the odd and even fields of the video frame (known as 2:2 pulldown). Thus the even field displays a time slice that is 0 milliseconds later than the odd field. In order to satisfy the progressivists, the Blu-Ray producers state that such material is in 1080p format, but using something called a 'Progressive Segmented Frame' technique (though they don't mention that last bit on the box). That is: that it is progressive video, but the odd lines have been recorded together and then they are followed by the even lines. It is really interlaced video, but by the time the display device or the Blu-ray player has de-interlaced the video (it doesn't matter one jot where it actually happens), the result is perceptually indistinguishable from true 1080/25p video (assuming the deinterlacing algorithm works properly). If watched on a CRT display then, of course, the video will be interlaced as there is no deinterlacing prior to display, but with that number of lines, no one is likely to notice (unless they sit inches away from the screen). The description 1080p on the box is, technically at least, wrong but percetually the same as 1080/25p video. The 4% speed up goes completely un-noticed especially these days when the sound is adjusted back to the original pitch - and obviously you hadn't noticed it yourself if you had convinced yourself that you were watching films at the original speed. Once we cross to the Americas, different problems occur. Obviously, running the film at 30 frames per second is not an option, so instead, film is converted to video by storing the same film frame on 3 half video frames, followed by storing the next frame on 2 half video frames and then repeating 3 - 2 - 3 - 2. Thus 4 film frames occupy 5 video frames (the technique is 3:2 pulldown - often wrongly called 2:3 pulldown). Properly deinterlaced, such material is perfectly watchable and the viewer unlikely to feel anything is wrong. But the progressivists have decided that it is not the way to watch film material and have even invented faults to justify a move to a progressive format. I have even seen claims (obviously failing to understand the technique) that movement in the resultant video is uneven in that it jumps 50% further every other jump due to the 3 half fields. The result was the 24p format. The only problem with the 24p format is that if you try to watch it on a CRT display (and A CRT is still unbeatable for contrast and colour reproduction), the result will be unviewable to bad flicker - something that was known as long ag	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Oh I was just wondering, I'm something of a fan myself. You've made some pretty good articles; all the best.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I guess I should fill you in with the whole generation controversy. Some of the editors here claimed that grouping consoles by generation is original research because groupings have been inconsistent from source to source. The whole thing can be seen here, although nothing new has been said for several months, now. ''''''[✆Talk] "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
, spent by private U.S. citizens	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Replaceable fair use Image:CarolLombard.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:CarolLombard.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hypercritical? On the 10th anniversary, and the first time you dare feature a list on mainpage? No way. It was supposed to be our chance to get it right, make it perfect. Why not directly tell us a week in advance that this list was the one you'd be featuring for the anniversary to give us a chance to shine it up and correct all the issues?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hi. Drop a note on the talk page of that article asking for it to be added. But, note that the article will likely be replaced by a redirect anyway. (comment)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" ""The WWE Raw guest host initiative was introduced on June 15, 2009 by Donald Trump during his time as owner of the Raw franchise."" This is Wikipedia all over. Listing stories as facts...Jesus Christ. Grow a brain, the first step might be to stop watching a product churned solely for children (not WWE, ALL PRO WRESTLING.86.128.14.112 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I've provided a citation that doesn't include Albert (or any other corps commander) in the list of principal commanders. In other words, unless you can provide a source that does, what you are doing constitutes Original Research and is not allowed. I'll remove Albert and replace the Prussian commanders per the source tomorrow to give you time to find a competing source. And remember to make it Reliable. Don't bother replying unless you have a source to supply, because you're simply repeating yourself. •T•C•E• "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" The problem is, 11 of the sources (and the most reliable ones) are all supporting one single sentence in the article. (talk) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
FUCKING FAGGOT LOLWAT.	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false
" our previous conversation you fucking shit eating liberal, you make lady bird johnson shake on her tampon. I said fucking sorry for my little brother and you still had to fucking complain. My life is fucking shit. My mother is always yelling at me and my dad beats the shit out of me if I get fucking out of line. My brother's one outlet is wikipedia. He cried when he saw my father smacking me, and his tears clogged his mac book pro's keyboard. we had to go to fucking apple and get a new one, all out of my mom's pocket. then last night i wanted to take this hot pussy from connecticut out in my dad's new rolls-royce and he said fucking no. so you know what I fucking did? I fucking cut his pinky off and didnt snitch like a little bitch like you. I take lazy ass niggers like you and stomp you with my fat nazi heel. you should be FUCKING sorry you ever fucked with me or my dad (Steve Jobs). And if I find out your using Linux, I'll take pity on thee. Cause you're just too stupid to understand shit. i can see your fucking at some fucking computer and you think that you have some power on this fucking site. let me tell you something you little bitch. when i'm doing coke off strippers titties in da clubz, you can just edit some fucking wikipedia articles. i smoke a phat blunt every damn day, and you smoke your mom's fucking tea. So, in closing, as Shakespeare said in Sonnet ninety-four (I believe): ""things turn sourest by their deeds. Lillies that fester smell far worse than (fucking) weeds."" fuck you and heil hitler. -n. jobs ps- if you ever fucking ban this ip again, there is going to be some serious shit thats gonna happen. i know a fucking guy."	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	1true
" Response I am obviously very disappointed by this decision. The assertion that I did not read the article is highly misleading, not to mention offensive. I have been a Wikipedia editor for many, many years, and have followed the rules and regulations throughout these years. To suggest that I did not follow the regulations is complete bunkum. Using the evidence present in the article, I made a choice based on what I thought was a fairly obvious case - it STILL breaks our rules on blogs, recentism, notability, and bias. The ""keep"" votes are from people who have an immense level of conflict of interest, and therefore skew the vote something rotten. I am very disappointed that this entire episode has been carried out at my expense, rather than at the article itself. This response will be copied to as many concerned editors in this matter. wordsdeeds "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
→ From WP:Third opinion: The inclusion of that section gives undue weight to a particular pre-Hungary period in this article, Hungary. Such material would be better placed at Hungarian prehistory or Pannonian Basin before the Hungarians, with links to Great Moravia where appropriate. The current article is almost 200 kb long, and needs more concise summaries more than it needs additional sections. When deciding how much space and depth to devote to a particular aspect of a topic, it is important to take recourse to general sources and reflect their coverage. Beyond the reliable sources threshold, the trustworthiness of a particular source is less important for determining weight in the treatment of a topic than is its generality. As an outsider, I could see adding up to a few dozen words based on the lingering impact of toponyms and script. As a side note, please remember to stay focused on improving the article without recourse to personal attacks on other editors. As well, I remind you that whenever text is copied from one article to another, you must include this fact in your edit summary. - 2/0 (cont.)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I am not a martyr. I am a human, and humans make mistakes. I did too, many mistakes.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Categories I have removed the Extreme Sport category, as most cavers do not consider their sport Extreme. It is only some noncavers who think it might be.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hey Drmies, are you ok? I can't imagine what I must have said on that IP's page to get you so upset that you've decided to literally track my every edit. Isn't there anything better that you can do with your time instead of THIS? You know, like move away from your computer and go out, talk to people and form friendships in real life? You've said you have a family with a kid to take care of, but I now find that very hard to believe because I would assume you wouldn't have so much time for this nonsense if that were really the case. I seriously hope I haven't hurt your feelings that much to prevent you from performing your daily duties off the world wide web. I would feel badly if that were the case, which now seems it actually is. Call me vandal all you like, it doesn't matter to me. I wish you well. 125.39.16.85	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false

