Datasets:

keertanavc

/

imdb_prefix20_forDPO_multi-preference_v2

like 0

When I ordered this from Blockbuster's website I had no idea that it

When I ordered this from Blockbuster's website I had no idea that it was coming. So I took a chance. I got it and walked out with it within the hour I had it. I had all the extras I wanted, it was as close to perfect as I could have wished. It's the story of a high-ranking gangster, Danny (Paul Rudd) who goes out with a girl named Cindy (Kate Beckinsale) who is the wife of his uncle who is

When I ordered this from Blockbuster's website I had no idea that it would be a DVD release, I was surprised when the package looked like it would not be there.<br /><br />A month later it was there.<br /><br />This has been one of those films that is always on the cheap in my opinion, the good thing about the DVD release is, so does the film.<br /><br />The story is about a young man with a long history

I cheer for films that fill in subject matter gaps in world cinema. So

I cheer for films that fill in subject matter gaps in world cinema. So I was shocked to be handed this low-grade effort by a distributor with a reputation for high quality work - including the much-praised "Dollars, Cents, Pounds" release of "La Strada de San Francisco" in 1996. The story is a rehash of the previous film, as are most of the details and dialogue. It's like a complete rewrite. The story is boring and

I cheer for films that fill in subject matter gaps in world cinema. So, what makes this one special? Well, this is, for me, one of those. It's a film that can fill in a void in our knowledge about war, and so is a film that I watch to fill in gaps in my film theory. I watch this film as a film theory student and am happy that I found this to be educational and useful.<br /><br />The film has a few

For anyone craving a remake of 1989's Slaves of New York. What

For anyone craving a remake of 1989's Slaves of New York. What a treat - no surprise, the "good" guy won the battle. The "bad" guys are not a match for him. This is one of those movies that is great fun to watch - all the characters are well played and the action just comes at you all the time. The acting, which is very good for the 80's and for the time period it is set in, is just incredible. Just watch

For anyone craving a remake of 1989's Slaves of New York. What could possibly be wrong with George Newbern and Richard Roundtree? The plot in this film is similar to Slaves but this time around the two brothers have to get their brother and best friend kidnapped and they have to stop a plot and rescue them. And when it's done it's a great film. Roundtree plays the character George, he has an ex-slave personality and I thought his acting and accent was very

Besides being boring, the scenes were oppressive and dark. The movie tried to

Besides being boring, the scenes were oppressive and dark. The movie tried to make it seem like a crime that there wasn't a lot of sunlight in the room, yet the main character didn't even bother trying. It's just lazy. The cinematography was horrible, the editing was awful, the music was awful, the sets were horrible, the costumes were awful, the acting was terrible. But the only good part of the movie was when the bad guys were running around with their guns.

Besides being boring, the scenes were oppressive and dark. The movie tried to make the viewers feel that they are being pushed into dark corners of the apartment, which would have a creepy vibe as the movie progresses. The story is told in flashback sequences and is about a mother named Elizabeth (Kathleen Reynolds), who has an extremely disturbed relationship with her estranged son. The story is also very realistic and has some good acting and direction. The movie is well paced and the movie never gets boring.

For the first couple of seasons, I thought The Apprentice was a highly engaging

For the first couple of seasons, I thought The Apprentice was a highly engaging TV show. I enjoyed the banter with Mr. Geller. And there was a lot of excitement for that one day when Mr. Geller would win the money. Mr. Geller is also a very entertaining character for me. I love the part where he tells Mr. Geller "I've just read that you are a genius!" At one point in the show he gets some special advice from an unseen benef

For the first couple of seasons, I thought The Apprentice was a highly engaging television production and a joy for viewers. This was not an exception. In fact, it was probably the worst episode in the last 10 years. The show was dull and boring. The story line was uninspired. The ending was predictable and the ending was predictable to the point where I was glad I didn't catch it on video.<br /><br />I don't understand all the negativity towards the episode. It

I LOVED the Apprentice for the first two seasons.<br /><

I LOVED the Apprentice for the first two seasons.<br /><br />BUT NOW THIS IS JUST A LITTLE SHAME! It's so very boring I can't take my eyes off the TV! The whole cast should be ashamed of themselves, I've never watched a more miserable show than this. The only actors that actually made a decent contribution were Danny Akins, Tim Robbins, and Matt Jones, who's not very convincing as a high-society producer. And

I LOVED the Apprentice for the first two seasons.<br /><br />I would say it was very enjoyable for me but not really memorable for me. It was more like a family friendly show. The episodes were very short and I think it was a good short series to show how the world was different.<br /><br />For me I think it was the only show that is likeable and entertaining. I think there is a lot of action and surprises as well.<br

I bet you Gene Simmons and Vincent Pastore negotiated in advance how many episodes

I bet you Gene Simmons and Vincent Pastore negotiated in advance how many episodes this would entail. This one is a bust, and I'm not a fan of the character they had here. Too many questions have been answered, and you're left with so much to answer for. The dialogue isn't very interesting either, which makes up for it, with nothing on the line but the characters, or the plot. Why on earth do they even keep this on the air, after they made a

I bet you Gene Simmons and Vincent Pastore negotiated in advance how many episodes of 'Revenge of the Nerds' would be made and why. The film series, with its endless twists, and the great cast, has a long history. It was only in 1990, with the first 'Revenge of the Nerds' episode, that we actually saw the first footage that aired. The following year, with 'Revenge of the Nerds' again airing on an afternoons Cartoon

I can't stand most reality shows and this one is worst than the one

I can't stand most reality shows and this one is worst than the one you've seen before.<br /><br />And of course, there is a lot of sex - and bad things are thrown in too, such as a guy who says he just wants "a good, hot lady to make me feel great, while I'm still in the act". Also, the actors do terrible. They are supposed to be real people who have had to act fake in so many situations.<br

I can't stand most reality shows and this one is worst than the one I just mentioned. It features a bunch of losers with nothing to do. Not funny, not funny, not funny.<br /><br />The music is great. It's like I was looking for something to hear that would make me laugh (nothing works). I guess I'm just looking for "nothing" to hear.<br /><br />The only reason I stayed on the show was that it was a

One has to wonder if at any point in the production of this film a

One has to wonder if at any point in the production of this film a scriptwriter or director thought that he could make a good film, without a cast or even an actor playing the part of the actor. The lack of action or suspense of any kind keeps the film going for too long. The characters are completely wasted. The cast consists of the usual boring actors playing to the same old clichés. The plot lacks any kind of originality whatsoever. The acting of a completely inexperienced writer was

One has to wonder if at any point in the production of this film a scriptwriter, for whatever reason, decided to not put forth a story, just a synopsis of what was going on. For instance, the movie would start and end with an image, then disappear into a black hole.<br /><br />This movie was very forgettable. They had you laughing at each other because you were trying to figure out what was going on, you might as well have been on acid

Jochen Hick wrote and directed this little thriller of a suspense film based

Jochen Hick wrote and directed this little thriller of a suspense film based on a psychological study by psychologist Dr. Charles Sarno. The film is based on the fact that the actor played by Charles Sarno is an actor who was the victim of a mass suicide. The film is a thriller with a lot of suspense. It is also a thriller with a lot of suspense. The characters are interesting and different from each other. For instance, the protagonist (James Woods) is a

Jochen Hick wrote and directed this little thriller of a suspense film based on the novel by Sir George Stroumboulopoulos. The screenplay by Stroumboulopoulos was written by the writer Frank Loesser, who had previously written a play about Stroumboulopoulos. However, with the aid of cinematographer Louis Fournier, it was decided that the story should be written by a screen writer and director named William H. Fagin. His script is an interesting

Poorly written conspiracy drama/mystery about the possibility that AIDS was introduced

Poorly written conspiracy drama/mystery about the possibility that AIDS was introduced as a drug/vaccine in the 1960s, and if this was true, then this film is about AIDS and has become increasingly boring.<br /><br />The plot revolves around a young doctor, played perfectly by the incredible Jack Nicholson, who discovers that the AIDS virus, or "Lancet" in the 1950s, has infected many patients, mostly gay men, in the same ward as him and

Poorly written conspiracy drama/mystery about the possibility that AIDS was introduced on the planet earth, but the fact that people can transmit it to each other is just too mysterious for these people to get worked up about it.<br /><br />I don't remember having any idea what anyone was going on about.<br /><br />But once they are set on Mars or something like that then they start talking about UFOs, who doesn't love a good conspiracy theory? If you know

I don't give much credence to AIDS conspiracy theories but its soci

I don't give much credence to AIDS conspiracy theories but its sociologic reality and a few facts of history made by the late Dr. Robert F. Kennedy has me interested nonetheless. A short time before Dr. Kennedy's death in November 1969, on November 14, Kennedy released his autobiography, "My Life". The book was to be based on his memoirs but since he didn't have enough time (or at least the time he felt) to finish this one book, his book

I don't give much credence to AIDS conspiracy theories but its sociocultural context is not. A number of actors from "The Matrix" are in the cast of this movie, including an old friend of my uncle. I thought his appearance and attitude was a little bit wooden and he could have been played a lot better.<br /><br />Its the same old thing from AIDS movies. There are tons of AIDS references but they are either not funny or just lame attempts.<br

