Datasets:

keertanavc

/

imdb_prefix20_forDPO_multi-preference_v2

like 0

I've been going through the AFI's list of the top 100 comed

I've been going through the AFI's list of the top 100 comedies. I don't know why this film didn't make the top. It is an outstanding comedy. They have a new list, and I am waiting for a comment from them on what they have up for the top 100 comedies. I'm looking forward to seeing the results. I just watched the video commentary of Rob Schneider, which seems to have been taken off the AFI website. It shows him giving a very

I've been going through the AFI's list of the top 100 comedies to see if one is in there and as I recall most of them don't have enough movies to qualify.<br /><br />I found this film in this category. The only two I know, are "The Mask of Zorro" and "Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon" but I could never forget "Singapore Noon" even though it is only a 2 and not a 10. It's the

After the superb AANKHEN(2002) which was a remake of

After the superb AANKHEN(2002) which was a remake of NARATONIK(1986), NARATONIK 2 was supposed to be the remake to the original NARATONIK. But then, the same year NARATONIK 3 came out, the remake was put off because of "bad luck". The original NARATONIK is supposed to have the same plot but there is no NARATONIK 2. The new NARAT

After the superb AANKHEN(2002) which was a remake of the famous HANDLE. This new version is a must see. The cast is also superb. All the lead actors play their parts very well and the script is very fresh.<br /><br />The story is very well developed and has the same story lines that AANKHEN had.<br /><br />The plot and character is totally new and very much a fresh story.<br /><br />The

I cannot believe that the Indian film industry still puts out such third-rate

I cannot believe that the Indian film industry still puts out such third-rate films. They are full of sub-plot, unnecessary characters, bad dialog, and an utter absence of a plot. The director of this movie must have been a true movie maker. The writer must have been a total stinker. The actors should be ashamed. How could anyone waste so much money and time? Who do you think it was that made this movie so bad? If we want movies that will entertain us,

I cannot believe that the Indian film industry still puts out such third-rate trash. It's like they were trying to pass off a "new-agey" nonsense and they didn't know any better. The only redeeming quality is the bad acting. It really makes you want to throw your arms up in frustration and rage and laugh your ass off. The story was absolutely bad, but that's the only real saving grace. The plot was utterly unbelievable, and even the fact that some of

I saw the 7.5 IMDb rating on this movie and on the

I saw the 7.5 IMDb rating on this movie and on the way to work, I heard about another one, 7.4, I thought "this movie is worth a 7.4", I was wrong I saw the 7.4 and got very upset I saw the 7.5 IMDb rating and I thought, I'm giving this one a 7 because the reviews say so. It's the same movie, except it's in the UK. And it's more annoying, than

I saw the 7.5 IMDb rating on this movie and on the other sites were asking me if the movie was good.<br /><br />Now i can't say that im not biased as i am the person who made this movie and i have rated it 7.5 and it was a lot higher so it should be accepted as a 9.<br /><br />This was an original concept of a new concept of acting to use to capture what it is that i see and what

This movie's full title is "Waqt: Race Against Time".

This movie's full title is "Waqt: Race Against Time". So the story goes like this...two young boys are riding around the deserts of Arabia and come across a huge desert dragon. Since this giant monster is so large it requires constant protection, so the boys become fast friends with a great white desert dragon who helps them battle this desert dragon. This movie is one of the best ones I have ever seen. A lot of action that would never see the silver screen. This has to

This movie's full title is "Waqt: Race Against Time". It was written by and is based on one of my favorite books from the past five years, by my old pal Richard Petronius of the University of Pennsylvania. It shows the same elements, but the action takes place in a different time period (aside from the racial tensions of the time period) and there's something about the time of this movie that can only be described as timeless.<br /><br />What

Those 2 points are dedicated the reasonable performance from Akshay Kumar. I

Those 2 points are dedicated the reasonable performance from Akshay Kumar. I really enjoy watching him in his 'high acting mode'. As of late, I like to see how he can create a scene in a flash of his mind. His comedy and dramatic performances in movies were both memorable. This time, he's a bit more hesitant. He really has done a poor job as well as his 'actor' was not strong enough. His performance was very inconsistent. He did not show any emotion in

Those 2 points are dedicated the reasonable performance from Akshay Kumar. I can think of one movie which he can't be faulted in which he isn't in charge for at least 2 or 3 of the 4 best scenes. The entire cast was fantastic, and the screenplay was superb. Even the story felt realistic, a person's life and what was on his mind. The songs were just incredible and so catchy. The actors were just fantastic! The only thing that I didn't like were the

this is just usual Indian garbage that gets turned out as cinema, as Indians

this is just usual Indian garbage that gets turned out as cinema, as Indians are known for it (like western film) and we know how it is getting corrupted to Indian style. i am happy to hear that this will also get a release in a western language, so the western viewer can experience it, at the same time, no one can know that this is a movie, so we are making movies now, and i can enjoy this movie too. not sure about the storyline but i am fine

this is just usual Indian garbage that gets turned out as cinema, as Indians always have. i am so sad that this movie didnt get more money, cause this is just so bad. i dont understand why this was such a huge hit when this is what the audience is all about. not even Indian films have to have Indian actors. i was really surprised. you can just see a bunch of crap just get past the first 20 minutes. i do know that is what i want, more movies with

PROS: Akshay Kumar's performance(is it just me or

PROS: Akshay Kumar's performance(is it just me or does he look a bit like a teenager?) is well deserved for the movie. His character of Arjun is a good role for the actor since he is not only a good actor in the beginning of the movie but he can also act in the later part too. The movie is also very good because the story line is not too long.The movie is also good because it does not involve any stunts,and the script is

PROS: Akshay Kumar's performance(is it just me or is this what it is all about??) was flawless and also great is that the whole cast was well casted(at least what happened in these parts). Also you get to see that a few of these actors were not just actors but actors themselves.<br /><br />CONS: Not much story lines. Too much melange. I was expecting a Bollywood melange. What i saw was Bollywood mel

well well One cant b wasting time just cause of a big star-cast

well well One cant b wasting time just cause of a big star-cast so if you want to see this movie and it is on a Friday at the theater and you cant find it and you cant afford to sit in the theater and the person giving out the tickets is wearing a hat thats got a big grin on it and you hear her name, you can find it in a secondhand store with no credit card or just want to know, you should see this movie. i have not been this

well well One cant b wasting time just cause of a big star-cast and not paying attention to what is happening at the scene<br /><br />I guess that is the way a lot of people want to experience movies, and i mean, that is all i can say because i really didnt want to see this movie at all.<br /><br />The film starts off slow and slow paced because we dont want to be drawn in by the music. I cant think why but its

First of all there is Gujarati Theatre then there is Bollywood. Both

First of all there is Gujarati Theatre then there is Bollywood. Both in the form of the films and performances which are not often seen in the Indian cinemas. There is a lot of action, a lot of suspense, lots of romance. The film which was made for a small audience was a huge success, a huge success! The Bollywood audience really has no excuse. It is very safe to think what a talented crew were trying to do. One wonders that so many people in the

First of all there is Gujarati Theatre then there is Bollywood. Both have got their share of hits. The two movies are not only different, but also completely different films.<br /><br />The one which is so similar is Karamkari (Karam is Karamkari) in which a girl played by Sonam Kapoor is the star, and the one which is so different is Raees, which is a thriller with no actors and actresses, with the actor playing

I found this film to be quite an oddity. From the very get

I found this film to be quite an oddity. From the very get-go, this movie has the distinct and very disturbing message of violence towards women which I found to be extremely uncomfortable. It is not to be confused with a horror film. In fact, in one of the worst parts of the movie, there is the shocking scene in which a man is pulled from a wall and thrown at the woman, which is so disturbing that the scene was hard to watch. All in all, this

I found this film to be quite an oddity. From the very get-go, I didn't find the movie interesting enough for me to enjoy. I think it's because I've been looking for something to make me smile like nothing else. But, in the end, I couldn't help but feel some of the films' characters felt empty and in contrast, none of the filmmakers were that interested in having characters speak. I can't say I find the concept of the "story" to

ALL FOR LOVE ( as it titled when it was broadcast at the weekend )

ALL FOR LOVE ( as it titled when it was broadcast at the weekend ) was a huge surprise. I was expecting some kind of lame melange of Burt Reynolds, Michael J. Fox, and the "new" Christopher Lee but this was just the icing on the cake! All the actors did a good job with this, they all had some kind of quality to their characters and the overall experience was pretty great. They have many things going for them (a great cast of talent and a good

ALL FOR LOVE ( as it titled when it was broadcast at the weekend ) is not about love in the usual narrow sense. I believe there is a deeper meaning here. I think this film is about the most fundamental aspect of a relationship, i.e. the one you share with someone you love and respect. It is about commitment, love, friendship and trust.<br /><br />"For Love" is about trust.<br /><br />It is a film which brings you in

Around the late 1970's, animator Don Bluth, frustrated with the

Around the late 1970's, animator Don Bluth, frustrated with the animation being produced by Fox Studios, decided to take his money, make an animated film and make it to be aired on TV. The result was a disaster. To put it on cable TV, the animation was extremely sloppy. In addition, some of the things in the film were so unrealistic you would have laughed out loud at the expense of the movie. It was as if these poor animators had no clue what was happening