Shalom Semite, get the fuck out of here. I will kill you, you son of a bitch if you don't leave wikipedia. If you tell anyone I said this to you, I will rape your jew family. Choke on a bagel, you faggoty hymie cock sucker. You better fucking die, before I hunt you down and piss on your face. If you get me blocked for this, I will find you and shoot you, I just want your jew fucking self gone, you dumb motherfucking piece of shit g-d damn jew. Die! Shalom. We Came In?

1true

Personal attacks Please do NOT post personal attacks on my talk page, I have deleted the one you did post. I think that's very rude and out of order. How very childish83.67.56.138

0false

" ""Tidied up massively"" means I tidied it up massively. Pretty simple really. Whatever problem you have with the use of ""grand slam"" to refer to a single tournament is your problem, not mine. Once you've convinced the world of sports journalism that they are getting it wrong, then you can change it here. Until then, the article reflects the usage. A simple question for you - is the title of this article ""major tennis tournament"" or is it ""grand slam""? 190.44.158.38 "

0false

" The first sentence says that media sources generally describe LaRouche as an extremist, and George and Wilcox explain why that is so. It also explains that he came from an extremist environment, where people fell out with each other very badly, and then started criticising each other. George and Wilcox thought it worth mentioning as a significant aspect of the story in their discussion of LaRouche, so I don't see why we should not mention it. 466 "

0false

" Another review I'm not asking for anything formal, but I was wondering if you could read over and comment on Subfossil lemur whenever you have time. (I know you're busy, so it can wait.) It will likely be my next FAC. Also, the article mentions a coprophilous fungus (Sporormiella spp.), so it might be up your alley. ;-) Anyway, take your time. If I can finish revising Silky Sifaka for Erik Patel as I promised today, I may try to help out with whatever you have up for review. Best, – « talk » "

0false

" , Yes, I mentioned that in the latest AfD. How do you reactivate a closed sock investigation? YO 😜 "

0false

Heres the talkpage discussion - that Jehocman has blocked me for - Hi Collect. I know you are a very considerate NPOV editor in regard to content additions in regard to BLP articles. Recently I have started to notice quite a few editors opposing any BLP considerations. Policy is quite strong from the foundation and Arbcom in regard to BLP and if this is not filtering through it may be necessary to return to Arbcom for further clarification - as your involved in many of the discussions, would you please log and keep an eye out for users that repeatedly oppose BLP considerations and for discussions that from your neutral BLP considerate position resulted in a POV support consensus. Youreallycan User:Will Beback has joined in and User:Coffeepusher has also reverted - YGM - Youreallycan Is there a problem? Does a sentence on his most famous law case actually violate BLP? Will Beback talk You are well aware of the good faith NPOV concerns that your desired addition as focusing unduly on one project in four years work is in violation of WP:UNDUE - User:Coffeepusher has now two reverts and is edit warring the disputed content into the BLP. Youreallycan Huh? Working on Wikipedia for four [sic] years is UNDUE? That's a very strange theory. I am well aware that you don't like me and that you and Collect follow me around Wikipedia opposing perfectly good edits. Will Beback talk Not you - read before you comment please. You see your own bigotry . I have no idea about you at all - No one is following you around, you attract investigation through your contributions - Youreallycan Now you're accusing me of bigotry?! Whew. Will Beback talk From an NPOV position, I am disturbed by your contributions and have already pointed that out to you - I urge you moving forward take a more BLP considerate NPOV position through your contributions - Youreallycan I honor and obey all of the Wikipedia policies. Please don't call me a bigot. I consider that to be a personal attack. Will Beback talk I am disturbed by your contributions and have already pointed that out to you - I urge you moving forward take a more BLP considerate NPOV position through your contributions. - Your wiki lawyering claims of attack are just a meaningless distraction from reality. Youreallycan My position on strong observance of the letter and spirit of WP:BLP should be pretty much clear. Collect (talk)

0false

Frankly, at this point I'm not sure if it is significant, based on the fact it is such a large, mainstream publication (or was pre-internet days), or not for reasons you state. Obviously if other WP:RS mention this, as they may over time, it would become more significant. After I get more general input on COI issues below, and if no NPOV editors opine (including on other issues that might come up), it can be brought to the proper forum for opinions.