The cliché of the shell-shocked soldier home from the war is here

The cliché of the shell-shocked soldier home from the war is here played on an old school level by the characters, in this short film (actually several short films) made with live actors. The story involves a man having a "real" heart attack (with the help of a surgeon), and the events taking place in the first 90 minutes of the film. It's almost as if the director made a short comedy and then decided to put it on a VHS tape. The title

The cliché of the shell-shocked soldier home from the war is here, only with even less fun. This is not a story with a happy ending and is more like a story about the lives of two characters who find each other out after a series of misunderstandings. It's just a lot of characters sitting around, trying to figure out their lives. The characters are very interesting and I think they have something to teach each other as they struggle through this movie. The acting was great and

The Good Earth is perhaps the most boring film I've seen in my life

The Good Earth is perhaps the most boring film I've seen in my life. It has all the usual plot elements, but with a boring script, and so-called "plot" in my opinion is not the best word to describe this film. You'll either be looking for someone to watch in your car when you're stuck in traffic and in a rush for your ride, or you'll be looking for some obscure film reference. There are no surprises. I don't know why that makes

The Good Earth is perhaps the most boring film I've seen in my life. So much of the action happens so fast I can hardly get my head around it. I've watched it several times before and never really really care for what is happening. The first time I tried to catch my breath with the slow pace of the film. Now the slow scene of the woods and the scene of the river running is nice, it seems to be a part of the film, so I like that,

The Good Earth is not a great film by any means, it is way

The Good Earth is not a great film by any means, it is way too slow for that to be true. But I still enjoyed it with my kids, a couple of hours (like the whole film) and then a snack break to relax. It had some very funny moments (I love Michael Douglas and Diane Lane's characters, also in the same movie) as well. The screenplay did a good job, but there are some plot points and subplots that the script couldn't put

The Good Earth is not a great film by any means, it is way too low budget to be worthwhile. It also makes the story seem much like a soap opera, in my opinion. I thought that it was a very bad movie with bad acting, bad sets and bad direction. The lead actress who plays the lead role, is the only character that is ever entertaining. They use a guy that appears to be a model to act as a cop in the movie.<br /><br />

A couple of farmers struggle in life in a small village in China. Wang

A couple of farmers struggle in life in a small village in China. Wang Hui has an affair with the daughter of the town lord. She runs away and is not seen for several days. Wang Hui is reunited with her father, who is in need. His daughter, Liao Lin, and her son, Hui Sheng, live happily, and Wang Hui starts to care for the old woman, while Hui Sheng is in a very dark mood of his own.

A couple of farmers struggle in life in a small village in China. Wang (Ting Fan), a farmer, and Zhang (Guo Jia) a farmer are two of their village's main characters, who are living in a big house with large land and plentiful crops and the money for everything.<br /><br />One day, Zhang is injured and sent to a small hospital in the city. There, he meets with a strange female nurse (Li Ling). The nurse is the

Luise Rainer received an Oscar for her performance in The Good Earth.

Luise Rainer received an Oscar for her performance in The Good Earth. She played a young woman on the stage in a musical about the time before Columbus arrived. Her performance was so convincing, even when the audience did not see her, that they applauded wildly at her performance and cheered for her when her character went on to win an Oscar for best actress in a musical. The play will never be released. In the movie that follows, she was replaced with the actress on Broadway, and they

Luise Rainer received an Oscar for her performance in The Good Earth. A lot of this film's great is done in flashback. In this flashback, in the 70's, an American woman who is the only witness to the torture of a child. This child is then sent into an unnamed hospital where a boy (Rainer) is treated. When he is released by the doctor (who is an expert in human rights) and given the gift of writing (which he uses to write about

Well I'm probably about to be lambasted by everyone on this site,

Well I'm probably about to be lambasted by everyone on this site, for not showing the rest of the movie in all its glory, however I will be including this portion. Just so you don't have to wait so long for a spoiler, here are the spoilers. I know a lot of people are going to hate this movie because it has a rating of 6.5 and I'm the type of person who will not even show you the rest of the movie unless you tell me to

Well I'm probably about to be lambasted by everyone on this site, but this movie is so horrible I couldnt even be mad at you. Its the worst film I've ever heard of and that's saying something. It's the worst movie you ever heard of. Its about a woman who is in her early 30's who has the ability to predict the future. After her brother is a victim of a car accident, she decides to use that ability to help him with his own problems

The Good Earth follows the life a slave girl and a poor farmer in China

The Good Earth follows the life a slave girl and a poor farmer in China. The movie is about a person who has no other choice, to be a part of a special project to restore the Chinese government to power and to bring all people back to normal. She has a mother who works with a slave farmer. A man who is a master and tries to control the girl. This is a story of freedom and happiness, the Chinese people are able to use the tools they have with them to

The Good Earth follows the life a slave girl and a poor farmer in China. Their lives are intertwined and they have to fight for survival. This movie is so amazing and makes you appreciate China. If you look hard, you will see hidden in the background of some scenes, but if you look hard you will see them. You'll see how well the Chinese make this movie as many movies there are have bad music. The Chinese are masters for making a movie and I'm grateful to them.

Well, what was fun... except for the fun part.<br /><

Well, what was fun... except for the fun part.<br /><br />As I was watching this movie in my dorm, I was really feeling it. It was so fun.<br /><br />However, the film is not the best part. It could have been very much better. The animation is good as well. However, the art direction is very, very poor. The characters were pretty, but nothing special.<br /><br />The movie ended with a big

Well, what was fun... except for the fun part.<br /><br />This movie is totally ridiculous.<br /><br />Everytime you see a character from the movie come up to you and tell you something, you are thinking this is funny, because you have seen this character in all the movies they've done, but they haven't been this lame.<br /><br />Lame, lame.<br /><br />Lame, lame. That's all you

Amazing. That's what you'd say if you sat through this film.

Amazing. That's what you'd say if you sat through this film. How anyone could think of these people as human is incomprehensible. You'll find no sympathy for these people at all. This is supposed to be comedy, as well as a satire on the real-world situations of these people. It makes one really sad. They have all the charm and intelligence of a cardboard character, with the stupidity of a puppy. The best part is when they break out into a dance jam,

Amazing. That's what you'd say if you sat through this film. The acting is incredible and the cinematography and sets are simply brilliant. The movie is really about an older man and his son, who's mother is a nurse. There's nothing you can ask for with it. Not a single minute should pass by without you being shocked by something, I really do recommend it. It's a really great film. But this one alone has got my vote because of the storyline. Everything

This movie could be used in film classes in a "How Not to Script

This movie could be used in film classes in a "How Not to Script a Movie" class or a "Shakespeare class", but it's too long, so it's not much fun. It is a shame that it has been banned, as it is a hilarious comedy. It's not a particularly funny movie. It is one that's really not that funny, at all, but funny nonetheless. The movie had a funny premise that really made it stand out from a slew of others,

This movie could be used in film classes in a "How Not to Script" class. This is a terrible film - the script is so bad it is hard to even write bad movie lines. The writing is extremely shallow - i thought the writer probably wasn't a writer. The characters are ridiculous. I am going to give this an A because of the "MST3K" segments, but I think this could be used in "MST3K" class - just like "Sc

I desperately want to give this movie a 10...I really do. Some

I desperately want to give this movie a 10...I really do. Some movie I saw this morning, "A Bigger Party" got 10. That is the only movie I thought was okay. That was one reason it was canceled for a while.<br /><br />This show was so bad, you can't even call it a comedy. The worst scene is at the end, with the guy who is supposed to be the show's lead character trying to act really dumb. There

I desperately want to give this movie a 10...I really do. Some of it's pretty good. But i was really surprised how little it took the movie to get it's audience. I am just so not into the romance that i just can't see myself enjoying this. It's all "romantic" in a cute way.<br /><br />The characters were so underdeveloped i dont know who they were trying to make a point about. They could have just spent some extra

This movie had the potential to be a decent horror movie. The main character

This movie had the potential to be a decent horror movie. The main character is a scientist who is also a psychologist. He is trying to develop the "brainless" computer, but there are a lot of people on the island with a history of mental illness. As we move into the film, more and more people have these weird feelings. When the movie opens, we see a woman (Laurie Strode) who is on a boat with two other people, one is a woman

This movie had the potential to be a decent horror movie. The main character was rather irritating. The script was quite funny, with the two main characters being very good actors. But the story is nothing really interesting, but rather dull. The main character did very well. I'd like to see more movies from him, or from other movies which are not made by Hollywood. It was a really bad movie, that's why I gave a lower rating. I hope he hasn't been fired from

Oh dear lord. This movie... It was horrible. I am a HUGE

Oh dear lord. This movie... It was horrible. I am a HUGE fan of Sam Mendes, so it pains me to say that this was just a complete waste of time. The movie was a complete bore, and even if you're not a Mendes fan, you'll probably think it's more of the same: The acting was so awful, and the scenes so bad you wouldn't even remember any of the people who are in it. If it were a film starring Brad Pitt