Around the late 1970's, animator Don Bluth, frustrated with the low quality of the CG animation in the Hollywood release of "Shrek the Third," began creating his own animation, and that's when he and his brother Steve (also an animator) put their "Shrek" idea into practice.<br /><br />"Shrek the Third" was a great disappointment to Hollywood studios because they had no idea what to do with all these new and interesting ideas, and they seemed

Wow, what a waste of acting talent. My husband and I sat there

Wow, what a waste of acting talent. My husband and I sat there looking at each other in shock, wondering "What was this guy doing with his life." The actor playing the part of the teacher is not only extremely creepy, he's not attractive. There are some genuinely horrible scenes that I can't believe weren't shot. The actor playing the teacher is a total idiot, there is no other reason why he couldn't be a good teacher, as there was more to him than what we

Wow, what a waste of acting talent. My husband and I sat there completely dumbfounded as they tried to get us to understand what was going on, and at one point I literally had to explain what we were watching (it was some kind of video game) to him. The plot was so stupid and we just laughed at all of the crap that was going on (not just at the cheesy stuff, like some kind of video game) and the characters were so lame that they were just a

I went to see "Evening" because of the cast. I'd

I went to see "Evening" because of the cast. I'd also seen "City of Thieves" but the cast was so much better. It was a bit of a disappointment, and there was no chemistry. It was also a little disappointing with the lack of a strong relationship between the cast, that is what i want you to believe. I have a feeling that even in the original cast, some characters weren't in tune. So much of it I felt like there were other people in

I went to see "Evening" because of the cast. I'd always heard that Jeff Bridges was a great actor so seeing that was great. I'm a sucker for someone with such bad acting and it's a great comedy. You have such a great cast. David's playing some really lame characters. I really don't like him but he's funny. One of the funniest guys I've ever seen in a comedy.<br /><br />Jeff Bridges was the funniest comedian I

The story of a woman (Ann) on her death bed, her two

The story of a woman (Ann) on her death bed, her two sons (William, James) and a loving grandmother (Dora) on the couch watching TV. When James's dad (Hutchins) starts having trouble sleeping, the woman dies and James is made out to be responsible. <br /><br />With the help of Grandma Dora, who lives the life of her deceased grandmother. James is put on trial for his crimes, and Grandma Dora uses

The story of a woman (Ann) on her death bed, her two sons, a woman and a man (Will) and an orphan (Ralph). The children are played by a man and a woman. It has some action and an enjoyable action set, where it is interesting to see how Ann takes care of her family with different personalities - she is kind of a tough mother, but she has other side too. Ralph is very funny. <br /><br />The story is very

Some of these viewer comments are just ridiculous. Not painful to watch with your

Some of these viewer comments are just ridiculous. Not painful to watch with your children. They've got a lot of stuff that's just too scary for children to cope with at the times they're showing. The show doesn't go beyond the typical horror genre. The plot is boring, the characters have nothing really to do, and the whole time the camera is so low it makes the show look like you're actually having some fun watching this. The sound doesn't really have a purpose either. The

Some of these viewer comments are just ridiculous. Not painful to watch with your whole family. Not scary at all. Just a lot of pointless swearing and screaming. Not even close to being funny at all.<br /><br />"Hmmm..." "Yes...yes!" "It just had to be a little..." "OH, so it's just this stupid garbage?" "No way, dude! I'm a big film buff!" "Yeah, but you're just a spoiled brat who

This crap is like watching paint dry. I'm so disappointed because I was

This crap is like watching paint dry. I'm so disappointed because I was planning on seeing this film and I bought tickets for it as well. I was hoping for a low budget film that took the time to make a good film. How this can be made any better than its self is beyond me. Its too predictable for any type of entertainment. The main character in the film is just a waste of time. The plot and the story is really nothing. All the character do is walk and talk

This crap is like watching paint dry. I'm so disappointed because I was ready to be entertained by it at the beginning. Why they didn't just make me put some music in it and keep playing it I never understood, or why a movie where people make fake out and are funny isn't on a Friday night in my opinion.<br /><br />They made the movie look fake. Like an ad for a restaurant they used a bunch of actors to put this movie together.<br /><

I knew that 'Evening' was a girlie film, so I

I knew that 'Evening' was a girlie film, so I was prepared for a boring affair.<br /><br />"Evening" is a truly dreadful film, a story you're stuck watching for 90 minutes, with no plot to hold the viewer's attention.<br /><br />The acting was awful, with everything that goes into acting and story, just completely wasted. The characters were bland and blandly bland, with no depth to them whatsoever. The characters were all

I knew that 'Evening' was a girlie film, so I was expecting something like 'Scream'. I was wrong.<br /><br />The plot was like that for my friend and I. I like a girlie film, so it was fun.<br /><br />The story was really cheesy at first. It is basically about an ex-con cop (the girl) getting to know the guy who ran her house in the 80's. The police are the ones

Just PPV'd this. I don't want to waste too much time

Just PPV'd this. I don't want to waste too much time on this because it's not a very good film. It's very short and it's in the middle of the afternoon. In addition to all that, it was very boring. Even the ending was predictable. So if you've been paying attention, you're going to miss some very important elements. But I'd rather just skip the boring bits and get right into the film. The best parts are in the first part where

Just PPV'd this. I don't want to waste too much time on this movie - I think you can see more from it's predecessor (Lemmings) here. Just go and see it. I will be there. You'll see the same cast (the same thing) playing the same characters, this time with the main characters from the previous film (Lemmings) thrown in the cast. It's about a bunch of criminals trying to escape prison. It starts out

With a cast list like this one, I expected far better. Veness

With a cast list like this one, I expected far better. Venessa (I thought I just had to show the name) was not the worst here. There was a long, long silence during the opening credits, which I did not understand. It seemed to be a production decision, not part of the movie-going experience.<br /><br />A lot of this might be just an excuse to show scenes of one man's family, but the scenes were not interesting. If you

With a cast list like this one, I expected far better. Venessa Shaw of the best cast is underused, and the actors are underdeveloped.<br /><br />This was an even bigger disappointment to me.<br /><br />The only redeeming quality of this film is that most of the actors did a superb job with the supporting cast of young actors. The two youngest (the two brothers that are in the movie) were superb.<br /><br />I do

I saw this in a sneak two days before the official opening, and I

I saw this in a sneak two days before the official opening, and I was amazed at how good this was. It has no budget and even though they must have borrowed from old American movies, they did not do it well. As with many movies about a black guy, the cast is very young but with the exception of Jason Priestly and Eric Roberts, are all really good actors. The cast is really only there to boost the story because Priestly is not a good actor and this movie is

I saw this in a sneak two days before the official opening, and I am pleased to say that it was worth seeing because the story was fascinating.<br /><br />I liked the movie because it had very interesting and memorable characters and the cinematography was superb.<br /><br />The characters were well portrayed with the actors portraying them as more than just stereotypes. The story of the boy and the girl is very appealing because it is a story of human relationships in general.<br /><

This is, without a doubt, the most offensive "chick flick"

This is, without a doubt, the most offensive "chick flick" movie ever made. I mean, seriously, there's a couple decent looking women in it. The plot is almost entirely about male "entertainment" and "sex" (but not "entertainment" or "sex"). The only time the acting actually does anything was the climactic fight scene with the "bad guys." They were basically all dumb, and I honestly believe the ending was never really intended to be

This is, without a doubt, the most offensive "chick flick" i've ever seen and i have a problem with the "jokes" and "jokes" (or at least the jokes) in the movie. The film has one of the worst scripts i have ever seen in my life and i can understand that it was directed by George C. Scott. I mean, i can understand one joke here and there but this one is just awful. One joke was so bad that I

I never expect a film adaptation to follow too closely to the novel (especially

I never expect a film adaptation to follow too closely to the novel (especially if it is a non-English-language production) and even this one is a bit surprising, since it doesn't make much of an effort to mimic the book's style at all. It is a pretty decent film and I enjoyed the performance of the leads, which is particularly notable for a director who normally doesn't find a way to include a black actor in his films, and particularly for his performance of a young,

I never expect a film adaptation to follow too closely to the novel (especially not for a novel by one of the authors of the book) so it's impossible to know what it will be like in the end. Here are a few things in the book that do not correspond to in the movie adaptation.<br /><br />1. In the book it is the story of a young girl, who has been sent by her aunt and uncle to live with a caretaker of an isolated family of

Cast to die for in a movie that is considerably less. Vanessa Redgrave

Cast to die for in a movie that is considerably less. Vanessa Redgrave is, in my opinion, the true star of this movie. She is the character most people have a problem with. This is, if nothing else, a very different way to play that role. I thought she did a magnificent job as the ditzy gal and was quite surprised when I saw this movie on Lifetime (the movie was released as Lifetime Movie Night - a movie you want to see just to laugh at the

Cast to die for in a movie that is considerably less. Vanessa Redgrave is the actress who should be in this movie and has the best scene with a guy who plays a punk rocker on the side and he gets her in the best scene and he's the one who is supposed to be the hero. It's the same person every time. I am not sure how much of that is in the book, the movie does it and not the book. It is so very much a movie.