0false

"==In response to your feedback== Have you visited Wikipedia:Tutorial? talk "

0false

I checked it but couldn't find that. -

0false

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Paco Catholic School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "

0false

Fat piece of shit you obese piece of shit. I thought of you naked last night. | got sick.

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

One mroe question before I go to bed, I was wondering if it would be better that the ACC headquarter pictures were smaller like px260 or px310 because the readers would find it easier to skim... also it wouldnt look like we are trying to use pictures to make our page seem longer p.

0false

In 1965 PMR was simply renamed RCP.

0false

I've created (based on ) I haven't tried it out yet to see if it works... will repost — dler —

0false

" The Marriage article is biased *against* objective truth, Jews and Christians. It has always been that way - with traditionalists eventually blocked and banned. There is a ""Same Sex Marriage"" article, no Traditional Marriage article. It was deleted. This is an ideological battle in the culture wars. THIS IS WAR. 75.168.209.210 "

0false

How is asking for CORRECT REFERENCES disrupting a page? Do you support bad history?

0false

" News suppressed on Wikipedia http://rexcurry.net/wikipedialies.html RexCurry.net is the historian who made the following discoveries covered elsewhere and on Wikipedia: 1. The USA’s first Pledge used a straight-arm salute and it was the origin of the salute of the monstrous National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazis). It was not an ancient Roman salute. http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html 2. The Pledge began with a military salute that then stretched outward toward the flag. Historic photographs are at http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html and at http://rexcurry.net/pledge_military.html Due to the way that both gestures were used, the military salute led to the Nazi salute. The Nazi salute is an extended military salute. http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html 3. The Pledge’s creator was a self-proclaimed socialist in the nationalism movement in the USA and his dogma influenced socialists in Germany, and his Pledge was the origin of their salute. ""Nazi"" means ""National Socialist German Workers' Party."" A mnemonic device is the swastika (Hakenkreuz in German). Although the swastika was an ancient symbol, it was also used sometimes by German National Socialists to represent ""S"" letters for their ""socialism."" Hitler altered his own signature to use the same stylized ""S"" letter for ""socialist."" http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-swastika.html The Pledge is part of the USA’s growing police-state. The insane government in the U.S. could cause comatose persons to Pledge dis-allegiance, desecrate the flag, and recite a declaration of independence. Remove the Pledge from the flag, remove flags from schools, remove schools from government. As a libertarian lawyer, Rex Curry provides pro bono services nationwide in schools and elsewhere, to educate the public about the news. Government schools will never teach children about their Pledge rights, nor the truth about the Pledge and its author. Most comments fail to ever mention that Francis Bellamy and his cousin Edward Bellamy were National Socialists in the USA, wrote for and supported their ""Nationalist"" and ""New Nation"" magazines, the ""Nationalist Educational Association"" and pushed their totalitarian dogma in their ""Nationalism"" clubs worldwide, including in Germany, and that the bible of their movement, Edward Bellamy's book ""Looking Backward"" was translated into every major language including the languages of those countries that became home to totalitarian socialism and the socialist Wholecaust (of which the Holocaust was a part) under the National Socialist German Workers' Party (21 million dead), the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (62 million dead), and the Peoples' Republic of China (35 million dead). It is easy to see why anyone would want to cover all of that up, but it should not be covered up. In the USA, the Bellamy dogma supported a government takeover of education. The government's schools imposed segregation by law and taught racism as official policy. The USA's behavior was an example for three decades before the Nazis. As under Nazism, the Jehovah's Witnesses, and blacks and the Jewish and others in the USA attended government schools that dictated segregation, taught racism, and persecuted children who refused to perform the straight-arm salute and robotically chant the Pledge. Some kids were expelled from government schools and had to use the many better alternatives. There were acts of violence. When Jesse Owens competed in the 1936 Olympics in Germany, his neighbors attended segregated government schools where they saluted the flag with the Nazi salute. The U.S. practice of official racism even outlasted the horrid party. And the schools and the Pledge still exist. The Pledge is still the most visible sign of the USA's growing police state. After segregation in government's schools ended, the Bellamy legacy caused more police-state racism of forced busing that destroyed communities and neighborhoods and deepened hostilities. Bellamy was a self-proclaimed national socialist in the USA, with the ""Nationalist"" magazine, and he preached what he called ""military socialism."" The federal flag darkens schools because Bellamy wanted government to take over all schools and to eliminate all of the better alternatives. Worse, Bellamy wanted the government to take over everything, not just schools. He wanted the government to impose the military system on all of society. School flags are a symbol of nationalization, militarism, and socialism. The Bellamy dogma was the same dogma that led to the ""Wholecaust"" (of which the Holocaust was a part): 62 million killed under the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; 35 million under the Peoples' Republic of China; 21 million under the National Socialist German Workers'

0false

"From their website: ""In 1965 Rudolf Schenker started up the SCORPIONS in Hanover. "" Link: http://www.the-scorpions.com/english/history.asp "

0false

" Multiple languages Ethnologue states that what this article refers to as ""dialects"" are actually seperate languages. Should this article be split? "

0false

" The Brazilian figure is based on the national census. If there is no ""racial"" census in Chile, then the figure is based on what? How can people know the percentage of whites in Chile if there's no census? "

0false

By the way, I don't practice Islam so I'm not a Munafiq, which means you're not allowed to stone me to death or whatever the punishment is.