Oh dear lord. This movie... It was horrible. I am a HUGE horror-movie fan so I don't really need to make my point. However, this movie was a complete pile of crap. This movie is so poorly acted, written, and directed that it was hard to understand what was going on and who was talking. I saw a bit of it before and couldn't take my eyes off it. Then I saw the same thing again on the same day because it was too late

Spirit of a murdered high school geek animates a scarecrow which then takes

Spirit of a murdered high school geek animates a scarecrow which then takes to the skies to torment the townspeople. He has the power to create animated creatures from scratch, to scare and eat people by making them feel sick. His best trick is creating monsters from his imagination. One such monster is the clown and if you see that little girl sitting on the porch of the creepy guy's mansion you will find you are caught in his web. When you see the old ghost girl in her

Spirit of a murdered high school geek animates a scarecrow which then takes the bodies of the teens into his underground lair and kills them off one by one with his creepy, terrifying, mummifying minions. His main attraction, a talking, reanimated corpse. A girl is taken hostage by the guy while he's off getting the body parts that make up the body. <br /><br />It looks as if a lot of people thought that this was a pretty poor knockoff

With all the excessive violence in this film, it could've been NC-

With all the excessive violence in this film, it could've been NC-17 or something. The whole film is just over twenty minutes of blood, bloody torture, and the worst of the violence can't be contained into any one moment. I'm not an expert, but I've never seen people cry that much in a movie and even though the main character does cry over the death of his father, he just doesn't cut the scene with the emotional intensity that he can. The ending is

With all the excessive violence in this film, it could've been NC-17. I have to disagree with the guy who thinks they could've been 15 minutes of action. The fact that this film had to be so violent in the beginning (especially with the cop guy) was the problem, it was nothing but action from the beginning. But there are some good performances and it is fun to watch a gang of teens play in the woods in the middle of the night, that is all.<

The director states in the Behind-the-Scenes feature that he loves

The director states in the Behind-the-Scenes feature that he loves the "dance-like" style of German film. This film was released on video, and as such it can be enjoyed without the soundtrack or dialog (just the sound track and the dance moves). The dance moves are actually quite catchy, and there is one really "perfect" dance move in the movie. All the other dances are a little cheesy and overdone. The choreography, though, is all perfectly

The director states in the Behind-the-Scenes feature that he loves to talk about the movie with his friends and family. He says that the best part of the movie is that he is not even in it because he is in a class with his wife and son, the actor and writer. The rest of the movie revolves around his kids, the actors, and the director.<br /><br />They say that the movie started as a joke for a little boy and his friend in

Scarecrow is set in the small American town of Emerald Grove where high

Scarecrow is set in the small American town of Emerald Grove where high school kid, Michael Caine, is sent to do the job of guard at a local hospital to provide a safehouse for a group of homeless refugees. Michael is given special powers by the hospital staff, which cause him to have incredible supernatural powers, and also allows him to be able to speak to ghostly patients to help them. The city residents become very afraid of him and his powers cause trouble for them and Michael

Scarecrow is set in the small American town of Emerald Grove where high schooler Sam Darnold (Eugene Levy) is a jock who gets the hot chick in town and her friend, Molly (Catherine O'Hara) so he can have some kind of fun. While Sam and Molly take the chance to get away they find themselves in a town full of trouble, a murder that just happens to be happening right under their noses. They go from town to town

This movie is so aggrivating. The main character looks like he's

This movie is so aggrivating. The main character looks like he's trying to get through the whole film as if it were only part 1 of a film. All the characters are ridiculous - the girl is so mean! and you hear a bunch of people yelling at each other in the background (which is supposed to be a movie). He looks like a fat guy. <br /><br />The story is about a guy who likes to look at women and think about other women.

This movie is so aggrivating. The main character looks like he's about to pop a vein. It's very cheesy.<br /><br />I'm not much of a comedy/comedy fan, so I'm surprised that I found this movie to be much more interesting than my local library. If I was searching for something that I could entertain myself and not get any results on, this might be the only movie I could see.<br /><br />The dialogue is about

Holy @#%& this movie was still warm and juicy from the pile

Holy @#%& this movie was still warm and juicy from the pile of rubbish they had dumped in the dumpster. The actor in the movie was one of the most annoying characters I have ever seen in a movie, and he could not have been much worse than Tom Wlaschiha. The rest of the cast was atrocious. The only characters you could not stand were the actress playing the wife and the director as some guy who hated the movie. No good. No good in

Holy @#%& this movie was still warm and juicy from the pile of garbage. The acting was horrible - the movie felt like one of those cheap cheap movies from that time period that really didn't work. The plot was all about "a little red dot on the floor of the hotel room, and in a flash, it goes from not to not to not to just not to and then...just not to no good at all...not to long...not to have any explanation of

I saw this not too long ago, and I must say: This movie

I saw this not too long ago, and I must say: This movie is an insult to the American movie making. I loved it! I still love it, for me, in my early teens. It is so sad to me, that we haven't gotten a sequel (just yet)<br /><br />I recommend this movie to anybody. It is one of those movies that makes you cry, when you're at the beginning, when you're getting angry, and you don

I saw this not too long ago, and I must say: This movie is the single best movie I've seen this year, and it was made by a group of talented people.<br /><br />A brilliant script, with terrific performances by everybody involved.<br /><br />The cinematography of this is one of the most beautiful cinematography I've seen, even by the standards of Hollywood.<br /><br />In addition to that, the story line of this movie is

WOW is all i can say if your reading this is either watched it

WOW is all i can say if your reading this is either watched it at the right time with the sound muted or you were forced to read something in the beginning so you can see what is coming up before you know it. The only thing that could make this movie watchable is if you read a book, if you can imagine i mean i can, so it was a bit of a stretch but it was nice. For those who haven't seen or can't think of a single character

WOW is all i can say if your reading this is either watched it first and then read the review and i can be your witness to your opinion is very different to mine because i watched this last night and it does not reflect the movie. I just went in to watch it last night and i would like to state it all. First of all i would like to say the soundtrack is good but i do not like the vocals in this movie. It's like it's being played on an

Perhaps one of the worst teenage slasher films I ever did see. I

Perhaps one of the worst teenage slasher films I ever did see. I can see where they got the actors from and why they made such terrible mistakes. The whole thing just isn't worth watching. If you want to see some good stuff you can check out the recent one, but that was a pretty decent slasher flick. The ones at the mall are much better. Maybe because they didn't take themselves seriously anymore. Also, they took themselves a bit too seriously for me to even bother

Perhaps one of the worst teenage slasher films I ever did see. I don't even like teen slasher movies anymore, so I won't bother re-listening to this one.<br /><br />Basically a group of kids are in a cabin in the woods, a serial killer named Jason takes over the house, and he starts killing people. The first couple murders are pretty bad. Then Jason starts killing children with the help of a psychic, so now they are forced to kill

First off, let me start with a quote a friend of mine said while

First off, let me start with a quote a friend of mine said while watching this, "This is a masterpiece." As the story progressed, he added: "This film can hold a candle to The Room." Okay, not totally in that class. But this one is. It is better than A Bug's Life, although there are still lots of problems: "Oscar," "Best Actress" and "Best Movie Character." As for its script, it has a clever idea, but

First off, let me start with a quote a friend of mine said while watching the opening montage. <br /><br />The scene that should be shown was the opening of the movie.<br /><br />And yes, they actually did get a real opening montage. In fact, the opening of the movie was actually a montage, showing the opening, and ending, and what have you.<br /><br />Now this was an example of where there was not

Let's face it; some lame kid who dies and has his soul transf

Let's face it; some lame kid who dies and has his soul transfixed in a big cardboard box is a true movie legend. This is no different. I had never seen an opening credits and I can't even remember a scene in which I saw a glimpse of the man who made this movie. He was so cute, and everyone who saw him was just so glad they were not caught in the opening credits. They would have loved a real opening credits.<br /><br />So

Let's face it; some lame kid who dies and has his soul transfered to another body is just the worst thing to happen in the movie "Super 7".<br /><br />And he is dead. So what do you do? You waste the money on another movie. <br /><br />Or do you? If you do, just know that you are one bad-movie in the long run.<br /><br />If this is your last movie, you

I've gotta say, I usually like horror movies that i've never seen

I've gotta say, I usually like horror movies that i've never seen in the theater before, but this one was definitely one I didn't know I'd like until it was done for me. It's nothing special, a lot of the humor is a bit over the top, but the acting, in a "no holds barred" way, is so convincing that you can't help but laugh. It has just about everything that made The Blair Witch Project great, but with a much more

I've gotta say, I usually like horror movies that i've never seen before. The last one that I remember is in the 80's when "Torture" was on the top of the charts and also made my top of the horror movie I've seen. However, this is definitely a horror movie for those that have seen the last "Torture", but are curious to see, or maybe have a good reason for going to the movies.<br /><br />If you

I'm watching this on the Sci-Fi channel right now. It's

I'm watching this on the Sci-Fi channel right now. It's an absolutely stunning short that should make the most dedicated sci-fi fans out. It's one of those rare short films that just really captures you and that's what you want in a short.<br /><br />This short is so intense and scary that it's really not even a film, it's a video. The atmosphere is absolutely unforgettable and makes you feel like you are watching the actual actors on screen,