Almost as tedious to watch as it was to read, Evening is a gorge

Almost as tedious to watch as it was to read, Evening is a gorgeously shot, stylised, highly stylised, and wonderfully detailed and atmospheric, especially in the early chapters of the story, when the focus is on the man alone and his relationship with the woman. The cinematography is excellent; the sets and sets make the world of the author seem more like the real world, the background and background props have become an integral part of the world of the characters, the camera work and use

Almost as tedious to watch as it was to read, Evening is a gorgeously photographed, gorgeous, and absorbing film that is very much of the 1960's, an era where a great deal of change took place. But while the film has everything a 1960's horror fan could ask for: a killer, a goth, and a woman's story that is intertwined throughout everything in the film. With director John Cassavetes at the helm this film is one not to miss and not one to be

I looked over the other comments and was thoroughly amused to find that clearly only

I looked over the other comments and was thoroughly amused to find that clearly only "doomed souls" thought this was "the best movie i've ever seen in my life". "Wise to the other viewers who have hated this movie. You may have a problem with seeing the woman in the film (I did) but once you see her in a full makeup costume you will be so moved by her character that you will forget that she is a man! This is a great way to experience

I looked over the other comments and was thoroughly amused to find that clearly only three people seem to actually like this movie. <br /><br />That doesn't sound like a lot of people to me.<br /><br />The story is simple: two brothers from another planet come to Earth and discover that they are actually siblings.<br /><br />The plot isn't very original. I'd probably call it a rehash of "M.A.S.H." with the

"The 40 Year Old Virgin" exists in a world I don't understand

"The 40 Year Old Virgin" exists in a world I don't understand, and I can't wait to return to it some day. I love the director (James Cameron), the cast (Jennifer Beals, Steve Carell, Paul Rudd), and the script, although I am sad to see how much of it will be written and filmed in a vacuum. The film is about the journey of a young married woman to discover her true self in a new role, which she is forced into by

"The 40 Year Old Virgin" exists in a world I don't understand but it is very funny and I like seeing different people like Andy Griffith and Drew Barrymore. It does have the big names in the cast but the cast is made up of the people that would be too boring for a sitcom. I haven't been disappointed with this movie. The ending was very unexpected and I enjoyed it so much. This is a great movie that will not be forgotten. If you liked "The 40 Year

It is amazing to me what passes for entertainment today. maybe I am a

It is amazing to me what passes for entertainment today. maybe I am a modernist, but everything is filmed to a T, with a very low budget and the actors are actors as opposed to a full cast. This was one of the few time I remember watching movies with the sound turned off.<br /><br />But it was great to see "Mister" Jeff Goldblum go into a diner where some kids are playing. He was pretty creepy to me in the diner scene.

It is amazing to me what passes for entertainment today. maybe I am a fan of the original, but to say it is nothing short of a shame. the acting (except for some nice bits from the original) is like a big, empty pit. its not that the original is bad, but if you like the original, you just feel like throwing it up to get a laugh. well done. even though the original was an awful experience and the original will never appeal to everyone, im still

About 15 minutes in, my wife was already wanting to leave. Not so

About 15 minutes in, my wife was already wanting to leave. Not so much for the gore but the fact that so much is happening and the first half was just boring. This is the third film (the first two were pretty good) of which I have seen in which the director has been in fact too. One can see that it is hard to find the third film in a video store (it was only the second) but some say it is really a sequel or something. It is just

About 15 minutes in, my wife was already wanting to leave. Not so much because of the film, but because it was so awful. She was like "no, this is it, this is the movie, this is the worst movie i've ever seen." I was like "ok, let's be realistic for this scene," then I said "and then this scene, let's go with that." After some more research, I decided I was watching the worst episode of a soap opera on

Wow! This film is truly awful. I can't imagine how anyone could

Wow! This film is truly awful. I can't imagine how anyone could think it is good, it is so stupid that I literally could not be bothered watching it. The best part of the movie was the musical sequences (I was in the audience for the musical sequences!) The worst part was everything else. First of all, I am not a big fan of the film. The music is so bad, that I cannot imagine a film with that soundtrack. It is so bad that I cannot take

Wow! This film is truly awful. I can't imagine how anyone could even think about watching this movie. It's bad, stupid, unbelievable, and it only gets worse and it's too lame to even watch even on video. What's worse is I can't believe that the director even wrote the screenplay. I couldn't even tell you if it is a comedy or a drama. If you're a fan of comedy or drama, you'll be very disappointed with this film, if you even

After we counted the use of the f word, oh, about 22 times

After we counted the use of the f word, oh, about 22 times in the film, we noticed one particular line (which is repeated several times) that kept on repeat. This line is almost verbatim from our old friend, Sam's Dad, and is the reason we never see this guy again.<br /><br />It's the same story: When a boy and his sister enter a restaurant, the owner's son announces to the waitress, "I'd like to order an

After we counted the use of the f word, oh, about 22 times, I said to myself, "How many films have f-word ever been used as a word or a noun that was actually a title rather than an insult?" I'm not sure there are many that I can think of, but the list is short.<br /><br />Let's just put this one in the "Most Unoriginal" category.<br /><br />I don't know if that's the

At least with the teenage geek gets the girl films, the guy is usually

At least with the teenage geek gets the girl films, the guy is usually good and at least they don't have to ask her. I don't get how movies can be made for teens unless they can make fun of teens without them even knowing it. This movie just makes it a bit harder to make fun about teens. If you like teen movies, you might want to check out the other movies I recommend. This one is good, the other one is pretty good. One more movie, and

At least with the teenage geek gets the girl films, the guy is usually at work at home getting a good job, so it's OK.<br /><br />Well, that was my attitude while watching this film. My sister and I went home after the film and I was disappointed in the two scenes of the man giving the girl the same message, not even giving the girl a chance to finish the sentence.<br /><br />The main difference between the two endings of this film

Bela Lugosi is not typecast in this fantastic twelve-part adventure

Bela Lugosi is not typecast in this fantastic twelve-part adventure featuring a cast including Mickey Rooney, Christopher Lee, Al Pacino, Jack Palance and Paul Lukas. In fact, the main plot is set before one of the most imaginative stories ever to be woven together in an original plot. The characters are not given many lines and yet they're so convincing, especially in their performances. In addition to Lugosi's wonderful performance and Lukas's energetic performance, the film is a

Bela Lugosi is not typecast in this fantastic twelve-part adventure, with more than half of the cast being new; a total of seventeen leads are cast, including a full ensemble of Lugosi regulars, the talented Claude Lanzmann as an engineer, and a lovely young girl as a reporter.<br /><br />In terms of plot, this would have been rather boring, in the "good vs bad" sense. However, with no obvious plot progression, you are never really

"The Return of Chandu" is notable, if one can say that

"The Return of Chandu" is notable, if one can say that, for the lack of any recognizable actors in the cast. Not only this, but as a result, a lot of the actors are just there to provide the audience with a chance to sit back and enjoy the story. The actors are nothing special for the most part; some of them are decent (especially James Stewart and Elizabeth Perkins), but not that special.<br /><br />This movie has a lot of charm,

"The Return of Chandu" is notable, if one can say that, for its "fantasy" setting. Chandu was a human being who, like many others, had had a very complicated life and destiny, including a strong romantic relationship with an exotic woman called the Tsuru. She appeared to be a woman of very mixed origin, not entirely human, and in all the stories of the time Chandu and Tsuru were considered male or male-form beings. In a

Ever notice how in his later movies Burt Reynolds' laugh sounds like scree

Ever notice how in his later movies Burt Reynolds' laugh sounds like screeching water! And when he says "I'm a comedian" he does sound like he is actually a comedian. Also, and I love this part where he says, "I'm an actor too" and he is playing a comic. (Which is why it is so fun) Oh, and by the way, as he's so quiet at that point he's actually quite adorable as a kitten! The movie had quite

Ever notice how in his later movies Burt Reynolds' laugh sounds like screeching tires. Then, on "The Stable Boy", Burt goes off the deep end! The movie is about a child whose home is being terrorized by a creepy old man, who gets hold of a special little toy in his car. The little boy wants this toy because, well, he likes "movies". We get to see lots of Burt as the old man tells the boy off for his toy

Oh man is this movie bad. It flows horribly. The story is about

Oh man is this movie bad. It flows horribly. The story is about a girl (Karen Page) who is so bad a psychiatrist who was her psychiatrist that she did not think she was a person. I was not sure if the movie was the same with someone who was a bad doctor who was also a psychologist. The other characters were not that special. This movie just does not fit together. The characters are just bad. I felt like a girl in an alternate reality and when she's

Oh man is this movie bad. It flows horribly. The story is about a young girl named Anna who plays with a stuffed animal (that's the part where she's named), and a small child named Joseph who lives with them. The mother of the two parents works at the store in the store that Joseph runs, and the father of the two parents, Joseph's mother, lives with the two kids (you know how this plays out). Joseph's mother is upset that Anna is with Joseph,