0false

the Exeter article has a wikipedia article - so that should go back in (or maybe the exeter article needs someone to take a harder look at him...) The latter I'll be putting some maintenance tags on that article in a bit.

0false

PS: you're all middle-aged losers at home in your parents basements living off 50 bucks a week

1true

0false

":::::What's meaningless is your POV argument. The most politically charged event of the past 60 years, that piece of the Cold War the entire world pointed to, was the Berlin Wall. Now, a new wall is being built, garnering similar attention. What's more, almost everyone who hears of this seperation barrier instantly says, ""like the Berlin Wall?"" All other references to the Berlin Wall have been removed from the article. The link belongs. 15:49, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC) "

0false

" I grow tired of protecting articles from bully users. AMIB and this other guy, the one word I can associate with them is ""bully"". They think that they can get away with telling people that their opinions hold no weight in this matter and delete an article. Both of the users are trying to make up reasons for the article to be deleted. The first was that it was of low quality and beyond repair, the second was (and this is the worst) is that a result of keep can result in a redirect, on the basis that redirect votes add to keep, not delete and the third one is that it is unsourcable and should be deleted - unlike the majority of articles which have no sources. There is no logic to this. They didn't create for fun. I'm not in the mood to be polite with people who aren't interested in acknowledging any other view but their own. - (talk) "

0false

Hi! It was great to see not only another fan of arrested development, but also a synaesthete! Good on you! You sound like a cool guy! , 19:03 11/03/06

0false

for January 2006 discussion.

0false

ah good - swing on, in that case!

0false

REDIRECT Talk:Vincent O'Brien National Stakes

0false

Indeed, your'e right. What's so frustrating about English is that if you are not a native speaker, or at least learend it at very young age, you will get hard time to get to closer level with native speaker of English. It may be much easier for people whose native tongue is German, Dutch, some Scandinavian languages (except for Finnish) and etc-but for me at the least it's not come naturaly (but I must say that during the last years I didn't have many opportunities to practice it extensively). The English vocabulary is huge, not once there are 100 different words for the very same object with most cases it's unnecessary (probably it's related to the expansions of the British empire). I realy think that German and English are among the hardest languges to take control of. Spanise on the other hand, is very friendly..

0false

" To the circumcision boss said that ""banned is banned."" Son, you might want to take an Introduction to Western Civilization course at your local community college. You're so unfamiliar with the Enlightenment that you don't realize that ""banned"" is a badge of honor in the history of human progress. 82.128.204.29 "

0false

Those were attempts at tweaking it to work when logged-out. The page model is a bit different then, and in other skins. Cheers,

0false

Hey treasury I hate to break it to you but one of the other users saw what you did. You won't be around here much longer once I get unblocked. You and ryulong think you are very clever but another user also saw you do it. Apparently you are not as smart as you think you are. You WILL be banned permanently as soon as I am unblocked and I can report what you did and the other user will confirm it that you did the same thing to their edits.

0false

By the way, there is no evidence, except that reported on blogs, that Sanchez is in porn videos. Sure, people could go rent them and watch, but that would be original research and he appeeared under pseudonyms. So you might as well go ahead and eliminate any mention of his porno too. Face it, that's what you want to do anyway. So you might as well get it over with. Down the memory hole at Wikipedia!

0false

I agree. BTW, same story about Navahradak being capital is also repeated on Belarus article. I think these disputes about various national ways to present history of GDL should be on article Grand Duchy of Lithuania and everyone who wants to read more about the Duchy would click the link.

0false

" Thanks for the update, and my aplogogies for not assuming better faith about the listing errors. — Talk "

0false

By the way, I am and always was happy to fix up any specific issues with my edits that Elf brought to my attention (provided they weren't totally unreasonable), but I received no such requests from Elf, all he would do is revert the whole lot without consultation with me first.

0false

" I find it interesting though that he removed the link to his still intact Userpage talk archive where there seems no alleged ""death threat"" issue either other than regarding his flame-wars with "

0false

OOT Bosses I have something I wanted to discuss with you, but I didn't to bring it up in the public talk pages. I saw that you been leaving various messages on the talk pages of other contributors. And they seem to point the blame at the article changes at myself and the other gent who worked on it. Now I'll take respnosibility, because I contributed. But, you can't very well sit there and act like you weren't part of it. We brought the idea for change up, and you agreed to it. Heck, you even did most of the work. So I'd appreciate it if in the future you didn't try to act like we did something bad against your will. And maybe I'm reading too much into this, and if that's the case, then I apologize in advance. But that's just the way it seems to me.

0false

Notable alumni section I removed several people from this section because they do not have their own Wikipedia article, which is required to establish notability. The information I removed is: Jennifer O'Malley Dillon, executive director of the Democratic National Committee, Bob Ward, Fox 25 News Reporter,Gerry Leone, Attorney, Former DA Middlesex County and James Vallee, Attorney, Former House of Representatives Majority Leader. Thanks

0false

" I'm sorry; I was lazy. Here's where I got the information about the diphthongal variants of , and they make it clear in the references that Wells (1982a) is Wells, J.C. Accents of English 1: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. They also say Cruttenden (2001) is Cruttenden, A. (2001) Gimson's Pronunciation of English. 6th edn. London: Arnold. A Handbook of Varieties of English (Bernd Kortmann, Edgar W. Schneider, Walter de Gruyter, 2004) is where I got the information about monophthongization in Cockney; they, in turn, referenced Wells (1982). In this case, ""Wells (1982: 309)"" refers to Wells, J.C. Accents of English 2 The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. There you go. "

0false

Hmm, thanks. But it's a nasty hack really ... — Martin ( · talk)