I'm watching this on the Sci-Fi channel right now. It's a great episode, with a fantastic guest star from the old TV-show, which I can't remember seeing in the UK. The actors were really great on screen, but so is the dialogue and everything in the episodes. Not the greatest of sci-fi as they were from the TV-show, but as a sci-fi fan I think the show did it's best.<br /><br />So if

Wow, what can I say about this film? It's a lousy piece

Wow, what can I say about this film? It's a lousy piece of junk but there is nothing about it that could not be spun into a whole "B" movie. The acting is terrible; the storyline a hoot (and it's such a hoot!). The music is a shabby excuse for a soundtrack. The production values were not too bad for a Disney sequel, although the special effects were pretty amateurish. The acting is so cheesy that even that old man at the

Wow, what can I say about this film? It's a lousy piece of junk; it's bad enough. It's sooo boring, and with the way it tries to be melange, it just does not work. The plot is simply not coherent, and the character traits are not very well developed, all of which can only be blamed on the story that is poorly handled.<br /><br />The worst part is the ending, which is pretty much the worst of the movie

A far as B-movies go, SCARECROW is

A far as B-movies go, SCARECROW is a low point, but not one for the film buffs. A total letdown. One of the last truly bad movies of the seventies, and the worst movie of the entire series. For all of the movies that had a plot, they were all over the map. SCARECROW had none of that. One of the most boring movies of all time, but it felt like a movie for those of

A far as B-movies go, SCARECROW is a gem. A guy with a shotgun gets to play the lead hero and has some of the greatest lines in movie history. This is a great flick for the horror genre and has a great cast including Chris Sarandon and George Lewis. A perfect family flick!<br /><br />Scary Good Guys. Scary Good Movie. <br /><br />8 out of 10.<br /><br />

Okay, 'enjoy' is a pretty relative term, but flexibility is

Okay, 'enjoy' is a pretty relative term, but flexibility is what we're talking about here. I can still sit in the armchair and watch a movie and enjoy, but now with a TV, my mind is on the road. I can watch with people over the internet, which means I'm looking at the movie in full context - in a way that I haven't been able to do in years.<br /><br />What I find interesting about this movie is that

Okay, 'enjoy' is a pretty relative term, but flexibility is good in terms of content. This isn't meant to be a 'best of' and is a bit of a 'what the hell' kind of movie. All movies have to be judged on their own merit, but this one falls well within the range of content.<br /><br />The story in the film revolves around a child, played with subtlety and charm by a rather talented cast. The lead is

I purchased this film on the cheap in a sale, having read the back

I purchased this film on the cheap in a sale, having read the back of the press release in a local TV shop, so I couldn't be bothered to go to a cinema to see it, and I've only been able to watch it a few times since. There is nothing redeeming about this film, except the acting. It's one of those films that have you scratching your head as to why the cast is apparently all friends. <br /><br />This movie doesn't

I purchased this film on the cheap in a sale, having read the back of the case, I think, and bought my girlfriend's book.<br /><br />It was great because it got me a bit of a fright, there was an aspect of my teenage horror hero's father that was haunting me. I felt in my guts that some things must have had something to do with this.<br /><br />I won't go into much detail on it, but the main thing

This was an absolutely terrible movie. Don't be lured in by Christopher Walk

This was an absolutely terrible movie. Don't be lured in by Christopher Walkinshaw or any other character that comes on for more than 5 minutes at a time and do not waste your time trying to watch any of the acting. If you have an extra hour, then maybe watch some TV shows or a movie so you can get an idea of what kind of movie you are watching.<br /><br />This was not made by any filmmaker of the 30's. It was made in 2003

This was an absolutely terrible movie. Don't be lured in by Christopher Walkin, it's not that bad, but don't be thrown in. The acting was awful, the direction was awful, it's just that bad.<br /><br />This is one of those movies that is just not bad by the film standards of other movies that came out during that time. However, when the writer came up with the idea for the film to put Walkin in a prison, I felt

Creep is the story of Kate (Potente), an intensely unlikeable

Creep is the story of Kate (Potente), an intensely unlikeable, yet irresistibly attractive woman who begins the story as a shy woman at a bar and learns of her true identity. She is not alone and is treated as a member of the gang. After meeting a mysterious character she is able to escape the gang and find her new love who happens to be her new best friend. The gang of creeps, who are obsessed with her, is now even more obsessed with her, but

Creep is the story of Kate (Potente), an intensely unlikeable female. Kate's family members are a bunch of old men and women and she is forced to spend all of her time in bed. One day, however, she is rescued by a man and all of the men are turned into zombies with a mind of their own. She then must figure out how to get home before her friends die! Unfortunately, there's nothing to eat in the jungle so she must rely on herself

The London Underground has something inherently creepy about it, with its long winding tunnels

The London Underground has something inherently creepy about it, with its long winding tunnels leading to an abandoned mental hospital. The main character, Jack Harkness (James Belushi), is brought in to check out the facility for his uncle Ed Sullivan (Tony Martin). He meets an old man who is supposed to have some knowledge and is the only witness to the haunting. When Jack enters a room, he is surprised to find a young girl, played by a young woman. They appear to be talking

The London Underground has something inherently creepy about it, with its long winding tunnels, a huge walled city, and the stench of a decaying, rotting factory. The actors are too good for this. I think you need to watch it with a pair of earplugs in and the worst smell will only come from the set-design and the music. <br /><br />The acting is too convincing and is more in the spirit of The Thing (also by the same director and

The potential was there. I saw Creep and thought, 'Oooh

The potential was there. I saw Creep and thought, 'Oooh, this could be something.' Then I saw a short film about a guy who thinks that zombies don't exist. And I thought that was so so so. I've got to watch out, it could get really gross. So yeah, I thought there was good potential, but it seems like that's something about the zombie genre that's holding it back. And it doesn't seem like it's going anywhere. We

The potential was there. I saw Creep and thought, 'Oooh, I like the creepy movie that's out there.' I saw The Babysitter and thought, 'Ahhhh, this movie is going to be good.' That's how I was so wrong.<br /><br />There was nothing really about this movie that made me think, I just didn't make it to that point that I thought it was really going to happen. I gave it a 7, so that

I'll keep this short as a movie like this doesn't deserve a full

I'll keep this short as a movie like this doesn't deserve a full 5-star rating because it doesn't have the potential to be anything more. This movie could've been made for cheap money. Why anyone in the world would want to see it, we can't imagine. It's about a high school student who starts taking on a gang and they try to keep him safe, which means making him work for them. He has to keep up with these guys and it's never quite

I'll keep this short as a movie like this doesn't deserve a full review, if not a lot less. It's nothing short of brilliant, with an excellent script that never falls down. It is also a masterpiece of art direction. A film that is very reminiscent of "Paris of the 20's" is also very true to the story. No one could accuse this movie of not having a heart, despite it's lack of an actual character (except one). All in all, an

I was so disgusted by this film, I felt obligated to warn off others

I was so disgusted by this film, I felt obligated to warn off others. I'm not kidding. The movie is like a drug. You don't have to be a drug expert, just a movie fanatic. The acting is horrible. The plot is like an endless parade of bad actors that is impossible not to like. The film tries to put a positive spin on a sad time, and doesn't even have the decency to try and redeem it. The movie tries to portray an old man

I was so disgusted by this film, I felt obligated to warn off others. I was absolutely baffled that this film would be rated so low, I mean, it is a horror movie. Why? Because it's bad. But it is even worse than bad. It's not even even a comedy.<br /><br />I had no idea what the hell is going on, I was just trying to figure out if it was a good or a bad movie or the fact that I was

Absolutely laughable film. I live in London and the plot is so ill-

Absolutely laughable film. I live in London and the plot is so ill-formed and unconvincing, it's like being taken for a guided tour of some of those old haunts. There are scenes which are so over-the-top, so contrived, that some of the actors simply cannot act. The characters are all pretty, but they are nothing special. The soundtrack was the only redeeming quality of the film. For the most part though, this is a low budget

Absolutely laughable film. I live in London and the plot is so ill-conceived that I thought some of the actors were trying too hard to be too serious. The dialogue is over dramatic, and the acting was dreadful. Not a single funny scene. A lot of acting. The storyline is so bizarre, and the actors so annoying, it was hard to take any of them seriously. There was no humour, no laughs, and the dialogue was so uninspired that you can't help but

Yet another example of the complete waste of UK Lottery money. Just how

Yet another example of the complete waste of UK Lottery money. Just how long does it take you to say you love a film, and the end? <br /><br />You might argue the fact that I'm making this comment is because I've seen this movie twice, which is a rarity. The first time was for the big premiere at the Glastonbury Festival, and the other was for the movie release in the UK. I loved the first, the second was a bit

Yet another example of the complete waste of UK Lottery money. Just how little has any charity, charity of any kind, ever been a priority? There was a new £40 million winner (thanks to the Lotto ticket, I guess) who did nothing as soon as the Lotto machine went into a mode of operation.<br /><br />And of course, the woman in the black cloak is nothing but a woman. I was looking forward to seeing more of these films, but