This is one of the most insipid, lackluster, unoriginal,

This is one of the most insipid, lackluster, unoriginal, and lame-looking movies I've ever seen. It's a wonder that it hasn't lost its status as an "experience movie". I have no doubt that most people would want a change of scenery in the middle of the country, so I can understand wanting to get your fix here.<br /><br />This film isn't an exception though. In fact, it's more a reflection of the whole film industry

This is one of the most insipid, lackluster, unoriginal, and inanely written films I have ever seen. The plot never has a chance to breathe or develop. The script is a total dumpfest and a movie that fails to take into account the actual story. Every joke is over the top, there is no chemistry, and even the "bad guys" aren't particularly effective.<br /><br />In my opinion it is one of the most boring, idiotic,

Burt Reynolds came to a point in his career where he appeared to just

Burt Reynolds came to a point in his career where he appeared to just do what he had to do and just throw money at any movie that would be good. That was especially true for some of the low budget films that came out at this time that were made at the turn of the decade. His movies just didn't have the quality needed to compete with other studio blockbusters. When he came to Warner Bros. to be the number one director for this year. So the story of a man

Burt Reynolds came to a point in his career where he appeared to just make movies, this isn't just a joke. He also made this as a career killer and should be ashamed of himself for even considering it. This movie was a complete mess, the dialogue didn't work for the characters, the action had nothing going for it, the script was a complete mess, the actors were nothing in a joke and everything was dumb. If you think you were on your own in this film, think

It occurs to me that some of the films that have been banned during the

It occurs to me that some of the films that have been banned during the 1980's will never be played in cinemas anymore.<br /><br />In my opinion (based on the list that was passed in the late 70's) a good majority of "bad" movies will never be shown here except under specific circumstances. I can only assume it is so that a lot of bad movies will have been banned.<br /><br />One of the best things about this film is that in

It occurs to me that some of the films that have been banned during the past few years may have to have their films pulled out of the DVD and tossed aside.<br /><br />This film is a very low budget flick that has a very bad quality.<br /><br />The script needs work.<br /><br />I thought this film was really a poor remake of "The Matrix" with the director that made the first.<br /><br />The plot and characters are

This should not have been listed as a Colombo because in my opinion it

This should not have been listed as a Colombo because in my opinion it should have been listed under 'Saving Private Ryan' because of the story and its the performances of Jack Nicholson and Peter O'Toole, who both portray this character, which are both very different from other Columbo cast members. Nicholson has to play the role like all the others in this movie, he is a very convincing actor. In my opinion he has the best performance. The movie has a very good plot and

This should not have been listed as a Colombo because in my opinion it is one of the most entertaining and interesting films I've seen in a long time. If you are looking for a good movie with great music and scenery, you are in for a treat.<br /><br />The storyline of "The Ladykillers" is quite a bit different from what Colombo was like but the story is pretty much the same. It's a story about the murder of young boys and their relatives that

Whenever a Columbo story deviates from the familiar plot (colorful killer

Whenever a Columbo story deviates from the familiar plot (colorful killer of a crime), the writers can't have a script. I'd never seen that in the same sentence with a story about a serial killer. This doesn't work that way at all. The story revolves around an actor (the real serial killer) that is hiding out in a mental institution with a couple of nice, happy people, but when the guy decides to go into "retirement," there's not much reason to

Whenever a Columbo story deviates from the familiar plot (colorful killer is stalking a woman in a house and hiding his hands; he is later in his hiding spot and is going to murder his target) it should never have been directed as a straight-to-video movie. The film and director, Steven Spielberg, who made The Conversation, and his team made a great picture here. It's always important to the director to be faithful to the script and the story. The direction was good

Seriously what were they thinking? Over the course of years the Columbo series

Seriously what were they thinking? Over the course of years the Columbo series has gone downhill. We can go to a point where the series falls into a "worse than ever" category. The first movie (the one I'm thinking of) was a real disaster and the second one (the one that really got the series rolling) only got you so far.<br /><br />What you're left with is a series that's more about Columbo, his "special powers" than

Seriously what were they thinking? Over the course of years the Columbo series has changed many of its rules, but in the end this series was a disaster. The actors acted like it and the director (for a change) tried to make a movie that he thought was "realistic". This was bad in a lot of ways.<br /><br />There's not much to dislike. Columbo is a terrible character, he's like a poor man's Paul Bunyan. He's a

The script for this Columbo film seemed to be pulled right out of a

The script for this Columbo film seemed to be pulled right out of a '70s script for an anthology film, complete with the usual suspects: John Lithgow (the same John Lithgow who is in the title role as Detective Columbo and also stars in a few of Columbo's many adventures), Christopher Walkin and Richard Dean Anderson. However, what really made this one special was what made us sit up and take notice: the character of George Sullivan (in one of the many recurring

The script for this Columbo film seemed to be pulled right out of a comic book. The plot was all over the place. It seemed the writers were in a rush to get this movie done for the networks that put Columbo in front of "All other shows" as the title of this episode of TV shows made it obvious that Columbo and his sidekick played a part in all the other TV shows in the area.<br /><br />This is the kind of movie that made me

I love Columbo and have seen pretty much all of the episodes but this

I love Columbo and have seen pretty much all of the episodes but this one is one I can't help but think of as a classic and the idea is brilliant. One of the most touching things I've seen in years. The script is good and in between the action and fun, the show is also a very dark show. One I recommend not to just any viewer. I can't believe how little we actually hear from the detectives about the murder of the victim. It's also a shame

I love Columbo and have seen pretty much all of the episodes but this is one of those episodes which makes it worth the wait - it's actually quite interesting and I can't help but see myself in the same boat - I have also seen other episodes of Columbo where it has been more or less like a crime series, where the criminal mastermind is not well understood by the police, which makes for a more enjoyable story.<br /><br />I was somewhat surprised to see that this was

Loyalty to Peter Falk is all that kept me from giving this awful

Loyalty to Peter Falk is all that kept me from giving this awful piece of nonsense a perfect ten! Despite all the flaws this is an absolutely awful flick which even has me wanting to cry every 15 minutes. Even the acting is terrible. The acting, especially from one of the leading men was completely baffling. Peter Falk is not particularly convincing as a father and the casting of his son in his father's shoes was painful to watch. I can only assume he had to play that role because

Loyalty to Peter Falk is all that kept me from giving this awful "spin-off" of Highlander and The Warriors a higher score. The story is pretty straightforward, with bad acting, poor acting, and some incredibly stupid and pointless scenes. There was very little time for the action, and very little time for anything else to happen at the same time as the action. There was nothing going on, just a bunch of idiots yelling about their favourite things. The two men in the middle are

Absolute garbage. The reason that this is so terrible is not because it

Absolute garbage. The reason that this is so terrible is not because it's bad, but because it's bad. The acting was poor, especially by the standards of a TV movie. I don't even know if any scenes were really filmed, as there was nothing real in the studio, and they were playing this off as a "bad" version of a movie that had gotten a lot better. The story was contrived, the characters, although seemingly well-acted, were so clichéd

Absolute garbage. The reason that this is so terrible is not because it's really bad, because it's one of the few movies that has been put on this list by sheer stupidity. Let's take the movie, the title, the plot, all together. I don't know what plot the director has going on. It seems like the director just really hates movies that are, well, not "movies". This movie is so bad that you have to wonder what a director's actual movie

An uninspired and undistinguished "new" Columbo which sees the

An uninspired and undistinguished "new" Columbo which sees the "demented" Columbo "fighting" "criminal spies" and "spoils" of his mission for vengeance. The movie was terrible and there is just nothing worth mentioning. The characters are very one dimensional, they do nothing worthwhile and the whole plot revolves around a "psychic" and her "senses". I wish more movies didn't fall into this trap and instead were more original.<br /><

An uninspired and undistinguished "new" Columbo which sees the re-use of the same script, same cast and same crew that served a superb remake of the original film.<br /><br />This re-production looks like something of a misfire. The new Columbo plays, in the words of the director, so poorly on set. The direction is poor, the story is not even remotely original. A man's wife finds his dead body and turns him over to the

Most definitely the worst Columbo ever dreamt up. No murder and the

Most definitely the worst Columbo ever dreamt up. No murder and the best cop on earth - that's your best, that's your worst. He is so boring I even missed his plot twist. The best part of this movie is when Columbo gets his final confrontation with the killer, you can tell he didn't have time to talk or explain. I've never seen anyone who likes this movie, and most likely any movie that comes out of a "franchise" studio like this

Most definitely the worst Columbo ever dreamt up. No murder and the main character is a psychopathic jerk who can't shut up. The cast are really pretty with little to work with but all of them are pretty decent at the top. They are all really annoying and the main character's arc is so much of a let down. Overall a lot of disappointment but I would give it a 1 if its a bit better then the other movies i've mentioned so I won't go into that again

This show stinks. For parents, they usually want their kids to watch

This show stinks. For parents, they usually want their kids to watch it with them. It is awful for the kids to watch, for some reason they can't be adults. The show is awful and the show is so unhelpful, the whole show is like a soapbox and the kids have to answer a lot of questions and most of the time it is very boring and the show is very unrealistic. It is so stupid, and the show is even dumb like the cast of the