0false

" I understand you, but you also should understand me. You shouldn't revert my work. As you can see, I don't disrupt your edits at articles Draza Mihailovic, Josip Broz Tito, or at Template:Yugoslav Axis collaborationism. I realy respect your effort and work there, and I don't revert it. I have no desire to get blocked, or to drag you into another blockade. I want to resolve all this disputes with you. As you can see I already changed Template:Politics of Yugoslavia to a neutral, non-image version. These are my proposals to you: 1) If we put in place your version of the list of Yugoslav Prime Ministers, it will remove Drago Marusic as Prime Minister in 1945, between Ivan Subasic and Tito. If you agree to left him on the list, this dispute is over. If we agree about Marusic, we can also agree about the issue ""Kingdom or DF Yugoslavia"". 2) Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was a complete different state than Serbia and Montenegro. It wasn't like Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and Kingdom of Yugoslavia, or Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia and Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. In 2003, after the adoption of the Constitutional Charter, whole system of government was changed. Even the position of the Prime Minister was abolished, and merged with the position of the President. Those two countries realy need a separate articles. Also, their armies need a separate articles. 3) Articles President of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and President of Serbia and Montenegro should remain separate. The last President of FRY was Vojislav Kostunica, from 2000 until 2003 when he was replaced by Svetozar Marovic of SCG (2003-2006). Those two offices was very different (President of FRY wasn't both head of state and head of government, like President of SCG). 4) Prime Minister of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia wasn't ""Prime Minister of Serbia and Montenegro"", but of FRY. That article should retain its current name. 5) As you can see, yesterday I changed Template:Politics of Yugoslavia to a neutral, non-image version. I hope that you agree with this version. P.S. I'm sorry if you think that people from the Balkans are uncivilized. It's not true, believe me. We aren't better or worse than other peoples. "

0false

William Wilberforce No worries. I had noticed the question of attribution, and had a look at the Ferens site before uploading, but saw nothing about the issue. I hadn't thought to look on the Talk page. Thanks for letting me know. Regards,

0false

you gotta let somebody love you.

0false

" Great peace-keeping! That solved the problem in my opinion. ™ "

0false

Hi Sometimes you are wright! Sometimes I am rihgt! Sometimes we are wright.

0false

Yeah i no it sucks.

1true

0false

I think he is a gay fag!!!

1true

0false

1true

Seems likely from their descriptions.

0false

File:CTI Measurements.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CTI Measurements.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

0false

" I am really sorry about your relatives, but any reasonable person, as I know you are, should agree that the persecution of the Copts, the massacre in Luxor cannot be compared to a collapsed building. Copts are important part of Egyptian society. I am not saying that the whole section that you deleted should be included, but a few sentences should. Here's an extract from Speigel: ""Copts make up the largest Christian community in the Arab world and around 8 million Egyptians belong to the Coptic Church. They're barred from high government positions, diplomatic service and the military, as well as from many state benefits. Universities have quotas for Coptic students considerably lower than their actual percentage within the population.Building new churches isn't allowed, and the old ones are falling into disrepair thanks to a lack both of money and authorization to renovate. When girls are kidnapped and forcibly converted, the police don't intervene. Thousands of pigs were also slaughtered under the pretense of confining swine flu. Naturally all were owned by Christians. The same with Luxor's massacre. For example see article Spain. It talks about bombing in commuter trains in Madrid, Spain on 11 March 2004. Egypt should have a few sentences about the massacre in Luxor's too. "

0false

Neutrality Can we get a professional that's not employed by humanewatch.org to clean up this article PLEASE.

0false

Why do you assume that I'm a native speaker of English? Why don't you simply accept that I'm having messages relayed from an alien planet on which, despite multifarious differences, something akin to the Roman alphabet developed in parallel, complete with 'e,' 'o,' and the 'ee'/'oo' innovation in the more advanced cultures? Why do you insist on putting something called 'regularity' (= 'one grapheme one function'?) above efficiency in conveying the full range and variety of phonemes? Stereotypically German or what?

0false

I would value your opinion on this The recent ugly behavior of a user in Istanbul Pogrom along with my fruitful collaborating with a Turkish editor on some articles have made me think if there is a way to deal with all this mutual suspicion among Greek and Turkish wikipedians. So I came up with the idea of a wikiProject where Greek and Turkish wikipedians work together assumming good faith and trying to overcome the said suspicion. I have written a . I would greatly appreciate it if you would read it and comment on it. Could it be done? Is there any point in trying? Does it brake any wikipedia anti-cabal rules? Thank you in advance!

0false

" Reply to Mr. Burdak I am glad to see you have at least referenced that quote now - it was not at all clear before where it came from. As it does not agree with standard translations of that passage, one wonders about the unusual wording - so reminiscent of the odd ""quote"" you made from the Mahabharata the other day. But, more importantly, what about the completely false ""reference"" to ""The History of Civilizations of Central Asia, Vol. II""? Why have you (again) not replied to my pointing out of this apparent dishonesty? This is only the most recent in a very long list of false ""quotes"" and ""references"" you have made and I have exposed on these pages - as you well know. Now, I am willing to accept that maybe one or two false quotes could be the result of honest mistakes or sloppy research - but when the process is repeated over and over and over again one begins to suspect that the author is doing it deliberately and intends to deceive readers. So, quite naturally, I and others have come to mistrust any quotes you may give - especially to sources that are difficult to check. I am sorry - but you have brought this situation upon yourself. "

0false

My user page Thanks for reverting the vandalism on it. (Talk|Contribs)

0false

I'm gay, I'm gay and I don't care who knows it. Sorry, I have sudden outbursts. Anyway, obviously