!!!!! OF COURSE THERE'S SPOILERS!!!!! I'm sure

!!!!! OF COURSE THERE'S SPOILERS!!!!! I'm sure some of you have seen the "best of" the previews on YouTube. What are you waiting for, check out the whole thing!! <br /><br />This is a really bad film!<br /><br />"One of the best" films I've seen in a long time. Watch the previews for the best and worst and you'll be fine. The previews are great and you're guaranteed that

!!!!! OF COURSE THERE'S SPOILERS!!!!! I'm sure it's the best movie in the world, but who cares? "The Shining" sucks! I give it a 1! Its better than "Empire" and "Tombstone", but if you can make an argument for one of those, i'll be the first to listen. <br /><br />This is a film which will stay with you forever. It's such an eye opener. A film

......in a horror movie that is. Alright first off, lets start with

......in a horror movie that is. Alright first off, lets start with something - this is a complete disaster. The main character, a white male, comes out of a van and starts shooting out people in the street, the police are unable to find the vehicle or him, and they are completely unconcerned with his lack of criminal record. The acting was worse than a homeless man wandering around a mall, the entire cast is terrible. There is zero acting, nothing except for the main character

......in a horror movie that is. Alright first off, lets start with the basics. You have a very bad guy, and a girl. The girl is trying to do the best with the bad guy. She tries to get him to give up on someones, so that she can escape. It's like something from a movie i don't know how it could go from bad to good, maybe, i don't know, this movie is just really, really bad. The first thing

Okay I must say that before the revealing of the'monster'. saying that

Okay I must say that before the revealing of the'monster'. saying that's very wrong. He just told us what we saw on the film, it's a horror movie, like the ones we saw at the movies. the main character, James Holmes goes to see a psychiatrist about his brother, who is suffering from anorexia nervosa. His psychiatrist says that he has a disorder called Anorexia, which is anorexia, bulimia nervosa, or binge eating disorder

Okay I must say that before the revealing of the'monster'. saying that I wasn't going to comment.<br /><br />and the ending I won't bore you with spoilers.<br /><br />and with the release of this film on the 20th of December 2005. it has been on sale in UK stores for months now. it is also available in DVD and with the full range of other entertainment that have been released in that country. This film seems to be on all

Please, be warned: this movie, though a pretty bad storyline, was

Please, be warned: this movie, though a pretty bad storyline, was still a pretty bad movie. The idea of a movie set in rural America is the idea that it was one of the only places in the world where movies could get shot for the actual filming purposes. The people in this movie were pretty boring. I really can't understand the "plot," and I'm surprised that this is even the movie the actors are in for. The music was pretty boring. The characters looked the

Please, be warned: this movie, though a pretty bad storyline, was one of the most memorable horror movies of the 1980's. The acting and script were also top notch. The music was excellent, with a lot of rock, country, punk and hip hop tunes that were just awesome. One time when I was around 14 years old, and this movie was playing on the television, I couldn't help but scream like crazy, because of some of the gore scenes, and the soundtrack was

This film is a perfect example of the recent crop of horror films that simply

This film is a perfect example of the recent crop of horror films that simply must not be watched. The worst I can say about this film is that it is "not scary", and that's something that is often overlooked in the rush to get all horror films into the cinema. It is, however, one of the worst films I have seen in a while. It's an odd mixture of the predictable and completely nonsensical elements that make a horror movie and then some more.<br /><br

This film is a perfect example of the recent crop of horror films that simply try to capture the essence of a certain genre that is popular in the US but so far has been absent in Europe. <br /><br />If you're a horror fan you will most probably recognise one of the most iconic horror movie characters as Richard Chamberlain. The man, who we are able to think of him as The Wolfman, has a lot to do and is a great character to watch for. The

Basically what we have here is little more than a remake of the hilarious 1970

Basically what we have here is little more than a remake of the hilarious 1970s film "Sickly Hot". In this film, the protagonist (played by Jack Cassidy) is a psychiatrist who has a son who has a mysterious problem: He is very good at getting the attention of women by doing this kind of thing. I mean, this guy is literally the only thing in this movie that can get the attention of the two main female leads. He is one of the coolest guys of his

Basically what we have here is little more than a remake of the hilarious 1970s cartoon "Space Jam." Well, maybe that is a bit of a misnomer - "Space Jam" was hilarious and made with a few interesting characters, but the movie seems to be mostly focused on the boring old cartoon characters of the 1980s with little attention given to the newer ones. So if this is a remake you are looking for then get ready. Otherwise "Space Jam" was so much better than

Creep - "Your journey terminates here." Some very graphic scenes and

Creep - "Your journey terminates here." Some very graphic scenes and some really good effects, but the performances were really all right. The special effects were not as good as they have been, but still it was not bad. Creep is just bad. Just like "Terms of Endearment" and "The Thing". It has some decent cinematography, but the acting was really just not bad at all. Like the first two movies, it is very simple, but just so

Creep - "Your journey terminates here." Some very graphic scenes and very unsettling, but, if you know the genre, you'll appreciate the atmosphere. It would make even a parent and their kid happy. Very scary. I haven't liked it very much since, and I can see why. I have the DVD and some of the episodes on the drive. My two faves are "The Visitor" and "The Beast of the Lake".<br /><br />So

I just rented Creep and was not at all impressed. I didn't feel

I just rented Creep and was not at all impressed. I didn't feel much like watching it. This movie had very few redeeming features and I found myself watching it like the whole thing. The only thing that stood out for me was that I wanted to keep watching to see how the killer is going to kill his victims because he's going to kill them so fast. This movie has so many similarities to "Slender Man" from which is also my other favorite movie of all time.

I just rented Creep and was not at all impressed. I didn't feel this was a movie for kids and I felt like it wasn't aimed at kids but I can't seem to find the ratings on IMDB. I didn't get what was on their site. The movie had a few songs that I didn't catch but they were pretty good. The plot was really cheesy, but it is still a cute movie. I didn't have a big problem with some things, but other than

This is quite possibly the worst film I have ever seen. Worse than the

This is quite possibly the worst film I have ever seen. Worse than the original. It has nothing new or original. It has the same type of characters and the same type of actors. The only difference is the director, and the actors. It is as if they just went and did everything they could to make this the most boring film I have ever seen. Nothing of anything is going on! It is absolutely unbearable. This is an awful movie.<br /><br />But wait,

This is quite possibly the worst film I have ever seen. Worse than the one you saw in Canada or the one you saw in Canada. This is worse than the one you saw in Canada.<br /><br />The movie started with a man and a woman walking down a path that was a big concrete slab. They were talking about something, then a bunch of people walked down in a circle. The man was like, "Hey! This is great! We should talk about something!

All logic goes straight out of the train window in this British horror film,

All logic goes straight out of the train window in this British horror film, and it is not only that which makes it interesting. The film is slow and tedious, and the characters come off as all too typical. The two leads are decent, though; the supporting cast is weak, but that is mostly due to the movie-going public. This movie is not for those who are the type to be easily entertained by the horror movies, for they are usually boring and predictable. One can't

All logic goes straight out of the train window in this British horror film, directed by John Peel. An old man gives a speech at a small, yet-to-be-built church in the middle of nowhere: "The church of peace" he says. It sounds good on paper, and is, in a sense, the perfect setting for a horror film.<br /><br />On the other hand, it's not the kind of church that's particularly frightening. It has the

I was really, really disappointed with this movie. it started really well,

I was really, really disappointed with this movie. it started really well, then they decided to just go full-bore with the "sparkly", ultra-laser-like CGI. a great piece of work, but with a film that has one of the highest production costs of the year.<br /><br />and by no stretch of the imagination is it any good. i thought the concept was good, but the execution of the idea was pretty much nonexistent.<br /

I was really, really disappointed with this movie. it started really well, then it just fizzles into "you're wasting your time watching me go" and "hey, you think you're cute" and it just doesn't get any better. <br /><br />The plot is stupid. the acting is soooo boring. and the worst part of it? that girl in the blue dress. i have seen a lot better performances from her and the chick from the bus station

I was sadly disappointed by this film due to the fact that it felt false

I was sadly disappointed by this film due to the fact that it felt false to the rest of the show. It was, as in the show, it was just an excuse to watch a few scenes from a scene and nothing else. There was nothing good or bad about this film so a review is not necessary. I do have an issue though. Some of the dialogue felt artificial. Not too much, but a lot of things felt forced, the most obvious being the acting. I really was

I was sadly disappointed by this film due to the fact that it felt false in it's presentation. It tried to depict the life of a typical New Yorker and it was all a lie. The story was nothing more than a dream and the characters acted exactly like the dream character. The story and the direction were both the same which is why the film should never have been released in the first place. The script is a disappointment and so was the acting. The film is so boring and dull that

Honestly, I went to see the movie, not because of the actors,

Honestly, I went to see the movie, not because of the actors, but because they were on an episode of "Shout" (it's a show about actors) which was on TV. The cast was good--the main actor was quite good in this, as was a woman who played a psychiatrist (which I think was a good role for her). The movie was so good, so original, I didn't laugh in a long time! Also, the sound was great! Not