This show stinks. For parents, they usually want their kids to watch and see it with their own 2 hands while being around them. They know they'll want them to have a great time watching it.<br /><br />I could not take my eyes of this. I've been to a lot of movie theaters, and this was so boring.<br /><br />Watching this crap with someone you're not going to spend a single second with is a complete waste. And those

My children watch the show everyday that its on. Its a great program for

My children watch the show everyday that its on. Its a great program for children.<br /><br />I can really appreciate it, even with little kids. I have a few episodes with my kids and I really love it. My husband has a great eye for detail and I can appreciate the show.<br /><br />It's a really great program for the children. My kids have grown out of the show but it still is something you have to see. So great! You just

My children watch the show everyday that its on. Its a great program for kids and adults alike. It has the right amount of drama for adults. It has everything and the perfect songs.<br /><br />The show is a great show with the right theme songs. This series does not let the kid's go to the bathroom so that can keep kids engaged. This is very relaxing for kids.<br /><br />Its a really great show with an even better season. Its great to

Normally when I write a review for a movie online, it is for one

Normally when I write a review for a movie online, it is for one of those rare exceptions. It is almost always because it is a very good film and for one of those rare few times when I actually want to watch a movie and have a good time. This movie, however, is so terrible that I found it a little bit funny. The story involves a group of men from a town who work for an extremely low pay and are all pretty much like themselves. Each of the guys in

Normally when I write a review for a movie online, it is for one thing, the movie, not for the review, nor the star's, so I thought a review of this movie with a review of this movie is more fun. After reading the spoiler for you, I've decided to post this movie because it is so great, not because it's spoiler free, but it is a movie that is too great to watch twice and I could not say the same about the movie that i just

I am currently sitting here, forcing myself to finish this. I figure I

I am currently sitting here, forcing myself to finish this. I figure I'm done with the movie now. I really wasn't. I'm just here because it's the first movie I've ever seen that I've liked, but I'm a "real" movie-goer, and that's what this was. The plot was decent, but it's all just a big waste of time and characters.<br /><br />I don't even know what's the point of this.

I am currently sitting here, forcing myself to finish this. I figure I will just give the movie a chance, then I will go and see how long it lasts.<br /><br />I watched the first few minutes of this movie and was pleasantly surprised. The movie moves at a slow, almost boring pace; I had to catch my breath a few times.<br /><br />The acting, while good, is nothing special. The script, while not good, is not bad either

I must admit I burst out laughing when I saw one reviewer compare this to

I must admit I burst out laughing when I saw one reviewer compare this to "The Fugitive" (I must be missing some points...) and this actually is a much better movie.<br /><br />If you like thrillers, spy movies or movies where you are taken to another dimension and become a character in the movie in a way that is not predictable you will like this movie. A nice cast of characters (though I guess a lot of them were trying to act more cool than they

I must admit I burst out laughing when I saw one reviewer compare this to another horror film. The reviewer stated: "Now it's like watching a low budget horror film. It looks exactly like The Blair Witch Project but nothing is here except an excuse to scare you.<br /><br />This is pure cheesy. It's like watching one of those bad '80s B-level horror films. Not even the most hardcore of the kids would even be able to stay awake through most of it

Wow...<br /><br />I picked this up at the local

Wow...<br /><br />I picked this up at the local video store for $8.99 (not counting the DVD player) and then bought it, expecting that I'd find some redeeming quality, and that maybe it'd be a little boring.<br /><br />A lot of it was wasted, with all the dialog going on too long. The director even got it wrong! I didn't think the audience would take the movie so seriously.<br /><br />

Wow...<br /><br />I picked this up at the local video store and didn't realise that i'd just bought myself a copy of one of the biggest box-office hits of 1993, the film "Anchorman".<br /><br />This film is about an anchorman who's at a standstill. He's really about the kind of people who sit in their cubicles, drinking their Diet Drinks, listening to music. He's about the dumb, over

Is it possible to give a movie NO STARS? I suppose not.

Is it possible to give a movie NO STARS? I suppose not. It's that bad. You have a good cast that really works to build this film up. The only actors who really bring the film to life are the two leads, who are so bad, and have to be so mean. The movie takes itself far too seriously. The story is very very dull and boring. It has some of the bad movies of The '70s which is OK if you are a fan of those

Is it possible to give a movie NO STARS? I suppose not. <br /><br />It's a film that's been done so many times, so many times that it's just become a dull, predictable mess of the usual, bland characters, bland acting, bland plot that we're expected to be happy.<br /><br />The only redeeming quality of the film is that it is so predictable.<br /><br />I'm sorry but I don't know how

I honestly believe that ANYONE considering film-making be subjected to this mind

I honestly believe that ANYONE considering film-making be subjected to this mind-numbingly bad movie, if they can even watch it. All I can say is that any movie starring Nicolas Cage that isn't a remake of a classic film won't be worth your time. This film can't be described as being any worse than "Star Wars" or "The Matrix". This is nothing more than a collection of clips from a variety of movies which I can only assume were all made for a

I honestly believe that ANYONE considering film-making be subjected to this mind-blowing piece of cinema. Not even horror movies have to make a big deal of the special effects. This film is simply the funniest movie you will ever see. It is also one of the few horror movies that you will NEVER watch again and even if you were, it is a bad idea. Every horror film that has ever been made has been extremely dull, boring and predictable.<br /><br />Every

After hearing the word of mouth of just how bad this film is I took

After hearing the word of mouth of just how bad this film is I took it with a grain of salt. All I could think is that it's too bad to be good. It is a terrible film. I was looking forward to the scene where the characters are discussing what happens to a car, I was waiting for the bad guy to crash into the side of their vehicle while they discuss it. It never did happen, it was really a stupid scene that was just silly.<br /><br

After hearing the word of mouth of just how bad this film is I took the opportunity to watch it in my little room on the floor in my room in the back of my room with my wife at this same time, I can assure you they were not expecting this much attention when they went to rent it. You can see in some parts of the film it was still moving but a good portion had to be taken out of the shot. I am very disappointed but I do not give this the same

Nu Image, UFO and others produce films for the SCI FI channel

Nu Image, UFO and others produce films for the SCI FI channel.<br /><br />Most of the films are made in Brazil, with some in Africa. Most of them are poorly shot and produced, with cheap, low quality scenery and special effects. The director seems to be trying to make a movie about aliens, and they seem to be trying to make a movie about aliens. In one instance when one character is talking about a UFO, the director cuts off the conversation, and

Nu Image, UFO and others produce films for the SCI FI channel. They seem to put out a good selection. The films are a mix of old and new that are enjoyable. My personal favourite is 'E-Men' (1970) (I've heard) which is about a couple of girls and their lives in the 1960's. We are not told the full story on this particular film but a very nice script comes through a lot of character, plot and a great set piece.

I love movies, and I'll watch any movie all the way through,

I love movies, and I'll watch any movie all the way through, so long as it isn't about a guy who's just having a bad day. He could be the most attractive person in the world, if he wasn't boring.<br /><br />He's too attractive to be good. I feel like there are people who want nothing to do with him. If anything, people find out about his good looks and "acting" after he's been rejected (by someone for example

I love movies, and I'll watch any movie all the way through, but the cast and director must have gotten it wrong.<br /><br />The plot of this movie was awful. No one should be making films as cheesy as this. The plot was completely and totally wrong. It's so embarrassing that they should put this together as a feature film with some of the main characters and the directors and make it a bad comedy.<br /><br />If you want something to see on

Finally i thought someone is going to do justice to H.G. Wells

Finally i thought someone is going to do justice to H.G. Wells, or perhaps they do and they get all their money's worth, you can find a book to prove he's even worth looking at, and he was a great writer who got a lot of great ideas from his surroundings. Wells was a great author too but his voice was a little nasal, but when he talks he says everything with passion and it's very endearing. It's nice and touching and you could learn something

Finally i thought someone is going to do justice to H.G. Wells novel. I thought about whether it should be called the second-movie trilogy (after "The Invisible Ray").<br /><br />Actually that would not be bad since it follows well the plot from Wells's novel. "Field of Dreams" is the first movie, this time it's the second. And yes, it's the same guy that we have in our movie. In this movie the same guy plays all

Save the $8.97 you'll spend at Walmart to buy this DVD

Save the $8.97 you'll spend at Walmart to buy this DVD. It should be in the bargain bin. It has the worst soundtrack of all movies in this genre, with the most overdone sound effects, cheesy music, bad special effects, and poor acting. I even got the feeling that a few people did not want to watch it because they felt it was too violent and sexual.<br /><br />This movie is just boring. The soundtrack is bland, the acting is awful

Save the $8.97 you'll spend at Walmart to buy this DVD of "The Lion Sleeps Tonight" if you don't like the sound of this movie.<br /><br />A couple of months back, we ran a story that said this DVD was about to be released. For $16.97, you could get a lot of this crap and watch it, which is great, I have to say. It's like a movie version of a movie that was banned by a

I'm not really sure how to even begin to describe how bad this movie

I'm not really sure how to even begin to describe how bad this movie was. It's like watching a low budget horror flick with poor effects and no plot. The acting was pretty bad and it seemed like the director didn't have a clue what he was trying to say. The script was a total mess and made up every character in the movie by adding a bunch of completely unrelated stuff such as the "secret" of the secret agent, the secret of the secret agent's sister, the story

I'm not really sure how to even begin to describe how bad this movie is. It's awful. For one, I'm not a big horror film fan but this was even worse. Not in the "bad enough to watch with your kids" sense but still, I mean bad. Just awful. The acting isn't all that great. Everyone is a stoner (maybe even a child) except the stoner guy. I saw this in the theater after it was released, and I saw

Holy freaking God all-freaking-mighty. This movie was so

Holy freaking God all-freaking-mighty. This movie was so far up there I literally thought it was going to be the first movie ever to be made of the show that is the Walking Dead. Well, that's what we call it these days, but even that was a stretch, this movie does not even make it into my top 10 list. The film does not make it onto that first list, however, as I'm not even remotely sure if these people actually filmed it.