0false

" Evidence Redux I'll be frank. The blocking of came a bit late for my taste. However, he was found to be in violation of the 3 revert rule, and to again quote the policy which ironically Malke was threatening people with and was himself found to be in violation of: "" A bright line exists on edit warring, known as the three-revert rule (3RR). If an administrator has not acted already by this point, then action is very likely, especially if a report is made to the noticeboard. Policy forbids edit warring generally, and editors may be blocked if they edit war, with or without breaching 3RR. "" I commend for taking the actions he did. The subsequent complaints Malke made, and his promise to cease his activity in order to get unblocked a few days later, are a matter of record on his user talk page. Malke has since deleted the notifications, but they are viewable in his talk page history, and make interesting reading. After Malke's block on August 19, 2009, I decided I needed to take a step back. For the past ten days I have busied myself with other Wikipedia subjects. I now return to this page. I suggest we talk a bit about what happened, and I also suggest we take a look at what happened here this month, edit by edit. It continues to seem clear to me that Malke was editing with obsession towards an agenda; his obsession got him in hot water with the admins. Soon, Wikipedia policy is going to change, as many here know. I'd welcome some reasonable discussion, and renewed work on the article. On closer examination of the history pages of the main article, it appears some of Malke's biased edits, through sheer volume, are still in effect. I propose going through every edit of his, see exactly what changes of his have survived, and put back all relevant, sourced material. Once that is effected, we can pick up the chore of dealing with further improvements. Having just returned to WP from an extended absence, I am not fully familiar with what has occurred with this article, but cursory skimming of the talk page reminds me of some of the frustrations which led me to leave WP more than a year ago. I recognize Malke's concerns. Material that is added back should strictly follow WP:BLP, ie., it should be directly relevant to Rove, not defamatory, and should be sourced by reliable secondary sources. Malke's concerns were one thing, his methods another. Admins blocked him not only due to his violation of the three edit rule, but because he was deleting paragraphs of properly sourced material, and as the admins noted (to quote directly from Malke's talk page history, since he has since, for obvious reasons, deleted all reference to his blocking): - *An impartial administrator just did; I don't know you from Adam, and haven't so much as looked at the contents of your edits; all that matters is that you broke WP:3RR, and received a short block for it; if you want to be unblocked, all you have to do is agree to stop edit warring, regardless of whether you think it is justified or not. :==( o ) '''I highly commend the admins, and urge others to support their work. These admins had not been involved here previously; they took firm, direct action on a disruptive editor, Malke, who was judged to be making ""untrue"" statements regarding his efforts. I again suggest we move past this period of turmoil and examine what changes were made to this article by an editor whose tactics earned him a block and who, in my view, obse

0false

, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia is hosted in the US, so US laws on copyright, etc. are enforcable. That's just the way it is, and we need to avoid legal action being taken against the foundation. To be honest, I don't see big differences in behaviour of editors by nationality, so far as nationality is apparent - I suspect that there are just more Americans here than any other nationality, simply due to sizes of populations of English-speakers, so any group of editors is likely to have more Americans than anything else, including the helpful, constructive, thoughtful ones. I think, however, that there are a higher proportion of editors here now than ever before who have little interest in adding and improving content, preferring to delete, argue, try to raise the bar on notability and fair use guidelines to allow more to be deleted, etc., but I don't see this as a wholly US phenomenon. 08:15

0false

Your discarding of vandalism complaints Re a recent vandalism report I submitted , the user in question has received numerous complaints, including from bots, and has resumed the same independent activity after being blocked a couple weeks ago. The user is rarely using authoritative references but apparently only what turns up first on Google. I'd feel differently if the vandal were responding at all to any complaints or if the user weren't making dozens of similar edits each day. I've learned my lesson from you and I won't complain about this user again, and I certainly won't report any others that regularly trash WP with similar types of rumors and fake references, so I don't expect a reply from you, but I think you are making a serious mistake by not treating this as vandalism and immediately imposing restraints. —

0false

Merge is now complete. I removed a section recently added about the content of a current issue, leaving in the text and references about the magazine itself. -

0false

Trust me, Mr. wants the world to know he's gay. I'm on him hte minute he gets home from school. I wish you no ill will, but my son was on the computor at 3:16 this morning. That won't fly. He is learning a lot from these on-line debates. Are you?

0false

See the news out today in the press: Un parque nacional español se cuela entre los 10 más visitados del mundo. He says the Teide is the 9th most visited in the world today. Do you have anything to say?.83.40.237.202

0false

We needs must be very careful to present these in historical context and without original synthesis, but they are notable to the topic of how parapsychology interacts with other disciplines. A less controversial (and less notable) parallel might be how music theorists have viewed the use of synthesizers in rock music over the last few decades. - 2/0 (cont.)

0false

Vergina Sun the pic is within fair use as it was made by a person i know and given to the public domain. that's a non-issue.

0false

(talk • contribs)

0false

Also, please have a look at Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and don't create artciles unless you can demonstrate that their subjects satisfy those guidelines.

0false

" I notice you reported me for saying I'm webmeister. Um, why? Because I am. I really am the member ""webmeister"" from that forum. What do you particularly wrong with that? "

0false

73 – Masada and end of Jewish-Roman War

0false

If some people are anti-catholic then their just biggots.

0false

You ignored him too

0false

, as User:Dr.K wasn't saying it in the article

0false

LaserActive Hi SchuminWeb, I am confused by your removal of the LaserActive link to the virtual LaserActive museum. Did you have a chance to explore that a little (like on the left, check various sections)? Cheers, -CyRo

0false

Lists of Islamic Jihads

0false

" URL Update (update to my previous, and only, post) I checked today and verified that the ""original"" 'chucknorrisfacts' URL is working (vs. the 'replacement' URL mentioned in my previous post 'thechucknorrisfacts'.)"