Honestly, I went to see the movie, not because of the actors, but because this story is really one to keep close to your heart. A group of friends are forced together when one of them gets a job interview in the city and is given the job of cooking. All of the people on the job find themselves in a "hurry-up" situation, having to be there first. Then one of the workers finds a recipe to cook with the ingredients he has gathered and so the

I am compelled to write a review of this IMAX feature as a means

I am compelled to write a review of this IMAX feature as a means to draw attention to the absence of an equivalent in cinema.<br /><br />When I saw this I was expecting a light, "funny" version of IMAX, but I was completely wrong. The film was like a nightmare of horrible, unbelievable horror. The film opens with a flashback about a man who has been brainwashed into becoming a vampire. The woman is an alcoholic, who goes by the name

I am compelled to write a review of this IMAX feature as a means of promoting the release of the film. It is, however, a waste of time and money.<br /><br />The fact that the feature was shown in IMAX was a testament to the power of the theater that these people made. The IMAX projection is, as the name suggests, a display of the full width of the screen, and I am not sure why they went there.<br /><br

This film differentiates itself from the run-of-the-mill "

This film differentiates itself from the run-of-the-mill "horror flick." The acting is a work of art and the music is top-notch. Every frame is packed. This is a movie for all types of people with a great plot to watch and characters to be in awe of. It's hard not to love this, it's hard not to love the way it shows the different sides of people who are good and bad. The cast is awesome and some of

This film differentiates itself from the run-of-the-mill "teen" drama which was dominating the cinema in the late 90s - when this was really starting to take off. It is about a young, and apparently troubled teenager. The story takes place in a small city (Henderson) which is also one of the world's most interesting - there are a number of hidden mysteries that may have the answers to some of the questions left behind in a series of mysterious disappearances

After what I thought was a masterful performance of two roles in Man From

After what I thought was a masterful performance of two roles in Man From U.N.C.L.E., this film had me really excited. The character of the hero, a guy who is forced to do horrible things like be part of a secret society and have his brain tampered with to the point that he becomes a brain in the body, was something you didn't see in any other movie I've seen. The script in some way manages to create a sort of comic

After what I thought was a masterful performance of two roles in Man From the Future, this is a very deserving winner.<br /><br />The story, directed by Jim McGovern, is about a scientist who discovers teleportation and the use of his new device to travel back in time to the future. He travels to Earth in a jet pack and travels through the wormhole to the future. There, he meets a woman (also in a jet pack) who has an ability to teleport

The original movie, Man From Snowy River, is one of the best

The original movie, Man From Snowy River, is one of the best movies that I've seen in a long time. It is one of those classics where I was just so impressed by the original production, that I feel it was just the perfect balance for a true remake. A classic movie, and a great soundtrack, this is a true film, as the music is so brilliant, it is almost as amazing as the film. The main cast is one of the best that I have seen

The original movie, Man From Snowy River, is one of the best films to come out of the 90's. If you haven't heard, but you can't bear to hear, it's about a poor man, Jim Kelly, who is so poor, he is forced to live in a septic tank. His son, the child of a deceased female, gives him a way of getting clean water into his house. The family and friends are also there to support him. After the

This film, like the first one ("The Man From Snowy River")

This film, like the first one ("The Man From Snowy River") is a total surprise, and one that I don't find very entertaining. In fact, I found the whole thing pretty boring. I would also add that the plot does not follow the original story well, and that the movie has not changed much from the first version. It was still good for the laughs, but really wasn't as enjoyable as the first movie. That's saying something. That is pretty much my opinion

This film, like the first one ("The Man From Snowy River") was made by a man with an idea and with no money to spare. We have to have some confidence in director Anthony Mann. This one is really good. If you have any idea about what happens in the first film, then you can watch this one as a stand-alone. This one is a good film for the whole family (even kids) and the plot is interesting. I was a little surprised the first

I bought this adaptation because I really liked Anne Brontë's novel when

I bought this adaptation because I really liked Anne Brontë's novel when I was a teenager (which is not to take it as an insult, since I'm actually a fairly ardent Brontë fan, in my late teens/early 20's) and I really do admire her for it.<br /><br />As for the story of how it all took place in the 1800's, well, in the novel, it wasn't entirely plausible because it was a modern-day version

I bought this adaptation because I really liked Anne Brontë's novel when it was first published. I think it's the most beautifully written book I have ever read. I also felt the actors in this movie were excellent.<br /><br />Brontë was a natural writer for this role as was Emma Thompson, who in turn was a natural for a small part. This movie came out before the original and is not an adaptation.<br /><br />It is the best adaptation

Brilliant book with wonderful characterizations and insights into human nature, particularly

Brilliant book with wonderful characterizations and insights into human nature, particularly the emotional state of love. The story unfolds itself through the eyes of a child, from the perspective of a boy in a care home as he is forced to overcome a profound feeling of abandonment. All the actors were amazing.<br /><br />And the music - this was the best I've heard in a while, and the orchestral music is particularly memorable. The soundtrack is also quite enjoyable and inspiring.

Brilliant book with wonderful characterizations and insights into human nature, particularly in relation to relationships. I was thrilled to finally see one written by a lesbian writer. I loved what she wrote - her insight into a woman's perception of the self and the world was very powerful and the dialogue between her and the author was wonderful. All of the characters were believable and believable in a way that is rare today - an understatement.<br /><br />Very long and complex, but the novel is

Before I go on I have to admit to being a huge Bon Jovi

Before I go on I have to admit to being a huge Bon Jovi fan and I was quite surprised they were in that part of it. Well I was as well, I would be if I were not a music fan. They were the best band of '93 to date and I think they played some of their best, not in those super catchy songs but in songs that really went and brought you in the mood to relax and enjoy, there were some very memorable stuff in there and a

Before I go on I have to admit to being a huge Bon Jovi fan. To this day, the original set has been in my mind for all of the time I have enjoyed the series. I loved the music and the acting was superb. So, I must not hold any negative comments against the film. So, if you haven't watched it yet, go and do so.<br /><br />If you like the series and the music, you will find it to be enjoyable

Really bad movie, the story is too simple and predictable and poor acting as

Really bad movie, the story is too simple and predictable and poor acting as well. But the acting is quite horrible. You cannot really find any decent actors in this film, just actors who got off the same job for this film to keep paying them. The only thing that makes this movie funny is the ending, but not because of its surprises. All the characters have a boring personality, they are forced to be sadistic and sad. The movie is also boring for long stretches of time,

Really bad movie, the story is too simple and predictable and poor acting as well as the characters. They must be trying to create a reality show for the boys who come to see the girls at the end, the girls are portrayed as being in love with them so they have to have a romantic scene every 4 minutes. This movie should be on Lifetime. For the girls in the movie, they are as believable as you could ask for. One of the boys should have a part that is made

Listening to the director's commentary confirmed what I had suspected whilst watching the

Listening to the director's commentary confirmed what I had suspected whilst watching the film: that is, that I'm not an Aussie. It was as if my father and I saw an episode of the Australian TV drama series 'Pulp Fiction' on the same night, but with subtitles added to add a bit of English commentary. This is a rare gem of film-making and it would be impossible not to recommend it. In fact, it is so enjoyable I can't even remember the

Listening to the director's commentary confirmed what I had suspected whilst watching the film. No one really cares how good the film is. The film simply serves as a vehicle for a great actor to demonstrate his abilities as a character actor. The film would not have made an impression without the performance of Jim Carey.<br /><br />I recommend this film to everyone. It is a true comedy film which focuses on the inner human struggle.<br /><br />It is not a movie which

This is not a good film. The acting is remarkably stiff and unconv

This is not a good film. The acting is remarkably stiff and unconvincing, and the screenplay just doesn't work. It's like reading a movie script which has been written by an old woman. Everything's just overstated and contrived. The movie itself is about something which was just plain stupid: the "courage" of a bunch of kids and their friends as they chase a girl around and try to get her to leave them (because, well, she's a pretty

This is not a good film. The acting is remarkably stiff and unconvincing. The script is so bad, it makes the film seem worse, even though there's nothing new in the cast.<br /><br />The plot is about a former teacher who is brought in to teach a class of second graders (the actors don't know the class, or know it's supposed to be a "second grade class", because that's not what they are doing, and the scenes

First of all, Jon Bon Jovi doesn't seem to be in place

First of all, Jon Bon Jovi doesn't seem to be in place for this movie (that's the only good thing I can say about it) the movie plays like he's a complete movie that no one can relate to (or understand) and I couldn't take it seriously. I know some of you love movies about the worst and the most unprofessional stuff you can imagine, but just not on a real budget. He needs to quit acting and start directing. This movie was the

First of all, Jon Bon Jovi doesn't seem to be in place for comedy. He's an actor who was given an outsize budget to create his own, and who couldn't even make the slightest pretense to be a comedian.<br /><br />His joke-slashing antics aren't funny. He's not funny at all. He doesn't have a plot, or even a premise, and everything is just like Jon Bon Jovi. He's a total comedy hack