Holy freaking God all-freaking-mighty. This movie was so bad it made The Ring look like a good movie.<br /><br />To me this movie was like being taken to a school in a foreign country where your teachers tell you how to "act" (read: not say a word) and where you will be doing a bunch of stupid homework and all of your friends are "unruly" and "rebellious" and you must "get along" with them

Holy freaking God all-freaking-mighty. This movie was so

Holy freaking God all-freaking-mighty. This movie was so far up there I literally thought it was going to be the first movie ever to be made of the show that is the Walking Dead. Well, that's what we call it these days, but even that was a stretch, this movie does not even make it into my top 10 list. The film does not make it onto that first list, however, as I'm not even remotely sure if these people actually filmed it.

Holy freaking God all-freaking-mighty. This movie was so bad it made The Ring look like a good movie.<br /><br />To me this movie was like being taken to a school in a foreign country where your teachers tell you how to "act" (read: not say a word) and where you will be doing a bunch of stupid homework and all of your friends are "unruly" and "rebellious" and you must "get along" with them

If this film had a budget of 20 million I'd just like to know

If this film had a budget of 20 million I'd just like to know where it could have been made. It doesn't matter since that's nothing. It has all the hallmarks of an unadulterated slasher flick. The lead lady is like an actor in drag. She's got to be one of the most convincing actresses I've ever seen. I have absolutely no problem seeing her from behind. The film makes no attempt at suspense. The plot isn't anything special at all

If this film had a budget of 20 million I'd just like to know how many more people saw it. A big surprise to me, a film that got a theatrical release and people are still talking about, despite it being out of their minds.<br /><br />It's so sad to me that they released it so late, it was almost midnight and I saw it as late as 3 am. I thought it would not be that bad after all because it doesn't really have to do

I have just lost three hours of my life to this travesty,

I have just lost three hours of my life to this travesty, I can't begin to count the number of people I have spoken to about this travesty. The most poignant comment I can draw on this movie was left by a woman on the day of it's release. It was in response to a comment regarding the title of the movie. It said: "This movie is a complete and utter garbage." (The movie was not released until a few days later and it has since

I have just lost three hours of my life to this travesty, I've had some time to digest it as of Friday. I'm going to save it for when the credits roll on the DVD version I just saw.<br /><br />All I can say is, you should have seen it! The only good thing about this film is it has absolutely no story at all and instead I am left being bombarded by the bad acting, bad directing and overall awfulness. As far

Well, on it's credit side (if it can be said to have

Well, on it's credit side (if it can be said to have one) it may not be the most "interesting" movie I've seen in ages, but it's still one of the most entertaining and satisfying (not to mention just plain fun) that's been in a while. The performances are wonderful - both cast members, even the man who plays the main character, are great. The score, which has been around longer than the movie, and just goes to show that no one

Well, on it's credit side (if it can be said to have any, there's little to fault with here) it is no slouch. It has a pretty cast (B.D. Wong with all the right stuff, and he has many others to take on) to look at, including Jeff Bridges, Julia Roberts, and Christopher Walkin. But I have a few issues. First, there's the soundtrack. No music is played in the movie, so you have to sit

Hines and Goforth, the perpetrators of this crime, begin on the

Hines and Goforth, the perpetrators of this crime, begin on the second floor of a three-story townhouse, which they rent out to a young woman they meet in the first floor. Their motive? To make her work at night. They are unable to sleep in the bedroom of the three-story building, so they arrange for a stranger to keep watch, presumably at night.<br /><br />The young woman in the townhouse is "the girl," so she is used

Hines and Goforth, the perpetrators of this crime, begin on the street (a drug den in the 1950's), and then they go back to their drug den and murder the victims' family to cover up their crimes.<br /><br />In the first half hour of this awful flick, it appears that the two boys are hiding something in the basement of the drug den.<br /><br />The plot is terrible.<br /><br />The dialogue is terrible.<br /

Let this serve as a warning to anyone wishing to draw attention to themselves in

Let this serve as a warning to anyone wishing to draw attention to themselves in front of the camera. The truth is that you cannot be funny. You must be a talented writer. No matter how talented or talented you are in the writing, directing or editing - if you are not funny it is not worth making into an episode. A funny episode is one in which all the actors do not exist to provide background information. The writers who do make the writers in any episode are not funny. They are

Let this serve as a warning to anyone wishing to draw attention to themselves in a positive fashion. All I can say is...'Thank you, thank you, thank you'. The quality of music is atrocious and the music in the film was so horrible, it was painful to watch. The dialog is just that awful. The film has a nice sound track, but this soundtrack was the primary reason why I stopped watching. It wasn't the sound at all, it was the poor quality of the

WOW!<br /><br />I just was given this film

WOW!<br /><br />I just was given this film to see by a young friend, he watched it before we were. I haven't watched a film like this in a LONG time. It's a fantastic film.<br /><br />The music, the art direction and cinematography are all incredibly well done. Even the cinematography of the main characters' faces in the film. They have never looked so good. The film also has a very subtle, delicate touch.<

WOW!<br /><br />I just was given this film to watch and it was great. The plot was so good and I liked it! And it's got some of the best cinematography that a cinema-goer could ask for. The cinematography was fantastic, I couldn't believe how well it was done. I have to admit the first 45 minutes are very confusing to me. I guess the only thing I have is that it took place in the 1970's, so

Twenty years ago, the five years old boy Michael Hawthorne witnessed his father

Twenty years ago, the five years old boy Michael Hawthorne witnessed his father's violent demise. He was forced to witness the death of his mother at the hands of his stepfather because he was not willing to put out of his mind the brutal beating of his father. The five years old Michael had seen enough to hate the family and had a grudge against the man that he hated. When he was a toddler, he was taken to the psychologist by the boy's mother, and she began teaching

Twenty years ago, the five years old boy Michael Hawthorne witnessed his father murder his grandparents before they committed suicide by jumping into a lake.<br /><br />In the movie, we see Michael's parents at their best and worst. First, they are both in complete denial. Second, we see a young, mentally disturbed Michael Hawthorne taking care of his younger sister. We see Michael with some of his school friends and Michael is actually having a good time during this time. In the last

Five-year-old Michael sees his mother getting axed to death by

Five-year-old Michael sees his mother getting axed to death by her abusive husband. However, his father is so upset by this tragedy, that he has turned his own son into his personal pantomime. Michael's mother has a temper, and the two fight constantly, which is why she's so sadistic. Michael's father is an annoying lunkhead, who also suffers from psychological problems. He's not so bad, however, and his mother, Angela, is a loving

Five-year-old Michael sees his mother getting axed to death by her co-worker. So, it is only natural for this kid to be a little obsessed with finding out who killed his mother.<br /><br />He begins to research the case, but doesn't have the knowledge needed to solve it and, when confronted by a murder detective in the police station, he ends up losing his case.<br /><br />This movie follows Michael in a search for answers about his

This movie was crap with a capital "C." The opening scene showed promise

This movie was crap with a capital "C." The opening scene showed promise, as an old friend and I walked out with a cup of coffee and a movie ticket. The movie itself had absolutely no character. It was about a father looking for a babysitter for his daughter. The director wanted to show her as a young girl and how her behavior changed with puberty. I was disappointed by the way the movie was shot. The main character had to be held down on the bed while the director was

This movie was crap with a capital "C." The opening scene showed promise but the entire film is a terrible waste of time and money with awful music. I don't care who sings it, it has to be good! The story is extremely annoying, and it's hard to like anyone because of this stupid premise and horrible script.<br /><br />The characters seem to have zero real motivations and are so unlikable they are almost impossible to care about. The only time anyone shows emotion

Those of you who, like me, were disappointed with the original 1995 horror

Those of you who, like me, were disappointed with the original 1995 horror film will be disappointed with this one. It's one of those movies which try to have as little on the level of realism as possible, so that in the end, it becomes something you are just trying to take in. This is an uninteresting movie, and while some of the elements are cool, that in itself is not worth the movie.<br /><br />The film is not very long. It is just

Those of you who, like me, were disappointed with the original 1995 horror flick The Bodyguard, I can see why this may have been more successful. The Bodyguard is essentially the same as the original with some new twists and twists.<br /><br />This film has even less plot, it's more psychological.<br /><br />The first 10 minutes of the film is fairly boring and it never moves on from there. It's all more of the same characters you had in the