0false

A person living in Canada has just as much right as anyone else in the world to research and own a particular dog (or anything else). You, nor the Koolie Club of Australia, have patented sole rights to these dogs. Wikipedia is all about correct information and NOT theories and your own ideas of what happened, what was and what will be.... Wikipedia is based on facts, which clearly has been stated on the German Coolie page and not the Australian Koolie page.

0false

" Thank you. Given the misuse of tools here and the itchy trigger finger as exemplified by the thread above, this ""admin"" needs to be examined by Arbcom. I'm not surprised to see a thread already open at ANI discussing it's recent behavioural trends. I won't be initiating anything but will most certainly be presenting evidence at the appropriate time. In the meantime someone needs to tell this ""admin"" to calm the fuck down and stop removing comments mad by editors on their own talk pages. That's a blockable offence, especially when they were told to never post here again. INVOLVED much? "

1true

0false

Based on the above discussion it is abundantly clear that there is no consensus for insertion of the third criteria repeatedly inserted by disruptive edits ignoring the talk page completely. Also unacceptable is editing the list based on the new criteria within the same edit that changed it.

0false

If it's irrelevant I'll remove it. The sentence adds nothing at all to anyone's understanding of the murder.

0false

" Grant specifically says that ""no attempt to enforce the rule of nonrecognition as regards East Jerusalem seems to have been made at U.N. level. No occasion for enforcement has been afforded in regard to the Golan Heights"". Also, Grant is the only guy I could find who calls UN General Assembly resolutions ""regimes of non-recognition"" and I believe that using this term is misleading and not neutral. So not ""sourced reliably"" and not ""written in a neutral style"". I would also suggest that reverting after a specific BRD request, even if only doing it once or twice per day is edit warring and disruptive. I'm sure ArbCom frowns on that sort of thing as well. "

0false

Or, I could scan the articles and place them online in a directory on my webserver....what is the community's pleasure?

0false

I have just followed from your edit exchange on the article Blu-Ray Disc to find the exchange above. Sadly, you appear to know little about the subject, and to be fair, it has become confusing because much of the terminology has become abused. First, European Blu-Ray discs are not produced in 24p format. That is almost exclusively the preserve of the American regions. Secondly, the Blu-Ray format does not support the proper 1080 progressive high definition formats (1080/50p and 1080/60p (and I include the 59.95p in that). This is because the data rate is not fast enough for these formats. The European sourced discs that state 1080p on the packaging are discs produced from film originated material and is one of the abuses of the term progressive. The term progressive strictly defines a video format where the lines of video information are recorded in strict numerical order, 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 ... 1078 - 1079 -1080. Alternatively, there is the interlaced format which displays the odd lines ony first (odd field) and then follows them by the even lines (even field). (You probably know this already). 1 - 3 - 5 - 7 ... 1077 - 1079 - 2 - 4 - 6 ... 1078 - 1080 They are actually stored in the digital video frame the other way around due to the digital video format's origins in the NTSC world. In true video source material, the even field displays a time slice that is 20 milliseconds later than the odd field and the two together give a comlete video frame. This is also largely true in the Americas, except the even field precedes the odd field by ~16.6 miliiseconds. There is a largish group of enthusiasts (if that's the right word) who have become somewhat anally retentive over the progressive video formats and who have convinced themselves that progressive is the only way to go. The reality is that any improvement in the visual perception of the video is marginal at best and certainly not worth the doubling of the required digital data to support it. But for them, everything has to be progressive. I shall coin the word 'progressivists' for this discussion. When film originated material is transferred to video in Europe, the film is run slightly fast by 4% which allows one film frame to occupy both the the odd and even fields of the video frame (known as 2:2 pulldown). Thus the even field displays a time slice that is 0 milliseconds later than the odd field. In order to satisfy the progressivists, the Blu-Ray producers state that such material is in 1080p format, but using something called a 'Progressive Segmented Frame' technique (though they don't mention that last bit on the box). That is: that it is progressive video, but the odd lines have been recorded together and then they are followed by the even lines. It is really interlaced video, but by the time the display device or the Blu-ray player has de-interlaced the video (it doesn't matter one jot where it actually happens), the result is perceptually indistinguishable from true 1080/25p video (assuming the deinterlacing algorithm works properly). If watched on a CRT display then, of course, the video will be interlaced as there is no deinterlacing prior to display, but with that number of lines, no one is likely to notice (unless they sit inches away from the screen). The description 1080p on the box is, technically at least, wrong but percetually the same as 1080/25p video. The 4% speed up goes completely un-noticed especially these days when the sound is adjusted back to the original pitch - and obviously you hadn't noticed it yourself if you had convinced yourself that you were watching films at the original speed. Once we cross to the Americas, different problems occur. Obviously, running the film at 30 frames per second is not an option, so instead, film is converted to video by storing the same film frame on 3 half video frames, followed by storing the next frame on 2 half video frames and then repeating 3 - 2 - 3 - 2. Thus 4 film frames occupy 5 video frames (the technique is 3:2 pulldown - often wrongly called 2:3 pulldown). Properly deinterlaced, such material is perfectly watchable and the viewer unlikely to feel anything is wrong. But the progressivists have decided that it is not the way to watch film material and have even invented faults to justify a move to a progressive format. I have even seen claims (obviously failing to understand the technique) that movement in the resultant video is uneven in that it jumps 50% further every other jump due to the 3 half fields. The result was the 24p format. The only problem with the 24p format is that if you try to watch it on a CRT display (and A CRT is still unbeatable for contrast and colour reproduction), the result will be unviewable to bad flicker - something that was known as long ag

0false

Oh I was just wondering, I'm something of a fan myself. You've made some pretty good articles; all the best.