Hi folks<br /><br />Forget about that movie. John

Hi folks<br /><br />Forget about that movie. John Turturro looks tired from all the dancing, and there's a lot of flak about his acting. As usual, a couple of decent lines like "It's funny when you go to your sister's place for a family reunion." (I think) or "When you think of the two words you can't do justice," (a really stupid comment that I couldn't put down) or something, they

Hi folks<br /><br />Forget about that movie. John Wick is great. Great characters, great sets, great music, great action, and an absolutely amazing soundtrack. The movie has a great cast, and the script was written by a movie legend and his assistant, William S. Burress.<br /><br />John Wick is one of those movies that makes you want to get the CD in your car so you can listen to it again and again. It is so

This movie isn't very good. It's boring, and not much blood

This movie isn't very good. It's boring, and not much blood and guts for that matter. The movie was a disappointment on that. My one big complaint, and its not really the biggest, but is more of an annoying annoying thing. It's very cheesy. I won't bother to go into great detail with the plot because I don't think it's worth it to take time. The only thing that made it worth it was the cast and the casting. I think the casting

This movie isn't very good. It's boring, and not much blood was spilled, as it was the middle of the night. There is very little emotion for the actors and actresses. The plot has no point at all. It is very predictable and predictable, but you can't help but give it a chance, even if you don't want to see the whole movie.<br /><br />If you like movies that have no action, and that have no redeeming qualities, then

This movie was messed up. A sequel to "John Carpenter's Vampires

This movie was messed up. A sequel to "John Carpenter's Vampires" with all the characters, including the lead star, are gone, yet they kept the old story and all of the supporting cast characters. A poor man and his wife have a baby, and the husband is a ghost hunter. Now the dead guy has returned to the mansion where he is a ghost, he has brought his partner, a kid with the same personality as the new ghost. The two teams of ghost hunter

This movie was messed up. A sequel to "John Carpenter's Vampires," this film is about a female vampire that will transform a young boy. It has a very similar plot to that of "Friday the 13th," but it was a really dumb, stupid movie.<br /><br />In the "original" story, a vampire girl was a human (although, in the original story, the vampire was a female). At the beginning of the movie, the vampire girl (now

The last reviewer was very generous. I quiet like the first movie, but

The last reviewer was very generous. I quiet like the first movie, but the latter one does have a better plot. Both movies have one thing in common, that they do not contain any of the characters that make them good and fun. You do not know who the protagonist is. And the ending is almost unbelievable. This movie is simply awful. So bad that if you take it to the store you can buy yourself a new car. But don't take me to be a car sales man

The last reviewer was very generous. I quiet like the first movie, but this one is wayyyy too cheesy to watch. It has almost the same script but doesn't have any actual laughs, not even in its first half, because the script was too cheesy, not a little cheesy but nothing too cheesy.<br /><br />So the director just made it happen. It's like his character in the first movie got the same treatment in this one. So it's not even funny

Ugh, what can I say other than, ugh. I rented

Ugh, what can I say other than, ugh. I rented this movie by the hundred, in what I found to be a very very very long time. I saw it twice and the second time, I tried to watch it as fast as possible to save my precious seconds, but after five minutes I got exhausted, I went into the first two or three minutes of it and just stood there because I couldn't take my eyes off the screen. But by this point in the movie

Ugh, what can I say other than, ugh. I rented this at a bargain basement price because it was the last comedy I saw. It was an utter waste of my time. The cast is so generic I couldn't think of any funny acting. The plot is just lame-ass. The only interesting thing about it was the ending which seemed to be a little predictable to the point where you were just happy it was finally over. Everyone else, apart from the two people who

I only rented this because i loved the first movie. However, calling it

I only rented this because i loved the first movie. However, calling it a sequel was a mistake. This is not a sequel, because this movie is NOT based on anything, it is an adaptation of the first movie, it just changed how they did it. The actors that were in it were just completely different. You would see a totally different type of character in this movie. The film is just another comedy comedy, with some funny moments, but nothing like the first movie. The only

I only rented this because i loved the first movie. However, calling it part 1 is a misnomer. This movie is truly part 2. This was just better than the first one. the movie was full of action. It is very different to what the first movie did.<br /><br /> this movie was great, i have never watched an action movie that has been this great. the movie is very different. however, there are a few people in the movie that are similar

John Carpenter's career is over if this sad excuse for a movie is any

John Carpenter's career is over if this sad excuse for a movie is any indication. There is nothing here except the bland title and the obligatory set pieces. All you get are endless numbers of the same old boring, dull acting and some of the same old cheesy cinematography (that is to say, without any special effects, cinematography, effects or even sound). The worst part of the movie (to the point that I'm surprised the film didn't get banned), is the last 40 minutes

John Carpenter's career is over if this sad excuse for a movie is any indication. It is so sad that there is no positive review in the entire world. The plot is absolutely ridiculous and utterly predictable. This must be the reason that it wasn't nominated for an Oscar. The characters are so clichéd and stupid that we just wish we could see them in all their stupid glory. The acting is not bad, the story is flat and clichéd. The plot is ridiculous and predictable in the

Thanks for killing the franchise with this turkey, John Carpenter and Tommy Lee Wallace

Thanks for killing the franchise with this turkey, John Carpenter and Tommy Lee Wallace. The whole movie was a waste of talent. Everyone is wasted. This is the "BAD movie of the week." It was also quite confusing. The only thing that makes it fun is the opening. You can even see the "evil aliens" opening the door. You would be amazed at how many people would like to sit through this horrible pile of trash! What would be the point of putting this on DVD

Thanks for killing the franchise with this turkey, John Carpenter and Tommy Lee Wallace. The first thing I noticed was that every time I think it's over with, it doesn't. I had a hard time believing that this was supposed to be about a monster-movie monster, but that was pretty much the only redeeming quality. Nothing in it ever was particularly interesting, and the film barely even had a point to rally around. It's a shame because it's supposed to be about a cult

This "Debuted" today on the SciFi channel and all I can

This "Debuted" today on the SciFi channel and all I can say that that is simply one of the worst TV experiences I have EVER had and the only reason it's still here is because I was stupid and didn't realize it wasn't supposed to be FUNNY and was caught by surprise by the plot. So what are you supposed to believe? Well the premise is that a scientist is sent to Earth to find a means of turning humans into some kind of new and better species.

This "Debuted" today on the SciFi channel and all I can say is wow!!! Thats it!!! A true sequel to the original trilogy! The action is epic in the first and the first is sooooo good, I can't wait for this to come out on DVD. The first was also about the same, but with no time travel, just some fun characters, not with all the plot points the second had, but more of a lot of awesome action. The second,

This movie is one of the most awful movies ever made.How can Jon

This movie is one of the most awful movies ever made.How can Jon Stewart watch this and not find himself wishing he could just sit on the side of the road and talk about the movie.I have to agree with a lot of other reviewers here,but this movie is stupid to even watch in public.Some parts were actually boring to hear,like the people that were the actors in the movie.It was like being in a car that is just running on gasoline and no oil or fuel

This movie is one of the most awful movies ever made.How can Jon Bon Jovi take on this movie?There is NO chemistry between the actors and Jon Bon Jovi is a really nice person.The lead actor is the same actor from "the movie" too.It was awful,I watched it as I was doing homework.This movie is even worse than "jingle" and I dont understand how this movie got it's name,the movie was terrible.I hope they make

This movie was very very mediocre and very very gory. everyone left their

This movie was very very mediocre and very very gory. everyone left their cell phone, except myself, and I have never been good with that feature. I have also never liked that scene with the killer whale in the bay, so I'm really surprised that this movie didn't score higher. I will say that the first ten minutes were very hot, so don't even read any further unless you have already seen the movie. The movie ended very very hot.<br /><br />Just

This movie was very very mediocre and very very gory. everyone left their brain in the gutter! that's not what you call quality.<br /><br />this was the best part of this movie, and i was totally surprised, and surprised to me at how good of a movie this was. it was like the story was trying to get out of my head! it was like it was trying to get out of the way and let me be happy. that's a pretty cool

The same difficulty I have with the musical version of "Les Miserables

The same difficulty I have with the musical version of "Les Miserables" here is with "Citizen Kane." The movie is the same in all of its forms, but the original is too complex for a musical and that's the one reason why I feel "Citizen Kane" should be made into an album (and not just a movie). The story is that of three people, played by Paul Simon, Eddy Steinbrueck and Paul Reiser, in the 1940s

The same difficulty I have with the musical version of "Les Miserables". They couldn't find the actors and have cast them based on the wrong performances. <br /><br />The story has been changed and the music is the same. This is a real pity. I love this film and the characters are so very interesting and have a different life from most dramas. The director seems to have very limited directing ability. His films, like so many others (Lesbian, Gangster

The producers made a big mistake casting Mark Lester, who couldn't act or

The producers made a big mistake casting Mark Lester, who couldn't act or sing, for an actor on screen in the first movie. They couldn't bring him into the second one. And in the first film, he was on the stage too, with a background score with strings and piano playing and singing, and that was it.<br /><br />The first time he heard the score it was when he was about 8, he thinks, and he thought it was funny. But then

The producers made a big mistake casting Mark Lester, who couldn't act or read the script. There was no chemistry or chemistry between Mark and the girls, plus the chemistry between Mark and Leslie was never developed as well.<br /><br />And, most of all, he looks horrible.<br /><br />The girls were likeable characters. They have no character flaws, except that they have this crazy idea that they have a twin brother.<br /><br />Now you can

Must every good story be "improved" with added corny Broadway music

Must every good story be "improved" with added corny Broadway music, cheesy cinematography, or "over the top" production values. This story is really rather forgettable but the main action is so entertaining. This is also the first of the series that will feature the new "super" robots from the previous series, the Gorgons. What do I have to say about that? Well, I'll just say this--if you're into movies that are cheesy, and have

Must every good story be "improved" with added corny Broadway music, but this movie has been so "wrong" I'm surprised it wasn't even more hated. "The Ladykillers" is like nothing I have ever seen or heard of. The film was filmed in two hours, with no continuity, so I really couldn't give it any more than a 0.<br /><br />The story is about a man with an obsessive streak who can't wait to finish a job

I like musicals but as a Dickens fan I HATE this one.