A young boy sees his mother getting killed and his father hanging himself. 20

A young boy sees his mother getting killed and his father hanging himself. 20 years later, the boy comes to a psychiatrist to talk about his mother's murder. The psychiatrist tells the young boy's mother to think about her son and a new family that she has with her sister, the girl's mother, and his two brothers. The psychiatrist goes to his mother's house and tries to find a letter from his sister (the girl's mother) to send to the new family. The psychiatrist then tries

A young boy sees his mother getting killed and his father hanging himself. 20 years later, a man goes to jail for the murder of his wife and child but can't seem to get a break for good behavior. He is given the chance of redemption by having the boy kill the guy and being given a place to stay in his nice apartment in the future. <br /><br />The movie revolves around two types of crimes: the first is murders which happen to family members of the family and

Mike Hawthorne(Gordon Currie)is witness to the brutal murder of

Mike Hawthorne(Gordon Currie)is witness to the brutal murder of his daughter, Lili(Rachel McAdams)and his wife and fiancé (Robert Downey Jr.and Diane Lane). Hawthorne is in a mental institution for his troubled life.<br /><br />His violent behavior can be seen from a very young age, but he learns that the best way out of his "mental" was to have a happy life with his loved ones, which is the key of all

Mike Hawthorne(Gordon Currie)is witness to the brutal murder of a young girl. He joins forces with a psychologist and detective.The psychiatrist discovers the identity of the murderer.<br /><br />In a town of mental patients, Hawthorne finds a woman he suspects to be the killer(Linda Legg). He tries to get her to talk.<br /><br />The killer is a sadistic serial killer,who preys on the young girls,and murders them by

I have not seen the first film and if it anything like this have no

I have not seen the first film and if it anything like this have no qualms about saying that it is one of the most boring films i have ever seen in my life and i will continue to say it as long as a director continues to give a crap about telling a story in a film.<br /><br />To me the only redeeming feature of this film is in how many things can be done in a scene. In any case, i find this film to be quite depressing as

I have not seen the first film and if it anything like this have no doubt it is a far better film.<br /><br />I have only seen it as the opening montage and it was really quite a depressing thing to watch. The movie starts out with some beautiful and romantic music which is played over the beginning of the film with the music becoming gradually more upbeat.<br /><br />The film jumps to a different location and this location in turn jumps to a different location. Then

Before starting to watch the show, I've heard it was great and aest

Before starting to watch the show, I've heard it was great and aesthetically appealing. I've read reviews about people liking the theme song, but never have I heard about a positive word to say. And I don't know what exactly is a "progression" but I'm curious, so can anyone answer that for me? Thanks!<br /><br />If you enjoy the kind of humor that you can only find online, you will like what you see here.<br /><

Before starting to watch the show, I've heard it was great and aesthetically just different.<br /><br />Well, I found it to be nothing but predictable, boring, pointless, and predictable.<br /><br />It didn't matter how many times I watched it - no matter how many times I thought "Man, I don't like this show, I don't like this show, I don't like this show, it's not worth watching" just "Man, that

i am very disappointed with this movie because i like these french actors and i

i am very disappointed with this movie because i like these french actors and i love french movies also and i think this one is really a failure of a movie from french actors. i don't understand why this movie had such a good score and i don't understand how some actors and a big french audience had the same movie. a great movie with the french actors but unfortunately a great movie for a french audience. i hope this movie is a disappointment for everyone because it is very disappointing. i would never

i am very disappointed with this movie because i like these french actors and i like movies with them. and its just so bad! just the whole movie is so stupid!!! i can't even count how many times i have seen a movie with these french actors and they would have a good time, as in other english movies. i guess these french actors are just so bad in their accents, they are just bad actors to be with, as i can't even speak french, which is not even my

I am really shocked that a great director like Chuck Jones started out making some

I am really shocked that a great director like Chuck Jones started out making some of the worst movies for a radio station as a guy that has always been to a radio station and was only there to entertain and make some noise. A couple of years later he was making something like a movie every 5 minutes. His movies are bad. The movie's that he usually made were terrible. The movies that he normally made were awful. I was surprised that this was the only movie that he has ever released.

I am really shocked that a great director like Chuck Jones started out making some boring crap but he grew and developed a passion for it. I remember when he first came on set I was a little skeptical when I saw him for the first time and I even think I was a little scared but once we were on the set I found out it was his first scene. It was a great experience for me as an outsider because I didn't get to know him before we started shooting and working together on the

I am amazed at the amount of praise that is heaped on this movie

I am amazed at the amount of praise that is heaped on this movie. Some people seem to think that it is the best of the trilogy and that it's just the greatest of all. I will agree with that, but I will also agree that it is the best of the series and only surpassed by the end. For that matter this movie contains a lot of the worst scenes from the other movies and was the most terrible in the series. The script is terrible. I can't see the

I am amazed at the amount of praise that is heaped on this movie. This must have something to do with the amazing supporting cast. This film has an almost perfect cast including: Adam Carolla, Peter Sarafina, Christopher Walkin, John Lithgow, Alan Arkin and Jeff Bridges. What would the film have done without these greats? The story about a couple who are in love with each other that develops into a drama involving the main character. The characters all have memorable characteristics

This was an awful movie! Not for the subject matter, but for the

This was an awful movie! Not for the subject matter, but for the utter waste of money. I'm not even sure anyone is supposed to think of the characters as well as the director, if you don't mind that the film is supposedly about a man who lives in the woods with his dog, rather than some kind of psycho or something. It is also almost unbearably boring. The only nice thing about this is its soundtrack, the other is awful. It is as if someone was

This was an awful movie! Not for the subject matter, but for the acting, direction, and the acting. It's so horrible in every aspect. The main character, Darryl K., is just a horrible actor. The other characters were weak too. The whole movie felt like you're watching a train wreck. The soundtrack sounded like a record shop. The story is nothing but bad acting, poor writing, and bad directing. The characters are so wooden. The special effects were awful.

The concept for Sarafina appears to be a sound one, that is

The concept for Sarafina appears to be a sound one, that is, one based on its premise. The plot begins with the death of a person who is the object of this movie. At the time, this would be considered a very depressing subject, as there is nothing positive that can be said about the death of the one whose passing brings about this movie. In this way, this is an extremely bleak and depressing picture. It is nothing short of tragic, yet there is nothing for the

The concept for Sarafina appears to be a sound one, that is to say it has enough plot twists and turns to fill a 2,000 word movie script. A cast that includes Robert Carlyle, Christopher Walkin, Richard Chamberlain, Paulie Bial, Susan Hayward, and John Carradine helps, and the production of the movie is pretty spectacular, the costumes, set designs, set design, and music are all spot on. Even the actors were good, with Carlyle and

I just didn't get this movie...Was it a musical? no..

I just didn't get this movie...Was it a musical? no..was it a movie? no... it was an event for music directors and dancers...it was the world...i was so excited to take an old school class to meet everyone in their field of expertise. i don't think this is a movie it is a living event and music is just the catalyst to the event. i would never want to spoil this movie...but i would like to think this movie will be more interesting

I just didn't get this movie...Was it a musical? no.. Was it supposed to be a comedy? NO.. Was it supposed to be a drama? NO.. And it's like every time you put the movie on in the background it makes it even worse.. What a joke, I don't even wanna watch it...I just really wanted to throw up.<br /><br />Don't get me wrong, this is one of the most well-done movies I've ever seen

One scene demonstrates the mentality of "Terminator Woman" pretty well: Karen

One scene demonstrates the mentality of "Terminator Woman" pretty well: Karen in the middle of her interrogation and interrogation of Jennifer, and, after some time, Jennifer's torture and the scene is so intense that they seem to go out of the range of her body to look at. As the interrogation moves on into a "fight scene" between Jennifer and Karen, Jennifer's body starts to turn into a machine and Karen (who is not even in the scene) comes out. When Jennifer is not

One scene demonstrates the mentality of "Terminator Woman" pretty well: Karen Deveraux's character is doing laundry in the shower and I'm here in the background with a camera to show my view of her. It's really only worth watching on DVD. The soundtrack is awesome, by the way. I can't understand how such a dumb story was made. The movie is really, really long, but it's just so boring in the first half hour. After which it was all kind of

This film has got several key flaws. The first and most significant of which

This film has got several key flaws. The first and most significant of which is the bad acting. That said, the movie did do try and portray the bad side of homosexuality, however bad, but the characters have nothing to do with it. The other problem is the "pointless" romance between the two leads which makes me cringe. The fact that the movie does not deal with homosexual issues is probably an attempt to not appeal to the right audience. The ending was extremely predictable and was not very

This film has got several key flaws. The first and most significant of which is that it doesn't tell a story. The story is simply the story of an evil corporation running an experiment to create a new, "perfect" creature (who happens to have a body that resembles a human). This is presented as an excuse to make people "feel" like they are living in a universe created entirely by "science" without any emotion or thought process. The "flesh" is an example. This

You may want to know up front that I am not a Mormon, unlike

You may want to know up front that I am not a Mormon, unlike the Mormon church. I don't practice and I have no love for Mormons.<br /><br />I thought that it would be interesting to find out what really happened with the book (also called "The Book of Mormon") and how the LDS church has been forced to change from what they have in their own records. I also thought it would be interesting to see if they have the same book that the original book has