0false

" I guess I should fill you in with the whole generation controversy. Some of the editors here claimed that grouping consoles by generation is original research because groupings have been inconsistent from source to source. The whole thing can be seen here, although nothing new has been said for several months, now. ''''''[✆Talk] "

0false

, spent by private U.S. citizens

0false

" Replaceable fair use Image:CarolLombard.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:CarolLombard.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "

0false

Hypercritical? On the 10th anniversary, and the first time you dare feature a list on mainpage? No way. It was supposed to be our chance to get it right, make it perfect. Why not directly tell us a week in advance that this list was the one you'd be featuring for the anniversary to give us a chance to shine it up and correct all the issues?

0false

Hi. Drop a note on the talk page of that article asking for it to be added. But, note that the article will likely be replaced by a redirect anyway. (comment)

0false

" ""The WWE Raw guest host initiative was introduced on June 15, 2009 by Donald Trump during his time as owner of the Raw franchise."" This is Wikipedia all over. Listing stories as facts...Jesus Christ. Grow a brain, the first step might be to stop watching a product churned solely for children (not WWE, ALL PRO WRESTLING.86.128.14.112 "

0false

" I've provided a citation that doesn't include Albert (or any other corps commander) in the list of principal commanders. In other words, unless you can provide a source that does, what you are doing constitutes Original Research and is not allowed. I'll remove Albert and replace the Prussian commanders per the source tomorrow to give you time to find a competing source. And remember to make it Reliable. Don't bother replying unless you have a source to supply, because you're simply repeating yourself. •T•C•E• "

0false

" The problem is, 11 of the sources (and the most reliable ones) are all supporting one single sentence in the article. (talk) "

0false

FUCKING FAGGOT LOLWAT.

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

" our previous conversation you fucking shit eating liberal, you make lady bird johnson shake on her tampon. I said fucking sorry for my little brother and you still had to fucking complain. My life is fucking shit. My mother is always yelling at me and my dad beats the shit out of me if I get fucking out of line. My brother's one outlet is wikipedia. He cried when he saw my father smacking me, and his tears clogged his mac book pro's keyboard. we had to go to fucking apple and get a new one, all out of my mom's pocket. then last night i wanted to take this hot pussy from connecticut out in my dad's new rolls-royce and he said fucking no. so you know what I fucking did? I fucking cut his pinky off and didnt snitch like a little bitch like you. I take lazy ass niggers like you and stomp you with my fat nazi heel. you should be FUCKING sorry you ever fucked with me or my dad (Steve Jobs). And if I find out your using Linux, I'll take pity on thee. Cause you're just too stupid to understand shit. i can see your fucking at some fucking computer and you think that you have some power on this fucking site. let me tell you something you little bitch. when i'm doing coke off strippers titties in da clubz, you can just edit some fucking wikipedia articles. i smoke a phat blunt every damn day, and you smoke your mom's fucking tea. So, in closing, as Shakespeare said in Sonnet ninety-four (I believe): ""things turn sourest by their deeds. Lillies that fester smell far worse than (fucking) weeds."" fuck you and heil hitler. -n. jobs ps- if you ever fucking ban this ip again, there is going to be some serious shit thats gonna happen. i know a fucking guy."

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

" Response I am obviously very disappointed by this decision. The assertion that I did not read the article is highly misleading, not to mention offensive. I have been a Wikipedia editor for many, many years, and have followed the rules and regulations throughout these years. To suggest that I did not follow the regulations is complete bunkum. Using the evidence present in the article, I made a choice based on what I thought was a fairly obvious case - it STILL breaks our rules on blogs, recentism, notability, and bias. The ""keep"" votes are from people who have an immense level of conflict of interest, and therefore skew the vote something rotten. I am very disappointed that this entire episode has been carried out at my expense, rather than at the article itself. This response will be copied to as many concerned editors in this matter. wordsdeeds "

0false

→ From WP:Third opinion: The inclusion of that section gives undue weight to a particular pre-Hungary period in this article, Hungary. Such material would be better placed at Hungarian prehistory or Pannonian Basin before the Hungarians, with links to Great Moravia where appropriate. The current article is almost 200 kb long, and needs more concise summaries more than it needs additional sections. When deciding how much space and depth to devote to a particular aspect of a topic, it is important to take recourse to general sources and reflect their coverage. Beyond the reliable sources threshold, the trustworthiness of a particular source is less important for determining weight in the treatment of a topic than is its generality. As an outsider, I could see adding up to a few dozen words based on the lingering impact of toponyms and script. As a side note, please remember to stay focused on improving the article without recourse to personal attacks on other editors. As well, I remind you that whenever text is copied from one article to another, you must include this fact in your edit summary. - 2/0 (cont.)

0false

I am not a martyr. I am a human, and humans make mistakes. I did too, many mistakes.

0false

Categories I have removed the Extreme Sport category, as most cavers do not consider their sport Extreme. It is only some noncavers who think it might be.

0false

Hey Drmies, are you ok? I can't imagine what I must have said on that IP's page to get you so upset that you've decided to literally track my every edit. Isn't there anything better that you can do with your time instead of THIS? You know, like move away from your computer and go out, talk to people and form friendships in real life? You've said you have a family with a kid to take care of, but I now find that very hard to believe because I would assume you wouldn't have so much time for this nonsense if that were really the case. I seriously hope I haven't hurt your feelings that much to prevent you from performing your daily duties off the world wide web. I would feel badly if that were the case, which now seems it actually is. Call me vandal all you like, it doesn't matter to me. I wish you well. 125.39.16.85

0false