I like musicals but as a Dickens fan I HATE this one. I was surprised to see that there was no way to watch it on TV because the set was big for its time, a lot of the scenery was still made of wood and it was too dark. However, the actors played their parts well and the film did show a lot of the different characters. You have an interesting point of view of the cast, the two brothers have interesting lines in this musical and they both seem

I like musicals but as a Dickens fan I HATE this one. First of all it's not really a musical, it's a one-act play. That's why I think the movie shouldn't have had the word "movies" in the title. Also it's not really a musical either, if you think about it it's actually a theatrical play. And it's also not about any of those musical numbers that are so much a part of the lyrics.<br /><

Well, I saw this movie yesterday and it's - unfortunately - worse than

Well, I saw this movie yesterday and it's - unfortunately - worse than I thought it was. I'm not here to judge the "main character" and his family, because - like many children I know - that is what's fascinating about this movie. What the kids do, how the family tries to keep it together, and ultimately make the movie as happy as possible. There is a lot of happy-making on a big scale with family members, the movie, as you know,

Well, I saw this movie yesterday and it's - unfortunately - worse than I expected.<br /><br />It's supposed to be funny, because it's so far over the top (i'm a huge fan of the original, of course) that it's actually pretty predictable. In the early scenes of the cast in the library, you have to wonder why they bother to put a door there.<br /><br />The opening sequence and the first couple minutes are fairly boring,

It's not like I have overwhelmingly fond memories of Verhoeven's original

It's not like I have overwhelmingly fond memories of Verhoeven's original, this has been a fun movie to watch as a kid and it's also an easy one to see as a grown up. I found myself drawn in from the very start and didn't think this movie was going to be any different from the original. It's always fun to see and it has one very distinctive aspect, I really enjoy when the character of the main character is on the receiving end of a karate

It's not like I have overwhelmingly fond memories of Verhoeven's original movie, in that I could just about live it all over again! I guess a few more things that I found interesting: In the "real world", the title of the movie was "The Verhoeven Series", so perhaps a little hint of its "originalness" is lurking here.<br /><br />I was surprised that the film was released only in German; a bit of a disappointment as I usually

I saw this film at the London Premiere, and I have to say -

I saw this film at the London Premiere, and I have to say - it was the best performance I have ever seen by any actor. I'm not sure which was the most thrilling - the performance, or the ending. I can't remember which is which, it's simply this: the actor is a young man named Jack Russell (Burt Reynolds). The movie is based on a short story by A.A. Milne. The story is set in the fictional town of Grosse

I saw this film at the London Premiere, and I have to say - I was rather disappointed. In fact, I was quite surprised. I'd been expecting better.<br /><br />Not that this is bad, as the film has very good cast and the director has done a good job with this film - he gets an A+ for this.<br /><br />The opening credit and the storyboard for this film is very creative. For a director, not the first time

It's been about 14 years since Sharon Stone awarded viewers a leg-cross

It's been about 14 years since Sharon Stone awarded viewers a leg-cross on the "A to Z" scale (which measures movie value on a scale of 1 to 10). The film has a low-budget but was filmed on a budget of £600,000. The cast is largely unknown and even the soundtrack is largely unheard of. The film's story, which is not a flashback to a period, has been re-worked by Stone, who has a gift for rewriting history and

It's been about 14 years since Sharon Stone awarded viewers a leg-crossing in order to see her. The movie has the same old movie-making formula. It has a movie star (Stone) and a bunch of actors on board to show how they're so good, I guess. Like most of Hollywood's classics, this one has to play a lot to appeal to the same sort of viewer.<br /><br />"I don't know what to do now, what to

It's hard to believe, after waiting 14 years, we wind up with

It's hard to believe, after waiting 14 years, we wind up with the best documentary ever made about the world of "The Best Man". It's hard to believe, after waiting 14 years, we wind up with the best documentary ever made about the world of "The Best Man". It's hard to believe, after waiting 14 years, we wind up with the best documentary ever made about the world of "The Best Man". It's hard to believe, after waiting 14 years, we

It's hard to believe, after waiting 14 years, we wind up with a DVD release, and not a theatrical release. I remember the first DVD release back in the mid 90's, and there is little to recommend except the good sound and the lack of any music.<br /><br />The animation is well done and the character design is not shabby, but this is a mixed bag.The music, while excellent, does not make the show, and that's all.If

In my book "Basic Instinct" was a perfect film. It had

In my book "Basic Instinct" was a perfect film. It had a plot, a character and a script that all came together in the end. I just love this movie and how well it was put together. I would like to see more of this film to make sure it was not made up by some great actors and a good script. Its an excellent movie. No real special effects just the same thing that other movies like this has and that is the same kind of emotional, heartfelt

In my book "Basic Instinct" was a perfect film. It had something every parent would like: A positive message. The movie was well produced, directed, well done. And I think it was the right movie for children. <br /><br />The premise was so simple. Someone dies and you have to decide which one of two people will take over the body to get him or her back. You have a very small budget, you don't have the usual suspects in your

The film is pretty confusing and ludicrous. The plot is awful...but on

The film is pretty confusing and ludicrous. The plot is awful...but on one hand, it's a horror movie, on the other it's a musical (that's about one of the most annoying musicals ever released). The story is ridiculous, the soundtrack is terrible, the plot is incomprehensible. I love it because it's really stupid and dumb, it's stupid because I love stupid, it's stupid because it's so awful, it's stupid because it's so terrible. But the

The film is pretty confusing and ludicrous. The plot is awful...but on a higher level because it's nothing but a disaster of clichés.The movie contains nothing, it has no suspense, it contains nothing. The movie is a total drag that should never be seen again. It was a total waste of time. It was embarrassing. The movie is so lame, I'm surprised it was so good. I watched it over and over again for no reason other than I have to have every

This film is awful. The screenplay is bad, the is script mediocre,

This film is awful. The screenplay is bad, the is script mediocre, the actors are terrible, the cinematography, direction, and production value is appalling. The people in the cast are a bunch of morons, and the movie is just plain bad. The movie is so bad that I thought I had a heart attack when I saw it last night. This is a film that is supposed to be a drama, but it's so bad that it is just a very disappointing film that nobody

This film is awful. The screenplay is bad, the is script mediocre, the plot is unbelievable, the acting is awful. It is not worth any film-going, it is a complete waste of time. A total waste of my time. This is definitely not a film that anyone with a taste should be interested in. Not even with a friend or co-worker watching. No thank you. Watch this film and forget about it. Get me some money and buy me a beer. If

After eagerly waiting to the end, I have to say I wish I wouldn

After eagerly waiting to the end, I have to say I wish I wouldn't have watched, it was just awful. The only redeeming feature was the fact I had no idea where the show was going next. There was no point in watching it at all.<br /><br />Why they can't just give a different format and call it something else like a movie. In my eyes the show was just awful. The only good thing to come out of it was the voice work of

After eagerly waiting to the end, I have to say I wish I wouldn't have been here today, and missed out so much of this gem. A man who is now the father of three, including a young girl, and a dog. This show starts out a little slow, at first but I guess it got boring for a few seconds, the show has great episodes but I have to say the one they made for the dog episode was the single funniest thing I have ever seen in

I sat through almost one episode of this series and just couldn't take anymore

I sat through almost one episode of this series and just couldn't take anymore of the same thing being repeated with more "cliche" episodes. The original cast members like Murtaugh, Macdonald, and Broussard aren't doing well in this show. The only way to keep people interested is for the writers to add some fresh and interesting people to the cast. The characters just aren't well-written. If you are a fan of the original and were expecting to find new and

I sat through almost one episode of this series and just couldn't take anymore of it. I felt this was a terrible mess that I was witnessing first hand. The acting was extremely weak, the characters had very little personality and it all just seemed to be a rush to get it done fast. The editing was crap and the scripts were crap. It was just the absolute worst of an epic journey. All the characters seemed to have the same stereotypical personalities all through out the show.<br /><br