You may want to know up front that I am not a Mormon, unlike most Mormons. So no, I'm not going to pretend to be a Mormon in here.<br /><br />And I'm definitely not the kind of Mormon you can relate to. I have strong values, and I believe in what we do, but that doesn't mean I'm going to tell you what is right or wrong, if that were the case.<br /><br />I'm going to talk about

This film, though ostensibly a comedy, is deadly serious. Its subject is

This film, though ostensibly a comedy, is deadly serious. Its subject is a horrible man, a cruel and selfish man. The story is about him. This man is not a person that you might have expected - he is a character, or an archetype. Its almost as if the writer-director was trying to be something in the film. The acting is just about as bad as it can get. It was a very poor excuse to watch a poorly made film about a very low-budget indie

This film, though ostensibly a comedy, is deadly serious. Its subject is not the movie. It is, rather, the actor, in the movie's opening, playing the lead role. He is not the hero, and the film takes place, for most of the movie, in his apartment. <br /><br />In any theater, a director needs to set the mood. In the theater, the mood is not so easily manipulated. Most filmgoers, including moviegoers at movie-

The main reason people still care about "Carlton-Browne Of The

The main reason people still care about "Carlton-Browne Of The Lost World" is that it is one of the most highly rated movies from the director of "Wedding Rock". That is what makes it so special. I was surprised to see "Carlton-Browne Of The Lost World" was released in Japan. This movie is a complete surprise and if you want to see it I highly recommend it. The other reason people enjoy this movie is because it was made on a

The main reason people still care about "Carlton-Browne Of The Wabash" is that it's one of the few movies in the late 1920's period that doesn't feature an actor or an actor in a major role.<br /><br />"Wabash" is based in an urban area of Chicago, a place which has many African-Americans and an area of Irish immigrants. It has a lot of poverty and many low-income people living in the area. The

It was meant to be a parody on the LOTR-Trilogy.

It was meant to be a parody on the LOTR-Trilogy. But as I watched it, I didn't feel like it ever really went anywhere. A bunch of people are dancing, and when they stop they start crying, it's almost a silent film. Nothing is happening; instead, we have the main characters dancing around in the background (which is actually a background) and you can hear an orchestra playing in the background. Why? I don't know. Just stop it. This

It was meant to be a parody on the LOTR-Trilogy. But the film was completely lost to time.<br /><br />The film that it was supposed to be, is a horrible attempt. The production design was so cheesy and overdone it made it look like the movie wasn't shot in Thailand. It's such a great way to make people stay away and keep a movie like this out of sight.<br /><br />But, this is still one of the worst

This movie is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. There is

This movie is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. There is no plot. It is a horrible mess. Nothing makes sense. What is supposed to be a "gorge", when you are supposed to see the entrance into the basement, with a massive hole in the ceiling, and the wall where it was supposed to be, is a large wooden railing. The scenery is horrible. It was horrible. The story has not been told in this flick. It is so far ahead of its

This movie is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. There is nothing to recommend except the stupid acting and some stupid stuff that is not even fun to watch. The story goes on for ages, and you really don't see how the characters turn out and if any of them were good or not. There is so much pointless sex and it's so boring you almost want to get your hands out and smack your own face after awhile of not watching it.<br /><br />Seriously,

This sounded like a really interesting movie from the blurb. Nazis, occult

This sounded like a really interesting movie from the blurb. Nazis, occultism, "The Man with No Name," and "Doorways in which to Escape." The whole film was not what you would call very good (I had to laugh once to get some laughs out of it), but there were some good songs. Anyway, this movie got cancelled because of a lot of bullshit (but we all still think it sucks), so that's why I have to put the rest of the review

This sounded like a really interesting movie from the blurb. Nazis, occultism, etc. I didn't know what to expect. But somehow, this movie just went down on me. I was really surprised to see that this was a movie about the occult, and that it's not so much a film about the movie, but about the movie director in general. I couldn't decide if this was about David Lynch or just some weird movie he had made, but I am glad I don't

This is a movie of tired, yet weirdly childish, clichés.

This is a movie of tired, yet weirdly childish, clichés. They could have made this movie a few years ago. A lot of stupid stuff happens in this movie. What is really weird is that it doesn't use a lot of clichés. A few of them that are good. However, none of them make for an original film.<br /><br />The movie plays around the clichés a lot. I personally dislike the clichés too. They are just too much.<

This is a movie of tired, yet weirdly childish, clichés. The actors in the movie are a mix of teenagers, middle-aged folks, and older people. All of the characters are either creepy, or stupid. There is no plot, no twists, and the movie keeps changing its ending until it is almost too depressing to watch.<br /><br />This is the best movie from 2001 in my opinion. It's not really about the characters, but about the story, it

Can I please say first of all, that I felt so strongly about this

Can I please say first of all, that I felt so strongly about this film that I felt compelled to let everyone know. After the first 30 minutes of the movie, you can actually hear people laughing. I'm talking "shaking a fist in a happy mood," or the type where you're really just doing the best you can. It is not funny. At all. I did not even enjoy the movie, and I think I still haven't felt the humor of a film since. I

Can I please say first of all, that I felt so strongly about this movie. This was by far the best movie I have ever seen. Why I didn't choose it above many other movies like "The Man in the Moon" and "The Masked Marauder" is a mystery I'm not going to solve.<br /><br />All the actors were brilliant, the plot was simple and yet I felt that the movie had a lot of depth to it. It is also the best

When I started watching this movie I saw the dude from Buffy, Xander,

When I started watching this movie I saw the dude from Buffy, Xander, play with his cat, the cat had the worst voice in the movie, i think he was playing it for the person. Anyway, she gets in to the store, and gets his attention, he says he wants to buy her clothes, and she starts to cry. The whole store shuts off the alarm, and the door is locked behind her, he goes to the phone and rings her, her cat is outside, he

When I started watching this movie I saw the dude from Buffy, Xander, on stage. I was like "Oh man, this is gonna suck!" but he was great. So I just kept watching, and I found this movie to be a waste of time and effort.<br /><br />And to be honest, I still find Buffy to be a very cheesy movie. It's like they were watching a movie, rather than the movie being a movie.<br /><br />The plot

I'm not sure this is a spoiler; perhaps it is a public service

I'm not sure this is a spoiler; perhaps it is a public service announcement about the lack of interesting people in television. This is a series with all the elements of a comedy, a drama, a drama of sorts. The director did something about it in the second episode, and I'm not sure what it was. This is an example of how not to do a good television series. The scripts are pretty simple to read, but it was still pretty boring. The series has been canceled,

I'm not sure this is a spoiler; perhaps it is a public service. I don't see anything here that is not in any way interesting or entertaining.<br /><br />We have a girl who wants to go to the opera. She's only able to do so with her uncle's help. It doesn't take the audience long to see through her ruse and she's outed as a dancer. She gets a job as a waitress and starts an independent business. The uncle starts

I read Rice's novel with interest, and became quite enchanted with its characters

I read Rice's novel with interest, and became quite enchanted with its characters, the magic of the island, and the magic of the island that surrounds the island and its inhabitants. I had so much empathy for the characters that I could not be satisfied by "good" performances from its cast.<br /><br />However, I was disappointed that the characters were not given enough space to express themselves. While it is the book that is the foundation for this drama, there should be much more,

I read Rice's novel with interest, and became quite enchanted with its characters. The film had no such charm.<br /><br />The screenplay should have been titled "Mysteries of the Invisible Hand." It's a much better movie, but as a director I would be more disappointed in a lesser director like Joe Johnston than I am in Rice.<br /><br />The production budget is low, so it's easy to find good things here. The cinematography, while bad for

This movie was so badly written, directed and acted that it beggars belief

This movie was so badly written, directed and acted that it beggars belief.<br /><br />At the beginning, it is supposed to be funny and amusing, then you watch the opening, and the movie begins to slowly turn into a horror movie. The only reason you watch this movie is to see a glimpse of an early scene from the movie. The movie is not really about what is supposed to be a horror, but is more about a romance between two characters. The opening sequence is

This movie was so badly written, directed and acted that it beggars belief. They should have just kept throwing in cheap money to fix it. The movie was just a joke. There were many ridiculous scenes, including one of a man having sex with a woman in the woods, followed by another man throwing himself in front of a falling tree.<br /><br />My wife and I saw this movie once. We were a little disappointed in it, as it had the potential to be great.

The story and the show were good, but it was really depressing and I

The story and the show were good, but it was really depressing and I couldn't find any redeeming features or anything. The episode about the kids was great and was very well directed, but it was the first episode to have a bad ending. There was one thing that was OK, and that was the end. If you don't want to spend the whole episode with the parents, you can watch that one. Otherwise, the episodes, especially the ones with the baby, didn't make sense

The story and the show were good, but it was really depressing and I could not keep in my mind that this was actually a TV show. Even though I wasn't a fan of the show, I wasn't an actual fan of the stories. <br /><br />The worst thing I thought was the whole relationship and the whole friendship between this girl and this guy. One was like this, the other was like that. The whole story was just really boring. I can't believe there